2021.0330.PR0010 City of Yelm DNS 20160343DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE
Proponent: City of Yelm Public Works Department
Description of Proposal: Adoption of the Sewer Facilities Plan
Location of the Proposal: The Wastewater Reclamation Facility is located at 931 N.P.
Road. Wastewater collection infrastructure is located
throughout the corporate city limits of Yelm and its Urban
Growth Area.
Section/Township/Range: Section 19, Township 17 North Range 2 East, W.M.
Threshold Determination: The City of Yelm as lead agency for this action has determined
that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse
impact on the environment. Therefore, an environmental
impact statement (EIS) will not be required under RCW
43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a
completed environmental checklist and other information on
file with the lead agency. This information is available to the
public on request.
Mitigating Measures: None
Lead agency: City of Yelm
Responsible Official: Grant Beck, Community Development Director
Date of Issue: October 14, 2016
Comment Deadline: October 28, 2016
Appeal Deadline: There is no local administrative appeal of a DNS
Grant Beck-, Community Development Director
This Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) is issued pursuant to Washington Administrative
Code 197-11-340 (2). Comments must be submitted to Grant Beck, Community Development
Department, at City of Yelm, 105 Yelm Avenue West, Yelm, WA 98597, by October 28, at 5:00
P.M. The City of Yelm will not act on this proposal prior October 28, 2016, at 5:00 P.M.
DO NOT PUBLISH BELOW THIS LINE
Published: Nisqually Valley News, Friday, March 21, 2016
Posted in public areas: Tuesday, March 14, 2016
Copies to: All agencies/citizens on SEPA mailing list
Dept. of Ecology w/checklist
L
WA9 FIi Fi FiTOM
Instructions.
City of Yelm
Community Development
Department
ENVIRONMENTAL
CHECKLIST
Fee
Date Received
By
File No.
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires all governmental agencies to
consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. The
purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help identify impacts from your
proposal, to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal if it can be done, and to help the
City decide whether an EIS is required. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must
be prepared for any proposal with probable significant adverse impacts on
environmental quality.
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your
proposal. The City will use this checklist to determine whether the environmental
impacts of your proposal are significant and require preparation of an EIS. You must
answer each question accurately, carefully and to the best of your knowledge. Answer
the questions briefly, but give the best description you can. In most cases, you should
be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the
need for experts. If you do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your
proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions
now may avoid delays later. If the space provided is too small, feel free to attach
additional sheets.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and
landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the
city staff can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal even if you plan to do them
over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information
that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. You may be asked to
explain your answers or provide additional information for determining if there may be
significant adverse impacts.
Nonproject Proposals Only:
Complete both the checklist (even though many questions may be answered "does not
apply") and the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions (part D). For nonproject
actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property
or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area,"
respectively.
105 Yelm Ave W (360) 458-3835
Yelm, WA 98597 (360) 458-3144 FAX
www.ci.yelm.wa.us
a
CITY OF YELM
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if any:
Sewer Facilities Plan
2. Name of applicant:
City of Yelm
3
G
5
X
7
E-1
CITY USE ONLY
FEE: $150.00
DATE RECD
BY:
FILE NO.
Address, phone number and email address of applicant and of any other contact person:
Ryan Johnstone, P.E.
Public Works Director
901 Rhoton Road
Yelm, WA 98597
Phone: 360-458-8499
Fax: 360-458-8417
Email: ryanj@ci.yelm.wa.us
Date checklist prepared:
April 19, 2016
Agency requesting checklist:
City of Yelm
Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
A specific objective of this Plan is to deliver construction and operation of an upgraded
water reclamation facility in a phased and cost effective manner during the 2018-2030 time
period.
Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
Yes, the projects will be delivered in phases during the 2018-2030 time period.
List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, directly related to this proposal.
Environmental Checklist and Determination of Nonsignificance for the Thurston County
Comprehensive Plan Update as amended by Resolution number 14034 and Ordinance
number 14035, November 2007.
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 1
Project specific environmental analyses will be prepared, if necessary, for the proposed
projects identified in the Plan.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
1►Ga
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
The Washington State Departments of Ecology and Health must review and approve the
Sewer Facilities Plan. Thurston County will review the Plan for consistency with the City of
Yelm Comprehensive Plan and Joint Plan with Thurston County (2009). The Yelm City
Council must approve and adopt the Plan before the final approval of the Plan by Ecology
and Health.
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the
size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask
you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those
answers on this page.
As documented in the approved 2013 City of Yelm General Sewer Plan (Yelm GSP), the
City of Yelm (City) will review critical upgrade requirements for their existing Water
Reclamation Facility (WRF). This Sewer Facilities Plan (Plan) describes the development
and evaluation of alternatives for liquid and solid waste stream treatment upgrades at the
City's WRF. This Plan has been prepared in accordance with Washington Administrative
Code (WAC) 173-240. Completing the projects recommended in this Plan will allow the
City to provide continued reliable reclaimed water production, wastewater treatment, and
waste solids handling to the City of Yelm while protecting and preserving the surrounding
environment.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the
precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section,
township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide
the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity
map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. You need not duplicate maps or
detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.
The City of Yelm is located about 17 miles southeast of Olympia, Washington near the
eastern boundary of Thurston County. The existing WRF is located in the northeast portion
of the city, on Industrial zoned land, reached by an access road off of Northern Pacific Rd
SE. The exact address of the site is 931 N P Rd NW, Yelm, WA 98597.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one):
fla rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
The steepest slope on the site is approximately 27%.
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 2
C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel,
peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and
note any prime farmland.
The soils of Thurston County have been mapped and classified into 133 soil units by
the United States Department of Agriculture, Soils Conservation Service (SCS). The
majority of soils in the City of Yelm area are classified as either (1) Spanaway
gravelly sandy or stony loam or (2) Everett very gravelly sandy loam. The
characteristics of the soils have been grouped by the SCS as undulating and rolling,
coarse and moderately coarse textured soils underlain by loose glacial outwash
materials.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity?
If so, describe.
There are no known unstable soils in the vicinity of the proposed projects identified
in the Plan.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or
grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
Excavation, back filling, and/or grading activity could occur in association with
proposed projects. In general, the amounts of grading and filling that would be
required will be relatively modest. More specific information regarding quantities of
filling and grading will be determined during project -level design. Where native
materials are unsuitable for backfill, suitable materials will be imported from
nearby sources.
The proposed projects will comply with the applicable local, state, and federal
regulations and permits required for grading and filling activities.
Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally
describe.
Sedimentation impacts will occur during construction; erosion control will be
required and shown on construction plans and specifications.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after
project construction such as asphalt or buildings?
Proposed projects will create minimal increases in impervious surfacing.
Impervious surfaces will be approximately 23% of the site.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if
any:
Construction of proposed projects will employ Best Management Practices (BMPs)
to reduce or control potential project -specific erosion. BMPs could include
temporary erosion and control measures, surface water pollution prevention plans,
and spill prevention control and countermeasures plans. Other examples of typical
BMPs include installing filter fabric fences or hay bales, covering exposed soils,
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 3
using temporary soil covers such as mulch, diverting stormwater with temporary
berms, and using settling ponds or grass -lined swales to prevent sediment from
moving into receiving waters and storm drains. Site-specific erosion and
sedimentation control provisions will be listed on construction plans and
specifications. These projects will comply with the applicable erosion control
provisions of the local and state jurisdictions.
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust,
automobile exhaust, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when
the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate
quantities if known.
Air emissions could result from these projects during construction. New facilities to
be constructed under the proposal generally will not produce new/additional air
emissions during operation. Temporary, localized emissions of fugitive dust and
vehicle emissions could occur during construction of individual projects; however,
these emissions are not anticipated to result in any significant impact on the overall
ambient air quality in Yelm.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your
proposal? If so, generally describe.
No.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
Projects will include construction mitigation measures in order to reduce
construction emissions and will comply with the Olympic Region Clean Air Agency
(ORCAA) regulations to minimize fugitive particulate matter. Site-specific
measures to reduce construction emissions could potentially include spraying areas
of exposed soil with water for dust control, regular street cleaning, and reducing
exhaust emissions by minimizing vehicle and equipment idling. Construction
activities will comply with ORCAA's requirements for reasonable precautions to
minimize fugitive dust. Construction equipment also could include emission -control
devices on gasoline and diesel engines to reduce carbon monoxide (CO) and
particulate emissions.
3. Water
a. Surface Water
1) Is there any surface water body or wetland on or in the immediate vicinity of the
site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds)? If
yes, describe type and provide names. State what stream or river it flows into?
No.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 300 feet) the
described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
Not applicable.
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 4
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that
would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
Not applicable.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note elevation on the
site plan.
No.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters?
If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No waste materials will be directly discharged to surface waters.
b. Groundwater:
1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater?
Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
Dewatering may be required for construction of WRF upgrades. Prior to
completing these projects, additional environmental investigation, including
hydraulic modeling, would be completed to determine impacts.
2) Describe the underlying aquifer with regard to quality and quantity, sensitivity,
protection, recharge areas, etc.
Proposed projects will not impact the underlying aquifer.
3) Describe waste material that will be discharged into or onto the ground from
septic tanks or other sources, if any (such as domestic sewage; industrial
byproducts; agricultural chemicals).
Proposed projects will not directly discharge waste materials from animals, humans,
or its operational activities to groundwater.
C. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection
and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow?
Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
Construction activities could temporarily increase runoff, and associated erosion
and sedimentation could affect water quality in the short term.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
No untreated waste materials will enter ground or surface waters as a result of
properly operated sewer conveyance, treatment, and disposal facilities.
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 5
Construction activities could temporarily discharge materials, which will be
controlled with site-specific BMPs and other mitigation measures.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water
impacts, if any:
Construction activities will include measures to reduce potential surface water,
groundwater, and runoff impacts, such as BMPs and other temporary erosion
controls. Yelm will prepare required plans for stormwater pollution control and
spill prevention.
All proposed projects will be designed, constructed, and operated to meet applicable
local, state, and federal regulatory requirements to protect water resources. All
Yelm projects will obtain the necessary permits and approvals concerning surface
water, groundwater, and storm water runoff. Proposed projects will comply with
applicable local storm water and drainage codes of the appropriate permitting
jurisdictions.
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
X deciduous tree: alder, maple oak aspen, other
X evergreen tree: S cedar, pine, other
X shrubs
X grasses
pasture
crops or grains
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
X other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Vegetation could be affected in association with proposed projects. Proposed
projects would occur in the immediate vicinity of the WRF, and the amounts of
vegetation to be removed or altered likely would be relatively small and localized.
Vegetation on or adjacent to projects site, where present, could be disturbed by
construction activities.
If areas of vegetation are removed or altered, vegetation will be restored following
construction.
C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
As part of the Thurston Highlands EIS effort, a comprehensive query of the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) website was conducted for documentation of
any Listed or Proposed Endangered and Threatened Species and Critical Habitat,
Candidate Species and Species of Concern occurring within a 1.5 -mile radius of the
project area. In addition, a thorough search was conducted of the National Marine
Fisheries Service, Northwest Regional Office, Office of Protected Resources web
pages. Both of these websites were accessed October 4, 2006. No Federally -listed
species or critical habitat records were found for the Thurston Highlands property.
The prevalence of low -diversity, replanted, mostly young Douglas fir forest does not
afford preferred habitat conditions for listed species that could potentially occur,
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 6
such as Northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis). Furthermore, the absence of
prairie habitat conditions within Thurston Highlands eliminates the potential for
listed plant and animal species associated with this habitat type to occur. The only
potential Federally -listed species that might occur within Thurston Highlands is an
aquatic plant, water howellia (Howellia aquatilis), that could occur within the
sphagnum bog habitat associated with the Wetland A complex.
The Draft Biological Assessment prepared for the SR 510/Yelm Loop Highway
Corridor (WSDOT, May 2007) investigated the presence of threatened and
endangered species within the same general project area as the Yelm sewer system
service area. Within the project area, it was determined that listed fish species
included Puget Sound Chinook salmon and bull trout. Designated critical habitat
for the Puget Sound Chinook salmon evolutionarily significant unit (ESU) occurs in
portions of the mainstem Nisqually River and the lowest reaches of Yelm Creek
(river mile [RM] 0.0 to 0.7). The closest designated critical habitat for the Coastal -
Puget Sound bull trout distinct population segment (DPS) is in the Nisqually River.
Puget Sound steelhead, proposed for listing as a threatened species, may also occur
in the project vicinity. There are no known listed plant species identified in the
project; however, a federal species of concern (Aster curtus, white -top aster) may
occur in the project vicinity. Bald eagles were the single wildlife species addressed in
this BA.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or
enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
Projects will be designed to minimize potential impacts on vegetation. Where
necessary to remove or alter areas of vegetation, vegetation will be restored
following construction. Areas will be restored, where possible, with plantings of
native species and other appropriate vegetation. Where appropriate, Yelm will
prepare a landscaping plan for individual projects, consistent with Yelm
development guidelines.
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site or are
known to be on or near the site:
birds: aw , heron, uck , ea I on bird
other: Passerinespecies, raptors, woodpecker, jays, crows
mammals: ee bear, el , beaver, other: Cougar
fish: bass, salmon, trout, shellfish, other:
b. List any priority, threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the
site.
Puget Sound Chinook salmon and bull trout are known to be nearby. However,
there are none located at the project site and none will be impacted.
C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
No.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 7
None, no impacts anticipated.
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, gasoline, heating oil, wood, solar etc.)
will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it
will be used for heating, manufacturing, transportation, etc.
The programs and proposed projects described in the Plan will not require any
major increase in regional long-term energy use. The Plan includes the construction
of sewer facilities which will require pumping and power. The existing electrical
infrastructure within the vicinity of the existing sewer facilities is adequate to handle
future loads.
Construction of proposed projects will require energy for construction equipment
and vehicles, which would temporarily use electricity and gasoline/diesel fuel.
Energy use during construction would be short term and would have a negligible
impact on regional energy supplies. Necessary equipment will consist of standard
construction equipment.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe.
The Plan does not involve building large, new structures or planting vegetation that
would block access to the sun for adjacent properties.
C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if
any:
Construction activities and operation of Yelm facilities will include measures to
conserve energy, such as selection of energy-efficient equipment and implementation
of energy-efficient operational practices, where applicable.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spills, of hazardous waste, that could occur
as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
No.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
Emergency services could be required to clean up spills or respond to worker
injuries during construction and, possibly, during the operation and maintenance of
completed facilities. However, operation of future infrastructure anticipated under
the Plan likely would not require special emergency services.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
Site-specific hazardous material and spill control plans have been developed to
provide a response plan in the event of a hazardous chemical spill at the existing
W RF.
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 8
A Construction Contingency Plan and a Health and Safety Plan will be required of
the contractor before work commences.
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:
traffic, equipment operation, other)?
Projects planned for implementation as part of the Plan will take place within the
immediate vicinity of the WRF. The existing noise sources at this location would not
affect projects identified the Plan.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the
project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction,
operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
Construction of proposed projects could result in localized construction noise, which
would be a short-term impact and would be reduced with project -specific mitigation
measures. The design and operation of new facilities would comply with any
applicable local noise ordinances.
Potential construction noise would be most noticeable at residences, institutions, and
park/public open spaces near construction activities. Short-term noise from
construction equipment would be limited to the allowable maximum noise levels
established by City code, or the applicable noise codes of other local jurisdictions
where projects are located.
After completion of the proposed projects, occasional noise from equipment and
vehicles used for on-going routine maintenance and repair may occur. Such noise
would be limited to daytime hours, except for noise associated with responses to
certain unanticipated emergencies and the operation of the standby generator at the
existing WRF site.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
Construction of projects will include reasonable mitigation measures, as
appropriate, to reduce potential site-specific construction noise impacts. Reasonable
construction mitigation could include restrictions on nighttime construction
activities, mufflers and enclosures for equipment, turning off idling equipment, and
locating equipment farther away from receptors. All construction work will be
performed in compliance with the applicable local noise ordinances. Prior to the
start of construction, Yelm will coordinate construction activities with affected
businesses, institutions, and residences that may be sensitive to construction -related
noise, dust, or traffic.
Construction work will be conducted during normal business hours and all future
facilities will be located, designed, and operated within applicable local noise
ordinance standards.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Based on analysis of the City zoning designations within the current city limits, the
City's WRF currently exists on industrial land surrounded by primarily
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 9
residentially zoned land with some commercially zoned land to the south of the
WRF.
b. Has the site been used for mineral excavation, agriculture or forestry? If so,
describe.
Some properties in the vicinity of the wastewater service area, specifically the
southwest portion of the City UGA, have been managed for commercial forestry in
the past. However, the land where the WRF is located has not been used in this
capacity.
C. Describe any structures on the site.
The WRF includes treatment basins and single -story structures housing treatment
equipment or for the support of operations staff.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
1►Ga
e. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
The current comprehensive plan designation of the site of the existing WRF is
"Industrial".
What is the current zoning classification of the site?
Zoning around the existing WRF is "Industrial".
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the
site?
Not applicable.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as a "natural resource", "critical" or
"environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
The entire City is located in a critical aquifer recharge area. Although the City of
Yelm has designated environmentally sensitive areas, projects identified in the Plan
will be sited outside of these areas.
Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
No people will reside in the upgraded WRF. Up to 6 people will be working there.
Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 10
Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any:
Prior to construction of any future projects, Yelm will apply for and obtain the
applicable land use permits and approvals. Design, construction, and operation of
the upgraded WRF will follow local zoning and development standards for
mitigating potential impacts on adjacent land uses. Future individual permits would
include site-specific conditions or mitigation measures to meet the requirements of
the applicable land use, zoning, and shoreline codes and policies.
The City has prepared and adopted Yelm's Comprehensive Plan, which was last
updated in 2007. The Comprehensive Plan contains policies on utilities and
identifies areas for future growth, which have been sources of direction for the
Yelm's sewer planning. The Plan is consistent with the goals and the policies of the
Utilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Any population growth facilitated by
implementation of the Plan generally would occur in areas identified for future
development in Yelm's Comprehensive Plan and in the comprehensive plans of
other local jurisdictions.
The Plan is consistent with the requirements of the Growth Management Act
(GMA) and local and regional land use plans. The City has also updated its
Comprehensive Plan in 2009 to adopt population projections consistent with the
Thurston County Comprehensive Plan.
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
None.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether
high, middle, or low-income housing.
None.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
Not Applicable.
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;
what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
The exact heights of proposed structures are unknown. However, no proposed
structures will be higher than the height of the tallest existing structure at the
project site, which stands at approximately 30' above grade.
Similarly, the principal exterior building material proposed is unknown, but will
resemble materials on existing structures at the project site.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 11
No views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it
mainly occur?
Implementation of the Plan would not introduce major new sources of light or glare.
Construction activities could be short-term sources of light and glare; however,
because most construction activities would be limited by the local noise ordinances
to avoid nighttime hours, most construction would occur during daytime hours. The
lighting requirements for future individual projects would be determined during the
design phase to comply with current lighting standards and local codes.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with
views?
No.
C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
Future Yelm projects under the Plan would not be affected by other existing off-site
sources of light or glare.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate
vicinity?
None.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
No.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts or provide recreation
opportunities:
Not applicable.
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local
preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally
describe.
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 12
Because the planning area is located within an area used by Native American Tribes
in the past, there is a possibility of discovering cultural materials. Infrastructure
construction is generally related to previously developed areas and for facilities
upgrades at the existing WRF, discovering new historical or cultural artifacts would
not be expected.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
Communications with staff representatives of the Nisqually Indian Tribe during the
preparation of the permitting documents for the Thurston Highlands MPC did not
indicate significant likelihood of former Native American use of the site or vicinity.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
If it is determined that there is a potential for cultural, historic, or archaeological
sites to be encountered during construction, a plan will be included in construction
contract documents. This plan would require that if any cultural, archaeological, or
historic resources were encountered during excavation, Yelm would immediately
consult with the state and local historic preservation offices and with affected Tribes
regarding site-specific mitigation measures. Work in that immediate area would be
suspended, and the find would be examined and documented by a professional
archaeologist or historian. Decisions regarding appropriate mitigation measures
and further action would be made before construction in the area of discovery was
allowed to resume.
14. Transportation
a. Identify sidewalks, trails, public streets and highways serving the site, and
describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if
any.
The existing WRF is reached solely by an access road off of Northern Pacific Rd SE.
There are no other sidewalks, trail, public streets, or highways serving the site.
b. Is site currently served by public transit? By what means? If not, what plans exist
for transit service?
The WRF is accessed almost exclusively by a relatively small number of operations
and maintenance staff and is not accessible to the public, making public transit
unnecessary. Therefore, the site is not currently served by public transit and no
plans exist to add service.
C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would
the project eliminate?
The project does not plan to add or eliminate any parking spaces.
d. Will the proposal require any new sidewalks, trails, roads or streets, or
improvements to existing sidewalks, trails, roads or streets, not including
driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private).
1►Ga
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 13
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
No.
How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?
If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
Operation of WRF upgrades would not generate additional vehicular trips as
compared to existing facility operation.
Construction activities would temporarily generate vehicle trips for workers and
hauling materials. The number of construction vehicles is anticipated to be
relatively small compared to traffic on local roadways.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
Construction of proposed projects will include measures to reduce short-term
impacts on affected roadways and other transportation facilities. Access to
residences and businesses from local roadways will be maintained during the
construction periods. Vehicular travel along local roadways also will be maintained
to allow passage of emergency service vehicles.
Traffic control plans for individual projects will ensure continued circulation and
access during construction. Plans potentially could include provisions to address
worker parking, such as requirements that workers carpool to the job site or that
the contractor provide worker shuttles from off-site parking locations. Construction
activities will be coordinated with affected landowners, local businesses, emergency
service providers, transit services, other local jurisdictions, and the local
jurisdictions.
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example:
fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally
describe:
No.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
Not applicable.
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currentIv available at the site: electricit natural gas, ate
efuse servic elephone anitary sewer septic system, other
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the
service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate
vicinity which might be needed.
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 14
Infrastructure improvements will not require any additional utility service.
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand
that the City of Yelm is relying on them to make its decision.
Signature:
Date Submitted:
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 15
SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(Do not use this sheet for project actions.)
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent of the proposal, or the types of
activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a
faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air;
production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
It will not.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
Not applicable.
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
It will not.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
Not applicable.
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
It will not have a significant impact.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
Not applicable.
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect critical or environmentally sensitive
areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection, such
as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat,
historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or natural resource areas?
It will not.
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
Not applicable.
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it
would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
It will have no impact.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 16
Not applicable.
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public
services and utilities?
It will not.
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
Not applicable.
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or
requirements for the protection of the environment.
It will not conflict.
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 17
Appendix I
State Environmental Review
Process (SERP) Checklist
State Environmental Review Process (SERP)
Coversheet for SRF Applicants and Recipients
DEPARTMENT OF
ECOLOGY
State of Washington
Applicant and Project Information
Applicant Name (Agency): City of Yelm
Project Title: Sewer Facilities Plan
Project Contact Person: Ryan Johnstone, PE, Public Works Director
Telephone: 360.458.8406
Address: 901 Rhoton Rd.,Yelm, WA 98597
Email: ryanj@ci.yelm.wa.us
Brief Project Description: As documented in the approved 2013 City of Yelm General Sewer Plan
(Yelm GSP), the City of Yelm (City) will review critical upgrade requirements for their existing Water
Reclamation Facility (WRF). This Sewer Facilities Plan (Plan) describes the development and evaluation
of alternatives for liquid and solid waste stream treatment upgrades at the City's WRF. This Plan has
been prepared in accordance with Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-240. Completing the
projects recommended in this Plan will allow the City to provide continued reliable reclaimed water
production, wastewater treatment, and waste solids handling to the City of Yelm while protecting and
preserving the surrounding environment.
Please submit all SERP documentation listed below together with this form to Ecology's Regional Engineer or
Manager and the Environmental Review Coordinator for review and approval.
Check the boxes below to indicate that the SERP Packet includes the documentation for the items listed and
complies with Ecology guidance and procedures. Provide comments for additional information when needed.
1. SEPA review documentation:
a. ® SEPA checklist.
b. ❑ The signed SEPA determination.
C. ❑ Documentation that the lead agency solicited public comments (affidavit of publication or
similar).
d. ❑ Any comments received by the lead agency.
❑ No comments received.
e. ❑ Categorical exemption. (Categorical exemptions may be further reviewed by Ecology to
ensure consistency with SERP. Provide documentation of the review and determination that the
entire project as funded by federal SRF qualifies for categorical exemption.)
Comments:
ECY 070-421 (Rev. 08/15) 1
2. Cost effectiveness analysis documentation (required for all projects after FY 2017):
a. ® A complete description of the alternatives that were considered.
b. ® Documentation that all appropriate alternatives were considered (regional approaches,
reclaimed water, alternative technologies, 1/1 correction, etc.)
C. ®Comparison of monetary costs/benefits of each alternative.
® Consideration of capital, operation, maintenance, replacement costs (20 year present
value).
ii. ® Estimate of sewer rates using different financing alternatives.
iii. ❑ Data for hardship analysis (if appropriate).
d. ® Comparison of non -monetary costs/benefits of each alternative, including environmental
impact, energy impacts, growth impacts, and community priorities.
e. ® Information supports that selected alternative represents the cost effective alternative.
Comments: Data can be found within Chapters 6 through 10 of the Sewer Facilities Plan.
3. Documentation of public participation in the selection process (required for all projects):
a. ® Public meeting announcement.
b. ® Meeting agenda listing discussion of environmental impacts.
C. ® Meeting agenda listing discussion of alternatives, costs, and rate impacts.
Comments: Meeting minutes can be found at the back of Appendix I of the Sewer Facilities Plan.
If you need this document in a format for the visually impaired, call the Water Quality Program at 360-407-6600. Persons
with hearing loss, call 711 for Washington Relay Service. Persons with a speech disability, call
877-833-6341.
ECY 070-421 (Rev. 08/15) 2
Community Development
Department
ENVIRONMENTAL
LY L3L CHECKLIST
GTQN
Instructions.-
The
nstructions:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires all governmental agencies to
consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. The
purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help identify impacts from your
proposal, to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal if it can be done, and to help the
City decide whether an EIS is required. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must
be prepared for any proposal with probable significant adverse impacts on
environmental quality.
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your
proposal. The City will use this checklist to determine whether the environmental
impacts of your proposal are significant and require preparation of an EIS. You must
answer each question accurately, carefully and to the best of your knowledge. Answer
the questions briefly, but give the best description you can. In most cases, you should
be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the
need for experts. If you do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your
proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions
now may avoid delays later. If the space provided is too small, feel free to attach
additional sheets.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and
landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the
city staff can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal even if you plan to do them
over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information
that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. You may be asked to
explain your answers or provide additional information for determining if there may be
significant adverse impacts.
Nonproject Proposals Only:
Complete both the checklist (even though many questions may be answered "does not
apply") and the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions (part D). For nonproject
actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property
or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area,"
respectively.
105 Yelm Ave W (360) 458-3835
Yelm, WA 98597 (360) 458-3144 FAX
www.cl.yelm.wu.us
0
CITY OF YELM
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if any:
Sewer Facilities Plan
2. Name of applicant:
City of Yelm
CITY USE ONLY
FEE: $150.00
DATE RECD
BY:
FILE NO.
3. Address, phone number and email address of applicant and of any other contact person:
Ryan Johnstone, P.E.
Public Works Director
901 Rhoton Road
Yelm, WA 98597
Phone: 360-458-8499
Fax: 360-458-8417
Email: ryanj@ci.yelm.wa.us
4. Date checklist prepared:
April 19, 2016
5. Agency requesting checklist:
City of Yelm
Y
7
!✓
Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
A specific objective of this Plan is to deliver construction and operation of an upgraded
water reclamation facility in a phased and cost effective manner during the 2018-2030 time
period.
Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
Yes, the projects will be delivered in phases during the 2018-2030 time period.
List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, directly related to this proposal.
Environmental Checklist and Determination of Nonsignificance for the Thurston County
Comprehensive Plan Update as amended by Resolution number 14034 and Ordinance
number 14035, November 2007.
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 1
Project specific environmental analyses will be prepared, if necessary, for the proposed
projects identified in the Plan.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
No.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
The Washington State Departments of Ecology and Health must review and approve the
Sewer Facilities Plan. Thurston County will review the Plan for consistency with the City of
Yelm Comprehensive Plan and Joint Plan with Thurston County (2009). The Yelm City
Council must approve and adopt the Plan before the final approval of the Plan by Ecology
and Health.
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the
size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask
you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those
answers on this page.
As documented in the approved 2013 City of Yelm General Sewer Plan (Yelm GSP), the
City of Yelm (City) will review critical upgrade requirements for their existing Water
Reclamation Facility (WRF). This Sewer Facilities Plan (Plan) describes the development
and evaluation of alternatives for liquid and solid waste stream treatment upgrades at the
City's WRF. This Plan has been prepared in accordance with Washington Administrative
Code (WAC) 173-240. Completing the projects recommended in this Plan will allow the
City to provide continued reliable reclaimed water production, wastewater treatment, and
waste solids handling to the City of Yelm while protecting and preserving the surrounding
environment.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the
precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section,
township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide
the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity
map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. You need not duplicate maps or
detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.
The City of Yelm is located about 17 miles southeast of Olympia, Washington near the
eastern boundary of Thurston County. The existing WRF is located in the northeast portion
of the city, on Industrial zoned land, reached by an access road off of Northern Pacific Rd
SE. The exact address of the site is 931 N P Rd NW, Yelm, WA 98597.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one):
(5D rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
The steepest slope on the site is approximately 27%.
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 2
C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel,
peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and
note any prime farmland.
The soils of Thurston County have been mapped and classified into 133 soil units by
the United States Department of Agriculture, Soils Conservation Service (SCS). The
majority of soils in the City of Yelm area are classified as either (1) Spanaway
gravelly sandy or stony loam or (2) Everett very gravelly sandy loam. The
characteristics of the soils have been grouped by the SCS as undulating and rolling,
coarse and moderately coarse textured soils underlain by loose glacial outwash
materials.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity?
If so, describe.
There are no known unstable soils in the vicinity of the proposed projects identified
in the Plan.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or
grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
Excavation, back filling, and/or grading activity could occur in association with
proposed projects. In general, the amounts of grading and filling that would be
required will be relatively modest. More specific information regarding quantities of
filling and grading will be determined during project -level design. Where native
materials are unsuitable for backfill, suitable materials will be imported from
nearby sources.
The proposed projects will comply with the applicable local, state, and federal
regulations and permits required for grading and filling activities.
Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally
describe.
Sedimentation impacts will occur during construction; erosion control will be
required and shown on construction plans and specifications.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after
project construction such as asphalt or buildings?
Proposed projects will create minimal increases in impervious surfacing.
Impervious surfaces will be approximately 23% of the site.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if
any:
Construction of proposed projects will employ Best Management Practices (BMPs)
to reduce or control potential project -specific erosion. BMPs could include
temporary erosion and control measures, surface water pollution prevention plans,
and spill prevention control and countermeasures plans. Other examples of typical
BMPs include installing filter fabric fences or hay bales, covering exposed soils,
using temporary soil covers such as mulch, diverting stormwater with temporary
berms, and using settling ponds or grass -lined swales to prevent sediment from
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 3
moving into receiving waters and storm drains. Site-specific erosion and
sedimentation control provisions will be listed on construction plans and
specifications. These projects will comply with the applicable erosion control
provisions of the local and state jurisdictions.
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust,
automobile exhaust, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when
the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate
quantities if known.
Air emissions could result from these projects during construction. New facilities to
be constructed under the proposal generally will not produce new/additional air
emissions during operation. Temporary, localized emissions of fugitive dust and
vehicle emissions could occur during construction of individual projects; however,
these emissions are not anticipated to result in any significant impact on the overall
ambient air quality in Yelm.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your
proposal? If so, generally describe.
No.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
Projects will include construction mitigation measures in order to reduce
construction emissions and will comply with the Olympic Region Clean Air Agency
(ORCAA) regulations to minimize fugitive particulate matter. Site-specific
measures to reduce construction emissions could potentially include spraying areas
of exposed soil with water for dust control, regular street cleaning, and reducing
exhaust emissions by minimizing vehicle and equipment idling. Construction
activities will comply with ORCAA's requirements for reasonable precautions to
minimize fugitive dust. Construction equipment also could include emission -control
devices on gasoline and diesel engines to reduce carbon monoxide (CO) and
particulate emissions.
3. Water
a. Surface Water
1) Is there any surface water body or wetland on or in the immediate vicinity of the
site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds)? If
yes, describe type and provide names. State what stream or river it flows into?
No.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 300 feet) the
described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
Not applicable.
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 4
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that
would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
Not applicable.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note elevation on the
site plan.
No.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters?
If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No waste materials will be directly discharged to surface waters.
b. Groundwater:
1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater?
Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
Dewatering may be required for construction of WRF upgrades. Prior to
completing these projects, additional environmental investigation, including
hydraulic modeling, would be completed to determine impacts.
2) Describe the underlying aquifer with regard to quality and quantity, sensitivity,
protection, recharge areas, etc.
Proposed projects will not impact the underlying aquifer.
3) Describe waste material that will be discharged into or onto the ground from
septic tanks or other sources, if any (such as domestic sewage; industrial
byproducts; agricultural chemicals).
Proposed projects will not directly discharge waste materials from animals, humans,
or its operational activities to groundwater.
C. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection
and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow?
Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
Construction activities could temporarily increase runoff, and associated erosion
and sedimentation could affect water quality in the short term.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
No untreated waste materials will enter ground or surface waters as a result of
properly operated sewer conveyance, treatment, and disposal facilities.
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 5
Construction activities could temporarily discharge materials, which will be
controlled with site-specific BMPs and other mitigation measures.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water
impacts, if any:
Construction activities will include measures to reduce potential surface water,
groundwater, and runoff impacts, such as BMPs and other temporary erosion
controls. Yelm will prepare required plans for stormwater pollution control and
spill prevention.
All proposed projects will be designed, constructed, and operated to meet applicable
local, state, and federal regulatory requirements to protect water resources. All
Yelm projects will obtain the necessary permits and approvals concerning surface
water, groundwater, and storm water runoff. Proposed projects will comply with
applicable local storm water and drainage codes of the appropriate permitting
jurisdictions.
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
X deciduous tree: alder, maple oak aspen, other
X evergreen tree: S cedar, pine, other
X shrubs
X grasses
pasture
crops or grains
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
X other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Vegetation could be affected in association with proposed projects. Proposed
projects would occur in the immediate vicinity of the WRF, and the amounts of
vegetation to be removed or altered likely would be relatively small and localized.
Vegetation on or adjacent to projects site, where present, could be disturbed by
construction activities.
If areas of vegetation are removed or altered, vegetation will be restored following
construction.
C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
As part of the Thurston Highlands EIS effort, a comprehensive query of the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) website was conducted for documentation of
any Listed or Proposed Endangered and Threatened Species and Critical Habitat,
Candidate Species and Species of Concern occurring within a 1.5 -mile radius of the
project area. In addition, a thorough search was conducted of the National Marine
Fisheries Service, Northwest Regional Office, Office of Protected Resources web
pages. Both of these websites were accessed October 4, 2006. No Federally -listed
species or critical habitat records were found for the Thurston Highlands property.
The prevalence of low -diversity, replanted, mostly young Douglas fir forest does not
afford preferred habitat conditions for listed species that could potentially occur,
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 6
such as Northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis). Furthermore, the absence of
prairie habitat conditions within Thurston Highlands eliminates the potential for
listed plant and animal species associated with this habitat type to occur. The only
potential Federally -listed species that might occur within Thurston Highlands is an
aquatic plant, water howellia (Howellia aquatilis), that could occur within the
sphagnum bog habitat associated with the Wetland A complex.
The Draft Biological Assessment prepared for the SR 510Nelm Loop Highway
Corridor (WSDOT, May 2007) investigated the presence of threatened and
endangered species within the same general project area as the Yelm sewer system
service area. Within the project area, it was determined that listed fish species
included Puget Sound Chinook salmon and bull trout. Designated critical habitat
for the Puget Sound Chinook salmon evolutionarily significant unit (ESU) occurs in
portions of the mainstem Nisqually River and the lowest reaches of Yelm Creek
(river mile [RM] 0.0 to 0.7). The closest designated critical habitat for the Coastal -
Puget Sound bull trout distinct population segment (DPS) is in the Nisqually River.
Puget Sound steelhead, proposed for listing as a threatened species, may also occur
in the project vicinity. There are no known listed plant species identified in the
project; however, a federal species of concern (Aster curtus, white -top aster) may
occur in the project vicinity. Bald eagles were the single wildlife species addressed in
this BA.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or
enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
Projects will be designed to minimize potential impacts on vegetation. Where
necessary to remove or alter areas of vegetation, vegetation will be restored
following construction. Areas will be restored, where possible, with plantings of
native species and other appropriate vegetation. Where appropriate, Yelm will
prepare a landscaping plan for individual projects, consistent with Yelm
development guidelines.
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site or are
known to be on or near the site:
birds: aw , heron, uck , ea le on bird
other: Passerinespecies, raptors, woodpecker, 'a s crows
mammals: ee bear, el beaver, other: Cougar
fish: bass, salmon, trout, shellfish, other:
b. List any priority, threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the
site.
Puget Sound Chinook salmon and bull trout are known to be nearby. However,
there are none located at the project site and none will be impacted.
C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
No.
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 7
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
None, no impacts anticipated.
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, gasoline, heating oil, wood, solar etc.)
will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it
will be used for heating, manufacturing, transportation, etc.
The programs and proposed projects described in the Plan will not require any
major increase in regional long-term energy use. The Plan includes the construction
of sewer facilities which will require pumping and power. The existing electrical
infrastructure within the vicinity of the existing sewer facilities is adequate to handle
future loads.
Construction of proposed projects will require energy for construction equipment
and vehicles, which would temporarily use electricity and gasoline/diesel fuel.
Energy use during construction would be short term and would have a negligible
impact on regional energy supplies. Necessary equipment will consist of standard
construction equipment.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe.
The Plan does not involve building large, new structures or planting vegetation that
would block access to the sun for adjacent properties.
C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if
any:
Construction activities and operation of Yelm facilities will include measures to
conserve energy, such as selection of energy-efficient equipment and implementation
of energy-efficient operational practices, where applicable.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spills, of hazardous waste, that could occur
as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
No.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
Emergency services could be required to clean up spills or respond to worker
injuries during construction and, possibly, during the operation and maintenance of
completed facilities. However, operation of future infrastructure anticipated under
the Plan likely would not require special emergency services.
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 8
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
Site-specific hazardous material and spill control plans have been developed to
provide a response plan in the event of a hazardous chemical spill at the existing
WRF.
A Construction Contingency Plan and a Health and Safety Plan will be required of
the contractor before work commences.
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:
traffic, equipment operation, other)?
Projects planned for implementation as part of the Plan will take place within the
immediate vicinity of the WRF. The existing noise sources at this location would not
affect projects identified the Plan.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the
project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction,
operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
Construction of proposed projects could result in localized construction noise, which
would be a short-term impact and would be reduced with project -specific mitigation
measures. The design and operation of new facilities would comply with any
applicable local noise ordinances.
Potential construction noise would be most noticeable at residences, institutions, and
park/public open spaces near construction activities. Short-term noise from
construction equipment would be limited to the allowable maximum noise levels
established by City code, or the applicable noise codes of other local jurisdictions
where projects are located.
After completion of the proposed projects, occasional noise from equipment and
vehicles used for on-going routine maintenance and repair may occur. Such noise
would be limited to daytime hours, except for noise associated with responses to
certain unanticipated emergencies and the operation of the standby generator at the
existing WRF site.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
Construction of projects will include reasonable mitigation measures, as
appropriate, to reduce potential site-specific construction noise impacts. Reasonable
construction mitigation could include restrictions on nighttime construction
activities, mufflers and enclosures for equipment, turning off idling equipment, and
locating equipment farther away from receptors. All construction work will be
performed in compliance with the applicable local noise ordinances. Prior to the
start of construction, Yelm will coordinate construction activities with affected
businesses, institutions, and residences that may be sensitive to construction -related
noise, dust, or traffic.
Construction work will be conducted during normal business hours and all future
facilities will be located, designed, and operated within applicable local noise
ordinance standards.
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 9
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Based on analysis of the City zoning designations within the current city limits, the
City's WRF currently exists on industrial land surrounded by primarily
residentially zoned land with some commercially zoned land to the south of the
WRF.
b. Has the site been used for mineral excavation, agriculture or forestry? If so,
describe.
Some properties in the vicinity of the wastewater service area, specifically the
southwest portion of the City UGA, have been managed for commercial forestry in
the past. However, the land where the WRF is located has not been used in this
capacity.
C. Describe any structures on the site.
The WRF includes treatment basins and single -story structures housing treatment
equipment or for the support of operations staff.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
I►[1
e. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
The current comprehensive plan designation of the site of the existing WRF is
"Industrial".
What is the current zoning classification of the site?
Zoning around the existing WRF is "Industrial".
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the
site?
Not applicable.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as a "natural resource", "critical" or
"environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
The entire City is located in a critical aquifer recharge area. Although the City of
Yelm has designated environmentally sensitive areas, projects identified in the Plan
will be sited outside of these areas.
Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
No people will reside in the upgraded WRF. Up to 6 people will be working there.
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 10
Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any:
Prior to construction of any future projects, Yelm will apply for and obtain the
applicable land use permits and approvals. Design, construction, and operation of
the upgraded WRF will follow local zoning and development standards for
mitigating potential impacts on adjacent land uses. Future individual permits would
include site-specific conditions or mitigation measures to meet the requirements of
the applicable land use, zoning, and shoreline codes and policies.
The City has prepared and adopted Yelm's Comprehensive Plan, which was last
updated in 2007. The Comprehensive Plan contains policies on utilities and
identifies areas for future growth, which have been sources of direction for the
Yelm's sewer planning. The Plan is consistent with the goals and the policies of the
Utilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Any population growth facilitated by
implementation of the Plan generally would occur in areas identified for future
development in Yelm's Comprehensive Plan and in the comprehensive plans of
other local jurisdictions.
The Plan is consistent with the requirements of the Growth Management Act
(GMA) and local and regional land use plans. The City has also updated its
Comprehensive Plan in 2009 to adopt population projections consistent with the
Thurston County Comprehensive Plan.
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
None.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether
high, middle, or low-income housing.
None.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
Not Applicable.
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 11
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;
what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
The exact heights of proposed structures are unknown. However, no proposed
structures will be higher than the height of the tallest existing structure at the
project site, which stands at approximately 30' above grade.
Similarly, the principal exterior building material proposed is unknown, but will
resemble materials on existing structures at the project site.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
No views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it
mainly occur?
Implementation of the Plan would not introduce major new sources of light or glare.
Construction activities could be short-term sources of light and glare; however,
because most construction activities would be limited by the local noise ordinances
to avoid nighttime hours, most construction would occur during daytime hours. The
lighting requirements for future individual projects would be determined during the
design phase to comply with current lighting standards and local codes.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with
views?
No.
C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
Future Yelm projects under the Plan would not be affected by other existing off-site
sources of light or glare.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate
vicinity?
None.
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 12
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
No.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts or provide recreation
opportunities:
Not applicable.
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local
preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally
describe.
Because the planning area is located within an area used by Native American Tribes
in the past, there is a possibility of discovering cultural materials. Infrastructure
construction is generally related to previously developed areas and for facilities
upgrades at the existing WRF, discovering new historical or cultural artifacts would
not be expected.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
Communications with staff representatives of the Nisqually Indian Tribe during the
preparation of the permitting documents for the Thurston Highlands MPC did not
indicate significant likelihood of former Native American use of the site or vicinity.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
If it is determined that there is a potential for cultural, historic, or archaeological
sites to be encountered during construction, a plan will be included in construction
contract documents. This plan would require that if any cultural, archaeological, or
historic resources were encountered during excavation, Yelm would immediately
consult with the state and local historic preservation offices and with affected Tribes
regarding site-specific mitigation measures. Work in that immediate area would be
suspended, and the find would be examined and documented by a professional
archaeologist or historian. Decisions regarding appropriate mitigation measures
and further action would be made before construction in the area of discovery was
allowed to resume.
14. Transportation
a. Identify sidewalks, trails, public streets and highways serving the site, and
describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if
any.
The existing WRF is reached solely by an access road off of Northern Pacific Rd SE.
There are no other sidewalks, trail, public streets, or highways serving the site.
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 13
b. Is site currently served by public transit? By what means? If not, what plans exist
for transit service?
The WRF is accessed almost exclusively by a relatively small number of operations
and maintenance staff and is not accessible to the public, making public transit
unnecessary. Therefore, the site is not currently served by public transit and no
plans exist to add service.
C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would
the project eliminate?
The project does not plan to add or eliminate any parking spaces.
d. Will the proposal require any new sidewalks, trails, roads or streets, or
improvements to existing sidewalks, trails, roads or streets, not including
driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private).
No.
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
No.
How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?
If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
Operation of WRF upgrades would not generate additional vehicular trips as
compared to existing facility operation.
Construction activities would temporarily generate vehicle trips for workers and
hauling materials. The number of construction vehicles is anticipated to be
relatively small compared to traffic on local roadways.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
Construction of proposed projects will include measures to reduce short-term
impacts on affected roadways and other transportation facilities. Access to
residences and businesses from local roadways will be maintained during the
construction periods. Vehicular travel along local roadways also will be maintained
to allow passage of emergency service vehicles.
Traffic control plans for individual projects will ensure continued circulation and
access during construction. Plans potentially could include provisions to address
worker parking, such as requirements that workers carpool to the job site or that
the contractor provide worker shuttles from off-site parking locations. Construction
activities will be coordinated with affected landowners, local businesses, emergency
service providers, transit services, other local jurisdictions, and the local
jurisdictions.
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 14
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example:
fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally
describe:
No.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
Not applicable.
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currentl available at the site: electricit natural gas, ate
efuse servic elephone anitary sewer septic system, other
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the
service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate
vicinity which might be needed.
Infrastructure improvements will not require any additional utility service.
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand
that the City of Yelm is relying on them to make its decision.
Signature:
Date Submitted:
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 15
SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(Do not use this sheet for project actions.)
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent of the proposal, or the types of
activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a
faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air;
production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
It will not.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
Not applicable.
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
It will not.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
Not applicable.
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
It will not have a significant impact.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
Not applicable.
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect critical or environmentally sensitive
areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection, such
as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat,
historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or natural resource areas?
It will not.
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
Not applicable.
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it
would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
It will have no impact.
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 16
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
Not applicable.
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public
services and utilities?
It will not.
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
Not applicable.
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or
requirements for the protection of the environment.
It will not conflict.
City of Yelm Environmental Checklist Page 17
YELM CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2015 5:00 P.M.
Mayor Harding called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
Present: Councilmembers: JW Foster, Joe Baker, Jennifer Littlefield, Tracey Wood, Ken
Garmann, Russ Hendrickson. Staff: Shelly Badger, Grant Beck, Ryan Johnstone, Guests: Dr.
David Kopchynski and Brian Bunker, Parametrix
4a. Reclaimed Water Plant Update- Ryan Johnstone introduced guests from Parametrix
working on a Pilot Study at WWTP to address the plant challenges. Ryan provided a
ppt, explaining it is all about meeting the permit for producing Class A reclaimed water.
The many factors for making permit include, maintaining total balance of nitrogen,
ammonia, coli form and turbidity. All of which are essential to outflow into Centralia
canal, Nisqually river, mitigate current and future water rights. Investigating solutions to
address the increasing load into the plant and decreasing food supply for the essential
bugs needed to treat the wastewater. The pilot study is narrowing the solution options,
including sand filtering and introducing synthetic carbon. A menu of options and
associated costs will be provided at the conclusion of the study. Mayor Harding thanked
Parametrix for their stellar efforts evaluating best options to improve the production at
the WWTP, one of this state's oldest reclaimed water plants.
4 b. Thurston County, Draft County -Wide Planning Policies. Grant Beck provided a draft,
stating cities must be consistent with their Comp Plans and the GMA, and
accommodate growth by law. Councilmember Isom was able to bring in things that Yelm
wants to change, including balancing the documents so that policies for urbanizing cities
and rural development in the county are equalized. Public Hearing has not been
scheduled for the approval. Grant will provide additional materials to Council as
requested.
5. Mayor's Report:
State repair of the guardrail at Creek St and 103�d discovered abutment cracks to the
roadway bridge in need of repair. City will add this project to the Six Year Transportation
Improvement Plan.
Review of MOA from Olympia regarding discontinuation of the purchase or use of
products containing insect control neonicotinoids, considered to be contributing to the
diminishing populations of bees and other pollinators and impacting agriculture and food
security.
Grant provided, "Your City, Your Future" Comprehensive Plan Update 2015, in
summary format previous known as the Vision Plan. Beginning in March, several
venues for community outreach are planned to gauge if the Plan reflects what they are
hearing. Determine if this is still the direction and it captures the vision.
The PW Teamsters 2015-2017 contract will be presented to Council 03-10-15.
6. Council Initiatives
Councilmember Foster recommended following Tumwater's example to sponsor a
municipal government "Academy" for citizens". Mayor recommended that JW do the
legwork and add this topic to the Council Retreat.
Councilmember Garmann - street lights on West Rd go out at 8 PM and come back
on at 9 PM each night. Ryan Johnstone will follow up with PSE. Inquired about the
ownership of the Y-3 right of way.
Councilmember Baker - completion schedule of Mosman realignment. DOT seasonal
paving begins in April to coincide with the install of the traffic signal.
Councilmember Wood - potential hazard of the elevated sidewalk at the adjacent
parking lot. Expressed frustration with the power line install that cross multiple times on
McKenzie Ave SE.
Councilmember Foster inquired about petitioning the State to add a guard rail at 507
at Mill Pond.
Councilmember Littlefield asked for an update of the fuel tank removal from the old
PW Yard.
Adjourn: 8:05 pm
Ron Harding, Mayor
Attest
Janine Schnepf, City Clerk
YELM CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 26, 2015 5:00 P.M.
Mayor Harding called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
Present: Councilmembers: JW Foster, Joe Baker, Tracy Wood, Ken Garmann and Jennifer Littlefield
Staff: Grant Beck, Ryan Johnstone, Bob Rhoades, Aris McClelland and spouse. One citizen attending.
4. Sewer Treatment Capital Facilities Plan, Condition Report, Presenters: Dr. David Kopchynski PHD PE
and Brian Bunker PE with Parametrix. Ryan Johnstone provided an update on the WWTP condition
assessment prepared by Parametrix from construction in 1993 to its current condition. Also provided a
graph map showing the sludge route processes from filtration to reclaimed water to clarify the basics,
before providing more detail on the current condition of the Plant. In summary, the Plant was built to treat
the conditions of the time. Challenges began in 2000 with balancing the nitrogen and ammonia levels as
required by the State permitting for Class A reclaimed water. Other contributing factors were identified,
including reduced BOD levels, heat and cold sensitivities, which required short term improvements. In
2010, work began on the Sewer Facility Plan and in April 2014 Parametrix was brought on for
comprehensive research and to provide alternative solutions to fix. Parametrix is determining the best
alternative options and will bring forward recommendations for the aging Plant.
5. Mayor's Report. Mayor Harding provided a draft of the Yelm Parks Advisory Board Committee's
recommended Policies, Guidelines, Rules and Rates for the use of the Yelm Community Center currently
under construction. Discussion followed with varied opinions about the rate structure; inquiries and
suggestions about how the facility would be staffed; and how operations and maintenance costs would be
supported. The policies and rates were modeled from other City's existing policies. Councilmember
Garmann inquired about previous attempts to partner with SSCC for extension classes in Yelm.
Response was that when the Community Center Bond failed, the design of the center was scaled down to
2 rooms and an office, insufficient for classrooms. However, there may be other opportunities with the
school in the future. Mayor announced there will be a walk-thru tour and later suggested that Council
review the draft and send their comments to him.
6. Council Initiatives
Discussion on the inconsistencies in the patchwork asphalt paving on Yelm Ave and suggested that they
be marked and addressed, including the final striping, before the county crew leaves Yelm.
Inquired about hiring staff for vacant positions. Mayor responded that the Finance Director and PW Parks
Maintenance positions have been filled, an offer has been made for WWTP Manager and staff is still
working on filling the PW Manager position. There is no confirmed process for filling the City Administrator
position at this time. City Hall will be closed to the public 2 hours per month to allow for staff meetings,
training or to catch up uninterrupted. Schedule will be posted on city buildings for 2nd and 4th Tuesday
mornings 8am-9am as closed to the public.
Skateboard Park bids came in high and will have to be re-evaluated. RFPs are out for prosecution
services. Mosman water leak was identified as part of the reclaimed water line. Inquired about use of
Restitution Center rather than Nisqually Jail. Increase visibility of pedestrian crosswalks.
Jennifer Littlefield announced September 12 is National Day of Service and is looking for community
service projects for a group.
Adjourn: 8:05 p.m.
Attest
Ron Harding, Mayor Janine Schnepf, City Clerk
YELM CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 2016, 5:00 P.M.
Mayor Harding called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. Present: Councilmembers JW Foster, Tracy Wood, Tad
Stillwell and Russ Hendrickson. Molly Carmody arrived 5:15 pm, Joe DePinto arrived 5:20 p.m. Staff: Grant Beck,
Ryan Johnstone, Todd Stancil, Noah Crocker and Chad Bedlington. Guest Presenters: Parametrix, United Way and
HomesFirst. Audience: Ken Garmann, WWTP staff: Bob Rhoades, Tony Edwards, Aris McClelland and spouse.
4a. Thurston County Community Initiative Partnership (CIP) Committee, Paul Knox, Executive Dir. — Mr. Knox
invited the City of Yelm to join with the CIP to manage combined funding initiatives to facilitate health and human
services needs within Thurston County. Objective to merge resources efficiently from multiple partners toward long-
term solutions. Provided the current MOU with cities of Lacey, Olympia, Tumwater with United Way and TC Regional
Health and Human Services. Each jurisdiction allocates one-half of one percent general sales and use tax to the CIP.
Trudy Soucoup, Executive Director of HomesFirst provided a handout and spoke about their successes administering
service to the community through rehabilitation of housing, services to veterans, youth training and recognized other
services: Community Youth Services, South Sound Seniors, Reading Foundation, homeless, free clinics and food
banks. Mr. Knox added that United Way is actively fundraising and is always looking for volunteers.
4b. Water Reclamation Facility Plan, Brian Bunker and David Kopchynsk from Parametrix joined Ryan Johnstone
with review of the WWTP challenges to meet DOE permit requirements that drive approval of a plan to move forward
with capital improvements. Parametrix has been working with city staff at the Plant since 2012, narrowing the options
for solutions to improve the status and meet the challenges of the aging plant. Reviewed the contributing factors,
short term and long-term fixes and financial costs associated, while conforming to the environmental requirements.
Council inquired about impact to future rates, grant opportunities, population capacity, and potential for future
restrictions and alternate disposal of wastewater outside of treatment. Informed Council that in the next 2 months
analysis will continue with more to bring to Council for consideration.
4c. Public Works Project Update -Chad Bedlington provided an update on current project and planning efforts.
1) AC Waterline replacement: Yelm Ave between 2"d & 3rd begin April -May for approx 90-120 days, mostly at night.
2) SW Well 1 A: $4.9 million construction for 600,000 gal reservoir, booster pump, water treatment is 37% complete.
3) Mosman Ave Phase II, $1.5 m collector arterial in permitting phase, funding opportunities for ROW acquisition.
4) SR 507 Sidewalk extensions from Mosman to Washington. 5) Skatepark on schedule at 63% complete for April
opening. Future: Stormwater Management Plan, policies and procedures currently at DOE review, bring to Council in
March 2016: Water System Plan with RH2 March 2016: Playground equipment City Park, pursuing grant
opportunities and will forward to Parks Advisory Committee, potential for cooperative efforts with local groups: Yelm
on Puget Sound Energy list to Re -light Washington with LED lights and future savings.
5. Mayor's Report.
1) Uber approached TC cities to accept their established background check process for licensing drivers in all
Thurston County cities and County. Announced Open House, March 9 at Olympia City Hall.
2) Critical Areas/Yelm Ave. renewed interest in changing setbacks from 1000 to 400 to open up available area for
retail marijuana sales.
CONCENSUS to maintain 1,000 ft setbacks.
3) Next study session will include Department presentations and Budget 101 workshop. 4) AWC Board looking for
nominations.
6. Council Initiatives
1) Councilmember Stillwell suggested Councilmembers be assigned as liaison with Dept Heads
2) Inquired about City adding a Facebook page.
1) Councilmember Carmody recommended collaborating with the Nisqually Tribe prior to and during the Alaska to
Nisqually Canoe Journey. 2) Inquired about allowances for Food Trucks in Yelm.
1) Councilmember Foster wanted to follow-up on previous week's major traffic backup through Yelm and lack of
reporting. Incident may help in future statewide funding opportunities through TRPC and state legislature. 2) Yelm
Schools Dollars for Scholars this Saturday, March 5, 2016.
1) Councilmember DePinto concern for safety at crosswalks, particularly at 15t Street at School District Office. Direct
complaints to Chief Stancil.
Adjourn: 8:25 p.m.
Ron Harding, Mayor
1 of 1 02/24/16
Attest
Janine Schnepf, City Clerk