Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
CTED GMA Planning Grant (2)
STATR 0 . a x w9 y4) ~y'L 1889 ~O STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY, TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 128 - 101h Avenue SW • PO Box 42525 • Olympia, Washington 98504-2525 • (360) 725-4000. July 17, 2007 Mr. Grant Beck Community Development Director J~' City of Yelm '9 Post Office Box 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 Subject: 2007-2009 Competitive GMA Planning Grants Dear Mr. Beck: Your community may be eligible for a competitive growth management grant from the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development. Approximately $4.3 million is available during the 2007 to 2009 biennium to help communities throughout the state develop plans, strategies and regulations to meet the requirements of the Growth Management Act (GMA). Attached is an overview of the Competitive GMA Planning Grant Program that includes information about eligibility and the criteria used to review grant applications. Also attached is a grant application form along with instructions on how to complete it. Please review these documents carefully if you are interested in one of these grants. To apply for a competitive grant, please complete the enclosed grant application. After a thorough review of all the grant applications, grants will be awarded in amounts up to $75,000 for single jurisdictions, up to $125,000 for joint applications with two to five jurisdictions, and up to $150,000 for joint applications with six or more jurisdictions.. Successful applicants will be notified by November 1, 2007. All work must be completed prior to June 15, 2009. The deadline for submitting applications for these competitive grants is 5 p.m. Monday, September 17, 2007. Applications received after the deadline will not be considered. If you need help completing the application, especially with developing your scope of work, then please contact the GMA planner assigned to your region. A list of GMA planner assignments is enclosed. For additional information about our grant programs, please contact our Technical and Financial Assistance Manager, Ike Nwankwo, at (360) 725-3056 or il;ern(i,cted.wa.gov. Sincerely, Leonard Bauer, AICP Managing Director Growth Management Services Enclosure cc: ' Mayor/Commission Chair O STATE STATE OF WASH I NGTON z DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY, TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 'L ]889 Competitive GMA Planning Grants for the 2007-2009 Biennium _ . l s. Application Deadline Monday, September 17, 2007 Local Government Division Growth Management Services July, 2007 Local Government Division Competitive GNU Planning Grants 2007-2009 Biennium OVERVIEW OF THE COMPETITIVE GRANT PROGRAM Every two years the State Legislature sets aside money to help local governments develop plans and strategies to meet the requirements of the Growth Management Act (GMA). These funds are distributed through GMA grants that are administered through a contract. The contract includes a project budget and a "Scope of Work" which lists the activities the grant will fund along with a description of the final products that these work activities will generate. These final products are referred to as "deliverables". The purpose of "competitive" GMA grants is to help local governments meet special needs or demonstrate innovative approaches to growth management issues. Competitive GMA grants are allocated once every two years. The grant application process occurs at the beginning of the two- year period. Additional grant applications may be sought later on if funds remain after the initial grant offering. All grant applications are reviewed to assure that applicants meet the minimum requirements. Each grant application is evaluated according to a criteria prescribed for the grant. program. Bonus points may be earned by addressing one of the following areas of special need or concern: • Regional Collaboration: Grants to help two or more jurisdictions develop a mutually beneficial response to a regional land use issue or concern. • Streamlined Regulations: Grants to reduce and/or expedite the successful completion and processing of development regulations and building permits. • Capital Facility Plans: Grants to help jurisdictions develop innovative ways and means to fund the capital facilities elements of their comprehensive plans. . • Transportation: Grants to resolve deficiencies and gaps in the determination of concurrency among state, regional and local transportation plans. • Affordable Housing: Grants to help jurisdictions plan for the development of affordable housing, particularly for households earning less than the county median income. • Sustainable Communities: Grants to help jurisdictions plan for sustainable economic development by reducing the public's consumption and dependence on oil and other non- renewable natural resources. • Rural Opportunities: Grants to develop innovative land use regulations in rural jurisdictions that are consistent with the GMA. • School Planning/Siting: Grants to coordinate the activities of cities, counties and school districts to plan and develop guidelines for the location of schools as important community assets. 1 Application Procedures Joint Applications Joint applications from two or more jurisdictions will be accepted by CTED. Joint applicants must designate a lead agency for purposes of grant administration and contracting. The lead agency must meet all the eligibility requirements for competitive grants. All communication on the grant contract will be conducted through the lead agency. Grant awards for "regional collaboration" are limited to joint. applications. Application Requirements Two items are needed to apply for a Competitive Planning Grant: (1) a completed grant application and (2) a letter. from. the mayor, county executive, or chair of the county commission indicating support for the work to be done as funded by the grant. If this is a joint. application, a letter will be needed from each jurisdiction involved in the grant or a single letter signed by all jurisdictions. Grant Application Grant applications are available to be downloaded at www.cted.wa.gov/growt h or prospective applicants may request an application through the mail by contacting the Grants Coordinator at 360-725-3067 or e-mail: ms agr nts(a_)cted.wa.gov Submittal of Completed Grant Applications Applications may be e-mailed to ms rg ants(a cted.wa.ov or mailed to the following address: Growth Management Services - Grants Team Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development 906 Columbia Street Southwest Post Office Box 42525 Olympia, Washington 98504-2525 Grant Application Deadline Grant applications are due to CTED no later than 5 p.m. on Monday, September 17, 2007. Grant Award: CTED will award these grants by November 1, 2007. CTED intends to have all the grant contract documents signed and executed by the end of December 2007. CTED reserves the right to request modifications to the proposals prior to awarding the grant. In the event that funding for these grants is withdrawn, reduced, or limited in any way, CTED may reduce the scope of work and budget or terminate the contract. 2 Grant Review Criteria General Criteria for All Grant Applications In prioritizing GMA planning grant awards to local governments, CTED will consider all applications based on the merits of the proposal. All grant applications will be scored relative to how well they meet the following factors. • Readiness to Proceed: (0-25 points) Ability to successfully start or complete the project, as evidenced by clear and realistic goals, schedule, budget and other indicators. • Demonstration Potential: (0-20 points) Usefulness as a statewide example to- solve a problem or demonstrate an approach. • Purpose: (0-15 points): The identification of an end product and its likeliness to resolve the identified local or regional need or to reach a. milestone in achieving goals. • Local Commitment to the Project: (0-15 points) Additional letters of support and/or some amount of local contribution (cash or in-kind) to the project; or an indication of partners (excluding co-applicants) or other types of community support. • Local or Regional Need: (0-15 points) The level of need for state assistance to address a significant growth management issue; or the critical nature of the problem to be solved relative to growth management. • Consistency with GM A: (0-10 points) Consistency and relevance between the project and GMA goals or requirements. Bonus Points Grant applications addressing topics of special concern may receive up to ten (10) extra points. These topics were chosen because they are either problems or challenges shared by many jurisdictions throughout the state or they are timely issues relative'to current events and/or the most recent legislative session. These topics are not listed in any priority. • Regional Collaboration: Grants to help two or more jurisdictions develop a mutually beneficial response to a regional land use issue or concern. Eligible activities might include, but are not limited to, the following: Annexation agreements and/or resolution of disputed UGA boundaries. Interlocal capital improvement plans. Scenario planning at the regional level regarding the full implementation of comprehensive plans by multiple jurisdictions within the same geographic region. 10-year re-evaluation of urban growth areas and their permitted densities. Developing a regional certification process to determine concurrency relative to transportation elements in jurisdiction's comprehensive plans. Other collaborative projects among two or more jurisdictions. 3 • Streamlined Regulations: Grants to reduce and/or expedite the successful completion and processing of development regulations and building permits. Eligible activities might include, but are not limited to, the following: Develop and implement regional application forms and procedures for development regulations and building permits. Conducting the environmental review for a large, designated area as a strategy to reduce development costs and expedite the permitting process for affordable housing. Revise codes in order to provide flexibility necessary to encourage infill developments. Use of flexible performance standards, such as form-based zoning, that emphasize desired outcomes instead of permitted land uses and limitations. • Capital Facility Plans: Grants to help jurisdictions develop innovative ways and means to implement or enhance the capital facilities elements of their comprehensive plans. Eligible activities might include, but are. not limited to, the following: Voluntary mitigation agreements. Creation of transportation-benefit districts. Establishment of impact fees and/or linkage fees. - Transfer-of-development rights programs. Revising capital facility plans to meet a jurisdiction's financial capacity. Agreements to use regional planning organizations to develop Capital Facilities Plans (CFP) or train member jurisdictions to use regional CFP templates. • Transportation: Grants to resolve deficiencies and gaps in the determination of concurrency among state, regional and local transportation plans.. Eligible planning, activities might include, but are not limited to, the following: Development of incentive-based approaches to implement local and regional concurrency certification programs, mitigation and/or access control requirements. Development of multi-modal concurrency programs that include incentives to become designated Growth and Transportation Efficiency Centers. Programs that empower regional transportation planning organizations to authorize incentives or disincentives designed to encourage development in locations that are most cost effective relative to the publicly supported transportation facilities and services. Public education program regarding concurrency certification that includes updating guidance documents, administrative rules, and/or offering educational programs for local government officials, developers and concerned citizens. • Affordable Housing: Grants to help jurisdictions develop practical and feasible options for the development of affordable housing, particularly for households earning less than the County median income. Eligible planning activities include, but are not limited to, 4 the following: 'Housing-Near-Jobs Programs whereby jurisdictions partner with major employers to provide affordable housing, strengthen neighborhoods and reduce commuting costs. Creation of "Community Land/Housing Trusts" that includes, among other strategies, land banking, land leases, sweat-equity loans, financial and educational services. Regional and sub-regional plans and strategies for the fair-share distribution of affordable housing along with regional incentives, such as linkage fees, to encourage the distribution of affordable housing throughout the region. Develop an on-going monitoring system to measure the type and number of affordable housing units in each jurisdiction for the purpose of including the results in the Buildable Lands Report. Other plans and strategies that will promote the development of affordable housing. • Sustainable Communities: Grants to help jurisdictions plan for sustainable economic development by implementing the Governor's Executive Order 07-02, "Washington Climate Change Challenge", and reducing dependence on oil. Eligible planning activities include, but are not limited to, the following: Plans regarding feasible strategies to mitigate the adverse economic impacts of continued increases in the price of gasoline. Development regulations that .encourage the mixed-use development necessary to make neighborhood-scale retail, professional and civic services more financially .feasible. Incentives to promote high performance green building standards. Plans and strategies to increase the number of clean energy sector jobs. Other plans and strategies to promote economic development while, at same time, reducing the consumption and dependency of oil. • Rural Opportunities: Planning grants to develop innovative land use regulations in rural jurisdictions that are consistent with the GMA. Eligible planning activities include, but are not limited to the following: Development regulations for limited areas of more intense rural development (LAMIRDs) and/or designation and monitoring of agricultural land. Plans and/or development regulations that promote the sustainability of farm land. Innovative zoning techniques such as transect zoning or quarter/quarter zoning. Flexible zoning using a point-rating system that evaluates and rates proposed developments based on how it meets a prescribed criterion relative to the preservation of rural and agricultural land. Other plans, strategies or land use regulations that promote the development and/or preservation of rural land in accordance with GMA. 5 • School Planning/Siting: Grants to coordinate the activities of cities, counties and school districts to plan and develop guidelines for the location of schools as important community assets. Eligible planning activities include, but are not limited to, the recommendations from the "First Summit on School Siting Report", published by CTED in May 2007, such as: Interagency agreements with local school districts to identify roles, responsibilities, and communication protocols for school planning. Policy and development guidelines revisions that support schools development, value schools as an important community asset and integrate schools into the community. In cooperation with school districts, seek opportunities for private sector engagement in the process of planning, siting, and funding schools. Work with local school districts to develop an expedited permit review process for school improvements and/or construction of new schools. Other plans, strategies or land use regulations that promote the siting of schools. Criteria for Awarding Bonus Points Grant applications in categories eligible to receive bonus points will be reviewed and evaluated relative to the following: ¦ Commitment to Permanent Planning Capacity: (0- 5 points): Sliding scale relative to the degree that the results are measurable, tangible and applicable to sustaining permanent growth management planning capacity; for instance: 1 point 5 points Episodic planning event that may Produces a long-term planning or may not be incorporated into the effort with a program to monitor jurisdiction's comprehensive plan results and correct inconsistencies or development regulations. to the comprehensive plan. ¦ General Criteria: (0 - 5 points): One point each for each of the following review criteria: o Planning model that can be replicated in other jurisdictions. o Stems from an existing lack of local planning capacity to meet the need. o Addresses a critical need and/or statewide concern. o Reduces likelihood of a petition for review by the Growth Management Hearings Board. o Results in sustained, regional planning capacity. 6 Grant Award and Notification CTED will announce grant awards by November 1, 2007. Jurisdictions may be contacted in order to clarify specific application information or discuss adjustments to the grant amount. Once a project has been selected for funding, CTED will work with the jurisdiction(s) to execute a contract that includes a scope of work with "deliverables" and a timeline for completing, assigned tasks. Either the jurisdiction or CTED may terminate the contract negotiation process if an agreement cannot be reached or contract executed in a timely or mutually satisfactory manner. CTED intends to have the grant contract documents signed and executed by the end of December, 2007. In the event that funding for these grants is withdrawn, reduced or limited in any way, then CTED may unilaterally reduce the scope of work and budget or terminate the contract. For more information, please contact: GMA Grants Coordinator at 360-725-3051, or . Email: gmsgrants@cted.wa.gov 7 8 Local Government Division Competitive GMA Planning Grants 2007-2009 Biennium APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS These instructions will help applicants fill out the application form necessary for a competitive planning grant from the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development (CTED). Reading these instructions prior to filling-out the application form will help assure that each question is answered clearly and with sufficient detail to meet the grant criteria. In addition to these instructions, prospective grant applicants are encouraged to read the "Overview of the Competitive Grants Program". The Overview provides information about competitive GMA planning grants, its review criteria and examples for special concerns and topics. Applications for 2007-2009 Competitive GMA Grants must be submitted to CTED no later than 5 P.M. on Monday. September 17, 2007. For more information about CTED's Competitive GMA Planning Grants, please contact the GMA Competitive Grants Coordinator at (360) 725-3051 or email gmsgrants @,,cted.wa.gov or your assigned planner (see attached map). Section 1: Proposal Request 1.1 Please give a brief description of your grant proposal. Please insert a brief (50 words or less) description of what the local government(s) plan to accomplish with this grant. 1. What level of funding are you requesting frorn CTED to accomplish this Pw pose? Please indicate the requested grant amount. Funding levels are up to $75, 000 for single applicants, up to $125, 000 for joint applications with two to five parties, and up to $150, 000 for joint applications with six or more parties. 9 Section 2: Jurisdiction Information Aplyitag:"JuxStll`"ctii Please state the name of the local government that will serve as the lead agency for this grant. The Lead Agency will assume the responsibility to oversee the grant and assure compliance with the stipulations of the grant contract. 1,oin~-A " irants T This is an optional line. If more than one local government is being served by this grant, please list all local jurisdictions participating, in addition to the Applying Jurisdiction. Rr€?ect.fa~iager . Provide contact information for the person who will be z, CTED's main point of contact. This person will be .'p responsible for keeping the other participants informed about the grant. Firiartial.C©ntact: J: Please provide name and contact information for the person who will be responsible for receiving and accounting for the grant funds. CTED needs this information in order for its accounting department to work with the appropriate person to ensure payments are received. `Federal TAX The identification number assigned by the federal -f 0,entification Number'-,., government to the applying jurisdiction indiction is needed to allow CTED to file necessary reports about the grant to the federal government. Statewide. Vendor This is an optional line. If applying jurisdiction has a SWV (SW ) Number. number to receive electronic fund transfers, then please include it here. Information on obtaining an SWV number is available at: http://www.ofni.wa.jzovlaccountinklvendors.asp 10 Section 3: Eligibility Requirements These grants will be awarded on a competitive basis to jurisdictions planning under the GMA or regional councils that include and represent local governments. They are eligible for GMA competitive grants if they meet the following eligibility requirements: 31 Daes yraur jrisdictiion{s} have an atlopte comprehensive, plan] crrti~al aie s;cirdin"arice'arii tcir `wh~er ]y~jy] li.cakile a;:r atura- resaurees'Iands ordnance. ws`~?a; : _ .j a cy r i v (ES Q :EJY ~ IV H~ 3 2 Has your- furisdi6 n(s?yadopted other;noce... ssary;.clve(ciprnonyre ulatia`s. and r he GM 'A- °in'd a Jn rdi'r ante..' 46(-s e .,.t p c s uf5c~. #'e location an rfersi nf.ce` d=i veloment (l:e::zorie` :-codes and:cr-itieal~rM;=;,:' s,. .:areas . - YE` youir°urisdiction;(s} it compliance with'aII G~vIA requirements? YES 1V0' GMA compliances means that a Growth Management Hearings Board (GMHB) must not have found the jurisdiction out of compliance with any GMA-related issue; or, if found out of compliance by a GMHB, the jurisdiction must resolve all noncompliance issues by the time the grant is awarded. In addition, the jurisdiction must have met the requirements of RCW 36.70A0.130 (4) to review and revise, if necessary, its comprehensive plan and development regulations. Section 4: General Grant Review (100 Points) This section provides us information about the project, its proposed schedule and the final products it will generate. The applicant should begin by preparing a "Statement of Work", which will be examined in detail during the grant review process. The applicant should then complete the questions following the "Statement of Work". These questions represent the applicant's responses to the review criteria for the grant program. 11 4. 1. Provide a complete statement of work for the project. Statement of Work Goals/ Description Start Date End Date Actions/ Deliverables On the application form, the statement of work is arranged in four columns. The Goal / Action /Deliverable column is reserved for the element name (goal, action, or deliverable). The second column is for the description of the element. The third and fourth columns are for estimated start and end dates for each action. ¦ Grant goals refer to the overall purpose of a specific part or portion of the project. Goals do not need a "start" or "end date. ¦ "Actions " are brief statements about the work activities that this particular portion of the project entails. Actions need an estimated start date and an estimated end date. If only a month and year are given, we will assume that the estimated start date is the first day of the first month and the estimated end date is the last day of the last month. ¦ "Deliverables " are the final products that the grant andlor portion of the grant will generate. The applicant will need to deliver these products on the dates indicated in the "End Date" column. Note: The deliverable due date cannot be later than June 15, 2009. If the deliverable will require adoption by elected officials, please include DRAFT deliverable(s) only. Here is an example of what the Statement of Work section should look like for one element of a comprehensive plan update. Your statement of work may include several elements. Sample Statement of Work Goal/Action/ Description Start Date End Deliverable Date Goal 1.0 To update the land use element of the comprehensive plan Action 1.1 Gather relevant data and review 1/1/08 3/31/08 existing land use element for compliance with GMA 12 Action 1.2 Analyze collected data and review of 4/1/08 4/30/08 land use element to generate amendments to the comprehensive plan Action 1.3 Present recommended amendments to 5/1/08 5/15/08 planning commission Action 1.4 Prepare notices, distribute information 5/1/08 6/15/08 and conduct public hearings Action 1.5 Make changes to amendment package 6/16/08 7/15/08 per planning commission recommendations " Deliverable 1.6 Final draft land use element 7/31/08 amendments Please note this example is for illustrative purposes only. The "Statement of Work" included in the grant application will be used to develop a contract if the grant is awarded. The applicant will want to make it as factual and realistic as possible. Applicants are not limited to the number of lines represented on the grant application form. Additional lines may and most likely will need to be added. Once the "Statement of Work" is finished, the applicant must answer the following questions. These questions are relative to the review criteria for this particular grant program. 4.2 Consistency with'GMA (0-10 points): What GIVIA requirements, are addressed by the `work in your proposal? List the sections of the Growth Management Act that the proposed grant will address. Provide details on how the project will address these requirements. 4.3 Purpose: (0-15 points): What specific goals/policies/actions of the 71 comprehensive plan would be implemented by the project? Projects receiving competitive grant funding should implement specific goals, policies or actions of a comprehensive plan. Please include the specific language from the comprehensive plan that would be implemented by the project. If possible, include the chapters, goals, and policy numbers where the language can be found in your compre- hensive plan. Please describe the end results the proposed grant will generate and how it resolves or address the milestones or needs addressed in the comprehensive plan. 13 A Read"mess to deg' ` 25 'Po'tnts 11 h is t e::2d0 4U9 bienri uirn most a rei° Ote tirrie`ta rc cee. . pi-az~ecpriij, Provide details regarding the timing of the project along with information pertaining to why the jurisdiction is proposing the project now. It is important that the project be started and completed within the current biennium. Please identify the key staff people who will be implementing the project along with their history regarding their ability to successfully complete other grant projects. Information should include previous planning grants that the jurisdiction successfully completed along with references that we can contact. 4 5`$r Locaf.arRe' dnai"IV..; _ .A 1 eed(f3: `1'S:"~"}or.='ts)_°:1ti%lat is t5t,.e:d~rect:cinmuni° bene F . sal. t of:ttis'. P 'roPo Please describe how the community will benefit from the proposal and how these benefits will be measured? Indicate whether the project addresses a local or regional need. I fa regional need, please describe the jurisdictions that will be affected by the proposed project. 4.6 Demonstratiorr:Potent(ak` (E1-20'points). ;-18:lhis',e pro}r_ect tf~a~~would•, -77 a Ati "-Pe vi e an example that can easity be ,used ,fey`other { ce :gove r meat's" ` .Y: Describe how the project or elements of the project could be transferred to other jurisdictions. Include factors that may limit the transferability of the project, such as budget and staffing, and factors related to the specificity of the project (e.g., the project only related to rural development.) Local Commitmertt'to the Protect: (0=15 points};" HAS the..Coun il1'or bi rd•.': of commissioners staffed. suppoft, the proposal it writing?°' Indicate the level and type of support that the appropriate legislative body will provide the project. For example, the amount of staff time and/or funding that is committed to the project through the jurisdiction 's budgeting process. A letter of support of the proposal in writing from the council or board of commissioners must be included with the application materials. For joint proposals, include letters of support from all participating jurisdictions. 14 Section 5: Special Topic or Concern (0-10 Points) 5.1 Special feed or Concern Applications that address one of the following special needs or concerns may receive additional points during the review process. If one of the following special topics or needs applies to the proposed grant, then please indicate which one should be considered. Applicants should mark only one topic. Additional points will not be awarded by marking more than one topic. • Regional Collaboration: Grants to help two or more jurisdictions develop a mutually beneficial response to a regional land use issue or concern. • Streamlined Regulations: Grants to reduce and/or expedite the successful completion and processing of development regulations and building permits. • Capital Facility Plans: Grants to help jurisdictions develop innovative ways and means to fund the capital facilities elements of their comprehensive plans. • Transportation: Grants to resolve deficiencies and gaps in the determination of concurrency among state, regional and local transportation plans. • Affordable Housing: Grants to help jurisdictions plan for the development of affordable housing, particularly for households earning less than the county median income. • Sustainable Communities: Grants to help jurisdictions plan for sustainable economic development by reducing the public's consumption and dependence on oil. • Rural Opportunities: Grants to develop innovative land use regulations in rural jurisdictions that are consistent with the GMA. • School Planning/Siting: Grants to coordinate the activities of cities, counties and school districts to plan and develop guidelines for the location of schools as important community assets. The applicant will need to answer the following question before answering one of the questions that succeeding questions relating to the selected topic. 5.2 Commitment to Permanent Planning Ca"aci : How will the proposed project be incorporated and/or continued, if at all, in the jurisdiction's capacity for planning growth management? The purpose of this question is to discern whether the project is an episodic, one-time event or part of a long-term planning effort that includes monitoring the results and correcting any inconsistencies between actual and planned development. 15 Once the above question is answered, the applicant must answer one of the following questions that match their chosen topic or special need. If no topic was chosen, then the applicant can proceed to the next section. Regioriai• GQllakoratonm Cl=.'I;UF `.'rots <:.Has. €ui `uriseliet©ri erit t. ; ",anyp art ersh ps o inter overnmentat= aan emerits' aces` o aR ry, cr~ ` ..h . t} ~y ~V G is e 0 In addition to any joint applicants, describe all partnerships or intergovernmental arrangements, including those with special districts, school districts, or other jurisdictions that have been entered into by your jurisdiction that are necessary to complete the proposed project. 5.4 StreahIIihed Regulations:-°(t1=1 tJ:'poi;nts tV l! Ale iased6' mint°reduce``a Y `expedite the'successful `campleti©n aril racessm of develri merit`regulatians-'.- Id gpm acid bui l in er its?:: .ar,• , Describe the problems in the existing regulatory process and how the proposed project will resolve those problems. Describe the end result(s) and the efficiency that will be achieved once the project is implemented. 5.5 Capital Facility: Prins: ` ((3'f 0 °points} Does his prepisl. inclu.e a stew ; or nnovativOmays or rneans to enhan06 the`c iap'tal facil tiesr:elerr eii dompreheh; ive plans'? Discuss why you believe the project provides an innovative approach relative to capital facility plans. Provide details related to the innovative approach and how it can be used in solving issues or problems within the jurisdiction or an innovation related to implementing a comprehensive plan goal. ,5.6 Transportation: (0-10 points): Will. the project resoty deficiencies or gaps in-the, determination of concurrency among states= regicirial ;and local: transportation 3plans?` Describe how the existing determination of concurrency among state, regional and/or local transportation plans and how this project will improve that process. Describe the end result along with the resulting concurrency process and certification it will generate. 16 5 7 'z .,,Affordable Housing {0 10 points} Will this pr - posa(: help`jurisdictions, develo : racttcal;nd feasible optiohs,forthe developrrteht of affordable p p„ tiousir articular!y- or.-house6old$ earniri° less, , the median househ0 .income. d Describe the affordable housing option(s) that the proposed project will develop along with the number of housing units it might generate and the target population it will be designed to serve.' 'v 5.8 Sustainab{e Cormunitiesy(0 10 paints) :Does°tl~e proposed project address any aspecf,.f he Gower~rior'secutive..tcder7-=02:° 1lVaslin `ortMGlimate Chang t Challer\` Explain how the project addresses the Governor's Executive Order 07-02 and its connection to sustainable economic development. Describe the end results and the type(s) of energy used or conserved. 5.9 Rura[`..Qpportuh'rties (0 10 points); Will thig proposvelop ~nhovat~ve land use regdMoris, it ,rural jurisdict oh9,,'J at are'ccir~sistehfi'witl _ 11!#A ` Describe the rural land use pattern or problem the proposed project will address and the proposed development regulations that will deal with it. 5.10 School Planning f $'iting' (0-10 poirits~ Doe's this project entail the, coordination among cities, counties and.schobl districts tci plan and develop"guidelines fn,r the:locat an 6f.sch6xas,, rriportant corrimunity assets?.,,. Identify the jurisdictions involved in the planning process along with information about the schools and community concerns that the proposed plan will address. 17 Section 6: Financial Information/Budget This section provides information about the project's cost, other funding sources, and impact on other contracts and obligations. 1 Ifth~s proposal IS, approved° end;:the jurisdictivtisceivs° a` grant, frail:; - m u GT D rl~ at 0caC resources :r irould: e:ccimmifked.to= t ie:`e ro'ect`? p ..t Describe the local resources that would be committed to this project if CTED grant funding is made available. Include otherfunding and "in-kind" support, such as equipment, copying, and volunteer help. 6:2 ` 1IVh t`otF er" rant,furidir ` sources: has- .ur:`iirisdECt on a lied.ili' ,o g g Y. 1 pp" at `are:;: ` n h f` con ni© t e unt:diri lrig Y from :CTI... p g. These funding sources could be federal grants or loans requiring a match of non federal funds or private foundations with their own funding requirements. Have`allarttcactual, obligatons beeri°net it ether contracts thy: jurisdiction Iias had; with CTED~,regardirlg °grawt i manag~m i~t -act'ivitie's? . if not;' please explain tcircumstances:.> Please indicate if all deliverables have been submitted in a timely manner and if all funding provided by CTED for growth management projects was appropriately spent. If these requirements have not been met, please explain the circumstances. 6A Indicate. Aa' t tfi'e statics: of the:.:projeet`will,I* "if the; jurisdicti6n_do"es:not` receive funding for the project. Indicate whether the proposed project is an expansion of an existing project that will proceed even without the CTED grant funds. Describe the impact that the lack of CTED grant fund will have on the project. 6,.5 Provide of budget for the project.. . Please complete the project budget to reflect your expected expenses and revenues in each of the categories for each of the time periods. Include only the expenses that will be directly related to completing the items included in the statement of work. Below is a description of each of the categories. This description includes the relevant lines from the Budget, Accounting, and Reporting System (BARS) manual used by your local government finance department in your city or county budget. The BARS manual information is included to assist you in categorizing grant costs. Please note that the 18 State fiscal year is July I to June 30 and may not-be the same as your jurisdiction's fiscal year. Salaries and Benefits: These are your costs to pay for your staff time on this grant. They relate to Object Codes 10 and 20 in the BARS Manual.. Goods and Supplies: This is the estimated cost of the office supplies that. will be needed to complete this grant. This relates to Object Codes 30 in the BARS Manual. • . Professional Services: This line is for the cost of any work that you are using private consultants to complete. This relates to Object Code 41 in the BARS Manual. • Other Goods and Services: This is for the estimated costs of such items as printing, advertising, training, and travel. This relates to Object Codes. 40 (less Object Code 41) in the BARS Manual Please complete the revenue portion of the budget table to reflect how the funding sources will be used to pay for activities and deliverables in the Statement of Work. For the CTED grant funds line, please insert'the amounts requested from CTED. The balance needs to be provided by the local government. The total revenue.dedicated to the completion of this grant needs to match the total expenditures necessary to complete the work. Very Important Note: Due to state law, all state funds that are disbursed to your local government under this grant need to be spent on eligible activities by the end of the state fiscal year in which they were issued. Local governments are not allowed to carry unexpended funds past that date. Each of the two center columns in the budget table is for one state fiscal year. The total expenses and total revenues in each column must be the same. We are aware that state and local fiscal years are not on the same schedule; however, state law requires strict adherence to the state fiscal year for state contracts. 19 20 Local Government Division Competitive GNIA Planning Grants 2007-2009 APPLICATION This form is used to apply for a competitive growth management grant from the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development (CTED). Be sure to answer each question clearly and with sufficient detail. Information on how to address the questions can be found in the Competitive Grant Application Instructions which was attached to this application form or available online at www.cted.wa.gov/growth. For additional information or questions, please contact the GMA Competitive Grant Coordinator at (360) 725- 3051 or email gmsgrants(a~cted.wa.gov, or contact your assigned planner (see attached map). Section 1: Proposal Request 1.1 Please givea brief description of your grant -proposal. 50 worcfs or ie5s) 1.2 What level of funding are you requesting from CTED to accomplish this purpose? 21 Section 2: Jurisdiction Information ~aziit Applicants, > ..Prtiject:Mauager ,...q Name, y~ ) (}QyT~ipt b ~;g?h c,~>,3 =.:y, ~'.V ~',Nrt„~4.kAV~ta`. • c' A~,.N1ailin \A~A=i. Vti7h~. State' v Zlj .'Ct%de TelepiZC - Number ' I~ax,Nu fiber Email T7o'y6u wish'tolreeeivexinfora atioii and:materials=via~email? Yes ? No ? Fi iarrcia Contact Title t?epartment Mall" . "Address.' ~pg " State ~ Zip,Cade= Telephone Nuniber Fax-Number ..°E-mail Federal Tax Identification Nu flier . State Ade Vendor (SWV) Number 22 Section 3: Eligibility Requirements 3.'l Does your jurioictjon(~) have an adopfe dy c m'pf "hens%a P;;ar ei t'ical a eas=oidiriance andt©` whereas'.` l'calale ? ,.lu a..-a#i"s >.;soces (ai'is.=:: ur -..ym h: 1 ;b ; ! , ~ r_.a : K....,, ,7... =s„P "r', - 'lava:.;.. , _ - 4`• . .alp S: g3z2< <.:.Has°ypur 17118d~ct an{s) adopted other necessary level©p en# r+ giula ions .tl ,rF clnder;tlle', GllllAx:inclut ~n ,qr Jpapce§,,, o ,su# divis o i af:ta :cj,"c 5n#rols~tah~: fit .V ~ :Z~... n the ta~a~iar irit ; .i. ens, o~.de, elepment`'(ji;ew. an n' , %de ~~,arici~'critical~= . .y a u3,'urea ~ r q . Fl? . +Y: S ,;YES ~\fi~("~ 3 Is``jttarunsclicti©ri{.s)'iri corripl,lnce wi#h all GNlA requirerrien#s' YES;: ~ NfJ • • Q Section 4: General Grant Review (100 Points) This section provides information about the project, its proposed schedule and the final product it will generate. The applicant must prepare the following "Statement of Work", which will be examined in detail during the grant review process. It will become part of a contract if the grant is awarded. Applicants are not limited to the number of lines represented on the grant application form. Additional lines will most likely be necessary. 4.1-Provide a complete statement of work, for the projecf Statement of Work Goals/ Description Start Date End Date Actions/ Deliverables 23 The applicant must answer the following questions pertaining to the above "Statement of Work". These questions represent the applicant's response to the review criteria for this particular grant program. 4.2 Consistency with GMA (0-10 points): What GMA requirements are addressed by the work in your proposal? 4.3 Purpose: (0-15 points): What specific goals/policies/actions of the comprehensive plan would be implemented by the project? 4.4 Readiness to Proceed: (0-25 Points)- Why is the 2007-2009 biennium the most appropriate time to proceed with the proposed project? 4.5 Local or Regional Deed: (0 - 15 points): What is the direct community benefit of this proposal and what needs or problems will it address? 24 4.6 ®ernor~stration PoteaC: (0-20 points): Is this a project that would provide an example that can easily be used by other local governments? 4.7 LocaO Commitment to the Project: (0-15 points): Does the council or board of commissioners Support the proposal and, if so, how? Section 5: Special Topic or Concern (0-10 Points) 5.1 Special Need or Concern - - - - - Applications that address one of the following special needs or concerns may receive additional points during the review process. If one of the following special topics or needs applies to the proposed grant, then please indicate which topic should be considered. Applicants should mark only one topic. Applicants will not get additional points by marking more than one topic. ? Regional Collaboration ? Streamlined Regulations ? Capital Facility Plans ? Transportation ? Affordable Housing ? Sustainable Communities ? Rural Opportunities ? School Planning/Siting 25 The applicant will need to answer Question No. 5.2 and one of the questions following it which matches the topic or special need that was chosen, if any. If no topic was chosen, then the applicant can proceed to the next section. 5,2 Comra~iiitmen o Permanent anniho'-", :ava if know will.tlier;pirOposed`,`` rojeet be hi6b, " or p."> r ated:: riot/or;co'ntir Ufttl "if;at~atf;1 the jurrsclict ririss ".:r. a ``ai? t fo tannin 9400 5.3. F egional Coiilabora#on:, (0-10 °points)::'".Nas yaur jurisdi.tiri: entered iritoax: any p6ttner§hips or;intergoyemmental;arra igerrterifs to,cornplefe'the "pr'oject` 5:4." Streamlined Re0ui"6ns;, (0-10 points::"Wi1F`tf e proposed .grant reduce. or expedite the successfit l camplet on.and Peocessinc of"develcipment. . regu1ati6'r)$, and- building permits? 26 55aprtal Facid~ty Plans : (0 10y points} Goes this prcipoal ;tnclu+de any " = h iWor.ipp vaiive.wa}rs t r r means:; a ei hani-.e th capital facilities a e elements of:cvm "reheiisive lais?: { p.. p ; Transr~orEat~on:: pints) 4.1Njil,t e.;project`resolve;de cencies:o'.. 9 ps, n.determiri6g'c6hdUrrency,amorig state, regioi of arrd' loca ; transportation plans?`" 5:7 Affordable ousirig.1 Q-1 a pornts} Wiii this proposai:.help 1 urisdictions. . deve[op:.pr Gtic [end feasible, options"fog the" deveiopment of affordable housing;, pprtioul"arlyfor housoholds earring less,than t ie rhedian'household income...: 27 5°.8 = Sustai'r~abte "£om unit>l'f 0`porots " D©es ;t ie pr~p% sed 'r© eat 1 -address;"ari as }ecf of'the overror`s Executive C3r'd VVeshin • tQn':Climte~Ciari "e "Cli"a Teri .9. R"rat C?rtunes, 0~=1 t1 cint$ n%il[ p } this': pbpasal cf'eve~op.`inrovative: land'use regulations Ar rural junsdictfor thatCennsistent witF.G "[1lIA'?.; 5,10: Sctio f Planoiin Shin" (07.10 points);.. Does::this, project eritsil..#rre. , w w coordination;among-c[tiesl`counties and: s6[ otadisfr cts:to plan.`anc ' devetop,.guideiines.:for. th6,,, ocation ofi:schools;"as<,important c©mnriuriity, .:assets? , . 28 Section 6: Financial Information/Budget This section provides information about the project's cost, other funding sources, and the resources that would be committed by your jurisdiction. 6,u If:.fis:pr.©pQSel is`appmved and the Junsdcfari reeevscrnt.fram CTWj what locaI resources w©uid; l e comer teed tc~ tiieJpr©jeef?,: . 6:2 What other funding sources has your ~urisdictiori appliedf f©r that are contingent: upon tle fund ingfrom CTED? 6.3 Have all contractual bligatinns been met in other=contracts;the-Jurisd ct, 6,, has had with` CTEQ regarding :growth mariagemeht activities?- if please explain-46e ciriumstances:'::.::; 6.4 Indicate:what the status of the pr9joct;wil[b6 if the jurisdiction doe's hot' receive funding for the project.: 29 6.5 Provide a budget for the project. SFY2008** SFY2009** Total (7/1/2007 to (7/1/2007 to (Both Fiscal Years) 6/30/2008) 6/30/2008) EXPENSES Salaries and Benefits Goods and Supplies Professional Services Other Goods and Services Total Expenses* a b c=(a+b) REVENUES SFY2008** SFY2009** Total (7/1/2007 to (7/1/2007 to (Both Fiscal Years) 6/30/2008) 6/30/2008) CTED Grant Funds Other Funds Total Revenues* d* e" f=(d+e) * Estimated expenses (column `a' and `b') must match the estimated sources of funds (column `d' and column `e') for each respective fiscal year. The total in column `c' must equal the total in column `f . The "State" fiscal year is July 1 to June 30 and may not be the same as the jurisdiction's fiscal year. 30 11 1\rl 1 I\/Irf 1 1 f111 11 1 l -1 11 11 11 t .11 IF+\ - " - - - - ` .:.:;:~-".i: » Anne rltze (all Pierce an AnneF@cted.wa.gov (360) 725-3064 LakeForest Park ' " r` N: ` ` Thurston cities) ' Bill Mandeville (all Snohomish cities) BillM@cted.wa.gov (360 725-3051 Shoreline Woodinville Duvall Kenmore David Andersen (Counties only) DavidA@cted.wa.gov (360) 725-3052 n Dee Caputo DeeCa@cted.wa.gov (360) 725-3068 ~1 Kirkland Doug Peters DouglasP@cted.wa.gov (360) 725-3046 ljlf_,~.: Redmond, Ike Nwankwo (Counties only) IkeN@cted.wa.gov (360) 725-3056 Janet Rogerson (Tacoma and JanetR@cted.wa.gov (360) 725-3047 Hunts Point Yarrow ~ Point Carnation: assigned counties) } Clyde Medina Hill Joyce Phillips 1 • • • • • < • • • • • • • • • . • • - • • • JoyceP@cted.wa.gov 360 725-3045 Seattle Bellevue QSammamish Lynn Kohn LynnK@cted.wa.gov (360) 725-3042 II Ted Gage TedG@cted.wa.gov (360) 725-3049 rBeaux Arts Tim Gates TimG@cted.wa.gov (360) 725-3058 Mercer Is d L ~ Valerie Grigg Devis ValerieGD@cted.wa.gov (360) 725-3065 Newcastle Issaquah Snoqualmie King County Cities Q Bill Mandeville (see insert map) BiIIM@cted.wa.gov (360) 725-3051 I Burien Tukwila 'Renton'' Joyce Phillips (Seattle) JoyceP@cted.wa.gov (360) 725-3045 North Bend= Sam Wentz (see insert map) SamW@cted.wa.gov (360) 725-3063 Sea ILL ac in County County Assignments Normandy Park " Des Moines .m• :3. : ; - a, Doug.Peters' € ; -L.- Covington . Ted age - Kent » i:.' ;°_x•, -°R, , San .loan ell ieille C - 1 ~ t• i aia,zr«'L •;':i• , x Ma le`Ualle Tim Gates' P Y Stevens E Federal W a Auburn rd Y r w . ou dE Davial Aiitlersen 9 P,eters Island e~ x Black Diamonds 3° Cities-= Nlandevlle< ° E =i;?'`"° Al ona ,.M, 3 mk~`:>.-:: < 1-, E >Srsohorni.~lh . V= y' Pacific Ch I e Do las> s P ; . "Kitsa Cities -see insert map u x• Lincoln Spokane :?~;a:, Jo ce`Philli/] :F.:,,, King a- .J~,..... s' =Y•> ' , . a5 `1Vlaaan Ike Nwankwo, . :.as. Grays Harbor Dee Ca uto r Kittitas p Tliur-ston Pierce m Adams Tim Gates: Ciries~= Hirzel Cities - Fritze, Whitman N"A a 3 NMI Nn 1 „ a GMA Planner Assignments: ,f `Paai c l: ws L nn Kohn Franklin` Garfield `EeXakituY Janet Rogerson Columbia May 1 2007 „ cowlitzc Benton Asotin Walla Walla Skamania x *TRADE Valerie Grigg DevisSTATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Dee Caputo gin. County City assignments Planner Phone Email Adams Dee Caputo (360) 725-3068 DeeCa@cted.wa.gov Asotin Dee Caputo (360) 725-3068 DeeCa@cted.wa.gov Benton Janet Rogerson (360) 725-3047 JanetR@cted.wa.gov Chelan Joyce Phillips (360) 725-3045 JoyceP@cted.wa.gov Clallam Doug Peters (360) 725-3046 DouglasP@cted.wa.gov Clark Valerie Grigg Devis (360) 725-3065 ValerieGD@cted.wa.gov Columbia Dee Caputo (360) 725-3068 DeeCa@cted.wa.gov Cowlitz Valerie Grigg Devis (360) 725-3065 ValerieGD@cted.wa.gov Douglas Joyce Phillips (360) 725-3045 JoyceP@cted.wa.gov Ferry Ted Gage (360) 725-3049 TedG@cted.wa.gov Franklin Janet Rogerson (360) 725-3047 JanetR@cted.wa.gov Garfield Dee Caputo (360) 725-3068 DeeCa@cted.wa.gov Grant Lynn Kohn (360) 725-3042 LynnK@cted.wa.gov Grays Harbor Tim Gates (360) 725-3058 TimG@cted.wa.gov Island Tim Gates (360) 725-3058 TimG@cted.wa.gov Jefferson Doug Peters (360) 725-3046 DouglasP@cted.wa.gov King" County only Ike Nwankwo (360) 725-3056 IkeN@cted.wa.gov Seattle Joyce Phillips (360) 725-3045 JoyceP@cted.wa.gov See insert map for Bill Mandeville (360) 725-3051 BiIIM@cted.wa.gov all other city assignments Sam Wentz (360) 725-3063 SamW@cted.wa.gov Kitsap Tim Gates (360) 725-3058 TimG@cted.wa.gov Kittitas Joyce Phillips (360) 725-3045 JoyceP@cted.wa.gov Klickitat Dee Caputo (360) 725-3068 DeeCa@cted.wa.gov Lewis Valerie Grigg Devis (360) 725-3065 ValerieGD@cted.wa.gov Lincoln Dee Caputo (360) 725-3068 DeeCa@cted.wa.gov Mason Tim Gates (360) 725-3058 TimG@cted.wa.gov Okanogan Ted Gage (360) 725-3049 TedG@cted.wa.gov Pacific Tim Gates (360) 725-3058 TimG@cted.wa.gov Pend Oreille Ted Gage (360) 725-3049 TedG@cted.wa.gov Pierce" County only Ike Nwankwo (360) 725-3056 IkeN@cted.wa.gov Tacoma Janet Rogerson (360) 725-3047 JanetR@cted.wa.gov All other cities in Pierce Anne Fritzel (360) 725-3064 AnneF@cted.wa.gov San Juan Tim Gates (360) 725-3058 TimG@cted.wa.gov Skagit Doug Peters (360) 725-3046 DouglasP@cted.wa.gov Skamania Dee Caputo (360) 725-3068 DeeCa@cted.wa.gov Snohomish"* County only David Andersen (360) 725-3052 DavidA@cted.wa.gov All cities in Snohomish Bill Mandeville (360) 725-3051 BillM@cted.wa.gov Spokane Dee Caputo (360) 725-3068 DeeCa@cted.wa.gov Stevens Ted Gage (360) 725-3049 TedG@cted.wa.gov Thurston" County only David Andersen (360) 725-3052 DavidA@cted.wa.gov All cities in Thurston Anne Fritzel (360) 725-3064 AnneF@cted.wa.gov Wahkiakum Valerie Grigg Devis (360) 725-3065 ValerieGD@cted.wa.gov Walla Walla Janet Rogerson (360) 725-3047 JanetR@cted.wa.gov Whatcom Doug Peters (360) 725-3046 DouglasP@cted.wa.gov Whitman Dee Caputo (360) 725-3068 DeeCa@cted.wa.gov Yakima Lynn Kohn (360) 725-3042 LynnK@cted.wa.gov 1