Project Rev & CorrespondenceTami Merriman
From: Charles Patton [Charles.Patton@jackinthebox.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 5:25 PM
To: tmerriman@ywave.com
Subject: Jack in the Box S
t
ne Wall
o
'`
"
'
'
`"'
DcP_3785.IPH DcP_3786.I P8 Dcp 3787.IP8 Dcp_3790.IPH DcP_3782.I PH
Thank you for meeting
with me on June 11. Per our conversation, I would
like to propose a modification to the design of the stone wall along Yelm
Avenue. The wall was originally proposed to have an opening of
approximately 96 feet along Yelm Avenue. The wall was subsequently
required by the City to be filled-in to create a continuous wall. The
adjacent Rite Aid facility has several breaks in the rock wall along Yelm
Avenue and Vancil Road. I propose a similar design to the Jack in the Box
wall along Yelm Avenue as follows:
1) Eliminate the entire length of the added wall (96') as shown on the
Drawings originally submitted for approval, or
2) Make the 96 foot section open for 36', rock wall for 24', and open for
36' (similar proportions to the Rite Aid wall along Vancil).
In either case, the opening(s) will have a screening hedge that would meet
the City's requirements. Currently, the design shows an Otto Luyken Laurel
(21" minimum planting height) spaced closely together to form a continuous
hedge. If the City accepts this hedge, as was on the original plan
submittal, that would be most desirable. At this time, if the hedge
species is not acceptable, I would request that the City rule on the wall
configuration only due to time constraints. Jack in the Box would work
diligently with the City to resolve the hedge species shortly thereafter.
The Rite Aid site has gaps in its stone wall ranging from 12 feet to 53
feet. Along Vancil Road, that wall is configured as follows (starting at
the intersection with Yelm Avenue): wall for 30 feet, opening for 53 feet,
wall for 30 feet, opening for 41 feet, wall for 30 feet. The openings are
longer than the adjacent wall sections which appears to be a desirable
design element and perhaps should be considered for the Jack in the Box
wall section under review here. I have attached some pictures of the Rite
Aid wall below for your review.
I feel that one of these proposed modifications to the wall would soften
the appearance and lend to the architectural appeal of this important
feature. Your time and consideration on this matter is very much
appreciated. Please call me at 503-293-3688 if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Charlie Patton
(See attached file: Dcp_3785.jpg) (See attached file: Dcp_3786.jpg)(See
attached file: Dcp_3787.jpg)(See attached file: Dcp_3790.jpg)(See attached
file: Dcp_3782.jpg)
1
City of Yelm
-105 Yelm Avenue West
P.O. Box 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
(360) 458-3244
May 20, 2002
Charlie Patton
Construction Manager
Jack in the Box
4500 SW Kruse Way Suite 270
Lake Oswego, OR 97035
RE: Frontage Improvement Fee
Jack in the Box
City of Yelm Project No. SPR 02-8306-YL
Dear Mr. Patton:
The following letter is to follow up on our phone conversation on May 20, 2002. The above
referenced Jack in the Box was issued site plan approval on March 27, 2002. In the
transportation section of the site plan approval letter the applicant is responsible for the
frontage improvements on Vancil Road. The letter states:
"The applicant shall be responsible for frontage improvements (curb, gutter, sidewalk,
planter strip, and landscaping) along Vancil Road, and the City shall be responsible for
the core road improvements. The City and WSDOT shall be the lead agencies in the
design and construction of said improvements on both Yelm Avenue and Vancil Road.
The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of Yelm for payment of the
projects fair share for the design and construction of the above specified improvements,
based on the bid award amount."
I have calculated the required amount to fulfill this requirement. The fee is $19,069.81. This
fee will be required prior to certificate of occupancy and operation of the building. The City
of Yelm will be sending you the appropriate agreement for this transaction. If you have any
further questions or concerns please call me at (360) 458-8438 and I will be glad to further
assist you.
Respectfully
Community Development Department
n
~im Gibson
Development Review Engineer
Cc Shelly Badger
G`,Community Development\Project Files\SPR Site Plan Revievl,8006 Jack in the BoxlFrontage Improvements CosLtloc
! Jack in the Box Frontage Improvements
Based on WSDOT Tabulation Report Dated 4/11/2002
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT PRICE % OF PROJECT AMOUNT TOTAL
1 Mobilization LS $38,000.00 5.00°h N/A $1,900.00
2 Clearing and Grubbing HA $5,850.00 5.00% N/A $292.50
34 Irrigation System LS $35,000.00 5.00% N/A $1,750.00
40 Seeding, Fert and Mulch HA $1,980.00 5.00°k N/A $99.00
43 Topsoil M3 $24.70 N/A 35.00 $864.50
47 Tree -Mtn. Ash EA $290.00 N/A 2.00 $580.00
49 Tree - Sawtooth Zelkova EA $300.00 N/A 5.00 $1,500.00
56 Curb and Gutter M $35.00 N/A 80.00 $2,800.00
87 Sidewalk MZ $27.80 N/A 144.00 $4,003.20
92 Roadside Cleanup LS $15,000.00 5.00°k N/A $750.00
$14,539.20
Design Engineering LS $14,539.20 10.00% N/A $1,453.92
Construction Engineering LS $14,539.20 16.00°k N/A $2,326.27
Subtotal $18,319.39
Contigency LS $18,760.39 4.00°k N/A $750.42
TOTAL $19,069.81
O .~
~ z M
~ w Q'
O ¢ ~
M ~
N
j ° x
Z U
x
a
I W u
I
W z °°
~ '
I o o+
g ~
Q m
~ H
I '+ °'
C H
w
Ul U
I
1 H
w
°z W
a
U U
w r
m W
` ¢ ~ q
N °
~ a0 N
W
I z
I ~ a z
I w W m as
a ~ ~
a ° m
I ~w
a ~ Ha
° ~ x~
o
i w
~ z
H
I
I z
f ~
I H ~
~
H in q
m .-~ z
~ 5
q M W I
r
rT •"ti
a N
w .-~ w
z
0~ m
m~a ~ ~ O
Xmm q
O
¢ Z. O~
~
94 W H
E
W
O3o E ^ [O a sC ~ a U'
f m
a U
~
U } W W ~"O
H H
f ~i
H S
'
~ H ¢ aC'1
B
2 RC W .-~ .-~ W
a
S ~ NOgHr.-~ H
' o
~.~O~aa ~
~ U M'.7. W H
h m a
H H
i a0 u
] W
March 13, 2002
Tom Spader
Freiheit & Ho Architects, Inc.
10940 NE 33rd Place
Suite 202
Bellevue, WA 98004
Re: Site Plan Approval for Case # SPR-01-8306-YL, Jack in the Box
Dear Mr. Spader:
The Site Plan Review Committee has considered your application for the above referenced
project, and finds that as conditioned below, the proposed project is consistent with the Yelm
Comprehensive Plan, and all applicable City policy's and development standards.
Pursuant to Chapter 15.49 Integrated Project Review Process, a project, which is subject to Site
Plan Approval, is a Type II Permit and can be appealed to the City Council. An appeal must be
filed within 14 days of the date of this notice. Site Plan Approval is valid for 18 months from the
date of this letter.
The affected property owners may request a change in property tax valuation from the Thurston
County Tax Assessor's Office.
,, ~~;~;,._ --':._~ ~.~: ~_ rid ~ c~/ W-d~ ~~- Gu..o~~~"
1. Transportation ~~`~ '/~ ~~ ~/ `5~~~ bT a~.
Finding: Yelm is a small compact community most directly affected by two state highways which
bisect the community. The two state highways are used by local residents for
transportation throughout the city and for access to commercial and residential areas
throughout the community. In lieu of widening existing streets, the City has elected to
create certain alternatives, Y-1, Y-2, Y-3, which will avoid the need to significantly
widen existing streets, and particularly Yelm Avenue. New developments do in fact
burden the city's central streets, and unless the bypass alternatives are accomplished,
the City would have to require developers to pay the cost of the internal street
widening. The city plans show, and the City finds that adequate facilities will be
accomplished better and in a timely fashion by bypass facilities as a substitute for the
widening of existing facilities. As a result, the City finds that the regional plans in fact
benefit projects in all areas on the City and will accomplish the goal of providing
adequate facilities to City standards within a reasonable time to serve the demands
created by the proposed project.
Finding: The City has adopted a Transportation Facility Charge (TFC) of $750.00 per pm
peak trip. The Ordinance provides a default table that the applicant can use to
determine new pm trips generated by the proposed use. The ordinance also
provides a discount for existing traffic. The current ordinance and default values are
based on the 5'" Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, and uses a formula
based on square footage. The applicant has provided a Transportation Impact
Analysis using two different formulas for calculating trip generation numbers. The
first formula is based on Jack in the Box projected sales. The second formula is
based on type of use and square footage sin the 6`" Edition of the ITF Trin_ __ ~~
Generation Manual. The project sho 2, 6 s u ra a feet for the restaurant, and
525 square feet for outside seating an a expansion area. The City has agreed
to use the 6"' Edition ITE manual~aadfacmula based on square footage.
~.~, ~,-~ ~ Ic,~... ~~~2) ~ ~~
Finding: Street frontage improvements for the site are required as part of Site Plan Re iew -~~~
j and approval. The City has plans to re-align and improve the Yelm Avenue ancil '
>` Road-ia#erxeiien, in partnership with the Washington State Department of
,; ~ ;~
~ ~ ~, Transportations If-con~ruction of the Jack in the Box project is complete prior to the
"~ ~ ~~ start of the City's road project, Jack in the,Box will be rg~}uired"fo complete the road
~ frontage improvements on I Road'acGOrding to standards and details approved
c ~ ~ '~4 for that project. If construction of the Box is during, or after the start of the
~, , ~ ~ ~ road project, Jack in the Box shall be respon ' for the cost of frontage
t'\ ~ ~~ ~ improvements, based on the awarded bid amount, minus actual "core road"
~' ~~ improvements:
_i„
Conditions of Approval:
a. The applicant shall mitigate traffic impacts to the transportation system. y~'~
Mitigation includes payment of the Transportation Facility Charge (TFC) for 49~-
new pm peak hour trips generated by the project. The total TFC is $ 32,65rs.96'
/W . By
b. The applicant shall be responsible for frontage improvements (curb, gutter,
sidewalk, planter strip, and landscaping) along Vancil Road and the City shall be
responsible for core road improvements on Vancil Road. The City and WSDOT
shall be the lead agencies in the design and construction of said improvements
on both Yelm Avenue and Vancil Road. The applicant shall enter into an
agreement with the City of Yelm for payment of the projects fair share for the
design and construction of the above specified improvements, based on the bid
award amount.
Page 2 of 6
2. Water Suaaly
Finding: The City's Water Comprehensive Plan identifies a portion of the City area for
service. The City is pursuing additional land areas for approval and the extension of
facilities. Completion of such activities is dependent on grant and developer funding,
as well as planned bonding and existing public funds. The status of such plans and
funding sources must be considered in any review of concurrency. Developer
extensions and or dedications, latecomer agreements, oversizing agreements, and
the creation of local improvement districts may all be considered. In the event of a
new funding source, however, concurrency is not found until the funding source is in
fact in place - e.g. award of a grant, a binding letter commitment for third party
funding, or the successful formation of a local improvement district. Any necessary
water rights are considered, only after approved for municipal use by the
Washington State Department of Ecology, or appropriate appeals board, and the
time for appeal or challenge has expired.
Finding: The proposal is for a commercial restaurant. Engineered calculations are required to
determine the number of Equivalent Residential Unit ERU's required for this project.
(each ERU equals 240 gallons of water consumption per day)
Finding: The City of Yelm is dedicated to providing the best quality water possible to its
consumers. The Washington Administrative Code, WAC 246-290-490 requires that
the City take measures to ensure that contamination does not occur as a result of a
cross contamination.
Conditions of Approval:
a. The applicant shall connect to the City water system. The cost to connect shall
include a fee of $1,500.00 per Equivalent Residential Unit (each ERU equals 240
gallons of water consumption per day, fee subject to change.)
b. All water connection fees are due at time of building permit issuance.
c. The applicant shall install a backflow prevention device for the irrigation system.
3. Sewer Svstem
Finding: The City's Sewer Comprehensive Plan identifies a portion of the City area for
service. The City is pursuing additional land areas or approval and the extension of
facilities. Completion of such activities is dependent on grant and developer funding,
as well as planned bonding and existing public funds. The status of such plans and
funding sources must be considered in any review of concurrency. Developer
extensions and or dedications, latecomer agreements, oversizing agreements, and
the creation of local improvement districts may all be considered. In the event of a
new funding source, however, concurrency is not found until the funding source is in
fact in pace - e.g. award of a grant, a binding letter commitment for third parting
funding, or the successful formation of a local improvement district.
Finding: The proposal is for a commercial restaurant. Engineered calculations are required to
determine the size of step tank, and number of hook ups required.
Page 3 of 6
Conditions of Approval:
a. The applicant shall connect to the City S.T. E.P. sewer system. The cost to
connect shall include a fee of $4,986.00 per ERU (each ERU equals 240 gallons
of water consumption per day, fee subject to change).
b. Upon completion of the onsite installation as per the City's Development
Guidelines, the S.T. E.P. sewer equipment shall be deeded to the City.
c. The applicant shall install a grease trap
4. Storm Water
Finding: The completed project will increase the amount of impervious surface on the site and
on the adjacent streets. Impervious surfaces create stormwater runoff. When
uncontrolled and untreated stormwater runoff can create health and safety hazards.
YMC requires all development to comply with the City stormwater Manual.
Conditions of Approval:
a. The applicant shall design and construct all stormwater facilities in accordance
with the DOE Manual, as adopted by the City of Yelm. Best Management
Practices are required during and post construction.
b. The applicant shall submit a final stormwater report with civil plan application.
c. The applicant shall submit a stormwater maintenance plan with civil plan
application.
d. The applicant shall provide a blanket easement for maintenance of all utilities
deeded to the City, and access to the stormwater facility.
5. Parking
Finding: The City of Yelm Development Guidelines, Design Guidelines, and Municipal Code
address parking regulations from many aspects, including, but not limited to; design,
number of stalls required, pedestrian pathways, and safety.
The requirements of off-street parking and loading facilities and their design shall be
regarded as the minimum; however, the owner, developer or operator of the
premises for which the parking facilities are intended shall be responsible for
providing adequate amounts and arrangement of space for the particular premises
even though such space or its arrangement is in excess of the minimum set forth.
Conditions of Approval:
a. Applicant shall provide for off-street parking. Minimum requirements are 1 stall
per 200 square feet of gross floor area. Applicant to provide handicap parking
stalls as required by ADA.
R:\Community Development\Project Files\BPR Site Plan Revievg6306 Jack in the Box\8306 Approval Letter.doc Page 4 of 6
6. Building Department
Finding: The City of Yelm has adopted Design Guidelines for projects located in Yelm's
Commercial Zones. These guidelines determine specific requirements for
development.
Conditions of Approval:
a. Design Guidelines II, Pedestrian Access. All pedestrian paths must correspond
with federal, state and local codes for handicap access, and ADA requirements.
All buildings shall have a paved pedestrian path from street sidewalk to the main
entry, and provide pathways through parking lots.
b. The "preview board" and "speaker board" placement in the drive through lane,
does not allow for vehicle storage, and interferes with pedestrian access. The
speaker board, and preview board shall be moved closer to the building, in the
drive-through lane to allow for vehicle storage.
c. Design Guidelines II, Pedestrian Area and Plaza. Provide visual and pedestr n
access, with seating of at least 2 linear feet. (bench, ledge, etc.)
~~ > ;.-~
\Cy ~ Design Guidelines I-F. Street Corners, LF.(1) Applicant to install a dec ative S~~G
,,C~~-, ; walltco
i;~"j\. .,~ tlte-Ftth~ftf5lfA. The wall shall be constructed witt~rairie rock", and extend
~' ~ 'u~ continuously from the northeast corner to the pedestriah access on the northwest
u corner.-
k1~' i\p Iti
>r \ e. Design Guidelines I-D, Siting Service Areas. Refuse area to be screened to
4,k match overall building design. Applicant to provide documentation that refuse
~, `~Y area is adequate size for storage of refuse and recycling.
f. Design Guidelines IV, Building Design. Applicant shall replace the Chokecherry
tree marked on the east side of the building with a pine tree, matching the
propose pine tree marked for that site.
7. Fire ~ ~~
Finding: Fire protection to the buildings must be provided per the Uniform Fire Code.
Requirements for installation of fire hydrants will be determined in civil plan review.
Conditions of Approval
a. The applicant shall submit fire flow calculations for all existing and proposed
hydrants. All hydrants must meet minimum City standards.
b. The applicant shall submit a fire hydrant plan to the Community Development
Department for review and approval.
8. Landscaping
Page 5 of 6
Finding: Landscaping and screening are necessary to promote safety, to provide screening
between compatible land uses, to safeguard privacy and to protect the aesthetic
assets of the City. YMC, Chapter 17.80 requires atl development to provide on site
landscaping.
Conditions of Approval:
a. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan to the Community
Development Department for review and approval.
\^ ' ' b. Completed landscaping shall be approved by the Community Development
!`C Depa~rt(m~en~t prior~to+ bu~ildin~g,~,occu~ancy~. S
Site Plann Approval j~ 's~'rype~ ICY 'A~" "(minis ra"tiv~ land use~pproJal' Aa n ppeal of this decision can
be filed within 14 days from the date of this letter, pursuant to YMC, Chapter 15.49, Integrated
Project Review Process.
The Site Plan is valid for eighteen (18) months from the date of this letter. The applicant may
request asix-month extension on the approval, if the request is made in writing prior to the
expiration date of this approval. If you need additional information or assistance, please call the
Community Development Department at (360) 458-3835.
~ I\~~ ' '"`"~f'
Tami Merriman
Planning Technician
cc: Charlie Patton, Jack in the Box, Inc.
Jim Gibson, Development Services Engineer
Gary Carlson, Building Official
Tim Peterson, Public Works Supervisor
Shelly Badger, City Administrator
R:\Community Development\Projed Files\SPR Site Plan Review\6306 Jack in the Box\8306 Approval Letter.doc Page 6 of 6
City of Yelm
105 Yelm Avenue West
P.O. Box 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
(360) 458-3244
Jack in the Box SPR 03-06-02
Outside Review
i) Plan review completed. No comments
2) Fire Review completed. See copy
Internal Review
1) ADA Accessible route of travel (SD1.1) blocked by drive thru waiting to order.
Required to be an "unobstructed path"
2) Accessible route of travel to be illuminated with a minimum of 1 foot candle per
ADA and 2 foot candles per our development guidelines. Verify illumination at
east and west ends.
3) Offsite lighting Resubmit lighting summary
4) Signage, including drive thru and directional will be reviewed and issued under a
separate permit. Due to the nature of your business this will be resolved prior to
Building Permit issuance.
~~~FREIHEIT & HO
ARCHITECTS. INC.. P.S.
10940 NE 33RD PUaCE SUITE 202 BELLEVUE, WA 98004 P:a25.827.2100 F:425.828.6899
DESIGN GUIDELINES
PROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST
AUTO ORIENTED DESIGNATION
JACK IN THE BOX RESTAURANT / 1001 YELM AVE. E. I YELM, WA
I.A.(2): The street edge is defined with a block wall and landscaping and access points are provided along
the street frontages. See sheets SD1.0 and L-1.
I.B.(1): The refuse container is not located between the building and the street, and is screened with a
block wall painted to match the building, and landscaping. See sheets SD1.0 and L-1.
I.C.(1): As this project is part of a large development, it uses the existing street access points and
connects to the existing pedestrian access points within the site.
I.D.(1): The refuse container is not located between the building and the street, and is screened with a
block wall painted to match the building, and landscaping. See sheets SD1.0 and L-1. Also, the
mechanical equipment for the building is located on the roof and screened by a parapet wall.
I.F.(1): A decoratve screen wall is provided, as well as substantial landscaping and pedestrian access.
See sheets SD1.0 and L-1.
I.F.(2): There is a new pedestrian access from the building to the street comer. See sheet SD1.0.
II.A.(1): The entire site is compliant with ADA for handicap access. See sheet SDt.t.
II.A.(2): Adequate lighting is provided throughout the site. See sheet ES1.1.
II.A.(3): There is adequate on-site pedestrian circulation, and the project connects with the existing on-site
pedestrian circulation paths and city sidewalks. See sheet SD1.0.
II.B.(1): There is a new 60" wide pedestrian walk to the front entry, on the west side of the property. See
sheet SD1.0.
II.B.(2): The project connects to the existing pedestrian paths. See sheet SD1.0.
II.B.(3): There is easy access to all parking areas from the building. See sheet SD1.0.
II.D.(1): There is pedestrian access to the adjacent uses and to the city sidewalk's, which allow access to
transit stops. See sheet SD1.0.
oos Iona a«
II.D.(2): There are no transit stops adjacent to this property.
II.D.(3): There are no transit stops adjacent to this property. However, there is adequate pedestrian
access in and around this project, which connects to the city sidewalks and adjoining
development. See sheet SD1.0.
II.E.(1): The building entrances are enhanced with a tower element and awning. The entrances lead to the
main pedestrian access. See sheet SD1.0.
II.F.(1): There is apedestrian-oriented open space at the front of the building that is also connected to the
pedestrian access to the city sidewalk. See sheet SD1.0.
III.B.(1): This project is utilizing the existing driveway access points and will have no new driveways onto
either adjoining street. See sheet SD1.0.
III.C.(2): The parking lot meets the requirements for parking lot design detail standards. See sheet SD1.0.
III.D.(1): The parking lot provides adequate parking for this project's use. See sheet SD1.0.
III.D.(2): Structured parking was not used in the overall shopping center development would not be
necessary for this project.
IV.A.(1): This project has a large pedestrian-oriented space at the front of the building, that connects to the
city sidewalks. It also has well defined covered entries. See sheet SD1.0.
IV.B.(1): This project is a small scale building, but it does include elements to provide building modulation.
IV.C.(1): There is apedestrian-oriented open space at the front of the building that is also connected to the
pedestrian access to the city sidewalk. Also, this entrance is well defned with a tower element
and awning. See sheet SD1.0.
IV.D.(1): The building utilizes a variety of building materials, including Stucco finish, glass, standing seam
metal awnings and metal coping. There are also towers which accent the entrances, with awnings
to provide protection from the elements.
IV.E.(2): The screening wall will be of split-face CMU construction. The trash enclosure will be constructed
of the same material. Both of these elements will be painted to match the building. The building
will be an unpattemed stucco fnish, done with the highest craftsmanship.
IV.F.(1): This project does not have any blank walls as def ned in the Definitions.
IV.G.(1): The mechanical equipment is located on the roof and is hidden behind a parapet wall.
IV.G.(2): The utility equipment is located on the back of the building and painted to match the adjacent
walls.
ooeiaoa a«
V.G.(1): A landscape plan is included in the submittal. See sheet L-1.
V.H.(1): The landscape plan provides substantial landscaping throughout the site. See sheet L-1.
V.H.(2): There are several trees on site that are being retained. See sheet L-1.
V.I.(1): The parking areas are landscaped. See sheet L-1.
V.I.(2): The project meets the requirements for parking lot landscaping. See sheet L-1.
V.I.(3): Internal parking lot landscaping is provided. See sheet L-1.
V.J.(1): There are several trees on site that are being retained. See sheet L-1.
006<Oa na
Jan-O -02 09: 16A Freihe it & Ho Architects, 425-828-6899 P.02
~~ .. ~~
~~ .;~ ~ ~ Y~h;ah ~"'~ ti,. '~ '~'~,
,G ~~ ,.
~c ~ zj ~ ~ .~~ '~z
_ _ '~~ ~~
o ~_ w
(-i u, y ~ ~~ ~~
~ o l 1~ ,+
\ \~l I :, \ ~~ ~
`~~~~ . ~
~ I ~ - .x, ., , ~~ J .
~ ~ ~ ~~~„ ~
~J ~~ ' Ism 0 `~ +,,~
,, ~~
N9q'39'ZJ'W ® ~ , 6 ~ ~ ~,
\\~ S ~
1 \ ~ ~ 1
j ,
~ I m ~ ~ ~\`
1~ I °y a ~ / ~
i ~~I
,~a Ig I I ~i~PQ ~N~ ~~ ~ ~ ~r~ ~i
/ ~ \ ..
W~• / ~ .
1 _y ~ n ,/ ~ ~ 3 / ~ ~ ~ -~.
[`~` l 1 Iq ---! I
0 ~ ,•~
~ ~ ~ i
~ ,:,..
. _. ~._ /.
t I ,, ~ ,.,.,..
f I r, F,. '~l
~4
Y
I ..i .. ..
N
SITE PLAN ~~
scn~e r = ~.
NORTH
~~ OF IHE P~~~
r
~~~
..`
~-''/ \~~
1rEL~fl
W515FiINOTQN
CITY OF YELM
PO Box 479
Yelm WA 98597
360-458-3835
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
Mailed on: Februarv 13. 2002
PROJECT NAME AND LOCATION: Jack In The Box Restaurant
1001 Yelm Avenue East, Yelm, WA 98597
LAND USE CASE: SPR-02-8306-YL
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: An application submitted by Freiheit & Ho Architects, Inc. for Jack in the
Box, Inc., 10940 NE 33rtl PI., Suite 202, Bellevue, WA 98004, for the above referenced project was
received by the City of Yelm on February 4, 2002. The City has determined the application to be
complete on February 11, 2002. The application and any related documents are available for public
review during normal business hours at the City of Yelm, 105 Yelm Avenue W., Yelm WA. For additional
information, please contact the Community Development Department at (360) 458-3835.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project proposal consists of the construction of a 2036 sq. ft. Jack in the
Box restaurant, with drive-through service. The project will provide on-site parking, landscaping,
pedestrian and automobile circulation, and storm water treatment and drainage.
ENVIRONMENTAL and OTHER DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION: A Mitigated
Determination of NonSignificance was issued for this site in July 1998. Additional environmental studies
are not required. A traffic analysis, and stormwater maintenance report was submitted with application.
Additional Information or Project Studies Requested by the City: None at this time.
No preliminary determination of consistency with City development regulations has been made.
At minimum, this project will be subject to the following plans and regulations: City of Yelm
Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Title (17), Critical Areas Ordinance (14.08), Storm Water Drainage Design
and Erosion Control Manual (DOE), Uniform Building Code, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Title
(14), Road Design Standards, Platting and Subdivision Title (16), and the Shoreline Master Program.
The City of Yelm invites your comments early in the review of this proposal. Comments should be
directed to Tami Merriman, Community Development Department, P.O. Box 479, Yelm WA 98597, 360-
458-3835.
THE 15-DAY PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON February 28, 2002
This notice has been provided to appropriate local and state agencies, and property owners within 300
feet of the project site. These recipients, and any others who submit a written request to be placed on the
mailing list, will also receive the following items when available or if applicable: Environmental Threshold
Determination, Notice of Public Hearing and Notice of Final Decision. If the proposed project requires a
City Council decision, it will be mailed to all those who participate in the public hearing and to anyone else
requesting the decision in writing. Additionally, there will be a 14-day public comment period if an
environmental determination is issued. Opportunities for appeal occur within twenty one (21) days after
the date the environmental determination is issued. City Council decision can be appealed through
Superior Court. Appeals of site plan review decisions may be filed within 14 days of Notice of Final
Decision.
C:\Community Development\Projec[ Files\SPR Site Plan Review\5306 Jack in the Box\Notice of Application.doc
^z
l /
/~
O
D
PLAN
SITE
_
SCnLE. ~ = 20'
NORTH
VICINITY MAP
91
w
D 1999
airo~
PEPYIi
I
~ _ _ .~
i
City of Yelm
Community Development Department
P.O. Box 479
Yelm, WA 98597
(360) 458-3835
(360) 458-3144 FAX
Memorandum
To: SPRC
From: Roberta Allen, Administrative Assistant
Date: February 5, 2002
Re: SPR-02-8306-YL -Project Review Schedule for Jack in the Box
Attached is [he application packet for the above referenced project. After your initial review of the information
submitted, if you need additional information from [he applicant, please let me know as soon as possible. The
following is the tentative review schedule for the project.
February 13 -Notice of Application distributed -begin 15 day wmment period.
March 6 & March 13-SPRC project review. Department comments/conditions of approval for staff report.
March 22 - l.e[ter of Approval completed.
C:\Community Development\Project Files\SPR Si[e Plan Review\8306 Jack in [he Box\Proj Rev Dale Memo.doc
Pre-Application Meeting
November 14, 2001
***These comments are preliminary in nature and are not intended to represent final comments and or
requirements for the City of Yelm. Until a complete application is made, the Community Development
Department can only attempt to inform the applicant of genera! requirements as they appear in the form
presented by the applicant at the time of pre-submission.
Proponent: Jack in the Box, Charlie Patton
Representative: Tom Spader, Freiheit & Ho Architects
Project Proposal: Construct a Jack in the Box Restaurant
Project Location: Southwest corner of Yelm Ave & Vancil Rd -Safeway Pad
Zoning and Commercial (C-1 ), Chapter 17.26. ,1
Setbacks: Minimum Lot/Pad Size - 5,000 sq. ft. ~`~
Setbacks: Front yard - 15' from R-O-W ~ ~ ~~-~~`~.%
Rear Yard - 20' g~-'~-'
Side yard - 10' ~~`'
Parking: Chapter 17.72. - 1 stall per 200 sq ft of gross floor area plus one loading
and unloading zoning, measuring a minimum of 12' wide, 14' high and 45'
long. The requirements for off-street parking and their design shall be
regarded as the minimum; however, the owner or developer shall be
responsible for providing adequate amounts and arrangement of space for
the particular premises even though such space or its arrangement is in
excess of the minimum set forth.
Landscaping: Chapter 17.80, Type II, III IV, and V.
~~.
Type II landscaping is used to provide visual separation of compatible ,:
uses. Type II landscaping is required around the perimeter of a site, ~ ~'~'
which has compatible zoning and adjacent to buildings to provide visual
separation of compatible use and soften the appearance of streets,
parking areas and building elevation.
Type III landscaping provides visual relief where clear sight is desired.
This landscaping includes street trees and vegetation required in the
planter strips along the property. frontage and along pedestrian walks for
separation of pedestrians from streets and parking areas.
Type IV landscaping is needed to provide visual relief and shade in
parking areas.
Type V is needed for any above ground stormwater facilities.
Other: Design Guidelines -attached checklist for applicable guidelines.
The site is located in the Auto-Oriented District.
The Design Guidelines for new development on corner lots at street
intersections require the applicant to enhance the property's visual
qualities at the corner. The previous applicant proposed to enhance the
corner with a rock wall, to match the opposite corner, and to provide a
"pedestrian park". These enhancements were acceptable to the City, and
would be acceptable for this proposal as well.
The City must approve the location of the building footprint and its design
for compliance with the Design Guidelines. A statement describing how
each guideline has been satisfied and Architectural drawings must be
submitted with the Site Plan application.
Pre-Application Meeting
Civil Comments
Date November 14, 2001
***1'hese comments are preliminary in nature and are not intended to represent final comments and or
requirements for the City of Yelm. Until a complete application is made, the planning and/or public
works department can only attempt to inform the applicant of general requirements as they appear in the
form presented by the applicant at the time of pre-submission.
Proponent: Tom Spader
Project: Jack in the Box
Project Loc: Yelm Ave East and Vancil Road
Water:
The proposed development is within the City's water service area and would
be required to connect to city's water system. There is an existing 8" water
main located along Vancil Road.
Water connection fees are based on a daily consumption rate and are
charged at a current rate of $1,000/240 gallons (fee subject to change) inside
city limits. Proposed calculations will need to be provided at the time of civil
review to determine the number of gallons of use a day for this project. These
fees are payable at time of building permit issuance.
Irrigation Meter:
An irrigation meter may be installed for the purpose of irrigation. A backflow
prevention device will be required for all landscape irrigation connections.
Sewer:
,, The proposed site will be required to connect to the City's sewer system.
~- ~~ There is a 3" sewer line located in Vancil Road along your project.
~. ,,.
~, ~.
.;ti~~ ~~-~ ~~ The sewer connection fee is based on a daily discharge rate of 240 gallons
;~ ~ \'J _ , per day and is charged at a rate of $4,850 per 240 gallons/day. If your usage
~-~~ is greater than 240 gallons/day your connection fee will be calculated by your
`,~` submitted usage. (fee subject to change). This fee is payable a building
permit issuance.
Fire:
Stormwater:
Fire protection must be provided per the Uniform Fire Code. There will be
requirements for installation of fire hydrants, fire truck access and fire truck
turn-around. These will be determined upon further review of the preliminary
civil and architect plans.
If the proposed improvement is over 5,000 square feet of impervious surface
there are stormwater treatment requirements per the D.O.E. Stormwater
Manual. At the time of Site Plan Review submittal a Preliminary Stormwater
Plan and report will be required.
{
._ L
`~'/.~
Y ~ .~-
.-
G:`,Cornmunity Devclopment\Weekly SPR\Presuh civil~,jackinhox vancil-civil 1114Ol.doc
Street Improvements:
Frontage improvements are required for this project. Improvements shall be
per the City of Yelm's Development Guidelines. Frontage improvements for
this project along Vancil Road may be deferred with a "waiver of protest" and
proponent will agree to participate in the Yelm Avenue /Vancil Road re-
alignment in conjunction with the Washington State Department of
Transportation and the City of Yelm. These improvements are expected to
begin Summer 2002. Vancil Road is currently classified as a "neighborhood
collector" (attached).
Street improvements may not be limited to above requirements. The
required TIA may also require additional improvements to Vancil Road or
other intersections.
Street Lighting:
Street lighting shall be installed as required per the City of Yelm's
"Development Guidelines". The street lighting plan will be reviewed at the
time of civil engineering plan review.
ADA Requirements:
The American Disabilities Act requires the improvements to be ADA
accessible. Facility improvements will have to meet current code. Review of
these improvements will be determined upon further review of the civil plans.
G:`,Cor7~munity Development\tiVeckly SPR',Pretiuh civil\jackinbos vancil-civil 1 11401.doc