Loading...
Forrester Heights TIA 1-20-06L l i J el asir~ Q~ rc act t dCllla ~ fi reared for• Forrester 1-feigh~s LLB' 125.E Devon [,oop E iyrx~pia, 9 5036 Prepared b: ranspo tion ngimeering orth est ~~ ,~ ~y`~ f ~ ~ ¢° rc" y;;~,~- Transportation Engineering!(~perations • Impact Studies • Qesagn Seruices • Transpactation PtanninglForecasting 16625 Redmond Way, Surce M, PMB 323 • Redmond, WA 48052 • QfficelMob[e {206) 346-8286 • Fax {425} 348-5774 Farrester elghu - Yelm, vdA TraEric Impact Study FI ®I GS CO LUI(3N .......................................................................................................... I T QCTIQ ...............................................................................................................................3 Protect Descrlption ......................................................................................................................3 Traffic Study Approach ................................................................................................................3 Primary Data and Information Sources ........................................................................................ EXISTING CQDITIQS ..................................................................................................................7 Study Area ................................................................................................................................. ..7 Existing Traffic Otolumes ....................................................................................... . ..7 Existing Intersection LGS .......................................................................................................... 1g Non-Motorized Transportation Facilities .................................................................................... 12 Public Transportation Services ..................................................................................................3~ Planned Transportation Improvements ......................................................................................12 T FIC i PACT ANALYSIS .....................................................................................................13 Trip Generation ..........................................................................................................................13 Trip Distribufion and Assignment ...............................................................................................14 Traffic lfolume Impact ................................................................................................................14 Intersection LS Analysis .........................................................................................................16 Site Access Analysis ................................................................................................... ......,2 Sife Access Qerations ....... ...................................................................................................2Q Left-Turn tans Anafysis ...... ................................................................................... ...2Q Sight C?istance ..................... ................................................................................................... ~1 on-Motorized Impacts ........... ...................................................................................................2~ Public Transportation Impacts ...................................................................................................21 ITIGTi4 ESURES ..............................................................................................................22 Appendix A -Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Counts Appendix B -Intersection LS Analysis Results Appendix G -Trip Generation Estimates Appendix D - Fu#ure Tragic Volume Es#ima#es TransportaElan ~nglneering orth est a January 20, 200b Forrester Heights - etm, W A Traffic Impact Study Figure 1, Project Vicinity ...............................................................................................................................5 1 11 13 19 Transportation engineering orth est ii January 20, 2006 Forrester Heights - Ye1m,1NA Traffic impact Study 1 Vehicle Access. Asp of Phase 1, a single site access read will be canstructed to create a new intersectian ante 1't Street (R-S7). Phase 2 ~v~ll antinue to site access read to farm a leap read thrau the site, resulting in a secand intersectian with 1 ~t Street (SR- 507~ appraximately 500 feet saut of the Phase 1 site access intersectan. Study Area Aerations. ~astauncl~westaund side-street turns at the intersectian of 1't Street (S-507) l Masman. Avenue aperatc at LAS P with and withaut the praject. Hawever, na praject trips wauld accur an the side-streets, All ether cantralled znavements at unsignalize intersectians wauid aperatc at I,S ar better, Site Access Impacts. All cantralled mavements at the prapased site access reads ante 1$t Street (SR-507) are anticipated to aperatc at LS ar better during the weekday PM peak hear, with na queuing impacts as a result of the prapased residential deveiapent under Phase 1 d Phase l+2 canditians. A center left-nr lane ~vauld be warranted at cash afte site intea~sectians ante 1$t Street ASR-507 with Phase ~ develapment, Nan- otorized pacts. ~Gurbs d sidewalks are prapased an ane side of all new streets within the prapased plat with uildaut of Phase 1 and P1lases 1+ to acca adate pedestrians and separate them fram niatarists in the travel lanes. Half-street curbsJgutters/sidewalks wauld else be l~ravided an all. praperty frontages of l st Street (SR-507). Public Transportation I pacts. `There are na anticipated impacts to public traizsportation services. Tranxportatian engineering arch e5t ~ January 2a, 2 6 ~~rrestet Heights - Yeim, 1NA Traffic Impact Study itigation. The following is identified to mitigate the traffic impacts of development. ?. Site Access Roadway. The site access roadway loop would be constructed as a Lacal 2ccess Residential roadway according to C`.ity of Yelm road design standards. This roadway will consist of two 11-foot traffic lanes. 7-foot parking lanes on bath sides of the road, and a -foot planter strip and. S-foot sidewalk on one side of the street. 3, Site Access Intersections. With development of Phase 2, a center left-turn lane is ~varrazlted on l~~ Street {S-507) at both project site intersections. {A center Ieft- lane is not w anted with Phase 1 uildout.) The center left- ~ tans would be constructed with Phase development to ialctude a miizamum queue storage length of approximately 100 feet {not including taper). 4. Non- otorized I .prove .ants. C~urbsiguutterslsidewalks are proposed on one side of the proposed site Loop road to accommodate pedestrians and separate them from motorists in the travel tanesm Half-street curbslgutterstsidewalks would also e provided along the 1§~ Street {SR-507} property frontage. Transparcatian engineering orth ~sE '? January 20R 2006 Forrester Heights - Yet, WA 1 Traffic [mpact Study Tl1is traffic impact alysis has been prepared far the proposed Forrester Heights development. The scope of work. far this analysis is based open correspondence with the City of Yetm between I~Tovember 2005 and January 2006. r je esCri do Location. The sate is located on the south side of 1`~ Street (SR-507), north of Creorge Road SE and south of 105~~' Avenue E. flee Figure 1 vicinity Map. Cif C ~/ ~i'dC This report documents the evaluation of traffic impacts and recommended mitigation measures for the proposed development under Phase 1 and Phase 1+2 (full build-out) conditions, To evaluate the traffic impacts of the Forrester Heights development, the fallowing tasks were undertaken. Transportation engineering orth est ~ January 2a, 20a6 Forrester Heights ~- Yelm, WA Tra#f3c [mpact Study a a infer atiQ ©rces Year 2006 P~VI Peek Dour Traffic oluzes; source: All Traffic Data Services, Inc. • ighwcrt~ ~`a~acrczt3,, 11~c~urxl ('~I~"}, ~~~c:iT ~,r~o~°t 2t?~, Trz~nsportation esearclx I3oard (T ), Year 2000 Eitin. • City of Yelzn De~~elczpment ~uic~calzrz~,~ - Jzzly 19, 2000. City of Yelzn 2006-2011 Sig.-Year Traz~spoz-tation Iznproveznent Program - I~eport Date July 25, 2005. Institute of Tr spoatiozi Engineers (:ITEM i•i G~nercxtion ~fanucxZ, 7t~' Edition, 2043. City of Yelm Muz~_icipal Code 1.5.40 - Cozlczzrrency 11~anagez~~ezlt. Trans lion engineering orth est q January 20, 2 6 %Qrre~ter Heigiats - etm, WA Traffic tmpact Study Figure 1. ~?r®ject Vicinity Transpartation engineering orth est ~ January 20, 24Q6 fic~rrester €ieights - Yetm, i~lA Traffic tmpact Study Fire 2. Procase ite ~'l~n Transportation engineering arct,~~c, ~~.c I U t'e roposed t~ fay Forrester Heights'' Yelsn, Washington Tra[#'ac imgact Ssudy transportation engineering orth est January 20, 2oob Source: StfA Consulfing Group, inc.. Pdtrvember 24Q5 Not to State Fcsrrester Heights - Yel A Traffic impact Study c'~ For existing conditions near the project site, four (4) study intersections were evaluated. Figure also illustrates the existing chanelization and traffic control. at the following four study intersections: .All study intersections were analyzed under full build-out of Phases 1+2. Under Phase 1 conditions, no study intersections are anticipated to require PM peak hour analysis except for the lat°oposed site access road intersection. onto S-507, The following paragraphs describe existing roadways that would be used as major routes toffrom the site. Roadway characteristics are described in terms of facility type, number of lanes, and posted speed limits, del Avenue (S -510) is classified by the City of Yelm as a major arterial and by SDC?T as a Rural irrar arterial with a posted speed limit of 25 mph to 35 mph within the cit~T limits. The roadway has one travel lane in each direction, A center. turn lane exists on ~eln1 Avenue east of Clark Road, lit Street SF {S -507) is a two-1 e roadway with i l-foot travel lanes, curbs, sidewalks, and 4- to 6-foot paved shoulders slang various parts of the street. 1 the vicinity of the project site, 4-foot paved shoulders are provided. This roadway is classified as a ~Ylajar a~°terial by the City of helm and as a Rrtral linr .~~°terial y SDC?T. The speed limit in the vic° 'ty of the project site is 45 inph. ~cistin~ raffic o~~u es UVeekday PM peak hour traffic volume data were collected in .January 2006 at the four study intersections. Appendix A provides the detailed traffic count sheets for each of the study intersections. Figure 4 illustrates the ?006 PM peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections. 'l ranspartation engineering oh est 'j January 20, 2oClfi ~~rrester t-Isights - ~e{m, 4YA Traffic Impact Study Figure 3, Existing Claaz~nelizatic~n ar~d Traffic Cc~altr~l S~CD~ g ~~. ~ ~ arty Vatley Ur tic sr =t~ ~zd s~ ,~" ~d ~~ ~ m__ sn ~'` a~ ~ ~_.~._ ti .~ ~t''~~ .. $~ a cae x u A,, ~~~~ ~v ~, cab ,, ~"~; „~ Y ~L au v'~ °'° ~ ~i ~ i ~' ~~ ~ t.7€ TransportaCion ~nganeering orth est January 20, 2t?06 Forrester eigizts - Yelm, WA Traffic Impact Study Figure 4. Existing 2t~06 P1VI Peak Hour Volumes 510 1/altev Dr ~~, ~~'~` ~, Railway Rd AtE °a ~~~~o „A r.~°t _e • 1st StreettWashingtan Ave w , cn -_' Rd SE lst Sd'eetlh7utanan Ave i i ^c .' ~''t4' aE ~ °' ~~ r' j `'~ ' ~`9 ,r ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ _ .Fox bill Itd E.._.€ ~ ~ 909th Ave SIr awn _ €._.m~ ~..~ , ~..n,m._m_...~ # ~{}~~~~ o` ss. uz .x a C.D w v c ~ Transportat°son ~ngineer°sng aett' est January 20, 2QQb Forrester Neigfits - Yelsn, A xisting terse ian Trai"fic ianpact Study Weekday P peak hour level of service (L(~} analyses were conducted at the four study intersections. The existing cha elization d traffic control at the four study intersections was illustrated in Figure 3. Yom; Transportation engineering orth est ~ (~ January 20, 2006 Fs~rrester Heights -'lelm, WA Traffic Impact Study ~ Table 2. Ii ~rresEer Heights xistin P t'eal~ . our L n~ a ry study Intersecttan Lt~s° L~e[av` V/C'' Sif~nali~ed i. 1~ Street (SR-5a7) / helm Av~~tue (SR-51a) Ia 37 a.$5 UI1SigpRftZf't~ (Stop COI1fCQl~E°d [naYE°.Ii1GgtS). ~,~, ~el1YZ ~1~3 <;. ~st St ~sR-~a~} / c°ts!]ingtan AVe Turns tram aSl7lIlgtan AVe (Eastbatu]d) ~~ a.a? Turns fram Washington Ave {~estbaund) ~ ! 6 a.13 Northbound Left-Turns fram i~` street ~ 8 aAa Southbound Lift-Turns frat~ ! s~ strut A $ a.a? 3. i$` st (sR-sa~> r asman. Ave I Turns fram Osman Ave (Eastbound) ~ ~3 a,56 Turns fram. Masman Ave {Westbound) ~ 24 a.2$ Northbound Left-Toms fram t" sheet A $ a.a2 sautl,baurwd Left-Tur„s frat~ isr sheet A s a.a~ ~. ~ ~~ st ~sx-saga f ~uratt Raad s~ Turns framer Mi[1 Raad SE (Westbound} ~ 1'7 a.43 Southbound Left-Yuma from. leg street A !S a,a4 1. LCIS analyses are based on methodologies established in ties. 7(~(?() Ha~fta;~aV C:tagxzczt}> MarneaZ. 2. t_?etay =average control delay per vehiele. 3. Yfi: = ITcalume to rapacity ratio. 4. Ail signats were asstmled to be frilly actuated; splits wera n tinaized. As shown in Table 2, at all unsignalized study intersections, side-street turns onto 2 st Street (R-507 currently operate at LQS C car better during the PM peak: hour. C>;T Tran nation Engitteersng arch est ~ ~ }anuary 2t1, 2 6 Earrester Heights - Yel, WA o - otori~e ranspo do acuities Traffic impact Study Adjacent to the property site on S12-S07~ 4-foot paved shoulders exist on both sides of the street. loo sidewalks or bicycle lames exist. Pubtic Transportation Services The nearest tr it stop is [orated. on Yelm Avenue, over =~/, mile from the project site. terrify Transit Route #93 provides Saturday only service between residential neighborhoods and rumznerria areas within the City of Y'elm with stops every half-hour t~°ot~~t s30 a.m. until. C~:4 p.m. [ e cans do 1 rove ants Priority St .semen Avenue eatign ant fro Edwards Street to S-507. This City project will re-align flee intersection at Osman Avenue / SR-507 and widen the roadway to C`c~llecte~r• standardsm `The estimated cost for this project is $430,000. Construction schedule of this improvement is currently u gown. neither of these improvemezats are assumed to be iti place prior to 2007 under phase 1 and 2009 under I?hase l+2 {full build-gut) renditions, ~ra ortation engineering arth est [ 2 January Zo, 2 6 Forrester ifeigfats - Yelm, f~4 Traffic Impact Study The followilag section describes tr sportation impacts that the proposed ~'~rt°~.ster eig~Zts development would leave in the site vicinity. The discussion includes laew trips generated by the proposed development, distributiola and assignmc;nt of flew project trips, impacts on levels of service at nearby study intersections, site access, Wore- otori~ed transportation, and public transportationm t'1 ell@t'dti4tl The weekday daily, ~111~1, and peak. hour trip generation rates were used to e~lculate the trip generation, as sho in 'T`able 5, ,per City of helm staff Table 3< Forrester eights roject Tri Generation A Peak Haar Trips PM Peak Hour Trips Daily Viand LTse t Size Total In (Tut Total Iu 6Jut Trips Phase i- Sixlgle-Family Detached Housing 24 units i8 4 i4 24 l5 9 230 Phase 2- Single-Family Detached Housing ~6 units 35 26 46 2 1'1 ~f~0 Church lOk GFA 7 ~ 3 7 4 3 90 Phase ~ subtotal 42 I3 4 53 33 20 530 Total Trip Generation (Phase 1. + 2~ 60 I'~ 43 7~ 8 29 7b4 d. Trip rates based on average rate equations in I'I'E Trio Generation A~ianual, ? ' Edition, 2003. 2. Sin te-Farnil r petacfted Rousin -1fiE LtIC 210, Church = TTE LUC' 560. Transpartatian engineering ~orth~est 13 January 2Q 20Qfi Farr~ster Heights - Yeim, WA ~"1 1&tCl~tUtitl[1 dCi S[~"fl ~11t Traffic imgact Study `t`he distribution of PM peak lour project-generated traffic was based on informatian pravided by the City of elm d existing travel patterns in the area. In general, the following distribution was used. in the traffic analyses far Phases 1 d 2; The distribution and assin.tnent of Pal peek hour project-generated trips far Phases 1 and ~ is else shown. in Figure S. raf~c Ql i pact In addition to the background growth rate, the following 12 pipeline projects were added to existing conditions to date ine 4Q7 PM peak hour traffic volumes Fa er (-le~ghu - Yei, WA Traffic Impact Study Figure 5. FM Peak hour Trip L)istriutior~ and Assignment for Phases 1 aat 2 ~~t~ i _ __ _ ~ ~, ~~~ ~ ~ . ~t2._~ ~~~ «~ ~ ~ ~o~m ~y~ s~ { .., i € ~ }S 3 E cap M~.....,... ~~ T w' „^ . n IC~Sth y SE ~ . ....,. .~.~«... .. e....,~,.,.. . ~...,,.. t i 3 ,,,. ( .. "C3 3 . . . . ~ t L!f z. V1i ~? ~z ~" Rd SE '~~~ w t ~S ( ~~ ~ >~ Fox s(i Rd SE ~ . b .R ~~ k _ .....,._. . E 383.1 • ~ ~~ p~gg^} {~ iVTtER A$/~ .]~ £ i gg""~~ 3.t., Transportation engineering arch est 1 ~ January 2Q, 2(}Ob Earrester Heights - Yeim, WA Traffic impact Study LL~ot.sctt~ would consist of up to 52 single-family homes. I3ut°t2ett t1~Iini-~`tor°ct~. Phase l would consist of '70,000 square feet of mini-storage space., d Phase l would be a mixed-used development consisting of 5,500 square fact of office space on the bottom floor with 4 apartments on the top floor, The weekday PM peak hour traffic volumes at study intersections fo1- year 2004 without Phases 1+? arc shown on Figure 6. ~.dding the P1VI peak hour project trips for Phases l+~ (so in Figure ) to the future without-project traffic volumes Figure 6}, results in future traffic volumes with Phases 1+2, as shown in Figure 7, See A.p~endx for future traffic volume estimates. tars i© S a[ysis The weekday P peak hour intersection LC~S analysis results for the fear study intersections are s marized in Table fi. e table is set-up to illustrate the LS results for future conditions without and with the proposed Phases 1+2. The table also separates the Lt?S results for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Iran don Engineering est ~ (~ January 20, 2006 Forrester Heights - Yelrn, WA 1"rai'fic impact Study Figure 6. 2009 V+~ithout Phases I+2 PM Peak Dour Traffic Volu~x~es Transportation engineering orth est ('~ January 20, 2(306 Forrester Fieight~ - Yelm, A Traffac Impact Study Figure 7. 2QQ With Phases 1+~ Ply Peak Hour Tra"fic Vc~h~~~~es ~t0 ut = }} v~° ~Q~4~4 ~~ F [tE' o [sc Srreec/Yelm Ave ~~ ~. ~~ ~.., °~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~~ ~~~,.F ,~ ~ ~?°,~ ~ ~~, ~:~Ra~lway Rd as> * . ,~~ 'v~ ~` = ~~, T- €sc SueerlWashington sue `~ ~,~,~.~,<. 2 `, '° ~` rt~ .> ~ cs~ dd 4 ISC :]try/6'AoSfataS3 A~fe t 9L. € sl tF F ke,..,x,„ yp, i J ~~ F ..~{ 4%# d ~ ~ F" } t LL3 7 fgq ~q ~~+yt~~ ~~~q '?~~ £ 'Cj ~~ P ~ ~ ~~ _< z T-~€ t Ld C€ ~ L€ +~ _ /s < qq V ~Otll AVe ~ Transportation engineering ort1~ est 1 January 20, 2006 Forrester Heights - Yelm, WA Traffic Impact Study Table 4. Forrester eig is 2009 Pb~se +2 P Peak ctur I, S n mark V~itl~aut~ Praject Witt,-Pra,~eet Study fntersectian LOS' Delay2 VEC~ LOS Delay V/C Signalized ~; 1, i~ St (SR-507) f Yelnz Ave (SR-510} ~ 61 0.98 E 65 1.04 Unsi~nalized {stop controlled movements): LOST Delay'` V/~~ LOS Delay ~/C ~, 1 ~` St (SR-507} / V~ashingtan Ave Toms fram Wash.ingtan Ave {F-astbaund) 1.1 0.1.3 T3 11 0.14 Toms fram Washingtan Ave (Westbaund) D 27 0.34 D 33 4,40 Narthbound Left-Toms fram l~r 'Street A 8 0,04 A 8 4.05 Sauthbattnd Left-Toms from l s` Street A 9 4.02 A 9 4.03 3. 1 ~` St (SR-547} l Masman Ave Turns fram Masman Ave (Easibatu~d~ 1~ > 104 > 1.00 f` > 100. > 1,40 Toms fram Masman Ave ~Westbaund} F ? 100 ~ 1..04 F > 140 > 1..44 Narthbaund Left-Turns fram i ~` Street A 8 4.03 A 9 0.43 Sauthbaund Left-Yuma fram 1~` Street A 9 0,43 A 9 0.03 4. 1 ~` St (SR-547 t Mi11 aad SE Turns from Mill. Raad SE (Wesibaund} D 27 4,46 D 3l 0.50 Sautt~baund Left-Toms fram 1~~ Street A 0.46 A 9 0.46 I _ L(~S analyses are taased on ethodalogies established in the 20C!{? Highway Ca~a~acily hfanucaf. 2_ Belay =average cantrol delay per vehicle. 3. V"/C =Volume Co Capacity ratio. ~. Signal was assumed to be full actuated; s fits were o timi~ed under each scenario. etazled L() ataalysis worksheets for ~htdy intersections are provided i Appendix Transportation engineering Northwest l g January 2Q, ZQ06 Farrester Heights - Yelm, W~ its cress nalysis Traffic Impact Study Asp of Phase 1, a single access road will e coast cted and a new intersection made with 1 ~` Street ASR-507). Phase 2 will continue the site assess road through the site to form a loop road and second intersection with 1 ~~ Street (SR-507 approximately 500 feet south of the Phase i site intersection. `The access loop road loop would e classified as a ~QCCrI Access esac~e~zticzl roadway by the City of Yelm. Zis roadway should consist of two, 11-foot traffic lanes and 7-foot parking lanes on both sides of the street with a -foot planter strip and 5-foot sidewalk on one side of the street, its cress erations with development of Phase 1, critical turning zovemezlts at tine proposed site access read intersection onto 1Si Street S-507) would operate at LS B or better with a vlc ratio less than 0.02 or less, Entering d exiting queue lengths at the proposed site access road would be no more t11 2 vehicles. ~Tith full build-out of Phase 1+2, all znovezraents at both site assess roadway intersections onto SR-507 are expected to operate at LC)S or better with a v/c ratio less th 0.03 or less. Entering and exiting queue lengths at both intersections would be no more th 2 vehicles. Left-Turn ne Analysis Left-t s represent side--street ng oveznents at signalized intersections, increasing the potential for intersection daisy and safety concerns. As such, the potential need for a center left-turn iazre on l~r Street ASR-507} at its intez°sections with the site loop road. was evaluated considering the peak afterzioon commute period. Based upon procedures and guidelines found in WSL?C~T's design Mcxnr~al, ianuary 2005 (Figure 910-8a Left-Tuz-n. Storage Gtzidelznes Two Lane- Unsignalized), southbound left- 1 es would be warranted at the site intersections with development of Phase 2. A center left-turn lane would not be warranted with. developznezxt of 24 lots in Prase l . The left-tarn ant alysis is based on the calculation of 3 percent inbound left-turns at the project site intersections `th approximately 1,035 northbound/southbound through vehicles during Phase 2 development. The center left-t lane at both site intersections would warrant the minimum queue storage length of approximately 100 feet (not including taper. Transportation Engineering orth est ~ January 20, 2QQ6 Forrester Heights - Yet, WA Tra#fic impact Study I~lt t 1104 o - otorize 1 pae curbs/gutters/sidewalks are proposed on one side o all new streets witita the proposed. plat with btziidout of Phase l d Phases i+2 to aeco odate pedestrians and separate them t~ron~ motorists in the travel lanes. Half-street curbslutters/sidewalks wot~id also e provided on the lit Street (SR-SQ7) property frontage. u tie ranspo Lion 1 pae Transportation engineering Northwest '? j January 20, 2ot16 Forrester Heights -- Yeim, A Trarfic impact Study E The following measures are identified to T~aitigate tlae traffic impacts of the Forrester Heights development, Site Access I2oad~y. The site access roadway loop would be constructed as a Lo~°al Ae~es.s esic~c~tztial roadway according to ~`ity of Yelm road design standards. This roadway will. consist of o l 1-foot tral~'ic l es, 7-foot parking lanes on both sides of the road, a -foot planter strip and 5-foot sidewalk on one side of the street, Site Access Intersections. With development of Phase , a center left-turn lane is warranted on 1St Street (S-547) at both project site intersections. (A center left- turz2lane is not warranted with Fhase 1 uildout.) The center left-turn lane would e constructed with Phase 2 developzr-ent to include a minimum queue storage length of approximately 144 feet (not including taper). Non-Motorized Improvements. Furs and sidewalks are proposed on one side of all. new streets within the proposed plat with uildout of Phase l and Phases 1+2 to acco iodate pedestrians and separate tlie~ frarr> motorists in the travel lanes. Half-street curbs/gutters/sidewalks would also be provided on all property frontages of 1St Street (S-547), Transportation engineering orth est `?~ January 20, 20Q6 • £'~~C ()Uf SUtllfilc7~( . ~ I ~ °*wfiUl ,. ..I i ~ ', I~ Mark Skaggs (2t~t 251-Q3t7Q 1st St & Washingt©n St SE :~ to ~e~s ~-t~esaay, .~at,uar~ 7~, ot~s r sa ~s ~ ~7~ ~s ashin on St SE ' T ~ -~ ~ a ss ''` as ~~° ~ _ _ } I ~ ~7 Washington 3t SE Asa ~ s ~o~ ~. ~, ~- Approach PHF HV°fa Volume EB 0. s0 0.0°do 4 0.86 4.&% 65 NB 090 6.9% 406 5B 0.79 6.4% 298 Ontersection 0.92 6.5°fo 773 Count Periad: 4:OQ PItr3 to 6:QQ P T+~tat Vehicle Summary '~~~! Ef '• ~M Mali; Skaggs (2tG) 251-f13th9 1JC v?4 Q[ Q~h~4~}®R E Tuesday, January 9Q, 2U(16 SS-Minute fntervat Summary d•(l0 PM tea fa~(SO PM to Chat 248 499 eL 2 2F7 19 x ~ ~.1 ,~, ty, Hv , s~ PHF 0.86 #. i .J ~ i.~, 3A Out 8 65 In 0 ~ e .~+- 2 §n $ 37 O 3 ^y # ~ ?9 NV O.CT°./~ PHF 0.50 "4"1 4 ,_ m °w A 3a4 9$ ~ a ouY in ~ _ 309 SOb o- ~~~~~k ~~'t4ddr Summary 4:15 PM tQ 5:15 FM tnferval NortlebourM bound Eastlaeasnd Westlx?und Start t si S& i st St Washington St &E Washmgto_n St SE lntorval Tame L TT R HV L I ____ T ft Fit! L. ~ 7 I R ttV L T' R itV Ta9a1 04:00 PM 4 ~ R _, ! i__ _2 _ 72 ' __, Y 1~8 _ _ 0 _?__ 9 L_ ~ __ -- ~~ _ 2_ _ ` ~__ F _ 0 190 _ 04:95 PM 3 9U5 4 9 5 - 58 9 & t ~ 0 0 0 0 -~~ 7~0 j_ Y2 _i...... 0.. - 19z'i 04:30 PM 1 99 6 9 2 ! 58 Q 2 4 ; o z 0 5 I '1 ~ 4 x 2 Ya5 PM 0445 0 89 4 __ 6 7 ( _ __ _ 72 4 4 0 10 0 4 ~ ,_ ',_ _ -- E 1 1 Y - F 0 993 05 PM a s$ - f aT + ___ s ~__. a s 89 _ _ _ ~ 0 9 0 o _ ... --f_- 6 0 _j_=s 9 - aos ~ 01595 PM 1 90 2 ~ 6 5 _j 61 1-._0 ~ 4 _ f_ Y I _ 495-~ _R _ S~9 fi 0 _979 ~ __ - o - ? o z -~ s a ~ 7- ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ os as PM 5 ? 6 ~ z z a a55 Total Survey i5 ~ Z35 I 26 f~ 28 557 ~ 5 ~ 3$ 2 ! t ~ 14 r 0 43 9 ~ 51 ~ 3 9;#86 E=eak Nour Summary d-15 PM to 5:15 PM Northbound Souttebound EasiAound Weaffioaand E Y 1st SY 1st Sf Washington St SE _ '+~'ashan an Si SE Tata4 A.ppmach --1- !n Ctui Total hiV I In Out ~ Totaf ~ HV do -- £ksi '. 7eW4 '. NV !n f Out i Tata4 NV Volumt 106 309 795 28 298 4Y9 797 '. Y9 4 i 8 s 92 I 0 85 i 3? J 102 3 773 °(ofiV 8.9% _ b.4%.._..._-_._._ ____ _. ..___O QP _-_ _..____ ._-_. 4.8°fi __.__ fiS% _ _ PHF _ 0.90 0.79 0.54 0.86 0.92 Northbound Souihbeund Eastbound Weszbeund 6 ~ 9 s% Sz isz St Wash+n tan Sz SE 4 - - Washin an St SE Total ---_ ...-~-- -- Movement ---~----- ! T R Total ---~---1_--~-- L T P ~7otat --. _ ---~- - - L i T I P Total L T i R~Tazal Volume 4 ! 384 9 $ IA05 94 _ 2FF I 2 298 _ ~ 7 _! _ 4 ~y 3 '4 2a _; 2 V 3a .65 7?3 PNF 0.33 ' 0.91 ~ 0.75 0.80 078 0.50 0.79 0.&9 025 I p.00 ! q.38 0.5A Q.f~6 i Q.Sp 0 8~ 6.92 Ro(fr'ng Hpur Summary d-nf9 PM to A-rld? PM interval Nardrbound So+xfhbound Easebesund Ydestbound Start 9s8 St tat Sf _ ..__ Washim3ton Si SE_ Washart. an SP SE interval Time _ L T R HV _ L T R I HV l ! T I R T HV L ! T I R FA% Total 04:Op PM 8 ~ 382 18 ~ 35 76 260 3_x_22 9 i 9 3 ~ 0 25 2 .35 2 754 04:15 PM 4 1384 98 28 93 2T7 2 ~(._99 9 _0 1 3 _LO 29 2_x_34 ~ 3 _ 773 04:30 PM 368 16 25 i4 1286 ~ 9 ~ t5_ 2 ~._0 i 4 I 0 27 _~ 3 2$ i2$ i 3 ?56 1 353 9? -- ~ _. 2~ 2 . . _~ r ~.__~.. - 7 32 05:00 PM 7 8 I 3 95 12 2 i6 ~ T 0 i& I i6 I S ? Total Vehicle Sumnnary n~~ ~I~ :. Ma~~~a (2G5p 2s9-D3(H3 ~St ~c Yel(tl VE' Tuesday, January 10, 2006 4: F to G: P i5-Minute lnferral Summary .t •IeE? vet to f,~t PAS a ~ kn Out p 2~ ~~ > i pp 901 d4 69 Z ~ ~ ~ PH 0.93 intctvat Sgrt No lsB St hound Sxt St Eas Yeim A s Yeim Are infenrtl Tome L T R HV L T R tiV t L T I R E tiV L T R 1{V Totat 04:00 PM 49 25 53 I 9 i3 2S 25 # 97 526 __7 I___Z_ _ 42 62 2_' _9S 4S9 Q4:95 PM 38 24 _ 54 _ 9 _ 59 95 3t _ 2 _ - 23 ~ 134 SG S 3# 996 7 2! 506 04:30 PM 3f 20 ^S3 ! 6 14 i 36 27 2 27 P 127 7_^ S 43 104 t0 t3_ 4l6 OdAS PM _05`60 PM 28 __ 27 I _21 21 53 53~ _ 9 _, 4 _ f4 _ 23 35 - -._... t... 94 99 _27 4 _ 24___ _ 132 37 ~9 5 ~ iS 9 7 47 97 L7 5_901 97 4 32 „_ 46& 495 OS_fS PM 05:3@ PM OS:4S PM 34 99 28 _ 9S 23 12 SS 48 39 it 3 9 3 i.7 49 0 9 7- -_ 2f I t 8 !7 46 2 41 1 342_ _2_~-92fl 25 ~ 137 49 S _ 21 ~ 5 r 16 i 2 4~_ 63 S St _ ° 95 5 72 38 ~ 9E 4 4 7 4S8 _ 444 447 Tatal Survey 247 ~ 162 ~ 411 52 94 E 940 ~ 182 ~ 93 223 ~ t.037 9S 54 77 349 7S3 i 66 ( 85 3.758 f k f'fOUr a°'tlmmdry a-t5 FM to 5^f5 vet N4AtIhnUnd Southbound FasBbcstteed TY+ESf630und i3y 5 st St ! st St Yetm Are Yeim Are Totat Rppmach _ _ to Ouf~ 7otai I tiY in {)ut TaEal HV In t Quf Tatel I NV ire flat ~ Totat HV Volume d23 ~ 287 70# P 28 236 j 238 I 474 I _5 555 640 ~ l,295 ! 32 _ 53t~_ 786 9;457 SS 3,945 ° %NV 5i6% 2.S'~ 4.4% 8.7% 5.2 .6 PNF 0-9f 0.89 098 0.93 0.96 ey Northbound 1 sf St Southhound €asttaound 1st St Yelm Ave YYCSYbound Yeim Ave Total Moremen8 L--~- T R jTafal _ L T R Totai L f T I R iTafai L I T R ~TOtai Valuate 124 I 85 213 1423 5t2 32 1555 5f i 7d 501 -236 9t9 975 1 4fS 43 '531 _ 4,945 P14F 0.82 i 490 ' 0.99 0.91 _ 0.80 I 0.80 - 0.8t X0.89 0.75 4.45 i 0. 0 98 ._ . G.86 I 0.84 G.60 1093 0.95 Railing Hour Summary e•71n vet rn a•rtn vet intefrai ^atart Northbaand 43t St ScucSte[so%tstd tzP St Eaxtbouexi Yelm Are tMesxt4oueM Yclm Ave InMrv#I Time L~ T R NV L 7 R kiV __ L~ 7 R HV L ! T R fN Tota4 Q4.00 PM Y38 ~ 99 293 33 Fi0 ~ SR ~ 99 ~_ 9 9Y S99 30 32 -~ 3E£ 396 26 SB _ ~ 1.909 04:15 PM 124 86 i 213 28 59 74 105 6 9i9 S92 32 32? 45 SS 575 49S ! 94S 04:30 PM 920 I 77 217 3Q 45 75 89 4 929 X520 41 ~ 32 983 j 362 i 39 T 38 4 89F 04_45 PM 05:~ PM tf~ 904 $0 292 7i4 39S 1 27 39 40 34 55 50 83 83 3 4 33t ! S93 _ _SS 932 Sib ~ 55 32 f9 981 _356 3S 29 _ 382 351 ~ 40 ~ 27 9 870 9849 Tcatal Vehicle Summary i ~w Mark Skaggs (246) 259-4304 '~S~ ~ ~ir. OStli1tl AVM E +~uPS(~8y..1c?tltt4iry "fag Z~~ °~= ,~ tQ s:~ P~ 95-traute tntervat Summary 4.ao Pit ro s:taa P~ In Out ,°~-, m 396 442 >_ u. 13 278 29 °' ,~ ~,,,~,. FtY 2.t°to PNF 0.78 ti9 '~ 23 that 48 5d '* q' E f 19 97 In to 25$ 902 O 143 '1 ~ /~ 57 HV 9.3% ---»-q" PHF 4.33 ~ !! 2d 392 ?3 caul In = _ 478 399 da Peak Hour Summary 4;15 PM fo 5:15 PM infernal Stan tia 9 sB 58 Sout9aboaccW 1 s8 St Eas Mosman Ave SE Westtaouead Mosman Ave SE tnMrval tone a t I T a3 t1v t_ T €. I riv 1_ T ft ran 1_ a P p civ Tntat Q4:44 PM 9 81 94 ~ 5 9 69 4 9 13 6 23 1 t3 2 4 a 259 o41sPM 7 _ ss $ s 'a sa a~~ 97 ss - 04 to s9 9 s o ass Q4:34 PM 6 7d 8 ~ 3 4 86 _ 2 ! 5 j 12 94 E 49 1 99 ~ 9a 9 ~ 255 144:49 PM 45:40 PM 45:95 PM 9 72 5 6 ! 67 } d 5 $2 r__5 _ 2 3 4 6 _ 5 _ 9 _ 69 84 _6d __5__ 9 3 6 6 _ r 5 18 14 S2 82 34 2 f7 29 2 $ 3i 9 _'92 5 i_ 4_ 19 ~ 3 ~ _3 9 SEi_ ,5 S_ S 4 ~ 25? 264 _ 253 45:34 PM 9_ 71 7 3 6 fib yy __4 _~_ 2 _ 6 $ __ _ 31 ~Q 75 3 I _ 4 .4 232 4S:d5 PM 5 i 64 - 2 1 4 4 62 1 4 3 9 6" 23 ~ 9 14 9 3 4 139 Tgtal Surrey 92 ~ 6t4 t A7 { 2g 53 537 3f 35 947 ~ B2 ~ 266 ~ $ 193 ~ 22 ~ 45 2 1.355 Peak Hour Summary 4:15 PM to 5:15 P!N ~ Nantsbauted Southbound Eastksoce€sd Westbound &si SS 9st 38 Mnsnean Are SE Masenan Ave SE Total AGPPOa~6 In Out Total ! t#lE in Out Total : tiV In I t3u4 `a a9al I 9iV 6n ! 4?uA i Tofai i HV volume 354__ 47$ &37 13 - - 316 442 71$ i 2a 298 I 48 ; ~ 9 97 ~ ao2 , as3 ! 2 s.03o _ %IiSf 36°6 fi.346 9.3%, 2.9°.-0 _ __ - - 3.3?k -_ PHI= 4.$9 0.~ 4.93 __. -_ 4 78 _. G.96 B ~ Northbound Southlxound Eastboaend Nfesttxound Moxement 1st St ____ __._ __. 9 sE Si _..._.._ Mosrnan Axe SE _. Akgsman Ave SE __ _._ . _._ _- To#aE T R Tota! l T L r :7gta6 T R t ~ P ITotal ~ ~ _ ~ F ;TO9ai Valume ?d ! 312 i 23 369 25 276 73 .31$ 6a 94 9 143 '258 5i ti ~29 37 3,a34 Ptii= 4.86 i 0 81 4.72 0.81 a 63 0.83 i 4.65 0.86 0.85 4.79:4.$7 14.33 0.75 0.95 0 73 ;4 7$ _ G 48 E2ottitsg Hour Summary 4.00 P to 6.00 PAd IMerva9 NorthtsoarrM SouMbournt EasthreFSead .wound Start 9st St _ 9st St Mosman Ave SE Masman Ave SE Interval Tivtae L T R ~ F291 L T R F!4f L I T R HV L T R I HY Total 04:00 PM _ 27 328 23 !5 29 i 259 11 i 7? d'a 8d3 55 4 51 ~ 14 ~ 24 9 1 421 0-0:15 PM 24 I 312 23 93 25 278 i3 __ 20 __ _ _ 61 ~_ 94 _943 _ _ 5 _ -_ 57 I 17 29 2 9 Q30 44:30 PM 22 29$ I 24 1 12 24 283 16 29 96 5t 943 6 64 t9 1 28 j 2 ~0?0 4445 PM 25 242 2t _. __~ 12 _ ___28 I. 28_9_ 18 I ' ~ 18 - 54 ~ d5 933 - 9 -- Fi4 16 i _22 1 _ -- . .. _997__ -. 45:44 PM 25 ~ 284 18 14 24 278 ~ 17 96 33 1?3 i 41 d 6? 42 1 2s 7 344 Total Vehicle Summary ~. ~~~ ~a~ s t2~) 254-oaai 1st St i11 d SE Tuesday, January 1Q, 2 6 a:ao -~~rr to s:~v PM f5-Minute lnteruat Summary d X00 PM to 8'00 PM Bnttl SavRhttnund Eax96ound tMestpound Start 4 st St 1st &1 MiS RQ SE _- Mii! Rei SE MMeva! Time T R tiV L T j HY l I R h1V Tagi 04 ~0 PM Oa:iS FM _~_84 84 I 5 4 10 8 __16 93 ~_ 12 ~ ! ~ E'a 7.- ~_.=1 _4~ 90 _,_2_ 16 & 9 ~ ~ _212 23f 04:30 PM _, _ 72 4 _ 40 ~ _ _ _46~~_ ~ 3 _ ~ ~ t_ __ 42 ~ _ ~ 1 232 04 AS F'M D5:Oi1 PM 05:15 RM { 59 { 79 86 _ S__ 5 6 6 I 4 S _ti { 145 ~ _ 13 ~ i24~. 12 HO ~ -_ 3 _ ~5 4 __. _.. - f ~ .- ~ _ _ f__ _ 6__~, ~ 12 I 0 7 4 i 0 fi_~_ 1 2 0 .__ 299 237 222 05:30 PM 79 __ 9 ~ 5 -- , . __ 16 98 --- ~~ 1 --- --~- .. ~ f 5 4 ~---~ - 204 0545 PM I 70 I 4 2 19 41 4 ~ 9 + ~ 443 Total Surrey 633 53 50 !! 915 ~ 841 i 38 i ( ?i 5 47 ~ f 1,760 ~eatC t{fldJr Jtfmmary :~°f5 PM to S:iS PM Nonthhound SoWhhoumf E.ai4BSewwvtd WeatRnund 6 y ' 4 sR St 9 sE S9 ~. M$4 Rd SE ~~_-- ~~v MidE R6 SE _ TMBH R ~PProac, fn 4ui Total HV 0u9 Totat ( in QuR i Tatat ~HV i in Irt 4u9 Tratal ~ NV itelume 338 ~ 483 i 824 28 48. SOi i 365 886.1 R_~ 0 _ 1 v0 .7_.__ 85 I 76 159 2 924 °ioH Y 8.8% _ __ . . . 35% _...__d?:~°'R'__. __._ 2.4%____ . 5.2%_ _ PHF __ _-_- 0.82 _..__._.____ _ -_-_..-_.__ 0.88 0.(10 059 0.97 NnRitbnund SnutteGoun~ €asBCOUnt9 Wesfb4und R Y M 1 sf St 4 s9 S9 _ __._ _ _ _ _Mell R.~ SE Mi&t Rd SE TofaS __ ._.-- _._;...___ -- -_ avemeni I T R ITo9aa L r S ~ Tofal ~ i ~ ( ?Total Tatai Vo4ume ~ 314 2d '338 52 444 ( '501 I 0 34 ~1 !85 424 PHF ~ 0.84 Ofi7 0.82 0.85 ~ 0.87 t !Q.88 1~J-040 0.75 -- 0.67 0.69 0.47 t~4ttfn,(,J ftQttP JURBtnaly d-(N7 PAf ttx ~^Oa PM In~rva6 Sfart Northbourtx! 1s4 SE £.naathbouaed 9si St Easl6autad MiN Rd SE Wcat4tttuntl Mili Rd SE In4el lime _ i T R HV _ 0 T HV Imo- _ t. I -i'-R ~~ HV Tota9 04:00 PM I 394 ' 24 34 55 493 99 I 39 57 4 -_. 899 04:15 PM 394 ~ 24 28 _ 52 ! 4{9 1 98 _ _~ ~_ --__ ~__. .___ I 51 2 .__._924 04:30 PM _ ~-21 25 52 I d&3 ! 15_ __L_~_ 31 1 37 ~ 1 990 04:15 PM _ 343 26 20 _ ~ _98._ 52 452 (_.._-_ s ~ ~-_~___ 21 _ _23 + 9 ___ ~__ 887 _-_T .__..__ 05:049 PM __ _ _ _ ____ 394 29 16 _ _ _...-. _ _ 60 428 i ~ 19 I i6 ~ 14 1 1 864 HG Signalized Interseeti©n Capacity Analysis Forrester Heights 1: Yelm Ave {S-510} & SR~507 2006 Existing Cond'#ions PM Peak .. ,. m ,LL,, w-~ ~., . .. ~_ ~w .. Lane Configurations '~ '~ `~ Ideal Flo~sr {V~ahl) ~! (}~? ~ 900 1900 1900 1900 1:900 1900 19QQ 1900 `! 900 1900.: ~ 900 Lane Width 12 12 11 12 12 1~ 12 12 12 11 10 12 Tta~~ t~sst t~r~te;s} ~:~ ~ ; ~~ ~~ Via? ~~. ~~ :~1 ~ ~4~~ .: . 4 ~ . ~~ ?t,0 ~ :~ 4.0. ~" 4~a3; : ~, .. ~ ~ ~ . 4.0: 4.0; ~.. Lane UtiE_ Factor 1.00 1.OQ 1.00 1.OQ 1.t~0 1.00 1.(30 1.00 1.Q0 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0,95 1.00 0.95 1.00 ri. Ip{ri~t~ ;. ;_ 1'l9 ~i1~? .; "~ ~5 1 191 ~4, 1551; Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 # 3~.{f?~ ... ..,,..1.71 81Q , ,18'x.. 5... 1;>: ' ;: , ,: :<1..;: :,::,.. °t4;. ,: 1:551'. ; . Volume {vph} 92 536 40 136 464 2 152 96 210 76 64 124 F?a~'tititt~~#~,~#~HF~ ~.~E~ =1;~}Q 1<~1t1< ~ 1a~t}~~ ~ ~~~.~ ~ ~I:#~t~~ ~`1.C?0 ~ ~~1:OL7 ~-~ ~1.OQ~~ =~~1:OiJ 1.#~~}. .~'I~.O( Adj. Flow {vph} 92 536 40 136 464 28 1 ~2 96 216. 76 64 124 ICtf~;~cii€~€~~ {ir~i ' ~ ~ ~, ~0 ~~~ ~r°~° r0 ~~;~tl , ~ ~~;~ . ~ ~ ~~ 0~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ;0~ ~ ~ ~t? ~ ~;~ £?~; ~ , Cl ~ ,~ Ci Lane Group Flow {vph} 92 536 40 136 492 0 152 312 0 76 188. 0 l :x"111 {°~a} a° °Ja ; ; ~ ~~cs„ . . =. °Ic~ : : °.o = ` .1 0 ; ; ° . oho , °1v ;' °,/~ ' , °,fv. : . 3° Turn Type Prot Perm ....Prot Prot Prot Phases 6 Effective Green, g {s) 6.0 30.6 30.6 8.6 33.2 7,4 ~,r~r . :gf loo ,~5 Oi 0 Q '1 . ~(~.3 Q fit} Clearance Time {s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 .0 Yla{~ t~tisic~~_~s~ ~ t0 `~~" ° 3.(? ~>Q> > ~ .0 ~ ~ ~ ~~.0 ~ , ~ ;3~0 ~ 18.7 4 : ' 5.0 ~~ ~~3:0 ~ ` ... 3.9 : 01:05 5.0 .~1 ` 15.2 0:t3 , 5.0 3.0'. Lane Grp Cap {vph} 133 712 585 183 737 160 382 85 303 `' i't~5 y Rt=Prat Q.~ }t;, t~:°' e~:t9: ' f1:(~'°, ' t~:t~ Q':2 . v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 vl±~ Rattt#. ; < ;::, ° °<:t1:9..,,.f} 0 €'~ . . "t74 '::°,m67 0.5 '..... - ' ;; `t3.9 0.52.. Uniform Delay, d1 35.0 20.3 14.7 33.5 17,9. 35.0:.. ...27.9..... 36.7 28.7.. ?r~gressi0r~ Ft~r, ~~~ '1.00; ~ ~'Sat~ ;~:0~ , 1;00 je(l0 !1.Otl ~, ~, 1s0{l . 1.00' 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 14.4 4.5 0.0 ... 15.0 2.3 55,6 12.7 63.3 3.9 Clay { ;:° :,` ': ' 9 4d9 r ~t~5 <' : 2.2 90,`7 0:6 = ` 00~1~ 32 . Levef of Service D C . D C F _ D F C Approach LC?S C C E D x '~ ~''=:- `a's ~ €. ~ `~. 4~,-`.ras~.~` i_'u~'' ~'~s"r~~~ ;~ ~ ~k 1~s~€ F~^.u~'"~S~~t~,4v~~ ''t~2Z`,"~v~ ~`~'""'S2w7 u~~~kwl~',.^~~`,'`~''~-~'"~~"'.+ '°~s`i. ~. }~ k~*~i~ a ... .. ~ tea. ... ,-.. ..:. ,. s ,p ,...~. ~ ~x .., a xa .. .. ,. ~. ,, ... :...,. .a~, . -.. ., ,. ~.. ~,, :. ~ ... HCM Average Control Delay 37.1 HCM Level of Service D N~ V~~rr1e ~p rya ratttt: ~ ., ~ ! ~ ~ . ~~ . ~ Actuated Cycle Length (s) 77.3 Sum of lost tRme {sj 20.0 lntr~stiiar~ j~acit'ttiliet~n ,71.'0°: ` 1U [~~vl of Service C Analysis Period (min} 15 Forrester Heights 5.00 pm 1f1112005 2006 Existing Conditions PM Peak Synchro 6 Report Transportation Engineering Northwest Page 1 U-WAY STC}R G TR4L. SUMMARY eneral Information.. ie Information nalyst ..//GT ~nt$r5ection ~ - tSt S aSttdngtodl A9Fe gencylCo. TEIUW urisdRCt~on W aC1C?TfCrty of Yelm Cate Performed Ottt t12QQ5 nalysis Year 2Qf16 Existing nal sis Time Period PM Peak Pro~ect Descri tion #41122 Forrester Hei hts EasttVltest Street: ashin teen Ave NorthlSouth Street: tsf SfreetlSR-5Q7 Intersection Qrientation: !North-South tud Period hrs : 11.25 chicle Volumes an d Ad`ustments Ma'or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 t_ T R L T R plume 4 392 t6 2C? 356 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF t_QQ t.Qt? t.(1 t.QQ t.Q(1 1.(10 Hourly Fiow Rate, HFR 4 392 t 6 20 356 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 - - - - Median Type Undivided' RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 t 0 0 t 0 Configuration LTR LTR U stream Si nal 0 t Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 1 11 12 L T R L T R plume 24 4 24 4 0 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 tv00 1,00 1.00 Hourly FI®w Rate, HFR 24 ~ 24 ~ ~ Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 5 0 0 0 Percent Grade {%} 0 0 Flared f~pproach 1V Storage 0 0 RT Channelized C1 0 Lanes ~ 1 0 0 t 0 onfiguration LTR ~.~~ t3eta Queue Len th and Level of Service pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ? 10 'I 1 1 ~ Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR {vph} 4 20 52 6 E-n} (vpft} t t &3 t t 29 395 4 1 3 !c Q. QO 0.02 0. t 3 0.02 5°lo queue length 0.01 0.05 0.45 0.06 ontrol Delay .1 .2 15.5 13.9 LQS A A C B pproach Delay - - 15.5 13.9 pproach LC~S - - C B Rights Reserved file~l~C.~Documents and Settings0$Jeff~L,ocat Settings\Ternp\n'?k6~L~.tixap 1 /2 ~/?OQ6 i arc ~ u c ~. Ovement 9 2 3 ~J 6 ~ T ~ T ~ plume 34 32 4{.1 236 12 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. Hourly Flaw Rate, HFR 28 384 32 ~`~ 236 12 Percent Heauy Vehicles 4 -- _ _ edian Type (Jdivide RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 ~ 0 onfiguration LTR LTR U strum Si nal 0 1 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 Q 11 1 L T R L T ft plume 44 4 24 68 44 136 eak-Hour Factor, PHF 9.(~Ct 1.06 Q ~,C1t? 1.C?(? 1.OQ purl Flow Rate, HFR 44 4 24 68 44 136 Percent Heauy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade {°to} 0 0 Flared Approach lV ti! torage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 onfiguration LTR LTR £?,ii , QUE'Ue Len th and LeY@~ of ~erYice pproach NB B VI/estbc~und Eastbound ouement 1 .4 7 8 9 1Q 91 "12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR {uph) 28 0 72 248 (m){uphj 1306 1122 257 440 fc 0.02 ...0.04 028 0.56 5°lo queue length 0.07 0.11 1.11 3.39 ontrol ©elay 7.8 8.3 24,4. 23.2 LQS a ~ c e pproach delay - __ 24.4 23.2 pproach LOS - - C C R~~hts Reserved ilea/C:1Dc~euinents and Settin~s\$3eftlLoeal S~~tinslTemp~u2k6S~i_trz~~ 1f23/2006 • Y4V 48 i.ts? VLiJ~F #.+B.FA 1&i 4F1 1 s.e~,+.. 1 ~.. <. li iB~~ i • VI}~ R Y~ VP ii•~e enerai Information ite Information naiyst JGT Intersectican #4 - 1st S iff Road SE gencyfCo. TECUW urisdiction iNSC?CTlCity of Yefrn Date Performed 01l11f2005 naiysis Year 2006 Existing nai sis Time Period PM Peak F'ro~ect Descri tion #4022 Forrester Nei hts Eas est Street: Milf Road SE NQrthfSouth Street= 1st StreetfSR 507 intersection Qrientation: North-South tud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes an d Ad°ustments a°or Street Northbound Sauthbound ovement 1 2 ~ 4 i_ T R L T R plume 0 316 20 52 516 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.OQ 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Fiow Rate, HFR 0 316 20 52 516 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - - "` Median Type (.fndivided RT Channeiized 0 0 cranes 0 1 Q 0 1 0 anfiguration TR ~~ U stream Si nai 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 1 91 12 ~ T R ~ T R plume 28 0 16 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 28 0 16 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles $ 0 8 0 0 0 Percent Grade (°IQj 0 0 Flared Approach N ~ torage 0 0 RT Channei6zed Q 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 onfiguration ~R ela Queue Eon. th, and Level of Service pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 1 Q 11 12 inane Configuration LT LR ~yph} 52 44 (m){vph) 1212 349 fc 0.04 0,13 5°I® queue length 0.13 0.43 ontrai Decay 8.1 16.8 LC}S ~ ppraach Decay - - 16.8 pproach LC~S - - C Rights Reserved f~le.ffC.lDcscuments and Settings\$3ef`t1Lc~cal Settirr~s0`Fen~p~u2kS.tp 1f23/LOQ6 • i • ., „~, ~ ~, TWQ-WAY STOP C4NTR01_ SUMMARY eneral Information ite Information nalyst JGr Intersection ~ Project Site t?rl SR- gencylCo. TEN urisdiction ~~~ SL?QTICity cat Yelrrt C1ate Performed ll9 006 nalysis Year 2007 nth Phase I Only nalysis Time Period PM Peak Pro'ect Descri tion #4022 Forrester Hei hts EastIVl/est Street: tVorttt Pro~ect Site Llrivewa North/South Street: SR-507 Intersection Orientation: !North-South tud Period hrs : 0.25 ehic#e Volumes an d Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 5 6 L T R L T R plume 0 392 92 545 (} Peak-Hour Factor, !'HF 0.90 11.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 4.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 435 S 9 505 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - - 4 - - Median Type Undiuide RT Channelized 0 4 Lanes 4 9 0 0 1 4 onfiguration rR Lr t1 Stfeam 51 naI 4 4 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound ovement 7 10 11 12 L T R L T R Olume 0 7 4 0 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.911 0.90 0.90 0.90 4.94 0.94 Hourly Flout Rate, HFR 2 0 7 0 0 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 4 0 0 4 0 4 Percent Grade (°,~~) 0 0 Flared Approach lV !tt tarage 0 4 RT Channelized 4 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 onfiguration LR Deis Queue Len. th, and Levet of Service pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound ovement 7 4 7 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR {vPh) 95 (m) (vph) 1191 465 !c 4.01 4.02 5% queue Iength 0.04 0.06 ontrol Delay .3 12.9 C.QS F1 ~ pproach Delay - - 12.9 pproach LOS - - B ~ile,ltC;\I~ocuments and Settings\$JeftlLoc.a1 Settings\Ter~~\rr2k1~5.trx~p 1/23/20Q6 C Signalized Intersection Gapaci Analysis Forrester Heights : Yel Ave {SFZ-510} & SR-547 2409 Without Phase 1+2 PM Peak Ideal Flow i*vphpl} 1900 1900 1900 1904 1944 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 Total Lost time (s} 4.4 4.0 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.0 4.4 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.40 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.89 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow {prot) 1719 1810 1487.. ..1556 1724 1687 1586 Flt Permitted 0,95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flaw {perm) 1719 1810 14$7 1556 1724 1687 1585 1904 1900 1900 1900 12 11 10 12 4.0 4A 1.00 1.00 1.Ofl 0.91 0.95 1.04 1694 1559 4.95 1.00 :1694 ,1559 Volume (vph) 153 589 36 197 574 46 _. 139 97 240 59 83 141 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 4.98 t},9$ 4.93 4.93 0.93 0.91 0.91 4.91 0.89 0.89 0.89 Adj. Flow (vph} 156 703 37 212 617 49 153 107 264 78 93 158 RTflR Reduction vph) 4 0 4 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 166 703 37 212 566 0 153 371 4 78 251 0 Heavy Vehicles (%} 5% 5°fo 6Q1~ % 9° 9°f~ 7°fv 7~fo ~l0 3% 3°fo 3°l~ Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot Prot Protected Phases 1 6 6 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 7.4 34.0 34.4 11.0 38s0 9.0 21,0 4,0 16.0 Effective Green, g (s) 8.4 35.0 35.0 12.0 39.0 10.0 22.0 5.0 17.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 4.49 0.39 4.39 0.13 ' ' 0.43 4,11 0.24 4.06 4.19 Clearance Time (s) 6.4 5.0 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 Vehicle Extension {s} 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.4 Lane Grp Cap {vph) 153 704 578 221 747 187 388 94 294 vfs Rabe Prot 0.09. c0.39 c0.13 ' .39 ; c4.09 0.23 4.05 0.16 vts Ratio Perm 0.02 vJc Ratio 1:02 1.00 0.06 :0.96 4:89 0.82 4. 4.83 0.85 uniform Delay, d1 41.0 27.5 17.2 38.8 2;3.5 39,1 33.5 42.1 35.3 Progression Factor 1.04 1.00 1.44 .1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 78.0 33.3 4.0 48.4 12.9 23.4 34.1 42.7 24.7 Delay (s) 119.4 60.8 17.3 87.2 36:5 52.5 .67.6 84.8 66.0 Level of Service F E 13 F D E E F E Approach Delay (s} 69;1 48..7:. 56.2 62,8 Approach LQS E D E E HCM Average Control Delay 60.9 HC Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0,98 Actuated Cycle Length {s) 90.0 Sum of lost time {s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.2°l~ ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period {m`sn~ 15 c Critical Lane Group Forrester Heights 5:00 pm 1f11t2445 2009 Without Phase 1 ~-2 P Peak Synchro 6 Report Transportation Engineering Northwest Page 1 ---~. .. rx ar- ee camp vo.u~.s w.uue.a u.a .c &i,~-je.. x ut s. ~. J~ A i a7 1 i.BC l~r 1 I.. t41'S. eneral Infer anon ite infer atian #2 -Washington ,4velR- nalyst JGT Intersection 507 gecyfCo. TEiUW urisdiction WSQOTIOity of Yetm Date Performed ~~~ ~{~ nalysis °fear 20Q9 rthQUt Project nalysis Time Period PMl Peak Pro eCt DeSCriptlQn #4022 I~tJrf~'St~r Kei t?tS Ec°3S eSt Street: WaShfn tQn Ave NorthiSouth Street. R-507 Intersection Orientatian. tVorth-South ehicle Volumes and Ad;us ends ovement 1 2 !,. T plume 45 432 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0, 9t? Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 50 480 Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 Median Type RT Ghannelized Lanes 0 1 on~guration LTR EJ stream Si na! 0 Minor Street V10estbound ovement 7 8 L T plume 33 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 086 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 38 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 Percent Grade (°fo} 0 Flared Approach IV Storage 0 RT Channetized Lanes 0 1 onfiguration LTR ®eta t~ueue Len th and Levet of Service pproach ~R SB Movement 1 4 Lane Gonfiguratian LTR LTR {vph} 50 2 (m} ~vph} ~ 959 9042 lc 0.04 0.02 queue length 0.94 0. (?8 antral Delay 8.2 8, 5 LOS ,~ A pproach Delay - - pproach LOS - - tud Period rs : 0,25 southbound 3 4 5 R !. T R 20 1 392 2 0.90 0. r 9 0.79 0.79 22 26 394 2 8 Undivided 0 0 0 0 9 0 LTR 1 Eastbound °t 11 "!2 R L T R 38 1 0 46 0.88 (d, 50 0.50 0.50 44 2 0 92 5 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 LTR iitlestbound Eastbound 7 1 1°! 12 LTR LTR 84 94 244 729 0.34 0,13 1.47 0.45 27.3 10.7 C? B 27.3 90.7 Q B fide:/~C.\Docuents and Settings\$JefflLocal. Settings\Tern\u~k5.ttp il23f2Q6 i YY\F- Ri µ~ 0.P 41F~.T 4,,.VWllA ilt a ~~.. ~,. V~ellient_......._ i ~ `~ V L T R L T R olurne 27 3'9i 26 28 355 15 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.8i 0.8i 0,81 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flaw Rate, HFR 33 482 32 32 412 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 4 - - 6 - - Median Type undivided RT Channe6zed 0 0 Lanes ~ 1 0 0 1 0 onfiguration LTR LTR stream Si nat 0 1 Mi€~or Street Westbound.. Eastbound Movement 7 8 1 1'1 12 L T R L T R olu~e 64 i2 33 69 61 16i Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.78 0.78 0,78 0.93 0,93 0.93 Hourly filow Rate, HFR 82 15 42 74 65 173 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade {°/4) (? 0 Flared Approach tV t1! forage 0 0 RT Channeli2ed 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 i 0 onfiguration LTR LTR @I3 QL14'tlE' L{'tl tlt c'ii1CI L4'YE'I Of $erVice pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound ovement 1 4 7 8 9 1 Q 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR (vph} 33 32 . 139 312 (m)(vp~ 1115 1031 124 294 fc 0.03 0.03 1.12 1.06 5°lo queue length 0.09 0.10 8..22 12.00 ontral Delay 8.3 8.6 185.3 108.7 LC?S A A R F pproach Delay - - 185.3 108.7 pproach LOS - - F F ~igl~ts Reserved file.//C.\Docu~nents and Settings\Jet1~L~oca1 Settings\Tep\ukC~SC".tn~ 1 f23/20Q6 c cx- x~ ay ~aGV~ r.J.v~tc~ta~ rages ~ +~~ O- AY ST P CA T L 5 ARY eneral Information ite Info anon nalyst 1GT Intersecfiion #4 Mill Rd/SR 507 gencylCo. 7'EN1N urisdiction WS£?®TlGity of Yelm Date Performed 01I11f2005 nalysis Year 2009 rthout Project nal sis Time Period PM Peak Pro'ect Descri tion 022 Forrester Hsi hts Eas est Streefi: Mifl Rd north/South Street= SR 507 Intersection Oriente#ion: North-South tud Period hrs 0.25 chicle Volumes an d Ad~ustments a"or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T P L T R plume 0 394 27 58 548 0 eak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.82 0.82 (1.88 0.88 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 480 32 65 622 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - -- 4 edian Type Llrtdivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 onfguration Tfi LT U stream Si naI 0 0 inor Street Westbound Eastbound ovement 7 8 1(1 11 12 L T R L T R plume 38 0 57 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.69 1.00 0.69 1,00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 55 0 82 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 8 0 8 0 0 0 Percent Grade (°/Q~ 0 0 Flared Approach N Sfiorage C1 C RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 ~} 0 0 onflgU ration LR ela Queue Len th and Level of Service pproach NB Sl3 Westbound Eastbound ovement 1 4 7 8 1 Q 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR (vph} 65 1;37 {m) (vph} 1043 297 /c 0.06 0.46 5°fo queue length 0.20 .2.301 ontrol Delay 8.7 27.1 LOS A pproach Delay - - 27.1 pproach LOS -- -- D Rights Deserved file.ll~:\ocuments and SettingslJefflLacal ettigs~Tern~ukSF.tna I /23I2006 ~I " C Signalized Intersectian Capacity Analysis Forrester Heights 1. Yelm Ave {SR-510} & SR-507 2009 With Phase 1+ PM Peak ---~ Lane Configurations ~' '~ '~ "~ '~ '~ Ideal Flaw {uphill} 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 10 12 Total Last time (s} 4,0 4A 4.0 4.fl 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factar 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1:00 0.99 1.00 ; 0.89 1.00 .0.91 Flt Pratected Q95 1.00 1,00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1,00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow {prat} 1719 1$10 .. .1487 1656 1724. 1587 .1584. 1694 1561 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1,00 0.95 1,00 0.95 1,00 Satd._Flow {perm) 1719 1810 1487 :'1656 `:1724 1687 1584 1694 1561 Valume {uph} 153 689 55 214 574 46 151 98 250 69 85 141 eakfirat~i' factor, PMF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.93 0.93 0.93 0,91 0.91 0.91 0.89 0.89 0.89 Adj. Flaw {vph} 156 703 56 230 617 49 166 108 275 78 96 158 RTQR Reduction {uph} 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Graup Flaw {vph} 156 703 56 230 666 0 166 383 0 78 254 0 Heavy Vehicles (°lo} ' S°lo 5% 5°fo 9°f~ 9% 9°f~ 7°1~ 7°l0 7°l0 3% 3%0 3°fa Turn Type Prat Perm Prat Prat Pro# Aratected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G {s} 7.0 .34.0 34.0 11.0 38.0 9,0 21..0 4,0 16.0 Effective Green, g {s} 8.0 35.0 35.0 12.0 39.0 10.0 22.0 5.0 17.0 Actuated gfC Ratio 0.00 ` 0.39 ....0.39 0.13 0.43 0.11 0.24 0.06 0.19 Clearance Time {s} 5,0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle.Extensian {s} 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap {uph} 153 704 578 221 747 187 387 94 295 ufs Ratio Prat 0,09 c0.39 c0;14 c0,39 c0.10' c0.24 0.05 0.16 vfs Ratia Perm 0.04 vfc Ratid 1.02 1.00 0.10 _..1;04 0.89 0.89 :.....0.99 .83 0.86 Unifarm Delay, d1 41.0 27.5 17.5 39.0 23.5 39.4 33.9 42.1 35.4 Pragressian Factar 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 78.0 33.3 0.1 71.6 12.9 35.9 42.5 42.7 21.8 lay (s} 119.0 60.8 17.5 ...110,6 36.5 75.4 76.4 84,8 57.1 Level of Service F E B F D E E F E Approach belay (s} 68.1 X5.5 76.1 63.6 Approach LC}S E E E E HCM Average Cantrol Delay 65,0 HCM Level of Service E HGM Volume to Capacity ratio ;:. 1:00 Actuated Cycle Length {s} 90.0 Sum of lost time {s} 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85,8°l~ ICU Level of Service E Analysis Periad {min} 15 c Critical Lane Graup Forrester Heights 5.00 pm 1f11f2005 2009 With Phase 1+2 P Peak Synchra 6 Repart Transportatian Engineering Northwest Page 1 t Svcs- rr €c~ acv}? a.,vctctvt ra~,~ t vt [. eneral Information ite Information nalyst JT ntersction 2 Washington AvefSR- gency/Co_ TENW urisdiction `'~ aQQT/City cif Yefm Date Performed 41/~ 1/2445 nalysis Year 2449 tth Protect nalvsis Time Period PM Peak Intersection Orientation: North-South tud Period hrs : 4.25 chicle Volumes an d Ad'us ents a'or Street Northbound Soumbound Movement 1 2 ~ 6 L T R L T R plume 45 455 24 21 354 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 4.94 4.94 4.94 4.79 4.79 4.79 party Flow Rate, HFR 54 545 22 26 443 2 Percent Hea Vehicles 7 - - 6 Median Type Clnctivided RT Channelized 4 4 Lanes 4 1 4 4 1 4 onfiguration LTR LTR stream Si nal 4 1 Mincer Street Westbound Eastbound ovement 7 8 1 11 12 ~ L T L T R plume 33 ~ 38 1 4 46 eak-Hour Factor, PHF 4.86 4.86 4.86. 4.54 (?.50 4.54 Flared Approach N N torage 4 4 RT Channelized 4 4 Lanes 4 1 4 4 1 4 onfiguration LTR LTR eta Queue Len th and Level of Service pproach N SB Westboun d Eastbound Movement 1 ~ 7 8 1 tl 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR (vph} 54 26 84 9 (m} (vph) 1499 1424 211 664 lc 4.45 4.43 4:44 4.14 °fo queue length 4.14 4.08 1.76 4.49 ontrol Delay 8.4 8.6 32.9 11.4 LQS A A L? E3 proach Delay - -- 32,9 11.4 pproach LOS - - D fale:lfC.lDacunients and. Settin~sl~Jeffll,c~cal ettingslTen~plu~k2.t P 1123f2006 ~ v- rv ay ,~ttr~r s. vsaaivs . ult. c ~fi ~. Q-WAY ST©P CQNTQL SUMMARY eneral information ite Information natyst JGT Intersectian iy3 Mosman AveISR-5Q7 genCyfCa. TENW liriShcCtlan WJQC~J~/~f#}f of ~'`@~fCT Date Perfarmed 0973 912005 nalysis Year 2009 i#h Prajecf nal sis Time Period PM Peak Pra~ect Descri Lion #4022 Forrester Hei h#s EastlWest Street: Masman Ave NarthlSuth Str t' R-507 Intersection Clrientation; tVorth-Beath tad Periad hrs ; 01,25 chicle Volumes an d Ad'ustments °or Street Northbound Southbound avement 1 2 3 4 5 6 ~ T R L T R oEume 27 494 26 28 393 95 Peak-Hour Factar, PHF 0.81 0.89 0.89 0,86 0.86 0.86 Houriy Fiow Rate, HFR 33 599 32 32 456 97 Percent Heavy Vehicles 4 - - 6 - - edian Type Urlrvrde RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 9 0 0 9 0 onfiguratian LTR LTR stream So nal (1 1 inl?r Street V1lestbound EastbOUnd OVement ! ~ '~ ~ 11 12 L T R L T R ofume 64 92 33 69 69 969 Peak-Haar Factor, PHF 11.78 0.78 0.78 0.93 0.93 0.33 surly Flaw Rate, HFR 82 95 42 74 65 973 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 ercent t;,rade {Q7#~ 0 0 Flared APpraach N N Starage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 9 0 0 9 0 onfiguration LTR LTR eia Queue Len th and Level of service PProach NB SS Westbound Eastbound ovement 1 4 7 8 9 1 fl 11 12 Lane Gonfiguratian LTR LTR LTR LTR (vph} 33 32 939 312 (m)(vph) 3079 9006 103 262 tc 0.03 0.03 3..35 3.19 5% queue length 0.90 0.90 9.83 14.38 ontrol Delay 8.5 8.7 284.2 157.6 LC~S A F F PProach Delay - - 284.2 157.6 PProach LC)S - -- i° F Rights Reserved fleafC:lDc~cuments and Seitingst$Jeft~Lacal Settings~Ten~~p\u2k65_tmp 1 /23/2006 ~ u- ay ,J~u~ <,vtiGrv~ ra~~ ~ vi ~ C}- .Alf` TQ G TROL S A Y eneral Information ite Information nalyst JGT Intefseetion Mill Raad/SR 507 gencylCo. TAW urisdiGtion ~'C3C?TlGity of Ye/ DatE' PerfQfined 1I11~205 nalysis ~°eaf 209 I~f1 ~iOfBG~ nal stS Time ~eflt}d P'A9 PGa%C Pfo~eGt DesGfi tion #4t?22 ~orreStef ~t il~S EaS +F;'St tfeE't: ~li~f f tOd l~ofttlJOUtl1 Street: ~~i ~~ IntefseG#ion Qrientation; North-Snuth tud Period fs : 0,25 ehicie Volumes an d Ad'us enfis a'or Street Northbound southbound ovement 1 2 5 6 L T L T R plume 0 417 7 58 586 0 Peak-Hoof Factof, PHF 1.00 d1.$2 0.82 #7.88 0.88 1.00 Hourly Fiow Rate, HFR 0 508 2 65 865 0 efGent Heavy ~/ehiGles 0 - °._ .~ - - edian Type Undivided RT Ghannelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 onfigufation T LT ~ Stfeam SI nal 0 (~ inor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 $ 11 12 L T R L T R plume 38 0 57 0 0 0 Peak-Hoof Factor, PHF Om69 1.00 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.0(1 oufl Flow Rate, HFR 55 0 82 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 8 0 8 0 0 0 PefGent Gfade {%} {1 (1 Flafed Appfoactt N tofage 0 0 RT ChanneGzed 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 on~gllfatEOn ~~ Qua Queue den th and LeYe1 of Servece ppfoaGh NB SB estbound Eastbound Movement 1 ~ 7 1 1'I 12 Lane Configuration ~T (vph} 65 137 (m} {vph~ 1018 273 Ic 0~ 06 0.50 5% queue length 0.20 2.62 ontrol Delay 8.8 30.8 t_C3S A G3 ppfoaGh Delay - -- 30.8 pproach LQS - -- 1? Rights Reserved ~le.l~~:\Docuents and Settings\3efflLocal. Settings\Tem\o~k6.tzrmia i /23/?06 .. ~ vvv-Tray ~cv~a ~.,veaa~vt r;~~c ~ c~~ .~ TWO-WAY STQP CtJNTROL SUMMARY eneral Information ite Information nalyst JGT Intersection 5 N Projecf SEte Qr/ S- gency/Co, late Performed TENW 1t1 006 urisiction ~~~ tNSC1QTICity of Yefm naiysis Time Period 1°M Peak nalysis Year 2009 ~f Phase f+2 rci ect Descri tion #4022 Forrester Hei hts EastlVltest Street: Ncarth Pra`eet Site Drivewa NorthlSouth Street: SR-507 intersection C}rientation: Norfh-South tud Period hrs : (1.25 ehicfe Volumes an d Ad'ustments a'or street Northbound southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R plume 0 431 4 22 603 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flaw Rate, HFR C1 478 24 670 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - - 4 Median Type Cfrttftvied RT Channelazed 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 0 onfi oration TR LT U stream si nal 0 0 Miinor Street Westbound Eastbound ovement 7 8 °l (} 11 12 L T R L T R ofume 2 ~ 1 0 f1 ~ Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 11.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 0 14 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (°l~} 0 0 Flared Approach N N torage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 onfigoration t._Fi' ela Queue Len th and Level of Service pproach NS SB 1stbound Eastbound ovement 1 7 8 1 {1 11 12 Lane Configuration T R (vph} 24 16 (m} (vph) 1070 476 fc 0.02 0.0~ 5°l~ queue length (1.07 0.10 ontrol Delay 8.4 12.8 LOS A B pproach Delay - - 12.8 pproach LC?S file:ffC:tQeurnents a.nd Settin~slJefflt.ocal Settings\Tc~IS~2k66.trr~p 1/23/2006 c v- yr ay ,~cv~,a ~viucali ra~c t c,tt ,~ STQP' NT QLJU ~RY eneral ~ti~OPmaflOtl 1te 1nfU afiion #6 S Project Site I~rf SR- nalyst JGT ntersection ~~~ gencyfGo, TFUV urisdiction INSt?t~TlCity of Yefrrt Date Performed 1f1 0Q6 nalysis Year 2009 With Phase !+2 nalysis Time Period PM Peak Pro'ect Descri tion #4022 Faraester f-fei hts Eas est Street: Saufh Pre ect Site t?rivewa o South Street; SR-5t?7' Intersection Orientation: iVarfh-Beath tad Period rs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes an d Ad'ustments a'or Street Northbound Southbound ovement 1 2 4 5 L T L T R plume 0 425 6 17 588 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 472 6 18 653 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - - - edian Type Clniviete RT Channelized 0 ~ Lanes 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ onfi oration TR LT U stream Si nal Minor Street Westbound Eastbound ovement 7 8 1 11 12 L T R L T R plume 3 0 10 0 ~ Peak-Hour Factor, FHF [1.90 0.90 0.90 11.911 0.90 0.90 Hou-1y Flow Rate, HFR 3 0 11 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Appraach N N torage 0 RT Canneiized 0 0 Lanes 11 11 0 0 0 0 Onfiguration LR Defa Queue Len th and Level of Service pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Mavement 1 4 7 9 11? 11 12 ane Congueatian 1_T LR (vph~ 18 14 (m) {vph) 1074 429 lc 0.112 0.03 5°l® queue length 0.05 0.10 ontrol Delay 8.4 13.7 LOS ~ 8 PProach Delay -- - 13.7 PProach LOS -- -_ B te.l/C°.1l~ocuents and ettingslJef~tL,aeal ettjn~s~Texpi6F.t 1f23f2(~Q6 ~~ i to .~ .~ • 1 ~ , f ca 0 4 __~ ~o v ~ '~ ~ z~,o ~~~ ~' u. r ~-- a cs o a~ use ~ ~v ter.,' i`-' ~ ~" °~ ~cQ ~~ ~t ~~ ' at ' ~~ ~~ ~~ re t~ ._ '~ o ~o ~-o ~ ~~ m~ -~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~- - °' {a t~ t~ + t~ {~ +` ~ L 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ as O? ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ c ' ea , m ~ ~ c~ m ca <o ~ c~ o ~ c-. t~: r~ r~ ~ a a c~ ~, ~s ° ~. ~. ~ '~ o ~ d Q cx. ~ ~ 0. >a ~' ~ m s° z ~° ~° z° ~° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ _ ® ~ = ci ca c- ~, a ~ >. ~. 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ tL ~m m~~ a m~~ Vic, -.~ ' ~ ~ ~~ a ~~~ a v Q ,mac ~,~ ~[ Q ,mac i' ~~.~ a ~ Q as in . aua a.rr'v a n aur ~, a v ~~ a o ~= aL ~~ a~ Q= ~ ~' ~~ ~° ~~ ~: Q ~~ ~_ ~~ C~ ~© a~ ~y ~~~ z° d ~- g w m rv J Q tine ~ etas ~e ~Q ~, ~~m~ ~a®4 K~H~ u, you m~~ ~mm arr ~ m~ 0~5 ~~~ m m E 0 m a+ ~~ as .~ c~ E@ 1~ ro si 3t~o°~ z°~`~ ~z#Q m~~= a„m,~ ~ ®a m a.aa`a 3