Loading...
02 - Reconsideration FrystTo: Steven H. Causseaux,lr. Hearing Examiner cfo Yel Community Development Depattment 1 OS Yelm Avenue West Yetm, WA 98597 From: Valentin Fyrst 15329 McKee LN Yelm, VGA 98597 I Y ~. Recede November 13, 2005 ~k=N , 1 l Case No.: SPR-OS-0091-Z'L - Wal-Mart Supercenter INTR(}DUCTI4N As a party of Drat record and accordang to the Hearing Examiner's guidelines, I herewith submit to The Yelm Community Development Department this "Request for Reconsideration" by the Hearing Examiner; as specified, copies of pages 44-45 of the "Report and Decision" document is attached (Attachment I). T FIC Errors in the Hearing Examiner`s Determinatian of Traffic Impact, Especially Regarding SR-510/Yelm Loop (Y3) The Hearing Examiner (HE) is basing his t rc analysis and conclusions mainly upon. the following elements: (1) Transpo Group's Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), ~2) The City's Six Year Transportation Plan (2006-2011), (3) The City of Yelm Comprehensive Plan (issued 2/22f 1.995), and {) Statements by Perry Shea, the City's Traffic Consultant. In the Transpo Group's TIA (Etement 1), a key premise is that "The SR510 loop (Y2fY3) project, which is planned jointly by WSDC?T and the City of Yelm, will add significant Element ~l) is else referencing the "Y2" partian of the full leap praject, far which there is neither planning nar funding. If the "Y2" partian afthe leap praject was included as part of the analysis, this is clearly in errar, and the repart must be campletely dismissed, vaiding the MI}NS. The City's Traffic Engineer {Element 4) testified that the Ira Laap "praject is net an ~~~ ~ ;`° "Far cancurrency purpases, the fallawing standards shall apply in the Urban. Grawth Area: ,,, .~ ~A CNCLUSIQI Since this level of Traffic Impact Analysis was not provided in the application process or at the hearing, the record is therefore incomplete, anal the applicant must be required to provide said analysis. The Responsible Officer relied on incomplete information in his evaluation ofthe application and therefore erred by not interpreting the relevant materials required for a proper evaluation. Therefore, the MDNS should be rendered void, and a comprehensive Environmental Impact Study should be required, t ~~., ~~~~ written, that disagrees with the decision of the hearing examiner may make a rrvritten request for reconsideration by the hearing examiner. Said request shall set forth specific errars relating ta: erroneous procedures; B. Errars of law abjected to at the public hearing by the person requesting reconsideration; C. Incomplete record; D. An error in interpreting the comprehensive plan or other relevant material;.. or ~. luewly discovered material evidence which was not available at the time of the The request must be filed o later than x:30 p.m; an November 14 2(}Q5 {fig days from mailing} with the Community Development Department ~ 5'felm Avenue West, Yelm, WA 9$59?. This request shell set forth the bases ftyr recc~nsideratie~n as limited by the -~~- ,..~ ~.. ~";~ .e ~~`; which shall he provided within. 10 days of the request. APPEAL flF EXAMINER'S LIEGISIt~N; The final decision by the Examiner may be appealed to the city council, by any aggrieved person or agency of record, oral or written that disagrees with the decision of the hearing examiner, except threshold determinations (YMC 15.49.1 ~Q) in accordance with Section 2.26.15Q of the Yelm Municipal Code (YMC}. Nt~i'E; In an effort to avoid confusion at the time of filing a request for reconsideration, please detach this page to the request for reconsideration. _~_ ,- ,t,~~ A rs ~?raject - 1 ~'elr I,a}~ ~.~~.~.:~~;~~~~ Pale 1 of ,~~~ w, .S .xe .. kk. ,~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ._-, a,~, , x~"' mkt $ axe:*' V~,~ ~ fi "A. ~ 1~J ~ U i,,, O `. E,.,, ~' FUriCIe?t'~~FR ~aF~ RF} ~h~ Li .~d~M` A . ,_ ~ , ~...:` ~~,~.q' ~ `~ a a ' ~'$~ 8 I P } ~ y.rg ~~'i~ ~~ ~ft'353"a}~i"~c"#~9t?Il Pa9'$d3£3'Shi PrC}Ject 7'{~i-'u#~a r~{ r'.~~~ClCc~~9t~ ~~ Ca1i~~td)fl'~Ca fsand f~'4E.' t~~SigCi s"3nd P1Q~1~ O~ 4da~' 4 ~ tt 3~aZt }~ ~i~ t3 ~~ a(3~}t'OV~'C~ ~?V Vi}$~iS, V~lash~rsgton ~a~E° IfittflattVc~ ~3'~t , ~ a ~# ~ ~ a ~a~lci s~eeal these ga s taxes an d ~lir7in~te ttais prc~j~ct . 4' ' ~ { k g ~ # a 3~n~n ~+~' S~ r~'.~3~81, i~Il ~t'~FQ~R ~${~ it i~~J ~~~3~i~. ~.+~ 3~ar't 6J ~,.f.~ ° ~}_?}~ §+ ~^,??ti ?'" ; ~3~aC2C~ E}rII h~ lkri2€~ aft°:r { I~t?VetY1~?el' ~~CtiC3. ~ ^q p s ~+w7VV 1 I\~n~ t~8s ~m~t'ov r~ L .°~ 3 w *.'°~# }P3.s, t p „a~-.?.a ~>... , ,j .} p, a reduce f..t}ngest9C?n on Y~ilt!'lvenue and First 4 _ Street, ~rnPr€ave freight resb~ltty and safety and I f l'l~ }ra{f~ trafc circulation qtr QE!{„~~t 1 4J~ ` ~ / 7 '' g } } I ~9rp. l ~~ n ~+ ~1~~.}r~3 $rt`~~ ~. &~ r{~~ ~ r ~ar ; f ~, ='.. ~.' s-~-. .Y ;.E.', ;'t .3 t,.'. ~ i {.~ .} { ~ ~ + p $p g ~+ efficiently between ~an~wy, y ~ tD`8{~+i\~rnG~ ~ n Pierce county and deaf:nations ~n ~'hurston ~ • :' ~~ . ..~ ~~,~`, ( 181. ~ R.~ Improved highway system resulting in better mobility in the Yel area. Project Benefits Project Facts '~~ °' ..,... tt:f/ ~.~~sclat.w~.au~Pra~eets/5~3/~'r~~:aa~ Public Involvement Your thoughts and opinions are important to us. iNe endeavor to maintain open communication with e community and all parties interested in the Yelm Loop project. Sl~€~ employs multiple strategies to keep flee 11f10/2~?QS If approved by voters, Washington Mate Initiative 2 outd repeat these gas taxes and eliminate this project funding. As a resutt, aft work o tuts project has been pfaeed on gold unfit after the t~lovrr~trer etectio. estimates are from an t~ctoer 2t?4 host Risk ssessrent and are teased on a design grad rigtat of rags funding date of 21)1)5 and corastruora funding elate of Juiy 211. r<ajecfi Farradira Far~reraditrs to ' -- IR irrirt -.-- --- f f2t1 Tf Farads Tatat Pre-existing State. FederaE. and a:ater Partnersiia Funds "I.244,444 ~4 X1,244,444 2445 ~egss{ative Transartatiorr Package ~ 33. .444 $33, .444 'rat[ vaiible FrrreeEi 1,24Dfk,Qf!{i ~3,4ttQ,4D{iCt 34.24U,flUf} ' Estimated 3tal ra~ct Gast _ $71,240,OQ0 Fin~ncsa3 aY~ ss ~urtees# as ca4 "9 29, crty ~rrt 1 get more nfcatatian'? Grttae:t: Project ~rlraager t~lichete Britton, PE 1~1iB~(~T {~iyr~aic Region Pty Box 7~1t1. C~Iyt~apia, WA g8544~-744~fJ Phone: {361}} 357-2682 Fax: (361?) a57-268$ B-rraait: a~~civ.,~ ca >°~~~~~ ~$=s~.~~cfi~t ~a ~' 7 ~ t, , t~nnc