The URL can be used to link to this page

Hard File Scanned~' ~? ~1' ~~ ~~ q, ;~ .~ ~ m d ~D m~ ~ . --`~' _ O d ry ~• m C o~ Q. .~_ ~UQ ~~ 0 ~ N N ~ I" i _ ~~ ~~ ~ « U ~~ ~n~i ~ ~E ~E o O ~~Z2 ~cp d~ ~y a ~ o ,¢m w ~ w ~ ;v`> `o zfio2 Q~ +,2 ~ooo 002 Eooz v -- _: l~~F ~H~ A~Q~ iq ~ a ~~ z ® l a -~~ ~~, ~ ' 105 Yelm Avenue West ~" ~ ~~~ `x P.O. Box 479 X E L 1dI Yelm, Washington 98597 WASHINGTON (360) 458-3244 February 3, 2004 Mr. and Mrs. Steve Rothwell 1011 West Yelm Avenue Yelm, WA 98597 RE: APPEAL OF SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL: SPR-03-8354-YLRPL-03-8361-YL Dear Appellants: Transmitted herewith is the Report and Decision of the City of Yelm Hearing Examiner relating to the above-entitled matter. Very truly yours, ,>°"~ ~,~` ~/ /' ~ 1-~N~K. CAUSSEAUX, J Hearing Examiner SKC/ca cc: Parties of Record CITY OF YELM -1- The City of Yelm is an Equal Opportunity Provider ~ _ CITY OF YELM REPORT AND DECISION CASE NO.: APPEAL OF SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL: SPR-03-8354-YL APL-03-8361-YL APPELLANTS: Mr. and Mrs. Steve Rothwell 1011 West Yelm Avenue Yelm, WA 98597 SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The appellants are appealing the conditions of their site plan review approval allowing the after the fact conversion of a residential accessory structure to a dance studio. SUMMARY OF DECISION: Appeal denied. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing Planning and Community Development Staff Report and examining available information on file with the application, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the request as follows: The hearing was opened on January 16, 2004, at 1:00 p.m. Parties wishing to testify were sworn in by the Examiner. The following exhibits were submitted and made a part of the record as follows: EXHIBIT "1" - Planning and Community Development Staff Report and Attachments GRANT BECKlappeared, presented the Community Development Department Staff Report, and testified that site plan review (SPR) is necessary to convert a previously constructed shod building to a dance studio. The city approved the SPR, but required that the existing residential structures connect to City sewer and water. The appellant does not appeal the requirement to connect the dance studio to public utilities. In addressing the -2- appeal issues, statements and requirements made in the pre-submission conference are not binding. In this instance, the results of the conference included a note that the requirements are preliminary in nature and the appellants were advised. The purpose of the pre-submission conference is to advise applicants of the process and the general requirements. However, the City does not consider any engineered drawings, but provides an idea of-the requirements. The city engineer noted in comments that the department did not know about the water/sewer connection requirements. One of the reasons for the connection requirement is the adopted plans of both Thurston County and the City. A Group B water system currently serves the site and is regulated by City and Health codes. He listed all of the appropriate sections of the Thurston County plan which names the City as the primary water provider. The dance studio is a new development which constitutes a commercial public use. The SPR is a discretionary permit which allows the placement of conditions of approval. The regulatory authority is found in the staff report. The requirements are based in health, safety, and welfare as the new sewer line will cross the existing water line serving the two houses and will also be located within 100 feet of the present drinking water well. The storm system is also located near the septic drainfield, and the septic for the mobile home was installed in 1970. They have no septic permit for the house as it was constructed in 1944. Section 17.84.050 of the code requires apre- submission conference. BILL TURNER, professional engineer, appeared on behalf of the appellants and testified that they are not developers, but school teachers, and that Mr. Rothwell was selected as citizen of the month. They constructed the new building, a 50 foot by 60 foot pole barn with bays. They used one bay for a basketball court, one bay for storage, and the third bay for a dance studio. They originally erected the building for personal use, but people came to them and wanted them to expand the dance facility. The appellants felt that all they needed was a B&O License. If they had known of the violation they would never have made the change. They shut the business down immediately and came to the City to the resolve the issues. The site plan pre-conference lets people know the City's requirements and what they need to do to complete them. The whole reason is to familiarize people with the criteria and let them know what they need to do. The City should have notified the appellants at the pre-hearing conference and by not doing so failed to comply with the ordinance. The appellants will have to expend substantial funds to connect to utilities. The appellants spent substantial funds to comply with the presubmittal conference requirements. He referred to Section 13.08.020 regarding sewers and noted that connection is totally at the discretion of City staff. The ordinance doesn't specify when property owners have to connect, but only specifies connection must occur 30 days from the date of a failing system. If they did not have an approved functioning septic system, the City would have placed them on sewers long ago. The State does not consider the water system public, and the Health Department refers to it as a Group II only for administrative purposes. A relative lives in the second residence and the well is exempt. Three buildings exist on the site; two residences and a pole barn and they should be looked at separately. SR-510 is a severely congested road and approval of the site plan will require dedication -3- of right-of--way and the construction of street improvements. The City will have to purchase the right-of-way if the project does not go forward. The use provides activities for 40 to 50 children and involves them in dance as opposed to video games and t.v. Reappearing was MR. BECK who testified that the appellants were told of the requirements for a dance studio. Their use constitutes a commercial activity and was treated as such from day one. The administration of Group II water systems is part of the plan. Site plan review requires a notice of application and comment period and is therefore a discretionary permit. MR. TURNER reappeared and testified that properties are connected to utilities when developed. The appellants have lived on the site for a long time and will need to sell the parcel in accordance with its commercial zone. A future owner will connect the site. They would have to refinance the site to get the studio alone connected. The dance studio is a desperately needed use. No one spoke further in this matter and so the Examiner took the request under advisement and the hearing was concluded at 1:35 p.m. NOTE: A complete record of this hearing is available in the City of Yelm Community Development Department FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION: FINDINGS: 1. The Hearing Examiner has admitted documentary evidence into the record, heard testimony, and taken this matter under advisement. 2. Appropriate notice was given. 3. This request is exempt from review under SEPA. 4. On May 5, 2003, the City of Yelm issued building permit no. 6967 to Steven and Darlene Rothwell, appellants, authorizing construction of a "50 x 64 enclosed play area". Mr. Rothwell signed the permit application affirming in part: I certify that I have read and examined the information contained within the application and know the same to be true and correct. I also certify that the proposed structure is in conformity with all applicable City of Yelm regulations including those governing zoning.... -4- The City classified the structure as a residential accessory use and a Group U occupancy under the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC) which includes private garages, carports, and sheds. The City of Yelm Municipal Code (YMC) considers an enclosed play area as an accessory use to an existing single family dwelling. 5. Shortly following approval, the City became aware that the appellants were advertising dance lessons at the site to include a "summer special July and August only $20.00 classes per month". A staff investigation revealed that in addition to operating a dance studio from the "enclosed play area", the appellants had also installed restroom facilities without obtaining building or plumbing permits, connected the restroom to the on-site well, and connected the building to the on-site sewage disposal system without approval of the Thurston County Health Department. The City issued an enforcement letter dated July 2, 2003, requiring the applicant to obtain site plan review for the commercial use. Thus, less than two months after obtaining the permit for an accessory, enclosed, play area the appellants commenced advertising and operating a dance studio, installed restroom facilities, connected said facilities to the existing on-site sewage disposal system, and provided water to the site, all without permits. 6. In response to the City's letter the appellants submitted to site plan review, and their application to convert a portion of the structure to a dance studio was approved on .December 3, 2003. The City issued the permit subject to the appellants complying with a number of conditions which included: A. Connect all existing structures to the City water system. B. Abandon the existing well. C. Connect all existing structures to the City sewer system. D. Abandon the on-site septic disposal systems. The appellants appeal the City's imposition of the above conditions. 7. The appellants' parcel is irregularly shaped, measures approximately four acres, and abuts Yelm Avenue for 150 feet. Improvements on the site include a site built single family residential dwelling, mobile home, and the recreation building. An on- site drinking water well provides water to all three structures. The appellants agree to connect the "enclosed play area" structure to City water and sewer, but object to connecting the existing residential dwellings. The appellants therefore appeal the four conditions set forth hereinabove. 8. The City of Yelm granted site plan approval for the Rothwell Dance Studio Case No. SPR-03-8354-YL on December 3, 2003, and imposed the said four conditions along with numerous other conditions of approval. On December 9, 2003, the appellants timely filed a Notice of Appeal asserting four errors. Findings on all four alleged -5- errors are made hereinafter. 9 Appellants assert that the City violated the YMC by not specifically notifying them at the pre-application meeting that they would have to connect the two existing residential structures to City water and sewers. Appellants further assert that since they were not so advised, the YMC precludes the City from imposing such requirement. Section 17.84.050 YMC entitled "Preliminary Site Plan" provides: Prior to applying for site plan review, a developer may file with the SPRC [Site Plan Review Committee] a summary site plan, which shall contain in a rough and approximate matter all of the information required in the site plan application. The purpose of the summary site plan is to enable a developer filing the plan to obtain the comments of the SPRC as to the applicability of the intent, standards and provisions of this chapter to the plan. Section 17.84.020(C) YMC requires the SPRC to review a site plan as follows: C. The SPRC shall review a site plan and approve, or approve with conditions, site plans which conform to the standards, provisions and policies of the City as expressed in its various adopted plans and ordinances including the applicable sections of the shoreline master program for the Thurston region.... The YMC does not contemplate that the pre-submission review requires the City to identify all standards, provisions, and policies which will apply to the proposed plan. According to Section 17.84.050 YMC, an applicant need only provide "a summary site plan" which contains "in a rough and approximate manner all of the information required in a site plan application". The notes from the pre-application meeting specifically advise an applicant of that fact: These comments are preliminary in nature and are not intended to represent final comments and/or requirements for the City of Yelm. Until a complete application is made, the Community Development Department can only attempt to inform the applicant of general requirements as they appear in the form presented by the applicant at the time of submission. Even so, written comments from the pre-application meeting notified the appellant as follows regarding ~rvater and sewer: -6- The proposed site is not currently connected to a public water system. Your site will be required to connect to the City of Yelm public water system... The proposed site is not currently connected to the City of Yelm's STEP sewer system. Your site will be required to connect to the City's sewer system... Note: It is unknown at this time if the existing residence will be allowed to continue on the current water and sewer system. These options will be reviewed at the time of civil engineering review. If the residence is required to connected [sic] to the public water and sewer system, the well and septic system will have to be decommissioned. The SPRC did not fail to comply with the intent of the YMC as it specifically stated in the pre-application comments that the City would make the decision regarding sewer and water hook-ups for the homes "at the time of civil engineering review". 10. Appellants assert that the Washington State and Thurston County Health Department requirements have classified the existing well as a shared well or two party well and that it does not need approval as a Group B system. Furthermore, testing shows the well clean and free of any contaminants. The appellants therefore assert that while they must connect the commercial building to City water, the existing well is adequate and legal for the existing dwellings. Section 246-290- 020(1) of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) provides in part: Public water system shall mean any system providing water for human consumption...excluding asystem serving only one single family residence.... WAC 246-290-020(5)(c) provides: A Group B water system is a public water system that does not meet the definition of a Group A water system.... The existing water system which serves the two residences on the site meets the definition of a Group B system. Section 2.1.2 of the South Thurston County Urban Growth Area's Abbreviated Coordinated Water System Plan (water system plan) provides in part: Over time, existing small public water systems should generally be -~- incorporated into the designated utility to ensure adequate fire flow to protect structures and public safety and provide professional water system operation and management.... Section 4.5 of the water system plan reads: Minimizing the number of separate water systems is a long-term objective of the Public Water System Coordination Act. Incorporating existing small systems into municipal systems is consistent with this objective. Thus, the policies of the water system plan clearly provide that small water systems such as the existing Group B system will be incorporated into the municipal system. The requirement of the SPRC that the applicant abandon the Group B system and connect to the Yelm water system is consistent with said policies. Furthermore, as previously found, Section 17.84.020(C) YMC requires the SPR to ensure that site plans comply with "policies of the City" as expressed in its "adopted plans". 11. Appellants assert that no "major building construction" will occur on the property, and therefore the appellant's 3,200 square foot building does not meet the definition of "new development". Section 17.84.010 YMC requires site plan review as follows: A. Site plan review and approval shall be required prior to the use of land for the location of any commercial, industrial or public buildin or activity.... B. Exceptions from site plan review and approval shall be granted by the site plan review committee, if: there is no addition of square feet or no additional tenant.... The appellants' proposal falls squarely within the requirements of Section 17.84.010 YMC, and thus site plan review is required. 12. Appellants assert that no City ordinances or Public Works standards require them to connect the existing residences to City water and sewer. As previously found, Section 17.84.020(C) YMC requires the SPRC to ensure that a proposed site plan conforms "to the standards, provisions, and policies of the City as expressed in its various adopted plans and ordinances". The Community Development Department Staff Report on pages 3-6 provides an exhaustive list of policies which support connection of the entire site to City sewer and water. CONCLUSIONS: -s- 1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction to consider and decide the issues presented by this request. 2. Section 2.26.090(A)(1) YMC authorizes the Examiner to issue decisions on appeals from "orders, recommendations, permits, decisions, or determinations made by a City official in the administration or enforcement of the provision of the zoning code or any ordinance adopted pursuant to it . The City has shown that the SPRC did not exceed its authority, did not misinterpret the YMC, properly notified the appellants of the possibility of connection of both houses to city sewer and water, and properly imposed Conditions 2A, 2B, 3A, and 3B following its review of the appellants' site plan in Case No. SPR-03-8354-YL. Therefore, the appellants' appeal should be denied. DECISION: The appellants' appeal should be denied. ORDERED this 3`d day of February, 2004. ~T~PFiEI~ K. CAUSSEAUX, Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED this 3rd day of February, 2004, to the following: APPELLANTS: Mr. and Mrs. Steve Rothwell 1011 West Yelm Avenue Yelm, V~lA 98597 OTHERS: Bill Turner 4405 7'h Avenue SE, Ste. 300 Lacey, WA 98503 City of Yelm Tami Merriman 105 Yelm Avenue West P.O. Box 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 -9- CASE NO.: APPEAL OF SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL: SPR-03-8354- YL APL-03-8361-YL NOTICE 1. RECONSIDERATION: Any interested party or agency of record, oral or written, that disagrees with the decision of the hearing examiner may make a written request for reconsideration by the hearing examiner. Said request shall set forth specific errors relating to: A. Erroneous procedures; B. Errors of law objected to at the public hearing by the person requesting reconsideration; C. Incomplete record; D. An error in interpreting the comprehensive plan or other relevant material; or E. Newly discovered material evidence which was not available at the time of the hearing. The term "new evidence" shall mean only evidence discovered after the hearing held by the hearing examiner and shall not include evidence which was available or which could reasonably have been available and simply not presented at the hearing for whatever reason. The request must be filed no later than 4:30 p.m. on February 18, 2004 (10 days from mailing) with the Community Development Department 105 Yelm Avenue West, Yelm, ~,~J,4 98597. This request shall set forth the bases for reconsideration as limited by the above. The hearing examiner shall review said request in light of the record and take such -io- further action as he deems proper. The hearing examiner may request further information which shall be provided within 10 days of the request. 2. APPEAL OF EXAMINER'S DECISION: The final decision by the Examiner may be appealed to the city council, by any aggrieved person or agency of record, oral or written that disagrees with the decision of the hearing examiner, except threshold determinations (YMC 15.49.160) in accordance with Section 2.26.150 of the Yelm Municipal Code (YMC). NOTE: In an effort to avoid confusion at the time of filing a request for reconsideration, please attach this page to the request for reconsideration. -11- I/ ~F THE p~Q~ V/ \~! YELM WASNINaTON City of Yelm 105 Yelm Avenue West P.O. Boz 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 (360) 458-3244 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING YELM HEARING EXAMINER DATE: Friday, January 16, 2004, 9:00 a.m. PLACE: Council Chambers, City Hall, 105 Yelm Ave W., Yelm WA PURPOSE: Public Meeting to appeal City Site Plan Review Conditions for Case #SPR-03-8354-YL APPLICANT: Mr. & Mrs. Steve Bothwell PROJECT LOCATION: 1017 Yelm Avenue West, Yelm, WA 98597 The City of Yelm Hearing Examiner will hold a public meeting to hear testimony from parties of record, regarding an appeal of certain Conditions of Approval for SPR-03-8354-YL. The Hearing Examiner will make a decision on the matter within 10 days after the meeting. Parties of Record may testify at the meeting on Friday, January 16, 2004. Any related documents are available for public review during normal business hours at the City of Yelm, 105 Yelm Ave W., Yelm, WA. For additional information, please contact Tami Merriman at (360) 458-3835. The City of Yelm provides reasonable accommodations to persons with disabilities. If you need special accommodations to attend or participate in this hearing, call the City Clerk, Agnes Bennick, at (360) 458-8404, at least 4 days before the meeting. ATTEST: City of Yelm Ag es Bennick, City Clerk DO NOT PUBLISH BELOW THIS LINE Published in the Nisqually Valley News: Friday, January 2, 2004 ~~=~~~it,ci ~, '~~a'•~~. -=a~.:~,: Monday, December 29, 2003 The City of Yelm is an Equal Opportunity Provider I/ ~F THE p+~ 4 9~ Ci o Yelm 4 ~M `~ ~: 105 Yelm Avenue West '~~`~ ~~< P.O. Box 479 YELM Y Yelm, Washington 98597 WAgHINOTON (360) 458-3244 February 3, 2004 Mr. and Mrs. Steve Rothwell 1011 West Yelm Avenue Yelm, WA 98597 RE: APPEAL OF SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL: SPR-03-8354-YLRPL-03-8361-YL Dear Appellants: Transmitted herewith is the Report and Decision of the City of Yelm Hearing Examiner relating to the above-entitled matter. Very truly yours, . CAUSSEAUX, J Hearing Examiner SKC/ca cc: Parties of Record CITY OF YELM -1- The City of Yelm is an Equal Opportunity Provider _ OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF YELM REPORT AND DECISION CASE NO.: APPEAL OF SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL: SPR-03-8354-YL APL-03-8361-YL APPELLANTS: Mr. and Mrs. Steve Rothwell 1011 West Yelm Avenue Yelm, WA 98597 SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The appellants are appealing the conditions of their site plan review approval allowing the after the fact conversion of a residential accessory structure to a dance studio. SUMMARY OF DECISION: Appeal denied. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing Planning and Community Development Staff Report and examining available information on file with the application, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the request as follows: The hearing was opened on January 16, 2004, at 1:00 p.m. Parties wishing to testify were sworn in by the Examiner. The following exhibits were submitted and made a part of the record as follows: EXHIBIT "1" - Planning and Community Development Staff Report and Attachments GRANT BECK appeared, presented the Community Development Department Staff Report, and testified that site plan review (SPR) is necessary to convert a previously constructed shop building to a dance studio. The city approved the SPR, but required that the existing residential structures connect to City sewer and water. The appellant does not appeal the requirement to connect the dance studio to public utilities. In addressing the -2- appeal issues, statements and requirements made in the pre-submission conference are not binding. In this instance, the results of the conference included a note that the requirements are preliminary in nature and the appellants were advised. The purpose of the pre-submission conference is to advise applicants of the process and the general requirements. However, the City does not consider any engineered drawings, but provides an idea of the requirements. The city engineer noted in comments that the department did not know about the water/sewer connection requirements. One of the reasons for the connection requirement is the adopted plans of both Thurston County and the City. A Group B water system currently serves the site and is regulated by City and Health codes. He listed all of the appropriate sections of the Thurston County plan which names the City as the primary water provider. The dance studio is a new development which constitutes a commercial public use. The SPR is a discretionary permit which allows the placement of conditions of approval. The regulatory authority is found in the staff report. The requirements are based in health, safety, and welfare as the new sewer line will cross the existing water line serving the two houses and will also be located within 100 feet of the present drinking water well. The storm system is also located near the septic drainfield, and the septic for the mobile home was installed in 1970. They have no septic permit for the house as it was constructed in 1944. Section 17.84.050 of the code requires apre- submission conference. BILL TURNER, professional engineer, appeared on behalf of the appellants and testified that they are not developers, but school teachers, and that Mr. Rothwell was selected as citizen of the month. They constructed the new building, a 50 foot by 60 foot pole barn with bays. They used one bay for a basketball court, one bay for storage, and the third bay for a dance studio. They originally erected the building for personal use, but people came to them and wanted them to expand the dance facility. The appellants felt that all they needed was a B&O License. If they had known of the violation they would never have made the change. They shut the business down immediately and came to the City to the resolve the issues. The site plan pre-conference lets people know the City's requirements and what they need to do to complete them. The whole reason is to familiarize people with the criteria and let them know what they need to do. The City should have notified the appellants at the pre-hearing conference and by not doing so failed to comply with the ordinance. The appellants will have to expend substantial funds to connect to utilities. The appellants spent substantial funds to comply with the presubmittal conference requirements. He referred to Section 13.08.020 regarding sewers and noted that connection is totally at the discretion of City staff. The ordinance doesn't specify when property owners have to connect, but only specifies connection must occur 30 days from the date of a failing system. If they did not have an approved functioning septic system, the City would have placed them on sewers long ago. The State does not consider the water system public, and the Health Department refers to it as a Group II only for administrative purposes. A relative lives in the second residence and the well is exempt. Three buildings exist on the site; two residences and a pole barn and they should be looked at separately. SR-510 is a severely congested road and approval of the site plan will require dedication -3- of right-of-way and the construction of street improvements. The City will have to purchase the right-of-way if the project does not go forward. The use provides activities for 40 to 50 children and involves them in dance as opposed to video games and t.v. Reappearing was MR. BECK who testified that the appellants were told of the requirements for a dance studio. Their use constitutes a commercial activity and was treated as such from day one. The administration of Group II water systems is part of the plan. Site plan review requires a notice of application and comment period and is therefore a discretionary permit. MR. TURNER reappeared and testified that properties are connected to utilities when developed. The appellants have lived on the site for a long time and will need to sell the parcel in accordance with its commercial zone. A future owner will connect the site. They would have to refinance the site to get the studio alone connected. The dance studio is a desperately needed use. No one spoke further in this matter and so the Examiner took the request under advisement and the hearing was concluded at 1:35 p.m. NOTE: A complete record of this hearing is available in the City of Yelm Community Development Department FINDINGS. CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION: FINDINGS: 1. The Hearing Examiner has admitted documentary evidence into the record, heard testimony, and taken this matter under advisement. 2. Appropriate notice was given. 3. This request is exempt from review under SEPA. 4. On May 5, 2003, the City of Yelm issued building permit no. 6967 to Steven and Darlene Rothwell, appellants, authorizing construction of a "50 x 64 enclosed play area". Mr. Rothwell signed the permit application affirming in part: I certify that I have read and examined the information contained within the application and know the same to be true and correct. I also certify that the proposed structure is in conformity with all applicable City of Yelm regulations including those governing zoning.... -4- The City classified the structure as a residential accessory use and a Group U occupancy under the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC) which includes private garages, carports, and sheds. The City of Yelm Municipal Code (YMC) considers an enclosed play area as an accessory use to an existing single family dwelling. 5. Shortly following approval, the City became aware that the appellants were advertising dance lessons at the site to include a "summer special July and August only $20.00 classes per month". A staff investigation revealed that in addition to operating a dance studio from the "enclosed play area", the appellants had also installed restroom facilities without obtaining building or plumbing permits, connected the restroom to the on-site well, and connected the building to the on-site sewage disposal system without approval of the Thurston County Health Department. The City issued an enforcement letter dated July 2, 2003, requiring the applicant to obtain site plan review for the commercial use. Thus, less than two months after obtaining the permit for an accessory, enclosed, play area the appellants commenced advertising and operating a dance studio, installed restroom facilities, connected said facilities to the existing on-site sewage disposal system, and provided water to the site, all without permits. 6. In response to the City's letter the appellants submitted to site plan review, and their application to convert a portion of the structure to a dance studio was approved on December 3, 2003. The City issued the permit subject to the appellants complying with a number of conditions which included: A. Connect all existing structures to the City water system. B. Abandon the existing well. C. Connect all existing structures to the City sewer system. D. Abandon the on-site septic disposal systems. The appellants appeal the City's imposition of the above conditions. 7. The appellants' parcel is irregularly shaped, measures approximately four acres, and abuts Yelm Avenue for 150 feet. Improvements on the site include a site built single family residential dwelling, mobile home, and the recreation building. An on- sitedrinking water well provides water to all three structures. The appellants agree to connect the "enclosed play area" structure to City water and sewer, but object to connecting the existing residential dwellings. The appellants therefore appeal the four conditions set forth hereinabove. 8. The City of Yelm granted site plan approval for the Rothwell Dance Studio Case No. SPR-03-8354-YL on December 3, 2003, and imposed the said four conditions along with numerous other conditions of approval. On December 9, 2003, the appellants timely filed a Notice of Appeal asserting four errors. Findings on all four alleged -5- errors are made hereinafter. Appellants assert that the City violated the YMC by not specifically notifying them at the pre-application meeting that they would have to connect the two existing residential structures to City water and sewers. Appellants further assert that since they were not so advised, the YMC precludes the City from imposing such requirement. 9. Section 17.84.050 YMC entitled "Preliminary Site Plan" provides: Prior to applying for site plan review, a developer may file with the SPRC [Site Plan Review Committee] a summary site plan, which shall contain in a rough and approximate matter all of the information required in the site plan application. The purpose of the summary site plan is to enable a developer filing the plan to obtain the comments of the SPRC as to the applicability of the intent, standards and provisions of this chapter to the plan. Section 17.84.020(C) YMC requires the SPRC to review a site plan as follows: C. The SPRC shall review a site plan and approve, or approve with conditions, site plans which conform to the standards, provisions and policies of the City as expressed in its various adopted plans and ordinances including the applicable sections of the shoreline master program for the Thurston region.... The YMC does not contemplate that the pre-submission review requires the City to identify all standards, provisions, and policies which will apply to the proposed plan. According to Section 17.84.050 YMC, an applicant need only provide "a summary site plan" which contains "in a rough and approximate manner all of the information required in a site plan application". The notes from the pre-application meeting specifically advise an applicant of that fact: These comments are preliminary in nature and are not intended to represent final comments and/or requirements for the City of Yelm. Until a complete application is made, the Community Development Department can only attempt to inform the applicant of general requirements as they appear in the form presented by the applicant at the time of submission. Even so, written comments from the pre-application meeting notified the appellant as follows regarding water and sewer: -6- The proposed site is not currently connected to a public water system. Your site will be required to connect to the City of Yelm public water system... The proposed site is not currently connected to the City of Yelm's STEP sewer system. Your site will be required to connect to the City's sewer system... Note: It is unknown at this time if the existing residence will be allowed to continue on the current water and sewer system. These options will be reviewed at the time of civil engineering review. If the residence is required to connected [sic] to the public water and sewer system, the well and septic system will have to be decommissioned. The SPRC did not fail to comply with the intent of the YMC as it specifically stated in the pre-application comments that the City would make the decision regarding sewer and water hook-ups for the homes "at the time of civil engineering review". 10. Appellants assert that the Washington State and Thurston County Health Department requirements have classified the existing well as a shared well or two party well and that it does not need approval as a Group B system. Furthermore, testing shows the well clean and free of any contaminants. The appellants therefore assert that while they must connect the commercial building to City water, the existing well is adequate and legal for the existing dwellings. Section 246-290- 020(1) of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) provides in part: Public water system shall mean any system providing water for human consumption...excluding asystem serving only one single family residence.... WAC 246-290-020(5)(c) provides: A Group B water system is a public water system that does not meet the definition of a Group A water system.... The existing water system which serves the two residences on the site meets the definition of a Group B system. Section 2.1.2 of the South Thurston County Urban Growth Area's Abbreviated Coordinated Water System Plan (water system plan) provides in part: Over time, existing small public water systems should generally be -~- incorporated into the designated utility to ensure adequate fire flow to protect structures and public safety and provide professional water system operation and management.... Section 4.5 of the water system plan reads: Minimizing the number of separate water systems is a long-term objective of the Public Water System Coordination Act. Incorporating existing small systems into municipal systems is consistent with this objective. Thus, the policies of the water system plan clearly provide that small water systems such as the existing Group B system will be incorporated into the municipal system. The requirement of the SPRC that the applicant abandon the Group 6 system and connect to the Yelm water system is consistent with said policies. Furthermore, as previously found, Section 17.84.020(C) YMC requires the SPR to ensure that site plans comply with "policies of the City" as expressed in its "adopted plans". 11. Appellants assert that no "major building construction" will occur on the property, and therefore the appellant's 3,200 square foot building does not meet the definition of "new development". Section 17.84.010 YMC requires site plan review as follows: A. Site plan review and approval shall be required prior to the use of land for the location of any commercial, industrial or public buildin or activity.... B. Exceptions from site plan review and approval shall be granted by the site plan review committee, if: there is no addition of square feet or no additional tenant.... The appellants' proposal falls squarely within the requirements of Section 17.84.010 YMC, and thus site plan review is required. 12. Appellants assert that no City ordinances or Public Works standards require them to connect the existing residences to City water and sewer. As previously found, Section 17.84.020(C) YMC requires the SPRC to ensure that a proposed site plan conforms "to the standards, provisions, and policies of the City as expressed in its various adopted plans and ordinances". The Community Development Department Staff Report on pages 3-6 provides an exhaustive list of policies which support connection of the entire site to City sewer and water. CONCLUSIONS: -a- 1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction to consider and decide the issues presented by this request. 2. Section 2.26.090(A)(1) YMC authorizes the Examiner to issue decisions on appeals from "orders, recommendations, permits, decisions, or determinations made by a City official in the administration or enforcement of the provision of the zoning code or any ordinance adopted pursuant to it". The City has shown that the SPRC did not exceed its authority, did not misinterpret the YMC, properly notified the appellants of the possibility of connection of both houses to city sewer and water, and properly imposed Conditions 2A, 2B, 3A, and 3B following its review of the appellants' site plan in Case No. SPR-03-8354-YL. Therefore, the appellants' appeal should be denied. DECISION: The appellants' appeal should be denied. ORDERED this 3~d day of February, 2004. P E K. CAUSSEAUX, Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED this 3~d day of February, 2004, to the following: APPELLANTS: Mr. and Mrs. Steve Rothwell 1011 West Yelm Avenue Yelm, WA 98597 OTHERS: Bill Turner 4405 7~h Avenue SE, Ste. 300 Lacey, WA 98503 City of Yelm Tami Merriman 105 Yelm Avenue West P.O. Box 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 -9- CASE NO.: APPEAL OF SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL: SPR-03-8354- YL APL-03-8361-YL NOTICE 1. RECONSIDERATION: Any interested party or agency of record, oral or written, that disagrees with the decision of the hearing examiner may make a written request for reconsideration by the hearing examiner. Said request shall set forth specific errors relating to: A. Erroneous procedures; B. Errors of law objected to at the public hearing by the person requesting reconsideration; C. Incomplete record; D. An error in interpreting the comprehensive plan or other relevant material; or E. Newly discovered material evidence which was not available at the time of the hearing. The term "new evidence" shall mean only evidence discovered after the hearing held by the hearing examiner and shall not include evidence which was available or which could reasonably have been available and simply not presented at the hearing for whatever reason. The request must be filed no later than 4:30 p.m. on February 18, 2004 (10 days from mailing) with the Community Development Department 105 Yelm Avenue West, Yelm, WA 98597. This request shall set forth the bases for reconsideration as limited by the above. The hearing examiner shall review said request in light of the record and take such -lo- further action as he deems proper. The hearing examiner may request further information which shall be provided within 10 days of the request. 2. APPEAL OF EXAMINER'S DECISION: The final decision by the Examiner may be appealed to the city council, by any aggrieved person or agency of record, oral or written that disagrees with the decision of the hearing examiner, except threshold determinations (YMC 15.49.160) in accordance with Section 2.26.150 of the Yelm Municipal Code (YMC). NOTE: In an effort to avoid confusion at the time of filing a request for reconsideration, please attach this page to the request for reconsideration. -11- VISITOR SIGN IN SHEET Please sign in and indicate if you wish to speak at this meeting or to be added to the mailing list to receive future agendas and minutes. All Hearing Examiner meetings are audio taped. For information on obtaining a copy please call the Yelm Community Development Department at (360) 458-3835. Meeting: Yelm Hearing Examiner Time: 1:00 PM Date: January 16, 2004 Location: Yelm Public Works Hearing: Bothwell Appeal of Site Plan Review Approval APP-03-8361-YL Name and Address ,~~ l ~ /Uli'1(/Pl~ ~l~l ~ ?~ ~~rh ~~e SL_ _ S~I~T~ 3~c- w~4 T~p~ L WpSM/NGTON S TAFF REPOR T City of 'elm Community Development Department To: Stephen K. Causseaux, Jr., Hearing Examiner~,~~ From: Grant Beck, Director of Community Developmeni~..,.~ " Date: January 6, 2004 Subject: Appeal of Site Plan Review Approval SPR-03-8354-YL APL-03-8361-YL Appellant: Mr. and Mrs. Steve Rothwell 1011 West Yelm Avenue Yelm, WA 98597 Location: 1011 West Yelm Avenue, Tax Parcel Number 21724130300 Proposal: Appeal conditions 2 and 3 of the site plan review approval, requiring connection of existing buildings on the property to the City sewer and water systems. I. INTRODUCTION The Rothwell's appeal conditions of their site plan review approval allowing the after the fact conversion of a residential accessory structure to a dance studio. II. FACTS On May 5, 2003, the Rothwell's were issued a building permit to construct a "50 x 64 enclosed play area" classified as residential accessory. The building was reviewed as a group U occupancy under the 1997 Uniform Building Code, which is defined at Section 312 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code as: Group U Occupancies shall include buildings or structures, or portions thereof, and shall be: Division 1. Private garages, carporfs, sheds and agricultural buildings. The Uniform Building Code considers this particular occupancy group as private (not for use by the general public} and does not require the same level of life safety requirements as if the structure were open to the public (as in a dance studio) such as: egress with panic hardware; fire alarms and detectors; and restroom facilities. Staff Report Page 1 of 8 The Yelm Zoning Code considers an enclosed play area with a group U occupancy to be a accessory use to the single family dwelling on the property. Subsequent to the final approval of the structure for private recreational use, the Community Development Department became aware that the Rothwell's were advertising dance lessons at the Luv2Dance Studio via flyers and advertisements at the Yelm Cinemas. Upon investigation, it was determined that the Rothwell's were operating the dance studio out of the building permitted as a residential play area and that restroom facilities had been installed inside the structure without benefit of building or plumbing permits. Further, the restroom was connected to a well and the on-site sewage disposal system located on the property without benefit of approval by the Thurston County Health Department. The Rothwell's were notified of the violation through a letter from Gary Carlson, the City's Code Enforcement Officer and Building Official on July 2, 2003. On July 16, 2003, apre-submission conference was held with the Rothwell's in order to review the requirements to convert the building to a dance studio. During the meeting, it was indicated that the requirements for conversion of a portion of the structure would be significantly easier to accomplish and the pre-submission notes were updated on August 6, 2003, assuming that 1,000 square feet of the building would be separated for use by the dance studio. The Site Plan Review application was approved on December 3, 2003. The permit was issued with a number of conditions of approval, including 2.a. The applicant shall connect all existing structures to the City water system. The cost to connect shall include a fee of $1,500.00 per Equivalent Residential Unit (each ERU equals 240 gallons of water consumption per day, fee subject to change.). The applicant shall provide proposed water usage calculations for the dance studio to the Community Development Department for review and approval, to determine the number of gallons of daily use. 2. b. The applicant shall abandon the existing well per Washington State Department of Ecology standards, and transfer any existing water rights to the City of Yelm. 3.a. The applicant shall connect all existing structures to the City S. T. E. P. sewer system. The cost to connect shall include a fee of $5,125.00 per ERU (each ERU equals 240 gallons of water consumption per day, fee subject to change). The number of ERU's required will be determined by approved water consumption calculations. 3.b. The applicant shall abandon the on-site sewage systems per the Thurston County Department of Health standards, and provide proof of approval to the City. The property is just over 4 acres in area, fronts on Yelm Avenue West, and currently is occupied by a single family dwelling, a double wide manufactured home, and the building constructed as a residential enclosed play area. A well located on the property provides potable water to the Staff Report Page 2 of 8 house and manufactured home, as well as being connected to the enclosed play area without building permit or County Health Department approval. There are two on-site sewage disposal systems serving the house and manufactured home. The system connected to the mobile home was installed in 1970 to serve two bedrooms pursuant to permit number 3054 issued by the Thurston-Mason Health District. The applicant's engineer was unable to provide any records relating to the septic system serving the house, most likely as the house was constructed in 1944 and pre-dates requirements for building or septic permits. According to the Washington Department of Health Rules: Public water system shall mean any system providing water for human consumption through pipes or other constructed conveyances, excluding a system serving only one single-family residence and a system with four or fewer connections all of which serve residences on the same farm. [Section 246-290- 020 (1) WAC] A Group 8 water system is a public water system that does not meet the definition of a Group A water system. (See Table 1 and chapter 246-291 WAC for further explanation of a Group 8 water system.) [Section 246-290-020 (5) (c) WAC] The Rules and Regulations of the Thurston County Board of Health (Health Code) states in Article III: 1.2 General Requirements. Every residence, place of business, or other building or place where people congregate, reside or are employed shall be served by a water system that is designed and operated to deliver safe drinking water. 1.2.1 Single-family, two-party, and rental unit water supplies shall be subject to the requirements of PARTS 1 and 2 of this regulation. 1.2.2 All public water supplies except two-party systems shall meet the design, construction, monitoring, quality, quantity and operational standards of PARTS 1 and 3 of this regulation and Chapter 246-290 WAC. Two-party water systems shall be considered public water systems for the purpose of administering the Thurston County Coordinated Water System Plan. Only the buildings and projects identified in SECTION 7.3 are exempt from this regulation. The South Thurston County Urban Growth Areas Abbreviated Coordinated Water System Plan establishes policies related to public water systems within the Yelm Water Service Area and Urban Growth Area, as follows: The designated water system is assigned a priority right to provide service within their designated Urban Water Supply Service Area (UWSSA). The UWSSAs for the municipalities of Yelm, Rainier, and Tenino are their respective Urban Growth Areas as identified in the Joint Plans adopted by the municipalities and Thurston County... Staff Report Page 3 of 8 The UWSSA is the area intended to be ultimately served by the designated utility... [Section 2.1 Water System Plan] Over time, existing small public water systems should generally be incorporated into the designated utility to ensure adequate fire flow to protect structures and public safety and provide professional water system operation and management. Wells that are no longer used must be properly decommissioned to reduce risk of groundwater contamination and allow full development of these areas. Timing of incorporation into the designated system will depend on connection requirements of the individual water systems. [Section 2.1.2 Water System Plan] Minimizing the number of separate water systems is a long-term objective of the Public Water System Coordination Act. Incorporating existing small systems into municipal systems is consistent with this objective. [Section 4.5 Water System Plan] Yelm's Comprehensive Plan and Joint Plan with Thurston County addresses public facilities and utilities in Chapter V, which states at Section V.3.d: The City considers a septic system a temporary system within the urban area and incompatible with long-term urban densities. Development standards shall be developed to identify the timing and nature of funding and conversion obligations for septic systems in the urban area. Groundwater monitoring is appropriate in areas under septic tank management. Most of Yelm is in an area of extreme aquifer sensitivity. The current sewage treatment plan was required due to groundwater pollution concerns. For this reason, development at urban levels of density on septic tanks is not in the public interest. Many areas within the Urban Growth Area are already on septic tanks. In addition, some development will likely occur at one unit per five acres density on septic tanks within the unsewered areas of the City and the Urban Growth Area. The City will permit development in non-sewered areas with low densities on septic tanks. Such installations must be prepared to transfer to the sewer line when facilities are available and hook-up required under the criteria set forth in the development standards. The County would follow similar guidelines in the unincorporated Urban Growth Area. The City's Development regulations implements the Comprehensive Plan at Section 7A.020: Except as provided herein, it shall be unlawful to construct or maintain any privy, privy vault, cesspool, or other facility intended or used for the disposal of sewage and to install or use any onsite soil absorption systems in such cases where the City's sewer collection system is available for service as provided herein. For purposes of this Section (Ordinance 505), the sewer collection system shall be deemed available when the premises are within 200 feet of the City's collection lines; provided that the City's treatment plant holds sufficient unused capacity to Staff Report Page 4 of 8 treat the expected sewage from the premise. The 200-foot distance shall be calculated by measuring from the lot line closest to the existing portion of the City's collection system. For the purpose of this chapter, when sewer is not available as defined in this Section, primarily treated waste water maybe disposed of onsite with a treatment and disposal system that meets the approval of the Health Officer. All components shall be designed and constructed to meet the City of Yelm's STEP System Standards, included in this Chapter. The City of Yelm shall establish the standards under which all components of the system will be constructed, including: side sewers, tanks, pumps, pump controls, and associated appurtenances for both the municipal system and onsite soil absorption systems that will be converted for use in the transport of effluent to the Yelm municipal collection system at such time as sewer is available. The owner(s) of any premises upon which any building is located within the City's sewer service area shall connect to the City's municipal sewer system if.• (a) the City's sewer collection system is available to the premises, as defined herein; (b) the Thurston County Health Department has determined that the interests of public health and safety require a connection to the City's municipal sewer system. Where the sewer collection system is available and as such, a property owner is required to connect to such system, such connection shall be made when, in the opinion of the Health Officer, the on-site system on the premises requires repair or replacement. Such connections shall be made at the sole expense of the owner within 30 days after notification by the City that service is available. These policies and regulations have been codified at Section 13.08.020 (A) Yelm Municipal Code: It is unlawful for any person to place, deposit or permit to be placed or deposited, any human or animal excrement, sanitary sewage or other objectionable waste, by any natural or nonnatural means in any manner, upon property of the city or private property within the city sewer boundaries, or in any area under the jurisdiction of the city, except through the city's sewage collection system or through an approved on-site system as provided in this chapter. Section 17.84.010 (A)Yelm Municipal Code states that: Site plan review and approval shall be required prior to the use of land or building for the location of any commercial, industrial or public building or activity, including environmental checklist review, and for the location of any building in which more than two dwelling units would be contained. Additionally, site plan review shall be required for any allowed, regulated or special use activity on lands containing a wetland or wetland buffer areas pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 14.08 YMC. Staff Report Page 5 of 8 Section 17.84.020 (C) states that a Site Plan Review should be approved when: The SPRC shall review a site plan and approve, or approve with conditions, site plans which conform to the standards, provisions and policies of the city as expressed in its various adopted plans and ordinances including the applicable sections of the shoreline master program for the Thurston Region. III. ISSUES The appellant indicates that the site plan review approval should be issued without conditions 2 and 3 for the following reasons: The possibility of connection to sewer and water were not addressed in the pre- submission conference and, therefore, the City is barred from requiring this as part of the site plan review approval. 2. The existing well is adequate and legal for the existing dwellings. 3. The project is not'new development' as there is no major building construction on the property. 4. No City regulation or standard requires the connection of the existing residences to the City water and sewer systems. IV. ANALYSIS A. Statements in apre-submission conference are not binding on the subsequent permit. A pre-submission conference is a preliminary meeting with potential developers to review the general requirements for a development. It is simply not possible to complete a full project review at the time of the pre-submission meeting as the detailed application materials required for the permit review have not been submitted. The written notes for apre-submission meeting prepared by the Community Development Department make this clear with the following statement: These comments are preliminary in nature and are not intended to represent final comments and or requirements for the City of Yelm. Until a complete application is made, the Community Development Department can only attempt to inform the applicant of general requirements as they appear in the form presented by the applicant at the time of pre-submission. In the case at hand, the site plan submitted by the Rothwell's for the meeting did not contain any dimensions, show the limits of the proposed parking area, identify water or sewer connections or the existing drainfield or well, identify the access to the building or even which portion of the building would be used for the dance studio. In fact, key information was not presented (including the proposed Staff Report Page 6 of 8 internal building layout) until the application was determined to be complete on October 30, a month after the site plan review application was initially submitted. 2. Even if apre-submission meeting were binding, the Rothwell's were clearly made aware at the pre-submission conference that the possibility existed that connection to City services would be required, and that this issue would be reviewed as part of the site plan review application. The Development Services Engineer for the City noted in his written comments that: NOTE: It is unknown at this time if the existing residence will be allowed to continue on the current water and sewer system. These options will be reviewed at the time of civil engineering review. If the residence is required to connected to the public water and sewer system, the well and septic system will have to be decommissioned. C. The well is a public water system within the Yelm Water System Service area which must be abandoned. The Rothwell's are incorrect in stating that the existing well is not a Group B water system which requires approval by Thurston County. Any well which provides water for human consumption excluding a system serving only one single-family residence is a public water system pursuant to Section 246-290-020 WAC. Two party water systems shall be considered public water systems pursuant to Article III, Section 1.2 of the Thurston County Health Code. The policies of the Water System Plan, adopted by both Thurston County and the City of Yelm as the primary water service provider within the urban growth area, clearly indicate that other water systems within Yelm's service area should be incorporated into the municipal system. D. The construction of a 3,200 square foot enclosed play area followed by a conversion to a dance studio requires Site Plan Review Approval. Whether or not the project is considered a `new development' a site plan review approval is clearly required by Section 17.84.010 as the project is a new commercial or public building. The construction of a building exempt from site plan review and subsequent conversion is reviewed no differently than a new building for a commercial or public use. E. A site plan review is a discretionary permit. The site plan review process is a discretionary land use permit that may include conditions of approval designed to implement adopted policy as well as regulatory requirements. The policies of the Comprehensive Plan, the Coordinated Water System Plan, the Development Guidelines, the Municipal Code, and the County Health Codes when reviewed together clearly indicate that within the urban growth area urban services should be provided by the City of Yelm. Picking at the individual threads of this policy does not unravel the tapestry. Staff Report Page 7 of 8 V. CONCLUSION The conditions of site plan review approval are appropriate, are supported by adopted City policies, are not contrary to law, and should be upheld. LIST OF EXHIBITS Staff Exhibit 1 - Notice of Appeal Staff Exhibit 2 - Building Permit Number 6967 Staff Exhibit 3 - Advertisements for Luv2Dance Studio Staff Exhibit 4 - Enforcement Letter dated July 2, 2003 Staff Exhibit 5 - Presubmission Meeting Materials Schedule (1 page) Request (3 pages) Land Use Notes (6 pages) Civil Notes (6 pages) Building Notes (1 page) Updated Land Use Notes (5 pages) Updated Building Notes (1 page) Staff Exhibit 6 - Site Plan Review Application Application (5 pages) Notice of incomplete application (1 page) Updated Application (4 pages) Staff Exhibit 7 - Site Plan Review Approval Staff Exhibit 8 - Septic Permit Number 3054 Staff Exhibit 9 - Assessor's Information Staff Report Page 8 of 8 3 c~ ~ .Q c ~ ~ z A O ~ m 1 r ~ ~. C o~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ J (~{ O b co ~ H i~ 0 m W ~ N z ~ ~ 3 ~ .c ~' ~; ', `,~-~' io N ~V ~ R, v o 0 N ~V ~ o~ O N ~:'+ v _~ ~=, a ~M 9j Ci o Yelp - 10~ Yelm Avenue West Y E LM P. O. Box 479 WASHINGTON Yelm, Washington 9897 July 16, 2003 (360) 4~8-3244 Stephen and Darlene Rothwell 1011 Yelm Ave. West. Yelm, WA 98597 Re: Luv2Dance Studio t Dear Mr. and Mrs. Rothwell, During a site visit while your play shed was under construction we discussed the possibility of using your residential structure as a public building in the context of a basketball camp for some of your students. At that time I stressed that to do so would trigger upgrades to the building you needed to be prepared for. You did not pursue the matter and the structure was completed as a private residential play shed. The use of the structure now as a public building is in violation of Yelm Municipal Code as adopted in Chapter 15. You maybe cited under each code if you continue the dance classes in the structure without the following upgrades: Uniform Building Code-Meet the conditions of a public building used for exercise and education. The closest occupancy under the code would be a gymnasium. Based on this occupancy you are required to have two three foot exit doors. Exits need to have illuminated exit signs and emergency lighting. Panic Hardware may be waived under certain circumstances. All interior finishes and flooring to have a Class III flame rating. A public discharge connecting the building to the public street is required. Minimum width is twenty feet, and will remain unobstructed to Yelm Ave West. Meet ADA requirements. All exits, door hardware, and restroom fixtures will meet the standards. Required sidewalks and parking stalls will meet requirements. Uniform Fire Code-Sprinklers and fire alarm not required at this time. You must have two fire extinguishers rated at 2AlOBC mounted no higher then 5 feet at your exits. Uniform Plumbing and Mechanical Code- Heating shall meet all applicable standards. Supply a minimum of 2 water closets and one lavatory sink in separate restrooms for men and women. Each restroom shall have a floor drain. Walls and floors will meet code requirements. 2001 Washington State Energy Code- with the installation of insulation and glazing that meet the U- Factors for the heat ty°pe supplied. Default would be electrical heating. Once your building has met these minimum standards you may open for your building to the public. Sin e1~7 _ ~` Buildin~Official Pre-Application Meeting Civil Comments Date July 16, 2003 ***These comments are preliminary in nature and are not intended to represent final comments and or requirements for the City of Yelm. Until a complete application is made, the Community Development Department can only attempt to inform the applicant of general requirements as they appear in the form presented by the applicant at the time of pre-submission. Proponent: Steven Rothwell Project: Public Recreation Center Project Loc: 1011 Yelm Ave West, WA 98597 Water: Sewer: Fire: The ro osed site is not currently connected to a public water system. Your site wii_ be require to connec o e i - - ~ e"~ e attached detail for general requirements of the water system connection. Water hook-up fees are based on a consumption rate of 240 gallons per day and are charged at a rate of $1,500/240gpd (fee subject to change) inside city limits. At the time of application submittal you will be required to submit water usage calculations provided by a licensed civil engineer. The water fees will be calculated using the information provided by the engineer. A cross connection/backflow prevention device will be required to be installed following the domestic water meter and a inspection will be required to verify the well is disconnected from the recreation center. The proposed site is not current) connected to the Cit of Yelm's STEP sewer sys e sl e will nP rPrn iircari to rnnnPrt to the Clty'S sewer system Sewer hook-up fees are based on a consumption rate of 240 gallons per day and are charged at a rate of $5,125.00/240gpd (fee subject to change) inside city limits. At the time of application submittal you will be required to submit water usage calculations provided by a licensed civil engineer. The sewer fees will be calculated using the information provided by the engineer. It is unclear at this time if the existing septic tank(s) will meet the re uirements of the roposed usage; a a al or general requirements of the step tank system. NOTE: It is unknown at this time if n e will be cant) n w and ewer s s m These options will be reviewed at the time o .ivil Pngine ring review If the residence is required to connected to the public water and sewer system, t e well and septic system wl ave to be ecommisslone ~~~ __._---, Fire protection to the buildings must be provided per the Uniform Building Code. All parts of the building must have fire hydrant coverage. The coverage is limited to 150' of hose pull from each hydrant. Another option may be to have a 20' fire lane around the building. This will be determined upon further review of the civil plans by the Building Official. R:~,Community Development\Weehly SPR`~Presub civih,Commercial\?003`,ec-071603 Rothwell Rec Centecdoc Stormwater: Developments with a significant amount of impervious surface are required to provide stormwater facilities per the 1992 DOE Stormwater Manual. Preliminary Stormwater Report and conceptual plan may be submitted with site plan review application if required. Street Improvements: Frontage improvements will be required for this project. Frontage improvements are defined as widing the asphalt, concrete curb and gutters, planter strip and street trees. These improvements would be along only,where your property is adjacent to West Yelm /dye. At this time the City will allow a deferment of the improvements. This is an agreement between the City end the applicant that says the improvements will be constructed when the City requires them in the future. Your improvements will be required when the high school, Twin County Credit Union and the Moose Lodge completes its frontage. The intent is to complete larger sections of frontages instead of piece-by-piece improvements. Street Lighting: Nothing to report. ADA Requirements: The American Disabilities Act required that facilities are ADA accessible. Facility improvements will have to meet current code.. Review of these improvements will be determined upon further review of the civil and architecture plans. UI I r yr r ~uvl DEPT. OF PUBLIC Vd~P,KS GENERAL NOTES: URBA~~ AF~TERIA~ NO "ON STREET" PARKING PERPd11TTED. 2. P.EFER TO RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELIhIES FOR ADDITIONAL If~IFORMATION Of~l STORM DRAI(~IAGE, STREET LIGHTING, PAVEMENT STP.UCTURE, ECT. JEG APPROVED PUBLIC V'/OP.K.S DIRECTOR DATE D4'ti<G. N0. 4-3 )ATE 9/21/2D00 * (OR APPROVED EQUAL} ENVIROPJMENT METER BOX LID TYPE MIDSTATES, BGF-1416 12RL CONCRETE *BROOKS SIDEWALK SERIES 36 CONCRETE CONCRETE OR FOG TITE B9H CONCRETE *BROOKS DRIVEW'.AY SERIES 36 -CAST IRON & OTHER CONCRETE TRAFFIC COVER SERVICE SADDLE TRAFFIC OR RGMAC 202S OR AREAS FOG TITS B9H ROCKWELL a'93 METEP, BGX *CARSON *GARSON z EARTH SERIES 1419-8 PLASTIC 1419 `~ ~ ~ 1 x t ' FORD GRIP JG1N T PLASTIC READER LID ~ '~' ~-.- CCRPGRATION STGP TYKE ~ LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL~ LLILLLLLLLLLL t t t t ~ '. FB ~ 9 0 i ~ t tt ttttl ttt ltt LL ttttttt tt~LL ~ ttt LLL ttt (II 1 ALL 14" i" PtAST+C LINE {USE 200' PSt~ DR7 PHILLIPS DRISCC PIPE 5100 PGLYETFfYLENE' PIPE) VALVE BGX OR 4" DtA,. PVC RISER SEE NOTE BEL04V. 2% SLOFE T4 BOX 18" CURB a . /~~~~/~~~~ o a a v n a 4 D v VALVE 8GX FOR SIDEWALK OR TRAFFIC SETTINGS, SEE D4VG. N0. 6-92 t1SE 4° DlA. SCHEDULE 40 PVC WITH CAP FGR OTHER INSTALLATiOPJS. 14 GAUGE INSULA 7ED CCPPER TGNtNG WIRE WRAPPED AROUND 7HE PtPt {SEE GENERAL NGTES N0. 7}- ~_~ FGRD 869-444-G, GRfP 22'12 JOINT BY I.P 7NP,EADS. + 1 9" MALE ADAPTER f 3~4" X 1" X 92" BELL - REDrJCEP,. ~ 1 "x 1 " FCRD GRIP JOJ^JT CORPGRATICN SiGP TYPE FB 99D9 SERV.+CE SADDLE NOTES: 1. ST,4INLESS STEEL INSEP,TS REQUIRED FGP, ALL PACk," JG7NTS. 2. ALL SERVJCE SADDLES SHALL A.PJD FfTT1PJGS SHALL NAVE 1. P. THREADS. METER ~ CHECK VALVE 19 1/2" PVC CAP 12„ 12" FORD UH 72-154'! 5/8"x 3/4" CGPPER METER SETTER WITH CHECK VALVE AhJD UNION NUT AND SWIVEL FDR COPJNECTlNG 1 " !P, ON PIPE CITY OF YELM, WASHINGTOP~ DEPT. OF PUELIC WORKS ~/~" SI~I~LE DETER ~ER~/ICE APPROVED PUBLIC '/<JORKS DIREOTOP. DES. Gvvrd. CKD. JEG TEW TE',~J DL Dw'G. NO. DATE G - DATE M 3/15/00 SERVICE BO?C -CARSON INDUSTRIES P.70DEL N0. 14198 WITH BOLTED HINGED COVER dR EC'UAL COVER MARKING TO READ "SEWER" (USE Irl NON-TRAFFIC AREAS SPLICE. Td EXISTING 14 GAUGE TONING WIRE WITH BUTT 14 GA. INSULATED ~.OPPER TONING WIRE CONNECTORS ARID SPLICE TONING WIRE FOR SERVICE TO HEAT SH'RIrlK TAPE FINISH MAINLINE TONI~JG WIRE AND WRAP GRADE SPLICE tiPJITH HEAT SHRINK TAPE-1 EXISTING ' ~'' ~ FVC SWP ~_ z ~ ~ TO STEP TANK_.._. STEP MAIN ~ o CONNECT TC} NIIN. EXISTING PVC SERVICE LINE 1" SCHEDULE 4d PVC SWP 2" x 1" REDUCER PVC SWING CHECK IF REQUIRED VALVE SL x SL 1" BALL VALVE, SL x SL 1" BALL VALVE, SL x SL 1" PVC NIPPLE, SL x 5L- 1" x MAIN DIA. PVG ' REDUCING TEE SL xSLxTH OR PIPE SADDLE - CITY OF YELM DEPT. CF PUBLIC ~N~JR~<S TYPICA,~ 1" SERVICE CO~I~JECTIC~N APPRdVEG DWG. No. PUBLIC `>ttI~ORKS DIRECTOR DATE ~- DES. D'uVr1. CKD. DATE PMX PMX ~.4T0 I 4/"I 1 /GO USE 1' UNION TO CONNECT TESTING FIBERGLASS LID APARATUS FOR PRESSURE TESTING SEP.VICE 1MTH STEEL BOLTS AND NEOPPENE GASKET 20" MIN RISER HEIGHT' TYPICAL V~9TH ALL NGN-TP,AFFIC BEARING TANKS 1" DIA.PVC HOSE AND VALVE .4SSEIviBLY LEAVE SUFFICIENT ORIENT BALL VALVE WIRE TO ALLOV`~ FOR AS SHObVN. BALL VALVE PUMP REMOVAL SHALL BE WITH 12" BELOW ELECTRICAL SPLICE BOX WITH CGRQ GRIPS LID ALL CONNECTIONS SHALL BE V~`RAPPEG WITH HEAT SHRINK TAPE 21" OR 2~" PVC 30" DIA. RIEBED PVC RISER W~LID SLGPE GROUND AWAY FROM P,ISEP, GROhAdyETS NEOPRENE 14 GAUGE 6" FROM TOP OF RISER TO ~ 18" FROM TOP RISER TG INSULATED OF ELECTRICAL CONDUIT TONING WIRE ~ EFFLUENT DISCHARGE INSTALL IN 3/4" EY CONDUIT SEAL TONING WIRE -INSTALL RISER N ~ ELECTRICAL CONDUIT TO--~- •~ t ~IN P,ISER POWER SOURCE EFFLUENT DISCHARGE STANDARD IhILET TEE 4"~ 2-PART EFGXY, USE ORIFICrE ORENCO RISER TANK C _ - ADAPTOR FOR CONCRETE LE~VEILD 3.5" ALARM M TANKS- - ON ..~=:::3.5" OFF o~ 3.5" REDUNDANT 1" PVC FLOAT ASSE1vIBLY AS SET OFF BY CITY OF YELM 0 4„~~ 1-1 /4" DIA. INLET ORIFICE HALES AP,OUND PERIMETER OF VAULT ~_ ' ~ 4" DIA. PVC FLOW cm -- Ih1DUCER N PVC BIOTUBE THE MATERIAL FOR DUPLEX, TRIPLEX, AND CLASS 1 DIVISION 1 INSTALLATIONS WILL VARY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET- THE INTENT OF THE INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS SHOWN IN THE TYPICAL STEP Ir1STALLATIGN. SUB~AERSIBLE EFFLUENT GREh1CG TURBINE 8 GPM 1 D OSI 0511 PUMP WITH S.O. POWER CABLE AND 1 /8" BY-PASS ORIFICE IN THE DISCHARGE HEAD I CITY OF YELM I DEPT. OF PUBLIC ~IOP,KS YPIC~,~ SIMPLEX STEP TAN ~< I N ST~~~~; I I Oil APPROVED DU1G. NO. CITY ENGIrJEEP. DATE ~- 9 DES. DVJN. CKD. DATE JEG PMX TEW MTO 4/11 /00 o~ ~ A~ ~~ ~_ Ci ® Yel ~~ a ~ 10~ Yelm Avenue West YELM P.O. Box 479 WASHINGTON Yelm, Washington 9897 (360) 458-3244 August 7, 2003 Stephen and Darlene Rothwell 1011 Yelm Ave. West. Yelm, WA 98597 Re: Luv2Dance Studio Revised Occupancy Dear Mr. and Mrs. Rothwell, As we discussed at your July 16 2003 Pre-submission Meeting, by reducing of the area of the dance studio to less then 1000 square feet and calling the use a classroom, with a maximum occupancy of 49, the following requirements apply: The area needs to be isolated from floor to roof with aone-hour occupancy separation (firewall). Openings in this wall are allowed as long as they-are rated for one hour `and self- closing. One exit a minimum of 36" is required. Latch must be open able with out a key. One restroom is required with one water closet and lavatory. Restroom must meet public standards and ADA standards Dance Studio must meet Energy Code for electrically heated business. All interior covering must have a Class III flame rating. This includes the dance floor. During the Site Plan Review process you may also submit to me plans bringing your structure up to these requirements for B Occupancy. If I can answer any questions or be of help please call me at 360.458.8407. Thank you. Sincerely, ~;% Gary rlson ____ Buil ing Official 7~hc Cih~ of Yclrn is nu I;r~unl UJ~portrmih~ I'roairl~~r Pre-Application Meeting July 16, 2003 Updated August 6, 2003 'k**These comments are preliminary in nature and are not intended to represent final comments and or requirements for the City of Yelm. Until a complete application is made, the Community Development Department can only attempt to inform the applicant of general requirements as they appear in the form presented by the applicant at the time of pre-submission. Proponent: Steve and Darlene Rothwell Project Proposal: Luv2Dance Studio (After the fact) Project Location: 1017 West Yelm Avenue Zoning and Setbacks The property is zoned Commercial (C-1 ), Chapter 17.26 YMC. This district allows `Studios, such as record recording, couturier, artist, music, dancing, and photographic' as a permitted use subject to site plan review. Note that the code does not distinguish between `commercial' and public or private dance studios, the site plan review process and other requirements of the Zoning Code apply to either. Minimum lot size: 5,000 square feet. Maximum height of buildings: 40 feet. Front yard setback: 15 feet. Side yard setback: 10 feet. Rear yard setback: 15 feet. Parking Chapter 17.72 YMC requires one parking space for every 10 occupants, based on the maximum occupant load as determined by the Uniform Building Code for Assembly areas of less-concentrated use. Based on a maximum occupant load of 49, 5 parking spaces would be required. A parking plan needs to be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval a the time of application for site plan review. All required parking areas must be paved and striped. Ingress/Egress Ingress and egress at the site shall be consistent with the Yelm Development Guidelines, section 46.140. Landscaping • Type II landscaping is intended to provide visual separation of uses from streets, and visual separation of compatible uses so as to soften the appearance of streets, parking areas, and building elevation. This landscaping is used around the perimeter of a site, and adjacent to buildings. Type II landscaping would be required along the side and rear property lines and adjacent to the building. Type II landscaping is charactorized by an 8 foot landscape strip between uses and a 5 foot strip around buildings of any combination of evergreen and deciduous trees (with no more than 50 percent being deciduous), shrubs, earthen berms and related plant materials or design features may be selected; provided, that the resultant effect is to provide partial screening and buffering between uses and of softening the appearance of streets, parking and structures. Fences are acceptable in lieu of the 8 foot landscape strip. Type III landscaping is intended to provide visual relief where clear sight is desired. This landscaping is utilized along pedestrian corridors and walks for separation of pedestrians from streets and parking areas. Type III landscaping would be required along Yelm Avenue. Type III landscaping is typified by a six foot landscaping strip with street trees for a large overstory canopy along streets and pedestrian corridors and grass or other approved vegetation for groundcover. Earthen berms with grass or other vegetative groundcover and other design features may be worked into landscaping provided the resultant effect of providing apedestrian-friendly environment and visual relief where clear site is required can be achieved. • Type IV landscaping is intended to provide visual relief and shade in parking areas. At least 24 square feet of landscape development for each parking stall proposed. Each area of landscaping must contain at least 100 square feet of area and must be at least six feet in any direction. Each planting area must contain at least one tree. Live groundcover shall be provided throughout each landscaping area. No parking stall shall be located more than 50 feet from a tree. • Type V landscaping is required in storm water retention areas, if required. The floor and slopes of any stormwater retention/detention area shall be planted in vegetation that is suitable and will thrive in hydric soils. The landscaping of the stormwater facility shall be incorporated with all on-site landscaping. A conceptual landscaping plan is required with the application for site plan review. Final landscaping and irrigation plan is required as element of civil construction drawings, with installation prior to occupancy. Existing vegetation may be retained to fulfil landscaping requirements and could satisify landscaping requirements, if the purpose of each type of landscaping is met or exceeded. The refuse area must be large enough to accommodate a dumpster and recycle bin. Refuse areas must be screened with an enclosure of a material and design compatible with the overall architetural theme. If fencing is used to enclose the refuse area, it must be landscaped with sight obscuring vegetation. No refuse container shall be permitted between a street and the front of a building. Traffic The City has adopted a Transportation Facility Charge (TFC) of $750.00 per PM peak trip. The Code provides a default table that the applicant can use to determine new PM trips generated. For a dance studio, the trip generation rate is 1.83 per 1,000 square feet. To determine the projects impact and fee, use the following formula: ((Peak PM Trip Rate * Gross Floor Area)/1,000) * $750.00=TFC Example: ((i.83 PM Trips x 1,000 sq. ft.)/1,000) * $750.00 = $1,372.50 If the applicant feels the proposed use would not generate the default number of trips as designated in the TFC Ordinance, and analysis prepared by a Washington State Licensed Engineer can be submitted to the City for review and consideration. SEPA An environmental checklist will be required if the proposal requires more than 20 or more parking stalls or other buildings than the pole structure are used as part of the dance studio. Application and Process Site Plan Review, Chapter 17.84, is an administrative process. Minimum application requirements are located in Section 17.84.060 and are listed on the application form. A project of this size can expect completed review in approximately 12 to 14 weeks. Land use approval typically contains conditions of approval that the applicant must complete prior to receiving a building permit. Upon satisfactory completion of all conditions of land use approval, the applicant can submit building plans for approval. Other Design Guidelines -the attached checklist must be submitted at time of application, with written responses on how each guideline requirement is proposed to be met. DESIGN GUIDELINES - Luv2Dance Studio Pro'ect Review Checklist Guidelines A licable Guidelines Met I.A. 1 Relate develo ment to edestrian oriented street fronta e. X I.A. 2 Relate develo ment to street fronts other than edestrian-oriented streets . I.B. 1 Minimize visibili and im acts of service areas. I.C.(1) Take advantage of special opportunities and mitigate impacts of large develo ments. I.D. 1 Reduce im act of service areas and mechanical a ui ment. I.E. 1 Inte rate biofiltration swales and onds into the overall site desi n. X I.F. 1 Enhance the visual uali of develo ment on corners. I.F.(2) Provide a paved pedestrian walkway from the street corner to the building entrance. II.A.(1) All pedestrian paths must correspond with federal, state and local codes for handica ed access, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. X II.A.(2) Provide adequate lighting at the building entries and all walkways and paths throu h arkin lots. X II.A. 3 Develo an on-site edestrian circulation conce t. II.B.(1) Provide a pedestrian path at least 60" wide (preferably 96" wide) from the street sidewalk to the main ent X II.B.(2) Provide pedestrian paths or walkways connecting all businesses and the entries of multi le buildin son the same develo ment site. II.B. 3 Provide athwa s throw h arkin lots II.C.(1) Where street ROW is insufficient to provide adequate sidewalks buildings and other site features must be set back from the public ROW to achieve at least minimum sidewalk widths. X II.C.(2) Where new streets are developed, provide sidewalks according to minimum standards. X II.D.(1) Provide, where feasible, pedestrian circulation routes to adjacent uses and transit. II.D. 2 Inte rate nearb transit sto s into the tannin of adjacent site im rovements. II.D.(3) Encourage pedestrian paths from all transit stops through commercial areas to residential areas within 1,200 feet X II.E. 1 Enhance buildin ent access. X II.F. 1 Provide edestrian-oriented o ens ace at ke locations. II I.A. 1 Provide access roads throw h tar a lots with more than one street fronta e. III.B. 1 Minimize drivewa im acts. X III.C.(1) Mee# requirements for location of parking lots on pedestrian-oriented streets. Continued DESIGN GUIDELINES Project Review Checklist Guidelines Applicable Guidelines Met III.C. 2 Meet re uirements for arkin lot desi n detail standards. X III.D. 1 Minimize arkin areas throw h 'oint use and mana ement. III.D. 2 Encoura a structured arkin X III.D. 3 Reduce im acts of arkin ara es. IV.A. 1 Incor orate human-scale buildin elements. X IV.B. 1 Reduce scale of lar a buildin s. IV.C. 1 Architectural) accentuate buildin corners at street intersections. IV. D. 1 Enhance buildin s with a ro riate details. X IV.E. 1 Retain on final facades. IV.E.(2) Use compatible building materials. (See Building Material Summary Matrix, 59 X IV. F. 1 Treat blank walls that are visible from the street arkin or ad'acent lot. X IV.G.(1) Locate and/or screen roof-mounted mechanical equipment so as not to be visible from the street or from the round-level of ad'acent ro erties. IV.G.(2) Where practical, locate and/or screen utility meters, electrical conduit and other service and utilities a aratus so as not to be visible from the street. X V.F.(1) Use plant materials that are approved for use in downtown Yelm. Pro onents ma use other )ant materials a roved b the Ci V.G. 1 Develo a site landsca a desi n conce t. X V.H. 1 Provide substantial site landsca in . V.H. 2 Protect and enhance natural features. X V.I. 1 Screen all arkin lots as re wired b Cha ter 17.80, Landsca in X V.I.(2) An alternative to the required perimeter parking area landscaping plan may be submitted. X V.I. 3 Provide internal arkin lot landsca in X V.J.(1) Consider alternative building and parking siting strategies to preserve existin trees. V.J.(2) Consider the integration of pedestrian and bicycle paths with stands of mature trees where feasible to connect ad'acent uses. Staff Exhibit 9 Assessor's Information Structure info Property: 217 Use these buttons to display different information for this property ` New Search ~ Basic Into ~ Values ~ Structures ` Permits ~ Sales ~ Feedback ~ Map Into Residential Structures Year Built 1944 Fireplaces/Wood Stoves 0 Construction OTHER Heat Type FORCED-AIR Construction Quality FAIR Fuel Type ELECTRIC Physical Condition GOOD Foundation Type BLOCK Number of Bedrooms Exterior Wall Type WOOD-SIDING Full Baths 1 Roofing Material COMPOSITION Partial Baths 1 Residence Square Footage Main Finished Area 1776 Detached Structures Code Year Built Square Feet Quality Condition FRAME-GARAGE 1944 350 LOW-COST AVERAGE SHED-ENCLSD 2003 3200 AVERAGE AVERAGE Office of the Assessor Patricia Costello, Assessor 2000 Lakeridge Drive SW -Olympia, WA 98502 Customer Service (360)786-5410 -- Fax (360)754-2958 -- TDD (360)754-2933 Staff Exhibit 8 Septic Permit Number 3054 11/25/2~i~3 ©9:18 36~a91E9F~a THE ~%IRI~BRIDE GROUP PaGgqE F~2 ~~~ ~~~ ~V _ T,, ,RSTON-Mt~;ON HEALTH DIS'l..ICT 17IVISI01~` OF SANITA'z'ION Receipt # (p! 5th & Birch Courthouse Annex Shelton, Washington Olympia, Washington Phone: 426 -4407 SITE INSPECTION #_~(~S.l + ~ Phone: 3 52 -4851, ext 8 APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT O.p,. ALTER P N INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (Application required for each installation and/or major repair) Buyer or Property Owner Phone: ~SIL .„~~,~o Mailing Address~~ ~ ,~/Q¢'~ City ,~i~,,.o~~~State l//~j~~'/~ Zip $ttsld e2' Location of Property, including: Loth Addr e s s .Block# Other: Zip Mailing Address oi' Site: /f~' ~ / /' / .<-~71~ ~`.c~ •C..~~i~/ <..fr~i4'_~J'CrCU ~'~~tL~~_-~J A~ ,( (VSlith directions to site) ~~,,,~~~ // J-` ~` --~~r u Property Commercial Size l2.esiden.ce ~•j~ „c.G~~. # of Bedrooms ~.. Baserxxent Type Water Supply: Depth of Well Spring~Other Is well or body of fresh water within 100 feet of sewage system? Is salt watez supply within 50 feet of sewage system? Septic Tank Ig/~' gals. Drainfield Length ft. Trench width ft, And/or system othex than above Is garbage grinder being installed? Is contractor installing septic t&nk? •d,~~, (Sewage Contractor rxiust be licensed by Thurston-Mason Health District) THE UNDERSIGNED hereby applies for a permit to construct ( ), alter. (. } and/or modify ( ) a sewage system on above property in accordance with minitnunn requirements and standards of the Thurston-Mason District Board of Health. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE NOT TO BE FILLED IN $Y APPLICANT hlt ey Permit # 1 `-~"7'0~, Fee~a® Date Issued_ ~ I ~ f ~'a $Y~V~1~ ~ ~ - ---~ Area Sanitarian Date Inepected__ ____ REMARKS; Date Approved; ~7--~ A xoved b --~L1-- '! r ~~ Pp Y, TMH-S-S q/bq 6EW, Gl~(~i`t, ~ !/C'' ; ~1~.-~~- Sanitarian 11/25/2~C~3 ©9:18 364916904 Tt-IE I~fIRI<:BFIIDE GPOUP P~GE G3 w- ~, ~~ ' '~ o b ~e~ _, ~ I ,. ~~ >~~_ ~~, ~~ ; ~ ~ 5 ~~ w ~ - ~ S 7` c~,~~2.~ .~-f Gds l r ~. ~ ce ~t.e.~.. r ~ ~ l ~~. W 11/251203 (99:18 36~49169~4 7NE F~IRK~RIDE GROUP P~,GE 04 • Sth ~ i;irch ~fYl`ib1't~A Hsal~ ~~>st~~ Couirt~Hou~~nwx• 8hakon, Washington D1Y181ON 0~ dl1M1TATIbN Qlyrr~pia, We.ahlnRtan Phana: 4x6-4~t8T ~_ _/,~~ ~ ~ ~~ ,~ Phone: ~2.4R~1 4vmer .,~+ _ . r ~ Phone ~yG~ • -; ~ -~`1 Mailing Addzese ~~ ~ /1~~~~} City p/>iw rState~l 4,~/~1 Builder Addre se Sewage Contractor ~ J , ~Addreas ,~~~~~'~ , vim j _ Legal Description Parcel No. Fitld Y3ook No. ~- Directione to Property__~r~~-r~u.~ l_~-~-~~_r~J ./~~~ ~~.~-,.I~ ~i~,~.~.~ Intends `c~ use s of ~uild~ings ~ t~?I.,c_1we.~i Publfc Sewer Water Supply. No. of Bedraome Z No. o Bathrooms Hasensent Septic Tank //~l> Type of Sail Lot Sise Soil Drainage: ood Moderate Pooz Noma DRAW SKETCH in blank space or on separate sheet indicating the following: 1. ProperEy lines and location of house on lot and indicate minimum and m~udznum, setbacks plus dimensiozzs of lot ar~d all buildings. 2. Location of house and sewage disposal syetexn in :gelation to streams, lake;a t~rells, patios, driveways, underground tanks, water supply ]fines and easexxlents. 3. Proposed fill, including depth, area, porosity aad amount plus location of drains. ~_ P o~p cR/~. APPLICAN'1^'8 SIGNATURE C~~~ DATE - 9- 74 Siptp in.Bpecti~ 0.00 Receipt No. (~ _ y A roved ~ -- Not Approved $Y 11/25/2©03 X9:18 36f3~916994 THE I! I RI< BRIDE GROUP PAGE 05 A Business Buitr $~ Confidcr+ce anrf . Crp~~inq Through Dedfcntion ~ • REALTY ~ INSURANCE ONE SOUTft SOUND CENTER, OLYMPIA ILACEYI, WASfiINGTON 98501 Moiling Address: P. 0. 80:3487 Moi» Of{ice: 491.4600 - Bronth Offite: 357.7781 That portion of the SW~ of th E~' of Section 24, Township 17 North, Range 1 East, W. M., esczibed as fn ows: Bega'~~ing at the intersection of the noztla line of the SW~ o.f the NFL of Section 24, Township 17 North, Range 1 East, W°m°, with the southerly line of the right of way of Olympia -Yelm County Road, thence southeasterly along said southerly line of said right of way l50 feet to the point of beginning, thence south westerly and at right angle to said County Road 570.18 feet, thence south easterly and parallel with said County Road 70fcet then,cc north easterly and at right angle to said County Road 570.18 feet, thence north westerly along said County Road 70 feet more or less to the point of Ueginning. REAL ESTATE PROPERTY f~4ANAGEME~T fNSURANCE MORTGAGE FINANCING APPRAISALS Staff Exhibit 7 Site Plan Review Approval City of Yelm IOS Yelm Avenue West P.O. Box 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 (360) 458-3244 December 3, 2003 Steve Rothwell 1011 West Yelm Ave. Yelm WA 98597 Re: Site Plan Approval for Case ~ SPR-03-8354-YL, Rothwell Dance Studio Dear Mr. Rothwell: The Site Plan Review Committee has considered your application for the above referenced project, and finds that as conditioned below, the proposed project is consistent with the Yelm Comprehensive Plan, and all applicable City policy's and development standards. Pursuant to Chapter 15.49 Integrated Project Review Process, a project, which is subject to Site Plan Approval, is a Type II Permit and can be appealed to the Yelm Hearing Examiner. An appeal must be filed within 14 days of the date of this notice. Site Plan Approval is v~~,d for 18 months from the date of this letter. The affected property owners may request a change in property tax valuation from the Thurston County Tax Assessor's Office. Proposal: The applicant has applied for Site Plan Review for the conversion .ofi 1,000 sq. ft of an existing structure into a Dance Studio with the addition of 110 sq. ft. for entrance and restroom facilities. Site plan review is required for any commercial use or activity, with exemptions allowed if-the use is similar to the prior use. The building was permitted for personal use. Operating a dance studio at this site requires Site Plan Review. The project is approved subject to the fiollowing conditions ofi approval: 1. Transportation Finding: Yelm is a small compact community most directly affected by two state high~~~ays, ~r~hich bisect the community. The highways are used by local residents for transportation throughout the cii~y, and for access to commercial and residential areas throughout the community. In lieu of widening existing streets, the City has elected to create certain alternatives, Y-1, Y-2, Y-3, ~r~hich will avoid the need to significantly ~r~iden existing 77ie Cih~ of Yelm is nn F~iunl OJ~i~nrt iurit y Pro~~idcr streets, and particularly Yelm Avenue. New developments do in fact burden the city's central streets, and unless the alternate routes are accomplished, the City would have to require developers to pay the cost of the internal street widening. The city plans show, and the City finds that adequate facilities will be accomplished better and in a timely fashion by the alternate route facilities as a substitute for the widening of existing facilities. As a result, the City finds that the regional plans in fact benefit projects in all areas on the City and will accomplish the goal of providing adequate facilities to City standards within a reasonable time to serve the demands created by the proposed project. Finding: The City has adopted a Transportation Facility Charge (TFC) of $750.00 per pm peak trip. The Ordinance provides a default table that is used to determine new pm trips generated by the proposed use. The table does not list a dance studio, so a similar use was determined. The new trip generation rate is based on 1.37 new pm peak hour trips, per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area. Finding: Street frontage improvements are required as part of Site Plan Review and approval. At this time the City of Yelm is granting the project a "frontage deferment". A deferment means that at any time the City can require this project to complete its frontage. Typically this is when the city has more than one project located along side each other that are required to construct frontage improvements. Your frontage improvements will be required when the Yelm High School improves its frontage on SR 510. "° Conditions of Approval: 1 a. The applicant shall mitigate traffic impacts to the transportation system. Mitigation includes payment of the Transportation Facility Charge (TFC). The TFC charge of $1,140.75 is based on 1.37 new pm peak hour trips generated by the project, and is due and payable at Civil Plan Approval 1 b. The applicant shall provide a waiver of protest for the deferral of the frontage improvements. 2. Water Supply Finding: The City's Water Comprehensive Plan identifies a portion of the City area for service. The City is pursuing additional land areas for approval and the extension of facilities. Completion of such activities is dependent on grant and developer funding, as well as planned bonding and existing public funds. The status of such plans and funding sources must be considered in any review of concurrency. Developer extensions and or dedications, latecomer agreements, oversizing agreements, and the creation of local improvement districts may all be considered. In the event of a new funding source, however, concurrency is not found until the funding source is in fact in place - e.g. award of a grant, a binding letter commitment for third party funding, or the successful formation of a local improvement district. Any necessary water rights are considered, only after approved for municipal use by the Washington State Department of Ecology, or appropriate appeals board, and the time for appeal or challenge has expired. P[iq=• 7 of 6 Finding: Connection to City water services is requi-red for all new development. Finding: The City of Yelm is dedicated to providing the best quality water possible to its consumers. The Washington Administrative Code, section 246-290-490 requires that the City take measures to ensure that contamination does not occur as a result of a cross contamination. Finding: The existing single-family dwelling and mobile home are served by an exisiting well. State and County health codes required a Group B water system for more than 1 single-family dwelling. The well has not been approved as a Group B system. Conditions of Approval: 2a. The applicant shall connect all existing structures to the City water system. The cost to connect shall include a fee of $1,500.00 per Equivalent Residential Unit (each ERU equals 240 gallons of water consumption per day, fee subject to change.). The applicant shall provide proposed water usage calculations for the dance studio to the Community Development Department for review and approval, to determine the number of gallons of daily use. 2b. The applicant shall abandon the existing well per Washington State Department of Ecology standards, and transfer any existing water rights to the City of Yelm. 2c. The applicant shall meet all conditions for cross connection control as required in section 246-290-490 WAC. 3. Sewer System Finding: The City's Sewer Comprehensive Plan identifies a portion of the City area for service. The City is pursuing additional land areas or approval and the extension of facilities. Completion of such activities is dependent on grant and developer funding, as well as planned bonding and existing public funds. The status of such plans and funding sources must be considered in any review of concurrency. Developer extensions and or dedications, latecomer agreements, oversizing agreements, and the creation of local improvement districts may all be considered. In the event of a new funding source, however, concurrency is not found until the funding source is in fact in place - e.g. award of a grant, a binding letter commitment for third party funding, or the successful formation of a local improvement district. Finding: Connection to City sewer services is required for all new development. The single- family dwelling is served by a private septic system. It is unclear when this system was installed. The mobile home is served by private septic system insta-led in or about 1970. Conditions of Approval: 3a. The applicant shall connect all existing structures to the City S.T.E.P. sewer system. The cost to connect shall include a fee of $5,125.00 per ERU (each ERU equals 240 Pane 3 n( 6 gallons ofi water consumption per day, fee subject to change). The number of ERU's required will be determined by approved water consumption calculations. 3b. The applicant shall abandon the on-site sewage systems per the Thurston County Department of Health standards, and provide proof of approval to the City. 3c. Upon completion of the onsite installation as per the City's Development Guidelines, the S.T. E.P. sewer equipment shall be deeded to the City, and an easement provided for maintenance. _ 4. Storm Water Finding: Impervious surfaces create stormwater runoff. Uncontrolled and untreated stormwater runoff can create health and safety hazards. YMC requires all development to comply with the City stormwater Manual. The manual states that projects creating less than 5,000 sq. ft. of impervious surface must contain and treat all stormwater runoff on site Conditions of Approval: 4a. The applicant shall submit civil plans that show appropriate stormwater containment. 5. Parking Finding: The City of Yelm Development Guidelines, Design Guidelines, and Municipal Code address parking regulations from many aspects, including, but not limited to; design, number of stalls required, pedestrian pathways, and safety. The requirements of off-street parking and loading facilities and their design shall be regarded as the minimum; however, the owner, developer or operator of the premises for which the parking facilities are intended shall be responsible for providing adequate amounts and arrangement of space for the particular premises even though such space or its arrangement is in excess of the minimum set forth. Chapter 17.72 YMC requires one parking space for every 10 occupants, based on the maximum occupant load as determined by the Uniform Building Code for Assembly areas of less-concentrated use. Based on a maximum occupant load of 49, 5 parking spaces would be required. Conditions of Approval: 5a. The applicant shall create a paved parking area, meeting the City of Yelm Development Guideline standards, with a minimum of 5 parking stalls, one being handicap van accessible. 5b. Parking area shall be landscaped per YMC 17.80. Page n of 6 6. Fire Finding: Fire protection to the buildings must be provided per the Uniform Fire Code. Requirements for installation of fire hydrants will be determined in civil plan review. Finding: The Unifiorm Building Code (UBC) provides occupancy ratings for different types of uses. The fire coverage for the commercial use must meet UBC requirements. Conditions of Approval 6a. The applicant shall submit fire flow calculations for all existing and proposed hydrants. All hydrants must meet minimum City standards. 6b. The applicant shall submit a fire hydrant plan to the Community Development Department for review and approval. 7. Landscaping Finding: Landscaping and screening are necessary to promote safety, to provide screening between compatible land uses, to safeguard privacy and to protect the aesthetic assets of the City. YMC, Chapter 17.80 requires all development to provide on site landscaping. Finding: Type II landscaping is intended to provide visual separation of uses from streets, and visual separation of compatible uses so as to soften the appearance of streets, parking areas, and building elevation. This landscaping is used around the perimeter of a site, and adjacert to buildings. Type III landscaping is intended to provide visual relief-where clear sight is desired. This landscaping is utilized along pedestrian corridors and walks for separation of pedestrians from streets and parking areas. Type IV landscaping is intended to provide visual relief and shade in parking areas. Type V landscaping is required in storm water retention areas, if required. Conditions of Approval: 7a. The applicant shall provide for Type II landscape buffer adjacent to parking, drive aisles, and the west and south side of the building. 7b. Type III landscaping shall be required when frontage improvements are installed. 7c. Type IV landscaping is required in parking areas. 7d. Type V landscaping is required in stormwater facilities. 7e. The applicant shall submit a final landscape plan with civil plan submittal Pear)e 5 0l S 8. Refuse: Finding: The City of Yelm Development Guidelines, Design Guidelines, and Municipal Code provides guidance for refuse storage and screening. Conditions ofi Approval: 8a. The applicant must provide for refuse storage. Refuse container screening shall be of a material and design compatible with the overall architectural theme of the associated structure, shall be at least as high as the refuse container, and shall in no case be less than six-feet. Sb. No refuse container shall be permitted between a street and the front of a building. 8c. Refuse collection areas shall be designed to contain all refuse generated on site and deposited between collections. Deposited refuse shall not be visible from outside the refuse enclosure. 8d. A six-foot wall or fence, with sight obscuring gates shall enclose any outdoor refuse collection point. The fence shall be a solid material such as wood or masonry, and shall be designed per the City of Yelm Development guidelines. 9. Other Conditions of Approval: 9a. Business must have a current City of Yelm Business License to operate a business within the City. Site Plan Approval is a Type I I Administrative land use approval.. An appeal of this decision can be filed within 14 days from the date of this letter, pursuant to YMC, Chapter 15.49, Integrated Project Review Process. The Site Plan is valid for eighteen (18) months from the date of this letter. The applicant may request asix-month extension on the approval, if the request is made in writing prior to the expiration date of this approval. If you need additional information or assistance, please call the Community Development Department at (360) 458-3835. Sincerely, ' Tami Merriman Assistant Planner cc: Bill Turner, P.E., Contours & Concepts Engineering Grant Beck, Community Development Director Jim Gibson, Development Services Engineer Gary Carlson, Building Official R..^~Projc~rt Files`SPP, Site Plan i~~riieri~.©,',54 Rothv,oll Dance Siudlrj,FS~54 approval L~~t~r~r.do,, P~ag^- 6 of G Staff Exhibit 6 Site Plan Review Application Application (5 pages) Notice of incomplete application (1 page) Updated Application (4 pages) ~ a~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ Y~~~ WAS!-IINGTON CITY OF YELM PO Box 479 Yeim WA 98597 360-458-3244 APPLICATION FOR Site Plan Review OFFICIAL USE ONLY a~ Date Recyeived ~ X12` By .,~ ti~ , File No ~/~ ~~~'2 35~ ~ ~x: ~t~ Site Plan Fee: ~A~ Mobile Home Parks: $250.00 plus $50.00 per mobile home space Multi-Family Building/Condominium: $350.00 plus $50.00 per unit 9 2~~ Commercial Site Plan: $350.00 plus $50.00 per 1000 sq. ft of gross floor area~C~ 2 ~ Industrial Site Plan: $350.00 plus $150 per acre ~~~ ®~ ~~ (In addition, any professional service charges per Resolution #358 ~ pt p Site plan review is a process for reviewing the design of certain types of development. Site plan approval is required for mobile home parks, duplexes, multi-family dwellings, commercial and industrial uses, planned development districts and for all land uses within the central business district. NAME OF PROJECT Steve Rothwell -Dance Studio APPLICANT Steve Rothwell Mailing Address 1011 West Yelm Hwv City, State and Zip Yelm WA 98597 Telephone Home 458-7104 OWNER Same Mailing Address City, State and Zip Telephone ENGINEER/ARCH/TECT/OTHER Bill Turner -= Contours & Concepts Engineering, LLC. Mailing Address PO Box 476 City, State and Zip Tenino WA 98589 Telephone _ SUMMARY OF REQUEST Requesting to operate a dance studio within an existing structure. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION General Location The property is located on the south side of Hwv 510 iust east of Yelm High School Site Address 1017 SE Yelm Highway Land Area (acres) 4.17Acres Section 24 Township 17 Range 1 E Assessor's Tax Parcel Number 21724130300 Full legal description of subject property (attach separate sheet if necessary) See Attached F-5 PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS ATTACH EXTRA PAGES IF NECESSARY 1. Does the design minimize conflicts with neighboring land uses? Explain. NO 2. Is the site within 300 feet of any "critical areas" such as wetlands or streams? NO 3. What provisions will be made for storm water and/or flood control? None 4. What provisions will be made for water supply and sewage disposal? City will supply water and sewer service A step tank with pressure pump will be installed for pressure main connection. 5. What provisions will be made for electrical power, natural gas, telephone and other utilities? Utilities are installed and connected to the existing structure and will be utilized for the new structure. 6. What provisions will be made for streets, access, and/or buses? Driveway access will be off of Yelm Highway Parking will be in front of structure. 7. What provisions, if any, will be made for open space and/or recreation? None 8. What provisions will be made for schools and school children? None I affirm that all answers, statements and information above and submitted with this application are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also affirm that I am the owner of the subject site or am duly authorized by the owner to act with respect to this application. Further, I grant permission from the owner to any and all employees and representatives of the City of Yelm and other governmental agencies to enter upon and inspect said property as reasonably necessary to process this application. I agree to pay all fees of the city that apply to this application. ~ C'~ Signed t}'~- Date 1 - ~ ~ - G~ E-6 ~~ ~4'~ ^PEN ty ty LASE D Z ; ~;. t Z = •.. • 1., ,, ~ ~ ~ X W r W e ° I ~ I D TI I ~ ~ Z ~ a ~ ~ N I °. i I j N I I Z I ~ I ~ I d ~ ,-Z~j W I • I ~ I H ------------------------- O] .ja (.t) O U1 X W d z D ty ~ Z ~ n C d H 0 ITI X H H ^z L li m d ~X-( O N 0 ~z D ~ C W _ ~ . ~ -~ Z I I I 8 ~-~ z d ~ ~ £ ~ W `~ e D TI ,~ d 1-x-1 0 N ~ ~ ~ /-r z ~ ~ -.~ w H ~TT I'1 D r r so' ~ ~ .~ I I I I I I I I I I I L_ ~~ (]l -Tl X Q H /~ /~ z 0 ~d ~~ ~ ~` D ~ zr v~ r U H ~ 1~-( (JI D ~ W ~W ~_ Z (] o~ ~~ D N Ui CJl Ul '..~ X X X ~ O~ I~ I i w w • ~~ z 1--1 Z H Z ~p ` ~ / `` r~ -- ~~ fTl L---------J H / \ 1 O ~ 1( / ` / J z D ~ -G W H Steve Bothwell - Dance Studio ~ '~ U d BLiild.in La ou.t •-~ o ~ O ~~ d ontours & oncepts ngineering Phone: 360-43R-0301 f annv \~/a f'l Z D z n 2 D r r r'. -'~j' ~. ~ ~~,~ '-1 ~ 9 o wJ II ~ ~ ~~ BBp~~y1 ~ y ~ :~ o f( If ~ ~- ~ ~ , ~ A ~ ~~~ nV y H~H 1 ~~~ axe ~ a e ~ ~I ~ Q ' •~~~ a ~ 00 00 `u s~ ~ ~ >~' ~ W ~ O ltF7VIf:W 1NFORMKI'1ON 95 % (bmplcte REVlEWEIt: OWNiiR DATI? 9i?NT TO RCVIRWI?R: ACTION PNOIi?01' IUEN'flPl(:A'FION Nn. CR(% ACf1UN UPSIONI(h PTIDII 9QRAq ol(nwN n(n yn(°ru CIIVCKI:D 11'1'/1111 4/ 6A1] rya d~~ ~b ~~b bb c•• b ~~ ~ ~ ~~ r 0 ~ r-' b ~ a y O ~ M N c o a ~ ~ y ~ ^z Y l y ~"'t l -1 O ~ ~..~. ( N ____, ~ ~m ~ $ ~ I A ~ ~ A a A A a p O m~ ~ d ~ a0 p H n Ain `n m o ~ mo p ~n n E C] p p c n vii D .ZI A A of y ~ A p C E m 0 i , x ~ ~ ~ x ~., FK-. N x N '~ FK-r ti N ti N ~ N ti ti .~. "i O .~. z z z z z rn z n n n n p n d n m ~ n r~ ti E v A c r~ m ri a A p ~ n -zi m m m o~ d m .mU .U .a U Z n f'l A n r ~ r .r. ~ K ~ z m { r m ~ m r r~ z m 3 (~1 H 0 O~ Coil H h7 H~ ~~ o ~ O r tr] z d ~~~ 2 / }~~' ~ ~ 7~Lv 3 p25~o ` 5.. ~' ~ ~ Steve Bothwell -Dance Studio v ; r; ~' `'' '~ ~ General Site Plan. __ u z V c~ -_ m -~- ~ d o ~ zzc~s~-+ o~m~zx mty~zm~ H oz~AZ~~ ~AD3p 1-+ zcy° dzr ° z' z A ~ m zm c ~ ~czi°~ ~A~r~ Zm W yA3'~ 1~r 0 o z~mz A m ° ~ ~lJ Z ~O(Aq f~`I UD .~.I d ~ ,ZDj v, to ao ., m ° m Am ao ° m C .ZI°1 z.Ay1 z l"7 D A ~ Q. ~ pr jO ~~1 Z ~ Ai=m dm~~ z { REVIEW INFORMATION 95 °Ju Covkplete DIS1CiN INFORMATION _.. _ _. OntoU~'S & RIiVII WIiR: OWNER I ROlI C I tlll N! 0 I( KI'ION No - - - --. - -- Fll f NAMk 13ytw up UATl UNI T'O RI VIFWI R. ........ (k(J _._ .. -.. _.......... A(a'lON_ oncepts ___ _._. ngineering _Dk S,UNkI) I3l,I>,3 98603 _ _. ARAN'N M13 9/26/03 Phone: 360-438-0301 cw c hkiU -_ k3vixi )i tiii~ Lacey, Wa I~I,oTTCn DATES RO'I'FIl3'ELL LAND~Ct~PE BETWEEN TWIN COUNTY CREDIT UNION & RAMIlZEZ: * over 50 filbert nut trees * over 20 fir trees * about 10 alder trees BETWEEN YELM AVE ~ DANCE STUDIO: * several junipers along $ontage * three privot hedges * yellow forcythias and pemwinkle ground covering * five fir trees * several locust trees * three holly trees * three poplar trees * ash trees * hawthorne trees * fruit trees AROUND STUDIO-5 FT PERIMETER * three birdsweet spruce * four lavatora * garden bazk for open area * grass stretch between 5' stretch and pavement Any questions, please feel free to call me. Thank you. Michael Iverson 9002 Rhoton Rd Se Yelm Wa 98597 360458=7265 C~ ?hr,,, ~p~~~ • ~_ C't ® Yel~~ a ~+ "'~ 105 Yelm Avenue West P.O. Box 479 3tEZ'M Yelm, Washington 98597 WASH I NGTO N (360) 458-3244 October 1, 2003 Steve Rothwell 1101 West Yelm Hwy Yeim, WA 98597 Re: Application for Site Plan Review for Rothwell Dance Studio Dear Mr. Rothwell: On September 29, 2003, the Ciry received your application for Site Plan Review and has determined the application to be incomplete. Your application is unclear if you are using the entire building for the dance studio, or only a portion as had been discussed previously. 1 have included information for your assistance in completing the application requirements. 1. A detailed floor plan showing the portion of the building to be used fior the dance i ~ studio, how the building separation is made, and a written description of this separation and use. 2. A written response is required to show how each of the Design Guidelines Checklist requirements are proposed to be met. 3. The Preliminary Stormwater Report must meet the guidelines as stated in Section 3.1.1 of the 1994 Thurston County Drainage Design and Erosion Control Manual. 4. Landscape plan should show all required areas per the Presubmission notes, dated July 16, 2003. 1f you are planning to use only 1,000 square fleet of the building as the dance studio, the application fee submitted is the correct amount. If you are planning to use more than 1,000 square feet, the fee is a larger amount. If you have any questions,, please feel free to give me a call. I can be reached at (360) 458-8496. Sincerely, ,-- /. ~ ' Gam, ~~, /,~; ~ % / _~/ .f_ ~~t // //f /~_ ./ Tami 1~~lerriman Assistant Planner cc: Bill Turner, Contours ~ Concepts Engineering, LLC ~~-.~'r~~~ . F i, . ~ 3 .~ , _ I ' ~lrr. ,., f?r,~h~;r~ll f1~^c~ ;'url ;~'~rn;;~gl[~ (n~~j IU (;n%. 77re City of Yclm is an F_rinnl OJ~portunih~ Pro~~ir~fcr o urs & Mailin€ ldress: P.O. Box 476 Tenino WA 9. 9 o epts Physical Address: 4405 - 7th Ave. S.E. Suite 30U Lacey, WA ngineering Phone Number: 360-438-0301 E-Mail: Bill@CandCengineering.com October 13, 2003 To: The City of Yelm PO Box 479 ~* ~ '~ ' ~'~'~ '~~ Yelm, WA 98597 360-458-3224 ~~~ ' ~ 2~~3 From: Bill Turner, P.E. PO Box 476 Tenino, WA. 98589 RE: Steve Rothwell -Dance Studio Dear City Planning, Listed below are your requests, as delineate in the Design Guidelines followed by our response: I.A. (1) Relate development to pedestrian street frontage. Frontage improvements are not required for project. The existing structure does not front the main street and because of the existing landscaping cannot be viewed from the public roadway. LE. (1) Integrate biofiltration swales and ponds into the overall site design There will be no bioswales on this project and there is an existing infiltration area within the project limit at this time. ILA. (1) All pedestrian paths must correspond with federal, state, and local codes for handicapped access, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. The handicapped access meets all local codes and the American with Disabilities Act. ILA. (2) Provide adequate lighting at the building entries a~zd all walk ways and paths through parking lots. Adequate lighting will be provided at the building entrance. ILB. (1) Provide a pedestrian path at least 60" wide (preferably 96" wide) from the street sidewalk to the main entry. A pathway from the street to the. main entrance of the structure has not been provided for the following reasons: • There are no sidewalks along the frontage road and frontage improvements are not required for this project. Without a connection point for the pathway, it would lead pedestrian into an unsafe condition along Yelm Highway. • The dance studio is a private business and not open to the public. C~_ IL C. (1) Where street ROW is insufficient to provide adequate sidewalks buildings and other site features must be set back from the public ROW to achieve at least minimum sidewalk widths. A proposed right-of-way line has been placed on the plan drawings indicating the width that will be required to install the required roadway section. IL C. (2) Where new streets are developed, provide sidewalks according to minimum standards. Frontage improvements are not required on this project. ILD. (3) Encourage pedestrian paths from all transit stops through commercial areas to residential areas within1,200 feet. Does not apply to this project at this time. ILE. (1) Enhance building entry access. Lighting and landscaping has been provided to enhance the building entry. III.B. (1) Minimize driveway impacts. There will be one entrance into the dance studio which will be shared with a residence that is on the same parcel. III. C. (2) Meet requirements for parking lot design detail standards. Parking lot is not visible from the street. Park lot will have lighting directed from the building entrance. Parking shall be stripped and landscaped. III.D. (2) Encourage structured parking. Structured parking may not apply to this project. N.A. (1) Incorporate human-scale building elements. The structure shall have 2 human scaling elements such as: individual windows < 32 sq. ft. per pane with 6 in molding separation from other windows, a porch or covered entry. IV.D. (1) Enha~zce buildings with appropriate details. The structure shall have Decorative Treatment of doors and windows: such as a decorative molding or framing details around all ground floor windows and doors located on facades facing or adjacent to public streets or parks or decorative glazing or door designs. N.E. (2) Use compatible building materials. (See Ba~silding Material Sttrnmary Matrix, pg. 59) The existing building is not visible from the street and the building material and color of the new structure shall match the facade with the existing building. ..w.- IV.F. (1) Treat blank walls that are visible form the street parking or adjacent lot. The dance studio will not be visible from the street and landscaping will be provided where visibility if from an adjacent lot. TV.G. (2) Where practical, locate and/or screen utility meters, electrical conduit and other service and utilities apparatus so as not to be visible from the street. All utility meters and apparatus are located away from the street and are not visible. V.G. (1) Develop a site landscape design concept. A landscaping plan shall be provided. V.H. (2) Protect and enhance natural features. The natural landscape between adjacent property owners shall remain and will be enhance through additional landscaping. V.I. (1) Screen all parking lots as required by Chapter 17.80, Landscaping. The existing parking lot is screen by landscape and fencing. V.I. (2) An alternative to the required perimeter parking area landscaping plan may be submitted. . Does not apply to this project at this time. V.I. (3) Provide internal parking lot landscaping Internal parking lot landscape plan shall be provided. This completes the Design Guidelines Project Review Checklist as identified by the City of Yelm. If you have any questions or need more information, please call me at (360) 438- 0301. Respectfully, ~~~ ~LZ~'yl,~i~ Bill Turner, P.E. Principal Engineer, Contours & Concepts Engineering, LLC. cc: file Steve Rothwell ~~, ~~ ~'~J it d I ~ w I D 1~i j ~ ~ I f)l N 0 w O c o ~ ~ ~ N a Nn ~ ~ ----- 9 -- -4--- ~- ---------- -- -- ----- ! C 1 X W C X W ~ £ Z d Z Z n C d H X H H Z -'l H /~ D r r !~~~! ~ ~ y' o~ d~! z b~ O Q~ tci I ~ Lyx O ,~..~ I ~ H I j D~ I ~ I 1 W 1 I 1 I 1 1 ~J 1'l ~l X O '-' ~ ~ -1 ~ Z D ~ ~ d d~ ~~ I.--+ (T1 zr v~ r so' ~~ ~4 I ^PEN d d CLOSE ~ -I ~7 ;.: fTl d rX-1 O N 0 ~~ £z a~ d I O ~ ~ -0 ~ Z I $'-J I I I 1 I I I I IX I z Iw o ~ i~ I~ ~ w I~ ~~--11I d !x„1 ~ N O ~ ~ £ Z ~~ -'~ W ~Z I I ~~ (II ~N I • (!1 (Jl (Jl ~ I X x w x w x w m ~ I: ~~ z d d d __ to I ~ ~ ~, ~ % ------------~--~---- ----'~L----- -----~ 1 I ~'__-~' X L----------, O y ~ ~ ~ J ~ Z D~ ~w Steve Rothwell -Dance Studio Building Layou..t ontours & oncepts ngineering .Phone: 360-438-0301 Lacey, Wa ---------, x 2 D r r ~~ ~~ ~ ~ C 'i •. o Vi R n 8 ~p9Ct p ~ ~ ~ ~`/~~yj. tl' 6 N u ~~ ~ ~~,,,, n r_ ~ ~~ A ~ V ~~~ E ~~ y f~ A ~ A ~ ~~ x~ ~ ~ a ~. ~ ~ ~ ~I ~ ~ ao 00 ~~~~~ ~ ~ O RF..VIEW INFORMATION 95 %(:omplc(c REVIEWER: OWNER PROJECT IDCNTIFIOATION Nn. FILE NAMC: tluanyi nnrE sr.Nr ro RrvmwrR: rsa A(,TION , ~,...... DI±SI(INEn RTrt)R 9R6AIJ DRAWN MB 9RRA)) cllEClcrn nrmn vnrvoJ pf.o•r~rn nn~7~s I ~ I ~ N I • I I I Z ! m Staff Exhibit 5 Presubmission Meeting Materials Schedule (1 page) Request (3 pages) Land Use Notes (6 pages) Civil Notes (6 pages) Building Notes (1 page) Updated Land Use Notes (5 pages) Updated Building Notes (1 page) YELM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (x) City Admin. (x) Comm. Dev. Dir. (x) Building Official (x) Mayor (x) Applicant (x) Posted (x) Public Works Dir. (x) City Engineer (x) Asst. Planner THE FOLLOWING CASES WILL BE CONSIDERED AT YELM CITY HALL, 105 YELM AVE. WEST, IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. MEETING DATE: WEDNESDAY JULY 16 2003 TIME I PR~- EN`JIRON- Si~E OT~iER~~ ~ DESGRIPTIQN SUE- iJ1ENTAL PLA(~' MISSION REVIEL~J REU{EVJ Applicant fntefnal .Internal .. ~ Attendance _ Staff Staff: Required -. Re~iiev~~ Review . Onl ~: Oaf ,. .;- . -- , ,- Rothwell 1:00 p.m. - Dance Studio 1011 Yelm Avenue West 1:30 p.m. ~ Packet distributed 7/9/03 D&D Associates, Don Findlay 2:00 p.m. Rosewood - 202 single family lots ~_ - Cullens & Killion 2:30 p.m. Packet distributed 5/27/03 3:00 p.m. 3:30 p.m. * Environmental Review/Site Plan Review: Internal staff review only, applicants and/or representatives may attend to OBSERVE. If you plan to attend, please notify the Community Development Department at 458-3835. C:\Community Development\'deekly SPR\4i~EKSPR.cloc _'_-~''-2?23 03:H0 PM 3604587104 P. 01 ,. I~~ ~~ ~ 1~ =~ t YE w~sr~frvcTa~ Gi'TY OF YE~.M PO Box 479 Yeim WA 98597 36Q-458-3244 Presubmission Meeting Request Forrn Fee: None OFF1clAL USE ONLY^~ Fea NIA .._ pato Received ~, ey . - - Flle No. ,~, prssubmlasior conference is an opportunity for applicants, developer(s) andJor consultants to meet with city staff to discuss preliminary studies or sketches of a proposed proJedt. At the conference the staff wil! tmake available infarmation'relating to the proposed development. The intent is to identify and eliminate as,many potential problems as possible in order for the project to be processed without delay. The Conference should take place prior to detailed work by an engineer or surveyor, however a site drawing must be submitted that has sufficient information ;o allow for eva{uation. Discussion topics will '-~'.~de such things as Yelm's Comprehensive Plan, streer. design, storm runoff and retention, Shoreline viastsr Program, zoning, availability of sewer and water, development concepts, other requirements and permits, and the environmental impact. Staff notes are prepared and available to review. There is no charge for this meeting. Meetings are held each Wednesday. This request form should be submitted by 5:00 p.m, at least one wtek before the preferred meeting date, ~~3EETlfdQ DATIr F1E©UESTED ~ • v~_ ~ ( Wednesday) r~itaiLi'JC, ADDRESS ~a`~ `~ i ~t.EPi LONE ~ ~ ~EpftE3E~NTATNE (If any) ,-~\~. OCCUPATION MAILING ADDRESS T~LEPHQNE ._.__~ General location of the proeec# 1~~~ `~~^~ ~" Section ~ Township Range ~~ssAsaor's i'ax Parcel Number ~ i Type of Project (Subdivision, Annexation, Zone Change, etc..),_ "~~c Total acreage `1 L"1 Proposed Density -~ Proposed Land Use: Single family Duplex Multi-!arnil;~ ~Aobils Homa Perk ~Com fi~ Industrial (mss;c ~f Grief dtscrlptien •f Prefect ~'~'- ~ ~ K ~,/•t his `~.~ - , r 5'- '! Y' C .v~ 'D r ` ~ . . e Pease attach aix copies of a site plan drawing not larger than 1 S' X 17" and forward to Yelm City Hal-. Time (afternoon only) OWNER '~-~^.~x.~~ ADDRESS ~~~ `~ -- 'iELt=AHOf~E ~S'S• r7 ic~~_ ': ^or~T~,~niry Dsvelopmon;lForrns & ProcedureslPre5ubmissloniPreS~;brriaaiorApp.doc °_r~, Q ~p ~~ A ~C ~~ ~...Y 1 _~ ,~ ~ ~' .~ ~ ...- H ~~ `~ 1 •r ~ _..., e -~, p~. `~„ 1--, ~ • , 3 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ r ~ ~ cr r ~ ^ ~. 3 ~~ a ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~+ t.S~ v .r ` .! ~~ . is - i _, ~ ~ o 35, m( "dn ~~ t ~y~I l I r_ ~l ~ ~-~_o ~<~) R to ~'lj~ ^_( _- ~. P r ~ Vr" ~. ~ ~ ~ r ~ C` `-d""i. ~., 7 ..r Va ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~^ C C ~" ~ Ci ~, ~ ` C H ~, t ~ ~, ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~"~ i ~ ~ f` l' ~ ~ Cf ~ T ~ "~ ~ ~ --~.., f ,T G `' ~ ~ f 07"7 ~' ti 6 -r ~ ~ b .. i >. ,,,.,,,•.,, ~~~ in ~ ~T rte! -~• (°"` 9URNETT RO <= r ~ ~ ~ i OZ ~. - ~, 1w ~~• b i ~ ~2 UYTAI VVIE1i RD S ~ (/I V• ~ ~,• m 00 ~ r' Oh RD SE ~ ~ ~ o ~~ ~ <,~ V .CUSS EN 5T:~4` a ~ ~ Q~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~', ~~ 'f ~~S CRS TA R NGS ^~ RD ~ ' RHOT 4 T 5 z ~ ' SAC .~ yo '- ~ ~ / ~ oay ° ~ ~ p GL ,` ~J F _ „_ 'Tvt N1LKE++SEN _ ~ (fl ~, RD :E •r ~r / A GROV ~ ~ `rr ~ ~+ r~.i• ^c~STSEO~,d~ ~ _ G .jS tiS sf A `~~' , ~ ~ ~ (D ~ C ~ rh I~ ~ n~ m K cn fi' n F'• $ O o r AI U i ~ y ct s tn ~ ~ O ~ ~ E ~ ~ N- b !'C w c~'v c~ :.~ w ~ n c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~- ~ E+ ~~ fi ~ ~ om -m o m ~ n ~ m rr ~ ~ m ~ ~ xs~ a c~ F.,. K N. `~ ~a ~ / ~~ / G i.l rU -~~ i \~ Y. / i''%qS~ ~% ' __ _ -=~-- - ~ o /_ I ~ ~--~ C(.7> ~'' ~ ~ ~ ~ ® rd w n n ~ ~ o N G G o ~ K ~ ~, _ _. „ 1 ' ~ -fry ~^ ---L ~,~, w ., ~~ ~ c"' r,i 1 r L ' x - ,~ v+ ~ v ~ ":: CD ,~ S R 1 ~~,, -~ .1{ ' ~` - / -~ I _~ ' ~;, r r---~ „~ 9 r r ~~ G ~ i ~^ 1 ~ ~ ~= ~_~ ( 1 i j / ~ ' 1 ~_. _.__.. _... .... ._,..-..~. '~-I ~~ 1 ! ` ~ . . j: ~. "'~. =~1 re ~ U R i J •^~ ~~. _`` ~~~..` ~, p ~ ~Ll~' ~.. ~S n'~ ' 4 _ __~ ~~,1 "~, ~f~, >, a ~?r ~ ;_ ~1_, (-. ~' ~) 1 ~=:. ~` 1~ ~„ ~y C'y C ,.t1 ~Y°h r '. (` •w ~"' '^° i n ` .'"'~ ,`' fi hh ~J vt Pre-Application Meeting July 16, 2003 ***These comments are preliminary in nature and are not intended to represent final comments and or requirements for the City of Yelm. Until a complete application is made, the Community Development Department can only attempt to inform the applicant of general requirements as they appear in the form presented by the applicant at the time of pre-submission. Proponent: Steve and Darlene Rothwell Project Proposal: Luv2Dance Studio (After the fact) Project Location: 1017 West Yelm Avenue ~ Zoning and Setbacks The property is zoned Commercial (C-1), Chapter 17.26 YMC. This district allows `Studios, such as record recording, couturier, artist, music, dancing, and photographic' as a permitted use subject to site plan review. Note that the code does not distinguish between `commercial' and public or private dance studios, the site plan review process and other requirements of the Zoning Code apply to either. Minimum lot size: 5,000 square feet. Maximum height of buildings: 40 feet. Front yard setback: 15 feet. Side yard setback: 10 feet. Rear yard setback: 15 feet. Parking Chapter 17.72 YMC requires one parking space for every 10 occupants, based on the maximum occupant load as determined by the Uniform Building Code for Assembly areas of less-concentrated use. Based on a maximum occupant load of 217, 22 parking spaces would be required. A parking plan needs to be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval a the time of application for site plan review. All required parking areas must be paved and striped. Ingress/Egress Ingress and egress at the site shall be consistent with the Yelm Development Guidelines, section 4B.140. Landscaping Type II landscaping is intended to provide visual separation of uses from streets, and visual separation of compatible uses so as to soften the appearance of streets, parking areas, and building elevation. This landscaping is used around the perimeter of a site, and adjacent to buildings. Type II landscaping would be required along the side and rear property lines and adjacent to the building. Traffic The City has adopted a Transportation Facility Charge (TFC) of $750.00 per PM peak trip. The Code provides a default table that the applicant can use to determine new PM trips generated. For a dance studio, the trip generation rate is 1.83 per 1,000 square feet. To determine the projects impact and fee, use the following formula: ((Peak PM Trip Rate * Gross Floor Area)/1,000) * $750.00 =TFC Example: ((1.83 PM Trips x 3,200 sq, ft.)/~, 000) * $750.00 = $4, 392.00 If the applicant feels the proposed use would not generate the default number of trips as designated'in the TFC Ordinance, and analysis prepared by a Washington State Licensed Engineer can be submitted to the City for review and consideration. SEPA An environmental checklist will be required if the proposal requires more than 20 or more parking stalls or other buildings than the pole structure are used as part of the dance studio. Application and Process Site Plan Review, Chapter 17.84, is an administrative process. Minimum application requirements are located in Section 17.84.060 and are listed on the application form. A project of this size can expect completed review in approximately 12 to 14 weeks. Land use approval typically contains conditions of approval that the applicant must complete prior to receiving a building permit. Upon satisfactory completion of all conditions of land use approval, the applicant can submit building plans for approval. Other Design Guidelines -the attached checklist must be submitted at time of application, with written responses on how each guideline requirement is proposed to be met. DESIGN GUIDELINES - Luv2Dance Studio Pro'ect Review Checklist Guidelines Applicable Guidelines Met I.A. (1) Relate develo ment to edestrian oriented street fronta e. X I.A. 2 Relate develo ment to street fronts other than edestrian-oriented streets). X I.B. 1 Minimize visibili and im acts of service areas. X I.C.(1) Take advantage of special opportunities and mitigate impacts of large develo ments. X I.D. 1 Reduce im act of service areas and mechanical e ui ment. X I.E. 1 Inte rate biofiltration swales and orids into the overall site desi n. ~ X I.F. 1 Enhance the visual uali of develo ment on corners. X I.F.(2) Provide a paved pedestrian walkway from the~street corner to the building entrance. X II.A.(1) All pedestrian paths must correspond with federal, state and local codes for handica ed access, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. X II.A.(2) Provide adequate lighting at the building entries and all walkways and paths throw h arkin lots. X II.A. 3 Develo an on-site edestrian circulation conce t. X 11.B.(1) Provide a pedestrian path at least 60" wide (preferably 96" wide) from the street sidewalk to the main ent X ~I ILB.(2) Provide pedestrian paths or walkways connecting all businesses and the entries of multi le buildin son the same develo meet site. X II.B. 3 Provide athwa s throw h arkin lots X II.C.(1) Where street ROW is insufficient to provide adequate sidewalks buildings and other site features must be set back from the public ROW to achieve at least minimum sidewalk widths. X II.C.(2) Where new streets are developed, provide sidewalks according to minimum standards. X II.D.(1) Provide, where feasible, pedestrian circulation routes to adjacent uses and transit. X II.D. 2 Inte rate nearb transit sto s into the tannin of adjacent site im rovements. X II.D.(3) Encourage pedestrian paths from all transit stops through commercial areas to residential areas within 1,200 feet X II.E.(1 Enhance buildin ent access. X II.F. 1 Provide edestrian-oriented o ens ace at ke locations. X III.A.(1) Provide access roads throw h tar e lots with more than one street fronta e. X IlLB.(1 Minimize drivewa im acts. X III.C.(1) Meet requirements for location of parking lots on pedestrian-oriented streets. X Yelm Municipal Code refuse container, and shall in no case be less than six feet high. 2. No refuse container shall be permitted between a street and the front of a building. ~. Refuse collection areas shall be designed to contain all refuse generated on-site and depos- ited between collections. Deposited refuse shall not be visible from outside the refuse enclosure. (Ord. 561 § 3, 1995; Ord. 5~5 § 14, 1995). 17.72.080 Development guidelines. A. Parking area design shall include: 1. Ingress and Egress. The location of all points of ingress and egress to parking areas shall be subject~to the review and approval of the city engineer. 2. Backing Out Prohibited. In all commercial and industrial developments and in all residential buildings containing five or more dwelling units, parking areas shall be so arranged as to make it unnecessary for a vehicle to back out into any street or public right-of-way. 3. Parking Spaces -Access and Dimensions. Adequate provision shall be made for individual ingress and egress by vehicles to all parking stalls at all times by means of unobstructed maneuvering aisles. Maneuvering aisles, .parking stall dimen- sions and requirements shall be as shown in:Tables 17-2 through 17-4. 4. Small Car Parking Spaces. In all parking facilities containing 25 or more parking spaces, a maximum of 25 percent of the required parking spaces may be reduced in size for the use of small cars, provided these spaces shall be clearly identi-• feed with a sign permanently affixed immediately in front of each space containing the notation, "Compacts Only." Spaces designed for small cars may be reduced in size to a minimum of seven and one-half feet in width and 15 feet in length. Where feasible, all small car spaces shall be located in one or more contiguous areas and/or adjacent to ingress/egress points within parking facilities. Location of compact car parking spaces shall not create traffic congestion or impede traffic flows. 17.72.080 Table 17-2 d ~ C ~ n ;4„ c' I ~e je L -~ f .~. f a One-Way Traffic a b c d e f b' c' 0° 28' 8' 12' 23' 8' 35° 48' 18' 12' 14.8' 8.5' 41' 14.5' 40° 49' 18.5' 12' 13.2' 8.5' 42' 15' 45° 50' 19' 12' 12' 8.5' 43' 15.5' 50° 51' 19.5' 12' 11.1' 8.5' 45' 16.5' 55° 53' 20' 13' 10.4' 8.5' 48' 17.5' 60° 55' 20' 15' 9.8' 8.5' S0' 17.5' 65 ° 57' 20' 17' 9.7' 8.8' S 3' 18' 70° 59' 20' 19' 9.6' 9' S6' 18.5' 45° 17' 11' 8' U U pp 60° 16.7' 14' 8' •~ 75° 16.3' 17.4' 8' .. L Z j ~; 90° 15' 20' 8' Table 17-3 b , %, / ~, ~i ~I b' i f ~e~f a ~ -i-! ~ i 17-~~') TR~IVSPORTATIO~i Co:r~nercial Co~?ector 200 feet 1Veighborhood Collector 200 feet Local Access 150 feet Pr_vate Roadway 150 feet . ti~,nen "~~~erent class sweets i~?tersect, i~he higher sta-!dard shall apply; On curb ra ~~: Deviatior_s t0 tit11S may be ~O4ved at the direction of`~he Ci~y. D. On slopi-~g approaches at a_n il-~tersection, 1a-~ ~ngs shall 'oe prov;ded wi=th grade not to exceed or_e foot differer_ee il~ elevation for a distance of 30 feet approaching any a_rter_al or 20 leer approaching a collector or Local access street, measured froze! ~' nearest Right-of-V~ay 1i-~e (extended) of intersecting street. 4B.14Q Driveways A. General 1. Driveway widths and spacing shall be designed following the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) "Guideline for Driveway Design ~ Location", latest edition and using the cement concrete approach, drawing number 4-9 located at the end of this chapter. Widths and spacing must be approved by the City. 2. All abandoned driveway areas shall be removed and the curbing and sidewalk or shoulder and ditch section shall be properly restored. 3. All driveways constructed within street right of ways shall be constructed of Portland Cement Concrete and shall be subject to the same testing and inspection requirements as curb, gutter, and sidewalk construction. 4. Joint-use driveways serving two adjacent parcels may be built on their common bounda-y upon formal written agreemer_t by both property owr_ers and approval of the Ci~y. the agreement shat be a recorded easernent for both parcels of land specuy~ng joint usage. :~. GLade Drea::S, 1~?C1:_'C..i:"ij t_"?e t:e t0 t'_^.e rOaC':+'?'!, S:~w'1 oe a M 2.:~~.._l.i "'_ cg .Tie= Ce-:. Gi:... C:"eS ~ a~-'_r i '~ Dc: Ce:: _ :i: a Sad. d. ~O CO -,e:C~al on~~e:~JG~ s a~.1 be aG~:"o~;e~ ,. c:? DaCc.1.'!° 0.1•`_0 t::e e':'^~=; -°°~ ~ '"'e~. sd ~. ~... o: st: ,,., ; s ree .;:: %. I~'.Oa'_. a~v~OaC:: t- ~~' a^CP55eS S';all (:~i;ly bF' aiio':vFr? :;:~C:: )USCii~er.; ii'1'C~:j~ 2~1 aCCe~%P.1 lic':C 2.1`:a~~i55 ~i~1=~ ie~0i , a_:`1(i TR_A!~ISPORTATI O?~ Witizin the sight t~iangle, cut slopes, hedges, fer_ces, trees, signs, u`~Liit+T poles, a a_n-y ding large er_ough to con stitute a sight obstruct; or_ shoal d be removed or lowered. Parl~~?g should also be eliminated and signs oi:"set so sight cLstance is not obsL acted. Szght obstT-ucuons that may be excluded ~-o~. these requ_v-~ent5 s!clude: e_~SL`lg Lt'u.~y poles, regulatory signs, trees t-:-led fro-~n L'ne base to a height of 10 feet above tlo.e Street, and preexisting bu?ldir~gs. A sight distance mainter_ance easea~ er_t must be granted to the Citti for all irnprovements'including commercial and residential (including mu'_ti- fa-nily) development, plats and short plats. The easement shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or engineer capable of performing such work.. The sight distance maintenance easement is based upon ' • the sight distance triangle calculations in the WSDOT Design Manual and the latest edition of the AASHTO Green Book. Easements shall be prepared in the same manner as outlined in section 3.110. A copy of the Easement Preparation Standards can be found in the Appendix B. 4B.160 Surfacing Requirements The following are the surfacing requirements for each application listed. Boulevard and Arterial Streets The engineer will provide a pavement design. The design of the pavement shall include a study of the native soils, their behavior under load, and the design of a structural section to carry the anticipated loads under all climate conditions. In no event shall the structural section be less than the minimums shown below: Surfacing: 0.33' Class B Asphalt Concrete Top Course: 0.17' Crushed Surfacing Top Course Base: 1.00' Gravel Base One soil sa-nple per each 500 LF of centerline with 3 mir~urn per project representative of the roadway subgrade shall be taken to determine a statis`ucal representa`uon of the existilzg soil conditions at design grade. Tie ua~ie:::er'_~ CeSij S~ ed a::d Spa.:_ve~i v~i a:_ ei ~ i'-°?: licensed D': the Stare Of ~'laSl''.?n ~~on, S~'?rll be based 0:1 aC:~..tal 50::S teS~S c"'_C SUD:=.itt~.C ~^ii~_'? LP.e OIc."'_S. Ti^.e friio' :.'?g S~l;C~i.:2~ S°C:iOP. n :a'i Cie L1Sed it li?U 0~ a ~a'-e::°::- deS.~ e Use Oi ChiS SeCuC n iS Si,.OjeCt t0 Cay a_C~rO~'2~ Oi p:epajeC Stib~ c_~e. :~. Col'i.n_.'.-Ci%~ COlCCtOi Si:'°~i3 _ ~ ~ _. ~f 1 ..) L) ~ ~~ ~ Jj 'J ~J Staff Exhibit 4 Enforcement Letter dated July 2, 2003 ~pfc TNF A~ I. ~ 9, Ci o Yel~n ~, ~ 105 Yelm Avenue West YELM P.O. Box 479 WASHINGTON Yelm, Washington 98597 (360) 458-3244 July 2, 2003 Stephen and Darlene Rothwell 1011 Yelm Ave. West. Yelm, WA 98597 Re: Luv2Dance Studio Dear Mr. and Mrs. Rothwell, It has come to the attention of the City of Yelm that you are proposing to open a dance studio in the structure recently built under permit #6967. The Use of this structure and property for a dance studio without required permits would be in violation of the Yelm Zoning Code and Uniform Building Code. Your property is zoned commercial (C-1) and such use would be allowed through the issuance of a Site Plan Review Permit. The Site Plan Review is an internal review by the City to ensure that your proposal meets all City requirements. The process usually takes 12 to 16 weeks, allowing for mandated public input periods. I have enclosed for your use and information a request for apre-submission meeting. Pre-submission meetings are held every Wednesday, at which time all requirements for the proposal are reviewed in detail, including the site plan process, landscaping requirements, frontage improvements, water sewer connection, and building issues During the Site Plan Review process you may also submit to me plans by a licensed Architect bringing your structure up to code requirements for a public building. If I can answer any questions or be of help please call me at 360.458.8407. Thank you. Sincerely Gary Carlson Building Official The City of Yelm is an Equal Opportunity Provider Staff Exhibit 3 Advertisements for Luv2Dance Studio s N O O r ~~ ~s+ t ~ o0 ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~' • ~ a, ~ cry ~ ~1 ~ ~ 1 a ~ O tt :-r rTT~ V s 0 0 oa (~ ~5 ~~ ~-=/ ~~ ~? C:/ ~ ~ 3 < ~ ° ,C ~ ~ CD ~ CD n ~ m n ~ c" v; ~' O ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cn rt ~ ~ S ~ O ~~ ~ o° ' • ~ Q N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ ~O V (J7 N Ul ~I O~ N GO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~~ ~ ~ .c ~ ~ ~, ~ a rt j Q Q ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ N _ ~~ ~ a ~`~°o o` ° ~ 0 ~ o , ~ ~' ~ a u o ~ ~ rr 3 ~ ~ ~ n~.~~~ c~ t~ rn ~, ~~ ~ ~ ~D j ~ N ~. 3 L _. ~• ~\ / ~ V 4 ,: ~ ~~ r b Q =~ L \~ 1 n b f' O O 0 rt A~ O ~ ~ a c a ~. '~ o ~ ~ c' CD ~ ~ a. ~ ~~ m~ C ~, ~~ ~ ~ cr rn 0 n ~~ U :c~ S {~_ S ~ n ~.. :~ t ~~ L O L `~U~r^~v,1\ ~((~l~ ~ i.. /~ O V V ~3 tit-'\ °4lr-~+.. .~ a: ~ ~ ;: ~~ ~ ~-~ c~ N u~ ,,,`. ~ , c '° Cl. -~" -~?^Y '~ i ~_ ~~~ ~ Q ~. ~^ `/ N to N O a O ~« ~~ c _. -~ :, ay ~ a A a ~, o ~ N 'a 91 ~r as cD t~D a c~ ca 7~ 7 7 ~ ~ ~ o~ ~~ ~~ ~. ~~~ a ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~:~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ o~ ~ . ,~,~ ~ c a ~ ~ ~a~ ~, o ~~ ~`~o o• ~ ~ m Q ~ ~ ~o J O 3 ~~ n ~ ~ Q ~° ~c~n ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ l ~/ a 4, t ~~ ~ i ~ R V ~~ • SUM11'IER SCHEDULE CLASSES BEGL'V JULY 7 MO---i`TDAI' 4PM BEGINNL~iG BALLET/JAZZ SPM BALLET 6PM JAZZ/HIP HOP 7PM MUSICAL THEATER TUESDAY, 4:00-5:30 TECH1vIQiTE/MODERN ' L~CALBALLET ~ . 5:30-7:00 JA7~1gIp_HOP 7PM ADULTS ONLY WEDNESDAY 4PM BOYS ONLY-BRE AK/g~_HOa~ SPM TAP 6PM HIP HOP 7PM JAZZ THURSDAY SPM KARAOKE SAY X3:00-5:30 TECHNIQUEIMODER'~t LYRICALBALLET x:30-7:00 JA.Z71gIp_HOP 4-5 & 6 YRS 4LD 7-9 YRS OLD 7-9 YRS OLD ~-13 YRS OLD 9-13 YR OLDS 9-13 YR OLDS 8 AND UP 9-13 YR OLDS 9-13 YR OLDS READING AGE TEENS TEENS Staff Exhibit 2 Building Permit Number 6967 CITY OF YELM BUILDING DEPT. Phone: (360) 458-8407 Fax: (360) 458-314.4 0 r N :..z~, Name -ti ~'? ~. ~ R j Address / ~ ~ % / ~"~!~ Site Address /J; j ~ P R Assessor's Parcel No. ~ ! O P Subdivision _ _ !~_:~ ~ /~~ ~T Y nra sr,~rt Pi~+ Nr, Existing Structures, if any: ~/ r.-ice S G Name "~ .~Gi: ~~. ~ ~~T,R%S / Address ~ 7j 7~/ ,~"J : ~i~!' /' r City ~~i'Js-s' State f~; Exp. Yelm Bus. Lic. No. Description of Work ~ ~ ;,tom _ ~ ~ ti' ~' ,~ le',rj • ,~j ~? Z• OFFICIAL USE ONLY Permit Type: Sq. Ft, per floor: (1st) ~ ~ ,,~,.,; (2nd) Garage v Residential Sign Sewer Septic Approval No. Commercial Other City Water Private Well Private System Shoreline Permit Y N Heat: Electric Gas Other Sepa Exempt Y N ITEM BASIS FOR FEE FEE Floor Plan Y N Building Value c ~'~ Z?/~`' 4 ~ G~ (,;~ ~y-' " // ~b) y,~, ~ ~ Sets of Prints Other Plumbing Permit # ~ ~ ~ WA. ST. BC. Fee (4.50 -New Const. Only) ~`f Mechanical Permit # r • TOTAL FEE ,.> ~~~ '7 ~ / Plan Check By ,~ Minimum distance of structure from property lines; Issued By ~'"'~ Front to of Road Finallnsp: / / Side Side Rear Owner L & I Form Assessor Floor Plan and Permit Applicants Affidavit: I certify that I have read and examined the information contained within the application and know the same to be true Submitted / / and correct. I also certify that the proposed structure is in conformity with all applicable City of Yelm regulations including those governing zoning and land subdivision, and in addition, all covenants, easements and restrictions of record. If applying as a contractor, I further certify that I am a currently registered contractor in the State of Washington. ~ J 9uarterly Reports Signature ,..~, ~ ~ ,i .~ Date J ~ ~ `~ ~ Assessor / / Firm: TRPC / /_ ~~ ~IA~ ~ ~ 200'. ~ ~LNi iT~ .~'~ ~~ ~. Building Permit ~~ 6 9 6 7 Date (Work must be started within 180 days) Phone ~.,~!' i.a ~ City ~'~ Cl.l-~~ State ~..~.~ i L'1 ~' Lot Size (sq. ff./acres) Lot ~ +~l Lc;1r~~ lc. 1 ~;~~~ Contact Block Block Phone ( ) Zip Code Gj~ j • Staff Exhibit 1 Notice of Appeal 12/09/2003 11:36 3604916904 THE KIRKBRIDE GROUP PAGE 02 ~ eF HE A~ f~ 4 ~c~ Y1;LN1 Ww$F+iNCI^ON C~~ ~r >f G~IYI PO BOX 479 Yeim WA 98x97 360-458-3244 OFFlCIAl. USE ONLY gee Date Received By Flle No. NaTICE OF APPEAI. Fee: Staff pecision - $50.00 Hearing Examiner Decision ~ $100.00 (In addition, any professional service char es sr Resolution #358 A Closed record appeal may follow either an open record hearing or an open record administrative decision on a project permit application when the appeal is on the record, and no or limited new evidence or lntormation is allowed to be submitted. Appeals on Category I & I! project decisions are heard by the Clty Council. Appeals oh Category It! 8t,1V project decisions as wetl as Category I & II declsions which have been appealed to the City Council go to Superior Court and foElow the judicial review process set forth in RCW 368.70C. !il Nofiice of Appeal must be filets wlihln 14 days of Notice of Final Decision. PROJECT CASE NUMBER f~E1NG APPEALED Case #SPR-03-8354-YL DATb OF NOTICE OF FINAL AEC1S10N Decembrrr 3, 200 APPELLANT(S) Mr. and Mrs. Steve Rothweil Mailing Address City, State and Zlp~~m, WA 98597 Telephone , (360 458-? I04 SPECIFIC JTEMS OF DECJ510N BEING APPEALED (attach addltlonal sheef ft necessary):_„_ The specific items that are being appealed are Condition #2 and #3 of th.e Site Plan Review Committee condition of approval, concerning the requirement of connecting the existing residences to the City water and sewer system. !affirm that all answers, statements and information contained in and submitted with this application are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. l also affirm tti~t I am the owner of the subject site or am duly arJihorizsd by the owner to act with respect to this appllcation. Further, I grant permission from the owner to any and ai! employees and representatives of the City of Yelm and other governmental agencies to enter upon and inspect said property as reasonably necessary to process this application. I agree to pay all fees of the city which apply to this application. -~ Slgned~~;_;/.l1 l~ ~.f Date C:1Community Dcvclctpmcnt~('nrm.~ ~ ProcccJurc.S~,F~ppcals`,Al~rcalApp.Jr~c amp 12/09/2003 11:36 3604916904 THE KIRKBRIDE GROUP PAGE 03 ~ o urs & Mailing Addre~ '.O. Box 4'76 Tenino WA 48589 o pts Physical Address: 4405 - 7th Ave. S.E. Suite 304 Lacey, WA _~ ngineeclPhone Number: 360-438-0301 ~Mai1: Bi11@CandCenQfneerinQ.enm December 9, 2003 To: Ta.mi Merriman Assistant Plattner PO Box 479 Xelm, WA 98597 Ph: 3611-458-3224 From,: Bi.II Turner, P.E. PO Iiox 476 Tenino, WA. 98589 RE: Steve Rothwel.l. --Dance Studio Case #SPR-03-8354-YL Appeal oP Site Plans Approval ,near Ms. Metri.man, On behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Rothwell, I am appealing the findings o'f the review board for. the above named project..A.fter reviewing the Site Plan .Approval Letter dated December 3, 2003 I a.t». appealing the findings of th,e review board specifically condition of approval #2 Water Supply, #3 Sewer System and the defi.n.iti.on of "New Development", for the following reason: • Connecting the existing residences to the City sewer and water system was not presented as a condition of approval at the preapplication meeting and was not an issue until mentioned in the Site Plan ,Review Meeting on November 19, 2003. Th.i.s is a requirement that should. have been known at the time of the preappl.ication meeting and not something that should be rcv.iewed at a later. date. Ordinance 17.84.050 Preliminar site Ian states that, "Prior to applying for s.i.te plan. review, a developer may file with the SPRC a summary site plan, which shall contain in a .rough and approximate manner all of the information required in the site plan application. The purpose of the summary site plan .is to enable a developer filing the plan to obtain the comments of the SPRC as to the applicability of the .intent, standards an. d provisions of this chapter to the plan." The SPRC failed in complying with the intent o.f this ordinance by not specifying that through the development process, opening a sma.il dance studio, the Rothwclls would be .required to connect thci.r personnel. .residences to the City water and sewer system. Mr. and Mrs. Rothwell have spent a considerable amount of time and .money on this project. Time and money that would not have been spent lead they known that they would be required to connect their personal residences to the City sewer and water system. • The existing well that is located on the site is ciassi'fed by Washington State and the Thurston County Health Departments as a shared well. or two party well. and does not need to be approved as a Group B system, as indicated in the SPRC fnndings under condition #2. The well has been tested and test results show that the well is clean and free of any contaminants. 12/09/2003 11:36 3604916904 THE KIRK BRIDE GROUP PAGE 04 Since there will not be any major building construction on the property, this project should not be classified as new d.evetopment as indicated in the SPRC findings under condition #2 and #3. New development is not det3ncd in rbe City Ordinances 17.06.410 through 17.06.830 and therefore should not arbitrarily classify any project under any circumstances as "New Development". The project site is coned in. a commercial area (Village Retail) and the proposed business is allowed under this zoning. Since the residential homes are in separate structures away from. the dance studio it does not seem reasonable to require these structures to also be connect to the City water and sewer system. Through my review of the Development Guidet_i.nes dated May 2002, I could not f.nd any City Ordinances or Public 'Works standards that would required tl.~e existing .residences to be connected to the City water and sewer system. Thank you for your time and consideration on this project. if you have arty questions or need more i.n'I'orrnation, please call me as soon as possible. Respectful.i.y, --. ,~c.t,~/CG2~~.i Bill Turner, P.E. Principal Engineer, Contours & Concepts Engineering, LLC. cc: file SCeve Rpthwell ~~! STAFF REPGIRT City o f 'elm Community Development Department To: Stephen K. Causseaux, Jr., Hearing Examiner From: Grant Beck, Director of Community Developmeni~-~ Date: January 6, 2004 Subject: Appeal of Site Plan Review Approval SPR-03-8354-YL APL-03-8361-YL Appellant: Mr. and Mrs. Steve Rothwell 1011 West Yelm Avenue Yelm, WA 98597 Location: 1011 West Yelm Avenue, Tax Parcel Number 21724130300 Proposal: Appeal conditions 2 and 3 of the site plan review approval, requiring connection of existing buildings on the property to the City sewer and water systems. I. INTRODUCTION The Rothwell's appeal conditions of their site plan review approval allowing the after the fact conversion of a residential accessory structure to a dance studio. II. FACTS On May 5, 2003, the Rothwell's were issued a building permit to construct a "50 x 64 enclosed play area" classified as residential accessory. The building was reviewed as a group U occupancy under the 1997 Uniform Building Code, which is defined at Section 312 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code as: Group U Occupancies shall include buildings or structures, or portions thereof, and shall be: Division 7. Private garages, carports, sheds and agricultural buildings. The Uniform Building Code considers this particular occupancy group as private (not for use by the general public) and does not require the same level of life safety requirements as if the structure were open to the public (as in a dance studio) such as: egress with panic hardware; fire alarms and detectors; and restroom facilities. Staff Report Page 1 of 8 The Yelm Zoning Code considers an enclosed play area with a group U occupancy to be a accessory use to the single family dwelling on~the property. Subsequent to the final approval of the structure for private recreational use, the Community Development Department became aware that the Rothwell's were advertising dance lessons at the Luv2Dance Studio via flyers and advertisements at the Yelm Cinemas. Upon investigation, it was determined that the Rothwell's were operating the dance studio out of the building permitted as a residential play area and that restroom facilities had been installed inside the structure without benefit of building or plumbing permits. Further, the restroom was connected to a well and the on-site sewage disposal system located on the property without benefit of approval by the Thurston County Health Department. The Rothwell's were notified of the violation through a letter from Gary Carlson, the City's Code Enforcement Officer and Building Official on July 2, 2003. On July 16, 2003, apre-submission conference was held with the Rothwell's in order to review the requirements to convert the building to a dance studio. During the meeting, it was indicated that the requirements for conversion of a portion of the structure would be significantly easier to accomplish and the pre-submission notes were updated on August 6, 2003, assuming that 1,000 square feet of the building would be separated for use by the dance studio. The Site Plan Review application was approved on December 3, 2003. The permit was issued with a number of conditions of approval, including 2.a. The applicant shall connect all existing structures to the City water system. The cost to connect shall include a fee of $1,500.00 per Equivalent Residential Unit (each ERU equals 240 gallons of water consumption per day, fee subject to change.). The applicant shall provide proposed water usage calculations for the dance studio to the Community Development Department for review and approval, to determine the number of gallons of daily use. 2.b. The applicant shall abandon the existing well per Washington State Department of Ecology standards, and transfer any existing water rights to the City of Yelm. 3.a. The applicant shall connect all existing structures to the City S. T.E. P. sewer system. The cost to connect shall include a fee of $5,125.00 per ERU (each ERU equals 240 gallons of water consumption per day, fee subject to change). The number of ERU's required will be determined by approved water consumption calculations. 3.b. The applicant shall abandon the on-site sewage systems per the Thurston County Department of Health standards, and provide proof of approval to the City. The property is just over 4 acres in area, fronts on Yelm Avenue West, and currently is occupied by a single family dwelling, a double wide manufactured home, and the building constructed as a residential enclosed play area. A well located on the property provides potable water to the Staff Report Page 2 of 8 house and manufactured home, as well as being connected to the enclosed play area without building permit or County Health Department approval. There are two on-site sewage disposal systems serving the house and manufactured home. The system connected to the mobile home was installed in 1970 to serve two bedrooms pursuant to permit number 3054 issued by the Thurston-Mason Health District. The applicant's engineer was unable to provide any records relating to the septic system serving the house, most likely as the house was constructed in 1944 and pre-dates requirements for building or septic permits. According to the Washington Department of Health Rules: Public water system shall mean any system providing water for human consumption through pipes or other constructed conveyances, excluding a system serving only one single-family residence and a system with four or fewer connections all of which serve residences on the same farm. [Section 246-290- 020 (1) WAC] A Group B water system is a public water system that does not meet the definition of a Group A water system. (See Table 1 and chapter 246-291 WAC for further explanation of a Group 8 water system.) [Section 246-290-020 (5)(c) WAC] The Rules and Regulations of the Thurston County Board of Health (Health Code) states in Article III: 1.2 General Requirements. Every residence, place of business, or other building or place where people congregate, reside or are employed shall be served by a water system that is designed and operated to deliver safe drinking water. 1.2.1 Single-family, two-party, and rental unit water supplies shall be subject to the requirements of PARTS 1 and 2 of this regulation. 1.2.2 All public water supplies except two-party systems shall meet the design, construction, monitoring, quality, quantity and operational standards of PARTS 1 and 3 of this regulation and Chapter 246-290 WAC. Two-party water systems shall be considered public water systems for the purpose of administering the Thurston County Coordinated Water System Plan. Only the buildings and projects identified in SECTION 7.3 are exempt from this regulation. The South Thurston County Urban Growth Areas Abbreviated Coordinated Water System Plan establishes policies related to public water systems within the Yelm Water Service Area and Urban Growth Area, as follows: The designated water system is assigned a priority right to provide service within their designated Urban Water Supply Service Area (UWSSA). The UWSSAs for the municipalities of Yelm, Rainier, and Tenino are their respective Urban Growth Areas as identified in the Joint Plans adopted by the municipalities and Thurston County... Staff Report Page 3 of 8 The UWSSA is the area intended to be ultimately served by the designated utility... [Section 2.1 Water System Plan] Over time, existing small public water systems should generally be incorporated into the designated utility to ensure adequate fire flow to protect structures and public safety and provide professional water system operation and management. Wells that are no longer used must be properly decommissioned to reduce risk of groundwater contamination and allow full development of these areas. Timing of incorporation into the designated system will depend on connection requirements of the individual water systems. [Section 2.1.2 Water System Plan] Minimizing the number of separate water systems is a long-term objective of the Public Water System Coordination Act. Incorporating existing small systems into municipal systems is consistent with this objective. [Section 4.5 Water System Plan] Yelm's Comprehensive Plan and Joint Plan with Thurston County addresses public facilities and utilities in Chapter V, which states at Section V.3.d: The City considers a septic system a temporary system within the urban area and incompatible with long-term urban densities. Development standards shall be developed to identify the timing and nature of funding and conversion obligations for septic systems in the urban area. Groundwater monitoring is appropriate in areas under septic tank management. Most of Yelm is in an area of extreme aquifer sensitivity. The current sewage treatment plan was required due to groundwater pollution concerns. For this reason, development at urban levels of density on septic tanks is not in the public interest. Many areas within the Urban Growth Area are already on septic tanks. !n addition, some development will likely occur at one unit per five acres density on septic tanks within the unsewered areas of the City and the Urban Growth Area. The City will permit development in non-sewered areas with low densities on septic tanks. Such installations must be prepared to transfer to the sewer line when facilities are available and hook-up required under the criteria set forth in the development standards. The County would follow similar guidelines in the unincorporated Urban Growth Area. The City's Development regulations implements the Comprehensive Plan at Section 7A.020: Except as provided herein, it shall be unlawful to construct or maintain any privy, privy vault, cesspool, or other facility intended or used for the disposal of sewage and to install or use any onsite soil absorption systems in such cases where the City's sewer collection system is available for service as provided herein. For purposes of this Section (Ordinance 505), the sewer collection system shall be deemed available when the premises are within 200 feet of the City's collection lines; provided that the City's treatment plant holds sufficient unused capacity to Staff Report Page 4 of 8 treat the expected sewage from the premise. The 200-foot distance shall be calculated by measuring from the lot line closest to the existing portion of the City's collection system. For the purpose of this chapter, when sewer is not available as defined in this Section, primarily treated waste water maybe disposed of onsite with a treatment and disposal system that meets the approval of the Health Officer. All components shall be designed and constructed to meet the City of Yelm's STEP System Standards, included in this Chapter. The City of Yelm shall establish the standards under which all components of the system will be constructed, including: side sewers, tanks, pumps, pump controls, and associated appurtenances for both the municipal system and onsite soil absorption systems that will be converted for use in the transport of effluent to the Yelm municipal collection system at such time as sewer is available. The owner(s) of any premises upon which any building is located within the City's sewer service area shall connect to the City's municipal sewer system if.• (a) the City's sewer collection system is available to the premises, as defined herein; (b) the Thurston County Health Department has determined that the interests of public health and safety require a connection to the City's municipal sewer system. Where the sewer collection system is available and as such, a property owner is required to connect to such system, such connection shall be made when, in the opinion of the Health Officer, the on-site system on the premises requires repair or replacement. Such connections shall be made at the sole expense of_ the owner within 30 days after notification by the City that service is available. These policies and regulations have been codified at Section 13.08.020 (A) Yelm Municipal Code: It is unlawful for any person to place, deposit or permit to be placed or deposited, any human or animal excrement, sanitary sewage or other objectionable waste, by any natural or nonnatural means in any manner, upon property of the city or private property within the city sewer boundaries, or in any area under the jurisdiction of the city, except through the city's sewage collection system or through an approved on-site system as provided in this chapter. Section 17.84.010 (A)Yelm Municipal Code states that: Site plan review and approval shall be required prior to the use of land or building for the location of any commercial, industrial or public building or activity, including environmental checklist review, and for the location of any building in which more than two dwelling units would be contained. Additionally, site plan review shall be required for any allowed, regulated or special use activity on lands containing a wetland or wetland buffer areas pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 14.08 YMC. Staff Report Page 5 of 8 Section 17.84.020 (C) states that a Site Plan Review should be approved when: The SPRC shall review a site plan and approve, or approve with conditions, site plans which conform to the standards, provisions and policies of the city as expressed in its various adopted plans and ordinances including the applicable sections of the shoreline master program for the Thurston Region. III. ISSUES The appellant indicates that the site plan review approval. should be issued without conditions 2 and 3 for the following reasons: The possibility of connection to sewer and water were not addressed in the pre- submission conference and, therefore, the City is barred from requiring this as part of the site plan review approval. 2. The existing well is adequate and legal for the existing dwellings. 3. The project is not'new development' as there is no major building construction on the property. 4. No City regulation or standard requires the connection of the existing residences to the City water and sewer systems. IV. ANALYSIS A. Statements in apre-submission conference are not binding on the subsequent permit. A pre-submission conference is a preliminary meeting. with potential developers to review the general requirements for a development. It is simply not possible to complete a full project review at the time of the pre-submission meeting as the detailed application materials required for the permit review have not been submitted. The written notes for apre-submission meeting prepared by the Community Development Department make this clear with the following statement: These comments are preliminary in nature and are not intended to represent final comments and or requirements for the City of Yelm. Until a complete application is made, the Community Development Department can only attempt to inform the applicant of general requirements as they appear in the form presented by the applicant at the time of pre-submission. In the case at hand, the site plan submitted by the Rothwell's for the meeting did not contain any dimensions, show the limits of the proposed parking area, identify water or sewer connections or the existing drainfield or well, identify the access to the building or even which portion of the building would be used for the dance studio. In fact, key information was not presented (including the proposed Staff Report Page 6 of 8 internal building layout) until the application was determined to be complete on October 30, a month after the site plan review application was initially submitted. 2. Even if apre-submission meeting were binding, the Rothwell's were clearly made aware at the pre-submission conference that the possibility existed that connection to City services would be required, and that this issue would be reviewed as part of the site plan review application. The Development Services Engineer for the City noted in his written comments that: NOTE.• It is unknown at this time if the existing residence will be allowed to continue on the current water and sewer system. These options will be reviewed at the time of civil engineering review. if the residence is required to connected to the public water and sewer system, the well and septic system will have to be decommissioned. C. The well is a public water system within the Yelm Water System Service area which must be abandoned. The Rothwell's are incorrect in stating that the existing well is not a Group B water system which requires approval by Thurston County. Any well which provides water for human consumption excluding a system serving only one single-family residence is a public water system pursuant to Section 246-290-020 WAC. Two parry water systems shall be considered public water systems pursuant to Article III, Section 1.2 of the Thurston County Health Code. The policies of the Water System Plan, adopted by both'Thurston County and the City of Yelm as the primary water service provider within the urban growth area, clearly indicate that other water systems within Yelm's service area should be incorporated into the municipal system. D. The construction of a 3,200 square foot enclosed play area followed by a conversion to a dance studio requires Site Plan Review Approval. Whether or not the project is considered a `new development' a site plan review approval is clearly required by Section 17.84.010 as the project is a new commercial or public building. The construction of a building exempt from site plan review and subsequent conversion is reviewed no differently than a new building for a commercial or public use. E. A site plan review is a discretionary permit. The site plan review process is a discretionary land use permit that may include conditions of approval designed to implement adopted policy as well as regulatory requirements. The policies of the Comprehensive Plan, the Coordinated Water System Plan, the Development Guidelines, the Municipal Code, and the County Health Codes when reviewed together clearly indicate that within the urban growth area urban services should be provided by the City of Yelm. Picking at the individual threads of this policy does not unravel the tapestry. Staff Report Page 7 of 8 F V. CONCLUSION The conditions of site plan review approval are appropriate, are supported by adopted City policies, are not contrary to law, and should be upheld. LIST OF EXHIBITS Staff Exhibit 1 - Notice of Appeal Staff Exhibit 2 - Building Permit Number 6967 Staff Exhibit 3 - Advertisements for Luv2Dance Studio Staff Exhibit 4 - Enforcement Letter dated July 2, 2003 Staff Exhibit 5 - Presubmission Meeting Materials Schedule (1 page) Request (3 pages) Land Use Notes (6 pages) Civil Notes (6 pages) Building Notes (1 page) Updated Land Use Notes (5 pages) Updated Building Notes (1 page) Staff Exhibit 6 - Site Plan Review Application Application (5 pages) Notice of incomplete application (1 page) Updated Application (4 pages) Staff Exhibit 7 - Site Plan Review Approval Staff Exhibit 8 - Septic Permit Number 3054 Staff Exhibit 9 - Assessor's Information Staff Report Page 8 of 8 Staff Exhibit 1 Notice of Appeal 12/09/2003 11:36 3604916904 THE KIRKBRIDE GROUP PAGE 02 ~ OF THE A~ f 4 ~~ YELi'.Vf WA$MtNC T'ON PO Box 479 Yelm WA 9897 36Q-458-3244 Or'r3CWL U$~ pyLY ~. ~~ Date Received ay ~-- pie No NC3TICE OF APPEAL Fee: Staff Decision - $5d.4Q Hearing Examiner Decision - $100.OQ (in addition, any professional service char es per Resolution #358 A Closed record appeal may follow either an open record hearing or an open record administrative decision on a project permit application when She appeal is on the record, and no ar limited new evidence ar information is allowed to be submitted. Appeals on Category (& ll project~decislons era heard by the City Council. Appeals oh Category (!l ~. IV project decisions as ws~ as Category i €~ ll decisions which have been appealed to the City Council go to Superior Court 2nd follow the judicial review process set forth in RCW 36fi.7pC. A Notice of Appeal must be tiled wlihlrt 14 days pf Notice vt Final Decision. PROTECT C,~SE NUMBEJ7 BEING AAPF~tLED Case #SPR-03-8354-YL DATE OF NOTICE OF FbVi4L RECISION December 3, 2003 APPELLANT(Sj Iylr. and Mrs. Steve Rothwell __ Mailing Address~011 Weat Yelrn Aye_ City, State and z3p~lextt. WA 98597 ~~ Telephone (3601458-7 T04 . SP,EGJFIC JTEMS OF DECISION BFlNO ,QPPEALFD ~'aftach addltlo~al sheet` tf necessary) ;~ The specific items that are being appealed are Condition #2 and; 3 of th.e Site Plan Review Committee condition of approval, conccrnin~ the requirement of connecting the existing residences to the City water and sewer system. ~ ' 1 affirm that all answers, statements and information containAd in and ubmitted with this application are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. f also affirm tiii~t I am the owner of the subject sits or am duly authorized by the owner to act with respect to this application. i`urther, I grant permission from the owner to any and all empioyees and representatives of the City of Yelm and other gcvernmentai agencies to enter upon and inspect said properly as reasonably necessary to process this application. I agree to pay all tees of the city which apply to thf3 application. Signed .r-"`%/~ f / /~3~-~!1~~ Date C:\Community Dcvcir>rmcntl('„rm; ~~: Froccrlurc5`.,/\ppcalti'vllrrcil/\pp.c)c,r <~m i 12/09/2003 11:36 3604916904 THE KIRKBRIDE GROUP PAGE 03 ~o urs & Mailing Address: P.Q. 33ox 476 Tenino ~dA 98SS9 o pts Physical Address: 440 - 7th Avc. S.E. Suite 300 i,acey, WA Phone Number: 360.435-0301 _~ngineeCl~~,lail: Bill@CandCen~neerino_enm December 9, 2003 To: Ta.tni Ivterriman Assistant P1at2ner PO Box 479 Yelm, WA 98597 Ph: 3Gt?-458-3224 Frona: Bi.II Turner, P.)/. PO Box 476 Tenino, WA. 485$9 RE: Steve Rothwel.l. --Dance Studio Case #SPR-03-8354-YL Appeal of Site Plan Approval ,Dear Ms. Merriman, On behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Rothwell, I am appealing the Endings of the review board for the above named project..After reviewi.7g the Site Plan .Approval Letter dated December 3, 2003 I a.m. appealing the findings of th,e .review board specifically condition of approval #2 Water Supply, #3 Sewer System and the definition of "New Development", for the following reason: • Connecting the existi.og restde.nces to the City sewer and water system was not presented as a condition of approval at the preapplication mectirtg and was not an issue until mentioned in the Site Plan ,Review Meeting on Novem.l}er I9, 2003. 'i'b.i.s is a requirement that should. have been known at the time of the preappI.ication meeting and not something that should be rcv.iewed at a later. date. Ordinance 17.84.450 Preliminae sitQ lan states that, "Prior to applying for s.i.te plan. review, a developer may file with the SPRC a summary site plan, which shall contain in a rough and approxi.ma.te manner all of the information required in the site plan appi.ication. The purpose of. the summary site plan .is to enable a developer filing the plan to obtain the comments of the S.P.RC as to the applicability of the .intent, standards anal provisions of this chapter to the plan." The SPRC failed in complying with the i.tZtent o.f this ordinance by not specifying that through the development process, opening a sma.tl dance studio, the Rothwclls would be .required to connect thci,r personnel. .residences to the City water and sewer system. Mr, and Mrs. Rothwell have spent a eonsiderabl.e amount of time and .money on this project. Ti.rrte and money that would not have been spent I~ad they lrnown that they would be required to connect their personas residences to the City sewer and water system. • The existing well that is located on the site is classified by Washington State and the Thurston County Health Departments as a shared well. or two party well. and does not need to be approved as a Crroup B system. as indicated in the SPRC findings under condition r2. The well has been tested and test results show that the well. is cican and free of any contaminants. 12/09!2003 11:36 3604916904 THE KIRKBRIDE GROUP PAGE 04 Since there will not be any major building construction on the property, this project should not be classified as new development as indicated in the SPRC findings under condition #2 and ~3. New development is not defined in the City Ordinances 17.06.010 through 17.06.830 and therefore should nat arbitrarily classify any project under any circumstances as "New Development". The project site is zoned in a commercial aria (Village Retail) and the proposed business is allowed under this zoning. Since the residential homes are i.n separate structures away from. the dance studio it does not seem reasonable to require these structures to also be connect to the City water and sewer system. Through my review of the Development Guidel_i.nes dated May 2002, I could not find any City Ordinances or Public Works standards that would regv.ired the existing residences to ~ connected to the City water and sewer syst~rn. Thank you for your time and consideration on this project. 1f you have say questions or need more in'Corznation, please call me ss soon as possible. Respectful.i.y, ~~ ~~/C'~Lr~~llJri BiII Turner, P.E. Principal Engineer, Contours & Concepts Engineering, LLC. cc: 'Cle Steve RothweIl Staff Exhibit 2 Building Permit Number 6967 ~~~ ~~A~ ~ ~ 200,: CITY ®F YELI1~'I a Building Permit ~~ 5 ~ ~ 7 BUILDING DEPT. ~~ ~' Phone: (360) 458-8407 ~ Date FClX: (360) 458-3144 \ (Work must be started within 180 days) ~'~ ~~ ~'~ `N Name ~ ~c..~l • i art ~ r`-~ !~. ~~~f ~'' Phone ( ) = /J .. 7~ , N r2 Address /! ~ C 1 /'-~~~ ~ ?-/ i ~ ~ Cfh' .``~ ~~i~r- State j,;;`,!) Zip Code I %'a.~ Site Address ~(~ / / ~` %,~, `j.,j ~ :~ P R _ Assessor's Parcel No. :~ i '~ ~ ,~ ~`, ~ ._'~~ ii t ~~ Lot Size (sq. ff./acres) O Subdivision ~ ! ~ ~s}_ Lot Block Y OR Short Plat No. Block Existing Structures, 'rf arr Name ~~ Address j '?j 7 ~ / License No. J,~~ c'e.~ i~ _'~ ~~ ~~~~~ Contact t1 ~~ Phone ( ) 7!' ~- ._ !• /4r EE®p. /' ~ ~~~,'~.,..„~ State f~,; Yelm Bus. Llc. No. Descrl Lion of Work ~ ~F', .~ ~ ~'ri• s ~? /_1. Z•~r OFFICIAL USE ONLY L Permit Type: ~ " ~ 2nd) Gara e Sq. Ft. per floor: (1st) , ~ ~ ~ ( 9 _~ Residential Sign Sewer Septic Approval No. Commercial Other City Water Private Well Private System Shoreline Permit Y N Heat: Electric Gas Other Sepa Exempt Y N ITEI1~1 BASIS FOR FEE FEE Y N Floor Plan ~// ~- ' ' ~ ~ 1 '' ''~ ~~ ~ ,,..~~ Sets of Prints ,-.C Building Value y/ . ` ! ~ ti) - ,) Other Plumbing Permit # j=` ~~' Mechanical Permit # .~~r WA. ST. BC. Fee (4.50 -New Const. Only) ~_ .. TOTAL FEE ~ /•~~ ~7,~ / Plan Check By 1 Minimum distance of structure from property lines: Issued By ~ '~~ Front to of Road Finallnsp: / / Side Side Rear Owner L & I Form Assessor Floor Plan and Permit Applicant's Affidavit: I certify that I have read and examined the information contained within the application and know the same to be true Submitted / / and cored. I also certify that the proposed structure is in conformity with oll applicable City of Yelm regulations including those governing zoning and Icnd subdivision, and in addition, all covenants, easements cnd restrictions of record. If applying as a contractor, I further certify that I am a currently registered contractor in the State of Washingtcn. '~ /'~ ~ ~ 9uorterly Reports Signoture ;..~ ~~` ' i Date J ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~/ Assessor l I Firm: TRPC / / ~. . Zip Code ~ ~ Staff Exhibit 3 Advertisements for Luv2Dance Studio -~ r 1 0 0 0 a • Cif ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. W O c~ ~e ~ y ~• CD a' ~ *; ~C ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c 0 r. 1--~ y~. } ~O O 2 (`C^,/f V O o ((~ ~~ ~~^\~ °:~-_ ;~. '~ w . ~ `_.. '~ 0 ~ < 'n --I ~ O ~ o ~ ~, cu ~• n CD ~ ~ ° m ~~`~~~ Q: o ~ ~ ~ N n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~'„ C ~.~ ~ ~ ~n ~. ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ cn N c^ vii cn ~ ~ ~. ~'' ~ ~• `~ ~ ~ O O` ~ ~ ~D ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A O ~ ~ ~ ` O o ~ ~ vfD, ~ ~ ~ ° n ~. ~ ~ ~ l0 V Ul N Q ~ ~ O Q 0 CI1 0 o V 0 0 ~ 0 0 N 0 0 GO o o ~ O O ~ cp n~.~~~ c~ ~ ~ ~\n ~ ~. O tD j.~f/ --= Fy Q Q O T 'b rt O• .,.3 ~ ~r O ~ ~ C/~ c~o C1.. Cs ~ O rG ~ C ~~ ~ a ~ 'C Q ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~; =-~ U !!: ~ .--~ ~) 4 n ~°°° ~~ ;I 4 ~ t ~~ L o c. ~o ~~ >f G-=/ /O ~/(V~~ ~~J~J ~ ~~ c~ it _ ~} ,~~ ' ' ~_ tom` ''/ ~~ ~ ~-~- cn ~.,t~ N u~ ~ ~ . C '~ f O V~ O ... rC Q 4 t ~~ s E. ~- + -s 0 ~l ~^ N to N O 'S s '~ ig O ~ N fD ~ N Q, ~ ~' ~ O ~ N Z y t~ tD N a c~ ca ~, ~_ /~• `C ~ ' c ~: c p ~ n ~ ~ a ~ ~n ~ Q J y ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~' O Q ~~ cU ~ a O ~ ~ ~ j "r ~, ~ O O ~ j ~~ ~ ~ a ~ cp ~ ~ ^r O ~ ~ ~ O ~ 3 ~ o ~, ~' n~ ~'' j~~ cp c~ ~ n ~ ~ ~~ ~ O~~ ~ j. ~.1(/ '.3 ~~ ,\ ~V ~, I b -T'F--mot T ~4 r c u ~' SUM~4IE12 SCHEDULE CLASSES BEGL'~T JU.~,y ~ MONDAY 4PM BEGL~L~iG BALLET/JAZZ ~~'M BALLET 6PM JA7s7~gJp HOP 7PM MUSICAL THEATER TUE- S-DAY, 4:00-5:30 TECHNIQ~E/IyIODERN ' LYRICAL/BALLET 5:30-7:00 JA7~Igjp-HOP 7PM ADULTS ONLY . WEDNESDAY 4PM BOYS ONLY-BRE AK/ID@_u~}a~ SPM .I.AI, ~~ HIP HOP 7PM JAZZ THURSDAY SPi'VI KARAOKE FRIDAY ~ : 00-5:30 TE CHI r~I Q L E(YI O D ER;~i LYRIC.4LlBALLET x:30-?:00 JAZZIHIP-HOP 4-S ~: 6 YRS OLD 7 9 YRS OLD 7-9 ~S OLD '~ 13 YRS OLD 9-13 YR OLDS 9-13 YIt OLDS S AND UP 9-13 YIZ OLDS 9-13 yR OLDS READEiV G A GE TEENS TEENS Staff Exhibit 4 Enforcement Letter dated July 2, 2003 (/ ~~ tHE p•Q~ ~~ ~_ Ci o Yel ~n 4 ~ ty ~: ~~~ I; ~~"`~ ~'`~~'` 105 Yelm Avenue West { r r .art z~l~i , YELM P.O. Box 479 WASHINGTON Yelm, Washington 98597 (360) 458-3244 July 2, 2003 Stephen and Darlene Rothwell 1011 Yelm Ave. West. Yelm, WA 9897 Re: Luv2Dance Studio Dear Mr. and Mrs. Rothwell, It has come to the attention of the City of Yelm that you are proposing to open a dance studio in the structure recently built under permit #6967. The Use of this structure and property for a dance studio without required permits would be in violation of the Yelm Zoning Code and Uniform Building Code. Your property is zoned commercial (C-1) and such use would be allowed through the issuance of a Site Plan Review Permit. The Site Plan Review is an internal review by the City to ensure that your proposal meets all City requirements. The process usually takes 12 to 16 weeks, allowing for mandated public input periods. I have enclosed for your use and information a request for apre-submission meeting. Pre-submission meetings are held every Wednesday, at which time all requirements for the proposal are reviewed in detail, including the site plan process, landscaping requirements, frontage improvements, water sewer connection, and building issues During the Site Plan Review process you may also submit to me plans by a licensed Architect bringing your structure up to code requirements for a public building. If I can answer any questions or be of help please call me at 360.458.8407. Thank you. Sincerely Garv Carlson Building Official T{ie City of Yelm is an Equnl Opportunity Provider Staff Exhibit 5 Presubmission Meeting Materials Schedule (1 page) Request (3 pages) Land Use Notes (6 pages) Civil Notes (6 pages) Building Notes (1 page) Updated Land Use Notes (5 pages) Updated Building Notes (1 page) YELM COMMUNI T Y DEVELOPMEN T DEPARTMENT (x) City Admin. (x) Comm. Dev. Dir. (x) Building Official (x) Mayor (x) Applicant (x) Posted (x) Public Works Dir. (x) City Engineer (x) Asst. Planner THE FOLLOWING GASES WILL BE CONSIDERED AT YELM CITY HALL, 105 YELM AVE. WEST, IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. MEETING DATE: WEDNESDAY, JULY 16, 2003 TIi~,1E ~ FRE- EN~fRON= ~ SITE ETHER ~ DE~CRIP_TlOf~1 j .SUB=-~ MENTAL ~ ~ PAC! l ~~~i[SSICf`J REVEEW - REVFEti~` _ .:, Applicant ~nternal~ ~ lnterna~ _ Attendance Staff Staff ~ ~ Required Revie4,r Review _ -_ _ ~ Rothwell 1:00 p.m. ~ - Dance Studio _- - 1011 Yelm Avenue West 1:30 p.m. _.` - Packet distributed 7!9/03 D&D Associates, Don Findlay 2:00 p.m. r - ~ Rosewood - 202 single family lots _ o e;< - Cullens & Killion 2:30 p.m. 'f ri ~ " Packet distributed 5/27/03 3:00 p.m. 3:30 p.m. * Environmental Review/Site Plan Review: Internal staff review only, applicants and/or representatives may attend to OBSERVE. if you plan to attend, please notify the Community Development Department at 458-3835. C:`,Corr,„run-its D ~ J.op;n n,_ 'r,ly ~}r.\41 ri<.Si:R.~ oc _' -`~.--~~?3 03 :H0 PM 3604587104 P. 01 i $ `~l 1~ ~ ~~ ~i t ~Ly~gWiNCTQN ~~~~ ~~ ~~E~. PO Box 479 Y61m WA 98597 380-458-3244 Pr~;~ubmission ~~s.~+n~ Rsqu~sfi Form Fee; Nine _ OFFICIAL USE ONLY Fee N1A pate RecaivEd ~_ 6y FILE No. ' ~~ a~ prssubmission conference is an oppertunlty for applicants, developer(s) and/or consultants to meet v~dh city staff to discuss preliminary studies or sl<etohes of a proposed pro)edt. At the conference the ... ~ staff w111 make available information relating to the proposed development. The intent is to identity and J eliminate as,many potentia{ problems as passible in order for the project to be processed without delay. ;The Conference should take plac® prior to detailed work by an engineer or surveyor, however a site 1 dra~~;~i~Zg must be submitted that has sufficient information to allow for evaluation. Discussion topics will `-:c'ude such things as Yelm's Comprehensive Plan, street. design, storm runoff and retention, Shoreline i4iastsr Program, ~oning, availabflliy of sewer and water, development concept, other requirements and permits, and the environmental impact. Staff notes ors prepared and available to review. There is no char a far this meeting, Hastings are held each Wednesday. This request farm should be g submitted by 5:00 p.m, at least one week before the preferred meeting date, SiEti'1'1Nf3 DATE REQUESTED °~ ' ~ J~ c~ ( Wednesday) .~ ~=ir1CANT '~'~'tiw~-~~ ~ ... .. ?''d^t~!L!':~la ADDRESS ~~~~ `^~ i ivLEPi~ONE REp1:tESENTATNE (if any)_ '~~~ OCCUPATION MAILING ADDRESS TELEPHONE General ivcatlan of the protect ~~~~ ~-~"~ ~~- "`~ -~---`~' Range J $~Ctlon ~ Township ;~ssAsaor's i'ax Parcel Number ~~ J T ypc o} Protect (Subdivision, Annexation, Zone Change, ete..)!~~ Total acreage `~ `~1 Proposed Density Proposed Land Use: Sing~e•tamay e~P1;3X Multi-';w~il;~ tAoEile Hone Perk ~C~S icl~a~._~n' usL(al ~ Briet description of project ~'~'- ~'^ '~ i' f C r ' ~- ( < 1 i' r ' X 17" and fcrNard to Yzlr~ City Hall. G~aase attach aix copies of a sit9 plan dra•r~ing not wryer ; .an 11 Time (afternoa~ n only} OWNER ~~'^~''G~~ ADDRESS ~.n w~ TELL=PHONE y5'$- ~l lo~Ir._. .-- ~o^- ~~~,^~ Dw9lcpm~nhFcrrna 8 ?rccedurz~'~,Prey.:bnis3lon',Pre3,:h~:~asiorApp.doc ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . I ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~i`~ h ~; 3 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ k r ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ .~ ~ N ` Lam. ~ ~~ ~ b t ,,,~ h r I ~ ~" ~' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~-~~ ~, ~ S. ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ Jr \ ~..a ~ D ' ~ ~ ~ ' . 1 t- ~ i Q o c~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ?c ' ~' 5~ ~ Q ~ °~ 'L r ~ ,~ a ~ ~ ~ i i '~ ~v ~ T -~--~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~" . 3 . - v ., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ i?+ 11 ~ (~ • S .... m 'd b _ ~e s: *»~ C •p ~` C~' ~ ~, oro •~ ~ ~ "~ m v~ b -~ ~o ~ ~~ c = ~ R Q fD I' it O. ~ ` ` L... ~ \ b - ~' /. QO ~• i ~ ~' r. i ~ ~_ ~' " U+ ~ I` v f r. f n \,1 ~~, ~'~~ r- ~ s '' -y ~ ~„ --~ c .~ ~ ~ `~ ~ ~' * r 7 1 t, -~ ~ ~~ v t ~ ` ~ ~7 l/`~ ~. ~. t"`' ., i~ ~~ c~ ~c~ rnN rr nN• g o o m ~ ~ y rt ~ to g ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ {'~' tv 'r'G~, }„ crO c~ ;~ w ~ ~~- ~ ~ ~' ~' r. ^~ ~ F+• (D O (D ~ n ~ UI t'(' x~ s~ c~ ~. K ~. ~ \ ~ 1~ '~d W i"i (~ CO I--~ o (D ~ ~ O V1 tj (^+ .R, Ul U N • ri ~) ~: ~ G n ~;,, C~ ~ cn ni ~ ~ • n ~ _+ O n (D ` G "~ (D G `~ < r-, c-- ~' ~ ~ .~ ^~ ~ \ '^ N • F-- Ci Ul ~ C . r ~ ~- V .J U ~ _ C( ^ 1 ~ t1 1 lD ~ ~ ~ _ 1 P P r r -r r ~'t v ~wL (~ ' '~ V, ,` .y ~. `r_ V f .~_ +°" O) J j~ 7 `;~ vti "`~- ~ v G '~. u ~ti~ ~--. 1I~ - ... ,,,~ ( i~J`~1 ~~ ,~-~ ti~ .~ ~~ a .:~. - ~ - - _ .,. y'~~ '~~ _ ~~~- ..s - =~ _, ,i ~ ) , ~/ ^~ S. '1 "\ ~~ ~~ ~,~~~_ ~ \~~\ •`1 ~ ~_ r r ~ ~ ; .., ~ .~ l~r i ~~ ~ ~~~~ Y Lev., `.-~i.l :a ;"~ ~~ u~ ~ ~ ~ =. ! , j- ~ ~ 1 ' ~_-~- E 1 , ~a ! i J ~ _~~ -~ I ,,. ~--~ --~ --~ ., - '•, i J ,~ ~ , ~ .. ~) ~~ T ~ -~- ~~ \ \ ~. Pre-Application Meeting July 16, 2003 ***These comments are preliminary in nature and are not intended to represent final comments and or requirements for the City ofi Yelm. Until a complete application is made, the Community Development Department can only attempt to inform the applicant of general requirements as they appear in the form presented by the applicant at the time of pre-submission. Proponent: Steve and Darlene Rothwell Project Proposal: Luv2Dance Studio (After the fact) Project Location: 1017 West Yelm Avenue ~ Zoning and Setbacks The property is zoned Commercial (C-1), Chapter 17.26 YMC. This district allows `Studios, such as record recording, couturier, artist, music, dancing, and photographic' as a permitted use subject to site plan review. Note that the code does not distinguish between `commercial' and public or private dance studios, the site plan review process and other requirements of the Zoning Code apply to either. Minimum lot size: 5,000 square feet. Maximum height of buildings: 40 feet. Front yard setback: 15 feet. Side yard setback: 10 feet. Rear yard setback: 15 feet. Parking Chapter 17.72 YMC requires one parking space for every 10 occupants, based on the maximum occupant load as determined by the Uniform Building Code for Assembly areas of less-concentrated use. Based on a maximum occupant load of 217, 22 parking spaces would be required. A parking plan needs to be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval a the time of application for site plan review. All required parking areas must be paved and striped. Ingress/Egress Ingress and egress at the site shall be consistent with the Yelm Development Guidelines, section 48.140. Landscaping Type II landscaping is intended to provide visual separation of uses from streets, and visual separation of compatible uses so as to soften the appearance of streets, parking areas, and building elevation. This landscaping is used around the perimeter of a site, and adjacent to buildings. Type II landscaping would be required along the side and rear property lines and adjacent to the building, Traffic The City has adopted a Transportation Facility Charge (TFC) of $750.00 per PM peak trip. The Code provides a default table that the applicant can use to determine new PM trips generated. For a dance studio, the trip generation rate is 1.83 per 1,000 square feet. To determine the projects impact and fee, use the following formula: ((Peak PM Trip Rate * Gross Floor Area)/1,000) * $750.00 =TFC Example: ((1.83 PM Trips x 3,200 sq. ft.)/i, 000) * X750.00 = $4,392.00 If the applicant feels the proposed use would not generate the default number of trips as designated'in the TFC Ordinance, and analysis prepared by a Washington State Licensed Engineer can be submitted to the City for review and consideration. SEPA An environmental checklist will be required if the proposal requires more than 20 or more parking stalls or other buildings than the pole structure are used as part of the dance studio. Application and Process Site Plan Review, Chapter 17.84, is an administrative process. Minimum application requirements are located in Section 17.84.060 and are listed on the application form. A project of this size can expect completed review in approximately 12 to 14 weeks. Land use approval typically contains conditions of approval that the applicant must complete prior to receiving a building permit. Upon satisfactory completion of all conditions of land use approval, the applicant can submit building plans for approval. Other Design Guidelines -the attached checklist must be submitted at time of applicaticn, with written responses on how each guideline requirement is proposed to be met. DESIGN GUIDELINES - Luv2Dance Studio Project Review Checklist Guidelines Applicable Guidelines Met I.A. (1) Relate develo ment to edestrian oriented street fronta e. X I.A.{2) Relate develo ment to street fronts other than edestrian-oriented streets}. X I.B.(1) I Minimize visibili~ and im acts of service areas. l X I.C.(1) Take advantage of special opportunities and mitigate impacts of large developments. X I.D. 1) Reduce im act of service areas and mechanical e ui ment. X LE.(1) Irate rate biofiltration swales and orids into the overall site desi n. < X I.F. 1 Enhance the visual uali of develo ment on corners. X I.F.(2) Provide a paved pedestrian walkway from the~street corner to the building entrance. ' X II.A.(1) All pedestrian paths must correspond with federal, state and local codes for handica ed access, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. X II.A.(2) Provide adequate lighting at the building entries and all walkways and paths throw h arkin lots. X II.A. 3 Develo an on-site edestrian circulation conce t. X II.B.(1) Provide a pedestrian path at least 60" wide (preferably 96" wide) from the street sidewalk to the main ent X II.B.(2) Provide pedestrian paths or walkways connecting all businesses and the entries of multi le buildin son the same develo ment site. X II.B. 3 Provide athwa s throw h arkin lots X II.C.(1) Where street ROW is insufficient to provide adequate sidewalks buildings and other site features must be set back from the public ROW to achieve at least minimum sidewalk widths. X II.C.(2) Where new streets are developed, provide sidewalks according to minimum standards. X II.D.(1) Provide, where feasible, pedestrian circulation routes to adjacent uses and transit. X II.D.(2) Irate rate nearb transit sto s into the tannin of adjacent site im rovements. X 11.D.(3) Encourage pedestrian paths from all transit slops through commercial areas to residential areas within 1,200 feet X II.E.(1) Enhance buildin entry access. X II.F.(1) I Pro~~ide pedestrian-oriented o en scace at key locations. X III.A.(1) Provide access roads through large lots v~ith more than one street fronta e. I X IILB.(1) Minimize driveway im acts. X IILC.(1) ~~1eet requirements for location of par'r,ing lots on pedestrian-oriented streets. %~ Yelm Municipal Code refuse container, and shall in no case be less than S1X feet hlgh. 2. No refuse container shall be permitted between a street and the front of a building. ~. Refuse collection areas shall be designed to contain all reuse generated on-site and depos- ited between collections. Deposited refuse shall not be visible from outside the refuse enclosure. (Ord. 561 § 3, 199; Ord. ~~~ § 14, 1990. 17.72.080 Development guidelines. A. Parking area design shall include: 1. Ingress and Egress. The location of all points of ingress and egress to parking areas shall be subject~to the review and approval of the city engineer. 2. Backing OutProhibited.In.allcommercial and industrial developments and in all residential buildings containing five or more dwelling units, parking areas shall be so arranged as to make it unnecessary for a vehicle to back out into any street or public right-of--way. 3. Parking Spaces -Access and Dimensions. Adequate provision shall be made for individual ingress and egress by vehicles to all parking stalls at all times by means of unobstructed maneuvering aisles. Maneuvering aisles, .parking stall: dimen- sions and requirements shall be as shown in:Tables 17-2 through 17-4. 4. Small Car Parking Spaces. In all parking facilities containing 2~ or more parking spaces, a maximum of 25 percent of the required parking spaces may be reduced in size for the use of small cars, provided these spaces shall be clearly identi,-• feed with a sign permanently affixed immediately in front of each space containing the notation, "Compacts Only." Spaces designed for small cars may be reduced in size to a minimum of seven and one-half feet in width and 15 feet in length. Where feasible, all small car spaces shall be located in one or more contiguous areas and/or adjacent to ingress/egress points within parking facilities. Location of compact car parking spaces shall not create traffic congestion or impede traffic flows. 17.72.080 Table 17-2 b ~ b' c d ;~ c C' ~" .-n y ~e . je -~- ~//~ -~-, a ,.. i a One-Way Traffic a b c d e f b' I c' 0° 28' 8' 12' 23' 8' 35° 48' 18' 12' 14.8' 8.5' 41' 14.5' 40° 49' 18.5' 12' 13.2' 8.5' 42' 15' 45° 50' 19' 12' 12` 8.5' 4~ 15.5' 50° ~ 1' 19.3' 12' 11.1' 8.5' 45' 16.5' 55° 53' 20' 13' 1 10.4' 8.5' 48' 17.5' 60° ~~' 20' 15' 9.8' 8.5' S0' 17.5' 65° 57' 20' 17' 9.7' 8.8' S3' 18' 70° 59' 20' 19' 9.6' 9' S6' 18.5' a 45 ° 17' 11' 8' U r.+ U ~ 60° 16.7' 14' 8' 75° 16.E 17.4' 8' U ~ 90° 15' 20' 8' Table 17-3 b , r ~ r j i~ ::~_ ~, b' ~ c ~ n r~ ~ I / f ( I~/ ie ^ j / //\~ V ~~ TR4!~1SPORTA T 10N Co-1-~ercial Cel?ector 200 feet Nei~_rborhood Collector 200 feet ~~C :.1 _4~'CeJs 1 v0 1G~'e: ~' v a.e ROa~`N. ~y ~ ~O T_e°.L ~+{ n e~ 'ifrerent ClaSS Si_ eels interSeCt the hi o-'_er Sta'idard Small ~ -~:- apply 0 Cl:irtil di i. D° ' i ~ ' w i g -rl a l i ,: .a .,v'a~..0 S t0 a iav be Owes.'. a: L_~ J C_eCtion Of the C3~y. D. ~rl SIOp?'1g a'_DarOaCileS at an L"lterseCtiOn, landjngS Shall 'De prov:dedwzth g:adeTlot LO e~CeedOrlefooL ~~~creTlCe?_'1 elevation for a distance of 30 feet approac ~~ any ar~era1_ or 20 feet app~-oach_irig a collector a Local access street, rseasured from! ' ' r! ea: est Right-of ti~~ay line (ems ended) of intersecting street. 4B.1 ~Q Driveway s A. General 1. Driveway wi dths and spacing shall be desib ed follo~~ris~.g the Ins~utute of Transportation Er_gineers (ITE) "Guideline for Driveway Design ~ Location", latest edition and usir_g the cement concrete approach, drawing number 4-9 located at the end of this chapter. Widths and spacing must be approved by tY~.e City. 2. All abar_doned driveway areas shall be removed and the curbing and sidewalk or shoulder and ditch secfiion shall be properly restored. 3. AL driveways ~constl-ucted within street right of ways shall be constructed of Portland Cement Concrete and shall be subject to the same testing and inspection requirements as curb, gutter, and sidewalk construction. ~. Joint-use driveways ser~~~lg two adjacent parcels may be built on their comr_on boundary upon fo-rnal v~::tten agreerr_ent by bo t'n propel Oz:~TnerS and appr C'v al Oi ti'? e Cli ~. The a~ eernent sh%11 be a reCOrded eaSeTie=1i for DOtil parcels Oi lw~a S?eC:r, ~'1~ jo. ~ usage. v. C_'a~ U °~p.~ _::Ci.;r:...j l.:° ._.~. V~ In°- _CiGC. .~G,~r Ji ~1 .rim G C. tti0 Cv:M._..._C_,1 ~.~ 'e-•'~c. S~~._'i ..~ Gam'/:O °~ _.... ~ D~~.`~'.-~.~_o ~~ _o t:.... s ~ - ar s~-ee is re~-~ __ ed. ,, ~ .~. _ I j7~~G.J'/.~'.J ;.. .... - -,n G~r~~. ..~J s.-.~..- ~~1~/ ~i'F, Gl~~i~. ~Pl~' .,iP r, .~ J~ :l: ~~~~rit C ~~l lJf l1`. ~ ~Il. ~/. TRA ~ISPOi=cT_='~TIO~i j.~Ji ~1~ in t„he Si ~_t1t tl7c"lg~e, Cut SlO~eS; hedges, renCeS, ti eeS Si ~"+S. ' i ii~- - - ~ -~-- u ~.y L~OleS, a a_n-y-L1,;-,g large enGUg_ti2 t0 Constitute a Sight ObSti uCL0Z1 S'?OUId be removed or lowered. Pa:'~-?g Should also be ei;-,-~;-~ated a.-~d Sij S o=set So sigh L distance is not obst~ ~;cted. S_g'nt ObSt_'"uCttonS ii'lat iav be e°Cluded`o'?'~ i~eSe re~u_e-~+ents include: e~'?s-`i`?gu~~y poles, re~Lzlatc_y sits; trees ~~-`~"~ed ~. o-m t'ne ,. base t0 a he_g~t 0: 10 feet above ti''_e Street, a-~ d ',L.'ree ;S"t.i"Ij bULCl:"' ~~. A Slgl'3t diSta_"1Ce ~a?"2tena_`?Ce eaSeL'?ent inL1St'De g='an_ted t0 Lt'2e C7.~y for all ~-~provements'includi_ng co~erci aI and r€~iden ~aI (L-~.clud?-? g -nulti - fa-nily) develop~.ent, plats and shoe plats. The easement shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or engineer capable ofper-iol-~.ing such work. The sight distar_ce ~-nai_ntenance easement is based uaor_ ' • the sight distance triangle calculations in the WSDOT Desigr_ 1VIar_ua1 and the latest edition of t_he AASHTO Green Book. Easements shaL'be prepared iri the same manner as out ~r~.ed in sec1iion 3.110. A copy cf the Easement Preparation Standards can be found in the Appendix B. 48.160 Surfacing Requirements The follo'w-ing are the surfacing requirements for each application listed. Boulevard and Arterial Sl~reets The engineer wiL1 provide a pavement design. The design of the pavement shall include a study of the native soils, their behavior under load, and the design of a s'Lructural section to carr~r the anticipated loads under all climate conditions. In no event shall the sliructural section be Iess than the mini,nums shown belo`a: Surfacing: 0.33' Class B Asphalt Concrete Top Course: 0.17' Crushed Surfacing Top Course Base: 1.00' Gravel Base One soil sa-nple per each 500 LF of centerline U~zth 3 riir_i_r'ium per project representatr~e of the roadway sub~_ ode shall be ta'_-yen t0 deter-ni_ze a StatiStlC2.l repreSentail0:? Of tl_e e r~S u"1g SOL CCr!d_L10nS aL CES.~ j ~C_e. ~ e L^..JeM ...___ CeJ~~-.1 S:_~~:.~. c. C..:.~~ vow 'Je~1 l.'"~ a._ e~ .--'1c~p- ~~Gc~':Se_ G i L e Sl :_.. O: '.~J a.~.~~--J_J~ .S~"'~ Cie vGJe~ C.:. G~:'~w~ CCi.~S LeSLS ~~:G Sl~D~iLLC~ .•%_~ ~:i~°. ~J~a_:S ~~ T__e ollG, __~~ s__ ~c~~_~i sec_:o-! ~=-r be uses ._. 1i°~_ o a Via"°:: e::_ deS:g :. ! e USe O: ~:::5 SeC'iG_: iS 5~...~.~. ?r.: i0 C:i~I a.., =0''a' Gi u:'G:.,%,.:°C 5u~~~ ? tee. Pre-Application Meeting Civil Comments Date July 16, 2003 ***These comments are preliminary in nature and are not intended to represent final comments and or requirements for the City of Yelm. Until a complete application is made, the Community Development Department can only attempt to inform the applicant of general requirements as they appear in the form presented by the applicant at the time of pre-submission. Proponent: Steven Rothweli Project: Public Recreation Center Project Loc: 1011 Yelm Ave West, WA 98597 Water: Sewer: Fire: The proposed site is not currently connected to a public water system. Your site will be required to connect to the City of Yelm public water system. See attached detail for general requirements of the water system connection. Water hook-up fees are based on a consumption rate of 240 gallons per day and are charged at a rate of $1,500/240gpd (fee subject to change) inside city limits. At the time of application submittal you will be required to submit water usage calculations provided by a licensed civil engineer. The water fees will be calculated using the information provided by the engineer. A cross connection/backflow prevention device will be required to be installed following the domestic water meter and a inspection will be required to verify the well is disconnected from the recreation center. The proposed site is not currently connected to the City of Yelm's STEP sewer system. Your site will be required to connect to the city's sewer system. Sewer hook-up fees are based on a consumption rate of 240 gallons per day and are charged at a rate of $5,125.00/240gpd (fee subject to change) inside city limits. At the time of application submittal you will be required to submit water usage calculations provided by a licensed civil engineer. The sewer fees will be calculated using the information provided by the engineer. It is unclear at this time if the existing septic tank(s) will meet the requirements of the proposed usage. See attached detail for general requirements of the step tank system. NOTE: It is unknown at this time if the existing residence will be allowed to continue on the current water and sewer system. These options will be reviewed at the time of civil engineering review. If the residence is required to connected to the public water and sewer system, the well and septic system will have to be decommissioned. Fire protection to the buildings must be provided per the Uniform Building Code. All parts of the building must have fire hydrant coverage. The coverage is limited to 150' of hose pull from each hydrant. Another option may be to have a 20' fire lane around the building. This will be determined upon further review of the civil plans by the Building Official. R:`,Community Development\~Veekly SYR`~,Presub civif,Commercial",'_'00:~`,cc-071603 Rothwcll I:cc Center.doc Stormwater: Developments with a significant amount of impervious surface are required to provide stormwater facilities per the 1992 DOE Stormwater Manual. Preliminary Stormwater Report and conceptual plan may be submitted with site plan review application if required. Street Improvements: Frontage improvements will be required for this project. Frontage improvements are defined as widing the asphalt, concrete curb and gutters, planter strip and street trees. These improvements would be along only,where your property is adjacent to West Yelm /dye. At this time the City will allow a deferment of the improvements. This is an agreement between the City and the applicant that says the improvements will be constructed when the City requires them in the future. Your improvements will be required when the high school, Twin County Credit Union and the Moose Lodge completes its frontage. The intent is to complete larger sections of frontages instead of piece-by-piece improvements. Street Lighting: Nothing to report. ADA Requirements: The American Disabilities Act required that facilities are ADA accessible. Facility improvements will have to meet current code.. Review of these improvements will be determined upon further review of the civil and architecture plans. vi i i v~ i ~u~i DEPT. OF PUBLIC U't1GRKS GEfaERA~ fdOTES: U ~ B A r~~~l A.P P ri ~'JED t~IO "JfJ STP,EET" PAP,KIf•IG PER~~IITTEC~ ~. P,E~tP. TO RELEVAi~IT SEC I IGhJS GF THE DEVELOPi•~'ENT GUIDELIi~IES FOR AGDITIOi~1~L Ii~IFOR~~IATIG~I Uf~l STORiai DR,~;If~IF~.GE, STREE T LIGHT'fdG, PP,'~JEiL!Ei,T STP.UCTIJRE, ECT. PUBLIC U/ONI'S DIF.~~iuF GE,. Db"tri. I D>~. TE D 4'IG. 1J i~. `~- - .~ 9/21 /2{i0o ,)r'~G ' * (GR APPROVED EQUAL) ENVIRONiviENT METEP. BOX LIG TYFE MIDSTATES, BGF-141 G 12RL CONCRETE *BROOKS SIDEWALK SERIES 36 CCNCP,ETE CONCRETE OR FOG TITS B9H CONCRETE *BROOKS DRIVEWAY SERIES 35 CAST IRON & OTHER CONCRETE 'TRAFFIC CQVER StRVrCE SADDLE TRAFFIC GR RCMAC 202S OP, AREAS FOG TITE B9H ROCh'.'r'IF~L ,~?,z hlETcR 9C}X *CARSON *GARSON Z ~ EAP,TH SERIES 1419-8 PLASTIC 1419 a PLASTIC P,E.ADER L1D ~ f'x 1° FORD GP,1P JQJNT w CORPORA714N STOP TYKE ~ LLLLLLLLLLL ~ LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL FB ] ] 0 ] Ft~t+ttttttt~~tttttttttttttttt, ; k=t ttt' L L ttl I ~ ~ ~ ALL 14" 1 » P~.AST,+C LINE {USE 200 PSI -~ DP, 7 PHILLIPS .DRISCO PIPE 5100 P4L YE TN YLENE' PIPE} VALVE BOX OR 4" DIA. PVC RrsER. SEE NOTE eELOav. 2~ SLOFE TO BOX 18" o /~~.~~/fir/\~~.~ CURB 4 ° ~~~~~`~%~~~ o e c v 0 v 4 D v VALVE BOX FOR SIDEWALK OR TRAFFIC SETTr1JGS, SEE D4VG. !•J0. 6-]2 t,'SE 4"' DIA: SCHEDULE 4Q PVC 4U1TH CAP FGR OTHER hVSTALL,471GAiS. ? 4 GAUGE lA1SULA TED COPPER TQNING WIRE WRAPPED AROU~~1D THE PIPE (SEE GEl,JERAL NOTES T10. 7)- 12" 12" ,/ FORD Bn]-4~a-G, GRIP ~ -FORD VN 72-?5VY 5/8"x ~ JOINT BY I.P THREA.DS. ~/4" COPPER METER SETTER ~ ~1 22 /2 WITH CHECK VALUE APJD + / ~ ~ ~ ?° MALE AD,~,PTEP, UN1DN NUT AND SWr~L FOP, :_..~- 3j 4" X ]" X ]2" FELL COPJNECTlNC ? ° IRON PIPE I , REDUCEF,. '~- ? "x 1 » F CP, D GRIP JOl^JT CO~RPOP,AT10+`J S,-r'~P r~ ;tea Fa ? r o ] S~Rb?Ct 5,4DOLE NOTE: 1. STAINLESS STcF.L JPJ,ERTS F,EO~JIP,cD FOR ALL PA.Ch; JQlNTS. 2. ALL SERb9Cc SA.DDLEC SHALL A;:J Flii(1!w SHALL N,4L~ Li/. Th'FE~.LS. METER -~ CHECK VALVE 19 1/2» PVC CAP CITY OF YEL~~I, V~J~,SHI(`JG TGf`~I DEPT. OE PUBLIC uti;OP,KS ~~ETER ~E~'~/ICE APPRG'JED PUBLIC ~"JC?MKS DIF.ECTOP DATE 6 - IE,~ TEb+! TE'JI DLPJI 3~ 1 S~OG D'rb'G. IJC~. SPLICE. TO EXISTING 14 GAUGE TONING WIRE WITH BUTT CONNECTORS AND HEAT SHRINK TAPE EXISTING FVC S4'JP ~ ~, ~z r TG STEP TANK.r CONNECT TO EXISTING PVC SERVICE LINE Z" x 1" REGUCER IF REQUIRED - 1" BALL VALVE, SL x SL SERVICE BCX - CARSON INDUSTRIES J~;10DEL ND. 1~19B WITH BOLTED HINGED COVER dP, EC'UAL COVER MIARKING TD READ "SE'v'dER" {USE IN NdN-TRAFFIC AREAS) 14 GA. INSULATED ~.OPPER TONING NtIRE SPLICE TONING WIRE FOR SERVICE TO P~1A.INLINE TONING WIRE AND 'JVRAP SPLICE ~MTH HEAT SHRINK TAFE-~ FINISH GRADE z STEP MAIN ~ o 1" SCHI=DULE 40 PVC SWP PVC St~JING CHECK VALVE SL x SL 1" BALL VALVE, SL x SL 1" PVC NIPPLE, SL x SL - 1" x MAIN DIA.. PVC REDUCING TEE SL xSLxTH OP, PIPE SADDLE - CI I Y OF YEL~~~ DEPT. OF PUBLIC ~~!~'~.~RI<S `YPICAC 1 " CCCCCC CCI'~J(`~,IECC!0i~,! A.PPRO'vi=G I DWG. h1C. PU6LIt, bVC!PKS GIREC.iCR D~=Tt J ~ ~, ~ P P~A ;{ I P P/1 }; ! w1 TO 7- ~ DA.E ~~11 ~DQ USE 1» UNIGN 70 CONNECT TESTING FIBERGLASS LID AFARATUS FOR PRESSURE TESTING SER~iIC ~Y1TH STEEL BGLTS AND NEOPPENE GASKET 20" MIN RISER HEIGHT TYPICAL tiA~9TH ALL NON-T„AFFIC BEARING TANKS 1» DIA.PVC HOSE AND VALVE .ASSEMBLY LEAVE SUFFICIENT ORIENT BALL VALVE 'w~iP,E TO ALLOW FOR AS SHOWN. BALL VALVE PUMP REMOVAL SHALL 8E V'.9TH 12" BELObN ELECTRICAL SPLICE BOX WITH CGP,D GRIPS LID ALL CONNECTIONS SHALL BE ?~'RAPFEG WITH HEAT SHRINK TAPE 21" OR 24" PVC 30" DIA. RIEBED PVC RISER W~LID SLGPE GROUND A1NAY FROM P.ISER RISER W1TH NEOPRENE GROMfU1ET5 14 GAUGE 6" FRGM TGP OF RISER TO CL INSULATED OF ELECTRICAL CONDUIT 18" FROM TOP RISER TO TONING WIRE t ~ EFFLUENT DISCHARGE INSTALL IN 3/4» EY CONDUIT SEAL ~ 1 TOM1diNG 441RE -INSTALL RISER in = ~ - ry .~: ~ ~IN P,ISER N ~ ELECTRICAL COiJDUII' TO-- POWER SOURCE I I i ~ EFFLUENT DISCHARGE STA.tJDARD IhlLET TEE ~~ q."~ 2-PART EPOXY, USE `~' I~ ORIFICY ORENCO RISER TANK ~_ - ADAPTOR FOR CONCRETE LEVEIp s.5» ALARMI `~' TANKS - ON ~ 3' =;-REDUNDANT 1" P'JC FLOAT ASSEIvIBLY AS SET OFF I BY CITY OF YELM ~: o 4,>~~ 1-1 /4» DIA.. IPILET ORIFICE HOLES AP,OUh1D PERIMETER OF VAULT L_ ~' 4» DIA. P'~r`C FLOW ~~ -- IPIDUCER - N PVC BIOTUBE THE f•,1ATERIAL FOR GUPLE;(, TRIPLEt, ANG CLASS 1 GI'•,'ISIGN 1 INSTALLATIONS WILL VARY. THE CONTRA.CTOP, SHALL M1EET THE INTENT OF THE INSTALLA?ION REOUIP.EPdENTS SHOWN IN THE TYPICAL STEP INSTALLATION, SUBPr1ERS16LE EFFLUENT GRENCG TUREINE 3 GP~,4 10 OSI 0511 PUh:iF WITH 5.0. POWER CABLE AND 1 /2» BY-PASS ORIFICE IN THE DISCHAP,GE HEAD I CITY OF YELM DEPT. OF PUBLIC ~/ORI<S IYPI~-,~<<~ S1MP~EX YIEP I ~L N ~~ I I`~•1 Y I A L L ~. Y O ~`l A.PPROVEQ DWG. hi0. CITY ENGIr1~tP ~.4.Tt 7- /~ JEr; ~ F'~~A~ I TtW ~ h~1T~~ ~ 4,'1 ? ~IJ~a `~ Cf ?H$ A~~ . a 10~ Yelm Avenue West - - P.O. Bax 479 WASHIN GTDN ~'~~'~ Yelm, Washington 9897 July 16, 2003 Stephen and Darlene Rothwell 1011 Yehn Ave. West. Yelm, WA 98597 Re: Luv2Dance Studio Dear Mr. and Mrs. Rothwell, (360) 4~8-3244 During a site visit while your play shed was under construction we discussed the possibility of using your residential structure as a public building in the context of a basketball camp for some of your students. At that time I stressed that to do so would trigger upgrades to the building you needed to be prepared for. You did not pursue the matter and the structure was completed as a private residential play shed. The use of the structure now as a public building is in violation of Yehn Municipal. Code as adopted in Chapter 15. You maybe cited under each code if you continue the dance classes in the structure without the following upgrades: Uniform Building Code-Meet the conditions of a public building used for exercise and education. The closest occupancy under the code would be a gymnasium. Based on this occupancy you are required to have two three foot exit doors. Exits need to have illuminated exit signs and emergency lighting. Panic Hardware maybe waived under certain circumstances. All interior finishes and flooring to have a Class III flame rating. A public discharge connecting the building to the public street is required. Minimum width is twenty feet, and will remain unobstructed to Yelm Ave West. Meet ADA requirements. All exits, door hardware, and restroom fixtures will meet the standards. Required sidewalks and parking stalls will meet requirements. Uniform Fire Code-Sprinklers and fire alarm not required at this time. You must have two fire extinguishers rated at 2AlOBC mounted no higher then 5 feet at your exits. Uniform Plumbing and Mechanical Code-Heating shall meet all applicable standards. Supply a minimum of ?water closets and one lavatory sink in separate restrooms for men and women. Each restroom shall have a floor drain. Walls and floors will meet code requirements. 2001 Washington State Energy Code- with the installation of insulation and glazing that meet the U- Factors for the heat type supplied. Default would be electrical heating. Once your buildin has met these minimum standards you may open for your building to the public. Sinc~•el}' Gar -mar Puildin Official 1~1~1• Cite of li•Im i:. nn Lltunl Ot,t~~,~ ti~~iiti~ ('~ntlr~l~•~ Pre-Application Meeting July 16, 2003 Updated August 6, 2003 ***These comments are preliminary in nature and are not intended to represent final comments and or requirements for the City of Yelm. Until a complete application is made, the Community Development Department can only attempt to inform the applicant of general requirements as they appear in the form presented. by the applicant at the time of pre-submission. Proponent: Steve and Darlene Rothwell Project Proposal: Luv2Dance Studio (After the fact) Project Location: 1017 West Yelm Avenue Zoning and Setbacks The property is zoned Commercial (C-1), Chapter 17.26 YMC. This district allows `Studios, such as record recording, couturier, artist, music, dancing, and photographic' as a permitted use subject to site plan review. Note that the code does not distinguish between `commercial' and public or private dance studios, the site plan review process and other requirements of the Zoning Code apply to either. Minimum lot size: 5,000 square feet. Maximum height of buildings: 40 feet. Front yard setback: 15 feet. Side yard setback: 10 feet. Rear yard setback: 15 feet. Parking Chapter 17.72 YMC requires one parking space for every 10 occupants, based on the maximum occupant load as determined by the Uniform Building Code for Assembly areas of less-concentrated use. Based on a maximum occupant load of 49, 5 parking spaces would be required. A parking plan needs to be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval a the time of application for site plan review. All required parking areas must be paved and striped. Ingress/Egress Ingress and egress at the site shall be consistent with the Yelm Development Guidelines, section 4B.140. Landscaping • Type II landscaping is intended to provide visual separation of uses from streets, and visual separation of compatible uses so as to soften the appearance of streets, parking areas, and building elevation. This landscaping is used around the perimeter of a site, and adjacent to buildings. Type II landscaping would be required along the side and rear property lines and adjacent to the building. Type II landscaping is charactorized by an 8 foot landscape strip between uses and a 5 foot strip around buildings of any combination of evergreen and deciduous trees (with no more than 50 percent being deciduous), shrubs, earthen berms and related plant materials or design features may be selected; provided, that the resultant effect is to provide partial screening and buffering between uses and of softening the appearance of streets, parking and structures. Fences are acceptable in lieu of the 8 foot landscape strip. • Type III landscaping is intended to provide visual relief where clear sight is desired. This landscaping is utilized along pedestrian corridors and walks for separation of pedestrians from streets and parking areas. Type III landscaping would be required along Yelm Avenue. Type III landscaping is typified by a six foot landscaping strip with street trees for a large overstory canopy along streets and pedestrian corridors and grass or other approved vegetation for groundcover. Earthen berms with grass or other vegetative groundcover and other design features may be worked into landscaping provided the resultant effect of providing apedestrian-friendly environment and visual relief where clear site is required can be achieved. Type IV landscaping is intended to provide visual relief and shade in parking areas. At least 24 square feet of landscape development for each parking stall proposed. Each area of landscaping must contain at least 100 square feet of area and must be at least six feet in any direction. Each planting area must contain at least one tree. Live groundcover shall be provided throughout each landscaping area. No parking stall shall be located more than 50 feet from a tree. • Type V landscaping is required in storm water retention areas, if required. The floor and slopes of any stormwater retention/detention area shall be planted in vegetation that is suitable and will thrive in hydric soils. The landscaping of the stormwater facility shall be incorporated with all on-site landscaping. A conceptual landscaping plan is required with the application for site plan review. Final landscaping and irrigation plan is required as element of civil construction drawings, with installation prior to occupancy. Existing vegetation may be retained to fulfil landscaping requirements and could satisify landscaping requirements, if the purpose of each type of landscaping is met or exceeded. The refuse area must be large enough to accommodate a dumpster and recycle bin. Refuse areas must be screened with an enclosure of a material and design compatible with the overall architetural theme. If fencing is used to enclose the refuse area, it must be landscaped with sight obscuring vegetation. No refuse container shall be permitted between a street and the front of a building. Traffic The City has adopted a Transportation Facility Charge (TFC) of $750.00 per PM peak trip. The Code provides a default table that the applicant can use to determine new PM trips generated. For a dance studio, the trip generation rate is 1.83 per 1,000 square feet. To determine the projects impact and fee, use the following formula: ((Peak PM Trip Rate * Gross Floor Area)/1,000) * $750.00=TFC Example: ((1.83 PM Trips x 1,000 sq. ft.)/1,000) * $750.00 = $1,372.50 If the applicant feels the proposed use would not generate the default number of trips as designated in the TFC Ordinance, and analysis prepared by a Washington State Licensed Engineer can be submitted to the City for review and consideration. SEPA An environmental checklist will be required if the proposal requires more than 20 or more parking stalls or other buildings than the pole structure are used as part of the dance studio. Application and Process Site Plan Review, Chapter 17.84, is an administrative process. Minimum application requirements are located in Section 17.84.060 and are listed on the application form. A project of this size can expect completed review in approximately 12 to 14 weeks. Land use approval typically contains conditions of approval that the applicant must complete prior to receiving a building permit. Upon satisfactory completion of all conditions of land use approval, the applicant can submit building plans for approval. Other Design Guidelines -the attached checklist must be submitted at time of application, with written responses on how each guideline requirement is proposed to be met. DESIGN GUIDELINES - Luv2Dance Studio Pro'ect Review Checklist Guidelines A licable Guidelines Met I.A. 1 Relate develo ment to edestrian oriented street fronta e. X I.A. 2 Relate develo ment to street fronts other than edestrian-oriented streets . I.B. 1 Minimize visibili and im acts of service areas. I.C.(1) Take advantage of special opportunities and mitigate impacts of large develo ments. I.D. 1 Reduce im act of service areas and mechanical a ui ment. I.E. 1 Inte rate biofiltration swales and onds into the overall site desi n. X I.F. 1 Enhance the visual uali of develo ment on corners. I.F.(2) Provide a paved pedestrian walkway from the street corner to the building entrance. II.A.(1) All pedestrian paths must correspond with federal, state and local codes for handica ed access, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. X II.A.(2) Provide adequate lighting at the building entries and all walkways and paths throu h arkin lots. X II.A. 3 Develo an on-site edestrian circulation conce t. II.B.(1) Provide a pedestrian path at least 60" wide (preferably 96" wide) from the street sidewalk to the main ent X II.B.(2) Provide pedestrian paths or walkways connecting all businesses and the entries of multi le buildin son the same develo ment site. II.B. 3 Provide athwa s throw h arkin lots II.C.(1) Where street ROW is insufficient to provide adequate sidewalks buildings and other site features must be set back from the public ROW to achieve at least minimum sidewalk widths. X II.C.(2) Where new streets are developed, provide sidewalks according to minimum standards. X II.D.(1) Provide, where feasible, pedestrian circulation routes to adjacent uses and transit. II.D. 2 Inte rate nearb transit sto s into the tannin of adjacent site im rovements. II.D.(3) Encourage pedestrian paths from all transit stops through commercial areas to residential areas within 1,200 feet X II.E. 1 Enhance buildin ent access. X II.F. 1 Provide edestrian-oriented o ens ace at ke locations. III.A. 1 Provide access roads throw h tar e lots with more than one street fronta e. III.B. 1 Minimize drivewa im acts. X III.C.(1) Meet requirements for location of parking lots on pedestrian-oriented streets. Continued DESIGN GUIDELINES Project Review Checklist Guidelines Applicable Guidelines Met III.C. 2 Meet re uirements for arkin lot desi n detail standards. X III.D. 1 Minimize arkin areas throu h 'oint use and mana ement. III.D. 2 Encoura a structured arkin X III.D. 3 Reduce im acts of arkin ara es. IV.A. 1 Incor orate human-scale buildin elements. X IV.B. 1 Reduce scale of lar a buildin s. IV.C. 1 Architectural) accentuate buildin corners at street intersections. IV. D. 1 Enhance buildin s with a ro riate details. X IV.E. 1 Retain on final facades. IV.E.(2) Use compatible building materials. (See Building Material Summary Matrix, 59 X IV. F. 1 Treat blank walls that are visible from the street arkin or ad'acent lot. X IV.G.(1) Locate and/or screen roof-mounted mechanical equipment so as not to be visible from the street or from the round-level of ad'acent ro erties. IV.G.(2) Where practical, locate and/or screen utility meters, electrical conduit and other service and utilities a aratus so as not to be visible from the street. X V.F.(1) Use plant materials that are approved for use in downtown Yelm. Pro onents ma use other )ant materials a roved b the Ci V.G. 1 Develo a site landsca a desi n conce t. X V.H. 1 Provide substantial site landsca in . V.H. 2 Protect and enhance natural features. X V.I. 1 Screen all arkin lots as re wired b Cha ter 17.80, Landsca in X V.I.(2) An alternative to the required perimeter parking area landscaping plan may be submitted. X V.I. 3 Provide internal arkin lot landsca in X V.J.(1) Consider alternative building and parking siting strategies to preserve existin trees. V.J.(2) Consider the integration of pedestrian and bicycle paths with stands of mature trees where feasible to connect ad"acent uses. ~~ ~~ t ~ ~ 4 ....~.. ~-~~ ~- 10~ Yelm Avenue West .~~ _ _ ~` - P.O. Box 479 Y~~S~~TON Yelm, Washington 9897 (360) 4.i8-3244 August 7, 2003 Stephen and Darlene Rothwell 1011 Yelm Ave. West. Yelm, WA 98597 Re: Luv2Dance Studio Revised Occupancy Dear Mr. and Mrs. Rothwell, As we discussed at your July 16 2003 Pre-submission Meeting, by reducing of the area of the dance studio to less then 1000 square feet and calling the use a classroom, with a maximum occupancy of 49, the following requirements apply: The area needs to be isolated from floor to roof with aone-hour occupancy separation (firewall). Openings in this wall are allowed as long as they-are rated for one hour~and self- closing. One exit a minimum of 36" is required. Latch must be open able with out a key. One restroom is required with one water closet and lavatory. Restroom must meet public standards and ADA standards Dance Studio must meet Energy Code for electrically heated business. All interior covering must have a Clas's III flame rating. This includes the dance floor. During the Site Plan Review process you may also submit to me plans bringing your structure up to these requirements for B Occupancy. If I can answer any questions or be of help please call me at 360.458.8407. Thank you. Sincerely; ,- Gary Clarlson Building Official (7i~~ City r,f Yi'Ir~i i~~ n~~ Cr~unl C)j~~~r~rl Fruity 1'rnr~l~lrr Staff Exhibit 6 Site Plan Review Application Application (5 pages) Notice of incomplete application (1 page) Updated Application (4 pages) Q~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~ WASHItJGTON CITY OF YELM PO Box 479 Yelm WA 98597 360-458-3244 APPLICATION FOR Site Plan Review OFFICIAL USE ONLY / a~ Fee "'~! C'(~ ~ r Date Received ~ o/2`r / r?~ ay ~~~~~ ' File No ~~ uZ 3~ c~ ~ ~.:~ ~ f- Lt` ~-Ll Site Plan Fee: Mobile Home Parks: $250.00 plus $50.00 per mobile home space Multi-Family Building/Condominium: $350.00 plus $50.00 per unit ~C ~ ~ ~ 200c Commercial Site Plan: $350.00 plus $50.00 per 1000 sq. ft of gross floor area ~ Industrial Site Plan: $350.00 plus $150 per acre (In addition, any professional service charges per Resolution #358 ~~. ~/~~ ~~~~f-tea Site plan review is a process for reviewing the design of certain types of development. Site plan approval is required for mobile home parks, duplexes, multi-family dwellings, commercial and industrial uses, planned development districts and for all land uses within the central business district. NAME OF PROJECT Steve Bothwell -Dance Studio APPLICANT Steve Bothwell Mailing Address 1011 West Yelm Hwv City, State and Zip Yelm WA 98597 Telephone Home 458-7104 OWNER Same Mailing Address City, State and Zip Telephone ENGINEER/ARCHITECT/OTHER Bill Turner -= Contours & Concepts Engineering, LLC. Mailing Address PO Box 476 City, State and Zip Tenino WA 98589 Telephone SUMMARY OF REQUEST Requesting to operate a dance studio within an existing structure. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION General Location The property is located on the south side of Hwv 510 lust east of Yelm High School Site Address 1017 SE Yelm Highway Land Area (acres) 4.17Acres Section 24 Township 17 Range 1 E Assessor's Tax Parcel Number 2 1 7241 30300 Full legal description of subject property (attach separate sheet if necessary) See Attached -5 PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS ATTACH EXTRA PAGES IF NECESSARY 1. Does the design minimize conflicts with neighboring land uses? Explain. NO 2. Is the site within 300 feet of any "critical areas" such as wetlands or streams? NO 3. What provisions will be made for storm water and/or flood control? None 4. What provisions will be made for water supply and sewage disposal? City will supply water and sewer service A step tank with pressure pump will be installed for pressure main connection. 5. What provisions will be made for electrical power, natural gas, telephone and other utilities? Utilities are installed and connected to the existing structure and will be utilized for the new structure. 6. What provisions will be made for streets, access, and/or buses? Driveway access will be off of Yelm Highway Parking will be in front of structure. 7. What provisions, if any, will be made for open space and/or recreation? None 8. What provisions will be made for schools and school children? None I affirm that all answers, statements and information above and submitted with this application are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also affirm that I am the owner of the subject site or am duly authorized by the owner to act with respect to this application. Further, I grant permission from the owner to any and all employees and representatives of the City of Yelm and other governmental agencies to enter upon and inspect said property as reasonably necessary to process this application. I agree to pay all fees of the city that apply to this application. `~_~~-o~ Signed 'V~- Date E-G t~~ dtd~ `U 'ti C ' ' ''d ~ ~ r' O ~ 0 r ~ d a o c o a ~~ --3 L~J ^~ 4 1 y f--! F -i L J N ~~~ ~~~ 1 / ,C,Q Gtr/ ~~ .1.0[.62. q~. S / ~` ~,`' I -- -- I ; ~.. ... ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ i ~ i i I i I j i A v a y A A A x f'1 t1 f1 m t7 1) f'1 ~ O Do .X. X .X-. ti .X. A X ~ ~O O N N N N N N ~ N ~ A N N -i ti ~ -I y .1. O ~ ~ m o o n n cZi n ~ cZi d o o A n n m 'I n r1 N £ ~~ = co o c z z c°i = y A o A A~ N ~ ~ -i m A f*1 V f~l A m f'i A z A O '~ t1 A -I C ~1 A -1 f'1 n ~ Z ~ Z 2 < K o m D (+I ~ r t- Z r~i z rZi ~ ~ 1 r z %'" \ £,py2 ` 5.. 31pZ yo /// o ~ _~~/ n o ~ n '/' C A D p p~ ~/ ~ yC °_ .. ! _ > `..I/ 4~= M ,~ ,/,, ~~ t, ,, t ~ i ~.~ ~ i ` .l'[ I ~ , s'' m i~ u, P n `\ z \ ~z ,. I ti ,\\ ~. / ~~ ~~ _ ~- i._ ' ~6'29•~l0 '' 55 ~1d•-~,~ t /- F--' J 3~ mW 'I---1 W ~ _ --~ r., ~%, `i ~~~. •`eF,{ 1~ n I--I Z 1-~--1 D n N ~ n ~.hti `\ O% COQ 1 ~ I'1,~. 1r :Ia O O ~ ~ S A N L K9 ~ ~ 19P da 2aL~l //{/j KC ~.,~ ny j ~~9 rya t1y J o =A m o ~" ~.. ~ ~ r~ v°~ vJ~ m ~_ .U O ~a Z c' n ~.? „d ~ m C? S r C /\ ~ 0 O~ MH H !([py W o o - ~~~ E~9 y5 E1 ~-~- ~ d a y a ~ oczimoZ= I~.~ ~ Z C .'O V rl ~ f'1 '-1 m N OZ~ ZHr ~~D3p H zlyo tizr °z' z NI"'3rOAV'A rHNZp C DHnm~l ~-ZI~m2 00 ~ Zen' ~'~ W ''D ~ 3 -C 0 o Dzv~z w m ° ~ DD N 'O- N ~ ~ ~ I~T1 4 ~ m Df~*lA°--1 ~ Z:CIy~ z ~ D-p 3~(~.I ~ -iODZ:(1 ~ ~Z~m z J A tyz~j 3 ~ 'O D ~ n~ cj \ ~ .\!\ y n o N ~ ny ~---- ~ .- ~n:~ 1 ~~ fit) ~~~) .,,~ o ~ !.. F. n ~ o ,n p ~ Y` `~/ ~ o n -1 ~ m / ". _ m Z °~ s =n .fti? `? '~ y oz fr``1/ ~ / ffr'``~f `~f ''l li / / / 1 / T-~,,~„ ~ / ~~-,/ 1 / ,\ r~ `~ ~ `7~M.. ~d••, i P ~ ~ ~." ~. ~ A in 2, q± umi _ ~ ~ / ~~ ~ ~ ~ A y a~ ~~:i; ~ _ Nm ? a ~) ~{(''''YI 3 i ``u4F ~/,, t' nl ' , /~~ /: -~~ n i ~ '? ~ ~ z r ~-w, ~ n ;' ~ ~ _ - „7 %~ t A ~\ " v I 1 m ~ ~~ n 1 1 cn ~ f '.J ~ $~ _ _ ~ ~. 1N3W3SV3 anon ~ r z O N -~ G7 ~ NlVM301S °! ~~m rn = O r~Tl ~ Z =+Arm O m L ~ d1211S 2131NV1d a: zoom ~ DI ~ A O n r r~ Zmm N - 3NVl 3N16 to Z o cn 'OO rn-1 DZ?O !n Z O ~m nr,Z m 0 ~ A orn m m !n ~~~ ~ ^v 3NVl OI.)jV211 f - ~z r ~o A Z ~ ~ f*f ~ my 3NVl NNl11 lj3l O1 ~ ~~ '~ p ~ D ~ tn~-Z 1,VM OMl a, ~' ~m~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3NVl 013.iV211 C o ~~rn~z j ~ D O O -1 m D D 0 m 3NVl 3NIQ rn _f0*7 p N ~ ~ ~ d12115 2131NV1d m ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ p m ti )IlVM3015 a' iC1 m~i o - ~ m r m ~ 0 1N3W3SV3 0 ~ X^v AlllllfJ ~J - ~? r 1NIOd HO1V0 Cli _ ~ ~ Stc;vc Rothwell -Dance Studio .~ ~ f _ General Site Plan. v ontours & oncepts. n~i.neerln~ I'llone: 360-438-03 1 t c-•~~/ i' ~: i~`, ~~. •~• v/ `\~ .. Ind m a~ to v<. h i^ ~~ T111 N Z ^~ ! t, D z N D RL'V1GW INFORMATION 95 ".'~ Gomplclc R13V L1i14'1R: O W N IiR DA'1'li tiliN'1"1'O RIiVI! Wl R. ~~ _ ._ ~~~ ~ AUI7ON C0C o~~ ~~~i' R,~ ~~~ o~ tIY ~ txx~ b' ~ '"' ~ p V 1 w' a. b ~M Z 6 ~ /~~ \ U 3. a ~ k~. E. /~ II ~ V I I N V ~~ H V n o V N » ~ In Cl o ~ :x v ~ ,~ ~ F ~ ~ `o ~.r F~..~ ' U " b ' ~ ~ ~ . E, ~.~ c (~ ~ 3~ ~ w to n II ~.~o ~^ °~Q y ~ ~ w I-+ II 0 ~ {M~• ~ ~ ~ y M ~ r . ~ DISiCiN iNI~CN2MA"PION P201L+CI' IULN'l'INICA'170N No. ........ Ptl l NAML: H~.vw mp Ck(9 DI till NI U li l/I)f) 92Gi03 UI(AMN Mli ~ 9Ylf/lU Clll C hl: D - • ~ _ li 1/I)lf ~. )/?!/flJ 92 ~ f ~ r~ - ~ ( ~ t'f '`\ ~ cn 2 n p.~ p~ ~' W X W ' I ~ ~ -< ~ Z d H V ]~ fTl F, £ z C~ I ~ fU 1 I ~ i N ! I 1 Z I ~ 1 d I ~ I ~T) W I ~ I H ............. ~ I -A ~ W I o ~ I i I I I i 1 1 ! 1 I 1 I i ! .\ ~-- ~ `~ i i ~~ L_-~~ ('1 ! d X o~ I ~~ .A i D£ G1 I ~ I I W 1 ! ! I I I i ~~ Ln ~. M '~ G~ d o ~ O d r~ fTl -Tl x aH ~~ -~ ~z o~ ~ d d~ ~~ D ~ zr vi r C d H x H '~ H z H D 50' ~~ ~ 4'~ OPEN d d LESE a~ .P~ W .~ i~ H j~ D Z ~L = ' , ~~,tr Y TT ~ • "• 2 Z ~. O rn rr X W H Z d 1'''1 d rX-+ o~ o~ H Z ~ ~ d - ow ~~ m ~Z 1 ~ I 1 8'-r-~ Z d ~~ 0 W ~ ~ D -'1 '.~ H --I /~ Z ('1 f'l Z a r r X\~~.. ~ ~ O ~ O ~ +-( ~z ~ ~ -~ W m x ~Z ~~ D N ~ ~ N ~° ~ a W a W X W O~ ~ e u ` ~-"~ H Z d H Z d z d -- ~ O ~ ~ i `~ --~_'----- ----~~`------ ------~-1- 1 ---ter X f'--------- d H 0 ~ 0 ` ' D ~ -< W Stcvc Bothwell - Dance Studio I3Li i 1.d i tzg L,~.yoLt.t ontours & oncepts, nglneering Phone: 3G0-438-0301 Laccy, Wa I I I IX IW 1 ~ I IZ Id 0 1~ I I 1 I _J (~ ~. ~ ~~~, ~{ ~ B o (A w. 11~ ~ ~'~ 6 ~ U ~ A ~ g- A ~ 1-.~ v ~~ I'VJ `y ',,,r y~H ~ ~~~ x~: ~ o ~ ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ • •~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' p~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~/~ ~$ ~~ tom., RlrVll%W 1N1'ORMA'I'ION 95 ",o ('omplctc REVIFWF:R: OWNfiR PIlO7R(:TIDf?N'i)PI(:A'I'IgNNo. FILIi NAME; IlYxem~y~ UATI! 9)!NT TO 1!RV 11! W I!0.• ('A(1 ACIIQN ACTION UI?SI(iNILI) H'I'ri)II 9rt6n17 unnwN Mn 9rx~m7 cue<:ICho urnm 9/26107 I~D~'H~'ELL LAl~SCAPE BETWEEN TWIN COUNTY CREDIT UNION ~ I2~~EZ: * over 50 filbert nut trees * over 20 fir trees * about 10 alder trees BETWEEN YELM AVE ~ DANCE ~TUDiO: * several junipers along frontage * three privot hedges * yellow forcythias and perriwinkle ground covering * five fir trees * several locust trees * three holly trees * three poplar trees * ash trees * hawthorns trees fruit trees ARO"IJND STUDIO-5 FT PERIlVIETBt2 * three birdsweet spruce * four lavatory * garden bark for open area * grass stretch between 5' stretch and pavement Any questions, please feel free to call me. Thank you. Michael Iverson 9002 Rhoton Rd Se Yelm Wa 98597 360=458=7265 a `'F,.~' ~~ THE ~p~~ s 'I q~y r ~_ ~ e 4 _ _ _ _ 10~ Yelm Avenue West P.O. Box 479 ~'~~'~ Yelm, Washington 98597 WASHINGTON (360) 4s8-3244 October 1, 2003 Steve Bothwell 1101 West Yelm Hwy Yelm, WA 98597 Re: Application for Site Plan Review for Bothwell Dane Studio Dear Mr. Bothwell: On September 29, 2003, the City received your application for Site Plan Review and has determined the application to be incomplete. Your application is unclear if you are using the entire building for the dance studio, or only a portion as had been discussed previously. I have included information for your assistance in completing the application requirements. 1. A detailed floor plan showing the portion ofi the building to be used for the dance ` studio, how the building separation is made, and a writ=~en description of this separation and use. 2. A written response is required to show how each of the Design Guidelines Checklist requirements are proposed to be met. 3. The Preliminary Stormwater Report must meet the guidelines as stated in Section 3.1.1 of the 1994 Thurston Counfiy Drainage Design and Erosion Control Iti9anual. 4. Landscape plan should show ail required areas per the Presubmission notes, dated July 16, 2003. if you are planning to use only 1,000 square feet of the building as the dance studio, the application fee submitted is the correct amount. If you are planning to use more than 1,000 square feet, the fee is a larger amount. If you have any questions,. please feel free to give me a call. I can be reached at (360) 458-8496. Sincerely, -~ ,.. i/ - Tani 1v~lerriman Assistant Planner nr- Silt Tu ner, Ccntours ~ Con ~epts Engineering. LLC "17u~ Crhi ~~f 7"slur is nn 1:I~inr! O~~~Ir~rtur~iti~ 1'nnnlll'r & Mailing Address: P.O. Box 476 Tenino WA 98589 opts Physical Address: 4405 - 7th Ave. S.E. Suite 300 Lacey, WA ngineering Phone Number: 360-438-0301 E-Mail: Bill@CandCengineering.com October 13, 2003 To: The City of Yelm PO Box 479 '°~ f_ °~ ~' ~° ~ '~' Yelm, WA 98597 „_ ~ ~ ?~L i 360-458-3224 ~ 1' } ` " `J From: Bill Turner, P.E. PO Box 476 Tenino, WA. 98589 RE: Steve Rothwell -Dance Studio Dear City Planning, Listed below are your requests, as delineate in the Design Guidelines followed by our response: I.A. (1) Relate development to pedestrian street froutage. Frontage improvements are not required for project. The existing structure does not front the main street and because of the existing landscaping cannot be viewed from the public roadway. LE. (1) Integrate biofiltration swales and ponds into the overall site design There will be no bioswales on this project and there is an existing infiltration area within the project limit at this time. II.A. (1) All pedestrian paths mtest correspond with federal, state, and local codes for handicapped access, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. The handicapped access meets all local codes and the American with Disabilities Act. ILA. (2) Provide adequate lighting at the building entries aiad all walk ways acid paths through parking lots. Adequate lighting will be provided at the building entrance. ILB. (1) Provide a pedestrian path at least 60" wide (preferably 96" wide) from the street sidewalk to the main entry. A pathway from the street to the main entrance of the structure has not been provided for the following reasons: There are no sidewalks along the frontage road and frontage improvements are not required for this project. Without a connection point for the pathway, it would lead pedestrian into an unsafe condition along Yelm Highway. The dance studio is a private business and not open to the public. ~= 17. C. (1) Where street ROW is insufficient to provide adequate sidewalks buildings and other site features must be set back from the patblic ROW to achieve at least minimum sidewalk widths. A proposed right-of-way line has been placed on the plan drawings indicating the width that will be required to install the required roadway section. ILC. (2) Where new streets are developed, provide sidewalks according to minimum standards. Frontage improvements are not required on this project. II.D. (3) Encourage pedestrian paths from all transit stops through commercial areas to residential areas within1,200 feet. Does not apply to this project at this time. ILE. (1) Enhance building entry access. Lighting and landscaping has been provided to enhance the building entry. III.B. (1) Minimize driveway impacts. There will be one entrance into the dance studio which will be shared with a residence that is on the same parcel. IILC. (2) Meet requirements for parking lot design detail standards. Parking lot is not visible from the street. Park lot will have lighting directed from the building entrance. Parking shall be stripped and landscaped. III.D. (2) Encourage structured parking. Structured parking may not apply to this project. N.A. (1) Incorporate human-scale buildi~zg elements. The structure shall have 2 human scaling elements such as: individual windows < 32 sq. ft. per pane with 6 in molding separation from other windows, a porch or covered entry. N, .D. (1) E~zhance buildings with appropriate details. The structure shall have Decorative Treatment of doors and windows: such as a decorative molding or framing details around all ground floor windows and doors located on facades facing or adjacent to public streets or parks or decorative glazing or door designs. IV. E. (2) Use compatible building materials. (See Building Material Sumnuir-v Matri.c, Pg. ~ 9) The existing building is not visible ft~om the street and the building material and color of the new structure shall match the facade with the existing building. ~~ ~~ Yrr-. ~~,a ._. ~... ~. IV.F. (1) Treat blank walls that are visible form the street parki~zg or adjace~zt lot. The dance studio will not be visible from the street and landscaping will be provided where visibility if from an adjacent lot. IV. G. (2) Wliere practical, locate and/or screen actility meters, electrical conduit a~zd other service and utilities apparatus so as not to be visible from the street. All utility meters and apparatus are located away from the street and are not visible. V.G. (1) Develop a site landscape design concept. A landscaping plan shall be provided. V.H. (2) Protect and enhance natural features. The natural landscape between adjacent property owners shall remain and will be enhance through additional landscaping. V.I. (1) Screen all parking lots as required by Chapter 17.80, Landscaping. The existing parking lot is screen by landscape and fencing. V.I. (2) An alternative to the required perimeter parking area landscaping plan may be submitted.. Does not apply to this project at this time. V.I. (3) Provide intenzal parking lot landscaping Internal parking lot landscape plan shall be provided. This completes the Design Guidelines Project Review Checklist as identified by the City of Yelm. If you have any questions or need more information, please call me at (360) 438- 0301. Respectfully, ~~ ~~~ ~CZ~'n-~~~ Bill Turner, P.E. Principal Engineer, Contours & Concepts Engineering, LLC. cc: file Steve Rothwell :~ ~, `~~ ---- ~..__- A r T N 0 W O ~~ r I I 1 D~ 1 ~~ 1 ~ r 1 ~ I I ~ fU I • I 1 Z 1 ~ 1 p ~ ~W 1 ~ ' I H I W Z d O d D n d H I ~ X H ---~ H z '1 H /~ D r r o ~ d '~ ~~ ~ z b~ o p d M I I I 1 it I ~.` ~-- 1 ~~ i 1 ~ i L_~~~ ITl 1 dx ~ ~ I ~ H -P j D Gl 1 ~ 1 1 W I 1 1 1 I I I ~~ 11 ~ X Q H /~ ~z o~ 0 ~d d~ -~ D ~ zr v~ r (.JI X W Z d ~~'~---- 50' X W Z d -~L--- CJ D 1 ~ 1 1 ~ '~ Z f*1 ~ ~ Z d o ~ Z n * ~ ~ 1 f 1 ~y X ~ 1 1 = .Z~7 1~i IX r ~ D ~ ~W GJ ~~ IZ d w ice _______ __________ `` ~ ~ I` 1-i ____~ I 1 ~ C X`\~-- d 1--1 0 N /'O t-a Z ~~ '.~ W X w Z ~ __ '~~ % ~ 1 ----ram ---~~ X I--- d H 0 Z ~~ -'~ W Steve Bothwell -Dance Studio Buildi. zg Layout /"~ ontours & oncepts ngineering Phone: 360-438-0301 Lacey, Wa_ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~..~ ~ ~~ H ~ y®~. O IA R II ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~n A V y F~°t, 46 ~ M'-d A ~ 0 ~ r !t'! r e ~ ~I ~ . ~~000 ~•. ~~ ~ ~~ og ~ ~ ° ~ ~' Q'; O REV1EiWiNFORMA'1'IpN 95%Cnmplc(c REVIEWER: OWNER O ~ ~ Z ~~ D N 0~ ~~ A(.9'IUN DI'SI(iN INfURMATION PNO1P.(T IDCN'IIFICA'f10N No. FIL1( NAMf•.: Uumnyi CA('l UI!51(iN1iD 0)'IDb 9RMq UIiAWN Mfl 9R(AI) cneclcrl) urnm ynRroi PL(YITI?U I)ATf5 Staff Exhibit 7 Site Plan Review Approval `~ O~ THE p•Q 4 10~ Yelm Avenue West 'Y'E L1V~ ` ~ P. O. Box 479 WASHINGTON Yelm, Washington 9897 (360) 4~8-3244 December 3, 2003 Steve Rothwell 1011 West Yelm Ave. Yelm WA 98597 Re: Site Plan Approval for Case ~ SPR-03-8354-Y1_, Rothwell Dance Studio Dear Mr. Rothwell: The Site Plan Review Committee has considered your application for the above referenced project, and finds that as conditioned trelow, the proposed project is consistent with the Yelm Comprehensive Plan, and afl applicable City policy's and development standards. Pursuant to Chapter 15.49 Integrated Project Review Process, a project, which is subject to Site Plan Approval, is a Type ll Permit and can be appealed to the Yelm Hearing Examiner. An appeal must be filed within 14 days of the date of this notice. Site Plan Approval is v~1j~1 for 18 months from the date of this letter. The affected property owners may request a change in property tax valuation from the Thurston County Tax Assessor's Office. Propasal: The applicanfi has applied for Site Plan Review for the conversion of 1,000 sq. fi of an existing structure into a Dance Studio with the addition of 110 sq. ft. for entrance and restroom facilities. Site plan review is required for any commercial use or activity, with exemptions allowed if-the use is similar to the prior use. Ths building was permitted for personal use. Operating a dance studio at this site requires Site Plan Review. The project is approved subject to the follo~vinc~ conditions of approval: 7. Transportation Finding: Yelm is a small compact community most directly a~~ected by tv'JO state highlrJays, `rJhic'r~ bis°ct the communi~y. The hiah'JJays aro used by local residents for transportation throughout the city, and to access to commercial and residential areas t'r,rouahcut the C^v!`nmUniiy. Ir. ilcU Oi v!id~ning EXiSing Strc°iS, the City haS elected t0 C(eai~ Ce~iain aiterna~_IV°S, Y-~ , Y-2, Y-~, `."JhICi ~ VJlil aV01d ti ~° need t0 SICnIiiCantly `IlIG~n eXiSiinG l~Itc Citi~of )i•lui i'~ nu l,r~unl O~,~~rrr(uriih/ l'ru~~irll•~ streets, and particularly Yelm Avenue. New developments do in fact burden the city's central streets, and unless the alternate routes are accomplished, the City would have to require developers to pay the cost of the internal street widening. The city plans show, and the City finds that adequate facilities will be accomplished better and in a timely fashion by the alternate route facilities as a substitute for the widening of existing facilities. As a result, the City finds that the regional plans in fact benefit projects in all areas on the City and will accomplish the goal of providing adequate fiacilities to City standards within a reasonable time to serve the demands created by the proposed project. Finding: The City has adopted a Transportation Facility Charge (TFC) of $750.00 per pm peak trip. The Ordinance provides a default table that is used to determine new pm trips generated by the. proposed use. The table does not list a dance studio, so a similar use was determined. The new trip generation rate is based on 1.37 new pm peak hour trips, per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area. Finding: Street frontage improvements are required as part of Site Plan Review and approval. At this time the City of Yelm is granting the project a "frontage deferment". A deferment means that at any time the City can require this project to complete its frontage. Typically this is when the city has more than one project located along side each other that are required to construct frontage improvements. 'Your frontage improvements will be required when the Yelm High School improves its frontage on SR 510. ~'" Conditions of Approval: 1 a. The applicant shall mitigate traffic impacts to the transportation system. Mitigation includes payment of the Transportation Facility Charge (TFC). The TFC charge of $1,140.75 is based on 1.37 new pm peak hour trips generated by the project, and is due and payable at Civil Plan Approval. 1 b. The applicant shall provide a waiver of protest for the deferral of the frontage improvements. 2. Water Supply Finding: The City's Water Comprehensive Plan identifies a portion of the City area for service. The City is pursuing additional land areas for approval and the extension of facilities. Completion of such activities is dependent on grant and developer funding, as well as planned bonding and existing public funds. The status of such plans and funding sources must be considered in any review of concurrency. Developer extensions and or dedications, latecomer agreements, oversizing agreements; and the creation of local improvement districts may all be considered. In the event of a new funding source, however, concurrency is not found until the funding source is in fact in place - e.g. award of a grant, a binding le~~er commitment for third party funding, or the successful formation of a local improvement district. Any necessary water rights are considered, only after approved for municipal use by the V~~lashington State Department of Ecology, or appropriate appeals board, and the time for appeal or challenge has expired. t~:~-~„ , ,,~ r Finding: Connection to Ciry water services is required for all new development. Finding; The City of Yeim is dedicated to providing the best quality water possible to its consumers. The Washington Administrative Code, section 246-290-490 requires that the Ciry take measures to ensure that contamination does not occur as a result of a cross contamination. Finding: The existing single-family dwelling and mobile home are served by an exisiting well. State and County health codes required a Group B water system for more than 1 single-family dwelling. The well has not been approved as a Group B system. Conditions of Approval: 2a. The applicant shall connect all existing structures to the City water system. The cost to connect shall include a flee ofi $1,500.00 per Equivalent Residential Unit (each ERU equals 240 gallons of water consumption per day, fee subject to change.). The applicant shall provide proposed water usage calculations for the dance studio to the Community Development Department for review and approval, to determine the number of gallons of daily use. 2b. The applicant shall abandon the existing well per Washington State Department of Ecology standards, and transfer any existing water rights to the City of Yelm. 2c. The applicant shall meet all conditions for cross connection control as required in section 246-290-490 WAC. 3. Sewer System Finding: The City's Sewer Comprehensive Plan identifies a portion of the City area for service. The City is pursuing additional land areas or approval and the extension of facilities. Completion of such activities is dependent on grant and developer funding, as well as planned bonding and existing public funds. The status of such plans and funding sources must be considered in any re~tiew of concurrency. Developer extensions and or dedications, latecomer agreements, oversizing agreements, and the creation of local improvement districts may all be considered. In the event of a new funding source, however, concurrency is not found until the funding source is in fact in place - e.g. award of a grant, a binding letter commitment for third party funding, or the successful formation of a local improvement district. Finding: Connection to City sewer services is required for all new development. The single- family dv~relling is served by a private septic system. It is unclear when this system arras installed. The mobile home is served by private septic system installed in or about 1970. Conditions of Approval: 3a. The applicant shall connect all existing structures to the City S.T. E. P. sewer system. The cost to connect shall include a fee of 55,125.00 per ERU (each ERU equals 240 gallons of water consumption per day, fee subject to change). The number of ERU's required will be determined by approved water consumption calculations. 3b. The applicant shall abandon the on-site sewage systems per the Thurston County Department of Health standards, and provide proof of approval to the Ciry. 3c. Upon completion of the onsite installation as per the City's Development Guidelines; the S.T.E.P. sewer equipment shall be deeded to the Ciry, and an easement provided for maintenance. _ 4. Storm Water Finding: Impervious surfaces create stormwater runoff. Uncontrolled and untreated stormwater runoff can. create health and safety hazards. YMC requires all development to comply with the City stormwater Manual. The manual states that projects creating less than 5,000 sq. ft. of impervious surface must contain and treat all stormwater runoff onsite Conditions of Approval: 4a. The applicant shall submit civil plans that show appropriate stormwater containment. 5. Parking Finding: The City of Yelm Development Guidelines, Design Guidelines, and Municipal Code address parking regulations from many aspects, including, but not limited to; design, number of stalls required, pedestrian pathways, and safety. The requirements of off-street parking and loading facilities and their design shall be regarded as the minimum; however, the owner, developer or operator of the premises for which the parking facilities are intended shall be responsible for providing adequate amounts and arrangement of space for the particular premises even though such space or its arrangement is in excess of the minimum set forth. Chapter 17.72 YMC requires one parking space for every 10 occupants, based on the maximum occupant load as determined by the Uniform Building Code for Assembly areas of less-concentrated use. Based on a maximum occupant load of 49, 5 parking spaces would be required. Conditions of Approval: 5a. The applicant shall create a paved parking area, meeting the Cit`,~ of Yelm Development Guideline standards, ~~r~ith a minimum of 5 parking stalls, one being handicap van accessible. 5b. Parking area shall be landscaped per YMC 17.80. ~';7 r; ~ ,~ f, 6. Fire Finding: Fire protection to the buildings must be provided per the Uniform Fire Code. Requirements for installation of fire hydrants will be determined in civil plan review. Finding: The Uniform Building Code (UBC) provides occupancy ratings for different types of uses. The fire coverage for the commercial use must meet UBC requirements. Condi~ions ofi Approval 6a. The applicant shall submit fire flow calculations for all existing and proposed hydrants. All hydrants must meet minimum City standards. 6b. The applicant shall submit a fire hydrant plan to the Community Development Department for review and approval. 7. Landscaping. Finding: Landscaping and screening are necessary to promote safety, to provide screening between compatible land uses, to safeguard privacy and to protect the aesthetic assets of the City. YMC, Chapter 17.80 requires all development to provide on site landscaping. Finding: Type 11 landscaping is intended to provide visual separation of uses from streets, and visual separation of compatible uses so as to soften the appearance of streets, parking areas, and building elevation. This landscaping is used around the perimeter of a site, and adjacent to buildings. Type III landscaping is intended to provide visual relief where clear sight is desired. This landscaping is utilized along pedestrian corridors and walks for separation of pedestrians from streets and parking areas. Type IV landscaping is intended to provide visual relief and shade in parking areas. Type V landscaping is required in storm water retention areas, if required. Conditions ofi Approval: 7a. The applicant shall provide for Type II landscape buffer adjacent to parking, drive aisles, and the west and south side of the building. 7b. Type 111 landscaping shall be required when frontage improvements are installed. 7c. Type IV landscaping is required in parking areas. 7d. Type V landscaping is required in storm4vater facilities. 7e. The applicant shall submit a final landscape plan ~r~ith civil plan submittal r~,~~~^ ., ~,i ~, 8, Refusz: Finding: The City of Yelm Development Guidelines, Design Guidelines, and Municipal Code provides guidance for refuse storage and screening. Conditions of Anprovai: 8a. The applicant must provide for refuse storage. Refuse container screening shall be of a material and design compatible with the overall architectural theme of the associated structure, shall be at least as high as the refuse container, and shall in no case be less than six-feet. 8b. No refuse container shall be permitted between a street and the front of a building. 8c. Refuse collection areas shall be designed to contain all refuse generated on site and deposited between collections. Deposited refuse shall not be visible from outside the refuse enclosure. 8d. A six-foot wall or fence, with sight obscuring gates shall enclose any outdoor refuse collection point. The fence shall be a solid material such as wood or masonry, and shall be designed per the City of Yelm Development guidelines. 9. Other Conditions of Approval: 9a. Business must have a current City of Yelm Business License to operate a business within the City. Site Plan Approval is a Type I I Administrative land use approval.. An appeal of this decision can be filed within 14 days from the date of this letter, pursuant to YMC, Chapter 15.49, Integrated Project Review Process. The Site Plan is valid for eighteen (18) months from the date of this letter. The applicant may request asix-month extension on the approval, if the request is made in writing prior to the expiration date of this approval. If you need additional information or assistance, please call the Community Development Department at (360) 458-3835. Sincerely, Tami Merriman Assistant Planner cc: Bill Turner, P.E., Contours & Concepts Engineering Grant Beck, Community Development Director Jim Gipson, Development Services Engineer Gary Carlson, Building Official n ... ~ .'i? '. ('i i^ : m.;r i;".. l f ir, ..-md1 Un n.~:. ,. ,.. i.~ , ri i~ I..~i~rt , ,.. Staff Exhibit 8 Septic Permit Number 3054 11/25/29103 09:18 36Ea9169Ei4 THE a!IRI<ERIDE GROUP PAGE 02 . i1'~~ _ TI~iURSTON-~vit~;ON HEALTH DISTRICT , DIVISION.` OF SANITATION Receipt ~ (p1 5th & Birch Courthouse Annex Shelton, Washington Olympia, Washington Phone: 42b-4407 SITE I1vSPEGTION #~QS. Phone: 352-4851, ext 8 APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT OR. ALTER AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (Application required for each installation and/or major repair} Buyer or Property Owner Phone:~CSIG ~.,?~1~0 Mailing Address~~~l~¢'~ City /li~oe~~State l ~~/%i~ Zip Builder Address zip Location o£ Property, including: Lot; Block# Other: Mailing Address of Site: /f,~,~,d1~ / ~1,~~,•`f~ ~~~~,,~ U (V~Iith directions to site) ~~,,,@~~-•~J ~ .c-~ ~ u Property Commercial Size I2.esiden,ce r'j~,c~~~ ~ of Bedrooms ~. Basennent Type Water Supply: Depth of Well Spring Other Is well or body of fresh water within 100 £eEt of sewage system? Is salt water supply within 50 feet of sewage system? Septic Tank //•5/5' gals. Drain£ield Length_ - £t. Trench width ft, And(o:r system other than above , Is garbage grinder being installed? Is contractor installing septic tank? (Sewage Contractor must be licensed by Thurston-Mason Health District) THE UNDERSIGNED hereby applies for a permit to construct ~ ), alter. (. } andlor modify ( ) a sewage system on above property in accordance with minimurz~ requirennents and standards of the Thuxstan-Mason District Board of Health. APPLICANT''S SIGNATURE NOT TO BE FILLED IN $Y APPLICANT sb Permit n l~~ Fee_ ~.~ Date Issued Qf ~ ~ f 7d $y~~,.,~.~Q~ ~ ~ Area ~~ Sanitarian REMARKS: Date Approved:~ l~-~~- ~~~ Approved by T.'-` Date Inspected ~~~, TMH-S-S q/69 ~Ew• CtIS~i't, Sanitarian 11/%5/28D3 ©9:18 36E~a9169Ga ,~. ~ .. THE I•'.IR~<gRIGE GROUP ~. ~~ •~ c ~ /8' ~, ~ ~ .. ~~ PAGE ~3 ~. ate- ~~~ ~~ ~~ 15 ~ S 7` P.u,, W ~ t ~~C S T c~,~~~ .~-r GoLvc l ~ a K ce ~~ 1 ~~~ Owner Phone ~y G - -~ 4/ =~ `J Mailing .A.ddzesg a~~ /_ ~-.r,~~/1~~~~- - Cfty~~iAi State / / Q~/~1 Builder Addre s s Sewage Caatractar~~~ ~..Qil~iyc.~~,%l~.i,-~~ Addres8~ '.~.~~'- , ~ai~1 _ ...... .J Legal Description Parcel No. ~~~ !.~ / ,3dy'~ Fitld Bvok No. Directions to PropertY__~i~%.~n..~~ / ~-~-~~..~~ J ./~~,, ~.1.-, .I~ ~-~i ~,.,... Intends `c~ use s of Buildings ~ ~~.~~~ Public Sewer_Water Supply. 230, of Bedraams Z A1o. o Bsthroozaa ~gaBement Septic Tsnlc //~l Type of 5az1 Irot Sire _ Sail Drainage: . ood Moderstc Foor Nona ~,__._ DRAW SKETCH in blink space or on separate sheet aadicsting the following: 1. ProperEy lines and locatlo~i of house on lot and indicate sxtinimuzxi and maximum, setbacks plus diznensiozzs o£ lot a:zd s11 buildings. 2. Location at house and sewage disposal system in r•elstion to stzearris, lake~.arells, patios, dxiveways, un~dergroumd tanks, water supply lines and easezxzents. 3. Proposed fill, including depth, area, porosify and gmotznt plus location of drains. ?~ ~ -~ ~, ~ ' ~ . ~ a ~~ ~ ~ ~ Q G'f~~~, APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE Site inspection fee $10.00 Receipt 230. Approved_ _q-I!~ ~ ~~ Not .P,.pproved, ~y By DATE 9- 9- 7 D 11/5/2883 89:18 368a91698a THE ~;IRI%ERIDE GROUP Pc;rE 85 A Business Buitt B~ Confidence and . Growing ThrovRh Ded4cat~on .~. ~' REALTY ~ INSURANCE ONE SOUTH SOUND CENTER, OLYMPIA ILkCEYI, WASHINGTON 98501 Moiling Address: P. O. 80:3487 Main Of{ice: 49t-460Q - Brench Offica: 357-1781 That portion of the S~ of th E~ of Section 24, Township 17 North, Range I East, W, M. , escxibed as follows: Beg~ning at the intersection of the nortl:~ Zinc of the S o.f the N of Section 24, Township 17 North, Range 1 East, W°m°, with the southerly lin,c of the right of way of Olynnpia -Yelm County Road, thence southeasterly along said southerly line of said right of way 150 feet to the point of beginning, thence south westerly and at right angle to said County R aa.d 570. 18 feet, thence south eastcriy and parallel with said County Road 70fcet then,cc north easterly and at right angle to said County Road 570.18 feet, thence north westEZly along said County Road 70 feet more or less to the point of beginning. REAL ESTATE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INSURANCE MORTGAGE FINANCING APPRAISALS Staff Exhibit 9 Assessor's Information Structure info Property: 217 Use these buttons to display different information for this property ' New Search Basic Into "Values ~ Structures ` Permits "Sales Feedback ~ Map Into Year Built Construction Construction Quality Physical Condition Number of Bedrooms Full Baths Partial Baths Residence Square Footage Main Finished Area Residential Structures 1944 Fireplaces/Wood Stoves OTHER Heat Type FAIR Fuel Type GOOD Foundation Type Exterior Wall Type 1 Roofing Material 1 1776 Detached Structures 0 FORCED-AIR ELECTRIC BLOCK WOOD-SIDING COMPOSITION Code Year Built Square Feet Quality Condition FRAME-GARAGE SHED-ENCLSD 1944 2003 350 3200 LOW-COST AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE Office of the Assessor Patricia Costello, Assessor 2000 Lakeridge Drive SW -Olympia, WA 98502 Customer Service (360)786-5410 -- Fax (360)754-2958 -- TDD (360)754-2933 Grant Beck From: Bill Turner [bill@candcengineering.com] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:59 PM To: gbeck@ywave.com Subject: RE: Bothwell Site Plan Review Importance: High Hi Grant, Thanks for your message and I will be getting the $50.00 to you ASAP. I apologize for not realizing there would be a fee. Your issues for the appeal are pretty much correct. In number 1. below, connecting to existing residences was mentioned at the presub, but they did not specified that they absolutely had to connect to the system. The presub said, "It is unknown at this time if the existing residence will be allowed to continue on the current water and sewer system. These options will be reviewed at the time of civil engineering review. If the residence is required to connected to the public water and sewer system, the well and septic system will have to be decommissioned." There is a considerable cost for connecting the residences to the system. Over $13,000 in connection fees alone and then to add the cost of the tank, pumps, water meters, and lines would bring the installation to over $20,000. It should have been known and specified at the time of the presub if they were going to be required to connect to the City system. Under #4, I am assuming that all of the City Ordinance were on the "Development Guidelines (May 2002)" CD that I purchased in July. I looked through the documents including the Public Works Standards and couldn't find anything that would required them to connect the residences to the system. If I am wrong or if there is more ordinances that I don't know about. Please let me know as soon as possible so I can inform my clients. I have spoken to the Mayor per the request of my client. I have talked with my client and informed them that under 42.36 RCW if we talked to anyone on the council about the case then that council person would have to abstain from voting do to having previous knowledge of the case before hand. But, the mayor would have to abstain from voting anyway since he is in close contact with the administration on knows about all of the details concerning the project. They chose to have me contact the mayor and I followed their wishes. Again Grant, I would like to thank you for your time and consideration on this project. If there is anything that I can do to help this project move forward, please let me know. Respectfully, Bill Turner, P.E. C & C Engineering, LLC. -----Original Message----- From: Grant Beck [mailto:gbeck@ywave.com] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 1:45 PM To: bill@candcengineering.com Subject: FW: Bothwell Site Plan Review -----Original Message----- From: Grant Beck [mailto:gbeck@ywave.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 10:01 AM To: Bill Turner Subject: Bothwell Site Plan Review Bill - The Department received your appeal on behalf of the Rothwells and will make every effort to schedule it for the January Hearing Examiner meeting. We will need the $50.00 appeal fee by the end of the week to have any chance at this schedule, however. 1 /16/2004 As I read your letter, I understand that you have outlined the following issues as the basis of the appeal: 1. The possiblity of connection to sewer and water were not addressed in the pre-submission conference and, therefore, the City is barred from requiring this as part of the site plan review approval. 2. The existing well is adequate and legal for the existing dwellings. 3. The project is not'new development' and as there is no major building construction on the property. 4. No City regulation or standard requires the connection of the existing residences to the City water and sewer systems. If I have misstated the basis of the appeal, please let me know. If you have additional basis for the appeal, they need to be raised at this time. I also understand that you have contacted the Mayor regarding your appeal. As the City Council would hear an appeal of the Hearing Examiners decision in this matter, I would direct your attention to Chapter 42.36 RCW and note that you may jepordize your clients position should there be an appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision to the City Council if the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine were violated. If you have any questions regarding the appeal, please don't hesitate to contact the Community Development Department. Grant Grant Beck, Director City of Yelm Community Development Department P.O. Box 479 Yelm, WA 98597 360.458.8408 360.458.3144 (FAX) gbeck@ywave.com 1 /16/2004 Grant Beck From: Grant Beck [gbeck@ywave.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 10:01 AM To: Bill Turner Subject: Bothwell Site Plan Review Bill - The Department received your appeal on behalf of the Rothwells and will make every effort to schedule it for the January Hearing Examiner meeting. We will need the $50.00 appeal fee by the end of the week to have any chance at this schedule, however. As I read your letter, I understand that you have outlined the following issues as the basis of the appeal: 1. The possiblity of connection to sewer and water were not addressed in the pre-submission conference and, therefore, the City is barred from requiring this as part of the site plan review approval. 2. The existing well is adequate and legal for the existing dwellings. 3. The project is not'new development' and as there is no major building construction on the property. 4. No City regulation or standard requires the connection of the existing residences to the City water and sewer systems. If I have misstated the basis of the appeal, please let me know. If you have additional basis for the appeal, they need to be raised at this time. I also understand that you have contacted the Mayor regarding your appeal. As the City Council would hear an appeal of the Hearing Examiners decision in this matter, I would direct your attention to Chapter 42.36 RCW and note that you may jepordize your clients position should there be an appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision to the City Council if the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine were violated. If you have any questions regarding the appeal, please don't hesitate to contact the Community Development Department. Grant Grant Beck, Director City of Yelm Community Development Department P.O. Box 479 Yelm, WA 98597 360.458.8408 360.458.3144 (FAX) gbeck@ywave.com 1 /16/2004 12/09/2003 11:36 3604916904 THE KIRKBRIDE GROUP PAGE 01 ontours c~ oncepts, ngineertng i~it{j" .f ~~li~~ ~ ~ ~~' s ~ ~~l4 ,~ ,+~, ~. ', . facsirrule transmittal To: Chant IIeck Fax: 458-3144 From: Bill Turner, P.E. Date: I2/9l43 Re: RothweiJ -.Dance Studio Pages: 3~+Cover Sheet -CC: © For Review ^ Please Comment D Please Reply ~ Pie®se Recycle appeal for Stcvc and ,Darlene Rothwell's project. Please let me know if you have or nced more informnrion. rc~espcctrw iy, Bill Turner, P.E. -- C & C Enginccrrng, L[.C. /~ ~ ~ n ~ ~~ ~ ~, ~~ , . ,- ,~ (~ 12/09/2003 11:36 3604916904 THE KIRK BRIDE GROUP PAGE 02 ~ OF HE A,~~~ ~ ~~ Y1/X.M Wa51+tNCTON C~ A li V~ ~G~lY1 PO Box 479 Yejrrt WA 98597 360-458-3244 OFFICIAL USE ONLY f'ee Date Received sy ~!e ~o. NOTICE t3F APPEAL Fee: Staff Decision - $50.00 Hearing Examiner Decision - $t00A0 (fn addltian, any professional service charges oar Resof~rtion f#3SE>,1 A Closed record appeal may foitaw either an open record hearing or an open record administrative decision on a project permit application when the appeal is on the record, and no or limited new evidence or information is allowed to be SUbrrlitted. Appeals on Category t & Il project decisions are heard by the Clty Council. Appeals on Category tll ~ IV project decisions 8S wen as Category t & ll decisions which haws been appealed to the City Council go to Superior Court and follow the judicial review process set forth in RCW 366.70C. A Notice a1 Appeal must be tiled wlthln 14 days of Notice ai Final Decision. PROJECT Cr4SE !NUMBER BEING AAPF.,4LED Case #SPR-03-8354-YL DATE OF NOTICE OF FJNAL DEC1SlON._ DecembEr 3, 200 APPELLANT(S) Mr. and Mrs. Steve Rothweil _ Mailing Address~011 Went Yelrn Av~_ City, State and Zlp~lexti. WA 98597 _ ~~ Telephone (3b0) 458-7104 SPECIFIC JTEMS OF DECISION BEING APPEALED {attach additlonat sheet 1f necessary); The specific items that are being appealed are Condition #2 and #3 of the Site Plan Review Committee condition of_pproval, coneernin8 the requirement of connecting the existing residences to the City water and sewer system. I affirm that all answers, statements and information contained in and submitted with this application are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also affirm that I am the owner of the subject site or am duly authorized by the owner to act with respect to this application. FuRher, I grant permission from the owner to any and al! employees and representatives of the City of Yelm and other governmental agencies to enter upon and inspect said property as reasonably necessary to process this application. I agree to pay all fees of the city which apply to this application. Signed ..; ."'%/~ ~~~~~z--- Date C:1Community Dcvctc>rment~t'i~rms ~ Prpccclurc.5~ppcalstArrcalApp.clc,c <}m ~ ~> p ; ,F~ w~ H P ~ ~ ~ i^ I O C f~ -yg~ ~ P.O. Bex 479 Yelrn,'r~JA 98597 ~,~ :~i 36G-458-3403 ~. ~.~ .. DOLh:~.~.,~ ~: 00 CE_1 1 S RECEIVED FRC":1 DATE REC. NO. CO~~iOiiR.S&CO'iCiJP!'S E:~iGIiiLERI~iO 12/15/03 29577 YO BOf 470 mEATINC' j'iA 9°539 i'1 .1,5C.F.I ,.: L'!'~`9 "L`ODU .niu C%'~r 1 BAP,i/ ~'~~~~~~ ~~~. ~ ~ ~ 7 A!~10UNT ~t}+{~ // p REF. N0. ___. ____ ___+..u ____ ._____ P.~~Ti-;~:IFIJL n~.Sz~- Srh'.-U3-3354-'fL 12/09/2003 11:36 3604916904 THE KIRKBRIDE GROUP PAGE 03 ~ urs & Mailing Address: P.O. Box 476 Tenino WA 98589 o pts Physics! Address: 4405 - 7th Avc. S.E. Suite 300 Lacey, WA Phone Number: 360-438-0301 __,,,~ngineec><~Mail: BiI1@CandCenQineerinQ.com December 9, 2003 To: Ta.mi tv,Ierriman Assistant Plattner PO B ox 479 Yclm, WA 98597 Ph: 36t?-458-3224 From: Bill Turner, P.B. PO Box 476 Tenino> WA. 98589 RE: Steve Rothwell. --Dance Studio Case #SPR-03-8354-YL Appeal of Site Plant Approve! Dear Ms. Metri.tnan, On behalf of Mr.. and Mrs. Rothwell, I am appealing tl.~e findings of the review board for. the above named project..A.fter reviewing the Site Plan .Approval Ietter dated December 3, 2003 I a.m. appealing the .fr.ndings of. the review board specifically eond.ition of approval #2 Water Supply, #3 Sewer System and the defi.n.iti.on of "New Development", for the following reason: • Connecting the existing residences to the City sewer and water system was not presented a,s a condition of approval at the preapplieation meeting and was not an issue until mentioned in the Site Plan ,Review Meeting on November 19, 2003. ~'b.i.s is a requirement that should. have been known at the time of the preapplication meeting and not something that should be reviewed at a later. date. Ordinance 17.84.050 Preliminary site Ulan, states that, "Prior to applying for site plan. review, a developer may file with the SPRC a summary site -plan, which shall contain in a rough and approximate manner all of the information required in the site plan application. The purpose of. the summary site plan .is to enab).c a developer filing the plan to obtain the comments of the SPRC as to the applicability of the .intent, standards and provisions of this chapter to the plan." The SPRC fa.ited in complying with the i.LZtent o.f this ordinance by not specifying that through the development process, opening a small dance studio, the Rothwclls would be .required to connect thci,r personnel. .residences to the City water and sewer system. .Mr. and Mrs. Rothwell have spent a considerable amount of time and .money on this project. Time and money that would not have been spent lead they lrnown that they would be required to connect their personal residences to the City sewer and water system. The existing well that is .located on the site i.s classi'f~ied by Washington Slate and the Thurstort County Health Departments as a shared well. or two party well. and does not need to be approved as a Group B system. as indicated in the SPRC findings under condition #i2. The well has been tested and test results show that the well. is clean and free of any contaminants. ~; ~ ~ _) J ~`7LL 12/09/2003 11:36 360a91690a THE KIRKBRIDE GROUP PAGE 04 Since there will not be any major building construction on the property, this project should not be classified as new d.eveiopment as indicated in the SPRC fi.nd.ings under condition #2 and ,*3. New development is not defzncd i.n rbe City Ordinances 17,06.010 through 17.06.830 and ~,~~ therefore should not arbitrarily classify any project under any circumstances as "New X`' Development". The project site is coned in a commercial area (Village Retail) and the proposed business is allowed under this zoning. Since the residential homes are in separate structures away from. the dance studio it does not seem reasonable to requite these structures to also be connect to the City water and sewer. system. Through my review of the Development Gui.del.,ines dated May 2042, I could not f.nd any City Ordinances or Public 'Works standards that would required the existing .residences to be connected to the City water and sewer systFrn. Thank you for your time and consideration on this project. if you have arty questions or need more i.n'forrnation, please call me as soon as possible. Respectfuli.y, -~-. ~~f e/GZ~ BiII Turner, P.E. Principal Engineer, Contours & Concepts .Engineering, LLC. cc: file Steve Rothwell =_~ L~7Dr=artmfnf o~Sflli.G70N MANUFACTURED HOME RECORDER'S CLOCK FILED AT THE REQUEST OF: ~cEns~nc APPLICATION NAME Please check one ADDRESS TITLE ELIMINATION (Complete all but section 3, below) ' TRANSFER IN LOCATION (Complete ALL sections below) REMOVAL FROM REAL PROPERTY (Complete all but section 4, below) MANUFACTURED HOME TPO/PLATE NUMBER YEAR MAKF„~Oduline L 1 wID7H/LENGTH VEHICLE IDENnFlCAT10N NUMBER (VIN) °a ©059 ~ 90 Da r tmouth 56/ 28 1-10729 LAND Attach a copy of the legal description of your land. It can be obtained from your County PROPERTY TAX PARCEL NUMBER Assessor's office or it may be typed or printed on an Additional Attachment Form (TD-420-732). 21724130300 Manufactured home will be ©AFFIXED ~ REMOVED TITLE COMPANY CERTIFICATION I certify that the legal description of the land and ownership is true and correct per the real property records. NAME TITLE COMPANY/PHONE NUMBER SIGNATURE DATE _~..56~: .. '4: x,T(F 4,..~4rt+1{.N! ,I~~'i"'~'~~'~~i~; 41Yt.f~1,3'};,Fg`"~~fA'.,. ~ 'i:'q. e X h'h~ ~,., d mi' x, N~k"t:. r7. .. , Finalize this'applicaflofityith ar,"icensing Agent within 10 calendar days of the date Title Company Repre'sen~ta#ive signs. I certify that the manufactured home has been affixed to the real property as described, or a building BLDGPERMITN - permit has been issued for this purpose a d the attach nt will be inspected upon completion. NAME ~~ ~~ /'"' v NATUR LE ~ ~ BLDG PERMIT OFFlCE/PHONE k DATE ~~~ _ v /` ~,~' ~Q ~l~ OWNER INFORMATION FEES COUNTYp INC Ur~`N`I~NC ^ p REGISTERED OWNERS 2 A LEGAL OWNERS 1 PfOVlde the WBSflln9lOn DflVer'S LICenSe Or I.D. FILING FEE tnn card number (PIC) for each owner: NAME OF FIRST OWNER APPLICATION STEPHEN ROTHWELL ROTHWSR445LG NAME OF SECOND OWNER MOBILE HOME FEES DARLENE ROTHWELL ROTHWDJ388BD ADDRESS OF OWNER ELIMINATION 1011 Ye lm Ave . W. --OR-- if the owner is a business, ' CITY STATE ZIP CODE provide the Unified Business USE TAX Identifier (UBI), found on the Yelm WA 98597 business Registration & Licenses NAME OF FIRST LEGAL OWNER' Document. SUB-AGENT FEES RESOURCE BANCSHARES MORTGAGE GROUP, INC. Non-Resident _ : , . S oW Y More than two owners or one _, ..._ .,,, _T~2TAL FEES & TAX ° ~ ,,, ,, _, ,, ,,, r° . ~ Y7909 Parklane Road Ste . 150'°`~ "~ "' " lienholder? Please use attachment CITY STATE ZIP CODE form(s) #TD-420-732. Columbia SC 29223 w DEALER'S REPORT OF SALE '~IG~NAjyR~pF~EGA4QyyNERI, T SC S I INATIONOFTITLE/I~IdiKi~i~ )certify that this information is correct. The vehicle is clear ~~~~;"X-, of encumbrances except as shown. Anyone who knowingly makes a false statement of a material fact is guilty of a felony, and Y~'A DLR No. DATE OF SAIE PURCHA$ PRICE `~ ~ '~ upon conviction may be punished by a fine of up to $5,000 and/or 1 o years imprisonment (RCW 46.12.210). I DO SOLEMNLY ATTEST UNDER P ~I~a1' JURY LAW " `" !~O }~ ` '' e 2t f V THAT /WE ARE THE REGISTEREDOWNERSOFTHI '~Af~T~;ORMA- TION A CURT Signature(s) d Tltte(.,` ~ ~~ ~$>s10/y~'•• ~/ DEALER NAME TAX JURIS ICTION/TAX RATE • ~~' tis~~ ~~ DEALER'S AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE , ~ •O ~- _ • ~ ~ puC~IC USE TAX EXEMPT Sale to a Certified Tribal member on ~ X ~ 1 the reservation (attach notarized statement of delivery) NOT ~~ (.`' ,AND SWORN BEF RE ME THI S Residing in (County) // nn 'G/ ~ O ~~ ~F 197h COUNTY AUDITOR/AG LICENSING ~ OVAL: (Not /or use by Sub-Agents) I certify that the above application appears to have been completed correctly, and the applicant has sufficient documentation to roceed with the recordin of this form. NAME SIGNATURE OFFICENFS OPERATOR NUMBER DATE Tn_A M_T'In \AhAll Ir LIn1.r •nn~ .nin.n.... n_ _. ... X l~ ! '~ ~ ~~- November 26, 2003 Steve Rothwell 1011 West Yelm Ave. Yelm WA 98597 Re: Site Plan Approval for Case # SPR-03-8354-YL, Rothwell Dance Studio Dear Mr. Rothwell: The Site Plan Review Committee has considered your application for the above referenced project, and finds that as conditioned below, the proposed project is consistent with the Yelm Comprehensive Plan, and all applicable City policy's and development standards. Pursuant to Chapter 15.49 Integrated Project Review Process, a project, which is subject to Site Plan Approval, is a Type II Permit and can be appealed to the City Council. An appeal must be filed within 14 days of the date of this notice. Site Plan Approval is valid for 18 months..from the _ date of this letter. The affected property owners may request a change in property tax valuation from the Thurston County Tax Assessor's Office. Proposal: The applicant has applied for Site Plan Review for the conversion of 1,000 sq. ft of an existing structure into a Dance Studio. Site plan review is required for any commercial use or activity, with exemptions allowed if the use is similar to the prior use. The building was permitted for personal use. Operating a dance studio at this site requires Site Plan Review. The project is approved subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. Transportation Finding: Yelm is a small compact community most directly affected by two state highways, which bisect the community. The highways are used by local residents for transportation throughout the city, and for access to commercial and residential areas throughout the community. In lieu of widening existing streets, the City has elected to create certain alternatives, Y-1, Y-2, Y-3, which will avoid the need to significantly widen existing Page 1 of 6 streets, and particularly Yelm Avenue. New developments do in fact burden the city's central streets, and unless the alternate routes are accomplished, the City would have to require developers to pay the cost of the internal street widening. The city plans show, and the City finds that adequate facilities will be accomplished better and in a timely fashion by the alternate route facilities as a substitute for the widening of existing facilities. As a result, the City finds that the regional plans in fact benefit projects in all areas on the City and will accomplish the goal of providing adequate facilities to City standards within a reasonable time to serve the demands created by the proposed project. Finding: The City has adopted a Transportation Facility Charge (TFC) of $750.00 per pm peak trip. The Ordinance provides a default table that is used to determine new pm trips generated by the proposed use. The table does not list a dance studio, so a similar use was determined. The new trip generation rate is based on 1.37 new pm peak hour trips, per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area. Finding: Street frontage improvements are required as part of Site Plan Review and approval when alterations and improvements constitute 60 percent or more of the estimated value of the existing structure on the property. Conditions of Approval: 1 a. The applicant shall mitigate traffic impacts to the transportation system. Mitigation includes payment of the Transportation Facility Charge (TFC). The TFC charge of $1027.50 is based on 1.37 new pm peak hour trips generated by the project, and is due and payable at Civil Plan Approval. 2. Water Supply Finding: The City's Water Comprehensive Plan identifies a portion of the City area for service. The City is pursuing additional land areas for approval and the extension of facilities. Completion of such activities is dependent on grant and developer funding, as well as planned bonding and existing public funds. The status of such plans and funding sources must be considered in any review of concurrency. Developer extensions and or dedications, latecomer agreements, oversizing agreements, and the creation of local improvement districts may all be considered. In the event of a new funding source, however, concurrency is not found until the funding source is in fact in place - e.g. award of a grant, a binding letter commitment for third party funding, or the successful formation of a local improvement district. Any necessary water rights are considered, only after approved for municipal use by the Washington State Department of Ecology, or appropriate appeals board, and the time for appeal or challenge has expired. Finding: The City of Yelm is dedicated to providing the best quality water possible to its consumers. The Washington Administrative Code, section 246-290-490 requires Page 2 of 6 that the City take measures to ensure that contamination does not occur as a result of a cross contamination. Conditions of Approval: 2a. The applicant shall connect to the City water system. The cost to connect shall include a fee of $1,500.00 per Equivalent Residential Unit (each ERU equals 240 gallons of water consumption per day, fee subject to change.). The applicant shall provide proposed water usage calculations to the Community Development Department for review and approval, to determine the number of gallons of daily use. 2b. The applicant shall meet all conditions for cross connection control as required in section 246-290-490 WAC. 3. Sewer System Finding: The City's Sewer Comprehensive Plan identifies a portion of the City area for service. The City is pursuing additional land areas or approval and the extension of facilities. Completion of such activities is dependent on grant and developer funding, as well as planned bonding and existing public funds. The status of such plans and funding sources must be considered in any review of concurrency. Developer extensions and or dedications, latecomer agreements, oversizing agreements, and the creation of local improvement districts may all be considered. In the event of a new funding source, however, concurrency is not found until the funding source is in fact in place - e.g. award of a grant, a binding letter commitment for third party funding, or the successful formation of a local improvement district. Conditions of Approval: 3a. The applicant shall connect to the City S.T. E. P. sewer system. The cost to connect shall include a fee of $5,125.00 per ERU (each ERU equals 240 gallons of water consumption per day, fee subject to change). The number of ERU's required will be determined by approved water consumption calculations. 3b. Upon completion of the onsite installation as per the City's Development Guidelines, the S.T.E.P. sewer equipment shall be deeded to the City, and an easement provided for maintenance. 4. Storm Water Finding: Impervious surfaces create stormwater runoff. Uncontrolled and untreated stormwater runoff can create health and safety hazards. YMC requires all development to comply with the City stormwater Manual. The manual states that projects creating over 5,000 sq. ft. of impervious surface must control and treat stormwater runoff. `~, 5 ~~ ~~~. r Page 3 of 6 „~ ` ' ~ ~~~ `C', ~ ~~d ~v ~L h ~' ~~ , I G~~' \ t , ., ~, ~ ~ n ,~`~~ Conditions of Approval: j 4a. The applicant shall design and construct all stormwater facilities in accordance with the DOE Manual, as adopted by the City of Yelm. Best Management Practices are required during construction. 5. Parking Finding: The City of Yelm Development Guidelines, Design Guidelines, and Municipal Code address parking regulations from many aspects, including, but not limited to; design, number of stalls required, pedestrian pathways, and safety. The requirements of off-street parking and loading facilities and their design shall be regarded as the minimum; however, the owner, developer or operator of the premises for which the parking facilities are intended shall be responsible for providing adequate amounts and arrangement of space for the particular premises even though such space or its arrangement is in excess of the minimum set forth. Chapter 17.72 YMC requires one parking space for every 10 occupants, based on the maximum occupant load as determined by the Uniform Building Code for Assembly areas of less-concentrated use. Based on a maximum occupant load of 49, 5 parking spaces would be required. Conditions of Approval: 5a. The applicant shall create a paved parking area, meeting the City of Yelm Development Guideline standards, with a minimum of 5 parking stalls, with on being handicap van accessible. 6. Fire Finding: Fire protection to the buildings must be provided- per the Uniform Fire Code. Requirements for installation of fire hydrants will be determined in civil plan review. Finding: The Uniform Building Code (UBC) provides occupancy ratings for different types of uses. The fire coverage for the commercial use must meet UBC requirements. Conditions of Approval 6a. The applicant shall submit fire flow calculations for all existing and proposed hydrants. All hydrants must meet minimum City standards. 6b. The applicant shall submit a fire hydrant plan to the Community Development Department for review and approval. R'\Projeot Files\SPR Site Plan Review1A354 Bothwell Dance Studio`,F3754 Approval Letter.doc Page 4 of 6 7. Landscaping Finding: Landscaping and screening are necessary to promote safety, to provide screening between compatible land uses, to safeguard privacy and to protect the aesthetic assets of the City. YMC, Chapter 17.80 requires all development to provide on site landscaping. Finding: Type II landscaping is intended to provide visual separation of uses from streets, and visual separation of compatible uses so as to soften the appearance of streets, parking areas, and building elevation. This landscaping is used around the perimeter of a site, and adjacent to buildings. Type III landscaping is intended to provide visual relief where clear sight is desired. This landscaping is utilized along pedestrian corridors and walks for separation of pedestrians from streets and parking areas. Type IV landscaping is intended to provide visual relief and shade in parking areas. Type V landscaping is required in storm water retention areas, if required. Conditions of Approval: 7a. The applicant shall provide for Type II landscape buffer along the side and rear property lines, and adjacent to the building. 7b. Type III landscaping shall be required when frontage improvements are installed. 7c. Type IV landscaping is required in parking areas. 7d. Type V landscaping is required in stormwater facilities. 7e. The applicant shall submit a final landscape plan with civil plan submittal. ',~,, , l ---.i ~~ .~ r n 1~ 8. Refuse: Finding: The City of Yelm Development Guidelines, Design Guidelines, and Municipal Code provides guidance for refuse storage and screening. Conditions of Approval: 8a. The applicant must provide for refuse storage. Refuse container screening shall be of a material and design compatible with the overall architectural theme of the associated structure, shall be at least as high as the refuse container, and shall in no ~ ' case be less than six-feet. ~\ ~~) ~- J Page 5 of 6 8b. No refuse container shall be permitted between a street and the front of a building. 8c. Refuse collection areas shall be designed to contain all refuse generated on site and deposited between collections. Deposited refuse shall not be visible from outside the refuse enclosure. 8d. A six-foot wall or fence shall enclose any outdoor refuse collection point. The fence shall be a solid material such as wood or masonry, and shall be designed per the City of Yelm Development guidelines. 9. Other Conditions of Approval: 12a. Business must have a current City of Yelm Business License to operate a business within the City. Site Plan Approval is a Type II Administrative land use approval. An appeal of this decision can be filed within 14 days from the date of this letter, pursuant to YMC, Chapter 15.49, Integrated Project Review Process. The Site Plan is valid for eighteen (18) months from the date of this letter. The applicant may request asix-month extension on the approval, if the request is made in writing prior to the expiration date of this approval. If you need additional information or assistance, please call the Community Development Department at (360) 458-3835. Sincerely, Tami Merriman Assistant Planner cc: Bill Turner, P.E., Contours & Concepts Engineering Grant Beck, Community Development Director Jim Gibson, Development Services Engineer Gary Carlson, Building Official R',Project Piles,SPR Sile Plan Review',8354 Rothwoll Dance Studio\8354 approval Lettecdoc Page 6 of 6 Grant Beck From: Jim Gibson (jimgibson@ywave.com] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:44 AM To: Bill Turner Cc: Grant Beck Subject: RE: Steve Rothwells Project Sensitivity: Confidential sill I will contact you as soon as I know something. How did the research go on the county septic permits for Rothwells systems? Jim Gibson -----Original Message----- From: Bill Turner [mailto:bill@candcengineering.com] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:33 AM To: jimgibson@ywave.com Subject: Steve Rothwells Project Importance: High Sensitivity: Confidential Hi Jim, Just wondering if you've heard back from the public works department about connecting the existing two homes on Mr. and Mrs. Rothwells property up to sewer and water? I talked with Steve yesterday about this and the frontage improvement deferral. They understood about the frontage improvements and didn't seem to have a problem with the deferral. Please let me know when you hear something and have a happy Thanksgiving if I don't-get to talk to you before then. Bill Turner, P.E. GARY CARLSON YELM BUILDING DEPARTMENT ~ ~~ f fi~~t r r~ t, _ ~ ,~ :: ,~> ~. > ~.~~..~ City of Yelm Community Development Department P.O. Box 479 Yelm, WA 98597 (360) 458-3835 (360) 458-3144 FAX Memorandum To: SPRC From: Tami Merriman, Assistant Planner Date: October 30, 2003 Re: SPR-03-8354-YL-Project Review Schedule for Rothwell Dance Studio Attached is the application packet for the above referenced project. After your initial review of the information submitted, if you need additional information from the applicant, please let me know as soon as possible. The following is the tentative review schedule for the project. October 30 -Notice of Application distributed -begin 15 day comment period. November 19 -SPRC project review. Department comments/conditions of approval for staff report. November 26 -Final approval letter completed. R:\Project Files\SPR Site Plan Review\8354 Rothwell Dance S[udiolProj Rev Date Memo.doc ~~, ~~ ~ ~~~~ CITI( OF YELM ~~ ~~ PO Box 479 i Yelm WA 98597 360-458-3835 a ~~~~ wa5r;i N ^v 7'C~Ev NOTICE OF APPLICATION Mailed on: October 30. 2003 PROJECT NAME AND LOCATION: Rothwell Dance Studio 1017 West Yelm Highway, Yelm, WA 98597 LAND USE CASE: SPR-03-8354-YL An application submitted by Steve Rothwell, 1011 West Yelm Highway, Yelm, WA 98597 for the above referenced project was received by the City of Yelm on September 29, 2003. The City has determined the application to be complete on October 30, 2003. The application and any related documents are available for public review during normal business hours at the City of Yelm, 105 Yelm Ave. W., Yelm WA. For additional information, please contact the Community Development Department at 360-458-3835. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project proposal is to operate a dance studio in a portion of an existing building. ENVIRONMENTAL and OTHER DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION: The applicant has submitted a site plan, and an abbreviated drainage plan. -- Additional Information or Project Studies Requested by the City: Additional drainage information may be requested. No preliminary determination of consistency with City development regulations has been made. At minimum, this project will be subject to the following plans and regulations: City of Yelm Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Title (17), Critical Areas Ordinance (14.08),. Storm Water Drainage Design and Erosion Control Manual {DOE), Uniform Building Code, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Title (14), Road Design Standards, Platting and Subdivision Title (16), and the Shoreline Master Program. The City of Yelm invites your comments early in the review of this. proposal. Comments should be directed to Tami Merriman, Community Development Department, P.O. Box 479, Yelm, WA 98597 (360) 458-3835. THE 15-DAY PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON NOVEMBER 14, 2003. This notice has been provided to appropriate local and state agencies, and property owners within 300 feet of the project site. These recipients, and any others who submit a written request to be placed on the mailing list, will also receive the following items when available or if applicable: Environmental Threshold Determination, Notice of Public Hearing and Notice of Final Decision. If the proposed project requires a City Council decision, it will be mailed to all those who participate in the public hearing and to anyone else requesting the decision in writing. Additionally, there will be a 14-day public comment period if an environmental determination is issued. Opportunities for appeal occur within twenty one (21) days after the date the environmental determination is issued. City Council decision can be appealed through Superior Court. Appeals of site plan review decisions may be filed within 14 days of Notice of Final Decision. ~ ~~ TAE ~~ l ~ r~, ~~~~ WA53i[NGTQN CITY OF YELM PO Box 479 Yelm WA 98597 360-458-3244 APPLICATION FOR Site Plan Review OFFICIAL USE ONLY ~C~U ~ DateR\ec` eived ~ ~/2` r5 By , `~~ File No ~~ uZ 35~ ~c;o cal _ Site Plan Fee: ~~ Mobile Home Parks: $250.00 plus $50.00 per mobile home space Multi-Family Building/Condominium: $350.00 plus $50.00 per unit Commercial Site Plan: $350.00 plus $50.00 per 1000 sq. ft of gross floor area~GT 2 ~ 200 Industrial Site Plan: $350.00 plus $150 per acre ~~ ®~ ~~~ (In addition, any professional service charges per Resolution #358 A p Site plan review is a process for reviewing the design of certain types of development. Site plan approval is required for mobile home parks, duplexes, multi-family dwellings, commercial and industrial uses, larined development districts and for all land uses within the central business district. NAME OF PROJECT Steve Bothwell -Dance Studio APPLICANT Steve Bothwell Mailing Address 1011 West Yelm Hwv City, State and Zip Yelm. WA 98597 _ Telephone Home 458-7104 OWNER Same - Mailing Address -- City, State and Zip Telephone ENGINEER/ARCHITECT/OTHER Bill Turner -= Contours & Concepts Engineering, LLC. Mailing Address PO Box 476 City, State and Zip Tenino WA 98589 Telephone :~ I, ~. ~-ti'~ ~~'~ ~-( ~ ~ ~l - SUMMARY OF REQUEST Requesting to operate a dance studio within an existing structure. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION General Location The property is located on the south side of Hwv 510 lust east of Yelm High School Site Address 1017 SE Yelm Hi by way_Land Area (acres) 4.17Acres Section 24 Township 17 Range 1 E Assessor's Tax Parcel Number 21724130300 Full legal description of subject property (attach separate sheet if necessary) See Attached F.-~ PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS ATTACH EXTRA PAGES IF NECESSARY 1. Does the design minimize conflicts with neighboring land uses? Explain. NO 2. Is the site within 300 feet of any "critical areas" such as wetlands or streams? NO 3. What provisions will be made for storm water and/or flood control? None 4. What provisions will be made for water supply and sewage disposal? Citv will supply water and sewer service A step tank with pressure pump will be installed for pressure main connection. 5. What provisions will be made for electrical power, natural gas, telephone and other utilities? Utilities are installed and connected to the existing_structure and wi-I be utilized for the new structure. 6. What provisions will be made for streets, access, and/or buses? Driveway access will be off of Yelm Highway Parking will be in front of structure. 7. What provisions, if any, will be made for open space and/or recreation? None 8. What provisions will be made for schools and school children? None I affirm that all answers, statements and information above and submitted with this application are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also affirm that I am the owner of the subject site or am duly authorized by the owner to act with respect to this application. Further, I grant permission from the owner to any and all employees and representatives of the City of Yelm and other governmental agencies to enter upon and inspect said property as reasonably necessary to process this application. I agree to pay all fees of the city that apply to this application. r Signed t~~ Date= 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ G E-6 o urs & Mailing Address: P.O. Box 476 Tenino WA 98589 o epts Physical Address: 4405 - 7th Ave. S.E. Suite 300 Lacey, WA _ngineering Phone Number: 360-438-0301 E-Mail: Bill@CandCengineering.com October 13, 2003 To: The City of Yelm _ ~~ PO Box 479 ~; ~ ~ -' "~ ~° ~` Yelm, WA 98597 360-458-3224 ~G~ ~ ~ ?~C~ From: Bill Turner, P.E. PO Box 476 Tenino, WA. 98589 RE: Steve Rothwell -Dance Studio Dear City Planning, Listed below are your requests, as delineate in the Design Guidelines followed by our response: LA. (1) Relate development to pedestrian street frontage. Frontage improvements are not required for project. The existing structure does not front the main street and because of the existing landscaping cannot be viewed from the~public roadway. LE. (1) Integrate biofiltration swales and ponds into the overall site design There will be no bioswales on this project and there is an existing infiltration area within the project limit at this time. II.A. (1) All pedestrian paths must correspond with federal, state, and local codes for handicapped access, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. The handicapped access meets all local codes and the_American with Disabilities Act. II.A. (2) Provide adequate lighting at the building entries and all walk ways and paths through parking lots. Adequate lighting will be provided at the building entrance. ILB. (1) Provide a pedestrian path at least 60" tivide (preferably 96" wide) from the street sidewalk to the main entry. A pathway from the street to the main entrance of the structure has not been provided for the following reasons: There are no sidewalks along the frontage road and frontage improvements are not required for this project. Without a connection point for the pathway, it would lead pedestrian into an unsafe condition along Yelm Highway. The dance studio is a private business and not open to the public. IL C. (1) Where street ROW is insufficient to provide adequate sidewalks buildings and other site features must be set back from the public ROW to achieve at least minimum sidewalk widths. A proposedright-of-way line has been placed on the plan drawings indicating the width that will be required to install the required roadway section. IL C. (2) Where new streets are developed, provide sidewalks according to mi~aimum standards. Frontage improvements are not required on this project. ILD. (3) Encourage pedestrian paths from all transit stops through commercial areas to residential areas within1,200 feet. Does not apply to this project at this time. ILE. (1) Enhance building entry access. Lighting and landscaping has been provided to enhance the building entry. III.B. (1) Minimize driveway impacts. There will be one entrance into the dance studio which will be shared with a residence that is on the same parcel. IIL C. (2) Meet requirements for parking lot design detail standards. Parking lot is not visible from the street. Park lot will have lighting directed from the building entrance. Parking shall be stripped and landscaped. IILD. (2) Encourage structured parking. Structured parking may not apply to this project. IV.A. (1) Incorporate human-scale building elements. The structure shall have 2 human scaling elements such as: individual windows < 32 sq. ft. per pane with 6 in molding separation from other windows, a porch or covered entry. IV.D. (1) Enhance buildings with appropriate details. The structure shall have Decorative Treatment of doors and windows: such as a decorative molding or framing details around all ground floor windows and doors located on facades facing or adjacent to public streets or parks or decorative glazing or door designs. 1V. E. (2) Use compatible building materials. (See Buildi~zg Material Summary Matrix, pg. 59) The existing building is not visible from the street and the building material and color of the new structure shall match the facade with the existing building. TV.F. (1) Treat blank walls that are visible form the street parking or adjacent lot. The dance studio will not be visible from the street and landscaping will be provided where visibility if from an adjacent lot. TV. G. (2) Where practical, locate and/or screen utility meters, electrical conduit and other service and utilities apparatus so as not to be visible from the street. All utility meters and apparatus are located away from the street and are not visible. V.G. (1) Develop a site landscape design concept. A landscaping plan shall be provided. V.H. (2) Protect and enhance natural features. The natural landscape between adjacent property owners shall remain and will be enhance through additional landscaping. V.L (1) Screen all parking lots as required by Chapter 17.80, Landscaping. The existing parking lot is screen by landscape and fencing. V.I. (2) An alternative to the required perimeter parking area landscaping plan may be submitted. Does not apply to this project at this time. V.I. (3) Provide internal parking lot landscaping _ Internal parking lot landscape plan shall be provided. This completes the Design Guidelines Project Review Checklist as identified by the City of Yelm. If you have any questions or need more information, please call me at (360) 438- 030 L Respectfully, Bill Turner, P.E. Principal Engineer, Contours & Concepts Engineering, LLC. cc: file Steve Rothwell ~Et= I ~ _. ~ I ,,,,,,, I I Q ! I ~~..._. _.....i I ' i -+ A A A m m m m m m -° m a Ao o a x x x x x x A x 3 n0 O ~Ni y y y N ti A y N N H ... ... ~ ^. O y m o z z z z z z z oe' n n n n n n o n A `,.~ a m n m f v iy N O C m m b m D ,ZAj O ~ ~' = vzi e n z m ~ m o A p mD y m m m A A m ~ r A Z A ~ 'A m A ~ n n r m n m A K z A z z < o m D '^ m r ~ z m z rzi 3 m m zi E; ~N~ ~~t - f a~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~\ L` %~ ~~ ~'i ~ -°> ~ ~~ l~ A v r ~~~. _ ~ :~ ts) z ry- i w~ L `j m°on l 1~ nn /--' O ~~ ~-'~''7 J 1 I ~~ ~~ ,D ~ W ~r cn 3 ~D = J ~ r d n / no ~~ m o . ,., .x ff ..,..z.~.... a ~ Ay~ iE n - ~n~ _,D t as ~ ~~ N~ 3 io _ ~ - mz ~ DD°p xD ~ Azn ~,.~ qo ym f z _ .~... __ i ~° ~ ~ r . , 1" ~. H ~ N/ly I r NC o~ ~~, r ~ ~~~ o r+~ 1 f ~~'y~ c~i t / J / / / / r, C 'i ~ ~~ ~ s ~ ~ ~~~ m '•f^.~ m N 1~ -i Ll y,J ~~~ r x ~/ ~ ~~ m ' ~ / ~ r 11 ~ r s- "_ 9~ o~~ ~~~ e~G ~z p- °~ me ~~ n° Am zA ~ ~ < n ~ 1 ~~ ~.,..~ ' r P M _, ~ ~/ ~ P ~ w ~ n H Z H 3 D ~~ - ~7 iV 0 9 y g ZZ(~S"'--1 Z A ° Ll Z C 1'1 N Z ~ d ~• 1~.,~ V O Z ~AZ~r+r lyz .I 1 . l ~O .Zl D 3 ° ° z~ z M-+ o r zti° ri ~y-1'-'3rOAy.'U m ''1 ° r~ M Z O o n ~zom <mC~~ ~~ ~ °~Zm Wy.'OSj a~ ~'~ °z z~mz ~Oyl~~l wmaa-I a0 n{ C ~ p L ~ tFy"r C Vl 1*1 'D. y m OD .-~ f'1 ~ °°° m ^ 4 1 ~~ ' ~AO zAln- i m ~ ~ ° { ODZA 3p'w Fr o _ crj° A ° ~ z ZNm e m°~ Z ~ --I ~ll sir r ~ o l[ 9 C~1 •'~'` ' ic/ f 3~+ l: ~/ M ~ d y ~, o v,~ aO~WZ ~ 9.~ y °' ~ n ~ y ~ N a• O ~ y ~ VJ W ~ x ~ N~+ ~ g d0 O i.~ lA ~ r~V N g~ ~ Ct ~ O ~ ~ rn w "g ,,, tl `.~~ ^~ ~; ~'o~ a~o a w~~ A ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~_ y ~ ~~ (~ `~ ~. b ~-. b ~~ d ~~~ ~y ~ ~ ~o^s° ~~ q p E~.E~~.~~~ m m ~~~~~y ~ ~ ('~ ~~~~~°~ ~~ w vl CD y ~ ~ ,~ o q ~ o0 00 ~~~ ~a ~~ ~ ~~ e ~ o ~ o~ ~ ~ ti$ ~°» RF'VIIiW INFORMATION l5 %Complctc DESIGN INFORMATION _ ~~- PROJk C 11llLN l II I(A l ION No ~` ontours & xI:VILwI;R: owNI~R C^ _.. ....._____. ._ _.._ .._ _... .... .. Flll NAML li.uun°p -~ M ~ Steve Bothwell -Dance Stu io DA'11:SfNi"IOItEVI[WiitC ('&CJ "' _ _. -~ ~ - oncep s ACfll)N tl ...... ..... ... __ ..... ........._ .. _..__.... .,. Z `J ~ Al.1~I ~iVl atei ~. D~a1na.~~i Plan 11~1nVerln~ UHAWNID i f3l/U[i 9/~('l13 Mt3 9/26/(13 ° ~ Phone:360-438-0301 cwiclat) 1 _flnl)IS 9;z6ro3 __ -__ r*-7 Lacey, Wa pLOTTrn nnTls .p ~ ~ £ N I j ~ i N I • I I Z I ~ I ty ~ ~ °~w ~,~ W r W • 1 ~ £ 1 I D -rl Z ~ ~ ty 1 frl ° W O d d D o Z ~ (7 ~ d~ O N ~ O ~~ C D czi D IT1 X H --'~ H Z H /~ D r r z b~ ~ o ~7 - so' I ' ~, , I ,, / I ~, X oN ~ O ~ /~ H (.fl ,^ VI 'n VI I ~ ~ D~ X W X W X W I ~W I I • z d o z d o z d ~ -- ~;~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~--------------------- ~-L---- ----~-'-------___ _r_~ 1 ___~~ ('rl L C X 0 N ~z ~ fTl -< W ~l X • a H /~ ~ _ /~ Z o~ 0 ~d d~ -~ D ~ zr vi r L7 Steve Bothwell - Dance Studio Bu.ildi:ng .Layout ontours & oncepts, ngineering Phone: 360-438-0301 Lacey, Wa D ~ ~ Z 8'- z d~ O £ O W A ~ D T1 d 1Xti ~~ 0 it) (~-( Z ~ ~ ~ W ~, o~ ~ Z` ~~ I ~ N Iii I Iw I ~ 1~ IZ Id I~ I£ 1 I I '---..J ~~ -~ D z n m 2 D r r •~ ~ ~ C H ~ •. o V) IT a g ~ ~~ tl u ~ N ~~._.. n ~~y~ a~ ~~'~H'o A ~ ~~~ ~ ~. ~y 1~.1 `„~~ A ~ gx~ ~ o a F ~ ~ ~$ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ W ~~~'~°~~ a, O Rf?V1FiW INFORMAI'IpN 93%(:omplcte D&SI(iN INPORMAT'IQN PNOII?<71' IDCN-'IPI<'ATIQN Nn. REVIEWER: OWNF?R FILR NAMG: fJumnyi DATR 9RNT T'b Rf VIP.Wf?R: CA(~ ACTION ACTION DI(SI(INIID fl)'/DA 9R6Aq DRAWN Mf1 9RAA1) CIII?CKff) urron vn(tioJ rl.crrl•rn nATTs Q ~ ~ ~. o O ~, -' ~' r- ..~ ~ ~` ~ `'' r ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~° 1 '~` ~ ---. ~ ~ a ~ ~-° A ~ r 1 7 ~ 1' ~~ ~ ~ ~.r~~ P ~ '~'~, ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ } ~r~~. ~ ~ f -' ~ ~.a ~~ ~ ` ~T ~ ~ l 1 ?' S r 1 ~ a~ ~ -,1 ~~. -~. a 1 -~J U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ P ~ i o P ~ r P ~ ~^~ '^ i ~ -~° u ~ ~ r (~ ~ ~ f v~ , ~ ~j 7 ~ -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r (rye,, C 1 ~ / S _. v ¢ & ~ c~ c'. u D -,..., .--. _~ _ , ~ '~ p ~~ ~ °~ ~~ _ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~b 3 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ M ~ ~ ~- ti ~ o -r ~' J ,~ ~ ~- /~y U m ~ `c ~ O ~ ~ ~ P ~ ~ R ~ b ~ vo ~ PyD ~ B •e c a ~ ~. ~ N a c. a~ V~ f?~ r ~' ~.., ~~. ., ~' -~ v ~.. r, t .--. N -~ R yr fD fL C ~ r-h I--' ~ ~ ~ (D fi cn (~ ~~.~ o o ~ s a ( ~ H t c ~ ~ ~ r o ~ ~ N ~ ~ - b ~C W CT V (] :~ l U Y~ 1 ' ~' F~ ~~~ ~ '~ ~ - ~ o n ~ ~ ~ c-r m ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~J. ~ IJ. `~ ~ a r U •C ~ N ry ~~ r ~! r° ~sWn~ 1-' o (D ~ ~ o m n m v N• K ~v ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ (t a• ~ ~ N• cD ~C rt F;i N• rt ~ ~ o. N-cn ~o~c~ ~, r-r, m R~ I-' I--' ~' Sv ~ C ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ w~ E £ ,~. ~ro~ ~~ r+ n .~ l~fi tic r~s ~F~ei~ i ~,,.r" V ~ `~' Jd ~ °~ F ~~ ~:- ,~ k 'lo I I ~~lw~ ~~ ~ ~~ {F 7 ------i j~ ~,.. ~ t ,w-, f r ~~l ..,,,, ~ ,,,~.,,_ 1 C` ~ w,,.. b ~, ~ t 1 r ~--, ~`` ~; ~~ .~, ~ i S ~"s ~~Ci I~~~a r1 r1 Q (r,~` ~~ f '~ Q_ i,J ~~ > a e ~QS x r p' f f a t f k~' 1 r r i r` J ~' 7 1 i w b b" ~ ~ ~ ~~ 4 ~t ~w. c;~ t d m~ ~ , .~> ` ~~ ~" ~ .) ~` f 1 ~"I ~.~ ,~., a a. J i ~ ~ r~l !o~ vz ~„ ~~ \~ o , q ~ • ~' CF THE p~~ 9- Ci o Yelm 4 M ,~ ~x.i-- ~ Y 105 Yelm Avenue West ' P.O. Box 479 YELMaTON Yelm, Washington 98597 (360) 458-3244 August 7, 2003 Stephen and Darlene Rothwell 1011 Yelm Ave. West. Yelm, WA 98597 Re: Luv2Dance Studio Revised Occupancy Dear Mr. and Mrs. Rothwell, As we discussed at your July 16 2003 Pre-submission Meeting, by reducing of the area of the dance studio to less then 1000 square feet and calling the use a classroom, with a maximum occupancy of 49, the following requirements apply: The area needs to be isolated from floor to roof with cone-hour occupancy separation (firewall). Openings in this wall are allowed as long as they are rated for one hour `and self- closing. One exit a minimum of 36" is required. Latch must be open able with out a key. One restroom is required with one water closet and lavatory. Restroom must meet public standards and ADA standards Dance Studio must meet Energy Code for electrically heated business. All interior covering must have a Clas's III flame rating. This includes the dance floor. During the Site Plan Review process you may also submit to me plans bringing your structure up to these requirements for B Occupancy. If I can answer any questions or be of help please call me at 360.458.8407. Thank you. Sincerelyr .--` Gary~rlson - Buil ~ ina Official T{ie City of Yelm is an Eq«al Opportunity Provider August 5, 2003 T .~ R D Stephen and Darlene Rothwell 1011 Yelm Ave. West. Yelm, WA 98597 Re: Luv2Dance Studio Revised Occupancy Dear Mr. and Mrs. Rothwell, As we discussed by reducing the area of the dance studio to less then 1000 square feet and calling the use a classroom with a maximum occupancy of 49 reduces the requirements to the following: The area needs to be isolated from floor to roof with cone-hour occupancy separation (firewall). Openings in this wall are allowed as long as they are rated for one hour and self- closing. One exit a minimum of 36" is required. Latch must be open able with out a key. One restroom is required with one water closet and lavatory. Restroom must meet public standards and ADA standards Dance Studio must meet Energy Code for electrically heated business. All interior covering must have a Class III flame rating. This includes the dance floor. During the Site Plan Review process you may also submit to me plans bringing your structure up to these requirements for B Occupancy. If I can answer any questions or be of help please call me at 360.458.8407. Thank you. Sincerely Gary Carlson Building Official V CF tH$ p~~ ~~ ,~.~~~ ,ri YELM WASH 1 N ETON July 16, 2003 Stephen and Darlene Rothwell 1011 Yelm Ave. West. Yelm, WA 98597 Re: Luv2Dance Studio Dear Mr. and Mrs. Rothwell, City of Yelm 105 Yelm Avenue West P.O. Box 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 (360) 458-3244 During a site visit while your play shed was under construction we discussed the possibility of using your residential structure as a public building in the context of a basketball camp for some of your students. At that time I stressed that to do so would trigger upgrades to the building you needed to be prepared for. You did not pursue the matter and the structure was completed as a private residential play shed. The use of the structure now as a public building is in violation of Yelm Municipal Code as adopted in Chapter 15. You maybe cited under each code if you continue the dance classes in the structure without the following upgrades: Uniform Building Code-Meet the conditions of a public building used for exercise and education. The closest occupancy under the code would be a gymnasium. Based on this occupancy you are required to have two three foot exit doors. Exits need to have illuminated exit signs and emergency lighting. Panic Hardware maybe waived under certain circumstances. All interior finishes and flooring to have a Class III flame rating. A public discharge connecting the building to the public street is required. Minimum width is twenty feet, and will remain unobstructed to Yelm Ave West. Meet ADA requirements. All exits, door hardware, and restroom fixtures will meet the standards. Required sidewalks and parking stalls will meet requirements. Uniform Fire Code-Sprinklers and fire alarm not required at this time. You must have two fire extinguishers rated at 2AlOBC mounted no higher then 5 feet at your exits. Uniform Plumbing and Mechanical Code- Heating shall meet all applicable standards. Supply a minimum of 2 water closets and one lavatory sink in separate restrooms for men and women. Each restroom shall have a floor drain. Walls and floors will meet code requirements. 2001 Washington State Energy Code- with the installation of insulation and glazing that meet the U- Factors for the heat type supplied. Default would be electrical heating. Once your building has met these minimum standards you may open for your building to the public. The City of Yclru is an Ertual Opportunity Provi~~~er ~TF.-~ r~ r c ~ r SUMMER SCHEDULE CLASSES BEGL'~T JULY ~ MONDAI' 4PM 5PM 6PM 7PM TUESDAY, 4:00-5:30 5:30-7:00 7PM WEDNESDAY 4PM 5PM 6PM 7PM THURSDAY 5PM FRIDAY 4:00-5:30 5:30-7; 00 BEGINNING BALLET/JAZZ - 4-5 & 6 YRS OLD - BALLET ~~ 7-9 YRS OLD JAZZ/HIP HOP - 7-9 YRS OLD MUSICAL THEATER ~-13 YRS OLD TECHNIQUE/lyIODERN LYRICAL/BAI,LET - 9-13 YR OLDS JAZ~/gjp-HOP - . 9-13 YR OLDS ADULTS ONLY BOYS ONLY-BREA,K/gIp_LrOP TAP 8 AND UP HIP HOP 9-13 YR OLDS JAZZ 9-13 YR OLDS KARAOKE READING AGE TECHIYIQUE/MODERN LYRICAL/BALLET TEENS JAZZ,/HIp-HOP TEENS ,~„~ .~ ~~ ~- D ]~ ~i..: ~_ ~I ! ~ o .~. ?+ °~ ~ 3 .~-'" ~ ~ (~ ~ ~' ._ ~~ .~. ._ ~ oo ~ ~ c ~ ~ .~ '~ ~ .~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ a~ ~ v .C , C v oo °~ o° °o °o o ~ ~ o`er ~~ ~ ~ ~' rn ~ ~ CA ~ ~ ~' _ o ~ o ~ ~ -a ~ ~+ 1 ~ '~ ~~~ o ~~ o~ ~ •~ C d ~~'a ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ i y ~ Df ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •~ C ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~~ ~ ~~~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y i ~ ~ ~ J w ~ ~-~; ~ ~ H ~ .~N~ ~ o ~ ~ ~~ c ~ V ~ ~~ d ' ~' { ~ 0 _~~~ ~ ~' ~ -~ Pre-Application Meeting Civil Comments Date July 16, 2003 ***1'hese comments are preliminary in nature and are not intended to represent final comments and or requirements for the City of Yelm. Until a complete application is made, the Community Development Department can only attempt to inform the applicant of general requirements as they appear in the form presented by the applicant at the time of pre-submission. Proponent: Steven Rothwell Project: Public Recreation Center Project Loc: 1011 Yelm Ave West, WA 98597 Water: Sewer: Fire: The proposed site is not currently connected to a public water system. Your site will be required to connect to the City of Yelm public water system. See attached detail for general requirements of the water system connection. Water hook-up fees are based on a consumption rate of 240 gallons per day and are charged at a rate of $1,500/240gpd (fee subject to change) inside city limits. At the time of application submittal you will be required to submit water usage calculations provided by a licensed civil engineer. The water fees will be calculated using the information provided by the engineer. A cross connection/backflow prevention device will be required to be installed following the domestic water meter and a inspection will be required to verify the well is disconnected from the recreation center. The proposed site is not currently connected to the City of Yelm's STEP sewer system. Your site will be required to connect to the city's sewer system. Sewer hook-up fees are based on a consumption rate of 240 gallons per day and are charged at a rate of $5,125.00/240gpd (fee subject to change) inside city limits. At the time of application submittal you will be required to submit water usage calculations provided by a licensed civil engineer. The sewer fees will be calculated using the information provided by the engineer. It is unclear at this time if the existing septic tank(s) will meet the requirements of the proposed usage. See attached detail for general requirements of the step tank system. NOTE: It is unknown at this time if the existing residence will be allowed to continue on the current water and sewer system. These options will be reviewed at the time of civil engineering review. If the residence is required to connected to the public water and sewer system, the well and septic system will have to be decommissioned. Fire protection to the buildings must be provided per the Uniform Building Code. All parts of the building must have fire hydrant coverage. The coverage is limited to 150' of hose pull from each hydrant. Another option may be to have a 20' fire lane around the building. This will be determined upon further review of the civil plans by the Building Official. R:\Community Development\Weekly SPR\Presub civil~,Commercial\'00.3\cc-071603 Rothwell Rec Center.doc Stormwater: Developments with a significant amount of impervious surface are required to provide stormwater facilities per the 1992 DOE Stormwater Manual. Preliminary Stormwater Report and conceptual plan may be submitted with site plan review application if required. Street Improvements: Frontage improvements will be required for this project. Frontage improvements are defined as widing the asphalt, concrete curb and gutters, planter strip and street trees. These improvements would be along only.where your property is adjacent to West Yelm Ave. At this time the City will allow a deferment of the improvements. This is an agreement between the City and the applicant that says the improvements will be constructed when the City requires them in the future. Your improvements will be required when the high school, Twin County Credit Union and the Moose Lodge completes its frontage. The intent is to complete larger sections of frontages instead of piece-by-piece improvements. Street Lighting: Nothing to report. ADA Requirements: The American Disabilities Act required that facilities are ADA accessible. Facility improvements will have to meet current code.. Review of these improvements will be determined upon further review of the civil and architecture plans. GEh•lERP,L MOTES: 1. X10 "ON STREET" PARKING PEP.P~.~1ITTED. 2. P,EFER TO RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES FOR ADDITIONAL If~IFORNI,4TI0f~l Ohl STOP,M DRAINAGE, STREET UGH T1h~1G, P?,VEfv1Ef~1T STRUCTURE, ECT. JEG ~, l 1 ~r ~ r r t e lvl DEFT. OF PUBLIC VdORKS URBAN ARTEPIA~ APPRGVED PUBLIC UlORI'S DIRECTOR DATE DWG. Nr. 4-~ 9/21/20GD * (OR APPROVED EQUAL) ENVIRChJMENT METER BOX LID TYPE MIDSTATES, BGF-1416 12RL CI~NCRETE *BROC)KS SIDEWALK SERIES 36 CONCRETE CONCRETE aR i FdG TITE 69H CONCRETE *BP.dOKS ~~ DRIVEWAY SERIES 36 CAST IRON & OTHER CONCRETE TRAFFIC COVER SERVICE SADDLE TRAFFC dR ROt~lAC 2025 OR AREAS FOG TITS B9H F•t?Ch'WELL 313 .~,lETEP, 80X *CARSON *GARSON z EA.RTH SERIES 1419-B PLASTIC 1419 a ~ ~ 1 ° 1 ° FORD GRIP I 1 PLASTIC READER LID ' ' x ~ Q N T ~ ~ CORPORATION STOP TYPE L F- a ~ L F8 ? i 0? Lt LL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL LLLL tLttLt~IftEfE~ Lttt L LLILLLLLLLLL tEttLEtttttt LL y 7 4 l -I - f ~~L I- 1 1" PL,4STtC LINE {USE 200 PSIS DR7 PNILLtPS DRISCO PIPE 5100 POL YE TH YLENE' PIPE} VALVE BOX OR 4» DtA. PVC RISER. SEE NOTE BEL04V. 2% SLOFE TO BOX 18" b Q C D 0 9 4 D v VALVE BOX FOR SIDEWALK OR TRAFFIC SETTINGS, SEE D4VG. N0. 6-?2 USE 4"' DIA. SCHEDULE 40 P'~/C 4YITN CAP FGR OTHER INSTALLATIOPJS. 14 GAUGE tNSULA TED COPPER TONING WIPE WP,APPED AROUND 7HE PIPE (SEE GENERAL NOTES N0. 7}- ~~ FrJRD B6?-4=F?-G, GRIP 22 ~/2 JOIPlT BY I.P TNP,EADS. + ! 1" MALE AD?,PTER r 3/4» X 1" X ?2" BELL - REDUCER. ~ 1 "x 1 " FOP.Q GRIP JOINT CORPOP,ATICAJ s; aP rrP,< FB ? ? o? SEP, L'!CE SADDLE rJOTES: 1. STAINLESS STEEL INSERTS REOLIIR.ED FOR ALL PACK JOINTS. 2. ALL SERVICE SADDLES SHp,LL AND FITi1NGS SriALL HATE LP. THREADS. 7~ - ~ u~ 14•. LLL LLL LLL LLL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL LLLLLL LLLLLLL ' ~LILLLLLLLLLLLL LLLLLL LLLLLLL METER CHECK VALVE 19 1 /2" PVC CAP 12" 12° FORD VH 72-15'x'1 5/8 "x 3/4" COPPER METER SETTER Wl TH CHECI< VALVE AND UNION NL1T AND SNJI'/EL FOP, COPJNECTING 1" IRON PIPE CITY OF YELM, WASHINGTON DEPT. OF PUBLIC ~~/ORKS 5/x'3 SID~I~LE P~~ETER SER~/ICE APPROVEG PUBLIC WORKS DIP,ECTOR DATE DES. DWTJ. CKD. JEG TE4V TE'dd DLM DWG. NO. 6-1 DATE 3/15/00 SERVICE BOX -CARSON INDUSTRIES P,AODEL N0. 14198 WITH BOLTED HINGED COVER QR EQUAL COVER MARKING TO READ "SEWER" (USE ICI iJON-TRAFFIC AREAS) SPLICE. TO EXISTING 14 GAUGE TONING 14 GA. INSULATED OPPER TOtJING WIRE WIRE WITH BUTT CONNECTORS Ar1D SPLICE TONING WIRE FOR SERVICE. TO HEAT SH'RirlK TAPE FINISH MAINLINE TONING W1RE AND UVRAP GRADE SPLICE V'JITH HEAT SHRINK TAPE-~ EXISTING ~ PVC S4vP ~z r s TO STEP TANK..._ STEP MAIN 1~ ? •~ CONNECT TO ivIIN. EXISTING PVC SERVICE LINE 1" SCHEDULE 40 PVC SWP 2" x 1" REDUCER PVC SVv'ING CHECK IF REQUIRED VALVE SL x SL 1" BALL VALVE, SL x SL 1" B,4LL VALVE, SL x SL 1" PVC rIIPPLE, SL x SL - 1" x MAIN DIA. PVC ' REDUCING TEE SL xSLxTH OR PIPE SADDLE - CITY CAF YELPS DEPT. OF PUBLIC U~/aRKS TYPICAL 1 " ~EPUICE CON~~ECTIO(~I APPROVED DWG. No. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE ~- DES. D1~JN. CKD. GATE JEG PP~1X PMX MTO 4/'I 1 /GO USE 1" UNION TO CONNECT TESTING -` FIBERGLASS LID APAR.ATUS FOR. PRESSURE 7EST(NG SERVICE >lVI7H STEEL BOLTS AND NEOPP,ErIE GASKET 20" MIN RISER HEIGHT TYPICAL WITH ALL NON-TRAFFIC BEARING TANKS 1" DIA.PVC HOSE AND LEAVE SUFFICIENT VALVE ASSEMBLY WIRE TO ALLOW FOR ORIENT BALL VALVE AS SHOWN. BALL VALVE PUMP REMOVAL SHALL BE WITH 12" BELOW ELECTRICAL SPLICE BOX WITH CGRD GRIPS LID ALL. CONNECTIONS SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH HEAT SHRINK TAPE 21" OR 24° PVC 3D" DIA. RIEBED FVC RISER WJ LID SLGPE GROUND AbvAY FRGM P,ISER RISER tiMTH NEOPRENE GROMMETS 14 GAUGE 6" FROM TOP OF RISER TO INSULATED OF ELECTRICAL CONDUIT 18" FROM TOP RISER TG TONING WIRE ~ EFFLUENT DISCHARGE INSTALL IN 3/4" EY CONDUIT SEAL TONING WIRE - INSTALL RISER N ~ ELECTRICAL CONDUIT TO--• •~ ~ ~IN P,ISER POWER SOURCE M EFFLUENT DISCHARGE STA.hlDARD INLET TEE ~ ~{."~ ~_ 2-PART EPOXY, USE ~'~! ORIFICE ORENCO RISER TANK ~. ~ - ADAPTOR FOR CONCRETE LEGVEID 3.5" ALARM ~ TANKS __ GN :,::"3.5" OFF ao 3.5° REDUNDANT 1" PVC FLOAT ASSEMBLY AS SET OFF BY CITY OF YELM o 4,>~ 1-1 /4" GI A. INLET HOLES AP,OUND ORIFICE PERIMETER OF VAULT L_ ~ ~' 4" DIA. PVC FLOW -- INDUCER. N PVC BIOTUBE AFFLEI ~-SUBMERSIBLE EFFLUENT GRENCO TURBINE 8 GPM ' 1O 051 0511 PUP~IF WITH THE MATERIAL FOR DUPLEX, TRIPLEX, AND CLASS 1 DIVISION 1 S.O. POWER CABLE AND INSTALLATIONS WILL -VARY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET THE 1/S° BY-PASS Of21FICE INTENT OF THE INSTALLATION REQUIP.EPAENTS SHOWN IN THE IN THE DISCHARGE HEAD TYPICAL STEP INSTALLATION, I CITY OF YELM I DEPT. OF PUBLIC ~/QP,KS TYPICAL SIMPLEX STEP TA~~~< INSTA~LATI~~I APPkOVED DW-G7. IJO. CITY EPJGIPJEEP. DATE / - JEG ~ PPAX I TEVV I MTO I 4/11 /00 Pre-Application Meeting July 16, 2003 ***These comments are preliminary in nature and are not intended to represent final comments and or requirements for the City of Yelm. Until a complete application is made, the Community Development Department can only attempt to inform the applicant of general requirements as they appear in the form presented by the applicant at the time of pre-submission. Proponent: Steve and Darlene Bothwell Project Proposal: Luv2Dance Studio (After the fact) Project Location: 1017 West Yelm Avenue Zoning and Setbacks The property is zoned Commercial (C-1), Chapter 17.26 YMC. This district allows `Studios, such as record recording, couturier, artist, music, dancing, and photographic' as a permitted use subject to site plan review. Note that the code does not distinguish between `commercial' and public or private dance studios, the site plan review process and other requirements of the Zoning Code apply to either. Minimum lot size: 5,000 square feet. Maximum height of buildings: 40 feet. Front yard setback: 15 feet. Side yard setback: 10 feet. Rear yard setback: 15 feet. Parking Chapter 17.72 YMC requires one parking space for every 10 occupants, based on the maximum occupant load as determined by the Uniform Building Code for Assembly areas of less-concentrated use. Based on a maximum occupant load of 217, 22 parking spaces would be required. A parking plan needs to be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval a the time of application for site plan review. All required parking areas must be paved and striped. Ingress/Egress Ingress and egress at the site shall be consistent with the Yelm Development Guidelines, section 4B.140. Landscaping Type I I landscaping is intended to provide visual separation of uses from streets, and visual separation of compatible uses so as to soften the appearance of streets, parking areas, and building elevation. This landscaping is used around the perimeter of a site, and adjacent to buildings. Type II landscaping would be required along the side and rear property lines and adjacent to the building. Type II landscaping is charactorized by an 8 foot landscape strip between uses and a 5 foot strip around buildings of any combination of evergreen and deciduous trees (with no more than 50 percent being deciduous), shrubs, earthen berms and related plant materials or design features may be selected; provided, that the resultant effect is to provide partial screening and buffering between uses and of softening the appearance of streets, parking and structures. Fences are acceptable in lieu of the 8 foot landscape strip. • Type III landscaping is intended to provide visual relief where clear sight is desired. This landscaping is utilized along pedestrian corridors and walks for separation of pedestrians from streets and parking areas. Type III landscaping would be required along Yelm Avenue. Type III landscaping is typified by a six foot landscaping strip with street trees for a large overstory canopy along streets and pedestrian corridors and grass or other approved vegetation for groundcover. Earthen berms with grass or other vegetative groundcover and other design features may be worked into landscaping provided the resultant effect of providing apedestrian-friendly environment and visual relief where clear site is required can be achieved. • Type IV landscaping is intended to provide visual relief and shade in parking areas. At least 24 square feet of landscape development for each parking stall proposed. Each area of landscaping must contain at least 100 square feet of area and must be at least six feet in any direction. Each planting area must contain at least one tree. Live groundcover shall be provided throughout each landscaping area. No parking stall shall be located more than 50 feet from a tree. • Type V landscaping is required in storm water retention areas, if required. The floor and slopes of any stormwater retention/detention area shall be planted in vegetation that is suitable and will thrive in hydric soils. The landscaping of the stormwater facility shall be incorporated with all on-site landscaping. A conceptual landscaping plan is required with the application for site plan review. Final landscaping and irrigation plan is required as element of civil construction drawings, with installation prior to occupancy. Existing vegetation may be retained to fulfil landscaping requirements and could satisify landscaping requirements, if the purpose of each type of landscaping is met or exceeded. The refuse area must be large enough to accommodate a dumpster and recycle bin. Refuse areas must be screened with an enclosure of a material and design compatible with the overall architetural theme. If fencing is used to enclose the refuse area, it must be landscaped with sight obscuring vegetation. No refuse container shall be permitted between a street and the front of a building. Traffic The City has adopted a Transportation Facility Charge (TFC) of $750.00 per PM peak trip. The Code provides a default table that the applicant can use to determine new PM trips generated. For a dance studio, the trip generation rate is 1.83 per 1,000 square feet. To determine the projects impact and fee, use the following formula: ((Peak PM Trip Rate * Gross Floor Area)/1,000) * $750.00 =TFC Example: ((1.83 PM Trips x 3,200 sq. tt.)/1,000) * $750.00 = $4,392.00 If the applicant feels the proposed use would not generate the default number of trips as designated in the TFC Ordinance, and analysis prepared by a Washington State Licensed Engineer can be submitted to the City for review and consideration. SEPA An environmental checklist will be required if the proposal requires more than 20 or more parking stalls or other buildings than the pole structure are used as part of the dance studio. Application and Process Site Plan Review, Chapter 17.84, is an administrative process. Minimum application requirements are located in Section 17.84.060 and are listed on the application form. A project of this size can expect completed review in approximately 12 to 14 weeks. Land use approval typically contains conditions of approval that the applicant must complete prior to receiving a building permit. Upon satisfactory completion of all conditions of land use approval, the applicant can submit building plans for approval. Other Design Guidelines -the attached checklist must be submitted at time of application, with written responses on how each guideline requirement is proposed to be met. DESIGN GUIDELINES - Luv2Dance Studio Pro"ect Review Checklist Guidelines A licable Guidelines Met I.A. 1 Relate develo ment to edestrian oriented street fronta e. X I.A. 2 Relate develo ment to street fronts other than edestrian-oriented streets . X I.B. 1 Minimize visibili and im acts of service areas. X I.C.(1) Take advantage of special opportunities and mitigate impacts of large develo ments. X I.D. 1 Reduce im act of service areas and mechanical a ui ment. X I.E. 1 Inte rate biofiltration swales and onds into the overall site desi n. X I.F. 1 Enhance the visual uali of develo ment on corners. X I.F.(2) Provide a paved pedestrian walkway from the street corner to the building entrance. X II.A.(1) All pedestrian paths must correspond with federal, state and local codes for handica ed access, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. X II.A.(2) Provide adequate lighting at the building entries and all walkways and paths throu h arkin lots. X II.A. 3 Develo an on-site edestrian circulation conce t. X II.B.(1) Provide a pedestrian path at least 60" wide (preferably 96" wide) from the street sidewalk to the main ent X II.B.(2) Provide pedestrian paths or walkways connecting all businesses and the entries of multi le buildin son the same develo ment site. X II.B. 3 Provide athwa s throu h arkin lots X II.C.(1) Where street ROW is insufficient to provide adequate sidewalks buildings and other site features must be set back from the public ROW to achieve at least minimum sidewalk widths. X II.C.(2) Where new streets are developed, provide sidewalks according to minimum standards. X II.D.(1) Provide, where feasible, pedestrian circulation routes to adjacent uses and transit. X II.D. 2 Inte rate nearb transit sto s into the tannin of adjacent site im rovements. X II.D.(3) Encourage pedestrian paths from all transit stops through commercial areas to residential areas within 1,200 feet X II.E. 1 Enhance buildin ent access. X II.F. 1 Provide edestrian-oriented o ens ace at ke locations. X III.A. 1 Provide access roads throu h tar a lots with more than one street fronta e. X III.B. 1 Minimize drivewa im acts. X III.C.(1) Meet requirements for location of parking lots on pedestrian-oriented streets. X Continued DESIGN GUIDELINES Protect Review Checklist Guidelines Applicable Guidelines Met III.C. 2 Meet re uirements for arkin lot desi n detail standards. X III.D. 1 Minimize arkin areas throu h 'oint use and mana ement. X III.D. 2 Encoura a structured arkin X III.D. 3 Reduce im acts of arkin ara es. X IV.A. 1 Incor orate human-scale buildin elements. X IV.B. 1 Reduce scale of lar a buildin s. X IV.C. 1 Architectural) accentuate buildin corners at street intersections. X IV. D. 1 Enhance buildin s with a ro riate details. X IV. E. 1 Retain on final facades. X IV.E.(2) Use compatible building materials. (See Building Material Summary Matrix, 59 X IV.F. 1 Treat blank walls that are visible from the street arkin or ad'acent lot. X IV.G.(1) Locate and/or screen roof-mounted mechanical equipment so as not to be visible from the street or from the round-level of ad'acent ro erties. X IV.G.(2) Where practical, locate and/or screen utility meters, electrical conduit and other service and utilities a aratus so as not to be visible from the street. X V.F.(1) Use plant materials that are approved for use in downtown Yelm. Pro onents ma use other )ant materials a roved b the Cit . X V.G. 1 Develo a site landsca a desi n conce t. X V.H. 1 Provide substantial site landsca in X V.H. 2 Protect and enhance natural features. X V.I. 1 Screen all arkin lots as re uired b Cha ter 17.80, Landsca in X V.I.(2) An alternative to the required perimeter parking area landscaping plan may be submitted. X V.I. 3 Provide internal arkin lot landsca in X V.J.(1) Consider alternative building and parking siting strategies to preserve existin trees. X V.J.(2) Consider the integration of pedestrian and bicycle paths with stands of mature trees where feasible to connect ad'acent uses. X Yelm Municipal Code 17.72.080 refuse container, and shall in no case be less than six feet high. 2. No refuse container shall be permitted between a street and the front of a building. 3. Refuse collection areas shall be designed to contain all refuse generated on-site and depos- ited between collections. Deposited refuse shall not be visible from outside the refuse enclosure. (Ord. 561 § 3, 1995; Ord. 555 § 14, 1995). 17.72.080 Development guidelines. A. Parking area design shall include: 1. Ingress and Egress. The location of all points of ingress and egress to parking areas shall be subject~to the review and approval of the city engineer. 2. Backing Out Prohibited. In all commercial and industrial developments and in all residential buildings containing five or more dwelling units, parking areas shall be so arranged as to make it unnecessary for a vehicle to back out into any street or public right-of-way. 3. Parking Spaces -Access and Dimensions. Adequate provision shall be made for individual ingress and egress by vehicles to all parking stalls at all times by means of unobstructed maneuvering aisles. Maneuvering aisles, .parking stall dimen- sions and requirements shall be as shown in Tables 17-2 through 17-4. 4. Small Car Parking Spaces. In all parking facilities containing 25 or more parking spaces, a maximum of 25 percent of the required parking spaces may be reduced in size for the use of small cars, provided these spaces shall be clearly identi-~ Pied with a sign permanently affixed immediately in front of each space containing the notation, "Compacts Only." Spaces designed for small cars may be reduced in size to a minimum of seven and one-half feet in width and 15 feet in length. Where feasible, all small car spaces shall be located in one or more contiguous areas and/or adjacent to ingress/egress points within parking facilities. Location of compact car parking spaces shall not create traffic congestion or impede traffic flows. Table 17-2 h' ~_ ~~ One-Way Traffic a b c d e f b' c' 0° 28' 8' 12' 23' 8' 35 ° 48' 18' 12' 14.8' 8.5' 41' 14.5' 40° 49' 18.5' 12' 13.2' 8.5' 42' 15' 45° 50' 19' 12' 12' 8.5' 43' 15.5' 50° 51' 19.5' 12' 11.1' 8.5' 45' 16.5' 55° 53' 20' 13' 10.4' 8.5' 48' 17.5' 60° 55' 20' 15' 9.8' 8.5' S0' 17.5' 65° 57' 20' 17' 9.7' 8.8' S3' 18' 70° 59' 20' 19' 9.6' 9' S 6' 18.5' ~ 45° 17' 11' 8' ~ 60° 16.7' 14' 8' 75 ° 16.3' 17.4' 8' ~ j pC°„ 90° 15' 20' 8' Table 17-3 b' ~ -:s_ ~e ~e f i a /i~- i 17-89 17.72.090 Two-Way Traffic a b c d e f b' c' 0° 36' 8' 20' 23' 8' 35° 56' 18' 20' 14.8' 8.5' 49' 14.5' 40° 5T 18.5' 20' 13.2' 8.5' S0' 15' 45° 58' 19' 20' 12' 8.5' S 1' 15.5' 50° 59' 19.5' 20' 11.1' 8.5' S3' 16.5' 55° 60' 20' 20' 10.4' 8.5' S5' 17.5' 60° 60' 20' 20' 9.8' 8.5' S5' 17.5' 65 ° 60' 20' 20' 9.7' 8.8' S 6' 18' 70° 60' ~0' 20' 9.6' 9' S7' 18.5' 90° 64' 20' 24' 9' 9' ~ 45 ° 17' 2b' 8' ~ 60° 16.7' 20' 8' R- ~ 75° 16.3' 20' 8' U py 90° 15' 20' 8' Table 17-4 Design of Stalls ---~ ~` __a m _ Y a 0 e R f~ Wheel Stop ,~2~ 3 ~ ~ ~ u 1 ?~ U~ Perpendicular Parallel e 4" x 8" Wooden or Concrete Curb ~' ~' ~~ Gravel ti ~~ a r Turning Clearance 5. Surfacing. All parking areas for more than four vehicles shall be surfaced with asphalt, con- crete or similar pavement so as to provide a surface that is durable and dust free and shall be so graded and drained as to properly dispose of all surface water. 6. Lighting. Any lighting used to illuminate any required off-street parking area shall be so arranged as to reflect the light away fi-om`adjoining premises in an R zone. ~. 7. Signs. Must meet requirements as set forth in Chapter 15.24 YMC. B. Stormwater Runoff. All stormwater runoff shall be retained, treated and disposed of on-site or disposed of in a system designed for such runoff and which does not flood or damage adjacent prop- erties. Systems designed for runoff retention and control shall comply with specifications provided by the city and shall be subject to its review and approval, and shall, moreover, comply with Chap- ter 5 of the Yelm development guidelines, drainage design and erosion control standards for the city of Yelm. (Ord. 617 § 15, 1998; Ord. 561 § 3, 1995; Ord. 555 § 14, 1995). 17.72.090 Incentives for reducing the number of parking stalls. The city may allow the overall parking ratio (stalls/floor area, people or employees) to be reduced for buildings of 5,000 square feet or more, provided such reductions are consistent with the intent of this chapter. Reduction in parking areas may include any combination of incentives; pro- vided, that the overall reduction does not exceed 25 percent of the minimum area required by YMC 17-90 Angle TRANSPORTATION Commercial Collector 200 feet Neighborhood Collector 200 feet Local Access 150 feet Private Roadway 150 feet When different class streets intersect, the higher standard shall apply on curb radii: Deviations to this may be allowed at the direction of the City. D. On sloping approaches at an intersection, landings shall be provided with grade not to exceed one foot dilrference in elevation for a distance of 30 feet approaching any arterial or 20 feet approaching a collector or local access street, measured from nearest Right-of-Way line (extended) of intersecting street. 4B.14Q Driveways A. General 1. Driveway widths and spacing shall be designed following the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) "Guideline for Driveway Design & Location", latest edition and using the cement concrete approach, drawing number 4-9 located at the end of this chapter. Widths and spacing must be approved by the City. 2. All abandoned driveway areas shall be removed and the curbing and sidewalk or shoulder and ditch section shall be properly restored. 3. All driveways constructed within street right of ways shall be constructed of Portland Cement Concrete and shall be subject to the same testing and inspection requirements as curb, gutter, and sidewalk construction. 4. Joint-use driveways serving two adjacent parcels may be built on their common boundary upon formal written agreement by both property owners and approval of the City. The agreement shall be a recorded easement for both parcels of land specifying joint usage. 5. Grade breaks, including the tie to the roadway, shall be a maximum 8 percent on a crest and 12 percent in a sag. 6. No commercial driveway shall be approved where back;l~g onto the sidewalk or street is required. 7. Road approach t~rpe accesses shall only be allowed when just.if~,ed through an accepted traffic analysis and report, and approved by the City. 4 - 1> 07/ 19/00 B. Width Residential driveway widths shall not exceed 24 feet. Commercial driveway widths may vary from 24 feet for low volume actiti-ity (providing that 20 foot radii are used), to a maximum of 36 feet for undivided design, higher volume activity. A 36-foot drivetivay shall be marked with two exit lanes of 10 to 1 i foot width, w~.th the balance used for a single, wide envy lane. Industrial drivewav widths shall not exceed 50 feet. Drawing number 4-25 contains recommended basic driveway approach widths. The minimum driveway length shall be 20 feet. ~. C. Spacing Spacing criteria seek to achieve several objectives. One is to clearly identify which property the driveway is serving. Another is to leave a usable island between driveways for utility poles and traffic control devices. Another element of spacing concerns the number of driveways to be permitted to serve a single commercial/industrial property. A restriction on the number of driveways allowed for individual properties based upon width of frontage is: 1 for 0-50 foot frontage, 2 for 51-150 foot frontage, 3 for 151-500 foot frontage, and 4 for over 500 foot frontage. An additional factor concerns the spacing ofhigh-volume driveways where deceleration or acceleration lanes are required. Examples would include driveways into community and regional shopping centers as well as those into major industrial, commercial, and apartment complexes. At least several hundred feet between major driveways is desirable. Factors to be considered include the speeds and volumes of entering and leaving traffic, the speeds of through traffic, and the resultant merging movements upstream and downstream. It is important that driveways be designed for the particular traffic characteristics anticipated and that upstream and downstream factors affecting a driveway location be considered in each instance. Drawing number 4-25 contains minimum spacing recommendations. All driveway spacing must be approved by the Citv. Drivewa~rs gvLng direct access onto arterials may be denied if alternate access is available. Deviations of these standards may be permitted by the Cit~r. 4B.150 .Sight Obstruction Sight distance at inter sections and road approaches shall be in conformance ~:th the WSDOT Design ~~Ianual and the AASHTO Green Book. ~} - 14 07/ 19/00 TRA~~ISPORTATION Within the sight triangle, cut slopes, hedges, fences, trees, signs, utility poles, or anything large enough to constitute a sight obstruction should be removed or lowered. Parkir_g should also be eliminated and signs offset so sight distance is not obstructed. Sight obstructions that may be excluded from these requirements include: existing utility poles, regulatory signs, trees trimmed from the base to a height of 10 feet above the street, and preexisting buildings. A sight distance maintenance easement must be granted to the City for all improvements'includingcommercia1 and residential (including multi- family) development, plats and short plats.. The easement shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or engineer capable of performing such work. The sight distance maintenance easement is based upon the sight distance triangle calculations in the WSDOT Design Manual and the latest edition of the AASHTO Green Book. Easements shall be prepared in the same manner as outlined in section 3.110. A copy of the Easement Preparation Standards can be found in the Appendix B. 4B.160 Surfacing Requirements The following are the surfacing requirements for each application listed. Boulevard and Arterial Streets The engineer will provide a pavement design. The design of the pavement shall include a study of the native soils, their behavior under load, and the design of a structural section to carry the anticipated loads under all climate conditions. In no event shall the structural section be less than the minimums shown below: Surfacing: 0.33' Class B Asphalt Concrete Top Course: 0.17' Crushed Surfacing Top Course Base: 1.00' Gravel Base One soil sample per each 500 LF of centerline with 3 minimum per project representative of the roadway subgrade shall be taken to determine a statistical representation of the existing soil conditions at design grade. The pavement design, signed .and stamped by an engineer licensed by the State of Washington, shall be based on actual soils tests and submitted with the plan s. The following structural section ma;; be used in lieu of a pavement design. The use of this section is subject to City approval of prepared subgrade. A. Commercial Collector Streets 4 - l~ 07/ 19/00 YELM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (x) City Admin. (x) Comm. Dev. Dir. (x) Building Official (x) Mayor (x) Applicant (x) Posted (x) Public Works Dir. (x) City Engineer (x) Asst. Planner t THE FOLLOWING CASES WILL BE CONSIDERED AT YELM CITY HALL, 105 YELM AVE. WEST, IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. MEETING DATE: WEDNESDAY, JULY 16, 2003 TIME PRE- ENVIRON- SITE OTHER DESCRIPTION SUB- MENTAL PLAN ..MISSION REVIEW REVIEW Applicant Internal Internal 1 Attendance Staff Staff Required Review Review On{ Ortl ~-~` ' > ~ Rothwell 1:00 p.m. ~ Dance Studio _ 1011 Yelm Avenue West 1:30 p.m. Packet distributed 7/9/03 D&D Associates, Don Findlay 2:00 p.m. Rosewood - 202 single family lots Cullens & Killion 2:30 p.m. Packet distributed 5/27/03 3:00 p.m. 3:30 p.m. * Environmental Review/Site Plan Review: Internal staff review only, applicants and/or representatives may attend to OBSERVE. If you plan to attend, please notify the Community Development Department at 458-3835. C:\Community Development\Weekly SPR\WEEKSPR.doc - - -°-2?23 03:00 PM 360458-104 P. 01 ~~ ~~ ~; ~ ~~ ~r XE wM wiNCro Ci~TY t~>= YE~M PO Box 479 Ye1m WA 98597 36Q-458-3244 Presubmission Meeting Request Form OFFtCtA liL SE N Y Fee "!'~ -- pato Recelvsd ~, ey Flle No. l ~~ pr®submission conference is an opportunity for applicants, developer(s) andlor consultants to meet with city staff to discuss preliminary studies or sketches of a proposed proJeot. At the conference the staff w111 retake available information relating to the proposed development. The intent is to identffy and eliminate as,many potential problems as possible in order for the project to be processed without delay. The conference should tails place prior to detailed work by an engineer or surveyor, however a alts drawing must be submitted that has sufficient information io allow for evaluation. Discussion topics will ~' '~^'1.~d£ such things as Yelm's Comprehensive Plan, streer design, storm runoff and retention, Shoreline " Master Program, zoning, evaiiabillty of sewer and water, development conc®pts, other requirements and permits, and the environmental impact. Staff notes are prepared end available to review. Thera is no charge for this meeting. Meetings are held each Wednesday. This request form should be submitted by 5:00 p.m, at-least one week before the preferred meeting date. 1~c'ETlNt3 DATIr REQUESTED ~~ ( Wednesday) APPLICANT '~~'w.~t-~~ ~ ?!~IAlLiNra ADDRESS ~a`~ TEt.EI'HONE~ ~5$-"? ~ ~ ~l rzEP~2ESENTATIVI: (if any) ~~ __OCCUPAI'1ON MAILING ADDRESS TELEPHONE General location of the project \~, ~^ Section ~ Township Range Assessor's lax Parcel Number ~~- Typt of Project (Subdivision, Annexation, Zone Change, ete..)_ "J~t w Total acreage `+ ~ proposed Density Proposed Land Use: Single•family Duplex Multi-tami;~ Mobile Home Perk Com is industrial Brief description of project ~'~'- ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ro.v~ ~. P'sase attach six copies of a site plan drawing not larger than 1 t ° X 17" and forward to Yelm City Hall. Time (afternoon only) OWNER ~-~`^~~~ ADDRESS ~Q~ _`-~- TELEPHONE ~15'g• ~7 to.~,~..._ =~:1Lommun+ty DBVelopmontlForms & PrOCedura9lP~eSubmisslan~PreSubmiasionApp.doc 'vr~ i July 14 2003 Grant: I sincerely apologize for keeping you on the phone for an extended period of time last week. As this one small town continues to grow, I should have realized you have better things to do than listen to me ramble on about issues. I did leave another informational sheet for you on Friday before heading out of town. If you need additional information, please call and we'll do the best we can hopefully work on a mutually acceptable agreement to benefit other children besides our family. Thank you. Steve Rothwell July 14, 2003 Gary: I would like to express my sincere apology for keeping you on the phone for an extended period of time last week. We appreciated your pleasantness and promptness while working with us on our building back in May and June. We will be there Wednesday to hopefully work on a mutually acceptable agreement to benefit other children besides our family. Thank you. Steve Rothwell ~n ~~~~LS /(~ // \~c'~ ~ ~~~-i lit/ .:: ~ro~: ^ 12" ^ o ,,,77 r ~„ FQQ'??~~C ~~ ~~ `'u(Da~e: ~%~.:Z~B_z'~ tae: Cow ens ~ ~ ' CO~~I3Lry~ Fx~..~s~Y1L/ ~~RIfl~ SH.~R ~~ L~~~EC~fl~i Ho?d dowers ^ Siear ~a17~~ ^ Fr ~e ^ Cas/P_ogane ^ ~l~bin~ ^ ~ Mechanicz ^ Co . ~ ents L~SUZ~TIO~i. CO~~neIl`u ^ Gas ^ ~o~-n and Sea? SH H N~! ~0 C;K/SN ~ ~ ~ rY_'~L `i ~_IL CG- :...' ...~ G ; ~ y~ ^ Elec~~!c ^ o-~e: ^ Va~o: ba-:?er ^ P V - 7 ti ~ _ -~ - ~''r'~1, !~'" MA` cl ~~ 7ao~ CITY OF YELM Building Permit N°_ 6 9 6 7 `~ M BUILDING DEPT. '-~/ ~~ y, E,L ! ~ Date j 1 Phone: (360) 458-8407 Fax: (360) 458-3144 \ (Work must be started within 180 days) ~_~ r~ ~~ o W v~+~l $~ V-r~.L_ +:X ~I Phone ( Name ) `- J .. "7 I N R / Address ~~ !' % ~l?C City ~ ~~~ State j rye ~ pp Zip Code ~//_.t<,j /'~ Site Address ~ Y P R Assessor's Parcel No. r ! Y ' t:3 ~ Lot Size (sq. ff./acres) 0 P E Subdivision ~~, Lot Block R T Y Block OR Short Plat No. / Existing Structures, if any: [~!• ~ S ~ ~ ' ~ ~ r Name °''~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~'~;~ ~~,~~~~ Contact Phone ( ) ~ ~ s ~- ~ ~~F T /~ f Address 7 ~{ /l "• ~ City ~,t ''~,.-t." State ~ ~ ~ Zip Code ~ License No. ,~~ EAR;' ` "~ .1 ~ ^ ~' Exp, Yelm Bus. Lic. No. Description of Work ~~ ~, ~, ~ ~',~ ,!lJ ~2 ~~ OFFICIAL USE ONLY Permit Type: Sq. Ft. per floor: (lst) ~~ (2nd) Garage v Residential Sign Sewer Septic Approval No. Commercial Other City Water Private Well Private System Shoreline Permit Y N Heat: Electric Gas Other Sepa Exempt Y N ITEM BASIS FOR FEE FEE Y N Floor Plan Building Value L,I~s ~> ~9 ~ °'-'-~ w~~~, ~ ~ ,,~~ Sets of Prints ~,~C Other Plumbing Permit # l ~' WA. ST. BC. Fee (4.50 -New Const. Only) Mechanical Permit # TOTAL FEE 70~. ~7,~ Plan Check By Minimum distance of structure from property lines: Issued By L~ Front to of Road Finallnsp: / / Side Side Rear Owner L & I Form Assessor Floor Plan and Permit Applicant's Affidavit: 1 certify that I have read and examined the information contained within the application and know the same to be true Submitted / / and correct. I also certify that the proposed structure is in conformity with all applicable City of Yelm regulations including those governing zoning and land subdivision, and in addition, all covenants, easements and restrictions of record. If applying as a contractor, I further certify that I am a currently registered contractor in the State of Washington. 9uarterly Reports Signature ,,,(~, c Date S ~ ~ `U ~ Assessor / / Firm: TRPC / / /~~ d h Y~I u F c r, earfv , a~ oar r. ,~. ~# hra J c~' rfC 7ZU 9 ~"{~,~,o , W~. ~e3 ~ 3~a - ~s'6- q~~2 I P ~, .., _ ~ or ~S . T ,, ~xrp r y-, 9 TY~' GIRTS ¢(~/~ND C//ti/ d d ~ 6~P d u P WIgNU 4 PusSfS a ' ~ Pr ~rqc~ h ~r !'u!f ~ Hu~, s' Pis ou l any . d ~ C h9oh0 ~ , rU t l~ ~' Y C~k t ~sS aP ~ c ~~ pr K~f ~raan '. S res,~ '? ~ r ~ ~ , r ~r~ Q a,C 2x6 r10 J 2 P ~- w -/6dea. ~4 -1 /''Or1 ~. 2X~ ~~~ ~ /yea er x6 au~r+ t 2 99 t3"."`~ d,i1 tYfa {~/r ~~. ,, . n~~ ~ ~~ D ~i ~i 4S/, t Jz 3 F- y , ,~ + ~~ a• _-~~ ~--3., ~ I+7B w teas cr S 2-1x~ S x/B~Lak 9 t. ~ f 4,1'~ C' ~~T, Vass ,Sep aer ~ 4y ~~-, / ei #'(~i Wish 1V~c? I d ir; 2 %2X6 r'r~f C+? 2 ~, ~ 2, 2X~ ~~~; t'~ l "iH, F/ E/e~ _ ___.__a___._.___..__ ~ ~ I , .__. _. __ ._ _:_. ~ _ _ ~~ _~ , -- _ _____._ s ~ ~ __. ~, ; , I _ f`l~ ~ ,~, +~- t i ' ' , __.. v_ _,_.,_ ~ I~ e ~,.., ;_ .. 9 .~ .~ ~ .~w ~~___.__. ~~~ i ~ ~. _.__. ~___. ~. ---+-: ~ _ , I ._ _-- _ _ ` ~ ~_ ~ ~. \; , - ~` -- ~ _.. _ _ ~j _~ - ~_ _.. \~ _ - ?. -iz ~3 .~ -•- , . E .3 ? ~ ~~ , ,, Za,6s~s ,xr~°~~ r d~ r~~w,G'•l6 eQ . ~/l f , Y ~ '~ ~- ~ !~ ~ t. ,, 12 ~'l 3 ZxG s+s; ~• ~` vhrn ~~ U i ~ ~-/6 ~G,blk ~~ ~ ~ ~ 9':s~ti ~2 I ~ i i rr i '1~4~ a I ti ;4 I ~ 4 o e ~~ f'avc r/l ,~~ . ~ _ t P y o~tt . d roc' 1<u ./ . ~: ' ..,_~C .~ ~~t S~ r ~ r ' .-rr-+ S'a ch'ls ~ re,~, - -~ t Jr I q I~~ I. +~~,,.~~ TYP/CA1 CROJs SECTI f 11 ~ /~ ;~ ~ ,. 0 .; o `~ ~1-_4 a~ N ,i ~i 1 Tjp. r ~~r~a ; r ~N I ~ 1 ~_~ .~a' r /o , 9 ~~ u; pr, dX m - o d a Tom' ~X ~ ~ 6 x X i ~ a, ,,,_._-_---.F--~ --~ ~ ~ ~ k D µ i ~ ~ i ~j,, l~ ,~flaa F 1 v ~ g xll y ~DF I ~~ I I ~ Q J I S i I Q, ' I ! v ~.. G ~ ~_ _.~, ~x ~ i "q r ~l1/U (oXIU ~ ~~ ~ v a I lD 6dJ 6xG' ~ ~ f ~ i , l I ~ ~ G~'~ •i L' ~ 6 ~-~ ~ ~: ~ 6 _ Ctau~/P 6~tGNv , P ~ R~ i"uSS~1 3 `c, o, ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~. ~ 5 a; f__. __..~~_..__ _ . 'l ~ ~ 1 /~ ~ I ~` `. ~ 1d'1 ~P < U ~, I GNd 6 ~ Ch~i/k .~ __ ~ ~ 4 e,S S~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ GX ~XG ... G ~~ ~ i ~ ~4------",.-- , , o, I ~ ~~ i I I l i ~ I C Q x ` 610 ~, 6X Gkl ~ t0 GxlU i ~ ~ GxG ~ • ~ ~_ i _ !~ 1 i •~ i '~ ov~J l+'JbNo ~• /yloyo /"u rep 'r ~ / 5 i i ~ i i ~ I • i i .... 4 i _...__ .:.... i ~x E ` ,-. dw us C G G ..Sr a !z/gllu J99b4 ~ .fib 4 r l ~~'f I' I GI 1ri aa'~ & ~ f 3 I i fi~ 6 XG o 6V /o / ~-o (a Xf X I ----~ r1 '!, Ire„ ~~ D _ c~./ d l 'Q 1 r -- ~` 3 . ~ / t ; ~---~ . f i ~~ .,, , . Y ~ .. ~;,. s ~ t~~Hr 3 ' /Z R_yG13'7' SI~EWHLL ~'LE!! T' 17fH 11 6„ E.K V ~``+4 ~J ~~ ~' ~~ i E ~ 1 I s ~~ NOTfS: II • Posts f/P,~,-f %'~2 b!v P.T. `rq~ ,. 2. /'rar.+;crq /uM,lu DFx2 61'~ 3, l9 4 ~ tJBC ~. LL=2~~rf'fhew> +,", !d1 80wdh~ ~Xd'asure B G..S'r:fw:c ~~q¢ 3 '7. 3"MBI l"9efiq /~1d~; ltis~lal`ieh Yvof'£ G/r~//1 s. Roo~'~ cJ4 /I MP/~ / 29 y 4 j, k/alk Drr G/,'„Jo~s~ ldxlzSl~r,~ Can be rE/o~6fr~pv ~~de~ ! /N {~iC~dw/O wa .~Gf~ir f/iP 1 sf.~~tu~k/o~~~e 6/~q. ~ Q3 ~6 ~`° ~ ~ • ,R ~v 6 ., ~~ ~ a, a ~ (~ B ~ .. APR U ~ i ar ~ S 1 d ~ ~ e~ ,~. u ~:,.. ~. e9 e X rrer; 4 • -U ----r^- '_~~ l~' ~ ~~ f~~"~,~'~~ ~~ C. ~ ~a jl''~ =' ~ ~ '~~l~j£~1YPY ~ ~b~1 C~/~5.1/~- -~ / r 1 I ~ (mil ~tS ~~~' ~( ~~' ~ ~ ~ ~~' , ~~ ~ !"ter ~'_PGI€~~t e~ GJ~. %~~~~~ t ::,U~~, r L4 tL~ L!.~ L! ~U tfi Oi 47 ~G~ C :v ,- ~. r ~' cC h N f~' ncv. ~, /~~~ ~~~~ ~~' ,~'~~~, ~ 1~0h~~aY ,~ ~ C~~~ J~ _ ~~,Y ~B~- 03 ~ ~ ,t r ~, ~`l' z ~~ ~I ~ ~ °~~ ~' V~ ~~~ U ^~ ~° y. ' ~ ~ ®p D ® a ~; '- G J (j~cS> ~yJV ~1 ~`~t.J' C~''! ~ ~. ~CGVC. ~ i ~ t X~~lYts: ~f'-~.S Q,3 Y~ ~ ' ///'~ // jjy/ / ~1+ / I ~, l+'7 ~ l~ 1 v ~ ~ 'P I ,~ j- ~ ~ ~ •T~' , z / 9!r . ~ a ~ ~' F, (N 4!~ iiLJC~~~'+ ~ j /~'~'S ~ e~ ~'~ ~'l ~~ _ ~~s:~,~ L~.~~Y~/,S'~,'/. ~r~s 2r/o ~-'~/~~drsS'Yi/~. ~.~ I t i~ 2 er d /~ ~~ <a ul , ~i* ua S'~J' ~ ~'P~'.~: ~ ,mss.' Y„~f =",'~~r, u@ t. ,~;•=~./~'~,. ,.j,/ 1 ~/'{ t: l~ E 3 i ~ ~ ,a..__ ro T ~r s; ~ t .~ ~ =- -, ~~ -r ~ o s ~,-- - --=- ~ 9 T '.. ~ ~ t O ~ h O S G Z ~ C ~ X - o ~ f t M ~~ ~_ , `~C ",, ;_- ~~ i ~ - ~ / ~~ ~ ~ _. _.. __~ . -b ~-- ~ I ~ ~, ~--- I j ~~ ~~ ~"J .1~Y ~--- - ~ ~ ~ z ~°, ~-. v. ~- APR ? ~~ 20Q? _l - ~ ~..~-l ~- ~"C a Z ~ ~~ :~`s ~~ ;4~ ~~ 4t LJ W c-, v, cn C ^ O ~; Q G (~; f~~ rcr f~ c`t N c~ cn c~ 4 1 ~~ Qj C 1~7s Z ! -~~ g t~~ ~, a 1 ~~, 3 ~~: D ~1. vv ff']_j~/j' J~~ ~~ ~3 j CD y~~~C_ ~~~ `_____? i,~_~~1~~'~'~°~ ~,...:~~ `z ~~_~~'f/ _ ~~.Ot~ /~~ ~~~~' ~' _ ~~' l£ %~~! ~` ! ,~.t.'`iE,~.F ~~'!°r?} ~ ~°/ w!3 C Q L'S',-t~d~ij ~ I ~i ~t ~ / J Fib r' ~ o t ~ ~ J c~.:r ,~ ,ft 1';~ v,.~ ~ j ; ~' ,"'r~„ ; t 1 , ~ ~ ,v- ,: ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~1~~F ~~ ~~ I ! 7 _ ~_ n 4 ~ i ,_ , c~~s~ ~, sy = Z ~ ~,sJ, ~ ~ i ~ ~ I~lO G! ! S~ ~ ~ ~'o~~ ~ ~ /2 hti~ ;,3 -r c~'' s Js! ~~ /~o ,~: h PT bay I'i Z_ ~.3~0 6~ : l ~,s~ /~ ~'~, _ 1~ . ~,jj~~l ~s-~~~ s `fir 1, z~~(lo~,f"~~ ~ s 30, 8'~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ = 20 s~~~ I • l o S ~ Imo' ~c ~~ c~~ 2..-, ~.t -~ ~ ~, f d ' j a ~ ; ~. r' _/1/v ~ ~, ~.,/~,.~ ___ / 1~ ~ t+ vrj c~.'e~ R ~ / ~~ < ~ 3~ ~ G Q 4 /~/Z i ~ ~ ) vt ~~ ls~~~ ~ ~~ / 33~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ _ 1 ~ ~ ~,YI Qlvd.'cl~ ~ i/ [ )~Gr~ o ~ t0 G~ O~SIs) 1~~, ~ /T / 0 }} ~. ~ s / 0 j ~/j' ~f / ~ le~~ ~ Z(J~ v G~ t? jt/f ~ l f c o { 2 7 ~ ? 3 ~,~ ~ ~ ,~"'r ~o~ 1 f ~~'r~}i ~[t ~J ! ~. ! ~,)'I'~iGCl~t~ac.t ~ f (. j i~ ~,S`-~Y/t~,~ ~~~ ~ :~,v ~` do C~J'/~ ~"d +1~0 +~~ / /~ 't ,~ / ~r ~ r l `i ,~ ~ - , ..,- ~ J 1 ~,~ ; G~ l•^^, G ^. C C ~:Y~ ^1 CV c+ C ~ C h~ w CJ :~c.cv ~~l ~~t .~ / ,~ f' i ,~ ; .ate ~. ~z ~J ~+ // ~ ~ ,rG rf tt+'~ ' ~ ~/1~J4~ Shoal ~Jv C ~ ~Y~ o ~ 14 ~ ,~ L ~ ~ ova/~ `~ ' ~z j // /, 4~ CAC ~ ~ of ~o~fs -~~'.~ ~s~es~~a~ ~- yr. J~~o~%s2,~ , l~~~s-~~~. X z= ~g~d ~ '+ ~°~ , ~'~~ Lcr Z X ~ X 2 D 1~ l ~ t1 `l ~'r' d ' USA 2 - ~ f ~ ~~/~ ~4 . s~ ~P'- o ~ ~~ 1,~~~ fz~o d, ~ ? ~ ' ~~ '~~ ~- ~s zi ~r;:.i ~ ~ I i~ ~ ~ ~ j ~we~Pr US 2 ~Z ~ el/Ph ~~~y~ S ~~~~ti~ ~ ~ I y ----~ ~. ~ ~ 1/ Ufe 'alt a ~ ~e~ ~.'~s .~Pe 1~';Y2-~~ ~~~s~~u~ ~~ ~. ,~ ,~,~.f /G~ co~,s~, pea,"/s ~-/~U`~ t'la~ Z-/~vu~~~y~~ .~ ~ ~~