Loading...
BRB Appliction to Annex <\" J;1 City of Yelm WASHINGTON 105 Yelm A venue West POBox 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 (206) 458-3244 TO: Thurston County Boundary Review Board, Shanna Stevenson FROM: City of Yelm Planning Dept DATE: June 8, 1993 SUBJECT: Application for Annexation to the City of Yelm Dear Shanna, Enclosed are twenty copies of the application for annexation (Anx 8062)82) to the City of Yelm Also enclosed are the required maps and legal description of the property The signatures represent owners of 61% of the a~sesed value of annexation area I await your review and response Sin~_ d ~-----~-- Ty terson, City Planner * Rec)'c led paper I) I THURSTON COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD APPLlCATION FOR ANNEXATION (Please submit 20 copies) 1 Junsdlctlon Requestmg AnnexatIon CITY OF YELM Responsible OfficIal KATHY WOLF, MAYOR 2 If number of parcels IS less than three, please lIst the owners. Phone Phone 3 LocatIon (address, If assIgned) SOUTH OF CURRENT CITY LIMITS 4 Legal Descnptlon (on separate page, If necessary) ATTACHED 5 Size In Acres: APPROXIMATELY 110 ACRES 6 Assessed ValuatIon $3,060,200 7 Please state the nature of this actJOn and the relevant statutory cltatlon (I e , annexatIon for munIcIpal purposes pursuant to RCW 35. 13 180) ANNEXATION FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES: RCW 35.13.180 RCW 35A.14.120 1 .. , 8 Current County Zonrng and Comprehensive Plan DesignatIon" RURAL RESIDENTIAL ONE UNIT PER FIVE ACRES 9 Proposed City Zonmg and Comprehensive Plan DesignatJon RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL ONE UNIT PER FIVE ACRES. 10 POTENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, AFTER COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING IN THE AREA IS COMPLETE. Is thIs site wlthm the present Urban Growth Management Area as adopted and approved by Lac8Y, OlympIa, Tumwater and Thurston County? Yes xx No IT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF YELM URBAN GROWTH AREA. 1 1 Is the sIte currently served by sewer or water? Sewer XX Water NeIther If no, specIfy servIces desIred NONE AT THIS TIME If sewer or water desired, include map showmg location of nearest lines. Is this site wlthm any eXIsting servIce areas or coordinated water or sewer planning areas (water, sewer, LOTT Phase I Service Area)? 1 2 Does thIs proposal affect any other mtequrlsdictional agreements? xx Yes No If yes, please list these agreements THE CITY OF YELM HAS AN AGREEMENT WITH THURSTON COUNTY FIRE DIST. #2 2 13 How does this proposal conform to adopted cIty policIes on annexatIon? THIS PROPOSAL MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS AND CRITERIA WITH RESPECT TO THE CITY'S ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 399 (DATED 5/8/91) 14 Other specIfIc Reason(s) for AnnexatIon AREA IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY'S URBAN GROWTH AREA. 1 5 ExplaIn how this proposal furthers the ObjectIves of the Boundary Review Board (RCW 36 93..180) [attached addItIonal pages IT necessary] a. PreservatIon of natural neighborhoods and commUnitIes: AREA IS MOSTLY RURAL IN CHARACTER. b Use of physIcal boundanes, IncludIng but not limited to bodies of water, highways, and land contours. AREA DOES USE LAND CONTOURS TO SOUTH. c CreatIon and preservatIon of logIcal service areas. d. PreventIon of abnormally Irregular boundanes. PROPOSAL BEGINS TO FILL IRREGULAR BOUNDARIES. e. DIscouragement of multIple IncorporatIons of small cItIes and encouragement of IncorporatIon of cItIes in excess of ten thousand populatIon in heavily populated urban areas PROPOSAL WOULD PREVENT INCORPORATIONS. 3 f DIssolutIon of InactIve special purpose dIstrIcts. NONE EXISTS 9 Adjustment of ImpractIcal boundanes PROPOSAL BEGINS TO 'SQUARE UP' CITY BOUNDARIES. h. IncorporatIon as cItIes or towns or annexatlon to citIes or towns of unincorporated areas whIch are urban In character AREA IS NOT CURRENTLY URBAN IN CHARACTER ProtectIon of agncultural lands SOILS ARE NOT CONDUCIVE TO ARGICULTURAL USES. For your InformatIon, the Boundary RevIew Board can consider the followmg factors (RCW 36 93 1 70lln decidIng whether a partIcular decIsion furthers the objectIves stated above: 1 PopulatIon and terntory 2. PopulatIon density 3 Land area and land use 4 Comprehensive use plans and zoning 5. Per capita assessed valuatJon 6 Topography I natural boundanes and drainage basins, proxImity to other populated areas 7 The eXIstence of pnme agncultural sods and agncultural uses 8 The likelihood of signIficant growth In the area and In adjacent incorporatIon and unincorporated areas dunng the next ten years 9 LocatIon and most desirable future locatIon of community facilities 10 MUnicIpal servIces 4 NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS TO The City Council of the City of Yelm 105 Yelm Avenue West Yelm, WA 98597 The undersigned, who are owners of not less than ten percent in value, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation of the property for which annexation is sought, hereby advise the City Council of the City of Yelm that it is the desire of the undersigned property owners of the following area to commence annexatIon proceedings The .........ope.....y h"r"'i...... referr~d .'" ,~ r4es........hed on Cvhil-..it "A" ",.I+a",hed ho"'e.'" "'n"" i"" ,...j".....(.."'..~d ........... C"hihi. I I i t-JI I l I Ie 011 f , I c: LV I'=>> U VI I..., i L....^i iiL.1I alL vi' ., Ivl i.U a U I"'" Uvt-J v\.~ VI I LAi IIUIL "B" further attached hereto It is requested that the City Council of the City of Yelm set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a meeting with the undersigned to determine 1 Whether the City Council will accept the proposed annexation, 2. Whether the City Council will permit the adoption of zoning for the proposed area in substantial compliance with the ordinance which permits annexation of property at the nearest comparable zone, under the Yelm Code which the parties believe is the Residential Agricultural Zone with an RA-5A designation The annexation and proposed zoning are shown on the attached map (Exhibit "B") and 3 Whether the City Council will require the assumption of existing City indebtedness by the area to be annexed This page is one of a group of pages containing identical text material and is intended by the signers of this Notice of Intention to be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention and may be filed with the other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention Owner's Signature (print name and address also) 9;-~~ VS Jf~~..v J,&P 0 _;21~ ::l- 37 (i 5" 7? S- 4: n? Ul) _. L C0 .yfl s 97 z, ( tAV)ert~. 13 Loutze.nhls~l') ~c/(J-L~~.,~ ;5c-,,,,- I r "7f-Y; 4~?,;. c , c:.' </3:, ~ ::::> .::; C' Parcel Number Date ;2;;; 730,;),/ 0 h 00 s II 9/9.~ v~ / / ;<~ 7 J D ~ / () 7 D D 5Jf If .I tic d--. V ;2:).7~ / 0 ,rDo 5]1 f /f~ \,/ D ~ .:.2 ;2.,7 3D .$"'D 0 5"-/ /' ~/ :7 z... V- a /0 ~- ~~7~ ~~;/z;r / I / ! YELM ANNEXATION PETITION ATTACHMENT TO PAGE ONE [PLEASE LIST ALL PARCELS WITHIN PROPOSED ANNEXATION] Signature, Date and Printed Name Parcel No Assessor's Acreage Value ~/~iffi!~ 2Z7130230/QOO ~A/<;r;M..IC~ i. 4Vtu2 2-9-98 A D /0548 ;/It( / j fti SJ6 . D ~ fir;-, v.4 9~6-C;7 S ds-;;(-/3C,O S -b- .-0 /, q aaes $1A)' 5uo \r $ A D D R E S S $ Page of A D D R E S S forms\anx (5/92) .. .1 . ,. YELM ANNEXATION PETITION ATTACHMENT TO PAGE ONE /lit) X' g iJ li 2- . . [PLEASE LIST ALL PARCELS WITHIN PROPOSED ANNEXATION] Signature, Date and Printed Name ~~_J' iL,~) ~f).;(rT,q. 5 fit:o W IV A D /5005 /osl:!:. tlJi'+V ~ E; D / R V 13 /.. /Y\ E / S S ?::-r LcJ ~. .../ E!<.R\/ W B~ow IV A / o D R E S S A o D R E S S ~ ...jIll, U ]) () IV At. t) 11 5M I T7j J )"0 ). r- It))}::h JtvE '11.:GYl 5E: , forms\anx (5/92) Parcel No Assessor's Acreage :;...,;<, 7 r:3 0 d,~ ':5 0000 f:3 ' t/- L/- ;;';;.. 7.3([)~3o/0,~ ~c",.~ It ~70 (.,0'6 01'').1 ,$ Sr- Page Value $ iV~ oZ,OD $ :;L 10-"0 D ) ..f) $ 'to, () 0(7 2. 0 f :J-. /" ~/""/ V/ v'/'/ -...~-~ YELM ANNEXATION PETITION ATTACHMENT TO PAGE ONE [PLEASE LIST ALL PARCELS WITHIN PROPOSED ANNEXATION] Signature, Date and Printed Name r;(--7-~/ \;; ~p / 0 ~ CJ I f-rJIN!. R rfJ,A.. 6"", A o CL (? (l ~ " 1~) ..-7../_ / o R ? ,-f .<) 7' 7 , E S E)/ c:- L 7~ S Ie) H? /?;L.. FaLL- -.pcd u bC\.~ I /.t! D I3N .:J{} &'1 9 g S,-{}/ 7 (~ :0\ ft.Y; :J, 5 M ,1/ RJ S- c ~\ \ J G / IY\ I tVt{. E! I i ~, ~ ~., -/.. (f-jd~ .::f1 ~l /'/) / / . :/ / {< /Jl;K./ ,I/.. , g /07// 111"(/ rill !i f R --0 cit-rl..~ { (. /c/( ~ t1 7 ~ S-C/7 ~S forms\anx (5/92) ~ I 7.;J 5' ~ /t'/ CJ 0 Assessor's Parcel No Acreage Value ;). / '7 ~ s- "'Y / CJ 100 . J- d'" $ /' --'7' ...:i~C! () tJ cI ~ J. / '} ;)5 / '105 (J.;L I, 7g / .... --- $ d3, !J()O , ~d- / ,)./ J .J- \-- .If (} SV ['/ '~ $ c.J-(} del (I u J I 7 J..s- / v: (j jc/J /4cu- / ,), :;-c:' (I c' LJ Page _ of _ YELM ANNEXATION PETITION ATTACHMENT TO PAGE ONE [PLEASE LIST ALL PARCELS WITHIN PROPOSED ANNEXATION] Signature, Date and Printed Name Parcel No Assessor's Acreage Value r ~ C '-). ,X- 'j ~ ~ "1-3!b)3C1JR0 tj; ~ $ q q \ lor[)(J). <b 1t V f D C---v--, \ 0- ~ 1 (\) 1- d \c h'l ~ \\ R co (l S~ D R q e 1 yYI r W f1 g 8 serf- E \' S S 2L 730 Z-L\oC\CO ,t./I /1,} (l'J G:' $ /, ()7;"/ /00 ; , $ A D D R E S S forms\anx (5/92) Page _ of _ CITY OF YELM CITY COUNCIL MINUTES, WEDNESDAY, APRIL 13, 1994, 7:30 PM CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS Agenda/Motion Numbers 2. 94-64 3 . 94-65 4. 94-66 1. The meeting was called to order at 7: 30 pm by Mayor Pro-Tempore Martha Parsons. All present joined in the flag salute. Council present: Patty Forrester, Amos Lawton, Don Miller and Bob Gallagher. Visitors: Jeff Crecelius, Nisqually Valley News; Rodney Orosco, Daily Olympian; Tom Gorman, Yelm Telephone Co.; Richard Finnigan, Vandeberg Johnson & Gandara; and Bill Steele, Gene Coulter, Les Clarambeau; Yelm Fire District 2. E.J. CurrYI Erling Birkland, Jan Loutzenhiser and Jerry Brown. Staff: Shelly Badger I Ty Peterson, Tim Peterson, Glenn Dunnam and Agnes Colombo. Agenda additions/deletions. MOTION BY DON MILLER, SECONDED PATTY FORRESTER APPROVING THE AGENDA AS WRITTEN. MOTION CARRIED. Minutes of March 23, 1994. MOTION BY BOB GALLAGHER, SECONDED BY AMOS LAWTON APPROVING MINUTES OF MARCH 23, 1994 WITH CORRECTION TO MOTION 94-54, RETAINAGE FEE CHANGED TO READ $12,359.00. MOTION CARRIED. Approval of Vouchers: MOTION BY PATTY FORRESTER, SECONDED BY BOB GALLAGHER APPROVING PAYMENT OF VOUCHERS #16619-16740 TOTALLING $871,571.73. MOTION CARRIED. 5. Fire Chief Bill Steele provided handouts containing lnformation on expenses related to the Medic 1 Unit and the Review Evaluatlon Design Committee Report. Chief Steele explained that the District was seeking Yelm's support in locating the proposed new Medic 1 Unit in Yelm. Estimated local cost is $65,000 annually. Also needed is encouragement for voter support of the levy. 6 . G Locating a Medic 1 Unit in Yelm would drastically reduce the response time in providing advanced life support to south county residents. A meeting will be scheduled for additional discussions with staff and a presentation is planned for the April 27 City Council meeting. No public comment or questions from the floor. Public Hearing (ANX8062/82) - Mayor Pro-Tempore Parsons opened the Public Hearing at 8:04 p.m. Ty Peterson, city plannerl reported that the property meets the 60% assessed valuation requirement and that the Planning Commission recommended that the area to the west of Mill Rd. not be included in the annexation. Staff concurred with CITY COUNCIL APRIL 13, 1994 PAGE 1 e 8 . that recommendation but would also would like to see the area north of the annexation boundary to the current city limits and west of Clark Rd. included in the annexation. Councilmembers expressed their concern on delaying the annexation. Staff was asked if the boundary could be squared by city initiation of annexation for area staff was suggesting for inclusion. Staff responded that this may be possible if the 60% valuation can be met, but that policy had been to not initiate annexations. Unknown was if the Thurston Co. Boundary Review Board would accept the irregular boundary. Chief Dunnam also expressed his concern over the problems created by uneven boundaries in distinguishing which areas are in/out of the City when responding to police calls. E. J. Curry - asked if all of Mill Road would be included. Ty Peterson answered affirmatively. Jerry Brown - stated that he saw no benefit to annexation if zonlng remained at the current 1/5. Ty Peterson explained that the reconunended 1/5 zoning would be reviewed following completion of the Capital Facilities Plan and Comprehensive Plan. Rezoning could be possible at that time depending on the availability of city services. Being no additlonal comment the Public Hearing was closed at 8:35 pm. Councilmember Forrester abstained from voting. MOTION BY DON MILLER, SECONDED BY AMOS LAWTON THAT THE ANNEXATION (ANX8062/82) ALONG BOTH SIDES OF MILL ROAD BE APPROVED FOR THE ORIGINAL ANNEXATION AREA AS DEMONSTRATED BY STAFF ON THE ZONING MAP. MOTION CARRIED. a. First Reading Ord. 499, Yelm Telephone Co. request for a non- exclusive Cable Franchise. Richard Finnigan and Tom Gorman spoke briefly stating that Yelm Telephone Co. was seeking approval to become a competing franchise for cable TV and other services as technology and equipment availability evolved. Yelm Telephone Co. intends to utilize fiber optics for multi-use transmission. b. Mayor Pro-Tempore Parsons read a proclamation designating April 19, 1994 as National Youth Service Day. c. CDBG Projects - Shelly Badger explained that a new procedure for Conununity Development Block Grant submission had been instituted. To compete for funding non profits would, following legal notification, present proposals to the City Council. Council would then be responsible for selecting project(s) to be submitted for funding. Projects must benefit low-moderate income residents. Staff recommended that the agency, not the city, be the administrator and CITY COUNCIL APRIL 13, 1994 PAGE 2 94-68 requested approval to proceed with actions necessary to meet the new procedures. MOTION BY DON MILLER, SECONDED BY AMOS LAWTON THAT CITY STAFF PROCEED WITH STEPS NECESSARY TO COMPETE FOR FUNDING FOR CDBG PROJECTS/PROPOSALS. MOTION CARRIED. 9 . Old Business: a. Public Works Director position Shelly Badger explained benefits to the city from having an experienced individual in this positlon. Time constraints continue due to growth and new requirements. Tim Peterson and Glenn Dunnam expressed their feelings that this position would benefit city/staff by allowing better access to the CAO and by having on staff an individual whose time is dedicated to keeping abreast of current and new regulations. The recommended salary range is $2700 - $3000 p/m. Approval to establish a PWD position, with salary coming from the vacant Assistant City Engineering position, and to advertise for the position was requested. 94-69 MOTION BY DON MILLER, SECONDED BY PATTY FORRESTER THAT PUBLIC WORKS POSITION BE ESTABLISHED AND THAT POSITION BE ADVERTISED. MOTION CARRIED. b. Backhoe bid Award - Tim Peterson explained that two bids had been submittedi Western Power and Equipment @ $34,787.38 and Smith Tractor & Equipment @ $44,778.50. Recommended was approval of the low bid from Western Power and Equipment. Also requested was approval of adding a four wheel drive option at an estimated cost of $5000. Even with the option added Western's bid would remain the low bid. 94-70 MOTION BY DON MILLER, SECONDED BY BOB GALLAGHER THAT THE BACK HOE BID SUBMITTED BY WESTERN POWER AND EQUIPMENT BE ACCEPTED WITH THE ADDITION OF THE FOUR WHEEL DRIVE OPTION. MOTION CARRIED. c. Arbor Day Tree - Staff requested ideas on where Council would like to see the tree presented by Lacey, Yelm's sister city, planted. As the tree was meant to be incorporated into City Hall landscaping, it was suggested that between the building and railroad tracks, which will at some point be a walking trail, would be a suitable location. Staff was asked to send a thank you letter to Lacey. 10. Reports a. Planning Commission - recommendation that the Central Business District zone be downsized. Shelly Badger explained that the CBD was increased in size approximately three years ago and that CBD' s purpose is to encourage pedestrian friendly types of business. Staff recommended that a portion of the zone, along Yelm Avenue, be decreased from Cullens to Edwards as the area does not meet CBD intent. A public hearing would be required for this change. CITY COUNCIL APRIL 13, 1994 PAGE 3 94-71 MOTION BY AMOS LAWTON, SECONDED BY BOB GALLAGHER AUTHORIZING STAFF TO PROCEED WITH REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION TO REDUCE THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONE ALONG YELM AVENUE W. AS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. MOTION CARRIED. 94-72 b. Parks Advisory Board Bids will soon be sought for new restrooms. Seven park use requests were submitted for approval. MOTION BY PATTY FORRESTER, SECONDED BY BOB GALLAGHER APPROVING ALL PARK USE REQUESTS FOLLOWING ESTABLISHED GUIDELINES, INCLUDING FORFEITURE OF PARK USE FOR GROUP REQUESTING ONGOING WEDNESDAY NIGHT USE, FOR ANY SINGLE EVENT/ACTIVITY SUBMITTED DURING THE REQUESTED TIME. MOTION CARRIED. c. Sewer Update - Shelly Badger reported that some changes had been made to meet L&I requirements. It is expected that bills for hook-up and use will be sent in mid-May for online users. d. Police Report - Chief Dunnam reported that 141 youths had attended the recent skateboard park fundraising dance. A presentation had been made to United Way for funds to be used towards the skateboard park and the Chief felt optimistic about receiving some funding. Jim Mays will be hired 6/1/94. Chief Dunnam plans to recommend a new hiring system to the Civil Service Commission which would have new hires brought in as cadets until they are certified through academy attendance when they would become officers. The Chief will be making a recommendation to the Make Yelm Attractive Committee that the city post 25 mph signs at city entrances instead throughout the City. In addition to improving overall appearances an estimated cost savings of $1,000 per year would be realized. Shelly Badger added that any change in speed limits on Yelm Ave. or 1st St. S. would have to be submitted for state approval. August '95 is the target date for accreditation for the YPD. f. Mayor's report - Shelly Badger told Council that a proposed Leave Share Ordinance amendment, as discussed in a meeting with Mayor Wolf, Agnes Colombo and herself, would be presented at the next meeting. g. Council report - Councilmember Gallagher reported that he had attended an Urban Growth Management meeting where discussion on the transfer of development rights continued. The Transportation Policy Board is working on procedures for setting up a public appeal process and that UGM meets again next week. Councilmember Lawton reported that Dale Sylvester had completed training and received his Water Distribution Specialist 1 Certificate of Competency issued by the state DOH. Also reported was that Smitty had recently completed a two day Water/Wastewater Math CITY COUNCIL APRIL 13, 1994 PAGE 4 CITY OF YELM RESOLUTION NO. 293 ANNEXATION REQUEST NO. ANX8062 AND ANX8082 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YELM SETTING FORTH THE DECISION OF THE COUNCIL REGARDING A NOTICE OF INTENT TO CIRCULATE A PETITION TO ANNEX CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF YELM. WHEREAS, the Yelm City Council has received the attached notice of intent to commence annexation proceedings, WHEREAS, pursuant to the procedures establlshed by Revised Code of Washington 35A.14.120 and Yelm Municipal Code Chapter 17.64, the City Council has met with the initiating parties, WHEREAS, the Council has duly considered said request to initiate annexation, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YELM DOES RESOLVE, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 - Decision. That the Council hereby accepts with modifications the proposal to initiate annexation and does grant the initiating parties permission to circulate a final petition to annex. *Fox Hill Road not to be included in boundary. Section 2 - Comprehensive Plan and Zoning. That the Council will not require the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning and comprehensive plan use designations for the area to be annexed. (If zoning and plan designations are required such requirement must be clearly indicated in the final petition.) Section 3 - Assumption of City Indebtedness. That the Council will require the assumption of a proportionate share of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. (If assumption of debt is required such requirement must be clearly indicated in the final petition.) Section 4 - Local Improvement District. That the Council will not require simultaneous formation of or consent to be included within a local improvement district. Section 5 - Water and Sewer District. That the Council will not require that the area to be annexed be included within an existing sewer and/or water district. CITY OF YELM RESOLUTION NO ~ PAGE 1 workshop. Councilmember Lawton and Tim Peterson pointed out that the public works crew continues to upgrade skill levels to meet new requirements and improve capabilities. h. Members reviewed the first quarter '94 financial report showing total checking, savings and investment balance at $1,169,200. i. Members reviewed the Library report for March which indicated a 6% increase of March of '93 and 152 new patron registrations for the month of March. 11. Correspondence was reviewed and members were encouraged to attend the Basics for Land Use Decision Maker seminar planned by AWC. Point of contact is Agnes. 12. The meeting was adjourned at 9:50 pm. ~~~ Ka ryn ~;lf, Mayor ATTEST: ~ ~ Agn P. ~~~fl PL~h Colombo, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL APRIL 13, 1994 PAGE 5 t~:~.~~~_h_ " 1OJC~---A.. ...._..A;;..~i~IfIe..-... J. __IA":"V" ~f'".-...-"8'l......_\!'lG ~J'~IWiH~" THE SOUTH 668 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST, W M , TOGETHER WITH THAT PART OF THE WEST 664 FEET LYING SOUTH OF THE NORTH 533 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER AND ALSO, A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 30, LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF THE YELM IRRIGATION DITCH, EXCEPT LOTS 1,2,3 AND 4 OF SHORT PLAT SS-1805 AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO 8303230024 IN VOLUME 18 OF SHORT PLATS, PAGES 251-255 AND ALSO, THE WEST 1394 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 30, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF ROAD KNOWN AS 105TH AVENUE SE IN SAID SOUTH HALF AND ALSO, THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST I W M AND ALSO, THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25, KNOWN AS THURSTON COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO 21725410100, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF ROAD KNOWN AS MILL ROAD SE IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25 AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 30 LYING EAST OF SAID PARCEL A