Loading...
Environmental Review~E, u~,., ~,~, 4 ~ ~ n a ~' a, J~ h~ti YES` !aN`J ' STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PO Box 47775 • Olympia, Washington 98504-7775 • (360) 407-6300 May 27, 2005 Mr. Grant Beck Community Development Director City of Yelm PO Box 479 Yelm, WA 98597 Dear Mr. Beck: ' ~ , 7 Your address ~~ ~` v~ ti is in the ~ ~ ~ ^ ~j.~,, ~`~, ,~ ';~ ~ watershed ~ ~~~, ~. ~~ , Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the mitigated determination of nonsignificance for the Mountain View Preliminary Plat project (SEPA No. OS-0096) located on the west side of Mountain View Road, north of Yelm Avenue West as proposed by Landshapes Northwest, Inc. We reviewed the environmental checklist and have the following comments: WATER QUALITY: Margaret Hill (360) 407-0246 Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent stormwater runoff from carrying soil and other pollutants into surface water or storm drains that lead to waters of the state. Sand, silt, clay particles, and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered to be pollutants. Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48, Water Pollution Control, and WAC 173-201A, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington, and is subject to enforcement action. During construction, all releases of oils, hydraulic fluids, fuels, other petroleum products, paints, solvents, and other deleterious materials must be contained and removed in a manner that will prevent their discharge to waters and soils of the state. The cleanup of spills should take precedence over other work on the site. If you have any questions or would like to respond to these comments please contact the appropriate reviewing staff listed above. Department of Ecology Southwest Regional Office f ~ f ~~ T'! (AW: OS-3814) ~QY ? " 110 cc: Margaret Hill, WQ Landshapes Northwest, Inc. (Applicant) i~~ SEPA NO: 05-0096 MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Proponent: Landshapes Northwest, Inc. Description of Proposal: Subdivide 3.01 acres into 16single-family residential lots. The project includes the construction of stormwater facilities, interior streets, and street improvements to Mt. View Road. Location of the Proposal: The project site is located on the west side of Mr. View Road, North of Yelm Avenue West (SR 510). Section/Township/Range: Section 13, Township 17 North Range 1 East, W.M. Threshold Determination: The City of Yelm as lead agency for this action has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. Therefore, an environmental impact statement (EIS) will not be required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Conditions/Mitigating Measures: SEE ATTACHED Lead agency: City of Yelm Responsible Official: Grant Beck, Community Development Director Date of Issue: Co a ~ May 16, 2005 May 31, 2005 pe eadlin ~ ,~ June 6 , 2005 Grant Belk, Community Development Director This Mitigated Determination of NonSignificance (MDNS) is issued pursuant to Washington Administrative Code 197-11-340 (2). Comments must be submitted to Tami Merriman, Community Development Department, at City of Yelm, 105 Yelm Avenue West, P.O. Box 479, Yelm, WA 98597, by May 31, 2005, at 5:00 P.M. The City of Yelm will not act on this proposal prior June 6, 2005, at 5:00 P.M. You may appeal this determination to the Yelm Hearing Examiner, at above address, by submitting a written appeal no later than June 6, 2005 at 5:00 P.M. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Grant Beck, Community Development Director, to learn more about the procedures for SEPA appeals. This MDNS is not a permit and does not by itself constitute project approval. The applicant must comply with all applicable requirements of the City of Yelm prior to receiving construction permits which may include but are not limited to the City of Yelm Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code (Title 17 YMC), Critical Areas Code (Chapter 14.08 YMC), Storm water Drainage Design and Erosion Control Manual (DOE), Uniform Building Code, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) (Title 14 YMC), Road Design Standards, Platting and Subdivision Code (Title 16 YMC), and the Shoreline Master Program. DO NOT PUBLISH BELOW THIS LINE Published: Nisqually Valley News, Friday, May 20, 2005 Posted in public areas: Monday, May 16, 2005 Copies to: All agencies/citizens on SEPA mailing list and adjacent property owners Dept. of Ecology w/checklist ATTACHMENT SEPA Case Number 05-0096 Findings of Fact 1. This Mitigated Determination of Non Significance is based on the project as proposed and the impacts and potential mitigation measures reflected in the following environmental documents: • Environmental Checklist (March 2005, prepared by John Lubbesmeyer.) • Preliminary Storm Drainage Report (January 2005, prepared by 2M Enterprises LLC.) 2. The City of Yelm has adopted a concurrency management system as required by the Growth Management Act. Chapter 15.40 YMC (concurrency Management) is designed to ensure that the improvements required to support development are available at the time of development. A concurrency determination may be issued for a proposal as it relates to transportation issues when: the development provides on-site frontage improvements; the project makes off-site improvements as necessary to provide for the safe movement of traffic; and the project makes a contribution to projects identified the six year transportation improvement program in the form of a Transportation Facilities Charge. 3. Chapter 14.12 YMC requires the dedication of open space for all residential development. Section 14.12.050 YMC lists four (4) attributes for qualification of open space. The applicant proposes open space to include recreation. 4. The Yelm School District has adopted a school mitigation requirement based on the demand that new residential units create for additional school services and facilities. Additional demands on the school system will be mitigated through the requirement that the developer enter into a mitigation agreement with the District. Section 14.16.110 YMC provides for the preservation of trees on private property with new development and requires that existing trees not be removed until a final decision is made regarding the feasibility of preserving existing trees. Trees located in the area of proposed development areas are in danger of future tree failure with grading near the base of the trees. Existing trees that are located in areas of qualified open space should be protected during development with protective fencing at the drip line. All machinery shall be kept out of the drip line. Mitigation Measures The developer shall mitigate transportation impacts based on the new residential P.M. peak hour trips generated by the project. The Transportation Facility Charge (TFC) shall be based on 1.01 new peak hour trips per residential unit. The proponent will be responsible for a TFC of $757.50 per dwelling unit which is payable at time of building permit. Credit should be given for the existing single-family dwelling. 2. Prior to final subdivision approval, the developer shall complete the following transportation improvements: a. The west half of Mt. View Road shall be improved to City Standards for a Neighborhood Collector along the property frontage. b. All interior streets shall be improved to City Standards for a Local Access Residential. 3. Temporary erosion control systems to be approved by the City of Yelm. 4. The developer shall provide at least 5% of total acreage as qualified open space. 5. The developer shall enter into an agreement with Yelm Community Schools to mitigate project impacts to the School District. 6. The developer shall mitigate tree loss at a minimum of 1-1 for trees that cannot be preserved. NQI~JNIHSVM'W'73A OLEYL£S (£5Z) lYld M31A NId1Nf10W 87Y96 dM'~+~1 ~ 3se3 7~aAS rAZ l L t9 t t Ldld AtIVNIWil3!!d :xp'uo0~npsurJ oleP99rld ~ntt ~_~~•~ a 'Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a r g: ffiSx Yor~ x t°w ~[ [ ~ t € s~ O ? r Z W W I I 119 I ~ I ~IQ ^~il I U~~! ba I ; ~~ ~^r{=a ~ i ~' ~ aY~ Si s f~ r~ g T q' x :x x gs~ , .~r~~a Gggbg~gag4~~€ -€ ~' ~ s ~ ••~ °~-ro~-°'sw°~°! ,ITT sasudta~u3 E t ~OLZ9-9i: (9OZ) "~"' aerae rr ' rwnc ... .~ ~ aoc r~ s „r ,_,,, -Wars v°°~e°s sresr ~~ ~r ..°.b ~~zdwo 4 Y Q ZIP U W ¢n\ ~2_ P~~ ~Ne 4RW ~Oy Z O ~^ b F = ~~ W ~ as xE~~ t0 Y ~~ riE.i ~=- " _ ~ ~~ ~ ~ U t' 23 M IA !fib F~.L N~ OY1I ~a I - 7 ' SL i cc ^B ii I ~~~ a~_ ~~- -i ~ ~ I~ / ~ I -- ~ 1 ' ~~ .~« Ja ,~ ~ S`_ COI'' rSb~ ~F t °, ti j I ~ C ~ ~n a:~7 I v i~ ~i: ~ °} I J. -~~ ~ I i ~~` rte, ~ i ~ ~ li I-Irj~l ~l, g~;~ fp- ~ *•f si I~ ~ , 11.ss s 3 is n a C ~ 'Y ~ 9. ' I I r /C~ ~ r { ~ ~\ ~p 1 fn• Lam.°L'r-- ~ ±4~/ 'A'^F.r~ ~~~~`~? ~ I I ms's; I I~ "~~- ~; I ~ \,\' ~ J ~ j I ! i r' e ~ . 7 P. ~ i ~ I I- M1 ~ J I OMf ~~ ~, ~ U U / ~ Oi I' I I i ~ I I- ----9 --- _--~ -- - L---'~'L~-.GCS sa e„ ~-r± aya-_I n5 d~~n_pc I .OS J .OC J I .^S I/ ll;I'OIC/~ t'. 4 .k-L I I / I I I r N ~ i i ~ i a~ i~ /i Y? i ~ I ~ I I i „~„ I ~ I I ~ ~ I ti I I "'I I I I r ~~ I I I I I I 1 ~ I ~> ti ~ ..~. _ I ~ ``Y / -:, i '" -----------------~ 1' r- ._ i - ~, ~, _. o . ,. :- J ~ S yy~ ~ t ~Y4~~'-e"`Y t ~ ~r ~ ~i~ ~ ~ ..ptt -~ ~~~~~ >sr Z zzz ~~~ ~~ w €[Y'a„~ F ?W? W anu 0 x~r`~~wR Z ~r~~" ~ Z ~~ F - j I~~ ~~ O O 7 O ~ w ~ i e W N m R J 8 <m U ~ f r ~===-_-_~~ ~ ~ -~ I ` Jc ~ ~+ ; ~ I 1 ~5 P Vf. '~ 1, c h `s.^ ~ g il r..,_C - •c ~ ~ E~. = ~ Q ti o z 'o = ~ A - ~ n ,\ 'S ?~ ~d. F.~ r/' .'/ /: ~r~ q~~ YELM CONIMMUNITY SCHOOLS _ Where all students can learn and grow ~ _ _ Erlina Birkland Director of Facilities April 12, 2005 Mr. Grant Beck Community Development Director City of Yelm PO Box 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 RE: SUB-05-0096-YL Country Vista Dear Mr. Grant: Yelm Community Schools requires mitigation agreements for all subdivisions. Please include the mitigation provision as part of the SEPA requirements. Should you have any questions please call me at 458-6128. Sincerely, i~P~ g . Zirliland Facilities Director Yelm Community Schools YELM COMMUNITY SCHOOLS IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER AND FOLLOWS TITLE IX REQUIREMENTS 107 First Street North, P. O. Box 476, Yelm, Washington 98597, (360) 458.6128, FAX (360) 458-6434 ~~j1 CIGC' CITY OF YELM ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Instructions: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help identify impacts from your proposal, to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal if it can be done, and to help the City decide whether an EIS is required. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for any proposal with probable significant adverse impacts on environmental quality. This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your nrnnnc~l The f~ity ~eiill ~ ~cA fihic r`M1P(`{(IICt fill f~AtPf1711f1A Wf1P.tr1P.r thP. P.nVlrnnrTlP.rltAl ImnactS of your proposal are significant and require preparation of an EIS. You must answer each question accurately, carefully and to the best of your knowledge. Answer the questions briefly, but give the best description you can. Inmost cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need for experts. If you do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid delays later. If the space provided is too small, feel free to attach additional sheets. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the city staff can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. You may be asked to explain your answers or provide additional information for determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Nonproject Proposals Only: Complete both the checklist (even though many questions may be answered "does not apply") and the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. - ,-- ~_ .~ CITY OF YELM A 1 2. 3. 4 5 6. 7 8 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST BACKGROUND Name of proposed project, if any: Mountain View Preliminary Plat Name of applicant: Landshapes Northwest, Inc. CITY USE ONLY FEE: 150.00 DATE RECD 1 v ~ sY: ti l FILE N Su~'~ ~ ~%5 yc ~~i (< - yL Address and phone number of applicant and of any other contact person: Address: 1151 East 112th Street Tacoma, WA 98445 Phone: 253 537-6370 Contact Name Sz Number: John 253 380-7640 Date checklist prepared: January 18, 2005 Agency requesting checklist: Does not apply Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Once all necessary approvals and permits are obtained, the project will be constructed. We anticipate that this will occur in the Fall of 2005. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No, the proposed plat will be constructed in one phase with no further plans for expansion List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. To our knowledge no other environmental information has been or will be prepared for this approval C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\7065\4408 - MTN Z VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/Ol 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. To our knowledge no other governmental approvals are pending that directly affect this proposal 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. SEPA Threshold Determination, Council approval, Site Development permit, and Building permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal is to plat 3.01± acres into 16 Single Family lots. Public roads, Public Sewers, and water will serve the Plat 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. You need not duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. (T) 17 (R) 1 E (S) 13 Plat is located in the Northwest area of the City of Yelm. Access to the area is from the Mountain View Road Southwest. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Earth a. ~6e~eral description of the site (circle one): Fla , rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The steepest slop on the site is about 2% and is located at the North East corner of the project. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The on-site soils are Spanaway Gravelly Sandy Loam. The Agriculture classification is unknown C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\JOBS\4408 -MTN 3 VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/01 d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Because of the mild terrain and soil classifications ofthe site no indications or unstable soils classification were found e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The proposal is to design the site to be self-balancing. Grading plans prepared by a licensed professional Engineer will be submitted to the City of Yelm for review and approval. We currently estimate approximately 1500 cubic yards of total cut and fill quantities Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes. The area is covered with vegetation that includes mainly young and mature trees, grasses, and shrubs. If vegetation is cleared during wet weather, erosion could occur g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction such as asphalt or buildings? Approximately 40percent of the site will be covered with impervious surface once the entire project, 16 lots, is constructed h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: As part of the Grading plan, a temporary erosion and Sedimentation Control plan will be prepared for approval by the City of Yelm. Erosion control features will be installed prior to construction and maintained until threat of erosion ceases to exist 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile exhaust, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. The Grading activities proposed at the site will cause dust particles to be emitted into the air. Vehicles and equipment used during all phases of construction can be a potential source of emissions. When the project is complete, the site may be the source of vehicle emissions from the vehicles using the site. Quantities are unknown. C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\7065\4408 - MTN VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/01 b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Vehicles using the surrounding streets systems can be a source of emissions or odor. It is not anticipated that these off-site vehicle source of emissions will impact this proposal. There are no other sources of odor or emissions in this vicinity c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: (~ Ll ~~ Unwanted dust particles can be controlled to a certain extent by the ~)~~ ~~ application of water before and during grading activities. It is assumed the ~~~' construction vehicles used will be equipped with factory-installed mufflers and ~~ ~~ spark arrestors that would control excessive emissions. There are no ~~; measures proposed to control emission as a result of vehicles using the site after construction. ~~' 3. Water a. Surface Water 1) Is there any surface water body or wetland on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, and ponds)? If yes, describe type and provide names. State what stream or river it flows into? None 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 300 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Does not apply 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No, the project does not include any surface water withdrawals or diversions 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note elevation on the site plan. No, the site does not lie within the 100-year Floodplain 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No, the proposal does not include discharge of waste materials to any existing surface water C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\JOBS\4408 - MTN S VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/01 b. Groundwater: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. There will be no groundwater withdrawals. stormwater discharge will be through infiltration, which will then discharge to the groundwater 2) Describe the underlying aquifer with regard to quality and quantity, sensitivity, protection, recharge areas, etc. The underlying aquifer quality and quantity are unknown. The Thurston County Geodata Center lists the parcel as an area with no groundwater concern and no elevated nitrates 3) Describe waste material that will be discharged into or onto the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (such as domestic sewage; industrial byproducts; agricultural chemicals). No waste materials will be discharged into the ground. The City of Yelm Sanitary Sewer System will serve the project c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. ~; ~~ ~'Z s1_`~ ~~~,ry R,` ,ti J 4,~ 'X'' ~^' ~' ~`~~.~~ ,'~ The primary source of runoff will be from stormwater. Minimal water runoff is anticipated to occur as a result of landscape watering and other maintenance activities. The proposed project site includes a tightline conveyance system to a proposed onsite stormwater infiltration system. All~will be tightlined to i ; „ the conveyance. ,~~~,,~~Q?, i ~. .~ !j < ~~%!f ~- _~ f i ~-' ~ ~'.~ / ~ 1 ~ ~ I~i 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. ~ r ~~}~~~ Project of this type and size would provide areas of landscaping as part of the individual lots. If chemicals or fertilizers that are used to maintain these areas are not handled properly, it is possible that they could enter infiltration facilities. To our knowledge there are no other known sources of contaminants associated with this proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: All stormwater runoff generated from this project will be collected and disposed in the proposed onsite infiltration system __ _ ~~~-: ~ .. C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\7065\4408 - MTN VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/01 4 Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: =x _ deciduous tree der, maple, oak, aspen, other x_ evergreen tree: fir cedar, pine, other x shrubs _x_ rag sses _x_ ap stu re crops or grains wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All vegetation will be removed during the grading process c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. To our knowledge, there are no threatened or endangered plant species on or near the site d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: There is no proposed landscaping amenity associated with this projects other than what is required by the City of Yelm 5 Animals a. Circle any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron,~s, eagle, songbirds, other: .IA mammals: aver, Dear, eiK, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, shellfish, other: b. List any priority, threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. To our knowledge there is no threatened or endangered animal species on or near our site c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not to our knowledge d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Trees that can be saved will be. While all other vegetation will be removed, the addition of landscaping on individual lots would provide vegetation for forage and habitat purposes for the bird population ~~~ J ~" y ~~ ~~ ~ ~ . ~~~, ~ `~ ~ ~~~, ~ ~~ ,~~ L C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\JOBS\4408 - MTN 7 VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/01 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, gasoline, heating oil, wood, solar etc.) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, transportation, etc. The primary energy source required to meet the energy needs of the proposed plat is electricity. Sufficient amounts of which would be used to maintain a comfortable lifestyle and environment. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No, it is not anticipated this project will affect the potential for the adjacent properties to use solar energy. The building heights will not exceed that which is required in the R-6 zone. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The homes that will be built to meet or exceed current building and energy codes 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spills, of hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. The risk of fire is always present within a residential development. Typically, a residential development is not a source of environmental health hazards 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. While not anticipated to occur, the services of the local emergency service providers may be required at some time 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None are proposed b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area, which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? Traffic noise is present on Mountain View Rd; however, it is not anticipated that the noise will adversely impact the proposed project. C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\JOBS\4408 - MTN $ VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/01 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise produced on the site depends on the equipment being used, the noise would vary from day to day. During the short-term, construction activity atthe project site will vary considerably as the construction progresses. Noise associated with the construction operations on the site will occur roughly between the hours of 7:OOam to 6:OOpm, Monday through Friday. Long-term noise impacts will result from vehicles using the site and noises typically to a Single-Family residential plat 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: No measures to mitigate noise impacts during the building phase are proposed. Noise impacts associated with the construction phases of the project will be limited in duration. During grading phase, measures such as using and regularly maintaining efficient mu~flers-a~~ Zvi ' _ devises on all constructions eauipment and vehicles c be anticioated: Constr 'on hours will be limited to the normal workda :OOam to 6:OOpm j 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? b c. d e The site is currently occupied by asingle-family residential house. The northern portion of the site is grass and brush covered, whereas the southern portion of the site is tree covered. The surrounded uses are large lot residential, and platted properties developed with single- family homes Has the site been used for mineral excavation, agriculture or forestry? If so, describe. To our knowledge the site has not been used for crop production; however, timber harvest may have occurred Describe any structures on the site. There is one single family dwelling on the site Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes, all existing structures will be demolished or removed What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current comprehensive plan designation is unknown What is the current zoning classification of the site? The site is zoned R-6, Low Density~ingle Family Dwelling ~ ;~~~ c~~ ` ~~ ~~~~~ .~~,~J o C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\JOBS\4408 - MTN 9 VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/01 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable h. Has any part of the site been classified as a "natural resource", "critical" or "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. ~y~t.~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ,1~-tz - , , No, not to our knowledge =~'~~~~' `~ ~ ' ~..., F,, ,t ~.C ~' i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Proposed plat of 16 lots will provide housing approximately for 32 - 64 individuals based on a 2 - 4 person household Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None R ~~1,4 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if anv , ` 4 ~ L ~ :. Z There are none ~.` j ~ C I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Anticipated that there will be 16 single-family dwellings at completion that would be in the middle-income range b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. ~~~~_ ~ . One residence will be demolished to allow for construction of the ~~ single- i` family residences. Existing residence is currently occupied c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: There are no proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts. The proposed plat will create housing to benefit the potential homebuyers in the Thurston County area C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\JOBS\4408 - MTN lO VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/01 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Tallest structure will be approximately 30 feet with wood exterior b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Proposed project should not compromise the views from the adjacent properties. The view of the site, of course, will be altered to that of a single- family housing development c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Proposed plat will include architecturally compatible homes by a single builder. The interior roads will be built to the City of Yelm Road standards 11 _ Liaht and Glare a. ~ What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light and glare will result from reflective surfaces, exterior building lights, and streetlights. Interior lighting may be noticeable. The occurrence of light impacts would be anticipated from dusk to dawn. Glare impacts are associated primarily with sunny days, something we don't have an abundance of in this region b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Highly unlikely that glare or light from the projects site will interfere with views or affect wildlife. Streetlights and other outdoor lighting are intended to promote safety rather than create a safety hazard c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? There are no known off-site sources of light or glare that are anticipated to affect this proposal d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: The exterior building lights and streetlights will be of low intensity, typically used for safety and security purposes 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\7065\4408 - MTN 11 VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/01 b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No, the project will not displace any recreational opportunities c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts or provide recreation opportunities: The project proposes approximately 8000 sq.ft. of Open Space for enjoyment by future residents 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No, there are no known sites in the vicinity eligible for or listed in any jurisdictional historic register b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Does not apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: There are no measures proposed to reduce or control impacts 14. Transportation a. Identify sidewalks, trails, public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access to parcel through Mountain View Road Southwest See Appendix Site Plan for Vicinity Map b. Is site currently served by public transit? By what means? If not, what plans exist for transit service? No, the site is not directly served by public transit There are no known plans for public transit c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project will provide two driveway parking spaces per lot. It is anticipated that street parking will be permitted as well. No parking spaces will be eliminated C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\JOBS\4408 - MTN 12 VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/01 d. Will the proposal require any new sidewalks, trails, roads or streets, or improvements to existing sidewalks, trails, roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Yes, interior public roads and sidewalk will be constructed. It is anticipated that road improvements including a sidewalk will be required along the Mountain View Road frontage e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Estimated that this project would generate 249 trips per day. The peak volumes are expected to occur during PM hours g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: In addition to the entrance and interior roads for the project, a Transportation Facility Charge of $750 per pm peak trip will be paid to the City of Yelm at the time of building permit issuance. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe: Yes. Whenever a residential development is constructed, the need for public services, such as police and fire protection, increases. Yelm Schools District, Yelm Police Department, and Yelm Fire District serve the site b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Impacts will be controlled by the increase in tax base and tax assessments paid to the public services as well as impact fees 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural qas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\7065\4408 - MTN 13 VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/01 b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity, which might be needed. The proposed plat will use the following utilities: Electricity: Gas: Water: Sanitary Sewer: Refuse: Telephone: C. SIGNATURE Puget Sound Energy Puget Sou~ad Energy City of Yelm City of Yelm Thurston County Refuse Ycomm The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the Citv of Yelm is relvinq on them to make its decision. Signature: l ~~ ~ Date Su rsiitted: 3~~ ~~ i C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\JOBS\4408 - MTN Z4 VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/01 ~~ °'~, -~' Y ~7 L1VI W~ASHINC,'~"C7N Instructions: CITY OF YELM ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help identify impacts from your proposal, to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal if it can be done, and to help the City decide whether an EIS is required. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for any proposal with probable significant adverse impacts on environmental quality. This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The City will use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant and require preparation of an EIS. You must answer each question accurately, carefully and to the best of your knowledge. Answer the questions briefly, but give the best description you can. Inmost cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need for experts. If you do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid delays later. If the space provided is too small, feel free to attach additional sheets. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the city staff can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. You may be asked to explain your answers or provide additional information for determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Nonproject Proposals Only: Complete both the checklist (even though many questions may be answered "does not apply") and the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. CITY OF YELM A. 1 2 3. 4 5 6. 7 8. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST BACKGROUND Name of proposed project, if any: Mountain View Preliminary Plat Name of applicant: Landshapes Northwest, Inc. CITY USE ONLY FEE: 150.00 DATE RECD o ~ BY: FILE N Sr,C.~ rJS C~O`~(c _ ~~ Address and phone number of applicant and of any other contact person: Address: 1151 East 112' Street Tacoma, WA 98445 Phone: 253 537-6370 Contact Name Si Number: John 253 380-7640 Date checklist prepared: January 18, 2005 Agency requesting checklist: Does not apply Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Once all necessary approvals and permits are obtained, the project will be constructed. We anticipate that this will occur in the Fall of 2005. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No, the proposed plat will be constructed in one phase with no further plans for expansion List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. To our knowledge no other environmental information has been or will be prepared for this approval C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\JOBS\4408 - MTN 2 VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/01 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. To our knowledge no other governmental approvals are pending that directly affect this proposal 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. SEPA Threshold Determination, Council approval, Site Development permit, and Building permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal is to plat 3.01± acres into 16 Single Family lots. Public roads, Public Sewers, and water will serve the Plat 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. You need not duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. (T) 17 (R) 1 E (S) 13 Plat is located in the Northwest area of the City of Yelm. Access to the area is from the Mountain View Road Southwest B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Earth a. ~eral description of the site (circle one): Fla , rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The steepest slop on the site is about 2% and is located at the North East corner of the project. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The on-site soils are Spanaway Gravelly Sandy Loam. The Agriculture classification is unknown C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\JOBS\4408 - MTN 3 VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/01 d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Because of the mild terrain and soil classifications ofthe site no indications or unstable soils classification were found e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The proposal is to design the site to be self-balancing. Grading plans prepared by a licensed professional Engineer will be submitted to the City of Yelm for review and approval. We currently estimate approximately 1500 cubic yards of total cut and fill quantities Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes. The area is covered with vegetation that includes mainly young and mature trees, grasses, and shrubs. If vegetation is cleared during wet weather, erosion could occur g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction such as asphalt or buildings? Approximately 40percent of the site will be covered with impervious surface once the entire project, 16 lots, is constructed h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: As part of the Grading plan, a temporary erosion and Sedimentation Control plan will be prepared for approval by the City of Yelm. Erosion control features will be installed prior to construction and maintained until threat of erosion ceases to exist 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile exhaust, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. The Grading activities proposed at the site will cause dust particles to be emitted into the air. Vehicles and equipment used during all phases of construction can be a potential source of emissions. When the project is complete, the site may be the source of vehicle emissions from the vehicles using the site. Quantities are unknown. C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\JOBS\4408 - MTN 4 VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/01 b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Vehicles using the surrounding streets systems can be a source ofemissions or odor. It is not anticipated that these off-site vehicle source ofemissions will impact this proposal. There are no other sources of odor or emissions in this vicinity c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Unwanted dust particles can be controlled to a certain extent by the application of water before and during grading activities. It is assumed the construction vehicles used will be equipped with factory-installed mufflers and spark arrestors that would control excessive emissions. There are no measures proposed to control emission as a result of vehicles using the site after construction. 3. Water a. Surface Water 1) Is there any surface water body or wetland on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, and ponds)? If yes, describe type and provide names. State what stream or river it flows into? None 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 300 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Does not apply 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No, the project does not include any surface water withdrawals or diversions 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note elevation on the site plan. No, the site does not lie within the 100-year Floodplain 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No, the proposal does not include discharge of waste materials to any existing surface water C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\7065\4408 - MTN 5 VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/01 b. Groundwater: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. There will be no groundwater withdrawals. stormwater discharge will be through infiltration, which will then discharge to the groundwater 2) Describe the underlying aquifer with regard to quality and quantity, sensitivity, protection, recharge areas, etc. The underlying aquifer quality and quantity are unknown. The Thurston County Geodata Center lists the parcel as an area with no groundwater concern and no elevated nitrates 3) Describe waste material that will be discharged into or onto the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (such as domestic sewage; industrial byproducts; agricultural chemicals). No waste materials will be discharged into the ground. The City of Yelm Sanitary Sewer System will serve the project c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The primary source of runoff will be from stormwater. Minimal water runoff is anticipated to occur as a result of landscape watering and other maintenance activities. The proposed project site includes a tightline conveyance system to a proposed onsite stormwater infiltration system. All lots will be tightlined to the conveyance. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Project of this type and size would provide areas of landscaping as part of the individual lots. If chemicals or fertilizers that are used to maintain these areas are not handled properly, it is possible that they could enter infiltration facilities. To our knowledge there are no other known sources of contaminants associated with this proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: All stormwater runoff generated from this project will be collected and disposed in the proposed onsite infiltration system C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\JOBS\4408 - MTN 6 VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/O1 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _x _ deciduous tree der, maple, oak, aspen, other _x_ evergreen tree: fir cedar, pine, other _x_ shrubs _x_ grasses _x_ ap stu re crops or grains wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All vegetation will be removed during the grading process c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. To our knowledge, there are no threatened or endangered plant species on or near the site d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: There is no proposed landscaping amenity associated with this projects other than what is required by the City of Yelm 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron,~s, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: d ,bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, shellfish, other: b. List any priority, threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. To our knowledge there is no threatened or endangered animal species on or near our site c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not to our knowledge d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Trees that can be saved will be. While all other vegetation will be removed, the addition of landscaping on individual lots would provide vegetation forforage and habitat purposes for the bird population C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\JOBS\4408 - MTN ] VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/01 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, gasoline, heating oil, wood, solar etc.) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, transportation, etc. The primary energy source required to meet the energy needs of the proposed plat is electricity. Sufficient amounts of which would be used to maintain a comfortable lifestyle and environment. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No, it is not anticipated this project will affect the potential for the adjacent properties to use solar energy. The building heights will not exceed that which is required in the R-6 zone. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The homes that will be built to meet or exceed current building and energy codes 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spills, of hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. The risk of fire is always present within a residential development Typically, a residential development is not a source of environmental health hazards 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. While not anticipated to occur, the services of the local emergency service providers may be required at some time 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None are proposed b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area, which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? Traffic noise is present on Mountain View Rd; however, it is not anticipated that the noise will adversely impact the proposed project. C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\JOBS\4408 - MTN $ VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/01 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise produced on the site depends on the equipment being used, the noise would vary from day to day. During the short-term, construction activity at the project site will vary considerably as the construction progresses. Noise associated with the construction operations on the site will occur roughly between the hours of 7:OOam to 6:OOpm, Monday through Friday. Long-term noise impacts will result from vehicles using the site and noises typically to a Single-Family residential plat 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: No measures to mitigate noise impacts during the building phase are proposed. Noise impacts associated with the construction phases of the project will be limited in duration. During grading phase, measures such as using and regularly maintaining efficient mufflers and quieting devises on all constructions equipment and vehicles can be anticipated. Construction hours will be limited to the normal workday, 7:OOam to 6:OOpm 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently occupied by asingle-family residential house. The northern portion of the site is grass and brush covered, whereas the southern portion of the site is tree covered. The surrounded uses are large lot residential, and platted properties developed with single- family homes b. Has the site been used for mineral excavation, agriculture or forestry? If so, describe. To our knowledge the site has not been used for crop production; however, timber harvest may have occurred c. Describe any structures on the site. There is one single family dwelling on the site d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes, all existing structures will be demolished or removed e. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current comprehensive plan designation is unknown What is the current zoning classification of the site? The site is zoned R-ti, Low Density Single Family Dwelling C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\JOBS\4408 - MTN g VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/01 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable h. Has any part of the site been classified as a "natural resource", "critical" or "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No, not to our knowledge i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Proposed plat of 16 lots will provide housing approximately for 32 - 64 individuals based on a 2 - 4 person household j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: There are none I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Anticipated that there will be 16 single-family dwellings at completion that would be in the middle-income range b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. One residence will be demolished to allow for construction of the 1 ~ single- family residences. Existing residence is currently occupied c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: There are no proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts. The proposed plat will create housing to benefit the potential homebuyers in the Thurston County area C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\JOBS\4408 - MTN 10 VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/01 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Tallest structure will be approximately 30 feet with wood exterior b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Proposed project should not compromise the views from the adjacent properties. The view of the site, of course, will be altered to that of a single- family housing development c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Proposed plat will include architecturally compatible homes by a single builder. The interior roads will be built to the City of Yelm Road standards 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light and glare will result from reflective surfaces, exterior building lights, and streetlights. Interior lighting may be noticeable. The occurrence of light impacts would be anticipated from dusk to dawn. Glare impacts are associated primarily with sunny days, something we don't have an abundance of in this region b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Highly unlikely that glare or light from the projects site will interfere with views or affect wildlife. Streetlights and other outdoor lighting are intended to promote safety rather than create a safety hazard c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? There are no known off-site sources of light or glare that are anticipated to affect this proposal d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: The exterior building lights and streetlights will be of low intensity, typically used for safety and security purposes 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\7065\4408 - MTN Zl VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/01 b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No, the project will not displace any recreational opportunities c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts or provide recreation opportunities: The project proposes approximately 8000 sq.ft. of Open Space for enjoyment by future residents 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No, there are no known sites in the vicinity eligible for or listed in any jurisdictional historic register b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Does not apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: There are no measures proposed to reduce or control impacts 14. Transportation a. Identify sidewalks, trails, public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access to parcel through Mountain View Road Southwest See Appendix Site Plan for Vicinity Map b. Is site currently served by public transit? By what means? If not, what plans exist for transit service? No, the site is not directly served by public transit. There are no known plans for public transit c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project will provide two driveway parking spaces per lot. It is anticipated that street parking will be permitted as well. No parking spaces will be eliminated C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\70BS\4408 - MTN ZZ VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/01 d. Will the proposal require any new sidewalks, trails, roads or streets, or improvements to existing sidewalks, trails, roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Yes, interior public roads and sidewalk will be constructed. It is anticipated that road improvements including a sidewalk will be required along the Mountain View Road frontage e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Estimated that this project would generate 249 trips per day. The peak volumes are expected to occur during PM hours g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: In addition to the entrance and interior roads for the project, a Transportation Facility Charge of $750 per pm peak trip will be paid to the City of Yelm at the time of building permit issuance. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe: Yes. Whenever a residential development is constructed, the need for public services, such as police and fire protection, increases. Yelm Schools District, Yelm Police Department, and Yelm Fire District serve the site b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Impacts will be controlled by the increase in tax base and tax assessments paid to the public services as well as impact fees 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, teleahone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\JOBS\4408 - MTN Z3 VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/01 b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity, which might be needed. The proposed plat will use the following utilities: Electricity: Gas: Water: Sanitary Sewer: Refuse: Telephone: C. SIGNATURE Puget Sound Energy Puget Sound Energy City of Yelm City of Yelm Thurston County Refuse Ycomm The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the City of Yelm is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: -- Date S fitted: .3 ~ ~- C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LUBBESMEYER\MY DOCUMENTS\LANDSHAPES NW\JOBS\4408 - MTN Z4 VIEW\SEPA MTN VIEW.DOC 8/01