Storm Drainage Report 001~ Q~~~~~~ENGINEERING, INCORPORATED
Storm Drainage Report
Resubmittal #1
Rainier View
Parcel No. 21724420501
9910 Durant St.
Yelm, Washington
Prepared for:
Crest Builders
5516 75`" St. W.
Lakewood. WA 98499
June 19, 2007
BASELINE Job No. 04-159
Prepared by:
Dean H. Zavack, E.I.T. and Paul Adgar, E.I.T.
Reviewed by:
A. William V. Robinson, P.E.
Gj ~/7/
6/z2~
"I hereby state that this Storm Drainage Plan for Rainier View has been prepared by me or under my
supervision end meets the standard of rare and expertise which is usual and customary in this oommunity for
professional engineers. I understand that City of Yelm does not and will not assume liability for the
suffciency, suitability, or performance of drainage facilities prepared by me."
Land planning & Use • Engineering • Surveying
1910-64'" Avcnuc West • Tacoma, W A 98466 • (253) 565-4491 • pAX (253) 565-8563 • Seaule (20~ 8241205
"Our goal is to exceed your expectations"
V
~, exa~rees a zoae ~
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 1 -PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3
SECTION 2 -EXISTING CONDITIONS 3
SECTION 3 -INFILTRATION RATES AND SOILS REPORTS 3
SECTION 4 -WELLS AND SEPTIC SYSTEMS 4
SECTION 5 -FUEL TANKS 4
SECTION 6 -SUB-BASIN DESCRIPTION 4
SECTION 7 - ANALY SIS OF THE 100•YEAR FLOOD 4
SECTION 8 -AESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR FACILITIES 4
SECTION 9 -FACILITY SIZING AND DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS 4
Water Quality 5
Flow Control 6
Conveyance 7
SECTION 10 -OTHER PERMITS OR CONDITIONS PLACED ON THIS PROJECT 8
APPENDICES
Appendix A- Vicinity Map, Site Map, and Excerpts of Soil Analysis For Vista Green
and Tahoma Terra
Appendix B -Drainage Calculations and Basin Map
Appendix C -Thurston County Flood Map
2of11
SECTION 1 -PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project proposal is to subdivide one 5.3 +l- acre parcel into 22 lots for future single-
family residences. There was a residential single-family home on-site, which was
recently destroyed by fire. The structure has since been removed. A public street
extending from an adjoining subdivision with aturn-around knuckle is proposed as
access to all 22 lots. The site is zoned Low Density Residential R-4.
The 5.3-acre parcel located at 9910 Durant SL SE in Yelm, WA. The subject property is
located in the SE quarter of Section 24, Township 17 North, Range 1 East, and W.M.
See the site map in Appendix A.
The project improvements consist of subdividing the parcel into 22 lots for single-family
residences, a storm tract area, and 56-foot right of way dedication for the public road
improvements and access to the residences. All interior streets shall be improved to
Yelm City Standards for a Local Access Residential, including a 35-foot paved roadway
with two 7-foot parking lanes. Rolled curb and gutter, and a 5-foot concrete sidewalk on
one side. The new public road will be extended through an adjacent development called
Vista Green and will dead end at the northerly end of site where an adjacent
development (Wyndstone) will presumable make a connection to SW Berry Valley Road.
SECTION 2 -EXISTING CONDITIONS
The site currently is a vacant feld with a few trees and under story brush. The site
slopes from northeast to southwest at slopes from 1% to 8%. Vista Green borders the
site to the east and Tahoma Terra is across Durant St. to the west.
Table 1 - Predevelooed Conditions
Basin Pervious Impervious 2-year, 10-year, 100-year
Descri lion Acres acres Peak rate Peak rate Peak rate
Low growing 5.25 0 0.13 cfs 0.69 cfs ~ 1.53 cfs
brush and
grasslands
SECTION 3 -INFILTRATION RATES AND SOILS REPORTS
Based on Soil Conservation Service (SCS) of Thurston County the soils have been
identified as 110 Spanaway Gravelly, Sandy, Loam which is a Hydrological Soil Group
A. On June 14, 2007, Baseline Engineering sent representatives to verify the soil
characteristics within the storm drainage tract. A. William V. Robinson, P.E., analyzed
the soil at depths approximately 10' below the existing grade at the location of the
infiltration pond. A. William V. Robinson, P.E., confirms that the soils are Spanaway
Gravel with infiltration rates greater than 20 inlhr (3 min/in) and no indication of a water
table 3-feet below the proposed infiltration facility, see soil logs in Appendix A.
Two different geotechnical reports on adjacent sites confirm this soil classification. An
excerpt from the geotechnical analysis from Parnell Engineering from the adjacent
3 of 11
development Vista Green and the adjacent development Tahoma Terra is included in
Appendix A.
SECTION 4 -WELLS AND SEPTIC SYSTEMS
There is an existing well on-site that will be abandoned in accordance with the
Department of Ecology (DOE) standards.
SECTION 5 -FUEL TANKS
There are no known fuel tanks located on the site.
SECTION 6 -SUB-BASIN DESCRIPTION
The 22-lot subdivision will have a conveyance, water treatment, and infiltration system
for the public roadway and driveways. The water treatment and retention facilities will be
situated in the dedicated storm tract of the site. The individual homes will each have a
roof downspout infiltration system on its respective lot. It is to our understanding with the
developer, Crest Builders, the homes will have a roof area of 2600 sf per lot. All
stormwater will be retained on-site and disposed of through infiltration.
SECTION 7 -ANALYSIS OF THE 100-YEAR FLOOD
The project site is not located within the 100-year flood plain. See Appendix C for the
FEMA Firm Map.
SECTION 8 -AESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR FACILITIES
Facilities will be located at the far end of the dedicated storm tract and will not detract
from site aesthetics.
SECTION 9 -FACILITY SIZING AND DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS
For the proposed 22-lot subdivision water quality, as well as stream bank erosion control
(SBEC), will be designed and constructed for long-term disposal of the stormwater
runoff. Waterworks 6.1.3.5 and the SBUH method were used to size the water quality
and infiltration facilities in accordance to the 1992 DOE stormwater Design Manual. See
Appendix B for calculations. The site is graded to flow stormwater toward the road and
into catch basins that will convey the stormwater to the water treatment and quantity
facilities located on Tract A of the site. See Site Map in Appendix A. Each lot will also
contain an individual roof downspout infiltration trench that is designed for 2600 sf of roof
area and will retain the 100-year 24-hour storm event.
4 ofll
Facility 1 contains a permanent pool wet pond water treatment facility. Facility 1 treats
stormwater from the pollution generating surtaces of the driveways and public street.
See Appendix B for site description and drainage calculations.
Waterworks 6.1.3.5 and the SBUH method were used to size the water quality and
infiltration facilities. See Appendix B for site description and drainage calculations. The
wet pond is designed to treat and contain stormwater flows up to the 6-month 24-hour
storm. The 6-month 24-hour storm is defined by 1992 DOE stormwater Manual as 64%
of the 2-year 24-hour storm. stormwater flows greater than the 6-month 24-hour storm
will enter an overflow and flow directly into the overflow infiltration pond. The infiltration
pond is designed to contain the 100-year 24-hour storm. By inspection the peak flow
rates of the 100-year, 7-day storm are lower than the peak flows generated by the 100-
year, 24-hour storm, therefore the 100-year, 24-hour storm will govern the design of the
overflow infiltration pond. Flows greater than the 100-year 24-hour storm will enter an
emergency overflow designed to drain into the drainage course along Durant Street,
which will become a paved pedestrian walkway.
Rainier View Developed Site Flows
Storm ID (24-hour) Impervious Area'
acres Pervious Area
acres SBUH Calculated
Flows
6-month 1.24 2.77 0.33 cfs
2- ear 1.24 2.77 0.63 cfs
10- ear 1.24 2.77 1.20 cfs
100-year 1.24 2.77 1.85 cfs
'Roof area not included since roofs stormwater flows into individual roof downspouts.
Water Quality
Facility 7 -Wet Pond:
Water treatment for Rainier View will be provided by a permanent pool, two-cell wet
pond to remove sediments (TSS) and free oil (TPH) from stormwater runoff before
entering an overflow infiltration pond. The pond will have a geotextile liner to prevent
infiltration into the Spanaway Gravel native soils, which have a high infiltration rate. The
pond will be built to minimum 1992 DOE Standards and shall incorporate two cells. The
wet pond cells are separated by a berm with 4 to 1 slopes that is submerged 1' below
the design water surface elevation of 341.0. The total wet pond volume is designed to
contain the 6-month 24-hour storm as was discussed with James E. Gibson, City of
Yelm Development Services Engineer, on 1/22 to comply with 1992 DOE design
standards. stormwater flows above the design water surface elevation of 341.0 will flow
through a 12-inch spillway pipe directly into the overflow infiltration pond. This pipe will
help prevent floatables from entering the infiltration pond, which is consistent with typical
spillway berms of this design. The overflow infiltration pond was sized by Waterworks
6.1.3.5 to contain the 100-year 24-hour storm event. The first cell of the permanent pool
wet pond is designed with one 4 to 1 side slopes and 3 to 1 side slopes to provide
maintenance access. Cell 1 of the wet pond is designed with one-foot of sediment
storage, 4-feet of active storage, and 1-foot of emergency freeboard. Cell 2 has 5-feet
S of II
of active storage and two 4 to 1 slopes to allow maintenance access between all three
pond cells.
Facility 1: Pretreatment Permanent Pool Wet Pond
Design Storm SBUH Calculated SBUH Calculated Actual Wet Depth of
ID Flow Volume Pond Active Wet Pond
Volume before @ overflow
overtlow'
6-month 24- 0.33 cfs 6246 cf 14,507 cf 5 feet
Hour
*Not including bottom 1-foot of cell 1 of pond intended for sediment storage.
Flows generated from roofs will enter individual roof downspout infiltration trenches and
will not require water quality because of the non-pollution generating surfaces of the
roofs.
Flow Control
Facility 2 -Infiltration Pond
The runoff from driveways, landscaping, and the public roadway will be collected with
catch basins and conveyed through CPEP pipe materials to a two cell wet pond
treatment facility and then into an overtlow infiltration pond. The water quality
permanent pool two-cell wet pond is sized to contain the volume of the 6-month 24-hour
storm. The 6-month 24-hour storm by 1992 DOE Stormwater Management Manual for
Puget Sound is defined as 64% of the 2-year 24-hour storm. Storms exceeding the 6-
month, 24-hour flow rate will enter the overflow infiltration pond through a with a 12-inch
pipe that runs through the spillway berm linking the wet pond with the infiltration pond.
The infiltration pond contains 1-foot of freeboard above the 100-year 24-hour storm
water level for stability. The infiltration pond contains 29% additional volume capacity for
emergency overflow volume. Storms greater than the 100-year 24-hour storm will enter
the infiltration pond emergency overtlow which is set a[ % foot below maximum free
board height and enter the drainage course along Durant St. SE. The infiltration pond
has a draw down time of less than 48 hours as per 1992 DOE standards see Appendix B
for calculations.
6 ofll
Facility 2: Overflow Infiltration Pond (Calculated Dimensions are 62' by 21.67'-
bottom dimensions with 3 to 1 slo es. Active Storac a De th = 3-feet
Design Infiltration SBUH SBUH Design Actual Emergency
Storm ID Rate Calculated Calculated Infiltration Pond Overflow
Developed Active Rate Volume Volume
100-year Volume Capacity
Flows before
overflow
100- 20 in / hr 1.85 cfs 5493 cf' 20 inches / 7100 cf 29%
year 24- hour
Hour _~
"1-foot of freeboard not included in this volume calculation.
Wet Pond volume not included in this volume calculation.
The infiltration rate used for the preliminary sizing of the overflow infiltration pond is
assumed 3 min per inch or 20 inches per hour based from Geotechnical Reports on
8124/05 by Parnell Engineering from the adjacent site Vista Green. An excerpt from this
report in Appendix A. This infiltration rate was cross-referenced by examining the
Geotechnical Report from Tahoma Terra, another adjacent site across Durant Street.
This report, also from Parnell Engineering, was dated 1/19105 and an excerpt of this
report is included in Appendix A. The Thurston County SCS also verifies this soil
classification, see Appendix A. This infiltration rate of 3 min per inch infiltration rate will
be verified for Rainier View with a soil analysis by A. William V. Robinson, P.E. from
Baseline Engineering at the time of construction of the infiltration pond.
Roof Downspout Infiltration Trenches:
Flow generated from roofs will enter individual root downspout infiltration trenches and
not enter the water quality infiltration pond because the non-pollution generating
surfaces of the roofs will not require treatment. Each lot will contain an individual roof
down spout infiltration trench sized for 2,600 sf of roof area. The individual roof
downspout infiltration trenches will be sized for the 100-year 24-hour storm.
Individual Roof Downsoout Infiltration Trench Summary 12600 sf Roof Area)
Design Infiltration SBUH SBUH Actual Actual
Storm ID Rate Calculated Calculated Trench Size Active
100-year Active Volume Volume'
Flows
100-year 24- 20 in / hr .058 cfs 50.8 cf 3' by 19' by 51.3 cf
Hour 3' dee
'Trench contains washed rock with 30% Voids. Volume contained in voids in rocks.
Conveyance
The conveyance designed is based on the 100-year 24-hour storm using flows
calculated from the Santa Barbara Unit Hyd rograph Method (SBUH) and Waterworks
6.1.3.5 as shown in Calculations in Appendix B.
7ofll
The runoff from the roadway and driveways will be collected using concrete rolled curb
and gutter, catch basins, and CPEP or PVC pipe materials. Storm drainage from the
public roadways will be conveyed [o the water qualitylinfiltration pond to remove total
suspended solids (TSS) and free oil (TPH) from the stormwater before entering the
overflow infiltration pond. Trapped oil contaminates and sediments can then be
removed from the bottom of wet pond cell 1 at regular service intervals.
Downstream Analysis
All stormwater is to be retained on-site for stormwater flows up to the 100-year 24-hour
storm. A downstream analysis was deemed unnecessary since all stormwater is to be
retained on-site.
SECTION 10 -OTHER PERMITS OR CONDITIONS PLACED ON THIS PROJECT
An NPDES permit and site development permit will be required. No other permits are
anticipated for this project as it is not affecting any existing wetlands and does not
discharge into a surface water body. A 10-foot setback from all property lines and
easement are required for stormwater facilities. Sewer will be provided by the City of
Yelm through a S.T.E.P. system and will not interfere with Storm Drainage Facilities.
SofLl
APPENDIX A-
VICINITY MAP, SITE PLAN 8 EXCERPTS OF SOIL ANALYSIS
FROM VISTA GREEN AND TAHOMA TERRA
e..
\ C ~~£~~ g ,I
.
u
ry i ~ i I
_ ~ ~
J
l
q
o b$ 1A sa j I I
h ~®
h I
'
... i
l V v g'
4 b
d_ I I
_ ~~
,
h R°+
i
I^ i
3Zd W °
~
a
~
~ i
T
e
, a 3lN ~ , aossi-
i5 i i
~ o
d I
a'' *~3
`
~ n
Im
,m _
ID w
s ,
6 i
~
f
mwim •px r E a ~^ 1 I
I Z
p' ~ 1 I I
i ^ ~
U
vs _p'
_L _ _
~ I~ IIt~~~]yy(}~/
-~-F J4~/-- ~
I I I
i I
~
I
Y
~
rvnu m
~
I N F
____ _____ ___
________
~ ,_y
~I __ ____ __
i `
IiL
~ ~ ~
~
~ ~
I ~ ~
I im Ws
~ ~ I
4 I
_
-' ~
I I I
s I
I I
9 '
p
I '
I
s ~
i
_ I ~,,~
I g qa ~-'- ii 0
' °a ,I~ OOSbI-
_____ __
________L___________~_______~ I
___a______. ___ _
..
I I __ __ ~ _ -
II ~
1 I yy~
I~O^ I Y
\ ~, I °
~
\l^
wp
i
~
I ~ ~
Q I~
I Q
I .^a
~ m Z~~~ eu _~~
h I I
~ m
I
I i
~ 4 n €
I I I~
~ I
~~ ~
~ I I
I I I
I
______ _~ _ _ i
~ 1
~. -.T! I I
_1 _1 ______L ___ ~
_` ~ ~ ____
~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ , ~
a,. ~,g,, j.,P /s ;., L{~.-
~ ~,. i
h ~ a d OOSft-
~f~M 2" ~; i ...
~~ ~R S r i I I ,' ..
.
l
~
;
~ i
~ ~.
~
,
m
4~= ~ ~ i _
~ ~~
~ t ~ •
~; I t
,,
~
~. ;~, ~ ;,r
;,
,,.~ e.
I
~,
~ ~
~ ~
~ F~ ~ - ~ ~ ~
T° r
---- --- -~-' -- ~
. ~--
~ t ~
I :. i .
~
I
Sf ~ ~
BI ~ ~
k I I ~ ye
I
I ~
~
~ ' I
~`
J
m Y
.x
_ i i
umvmq
1
I ~
YI -...
4~~ 'a'n nunl ~~-' d
t~T___________I _________OOSZIQ n
D ° ~L~~LN~ ENGINEERING, INCORPORATED
~tuul GlJeuel~neizt ~>~.r~riorzaGrfrurce~
June 15, 2007
Soil Log information for
Rainier View Estates
Site Address: 9910 Durant Street S.E.
Yelm, WA 98597
BASELINE Engineering Job No. 04-159
Soil Loa #1
Located in the Southwest corner of site 20' East of fence 27' North of fence
0' - 2' Black loamy gravely sand with humus
2' - 10' Brawn medium sandy gravel with up to 8" cobles and a 2" pea gravel lens at
T and roots to 10'
10' - 11 %' Coarse gravely sand No Groundwater
Soil Loa #2
Located in the Southwest corner of site 25' North of fence & 120' East of fence
0' - 2' Black loamy gravely sand with humus
2' - 10 % ' Brown sandy gravel with three - 2" pea gravel lens
10 % ' - 11 %' Dark brown coarse sandy gravel - No Groundwater
Recommended Design Infiltration Rate: 2 minutes per inch
v~.
Land Planning 8 Use Engineering Surveying
1910-64th Avenue West • Tacoma, WA 98466 (253) 565-4491 Fax (253) 565-8563 Seaflle (206) 624-1205
"The industry starts here"
EXPIRES 6-2T-O6
Soi~ s ~ a~ 89 .
NASHINGTON - SHEET NUMBER 24 ~-
!l0-SPA,df~uRY C~RA~tC7 SA~~07Le
_aton County. Washington ~)
pNp CHIHICAL ppOPERTIES OF '111£ SOILS--Continued ~..
pBYSICAL ros on ~ i~
TABLE 15.-- factors 'Organ lc
Soil ~ Shrink-swell ~iT~ matter
permeabil Sty Availabcit lreaction~ potential ~ E T i
~~De th'~ Clay ~'~ water cap Y pct
~ i i i
S maP symholnd P ~ ''
i ' ' '
i
~ ~ i
-i ern __ 5 5-15
~ i i
n ' ct % i 0.12-0.14 '15.6-6.0 {LOw_______ ____'i 0.1]{
' i i 2-0-6.0 ', 0.14-0.17 .5.6-6.0 iiLOw____________'i 0.10, ~
0-22 7 15 { 2 0 6.0 _ _ 5 6-6 0 Low '
'9------- ,22-26 `'-15 ; 2 0 6.0 0.05 0 OB 5.6-6 0 Low -- 0 O5. ~ _
5
~Ipana 26-38 5 15 ~ .._ 2 5_1
60 20 _ _ -- 015 '
2-5 " { -- 5.1-6 0 Low -" '
--~ 0.11-0 13 5 1-6 5 Low -"
_._.-__-.- -~- ~ 2 0-6.0 0.09-0 12 ___ 0 02 '
10, 111- ---"-i 0-15' -- i 2 0-6.0 6 I-] 3 Low _-._... - ~. ',
--- ~ 5-15
15 20. ~ )20 0.03-0 0 2
--' 0 151
SpanawaY 20_60' 0_g ~ -"_ " 0.11-0.13 -- 5.1-6.0 Low - -- ~0.10i
_ __.. _
i
i i
. - i---~-"~"_- - ~-' 2.0-6.0 i 0.09-0.12 'i 5.1-6.5 'iLOw____________i0.02'
~---_ 'i 0_161 ___ ~I 2.0-6.0 ~~ 0.03-0.05 16.1-7.3 iLOw_____
112, 113----'-"-- i i ~
Spanaway ,16-22. -' )20
i
122-601 0_5 _- ',0.15% 2 5-15
i '
~ i , 0-11-0-13 'i 5.1-6.0 ~LOw--^-'"' 0 10'
~ ____
119: ~~ i 'i 2.0-6.0 ~~ p-09-0.12 ,5.1-6.5 1LOx________ ___'~p.02
0-15 -__ i 2.0-6.0 i 0.03-0.05 '6.1-].3 iLOw------'"-
SpanawaY-'------ ~' '
115-20% >20 ---,0.20', 5 3-10
,20-60. 0'S 1i 5.6-6.5 ',Low---^"- __10.281
~ ii i i
2.0-6.0 0-09-0.12 -
~ ~ i
0-5 0.08-0.12 15.6-6.5 1LOw--'-'"-"-___i0.24~
' i 2.0-6.0 i 'i6-1-73 iLOw_________ I '
~ 0-5
i ~
NisquallY"-"----~ 5_31, 0-5 0-09-0-07 5-10
0-5 )20 ________J~037'i 5
i
' ~ 1 L
i ~
31-60% '
'i ' 0.18-0.20 ',6.1-7.3 ow___
032.
' 0.6-2.0 i 0.18-0.20 %6.1-].3 {Moderate-----"'~
~ 1
_- ' 0-7 i 15-20 ~ 0.6-2.0 i ~ 5 0-20
115--'-"------ 'i 7_601 20-30 i ' 0.25-0.35 ',3.6-5-5 1Low-^--_ --___i0.32'1~
Sultan ' i
'i ~ 5-18 ' 0-6-2.0 i 0.20-0.30 '13.6-5.5 1LOw----' _ii0-321
i
0-7 i ' 0-2-0.6 ~ ,3.6-5.0 %MOderate------ ~ ~
116______________~ ~ 5_18 03-0.6
' ]-501 0.19-0.21 _1i p-20'1 2 5-10
Tacoma 150-601 20-50 -------_
p.12-0.14 ',5-1-6.0 iLOw--- ___ _10.201
~ i i i
~ i i ~
10-15 0-6-2.0 0.12-0.14 15.1-6.0 iLOw__ _________ ____i
' 0_11'1 ' ' ~ ___ ____
117, 118, 119 ____i, 11-361 30-15 0.6_2.0 ___ _- -_'i 0.021
Ten lno ___ 0.06-0-0] i5-1-6.0 ',Low------ ~
i ~
136-401 2 10 >20 ___ ____-'i 0.28'1 5 3-10
140-60', '5.6-].3 I'iLOw___ _IO-28'1
~ ~ __
' ~' 0.25-0.35 -
'i ' ' 0.6-2.0 i 0.25-0.35 'i 5.6-].3 ii LOw____________10-001
' 0-111 "-- i 0.2-0.6 '~ 0.30-0.40 15.6-]•3 ~LOw----- ' ~
120_____________ ~
~ ~
Tisch '111-50'1 -_- 0.6-2.0 __ ____--10.291 3 5-10
i ii
150-601 '5.1-6.0 I'iLOw-- _0.24{
_______
i ~ ~ 0-25-035
'i i ~i p.6-2.0 0.25-0-35 15.1-6.0 1LOw--_---_---__10-15'1
', 0-10 i~ ___ ; 0-6-2.0 ~' 0 20-0-30 X5.1-6.0 'Low-- ___
121, 122_________110-15, ___ 0.6_2-0 i ___ __ ____________ _ ~
' Vallton ilg _48I ""- ___ "-- 5 5-10
'~ 48 ___ ____10.32'.
i ' ' ~
~ i 'i 0.1]-0-20 15.1-6.0 iLOw________
i
i ' 1 0.6-2.0 , 0.12-0.1] 15.1-6.0 MMOderate----_-_ 0'
20'1
'0
0-111 '--- ' -
123, 124--^"-- -~'1 25-35 ~ 0.6-2.0 'i 5.1-6.0 (Moderate ~
11-4]'1 0.15-0.20
Wilkeson '4]_601 18-35
125. -- 10.32''1 5 3-9
', 5.6-6.5 '~LOw_________ -10321
i i i
%eror thenie I 2.0-6.0 0.25-035 --__
i i ~
0-6 1'~ ___ 0.15-0.25 15.6-6.5 1LOx_______ _ _'i0-101
126, 12], 128----% 8_46' _ _ 1 2-0-6.0 ii 0.04-0-09 '15-6-6.5 ~GOw-----" 1 ~ 1
Yelm '46-60'11 0-5 6.0-20 1 ~
' 1 osition and behavior characteristics of the map unit.
+ See description of the map unit foi comp
LUBBESMEYER LONGMIRE PLAT
Soils Report For Drainage Purposes
Site Address: 15132 Longmire Street Yelm, Wa. 98597
Tax Parcel Number: 21724420800
Prepared For: Olympic Engineering
1252 Devon Loop NE
Olympia, WA 98506
(360)870-2561
Contact: Chris Memtt, P.E.
Prepared By: Parnell Engineering
10623 Hunters Lane S.E.
Olympia, WA 98513
(360) 491-3243 Fax (360) 49]-3243
Contact: William Parnell, P.E.
PE
PARNELL ENGINEERING
~~5-~~ ~t~~~
SOIL EVALUATION REPORT
FORM 7: GENERAL SITE INFORMATION
PROJECT TITLE Lubbesmeyer Longmire Plat SHEET: 1 OF 1
PROJECT NO. OS134 DATE: BY24/O6
PREPARED BY :William Parnell, P.E.
1. SITE ADDRESS: 15132 Longmire Street Yelm, Wa. 98597
TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 21724420800
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Create a 201ot residential subdivision.
3. SITE DESCRIPTION: The 4.7 acre project site is currently occupied by a single residential tlwelling antl
two cutbuiltlings. Site relief is nearly level. The southern 180' of this parcel slopes to the south at a 1%slope.
The remaining projeM site slopes to the north at a 1-2 % slope. Elevations range from a high of 353 ft. to a
low of 346 R. at the northeast property corner. There are no site tlistinguishing features other than an existing
domestic well. Site vegetation consists of uncropped feld grasses on the majority of the site, with maintained
grass lawn antl landscaping atljacent to [he existing house. The project site is bounded by residential
property to the north, east antl west, and by Longmire Street SE to the south. On-site soils are swell-drained
Spanaway series formed in glacial oulwash.
4. SUMMARY OF SOILS WORK PERFORMED'. Two test pits were excavated by backhoe to a depth of
152' below the existing gratle. Soils were inspectetl by entering and visually logging each test pit to a depth
of four feet. Soils beyond four feet were inspected by examining backhoe tailings. One double ring infiltration
test was completed in test pit #1 at 96" below the existing grade. Test pit soil log tlata sheets and a double
ring infltration test result are included in this report.
5. ADDITIONAL SOILS WORK RECOMMENDED'. Additional soils work should not be necessary unless
drainage infltration facilities are locatetl outside the general area encompassed by the soil test pits.
6. FINDINGS: The Natural Resource Conservation Service soil survey for Thurston County mapped the on-
sita soils ass Spanaway Gravelly Sandy Loam(110). Thelwotest pits confirmed the Spanaway tlesignation
generally profiling a gravelly fine sandy loam surtace soil overlying an extremely gravelly 8 cobbley coarse-
metliumsand substratum. The substratum gravels and sands were slightly loose. Winter water table was not
present antl intlicators were not visible. A double ring infltration test completed at 96" below the existing
grade revealed an infiltration rate of 46.5 in/hr.
7. RECOMMENDATIONS: The Spanaway soil series is a somewhat excessively drained soil that formetl in
gravelly glacial outwash. Infiltration rates are generally rapid in the substratum soils. The specifed
substratum C-horizon soils shoultl be targeted for all tlrainage infiltration facill[ies as noted in [he attached
soil log data sheets. A design infiltration rate of 20 in/hr or less would be appropriate for these targetetl soils.
During construction, care must be taken to prevent the erosion of exposetl soils. Drainage facility infiltration
surfaces must be properly protectetl from contamination by the fne-grained upper horizon sails antl from
compaction by construction site activities. Soils not properly pratecied will cause drainage infiltration facilities
to prematurely fail.
I hereby certify that I prepared this report, and conducted or supervised the peRormance of related work. I
certify that I am qualified to do this work. I represent my work to be complete an accurate within the bounds
of uncertainty inher/en~t to th~e~practice of `its science, antl to be suitable for its intended use.
SIGNED: ~c//.C/GZ~,- , ` `-~~~~~
DATE: ~ (~~ ~~'S '
~aVl D~ma ~ ~ roe
SOIL EVALUATION REPORT
FORM 1: GENERAL SITE INFORMATION
PROJECT TITLE: Tahoma Terra SHEET: 1 OF 1
PROJECT NO.: 05100 DATE: 1/19/05
PREPARED BY: William Parnell. P.E.
1. SITE ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 14848 Longmire Street SE Yelm. WA 98597
TPN: 21724310100
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Create a residential subdivision with all associated roadway. utility and
landscaping improvements.
3. SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is currently occupied by one residentlal building and several
cuthuildings cenVally located on the parcel. Site relief is relatively flat with no distinguishing features.
Vegetation consists of actively used agricultural pasture grasses. The project site is bounded by Berry
Valley Road to Ne north. Longmire Street SE to the south, residential to the east and undeveloped
property to the west. On-site sails are well drained and formed in glacial outwash.
4. SUMMARY OF SOILS WORK PERFORMED: Thirteen test pits were excavated by backhoe to a
maximum depth of 180" helow existing grade. Soils were inspected by entering and visually logging
each test pit to a depth of four feet. Soils beyond four fee[ were inspected by examining hackhoe
tailings. Falling head percolation tests were completed in test pits #2, 5. 7, 9, 11 and 13 a[ a depth of
60" below the existing gratle. Test pit soil log data sheets and percolation test results are included in
Mis report.
5. ADDITIONAL SOILS WORK RECOMMENDED: Additional soils work should not he necessary
unless drainage infltration facilities are located outside the general area encompassed by the soil test
pits.
6. FINDINGS: The National Resource Conservation Service of Thurston County mapped Ne on-site
soils as a Spanaway Gravelly Sandy Loam (170). All test pits confrm this designation. All test pits
generally revealed gravelly fne sandy loam surtace soils, overlying an extremely gravelly and cobbley
coarse sand substratum. SubsVa[um sails were moderately loose with no fnes present. Winter water
table was not present in any test pits. Falling head percolation tests were completed revealing the
following infltration rates: Test pit #2 - 2160 in/hr, #5 - 144 in/hr, #7 - 188 in/hr, # 9 - 617 in/hr,
#11 - 360 in/hr, #13 - fi8.5 in/hr. Tests were completed utilizing a 6" diameter PVC pipe to prevent
sidewall collapse.
7. RECOMMENDATIONS: The Spanaway soil series is a somewhat excessively drained soil that
formed in glacial outwash. Infltraticn rates are generally rapid in the substratum sails. The substratum
soils should he targeted for all drainage infltration facilities. A design infltration rate of 20 in/hr or less
would be appropriate for all targeted O-horizon soils as recommended in the attached soil log
information sheets.
During construction, care must be taken to prevent erosion of exposed soils. Drainage facility
infiltration surtaces must he properly protected from contamination by the fne-grained upper horizon
soils and from compaction by site construction activities. Soils not properly protected will cause
drainage infiltration facilities to prematurely fail.
I hereby certi(y that I prepared this report. and conducted or supervised the pedormance of related
work. I certify that I am qualifed to do this work. 1 represent my work to he complete an accurate within
the hounds of uncertainty inherent to-ih practice of soils science, and to be suitable for its intended
use. ~
//~ j ~* v -.. t...
SIGNED: L •.C "wx ~ ~~ y t ~^~ 4
DATE: y~4~OS ~ "' I`t'' r
y_.> _ a:._. .Y
i; -
vA ,t
+~;
,.c
APPENDIX B -BASIN MAP AND DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
l0 of 11
-- --
;- ~ ~ -
I
~,~
--
_ ~e °~~
r ~, ~ ``q
~ tg;~ (~4
s l '•y~ r4-
yA
I~ ~. _
~ 8 '. 9't~ •~4
4 1
4~ i 4~
Po 4g ~~` \
4
\~ 4
~ 4
Q
4 ~'e i
Z s _
~ M ynti ~ ~
m ~ ''r 6~ i
W ~ _ ~ ~ ~ r4 4'~.
W 9~ `f ~ ~4~ ~z
____ ~ o ``^ ~~ "4.
~ ~~a ~y
~. `°r e,~l ,~ ~~~~ ~ //
~~ ~_
F ky~ m
s
4~4 U \a
i r
i ~.~ " w 4
~~--
-, ~ ;
,~_
~' ~_ ~
t ie~az ~av
,, .,,
_-laa{lIRINVfI!!O -- ___
~~t!
~~~,
,~
~ ~~
^ ~ ~
WaterWOrks HMS Report
Fdtlay, February 16, 200]
Paoe 1
Rainier View 04-159
Yelm, WA per 1992 DOE Stormwater Management Manual Standards
Predeveloped Flows For Rainier View
Project Precips
[2 yr] 2.00 in
[5 yr] 2.50 in
[10 yr] 3.00 in
[25 yr] 3.50 in
[100 yr] 4.00 in
[6 mo] 1.28 in
Drainage Area: predeveloped
Hyd Method: SBUH Hyd
Peak Factor: 484.00
Storm Dur 24.00 hrs
Area CN
Pervious 5.2800 ac 74.00
Impervious 0.0000 ac 0.00
Total 5.2800 ac
Supporting Data:
Pervious CN Data:
low growing brush & grasslands 74.00
Pervious TC Data:
Flow type: Description:
Loss Method: SCS CN Number
SCS Abs: 0.20
TC
0.17 hrs
0.00 hrs
5.2800 ac
Leng[h: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time
440.00 ft 2.00 % 5.0000 10.37 min
6 mo Flow Time Volume
Summary: 0.0390 cfs 22.00 hrs 1560.14 cf - 0.0358 acft
2 yr Flow Time Volume
Summary: 0.1300 cfs 9.00 hrs fi700.66 cf - 0.1538 acft
10 yr Flow Time Volume
Summary: 0.6900 cfs 8.00 hrs 17406.63 cf - 0.3996 acft
25 yr Flow Time Volume
Summary: 1.0916 cfs 8.00 hrs 23762.31 cf - 0.5455 acft
100 yr Flow Time Volume
Summary: 1.5336 cfs 8.00 hrs 30592.76 cf - 0.7023 acft
Baseline
~ ~
I
~
- ~ e
~ ~ I
~ 11
~ k
~
\
A I
F
WO ~
y ~$
~ / U
'
~
F ~
8
~\ `
t c m
~. 4
~ ~w
Q
~. n
2
P ~ ~
- ~ '
.
,,_
« ~m
~
~ ~
~. e
.
m„ t'
~ ~
~ ~
~ .
~ ~
Q / n"
m -
~
~
~
W ____ ~ ~ m
~
1 1 m
p J
`
~ 1 M
~ g(}
~n r„
1 Rn
, ~
. ~
/
~~
/ ~i
~ o
4
N ~ ~
w
~ ~
Y: _
-_~
p ;ice
~ s
~~ i
W
~ I m
- - ~g
~ y
~
I
r ~ _
~
« ~/~ ~ (
`Nw
~~~
Q ~ r
~~1~
1 u
'' s L gY{8n ON
~
~
~
~ id
i . u .. . i l ~~
_ ~ ~
_~
~aaFIIS .
.
.. ,
__~__-__
__ ,. _
_-
_ d
~j.
WaterWOrks HMS Repoli
Thurstlay, January 11.2007
Developed Flows for Rainier View 04-159
Yelm, WA per 1992 DOE Stormwater Management Manual Standards
Project Precips
[2 yr] 2.00 in
[5 yr] 2.50 in
[10 yr] 3.00 in
[25 yr] 3.50 in
[100 yr] 4.00 in
[6 mo] 1.28 in (6-month = 64 % of 2-year for 1992 DOE)
Drainage Area: Dev
Hyd Method: SBUH Hyd
Peak Factor: 484.00
Storm Dur 24.00 hrs
Area CN
Pervious 2.7700 ac 78.00
Impervious 1.2400 ac 98.00
Total 4.0100 ac
Supporting Data:
Pervious CN Da[a:
Landscaping 78.00
Impervious CN Data:
Road, driveways, pond area 98.00
shared driveway for lots 8, 11 98.00
Pervious TC Data:
Flow type: Description:
Sheet flow down landscaping
Sheet flow down road
Shallow flow down road
Channel conveyance through N-12 pipe
Impervious TC Data:
Flow type: Description:
Sheet flow dawn driveway
Sheet flow down road to CB
Loss Method: SCS CN Number
SCS Abs: 0.20
TC
0.50 hrs
0.10 hrs
2.7700 ac
1.1400 ac
0.1000 ac
Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time
225.00 ft 1.50% 0.1500 26.60 min
75.00 ft 1.00 % 0.0110 1.61 min
130.00 ft 1.00 % 27.0000 0.80 min
250.00 ft 1.00°/ 42.0000 0.99 min
Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time
195.00 ff 2.00 % 0.0110 2.61 min
105.00 ft 1.00 % 0.0110 2.10 min
Channel conve ante with N-12 i e mat. 250.00 ft 1.00 % 42.0000 0.99 min
6 mo Flow Time Volume
Summary: 0.3316 cfs 8.00 hrs 6245.92 cf - 0.1434 acft
2 yr Flow Time Volume
Summary: 0.6261 cfs 8.00 hrs 12856.27 d- 0.2951 acft
10 yr Flow Time Volume
Summary: 1.2012 cfs 8.00 hrs 23809.96 cf - 0.5466 acft
100 yr Flow Time Volume
Summary: 1.8526 cfs 8.00 hrs 35919.42 cf - 0.8246 acft
Engineering Inc.
WaterWOrks HMS Report Thursday, January 11, 2007
ProjecC 041591n(I Pantl2 p 1
Rainier View 04-159
(Calculated Infiltration Pond Size 28' by 41' with 3.00 h: 1v and 3-foot deep)
Project Precips m~ 103
[2 yr] z.oo m 1'
[5 yr] 2.50 in ~ ]
[10 yr] 3.00 in 3~~.1V 100-year 24-hour 3 4rc<byrQ
[25 yr] 3.50 in storm GL'
[100 yr] 4.00 in _ c~ i~a
[6 mo] 1.28 in ~ fig, ~
RLPCOMPUTE [Routing] SUMMARY
100 yr Match O: 0.00 cfs Peak Out O: 0.53 cfs -Peak Stg: 102.95 ft -Active Vol: 0.13 acft
Summary Report of all RLPooI Data
BASLI5T2
[Dev] Using [TYPEIA] As [100 yr]
LSTEND
BasinlD Peak O Peak T Peak Vol Area Method Raintype
Event
------- (cfs) (hrs) (ac-ft) ac (Loss
Dev 1.85 8.00 O.S246 4.01 SBUHISCS TVPEIA 100 yr
BASLIST [rYPE1A] AS [100 yr] DETAILED
[Dev]
Drainage Area: Dev
Hyd Method: SBUH Hyd
Peak Factor: 484.00
Storm Dur 24.00 hrs
Area CN
Pervious 2.7700 ac 78.00
Impervious 1.2400 ac 98.00
Total 4.0100 ac
Supporting Data:
Pervious CN Da[a:
Landscaping 78.00
Impervious CN Data:
Road, driveways, pond area 98.00
shared driveway for lots 8, 11 98.00
Pervious TC Data:
Flow type: Description:
Sheet flow down landscaping
Sheet flow down road
Shallow flow down road
Channel conveyance through N-12 pipe
Impervious TC Data:
Flow type: Description:
Sheet flow down driveway
Sheet flow down road to CB
Loss Method: SCS CN Number
SCS Abs: 0.20
TC
0.50 hrs
0.10 hrs
2.7700 ac
1.1400 ac
0.1000 ac
Length: Slope: Cceft: Travel Time
225.00 ft 1.50 % 0.1500 26.60 min
75.00 ft 1.00 % 0.0110 1.61 min
130.00 ft 1.00 % 27.0000 0.80 min
250.00 fl 1.00 % 42.0000 0.99 min
Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time
195.00 ft 2.00°/ 0.0110 2.61 min
105.00 ft 1.00% 0.0110 7.10 min
Channel conveyance with N-12 pipe mat 250 00 ft 1 00 % 42 0000 0 99 min
100 yr Flow Time Volume
Summary: 1.8526 cfs 8.00 hrs 35919.42 cf - 0.8246 acft
Baseline
WalerWOrks HMS Repotl Ttlursday, January 11, 2007
Project: 041591nfil Pontl2 p 2
HYDLIST SUMMARY
[100yr out]
LSTEND
HydID PeakO PeakT Peak Vol Cont Area
------- (cfs) (hrs) (ac-ft) (ac)
100yr out 0.53 ].17 0.8251 4.0100
STORLIST
pnfl Pond]
LSTEND
Node ID: Infil Pond
Desc: Infiltration Pond
Start EI: 100.0000 ft Maz EI: 103.0000 ft
Contrib Basin: Contrib Hyd:
Lenqth ss1 ss2 Width ss3 ss4
41.0000 ft 3.OOh:1v 3.OOh:1v 28.000Oft 3.OOh:1v 3.OOhav
Bottom area only with infltration
DISCHLIST
[Infiltration]
LSTEND
Control Structure ID: Infiltration -Infiltration control structure
Descrip: Multiple Orifce
Start EI Max EI Increment
100.0000 ft 103.0000 ft 0.10
Infil: 20.00 in/hr Multiplier: 1.00
STORTABLE TABLE
[Infl Pond]
LSTEND
Stage-Storge Table for node Infil Pond
Stage Vol Vol
(ft) (cf) (ac-ft)
1ap .po p.pp o.apop
1op _1a 116sa o.ooz7
100 .20 237.98 0.0055
100 .30 363.35 0.0083
100 .40 493.p9 0.0113
100 .50 62].25 0.0144
100 .fi0 765.91 0.0176
100 .70 909.15 0.0209
100 .80 1057.02 0.0243
100 .90 1209.62 0.02]6
101 .00 136].p0 p.0314
101 .10 1529.24 0.0351
101 .20 1696 a2 0.0389
101 .30 1868.59 p.p429
101. 40 2045.85 0.0470
101. 50 2228.25 0.0512
101. 60 2415.8] 0.0555
Slage Vol Vol
(ft) (cf) (ac-ft)
101 .70 zsoe .7s o.osss
mT fio zso7 .os a.osa4
101. 90 3010 .78 0.0691
102. 00 3220 .00 0.0]39
102. 10 3434 .80 0.0789
102. 20 3655 .26 0.0839
102. 30 3681 .43 0.0891
102. 40 4113 di 0.0944
102. 50 4351 .25 0.0999
102. fi0 4595 .03 0.1055
102. ]0 4844 .83 0.1112
102. 80 5100 .70 0.1171
102. 90 5362 ,74 0.1231
103 .00 5631 .00 0.1293
Engineering Inc.
WaterWOrks HMS Repotl Mantlay, January 22, 2007
Project: 041591nf1 Pontl2 Pape 1
Wet Pond For Rainier View 04-159
Yelm, WA per 1992 DOE Stormwater Management Manual Standards
Project Precips +o~ of p;pe ~bwergr~
[z yr] z.oo in =
[5 yr] 2.50 in ~jhlly Cell1 ~}~ .q h;1V- Cell2 5~ Sn~~„
[10 yr] 3.00 in ~ "~ °"
[25 yr] 3.50 in ~~ 1'~tiaxi ' °iW
[100 yr] 4.00 in cJyr,~
[6 mo] 1.28 in (6-month = 64°/ of 2-year for 1992 DOE)
Drainage Area: Dev
Hyd Method: SBUH Hyd
Peak Factor: 484.00
Storm Dur 24.00 hrs
Area CN
Pervious 2.7700 ac 78.00
Impervious 1.2400 ac 98.00
Total 4.0100 ac
Supporting Data:
Pervious CN Data:
Landscaping 78.00
Impervious CN Da[a:
Road, driveways, pond area 98.00
shared driveway for lots 8, 11 98.00
Pervious TC Data:
Flow type: Description:
Sheet flow down landscaping
Sheet flow down road
Shallow flow down road
Channel conveyance through N-12 pipe
Impervious TC Data:
Flow type: Description:
Sheet flow down tlriveway
Sheet Flaw down road to CB
Channel conveyance with N-12 pipe mat.
6 mo Flaw Time
Summary: 0.3316 cfs 8.00 hrs
Loss Method: SCS CN Number
SCS Abs: 0.20
TC
0.50 hrs
0.10 hrs
2.7700 ac
1.1400 ac
0.1000 ac
Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time
225.00 ff 1.50 % 0.1500 26.60 min
75.00 ft 1.00% 0.0110 1.61 min
130.00 f[ 1.00% 27.0000 0.80 min
250.00 ff 1.00 % 42.0000 0.99 min
Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time
195.00 ft 2.00 % 0.0110 2.61 min
105.OOft 1.00% 0.0110 2.10 min
250.00 ft 1.00 % 42.0000 0.99 min
Volume
6245.92 cf - 0.1434 acft
1992 DOE Requires Wet pond to Contain Volume of 6-month 24-Hour Storm
Pond Volume should have minimum 6245.9 cf of volume using SBUH method for 6-month 24-
hourstorm. Actual Pontl size will have a minimum volume of 14,507 cf which gives a Factor of
Safety (FS) of 2.3.
Baseline
WalerWOrks HMS Repon Wednestlay, January 10, 200]
Project OA1591nfl POntl2 P 1
Individual Roof Downspouts For 2600 sf Roof Area
Trench size (3' by 19' by 3' Deep)
Rainier View 04-159
Yelm, WA per 1992 DOE Stormwater Management Manual Standards
Project Precips
[2 yr]
[5 yr] 2.00 in
2.50 in
30 % Voids in
[10 yr] 3.00 in ~
[25 yr] 3.50 in 3
[100 yr]
4.00 in
Washed Rack p
~
[6 ma] 1.28 in rerfw.-~
~~
RLPCOMPUTE [roof routing] SUMMARY 3r
100 yr Match O: 0.00 cis Peak Out O: 0.03 cfs -Peak Stg: 102.97 ft -Active Vol: 50.77 cf
Summary Report of all RLPooI Data
BASLIST2
[Single Roof] Using [rYPEtA] As [100 yr]
LSTEND
BasinlD Peak O Peak T Peak Vol Area Melhod Raintype
Event
------ (cfs) (hrs) (ac-ft) ac /Loss
single ROOF 0.06 ].83 0.0188 0.06 SBUHISCS TVPEIA 100 yr
BASLIST [TYPEIA] AS [100 yr] DETAILED
[Single Roof)
LSTEND
Drainage Area: Single Roof
Hyd Method: SBUH Hyd Loss Method: SCS CN Number
Peak Factor: 484.00 SCS Abs: 0.20
Storm Dur 24.00 hrs
Area CN TC
Pervious 0.0000 ac 0.00 0.00 hrs
Impervious 0.0600 ac 98.00 0.01 hrs
Total 0.0600 ac
Supporting Data:
Impervious CN Data:
2500 sf per home 98.00 0.0600 ac
Impervious TC Data:
Flaw type: Description: Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time
Sheet flow down roof 30.00 ft 3.00 % 0.0110 0.50 min
Channel N-12 pipe conveyance to trench 40.00 ft 1.00 % 42.0000 0.16 min
TC of 0.66 min < 5 min, program will use a tc o f 5 min in computations.
100 yr Flow Time Volume
Summary: 0.0578 cfs 7.83 hrs 820.10 cf - 0.0188 acft
Inc.
Wa[erWOrks HMS Report Wetlnestlay, January 10, 200]
Project: 041591nfil Pontl2 P 2
STORLIST
[roof trench]
LSTEND
Node ID: roof trench
Desc: Infl[ration Pond
Start EI: 100.0000 R Max EI: 103.0000 ft
Contrib Basin: Contrib H d:
Length Wid[h Void Ratio
19.0000 ft 3.0000 ft 30.00
Bottom area only with infiltration
DISCHLIST
[Infltration]
LSTEND
Control Structure ID: Infiltration -Infiltration control structure
Descrip: Multiple Orifice
Stan EI Max EI Increment
100.0000 ft 103.0000 ft 0.10
Infil: 20.00 in/hr Multiplier: 1.00
STORTABLE TABLE
[roof trench]
LSTEND
Stage-Storge Table far node roof trench
Stage Vol Vol
(ft) (cf) (ac-f[)
100.00 0.00 a.oooo
100.10 1.]1 6.6006
1 oo.zo a4z 0.0001
100.36 s.13 0.0001
100.40 6.84 p.0002
100.50 8.55 0.0002
100.60 10.2fi 0.0002
100.]0 11.9] 0.0003
100.80 13.68 0.0003
100.90 15.39 p.0004
101.00 n.10 0.0004
101.10 18.61 a.ooo4
1o1.zo zos2 o.ooos
101.30 zz z3 o.0oos
m1 ao zasa o.ooos
1n1so 2sss o.oa0s
1o1s6 2].3s 0.0oos
Stage Vol Vol
(K) (cf) lac-ft)
101.]0 zs.m 0.060]
101.80 36.]e 0.000]
m1.96 az a9 o.oao]
102.00 34.20 0.0008
102.10 35.91 00008
102.20 3].62 0.0009
102.30 39.33 0.0009
102.40 41.04 O.OOO9
102.50 a2]5 0.0010
l ozso 4a.4s 0.0010
1oz.]o as.n 0.6011
102.80 4].88 0.0011
l ozso a0s9 0.0011
103.00 s1.3o o.oalz
Inc.
MANNING'S EQUATION FOR OPEN CHANNEL FLOV~
12" CIRCULAR PIPE CAPACITY
i I
Q- 1.49AR3Sz
n
Input Values
d =diameter of pipe 1.00 h
h =height of flow 0.90 ft
S = longitutlinal slope 0.005 fVft
n =roughness coefficien 0.014
Calculated Variables
V =Velocity 3.36 fps
A -Area
P =Perimeter
WA =Wetted Area 0.745
WP =Wetted Perimeter 2.498 ft
= y rau is a ius
ercent u g
= uantity o ow c s
Minimum pipe slope
Check for Capacity: 100-year 24-hour Storm Flow = 1.86 cfs
2.50 c£s > 1.86 cfs Has Capacity
Infiltration Pond 48-hour Drawdown Time Requirement
Ta~awaow~ _ (Pond Volume) /[Bottom Area x hfiltration Rate x (1 ft/12 inches)]
Ta~waow~ = 5493 cf / [962 sf x 20 inches / hour x Q ft/12 inches) ]
Tarewaow„ = 3.42 hours
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN
APPENDIE AIII-1.1
IBOPLWIAL MAPS FOR D63ION STORKS
Included in this appendix are the 2, 10 and 100-year, 24-pour design storm and mean
annual precipitet ion ieopluvial maps for the Puget Sound basin. These have been taken
from NOAA Atl ae 2 "Precipitation - Prequency Atlas of the Neetern United States, Volume
IX, Washington.
III-1-43 FBERUARY, 1992
~,
r~ ' ~
STORHWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE POGET SOUND BAEIN
IZI-1-44 FEBRUARY, 1992
STORMWATEA MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BAE IN
fie
ilIV -Y5 edHRUARY, 1992
i :.iY/
STORHWATER RANAGEMENT RANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN
124 123 122 121
49r-__-
~s ~ eo ,
~` is_~/ ~ -- w
- ~~ 1
~ o d ~ a
L. GA 1
q
fPIUAY M4~~ F URi $IPNI ~ ~E r
''~se4s v 1~ ~ 90~{ ~ I s ~ ~ ~
L1
S 3 ~yy ~yII~
~~
is'- ~~~ ~\~7~~.~J,~ 15 fM1~A~ [~~CNmr_ll ,~ _ L~
10
~ \~~
WASHINGTON I '°
', to o la 20 ao qo
~~ MILES 10~~,
i Figure 30 I f
ISOPLUVIAlS F 100-YR 24~NR PRECIPITgTION
~. IN TENTHS OF N INCH ~,
124 123
n nu•'15 \~~
0.TLg5 2. Volume I%
M Oy LL5. Mwrtmenl of C
I Oceemwntl 0.11me pgnlt R11n
it WntM Eemu.OXKe of M'
M for U.S Oeptlmenl ol0.L
verveuon Snm~e. EnRmeerln~
72i
71 ~~
STOAMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOA THE PUGET SOUND EASIN
Table III-1.3 SCS Western Washington Runoff Curve Numbers
(Published by 5C8 in 1982) Runoff curve numbers Eor ee lectetl agricultural,
suburban and urban
LAND UEE DESCRIPTION CURVE NUMBERS 8Y
H OLOGIC SOIL GROUP
A B C 0
Cultivated land(1 winter condition 86 91 94 95
Movnt aln open areas: low growing brush S grasslands ]4 82 89 92
Meadow or pasture: 65 7B 85 89
Nood or £areet land: undi eturbed 42 64 ]6 81
wood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 72 E1 86
Orchard: with cover cro B1 88 92 94
Open spaces, lawns, parka, golf courses, cemeteries,
landscaping.
Good condition: grass cover on L75a of the 68 80 86 90
area
Fair eondit ion: grass cover on 50-]58 of 77 85 90 92
the area
Gravel roads 6 parki ng lots: 76 85 89 91
Dirt roads 6 erkin lots: ]2 82 87 89
Impervious surfaces, pav¢ment, roofs etc. ~
I 98 96 98 98
O n water bodies: lakes, wetlands, onds etc. ~00 ~ 100 100 100
Single family reeidential(2 ):
Dwelling Unit /Gross Acre •Imperv iove(3) Separ ate curve number
1.0 DU/GA 15' shell be select ed for
1.5 DU/GA 20 pervi ous 6 impe rvious
2.0 DU/GA 25 porti ons of the Bite
2.5 DU/GA 30 or be e in
3.0 DU/GA 34
3.5 DU/GA 38
4.0 DU/GA 42
4.5 DU/GA 46
5.0 DU/GA 98
5.5 DU/GA 50
6.0 DU/GA 52
6.5 DU/GA 54
7.0 DU/GA 56
PUD'er condos, apart ment e, •impervioue
commercial businesses 6 moat be
industrial erase computed
(1) For a more detailed description of agricultural land use curve numbers refer
to National Engineering Handbook, Sec. 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972.
(2) Ae eumee roof and driveway runoff ie directed into street/storm ey stem.
(3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good
condition for these eurv¢ numbers.
III-1-12 FEBRUARY, 1992
APPENDIX C - THURSTON COUNTY FLOOD MAP
11 of 11
Thurston County Map Output Page
Page I of 1
Thurston
~<4
~
F~
~
e[gpv veuev no se sw eexavvweeer
~,~s;~
~.o.~ ~ e ~
~>°~ 5 ~~.FE ~
tE ~ m
-w4 ROSE.
o [seen
>'¢clnimer TM1umon Counir n,nkes even effon,o ensue iM1Ui iM1ls mnV Is a mie and
mm.ev~es nmtlon nnne,~a.n ofeonmr snvemm<in. enw.YCr, ~n<-e'o,mw non all LEGEND
elm<d p<rsonnel make no wamnry, vxp¢sxN or Implied reganling,M1e accuracy,
mpln oleo inform on JlselosW on iMS map. Noe tloee iM1e fnun,y
a /~/ h]ajor Roads .Flood Zones
sed br,ne, ofinls mnp_
pll filly brany I ~SCO njury ev
„ne tulles mpcn szlnl<pu ,npPGcublc lmr, TM1m'slon County tlisdnims all Roads
conies, <xprcss nr impncJ, mdnJln3, nw no, Ilmi,eJ m, Implied a anfms of iTeleham lCater Bodies
bilny. dum Gm ss ~ru pnr cWOrpuryos andn imiingenonso(propri<inryrlynu. Streams
I I I I J.I I 1 br. -I~II17 I C vne
n
Zooiug
II I 'd` ~ I 1~ ~I- v I 1 ~ I IamnEvs,nu vs,l I
m
' ~
~~CORteID'S
nal l_ ,x, r uulOC aLL-ale.
COQ, Oi ~h<
taetlands a - Cities
ll,on:e., [12009 ~Tnuamn Coun,y GwDwa Cenral -~
(lr^It+,+ 2404Ileritoge Cnurt5W, 3rd Flaor
~~~°~°r
t~'etlavd BUffea Ba[cek
OI WA 980021031
ymp~a,
http://geomap l .geodata.org/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=cadastralov&... 2/ 16/2007
in` r i Est ~e Mood a/U
-~ "
W
m
z
J
W
Z Q
Q
Qoo Z
O
w °o t=
LL M Z
~~ ~X
~ W Q
O
~ W W
a zz
U 00
X
w
W i q
151Nbtly~~ " ~$}
x ~ ~ e j~
~ a ~ ~~ DQ ~`o ClyyM1~
O ¢U iO Y 8 ~G
°~ n 2~
iw "-
Q
W
Z
O
JN
X
W
Z
O
N
x
~,,~ o
a o
a
LL
LL
. ~~ ~O
~m
~~-
~ s
~U