Traffic 001ATE .Jake Tn(fic Engineering, Inc . Mark J. Jawbs, P.E, P.T.O.E.
President
7131 8^ Are SW - Seanle, WA 98106 - 7007
Tel. 706762.1918 -Cell 706.799.5692 -Facsimile 706.767.1978
bmail jaketraHic@mmcazccet
March 3, 2005
Received
Scott Griffin, Member MAR 0 8 2005
FREESTONE DFF YELM II, LLC
6820 20m St. East
Fife, WA 98424
Re: Yelm Plat - Yelm
Addendum Letter
Dear Mr. Griffin,
We have prepared this Addendum Letter to our Level II Traffic Impact Analysis Report dated
August 25, 2004 in response to the City's February llm, 2005 letter to you, a copy of this
letter is attached. This addendum reviews the sight lines at the Proposed Plat Access on
Middle Rd. S.E. for the Yelm Plat project. The site is located at 16440 Mitldle Rd. Southeast.
Access to the site is provided via a new intersection off of Middle Rd. Southeast.
Site Access Sight Distance
The City of Yelm's sight distance standards are based on the American Association of State
Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) criteria.
Exhibit 9-55 "Design Intersection provides guidance to the recommended sight lines
contained in the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
(AASHTO) A Policy on geometric Design of highways and Streets, 2001 provides guidance
regarding recommended sight lines at access points. Sight Distance -Case B1 -Left Turn
from Stop" (attached in the appendix) identifies sight distance criteria fora 25 MPH design
speed, the posted speetl limit on Middle Road Southeast. The stopping sight distance is
identified at 155 feet antl the entering sight distance is 280 feet fora 25 MPH speed.
The sight lines at the existing south driveway serving a single family home (SFDU) on Midtlle
Roatl S.E. were previously field measured. No impetliment to the sight line to the north
exists. A horizontal curve in Middle Road S.E. to the south affects the sight line that is further
exacerbated by vegetation growth in the right of way. The Proposed Plat Access intersection
on Middle Rd. S.E. to serve the subject Yelm Plat project is -75 to the northwest of this
existing SFDU driveway.
Scott Griffin, Member
FREESTONE DFF YELM II, LLC
March 3, 2005
Page -2 -
JTE, Inc.
The following table shows the stopping and entering sight distances ai the existing SFDU and
Proposed Plat Access intersections with Middle Road Southeast:
SSD (ft.) ESD (fL)
L
ti
oca
on
from from to northwest to southeast
northwest southwest
'
Existing SFDU Driveway 200' + (225) r +
350 (240) ~
Proposed Plat Access 200' + 210' + 350' + - 310' ~
Per the AASHTO criteria the stopping and entering sight distance standards (155 and 280
feet, respectively) are met at the Proposed Plat Access on Middle Road Southeast. Cutting
back the vegetation in the right of way on the inside of the horizontal curve on Middle Road
would enhance the sight line for the existing SFDU driveway that is not a part of the subject
project.
Summary and Conclusion
This letter has reviewed the site access sight lines at the Proposed Plat Access on Middle
Road Southeast. The AASHTO recommended sight lines of 155 and 280 feet, SSD and ESD,
respectively, are the City of Yelm criteria fora 25 MPH speed. Our analysis indicates that the
City of Yelm sight distance requirements would be met at the Proposed Plat Access /Middle
Rd. S.E. intersection. The access intersection would need to be constructed to City of Yelm
criteria. Cutting back the vegetation in the right of way on the inside of the horizontal curve
on Middle Road would enhance the sight line for the existing SFDU driveway that is not a part
of the Subject project.
If you have any questions you can contact me at (206) 762-1978 or email meat
Very truly yours,
Mark J. Jacobs, PE, PTOE, President
Jake Traffic Engineering, Inc.
v~,o3. oS"
i -Sight line with trimming of brush in the right of way located on the insioe of the horizontal curve on
Mitltlle Roetl SE. to the South of [he driveway
~ -Sight Distance base0 on previous measurements and County aerial mapping information (copy attached)
M1J: m~~ExrtRwt:s 4/3/O
~.
0
m
m
a
Project Yelm Plat
Location: 16440 Middle Rd . S.E.
Owner. Freestone DFF Yelm II, LLC
NORTH
n
~ a m
H
xnm s s
e4
sP ~ ~
~ a ~ m
~'~
ce.
¢
4
~
Bxry Valley Rtl SE }°~
9' s ~
~r
'
a 5
~
i
A ~ Qd '~
y'
<o ngmin SY SE ~~
e ty ®
i o
nuW 4e
~ i9F
J ~
~ ~
' ¢
~
v4
Tn NE 1mN Ma
S
SE 163N Are
m F'
eTi
B~Mas
n Y q~~
~5'ga+ere ~ tlE
b
iRStx Way sE
f etia~u~vi
~
Hill Rtl SE Nk Ry
~
~. 1®IM1 Aw SE
2 _ -
YELM PLAT -YELM
JTE, InC. LEVEL II TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
FIGURE 1
VICINITY MAP
Project: Yelm Plat
Location: 16440 Middle Rd. S.E.
Owner. Freestone DFF Yelm II, LLC
YELM PLAT - YELM
JTE, ~f1C. LEVEL II TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
FIGURE 2
SITE PLAN
City of Yelm
Commnnity Development Department
105 Yetm Avenue West
P.O. Box 979
Yelm, WA 98597
February 11, 2005
Mr. Scott Griffn
Freestone DFF Yelm II LLC
P.O. Box 73669
Puyallup, WA 98373
Dear Mr. Griffin:
The City has performed a preliminary review of your environmental checklist, and
requires further information before we can complete our environmental review.
The road connection to the new subdivision located on the west side of the property
does not align. Please have your engineer contact Skillings Connelly to acquire the
correct placement of the new road connection.
The amount of grading discussed in the environmental checklist does not correlate with
the amount shown on the preliminary grading plan.
The Traffic Impact Analysis submitted does not discuss sight distance on Middle Road.
Please submit more detailed information on sight distance in the north and west
directions, to include existing driveways.
Please submit the additional information above. If you have any further questions,
please feel free to give me a call.
Sincerely,
7/
Tami Merriman
Assistant Planner
cc: Cathie Carlson, Parametrix
(360) J58-3835
(360) ISB-31J4 FAX
u.,. ru,ci.yelma~~aue
YELM
YELM PLAT
LEVEL II TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Prepared for
Scott Griffin, Member
FREESTONE DFF YELM II, LLC
6820 2Ot" St. East
Fife, WA 98424
August 25, 2004
J I E I nC. Mark 1. Jaco65. P.E., P.T.O.E., President
r 77318x^ Ave. SW -Seattle. WA 95106 - 2007
JAKE TRAFFIC Tel. 206.762.1978; Cell. 206.799.5692
ENGINEERING, INC. Facsimile 206.762.1975
Snail -jaketraffic@comcast.net
JTE .,ake Traffic Enpneeriag, lac . Mark J. Jacobs, P.E., P.T.O.E
President
1731 B" Are SW - kaMe, WA 98106 - 2W7
Tel. 206.162.1918 -Cell 206.799.5692 - Fauimile 206.162.1978
E-mail jaketaKr@mmcast.net
August 25, 2004
Scott Griffin, Member
FREESTONE DFF YELM II, LLC
6820 20s^ SL East
Fife, WA 98424
Re: Yelm Plat - Yelm
level II Traffic Impact Analysis
Dear Mr. Griffin;
We are pleased to submit this Level II Traffic Impact Analysis for the proposed Yelm Plat
project. The project proposes to provide 50 single family lots. The site is located at 16440
Middle Rd. Southeast. Access to the site is provided via a new intersection off of Middle Rd.
Southeast.
We prepared a Traffic Scoping Worksheet which identified the intersections to be studied.
City of Yelm staff reviewed the Scoping Worksheet and identified the following intersections
for study in this Traffic Impact Analysis:
- 1~s St. S./SR 507
- 1es St. N./Rhoton Rd. S.E.
- Railway Rd. S.E./Middle Rd. S.E.
- 100 Way S.E./Grove Rd. S.E.
- Site Access intersection
We have contluctetl a fieltl review of the site and surrounding street system. The general
format of this report is to describe the proposetl project, identity existing traffic conditions
(baseline), project future traffic conditions and identify Agency street road improvements
(future baseline), calculate the traffic that would be generated by the project and then atltl it
to the future baseline traffic volumes. Operational analyses are used to determine the
specific project traffic impact and appropriate traffic mitigation measures to reduce the
impact. The City of Yelm traffic impact fee is also discussed.
The summary, conclusions and recommendations begin on page six of this report
Scott Griffin, Member
FREESTONE DFF YELM 11, LLC
August 25.2004
Page -2-
PROJECT INFORMATION
JTE, Inc.
Figure 1 is a vicinity map which shows the location of the site and its surrounding street
system.
Figure 2 shows a preliminary site plan prepared by Parametrix, Inc. provided to us on August
25~^, 2004. The site plan consists of the layout of the proposed project and internal street
system. A street stub exists on the northwest portion of the project to provide for future
development. Access to the site is provided via a new intersection off of Middle Rd.
Southeast.
Full development and occupancy of the proposed Velm Plat project is anticipated to occur by
2006, presuming the permits are issued in a timely manner. However, to ensure a
conservative analysis 2009 is proposed to be used as the horizon year.
EXISTING ENVIRONMENT
Project Site
The site is currently undeveloped.
Street Svstem
Figure 3 shows [he existing traffic control, number of street lanes, number of approach lanes
a[ intersections and other pertinent information. The primary streets within the study areas
and their functional classifications are as follows:
Y W/E Yelm Ave. - SR 510/507 Arterial
- 1st St. S./N. Arterial
- Rhoton Rd. S.E. Collector
- Railway Rd. S.E. Collector
- Grove Rd. S.E. Collector
- Middle Rd. S.E. Local Access
- 100 Way S.E. Local Access
Traffic Volumes
Figure 4 shows the existing PM peak hour traffic volumes for the analysis intersection.
Trafficount, a firm that specializes in the collection of traffic data, collected the existing PM
peak hour turning movement count at the 1~~ St. S./SR 507 on the date shown in Figure 4.
Existing PM peak hour turning movement counts at the Railway Rd. S.E./Middle Rd. S.E.,
100U Way S.E./Grove Rd. S.E. and Rhoton Rd. S.E./Railway Rd. S.E. intersections were
gleaned from the Traffic Imoact Analysis for Willow Glen Phase III Preliminary Plat by
Skillings-Connelly, Inc. dated August 22, 2002.
Scott Griffin, Member
FREESTONE DFF YELM II, LLC
August 25, 2004
Page -3-
Intersection Ooerations
JTE, Inc.
Traffic engineers have developed criteria for intersection operations called level of service
(LOS). The LOS are A to F with A and B being very good and E and F being more congested.
LOS C and D correlate to busy traffic conditions with some restrictions to the ability to choose
travel speed, change lanes and the general convenience comfort and safety.
The procedures in the Transportation Research Board Hiehwav CawciTy Manual, 2000 were
used to calculate the level of service at the study intersections. The followingtable depicts
the LOS and corresponding average delay in seconds at signalized and stop control
intersections:
Intersection Level of Service
Type
A B C D E F
Signalized <10 >10 and >20 and >35 and >55 and >80
<20 <35 <55 <80
Stop Control <10 >10 and >15 and >25 and >35 and >50
<15 <25 <35 <50
LOS Analysis Criteria
We understand that the Citys LOS criterion is "D" except for the SR 510 corridor where a
lower LOS is acceptable.
LOS Analysis Software
The LOS of the stutly intersections were calculated using the following software program:
Signal 2000 (signalizetl) by Strong Concepts
- Highway Capacity Software (HCS) 2000 by McTrans (stop control)
Accident History
The Traffic Im Anal is for Willow Glen Ph III Pr liming PI t reviewed accidents for
the analysis intersections for a three year time period (January 1, 1999 to December 31,
2001). This report determined the accident rate at the SR 507/1~r St. S.E. intersection. The
SR 507/l~r St. S.E. intersection yielded an accident rate of 1.46 per million entering vehicles.
The other analysis intersections had minimal recorded accidents at the intersection thus
were not analyzed for accident rates.
Scott Griffin, Member
FREESTONE DFF YELM II, LLC
August 25, 2004
Page -4-
JTE, Inc.
No apparent problems were noted at the analysis intersections during our field
reconnaissance of the site and study streets and intersections.
HORIZON YEAR IbNDITIONS "WITHOUT" THE PROJECT
Historical Traffic Growth
A growth factor of three (at the SR 507/SR 510 intersection) and four percent (at the other
analysis intersections per year was applied to the baseline traffic data based on past traffic
studies conducted in the City.
Pipeline Projects
The following are pipeline projects located in the vicinity of the proposed project:
- Willow Glenn Phase II (441ots)
- Cherry Meadows Subdivision (202-lots)
- Yelm Terra (97-lots)
- Mountain Sunrise (103-lots)
2009 Traffic Volumes
Figure 5 shows the projected 2009 PM peak hour traffic volumes "without" the project.
These volumes include the existing traffic volume counts plus background growth and traffic
generated by the identified "pipeline" projects. Background traffic growth inherently includes
traffic generated by development. Therefore, projecting horizon year traffic volumes using
both a growth factor and adding "pipeline" traffic data is a conservative approach.
TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION
Definitions
A vehicle trip is defined as a single or one direction vehicle movement with either the origin
or destination (existing or entering) inside the proposed development.
Traffic generated by development projects consists of the following types:
Pass-By Trips: Trips made as intermediate stops on the way from an origin to
a primary trip destination.
Diverted Link Trips: Trips attracted from the traffic volume on roadways within the
vicinity of the generator but require a diversion from that
roadway to another roadway to gain access to the site.
Scott Griffin, Member
FREESTONE DFF YELM II, LLC
August 25, 2004
Page-5-
JTE, Inc.
Captured Trips: Site trips shared by more than one land use in a multi-use
development.
Primary (New) Trips: Trips made for the specific purpose of using the services of
the project.
Trio Generation
The proposed Yelm Plat project is expected to generate the vehicular trips during the average
weekday, road traffic AM and PM peak hours as shown in Table 2. The trip generation for the
project is calculated usingtrip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) T
Generation, Seventh Edition, 2003 for Single Family Detached Housing (ITE land Use Code
210). All site trips made by all vehicles for all purposes, including commuter, visitor, and
service and delivery vehicle trips are included in the trip generation values. Trips generated
by residential projects are considered new.
Based on our analysis, the trips generated by Yelm Plat project are calculated to be 51 trips
during the PM peak hour. During the PM peak hour 63% of the trips would be entering and
37%would be exiting the development.
Trio Distribution
Figure 6 shows the project generated trips assigned to the adjacent street network. The
distribution is based on past projects located in the vicinity of the proposed project. The
project generated trip distribution is also based on the characteristics of the street network
antl the location of likely trip origins and destinations (residential, employment, shopping,
social and recreational opportunities).
HORIZON YEAR CONDITIONS "WRH" THE PROJECT
Traffic Volum
Figure 7 shows the 2009 PM peak hour traffic volumes "with" the proposetl project at the
analysis and site access intersections. The site genereted PM peak hour traffic volumes
shown on Figure 6 were added to the projected background traffic volumes shown on Figure
5 to obtain the Figure 7 volumes.
Level of Service
Table 1 shows the calculated LOS for the horizon year (2008) "with" and "without" project
conditions at the pertinent intersection. Based on our analysis the 1~t St. N./Rhoton Rd. S.E.,
Railway Rd. S.E./Middle Rd. S.E. and 100 Way S.E./Grove Rd. S.E. intersections would
operate at LOS'C' or better for both "with" and "without" project conditions. The SR 507/SR
510 (1~~ St. S.E.) intersection would operate at LOS'E' for both the "with" and the "without"
project conditions. The analyzed intersections meet the City standards.
Scott Griffin, Member
FREESTONE DFF YELM II, LLC
August 25, 2004
Page -5-
Site Access
JTE, Inc.
The proposed project would provide access onto Middle Rd. Southeast. The site access
intersection is expected to operate at LOS 'A' for northbound left turn and eastbound
movements.
AGENCY TRAFFIClMPACT MRIGATION REQUIREMENTS
The City of Yelm requires a traffic impact fee for new developments based on the number of
PM peak hour trips generated. The current fee is $750.00 per trip. The Yelm Plat project is
expected to generate 51 new PM peak hour trips. Therefore, the City traffic mitigation fee
would be $38,250.
The proposed site access will need to be constructed in conformance with CiTy of Yelm
standards. Also the site frontage will need to be constructed to applicable Agency
requirements.
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This report analyzed the traffic impact of the proposed 50 lot Yelm Plat project located at
16440 Middle Rd. Southeast in the City of Yelm. Traffic data was collected and/or obtained
at the pertinent street intersection identifietl for analysis. Future horizon year traffic volumes
were derived using a growth factor. level of service analyses were pertormed for existing
and projected future horizon traffic volumes. The evaluation of the traffic impact of the
proposed project included adding project generated traffic to the future traffic volume
projections and calculating the level of service. The "with" project traffic operations were
then compared to the "without" project operations. The comparison of traffic operations
"with" and "without" the project itlentified that the project would not cause a significant
adverse affect on the operation of the study intersections.
Based on our analysis we recommend that the Yelm Plat project be allowed with the
following traffic impact mitigation measures.
1. Construct site in accordance with applicable City requirements.
2. Construct site access connection to Middle Rd. S.E. in accordance with City
standards.
JTE, Inc.
Scott Griffin, Member
FREESTONE DFF YELM II, LLC
August 25, 2004
Page-7-
3. Payment of a $38,250 Traffic Impact Fee to the City of Yelm.
No other traffic mitigation should be necessary. Please contact me at (206) 762-1978 or
email me at iaketraffic@comcast.net if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
M1J: cw
Mark J. Jacobs, P.E., P.T.O.E., President
JAKE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC
C~~_Z)~.~`f
EXPIFEa M3I
JTE, Inc.
PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE
TABLE 1
YELM PLAT -YELM
LEVEL tl TRAFFlC IMPACT ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION APPROACH IXISTING 2009 W/0 2009 W/
PROJECT PROJECT
1~~ St. S.E./ Overall D (50.7) E (732) E (74.2)
SR 507
NB A (7.5) A (7.7) A (7.7)
Rhoton Rd. S.E./ SB A(7.8) A(8.2) A(8.3)
1~r St. N.E. WB B (11.5) B (14.7) C (15.2)
EB A (7.3) A (7.3) A (7.3)
Railway Rd. S.E./ WB A (7.3) A (7.4) A (7.4)
Middle Rd. S.E. NB A (9.0) A (9.3) A (9.5)
100 Way S.E./ NBLT A (7.5) A (7.6) A (7.6)
Grove Rd. S.E. EB A (9.0) A (9.5) A (9.5)
Site Access/Middle NBLT - - A(7.4)
Rd. S.E. EB - - A (9.1)
Number shown in parenthesis is the average control delay in seconds per vehicle for the
intersection as a whole or approach movement, which determines the LOS per the Hi hwa
Capacity Manual.
JTE, Inc.
VEHICULAR TRIP GENERATION
TABLE 2
VELM PLAT - VELM
LEVEL II TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
TIME PERIOD TRIP RATE TRIPS ENTERING TRIPS IXITING TOTAL
Single Fatuity Detached Housing (fTE Lantl Use Code 210, 50 bts)
Average Weekday T = 9.57X 239 (50%) 239 (50%) 478
AM Peak Hour T = 0.75X 9 (25%) 29 (75%) 38
PM peak Hour T = 1.O1X 32 (63%) 19 (37%) 51
T =trips
X = # of lots (= 50)
A vehicle trip is defined as a single or one direction vehicle movement with either the origin
or destination (existing or entering) inside the study site.
The above trip generation values account for all the site trips made by all vehicles for all
purposes, inclutling commuter, visitor, recreation, and service and delivery vehicle trips
Project: Yelm Plat
Location: 16440 Middle Rd . S.E.
Owner: Freestone DFF Yelm II, LLC
NORTH
r
~ snm s s
~
',~. e u °a ¢E
~ ~
9F ~ ~
~Z
~ ¢~`~ f
~i
'i
9 C'
s ~q Q ~ b JI
~" a in
eam v.war Ne sE
~~ ~~ ~
b
A
~SP Q
C ~
m
k n9mv¢ 9 SE y°P
e Jy
e` y,_ ®
y~'Pa
~®I w ~9F
a>M Se
fi
q
~ v¢
d' Al NE 103N Are ~ ~ ~~ ~
F
encw
m ey a~
~ ~
9y
1R5iM1 Way SE
f rN. co~.~
9
g'4M
raw Re SE qa
~ „~
u 169M Pxe SE
v~ E
- fl M1
YELM PLAT - YELM
JTE, ~f1C. LEVEL II TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
1
FIGURE
VICINITY MAP
Project: Yelm Plat
Location: 16440 Middle Rd. S.E.
Owner: Freestone DFF Yelm II, LLC
YELM PLAT -YELM
JTE, ~ nC. LEVEL II TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
FIGURE 2 ,
SITE PLAN
~ p
o
~y s
~ ~ s~
~o
p ~P
~\
3L 15 MPH
X ~
/ ~Qf
/ M1S
~ ti
/?E
4
.r110 / 245
i YELM ma wnv sE
is< ~I
~q zM1 a~ PROJECT
~ SITE
i sp
H
'o
~y ~ tOJRO HVE SE
~~ 5~~ ;F $
NEY __
STOP SIGN
XX MPH POSTED SPEED LIMIT
Xl NUMBER OP ROADWAY LANES
~ APPROACH LANE & DIRECTION
- - - RAILROAD TRACKS
YELM PLAT -YELM
JTE, ~nC. LEVEL II TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
FIGURE 3
EXISTING CONDITIONS
/
Zi 0 /
OB.Oi.02
~~ r<3 ~ / / WEDNESDAY
/ POSE ~~6 1515-1]15
i
'a~Sti / / ~p~ S
r
05.OB.OZ a`
TNU RSDAY ~ P 3
---- __ SOS
1]004500 ~/
/ z53
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ie
t
S~IU / 645
/ YELM +oo wnv sE
/zt ~I
/y4
/ s+ PROJECT
/ SITE
'o
o°
o~~ °
T N~yy `~ ~~ 103RD PVE $E
l
`°~~a 'ng~' 2S hT_
h" 153 05.05.03
w g5rti 600MDAY
ti 00.30.03 1130
WEDNESDAY
1515-ti15
K EY_
XX ~ - PM PEAK HOUR TRIP AND DIRECTION
YELM PLAT -YELM
JTE, III C. LEVEL II TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
FIGURE 4
EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME
t, a ,~
.+a rft= o ,
_ ,
3 ~ sE aoo
y~y / p0 ~~A
~~Ah ~ ~ ~P
PP _ ~~S
IO S ~O
„3
,
,
,~~
s~o , y<s
,
, YELM ioo war sE
/st ~I
, ya
PROJECT
~ 5,
, SITE
0
ny
0~b T
~~~1 ~ ~~ 103ft0 AVE 5E
,Sr '°Z
a^ my
h
NEY _
XX ~ - PM PEAH HOUR TRIP AND DIRECTION
YELM PLAT -YELM
JTE, InC. LEVEL II TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
FIGURE 5
PROJECTED 2009 PM PEAH HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES W/O PROTECT
°~ x
i
'"
' A,
, o
.
.+a r"
5 3 /'
y
f ~ QOS~ ~0..
i L
w9
\
, ~p
PP ____ ~ O
~
X 0
~
~
~ 303
BJ
{
'Pk i" go+
ie
.510 ~ 54
~ 35X
~ YELM mo wnv sE
/SS
/SS
~
e
PROJECT
SITE
X w
t
k
^* '
o
~
^
~~
`~
~ ~~ 103RD FVE SE
` t
~o
~~~
D3 hT
r
o~ T
e h
NEY
XX~ - PM PEAK HOUR
VV% -TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE
51 TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS
32 - ENTERING
19 - E%ITING
YELM PLAT -YELM
JTE, InC. LEVEL II TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
FIGURE 6
PROTECT GENERATED PM PEAN HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND DISTRIBUTION
_ ,
5 3 ~ sE a°a
A~~P~ ~ ~ / y101 PO ~~
PPy ~~J
J2
653
5~0 ~,g454~~ t~~l ~jS _
l
~ YELM ~y ioo wav se
/54
/4
i zse PROJECT
i SITE
'o
u
~A
~ q1a n
a ~~ ~ ~l * io3RO ave se
's ~~1 ~ s'O S X11
~, ,o
o~ 3T3
~~ o°y
A
KEY
XX ~ - PM PEAK HOUR TRIP AND DIRECTION
YELM PLAT -YELM
JTE, IIIC. LEVEL II TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
FIGURE 7
PROJECTED 2009 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES W/ PROJECT
Yelm Plat - Yelm 08/12/06
1st St. S.E./SR 507 11:37:05
8xiating (1507E8)
SI(~D1I$000/TBAPAC[Ver 2.02.12] - Capacity Analyaie Summary
intersection Averages for Int 4 1 -
Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.73 Vehicle Delay 50.7 Level of Service D
Sq 44 I Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1
I + 1+* I+ I " I
I + I + * 1 + I ++++I
I I I v i ++++I 1
I I I " I**'* v I 1
North I <* I + +>I la::*> I
I I * I ++ I I**** I
I • I ++ I I v I
I G/C=0.165 I G/C=0.322 I G/C=0.134 I G/C=0.247 I
I G= 19.8" I G= 38.6" I G= 16.1" I G= 29.6" I
I Y+R= 4.0•' I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0•' I Y+R= 4.0" I
I OFF= 0.08 I OPF=19.88 1 OFP=55.38 1
_________ OFF=72.08 I
___________
____________
0=120 sec ____________
G=104.0 aec _____
= 86.79 Y=16. 0 aec = 13.3fi Ped= 0. 0 aec = 0.06
__________________
I Lana (Width/I ____________
4/C ____________________________
I Service Ratel Adj 1 I ________
HCM ____
I L _________
I Queue I
I Grovp I Laneal Reqd Dsed I @C (vph) @H IVOlumel v/c I Delay I S INOdel 11
N Approach 49.5 D
I RT 112/1 10.218 10.189 1 652 I 774 I 43 10.056 I 16.1 I B 1 36 ftl
I TH 112/1 10.389 10.322 I 339 I 599 I 529 10.833 I 53.1 I*D 1783 ftl
I LT 112/1 10.263 10.165 1 1 1 265 I 109 10.375 I 45.4 I D 1152 ftl
S Approach 52.8 D
IRT+TB 1 12/1 10.388 10.322 1 337 I 595 I 521 10.876 I 52.2 I D 1767 ftl
I LT 112/1 10.286 10.165 I 1 1 265 1 202 10.694 I 54.3 I*D 1305 ftl
B Approach 40.9 D+
IRT+TH 112/1 10.283 10.247 I 41 I 405 I 179 10.428 I 38.8 I D+I 232 ftl
I LT 112/1
________________ 10.251
_______ 10.134 I
_________ 1 1
______ 209 I
_______ 60
______ 10.253 I
________ 47.2
_______ I D I
_____ 85
_____ ftl
___
W Approach 53.9 D
IRT+TB 112/1 10.333 10.247 I 41 I 397 1 331 10.805 I 53.7 I*D 1 494 ftl
I LT 112/1 10.273 10.134 I 1 1 209 I 149 10.629 I 54.4 I*D 1 227 ftl
~~
Yelm Plat - Yelm
lat St. S.S./SR 507
Existing (150788)
SIGNAL2000/TEAYAC [Ver 2.02.12) - Suamary of Parameter Valuea
oe/12/oa
11:37:15
Intersection Pazamtera for Int 1C 1 -
NETROAREA NonCRD NETNORR North 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No
LOS Tazgeta 35 80 5 NETWORR East 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No
90 100 5 NETNORE South 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No
Priorities 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBTWORx Weat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No
NODELOCATION 0 0
Approach Parameters
APPLABEL3 N E S W
GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
PEDLEVBLS 0 0 0 0
BIlO:VOLtRaE3 0 0 0 0
PARRINGSIDES None None None None
PARRVOLUlOS3 20 20 20 20
HDyypLOq,~g 0 0 0 0
RIGHTTORNONRSDS 0 0 0 0
OPSTRSANVC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Novement Pazametere
NOVLAEBLS RT T8 LT RT TR LT RT TE LT RT TE LT
VOLLINES 41 503 104 103 67 57 22 473 192 219 95 192
WIDTHS 12.0 12.0 12.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 0.0 12.0 12.0
LANES 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1
GRODPTYPES Nora Norm Norm Nora Norm Norm Nora Nora Norm Nora Nora Nora
UTILIEATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TROCEPSRCENTS 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
PEAEeOURFACTORS 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
ACTDATION3 Yea Yee Yea Yes Yea Yea Ye8 Yea Yes Yee Yea Yea
REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 d.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
MININON3 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
3TARTDPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
BNDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
STORAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
INITIALQDEOE 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0
IDEALSATFIOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
SATORIITIONFLOW3 1583 1663 1770 0 1694 1770 0 1850 1770 0 1668 1770
Phasing Pazamatera
sE4DSNCES as ALL
pSRMISSIVES No No No No LBADL AGS None None
OVERLAPS YeH Yee Yea Yes OFFSET 0 .00 1
CYCLES 120 120 30 PEDTIt~ 0.0 0
GREEHTI!ffiS 19.75 3 8.60 16.05 29.59
YELLgITIl~S 4.00 6.00 4.00 4.00
CRITICALS 9 2 12 11
Yelm Plat - Yelm 08/12/04
lat St. S.S./SR 507 11:36:08
Aithout Project (1507N0)
SIG2AL2000/TEABAC [Ver 2.02.127 - Capacity Analysis S••^^^°^y
Intersection Averages for Int * 1 -
Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.89 Vehicle Delay 73.2 7sve1 of Service 8
Sq 44 I Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1
I + i++ I+ 1 ^ I
I + i + + I + I ++++I
1 I I v I ++++1 I
I I I I**** v I I
North I <* I * *>1 I****> i
I I * I ** 1 i**+* I
I • I ** I 1 v I
I G/C=0.137 I G/C=0.368 I G/C=0.113 I G/C=0.248 I
I G= 16.4" 1 G= 44.2" I c1= 13.6" I G= 29.8" I
I Y+H= 4.0" I Y+Ibe 4.0^ I Y+R= 4.0^ I Y+R= 4.0" I
I OFF= 0.08 I OFF=17.0& I OFF=57.28 I OFF=71.85 I
_________________
___________
C=120 sec _____________
G=104.0 sec ________
= 86.7! Y=16.0 sec = 13.38 Pad= 0.0 sec = 0.08
_________________
I Lana INidth/I _____________
g/C ____________________________
I Service Ratel AdJ I __________
I BCN I ___________
L I Queue I
I Group I Leneal
_________________ Read Used
_____________ 1 @C (vph) @8 IVOlumel v/c
____________________________ I Delay 1
_________ 3 IMOdel 11
____________
p Approach 58.5 E+
1 RT 112/1 10.258 10.515 1 705 1 815 I 79 10.097 I 14.9 I B+I 64 ftl
I TH 112/1 10.442 10.368 1 473 I 686 I 663 10.966 I 63.4 I E+11053 ftl
I LT 112/1 10.279 10.137 I 1 1 214 I 174 10.719 I 59.5 1 E+I 273 ft)
S Approach 81.9 F
IRT+TH 1 12/1 10.451 10.368 I 468 I 680 I 679 10.999 I 72.0 I*S 11130 ftl
I LT 112/1 10.297 10.137 I 1 1 214 I 242 11.000 1109.6 I*P 1 466 ftl
S Approach 44.3 D+
IRT+TB 112/1
I LT 1 12/1 10.303
10.255 10.248 I
10.113 I 48 I 407 I 253 10.602 1
1 1 171 I 79 10.395 i 42.3
50.7 I D+I
I D 1 349 ftl
117 ftl
N Approach 97.7 F
IRT+TN 112/1 10.366 10.248 I 47 I 404 I 416 10.998 I 88.5 I*F 1741 ftl
I LT 112/1 10.286 10.113 1 1 1 171 i 200 11.000 1116.8 I*F 1395 ftl
Yelm Plat - Yelm
lat St. 5.8./SR 507
Without Project (1507N0)
gI0ta1L2000/TEAPACIVer 2.02.12] - suamary of parameter values
oe/lz/oa
11:36:14
Intersection Parameters for Int * 1 -
NETROAAEA NonCBD NETNORH North 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No
LOS Targets 35 80 5 NBTNOAE East 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No
90 100 5 NBTNORE South 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No
Priorities 0 0 0 0 0 0 NETWORK West 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No
NODELOCATION 0 0
Approach Parameters
APPLABELS N E S N
~Dgg 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
pSDLEVELS 0 0 0 0
BIEEWLUMES 0 0 0 0
PARRIIiGSIDE3 None None None None
PAREVOLOMEg 20 20 20 20
HtIgVOL2D03S 0 0 0 0
RIGHTTORNONREDS 0 0 0 0
DPSTREANPC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Movement Parameters
NpVIAHSLS RT TH LT RT TH LT
WLSRleg 75 630 165 145 95 75
WIDTHS 12.0 12.0 12.0 0.0 12.0 32.0
LANES 1 1 1 0 1 1
ORODPTYPES Norm Nora Morn Nora Norm Norm
DTILIZATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TRtlCEPERCENT3 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
pEAEgpDRpACTORS 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
ARRIVALTYP83 3 3 3 3 3 3
ACTDATIONS Yee Yes Yen Yes Yee Yea
RBgCLEARANCBS 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
NINII4[84S 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
STARTOPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
gTOgAOg 0 0 0 0 0 0
INITYALQUEOE 0 0 0 0 0 0
IDEALSATFL(Mg 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
gACTOpg 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
NSTOPFACTORg 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
gATORATLONFLOW3 1583 1663 1770 0 1694 1770
Phasing Parameters
gEQDENCE3 44 ALL
pEI0SI33IVEg NO No No No
OVERLAPS Yea Yea Yea Yes
CYCLES 1 20 120 30
GREENTIt4B3 16. 44 4 4.18 13.59 29. 79
YELLONTINBS 4. 00 4.00 4.00 4. 00
CRITICALS 9 8 12 11
RT TH LT
35 610 230
0.0 12.0 12.0
0 1 1
Norm Nora Norm
0.00 0.00 0.00
2.0 2.0 2.0
0.95 0.95 0.95
3 3 3
Yea Yea Yee
4.0 9.0 4.0
5.0 5.0 5.0
2.0 2.0 2.0
2.0 2.0 2.0
0 0 0
0 0 0
1900 1900 1900
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
o leas rno
LEADLAGS
OPFSBT
PEDTI!ffi
RT TH LT
260 135 190
0.0 12.0 12.0
0 1 1
Norm Nora Nora
0.00 0.00 0.00
2.0 2.0 2.0
0.95 0.95 0.95
3 3 3
Yee Yea Yee
4.0 4.0 4.0
5.0 5.0 5.0
2.0 2.0 2.0
2.0 2.0 2.0
0 0 0
0 0 0
1900 1900 1900
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
0 1679 1770
None None
0.00 1
0.0 0
~;C_ .
Yalm Plat - Yelm 08/12/04
let St. S.S./SR 507 11:35:27
-Pith Piojact (1507WP)
SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC (Ves 2.02.12] - Capacity Aualyais Summary
intersection Averages for Int 4 1 -
Degree of saturation (v/c) 0.90 Vehicle Delay 74.2 7sve1 of Service 8
Sq 44 I Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1
----_
~
+
I + I++
I + + I+ I I
I + I ++++I
I I 1 v I ++++I 1
I I 1 I**+' v 1 I
North I <* I ' *>I I"**> I
I I * I ** I I+**: I
I + 1 *• I I v I
------------
------------
I G/C=0.136 ------------
I G/C=0.368 -------------
I G/C=0.113 I G/CC=0.250 I
I G= 16.4" I G= 44.1" I G= 13.5^ 1 G= 30.0" I
I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+A= 4.0^ I Y+t4= 4.0" 1
I OFF= 0.08 I OFP=17.0& I OFP=57.1& I OFF=71.7R I
______________
_____
0=120 sec _____________
G=104.0 sec ___________
= 86.76 Y=16.0 sec = 13.38 Pad= 0.0 sec = 0.08
_________________
I Lane Ipidth/1 _____________
g/C
___________________________
__
lv
R
r
________
6
~
____________
I Group I Laneel
_________________ tlaed
Regd
_____________ mel v/c I
(vph)
@E IVO
I @C
____________________________ a
Del
y 1
_________ 8 INodel 11
____________
N Approach 59.7 E+
I RT 112/1 10.258 10.514 I 703 I 814 I 79 10.097 I 15.0 I S+I 64 ftl
i TH 112/1 10.442 10.368 I 471 I 685 I 663 10.968 I 63.8 1 8+11055 ftl
1 LT 112/1 10.282 10.136 I 1 1 213 I 186 10.772 I 64.3 I E+1 298 ftl
S Approach 83.1 F
IRT+TH 1 12/1 10.451 10.366 I 467 I 679 I 661 11.003 I 73.2 I*E 11139 Ptl
I LT 112/1 10.297 10.136 I 1 I 213 I 242 11.004 1110.9 I*F 1468 Ptt
B Approach 44.7 D+
IRT+TN 112/1 10.307 10.250 I 54 I 410 I 263 10.622 I 42.8 I D+I 360 ftl
I LT 112/1 10.256 10.113 I 1 1 170 I 80 10.402 I 50.8 I D 1119 ftl
N Approach 98.8 F
IRT+TS 112/1 10.368 10.250 I 53 I 407 I 421 11.002 I 89.5 I*F 1753 ftl
I LT 1 12/1 10.286 10.113 I 1 1 170 1 200 11.005 1118.3 I*F 1397 ftl
Yelm Plat - Yelm
lot St. 9.E./SR 507
With Projact (1507NP)
SIGCW.2000/TEAPAC LVer 2.02.12] - °~^"~"°^' o£ Parameter Values
Intersection
MBTRDAREA
LOS Targets
Priorities
Approach ear
APPLAEEL3
GNADES
pSDLEVELS
BIEEV0LfII4E3
pAREINGSIDES
pAREVOLW033
BOSVOLDNES
RI(03TTDANONREDS
DPSTREAMVC
os/iz/oa
11:35:33
Pareaetera for Int # 1 -
0
0
0
0 Def
No
NonCHD NETMORE Nozth 0 0 0
35 SO 5 NETIIORE East 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 De£ No
90 100 5 NETNOAE south 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No
0 0 0 0 0 NETEORR Neat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No
NODELOGTION
ametera S N
N
0
0 E
0.0
0.0 0.0
.
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
None Nona None None
20 20 20 20
0 0 0 0
0 O 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Novemant
lgVLAEELS
VOLDNBS
NIDT$S
LANEg
ORODPTYPES
OTILISATIONg
TRDCAPERCENTS
pgAERODRFACTORS
ARRIVALTYPES
ACTDATIONS
RE{1CLBARANCES
lRNII~S
3TARTOPLOST
ElIDGAIN
STORAGE
INITLAI.(]UEOE
IDEALSATFLONS
FACTORS
DgyAYFACTORS
NSTOpFACTOR3
SATORATIONFLONS
TE LT
630 177
12.0 12.0
1 1
Norm Norm Norm
0.00 0.00 0.00
z.o 2.o z.o
0.95 0.95 0.95
3 3 3
Yea Yea Yea
4.0 6.0 4.0
5.0 5.0 5.0
2.0 2.0 2.0
2.0 2.0 2.0
0 0 0
0 0 0
1900 1900 1900
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
l.oo l.oo l.oo
1583 1063 1770
RT TH LT
153 97 76
0.0 12.0 12.0
0 1 1
NOrm Norm Norm
0.00 0.00 0.00
2.o a.o z.o
0.95 0.95 0.95
3 3 3
Yea Yas Yee
4.0 9.0 4.0
5.0 5.0 5.0
2.0 2.0 2.0
2.0 2.0 2.0
0 0 0
0 0 0
1900 1900 1900
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
0 1692 1770
Phoning Parameters
gg~ENCEg 44 ALL
pg~agglVgg No No No No
pV8R1,Apg Yea Yea Yea Yea
CYCLES 120 120 30
GREENTINES 16.37 44.13 13.53 29.97
ygLLONTIl~S 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
CRITICALS 9 8 12 li
Parameters
RT
75
12.0
1
RT TE LT
37 610 230
0.0 12.0 12.0
0 1 1
Nora Norm Nora
0.00 0.00 0.00
2.0 2.0 2.0
0.95 0.95 0.95
3 3 3
Yae Yea Yea
4.0 9.0 4.0
5.0 5.0 5.0
2.0 2.0 2.0
2.0 2.0 2.0
0 0 0
0 0 0
1900 1900 1900
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
o ig47 1770
LEADLAGS
OFFSET
PEDTI!ffi
RT TH LT
260 140 190
0.0 12.0 12.0
0 1 1
Nora Norm Norm
0.00 0.00 0.00
2.0 2.0 2.0
0.95 0.95 0.95
3 3 3
Yee Yea Yee
4.0 4.0 4.0
5.0 5.0 5.0
2.0 2.0 2.0
2.0 2.0 2.0
0 0 0
0 0 0
1900 1900 1900
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
0 1681 1770
None None
0.00 1
0.0 0
/J /7 ~ Q 08/12/04
WithSt~9.S~r I ~,8 ~~rX /~tYr~~"'r ~ "r 11:33:12
n....^.9
SIQ81L2000/TBAPAC(Ver 2.02.121 - Capacit4 Analysis
Intersection Averages for Int 8 1
Degtee of Saturation (v/c) 0.78 Vehicle Delay 'N-8 lAOel of Service 0+
1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 Phase 4
I
Sq 44 ( phase
______ __
______ _
___
x: rx _
/ I ___________
+
__
____
i + + +
1 +
I ++++I
1 + 1 + + + I +
xxxx 1 <++++I
++++1
I
v l
I I ^
1++++ o
++++ v 1
i
I I
North I <x I
1 <+ * *>I
x x *
Ixxxx> 1
I I
I * I + l
I
I x 1 + x x la
______ I v 1
_____________
_ __ ____ _
125
I G/C=0 _______
I G/C=0.402 ______
I G/Ct0.042 I G/C=0.298 1
^
.
I G= 15.0^ I Gc 46.3^ I G= 5.0^
^ I
I G~ 35.7
0^ 1
4
I Y+R~ 4.0^ I Y+Ps 4.0^
98 I Y+9f 4.0
48
OFP 59 .
I Y+RP
I
I O>?P~66.9$
I OPF= 0.08 1 OP8=15. .
I _
0=120 sac
________________________
G=101.0 sec 56.78 Y=16-0 sac = 13.38 Pew 0.0 sec : 0.08
________________
_______________
I Lane IWidth/I 4/C i _________
Servios
h)
8C (v
Patel Adj 1 I
98 IVOlusel v/c I
NCl4 1
Delay 1
L
S
I Q~
INOdel
1
1 Group ( Cancel Segd Osad 1 p _
40.9 D+
N Approach
1 gT 1 12/1 10.253 (0.477 I 629 1 756 I 79 10.104 I 17.3 I S 1 69 ftl
~ ~
123 125 I
10 189 1 273 1 186 10.655 I 34.3 I C 1 216 ftl
1 12/1 10. .
________ _________ _____ _______ _______ ________ ____ ______ _
50.7 D
S ApproacL
IgT+ryg 112/i 10.451 10.402 I 558 1 743 I 681 10.917 I 50.1 1*0 1999 fti
I LT i 12/1 10.165 10.125 I 198 I 280 1__242_10 837_1__52 3_1*D_i 3/8 ftl
________________
34.5 C
g ~~..ats
19T yT 1 12/1 10.025 10.042 I 115 ( 171 I 280 10.430 I 29.3 1*c+l 398 ftl
I _____________________________________________________
47.4 D
W Approach
IgT+T3 112/1 10.368 10.298 I 231 I 496 I 421 10.842 ( 51.9 1*0 1621 ftl
I LY 112/1 10.050 10.042 1 191 I 296 1 200 10.649 I 36.2 1_D+I 267 fYl
Yelm Plat - Yelm
lat St. S.E./SR 507
With Project (1507WP)
SIGRAL2000/TEAPAC [Ver 2.02.12] - 3u®ary of Parameter Valued
oe/lz/aa
11:31:07
Intersection Parameters for Int A 1 -
NETROAREA NonCBD NETWORK North 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No
LOS Targets 35 80 5 NETWORK East 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No
90 100 5 NETWORK South 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DeP No
Priorities 0 0 0 0 0 0 NETWORK Neat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No
NODELOCATION 0 0
Approach Parameters
APPLABEL3 N E 3 F
(RtAD83 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
P®LEVELS 0 0 0 0
EIlOSVOL[HQBS 0 0 0 0
PARKINGSIDES None None None None
PARRVOLOld9 20 20 20 20
BIISVOLID4E3 0 0 0 0
RIGHTTORNONRBD3 0 0 0 0
DPSTAEAMVC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Movement Parameters
[4OPLABEL3 RT TE LT RT TN LT RT T8 LT RT TN LT
VOLOMES 75 630 177 153 97 76 37 610 230 260 140 190
WIDTHS 12.0 12.0 12.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 0.0 12.0 12.0
LANES 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1
GROIIPTYP88 Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Non Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm
UTILIKATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TROCKPBRCENTS 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
PEARHOORFACTORS 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
ACTOATIONS Yee Yee Yea Yea Yee Yea Yee Yae Yea Yea Yea Yee
REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
MiNII4[MS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
STARTOPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
BNDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
STORAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
INITIALQUSOE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
IDSALSATFLOFS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
SATORATIONFLOWS 1583 1863 1770 0 1692 1770 0 1847 1770 0 1681 1770
Phasing Parameters
SEQOENCES 44 ALL
PEI0IISSIVES Yea Yee Yea Yea LSAD LAGS None None
OVERLAPS Yea Yea Yea Yea OFFSET 0. 00 1
CYCLE3 120 120 30 PEDT II~ffi 0 .0 0
GAEENTINE9 15.03 48.26 5.00 35.70
YELLOWTIlOIS 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
CRITICALS 9 6 6 11
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
neral information ite Information
atyst
ncy/Co.
ate Performed
a sis Time Period Chris Valdez
JTE, INC
0810/1004
PM k ntersecfion
udsdicfion
atysis Year 1st St. S. E/Rhonton Rd.
Yelm
Exish~ng
ro'ed Descd lion Yelm Plat 1 RH0
sfM/est Street 1st St. S.E> orth/South Street Rhonton Rd. S.E.
nteisection Odentafion: North-South Pedod hrs : 0.25
ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments
r Street Northbound Southbound
vement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
olume 0 193 74 3 162 0
eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
ou Fkrv/ Rate, HFR 0 203 77 3 170 0
ercent Hea VehiGes 0 - 0
-
-
edian T Undi vided
T Channelized 0 0
nes 0 1 0 0 1 0
urafion L7R LTR
m Si nal 0 0
hror Street Westbound Eastbound
ovement 7 6 9 10 11 72
L T R L T R
olume 43 0 1 0 0 0
eak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
ou Flow Rate, HFR 45 0 1 0 0 0
ercent Hea VehiGes 0 0 0 0 0 0
ercent Grade (%) 0 0
tared Approach N N
rage 0 0
T Channelized 0 0
nes 0 1 0 0 0 0
o uration LTR
la Queue Lon and Level of Service
roach NB SB Westbound Eastbound
ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
ne Configuration LTR LTR LTR
(vph) 0 3 46
(m)(vph) 1420 1294 597
/c 0.00 0.00 0.08
5% queue IengM 0.00 0.01 0.25
onlrol Delay 75 78 11.5
OS A A B
roach Delay - - 11.5
proach LOS - - B
> ~
CapynrM 010011 Uniwdty or da All RirMaRmrvW Ve~u°n <.Ic
file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Owner\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k19C.hnp 8/1 012 0 04
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
enerai Information ite Information
ayst
ncy/Co.
Pedomv.W
aysis Tune Period Chas Valdez
JTE, INC
08/iW1004
PM peak nierseceon
udsdicUOn
aysis Year 1st St. N.ErRhonton Rd.
S.E.
Yefm
Without Project
Descri 'on Yelm flat 1RHOW0
sWJest Sneet 1st SL N.E. MlSouth Street Rfroton Rtl. S.E.
Mersecdon Orienfafion: North•SOUN Pedod hrs : 0.25
ehicle Volumes and Ad ustmenffi
Street Nortlrbound
vement 1 2
3 4
Southbound
5
6
L T R L T R
olume 0 305 115 5 240 0
eak+laur Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
ov Fkwr Rate, HFR 0 321 121 5 252 0
enxnt Hea Vehides 0 0 - -
ian T UrMivided
T Channeled 0 0
nes 0 1 0 0 1 0
oration LTR LTR
Cream S' nal 0 0
nor Street Westlwuntl Easllwund
emeM 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
olume 65 0 1 0 0 0
eak+bur Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
ou Flow Rate, HFR 68 0 1 0 0 0
enxnt Hea Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
ercent Grade (%) 0 0
tared Approach N N
rs9e 0 0
T Channelized 0 0
es 0 1 0 0 0 0
o oration LTR
Queue Len and Level of Service
pproach NB 58 Westbound Eastbound
ement 1 4 7 8 9 f0 11 12
ne Configuration LTR LTR LTR
(vph) 0 5 69
(m)(vph) 1325 1129 440
/c 0.00 0.00 0.16
5%queue length 0.00 0.01 0.55
trot Delay 7.7 8.2 14.7
OS A A B
proach Delay - - 14.7
roach LOS - - B
51eJ/C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Owner\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k1B0.tmp 8!10/2004
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
eneral Information ite Information
1st St. NE./Rhonton Rd.
alyst Chris Valdez n[ersecacn S.E.
envy/Co. JTE, INC uristlicfion Yelm
ate Performed 08/102004 alysis Year WitheatProject
alysis Time Pedod PM peak
ro'ed Oescri [ion Yelm Pla[ 1 RHOW0
sfNVest Street 1st SL N.E. orthlSouth Street Rholon Rd. S.E.
mersectron Orientation: North_South to Period hrs : 0.25
ehicle Volumea and Ad'us6nents
rg~t
Northbound souMbound
ement 1 2 3 4 5
T 6
R
L T R L
olume 0 305 134 6 240 0
eak+lour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95
Dori Flow Rate, HFR 0 321 141 6 252 0
ercent Hea Vehicles 0 - - 0
ion T Undivided
T Channelized 0 0
0 1 0 0 1 0
nes
on oration LTR LTR
Cream S' nal 0 0
inor Street Westbound Eastbountl
12
vement 7 8 9 10 11
L T R L T R
olume 76 0 2 0 0 0
eak+lour FaUOr, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
ou Flow Rate, HFR 80 0 2 0 0 0
ercent Hea Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
nt Grade (%) 0 0
tared Approach N N
rage 0 0
T Channelizetl 0 0
nes p 1 0 0 0 0
on oration LTR
Ia Oueue Len and Level of Service
proach Ng Sg Westbound Eastbound
vemeM 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
ne Configu2fion LTR LTR LTR
(vPh) 0 6 82
(m)(vph) 1325 1110 435
Ic 0.00 0.01 0.19
5%queue length 0.00 0.02 0.69
ontroi Dewy 7.7 8.3 15.2
OS A A C
proadr Delay - - 152
PProach LOS - - C
> ~(, J(
file://C:\Documemts%20and%20Se[tings\OwmerV.ocal%20Settings\Temp\u2k1AD.tmp 8/10/2004
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
neral Infomration ite Information
Descri Lion Yelm Plat MRRRE
tlWest Street RaiAva Rd. S.E. orth/South Street Middle Rd. S.E.
ntersection Orientation: East-West Period hrs : 0.25
ehicie Volumes and Ad'usffnents
r Street Fzslbound Westbound
ovement t 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
plume 0 30 20 6 30 0
eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
ou Fknv Rate, HFR 0 31 21 6 31 0
ercent Hea Vehices 0 0 -
edian T Undivided
T Channelized 0 0
nes 0 1 0 0 1 0
ura0on LTR LTR
(ream S' nal 0 0
nor Street NoMbound Southbound
ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
plume 21 0 3 0 0 0
eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
ou Flow Rate, HFR 22 0 3 0 0 0
ercent Hea Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
ercent Grade (%) 0 0
tared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
T Channelized 0 0
nes 0 1 0 0 0 0
o uradon LTR
Qww L and Level of Service
proach E8 WB Northbound Souhbound
vement 1 4 7 6 9 10 11 12
rte Confguration LTR LTR LTR
(vph) 0 6 25
(m)(vph) 1595 1567 930
/c 0.00 0.00 0.03
5% gwue length 0.00 0.01 0.08
trot Delay 7.3 7.3 9.0
OS A A A
proach Delay - - 9.0
roach LOS - - ! A
a st has Valdez ntersection iddle/Raihva
en ICo. TE, INC urisdicfion Yelm
ate Pertomled 102004 ~ Year isti
a 'Time Period M k
1fG40°U~ CogngM 02000 Utisavty of Flwidr. All Rights Reserved Version 4.Ic
file://C:\Docwnents%20and%20Seltings\Owner\[,ocal%20Settings\Temp\u2k1B5.[mp 8/10/2004
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
enenl Information ite Information
st hds Valdez nterseclion MiddleA2ailwa
n ICo. TE, INC urisdicfion Yelm
Pe~~ W2004 sis Year Without Pro'ect
a sis Tima Period M ak
ro'ect Descd lion Yelm Plat MRRRlNO
stlWest Street Railwa Rd. S.E. ont/South Street Mkldle Rd. S.E.
ntersection Orientation: East_yyey lud Period hrs : 0.25
ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustrnent8
or get Eastbound Westbound
ovement 1 2 3 4 5
L T R L T
8
R
olume
eak-Hour Factor. PHF
ouri Fbw Rate, HFR 0
0.95
0 40
0.95
42 45
0.95
47 10
0.95
10 40
0.95
42 0
0.95
0
ercent Hea Vehicles
edian T 0 - - 0
Undivided - -
T Channelized 0 0
anes 0 1 0 0 1 0
on urafion LTR LTR
(ream S' nal
nor Street 0
Northbound 0
Southbound
vement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
olume
eak-Hour Factor, PHF 40
0.95 0
0.95 5
0.95 0
0.95 0
0.95 0
0.95
ou Flow Rate, HFR 42 0 5 0 0 0
erceM Hea Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
ercent Grade (%) 0 0
aced Approach N N
Storage 0 0
T Channelized 0 0
apes 0 1 0 0 0 0
nfi urafion LTR
eW Duaue Len and Level of Service
proach EB WB
Northbound
Southbound
ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
ne Configurafion LTR LTR LTR
(~h) 0 f0 47
(m)(vph) 1580 1519 878
Ic 0.00 0.01 0.05
5% queue length 0.00 0.02 0.17
ontrol Delay T3 7.4 9.3
OS A A A
proach Delay - - 9.3
proach LOS - - ~ A
afST°°°TM ~°Sl~rBa o 30DU u~tirm~rY of PlwiN. All w8~ xeservea •v~••,•, ~.•~
file://C:\Documents%20and%20Setlings\OwnerlLocal%20Se[tings\Temp\u2k1B5.tmp 8/]0/2004
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
neral Information ite Information
a s[ Chas Valdez ntersection tiddle/Railwa
e /Co. TE, ING udsdktlon Yelm
Performed 8/1(12004 a sis Year YYd(r Pro~ect
sis Time Pedad M ak
Descri n Ye(m Plat MRRRWP
asfMlest Street Raihva Rd. S.E. onhlSouth Street Middle Rd. S.E.
ntersecdon Orientation: East-Wes1 Pedod hrs : 0.25
ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments
'or Street Eastbound Westbound
ovement t 2 3 4 5
6
L T R L T R
olume 0 40 65 11 40 0
eak+bur Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
ou Fknv Rale, HFR 0 42 68 11 42 0
ercent Heavy Vehicles
ian T 0 - - 0
Undivided - -
T Channeled 0 0
nes 0 1 0 0 1 0
on oration LTR LTR
stream Si naI
nor Street 0
Northbound 0
Southbound
ovement 7 8 9 10 11 t2
L T R L T R
alume 52 0 5 0 0 0
eak-Hour Factor PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
ou Flow Rate, HFR 54 0 5 0 0 0
ercent Hea Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
ercent Grade (%) 0 0
aced Approach N N
Storage 0 0
T Channelized 0 0
nes 0 1 0 0 0 0
oration LTR
a Queua Le and Level of
roach EB Service
WB
Northbound
Southbound
ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
ne Configuration LTR LTR LTR
(Wh) 0 11 59
(m)(vph) 1580 1493 862
/c 0.00 0.01 0.07
5%queue length 0.00 0.02 0.22
onfrol Delay 73 74 9.5
OS A A '4
proach Delay - - 9.5
roach LOS - - 1 A
HGSIOOOTM CoMrierrt 020110 Umvavry of Fbnd4 All Rims ResvvW vemw r.,v
file://C:\Dceuments%20and%20Settings\Ownet~\Local%20Settings\Temp\uZk7B5.tmp 8/10/2004
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
eneral Information iffi Information
atyst Chas Valdez
ncylCo. JTE, INC
pedomted 08/102004
is Time Period PM k
to' Descri lion Yelm Plat f00GREX
sWVest Street 100 Wa S.E.
ntersection Orientation: North-South
ehicffi Volumes and Ad usimenffi
g(rpst NoMbound
ovement 1 2 ntersecdon f00Marove
urisdicdon Yelm
aysia Year Existing
rtlJSouth Street Grove Rd. S.E.
Pedod hrs : 0.25
Southbound
3 4 5
6
L T R L T R
olume 27 151 0 0 103 0
eak-Hour Factor PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
ou Flax Rate, HFR 28 158 0 0 108 0
ercem H Vehicles 0 0 - -
edian T Undivided
T Channeled 0 0
nes 0 1 0 0 1 0
n uretion LT TR
tream S~ nal
Inor Street
ement
7 0
Westbound
8
9
10 0
Eastbound
11
12
L T R L T R
olume 0 0 0 2 0 18
eak-Hour Factor PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 2 0 18
ercent Hea VehiGes 0 0 0 0 0 0
ercznt Grade (%) 0 0
tared Approach N N
rage 0 0
T Chanrtelized 0 0
nrx 0 0 0 0 1 0
oration LTR
Queue Len and Leval of Servke
roach NB SB
t 1 4
Westbound
7 8 9
Eastbound
10 11 12
ne Configuration LT LTR
(vph) Y8 20
(m)(vph) 1495 911
/c 0.02 0.02
%queue length 0.05 0.07
ontrol Delay 75 9.0
OS A A
proach Delay - _ 9.0
roach LOS - - fS A
co°y~da o soon u~~.e~v orew~m, ai w¢nn ae,.ea vusian 4.rc
file://C:\DoctuBents°/a20and%20Settings\Owner\Local%20Se[tings\Temp\u2k1B5.1mp 8/10/2004
nerol Information TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
ite Information
ayst Chds Valdez
/Co. JTE, INC
to Performed 08/10/2004
a sis Time Period PM ak
'eG Desai lion Yelm Plat f00GRW0
st Street 100 Wa S.E.
ntersectlon Orientation: North-South
ehicle Volumes and Ad'us6nents
r gt~ Northbound
ement 1 2 ntersecficn f00/Grove
urisdk:tion Yelm
arysis Year Without Project
omhlSouth Street Grove Rd. S.E.
Period hrs : 0.25
Southbound
3 4 5
6
L T R L T R
olume 45 200 0 0 135 0
eak+lour Factor PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
ou Flow Rate, HFR 47 210 0 0 142 0
ercent Hea Vehicles
ian T 0 - - 0
Undivided - -
T Channeled 0 0
nes 0 1 0 0 1 0
on uration LT ~
tream S~ nal
nor Street 0
Westbound 0
Eastlround
ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
olume 0 0 0 5 0 30
eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
ou Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 5 0 31
ercent Hea Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
ercent Gmde (%) 0 0
aced Approach N N
forage 0 0
T Channelized 0 0
nes 0 0 0 0 1 0
urefion LTR
Queue Len and Leval of Serve
proach NB SB
Westbound
Eastbound
ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
aria Configuration LT LTR
("ph) 47 38
(m) (vph) 1453 836
/c 0.03 0.04
5%queue length 0.10 0.13
ntrol Delay 7.6 9.5
OS A A
proach Delay - - 9.5
proach LOS - - A
6
C°pynpp102000 Uviveniry of Flori,~ All Rigks Re¢rvW Version4.lc
file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Owner\Local%20Set[ings\Temp\u2k1B5.tmp 8/10/2004
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
neral Information ite Information
ayst Chfis Valdez
nglCo. JTE, INC
ate Performed 03/102004
sis Time Period PM ak
De n Yelm Plat t00GRWP
Street 100 Wa S.E.
rdersection Orientatlon: North-South
ehicle Volumes and Ad uslments
or gtreet Northbound
vemeM 1 2 ntersection f00/Grove
urisdicUon Yelm
alysis Year YYNr Projects
oM/SouM Street Grove Rd. S.E.
Period hrs : 0.25
Southbound
3 4 5
6
L T R L T R
dome 55 200 0 0 135 0
eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85
ou Flow Rate, HFR 57 210 0 0 142 0
ercent Hea Vehicles 0 0 - -
tan T UrMivkled
T Channelized 0 0
nes 0 1 0 0 1 0
oration LT TR
Cream S' nal
nor gtreet
ovemeM
7 0
Vestbound
8
9
10 0
Eastbound
11
12
L T R L T R
olume 0 0 0 5 0 37
dk-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
ou Fkrvr Rate, HFR 0 0 0 5 0 38
ercent Hea Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
ercent Grade (%) 0 0
aced APPioaach N N
ge 0 0
T Channelized 0 0
nes 0 0 0 0 1 0
on oration LTR
W Queue Len and Level of Service
proach NB SB Westbound Eastbound
vemeM 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
ane Configuralron LT LTR
(vph) 57 43
(m)(vph) 1453 B43
/c 0.04 0.05
5%queue length 0.12 0.16
I Delay 7.6 9.5
OS A A
roach Delay - _ 9.5
roach LOS - - A
> / I-f~
Copyright 02°DOU fFlonAe, All RigNs Resxvetl Vc9on 4.Ic
file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Owner\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k1B5.tmp 8/10/2004
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
neral Information ite Infotmation
ayst
gency/CO.
ate Performed
a sis Time Period Chris Valdez
JTE, INC
08H02004
PM ak ntersec8on
udsdiction
aysis Year Site Acces54WkMle
Yelm
H4th Project
'ect Descd lion Yelm Plat SAMRWP
StMlest Street Sife Acoess ortlVSouth Street Middle Rd. S.E.
ntersection Orientation: North-South Period hrs : 0.25
ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustmenffi
r Street Northbound Southbound
ovement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
olume 10 45 0 0 55 21
eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
ou Fklw Rate, HFR f0 47 0 0 57 22
ercent Hea Veli~ 0 0
edian T Undivided
T Channelized 0 0
nes 0 1 0 0 1 0
fi uration LT TR
stream S~ nal 0 0
nor Street Westbound Eastbound
ovement 7 f3 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
olume 0 0 0 12 0 7
eak-Hour Factor PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
ou Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 12 0 7
ercent Hea Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
ercent Grade (%) 0 0
tared Approach N N
rage 0 0
T Channelized 0 0
nes 0 0 0 0 1 0
n oration LTR
la Queue Len and Level of Servke
proach NB SB Westbountl Eastbound
ovement 1 4 7 t3 9 10 11 12
ne Confguration LT LTR
(vph) f0 19
(m)(vph) 1532 905
Ic 0.01 0.02
5%queue length 0.02 0.08
ontrol Delay 7.4 9.1
OS A A
proach Delay - - 9.1
proach LOS - - ~ A
CopidgW B I°W Uryversi7 of iMidq NI RigMV Reined Versi°n 4.Ic
fete://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\OwnerU.ocal%20Settings\Temp\u2k1B5.ttnp 8/10/2004
FAX TRANSMISSION
CITY OF YELM
CONIMPJNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PO BOX 479 -105 YELM AVE W
YELM WA 98599
(360) 458-3835
FAX: (360) 458-3144
TO: Mark Jacobs DATE: APRIL 29, 2004
FAX #: 206-762-1978 PAGES: , including this cover sheet.
FROM: Jim Gibson
Development Review Engineer
SUBJECT: Griffin Plat for Parametrix
COMMENTS:
I have mailed out [he TIA for Willow Glenn Phase 2 for your information.
I have also included a Trip Dristribation with this faz from the Willow
Glenn Phase 2 project. One piece of information that is not included in
the TIA is the pipeline projects. They are Willow Glenn Ph 2 (44 lots),
Cherry Meadows Subdrvison (2021ots), Yelm Terra (971ots), Mountain
Sunrise (103 lots) and Yelm School Expansion on Middle Road. Please
call if you have any questions or concerns.
(9
** IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL COPIES, OR ANY COPY IS NOT LEGIBLE, PLEASE CALL
(360) 455-3835 As sooty As PossIBLE.
Jim Gibson
From: Mark Jacobs, PE, PTOE paketraffc@comcastnet]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 8:28 AM
To: Jim Gibson, PE
Cc: Scott Griffin; Cathie Carlson
Subject: yelm plat
Jim
You requested that the "pipeline" projects data be incorporated into the traffic impact analysis. Please provide the
"pipeline" traffic data for the following projects. Alternatively the location and number of lots (how much more school
space) could be provitled and the traffic will be manually assigned.
-Willow Glenn Phase II '~
-Cherry Meadows Subdivision .i
- Yelm Terra ~
-Mountain Sunrise
Du r.~.~T Ir-+<.<u of .
I neetl to wrap up this report antl plan on completing the report next week. My engineer will be on vacation the week
after next, thus the push to get it tlone.
Contact me if you have any questions.
Mark
Mark J Jacobs, PE, PTOE, Presitlent
JAKE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC
77318th Ave SW
Seattle, WA 98106
phone/fax 206.762.1978
cell 206.799.5692
6/8/04
- _ ._
0 0 \
~~
~~ o _~~ ~~
Z
tW
V
W
J
~~
_<
C~i~
a ~
~ o
0 F
. ~
N
S In
J ~
a o
^W'
~3
g
o~
x
~e°
r"
0
0P
A
mvHws Rn
~,
1C •°~
5~
- ~
~~ ~ ~
.T VPNG( HP I-
t~ 0
4. J
r
n
°mr
U
G '~.c
C.+~ ,~
I-
~
3H
~
`.' `~W L
F L
W y `/"
` r
U
_ p }RO ST SE
W -
`~
b 1~
a
Z2~
~J
2
b0,` J
~s ~
w
~ Q
~6 .\`OQ r
`'sue ~ ,~J~~ ~? ~
reefi/~2~ ~'
e+~ ~ Lei ~P~ W o
o~J ~ ~ N
V
~~~0
p o 0
Lfj
~ QO
O
m ~~
J Q~\
as ~-~° 3 oao ~~~1 ~P~
fL m ~ ~~•
m
RD ~ U
0
o mr ~~,a
Y
~~m
as NoloHa s-~ ~~`' ~2 P
~r~Jv~
! \ ~
a J jai
- ~ i ~
~ ~
0 16 `rs
7
~ ~~~
d
o
~n o~ o '~
p M
a ~
r ~
~ ~ ~ ~ r
~
~
~ z
~ a
~
4
~ O
~ X
W ~
Q N
~ ~
N ~
0
o Z ~
S
~
Y
~
°- m
~
~ w ~ ~ ~
~ w a w a
z
3
~
a
a w
~
Z
~ ~ w
J
~ Z ~
j w ~
~ ~ Z
a cn O
< a
a~ u
M
W
~_
VI Aso
V"
Z ~ ~"
~ 3
LL
.
o me
~ Z~
m
an v m~
C1'•'.
Yelm Subdivuion
Y I WA TramportaUon Impatt Smdy
C.({t P.Ry Mr.~~s~WS -
9
Z
U
8
(NOl b Swle)
Tronsportadon
Engineering
North Wert, LlC
Sc
Figure 4
Project Trip Distribution
Yelm
Subdivision
r„m~,~~on ~moM~:~~,
May 12, 2003
Transporption Engineerin¢NorUiWest, LLC Page 10
Map Output Page 1 of I
Legend
Fa mss
~ Gmup A WeK
r/ HgM1ways
9lreels
Coun4es
Waver Bod~as
4cmar
Gmv
^ ~bvi
Zwa
n s~
O 'Nm
~/ Streams
Cities
o
I , ~ °
GdM1OpM1OIOs
aackgrountl
.v.e
. 4m W xrNrn W
a -^ sFi
~
~ ~ p`.
V
nor
"'"'~~
y ~TATE HWI'~5~07
Fi ' i;
~
~"
~ r
s
~ ~ ~
~
~_;
> i ;
.. m
'~ ~
- z
109r~H ry pl
` ~ a
z
z
i
http:/ apps.ecy.wa.gov/servleUcom.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=s[ate_ov&ClientVersion=... 1/13/2005
Map Output Page I of 1
Well Loa Images Mao
I:i
~ '
E
Y ~ , PFa eyy
PERIppR ~ ~
~ ~ _,
. VI
1
4
i
RYSTpL ~
•Cq +~ 1
7 • ~1 N Y
.. 5~. / •
~'\
^
Ill
Z~
U i ..
~ Q~NINOSYIEW
~~ ~/
;y TA
^ ~ ~_ ~
rcrc
^~ U
4
-
` ~
i 1 ~~
^ S ~~
°yP ~ ~d y N
.-.
951k O
1
e Q PPS
^ ^
I
g
l
~
~ ~
~ \ I -
~
~ ~
~q
I
%tic
• Pp
°
~
~~
~
i 4
l ~ y~
~~~-'. ~ `. ~ ~ o-
pP`~ Sri .-
•`.: ~ayyu l ~¢,. r
l~
, 'T
~
~'~~ ~o w ~~~ ~ i ~~.~', 4JS ^
~P~
~ .~
02 -._ ~
~ G
~ ~ ~
` ~ ~
,~
" $ 'a' i`s~D
0 Qv q
~ P
A ~~~ ~~
• fin ~ [~F
< .
~
r KV,LE
~
rnkozt I ~~ 5
~
i
~~o.~
~ • G
,px
~ !
y
~p
ys
Q'Q .
_
__ ~
~ 140TH
100TH.- j
~ ~
~. i
~, ti~ l~ _. ~m, w I U ~~ ~~
~
~
y ~'. 2°
Sr ,..._.
•
' \
,~
I `
e- 103RD
~ ~ ~_~
~
~
~
10ATH_ ^ .'~ ..y¢( Al S~ 5, m ,,, Ili ^ I
.
Q L . W
^
•
'= 105THT • PRAIR E n
~ ~
~
~
~
~P
•
~ ~ g4MLP~i ^ ~~
~
^zs-- ^ ~
'~~ ~~.., STATE NWY 507 I p •\
~
~ e •\ ~ •C.
I ~
~ ,~
~.
~ y. _.. _. ^_.. zY .. 1. [N 281
^`l
-
FOX~HIL-L _ _
- ~ ~
>~r" ~ ~
rc ^
I_.-~
- -109TH-- ^___
^
^
~/ Map created by the WA Sfate Dept of E<ob9y a 0.4)mi
ht[p://apps.ecy.wa.gov/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=state ov&ClientVersion=... 1/13/2005
Well Log Search Rcsults
Access
iLWashingtonm
on~,nl sou r._v<<~~.~.~~. vrnu er.
Water Resources
Links
Disclaimer
Priya[y NO}ice
Water Docs Home Text Search Map Search Site Info Forms Contact Us
MAP SEARCH RESULTS
Back... New Search
Pagc 1 of I
Search Crl[eria Usetl: Left Coortlinate: 14]6825, Right Coordinate: 14]8596, Top Coortlinate: 594935, Bottom Coortlinate: 592498
There are 1 well logs that match your search criteria.
The results are sorted by Well Owner Name.
Download a_II 1 1_mages I ~ Download all 1 Records 1 I$ Prin[ [his Page I ~ Help
Displaying 1 -1 of 1 well loq results Sort results by W2 OWDef NamO _ ~ii.
1. GENE XORSEWIN-'-{vl~~~ I view TlFF.~ }
Public Lantl Survey: NE, SE, 5-19, T-1]-N, R-02-E, Tax Parcel Number: (blank)
County: THURSTON, Well Atltlress: (blank)
Well Log ID: 24]15, Well Tag ID: (blank) , No[ice of Intent Number: (blank)
Well piametec 6 (inches), Well Depth: 45 (feet)
Well Type: Water, Well Completion Date: 12/12/19]], Well Log Received Date: 6I28Ii9]B
Ex owH w 1RdNUf~~er nocawell LnO Ome Paffe GClh9D FrLyyJJUWa
®Was~lnaron adta Dpatlmenl of ECaloay Well bplmapine lnbmn Ponlan LO LIIROOJ
http://apps.ecy. wa. gov/we Illog/scripts/mapresults3.asp?sessionid=334959462 &left=1471936&tig... 1/ 13/2005
Page 1 of 1
http://geomap 1.geodata.org/serv]et/com.esri.esdmap.Esrimap?ServiceName=cadastralov&ClientV... 1 /13/2005
Thurston County Map Outpu[ Page