Loading...
Hard File ScannedTami Merriman From: Charles Patton [Charles.Patton@jackinthebox.com] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:20 AM To: tmerriman@ywave.com Subject: Appeal of Traffic Facilities Charges Jack in the Box has decided to drop its appeal of the traffic facilities charges for the Yelm, WA store. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. -Charlie Patton ,~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~C13 _ ~, ~~ ~ g~ ~,.~ 1 City of Yelm 105 Yelm Avenue West P.O. Box 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 (360) 458-3244 June 7, 2002 Charlie Patton Jack in the Box, Inc. 8909 SW Barbur Blvd. #250 Portland, OR 97219 Re: Appeal of Traffic Facilities Charge Dear Mr. Patton: Before the Community Development Department can schedule a hearing before the City Council regarding your appeal of the City of Yelm's calculation of the Traffic Facilities Charge, additional information regarding the appeal is required. Specifically, Section 15.40.040 Yelm Municipal Code states that the City must consider: the issues raised; the proper fee to be assessed; the necessity to find concurrency If you feel the fee as assessed was not proper, you should explain why you believe the Community Development Department's calculation of the fee was in error. Once this additional information is received, the matter will be scheduled for a public hearing before the City Council. The Department will prepare a staff analysis of the appeal, which will be available for review a week before the scheduled hearing. If you have any questions regarding this request, or about the appeal process, please contact the Community Development Department at (360) 458-8408 or by stopping by City Halt. /~ e + '~ Grant Beck, Director ~- -Community Development Department c. Tami Merriman, Planning Technician City of Yelm Community Development Department Invoice No. CDD-02-054 INVOICE - ~- Customer Name Tom Spader, Freiheit & Ho, Architects, Inc. Address 10940 NE 33rd Place, Suite 202 City Bellevue State WA ZIP 98004 \ Phone ~ Date 5/13/02 Order No. SPR-01-8306-YL Rep Jack In the Box FOB Qty Description ~ Unit Price TOTAL Site Plan and Civil Engineer Plan Rev. Fees 30 Plan Review #1 $54.00 $1,620.00 6 Plan Review #2 $54.00 $324.00 4 Plan Review #3 $54.00 $216.00 6 Correspondence letters, emails, phone calls $54.00 $324.00 SubTotal $2,484.00 Payment Details Shipping & Handling $0.00 0 Cash Taxes WA O Check Q TOTAL $2,484.00 Office Use Only City of Yelm Community Development Department P.O. Box 479 Yelm, WA 98597 (360) 458-3835 fax (360) 458-3835 THANK YOU 0 ~ z r ~ M N ~ N O u' M N N` O Z x v H w a x w ~' v W ~m z m = o ~ ~ H a H W CJ W z x ar W N ~ ~ ~ ~ M O N W i ~ t-a ~ ~ F- W 7a { O m U H E1 ` H Q x ~ ~ h W U ~ O m ~ f ~ V1 a RC w a .-+ ' a 'r' U i i ° ~ •-' w ^ A -.., M ~ ~ 'J+ ~ N I (~"~~ oQ,~ ~ H ~ O > Q1 Q wO o ~ W ~ GCI ~I~I°-}° IF ~ ~ W~U V wF ° ~ O no ; ,-- ~ a ~ I ~ ~' ~ A a; w x M ~ ~ 1J " 1 ~~ oad : l CC Q ~ ~ ~ hrntf! O W GO W xW H W ~w hd U FC U] w a ~., aH ~ E May 16 02 02:58p pdx development Z00'd 14101 / `p~ ~~ T ~~I~ a YE LA4 WAYH•N TOti G1TY QF YELM PO Bax 479 Yelm WA 98597 360-~58-3244 Fee: Staff Decision - $50.00 Commission Decision $1{b.00 (In addition, any professional service charges wnr {70ani~ dine !!.'2!SAl 503 293 3689 p.2 OfE1C1AL USt£ ONLY fJ-~ Fee tJ ~ Odta Rsnived ~ G Z- ~r n /~ ~~~~C~ QF Fi1a No. ~/'J ~ L~~i ~ APPEAL ~ ~~~~~ y ~- - ' - - - - w.rr~r A Closed record appeal may foltaw either an open record hearing car an open record administrative decision an a project permit application when ttte appeal is on the record, and no or limited new evidence or information is allowed to be submitted. Appeals on Category i 8~ II project decisions are heard by the Clty Council. Appeals on Category 111 & IV project det:isians as well as Category 18~ If decisions which have been appealed to the City Councils go to Sufterior Court and follow the judicial review process set forth in RCW 3136.70C. A Notice of Appeal must be filed within 14 days pf >+lotiice of final Oec~io~rt. Pi4t?JECY CASE NtANBER BEING APPEALED ~ P rR - D 1 -~ ~~3DLa " y L. DATE OF NOTICE OF F1NAL OFCISION_,,, Vwr, ~c~t-, ~ ~7 . a ~==C`,~. APPELLANT(S) Ju G ~~ ~ ~- oX Mailing Address t.[, rut v 2S- City, State and Zip r r n 2 ~ Telephone .Sa3 - Z 93 -- 3 ~ ~' 8 $pECIFIG ITEMS OF DECISION BEING APPEALED (attach adciltlona! sheet ii necessary) ~ru f rc~ ~~.,~~ c ~ ~ e- ._ I affKm that all answers, statements and information contained in ;ind submitted with this application are complete and accurate to thQ best of my knowledge. Further, t grant permission From the owner to any and al3 employees and representatives of the City of Yefm anti other governmental agencies to enter upon and i ect sal property as reasonably necessary to Ixocess this application. I agree to pay ail fees of ity wh' iy t his application. Signed Date , S- /~ " ~ Z- Cl7Y QF YELM dslcbfficelptandept.oclaPpsWreplai.apP _'' '-". ,. ... .. .min n~~ nnn -} , ~~ ; .y ~ ~~;, `~ ~~ `~ ~ •~ ~ ~~ ~' ~ t ~~` ~~~ ~? ~ ~~ PAGE i t, a-tn IdIJr'1 i.n~i to ti 1~ A7•t-I ~M7_(1i_AM,I May 16 02 02:58p pdx development 503 293 3689 p.l FAQ '~''1~.A~NS~ISSYaN CTrY OF YES COMN~IU'NTT'Y DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT T'O BO:~ 479--105 YEI,NI AVE W XELM WA 9$597 (360) 458.3835 ]?AX: (360) 458-3144 ~~~•~ ~~~ r~~+~ \-~~~~ DATE: FA,X #: JC!3 - ~~3 - 3t~~`? PACES: 1~ r SUBJECT: ~'~ ~ (~-~ C~ C011~MENTS: including this cover sheet. ~~ijaw ~ rS '" IF Y'AU llU NUT RLG~[V£ ALL CQPiL• S, OR .4YY COPY [S C7p'C LEGIBLE, PLC;AS~ CALL (360) 4~8-383J AS SOON ~\S FO55{BLE. ,....,~.... ~ ...+~.. ~ ~L~., nrL nr,n .ten ~.u.u,~ ia~~i in i i r~ n~•rr ~nm ni rNi,~ ~'~~ ® Yelp _~ > 105 Yelm Avenue West s "`~ ~ ~~`~~~~-~ P. O. Boz 479 ,r. w.-s-nHCTOa Y ~ LM Yelm, Washington 9&597 (360) 458-3244 March 27, 2002 Tom Spader Freiheit & Ho Architects, Inc. 10940 NE 33`d Place Suite 202 Bellevue, WA 98004 Re: Site Plan Approval for Case # SPR-01-8306-YL, Jack in the Box Dear Mr. Spader: The Site Plan Review Committee has considered your application for the above referenced project, and finds that as conditioned below, the proposed project is consistent with the Yelm Comprehensive Plan, and all applicable City policy's and development standards. Pursuant to Chapter 15.49 Integrated Project Review Process, a project, which is subject to Site Plan Approval, is a Type II Permit and can be appealed to the City Council. An appeal must be filed within 14 days of the date of this notice. Site Plan Approval is valid for 18 months from the date of this letter. The affected property owners may request a change in property tax valuation from the Thurston County Tax Assessor's Office. The project is aporoved subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. Future Expansion Finding: The applicant has proposed an outside seating area that is approximately 525 square feet, that is not directly addressed in the application. The applicant has also verbalized that the area is designated as a future expansion area. In order to revie~r~ the projects total impact. and to facilitate the future gro~~~~ih. the City has included the 525 sq. ft. into it's project revie~,v to mitigate impacts. The conditions of approval bclo'f/ include the future expansion area. ~,~lhen the applicant .S preCaf°d i0 °Xpand the restaurant by enC;CSinS that 525 sq. ~. of OUtSlde seating a(~a, 51te plan r?`lie'!'d will not be required. 2. Transportation Finding: Yelm is a small compact community most directly affected by two state highways which bisect the community. The two state highways are used by local residents for transportation throughout the city and for access to commercial and residential areas throughout the community. In lieu of widening existing streets, the City has elected to create certain alternatives, Y-1, Y-2, Y-3, which will avoid the need to significantly widen existing streets, and particularly Yelm Avenue. New developments do in fact burden the city's central streets, and unless the bypass alternatives are accomplished, the City would have to require developers to pay the cost of the internal street widening. The city plans show, and the City finds that adequate facilities will be accomplished better and in a timely fashion by bypass facilities as a substitute for the widening of existing facilities. As a result, the City finds that the regional plans in fact benefit projects in all areas on the City and will accomplish the goal of providing adequate facilities to City standards within a reasonable time to serve the demands created by the proposed project. Finding: The City has adopted a Transportation Facility Charge (TFC) of $750.00 per pm peak trip. The Ordinance provides a default table that the applicant can use to determine new pm trips generated by the proposed use. The ordinance also provides a discount for existing traffic. The current ordinance and default values are based on the 5th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, and uses a formula based on square footage. The applicant has provided a Transportation Impact Analysis using two different formulas for calculating trip generation numbers. The first formula is based on Jack in the Box projected sales. The second formula is based on type of use and square footage, using the 6th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The project shows 2,036 square feet for the restaurant, and 525 square feet for outside seating and future expansion area. The City has agreed to use the 6th Edition ITE manual, based on square footage. Finding: Street frontage improvements for the site are required as part of Site Plan Review and approval. The City has plans to improve Yelm Avenue, and re-align Vancil Road in partnership with the Washington State Department of Transportation and various private property owners fronting the improvement areas. Conditions of Approval: a. The applicant shall mitigate traffic impacts to the transportation system. Mitigation includes payment of the Transportation Facility Charge (TFC) for 42.88 new pm peak hour trips generated by the project. The total TFC is $ 32,160.00 b. The applicant shall be responsible for frontage improvements (curb, gutter, sidewalk, planter strip, and landscaping) along Vancil Road, and the'City shall be responsible for the core road improvements. The City and WSDOT shall be the lead agencies in the design and construction of said improvements on both Yelm Avenue and Vancil Road. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of Yelm for payment of the projects fair share for the design and construction of the above specified improvements, based on the bid award amount. Page 2 n( 6 3. Water Supply Finding: The City's Water Comprehensive Plan identifies a portion of the City area for service. The City is pursuing additional land areas for approval and the extension of facilities. Completion of such activities is dependent on grant and developer funding, as well as planned bonding and existing public funds. The status of such plans and funding sources must be considered in any review of concurrency. Developer extensions and or dedications, latecomer agreements, oversizing agreements, and the creation of local improvement districts may all be considered. In the event of a new funding source, however, concurrency is not found until the funding source is in fact in place - e.g. award of a grant, a binding letter commitment for third party funding, or the successful formation of a local improvement district. Any necessary water rights are considered, only after approved for municipal use by the Washington State Department of Ecology, or appropriate appeals board, and the time for appeal or challenge has expired. Finding: The proposal is for a commercial restaurant. Engineered calculations are required to determine the number of Equivalent Residential Unit ERU's required for this project. (each ERU equals 240 gallons of water consumption per day) Finding: The City of Yelm is dedicated to providing the best quality water possible to its consumers. The Washington Administrative Code, WAC 246-290-490 requires that the City take measures to ensure that contamination does not occur as a result of a cross contamination. Conditions of Approval: a. The applicant shall connect to the City water system. The cost to connect shall include a fee of $1,500.00 per Equivalent Residential Unit (each ERU equals 240 gallons of water consumption per day, fee subject to change.) b. All water connection fees are due at time of building permit issuance. c. The applicant shall install a backflow prevention device for the irrigation system. 4. Sewer System Finding: The City's Sewer Comprehensive Plan identifies a portion of the City area for service. The City is pursuing additional land areas or approval and the extension of facilities. Completion of such activities is dependent on grant and developer funding, as well as planned bonding and existing public funds. The status of such plans and funding sources must be considered in any review of concurrency. Developer extensions and or dedications, latecomer agreements, oversizing agreements, and the creation of local improvement districts may all be considered. In the event of a new funding source, however, concurrency is not found until the funding source is in fact in pace - e.g. award of a grant, a binding letter commitment for third parting funding, or the successful formation of a local improvement district. Finding: The proposal is for a commercial restaurant. Engineered calculations are required to determine the size of step tank, and number of hook ups required. Page 3 of 6 Conditions of Approval: a. The applicant shall connect to the City S.T.E.P. sewer system. The cost to connect shall include a fee of $4,986.00 per ERU (each ERU equals 240 gallons of water consumption per day, fee subject to change). b. Upon completion of the onsite installation as per the City's Development Guidelines, the S.T.E. P. sewer equipment shall be deeded to the City. c. The applicant shall install a grease trap 5. Storm Water Finding: The completed project will increase the amount of impervious surface on the site and on the adjacent streets. Impervious surfaces create stormwater runoff. When uncontrolled and untreated stormwater runoff can create health and safety hazards. YMC requires all development to comply with the City stormwater Manual. Conditions of Approval: a. The applicant shall design and construct all stormwater facilities in accordance with the DOE Manual, as adopted by the City of Yelm. Best Management Practices are required during and post construction. b. The applicant shall submit a final stormwater report with civil plan application. c. The applicant shall submit a stormwater maintenance plan with civil plan application. d. The applicant shall provide a blanket easement for maintenance of all utilities deeded to the City, and access to the stormwater facility. 6. Parking Finding: The City of Yelm Development Guidelines, Design Guidelines, and Municipal Code address parking regulations from many aspects, including, but not limited to; design, number of stalls required, pedestrian pathways, and safety. The requirements of off-street parking and loading facilities and their design shall be regarded as the minimum; however, the owner, developer or operator of the premises for which the parking facilities are intenced shall be responsible for providing adequate amounts and arrangement of space for the particular premises even though such space or its arrangement is in excess of the minimum'set forth. Conditions of Approval: a. Applicant shall provide for off-street parking. Minimum requirements are 1 stall per 200 square feet of gross floor area. Applicant to provide handicap parking stalls as required by ADA. R,Cnmmunity Development~,Prc~ect Fiies,SPR Site Plan Review~8306 .lack in ;he Bnx,83G6 Approval Letter.doc Page 4 of 6 7. Building Department Finding: The City of Yelm has adopted Design Guidelines for projects located in Yelm's Commercial Zones. These guidelines determine specific requirements for development. Conditions of Approval: a. Design Guidelines II, Pedestrian Access. All pedestrian paths must correspond with federal, state and local codes for handicap access, and ADA requirements. All buildings shall have a paved pedestrian path from street sidewalk to the main entry, and provide pathways through parking lots. b. The "preview board" and "speaker board" placement in the drive through lane, does not allow for vehicle storage, and interferes with pedestrian access. The speaker board, and preview board shall be moved closer to the building, in the drive-through lane to allow for vehicle storage. c. Design Guidelines II, Pedestrian Area and Plaza. Provide visual and pedestrian access, with seating of at least 2 linear feet. (bench, ledge, etc.) d. Design Guidelines I-F. Street Corners, I.F.(1) Applicant to install a decorative wall. The wall shall be constructed with "prairie rock", to match the decorative wall that is located on the neighboring property. The wall shall extend continuously from the pedestrian access located at the northeast corner to the pedestrian access located on on the northwest corner. e. Design Guidelines I-D, Siting Service Areas. Refuse area to be screened to match overall building design. Applicant to provide documentation that refuse area is adequate size for storage of refuse and recycling. f. Design Guidelines IV, Building Design. Applicant shall replace the Chokecherry tree marked on the east side of the building with an Austrian Black Pine tree, matching the proposed pine tree marked for that site. g. All signs require permit and approval by the Community Development Department. 8. Fire Finding: Fire protection to the buildings must be provided per the Uniform Fire Code. Requirements for installation of fire hydrants will be determined in civil plan review. Conditions of Approval a. The applicant shall submit fire flow calculations for all existing and proposed hydrants. All hydrants must meet minimum City standards. b. The applicant shall submit a fire hydrant plan to the Community Development Department for review and approval. Page 5 of 5 9. Landscaping Finding: Landscaping and screening are necessary to promote safety, to provide screening between compatible land uses, to safeguard privacy and to protect the aesthetic assets of the City. YMC, Chapter 17.80 requires all development to provide on site landscaping. Conditions of Approval: a. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan to the Community Development Department for review and approval. b. Completed landscaping shall be approved by the Community Development Department prior to building occupancy. Site Plan Approval is a Type II Administrative land use approval. An appeal of this decision can be filed within 14 days from the date of this letter, pursuant to YMC, Chapter 15.49, Integrated Project Review Process. The Site Plan is valid for eighteen (18) months from the date of this letter. The applicant may request asix-month extension on the approval, if the request is made in writing prior to the expiration date of this approval. If you need additional information or assistance, please call the Community Development Department at (360) 458-3835. Sincerely, ~. i Tami Merriman Planning Technician cc: Charlie Patton, Jack in the Box, Inc. Jim Gibson, Development Services Engineer Gary Carlson, Building Official Tim Peterson, Public Works Supervisor Shelly Badger, City Administrator R:,Community Cevelrpment~,Pro~ect FileslSPR Site Plan Review~.83G6 Jack in the Box',8306 Approval letter doc Page 5 of 6 ~- 3 y YEZM if~f WA8M1111GTOM March 27, 2002 City of Yelm 105 Yelm Avenue West P.O. Box 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 (360) 458-3244 Tom Spader Freiheit & Ho Architects, Inc. 10940 NE 33~d Place Suite 202 Bellevue, WA 98004 Re: Site Plan Approval for Case # SPR-01-8306-YL, Jack in the Box Dear Mr. Spader: The Site Plan Review Committee has considered your application for the above referenced project, and finds that as conditioned below, the proposed project is consistent with the Yelm Comprehensive Plan, and all applicable City policy's and development standards. Pursuant to Chapter 15.49 Integrated Project Review Process, a project, which is subject to Site Plan Approval, is a Type II Permit and can be appealed to the City Council. An appeal must be filed within 14 days of the date of this notice. Site Plan Approval is valid for 18 months from the date of this letter. The affected property owners may request a change in property tax valuation from the Thurston County Tax Assessor's Office. The project is approved subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. Future Expansion Finding: The applicant has proposed an outside seating area that is approximately 525 square feet, that is not directly addressed in the application. The applicant has also verbalized that the area is designated as a future expansion area. In order to revie~rf the projects fetal impact, and tc facilitate the future gro~~~rth, the Cit`j has included the 525 sq. ft. into it's project re~iie~N to mitigate impacts. The conditions of approval belo~rl include the future expansion area. ~Nhen the applicant is prepared to expand the restaurant by enciosn5 That 525 sq. ~i. of outside seating area, site plan reviewv will net be required. 2. Transportation Finding: Yelm is a small compact community most directly affected by two state highways which bisect the community. The two state highways are used by local residents for transportation throughout the city and for access to commercial and residential areas throughout the community. In lieu of widening existing streets, the City has elected to create certain alternatives, Y-1, Y-2, Y-3, which will avoid the need to significantly widen existing streets, and particularly Yelm Avenue. New developments do in fact burden the city's central streets, and unless the bypass alternatives are accomplished, the City would have to require developers to pay the cost of the internal street widening. The city plans show, and the City finds that adequate facilities will be accomplished better and in a timely fashion by bypass facilities as a substitute for the widening of existing facilities. As a result, the City finds that the regional plans in fact benefit projects in all areas on the City and will accomplish the goal of providing adequate facilities to City standards within a reasonable time to serve the demands created by the proposed project. Finding: The City has adopted a Transportation Facility Charge (TFC) of $750.00 per pm peak trip. The Ordinance provides a default table that the applicant can use to determine new pm trips generated by the proposed use. The ordinance also provides a discount for existing traffic. The current ordinance and default values are based on the 5th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, and uses a formula based on square footage. The applicant has provided a Transportation Impact Analysis using two different formulas for calculating trip generation numbers. The first formula is based on Jack in the Box projected sales. The second formula is based on type of use and square footage, using the 6th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The project shows 2,036 square feet for the restaurant, and 525 square feet for outside seating and future expansion area. The City has agreed to use the 6th Edition ITE manual, based on square footage. Finding: Street frontage improvements for the site are required as part of Site Plan Review and approval. The City has plans to improve Yelm Avenue, and re-align Vancil Road in partnership with the Washington State Department of Transportation and various private property owners fronting the improvement areas. Conditions of Approval: a. The applicant shall mitigate traffic impacts to the transportation system. Mitigation includes payment of the Transportation Facility Charge (TFC) for 42.88 new pm peak hour trips generated by the project. The total TFC is $ 32,160.00 b. The applicant shall be responsible for frontage improvements (curb, gutter, sidewalk, planter strip, and landscaping) along Vancil Road, and the'City shall be responsible for the core road improvements. The City and WSDOT shall be the lead agencies in the design and construction of said improvements on both Yelm Avenue and Vancil Road. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of Yelm for payment of the projects fair share for the design and construction of the above specified improvements, based on the bid award amount. Page 2 of 6 3. Water Supply Finding: The City's Water Comprehensive Plan identifies a portion of the City area for service. The City is pursuing additional land areas for approval and the extension of facilities. Completion of such activities is dependent on grant and developer funding, as well as planned bonding and existing public funds. The status of such plans and funding sources must be considered in any review of concurrency. Developer extensions and or dedications, latecomer agreements, oversizing agreements, and the creation of local improvement districts may all be considered. In the event of a new funding source, however, concurrency is not found until the funding source is in fact in place - e.g. award of a grant, a binding letter commitment for third party funding, or the successful formation of a local improvement district. Any necessary water rights are considered, only after approved for municipal use by the Washington State Department of Ecology, or appropriate appeals board, and the time for appeal or challenge has expired. Finding: The proposal is for a commercial restaurant. Engineered calculations are required to determine the number of Equivalent Residential Unit ERU's required for this project. (each ERU equals 240 gallons of water consumption per day) Finding: The City of Yelm is dedicated to providing the best quality water possible to its consumers. The Washington Administrative Code, WAC 246-290-490 requires that the City take measures to ensure that contamination does not occur as a result of a cross contamination. Conditions of Approval: a. The applicant shall connect to the City water system. The cost to connect shall include a fee of $1,500.00 per Equivalent Residential Unit (each ERU equals 240 gallons of water consumption per day, fee subject to change.) b. All water connection fees are due at time of building permit issuance. c. The applicant shall install a backflow prevention device for the irrigation system. 4. Sewer System Finding: The City's Sewer Comprehensive Plan identifies a portion of the City area for service. The City is pursuing additional land areas or approval and the extension of facilities. Completion of such activities is dependent on grant and developer funding, as well as planned bonding and existing public funds. The status of such plans and funding sources must be considered in any review of concurrency. Developer extensions and or dedications, latecomer agreements, oversizing agreements, and the creation of local improvement districts may all be considered. In the event of a new funding source, however, concurrency is not found until the funding source is in fact in pace - e.g. award of a grant, a binding letter commitment for third parting funding, or the successful formation of a local improvement district. Finding: The proposal is for a commercial restaurant. Engineered calculations are required to determine the size of step tank, and number of hook ups required. Page 3 of 6 Conditions of Approval: a. The applicant shall connect to the City S.T. E.P. sewer system. The cost to connect shall include a fee of $4,986.00 per ERU (each ERU equals 240 gallons of water consumption per day, fee subject to change). b. Upon completion of the onsite installation as per the City's Development Guidelines, the S.T.E. P. sewer equipment shall be deeded to the City. c. The applicant shall install a grease trap 5. Storm Water Finding: The completed project will increase the amount of impervious surface on the site and on the adjacent streets. Impervious surfaces create stormwater runoff. When uncontrolled and untreated stormwater runoff can create health and safety hazards. YMC requires all development to comply with the City stormwater Manual. Conditions of Approval: a. The applicant shall design and construct all stormwater facilities in accordance with the DOE Manual, as adopted by the City of Yelm. Best Management Practices are required during and post construction. b. The applicant shall submit a final stormwater report with civil plan application. c. The applicant shall submit a stormwater maintenance plan with civil plan application. d. The applicant shall provide a blanket easement for maintenance of all utilities deeded to the City, and access to the stormwater facility. 6. Parking Finding: The City of Yelm Development Guidelines, Design Guidelines, and Municipal Code address parking regulations from many aspects, including, but not limited to; design, number of stalls required, pedestrian pathways, and safety. The requirements of off-street parking and loading facilities and their design shall be regarded as the minimum; however, the owner, developer or operator of the premises for which the parking facilities are intended shall be responsible for providing adequate amounts and arrangement of space for the particular premises even though such space or its arrangement is in excess of the minimum'set forth. Conditions of Approval: a. Applicant shall provide for off-street parking. Minimum requirements are 1 stall per 200 square feet of-gross floor area. Applicant to provide handicap parking stalls as required by ADA. R',Community Developmenl',Pro!ect FilesSPR Site Plan Review~8G06 .Jack in the Box,83G6 Approval t_etier.doc Page a of 6 7. Building Department Finding: The City of Yelm has adopted Design Guidelines for projects located in Yelm's Commercial Zones. These guidelines determine specific requirements for development. Conditions of Approval: a. Design Guidelines II, Pedestrian Access. All pedestrian paths must correspond with federal, state and local codes for handicap access, and ADA requirements. All buildings shall have a paved pedestrian path from street sidewalk to the main entry, and provide pathways through parking lots. b. The "preview board" and "speaker board" placement in the drive through lane, does not allow for vehicle storage, and interferes with pedestrian access. The speaker board, and preview board shall be moved closer to the building, in the drive-through lane to allow for vehicle storage. c. Design Guidelines II, Pedestrian Area and Plaza. Provide visual and pedestrian access, with seating of at least 2 linear feet. (bench, ledge, etc.) d. Design Guidelines I-F. Street Corners, I.F.(1) Applicant to install a decorative wall. The wall shall be constructed with "prairie rock", to match the decorative wall that is located on the neighboring property. The wall shall extend continuously from the pedestrian access located at the northeast corner to the pedestrian access located on on the northwest corner. e. Design Guidelines I-D, Siting Service Areas. Refuse area to be screened to match overall building design. Applicant to provide documentation that refuse area is adequate size for storage of refuse and recycling. f. Design Guidelines IV, Building Design. Applicant shall replace the Chokecherry tree marked on the east side of the building with an Austrian Black Pine tree, matching the proposed pine tree marked for that site. g. All signs require permit and approval by the Community Development Department. 8. Fire Finding: Fire protection to the buildings must be provided per the Uniform Fire Code. Requirements for installation of fire hydrants will be determined in civil plan review. Conditions of Approval a. The applicant shall submit fire flow calculations for all existing and proposed hydrants. All hydrants must meet minimum City standards. b. The applicant shall submit a fire hydrant plan to the Community Development Department for review and approval. Page 5 Of 5 9. Landscaping Finding: Landscaping and screening are necessary to promote safety, to provide screening between compatible land uses, to safeguard privacy and to protect the aesthetic assets of the City. YMC, Chapter 17.80 requires all development to provide on site landscaping. Conditions of Approval: a. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan to the Community Development Department for review and approval. b. Completed landscaping shall be approved by the Community Development Department prior to building occupancy. Site Plan Approval is a Type II Administrative land use approval. An appeal of this decision can be filed within 14 days from the date of this letter, pursuant to YMC, Chapter 15.49, Integrated Project Review Process. The Site Plan is valid for eighteen (18) months from the date of this letter. The applicant may request asix-month extension on the approval, if the request is made in writing prior to the expiration date of this approval. If you need additional information or assistance, please call the Community Development Department at (360) 458-3835. Sincerely, y,i 1: ,, Tami Merriman Planning Technician cc: Charlie Patton, Jack in the Box, Inc. Jim Gibson, Development Services Engineer Gary Carlson, Building Official Tim Peterson, Public Works Supervisor Shelly Badger, City Administrator R:Communrty Cevelopment Proven Files SPR Site Plan Revievr8306 Jack m ,he Box.8306 Approval Lettrcdoc Page 6 pf 6 Of ?~ A~ ?tip 5 YELM t WASNIMGTON May 6, 2002 Tom Spader Freiheit & Ho Architects, Inc. 10940 NE 33 Rd PI. Suite 202 Bellevue, Washington 98004 City of Yelm 105 Yelm Avenue West P.O. Box 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 (360) 458-3244 RE: Civil Engineering Review No. 2 Jack in the Box City of Yelm Project No. SPR-01-8306-YL Dear Mr. Spader: I have reviewed the civil plans submitted and dated 4/29/2002. The following are comments from the above referenced plans and need to be addressed before submitting the final mylars. I have organized these comments by general category. Sewer Plans: 1. Please add the following note to sheets PS1.0 and PS1.1: This STEP system shall be a duplex pumping system. This system shall have 2/20 gpm pumps. Water Plans: 2. No Comments. Temporary Erosion and Grading Plans: 3. No Comments Roadway and Stormwater Plans: 4. Please add a concrete roadway section to the plans. Misc. Information: 5. No Comment Please revise your engineering drawings. When you resubmit your package, please send 1 set of mylar drawings for the city's records, 1 sets of drawings for your record (your choice of media), 1 set of/2' scale drawings and the AutoCAD engineering files on a CD. Your client will be required to pay their review fees prior to the release of the signed drawings. If you have any questions or comments, please call me at (360) 458-8438 and I will be happy to further assist you. Respectfully City of Yelm Community Development r Jim Gibson Development Engineer Cc: ami Merriman, Planning Tim Paterson ~ ~ ir. nrks ~ 1 ~r ,.. C1'I'Y QF `~~.M GOI~TMU'N1'1'Y TIEVELOPMENT DEPARTMFN'1' PO BQX 479 --105 YELM AVE W XELM WA 9559'7 (360} 455-3535 FAX: (360) 455-3144 TO: ~,~cv~ r~~~ e- ~"~~~~ DATE: FAX #: X03 - c~-c1 ~ J ~~'~ PAGES: FROM: C3..~~~~ ~~~'. -r'r i ~r~ SUBJECT: ~ ~ (~-eCf- ~. COIV~IENTS: including this cover sheet. '` IF YOU UU NOT iZCC1E1(~VIEALL COFIES~ ORA:YY COPY IS i~Q~` Y~EGIBLE~ PLC#SE Cr~I,.L (360) 45$-3$3a AS SOON r~S P055IBLE. ********** -bb G£ 89b 09£ - *** - 1134 WWO~ Wl3A- ***************************************************************** - 113a WWO~ -Wl3A 30 All ~ - Z£~00;00 Z00/Z00 689££6Z£0916 ~0 L00 uo!~eana sa8ed 'oN lal / aweN ua!}e~S 'oN d88tl wwoa 'aN u}S 8Z~5~ 9~-ReW ~ pu3 ~Z~9G 9G-,teW }ae~S £8G ~ 'aN al!3 uo!ss!wsue.+l ,teowaW 340W ** ~p abed ********* 8Z~9~ 3W11 **** ZOOl-9~-ReW 31tl4 **************************************** - ltlNWf10(' 'WW00 - ********** • un wasH~Na~ror+ FAX T~tANSMISSION CITY OF YELM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PO BOX 479 -105 YELM AVE W YELM WA 98597 (360) 458-3835 FAX: (360) 458-3144 TO: (~ ~c~ ~~~~~ e_ \ f~ ~11z~\`~ DATE: FAX #: ~ ~` ~ - ~~~~ ~ ~~`'~ PAGES: FROM: I C~ ti-ti~~ ~~'~E' Y~~ ~ vY~C~=~r~-~ SUBJECT: COMMENTS: including this cover sheet. '' ~" Ir YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL COPIES, OR ANY COPY IS NOT LEGIBLE, PLE.ISE CALL (3G0) 458-3835 As sooty As rosstsl,E. R:`,Cnmmunity Devclopmenl`;I'cmplatesF3LANK F~1XTI2ANSMISS(ON.~nc ~~ ~g THE A~t YELM WASHfNGTON CITY OF YELM PO Box 479 Yelm WA 98597 360-458-3244 NOTICE OF APPEAL Fee: Staff Decision - $50.00 OFFICIAL USE ONLY Fee Date Received BY File No. Commission Decision $100.00 (In addition, any professional service charges er Resolution #358 A Closed record appeal may follow either an open record hearing or an open record administrative decision on a project permit application when the appeal is on the record, and no or limited new evidence or information is allowed to be submitted. Appeals on Category I & II project decisions are heard by the City Council. Appeals on Category III 8~ IV project decisions as well as Category 1 & II decisions which have been appealed to the City Councils go to Superior Court and follow the judicial review process set forth in RCW 366.70C. A Notice of Appeal must be filed within 14 days of Notice of Final Decision. PROJECT CASE NUMBER BEING APPEALED ~~ P R - C`~ I -~ fis .~ Lo - ~ L DATE OF NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION YV°~C~ ~~c~!~ :~ 7 I ,~1.cL'~. APPELLANT(S) Mailing Address City, State and Zip Telephone SPECIFIC ITEMS OF DECISION BEING APPEALED (attach additional sheet if necessary) I affirm that all answers, statements and information contained in and submitted with this application are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Further, I grant permission from the owner to any and all employees and representatives of the City of Yelm and other governmental agencies to enter upon and inspect said property as reasonably necessary to process this application. I agree to pay all fees of the city which apply to this application. Signed Date CITY OF YELM ds\c:\o~ce\plandept. cc\apps\preplat.app PAGE 1 ~I't~~ ~c~ `) .. 1~~-lx ~ ~ ~~~% -~ ~, ~~r-, ~~~~~~ ~~, ~ ~~._ L ~ ~ (r ~' ,a r ~. ~~~ ~ lam- ;~~~ c~%~ `-~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ z_% ~' JACK IN THE BOX RESTAURANT TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS CITY OF YELM Prepared for JACK IN THE BOX INC. 4500 S.W. Kruse Way, Suite 270 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 January 18, 2002 ~. 2223 - 112th Avenue N.E., Suite 101 Bellevue, Washington 98004-2952 Telephone: (425) 455-5320 Facsimile: (425) 453-5759 JACK IN THE BOX RESTAURANT TRIP GENERATION AND FEE ANALYSIS CITY OF YELM Prepared for JACK IN THE BOX INC. 4500 S.W. Kruse Way, Suite 270 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Prepared by TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 8~ ENGINEERING, INC. 2223 112t" Ave. N.E., Suite 101 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Telephone - (425) 455-5320 ..FAX - (425) 453-5759 January 18, 2002 nr_1~r~ J~ ~~'DY \1~Sff~l ~~. !`;~ ~ c~ ~. t b` ' !44 .s: ._, ~ _; , ~EY.PIPES a~s~ 0 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. ' ~ 2223 - 112'" AVENUE N.E., SUITE 101 - BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98004-2952 TELEPHONE (425) 455-5320 VICTOR H. BISHOP, P.E. President DAVID H. ENGER, P.E. Vice President FACSIMILE (425) 453-5759 January 18, 2002 Charlie Patton, Construction Manager JACK IN THE BOX INC. 4500 S.W. Kruse Way, Suite 270 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 RE: Jack in the Box Restaurant - Yelm Trip Generation and Fee Analysis Dear Mr. Patton: We are pleased to submit this trip generation and traffic fee analysis for the proposed Jack in the Box restaurant to be located on the northwest corner of Yelm Ave. E (SR 507)/Vancil Road intersection in the City of Yelm. The project proposal is the construction of a 2,036 sq. ft. Jack in the Box restaurant. Access to the site is proposed via two existing driveways, one on Yelm Ave. E. and the other on Vancil Road. The purpose of this report is to document the projected trip generation of the proposed project. City of Yelm traffic fees are based on the projected PM peak hour trips. The summary, conclusions and recommendations begin on page three of this report. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Figure 1 is a vicinity map showing the location of the proposed site and the surrounding road network. Figure 2 shows a preliminary site plan prepared by Freiheit & Ho Architects, Inc, P.S. The plan consists of the following components: • A 2,036 square foot Jack in the Box restaurant with drive up service. • Twenty-two parking stalls, including one handicap Full development oft a Spanaway Jack~n~the Box Restaurant project is expected to occur by 2002/2003, pending ti "~ ' proval. TRIP GENERATION Definitions A vehicle trip is defined as a single or one direction vehicle movement with either the origin or destination (exiting or entering) inside the study site. Traffic generated by development projects consists of the following types: Y070301 Velm Jackln The Box Charlie Patton, Construction Manager JACK IN THE BOX INC. January 18, 2002 Page 2 Pass-By Trips: Trips made as intermediate stops on the way from an origin to a primary trip destination. Diverted Linked Trips: Trips from the traffic volume on roadways within the vicinity of the generator but require a diversion from that roadway to another roadway to gain access to the site. Captured Trips: Trips shared by more than one land use on a single development site. Primary Trips: Trips made for the specific purpose of using the services of the project. Trip Generation Table 1 shows the vehicular trips during an average weekday and during the AM and PM street traffic peak hours for the proposed 2,036 sq. ft. Jack in the Box restaurant development. The trip generation values are calculated using the average trip rates in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, Sixth Edition, 1997 for a Fast Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window (ITE Land Use Code 834). These trip generation values account for all site trips made by all vehicles for all purposes, including employee, customer, visitor, and service and delivery trips. The trip generation values were also calculated in Appendix A per the projected sales data provided by Jack in the Box restaurant personnel. The calculated rate using the projected sales data is within the range of rates listed in the Trip Generation. This report documents the total number of trips are based on the calculated trip generation rates from projected sales volumes and on ITE data. We believe that using the projected sales volume provides a better assessment of project impacts. This is a building being specifically constructed for a Jack in the Box restaurant. The data for the ITE Land Use Code 834 is based on a wide range of fast food restaurants. Using data specific to the proposed user is more appropriate than using the generic data contained within the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, Sixth Edition, 1997. In addition, on page I-12 of Trip Generation, Sixth Edition, the following is stated: "The use of an average trip rate or equation is applicable if the sife is likely to be average in nature. If there is evidence, such as through a market analysis (i.e. projected sales data), that the site maybe better or different than average, the average trip rate or equation results should be adjusted accordingly." A pass-by trip is an existing trip that comes directly from the traffic flow on a street adjacent to the project site and does not require a diversion from another street. These pass-by trips were deducted from the total trips according to the following pass-by rates identified in the Y070301 Yelm Jack In The Box Charlie Patton, Construction Manager JACK IN THE BOX INC. January 18, 2002 Page 3 ITE Trip Generation Handbook, October 1998: Table Land Use 5.8 (AM Peak Hour) Fast Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window 5.9 (PM Peak Hour) Fast Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window Results 49% 50% The results of our trip generation analysis indicate that the subject Jack in the Box Restaurant would add 31 net new PM peak hour trips to the City's street system. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE The City of Yelm has adopted a Transportation Facility Charge (TFC) of $750 per new PM peak hour trip. The proposed Jack in the Box restaurant is projected to add 31 new PM peak hour trips to the City's street system. Thus a traffic fee of $23,250 is calculated. 31 new PM peak hour trips X $750.00 (TFC charge per trip) _ $23,250. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This report documents the projected trip generation of the proposed Jack in the Box restaurant. Our analysis shows that the restaurant would add 31 new PM peak hour trips to the City's street system. The Jack in the Box restaurant project should be approved with the following traffic mitigation measures: Construct the project site in accordance with applicable City requirements. 2. Contribute $23,250 towards the City's traffic impact fee program. No other traffic mitigation should be necessary. Please contact us at (425) 455-5320 or by a-mail us at valdez(c~tranplaneng.com or miacobsCa~tranplaneng.com if you have any questions or require further service. Very truly yours, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. CW:mc Mark J. Ja s, Associate . ., P.T.O.E. Pass-bv Rate Y070301 Yelm Jackln The Box TABLE 1 JACK IN THE BOX RESTAURANT -CITY OF YELM TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRIP GENERATION TIME PERIOD AVERAGE TRIP RATE TRIPS ENTERING TRIPS EXITING DRIVEWAY TOTAL PASS BY TRIP / STREET TOTAL A. Appendix A Rates: Jack in the Box Avera a Weekda T = 453.64X 509 50% 509 50% 924 49.5% 457 AM Peak Hour T = 45.60X 52 51 % 51 49% 93 49% 45 PM Peak Hour T = 30.62X 36 52% 33 48% 62 50% 31 B. I.T.E. Rates: Fast Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window, 834, X = 2,036 sq. ft. Avera a Weekda T = 496.12X 635(50% 635 (50%) 1010 49.5% 500 AM Peak Hour T = 49.86X 65 51 % 63 49% 102 49% 50 PM Peak Hour T = 33.48X 45 (52%) 31 (48%) 68 50% T = Trips X = 1,000 sq. ft. ~'~ Per Trip Generation Handbook lS~~~~1 A vehicle trip is defined as a single or one direction vehicle movement with either the origin or destination (exiting or entering) inside the study site. The above trip generation values account for all site trips made by all vehicles for all purposes, including commuter, visitor, recreation, and service and delivery vehicle.trips. ~~. D ,~s ~ G 3~J~~~' Tf~~~Fem. JACK IN THE BOX RESTAURANT -CITY OF YELM TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS APPENDIX A TRIP GENERATION Projected Sales: $1,000,000' Typical Sale: $5.50/sale' Sales per Year: 181,818 2 Sales per Day: 498 s Trips per Day: 996 a Restaurant Area (KSF): 2.036 Daily Trips per KSF: 489.32 s Average Weekday Trips per KSF: 453.64 s AM Peak Hour Trips per KSF: 45.60' PM Peak Hour Trips per KSF: 30.62 a ' Data provided by Jack in the Box z Projected Sales/Typical Sale s Sales per Year/365 ° One (1) sale =two (2) trips According to ITE Trip Generation, 6`h Edition, (Land Use Code 834) Weekday = 496 trips/day Saturday = 722 trips/day Sunday = 543 tripslday Weighted Average = 535 trips/day AM Peak = 49.86 trips/hour _ PM Peak = 33.48 trips/hour e Daily Trips/2.561 KSF (KSF: 1000 square feet) s Daily Trips per KSF/Weighted Average X Weekday trips per day Daily Trips per KSF/Weighted Average X AM Peak trips per hour e Daily Trips per KSF/Weighted Average X PM Peak trips per hour Please note: Multiple sales from people in a single vehicle and walk-up customers are also included in the above trip generation values. We believe that these added trips would be offset by employee/vendoruips and thus be a push on the trip generation values derived. ,~F o P~~ ~ ~ a5' Q~i ~ ~~ 5~:' ,, ~~- ~ ~ '~ ,< ~~~ ~ ~ a io° ~ i 9A 'S Q- i l e~ ~ 0~A; ~~ . ~~ , ~~ 0i , ~ ~J~ " ~\/' ri .~ . - ~ S . S ~ ~ ~ b O~ ~, ~ ~~~~~ ~'~~V~~ = ~~/~\ ~m fir' 'S'to ~ 5~ I ~~ ~• ,._S ~~ \ S ~~ ~. / m:" :' '- T: l ~ \ ~~ ~ x`, ,~.., ~ ,._:; Yel ~ . /"`-. ~~ `.._ __JO.9...th__.W._a.Y._S.E___._. .' , , . ~ ~ ~~ ~~ , r, ~~'~ ~-. P~ ~- ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ 51 ~ ~~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ sr ~~ ~ o' \ ~g ~ ' ., m ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ 2nd St = ~ ~~`~ .., ~~ 103r_ A_v_e,S.F v m ••" ~ Y\ ~~~ u m ~ w v> ~ Project Site ~r~-, ` ~ X b D: ~ ~ 7 ~ _-- ` \~ b £ ro ( 1, ~ mia ~m ~-p 105th (y ay Sp 105th Wa SE • U ~ ~U~ `.4 ~ s 11 ~~F ~ ~~ - `- ~ Fi rnet 507 CY ~ \\ U w ~ ~' 7 ~ t y ti a C ro ~ x w ~ ~ ,eeia s m ~ y j~ / Rd ~ SF __09ih Ay_e SE__.._,T_____.10.91n_Ave,..._S.E___ __.._ `- -- 0 ~ -,\ rr °rh -.~_~ S~ _ _- 1~ _ f~ 1 MI C110f O~T,~. Streets Plus VICINITY MAP JACK IN THE BOX - YELM TRIP GENERATION AND FEE ANALYSIS FIGURE 1 ~. \ ..~ ...\~ i I I Zi ~~ I f of ~ of I i i 1' ~..% '1 i ~~ f i i ~' '~ ~~~ f `~~\ \ \~ `\\`\~ '~. •. ~~~. f `, \ ~\ 11 ~ .~ .\\ ~~ \ \ ~ \. _ ~. SITE PLAN JACK IN THE BOX - YELM TRIP GENERATION AND FEE ANALYSIS ~~PE O Refuse: Refuse Area must be large enough to accommodate a dumpster and recycle bin. Refuse areas must be of a material and design compatible with the overall architectural theme. (f fencing is used to enclose the refuse area it must be landscaped with sight obscuring Vegetation. The applicant shall contact Lemay Disposal, to assure adequate access for refuse pick-up. A conceptual landscaping plan is required with application for Site Ptan Review. Final landscaping and irrigation plan is required as element of civil drawings. ~~ Traffic: The City has adopted a Transportation Facility Charge (1-FC) of $750.00 _- per pm peak trip. The Qrdinance provides a default table that the applicant can use to determine new pm trips generated or if the type of use is not on the default table the Trip Generation Manual, 5th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers shall be used to determine new pm peaks hour trips. To determine the projects impact and fee use the following formula far a Fast Food Restaurant: _ 18.27 new pm peak hour trips per 1000 sq. ft. 18.27 x sq. ft. =1000 x $750.00 ~ TFC Example 18.27 x 2880 sq. ft. : 1000 x $750.00 = $89,463.20 If the applicant feels the proposed use would not generate the default _ number of trips as designated in the TFC Ordinance an analysis prepared by a Washington State Licensed Engineer can be submitted to the City for review and consideration. A traffic analysis was completed for the Safeway proposal. A letter amending that study in regards to your proposal, may be acceptable. SEPA: A Mitigated Determination of NonSignificance was issued with the Safeway Proposal. If the project is consistent with the previous environmental evaluation an Environmental Checklist may not be required. ~ ` Application and Process: Site Plan Review, Chapter 17.84 Site Plan Review is an administrative process. Minimum application requirements are located in Section 17.84.060 and are listed on the application form. A project of this size can expect completed review in approximately 14 - 18 weeks. Land use approval typically contains conditions of approval that the applicant must complete prior to submission of civil drawings, and receiving a building permit. Y~ r" P~ ~-A~~ ---_____---y-- City of Yelm Invoice No. CDD-02-054 Community Development Department INVOICE - Customer Name Tom Spader, Freiheit & Ho, Architects, Inc. Address 10940 NE 33rd Place, Suite 202 City Bellevue State WA ZIP 98004 Phone Date 5/13/02 Order No. SPR-01-8306-YL Rep Jack In the Box FOB aty Description Unit Price TOTAL Site Plan and Civil Engineer Plan Rev. Fees 30 Plan Review #1 $54.00 $1,620.00 6 Plan Review #2 $54.00 $324.00 4 Plan Review #3 $54.00 $216.00 6 Correspondence letters, emails, phone calls $54.00 $324.00 SubTotal $2,484.00 Payment Details Shipping & Handling $0.00 O Cash Taxes WA O Check Q TOTAL $2,484.00 Office Use Only City of Yelm Community Development Department P.O. Box 479 Yelm, WA 98597 (360) 458-3835 fax (360) 458-3835 THANK YOU Jack in the Box SPR-01-8306-YL Date: 13 May 2002 Site Plan and Civil Engineering Plan Review Fees 40 hours of Plan review Plan Review No. 1 30 hours Plan Review No. 2 6 hours Plan Review No. 3 4 hours Correspondence letters, emails, phone calls 6 hours Hourly Billing Fee 54.00 X 46 hrs = $2,484.00 G:\Community Development\Jim's File\Engineering Invoices\8306-Jack in the Box.doc Cathie Carlson From: George Smith [gsmith@parametrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:22 PM To: Mark J. Jacobs Cc: Perry Shea Subject: Re: Yelm Jack-in-the-box Mark, Ok. Use the 6th Edition. When you submit a traffic scoping letter outlining the trip generation and distribution for the project please provide the source and justification for the trip rate and any trip discounts that are used. Also, be sure to include a reduced copy of the site plan. Thanks, George »> "Mark J. Jacobs" <mjacobs@tranplaneng.com> 01/03/02 10:49AM »> George The Ordinance trip generation rate is based on a older version of the ITE Trip Generation Manual. We believe that the intent of the Ordinance is to charge developers based on their traffic impact. Traffic impact, i.e. generation, should be based on the best available documentation. The current Trip Generation manual should be used. please advise Mark Jacobs, PE, PTOE TP&E INC 2223 112th Ave. NE, Suite 101 Bellevue, WA. 98004 425.455.5320 Fax 425.453.5759 ----- Original Message ----- From: "George Smith" <gsmith@parametrix.com> To: <mjacobs@tranplaneng.com> Cc: "Perry Shea" <PShea@parametrix.com> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:15 PM Subject: Yelm Jack-in-the-box > Mark, > At the request of Jim Gibson at the City of Yelm, we are providing a recommendation for calculating the trip generation of the proposed Jack-in-the-box project. The trip rate in the current Transportation Facility Charge ordinance should be used to calculate project trip generation for the TIA. > As shown in Table 15.40.030.8.1, the fast-food restaurant trip rate is 36.53 trips per 1,000 sf. 50% of the total project traffic constitutes 'new' trips, the remaining 50% are comprised of pass-by and/or diverted link trips. > I you have any questions, feel free to a-mail or phone Perry Shea or me. > (360 459-3609) > gsmith@parametrix.com > pshea @parametrix.com > George Smith