Revised Storm 001° ~ ~~~ENGINEERING, INCORPORATED
Storm Drainage Report
Resubmittal #2
Rainier View
Parcel No. 21724420501
9910 Durant St.
Yelm, Washington
Prepared for:
Crest Builders ~~^..^ ~~ ^--
5516 75'" St. W.
Lakewood, WA 98499 DEC ~, ,~ ,
October 15, 2007
BASELINE Jab No. 04-159
Prepared by:
Dean H. Zavack, E.I.T.
Reviewed by:
Jerry Waldron, P.E.
~EXPIP.ES B-le 0
"I hereby state that this Storm Drainage Plan for Rainier View has been prepazed by me or under my
supervision and meets the standard of Gaze and expertise which is usual and customary in this community for
professional engineers. I understand [hat City of Yelm does not and will not assume liability for the
sufficiency, suitability, or performance of drainage facilities prepared by me."
Land Panning & Use • Engineering • Surveying
1910-fi4~"Avenue Wes[ • Tacoma, WA 98466 • (253) 565-449b FAX (253) 565-8563 • SeaMe (206) 824-1205
"Ourgoal is to exceed your expectations"
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 1 -PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3
SECTION 2 -EXISTING CONDITIONS 3
SECTION 3 -INFILTRATION RATES AND SOILS REPORTS 3
SECTION 4 -WELLS AND SEPTIC SYSTEMS 4
SECTION 5 -FUEL TANKS 4
SECTION 6 -SUB-BASIN DESCRIPTION 4
SECTION 7 -ANALYSIS OF THE 100-YEAR FLOOD 4
SECTION 8 -AESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR FACILITIES 4
SECTION 9 -FACILITY SIZING AND DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS 4
Water Quality 5
Flow Control 6
Conveyance 7
SECTION 10 -OTHER PERMITS OR CONDITIONS PLACED ON THIS PROJECT 8
APPENDICES
Appendix A-Vicinity Map, Site Map, and Excerpts of Soil Analysis For Vista Green
and Tahoma Terra
Appendix B -Drainage Calculations and Basin Map
Appendix C -Thurston County Flood Map
2of11
SECTION 1 -PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project proposal is to subdivide one 5.3 +/- acre parcel into 22 lots for future single-
family residences. There was a residential single-family home on-site, which was
recently destroyed by fire. The structure has since been removed. A public street
extending from an adjoining subdivision with aturn-around knuckle is proposed as
access to all 22 lots. The site is zoned Low Density Residential R-4.
The 5.3-acre parcel located at 9910 Durant St. SE in Yelm, WA. The subject property is
located in the SE quarter of Section 24, Township 17 North, Range 1 East, and W.M.
See the site map in Appendix A.
The project improvements consist of subdividing the parcel into 221ots for single-family
residences, a storm tract area, and 56-foot right of way dedication for the public road
improvements and access to the residences. All interior streets shall be improved to
Yelm City Standards for a Local Access Residential, including a 35-foot paved roadway
with two 7-foot parking lanes. Rolled curb and gutter, and a 5-foot concrete sidewalk on
one side. The new public road will be extended through an adjacent development called
Vista Green and will dead end at the northerly end of site where an adjacent
development (Wyndstone) will presumable make a connection to SW Berry Valley Road.
SECTION 2 -EXISTING CONDITIONS
The site currently is a vacant field with a few trees and under story brush. The site
slopes from northeast to southwest at slopes from 1 % to 8%. Vista Green borders the
site to the east and Tahoma Terra is across Durant St. to the west.
Table 1 - Predevelooed Conditions
Basin Pervious Impervious 2-year, 10-year, 100-year
Descri lion Acres acres Peak rate Peak rate Peak rate
Low growing 5.28 0 0.13 cfs 0.69 cfs 1.53 cfs
brush and
grasslands _
SECTION 3 -INFILTRATION RATES AND SOILS REPORTS
Based on Soil Conservation Service (SCS) of Thurston County the soils have been
identified as 110 Spanaway Gravelly, Sandy, Loam which is a Hydrological Soil Group
A. On June 14, 2007, Baseline Engineering sent representatives to verify the soil
characteristics within the storm drainage tract. A. William V. Robinson, P.E., analyzed
the soil at depths approximately 10' below the existing grade at the location of the
infiltration pond. A. William V. Robinson, P.E., confirms that the soils are Spanaway
Gravel with infiltration rates greater than 20 in/hr (3 min/in) and no indication of a water
table 3-feet below the proposed infiltration facility, see soil logs in Appendix A.
Two different geotechnical reports on adjacent sites confirm this soil classification. An
excerpt from the geotechnical analysis from Parnell Engineering from the adjacent
3of11
development Vista Green and the adjacent development Tahoma Terra is included in
Appendix A.
SECTION 4 -WELLS AND SEPTIC SYSTEMS
There is an existing well on-site that will be abandoned in accordance with the
Department of Ecology (DOE) standards.
SECTION 5 -FUEL TANKS
There are no known fuel tanks located on the site.
SECTION 6 -SUB-BASIN DESCRIPTION
The 22-lot subdivision will have a conveyance, water treatment, and infiltration system
for the public roadway and driveways. The water treatment and retention facilities will be
situated in the dedicated storm tract of the site. The individual homes will each have a
roof downspout infiltration system on its respective lot. It is to our understanding with the
developer, Crest Builders, the homes will have a roof area of 2600 sf per lot. All
stormwater will be retained on-site and disposed of through infiltration.
SECTION 7 -ANALYSIS OF THE 100-YEAR FLOOD
The project site is not located within the 100-year flood plain. See Appendix C for the
FEMA Firm Map.
SECTION 8 -AESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR FACILITIES
Facilities will be located at the far end of the dedicated storm tract and will not detract
from site aesthetics.
SECTION 9 -FACILITY SIZING AND DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS
For the proposed 22-lot subdivision water quality, as well as stream bank erosion control
(SBEC), will be designed and constructed for long-term disposal of the stormwater
runoff. Waterworks 6.1.3.5 and the SBUH method were used to size the water quality
and infltration facilities in accordance to the 1992 DOE stormwater Design Manual. See
Appendix B for calculations. The site is graded to flow stormwater toward the road and
into catch basins that will convey the stormwater to the water treatment and quantity
facilities located on Tract A of the site. See Site Map in Appendix A. Each lot will also
contain an individual roof downspout infiltration trench that is designed for 2600 sf of roof
area and will retain the 100-year 24-hour storm event.
4 of 11
Facility 1 contains a permanent pool wet pond water treatment facility. Facility 1 treats
stormwater from the pollution generating surfaces of the driveways and public street.
See Appendix B for site description and drainage calculations.
Waterworks 6.1.3.5 and the SBUH method were used to size the water quality and
infiltration facilities. See Appendix B for site description and drainage calculations. The
wet pond is designed to treat and contain stormwater flows up to the 6-month 24-hour
storm. The 6-month 24-hour storm is defned by 1992 DOE stormwater Manual as 64%
of the 2-year 24-hour storm. stormwater flows greater than the 6-month 24-hour storm
will enter an overflow and flow directly into the overflow infiltration pond. The infiltration
pond is designed to contain the 100-year 24-hour storm. By inspection the peak flow
rates of the 100-year, 7-day storm are lower than the peak flows generated by the 100-
year, 24-hour storm, therefore the 100-year, 24-hour storm will govern the design of the
overFlow infiltration pond. Flaws greater than the 100-year 24-hour storm will enter an
emergency overflow designed to drain into the drainage course along Durant Street,
which will become a paved pedestrian walkway.
Rainier View Developed Site Flows
Storm ID (24-hour) Impervious Area'
acres Pervious Area
acres SBUH Calculated
Flows
6-month 1.24 2.77 0.33 cfs
2- ear 1.24 2.77 0.63 cfs
10- ear 1.24 2.77 1.20 cfs
100- ear 1.24 2.77 1.85 cfs
"Roof area not included since roofs stormwater flows into individual roof downspouts.
Water Quality
Facility 1 -Wet Pond:
Water treatment for Rainier View will be provided by a permanent pool, two-cell wet
pond to remove sediments (TSS) and free oil (TPH) from stormwater runoff before
entering an overtlow infiltration pond. The pond will have a geotextile liner to prevent
infiltration into the Spanaway Gravel native soils, which have a high infiltration rate. The
pond will be built to minimum 1992 DOE Standards and shall incorporate two cells. The
wet pond cells are separated by a berm with 4 to 1 slopes that is submerged 1' below
the design water surface elevation of 341.0. The total wet pond volume is designed to
contain the 6-month 24-hour storm as was discussed with James E. Gibson, City of
Yeim Development Services Engineer, on 1/22 to comply with 1992 DOE design
standards. stormwater flows above the design water surface elevation of 341.0 will flow
through a 12-inch spillway pipe directly into the overtlow infiltration pond. This pipe will
help prevent floatables from entering the infiltration pond, which is consistent with typical
spillway berms of this design. The overflow infiltration pond was sized by Waterworks
6.1.3.5 to contain the 100-year 24-hour storm event. The first cell of the permanent pool
wet pond is designed with one 4 to 1 side slopes and 3 to 1 side slopes to provide
maintenance access. Cell 1 of the wet pond is designed with one-foot of sediment
storage, 4-feet of active storage, and 1-foot of emergency freeboard. Cell 2 has 5-feet
S ofll
of active storage and two 4 to 1 slopes to allow maintenance access between all three
pond cells.
Facility 1: Pretreatment Permanent Pool Wet Pond
Design Storm SBUH Calculated SBUH Calculated Actual Wet Depth of
ID Flow Volume Pond Active Wet Pond
Volume before @ overfow
overfow*
6-month 24- 0.33 cfs 6246 cf 14,507 cf 5 feet
Hour
*Not including bottom 1-foot of cell 1 of pond intended for sediment storage.
Flows generated from roofs will enter individual roof downspout infiltration trenches and
will not require water quality because of the non-pollution generating surfaces of the
roofs.
Flow Control
Facility 2-Infiltration Pond
The runoff from driveways, landscaping, and the public roadway will be collected with
catch basins and conveyed through CPEP pipe materials to a two cell wet pond
treatment facility and then into an overflow infiltration pond. The water quality
permanent pool two-cell wet pond is sized to contain the volume of the 6-month 24-hour
storm. The 6-month 24-hour storm by 1992 DOE Stormwater Management Manual for
Puget Sound is defined as 64% of the 2-year 24-hour storm. Storms exceeding the 6-
month, 24-hour flow rate will enter the overflow infiltration pond through a with a 12-inch
pipe that runs through the spillway berm linking the wet pond with the infiltration pond.
The infiltration pond contains 1-foot of freeboard above the 100-year 24-hour storm
water level for stability. The infiltration pond contains 29% additional volume capacity for
emergency overflow volume. Storms greater than the 100-year 24-hour storm will enter
the infiltration pond emergency overtlow which is set at %foot below maximum free
board height and enter the drainage course along Durant St. SE. The infiltration pond
has a draw down time of less than 48 hours as per 1992 DOE standards see Appendix 8
for calculations.
6of11
Facility 2: Overflow Infiltration Pond (Calculated Dimensions are 62' by 21.67'-
h„rrno, riimencinon with 3 to ~ slopes. Active Storage Depth = 3-feet)
--
Design ----- -------
Infiltration ------ ----- -
SBUH
SBUH
Design
Actual
Emergency
Storm ID Rate Calculated Calculated Infiltration Pond Overflow
Developed Active Rate Volume Volume
100-year Volume Capacity
Flows before
overtlow~
100- 20 in / hr 1.85 cfs 5493 cf* 20 inches / 7100 cf 29%
year 24- hour
Hour
*1-foot of freeboard not included in this volume calculation.
Wet Pond volume not included in this volume calculation.
The infiltration rate used for the preliminary sizing of the overflow infiltration pond is
assumed 3 min per inch or 20 inches per hour based from Geotechnical Reports on
8/24/05 by Parnell Engineering from the adjacent site Vista Green. An excerpt from this
report in Appendix A. This infiltration rate was cross-referenced by examining the
Geotechnical Report from Tahoma Terra, another adjacent site across Durant Street.
This report, also from Parnell Engineering, was dated 1/19/05 and an excerpt of this
report is included in Appendix A. The Thurston County SCS also verifes this soil
classification, see Appendix A. This infiltration rate of 3 min per inch infiltration rate will
be verified for Rainier View with a soil analysis by A. William V. Robinson, P.E. from
Baseline Engineering at the time of construction of the infiltration pond.
Roof Downspout Infiltration Trenches:
Flow generated from roofs will enter individual roof downspout infiltration trenches and
not enter the water quality infiltration pond because the non-pollution generating
surfaces of the roofs will not require treatment. Each lot will contain an individual roof
down spout infiltration trench sized for 2,600 sf of roof area. The individual roof
downspout infiltration trenches will be sized for the 100-year 24-hour storm.
Individual Rnnf nnwnsnnut Infiltration Trench Summary (2600 sf Roof Area)
Design Infiltration SBUH SBUH Actual Actual
Storm ID Rate Calculated Calculated Trench Size Active
100-year Active Volume Volume*
Flows
100-year 24- 20 in / hr .058 cfs 50.8 cf 3' by 19' by 51.3 cf
Hour 3' dee
*Trench contains washed rock with 30% Voids. Volume contained in voids in rocks.
Convevance
The conveyance designed is based on the 100-year 24-hour storm using flows
calculated from the Santa Barbara Unit Hydrograph Method (SBUH) and Waterworks
6.1.3.5 as shown in Calculations in Appendix B.
7of11
The runoff from the roadway and driveways will be collected using concrete rolled curb
and gutter, catch basins, and CPEP or PVC pipe materials. Storm drainage from the
public roadways will be conveyed to the water quality/infiltration pond to remove total
suspended solids (TSS) and free oil (TPH) from the stormwater before entering the
overflow infiltration pond. Trapped oil contaminates and sediments can then be
removed from the bottom of wet pond cell 1 at regular service intervals.
Downstream Analysis
All stormwater is to be retained on-site for stormwater flows up to the 100-year 24-hour
storm. A downstream analysis was deemed unnecessary since all stormwater is to be
retained on-site.
SECTION 10 -OTHER PERMITS OR CONDITIONS PLACED ON THIS PROJECT
An NPDES permit and site development permit will be required. No other permits are
anticipated far this project as it is not affecting any existing wetlands and does not
discharge into a surface water body. A 10-foot setback from all property lines and
easement are required for stormwater facilities. Sewer will be provided by the City of
Yelm through a S.T. E.P. system and will not intertere with Storm Drainage Facilities.
8of11
APPENDIX A-
VICINITY MAP, SITE PLAN & EXCERPTS OF SOIL ANALYSIS
FROM VISTA GREEN AND TAHOMA TERRA
r N
°€kc ~
3 ~
4
e^ra o ~ a a*
~ e.
o r ~~~
~,~ ~ ~
~ i
i
i
~ s ~
s .
~•
i'
i ~_ i y
3aa w r
31F1 m , ... ~ _ aossi-
z ~o
_.
~ .g ~ o
~
-
i~ i .~
^
i I Z
~ ~
i r c0
i ~
i ~
i i
._______~____ _____m
._y_______
_______
__
i
~
i
i ...,,~
~ i
i i
i
i
i
~.I i
~
i
m
Y Q
v
~ I
I
_L_
I
~~ n
~`
1
~i
,~ __'___
I
i
O~ ~
i
D ° L~~L1~J~ ENGINEERING, INCORPORATED
~d ~welo~.nerc ~.bl~ss~o>2aG J~
June 15, 2007
Soil Log information for
Rainier View Estates
Site Address: 9910 Durant Street S.E.
Yelm, WA 98597
BASELINE Engineering Job No. 04-159
Soil Loa #1
Located in the Southwest corner of site 20' East of fence 27' North of fence
0' - 2' Black loamy gravely sand with humus
2' - 10' Brown medium sandy gravel with up to 8" cobles and a 2" pea gravel lens at
7' and roots to 10'
10' - 11 % Coarse gravely sand No Groundwater
Soil Loa #2
Located in the Southwest corner of site 25' North of fence & 120' East of fence
0' - 2' Black loamy gravely sand with humus
2' - 10 % ' Brown sandy gravel with three - 2" pea gravel lens
10 Yz' - 11 %_' Dark brown coarse sandy gravel - No Groundwater
Recommended Design Infiltration Rate: 2 minutes per inch
d~;
Lantl Planning & Ilse Engineering Surveying
1910-641h Avenua West • Tacoma, WA 90466 (253) 565-4491 Fax (253) 565-8563 Seaele (206) 824-1205
"Tha inrlu.ctrv starts here"
E%PIREB 8-29-08
WASHINGTON - SHEET NUMBER 24
S olL 5 ~ NG ~9 ~ '
~- --
I (D- SGR~/AsIgY CRRVEUY SAti/~YL
S/TE
2 MILES
I
2 MILOMEtERS
drston County, Washington
ROPERTIES OF THE SOILS--COnti¢ued
--PHYSL CHEMICA
CAL ANO L P ros on ~
TAELE 15. St¢ivk-swell Factors 'Organic
Soil 'DTI matter
Permeabll ity ~
~
'
' Available
j
acity
ca reaction~ Potential i K T ~
'
~
Clay
th
Soil name avd iOeP wa p
ter t
~ ~ ~
maP symbol 1
r I~in 3H. ~ I ~ 5 ' 5_15
z4
'i0
¢ i ~t
' ' ' -
~' 14
13-0
0 .
--------
15.6-6.0 {Low--- ____10.171 ~'
'
-221 7-15 i
~ 2.0-6.0 ~ .
.
14-0.1]
0' - ____--------
Law
~
p
'
0
--i
109--__________ 1
-261 5-15 'i 2.0-6.0 i
i
0.09-0.12 'S 6 6 0
__
_ __- _
~0.0
5
~
_
iLOw----'-`-- ~
1
22
'
SPar`a
,26-381 5-15 i 2.0-6.0
'
0-20 i 0.05-0.08
-- __
5
,5.6-6.0
-_~. 5 1
.i °°^'.'-'"3~.~-
15
i 2
-
~
,38-601 2_5 '~._
_.., __
- 6.
_..~-
___---_-~°
' _.
-...~.._~.-..d
11-0.13
0 ______
-_
0.
,5.1-6.0 ~LOw---__ 0 10'
_
..--m.--_.,._""-"
~
'~ ~ _
0 15
~ 2.0-6.0
i .
0.09-0.12 ' 0
'S. .02 i.
i ~,3 Low____
'
--
10~ 111_______
___ '
,15-20 2.0-6.0
220
' 0.03-0.05
- 6. _~
i
15~ 2 5-15
0
-
-
1--.-_v_-
SpanawaY ,20-601 0_5 '
I ~~~~ ^--
3 ~
.
'
X5.1-6.0 iLOw--- _10
10{
i
'
l
1
~~
~----
'--
2.0-6.0 i
.11-0.1
12
09-0
.
{5.1-6.5 iLOw--- _~0-07~ ''
_____ -_
__
6
'
0-
112r 113_________ i
i
-22 2.0-6.0 ~
' .
0.
0.03-0.05 X6.1-].3 ~Low_
~
1 O:5
i
i
Spanaway ,16
'22-60'
'
i
220
ii
'
i
2 ~ 5-15
_____ 0.15'
__
i
~
~
~ ~
'
'
'
i
0.11-0.13
-6.0 (Low-`-_
---'i0.10'~
1
'S
iLow_________
is
' ~
119*:
' 0-15, ---
'
-'------' 2.0-6.0 i
'
0-6.0 i
2 0.09-0.12 _6,3
~ '1 'iLaw-----'"--- -i0.02~
1- .
6
SpanawaY
i
'15-20~ -'- '
~ .
'
i
220 0.03-0.05 .
5 3-10
i
'
0i '
i
~20-60i 0_5
'
~
~
2 ~
_________
~0.2
--
5.6-6.5 ;Low---
-i
~
' i
i 0-6.0 i
2 0.09-0.1
2 _
--- 0
1i 5.6-6.5 Low-^--'-
241 i
0-5 i
i
N isgvallY'------',
0-5 i .
2.020.0 ~ 0.08-0.1
09-0.07
0 --
.
'16.1-7.3 iLOw------" i ~
5-10
i
5-311
,31-601 0'S i i
~ ,
' -,0.37' S
1-].3 iLOw___________
'
32'
' ' i
~ ;0
6.
1
1-7.3 Moderate--^-' i.
'
'
___i 0-7 i 15-20 ~
115-----"--~--
601 20-30 0 6-2.0 i 0.18-0.20 , -
' ~ 'n,28'~ 5 ', 10-20
i
w----------_
L
~ ]-
i
Sultan ~ i ' i 0.25-0.35 - i
O
',3.6-5.5 i
X0.32
5 iLow--------~
0_p i 5-18 i
'
"----- 0.6-2.0 i
6
2-0
0 0.20-0.30 ,3.6-5.
'0321 i
6-5.0 ,Moderate-----"-'
,3
'
116-----
i 7-501 5-18 i ~
.
,
2-0.6
0 0.19-0.21 .
i '
~
201 2 5-10
--10
I
Tacoma 20-50
'150-601 . i ____---
.
i LOW--- _~0
1-6.0
~
5
20~
-
i
~
~ 6-2.0
0 'i 0.12-0.14 i
.
.
____---
----
-
1-6.0 iLOw
15
i 10-15
0-11
117~ 118 119----~,
61 10-15 .
0.6_2.0 0.12-0.14
-__ _-___ _--_-
.
____
0.02'1
------- -,1
~
11-3
Ten Snc '
36-401 `- 0.06-0.07 1
~LOw
', 5.1-6.0
5 3-10
1
2-10
140-601
i
220
'
~
i
i
5 __----10.281
5.6-7.3 {Low----- _10
1
281
'
0-lli --- i ' 0.25-0.3
1 0.25-0.35 i
.
15.6-7.3 iLow---_-------_10.001
3 iLow___ ~
~
______ ___
120-----'-- '
ll-50, 0.2 0 6
~
0
6-1 ' 0.30-0.40
i 15.6-7.
~ ' ~
24' 3 5-10
i
Tisch ___
150-60 i .
0.
i
i
5 _______--10.
15.1-6.0 'iLOw--- _'
241 ~
0
i
' ~ 0.6_2.0 i 0.25-0.3
35 1
.
,5.1-6.0 ,Low--____._-___10
15'
' 0-101 ---
122_________ '
1 0.6-2.0 ' 0.25-0.
'
30 .
___
~ .1-6.0 'Law---
_____ ____
5
'
121,
Vailton 110-15~ ___
15-481
i
0,6-2.0
' 0.30_0.
i
' __ _______
~ '
--- ; 1
i
1 5 5-10
i
i ___
~ 4B 1 ___
, ~
i __
0 32
__
i
1-6.0 iLow__-_____ , .
'5
i
'
i ~
~ ~' 0.6-2.0 .
i 0.1]-0.20 i
17 15.1-6.0 iMOderate-------~0
__
201i
10-25
~ 123, 134-----'---'i 0-q~i 25-35 ~
i 0.6-2.0 .
i p, 12-0.
i 'S.1-6.0 1MOderate----
1
15-0.20
0
~ Wllkesvn '11
1q7-60, 18-35 0.6-2.0 .
'
,
~
5 { 5 3-9
'i 0.32
--
---
.
1~ 12
' i
%ervrthents
i
i
~
i
~
0.25-0.3 5 ',5.6-6.5 ',Low----'-
__10.321
itow__________
'
~
~ i
___
128---'i 0_g '
7 ~
2.0-6.0
0-6.0
~' 2 15.6-6.5
1 '~
' 0.15-0.35 '0.10
6-6.5 ~LOw-----'-`-- i
15
126, 12
r ~ 8-461 --- .
0-20
6 0.04-0.0
~ i
.
9
~
Yelm '~46-601 0-5
~ i .
ii
~ ~ unit.
¢f the map
compo
E sition and behavior characteristics
descr iptlon of the ma ar
p unit
* See
LUBBESMEYER LONGMIRE PLAT
Soils Report For Drainage Purposes
Site Address: 15132 Longmire Street Yebn, Wa. 98597
Tax Parcel Number: 21724420800
Prepared For: Olympic Engineering
1252 Devon Loop NE
Olympia, WA 98506
(360) 870-2561
Contact: Chris Merritt, P.E.
Prepared By: Parnell Engineering
10623 Hunters Lane S.E.
Olympia, WA 98513
(360) 491-3243 Fax (360) 491-3243
Contact: William Parnell, P.E.
PE
PARNELL ENGINEERING
~ 5~~ ~9 t~EEg~
SOIL EVALUATION REPORT
FORM 1: GENERAL SITE INFORMATION
PROJECT TITLE: Lubbesmeyer Longmire Plat SHEET: 1 OF 1
PROJECT NO. :05134 DATE: 8/24/65
PREPARED BY :William Parnell, P.E.
1. SITE ADDRESS: 15132 Longmire Street Yelm, Wa. 98597
TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 21724426806
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Create a 20 lot residential subdivision.
3. SITE DESCRIPTION: The 4.7 acre project site is currently occupied by a single residential dwelling and
two outbuildings. Site relief is nearly level. The southern 180' of this parcel slopes to the south at a t%slope.
The remaining project site slopes to the north at a 1-2 % slope. Elevations ange from a high of 353 f[. to a
low of 346 ft. at the northeast property corner. There are no site distinguishing features other than an existing
domestic well. Site vegetation consists of uncroppetl feld grasses on the majority of the site, with maintained
grass lawn and landscaping adjacent to the existing house. The project sde is hounded by residential
property to the north, east and west, and by Longmire Street SE to the south. On-site soils are swell-drained
Spanaway series formed in glacial outwash.
4. SUMMARY OF SOILS WORK PERFORMED: Two test pits were excavated by hackhoe to a depth of
152° below the existing grade. Sails were inspected by entering antl visually logging each test pit to a tlepth
of four fee[. Soils beyond four feet were inspected by examining backhoe tailings. One double ring infltration
test was completed in test pit #1 at 96" below the existing grade. Test pit soil lag data sheets and a double
ring infltration test result are included in this report.
5. ADDITIONAL SOILS WORK RECOMMENDED: Additional soils work should not he necessary unless
drainage infiltration facilities are located outside the general area encompassed by the soil test pits.
6. FINDINGS: The Natural Resource Conservation Service soil survey Far Thurston County mapped the on-
sitesoils as aSpanaway Gravelly Sandy Loam (110). The lwo test pits confrmed the Spanaway designation
generally profiling a gravelly fine sandy loam surtace soil overlying an extremely gravelly 8 cohbley coarse-
medium sand substratum. The substratum gravels and sands were slightly loose. Winter water table was no[
present and indicators were not visible. A tlouble ring infltration test completetl at 96" below the existing
gratle revealed an infltration mte of 46.5 in/hr.
7. RECOMMENDATIONS: The Spanaway soil series is a somewhat excessively drained soil that formed in
gravelly glacial oulwash. Infiltration rates are generally rapid in the substratum soils. The specified
substratum C-horizon soils should be targeted for all drainage infltration facilities as noted in the attached
soil log data sheets A design infltration rate of 20 in/hr or less would be appropriate for these targeted soils.
During construction, care must be taken to prevent the erasion of exposed soils. Drainage facility infiltration
surtaces must be properly protected from contamination bythe fne-grained upper horizon soils and from
compaction by construction site activities. Soils not properly protected will cause drainage infltration facilRies
to prematurely fail.
I hereby certify that I prepared this report, and conducted or supervised the pertormance of related work. I
certify that I am qualified to do this work. I represent my work to be complete an accurate within the hounds
of uncertainty inherent to the practice of s ils science, and to be suitable far its intended use.
SIGNED: ~d~~r-n. 1 ~~-=-=.,ZE~^
DATE ~=I~ i~~s
aVf Dl~ta lei°rr~
SOIL EVALUATION REPORT
FORM 1: GENERAL SITE INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.: 05100 antti: t ur t
PREPARED BY: William Parnell, P.E. DATE: 1/19/05
1. SITE ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 14848 Longmire Street SE Yelm, WA 98597
TPN: 21724310100
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Create a residential subdivision with all associated roadway. utility an
landscaping improvements.
3. SITE DESCRIPTION The project site is currently occupied by one residential building and severs
outbuildings centrally located on the parcel. Site relief is relatively flat with no distinguishing features.
Vegetation consists of actively used agricultural pasture grasses. The project site is bounded by Berry
Valley Road to the north. Longmire Street SE to the south. residential to the east and undeveloped
property to the west. On-site sails are well drained and formed in glacial outwash.
4. SUMMARY OF SOILS WORK PERFORMED: Thirteen test pits were excavated by backhoe [o a
maximum depth of 180" helow existing grade. Sails were inspected by entering and visually logging
each test pit to a depth of four feet. Soils heyond four feet were inspected by examining backhoe
tailings. Falling head percolation tests were completed in test pits #2, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13 at a depth of
fi0"below the existing gratle. Test pit soil log data sheets and percolation test results are included in
this report.
5. ADDITIONAL SOILS WORK RECOMMENDED: Additional soils work should not be necessary
unless drainage infltraticn facilities are located outside the general area encompassed by the sail test
pits.
6. FINDINGS: The National Resource Conservation Service of Thurston County mapped the on-site
soils as a Spanaway Gravelly Sandy Loam (110). All test pits confirm this designation. All test pits
generally revealed gravelly fne sandy loam surface sails, overlying an extremely gravelly and cobbley
coarse sand subsUaNm. SubstraNm sails were moderately loose with no fines present. Winter water
[able was not present in any test pits. Falling head percolation tests were completed revealing the
fallowing infiltration rates: Test pit #2 - 2160 in/hr, #5 - 144 in/hr, #7 - 188 in/hr, # 9 - 617 in/hr,
#11 - 360 in/hr, #13 - 68.5 iNhr. Tests were completed utilizing a 6" diameter PVC pipe to prevent
sidewall collapse.
--- ^•~-~ •~~ ~ ~~~.~. i ne apanaway son series is a somewhat excessively drained soil that
formed in glacial outwash. Infiltratlon fates are generally rapid in the substratum soils. The substratum
soils should he targeted for all drainage infiltration facilities. A design infiltrafion rate of 20 in/hr or less
would be appropriate for all targeted C-horizon sails as recommended in the attached soil log
information sheets.
During construction, care must he taken to prevent erosion of exposed soils. Drainage facility
infiltration surfaces must he properly protected from contamination by the fine-grained upper horizon
soils and from compaction by site constructlon activities. Sails not properly protected will cause
drainage infiltration facilities to prematurely fail.
I hereby certify [hat I prepared this report. and conducted ar supervised the pertormance of related
work. I certify that I am qualifed to do this work. I represent my work to he complete an accurate within
the hounds of uncertainTy inherent to-Fh practice of soils science, and to he suitable for its intended
use. ~
~J ~ s ~-'~_`.
SIGNED: ~.•[ 4r ~ - ~1 ~ ~
DATE: ~~4~'S a± '~L y
iC:3' 9 ~ .~~_9
,+. `~~ ~.
A t ir'~.
s~,~ •. ~.
-Yn~;x _~-;i;~:~-~-__~~
APPENDIX B -BASIN MAP AND DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
10 of 11
b
„-,-,, ;,
~„
~~
~ ,~~~
;o o
, ;~
~
~, ~ ~
~ n
,
~.
0
0
Q
o {~
RII
r
N C
0
q'g,
~\
°°~.
~~;.
L,~
~ ~a.
i
°r
~~ ~
~: `~~
~ ~ ,~
:~
~ o
~/ W Z
1, I\ ~~~
1 I W Z Q
J o w ~
~_ wzp
/~ ~ a~ii
~ ~ ~-~
~~ ~ ~
o ~.
1 ~. Tr
,.
°'h
°r~
o
g
i.
~4
r 1
'rte
- - ~-.a --_-__ I
43}, )~~'
r
~' ~r,
\\~` sr~ iL `5%~~\\\\\
~~,
";
,_
=~ ~,>
-_-.
r4 ~~,
t
"~
~ ~ ~i
br ~ ~ _
t~ ~
~~
~~ / ~~ t~l
..
1\ \\\ mac- ~ 4`f '~l
O
Y
Q
m m
~ U z'
N Q °~
a W
J
~o
as
J
~~
9y
~r
N ~
F / ~r
~~ S
\ / d ~ N
~ti e6 Mj
/ UI /~ M
~` - / / F i n
3
\°`- /~ ~ a
~'
/ / //,
~. m
// . / z
~ ~ i
/ d~ i f~a_
~ / T J //
~s.~ ti
mt ~ a
~r~ U
i"`~ ~ ~ m
~ o ~__
%' ~ a
.~3tus ~vdr~na - - - - - -
g~.
~
aam
C 7
v
f
2 n
o
W b~
I
$
.L
.
''
. r
'~
:
g
l va
Q ~
O ^
- a9
a
Waterworks HMS Report Fritlay, February 16, 200]
Pr°jecL 041591nf1 Pontl2 P 1
Rainier View 04-159
Yelm, WA per 1992 DOE Stormwater Management Manual Standards
Predeveloped Flows For Rainier View
Project Precips
i2 Yr] 2.00 in
[5 yr] 2.50 in
[1.0 yr] 3.00 in
(25 Yr] 3.50 in
[100 yr] 4.00 in
[6 moj 1.28 in
Drainage Area: predeveloped
Hyd Method: SBUH Hyd
Peak Factor: 484.00
Storm Dur 24.00 hrs
Area CN
Pervious 5.2800 ac 74.OC
Impervious 0.0000 ac 0.00
Total 5.2800 ac
Supporting Data:
Pervious CN Data:
low growing brush & grasslands 74.00
Pervious TC Data:
Flow type: Description:
Loss Method: SCS CN Number
SCS Abs: 0.20
TC
0.17 hrs
0.00 hrs
5.2800 ac
Length: Slope: Coeff:
6 mo Flow Time Volume
Summary: 0.0390 cfs 22.00 hrs 1560.14 cf - 0.0358 acft
2 yr Flow Time Volume
Summary: 0.1300 cfs 9.00 hrs 6700.66 cf - 0.1538 acft
10 yr Flow Time Volume
Summary: 0.6900 cfs 8.00 hrs 17406.63 cf - 0.3996 acft
25 yr Flow Time Volume
Summary: 1.0916 cfs 8.00 hrs 23762.31 cf - 0.5455 acft
100 yr Flaw Time Volume
Summary: 1.5336 cfs 8.00 hrs 30592.76 cf - 0.7023 acft
Travel Time
10.37 min
Engineering Inc.
ONIHSVM Wl3A ~O A1J0
S3Ld.LS3 A1~A ~1~I11ViI
SlIV13O ONV
S31ON 'SNOLLO3S 'NV~d ONOd
,• m
M ~~:
OOE9-SL4-ESZ a ,,..,,,e.3
e~ +~~z
..n a e.rv..,a c.~ <
6fib8fi tlM OOOM3AVl cao-z,z¢sa -.:,m ~. .,e.._s«aa~ p
o ~ n
tl 3llf1S'M 13""^ 4)SL - 91SS F /°" ~~' T'•'u/~^•6 P"°~ '~"' °'" ° c
$ ~
SkJ3OlIf1S 193H0 '
' o
U
0 NI
ONI833NI0 N3 ~a0~~~~° fl m
~tl3tlO13A30/b3NM0 s mmmo
~~
~G
3
~~
z;;
F"' P 3
~'¢~
W ~ 6~
~~~
W o~
_ ~LL
Z~~
Q
n~
S
Q
~s O /.::
L
/.
i
i
/ i
H'
O
J
V
8
8~
xg
~a
a~
~~
Z
w.
i
~U
PnFJ~J
N J
m3=`
1'
S~,
i~
~a€
~4m
~`
p~
Q
3
J Z
3
O
O b
b t ~ s
a s o -
U
W s
g
~ n t
e
~
~
w 2 rv
w 3
~ a
`
= 044 4 £~? a
3
d
~ i i 3~; 4
o
e~
m
m
2
F"
w•
Ne
Z_i
a~
2
O'
F':
~_
No
Z`
a~
§~
x e _o s~
a.
_- a J L- -_ __ ~
(jl~'/ /
aez.vz.,ex
~~. / / //~A i ./~
i =~ m
i / ...~;~ ~~,3 ~ ~ ~ / iii j ~~ m ~
~- /%/._i ~ i/~ ~-~~~ /~ %~ i ~ ~ ~ U~O
L... / / 3
~_ ~
WaterWOrks HMS Report
Thurstlay, January 11,200]
Developed Flows for Rainier View 04-159
Yelm, WA per 1992 DOE Stormwater Management Manual Standards
Project Precips
[2 Yrl 2.00 in
[5 yr] 2.50 in
[10 yr] 3.00 in
[25 yr] 3.50 in
[100 yr] 4.00 in
[6 mo] 1.28 in (6-month = 64 % of 2-year for 1992 DOE)
Drainage Area: Dev
Hyd Method: SBUH Hyd
Peak Factor: 484.00
Storm Dur 24.00 hrs
Area CN
Pervious 2.7700 ac 78.00
Impervious 1.2400 ac 98.00
Total 4.0100 ac
Supporting Data:
Pervious CN Data:
Landscaping 78.00
Impervious CN Data:
Road, driveways, pond area 98.00
shared driveway for lots 8, 11 98.00
Pervious TC Data:
Flow type: Description:
Sheet flow down landscaping
Sheet flow down road
Shallow flow down road
Channel conveyance through N-12 pipe
Impervious TC Data:
Flow type: Description:
Sheet Flaw down driveway
Sheet flow down road to CB
Loss Method: SCS CN Number
SCS Abs: 0.20
TC
0.50 hrs
0.10 hrs
2.7700 ac
1.1400 ac
0.1000 ac
Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time
225.00 ft 1.50% 0.1500 26.60 min
75.00 ft 1.00 % 0.0110 1.61 min
130.00 ft 1.00 % 27.0000 0.80 min
250.00 ft 1.00°/ 42.0000 0.99 min
Leng[h: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time
195.00 K 2.00 % 0.0110 2.61 min
105.00 ft 1.00 % 0.0110 2.10 min
Channel conve ante with N-12 i e mat. 250.00 ft 1.00 % 42.0000 0.99 min
6 mo Flow Time Volume
Summary: 0.3316 cfs 8.00 hrs 6245.92 cf - 0.1434 acft
2 yr Flow Time Volume
Summary: 0.6261 cfs 8.00 hrs 12856.27 cf-0.2951 acft
10 yr Flow Time Volume
Summary: 1.2012 cfs 8.00 hrs 23809.96 cf - 0.5466 acft
100 yr Flow Time Volume
Summary: 1.8526 cfs 8.00 hrs 35919.42 cf - 0.8246 acft
Inc.
Waterworks HMS Repon Thursday, January i 1, 2007
PrajecC 041591nf1 Pontl2 p 1
Rainier View 04-159
(Calculated Infiltration Pond Size 28' by 41' with 3.00 h: 1v and 3-foot deep)
Project Precips ~~ ]03
[2 yr] 2.00 in = , 1 r
[5 yr] 2.50 in
[10 yr] 3.00 in 31n; 1V 100-year 24-hour 3~ '~°~"
[25 yr] 3.50 in storm E~
[100 yr] 4.00 in _ ~~ [~~
[6 mo] L28 in ~ fig, -~
RLPCOMPUTE [Routing] SUMMARY
100 yr Match O: 0.00 cfs Peak Out O: 0.53 cfs -Peak Stg: 102.95 ft -Active Vol: 0.13 acft
Summary Report of all RLPooI Data
BASLIST2
[Dev] Using [TYPEtA] As [100 yQ
LSTEND
BasinlD Peak O Peak T Peak Vol Area Method Raintype
Event
------- (cfs) (hrs) (ac-ft) ac ILOSs
Dev 1.85 B.00 0.8246 4.01 SBUH/SCS TYPEIA 100 yr
BASLIST [TYPEIA] AS [100 yr] DETAILED
[Dev]
Drainage Area: Dev
Hyd Method: SBUH Hyd
Peak Factor: 484.00
Storm Dur 24.00 hrs
Area CN
Pervious 2.7700 ac 78.00
Impervious 1.2400 ac 98.00
Total 4.0100 ac
Supporting Data:
Pervious CN Data:
Landscaping 78.00
Impervious CN Data:
Road, driveways, pond area 98.00
shared driveway for lots 8, 11 98.00
Pervious TC Data:
Flow type: Description:
Sheet flow down landscaping
Sheet flow down road
Shallow flow down road
Channel conveyance through N-12 pipe
Impervious TC Data:
Flow type: Description:
Sheet flow down driveway
Sheet Flow down road to CB
Loss Method: SCS CN Number
SCS Abs: 0.20
TC
0.50 hrs
0.10 hrs
2.7700 ac
1.1400 ac
0.1000 ac
Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time
225.00 ft 1.50% 0.1500 26.60 min
75.OOft 1.00% 0.0110 1.61 min
130.00 ft 1.00 % 27.0000 0.80 min
250.00 ft 1.00 % 42.0000 0.99 min
Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time
195.00 ft 2.00°/ 0.0110 2.81 min
105.00 ft 1.00°/ 0.0110 2.10 min
Channel conve ante with N-12 i e mat. 250.00 ft 1.00% 42.0000 0.99 min
100 yr Flow Time Volume
Summary: 1.8526 cfs 8.00 hrs 35919.42 cf - 0.824fi acft
Baseline Engineering
WaterWOrks HMS Report Thvrstlay, January 11, 2007
Project: 041591n(I Pantl2 p q 2
HYDLIST SUMMARY
[100yr out]
LSTEND
HydID Peak O Peak T Peak Vol Cont Area
------- (cfs) (hrs) (ac-ft) (ac)
moyr om asa zn o.azsl a.olpo
STORLIST
[loft Pond]
LSTEND
Node ID: Infil Pond
Desc: Infiltration Pond
Start EI: 100.0000 ft Max EI: 103.0000 ft
Contrib Basin: Contrib Hyd:
Length ss1 ss2 Width ss3 ss4
41.000Oft 3.OOh:1v 3.OOhav 28.000Oft 3.OOh:1v 3.OOhav
Bottom area only with inf Itraticn
DISCHLIST
[Infiltration]
LSTEND
Control Structure ID: Infiltration -Infiltration control structure
Descrip: Multiple Orifce
Start EI Max EI Increment
100.0000 ft 103.0000 ft 0.10
Infil: 20.00 in/hr Multiplier: 1.00
STORTABLE TABLE
[Infil Pond]
LSTEND
Stage-Storge Table for node Infil Pond
Stage Vol Vol
(ft) (cf) (ac-ft)
100.00 o.ao o.oooo
1 o0.m 116.88 o.ooz7
100.20 237.98 0.0055
100.30 3fi3.35 0.0083
100.40 493.09 0.0113
tnpsp s27.zs p.olaa
100.60 765.91 0.0176
100.70 909.15 0.0209
1 oo.ep lpszoz p.ozaa
100.90 1209.62 0.0278
101.00 1367.00 0.0314
m1.1o uzs za o.oasl
1c1.zg 1sss.az p.oae9
101.30 1868.59 0.0429
101.40 2045.85 0.0470
101.50 2228.25 0.0512
701.60 2415.87 0.0555
Stage Vol Vol
(ft) (cf) (ac-h)
101.70 2608.79 a.psss
lotep zeo7.as o.ofiaa
101.90 3010.78 0.0691
102.00 3220.00 0.0739
102.10 3434.80 0.0]89
102.20 3655.26 0.0839
102.30 3881.43 0.0891
102.40 4113.41 0.0944
102.50 4351.25 0.0999
102.60 4595.03 0.1055
102.70 4844.83 0.1112
lozao smo.7o o.1m
102.90 53fi2.]4 0.1231
103.00 5631.00 0.1293
Engineering Inc.
WaterWOrks HMS Repotl
Montlay, January 22, 2047
Wet Pond For Rainier View 04-159
Yelm, WA per 1992 DOE Stormwater Management Manual Standards
Project Precips
[2 yr] 2.00 in =
~
[5 yr] 2.50 in 3h'~ly Cell 1 /{
-4 At1V- Cell2 5~ Sn~t+m{,~.~
[10 yr] 3.00 in
[25 yr]
3.50 in
~~ 1 c~~jieot _
I ~''
[100 yr] 4.00 in ~'r`Je
[6 moj 1.28 in (6-month = 64 % of 2-year for 1992 DOE)
Drainage Area: Dev
Hyd Method: SBUH Hyd
Peak Factor: 484.00
Storm Dur 24.00 hrs
Area CN
Pervious 2.7700 ac 78.00
Impervious 1.2400 ac 98.00
Total 4.0100 ac
Supporting Data:
Pervious CN Data:
Landscaping 78.00
Impervious CN Data:
Road, driveways, pond area 98.00
shared driveway for lots 8, 11 98.00
Pervious TC Data:
Flow type: Description:
Sheet Flow down landscaping
Sheet flow down road
Shallow flow down road
Channel conveyance through N-12 pipe
Impervious TC Data:
Flow type: Description:
Sheet flow down driveway
Sheet flow down road to CB
Channel conveyance with N-12 pipe mat.
6 mo Flow Time
Summary: 0.3316 cfs B.00 hrs
Loss Method: SCS CN Number
SCS Abs: 0.20
TC
0.50 hrs
0.10 hrs
2.7700 ac
1.1400 ac
0.1000 ac
Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time
225.00 ft 1.50% 0.1500 26.60 min
75.00 ft 1.00 % 0.0110 1.61 min
130.00 ft 1.00°/ 27.0000 0.80 min
250.00 ff 1.00 % 42.0000 0.99 min
Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time
195.00 ft 2.00 % 0.0110 2.61 min
105.00 ft 1.00 % 0.0110 2.10 min
250.00 ft 1.00 % 42.0000 0.99 min
Volume
6245.92 cf - 0.1434 acft
1992 DOE Requires Wet pond to Contain Volume of 6-month 24-Hour Storm
Pond Volume should have minimum 6245.9 cfof volume using SBUH method for 6-month 24-
hour storm. Actual Pond size will have a minimum volume of 14,507 cf which gives a Factor of
Safety (FS) of 2.3.
Baseline Engineering Inc.
Wa[erWorks HMS Report Wetlnestlay, January 10, 200]
Pr~lon~ nm so 1„ei o,..,no
Individual Roof Downspouts For 2600 sf Roof Area
Trench size (3' by 19' by 3' Deep)
Rainier View 04-159
Yelm, WA per 1992 DOE Stormwater Management Manual Standards
Project Precips
[2 yr] 2.00 in
[5 yr] 2.50 in 30% Voids in
[10 yr] 3.00 in ~
[25 yr] 3.50 in p
[100 yr] 4.00 in 3 Washed Rock rer'for~~~
[6 mo] 1.28 in
(i~
~ ~ ~~
RLPCOMPUTE [roof routing] SUMMARY 3
100 yr Match O: 0.00 cfs Peak Out O: 0.03 cfs -Peak Stg: 102.97 ft -Active Vol: 50.77 cf
Summary Report of all RLPooI Data
BASLIST2
[Single RcofJ Using [TYPEIA] As [100 yr]
LSTEND
BasinlD Peak Q Peak T Peak Vol Area Method Raintype
Event
------- (cfs) (hrs) (ac-ft) ac /Loss
Single ROOf 0.06 ].83 0.0188 0.06 SBUH/SCS TYPEIA 100 yr
BASLIST [TYPEIA] AS [100 yr] DETAILED
[Single Roof)
LSTEND
Drainage Area: Single Roof
Hyd Method: SBUH Hyd Loss Method: SCS CN Number
Peak Factor: 484.00 SCS Abs: 0.20
Storm Dur 24.00 hrs
Area CN TC
Pervious 0.0000 ac 0.00 0.00 hrs
Impervious 0.0600 ac 98.00 0.01 hrs
Total 0.0600 ac
Supporting Data:
Impervious CN Data:
2500 sf per home 98.00 0.0600 ac
Impervious TC Data:
Flow type: Description: Length: Slope: Ceeff:
Sheet flow down roof 30.00 ft 3.00 % 0.0110
Channel N-12 pipe conveyance to trench 40.00 ft 1.00 % 42.0000
TC of 0.66 min < 5 min, program will use a tc of 5 min in computations.
100 yr Flow Time Volume
Summary: 0.0578 cfs 7.83 hrs 820.10 cf - 0.0188 acft
Travel Time
0.50 min
0.16 min
Baseline Engineering Inc.
Waterworks HMS Report Wednestlay, January 10, 200]
Project: 041591nfl POntl2 P q 2
STORLIST
[roof trench]
LSTEND
Node ID: roof trench
Desc: Infiltration Pond
Start EI: 100.0000 ft Max EI: 103nnnn ff
Contrib Basin: Contrib Hyd:
Length Width Void Ratio
19.0000 ft 3.0000 ft 30.00
Bottom area only with infiltration
DISCHLIST
[Infiltration]
LSTEND
Control Structure ID: Infiltration -
Descrip: Multiple Orifice
Start EI Max EI Increment
100.0000 ft 103.0000 fl 0.10
Infil: 20.00 in/hr
Infiltration control structure
Multiplier: 1.00
STORTABLE TABLE
[roof trench]
LSTEND
Stage-Storge Table for node roof trench
Stage Val Vol
(ft) (cf) (ac-ft)
m6.oo o.oa a.oooo
1 oo.m i ~1 0.0600
1oo.zo 3.4z 0.0601
maao s.13 0.0001
wo,ao s.a4 o.oooz
m6so ass o.o00z
100.60 10.26 0.0002
100.]0 11.97 0.0003
100.60 13.66 0.0003
1o6so 1sa9 6.0o6a
1n1.oc n.1c 0.0604
1a1.1o 1e.a1 0.oooa
1o1.zo zosz o.ooos
1o1a9 2z.za o.0oos
101.40 z3s4 o.o60s
101.50 25.65 0.0006
101.60 27.36 0.0006
Stage Vol Vol
(ft) (cf) (ac-ft)
1o1.7a zs.o7 aooo7
m1.ao ao.7e 0.0007
1o1s6 3z as 0,0007
1 oz.0o aa.z0 o.o0oa
102.10 35.91 0.0006
loazo 3]sz o.6oos
102.30 39.33 0.0009
102 40 41.04 0.0009
i ozso az.7s 0.0010
1ozs9 aa.as o.aolo
1nz.]o as.n 0.0011
102a0 47.88 0.0011
mzso asss o.ao11
1a3.oo s1.3o o.oolz
Baseline Engineering Inc.
MANNING'S EQUATION FOR OPEN CHANNEL FLOV~
12" CIRCULAR PIPE CAPACITY
z t
Q- 1.49AR3Sz
Input Values
d = diameter of pipe 1.00 ft
h =height of flow 0.90 ft
S = longitutlinal slope 0.005 ft/ft
n =roughness coefficien 0.014
Calculated Variables
V =Velocity 3.36 fps
A =Area
P =Perimeter
WA =Wetted Area 0.745
WP =Wetted Perimeter 2.498 ft
= y rau is a ius
ercent ul .00 ~
= uan ityo ow 2.5 cs
Minimum pipe slope
Check for Capacity: 100-year 24-hour Storm Flow = 1.86 cfs
2.50 e£s > 1.86 cEs Has Capacity
Infiltration Pond 48-hour Drawdown Time Requirement
Ta~awaow~ _ (Pond Volume)/ [Bottom Area x Infiltration Rate x (1 ft/12 inches)]
Ta~waowa= 5493 cf / [962 sf x 20 inches / hour x (1 ft/12 inches) ]
Tarawaown = 3.42 hours
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FoR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN
APPENDIE AIII-1.1
ISOPLWIAL NAPS FOR D83ION STORMS
Included Ln thia appendix are the 2, 30 and 100-year, 2a-hour design etozm and mean
annual precipitation isopluvial maps for the Puget sound basin. Theee have been taken
from NOAH Atlas 2 "Precipitation - Frequency Atlas of the Weet ern United States, Volume
IX, Washington.
III-1-43 FEBRUARY, 1992
BTOAMWATER HANACEMENT HANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN
-III 1 44 FEBAUAAY~ 1992
lDy~ },O ;n
STORMWATEA MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN
~~~
iSI 1 45 ee:BRUARY, 1992
~D i ~,,,
STGRMWATER MANAGEMENT MANDAL FOA THE PUGET SOUND HASIN
124 123
I~ ~--_~- IS~~
~ ~ /0.~
~ \ ~
i U /7
~;-. I
t Gn
1
\ fP1~4Y XAP Qk ~POFI $IPNL--
i r,l~5'~BS \ ~ 7' 70 ~! ..
Y~'I / f
WASHINGTON i "°
la o to zo ~o w I
`- ~~ MMES ~ la
I
Figure 30
ISOPLUVIAES F 100-YR 24-HR PRECIPITgTION
IN TENTHS OF N INCH ,
124 »e
.. ~ tiS;~f
FTLAS $, Volume I%
~O Cy r1,5.0epartment of CQnme¢e
122
mru
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN
Table ZII-1.3 SCS Weetarn Washington Runoff Curve Numbers
(Published by SCS in 1982) Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural,
suburban and urban
13 T[I 1 P. Fns TvnP 1L r n£all AV e4 r<F..4i nn 9d-Fr.nr e
LAND USE DESCRIPTION CUAVE NUMBERS RY
OLOGIC SOIL GROUP
A E C 0
Cultivated land 1J: winter condition R6 91 94 95
Mountain open areas: low growing brush d grasslands 74 82 89 92
Meadow or pasture: 65 78 85 89
Wood or forest land:. undisturbed 42 64 76 el
Wood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 72 S1 86
Orchard: with cover crop 81 88 92 94
open spaces, lawns, parka, golf courses, cemeteries,
landscaping.
Good condition: grass cover on L75a of the 68 80 86 90
area
Fair condition: qr sea cover on 50-]56 of ]] 85. 90 92
the area
Gravel roads 6 parking lore: 76 85 89 91
ntrt roads fi arking lot a: 72~ 82 87 89
Impervious surfaces, pavement, roofs etc. 98 98 98 98
O en water bodies: lakes, wetlands, onde etc, LL p00 100 100 100
Single family reeidenti al(2 ):
Dwelling Unit/Gross Acr e &Impervious(3) Separ ate curve number
1.0 DU/GA 15' shall be select ed for
1.5 DD/GA 20 pervi ous & impervious
2.0 DU/GA 25 porti ons of the site
2.5 DU/GA 30 or ba sin
3.0 DU/GA 34
3.5 DU/GA 38
4.0 DU/GA 42
4.5 DU/GA 46
5.0 DU/GA 48
5.5 DU/GA 50
6.0 DU/CA 52
fi.5 DU/GA 54
7.0 DU/GA 56
PUD's, condos, apartments, &impervioue
commercial bueineaeea G moat be
industrial areas computed
(1) For a more detailed description of agricultural land use curve numbers refer
to National Bngineering Handbook, Sec. 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972.
(2) Assumes roof and driveway runoff is directed into street/storm system.
(3) Tha remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good
condition for the ee curve numbers.
III-1-12 FEBRUARY, 1992
APPENDIX C - THURSTON COUNTY FLOOD MAP
l l of 11
Thurston County Vlap Output Page
Page 1 of 1
Thurston C
e
,
e
E
f
t
N~sf~
s
<z
0
__~_ta.eawe„~r 5°
emsxiE pO SE ~, n-
a se b
.a"so ct
M •~Pp( R~
aE
nraR~Rn3E
ulsnmmer mmsron ~ounry malwa every etlb~t ro ensure tha[ This map is a nneend
uate mpresenration of the work ofCOnnty government. However, the Ccunry and all
relatetl personnel make no wai.anry, expressed or ilnVlied, regarding rM1e accuracy,
ompleteness or convenience of any information tliwlosed on this maV. Nor does tFe County
uryt liablllty for vny damvge or Injury ceased by the nse o(tFis mvp.
To tFe fallen extern permissible pursuvnuo vpplicable law, TM1Umtoo County daeleims el I
war ie expres o mVllcd, includln~but not llmitW ro, Inrylied werremtes of memhavt
vbility,tdma fitness Por~a pan vWar purVOS vnd non-Infn'ngen of proprierzry rights.
ants
Under no circumsmners, indudmg, bur nor limited m, negligence, shall TM1urnon Ccunry be
liable Far any diixcq indl«et, incidental, special or eonsequemial demvgev that result from
tM1e nse of, or the inability m nse, TM1vrston County marermis.
flu nav ®200L 11uusmn Cowry GeoDam Cemer
G culLi I'a : 24p4 Heritage Cour[ SW, 3rd Ploor
Grwcr = OlYmpin, WA 98b@-fi031
tsean
LEGEND
/~/ Llajar Roads }food Zones
Roads
t+ater Bod{es
Streuus
~~--~ eo
t ~. 2ouiug
n
outs
t+retlands ~- Cities
SVetlaud Bntfers paecets
http://geomap Lgeodata.org/servlet/cow.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=cadastra]ov&... 2/16/2007
W
m
Z
J
W
Q
Z
Q ~
O
W H
w~ Z
O~ C7X
~ wQ
D
a ww
~
W zz
oo
U
W
1=100
L N
alt ~
Z
x
0
W ~
6 ~ a
6 O
a
K
LL
~ ~(9
a
~~-
~ s
.~ o