Loading...
Burnett Phase 2 Traffic Analysis - updated 1-31-07 with appeTransportation Engineering Northwest DATE: January 31, 2007 TO: Tami Merriman, City of Yelm FROM: Jeff Schramm, Transportation Engineering Northwest CC: Steve Chamberlain, The SCA Group Updated Traffic Impact Analysis RE: UPDATED Traffic Impact Analysis -Burnett Commercial Park Phase 2 TENW Project No. 4130 This updated traffic impact analysis has been prepared for Phase 2 of the Burnett Commercial Park development. Phase 2 of the development has changed, and this memo updates the traffic impacts associated with the Phase 2 site plan changes. The future background conditions without the project have also changed based on comments provided by the City. Project Description Phase 1 has already been constructed and consists of about 70,000 square feet of mini- storage space. Phase 2 would be a mixed-used development consisting of about 7,100 square feet of retail space on the bottom floors of Buildings A and B, along with 4,450 square feet of professional office on the top floor of Building A. The project site is located on the east side of Burnett Road in the City of Yelm. Vehicular access occurs at one driveway on Burnett Road. Build-out of Phase 2 is expected to be completed in 2008. A project site vicinity map is shown in Figure 1, and an updated site plan is shown in Figure 2. Existing Traffic Volumes Existing weekday PM peak hour traffic volumes, which were provided by the City, were collected in September 2006 at the following 6 study intersections between the 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. peak period: 1. SR 510 (Yelm Avenue) / Burnett Road 2. SR 510 (Yelm Avenue) /Mountain View Road 3. SR 510 (Yelm Avenue) / Killion Road 4. SR 510 (Yelm Avenue) / Cullens Street 5. SR 510 (Yelm Avenue) / Longmire Street 6. SR 510-SR 507 (Yelm Avenue) / SR 507 (1St Street SE) Figure 3 illustrates the 2006 existing PM peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections. Existing count sheets are provided in Appendix A. Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) Transportation Engineering North~/est January 31, 2007 Page 2 88th Ave ae b Prairie Vista Loop 3 Project m Site ' .~ a 0 a o ~ F 'a ~P,~ ~, ~ J ~GP a U V ~4 [.~` . ~Dd`P~ p{.~ .. ~d ~4 2t~ Berry Valley Rd ,~a~ l,y4, ~` ~y d~~ ~~ A_ ~C+b 1SL . / / ~ Lvngniire 5[ s'~~,~~L`4 ~ ~GF 5fl7~'yq GP /'~ S ~St ` / x ' 5a7. - (Nor to Scare] Burnett Transportation Figure ~ Ca1l~mer~ial Park Engineering Yelm, WA Northwest, r_LC Project Site Vicinity Upd3ie~f T~,~F9c Imp3Ct Andly;ES Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) Transportation Engineering North~/est January 31, 2007 Page 3 Mini 5[orage is all built, some [50°f°j occupied. Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) Transportation Engineering North~/est January 31, 2007 Page 4 (NOf to Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) Transportation Fi u re 3 Burnett g Ca1l~mereial Park Engineering ~ppb Existing PM Peak Hour re~~», wA Northwest, r_LC Traffic Volumes Up[1aip~f T~aF9c Im Vacs AnJl pis Transportation Engineering North~/est January 31, 2007 Page 5 Existing Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Level of service (LOS) serves as an indicator of the quality of traffic flow and degree of congestion at an intersection or roadway segment. It is a measure of vehicle operating speed, travel time, travel delays, and driving comfort. Level of service is generally described by a letter scale from A to F. LOS A represents free-flow conditions, i.e. motorists experience little or no delays, and LOS F represents forced-flow conditions. Intersection LOS were calculated using the methodology and procedures outlined in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board using the Synchro software program. Existing weekday PM peak hour LOS analysis results for the study intersection are summarized in Table 1. Table 1. Burnett Commercial Park Phase 2 Existing PM Peak Hour LOS Summary Study Intersection Movement LOST elay2 /C3 Unsignalized: 1. SR 510 (Yelm Ave) / Burnett Rd Eastbound Left A 1 0.02 Southbound D 27 0.18 2. SR 510 (Yelm Ave) /Mountain View Rd Eastbound Left A 1 0.01 Southbound E 42 0.22 3. SR 510 (Yelm Ave) / Killion Rd Eastbound Left A 1 0.00 Westbound Left A 1 0.03 Northbound C 19 0.04 Southbound F 65 0.25 4. SR 510 (Yelm Ave) / Cullens St Eastbound Left A 9 0.09 Westbound Left B 10 0.01 Northbound F 70 0.18 Southbound F 73 0.69 5. SR 510 (Yelm Ave) / Longmire St Eastbound Left A 1 0.01 Westbound Left A 1 0.03 Northbound E 47 0.33 Southbound E 30 0.19 Signalized 4: 6. SR 510-SR 507 (Yelm Ave) / SR 507 (lgt St SE) D 39 0.83 1. LOS analyses are based on methodologies established in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. 2. Delay =average control delay per vehicle. 3. V/C represents the ratio of traffic volume to capacity. 4. All signals were assumed to be actuated; splits were optimized. As shown in Table 1, most of the side-street approaches at the study intersections on Yelm Avenue currently operate in the LOS D to LOS F range during the PM peak hour. The detailed intersection LOS results are provided in Appendix B. Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) Transportation Engineering North~/est January 31, 2007 Page 6 Project Impact Analysis Trip Generation The trip generation for the proposed Phase 2 development, as shown in Table 2, was estimated based on trip generation rates provided by the City of Yelm for Administrative Office and Miscellaneous Retail uses. Phase 2 is estimated to generate about 364 total trips per day, with 162 (45%) of these trips being pass-by/diverted trips that would only occur at the site driveway and on Burnett Road at the intersection with SR 510 (Yelm Avenue). The remaining 202 daily trips would be new trips to the area road network. About 52 total trips would be generated during the weekday PM peak hour, which would consist of 19 pass-by/diverted trips and 33 net new trips. Table 2. Burnett Commercial Park Phase 2 Trip Generation Summary PM Peak Hour Daily Land Use Size Ratel Total In Out Ratel Trips Administrative Office Total Trips 4,450 GFA 4.09 18 3 15 11.01 49 Less Pass-by Trips (10%) -2 -1 -1 -5 Net New Trips 16 2 14 44 Miscellaneous Retail Sales Total Trips 7,100 GFA 4.8 34 18 16 44.32 315 Less Pass-by Trips (50%) -17 -8 -9 -157 Net New Trips 17 10 7 158 Total Trips Total Trips 52 21 31 364 Less Pass-by Trips (45%) -19 -9 -10 -162 Net New Trips 33 12 21 202 1. Trip rates adopted by City of Yelm. 2. 1,000 GFA is Gross Floor Area. Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) Transportation Engineering North~/est January 31, 2007 Page 7 Trip Distribution and Assignment Using standard engineering practices and guidelines, new vehicle trips generated by the Phase 2 development were distributed and assigned to the surrounding street system based on local traffic patterns, and based on direction from City staff. As shown in Figure 4, project trips were generally distributed to the local street system as follows: • 25 percent to the northwest via Yelm Avenue (SR 510). • 75 percent to the southeast via Yelm Avenue (SR 510). Phase 2 new project trips generated in the PM peak hour were assigned to the 6 study intersections based on the travel patterns illustrated in Figure 4. Traffic Volume Impact Future traffic volumes with and without the proposed Phase 2 project were estimated for PM peak hour conditions in the year 2008. Future traffic volumes at the study intersections were developed based on existing peak hour traffic counts increased to account fora 2 percent annual background growth. In addition to the background growth rate, traffic generated by the following 10 pipeline projects were added to existing conditions to determine 2008 PM peak hour traffic volumes without the project. 1. Terra Valley Residential Development (40 PM peak hour project trips) 2. Mountain Shadow (88 PM peak hour project trips) 3. Mountain Sunrise (109 PM peak hour project trips) 4. Yelm Retail (800 PM peak hour project trips) 5. Hutch Subdivision (119 PM peak hour project trips) 6. Green Village Subdivision (54 PM peak hour project trips) 7. Cherry Meadows (185 PM peak hour project trips) 8. Willow Glen Phase 3 (56 PM peak hour project trips) 9. Tahoma Terra Phase 1 & 2 (512 PM peak hour project trips) 10. Burnett Commercial Park Phase 1 (18 PM peak hour trips) Figure 5 illustrates the total PM peak hour traffic generated by these 9 pipeline projects at the 6 study intersections. Weekday PM peak hour traffic volumes for year 2008 without the project are shown on Figure 6. Adding the project-generated PM peak hour trips (shown in Figure 4) to the future without-project traffic volumes (Figure 6), results in future with-project traffic volumes, as shown in Figure 7. The detailed future year traffic volume estimates with and without the Phase 2 project are provided in Appendix C. Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) Transportation Engineering North~/est January 31, 2007 Page 8 Transportation Figure 4 Burnett Ca1l~mereial Pa~~k Engineering PM Peak Hour Yeim, WA Northwest, r_LC Trip Distribution and Assignment Upd3ie~f T~,~F9c Impact Andlpis Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) Soa - (Nor to Scare] Transportation Engineering North~/est January 31, 2007 Page 9 (Nor to Scale) Transportation FI ure 5 Burnett ~ Ca1l~mereial Park Engineering pipeline Project PM Peak Hour re~~», wA Northwest, r_LC Traffic Volumes U11[13SPlf T~,~F9[ ImpJ(t Anyl plS Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) Transportation Engineering North~/est January 31, 2007 Page 10 (Nor to Scale) Figure 6 Burnett Transportation Calltmer~ial Park Engineering ZODB Without Project Yeim, WA Northwest, r_LC PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Uoda[esf T~aF9c Impact Analnls Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) Transportation Engineering North~/est January 31, 2007 Page 11 SR S Ip {Ye1m Aveyl 88th A ,b ~ ~ti ~ ~ ~ `j ~~~ b / ~y ,( Sf Prairie Vista Loop 3 ~F~ y Ray Project m ~ ~. Site e C f~giP .~ C a O ~ SR 5 ] D (Yelm Ave]I yo b ~f~~ yo r~~`~ ~ J3fOS ~ ~ {~ ~ ~~l~y ~' ~f`~~~ a SR 510 ~Yelm Ave~l 1p 'R Bumecc Raad cn a9 ~.. 28 44 ao~r~ P!.}~ 'n ~ ro ~~'~o a U l ps ~ ~ Yp ~ \. y X62 V SR 510 {Ye9rn Ave}I i 4'h r~'1+e {~` ~ ~ l0. ~~ ~d SR 510 {Yelm Ave}I ~pfi Gi`" ~f ~ ~l~s ~ et~0 ~ w p,~~l ~' ~bo c~~ Berry Valley Rd ,~a~ ` ~ ~b,~ a~ ~'~~ ~~~~q ~ t ,Y ~~ s r~ s8 ,~ t ~a~` ~ ~8,~ b~ SL~ Y ^T ~ 1 SR 510 {Yelm Ave)1 C~- D~~ r~ Lan mire Screec N~ A _ 2/ ~ b R~ ; n4 ' T~s~ P,gLP ~~..~~, ,F %~ ~~ r ~,~9~ GF x{17-.}q P. ~~~ 1 Q, G ~~ Ab O ~ y"~n s~ ~~ ~~ ! ' S~ ~St a[ ' 5a7. - (Nor to Scare] Transportation Figure 7 Burnett Ca1l~mereial Park Engineering 2008 With Project Yeil,i, WA Northwest, r_L~ p~ Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Up[1aSP~f T~,~F9c Impact Andlyeii Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) Transportation Engineering North~/est January 31, 2007 Page 12 Intersection LOS Impact The weekday PM peak hour intersection LOS analysis results in 2008 at the study intersections are summarized in Table 3. The table is set-up to show intersection LOS in the future without and with the proposed Phase 2 development. The detailed intersection LOS results are provided in Appendix B. Table 3. Burnett Commercial Park Phase 2 2008 PM Peak Hour LOS Summary 2008 Without-Project 2008 With-Project Intersection Movement LOS' Dela~~ V/C3 LOS Delay V/C Unsignalized: 1. SR 510 (Yelm Ave) / Burnett Rd Eastbound Left Southbound 2. SR 510 (Yelm Ave) /Mountain View Rd Eastbound Left Southbound 3. SR 510 (Yelm Ave) / Killion Rd Eastbound Left Westbound Left Northbound Southbound 4. SR 510 (Yelm Ave) / Cullens St Eastbound Left Westbound Left Northbound Southbound 5. SR 510 (Yelm Ave) / Longmire St Eastbound Left Westbound Left Northbound Southbound Signalized 4: 6. SR 510-SR 507 (Yelm Ave) / SR 507 (lgt St A 2 0.05 A 2 0.05 F 80 0.68 F 173 1.03 A 2 0.04 A 2 0.04 F >100 >1.00 F >100 >1.00 A 5 0.09 A 5 0.09 A 1 0.03 A 1 0.04 D 26 0.06 D 26 0.07 F >100 >1.00 F >100 >1.00 B 11 0.16 B 11 0.16 B 12 0.02 B 12 0.03 F > 100 0.66 F > 100 0.70 F >100 >1.00 F >100 >1.00 A 1 0.02 A 1 0.02 B 14 0.36 B 15 0.36 F >100 >1.00 F >100 >1.00 F >100 >1.00 F >100 >1.00 1.10 1.10 SE) F 105 F 106 1. LOS analyses are based on methodologies established in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. 2. Delay =average control delay per vehicle. 3. V/C is ratio of traffic volume to capacity. 4. Signals were assumed to be actuated; splits were optimized under each scenario. As shown above, side-street turns at the study intersections on Yelm Avenue are anticipated to operate at LOS F in the future during the PM peak hour with or without the proposed Phase 2 development in 2008. The signalized study intersection of Yelm Avenue at First Street is also expected to operate at LOS F with or without the project in 2008. Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) Transportation Engineering North~/est January 31, 2007 Page 13 Turn Lane Warrant Evaluation Left- and right-turn movements represent critical turning movements at unsignalized intersections, increasing the potential for intersection delay and safety issues. Therefore, an evaluation of the potential need for aleft- and right-turn lane onto SR 510 (Yelm Avenue) at its intersection with Burnett Road was conducted based upon the WSDOT Design Manual, January 2005, considering PM peak hour conditions in 2008 with the project and 10 other pipeline projects. An eastbound left-turn lane (Figure 910-8a, Left-Turn Storage Guidelines, Two-Lane, Unsignalized) is warranted based upon an approximate 4 percent left-turn with a total eastbound/westbound entering volume of approximately 1,798 vehicles during the PM peak hour. The eastbound left-turn lane should be a minimum of 100 feet (Figure 910-9a Left-Turn Storage Length, Two-Lane Unsignalized). It should be noted that the eastbound left-turn lane would be warranted with or without Phase 2 of the Burnett Commercial Park Development in 2008. Additionally, a westbound right-turn lane (Figure 910-11, Right-Turn Lane Guidelines) would be warranted at the intersection based upon aright-turn volume of 42 vehicles with 704 westbound approach volumes during the PM peak hour in 2008. The right-turn lane should be a minimum of 280 feet with a 50-foot minimum taper (Figure 910-13 Right-Turn Lane) based upon a 35 mph design speed (25 mph posted speed + 10 mph). Transportation Impact Fees The City of Yelm administers a traffic impact fee of $750 per PM peak hour trip. Based upon this trip rate, the Phase 2 traffic impact fee would be $24,750 (33 trips x $750 per trip). If you have any questions, please contact Jeff Schramm at (206) 396-8286 or schramm@tenw.com Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services • Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6"' Street S. • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 396-8286 • Fax (425) 889-TENW (8369) appendix A p p~k ~®~ ~ra~~~~ ~®s ~ y~ X006 ~~~I~ Naur ur~nn~~ 1 ' M Mack Skn jps ~~ (~'OB} 251.43p4 X1.96°97~~'~; ~,~ ~~1 ~oi~ ~~ ~~~~ ~;3Q f~lUf tq 0t30. piUf. W~cln~~ctay, S~~t~irtber 1.~; 2U~6 ~` I 2d~ w A3µµ ... ...~~» ..~1~...Q.ml ~' ~~ !?] A-c~ "Fa x`70 ~ 23 ~d6Q_) ~ 467 J 4a{? ru 1 i 2'0 ~ ,S' ~71~fs I 'P66 ~ 7Q~1 .~.~~~.µ Yeltr~ .~ ve. (~h .b90J ~i~prc~eietti F~I~II" I°tV% Valcamo - ...,~,.e..„~~~~ „„p„„„,,,„, ~~ 0.91 1.bp/o 7ktB W~ 0.~$ 2.1 °/n 4fi0 ~1;7 411!! O~IJ~IP !~ count ~'or~ioci; ~,ao r~~ tc~ e,~a r~r~l P~~k ~~~r ~ut~m~~y w it wM h4ark$kti~gs. (2pti1~5t~0340~ IApp-~o~sCF1 I~I~IE~ ~~a~o Vall~ma ~~ n,~~ ~,zp~p a~~ ~~ o,oo n:oaia o o.a~ ~:~aia z~ Itr~or~~cYEpn D,~4~ ~;~GR/a 'I t~39 {lounf~~'arla~tl: 3t~30 F~~ #q 6;~G ISM ~.~~} ply ~Q ~~v~Q: 1~~~ 'W®cl~ira~day, S~ptem#~~rr 1~, ~OQ6 ~~~~ ~~~1P l1~1r111Y1~~';~II lr Nark slta~4s: (146)'1,61r4a00 4,00 PM to x.00 ~M Ulfs~irt~sdny, ~eptaknia~r 13, ~q0~ ~~5 ~ ~~ I~.... ~.~. 10 fir ~ ~ Y~Irn At~~ ~S"~'t 6•Ip fit 641' ~' 636 ~t32 ~, ~ ~'I G ll .. rr x: 3 ~ .5 fl7~ 9~43~ '~ 4lflrl~I R ~ ~~„~.. L..° _~ ° ~'18~~ ~~~~1 ~~', ~pl~rq~Cfl I?I~I~ F1V% l/Ulum4 ~.,_,~..., ~I~ ~ 0.91 ~,3% ~~.~y77....,, w o.a1 ~,~r~f c~ez rur~ a.5o o:a°io 0 ~~ 0.70 o.opro ~~ Ir~kgrseCklon 0,9"/ 1,~% 1,~"a C~ur~t !~'erimti; 3:3a ~M to x:30 F"M leak F~aur ~unnt~t~ry R • : ~ ~~ ~Antk vka~gs (2p[f) 2(S1,p304 tall~~~ Ind N~1 ~ ~~I ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~1f'; F"M ko ~a'if3 pM~ w~~r,~~~~y, ~~n~m~~~o~ ~~, ~oo~ _ _ I i§3~ I. #0.1 ~. L~~~~ ~ P ~a~ 4~, ~I Yew ~ti He~Q 7.~ ~~~wl ~ ~o~ h ~~~ ~~ (" ®o ~ .r I ~J4lIl g93V ~ 142 II~. #~ ~ ll~~ Yelrr, ~l v~ (~k~ ~lOf _ L6~~.~ ~. ~E~f•}YQ~GiI i~f•!f~ f°IV% V{~iL111'}0 ~~ 0,9~ 2.4°/a 9~J0 VUf~ U~~7~ 1,9°70 ~i2#~ ~~ a,~~ 11 r1 % y ~~ o~,~~ ~.~~ia ~~ ~fnker~ac#Ior1 0.96 2,;3°fo w 1,60 Cpun# (~c~~loci: 3,3Q faM fn 6,3(l l'M ~~~~c ~~~r S~mr~i~~y r ® ~ Mack skagpa (208j'281 ~S1~Q0 ~:tlb. F~~ ~o ~:{Ib FPM Wadrresday, ~aptaiitber 13, 20b6 as. ~~~~: ~ ,r, ~ ~~~, ,~~~ ,~~ ~~o ' 6t32 ~ Bf32 BOG av ~ '! B ~~ ~ s 1 R9R E369 ~ R9~ I 9II . ~ 11 Yairr~ ,~ va (5~2 51 D) ~38 1 ~27 ~ *.t /~p~rt~aGh raia~ wv~io v~~c~ma ~~ ~~~6£~ ~~~~/4 ~r AinknrGpGtl~n U.U'I~ ~:ES% ~,6?£3 ~nunt C~c~rlnil; ;3;~0 f~M to 6,~0 r~M ~'e~k H~~.t~ ~ur~nr~~ar. r M;~rk:Skuyy9 (208f 26.1-0340 4;3q ~'f~ to ;5:30 ~'~I W~dt~~~c9~y, ~np~emh~r 13, 20UG ~. L.: ~ ~.._zar~ 14G 71 49 ~: ~ ~ Y~,e~lm,~v~ ~~ t5~q ~. 1~ rm~3 ~ ~" 67~ ~7A4 . "' ~ •i°ra ..137 ~9 '~ P64 I GDG. ~ I u~~.~ a~ 99 ~-- Yafrrt ,ova (SIB ~?Q) _.~..r~...,...__-.. ~C _ 1! ~7z~N~_WIIO_. _:14a~ r~ sirs...! fin. lap~ep~ct~ F~f~li» _F''-IV% Vriluma .,.,.... ~~.~,...-..~..v.~.0,9~t,,... 1,7% 76~,.~, INS 0:03 7„,l%n 70p Nth O.~JB 3,5% 39x3 £3~4 U;.ES~ 3.5~/, 13q ir~~~r~i~c~ion ~~ : o:~~ ~,abid _zfn~~ Count Faorloci; ~,301~tv1 in x:30 f~~ App~ni~t ~~~~re~tw®~, ~ A~aly~ ~~ ~00~ itir~ L®5 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Yelm Ave SRT510 & Burnefit Rd 2/1/2007 lane Configurations ~ic~n Control = k^r e ~ , i=ree Stop. _ Grade 0% 0°/n "0% .. Uolurne`,(vehlh} 20„ X66 23 < 1$ .oar 6 ~:' - - Peak flour Factor 0.94 0.94 _ 0:96 0.96 0.67 0.67 Hourlyflaw raft {vphj , 21 $15 476 . ~ 24 ' 27 9 ,. - _ , Pedestrians lane l`Nid#h ~~~); - - - Walking Speed (ftls) Percent Blockage _. Right turn flare (veh) 1~f~dian?ty~e .:' =None . Median storage veh) Upstream si~iial {fit) _ - pX, platoon unblocked vC, corifllctmg Valume: 6~0 .1345 ' 4$8 -. . vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stake 2 conf vol ' - vCu, unblocked vol 500 1345 488 tC, singfe (s) 4,1 ':.6.4 6.2 , tC, 2 stage (s) .. p0 queue free % 98 84 98 cal capacity (iiehlli) 1064 165 584. ; .. .. , ~~Iolurrm2~.`~otal .; 8~3G X500 °~36 _ _ . . Volume Left 21 0 _ 27 Volume Right'.: '° '0 '24 9 cSF~I ~ 1064 1700 201 ;Volurne,to Capacity .,. ,. O..b2 0;~9 '4;_18 Queue Length 95th {ft} 2 0 16 Control Delay (s) 05 . " 0,0 26.7 Lane LOS A - D Approach Delay {s} 0:5" `Q:0 ,, ;26.7 Approach LOS . ~ ~. j>~~,,, ; 3 ~ ~, ~~ ~u .~ , ~~ t ~,~ ~~:~:~ Ynt~ rs cfi ~ u ~,~~ x ~~z ~ ~ ~> ~ ~~~ ~ ~t~~~,~,z ~ ~ , ~, ~"lrfl '~ ~ ~ e ~ , ~ .., ~ . : . k~.., :. ~,.?:~_.~9 .. . < ,. , :~ ~_ 7 r ,~ .x.~,.- . h..,,.~.,.- ~ tu~• ,_r.,. ..~ , _ ~ ~ . ~ - .rte Average Delay 1.0 Intersection Capac~ty.utl lizatlon ij`~:~Ib/o ICU level of Ser.Vice C: , -. Analysis Period {min) 15 Burnett Commercial Park 1/26/2007 2006 existing PM Peak Synchro 6 Report Transportation E=nginoering Northwest Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Yelm Ave (SR~510) & Mountain View Road 2/1/2007 .., r- ~ ~ Configurations Lane ~' '~ '~~" Sign Control Free Flee Stop - Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume {vehlii:~ 9 9~0 557 10 17 6 `_ Peak Hour Factor 0'.91 0,91 0.88 0.88 0,82 0.82 Ho~1'ly flow rate (vptl},:; 10 1'03 633 1,1 21 7 Pedestrians bane Vllidth (ft}` Waiking Speed. {ftls} Percent `,~l ockage. Right turn flare (veh) Median ype None '' Median storage veh} ,Upstream ~)gnal eft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, c~i~fl~ctmg voiume` :044 1~;6~1 639 vC1, stage 1 conf vol . . _ . vC2, sfa~e 2 conf vol., _ .., vCu, unblocked vol 644 1691 639 tC 5in~le {s) 4`1 '' 6.4 . 6,2 tC, 2 Stage {5} _ p0 queue free % 99 79 98 cM capacity {vohlh) .: ~ 9~41 . -1'00 _-: 473 ~ ~..'. .. ... .. _ . ... .`s ^~ ~7 r k/:~,k ~t~o~3 Lt~~.xf":, y~ t ~ l.. ~~ ~i?~ L"`~f$~ ~~`~i ;T~t'.C bbay } i~,- Fi tab- ~~Y~G~f~'~S'i ~~Y_~~{~ '4 y..~ y 23 $ 3-_-~ S~+s'•}. ~~ ~. t_ ~. C ..-?fr. pe'. ~.. 4~'Y,~~ ~€~, a. n ~.a ..lv ..~' . ~ ti..>. t `4~ ( .~ S ~ ~ Z. __r~~x Y.2s 5a. ~. Volume `focal ` . 1043 644 ':28 _, Volume Left 10 0 `L1 Volume'i~ight `. `0 ~ .11 7 cS H 941 1700 126 l/olurn~ to Capacity 0:01 0.3$ fl:22 : Queue Length 95th {ft) 1 0 20 _ Control Dei~y(s} 0.3 00 - ,4~ 5 ' Lane LOS A E Approach belay (s) `` `0,3 0.0 41.E .: Approach L.OS E ~f7te~se~tion°S~mmary~X~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~, t ~ _, ~ ~ ~ < .. ~~, ` Average Delay 0.9 riters2ctipn Capacity Utili z~fiion 66.~b% ICU. Level of `Service C , Analysis Period (min) 15 [3urnett Commercial Park 1/26/2007 2006 Existing PM beak 5ynchro 6 Report Transportation Engineering Northwest Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection- Capacity Analysis 3: Yelm Ave (SR-510 ,..~. ) & Killion Rd 2/1/2007 - ~ ^ Lane Configurations ~igri Cor~troi - Frei Free ;,;.Stop '`:: Sk"op. ~~ trade 0% 0% 0% 0% Vofurne (vehlh')' :. ;,:3:. 968 '' 1 ,: 15 ;635. ' 11 :: D _. 0 '; 6s .. 1.0 :~. _. ' ~, Peak Haur Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0,91 0.91 0,91 0,50 0.50 0.50 0,75 0,75 D.75 Hourly;fl_ow r~t~.(vph}- . : '3 1r~;64 : 1 16 69~ 12 ,;' 0 0 : 12 13; . ~ 0 -- 7 . Pedestrians Lane.Wi~th (i•t} Walking Speed (ft/s) ~?ercerit;Slock.~ge .... .. Right turn flare (veh) _ Med~an'tY,pe None;: . None Median storage veh) ~U~stre~m s~gri.a! (ft<) :~ pX, platoon unblocked vC, confli~t~n~"-Volume;; 71:1. ,;165 - 18~f5 ;.;1815 ~' 1064; .1821_. 18iJ9 ~D5 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2 stage 2 conf val ?. vCu, unblocked val 711 1065 1815 1815 1064 1821 1$09 705 tC, single {s) 4.1 `4;1 7,1 6.5 .`: 6.2 _ 7,1' 65 6:2 tC, 2 Stagg {s} ;tF (s) '; 22 2.2 . 3 5 -4,0" 3.3 35; 4.0 3.3; p0 quoue free % 100 97 100 100 96 76 100 98 cM capacity (vehlh) 88$ 651 . ' ; '' S9 77 ; 273 57 7,Z . 440 1lplume`Total.`': 10.8 727 12 ,, 20" : _. Volume Left 3 16 0 13 Volurrte.Right: `1 ,.12 12 '. 7 , cSH 888 651 273 80 Voium,e to Capacity `. : 0:(30 Obi 0;04 0.2'5 . Queue Length 95th {ft) 0 2. _ 3 . _ 22 - 'Gontrol Delay {5) , ~;:1 b.7 1'8,~ 64.7 Lane LOS A A C F Approach belay (s}. ' 0:1 0.7 18.8 6'4.7 Approach LOS C F /•lverage Delay 1.2 Jntersee#ian Capacity l:3filiz~t'ion X6:6% ICIJ"Levei of Service C Analysis Period-(min} 15 Burnett Commercial Park 9/26/2007 2006 Fwxisting PM Peak Synchro 6 Report Transportation Engineering Northwest Page 3 HCM Unsignalized Infiersecfiion Capacity Analysis ~: Yelm Aye (SR~5~0) & Culiens Sfi 2/1/2007 „_ -- Lane Canfigurat~ons ~ '~ ~ ~ . "~' .:. , ~~gn Cor'ttral -" : , free " _. . . - ~ Free . _ - `- . , : Stap.~~. :. stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% ~Volume:'(vehll;)` 0 $93 17 7 `6~0 : - 21 6 ;. 0 .` 3` ~7,; 0 3 Peak Hnur Factor 0,95 0.96 0.96 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.75 _ 0.75.. 0.75 0,67 0.67 O.B7 dourly flow rite (vpti;}: $3 934 ~ $ 8 -_652 23 : '. - 8 ~ `- .. 0 : 4;;;: 40:- `:0 5`('. Pedestrians Lane..Vll~idth (.f~)' , Walking Speed (Ells) Percent l~lacka~e :. Right turn flare (veh) ,Medan type " .' _ ;;None Node . Median storage veh) [lpstream s~~rt~l (ff} ,` . . pX, platoon unblocked vC, can~Iictiri~ Volume: 6Z5 ~9~8." ~18~7 :-1796 -., 989;° 1780 1793 fib vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2 stake 2 eonf vol vCu,unblocked vol 675 948 1827 1796 939 1780 1793 664 fC smg~e (s) .: 41 4 1 - ``:" 7 1 6.5 6.2 7.1: 6:~ 6c2~ tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) `,`: 2...2 - 2,2 - 3.5. ,. : 4.0-: 33 • 3'.5' 4:.0 3;3 p0 queue free % 91 99 83 .100 99 31 100 88 cM napacii<y (vehlh} x'1:6 ;724 - . , , ~$ ~ . 72.. 3~i}.' 58; . 72 `(61~, Volume.-Total > 83 9.48 " 8 675 12 :` 40 " < ; 54 , Volume Left 83 0 8 0 8 40 0 Vol~rne Right° 0 1,$ 0. 23 4 0 54 cSH 916 1700 724 1700 67 58 461 Volume fo C.~.pac~ty : ' 0:09 _ 0;56 a;b'9 ' O:AO . .:'0.1'8 ': Q.E9 -.: . 0:12. . Queue Length 95th (ft} 7 ~ ~ 0 15 ~~ 10 Control >~elay (~) 9;3 0;0 10,0 0.0 6.9.7 1`_:52 5 13,8. . Lane LOS A E3 P P R approach ®elay (s}. „ '0,.8 0.1 09,7. 73.3: Approach LOS F F ~h d ~2 ~y{ ~c, 3 1 'I~~; St~iY~VCitj~~S)~!7 ill~a~„i -YS`s ~ u r~~ '.. sF '~ ~ 2-. fz ~ ~ 3 _i f iZ > _,t~ Average Delay 4.7 ..lnt~rs~ctior7 Capacity lJtilization 67fi'~/o I CU Leuel of Serv ice C' Analysis Period-(min) 15 E3urnett Commercial Park 1/26/2007 ?_006 Existing PM Peak Synchra 6 Report "transportation Engineering Northwest Page 4 HCM Unsignalized Intersection rapacity Analysis 5. Yelm Ave SR-51 q & ~.on mire Street 2/1/2007 'iH ~~ a'.h"s `~ S~vu !Y L-' k_~ Xa Y ~ ~~ } F J ~ ~~- P~~Y. f~s~+,) y~y5 r- G F _ _ ` . s . ~~ _ . '~ :. . . Lane Configurations Sign Cohtrol Free Free -Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Voiurne (vehlh)' `11 069 ':T$ ; `I6 ~ '662 7 . ;; 9 ~'': 0': 1$."' S' 2 . ' 1:`I`' Peak Hour i=actor 0..93 0.93.. _ .0.93 0.86 ,._ O.S6 0.86 0.68 O.~iB 0.68 0.75 0,75 0,75 aurly:~low r~lEe {v~.l~;):. 12 934 ~0 `:`19 770 8 : ' 13 0:.: ~6; 7_ 3 1, Pedestrians Line IlVdfih {ff); - Walking Speed (ftls) ~?ercerit.i~iack~ge , .., ;.. ,: ,. Righfi turn flare (veh) ~Med~an:~Ype ~tNone `. None Median storage veh) Upstream signal.{ft)~ '.~ _ _. pX, platoon unblocked vC, confllc~iC~~`=volume 7:78 ~ 954 ~ 1795 17$3.,: 944 ; 1$Q5' 128`8 77 vC1, stage 1 conf vol IiC2, stele 2 conf vol•- vCu, unblocked vol 778 954 1795 1783 944 1805 1788 774 tC, sirigl.e (s) ;` 41 4.1 _ 7,1 6 5: ; 6.2 7.7 65 6~~ tC, 2 stage {s) ~~. (s~.. 2:2 2 2. . .;', ? 3r6 4.0 : . 3:3 ` 3 ~`~ 49 3.3 p0 queue.free % 99 97 76 100 92 88 97 90 cM capaciiry.~vehlh) 843 71 T `, 56 78 `;: 3'f 5 . : ~5 ~ 7.9 ~'02 } =~ ~ ~1 ; ''~~ NB 'i '` ~`~ F"~~~'r ~~~ ` ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ 4~~~~- ~~t ~ s .f s, ~ ~ ~ k ~ '; b , ir~c~t o F ~Lane~# N °~~ , ~, x~ ~ ~~ t ~ ~ max ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x , ~y ~ ~ ~ = .. , ~ _ . ~ ~.~ .:~_ . _ , . ,. h - VoLpmeTotal }: 9.66 7.97. 40 ° 24 . . . Volume Left 12 19 13 7 Valume`Ri~ht '' 1'~ °$ 26 15 _ cSH 843 717 124 125 Volume`fio Capacity 0.01 0;03 ,'0.32 : 0:.19 _. _ Queue 1_ength 95th (ft} 1 2 32 17 Control 'D~lay (s) 0:4 0:7 `A 7 1 :.4.0.4 , Lane LOS /~ A E E Approach Delay {s) ; 0,4 0:7 4-7.1 X0,4 Approach L.OS ~ E Average Delay 2.1 lnterseckion Capacity U~Ilzai:ian 62.:0°1° ICU,Lev~I of Service B _.. Analysis Period (ruin} 15 Burnett Commercial Park 1/26/2007 2006 existing PM Pealc Synchro 6 Report Transportation engineering Northwest Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Yelm Ave SR-51.0 & 1st St SE 2/1/2007 ,~-- ~ ~ Lane Configurat~ans '~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ )deli Flow (Vplipl) 19.0:0 1!~~'0 1"900 ~1~00 ~ ,900 . ?1900 19`00, 1900" 190{) 1904 1"900 190' Lane Width 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 1?_ 11 1D 12 ~`otal Lost time.(s) ~}'0 4,0 4 0 ?!4 0 4 0 .`" : 4 0 ! 4 D, 4,0° 40 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 `art 1.d0 , 1_:00. 0$5 ,1`.00 .. :`i ~D '.1 00: : "0.89. 1.00_; 0 ~"7 Flt Protected 0.95 1,00 1,00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1 A0 0.95 1.00 Satd "Flow (prot} 1770 1863 1 X31 't752 . .1:836 :::1736 1633 1678' 1550 Flt Perm fitted 0.95. 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1,00 0,95 1,00 Satd Fiow{pei`rr~) '177,0 163 1:531 ;'1252 1`:$36 :' '. `:1736 ::1633 "~ 1678:` 155Q Volume (vph) 131 596 37 170 514 16 125 80 193 49 71 110 r .~'H~ peak-hoer faeto = 0.9`4 0,;_94 ' 0;94 = 0:93 0,93 `0 93 0 9`5 0 95 .:;. 0,~5., b 82 0 $2 0;8" ., _ Ada Flow (vph) 139 634 39 183 553 17 132 84 203 60 87 134 _ ~RTf~~ }~edue#iari (vph') ~ ~ "'0 , 0 . 0, 0 0 0 " ': 0 ~ 4 == 0'. "0 0 ,. ;;~; _ Lane Group Flow (vph) 139 , 634 39 183 ~ 570 0 132 287 0 60 221 0 Heavy Vehicles (%} 2°l~ 26/0. ~~/° s:,3% " : 3~/° 3%° ';:; 4b/° ' . ~b% ' 4%° ` ~°!~ ~b% . 4~1a Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot Prot ,Protected Phases ~ 6 S 2 7 . `: 4- 3` ~ - . Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (~} .6.`8 32,3 32 3 'f",0;5 °36.{7 : ``` 7.9 :19 9 ` 3.8 15;$ Effective Green, g (s) 7.8 33.3 33.3 11,5 37,0- ,. 8.9 20.9 4.8 16.8 r. ;actuated SIC Ratio Ob9 0:68 Qi3$ 0:13 0 43 : ° ' 0,10 '. 0 24.`: 0 ~6 0.1'9 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5A 5,0 5,0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehl~le extension (s) ? ;.30 3.0 ` 3 D . " " 3 0 3.p `' 3 0' ` 3,0 -.; ~:0 3:9 Lane Grp Cap (vph} 160 717 589 233 785 179 395 93 301 VYs Ratio Prot ' .:0:08. c0:34 c0,10 c0 31 c0,08 :c0.18 0 04' 0,1`4 v1s Ratio Perm 0.03 vlc"F~afio 0:$7 0$8 ':°9,07 0.79" ',0.73 `. 0.74 : 0.73 ``:. 0.65: b.73 .. Uniform ©elay, d1 38,8 24 8 16 8 36.3 20 5 3l 7 3D.2 40.0 32,8 Progress~onFac#or. : ., ~ :00 1:00. 1;00 3 ;00. 1 00 ' 1 00 .1,0`0. 1 Q0 1.d0. Iricremental Delay, d2 36.9 12,5 0.0 15.8 3,4 14.6 6,5 14.3 8,9 ~~eJey;{$) 74r$ 37:3 " .1'6,8 52.1 23.9 52,3 36.7 54:4 41:T Level of Service E D i3 D C D D C) D Approach Delay (s"). :; 42 7 " .'_30.8 .. .: 41 6`: 44:9 . Approach LOS D C D D Ers#er~~~flQl~ Sui[rlm~~y' ~, ` ;,: ; ~ ;. :_. , . _... 5' _ ~~ ~ ,i ~ E.~ ~ ~ ~{ ~ - ~.. _ .. _..__, _ _.. _ ..... .~... ,_.... r ::. ,_ . ~ ... ,...., . ~ ., _ .. .. . _ .,. -HCM Average Control Delay 38,8 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capac ity ratio 0:83 Actuated Cycfe Length (s) 86,5 Sum of lo st time (s) 16.0 ntersection Capacity, Uti7zatipt~ 73'.5/° ICU Level . of SecVice D` ; Analysis Period (min} 15 c Critical Lane Group Burnett Commercial Park 1/26/2007 2006 Existing PM Peak Synchro 6 i~c;pnrt Transportation Engineering Northwest Page 1 zoos ~~ho~t~Pro,~~~ ~.o HCM Unsignafized intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Yelm Ave (SR-510) & Burnett Rd 2/1/2007 ~I~ . ~• 1 ~I~ -- --- ~• ~ . - Lane Configurations ~' "~i '~ S~~n ~arttrol :;= l*r~e free '-Stop _ _ ~` _. Grade 0°10 0% 4% 1lol~m~(vehll~) .37 1057 `669 ` 33 " 26 "' 16 .? Peak Hour Factor 0,94 0.94 0.96 0,96 0.67 0,67 Fiouclyflowra€e (vph) " ; 39 11'24, "697 34 :.. 39 ; :; . 24 Pedestrians Lane ~IJd#ii (ff): _. . _ -. Walking Speed (ftls) percent ~lockac~e" .. Right turn flare (veh) Me~[ian type ,.:; 'None " ..' Median storage veh) Upstream si~r~al (ft) _ pX, platoon unblocked uC,"cor~fl,ictin~volu~ne~ " ".7.~1 x_917 ~~:'.7'i4 "~'~~' vC1, stage 1 conf vol wC2, stage 2 conf vol °' _ - . vCu, unblocked vol 731 1917 714 fC,.sin~l~; (s) "; 4:1 ` 6.4 " '` 6 2 , tC, 2 stage (s) ,,, tF Gs) 2,2 '..3.5 - 3.3 :: _ , p0 queue free °I° 95 46 95 cfvl capacity (vehlh) $73 :: > 72 , 435 Volume'Yotal 1164 "731 63 Volume Left 39 0 39 Volume might ,::: 0 : 34 2.4 cSl-I 873 1700 105 Volume to Capacity ,: O,bS Or43 0;60 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 0 72 ControC:C7elay:(~) ~5 - 0.0 80 4 ,: Lane LOS A . F Approach Delay (s) ,. '1:5 0<0 X0,4 ` - Approach LOS F ~K a ~ ~~~ r~~~t~ ) ~ ~ txS4rn~Y~• i ~ ~s ~ ~~ ~nYZ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ "~` ~~` ' ~~ ~ ' ~ ~~ e ~ _ k ~ . ~ ,~ ~ ~ , ~ ~~;~ ~ H ~~ t ~` ; ~: ry~~ ,. _~ ~,: ~w~~ ~., ._ : ~5 . ~ . ~~s~ ~._,~~ , Average geiay 3.5 ;Intersection Capacity lJti]izatian 95:5% " ICI Level of 5eruce F .. Analysis Period (min) _ . 15 t3urnett Commercial i-'ark 1/26/2007 2008 Without Project PM Peak 5ynchro 6 Report Transportation frngineering Northwest Page 1 HCM Unsignalized lnfiersection Capacity Anaiysis 2: Yelm Ave SR-510 & Mountain View Road 21112x07 Lane Configurations ~` '~ '~` v~gn Control :'' _ Free - -Free Stop. , ;: - - .:._ , _. _ Grade, 0% 0% 0% Volume;(vehal:) " ' 24 '1231 775 , 51 ~~ ;' . 42 16. , : - -' Peak Hoaar Factor 0,91 0,91 0.88 0,88 0.82 0,82 Ho~riy.fiow r~Ee (vpkl);;' 26 1353 .. _ 88`1 58 51 20 : . :. ,: : Pedestrians _ .. . Line Vti!(dth (fit}: -.. Walking Speed (ftls) F?ercent•'l~lock~ge ~ _.. Right turn #lare (veh) ,Median:fype "~ ~~ _ __ LVone ;~ Median storage veh) Upstret3m s.i~nal (ft) . pX, platoon unblocked ~C, corrflictin,g volume= ,939 ..,23.15 910 vC1, stage 1 conf val uC2, stake 2 con# vo! vCu, unblocked vol 939 2315 910 fC, s,n~le (s) ` 41 6.4 ` 6.2 '; - tC, 2 stage (s) . p0 queue free % 96 0 94 qM capacity (v'eh/h) : ,, 730. ~0 . '330 Volume Total : `': '1:379 939 71 ,: Volume Left 26 0 . 51 Volume Right .. 0 58 20 cSl-~I 730 1700 52 Volume fo Capacity x;04 0`;55 1;35 ~ , . Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 161. Control D~I~y`(s) 1:g 0.0 373,6 Lane LOS A F .. ,: l~pproach Oeiay (s} 1.9 0:0 ` 373.6 Approach LOS F Average Qelay 12.?_ Intersection Capacity U~llzation ` : 94.Q%~ ICU Level of Service Analysis I'eriad (min) 15 . Burnett Commercial Park 11?_612007 2008 Without Project PM Peak Synchro 6 Report Transportation Engineering Northwest Page 2_ HCM Unsignalized intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Ye1m Ave SR-510 & Killion Rd 2/1/2007 3 ~~~~ t € a~~~-~l~ ~ r~~~i4~ ~~ ~ Hx:: t . E'~.~;,~$ - _ ' 5..,,.r a _ 27~ ~ ~ ~~~', rh .4~ ~4,._; n.: lane Configurations Mgrs Control ' ' Free free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volurne:(vehlt~;) 'S;4 1230 1 " 16 "867.. ~8 0 -` b': 6. - 39 '0 °3 . Peak l-lour Factor 0,91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.50 0,50 0.5U 0.75 0.75 0,75 hlou~ly ~lvw rate"(vph),:. 59 " 1352 ,. 1 1 S 958, `. 64 0 0: ~ 2 52. 0 48 Pedestrians Lane W doh {ft):: Walking Speed (ftls) _ Pergent: t8lockage might turn flare (veh} ,IVledian. ype _ - ;; `, _ `;:None ;' `: N~r~e Median storage veh) .Upstream si~iai (ft} ,' pX, platoon unblocked vC, con~hctmg wolu~ie` 10'l`6 , 1..353 - ' ='253J". ;' 2523 '.. 1352 : 2503 29`1 985 vC1, stage 1 conf vol VC2, sfa~e 2 canf vol ' _ ` , :: `: vCu,unblocked vol 1016 1353 2539 2523 1352 2503 2491 985 ~C, single (s) ,: 4.1 4.1 . , : 7.1 6 5 - "6,2 7:1 65 6.:2~ tC, 2 stage {s) fiF (s) .` 22 ' 2.2 ~. , ~.5 . 4.0 :. 3.3 , 35 4D 3,3 p0 queue free % . 91 97 100 100 94 0 100 84 cM capacEty {vehlh) 682 `50'5 ~ 14 :` 25 ' 18:5 = 17 ~6 .30~A Volume Total " - 1:412 '1034. '- 12 100...'- _.. Vglume Left 59 18 0 52 Voiume'I~Igl# 1 64. ;12 48 cSl~l 682 505 185 31 Volume,to Capac.tty 0',09 b:03 0:06 3 26-. Queue length 96th (ft} 7 3 6 Err Contral,~elay`(s) 4.8 1.3 25 8 Err Lane LOS A A D F Rpproaeh Delay (s} .: 4:$ , 1 3 2`5.8 Err Approach IOS D F I~' _ ,[y) y(~~.j`l~-{ ~{~k -. _. -,` ~p -K ~ '}~_~ `i{ ,~.` ~ -' bT 'n 2~~ S", 3~`3 ) L V- r '' _~:~~~T ~ k x 31sk2i :A ~1 ! > 1.~~~fC~ ~~~.V U~f+E C~TyP~t .. ~k..~ii ?s. cr: \,~~ Z..ti:s r`Ef`.~ M F'. i.A [-~~~~h"~>'t~.-.. ~ i.5: _ ~_ ~~~ Average Delay 394.2 lnt~rsection.Capacity Utilization 1 12:0% ICU Level' of Service: f'"1. Analysis Period (min) 15 ~3urnett Commercial Park 1/26/2007 2008 Without Projeot PM Peak Synchro 6 Report Transportation Engineering Northwest Page 3 HCM Unsignaiized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: Yelm Ave SR-510 & Cullens St 2/1/2007 -~ ~- ~ ~ Lane Configurations ~ "~ ~ "~ '~ "~ 5i~n Control ," ; Free ~ Free. - stop'" Stop' . Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% U.oluFne;;{ve~1~) 10.4 9:'f:~3 ',18 .`'13 _ . ..:::864 . ,"`: 57; `"~ " 6 0:. 10' .. '.'S0 0 49 Peak Harar Factor- 0.96 0.96 . _ 0.96 0.92 _- 0,92 0.92 0,75 0.75 0,75 0.67 0.67 0.67 Hourly fio~nr rate (veh):` 1.08 1211 " 19 1.4 989 62 :: 8 4 ,. 13,° :75 ;;-0 73 Pedestrians Lang I'IV dth{ff); - Walking Speed (ftls) Percent: ~locka~e . . Right turn flare (veh) Niedian :type - - :None `. Norm Median storage veh) Upstream signal {fit) "" pX, platoon unblocked vC, corfhctirtg Volume;: 1001 'f230 °; 2478: 2467,: . 1221`" 2440 244:5 ~ 970 vC1, stage 1 conf voi vC2;"stake 2 conf vni `' - vCu, unblocked vol 1001 1230 2478 2467 1221 2440 2445 970 t~C, smile (s) ;` 4(1. ''41 " 7.1 6.5;' 6.2. 7:1' 65 6~. tC, 2 stage (s) fF (~} 22 ,,2,2 3.5 "' 4 0 3.3 ' 35 , 40 3`.; p0 queue free % 84 98 40 100 94 0 100 76 cM capacii:y (Vehlh,) :;: 692 566 13 " 25 2'f 9 . '[ 7 2~6 36~' Volume Left 108 0 14 0 8 75 0 Volume Right t7 19 0 62 13 - 0 ; :: 73 :;: cSH 692 1700 566 1700 32 17 307 Volume,.to Capacity .' 0"1`6 0;72 0;x}2 -:0:59 - 0.66 -, 4,27 0.24 :. Queue Leitigth 95th (ft) 14 0 2 0 56 Err 7_3 ~Gontrol Delay (s} ., 11 °:2 Q:0 17.5 0.0 2~i3.3 Err 20,3 Lane LOS ~ Q F F C /~ppraach Delay (s) 99 ~ . ,0.2 _ 23$.3.:500.1 , Approach LOS ~ ~ Iri(ersett{lQr~ Samrt~a~y° f , - ~ ~ - Average Delay 298.9 [ntersection Capacafy Uti lization 82.1 %° ; ICU Level of S~tvice Analysis Period (min) 15 Burnett Commercial Park 11?_612007 2008 Without Project i~M Peak Synchro 6 Report '1"ransportation Engineering Northwest Page 4 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5. Yelm Ave SR-510 & Lon mire Street 2/1/2007 Lane Configurations Sign Control . " . ~r~e - `"-Free ;.: ° Stop = stop - , Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% 1[olurne{yehlh) 11 1`Q86 1:01 '`167 -`884 '' 10 `.' 95 ' " 0 177 `' 8! ?~ .: `11` Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0,93 0.93 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.75 0.75 0.75 }-iourly flow r~t~ {ypti}', 12 . 116$ 109 194 ' X028 :: 12 : 140'`- d 264_-' 11.° 3 1'~, Pedestrians Lane VSI.i~.th (ft} . Walking Speed (ftls) Percent.: ~iock~~e Right turn flare {veh) :Median `type None"- Norte Median storage veh) Upstream sig~~l {ft) ;,' - pX, platoon unblocked 'vC; cori~lic#mgvolume 1040 1`276: ' 26$4 2674 • 1222 2928'' 2722 -1034; vC1, stage 1 conf vol . vC2, sta;~e 2 conf voi ' _ vCu, unblocked voi 1040 1276 2684 2674 1222 2928 2722 1034 ;tC, s~n~le {s} ` , 4,1 •:4,1 " 7.1: 6.5 < 62 ; 7:1 6,5 6 tC, 2 stage {s} f~"(s) ;; 22- ;2,2 3,5 `-, : 4.0-' 3.3,' 3;5 4.0 3: p0 queue free % 98 _. 64 0 100 0 0 80 95 cM capacity {~ehlh) '` .673 541 $ 14 : 217 (~ X13 285 ,. Voiume Totai.,';' 1288 ,9:2.34 :400 28 Volume Left _ 12 194 140 11 Volume;l~i,~ht`; 1Q9 ':12 `,260 ,..;15." _ . cSH 673 541 22 0 Volume o.C~pacity O.Q2 . 0.36 " 1~8'3rj Err Queue Length 95th {ft) 1 41 err E;rr Control Delay Vie) 0,$. ' 14.4 Err Err _ Lane LOS A Q F F Rpproach Delay (s) 0,8 14.4 ''lrr I*rr - Approach LOS. F F .. ,Inter~a~fiott SG:t~rr7a y' T S - - - - --- Average Delay Err ~ntersectjOn Capacity Util~zatic~n 1.50'.6%.. ICU-Level of ~;~rvice F-k Analysis Period (min) 15 Burnett Commercial Park 1/26/2007 2008 Without Project I'M Peak Synchro 6 Report Transportation Engineering Northwest F~age 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6; Yelm Ave SR~5~0 & Est St SE 2/1/2007 ~" ~ '~ ~ Lane Configurations '~ ~ ~" ~ "~ ~ '~ ~y '~ ,Ideal Floyv {vphpl) - 1:9(1:0 1900. 1;OQ0 . 1900 =x'900= :'1900 ::19 00 . :;' 1 900 °: 19b0~: 190b 190 19( ,. Lane Width 12 12 11 12 12 . 1? 12 _ . 12 12 11 10 12 ~'otai Lost t1me (s) 4;0 4 0 4 0 :4 0. 4 0 :; ::: 4 0:.: 4.0 ;" "4.b` 4~0 Lane Utii. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 •{)0 1.00 1.Q0 1 AO 1.00 -1.00 'art 1.QO 1=0a 0~5 '1.00 .:0 9~ ` . : ':1.00 ; 0 90.?: . :' 1 fib: b90 , .. :' ', Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1,00 . 0.95 . 1.00 ... 0.95 1.00 Said. Ffow.~prq~) - _ 1770 . -1:863 -'(531 17'52 _1_`82'5 `1736 ` 1640 1678:- 1532 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd "Flow {perm) 177p 1$63 1:531 ' ,x`752 :1`$,25" `;173`0- < 1010-;: 167s 1532 Volume (vph) 244 838 . 58 212 782 61 162 111 239 92 91 192 ~F'eak hour fiactor, i~Fi1" - 0;9;4 0:94, 0:94 0.93. 0 93 ` 0 93 '0.95 :0 95 `, 0,95; 0 82 0 "82 0 82 _. Ad~ Flnw (vph) 260 89 1 62 228 841 G6 171 117. 252 112 111 234 RTORa~eduction {ypi~) =0 . 0 0 '` 0 0 ' 0 . ';. "0 0:'- _ 0: 0 ;0 " 0 Lane Group Flow {vpiij 280 891 62 228 _ 907 0 -171 369 0 112 345 0 Heavy V~hlal~s" (~Iq} ": ~-blo ~% , 2~/o, 36%Q ~ . ~> 3b/~ -;:- 3% °' ~blo ~~/.o .' 4°/v+:; ... 4~/0? 4% 4b/s Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot Prat ~?rotecfed Phases 1 -:6 5 `" 2 - ? ': 4 ~ 3. 8 Permitted Phases 6 Acfuated Greeri, G (s) 16:0 b0A G~ 0 ,~5 0 :59.0 10 0 '• : 27 0 ' 8:b: 25;:0 effective Green, g (s) 17.0 61.0 61.0 16.0 60.0 11.0 2$.0 9.0 26.0 Actuated ~~C ratio `` 0::93 0:;47 0:47 °0:12 :,0 46 : ~;0.0$, 0.22 :: 0 d7 0.20 Clearance Time {s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5A 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle FxteCslon (s):_` :3.0 . 3.0 3 0 `;:3.b `.3.0 ,: 3 0 ' ;: .3,0: - 3.,0 30 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 231 874 718 216 842 147 353 116 -306 vls aa'io Prat..;:' c0.'1:5 Q:48 ;4:13 c0 54 e0 10 . 0.23 ' 0:07: c0 23 _ vls Ratio Parm 0.04 vlc Ratio 1'1:3 1_:,02 b:09 ~ 7:b`6 1.08: ,' =1.16 1.05 ; , : 0 9T 1.1:3 Uniform Delay, d1 56.5 34,5 19.1 57.0 35.0- 59.5 51.0 60.3 52.0 I?rogrossipn factor 1:00 1:Q4 ::1.00: 1..00 .: ,1.00 _ - 1.0'"0' . 1 0'0 - 1 00; 1 ia0 Incremental C~elay, d2 97.1 35.4 0.1 76,6 53.9 124.8 60.2 72,1 90.4 belay (s) '; 153.6 <69.9 1$"1 1:33.5 88.9 - 184.3.'' '111.2_ 132: X42;4 Level of Service F E B F F F F F F 'Approach ©elay (s) : $5.3 - : '. ;':97.9 ' 134.4 ' ~ 39;9 Approach LOS F F F F ~ ser~fEC~~ ~u~m r: = ; ~ : ,, ' ~ ~ • ` a.3~r~_ ~~ ,~~ ~~~~_ ~ ~.s.~~~.`.~ ~ ~ _ t ~ : t~v > ~~~ ~ w_~~ ~~,_„.} c _ ~ .~ ~ HCM Average Control Delay 105.0 N CM Lev el of Service F HCM Volume to C~paciiy rafo '1:10: Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 S um of lo st time (s} 16.0 lnterSeciion Capacity;Utfl. lzaiion 97.3/0 .; ICU Leve l of Seriiice F - Analysis Period {min) 15 c Cr•ifical;Lane Group Burnett Commercial Park 1/26/2007 2008 Without Project PM Peak Synchrn 6 Report Transportation Fr~gineering fVorthwest Page 1 2008 With-Project LOS HCM Unsignalized Intersection Ce~acity Analysis 1. Yelm Ave (SR-510 & Burnett Rd 211I2oo7 _-- _..-. ___ -__-.~ - ~II~PI~Ip 1 I F ~~ T Lane Canfigurakions ~` '~'~ Sir! ~ontroi ..: -- _. ' Pree ~"ree Stop=. '. Grade o°i° o°i° a°i° Volume: (~ehlf%),. -42 ~'0~5 : . 6~2 `' 49 ° 44 ': 2$ ? _ ,. Peak F-jour Factor 0.94 0,94 0.96 0,96 0.67 0.67 Hourly"flow rate {yph}I' X45 "=11`22. 690. 51 66 42 Pedestrians _ bane Width ~ftj _ IlValking Speed {ftls) ~erCent-Blockage , , . : Right turn-flare (veh} ,Median -type `. done Median storage veh) Upstream signal eft) _ pX, platoon unblocked vG, carfiicting volume;: 741. 'f 927 ' 715 " vC1, stage 1 conf vol _ " vC2, stake 2 conf vol': - vCu, unblocked vol 741 1927 715 ~C, sjn~fe (s) :.: 4-:.1 '6.~ 6,2 tC, 2 stage. (s} _. : ,: p0 queue free % 95 7 . .. 90 cM capacity (ve.hlh) ' ,; 866 '- 70. -'.434 :' - Volume:.-fotal~",;' .. 1167 ~ '.741 .. .:107 - , Volume Left 45 . 0 66 Volurrie.I~~gha -0 51 42 cS H 366 1700 104 Voiurn~'to Capaaty 0.05. 0;.,44 ' 1,03 , , Queue Length 95#h (ft) 4 . 0 164 Control Delay(s) 1.7 0,0 17:3,4 , Lane LOS A F Rpproaeh C3elay {s} . 17 0.0 173.4 ,: Approach LOS P . _ 7:ht~f~e~~Pr~a~rnmary_ ;wa ~ ~ i -~,,, ~ ar ~~, }~~ z~.'•~ sK..x,.- ?~. ...4s x:x ~ti;;-s .,~a5'- ~ .a_~..l.. :<4 ~. .vx- .. ~+, ~t .si Average lOelay 10.?_ Intersecti.on.Capacity Ut _ ilj.zatiipn ~00.~'~/° 7GU:Le~eLof Servica G _ ,.: Analysis Pariad (min) 15 Burnett Cammercial Park 112612.00'7 2003 With I~roject PM Peal< Synchro 6 Report Transportation ~:nginaering Northwest Page 1 HCM Unsignaiized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Ye1m Ave (SR-510) & Mountain View Road 2/1/2007 Lane Configurations ~" "~ ~' SigrE Control - Froe Free `atop . ' - Grade 0% Q% 0% Velurne(vehlh) ~24 1.247 "784 51 42 16 .. . _ . Peak Hour Factor 0.91 -0.91 0.88 Q.88 0.82 0,82 F-1ou~ly flow rafe (vpYi}' ~ 2'S 1370 "891 58 S1 _; 20 . _ . !'edestrians L~rle V~ldl;h .eft}; - Walking Speed (ftls) k?ercert#~E~locka~e - _ Right turn-flare (veh) I~lediar'tYpe ~ alone" . - Median storage veh) Upstrearp sl~ria4 (fk} ;' - pX, platoon unblocked vC coriflicti,n~ volume. 9~9 . '_23'43 , 920 " __~ vC1, stage 1 confvol _ vC2, stake 2 cnnf poi : _ vCu, unblocked vol 949 2343 920 fC, s~n~le (s) '` 4•:1 6,4 : : 6 2 tC, 2 stage. {s) , _ .. , _. . - p0 queue free % 96 0 . . 94 cM capacity (vehlh) 724 ; : „.: ;`` 38 32~ _. Votume.Total 1'.397. X49 71 , Volume Left 26 0 51 lV~[urn~Right _:.°. ~ :~0 ~ ~~ ;~.2a cSH 724 1700 50 Volume. to Capacity b.04 O:~F 1"41 Queue Length 95th (ft} 3 0 105 Gontral Dela.y`(s) 21 0.0 401 3 . : - Lane -LOS A _ _ F Approach C?alay (s) < ` 2.`1 p.0 401.3 - Approach LOS. F Average Delay Ir~tersecti~ri..Capacii:y;lJtllizatioh Analysis C'eriod (min) 12.9 94;9% I~GIJ LaVel of S~ru'i'ce ~~ F Burnett Commercial Park 1/26/2007 2008 with Project PM Freak Synchro 6 Report Transportation Engineering Northwest Rage 2 ~ ~- HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3; Yelm Ave SR~510 & Killion Rd 211!2007 Lane Configurations a ~~~ri Control, Free °Froe " •? Stop =; . Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0°1° Vol~ene' (vekil}) 54 126 1 ;° 16 ~ 876 58 ~ . 0. _; Q ~;;. ... .39` 0 _3 Peak Hour Foctor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.75 0.75 0,75 Hourly,~low rate (vph).; 59. 13'69 1 18 .963 ° : 64 . ; - ~. - . 0 1,2 52 0 4$', Pedestrians Lane"Width (f{) .~ - - Walking Speed (ftls) ~'ercert°Blgcka~e ~ _ _ __. Right turn flare (veh) ;[Vjedian`type _ `None Norie Median storage veh) Upstream slgrial {ft} ::.. pX, platoon unblocked UC, cor~~l~otin~:yolum~- 1026 X370 ~ :2566 '2550 : 1370:_: . 2530 251.9 ,995% vC1, stage 1 conf voi vC2,stage 2 conf vof:: - . , ,. vCu, unblocked vol 1026 1370 2566 2550 1370 2530 2519 995 fC, single (s} '' Q1 41 :" 7.1 ;: 6:5.. 62 7:1; 65 6, tC, 2 stage {~) _ ~F {s) ;. ,. 2,`2 ? 2 3.5. - . 4 b= `: , 3:3 3 :5. ,: " '40 33 p0 queue free % 91 96 , . 100 10a 93 0 100 84 clVl capacity (vehlh} 677 , 498 14 -:: 24- .` 151' 16: 25 `30:0 Vol~ani.e:Total 1 Q~30 1:044 12 -100 Vnlume Left 59 18 0 _ 52 Volume:I~iO~t'.' 1 `64 12 `48 cSH 677 498 181 29 Volume o Capacity O;b`9 0:04 0,07 3.42 Queue Length 95th (ft) 7 3 5 l=rr Control Delay {s) 5;1 1:3 2i? 3 `:Err' Lane- LOS A A l~ l= Appro~eh delay (s} X5::1 1.3 26 3 i=rr .', Approach LOS ® F Average [~eiay 390.2 Irlt~rsection Capackty Utfli,zatian ...:':` 112:9% IG.IJ. Level of Service H.'. Analysis Period (min} 15 E~urnett Commercial Park 1/26/2007 2008 With Project f'M Peai< Synchro 6 Report l~~ransportatinn Engini;cring Northwest Page 3 HCM Unsignalized intersection Capacity Analysis 4: Yelm Ave (SR~514) & Cuilens St 2/1/2007 Lane Configurations '~ '~ '~ ~ '~ "'~ Slgr~ Control Free FPee - ~ stop ' _ Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0°1° _ Volume:{Vehlh;}° ~ 0;5 1:'1:78 ;1$ ' .` 13 -`$72 .:" 57 - . 5 " `': 0':` .. 10 5~` ~ ~R Peak Hour Factor 0.901 ...0,96 0,96 0,92 0,92 0;92 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.67 0.67 0.67 NouPtY flow Piste {Vph}`. 'lO9 1227 `19 ;:14 `94$ `: fit . ;: $ 0` 1:$:; - 75'_ Q I Pedestrians Lane r1V.dth {ft} - , Walking Speed (ftls) "~'ercent 13locka,~e, Right turn flare (veh) ~/led~am'.type =' - - -None ~ _. .: None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (f{} :; _ pX, platoon unblocked v~, cortflictin~:~olut~e<= 101'0 1246 2506 2d~93_', .,,12$6„: 2466' 2472 t~`79 vC1, stage 1 conf val GC2, stage 2 conf val vCu, unblocked vol 1010 124fi 2506 2493 1236 2466 2472 979 tC, sirt~le (s).:`: 4~ - . 41 "" 7 1~. ' 6,5'; 6.2~` 7 1: 65 6:2, tC, 2 stage {s} , t~ (s} .: 22 `: 2 2 3,5 4.0: . 3.0 . 3:5 4:b 3,3~ p0 queue free % 84 97 ~ 36 100 94 Q 100 75 'cM cap~c~ty (vehlh}" 6`~6 °.559. `: 13 : : 24 . 215= 17 2'5 30 Volume::Total :: ,.. `.1 p9 . 7 246 14. ~:010: : ` 21 , ::: 75 > ' 75: Volume Left 109 0 14 0 8 75 0 Volume Might , ~ ".1:9 . 0 62 . 13 0 - ;: 75 cSH 686 1700 559 1700 30 17 304 Voiurneao Capacity ` " 0.1`~ 0::73 0;03 0;:59 0.70 4 48 0 25 : Queue Length 95th (ft) 14 0 2 0 58 Err 24 ~Goritrdf Delay {s} °11:2 00 11.6 0.0 ' 250.0 ; ` Err 2`0,7' ,. Lang LOS B ~3 F F C Reproach I~el:~y {s) 0:9 0.2 `260.0 5009.8 :' , Approach L.~S .. F E ~r~er~et~ia0,~4~,~~:I~rY~` 4 .; -,;t,'~~{ l y.~ ~ ~~.._' y. ~ :~. ~~ ~- --`-z ~ ~ °y Average Delay 296.0 Iriterseetion Capacit~:Cli:iliz~tion 82:~% ICtJ Level of Serv ice E': Analysis Period (min} 15 Burnett Commercial r~arl< 1/26/2007 2008 With Project PM Peak Synchro 6 Report Transportation Engineering Northwest Pago 4 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Yelm Aye SRT510 & L.an -mire Sfiree# 2/1/2007 Lane Configuratians ~i~n,Control~ ,' Frye - "Frye ` Stop` ` : Stop _ Grade 0°10 0% 0% 0% Volurn:e°-(veririj ,. 1~1 1100 x'42. =~67 `:8$2 '' 10-= 96 0. `. 177'.' 8 2 1.;~' Peak dour Factor 0,93 0,93 _.. 0,93 0.86 _. 0.86 0,86 0.68 0.88 0.68 0.75 0.75 0,75 I~ourly,f(ow r.~te~ (Vph}:` 9;2 1-18~ ;~10 -.194 1'Q37 12 ` ' 141 ,':. 0 ` 260 11 3 1''~, Pedestrians Lar~e:Vllidth (ff}` _ - Walking Speed (ftls) Percert'f31¢ck:~~e `: Right turn flare (veh) ,IVi~dian t~rpe `°` Norie: None Median storage veh) - _ _ U,pstrearn si~nat (ft) - _ _ _. pX, platoon unblocked vC, co~flictingvalum~' 10'9 1.292 2709 ; 2698 128:; 2953 274 '(Q43 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stake 2 conf col - ~ ~ vCu, unblocked vol 1049 1292 2709 2698 123 2953 2748 1043 tC, s~n~le (5) ~ - 4,1 . -4.1 `< 7,1 r?:a ° 6,2, 7.1` 6:5 6 tC, 2 stage (s} _ . tF(s} 2.2" '22 " 35:, 4.0 ` ` 3,3` 35 4:0 3 p0 queue free % 98 64 .. 0 100 0 0 79 95 cM capacity "(vehlh) _ 667 '`533 $ •` 13 _ ' 212`;: . 0 13 2'$1" Voiume<Totai `: , 13x4 ` ::1:243 " . 401 28 ... Volume Left 12 194 .. . .141 11 Volurime Right ~'- 1:10 'i 2 ,260 15 _ _ cSH 667 533 21 0 V.olurne to Opacity 0`:02 . - 0'~6 19;58 .'. Err _ , _ _ Queue Length 95th (ftj 1 41 err Frr _ Control.Del~Y(S) a;9 14:9. Err 'Err Lane LOS A B F F °Rpproach belay (s} : 0~ 1'4.9 Frr ~ Err Appraach LOS F .F i ~r {~ ~pter~e~tio0,~umrn~,ry ~4~" ..~:eff. 1 ' f 1 , ~' ( 4 L Z }r } Sy - " - ~~- -- - .. Average Delay Err ~ntersection Capacity Ut~ li~atlon- ``` 15~ .J% ICU Level of Service N'' Analysis period (min) 16 Burnett Commercial Park 1/26/2007 2008 With Project PM Peak Synchro 6 report Transportation Engineering Northwest Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Yelm Ave {SR-510) & 1st St SE 2/1/2007 -~ 111 III,IIwY~~ ~ ~ ~ Lane Configurations '~ ~ ~' '~ '~ ~ '~ ~j '~ fdeai Flow (Vpi~;p~) 19'b0 '19(}0 19'00 1_,:900 1900 1900 1900 '':-1900 1900"` 1900.; 190E} 19.iJ~1 bane Width 12 12 11 12_ 12 12 12 12 12 11 10 12 Fatal Lost timer(s) 40 4',0 4 0" . 4 0 r =!4 0 = 4 0 °' 4 0 ; 4 D- 4.0 - - , iWane tJtil. Factar 1,00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1,00 1.00 art 1`,00 1;;00 0:$5 ~ :00 .0.99 1 (}0 0 90 ~ •00' 0 ~~ Flt Protected 0.95 -1.00 1:00 0.95 1.00 0:95 1:00 0:9a 1.00 ~atd FIoW (prod) '1770" " 1863 " '(,~31 1:52 d$~5 1786 1640 ' 167'8_- 153:1 Flt Permitted 0.95 1:00 1:00 0:95 1.00 0,95 1.00 0:95 1,00 S.akd. Flow (perm) 1770 1$63 1`'53`1 1.752 .'1'825 ": _ .`:'1736 .-1640 :' 1678' .153;1 Volume (vph) 246 843 61 212 785 61 164 111 239 92 91 193 beak-Y~c?ur facfar, I~F(,F 0:34 - 0:34 0.,94 0:93 q 93. 0 93 ~ .~0,95 0 9'8" 0.95< " 0 82- 0 82 0 8 Adj: i=iow (vph) 262 897 65 228 844 66 173 117 252 112 111 235 RT'OR I~educ~on (VPh} 0. . - 0 0 0 " 0 -j '" 0 .0 0 , 0- 0 :a) ;:O Lane G~raup Flow (vph'} 262 . 897 65 228 910 0 173 . 369 0 112 346 0 lte~vVVeh`4cies tb/o} 2%a . 2% ~bla 3%0 `3b/p.. ; 3%0 ~~fo" 4~/0': ~~/o' ~G~I4. ~~% ~~ Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot Prnt protecfecf phases . ~ "1 - , 6 `: ~ . 2 7 ' " . 4 " . 3 ~_ $ - . Permitted Phases 6 - . . . Actuated Green,,G (s~}. 160 50.0 80.0 1';5.0 59.0 10.0 ' 2T.0 ' _. 8A 25';.0 , Effective Gre~an, g (s) 17:0 61.0 61 A- 16.0 60.0 11.0 28.0 9.0 26.0 ,... ,4ct~at_ed 3IC C~atio 0;13 0.47 .. 0:47" 0 .12 `.0 ~6 'o OS" 0 ~2 ;• 0 07 ,: p.2~0 Clearance Time (s} 5.0 5.0 5.0 _ 5;0 5.0 5.0 5:0 5.0 5.0 Veh~cl,e:Ext~nsfpn (s) ;: 30 3:0 , 3.0 3,0 , 3 0 '` ` 3.0 3 ~ .: 3,0. 3b Lane Grp Cap {vph) 231 874 718 216 842 147 353 116 .306 vIs Rang Prot; ` c015 0;48 '0.13 cq 50 `c0.10 -' 0.23 `' 0 07 c0.23 -_ , v/s f~atia Perm 0.04 Ylc Ratlo_ 1.13 1;0`3 O:b9 _ 1;06 _. 1.08 ; - 1.18 ` 1.05 `: 0":97 1.13 Urnforrn Delay, d1 56.8 34.5 19.1 57 0 35 0 59.5 51:0 60:3 52.0 Progression Factor ! 1,00 1:00 1:0~? 1'.00 1.00 '1.00 .1.00 1 00 1100"'. . Incremental Delay, d2 100.1 37:3 0.1 76.6 55.2 129.6 60.2 72:1 91:5 Delay (~) 156;6 _ 71:8 ... _ 19.2 1.33.6 90 2 1$9:1 ; ` 111.2.. 132.4 , 143;:5 . . Level of Service F E B F ~= F F F F Approach Dewy (s) <. 87;2 - . 98.9 136:1-' -. 140~Z3~ _ . Approach LOS F F F F ~r1#@rse9fiQn~S~mtn~fy::= ~ ~ ,.~:.~~ F~ ~;~ ,:>z: x ~` - ~ -~ .~,,,~~~: °~ u 1 HCM Average Control Delay 106.3 HCM Level of Service f HCM Volume to Capacity radio 1;10 _ Actuated Cycle Length {s) 130.0 hum of lost time (s) 16.0 j.rttersection Capacity l~(ifiz~tion 97.7% ICIJ Level .of Service i= Analysis Period (min) 15 c `Critical Lane Grt~up Burnett Commercial Park 112.612007 2008 With Project PM Peak 5ynchro b Repart Transportation Engineering Northwest Page 1 A1pp~ndix 2p Future Y'r Tr~fic V~I~m~ tir~n~ts \° O N ~O S0. S 00 O N Q h~- q 9r .n P 41 ~. N uJ ~! O ~. f.3 Kd. I" e ~ ~ ~ q N N N II II II m ~~ ~ ~ N I~ ~ 111 ,A~.J F- 8 ~ SO ~ ~ © ~~ ~i ~ '~ 1.. 7 ~ ~ ~7' ~ 19 :~ I~ ~. N W ~ ~i, - ~, @ ~~ ~? ~. _. 40 El UV 0 $Z ~. 0 0 0 0 ~ -0 _c _ 9L Zb 6 0 e 0 ~ 0 69 84 0 0 s :2 ~ Z4L 6E 9 ® 8 0 ~ 0 4L 89 0 L4 ~. ~~4 "o~ Z94 OS Ob 94 0 ~ 0 064 09 9 V£ w ap m yN.~a "-_.~ H^`TLo "off y In h~ '~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ n s 4 ~ fJ ~ O s e o .- o 0 a o o Y ¢ H o n o o o ~ a ~ O O o a of L o O O ~, o o A Q o a o © 0 0 O O ~.. ~: ... G L z ~ O~ ~ o _ q. SY -~ W m o o : di m W o o ~ ~ °0 W 4 4 0 ~n M N O ~ W ~ w m .~~ :: ~ q I~ r r roo4 r~G ra ° C ~ /°064 %~Z %0 _..~ 1' ~: ~ '6 o ~ h h i°o io ~ °°/a0 %0 ~cc 3_ Y ~ ~ ~ eC 3° ~ h ~ ro °ro e ,R °/a0 %0 ~g Y ~ 4 .~ 9 °/S °k9 S= r o o %0 ~{ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ aE N ~ _ n'~ ~i a° r ~ M o ~ n ~ e ~ n ~ ~ ^~ ~ ~ M~ O M .. ~ P s ~ ~ N n q fl ~ II ___: @. a ~m h ~i N~ O I ~ N ~' :.a r~ ~ OL 9Z D 0 0 ~. 0 zv 94 0 0 } .~ ~ ~ SL 09 ZY 0 fl4 H 0 0 o 0 a ..~~ ~' Q j ZC1 BE ® S 0 ~ 0 9G ee o u _~ _ ~. lfll 09 04 94 0 ~ 0 oe av s 4E N h IV~~ M V p ~ pC N ~]. tl N ~Y ~ Hi y _ ° K~ ~ ~ ~K' W ~ ~ A eQ }1 '? M y~j ~ h „l M ~ n $ N P V ~ W N _ ~ -~~: _ g ~ a w W v I~ 9Z G ~ 0 0 N 0 ~ 0 ~" gg .K. rr ~ ~°~ ~ N ~ ~ O II 99 4Z 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ :~ ~ ~ uhu~ff N N ~ r oNo O II 06 £SC 0 0 Ui 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~~ pp ~ ~ ~ N fl 04 'L"L ~ G L ~7 0 ~ 0 a , G4 Ol 0 0 _~~ 48 OL 0 0 ~ ~ 00 6E 0 0 ~ 6E Z4 0 0 .-~ ~~0 ept _ N N ~N (i N ~:2o ~pn Yv m N N a N M ~~io t~ b3 N N _...~ _.._ -.~ w N~© N __ -- a E ~~ ~ , yy n £4 Q4 0 ~ bZ fl 0 p 3 ~ ~ ~~ -~ Ip. N ~ O ~ ~ 84 L4 0 ~`~ ..._ EZ fl 0 ~. -_ 4 " 3'. ~' ~ ~ ,- ~ ~ 6L 04 0 9 0 0 ~ ~ 9} 9 0 34 Vy, ~ ~ .~ ~ SOl !Z o E4 fl£ W ~ N p r ~ £ B 0 __ 9 VZ p ( ~-p- R _ a O M. -- ~ - ~ ~°i T d ~,, ~ ~ - I`n o p p ~i p m F d ~ 1 0. m ~ ~ ~ 0 0 p ~ o ~ u ~ S T d 0! a ~i ~ d b O O rn V m ~ 0. ~ n y fl. _.._ rn ~i e` m 0 0 0 A ......_. _._ a> P __ tiy~ m' Q 2 . d N _ ~ e ~. 0 0 ~ n N IV O ._...~ n W (V ~~~' ~!i ® Q ~ V ~ c - o n n N Ci ~ ~ o t~ ~". ~ ~. ~ ~ - y e -- 0 000 0 (V c3 a ~"- ~? ~. ~ n ~ o 0 [v tV .`- M n N ~ ~ ~ ig mm m ~ _ ~ ~: ~ m ~m m ~P7 ~~ l? ..... ~mm m ~ ~' ~ mmm m ~' v L]-~ d (, <' ~ G N ~ ~ U U IL 7_ Ul H ~ V ~ ~ i z // I_ ~- U W ? 7 (0 ~ $~ m~ a w F V L a N N 0. o y~ a N ~w.^I N f1 ul R~ 0 ~ 'A ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ra ffi F~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N C I] II II y ~~~ m 00 ~ y' O :~,~ N I~ ~ lL y~y J w a 0. O F^ C~ 6 0 ~ C C N f0 ~ ~ C, ~ N ~ p ' U s v ~ ~x ~ QQ N ~ ~ b' ~ '~ ~ .. ~.~~ ~ O ~. Q. a F Q : P~ c4 W S, ~ N '~ ..~ ~ ~ ~ n N y L(~i '~~O y M a P P ,y :.. -._~ 4Z . 8 Z n ~ l.Ll 0 £Ld ~ .,,,~ ~ 84v LB BEZ ylS s l6 ~ 111 ~-.'g _a ~ OL 0 GZ l8 Z6 ~. OG 4Z Y4 - 96 lLZ . °' flLE E64 484 v9E :~~~ 'Zb 0 0 EL ((..]] W M Y Y n o ~ 'w ~ ~- ~ o o 0 0 o D 0 ~~ N .a. - r. -- ~ 0 0 B 0 o 0 0 '~ ci ~H: ` a4'~ ~ B 0 ~ w ~ o 6 04 ~ ~ .k ® n a __ n a a 0 .__ ~ye F IJn Ca V ' 0 4 N ~ o ~.'~EE. .u~ ~ M ~ Z Z ~ ~ N ~:~ '~d N ` 0 Zl Z4 e~ ~~ ' 0 L L ~ ~ ' £ L 4 Z £ N a m ~. ~ - 0 lZ . .,~. m a ~ w ~ ,. m -. 0 0 .~ r ~ o, ~ ~ ~ ~ o. ~ o g a g io is iol %sl ~ %o fool cool a ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ro is i9 roo4 io4 rs4 %44 fr ro rooo4 ~ ~~ N ~~~ O h p If 1 ~j 4 O g ~$ ~ ~ ~v'i IE ~ ~ ^N Q Xdi o._ - ~ '.-.~ ! ~ LS ~ ~ ~ [v ~ Wl- N ~E Ni ~ II r. ~ ~' ~. a o ~` II 9 O n lZ 4 GG4 ZLZ ~ ~~ 9lV 7,6 6EZ Z49 ss;; _ y 6L 0 D OL b .q Z ~ 0 ~ l0 ~ Sol n ZV ,_ OG B ,_ . '~~ lZ ll 56 OGZ `~- 9LE ZBL Z9l l0E ~- r Z4 0 0 ZY . pmt pp W y., ( E4 ' . ~ Oi w - '. d ~ V . .. A O O _ .,F %~ ] p M ~ IGr c~' n ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~i ~i ~i Vti n C N ~ ~ a` ~~ o n n r, u ~ a E e o ~ II94 o vvz ~ ~ ' : '4 .~ oa4 4h E£ Ea c G4 ~ Ez ~~ a ~ ~ ~ L ~z o o az ~ Ll ~ oz ~ E 0 90 ZEZ ~ 9E4 9/ ZE Z1 ~ ~ Lb 0 0 L6 -. PW~ ' ON~ .~ PPP 00 ~ •~ ~ ~ ~' n n .'~. C' `~ ~ ^ ~ ro ~-~ ~ p n ~ ~ v Y ~ ~. ~ n n ~' e 6l 4 6l GZ ~ z Eo o ~~ ~ {_ZZ SV lc ~ EBl oo 96E y ~ g. o w" ~~ EV £V vz ~ Ev --.~ 4l lV 6 9£ ~ OEZ Oll 5Zl OLZ ~. YZ 4Z h ". y ~ c ~ ~ r4 ~ m _ N ~ p W Q i < p ~ O O ~ g I i1 pp ~ ~ W l0 ~ 0 0 0 0 61 o a ~ ~ ~ u" t~1 ~~ N ~ 01 ~ 6l 0 0 o n m ri o ~ ~ ~i __ ~~ 4,. ~({ Q ~ U p] V O .. ... N ~~-.~ Q} ~ ('I ~ PN V] V P Q ~{ f~` A p ~C ~ ~ .Y ~ d. ~~9v ~ " ~+. F' N L d ~ p V pq IL ~ Z N ~ m ~,, ~~~sss''' .h~ y L 6. 2 ~ U 111 ~ Z N F- . .~ ,$q~' ~ {V}~~ U '~."- y L ~ 2 ~p U E11 ~ Z Vl F' N U o ~ ~~