Loading...
Burnett Phase 2 Traffic Analysis - updated 1-31-07 with appendicesTransportation Engineering Northwest Updated Traffic Impact Analysis DATE: January 31, 2007 TO: Tami Merriman, City of Yelm FROM: Jeff Schramm, Transportation Engineering Northwest CC: Steve Chamberlain, The SCA Group RE: UPDATED Traffic Impact Analysis -Burnett Commercial Park Phase 2 TENW Project No. 4130 This updated traffic impact analysis has been prepared for Phase 2 of the Burnett Commercial Park development. Phase 2 of the development has changed, and this memo updates the traffic impacts associated with the Phase 2 site plan changes. The future background conditions without the project have also changed based on comments provided by the City. Project Description Phase 1 has already been constructed and consists of about 70,000 square feet of mini- storage space. Phase 2 would be a mixed-used development consisting of about 7,100 square feet of retail space on the bottom floors of Buildings A and B, along with 4,450 square feet of professional office on the top floor of Building A. The project site is located on the east side of Burnett Road in the City of Yelm. Vehicular access occurs at one driveway on Burnett Road. Build-out of Phase 2 is expected to be completed in 2008. A project site vicinity map is shown in Figure 1, and an updated site plan is shown in Figure 2. Existing Traffic Volumes Existing weekday PM peak hour traffic volumes, which were provided by the City, were collected in September 2006 at the following 6 study intersections between the 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. peak period: 1. SR 510 (Yelm Avenue) / Burnett Road 2. SR 510 (Yelm Avenue) /Mountain View Road 3. SR 510 (Yelm Avenue) / Killion Road 4. SR 510 (Yelm Avenue) / Cullens Street 5. SR 510 (Yelm Avenue) / Longmire Street 6. SR 510-SR 507 (Yelm Avenue) / SR 507 (1St Street SE) Figure 3 illustrates the 2006 existing PM peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections. Existing count sheets are provided in Appendix A. Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) Transportation Engineering NorthVl/est January 31, 2007 Page 2 ~- (Nor to Scale] Transportation Figure l Engineering Pro'eCt Site ViCinit Northwest, LLC l y Burnett Ca]1~mereial Park Yeim, WA Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) Transportation Engineering NorthVl/est January 31, 2007 Page 3 Mini 5[orage is all built, some [50°f°j occupied. Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) Transportation Engineering NorthVl/est January 31, 2007 Page 4 Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) Transportation Fi u re 3 Burnett g Cail~mereial Park Engineering ~ppb Existing PM Peak Hour re~~», wA Northwest, r_LC Traffic Volumes Uoda[eif T~aF9c Inlnact Ait al V]ii. Transportation Engineering NorthVl/est January 31, 2007 Page 5 Existing Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Level of service (LOS) serves as an indicator of the quality of traffic flow and degree of congestion at an intersection or roadway segment. It is a measure of vehicle operating speed, travel time, travel delays, and driving comfort. Level of service is generally described by a letter scale from A to F. LOS A represents free-flow conditions, i.e. motorists experience little or no delays, and LOS F represents forced-flow conditions. Intersection LOS were calculated using the methodology and procedures outlined in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board using the Synchro software program. Existing weekday PM peak hour LOS analysis results for the study intersection are summarized in Table 1. Table 1. Burnett Commercial Park Phase 2 Existing PM Peak Hour LOS Summary Study Intersection Movement LOS' elay /C3 Unsignalized: 1. SR 510 (Yelm Ave) / Burnett Rd Eastbound Left A 1 0.02 Southbound D 27 0.18 2. SR 510 (Yelm Ave) /Mountain View Rd Eastbound Left A 1 0.01 Southbound E 42 0.22 3. SR 510 (Yelm Ave) / Killion Rd Eastbound Left A 1 0.00 Westbound Left A 1 0.03 Northbound C 19 0.04 Southbound F 65 0.25 4. SR 510 (Yelm Ave) / Cullens St Eastbound Left A 9 0.09 Westbound Left B 10 0.01 Northbound F 70 0.18 Southbound F 73 0.69 5. SR 510 (Yelm Ave) / Longmire St Eastbound Left A 1 0.01 Westbound Left A 1 0.03 Northbound E 47 0.33 Southbound E 30 0.19 Signalized 4: 6. SR 510-SR 507 (Yelm Ave) / SR 507 (lit St SE) D 39 0.83 1. LOS analyses are based on methodologies established in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. 2. Delay =average control delay per vehicle. 3. V/C represents the ratio of traffic volume to capacity. 4. All signals were assumed to be actuated; splits were optimized. As shown in Table 1, most of the side-street approaches at the study intersections on Yelm Avenue currently operate in the LOS D to LOS F range during the PM peak hour. The detailed intersection LOS results are provided in Appendix B. Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) Transportation Engineering NorthVl/est January 31, 2007 Page 6 Project Impact Analysis Trip Generation The trip generation for the proposed Phase 2 development, as shown in Table 2, was estimated based on trip generation rates provided by the City of Yelm for Administrative Office and Miscellaneous Retail uses. Phase 2 is estimated to generate about 364 total trips per day, with 162 (45%) of these trips being pass-by/diverted trips that would only occur at the site driveway and on Burnett Road at the intersection with SR 510 (Yelm Avenue). The remaining 202 daily trips would be new trips to the area road network. About 52 total trips would be generated during the weekday PM peak hour, which would consist of 19 pass-by/diverted trips and 33 net new trips. Table 2. Burnett Commercial Park Phase 2 Trip Generation Summary PM Peak Hour Daily Land Use Size Rate' Total In Out Rate' Trips Administrative Office Total Trips 4,450 GFA 4.09 18 3 15 11.01 49 Less Pass-by Trips (10%) -2 -1 -1 -5 Net New Trips 16 2 14 44 Miscellaneous Retail Sales Total Trips 7,100 GFA 4.8 34 18 16 44.32 315 Less Pass-by Trips (50%) -17 -8 -9 -157 Net New Trips 17 10 7 158 Total Trips Total Trips 52 21 31 364 Less Pass-by Trips (45%) -19 -9 -10 -162 Net New Trips 33 12 21 202 1. Trip rates adopted by City of Yelm. 2. 1,000 GFA is Gross Floor Area. Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) Transportation Engineering NorthVl/est January 31, 2007 Page 7 Trip Distribution and Assignment Using standard engineering practices and guidelines, new vehicle trips generated by the Phase 2 development were distributed and assigned to the surrounding street system based on local traffic patterns, and based on direction from City staff. As shown in Figure 4, project trips were generally distributed to the local street system as follows: • 25 percent to the northwest via Yelm Avenue (SR 510). • 75 percent to the southeast via Yelm Avenue (SR 510). Phase 2 new project trips generated in the PM peak hour were assigned to the 6 study intersections based on the travel patterns illustrated in Figure 4. Traffic Volume Impact Future traffic volumes with and without the proposed Phase 2 project were estimated for PM peak hour conditions in the year 2008. Future traffic volumes at the study intersections were developed based on existing peak hour traffic counts increased to account fora 2 percent annual background growth. In addition to the background growth rate, traffic generated by the following 10 pipeline projects were added to existing conditions to determine 2008 PM peak hour traffic volumes without the project. 1. Terra Valley Residential Development (40 PM peak hour project trips) 2. Mountain Shadow (88 PM peak hour project trips) 3. Mountain Sunrise (109 PM peak hour project trips) 4. Yelm Retail (800 PM peak hour project trips) 5. Hutch Subdivision (119 PM peak hour project trips) 6. Green Village Subdivision (54 PM peak hour project trips) 7. Cherry Meadows (185 PM peak hour project trips) 8. Willow Glen Phase 3 (56 PM peak hour project trips) 9. Tahoma Terra Phase 1 & 2 (512 PM peak hour project trips) 10. Burnett Commercial Park Phase 1 (18 PM peak hour trips) Figure 5 illustrates the total PM peak hour traffic generated by these 9 pipeline projects at the 6 study intersections. Weekday PM peak hour traffic volumes for year 2008 without the project are shown on Figure 6. Adding the project-generated PM peak hour trips (shown in Figure 4) to the future without-project traffic volumes (Figure 6), results in future with-project traffic volumes, as shown in Figure 7. The detailed future year traffic volume estimates with and without the Phase 2 project are provided in Appendix C. Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) Transportation Engineering NorthVl/est January 31, 2007 Page 8 88th Ave ~~ (Nor to Scale) Transportation Figure 4 Burnett Ca)1~mereial Park Engineering PM Peak Hour Yeim, WA Northwest, r_LC Trip Distribution and Assignment U11[13SPlf T~,~F9c Impact Anal pigi Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) Transportation Engineering NorthVl/est January 31, 2007 Page 9 (Nor to Scale) Transportation FI ure 5 Burnett ~ Cail~mereial Pa~•[c Engineering Pipeline Project PM Peak Hour re~~», wA Northwest, PLC Traffic Volumes Uoda[eif T~aF9c Im^acc AnylnEs Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) Transportation Engineering NorthVl/est January 31, 2007 Page 10 (Nor to Scale) Figure 6 Burnett Transportation Cailtmer~ial Pa~'[c Engineering ZODB Without Project Yeim, WA Northwest, PLC PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) Transportation Engineering NorthVl/est January 31, 2007 Page 11 SR S Ip {Ye1m Aveyl 88th A •b 4 ~ti ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~. .~ b r gyp, Sf Prairie Vista Loop 3 ~F~ y ~~~~ Project m ~ ~. Site e f~~rP .~ a 0 ~ SR 5 ] D (Yell» Ave~l yo b ~f~~ yo r.~~`~ rr3rps, ,~ ~ S> a r~ ~`' ~ ~r~ ~2 ~ v ~, ~ i SR 510 ~1`e1155 A4e~! 10 .R Burnes Raad cn a~ /- 28 44 ao~r~ P!.}~ 'n ~ ro ~!'~o a U has >~ ~ FD \.y ~6~ V SR 510 {YelnS Ave}I ~+P ~{2 ~ ~~ ~ r -~ 6l SR 510 {Yelm Ave}I ~pfi' Gj`' ~r ~ ~f~s ~ et~0 ~ w p,~~l ~' ~bo c~~ Berry Valley Rd ,~a~ ` ~ ~b,~ a~ ~R~w ~~~~q ~ t ,Y ~~ s .~ s8 ,~ ; ~a~` ~ ~8,~ b~ SL~ Y ^T ~ 1 SR 510 {Yelm Ave)1 C~- D~~ r~ Lan mire Screec N~ A _ 2/ L r EJ~`L~ '~ ~~R ~ ~~~;~ ~ ~l~9? GF. 5~7i,}~P ~~~ ~. Q, ~ ~ yin ~ ... ~`. A ~ ~ ~ ~1 tiSiS ` / x ' 5a7. - (Nor to Scalel Transportation Figure 7 Burnett Ca}1~mereial Park Engineering 2008 With Project Yeim, WA Northwest, r_LC p~ Peak Hour Traffic Volumes U11[1aSPlf T~,~F9c Impact Anal plS Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) Transportation Engineering NorthVl/est January 31, 2007 Page 12 Intersection LOS Impact The weekday PM peak hour intersection LOS analysis results in 2008 at the study intersections are summarized in Table 3. The table is set-up to show intersection LOS in the future without and with the proposed Phase 2 development. The detailed intersection LOS results are provided in Appendix B. Table 3. Burnett Commercial Park Phase 2 2008 PM Peak Hour LOS Summary 2008 Without-Project 2008 With-Project Intersection Movement LOS' Delav~ V/C3 LOS Delav V/C Unsi~nalized: 1. SR 510 (Yelm Ave) / Burnett Rd Eastbound Left Southbound 2. SR 510 (Yelm Ave) /Mountain View Rd Eastbound Left Southbound 3. SR 510 (Yelm Ave) / Killion Rd Eastbound Left Westbound Left Northbound Southbound 4. SR 510 (Yelm Ave) / Cullens St Eastbound Left Westbound Left Northbound Southbound 5. SR 510 (Yelm Ave) / Longmire St Eastbound Left Westbound Left Northbound Southbound Signalized 4: 6. SR 510-SR 507 (Yelm Ave) / SR 507 (lit St A 2 0.05 A 2 0.05 F 80 0.68 F 173 1.03 A 2 0.04 A 2 0.04 F >100 >1.00 F >100 >1.00 A 5 0.09 A 5 0.09 A 1 0.03 A 1 0.04 D 26 0.06 D 26 0.07 F > 100 > 1.00 F > 100 > 1.00 B 11 0.16 B 11 0.16 B 12 0.02 B 12 0.03 F > 100 0.66 F > 100 0.70 F > 100 > 1.00 F > 100 > 1.00 A 1 0.02 A 1 0.02 B 14 0.36 B 15 0.36 F >100 >1.00 F >100 >1.00 F > 100 > 1.00 F > 100 > 1.00 1.10 1.10 SE) F 105 F 106 1. LOS analyses are based on methodologies established in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. 2. Delay =average control delay per vehicle. 3. V/C is ratio of traffic volume to capacity. 4. Signals were assumed to be actuated; splits were optimized under each scenario. As shown above, side-street turns at the study intersections on Yelm Avenue are anticipated to operate at LOS F in the future during the PM peak hour with or without the proposed Phase 2 development in 2008. The signalized study intersection of Yelm Avenue at First Street is also expected to operate at LOS F with or without the project in 2008. Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) Transportation Engineering NorthVl/est January 31, 2007 Page 13 Turn Lane Warrant Evaluation Left- and right-turn movements represent critical turning movements at unsignalized intersections, increasing the potential for intersection delay and safety issues. Therefore, an evaluation of the potential need for cleft- and right-turn lane onto SR 510 (Yelm Avenue) at its intersection with Burnett Road was conducted based upon the WSDOT Design Manual, January 2005, considering PM peak hour conditions in 2008 with the project and 10 other pipeline projects. An eastbound left-turn lane (Figure 910-8a, Left-Turn Storage Guidelines, Two-Lane, Unsignalized) is warranted based upon an approximate 4 percent left-turn with a total eastbound/westbound entering volume of approximately 1,798 vehicles during the PM peak hour. The eastbound left-turn lane should be a minimum of 100 feet (Figure 910-9a Left-Turn Storage Length, Two-Lane Unsignalized). It should be noted that the eastbound left-turn lane would be warranted with or without Phase 2 of the Burnett Commercial Park Development in 2008. Additionally, a westbound right-turn lane (Figure 910-11, Right-Turn Lane Guidelines) would be warranted at the intersection based upon aright-turn volume of 42 vehicles with 704 westbound approach volumes during the PM peak hour in 2008. The right-turn lane should be a minimum of 280 feet with a 50-foot minimum taper (Figure 910-13 Right-Turn Lane) based upon a 35 mph design speed (25 mph posted speed + 10 mph). Transportation Impact Fees The City of Yelm administers a traffic impact fee of $750 per PM peak hour trip. Based upon this trip rate, the Phase 2 traffic impact fee would be $24,750 (33 trips x $750 per trip). If you have any questions, please contact Jeff Schramm at (206) 396-8286 or schramm@tenw.com Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) appendix A p~k ~®~ ~r~~~~~ ~®~ -~ y~ X006 ~~~1~ Naur ~ur~nn~~ ~ - __ Mack aka jps (I08} 251.43p4 X1.96°97~~'~; ~,~ ~~1 ~oi~ ~~ ~~ ~.~ x;.30 P~NI to ~:3U. Pi11f Waclna~.tiay, S~~st~rr~t~er 13; 2(106 ~i~prc~eietti - ...,~,.e . ~ F~I~II" ~ I°tV% Valcamo . „ ~ ~~ 0.91 ~ 1.bp/o „„p„„„,,,„, 7ktB W~ O.~b 2.1 % 4fi0 ~1;7 411!! O~IJ~IP !~ b90J count ~'or~ioci; ~,ao r~~ tc~ e,~a r~r~l P~~k ~~~r ~ut~m~~y h€ark$kti~#gs. (2pti1~51~0340 'Wod~ira~ci~y, S~ptem¢~~r 1~, ~C~O~ __I _ ~~ 23 I 9 ~1 JJJ ~ ~.-,..~ ~ 17 ~. III ~ 'Y~ir~7.A'v~ ~~ ~~a '""~ ~ ~o "a83 I ~' C9a7 ~..._~G7 f .~a.:~.~. ,K rr !P -~ li r.~..wra~~vnw+.~+ww..,. smN..a~.,,w~ 14~d~ I 4f90 °~ I ^fltt7 n~ ..~. )i~31117 /~V(3 ( ~9U~ Ioippro~sCl1 l~I~IE~ ~Va/o 1/QI111Y1(3 ~~ 0,5:1 ?,Z%u J~;J i~lf3 0,00 0:0% 0 0.#52 ~:0°Io 23 Itr~or~~ctEpn 0,~5 ~;MGR/a '1,39 {lounf~~'arla~tl: 3t~30 F~~ #q 6;~G ISM ~~~~ ~~~1P l1~1r111Y1~~';~II lr Nark slta~4s: (146)'1,61r4a00 4:00 P1VI to x:00 PM V11e~lrk~st!€ky, ~ep~omi~er 13, ~Al)6 ~: o' '15 ~ 4~k ~ ~ ~! Yelt»..~1 ~~:.~'~ 5.1 p . fit ~~~ ~' 4636 662.. ~, ~ ~~ ~ 3 ~ .5 fl7~ 9643 '~ 4lflrl~I R ~ ~~„~.. ~° ~~ ° ~pl~rq~Cfl I?I~I~ F1V% l/Ulum4 ~.,_,~..., ~I~ ~ 0.9'1 ~,3% ~~.~y77....,, w o,a~ ~,~r~f c~ez rur~ a,5o o:a°io 0 ~~ 0.70 o.opro ~~ Ir~kgrseCklon 0,9"/ 1,~% 1,~"a C~ur~t !~'erimti; 3:3a ~M to x:30 F"M t leak F~aur ~unnt~t~ry R • : ~ ~~ ~Antk vka~gs (2p[f) 2(S1,p304 tall~~~ Ind N~1 ~ ~~I ~~ ~~ ~~~ 5s1ks PM td 6s~~ pMtl yVadn~~d~y, ~epkorri4aao• 13, ~UiD~ "~ ~ _ _ ~~53~ I. #0.1 ~. ~a~ ~, '~~ Y~;~v~ ~/°'v fi?Q ~~ {3~2I ~" fiop. ~.~~ 1 l1 `v ~ 7 ~ ~ ~, (" ®o ~ .r I ~J4lIl g93V ~ 142 II~. #~ ~ ll~~ Yelrr, ~l v~ (~k~ ~lOf L~_:~.~ ~E~f•}YQ~GiI i~f•!f~ f°IV% V{~iL111'}0 ~~ 0,9~ 2.4°/a 9~J0 VUf~ U~~7~ 1,9°70 ~i2#~ ~~ a,~~ 11 r1 % y ~~ o~,~~ ~.~~ia ~~ ~fnker~ac#Ior1 0.96 2,;3°fo w 1,60 Cpun# (~c~~loci: 3,3Q faM fn 6,3(l l'M ~~~~c ~~~r S~mr~i~~y r ® ~ Mack skagpa (208j'281 ~S1~Q0 ~:tln PNl to '~:UQ PPS Vllacinesday, Sapkainbei" ~3, ~Ob6 ns ~~ ~ r. ~ ~ ~ Yalr ,ftv~ S1~ ~i'f17 R ^ sR~ ~ a~a ~oG ~v i~ ,3 ~~~ . ~~ ~ s 1 R9R E369 ~ R9~ I 9II . ~ 11 Yairr~ ,~ va (5~2 51 D) ua ~~6~ ~~7 ~ ~~~~~....JJJJJ a ~.t /~p~rt~aGh raia~ wv~io v~~c~ma ~~ ~~~6£~ ~~~~/4 ~r AinknrGpGtl~n U.U'I~ ~:ES% ~,6?£3 ~nunt C~c~rlnil; ;3;~0 f~M to 6,~0 r~M ~'e~k H~~.t~ ~ur~nr~~ar, r M;~rk:Skuyy9 (208f 26.1-0340 4;~0. i~iVi to :3:~0 ~'~l W~dr~~sd~y, ~epfiemhmr 13, 240 o ~. zar~ 744 ^ 77 as ~t ~ ~ Yevt~~o. 4t 1~ ~`` 7A~ ~ ~' :81~d. 170A 11 '~ ~ -tra L ..137 ~9 '~ P64 I GDG. ~ I u~~.~ 3~ 99 ~-- Yafrrt ,ova (SIB ~?Q) _.~..r~...,...__-.. ~C r _ 1! ~~z~_J___II.°~.. _.74a~ fin. lap~ep~ct~ F~f~li» _F''-IV% Vriluma .,.,.... ~~.~,...-..~..v.~.0,9~t,,... 1,7% 76~,.~, INS 0:03 7„,l%n 70p Nth O.~JB 3,5% 3913 £3~4 U;.ES~ 3.5~/, 13q ir~~~r~i~c~ion ~~ : o:~~ ~,abid _zfn~~ Count Faorloci; ~,301~tv1 in x:30 f~~ App~ni~ Intersection LOS Analysis Results ~OOG ~iStin LOS HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Yelm Ave SRT510 & Burnett fwd 2/1/2007 lane Configurations ~ic~n Confrbl = k"r e , ~ i=ree _ Stop. Grade 0% 0% "0% .. Uolurne`,(vehlh} 20„ X66 23 .oar < 1$ 6 ~:' - Peak I~kour Factor 0.94 0.94 _ 0:96 0.96 0.67 0.67 Hourlyflow rats (vph) 21 $15 476 24, 27 9 _. Pedestrians Lane wUid£h ~~~) _ Walking Speed {ftls) Percerit :lockage . _ - _ _.. - Right turn flare {veh) f~l~dian y~e...' None . Median storage veh) l~pstrea,m signal {fit) :`. _ - pX, platoon unblocked vC, corifl~ctmgvalume 5~0 - :x,345 48`8 , vC1, stage 1 conf vol "v"C2, stake 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 500 1345 488 tC, sin~fe (s) 4,1 .. 6.4 6 2 ':. _ tC, 2 stage (s) p0 queue-free % 98 84 98 cM capacity (vehlil) .. 10.64 `165 X84, . ~~Iolurrm2~.`~otal .; 8~3G X500 °~36 _ _ . . Volume Left 21 0 _ 27 Volume Right'.: '° '0 '24 9 cSF~I ~ 1064 1700 201 ;Volurne,to Capacity .,. O..b2 0;~9 '4; 18 ,. Queue Length 95th {ft} 2 0 _ 16 Control Delay (s) 05 . " 0,0 26.7 Lane LOS A - D Approach Delay {s) 0:5" `Q:0 ,, ;26.7 Approach LOS . D Average Caelay 1,0 Interseetiori .Gapac~tjilJ{iiizatlon 6~::46/o ICtJ; level of Service C .: Analysis Period {min) 15 Burnett Commercial Dark 1/26/2007 2006 existing PM Peak Synchro 6 Report Transportation E=nginoering Northwest Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Yelm Ave (SR~510) & Mountain View Road 2/1/2007 .., ~ r- Lane~Configurations ~' '~ '~~" Sign Control Free Flee Stop - Grade p% p% 0% Volume {vehlii:~ 9 9,40 557 10 17 6 `_ Peak Hour Factor 0'.91 0,91 0.88 0.88 0,82 0.82 Ho~xlyflow rate (vph)' 90 103 ;6.33 1,1 21 7 vC1, stage 1 conf vol "vC2, 5ta~e 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked val 644 1691 639 tC, single (s) `° ;41 6 4 . :: 6.2 - tC, 2 stage {s} p0 queue free % 99 79 98 cM capac~tY (vehlh) 941 100 473 .. Vol,~me `focal ` . 1043 644 _ 28 .. _. Volume Left 10 0 `L1 Volume'i~ight `. `0 ~ .11" 7 cS H 941 1700 126 l/olurn~ to Capacity 0:01 0.3""$ fl:22 -: Queue Length 95th {ft) 1 p 2p Control Deify{s} 0.3 00 - ,4~ 5 Lane LOS A E Approach belay (s) `` `0,3 0.0 41.E .: - oa ch LO S ppr A E c } (y ~ry y~ ~ ~I~f~t•se~~ionEs~Jll~Gry~v3 '~ F A `ikk ~F y S x tf j E 2 S9 ,~ ~ i _ Y~ # S !1 >~ (Y °f e1 Y 5 ~~ C I ~~1eJ, s~._ - Average pelay p.9 Ihtersectipn Gapac.ity.Ufilizafion 66.~b% IGU Level~of Service C..:. Analysis Period (min) 15 [3urnett Commercial Park 1/26/2007 2006 Existing PM beak 5ynchro 6 Deport Transportation Engineering Northwest Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection- Capacity Analysis 3: Yelm Ave (SR-510 ,..~. ) & Killion Rd 2/1/2007 _ Lane Configurations - ~ ^ ~i~ri Cor~troi " :: - Frei Free ;:;.Stop '`:: Sk"op. "~ cradG 0% 0% 0% 0% Vofurne (vehlh')' :. ;,:3:. 968 '' 1 ,: 15 ;635. ' 11 :: D _. 0 '; .. 6s 1.0 :~. _ _. ' ~, Peak Haur Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0:91 0.91 0:91 0:50 0.50 0.50 0:75 0,75 D.75 Hourly;flowr~t~(vph') '3 164 1 '.'i6 69~ -: 12, 0. 0 12 13„ "_ 0, 7` vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 711 1065 1815 1815 1064 1821 1809 705 #C, single {s} 4:`1 '`4.1 71 ~,6.5 6.2 7:1' 6;5 6: tC, 2 stage {s} _ , ,tF {s} ;; 2;2 2.2 . 3:5 4:0: 3`,3 3:5. 4;.0 3..3i _ p0 queue free % 100 97 1.00 100 96 76 100 98 cal cap,~city {vehlh) 88$ 651 S9 77':: ' 273 57- 77 440 plume Total. ` 10.8 .727 `:12 ,. ,. , 20 " _. Volume Left 3 16 0 13 Volurrte.F~ight.: `1 ,.12 12 '. 7 , cSH 888 651 273 80 Voium,e to Capacity `. : 0:(30 Obi 0;04 0.2'5 . Queue Length 95th {ft} 0 2. _ 3 . _ 22 - 'Gontrol Delay {5} ~;:1 b.7 1'8:~ 64.7 Lane LOS A A C F Approach belay (s}. ' 0:1 0.7 18.8 6'4.7 Approach LOS C F Average Delay 1.2 InterseefionCapacity,~fiiiz~tiion 666b/o IC[1"Levei:of Service C. Analysis Period (min} 15 Burnett Commercial Park 9/26/2007 2006 Fwxisting PM Peak Synchs 6 Report Transportation Engineering Narthwpst Page 3 HCM Unsignalized Infiersecfiion Capacifiy Analysis ~: Yelm Aye (SR~5~0) & Culiens Sfi 2/1/2007 „_ -- Lane Canfigurat~ons ~ '~ ~ ~ "~' .:. , ~~gn Cor'tfral -" ` , free " _. . . - ~ . _ Free `- - . , : Stap.~~.:. : stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% ~Volume:'(vehll;)` 0 $93 17 7 f;40,, - 21 6 ;. 0.` 3` ~7,; 0 3 Peak Hnur Factar 0,98 0.96 0.96 0,92 0.92 0.92 _ 0.75 0.75.. 0.75 0,67 0.67 O.B7 Haurly.fjouv r'~fe (vph}:. $3 934 `18 8 652 ., . 23 $ 0 , -: 4.: 40: `:0 :54' vC2, stake 2 conf vo! vCu,unblacked val 675 948 1827 1796 939 1780 1793 664 fC, smgfe (s) ~1 4.1 7.1 . 6 5 6.2 7,1 6:5 6:2' tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) ': 2:2 '2 2 3,5. .: 4 4 : 3F3:; 35' 4,.Q 33 . p0 queue free % 91 99 83 100 99 31 100 88 cM capaciiry (iehlh} '.; x`1.6 '724 - ,; . ~8 ~ . 72..', 3~0 : 58 . 72 461`` Voiume Total > 83 9 48 " 8 675 12 :` 40 " <; 54 , Volume Left 83 . 0 8 0 8 40 0 Vol~rne Right° 0 ~8 0. 23 4 0 54 cSH 916 1700 724 1700 67 58 461 Volumefo C.~.pac~ty 4:09 0,56 o;b'1 'O:AO . '0.'f8 '' Q.E9 -.: 0:12. Queue Length 95th (ft} _ 7 ~ ~ 0. 15 ~~ . 10 . Control >~elay (~) 9;3 0;0 X0,0 0.0 6.9.7 1`_:52 5 ' 13,8. . Lane LOS A E3 ~ ~ R approach Delay (s}. „ '0,.8 0.1 09,7. 73.3 : ch LOS Ap p r oa F F [ y / C l I;lt~x$~~trnrl ~5{ ~~yf I l ~ a}tyr i ~ ~ . ~~.. ~ L ~ ~ ~~~. _::`:~ t ~ ~. ~r :.0 3 ~2 : !~ ~ ~ h L f ~ +~5 , sy` ~.. ~_}~ T:! fir. S J.: i Average Delay 4.7 lnt~rsecti4n Capacity U f[lizatian 67;1`x% I CU Level of Se rvca C Analysis Period (min) 15 E3urnett Commercial Park 1/26/2007 ?_006 Existing PM Peak Synchra 6 Report "transportation Engineering Northwest Page 4 HCM Unsignalized Intersection rapacity Analysis 5. Yelm Ave SR-51 q & ~.on mire Street 2/1/2007 Lane Configurations , Sign Cohtrol Free Free -Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Voiurne (vehlh)' " "..: , " . `11 869 ':TS ; `I6 ~ '662 7 . ;; 9 "': 0 ': 1$."' S' 2 . ' 1:`I`' Peak Hour i=actor _ 0..93 0.93...0.93 0.86 ,._ O.S6 0.86 0.68 O.~iB 0.68 0.70 0,75 0,75 ~#ourly~low r~i~e (v~.~). 1.2 934 ~ ~9 ~' 19 ;770. 8 13 0 26 7" '3 1, Pedestrians Cane VII'i~fh {f#); Speed (ftls} Walking ", . 4~ercent dockage ... ,° ~edfa"ri.~Ype .-:. - ~<`None '~._ ~'~ Noce Median storage veh) Llpstrea~ signal (ft) ..°: vC, confllci;ir~~;volume 7:78 954 .1795. 17`$3 „ 944°; 1$Q5' 1788 7 vC1, stage 1 conf vol VC2 st~~e 2 conf vol . _ ~Cu, unblocked vol 778 954 1795 1783 944 1805 1788 774 tG, siri~fe (s) :" 4:1 °4.1 7 1 - 6.5 6.2'<~ 7:1 6~5 6~~ tC, 2 stage (s) ~F (s~ . ' 2:2 2;2 ". 3,~ 4 Q.`: 3 3:` 3,5'. ~ 4{) 33 p0 queue.free %° 99 97 76 100 92 88 97 96 cM oapaciiry.~weh~h) 843 717 56 78 3'f 5: 55 79 40 VoLpmeTotal 9.66 7.97. 40 24 . .. Volume Left 12 19 13 7 Valume`Ri~ht '' 1'~ °$ 26 15" _ cSH 843 717 124 125 Volume`fio Capacity 0.01 0;03 ,'0.32 :0:.19 _. _ Queue 1_ength 95th (ft) 1 2 32 17 Control 'D~lay (s) 0:4 0:7 `A 7 1 :.4.0.4 Lane LOS /~ A E E Approach Delay {s) ; 0,4 0:7 4-7.1 X0,4 Approach L.OS ~ E z ~ 3n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, .~. ,~ ~7 ~~ ~,° ~ ~ ~ ~~ - ; 3~t Jri`terse~~tEOr~ Suf7lfrt~r ~ ~# ;} - , .. .~ ., >.. ~ _ i _ ~ __ Average Delay 2.1 intersection C~paci~y U~llzation 62.:.0% ICU,Level of Service B . . Analysis Period (ruin} 15 . . Burnett Commercial Park 1/26/2007 2006 existing PM Pealc Synchro 6 Report Transportation engineering Northwest Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Yelm Ave SR-51.0 & 1st St SE 2/1/2007 ~ ~-- ~ # ~~{y w 'fin{ ~`~ ~ ~ ~ A - ~ r ~` `~~ Lane Configurat~ans '~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ )deli" Flow (Vplpl) 19.6:0 1!~~'0 1"900 ~1~00 ~ ,900 . ?19D0 " 19`00, 1900" 190fl" 19t)4 1"900 1990' Lane Width 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 1?_ 11 1D 12 ~`os:al Lost time.(s) ~}'0 4,0 4 0 ?!4 0 4 0 "` 4 0 ! 4 D, 4,0° 40 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1:00 1.00 1.00 `t"rt ~ ,:: 1;00 1::00 Q85 1.4'0 ~ ~0 ;: ;.1 (l0- ..` D $9 : 1 00: 0 ~:9 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1,00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1 A0 0.95 1.00 Satd Flow (prc;t} 170 "1863 " 9 X31 ~f.7'52 1'806 :.176 ' .1633. 1678 9550 _ Flt Permitted 0.95 1.QO 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 D,95 1,00 Std. Fio~v {perm) 17~,i} 10'63 153'1 1752 1836 " `': 1736 `':1633 ~ `` ,1678`. 155Q Voiumo (vph) 131 596 37 170 514 16 125 8D 193 49 71 110 peak-lio~r fecfdr ~'Ha= 0.94 g4 O 0,94 0:93 b,93 `0 93 ' 0 95 0 95 " ~ 0 95<, 0 82 0 82 -.: 0 8'2 , :.. . Ada Flow (vph) 139 , 634 39 183 553 17 132 84 203 60 87 134 ~RTf~f~;Fteduckian (vph') 0 °:.0 . ` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0: 0 ;~; Lane Group Flow (vph} 139 634 39 183 570 0 132 287 0 60 221 0 Heavy Vehleles ~°[g} :. 2`°lQ 2~/0 2~/0 ,3% ' 3~/0 ; ~%o 4b/o . _:: ~b/o 4% `: ~,°Jo 4::b~o ~~Ia Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot Prot ;hra#ecfed~~~hases . _, ~.~ `g .. ~5 ` 2 7 ~~ q, _ .. ~." $ Permitted Phases _ 6 . Actuated Green G {$): 6.8 . , 3213.. .32 3 ":,'10,5 36:0" ,, 7.9 :19.9: 3.8 158 , Effective Green, g {s) 7.8 33.3 33.3 11,5 37,0 8.9 20.9 4,8 16.8 Actuated SIC Ratio .. 0:09 0:38. 0:38 0 .:13 0;43" ; : ` 0 10 :: 0 24. ` O.b6: 0 :19 Clearance Time {s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 _ 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.0 5:0 5.0 Vel~iele:~xten_sian {s)' 30 30 '•3 0 `.3.0 `:3 0 3 0 .•' 3 D':: 3'b 3;p Lane Grp Cap (vph} 160 717 589 233 785 179 395 93 301 vls Ratio Prot' .,0:08 x0:34 `c0,10 'c0.3"1 cb,08 c0.18 0 04` 0 1'4 v1s Ratio Perm 0.03 vlc"F~afio 0:$7 0$8 ' :°x,07 0.79 ,0.73 `. 0.74 : 0.73 ``:. 0.65: b.73 .. Uniform ©elay, d1 38,8 24 8 16 8 36.3 20 5 3l 7 30.2 40.0 32,8 Progress~onFac#or. ., ~ :00 1:00. 1;00 3 ;00 .1 00 ' 1 00 .1,0`0. 1 Q0 1.d0. Incremental Delay, d2 36.9 12,5 0.0 15.8 3,4 14.6 6,5 14.3 8,9 ~{JeI~Y ($:) 74r$ 37:3 " .1'6,8 52.1 23.9 52,3 36.7 54:4 41:T Level of Service E D ~ D C D D C) D Approach Delay (s). :;. 42 7 ".'30.8 ...: 41 6`: 44:9 Approach LOS D C D D l-lCM Average Control Delay 38,8 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capaciky .ratio 0.83 _ Actuated Cycle Length(s) 86,5 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 ntersection Capacity, Uti7zatipt~ 73'.5/° ICU Level. of SecVice D` ; Analysis Poriod (min) 15 c 'Critical Lane Group Burnett Commercial Park 1/26/2007 2006 Existing PM Peak Synchro 6 i~c;pnrt Transportation Engineering Northwest Page 1 ~0® VVitho~~~Pr~j~~t ~.C~S Peak Hour Factor `free . 37 1057 , °669.. . - ° 33 " 26 16 . , .:" . : . 0,94 0.94 0.96.. ..0,96 0.67 _ . . 0,67 39 11`24 697 `' 34 39 24 - - pX, platoon unbloeKed uC, corflictin~ yolum.e .7.31 1:917 714 ` vC1, stage 1 conf val vC2, stage 2 conf vol - vCu, unblocked vol 731 1917 714 fC sm~l~ (s) 4.:1 ': 6 4 ;'' 6.2 . tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2,2 ' 3 5 ~3.3 , p0 queue free % 95 46 95 ~Nl capacity. (vehlh) $73 72 " : 435 '::. Volum~'Yotal 1164 "731 63 Volume Left 39 0 39 Volume might ,::: 0 ; 34 2.4 cSl-I 873 1700 105 Volume to Capacity ,: O,bS Or43 0;60 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 0 72 ControC:C7elay (~) ~5 " - 0.0 so 4 ,:. Lane LOS A F Approach Delay (s) ,. '[:5 0<0 30,4 ` - Approach LOS F Average Delay 3.5 ]ntersec~ion CapaciEy lJtilizaian 95:5b/o " JCU t_ev~l of Seruce F Analysis Period-(min) 15 t3urnett Commercial i-'ark 1/26/2007 2008 Without Project PM Peak 5ynchro 6 Report Transportation frngineering Northwest Page 1 HCM Unsignafized intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Yelm Ave (SR-510) & Burnett Rd 2/1/2007 ~I~ . ~• 1 ~I~ -- --- HCM Unsignalized lnfiersection Capacity Anaiysis 2: Yelm Ave SR-510 & Mountain View Road 21112x07 Lane Configurations ~` '~ '~` v~gn Control :'' _ Free - -Free Stop. ,;: - - .:._ , _. Grade, 0% 0% 0% Volume;(vehal:) " ' 2~ '1231 775 , 51 ~~ ;' . 42 16- , : - -' Peak Hoaar Factor 0,91 0,91 0.88 0,88 0.82 0,82 H~ogrly_fiow rite (vph)` 26 1 X53 ;8$~1 58 51 ., 20 _ , . ~ . pedestrians Line Vtilldth (fit}' . Walking Speed (ftls) F?ercent'`~lock~ge Right turn flare (veh) ,Median.::fype None Median storage veh) Upstr~~m signal (f~) pX, platoon unblocked ~C, conflicting:,~olume= :939 2315 ?910 , vC1, stage 1 conf vol uC2, sta;~e 2 conf vol` vCu, unblocked vol 939 2 315 910 . tC, 2 stage (s) p0 queue free % 96 0 94 9M capacity (vehlh) 730. ' ~0 . 330 -_ , Volume Total : `': '1:379 939 71 ,: ~ , Volume Left 26 0 . 51 Volume Right .. 0 58 20 cSl-~I 730 1700 52 Volume fo Capacity x;04 0`;55 1;35 ~ , . Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 161. Control D~I~y`(s) 1:g 0.0 373,6 Lane LOS A F .. ,: l~pproach Oeiay (s} 1.9 0:0 ` 373.6 Approach LOS F Average Qelay 12.2 Intersection Capacity.U~lization 94.Q%° ICU Level of Servico F Analysis I'eriad (min) 15 Burnett Commercial Park 11?_612007 2008 Without Project PM Peak Synchro 6 Report Transportation Engineering Northwest Page 2_ HCM Unsignalized intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Ye1m Ave SR-510 & Killion Rd 2/1/2007 --~ ~-- Lane Configurations Mgrs Control ' ' Free free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% VolUrne:(vehlt~;) 5:4 1230 1 " 16 "867.. ~8 0 -` b': 6.- 39 0 °3 . Peak Hour Factor 0,91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.50 0,50 0.5U 0.75 0.75 0,75 ~loutrly~low"rats {vph), 59 1352 ;. 1 ;: 18 :953 64 0 0, , ~°~ 52 0 ~; Pedestrians _ Walking Speed (ftls) Peroent F8lockage Right turn flare (veh} ~ ,Medan. tY9e :;: _ .. .: ' . ` None =Ngre , Median storage veh) Upstream si~~al (ft)„" pX, platoon unblocked - ' vG, con.~hctmg;:volume` -101;6 1353 _ -'253J. ; 2523- 1352,:- _25(}3 ..2491 9$:~~ ° ~C1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stake 2 conf vol ~, vCu,unblocked vol 1016 1353 2539 2523 1352 2503 2491 985 ~C, smile (s) 4.'1 ~ '41 7.1 ~6.5 . . ~6,2. 7~ 6:5 6:2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2;2 '2 2 '. '• 0.5 • 4.0 3 3 ; 35 40 3>3 p0 queue free % _ 91 97 100 100 94 0 100 84 cM capacity (vehlh} 682 `50'5 14 : 25 1`85 17 26 30'A 1:412 `1034 '-12 100 Vglume Left 59 18 0 52 Voiume'I~Igl# 1 64. ;12 48 cSl~l 682 505 185 31 Volume,to Capac.tty 0',09 b:03 0:06 3 26-. Queue Length 96th (ft} 7 3 6 Err C;ontral,~elay`(s) 4.8 1.3 25 8 Err Lane LOS A A D i" Rpproaeh Delay (s} .: 4:$ , 1 3 2`5.8 Err Annroach LOS D F J.htp~~~~ ~~f5-~1~~[+l~~la~t ~ .. ~ e i `£ ~ v ~`~ ~U ,~ :. ._v~~ ~ ~`,~k ~x~~~,~t~i'..,~~Ss~, e sr~,_ t: ~~ ~~RC ',S'.!.-.~'~5s..s` r~'~,?_z..~. Average Delay 394.2~~ ~1rtt~rsection Capacity'Ut~lz~tion 112:0% IC.U Level' of Service ri. Analysis Period (min) 15 ~3urnett Commercial Park 1/26/2007 2008 Without Projeot PM Peak Synchro 6 Report Transportation Engineering Northwest Page 3 HCM Unsignaiized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: Yelm Ave SR-510 & Cullens St 2/1/2007 -~ ~- ~ ~ Lane Configurations ~ "~ ~ "~ '~ "~ 5i~n Control ," ; Free ~ Free. - stop'" Stop' . Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% U.oluFne;;(ve~1~) 10.4 9:~f:~3 ',18 .`'13 .:::864 . "`: 57; `"~ " 6 0'. 10' .. "50 0 49 Peak Horar Factor- 0.96 0.96 _. _. 0.96 0.92 , . _- 0,92 0.92 0,75 0.75 0,75 0.67 0.67 0.67 Hnurlyflo~nr rate (vph) - 1OS 1211 19 ' ` 14 _ 9~9 :: 62 8 0 13 75 0 7 pedestrians . Lane tiV dth (~ff~ Walking Speed (ftls) )percent Blockade - Right turn flare lveh) N~edian:Y,pe _ -:None:' None Median storage veh) lJpstream si~ri~l {ft) pX, platoon unblocked VC, confl~Cti-~g .Yolurne 1,00:1. 1:230. ° 248 : ; 2467: 1221; 2440 244;5 970 vC1, stage 1 conf voi vC2, stake 2 GQnf VOi _ vCu, unblocked vol 1001 1230 2478 2467 1221 2440 2445 970 tC, single (s) '.. 4(1." 41 7.1 6.5 ` 6 2' 71' 65 '6's . tC, 2 stage (s) #F (~) 2":2 2 2 ',; 3.5 4.0 : ; .. 3.3 : 35 40 3`. p0 queue free % 84 98 40 100 94 0 100 76 cM capacity (Vehlh) ° 692 566 _' 13 :. 25 , 299:;: 1 ~,,. 2F 3t7 r?'' Uolum;e Total 108 '{230 14 :1:001 21 `" 75 73: ': Volume Left 108- 0 14 0 8 75 0 Volume Right b 19 0 62 13 - 0 ;; ": 73 :;: cSH 692 1700 566 1700 32 17 307 Volume,.to Capacity .' 0"1`6 0;72 0;x}2 0:59 - 0.66 -, 4,27 0.24 Burnett Commercial Park 11?_612007 2008 Without Project l~M Weak Synchro 6 Report '1"ransportation Engineering Northwest Page 4 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5. Yelm Ave SR-510 & Lon mire Street 2/1/2007 Lane Configurations Sign Control . " . free - `"-Free ;.: ° Stop = stop - - Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% 1[olurne{yehlh) 11 1`Q86 1:01 '`167 -`884 '' 10 `. ' 95 ' . 0 177 `' 8! ?~ . `11` Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0,93 0.93 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.75 0.75 0.75 l~-iourly.#low r~#e {vpii} 12 . 11:6$ 109 194 : X028 12 : 140 ~. 2~4 11 3 1;~, Pedestrians Lane V~Ii~th (ft} _ Walking Speed (ft/s) Percept ~lock~~e Right turn flare (veh) _ - ;~iedfan''type - ` - None ` ', Name Median storage veh) :Upstream sig~~i (ft) - - _ pX, platoon unblocked 'vC, cori~licting Wolume 104:0- . 1276 - `:: `2684 ': 2674' 12.22 i:. 2g2$' 2722 . 103 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,~ stake 2 cor7f vol : vCu, unblocked voi 1 040 1276 2684 2674 1222 2928 2722 1034 :tC, single {s} . '4,1 `4.1 - ' 7.1 6 5.• 6 2 7 :"l 6,5, 6 tC, 2 stage {s} _ f~" (s~) 22 2,2 .3,~ -, 4.0' 3.3 ' 3.5 4:0 3: p0 queue-free °10 98 64 0 100 0 0 80 95 cM capacity (~ehlh} ",` 673 '541 $ 14 . 217:. (~ `>13 28 ,. VolumeTotal..';' - 1288 ,1:2.34 :400 28 Volume Left _ 12 194 140 11 Volume;l~i,~ht`; 1Q9 ':12 `,260 ,..;15." _ . cSH 673 541 22 0 Volume o.C~paclty O.Q2 . 0.36 " 18';06 Ert' Queue Length 95th {ft) 1 41 err E;rr Control Delay {e) 0,$. ' 14.4 Err Err _ Lane LOS A Q F F Rppi'oach Ddlay (s) 0,8 14.4 ''Err f*rr - _ Approach LOS. F F Irter~edfiorf.~i;~~rria~:y~' _ ~ _ .~: Average Delay Err ~riterseetion Capacity Util ization 150.6% !CU Level of ~;eryice H Analysis Period (min) 15 Burnett Commercial Park 1/26/2007 2008 Without Project I'M Peak Synchro 6 Report Transportation Engineering Northwest F~age; 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6; Yelm Ave SR~5~0 & Est St SE 2/1/2007 '~ ~ Lane Configurations '~ ~ ~" ~ "~ ~ '~ ~y '~ Ideal Floyv{vphpl) 1:9(1:01900. 1;~Q0 . 1900 =x'900= :'1900 x:1900 .:;'1900 °: 19b0~: 190Q 1909 190 Lane Width 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 10 12 ~°otai Lost t1me (s) 4;0 ~ 0 ,4 0 °4 0. 4 0 -; 4 0 .: 4.0 ;" ~4.0` ~0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 •{)0 1.00 1.Q0 1 AO 1.00 -1.00 art • . :. . 1.00 : :::00 ' 1 . 0~5 1:00 • .;0 99 , 1 00 ';; 0 90.` 1 OQ; b 90 Fit Protected , 0.95 _ 1 A0 1 •QO 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 _ 1.00 Said Flow ~prpir) - 177:0 " -18.63 -'(531 1752 -.1:825 -`1736 : `' 1640" ° 1678: 153 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1..00 ~atrl "f=i~tu lriPrml . ::. 17~fi ='i'~S~R~ . ,151 ', .::1`7.ri~ 1'R~.~"i ' 1.7:~`R::: 1 Rd(l~': '- 1 ~7~3 •1532 .. 'alume (vph) 244 838. 58 212 782 61 162 111 239 92 91 192 'yak-hourfactor i~'H~ 0;9:4 0:94. 0:94 ..1193.' 0 93 0 93 ` '0 95 °; 0 95 `; 0,95 0 $2 0'82 0.82' ~dj, Flaw (vph) 260 891 62 228 841 66 171 117 . 252 112 111 234 :TOR Deduction (yph) 0. '0 0 ': 0 `'.. ~ 0 . 0 ;' p~ _ ~ 0' ~ U - `0: one Group Flow {vph) . 280 891 62 228 907 . _ 0 171 369 0 112 345 0 Ie~vvVc;h~clc~s~l~/nl..,°; ~'b7~ `~~/0 2~/0 ``36/0. " 3~/0 ;- 3% :': ~~Io ~~/o~; • ~i•b/o 4aZo', 4%0 4b~4 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot Prot ~?rotecfed Phases 1 °_ 6 : 5 - 2 7 4 : ~ ...: Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G s O 16::0 50:A 60 0 ~'S,0 59.0 ;10.0. `: . 270 ' 8:0 - .:. _~ 25:0 ;: Effective Green, g (s) 17.0 61.0 61.0 16.0 60.0 11.0 2$.0 9.0 26.0 Actuated SIC ratio 0:13 0;47 0 :47 , ."012 0 46 '0 08 :;. Q 22 : 0.07_ 0.2:0 • Clearance Time {s) 5.0 5.0 _ 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Uehlcl'e,'ExteOslon {s)'_' 30 3.0 3.0 `°;3.0 `3,0 ~ 3 0 '; . 3,0" 3;0 3Q Lane Grp Cap (vph) 231 874 718 216 842 147 353 116 306 vls Radio Prot.;<. : c0.15 0:48 ;0:13 c0 5b ~. C0.10 . 0 23 0:07: c0 23 vls Ratio Perm 0.04 vlc Ratio 1'1:3 1_:,02 b:09 ~ 7:0`6 1.08: ,' =1.16 1.05 ;, 0 9T 1.13 Uniform Delay, d1 56.5 34,5 19.1 57.0 35.0- 59.5 51.0 60.3 52.0 I?rogressipn l=actor 1:00 1:Qb ::1.00: 1..00 . : ,1.00 _ - 1.0'"0' . 1 00 1 {]0; 1 0a Incremental C~elay, d2 97.1 35.4 0.1 76,6 53.9 124.8 60.2 72,1 90.4 belay (s) '; 153.6 <69.9 1$,1 133.5 88.9 - 184.3.''' 111.2:_ 132: X42;4 Level of Service F E B F F f= F F F 'Approach Delay (s) $5,3 - : '. ;':97.9 ' 134.4 ' ~ 39;9 Approach LOS F F F F HCM Average Control pelay 105.0 HCM Level of Service F HCNi Volume to C~pacl)y ratio 1;10 . Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s} 16A lnterSeciion Capacity;Utfl.iza#ion 97.3/0 .; ICU Level of Seriiice F - Analysis Period {min) 15 c Crifical;Larie Group Burnett Commercial Park 1/26/2007 2008 Without Project PM Peak Synchro 6 Report Transportation Engineering fVorthwest Page 1 oo vu~~~~pro~~~ cos HCM Unsignalized Intersection Ce~acity Analysis 1. Yelm Ave (SR-510 _-- _..-. ___ -__-.~ - ~II~PI~Ip 1 & Burnett Rd 211I2oo7 T I ~~ Lane Canfigurakions ~` '~'~ 5i~~ ~ontroi ..: -- . '"Free ~"ree Stop=. '. _ Grade o°i° o°i° a°i° Volume: (~ehlf%),. -42 ~'0~5 : . 6~2 `' 49 ° 44 ': 2$ ? _ . Peak F-jour Factor 0.94 0,94 0.96 0,96 0.67 . 0.07 Hourlyffow..rafe(.~ph} _45 =122. ,690 51 ='% 66 `. 42 . v~, cor;~iict~ng volume'. 74"1 'f 927 `:715 : vC1, stage 1 conf voi _ - vC2, "stake 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked val 741 1927 715 {C, sari~fe (s} 4.:.1 6.4 6,2 tC, 2 stage. (s) _ -. ,. p0 queue free % 96 _ . .. 7 90 } " ; apacity (Vehlh cM c 8 66 " - 70 ~ - :.;_ 43'4 .: pp,, }}y~ { }rY~`~ ~~~L ~~ d~ 2,/ '" S~ ,_~'Y' 4 ~i}`Y'_V~},} k ~~F F'Y k ~ F-" ~"'~ ~ ~ ~~~S~SJt3T~ ~ ,~-F~~~$..~'~~;y ~2~~;~L -°L~~>)~~ ~ -' .+yC V~~~ r~I{ ~i i J^ v ~IJ ~ ~ ~:~ -' 4 ~T ~f k ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~' - ' ~ ~ ; t` } ~ ~ ( -~. _ S _ -. i y ~ 5 .- ~ a _-ri Z•~";~e ~ 55 ~c £.i1 . i .5 i i'.. . -. N~:v .. . }t,t5 ~ ~~.. ~-. (l . t Volume:.-fotal~"'' . 1167 '"741. 107 - Volume Left . 45 0 66 Volunle.I~~gha -0 " 51 42 cS H 306 1700 104 Voium~'to Capaaty 0.05. 0;.,44 ' 1,03 ,., Quoue Length 95#h (ft) 4 0 164 Control Delay(s) 1.7 0,0 17:3,4 Lane LOS A F Rpproaeh C3elay (s} . 17 0.0 173.4 ,: Approach LOS F . _ S ~ ~r ~~,, ~~~~ ,~ ,~ 4~_-~ 1ht~~~~~tlQh~~mmary ,k1 ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ,.. 5, ,. H. ~Iverage i0elay 10.7_ Intersection'Capacity Utiljzation 100:~'~/0 1GU"Level of Service G:. `. Analysis Pariad (min) 15 Burnett Cammarciai Park 112612.00'7 2003 With I~roject PM Peal< Synchro 6 Report Transportation ~:nginaering Northwest Page 1 HCM Unsignaiized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Ye1m Ave (SR-510) & Mountain View Road 2/1/2007 ~ ~- nfiguratians ~" '~ ~' ~tro1 '. - Frye Free .: `atop . ': _. . 0% 0% 0% vehlh:) ~24 1.247 "784 51 42 .. 16 .. . _ . ur Factor 0.91 -0.91 0.88 0.88 0.82 0,82 aw rate (vpYi} 2'0 . 1370 851 . 58 ` 51 '_ 20 ; . Vo~umaTotal 1'.397. X49 71 , Vofurne Left 26 0 51 lV~[urn~Right _::°. ~ :~0 ~ ~~ ;~.2a cSH 724 1700 50 Volume. to Capacity b.04 O:~F 1"41 Queue Length 95th (ft} 3 0 105 Gontral Del~.y`(s) 21 0.0 401 3 : - Lane -LOS A . _ _ F Approach C?~lay (s) < ` 2.`1 p.0 401.3 - Approach LOS. F Average C~elay 12.9 ;biters`ectior~ Gapacii:y Utilization 94':9% IGIJ Level of Service F Anaiysis Period (min) ~ ~ Burnett Commercial Park 1/26/2007 2008 with Project PM Freak Synchro 6 Report Transportation Engineering Northwest Rage 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3; Yelm Ave SR~510 & Killion Rd 2/1/2007 Lane Configurations a ~~~ri Control, Free °Froe " •? Stop =; . Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0°1° Volume (vekil}) 54 126 1 ;° 16 ~ 876 58 ~ . 0. _; 0 ~;;.. .. .39` 0 _3 Peak Hour Foctor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.75 0.75 0,75 laourly:flow rate (iiph.)`.` 59 13'69 .. " 1 18 `,9rj3 ~ 54, ,' ~. 'b ` 12 _52 0 48, ~~ voliam~: 1026 1370 ;2566 ;::2550 1370: 253.p' 251;.9 J'9 tC, 2 stage { ~~ (s) ` ` p0 queue fry I canf voi _ conf .vof : . ,.. . - _.. .. ked vol 1026 1370 2566 2550 1370 2530 2519 995 . '4:1 4:1 =' "". 7.1 ;' 6 5:':. 6.2; 7:1: 65 6,~: ~,•2 2 2 .3.6- ' 4.b-` 3:3 35. " 4:0 3`3 91 96 100 100 93 0 100 84 ehlh) >:. 677. _ +498 14 ~ 24~ ` 181' _ 1'6 ~5 300 Vol~ani.e Total 1 Q~30 1:044 12 -100 Vnlume Left 59 18 0 _ 52 Volume:I~iO~t'.' 1 `64 12 `48 cSH 677 498 181 29 Volume n Capacity O;b`9 0:04 0,07 3.42 Queue Length 95th (ft) 7 3 5 l=rr Control Delay (s) 5;1 1:3 2~ 3 `'•Err' Lane- LOS A A l~ l= Appro~eh delay (s} X5::1 1.3 26 3 1=rr .', Approach L05 ® F ~ k ~,f~e~sec#foh S~ilrnin~,ry ~ f Average f3eiay 390.2 Irtt,~rsec€ion ~apaciky lJl li,za{ion 112;9% ICtJ Level of service H' - Analysis Period (min} 15 E~urnett Commercial Parl< 1/26/2007 2008 With Project f'M Peai< Synchro 6 F~eport l~~ransportatinn ~ngini;cring Northwest Page 3 HCM Unsignalized intersection Capacity Analysis 4: Yelm Ave (SR~514) & Cuilens St 2/1/2007 ! II IYI:~1- - Lane Configurations '~ '~ '~ ~ '~ "'~ Sign Control Free FPee - ~ stop ' _ Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0°1° _ Vol~nie:{~ehlh;}° ~ 0;5 1:'1:78 ;1$ ' .` 13 -`$72 .: 57 - . 5 `': 0':`. . 10 5~` ~ ~R Peak Hour Factor 0.901 ...0,96 0,96 0,92 0,92 0;92 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.67 0.67 0.67 HouPty flow ti~te {vph}: 'Cf}9 .:1227 19 ;14 `'94$ 62 <.° $ 0'::: 13 .- 75 0 •15 1010 12~"6. •.: 2506- 2A~93-:.126`; 2466 2472 J`79 vC2, stage 2 conf val vCu, unbiocked vol 1010 1240 2506 2493 1236 2466 2472 979 tC, sir~~le (s) : 47 41, : T 1 .:.. 6.5 6.2:`:: 7.1 6:5 1?:2 .. .. tC, 2 stage {s} f~ (s) 2:2 2 2 ':: 3,5 4,0 _` : 3.0° . 3:5 4:b ~3:3 p0 quoue free% 84 97 ~ 36 100 94 0 100 75 eM c~P~city (vehlh} . ; 6`~6 X59 . 13 :. 24 215 17 25 ..~0 Volume::rota! :: ,.. `.1 p9 . 7 246 14. ~:010: : ` 21 : :: 75 > ' 75: Volume Left 109 0 14 0 8 75 0 Volume Might , ~ ".1:9 . 0 62 . 13 0 - ;: 75 cSH 686 1700 559 1700 30 17 304 Voiurneao Capacity 0.1`~ 0::73 0;03 0;:59 0.70 4 48 0 25 : Queue Length 95th (ft) 14 0 2 0 58 Err 24 ~Goritrdf Delay {s} °11.2 00 11.6 0.0 ' 250.0 ; ` Err 2`0,7' ,. Lang LOS B ~3 F F C Reproach I~el:~y (s) 0:9 0.2 `260.0 5009.8 : _ ' _ Approach L.OS F t~ Average Delay 296.0 Intersection Gapaci#.y;Utiliz~i;ion~ 82:9% IGIJ Level of Service E Analysis Period (min} 15 Burnett Commercial f~arl< 1/26/2007 2008 With Project PM Peak Synchro 6 Report Transportation Engineering Northwest Pago 4 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Yelm Aye SRT510 & L.an -mire Sfiree# 2/1/2007 Lane Configuratians ~i~n,Control~ ,' Frye - "Frye `Stop` ` : Stop _ Grade 0°10 0% 0% 0% Volurn:e°-(veririj , 1~1 1100 x'42. =~67 `:8$2 '' 10-= 96 0. `. 177'. ' 8 2 1.;~' . Peak dour Factor 0,93 0,93 _.. 0,93 0.86 _. 0.86 0,86" 0.68 0.88 0.68 0.75 0.75 0,75 l~b.urly#low ri~te~ (yph`);' - ~2 1-1';$~ ~ 10 X94 ~''"037 12 :: 141: 0 260 . 11 3 1' Pedestrians Large Vhidi;h (ff)~ - Walking Speed (ftls) Percent ~[314ck=~,~e: Right turn flare (veh) ,Nied~an ~tXpe - - _ = :~Nane:~~ " ~ None Median storage veh) U.pstrearn signal ~ftj... .. pX, platoon unblocked vC conflictingvalume 10'9 :292 1 _ 27Q9 : _ 2698 ; . 128;;: 2953. 274$ 1Q4.3 vC1, stage 1 conf vol _ v:C2, s.ta~~ 2 conf vol - vCu, unblocked vol 1049 1292 2709 2698 1238 2953 2748 1043 1:C, si01~ (s) 4,1 `. 41 ' ; 7 1 = 6 ~v.' 6.2,: 7.1` 6.'5 6 tC, 2 stage (s} fF (s) "` 2,2 2.2 = -.° 3 5 ; 4.0. ` . 3,3 35 ~:0 3 p0 queue free % 98 64 0 -100 0 0 79 95 cM capacity (vehlh) ,`' 667 ' 533 $' 13 : . 212 ~ D;. ~13 2'$1 Voiume<Totai `: , 13x4 `::1:243 " . 401 28 ... Volume Left 12 194 141 11 Volurime Right ~'- 1:10 'i 2 ,260 15 cSH 667 533 21 0 V.olurne to Opacity 0`:02 . - 0':36 19;8 . '. err Queue Length 95th (ftj 1 41 err Frr Control.Del~Y(S) a;9 14:9. Err 'Err Lane LOS A B F F °Rpproach belay (s} : 09 1'4.9 Frr Frr Appraach LOS F F 't~r_~e~~tiag,~u~rn~CY.:~. _. 3< ~ _~.. ~. _ .x„~~ ...._-_ ~`...,_ __ . ,.~ ..._ ;~, ~_ .~, r .~, - e , ..,....-. , ... . ~ . .. ~~ . s. Average ©elay Frr intersection G~pacity Utilization 15~:J% ICU'Level of Service _ H Analysis Period (min} 16 Burnett Commercial Park 1/26/2007 2008 With Project PM Peak Synchro 6 report Transportation Engineering Northwest Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Yelm Ave {SR-510) & 1st St SE 2/1/2007 -~ 1111111rY~~ Lane Configurations '~ ~ ~' '~ '~ ~ '~ ~j '~ ) 19'b0 '19(}0 fdeai Flow (Vpi~;pi 19'00 1_,:900 1900 1900 19()0 '': -1900 1900 ` 1900.; 190E} 19.01 ; bane Width 12 12 11 12_ 12 12 12 12 12 11 10 12 Fatal Lost time;{s), 40 4'.0 4 0 4 0 r =!4 0 = 4 0 °' 4 0 ; 4 D- 4.0 - - iWane tJtil. Factar 1,00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1,00 1.00 ~['t 1',a0 1;;00 Q$5 , 1.Ofl ; 0 99 1.00: 0 30':: ;_ '~ 0.~'`. 0 ~C} Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1:00 0.95 1.00 0:95 1:00 0:95 1 A0 ~akd~ FIoW (pray) 170 1863 '{~31 1;752 'i'$~5 :-; 1736 -` 1040 ` 15"~8` . 153:1 . Flt Permitted 0.95 1:00 1:00 0,95 1.00 0:95 1.00 0:95 1,00 Satd. Flow (perm) . . ;: 1770 1$63 "- 1531. . :1;52 "- 1:$25 ~ ' 1736 :- :1640 `` 1078' .153;1 Volume {vph) ~ 246 843 51 212 785 61 164 111 239 92 91 193 .Peak f~oUr factor, I~N;F 0:9'4 0:94 0;94 0;93 . ", 0 93 . ; 0 93 ~ "~b.95 0 9'~ ;'' 0 95 "' 0 82= 0 $;2 0,$~. Adj: Flow (vph) 262 897 05 228 844 66 173 117 252 112 111 235 ~TOi~ Deduction (VI51.} -0 . °-;0 ;>.0 0 _:' 0 <, 0 0 0 ': 0" 0, ~ `(~~ Lane Group Flow (vph} 262 897 55 228 910 0 173 369 0 112 340 0 1`leavy Veh4cies (~/,o) -'.` 2~% . 2~/n ~d(° 3% .' `:38/°-; `. 3blo ~afo ;'; ~~% " ~~lo:" : ~~ajq ~,a~o ~b~~. Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot Prot F?rotecccf°.E~hases • 9 , 6 5 ':. 2 7 ` .: " ~4:: 3: -"g _,,, Permitted Phases 6 .. Actuated Green, G (s~}: 160 . $,Q.O 90.0 1'5.0 59.0 ~ `1 OA ~ 27 0 - 8 0 25;0, , effective Green, g {s) 17,0 - ....6.1.0 61:0 1.6.0 60.0 11.0 28.0 9,0 26.0 4ct~ated ~]C. ~2atia 0113 0:47 0;47 '0.12 . " . n.46 - `; 0 08 "" 0 22" 0 07 0 2~0 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5A 5:0 5:0 5.0 5A 5:0 5A 5.0 1'/ah~r.Ip Fxtr?nGinn lcl:: '... ~'fl ;'~ ft ;"~ ~ - ~-{~ .;: -3.0 " ,` ,: , 3.r'1 ;` 3.0`:. ~ :`:: 3:0 30 Lane Grp Cap {vph) 231 874 718 216 842 1.47 353 116 .306 vls Rang Prot, c015 Q:48 - 0.13 " cQ 50 '`c0.10 . `: 0.23 0 07 c0.23 -_ , v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 Ylc Rato_ 1.13 1;0`3 O:b9 1;06 _. 1.08 ; - 1.18 ` 1.05 `: 0":97 1.13 Urnforrn Delay, d1 56.8 34.5 _ 19.1 57 0 35 0 59.5 51:0 50:3 52.0 Progression Factor ! 1,00 1:00 1:0~? 1:'.00 1.00 '1.00 .1.00 1 00 1100"'. . Incremental Delay, d2 100.1 37:3 0.1 70.0 55.2 129.6 60,2 72,1 91:5 Delay (~) 156;6 71:8 19.2 1.33.6 90 2 1$9:1 ; `111.2.. 132.4 , 143;:5 . . Level of Service F _... E B F ~= F F F F Approach Dewy (s) <. 87;2 - . 9$.9 136:1-' -. 140i:3~ _ . Approach LOS F F F F HCM Average Control Delay 100.3 HCM Level of Service F HCiI/] Vo]umoao Capacity rang 1;10 - . Actuated Cycle Length {sJ 130.U Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 j.rttersectiori Capacity l~tifiz~tion 97.7% ICIJ Level .of Service i= ' Analysis Period (min) 15 c CriticaF Lane Group Burnett Commercial Park 112.612007 2008 With Project PM Peak 5ynchro 5 Report Transportation Engineering Northwest Page 1 ~pp~rtdiac 2p Future Y'r Trfic V~I~m~ tir~n~ts \° O (V ~O S0. S 00 O N Q h~- o y, .8 a u1 Q. 'C h ry fl. O 7 0., Q ~„" O ~ CD ~ ~ N N N II II II CD ~~ ~ ~ N I~ ~ 111 I d SL Q h' ~ SO ~ ~ © ~0 ~i ~ '~ 1.. 7 ~ ~ ~7' ~ l9 :~ I~ ~. N W ~ ~i, - ~, @ ~~ ~? ~. _. 40 El UV 0 $Z ~. 0 0 0 0 ~ -0 _c _ 9L Zb 6 0 e 0 ~ 0 69 84 0 0 s :2 ~ Z4l 6E 9 0 8 0 ~ 0 4L 89 0 L4 ~. ~~4 "o~ Z94 OS Ol 94 0 ~ 0 064 09 9 V£ w °p m yN.~a "-_.~ H^`TLo "off y In h~ '~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ n ~ .. ~. ~ 4, ~ fJ ~ O s E o _ ~ y o 0 a o o Y ~ ¢ E o n o o n ~ ~ a ~ O O o a o 0 01 /. 0 c° N 0 o ~~' o~ 0 0 n n _~ 0 6 o 0 0 0 0 0 rc- ...n g `~ ° 0 tl) ~ °' R 0 '.~ ~ _-~~ ~ W' m m ~ 0 0 ~ ~ Y: w ~ ~ 0 0 .~ M ~ ~. ~ r w X~ 4 l 0 N . ~ ~ c ~f1 fri N w r tl1 m W ~ ~ a° n ~ %06l%OZ %D a ~ n %0 %0 ~~ ..~ ° ~ n ti o %0 %0 /,S °k8 4 b n e D ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ LLnn N N . n y7~Q 1~ ~ ~ Imo.. ~ V '-' tom- h ~~ r~' ~ N ff~~i c v M ~ 0 ~~ ~ ~ N ~ O ~ II ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~i N ~ ~ I ~ M N ~' :.a 5 " Y' ~ OL 9Z D 0 0 ~. 0 ZV 94 0 0 } .~ ~ ~ SL 09 ZV 0 94 H 0 0 0 0 0 ..~~ ~' Q ~`, Zll OE ® S 0 ~ 0 9L BE 0 Ll _~ _ ~. -.~" lfll 09 04 9l 0 ~ 0 68 86 9 LE N h IV~~ M V p ~ pC N ~]. tl N ~Y ~ Hi y _ ° K~ ~ ~ ~K' W ~ ~ A eQ }1 '? M y~j ~ h „l M ~ n $ N P V ~ W N _ 4 _ g ~ a w W v li R 9Z L 0 0 ~i ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ gg .K. j ~ _ r "~ ~' ~ N ~ ~ n II ~ ~ 90 VZ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0- ~ :~ GG ~_Y ~ uhu~ff N ~`1 ~ ti ONo O II ~ N ~ 06 6Z 0 0 Vl ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ N .. ~ ~ ~: 4 pp N ~ N v~ fl M ry .~ OS L"L L L m m 0 ~ 0 _~ L4 OL 0 0 :~ VE 04 0 0 _~ ~ 00 LE 0 0 ~' 66 Z6 0 0 yp N N yQ~ ¢f N N M t~ h N N _...~ _.._ h N ~ N __ '~ a E ~~ ~ , yy n ~ ~ £4 04 0 ~ VZ fl 0 p 3 ~ ~~ -~ Ip. N ~ O ~ ~ O4 L4 0 ~`~ ..._ EZ fl 0 ~. 4 " 3'. ~' ~ ~ ,- ~ ~ 61 04 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 9} 9 0 Ol Vy, ~ ~ .~ ~ SOl L7, 0 E4 9£ W ~ N p I.. ~ £ 0 0 __ 9 VZ p ( ~-p- R _ a O M. -- ~ - Z ~°i T d ~,, ~ ~ - I`n o p p ~i p m F d ~ 1 0. m ~ ~ ~ 0 0 p ~ o ~ u ~ S T d 0! a ~i ~ d b O O rn V m ~ 0. ~ n y fl. _.._ rn ~i e` m 0 0 0 A ......_. _._ a> P __ tiy~ m' Q 2 . d N _ ~ e ~. 0 0 ~ n N IV O ._...~ n W (V ~~~' ~!i ® Q ~ V ~ c - o n n N Ci ~ ~ o t~ ~". ~ ~. ~ ~ - y e -- o 000 0 (V c3 a ~"- ~? ~. ~ n ~ o 0 [v tV .`- M n N ~v~ L]-~ ~ dig(, <' mm m ~ ~ G N _ ~ ~ ~~: U ~ U m ~m m IL 7_ U1 ~P7 H ~~~ V ~ l? ~ ..... ~mm m i z // ~ 1_ ~' ~- ~ U mmm m ul ? 7 (0 ~' ~ N V N a w W V L a N 0. o ~ A ~wI N f1 [J Q~ O ~ ~ 4f 'C ~~ N ti ap N F° O ~ O ® CJ CV N N N C I] II II y ~~~ m 00 ~ ~ O ,,jj~/~/j{~{~ N fo % 11~ IL a 0. h- Cd 6 0 ~ C C N f0 ~ ~ C, ~ N ~ p ' U s v ~ ~x ~ QQ N ~ ~ b' ~ '~ ~ .. ~.~~ ~ O ~. Q. a F Q : P~ c4 W S, ~ N '~ ..~ ~ ~ ~ n N y L(~i '~~O y M a P P ,y :.. -.,g 6L . 8 G n ~ 1.L6 0 £Ld ~ .,,,~ >~ 86V LB BEL y6S s 66 ~ 66l ~_.'g _a ~ OL 0 GZ 68 LV ~. OG ~ 6Z Y4 - 96 6LZ . °' flLE E64 486 ti9E :.~. 'Zb 0 0 EL pp (ry.] ~y W GO M Y ~ n o ~ 'w ,.~2~j o o 0 0 D 0 ~~ N .a. ~~'. 0 0 0 0 0 0 '~ ci ~` ~ 0 0 ~ w ~ o 6 06 M k 4 Q P P P P .- -. .a ~.,, w ~ ~ 0 6 N N 'E~. .u~ _ ~ M ~ ~ Z Z ~ ~ -~ -..a .... N N __ N a Z6 Z6 ~ ~- : - 0 4 6 ' B - ~ 6 6 "Z E ~ cn _ ~ 0 R .: ~ ~. o> ~ . x m ~ m' 0 0 y q ~+ ~ ~ io is ; %06 %~6 ~ %a %006 %006 ; ~ ~ $ d. ~ ~ ~ Rio is is aioo6 io6 ash vs6 ~ ro ~ioo6 In ''" m h ~ ~ 0 0 E ': g [n o ~ ~ ~ IE '.' _ ~ ~ !f ~ r ~ [y N WI- d' II ... ~. g II 9 O n 6Z 4 GG6 ZLZ ~ ~~ 9lV 7,6 BEZ Z69 ss;; _ y aL 0 0 OL b . q Z ~ 0 ~ L0 ~ S66 n ZV ,_ OG B ,_ . '~~ 6G 66 56 OGG `~- 9LE ZBL G9l 60E ~- r G4 0 0 GY . pmt pp W y., ( E4 ' . ~ Oi w - '. d ~ V . .. A O O _ .,F %~ ] p M ~ IGr c~' n ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~i ~i ~i Vti n C N ~ ~ a` ~~ o n n r, u ' In ~_~a. £ E 0 ~ IIS6 0 V6G ~ ~ ' ~a. ~ .C 006 66 9£ 4B c I.6 ~ 9G ~~ a _ ~ - gg ~ L 9G 0 0 5L ~ G6 Q SL ~ ~~ £ 0 fl0 GEL A£6 Ol. Z£ GG ~ a- 1.1 0 0 16 ~. ~ a m ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ _ ~ n n n ~ ~ ~' o n .'~. C' "~ ~" ^ ~ ro ~-~ ~ g ~ ~ v Y ~ ~. ~ n n ~' e 66 4 9l GZ ~ z Eo o ~~ ~ {_ZZ SV 6c ~ E66 oo 96E y ~ g. o w" ~~ EV £V vz ~ Ev --.~ 46 6V B fl£ ~ OEZ O66 5G6 9LZ ~. YZ 4G h ". y ~ c ~ ~ r4 ~ m _ N ~ p W Q i < p ~ O O ~ g I i1 pp ~ ~ W l0 ~ 0 0 0 0 61 o a ~ ~ ~ u" t~1 ~~ N ~ 01 ~ 6l 0 0 o n m ri o ~ ~ ~i __ ~~ 4,. ~({ Q ~ U p] V O .. ... N ~~~.~ Q} ~ ('I ~ PN V] V P Q ~{ f~` A p ~C ~ ~ .Y ~ d. ~~9v ~ " ~+. F' N L d ~ p V pq IL ~ Z N ~ m ~,, ~~~sss''' .h~ y L 6. 2 ~ U 111 ~ Z N F- . .~ ,$q~' ~ {V}~~ U '~."- y L ~ 2 ~p U E11 ~ Z Vl F' N U O ~~