BRB Request for Waiver
City of Yelm
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, c Washington 98597
(206) 458-3244
June 4, 1993
thurston ,County Boundary ReView Board
7742 Manzanita Drive NW
"
SubjeQt: Ann~xatton Waiver Request CYelm File #ANX-S081)
Dear Bouhda~y R~view Board Chairpe~so~,
The City of Yelm is requesting tha~ the BoUrndaryRevieW
Board not r.view the annexation d~scribed in the attached
,materials and grant a waiver The subject annexation is
less than ten atres in size and has an asse$sed v~lue of
47,400 This meets the requirements of ~hen a review is
not necessary under RCW 36 93 110
Th i s proper ty is cur rent 1 y zoned Rura 1 Res id,enti a lOne
U~it per FiNe Acres, upon annexation it would remain
One Unit per Five Acres zoning In additibn,"the
, property'is vacant and no proposals for development
, have been made The annexation is\cont8ine~ within
Yelm's esta'bl"ished Urban Growth Area and_ the city will
~phase in" necessary services that nee~ to be provided
This request is made to expedite the annexation and
minimize the Cit~'~ cost of prodessing this action
Your con~ideratiori of this request is appreciated
Jerel)'......~
~~~~
Ty.-' P,eter son,
<(ity Planner
@,
Recyc/etfJXlper
I". ~G
THURSTON COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD
APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION
(Please submit 20 copies)
1 JUriSdIction Requesting AnnexatIon CITY OF YELM
ResponsIble OfficIal
Kathy Wolf
2. If number of parcels IS less than three, please lIst the owner.s:
Juan & Denise Rodriguez
3916 E. 276
Spanaway, WA 98387
Phone: (206) 847-5683
Phone.
3. LocatIon (address, If assigned)
4 Legal DescrIption (on separate page, If necessary)
Parcel 3 of Large lot slIhnivision NO T.T.-04nn.=ls Y'p(;ornpn
21 March 1988, under Auditors File NO. 880321005 and as amended
06 April 1988, under Auditors File NO. 8804060022.
6.
Size In Acres:
9.9
6
Assessed Valuation
47,400
7 Please state the nature of thIS action and the relevant statutory cltation
(I.e., annexatIon for mUnicIpal purposes pursuant to RCW 35.13 180):
A 9.9 acre annexation pursuant to RCW 35.13.180.
1
,
'"
8 Current County Zonrng and Comprehensive Plan Designation:
Residential Agriculture-l to'S
9 Proposed CIty Zonrng and Comprehensive Plan DesignatIon
Residential Agriculture 1 to S
10 /s thIs site wIthin the present Urban Growth Management Area as
adoPted and approved by Lac8Y, Olympic, Tumwater and Thurston
County? It is located within Yelms established Urban Growth Boundary.
Yes No
11 Is the site currently served by sewer or water?
Sewer
Water
xx NeIther
If no, specIfy servIces desired' None at this time
If sewer or water desired, Include map showmg locatIon of nearest lines.
Is this site wlthm any eXisting servIce areas or coordinated water or
sewer planning areas (water, sewer, LOTI Phase I Service Area)?
No
1 2 Does thIs proposal affect any other Intequrrsdictional agreements 7
Yes .xx... No
If yes, please list th~se agreements.
2
13. How does this proposal conform to adopted Clty policIes on annexation?
The-:.eiJ;y_ _Couocil has ~.:lnted approval to proceed.
The proposal does not have a substantial environmental impact.
The property is contiguous with Yelms current City limits.
The property does not create an unlogical boundary line.
14 Other specific Reason(s) for AnnexatIon
The property conforms to the City of Yelnrs annexation
requirements and is located within our Urban Growth Area.
15
Explam how this proposal furthers
RevIew Board (RCW 36.93, 180)
necessary] :
the objectIves of the Boundary
[attached additional pages If
a. Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communitJes:
Current land use is open space.
b. Use of physIcal boundanes, Includmg but not limited to bodies of
CJ
water, highways, and land contours'
No. the land is undeveloped and Flaf_with,bo adiacent bbdy
of water.
C Creation and preservation of logical service areas: Not included
in current City service areas except for police.
d. PreventJon of abnormally Irregular boundanes. Does not
create abnormally irregular boundaries
e. DIscouragement of multiple incorporations of small cItIes and
encouragement of Incorporation of Cities In excess of ten thousand
population m heavily populated urban areas
Not applicable - rural area.
3
f. DIssolution of Inactive specIal purpose districts: No
g Adjustment of ImpractIcal boundarIes Does not create or
adjust impractical boundaries
h. IncorporatIon as cIties or towns or annexation to cItIes or towns of
unincorporated areas whIch are urban In character
ProtectIon of agncultural lands Proposed zoninq will be
Residential/Agriculture 1-5 acres
For your InformatlOn, the Boundary Review Board can consider the following
factors (RCW 36.93.170)1n deciding whether a particular declslon furthers the
objectives stated above:
1 . PopulatIon and terrItory
2. PopulatIon density
3 Land area and land use
4 Comprehensive use plans and zoning
5 Per capita assessed valuatIon
6. Topography I natural boundaries and drainage basins, proxImity to other
populated areas
7 The eXistence of pnme agricultural saris and agncultural uses
8. The likelihood of slgnrficant growth In the area and In adjacent
IncorporatIon and unincorporated areas dUring the next ten years
9 LocatIon and most desirable future location of community facilitIes
10. MUnicIpal servIces
4
11 Need for mUnicIpal servIces
12 Effect of ordrnances, governmental codes, regulatIons and resolutIons
on eXIstIng uses
1 3 Present cost and adequacy of governmental servIces and controls In area
14 Prospects of governmental servIces from other sources
15 Probable future needs for such servIces and controls
16 Probable effect of proposal or alternatIve on cost and adequacy of
servIces and controls In area and adjacent area
17 The effect of the finances, debt structure, and contractual oblIgatIons
and rights of all affected governmental Units
18 The effect of the proposal or alternative on adjacent areas, on mutual
economIc and socIal Interests, and on the local governmental structure
of the county
(3/31/92- 386.101
5
REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS:
THURSTON COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD'
NOTICE OF INTENT10N
II. MAP S (NOTE:: Must have legends/Colored maps are noe accepeable unless 20 copies are submicredJ
The following maps must be submitted wIth all notIces of Intent
A. MaD of EntIre City An 8-1/2 X 11 Inch map I usmg as a base the
Department of TransportatIon Urban Area Map (scale 1 2000) as
updated and kept on file at Thurston Regional Planning CouncIl, will
be used by all JUriSdIctIon In the urban area to show the following:
1 The general VlClnlty of the proposal.
2 The area proposed for annex,:tlon, highlighted In some manner.
3 The boundaries of other citIes near the annexatIon area
(hIghlighted If not readily dlscernable).
4 Major streets/roads IdentIfied
8 Assessor's MaD showing speCIfic parcel(s) and Immediate VICInity
(reduced copy IS preferable).
C Phvslcal Features One or more maps shOWing the followmg:
1 Dommant phYSical features such as lakes, creeks, and ravines
2 Flood plain boundanes (1 OO-year)
3. Railroad lines
4 All publIc roads near the annexatIon
5 CommercIal agnculture lands (when thIS InformatIon IS
avallablel
D. ServIce Area and Other Boundaries. One map shOWing the
annexation and ItS relatIonship to the followIng:
1 UGMA boundary
2 Approved water servIce areas
3 LOTI I drainage baSinS
E. Other MaDs
1. EXisting county zOning, zoning requested by applicant, zoning
proposed by CIty, contIguous cIty zonmg, as well as shoreline
deSIgnatIons and changes In tidelands and bedlands
designations, If applicable.
2 Location of water and sewer mams wlthm proposed
annexatIon, If any, and those nearby (any jUrIsdiction).
1
, .
III. DETERMINA TJON OF NONSIGNIFICANCE UNDER WASHINGTON STATE
ENVIRONMENTAL POLlCY ACT
IV $50.00 CHECK MADE OUT TO "THURSTON COUNTY"
V PETITIONS (CERTIFIED IF APPROPRIATE)
VI. EVIDENCE OF PREVIOUS STATUTORY ACTIONS OF PETITJONER
REGARDING THE APPllCA TION
(3/31/92- 386.10l
2