Loading...
Environmental Site AssessmentPhase I Environmental Site Assec;sment Prairie Run Propet-ty Yelm, Washington February 2001 ~G lPf~1,~„_ ,ui' ~.~i arro:.- it ~o Pr n 1'~' .. • •'n ~~. i„ riui~ni.rri r~:'oA~tvnv..~ rnic:glrr 4;: lino m der lir66 r(:-,r, nr, ~r:~:; r: n:.' u, ~~ ~lird :-,n'm .:,',: vn tr. Uin Rind t i ; n ~~n ih~ ,u ~,; a- ~:.~ ....., n r.n I4r /~~ ii/rs+d,:rrd ,:l:~~rgh: t-ninulr ~:u i, .d. ,/br , wr„d. ~;u ~, .vr e, ~,u r,:.r rN.:, .,e irt:hr pui: sir, , u, rhrur: u. ~ ;.i..., n. ./~,.. i't ~ } ~~~~ ,4 ti. Subrr itta;.+ To: ~'i0i7;m UOlty ~C'10,^, (;L`UnCii of Lz:•~is. P~tasor,, a^d Thurston Oou-,ues 6004 Marin'ati',p Ez~; Olympia, WA 985?F. G'~: Shannon 8'N~Iso-~, h-c. 4CC IV 3J"~ Stree:, Si,,;e i0c Seattle, Washinyto~~ 9803 21-1-120'S OOt SI~ANNt'7N F~IPII~ SAN, Ii 1C. EXECUTIVE SUMNL4RY Shannon & Wilson has completed a Phase 7 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA} for the Prairie Run property, located at 205 Mountain View Road in Yelm, Washing*.on The scope of work was in genera] accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM} Standard E 1527-2000. The purpose of the ESA was to evaluate the likelihood for the presence of recognized environmental conditions at the site. The site consists of one tax parcel, identified as lot 6 of Sprague's Subdivision, located on the west side of Mountain View Road, between Yelm Highway and NW Sprague Street. A mobile home, a carport, and several small sheds occupy the property. This ESA has revealed evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with historic and existing site uses. Recognized environmental conditions included oil previously spilled on the property, two 55-gallon drums used as burn barrels, and a septic system. Additional details regarding these recognized environmental conditions are included within t}ie text of this report. 21-I-12015-001 21-I-1.015-DUI-Kt-da:/ap/eri L77 iHi"+1~C1~7 ~~ b I~~C~i FJ, 33~~i~'..~. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................. ............................................................................ I 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............,.. ,..,. ............................................................................. 1. i Scope of Work ................... 1 .......................................... ............................................. 1.2 Site Location and Description ~~'~~~""~""""""" ........................................................................................ 2 2.0 GEOLOGIC AND HYDRGGEOLOGIC SETTING ........................... . .................................. 2 3.0 SITE HISTORY ............ ........................................................................................................... 3 4.0 RESULTS OF VISUAL RECONNAISSANCE AND INTERVIEWS .............. 4.I Subjec:t Pro ert ~"'""""""""' 4 4.2 Adjacent Properties ......................................................................................................... ~ .................................................................... b 4.3 Interviews ................... ..................................................... 6 . ......... ............................. .3.1 Mr. Shawn Keesler -Current Site Tenant .............................. ............................ 7 4.3.2 Ms. Victoria Allison -Current Property Manager ............... .............................. 7 4.3.3 Mr. Cliff Billingsley -Current Site Owner ............. ........................................... 7 5.0 RESULTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS REVIEW .................................... ............... 7 6.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ........................ 6.1 Site Uses ..................................... 8 ................................................. ............................................................ 6.2 Potential Off-Site Sources ~~'"'~~"" ................................................................................... ....... 9 7.0 LIMITATIONS ........... ............................................................................................................ 9 8.0 REFERENCES ....................... ................................................................................................ 11 TABLE Table I~To. i H.istory of Site Uses LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. 1 Vicinity Map 2 Site and Adjoining Property Map 21-! ! ~U 15-(ti 1-R i da/wpleer 21-1-12015-001 TABLE OF CCa:~`TENTS (cont.) LIST IMP APPE~DII;ES Appendix A Shannon ~z tiViIson, Inc. Phase 1 ESA Proposal for the Subject Property B Selected Historival Source Information C Site PhcPtographs D Regulatory Search Report E Qualifications F Important Information about Your Environmental Site r~.stiessrnent~valuation Report 21.1.12~J15-txil•kI docJwpJeet 21-1-12015-OUl 1!1 ~~~Nf~Oi'~l ~~1fILS~N, IPV~. I~HASE I El'r"t'IRONI~IENTAL SITE ASSF.SSMEIVT PRAIRIE RtJI'~ PROPERTY YEL?<Ts ~'6TASI~II4IGTON 1•(3 Il~'TRODtiCTIOIv Sharman & Wilson has completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA} for the Prairie Run property located at 20S Mountain Vier Road in ~Yelm, V~'ashington (referred to herein as the site or sub}ect property}. IVir. Mark Rozgay authorized the ESA an December 14, 2040, by signing our propasal dated December 8, 2000 (Appendix A). I4Ir. Rozgay authorized the ESA on behalf of Shelter Resources Inc. (Shelter Resources) and the Camp-nunity Action Council cf Lewis, Mason, and Thurston Coumties (Community Action Council). It is our understanding that Shelter Resources and the Community Action Council anticipate purchasing the subect property to construct the Prairie Run Apartments. We understand that the existing mobile Name will be removed prior to the purchase of the property. The purpose of the ESA was to evaluate the likelihood for the presence of recognized environmental conditions at the site. The terrn "recognized enviranmet;tal conditions" means the presence or likely presence of regulated hazardous or dangerous wastes and~or substances, including petroleum products, under conditions that indicate ar, existing release, a past release, ar a material threat of a release into the structures of the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. Hazardous or dangerous wastes andlor substances are defined b)' the Wasl-lington State >Vlodel Toxics Control r'1ct (i1~1'TCA) and the Dangerous Waste Regulations. 1.1 Scope of Fork The scope of work was in general accordance with the American Society for Testing and :Materials (ASTM} Standard E 1527-200C. The scope of work was limited to the following subtasks: Review of readily available information with respect to current uses of the. property and its surroundings. Review of readily available information from various sources with respect to the histt~rical uses of the property, including assessor's records, available historical maps, anti aerial photographs. I - I - 12U 15 -(KJ 1-F. I .dxiwp/crc 21-1-t24I5-001 SP-IAJVRI~N ~1NILSO~I,INC. - Review of state and federal databases of known and suspected contaminated sites. - Detailed visual reconnaissance of the property and cursory reconnaissance of the immediate site vicinity. - Review of information related to the physical setting of the site. - Preparation of this report. The scope of this project-did not include an audit of environmental regulatory compliance. issues or permits, wetland delineation, or collection and testing of any environmental samples, including those for radon gas, lead-based paint, polychlorinated biphenyls, asbestos, soil, surface water andlor groundwater. A detailed scope of work for this project is included in our Phase I ESA proposal for the site (Appendix A}. 1.2 Site Location anti Description The site is located in the northwest quarter of Section 24, Township 17 North, Range I East, Willamette Meridian, in the northwest portion of the City of Yelm, Washington (Figure 1}. It occupies one 2.67-acre tax parcel located on the west side of Mountain View Road, between Yelrn Highway and NW Sprague Street. The subject property is identified by Thurston County Tax Ill #7573-0000-b00. A mobile home, a carport, and several sheds currently occupy the site {Figure 2). The topography of the eastern portion of the site is relatively flat (where the site buildings are located}; however, the western portion of the site is slightly hilly and slopes gently to the west southwest. A layout of the site and adjacent properties is shown on Figure 2. 2.0 GEOLOGIC AND Hg'DItOGEOLOGIC SETTING This section describes the general geologic setting of the site area, and discusses the subsurface conditions beneath the site and surrounding area as they relate to the potential for contamination to micrate through the soils and groundwater. Yelm lies in the southern portion of the Puget Low•iand, anorth-trending topographic and structural depression between the Olympic Mountains to the west and the Cascade Mountains to the east. This depression is filled with a complexly interstratified sequence of unconsolidated glacial and nonglacial sediments that were deposited during several glacial and interglacial periods over the past 2 million years. 2I-i-1241-001 ? I -1-12015-001-R l .doc!wpleet 2 SF~I~NIdC)N ~V1/1L.SO!\I, iI~'ta According to Geologic framework for the Fuget Sound A,~uifer System, Washington and British Coi'um~ia {Jones, 1952), the site and surrounding areas are underlain by Vashon recessional outwash deposits, These deposits consist predominantly ofcoarse-grain, moderately to poorl}~ sorted sand and gravel that was deposited during the retreat of the last glacial ice sheet, the Vashon glacier, approximately 13,..500 years ago. Based on information provided in Geology and Ground-Water Reso~rrces of Thurston County (tiVallace and MoIenaar, 1961), three wells were located within the site vicinity in 1950/1951. Depth to groundwater in these wells was reportedly at 27 to 55 feet below ground surface {bgs). One of the wells was located on the adjoining property to the east (across Mountain View Road) at the Lewis Poultry Farm and was used for irrigation. The following table summarizes the soils reportedly encoumered in the well. SUMMARY OF SOILS ENiC'OUItiTERED I1~1 ' ' ' 1 ~IEARI31 ~'a ELL ~ ~ } 'it, ~,~p j ,, ._.. ' +' ~`.} ' Vashon drift: Recessional outwash 0 to 3 feet Gravel and black dirt Vashon drift: 'f'ill 3 to 8 feet Boulders and clay Vashon drift: Advance outwash 8 to 35 feet Hardpan - 35 to 42 feet ---__.. Sand, coarse, and loose gravel _ 42 t° 46 feet Clay, sandy, and gravel Pre-Vashon deposits 4b to 50 feet Sated, fine, gravel with clay _ SO to d9 feet -- CIay, yellowish. and fine sand 69 to 75 feet Sand and blue clay 75 to 93 feet Hardpan (cemented gravel'?j and boulders 93 to 95 feet Sand and gravel, some c!a water-bearing y. - 95 to 99 feet Hardpan (cemented gravel?) and boulders 3.0 SITE 1H[ISTOR~' The history of lard use far the subject property and adjoining properties was evaluated to identify past uses that might have had adverse effects on the environmental conditions of the site, primarily through the use of potentially haiardous materials. This evaluation was based on the Historical information obtained by reviewing readily available data from public agencies and library resources. A chain-of-title was not available fur review. 21-1.120~5~001-K1 dx/wp/cct 3 21-1-120.15-001 Sl-~1vON ~~~1~.~01*~1. #edC. Table 1 provides a summary of the historical uses of the subject property and adjacent properties, based on a compilation of information obtained from the following r•es:~urces: - Thurston County Tax Assessor records, Olympia, Washington - Aerial Photographs (1960, 1969, 1979, 1990, and 1996) - Palk City ~irectores (19913-99) The site appeared to be occupied by a small shed or barn on the southwesta ~?n ~em~lishediand 1960. The remainder of the site was farmland. By 1969, the shedlbarn ha the entire site was farmland. Since at ]east 1975, a mobile homz, carport, and several small sheds have occupied the site. The adjoining properties were all fai-rnland until at least 1935. The adjoining properties to the north have historically been occupied by three duplexes, and a small pointfiy anrn,au h ~~ oe cally occupied the property to the east. The adjoining properties to the southwe.t historically been single-family residential. the existing car The adjoining property west of the site was pastureland prior to 1996. In 1997, lot 'was constructed. A 20-unit mobile home park has historically occupied the property to the northwest. Appendix B contains copies of selected historical records. 4.0 RESULTS OF VISUAL REt:ONNAISSANCE ANi~ INTEI~w'IE~'S A Shannon & Wilson representative conducted a visual reconnaissance of the site on 3anuary 9, 2001. The purpose of the site recornaissancetyas to identify visibl urrentlv~used, generadteds or potentially hazardous substances that were historically used or are c y rovided access stored, or disposed of on the property. Mr. Shawn Keesler, current si.c ten~.nt, p to the sits mobile home and the storage areas of the site carport. A general visual reconnaissance of adjacent properties was also conducted durin ~~ ~"nt e thet but was restricted to what could be observed from public areas. Photographs tak g site reconnaissance are provided in Appendix C. 21-1-12015-001 ~~-~-7205-001-R1 da+wpleet 4 ~•1 Subject Property The eastern portion of the site, currently occupied by a mobile home, a carport, and several small sheds, is relatively flat. The western portion of the situ is slightly hilly and slopes gently to the southwest. In general, surface water from the site most likely drains into the groan;:. The mobile home ID tag indicated that the mobile home was manufactured in 1975. The mobile home is currently supported on concrete black piers with corrugated metal ssirting surrounding the base of the mobile home (Photograph A). Fiberglass insulation rind a ~~~ater spigot were observed underneath the mobile home; no hazardous materials were obsen~ed in this arrea. The miobile home receives water and sewer services from the City of Yelm; telephone and electrical services are located aboveground. No pole-mounted electrical transformers were located on the site. A detailed inspection of the interior of the mobile home was not performed because we understand that the site mobile home will be moved off-site prior to the client's pun:;hase of the property. A brief inspection of the interior of the mobile home indicated that it was recently rernodeled. Sheet vinyl, a material .that has historically contained asbestos, was noted under the carpeting. No fluorescent light fixtures were observed. Based on the age of the mobile home, asbestos-containing materials maybe present. Also, if fluorescent light fixtures are present, they may contain polychlorinated biphenyls (FCBs). .The carport is located south of the mobile home and consists of a covered parking area and two unfinished storage rooms. The carport is constructed of wood with a flat roof, and is situated on a slab-on-grade concrete foundation (Photograph B). The interior of the storage rooms contained miscellaneous items, including mattresses, furniture, power tools, and clothing. Items of note included one five-gallon drum of shellac, five one-gallon cans of paint, and several small cans of wood primer and/or finish. No staining, pitting, or cracking was observed on the concrete floor. The type of construction of the carport roof is not known at this time; however, if asphaltic materials were used, roofing materials containing asbestos may be present. The vegetation in a rectangular area southeast of the carport appeared to be green~.;r and healthier than the remaining site vegetation (Photograph B). The cause for the contrast in vegetation is not known. 21-1-12~JIS-O(il•R1 dtx/wp/eet 21-1-1215-OUl 5 Cane metal shed was located behind (.vest of} the site carport {Photograph C). The shed had a wood floor and contained an old d=esser and some wire fencing. N+~ one°ironmental cOndltloriS were noted in or around the metal shed. "f'wo small sheds, most likely old chicken coops, were observed vilest of the carport (°};otograph D). Both sheds were, constl*vcted of wood and were empty with the exception of a few magazines, a plastic feed bin and a tarp. No environmental corditiors were n+~ted in the wooden sheds. Two 55-gallon drums were noted west of the site mobile home. The drums were not labeled, and appea=~ed to be used by the site tenart for burning yard waste and/or household gar'Qage (Photograph E). Na spills, stains, or hazardous material containers were noted in or around the_ drums. 4.2 Adjacent Properties Three duplexes L;ccupy the property north of the site. The property east of the site (across Mountain 'view Road) is predominantly pastureland, with a farmhouse and several barns located on the southern portion of the property. Two pole-mounted electrical transformers dvere observed on this property. The labels on the transformers were unreadable and it is not knawn whether the transformers contains PCBs. There were no signs of staining or ieai<s~ge front the transformer on or around the pole. Two single-family residences occupy the properties south and southwest of the site. Fairway Iv2otors, a car dealership, occupies the property w est of the subject property. The car dealership consisted of an asphalt parking area and a small building that included an office area and atwo- bay garage. A 2~-unit mobile home park is located northwest of the site. No hazardous material storage or other environmental concerns could be observed on the adjacent properties from public areas during tl;e site visit. 4.3 Interviews Shannon & Wilson intervie~~ed the current site tenant, site properly rnana°er, and current sYte owner as part of our due diligence research. A summary of each intervi:.w is presented Lelow. ~~1-1-121)15-OGl 2I.1-12015-OGl -K t .dcrlwpleet Sl-I~lVl~l©9`~ ~iNlll..SOf~l, i~C 4.3.1 1VIr. Shawn Keesler -Current Site Tenant - Shannon & Wilson interviewed Mr. Shawn Keesler or, January ~3, ?001. Mr. I;eesler indicated that he has rented the site mobile home since September ?004. Mr. Keesler remarked that he didn't know of any filling or dumping on the property, but that the property manager told him that the previous tenant had spilled soTie ail on the property and was told to dig up the contaminated soil and take it off-site. Mr. Keesler did not know where or how the oil was spilled, but he guessed that it was not a large quantity. - Mr. Keesler indicated that the 55-gallon drums were used to burn household garbage and yard waste. 4.3.2 Ms. Victoria Allison -Current property Manager Shannon & Wilson interviewed Ms. Victoria Allison on January 11, ?001. Ms. Allison has managed the subject property since July 1999. Ms. Allison remarked that she didn't know much about the oil spill on the property, but said that, to her knowledge, the soil was dug up and removed from the property. Ms. Allison indicated that Mr. Billingslea might know more about the incident. 4.3.3 Mr. Cliff Billingslea -Current Site Owner Shannon & Wilson interviewed Mr. CIiff Billingslea en January 11 8z. 26,x'001. ~1r. ~Biilingslea indicated that he has owned the site since 1995. M.r. Billingslea remarked that he did - .not kno~,~~ of any prior site uses, but indicated that the site was most likely pastureland prior to the mobile home being placed on the property. To his knowledge, no filling or dumping has occurred on the property. Mr. Billingslea indicated that he did not know of any wells on the property. Aseptic field is reportedly on the property; however, Mr. Billingslea was unaware of the locatior. of the septic field. Mr. Billingslea ren~=arked that he has no knowledge of any oil being spilled on the property. 5.0 RESULTS OF ENVIRON;17Eh'T,~L Ri:C'ORI)S Rk:ViE~'Y' A review of regulatory agency records was :.onducted fur the subject property and nearby prc~perries to identify known or puter,tial sources of contamination that could adversely impact 2) -1.1 ?(1 15-001-R I .dcx/µ~ yea 21-1-1'1015-U01 7 Si-i~4~~1~! s~~liL.SC~t~t, INS. the subject property. Records were obtained using the VISTA Starview System, w°hich searches I,T.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA} and Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) databases. A copy of the Vista report is included in Appendix D. No properties within one mile of the subject site were listed on the EPA and~or Ecology databases reviewed. 6.0 S~ZMAR~ ~F FI~IIelGS AlVI3 ~~NCLUSIC~1dS Based on our studies and observations, recognized environmental conditio±is (as defined by ASTM E 1527 LOOd~) were encountered at the Prairie Run property. Specific findings and conclusions regarding the recognized environmental conditions follow. 6.1 Site >lJses According to Mr. Keesler, a previous tenant spilled oil on the property. The quantity rt rna be location of the oil spill is un'~nown. An area of lush vegetation southeast of the carpe y "' the location of the oil spilt and subsequent remediation work. Because there is no record of soil samples being takers after the oil-contaminated soil was removed, it is unknown whether the site soil is in compliance with regulatory standards. The oat spill is considered a recognized environmental candation. 't'wo 55-gallon drums, reportedly used for burning household g~'bage~ w fumed in h barrelsthe mobile home. It is unknown whether any hazardous materials have been andlor 4vhether the ashes have been historically disposed of on the property; therefore, the burn barrels are considered a recognized environmental condition. A septic systerrY is located on the property. It is not known whether any hazardous materials were disposed of in the septic system. In addition, health and safety concerns may arise if the " proposed apartment building includes a basement and extensive excavation is anticipated. The septic system is considered a recognized environmental condition. ~Ve understand that the site mobile home will be removed prior to the client's purchase of the property, and that the carport and sheds will remain on the property. The roofing materials of the carport may contain asbestos. Although this is not a recognized environmental condition under ASTM standards, we conclude that the roofing material is a potential environmental coTicern. 21-1-12015-001 21-i-12015 (b"?1.Kt.dxlwp~cet g Sl-lAlel~lC~1V ~V'~'1~~t~1. $I`~C. Fertilizers and/or pesticides may have been used on the site and adjoining properties in association with former agricultural uses of the site. However, former agricultural uses would not be a unique historical use for many properties in the Yelm area. Presuming that historic applications of fertilizer and/or pesticides at the sits and adjoining properties were performed in • accordance with manufacturers specifications, the former agricultural use of the site area presents little potential for adverse environmental or health effects. The historical :~s•e of the site and adjoining properties as farmland is not considered a recognized environmental condition. 6.2 Potential Of'f--Site Sources A car lot with atwo-bay garage is located on the adjoining property to the west. However, this property is not considered a recognised environmeyrtal condition based on the following: {1) the car lot has only occupied the property for a short time {less than five years), (2) the property was not listed on the state and/or federal databases reviewed, and {3) no hazardous rnateriai storage or environmental concerns were noted during our site reconnaissance. 7.0 LIMITATI4~NS This Phase I ESA was conducted to render a professional opinion about the likelihood of regulated contaminants being present on, fn, or beneath the site at the time services were conducted. No matter how thorough a Phase I ESA study may be, findings derived from its ' conduct are limited. Shannon 3z Wilson cannot know or state for an absolute fact that a site is unaffected by reportable quantities of regulated contaminants. Furthermore, even if Shannon & Wilson believes that reportable quantities at regulated contaminants are not present, the Client still bears the risk that such contaminants may be present or rriay migrate to the silo after the _ study is complete. Shannon & Wilson has reviewed historical records, conducted interviews with the property -~ owner's representative, and conducted an on-site visual inspection of the subject property. We have examined and relied on document; referenced in the report and on oral statements .made by certain individuals. Shannon & Wilson has not conducted an independent exarrmination of the facts contained in referenced materals and statements. We have assumed that these documents are genuine, and that the information provided in these documents and statements is true and ar_cr~rate. The Client did not provide any information regardin ;environments} liens or any specialized knowledge that related to previous ownership or use of the property. Data generated prom the site reconnaissance reflect that which can be reasonably inferred or is obvious by direct 11.1-I2G15•D01•R1 dcx/wp/ett 21-1-1201 J-~J01 9 ~°~lf~ON ~'V~iLSC~~l, ll~~. visual observation. Shannon & Wilson assumes no responsibility for identifying characteristics of the subject property that were not readily identifiable by visual reconnaissance at the time of the site visit. Shannon & Wilson has prepared this report in a professional manner, using that level of skill and care normally exercised for similar projects under similar conditions by reputable and competent environmental consultants currently practicing in the area, and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in our proposal and contract dated December S, 2000. Shannon & Wilson is not responsible for conditions or consequences arising from relevant facts that wore concealed, withheld, or nat fully disclosed at the time the report was prepared. We also note that the facts and conditions referenced in this report may change over time, and that the conclusions set forth here are applicable to the facts and conditions as described only at the time rf this report. Conclusions were made within the operative constraints of the scope, budget, and schedule for this project. We believe that the conditions stated here are factual, but no guarantee is made or implied. Appendix E contains information about the qualifications of the personnel wha conducted this ESA. This report is for the exclusive use of Mr. Mark Rozgay, Shelter Resources. lnc., C~.~rnmunity Action Council of Lewis, Mason, and Thurston Counties, and their respective representatives. Shannon ~ Wilson has prepared Appendix F, "Important Information About Your Environmental Site Assessment/Evaluation Report," to help you and others understand the use aid limitations of our reports. 21-1-1201-Gt)1 I -1- - 20 ; 5.001 •R l .dcxawp/eet 10 ~l-~.~li\1l~iV ~~~1_~~~I, file;. S•0 REFERENCES Arr:erican Society for Testing and Materials, 2000, Standard practice for environmental site assessments: phase I environmental site assessment process: West Conshohocken, Pennsyl : ania, American Society for Testing and Materials E 1527-2000, 27p. Jones, M. A., 1999, Geologic Framework for the Puget Sound Aquifer System, Rlashington and British Columbia: Reston, VA, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services. U.S. Geological Survey, 1959, revised 1968 and 1973, 1V1cKenna quadrangle, Washington 7.5- minute series {topographic): Denver, Colorado, scale 1:24,000. _~> 1959, revised 1968, Weir Prairie quadrangle, Washington 7.5-minute series !topographic): Denver, Colorado, scale 1:24,000. Wallace, E. P., Molenar, D., and Noble, J. B., 1961, Geology and Ground-water Resources of Thurston County, Washington: t~lympia, Washington. Washington Department of Ecology, 1996, The Model Toxics Control Act cleanup regulation, chapter 173-340 WAC: Clyrr-pia, Washington, Publication No. 94-06, January. 21.1-12;)15-0(11-K l.dx/wp,~eei it 21-1-12015-00 i z ~) i Z O ~_ G G J Sid ~w <~ O VI .M.. 1 y~ X R X ~ ~ h c% ~ M R R ... F^ A ` ~ I T z, T ~ >, y. i ~ ~, " , ~ ' _ .. I ..~, .. C C ~ 7 r ~ ~ a 7 ~ ~ ~ I I~ ~ U ~ v :a ~ ~ ~~ U I U U B~I C C O G ~ ~ 0. p ~ V d II ~ O y 4+ ~ ~ . ~' ~ ~ 7_ ~~C L II v; 3 ~ ~ X t L '~ o, c a. ~ .~ -0 ~ En u m w ~ C o p ~ C O C ° ° ^ O ~~ Q O U d O w C O ~ L ~ L ~, > G ~ ~ ~ t .C L C G. O y 0 O O. O R N i. C1. ~~ . G N a' N R G v Oi d G G. O O n ~ R i0 H ~~ :d y M ti ' ' :a ~ :v ~ v S y r Vt ~ lC ~ H R R R ~ y G C w C ut C v a: ¢ ~ ¢¢ ¢¢ <¢ ¢~ ¢¢ ¢¢ EQ <¢ I~ a ¢¢ ¢ < ¢ ~ ` b~~ I "~' u 'o c ~ ~ : ~ , •y L' C R v .= ~ E I ~ O '~j L ' ~ l vi . 'C . u ~ . ~ R ~ R o ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ro ~a U ~ 1 ~ i F ~ cs ~ ~ y '" .O '" 1 .O ~. £ w v 'z' 'O ~ ~ 1.0. oq r .. ~ N ~ ~ ~ .LS ~ ~ U .O+ a'i I I ai `O ~ 1 O N i 11 6~ ~a w ~ 0 r iO -~ C ' ~ C C vCi ~ rn 3 0 ~' ti c c "' '~ '6 ~ X C) N R cs _ ~ C O i G '4 L CJ 'p' G ~ V ~' G O U ~ U C ... in ^7 C L li r ~ ` ~~ U C ,~ y V b y ~ C ;a ~ O w. ~ 7 6J V C b ~ ~ I ro ~ ~ ~ ~ U _ ~ ~ ~ R ~~ I R i ~ ~ ~ R ^~ U •• ~ w , P Iw o ~ 9 O t0 c ~ v c ~ ~, ~ L € M ° N 1 N 1 ~= CJ ~ O~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 w V. .. ~ J ~ ~y V ~ ~ ~ . Q A o O w D\ G I w cC I ^ ~ ~ , G ~ ' ~ O k . ' ~ ... ~- . cRi R . ' V7 G O L' . ~ ~, 1 _ ~o n `+' ~ r F~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ a r o~ ~ o~ o a ` ' n a o ' ~ a :~+ v ;T n w a a - a g . ..` o - '- c O ~ a ~ v 1 •f. 13 ~ X CL~ ~ ~ > ., ~, ~ 3 ` ~ G ~ y ~ I..-. cn ~ ~ a `-' ~ °' I z I ~ - i y ~ rY o'er ~ ~ W = ~ ! i l `_ a .c U ~ ~ ~ _ ~ I .~. C L !_ r ~ N C 1Y v i _ b~ r•_, c> c x I 4 ~a ~ I 4 L ~ ' J D 7 .. z a w N y v _ ~ ~ c 3 F r 3 Z :: ~ C C := ~ c b y , , ~ :s a ~ I . ~ , n '~ ~ s. a a fV :, ~~ ,.. ` ..~ `/' i ~ , ..J a r i .~J•l i I~ ~ F,UTJ f,F . i rij 1 ^~' {/ ~ . ~ .i -: ritp ryL nt-•~i _~ ~ ..r:... ,, 7 ~ 3 I;13 ,,t .. _ _ ... 4~.. ~.:. `-~~ ,,, ti ~;,: ~ : ~r ~ t ~ , ~i p-:~ . t l i r 1urre+ ~ ~r .... = E - r ~ ~ - f3q ,'~~~ ~.~--- ,,~- '`~•.~ ~ Lt~CA~I~N '~ i of ~i.. RA~NBCrN t •~ C. ~, 4 ~l y L • -• ! ` ., ._... i ~ t ~ r/ , ~ a. _'r _ ~° .,` ° r Z'.~?lptl\ ~^ ~ S' .Nc`I i _ ,° ~. '..~ ~ ,t,~ 4 r. .1 "• \ ., , ,. , . ... _ `~ ~.~loe,,~ Laf~tE: ` ' ..~:~Irh•~yaxie ( ,; _ 1. i '~ y 7 1 ' fI 1~ ~. • \ ~ • -- a .__~ ..~ •~ ~~. ..- i , cYi /J/„ .. ,._ ., ._ ~~ N L ~ , ~ t ) rr ~ ~ ~ r,. j ~ L - / r i 1 - -~ ~.. - J~/~ ~ j t; _ ~-{a (tlrn e rs rr~ i t , I ~ ' r - ui f°v o ,- lit 1 ~- ~~ -_ ~ Prairie Run Property ~ Scale in Miles ~ Yelm, Washington _N C -- __' N NOTE - Map adapted from 1:24,fl0(} L~SGS topographic VICINITY MAP ~ map of Weir Prairie, WA quadrangle, dated 1959, photorevised 1958 and McKenna, WA quadran le, , dated 1959• photorevised 1968 and 1973. g Febn~ary 2ti0, 21-1-12015-001 SHANNUN $ WILSON, INC. ~~ ~otact+rt~ca and Er,vkxu,m.nW Cavuhanb FIG. 1 ~~_~_ ~~ Z d _~ E VLn} A ~- N 4 m tS O N QY~ N , O ~_QQ ~'t' ~o_ N 9 LL i .~ ~ -a I .~ ~ N ~ r ~i () N _ LL Z a. r /r ~ 1 T L o ~ C a ~L ~~ Y/ ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ' W z a a ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ r ~ 3 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 G ~.~. d c~ a V Z G .~.~ ZI n) ~.1 1 F~r. Z