Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes and Agenda 2021 Y ELM P LANNING C OMMISSION A GENDA J ANUARY 19,20214:00PM Click here for meeting link 1.C ALL TO O RDER 2.R OLL C ALL 3.A GENDA A PPROVAL 4.A PPROVAL OF M INUTES Minutes from October 19, 2020 attached 5.P UBLIC C OMMENT OR C OMMUNICATIONS 6.2021C OMPREHENSIVE P LAN U PDATE R EZONE R EQUESTS 7.S UBCOMMITTEE R EPORTS 8.A DJOURN Next Planning Commission Meeting February 16, 20214:00 PM Virtual Meeting: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_Ar6duKCcTMSCr5C6wlu0dQ MEETINGINFORMATION All regular meetings are recorded and may be viewed at www.yelmwa.gov. least four(4) working days prior to meeting. Information on the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Title VI Statement is available at www.yelmwa.gov/human-resources. The public comment portion of the agenda is an opportunity for the public to address the Commission regarding matters that are not on the agenda. Comments are limited to three minutes and five speakers. Comment on matters listed on the agenda are welcomed. nd 106 2Street SE Yelm, WA 98597 360.458.3244 www.yelmwa.gov The City of Yelm is an equal opportunity employer and provider YELM PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES VIRTUAL MEETING VIA ZOOM OCTOBER 19, 2020 4:00 PM Jerry Fugich called the meeting to order at 4:01 pm Members present: Jerry Fugich, Carlos Perez, John Thomson, John Graver, Floyd Sheldon, and Anne Wahrmund Members Absent: Bob Howard Staff: Tami Merriman, Grant Beck MOTION BY ANNE WAHRMUND, SECONDED BY CARLOS PEREZ TO EXCUSE BOB HOWARD. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Approval of Agenda: MOTION BY JOHN THOMSON, SECONDED BY JOHN GRAVER TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Approval of Minutes: MOTION BY JOHN GRAVER, SECONDED BY CARLOS PEREZ TO APPROVE THE AUGUST 17, 2020MINUTES. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Project Update: Tami Merriman shared a PowerPoint presentation of development projects currently under review, City planning projects including the Education and Innovation Center, the Habitat Conservation Plan, and the Prairie Line Trail. Also included in the presentation was the draft Planning Commission 2021 work plan to include applicant initiated rezone applications, applicant initiated design standard review, and review and public process for the planning documents presented. Subcommittee Reports: Anne Wahrmund reported that the Parks Advisory Board has been working on creative Christmas in the Park activities for this year during the pandemic. Adjourn: MOTION BY CARLOS PEREZ, SECONDED BY JOHN THOMSON TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 4:48 PM. Respectfully submitted, Tami Merriman, Associate Planner YELM PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES VIRTUAL MEETING VIA ZOOM JANUARY 19, 2021 4:00 PM Jerry Fugich called the meeting to order at 4:00 pm Members present: Jerry Fugich, John Thomson, John Graver, Anne Wahrmund, and Bob Howard Members Absent: Carlos Perez excused, Floyd Sheldon Staff: Tami Merriman, Grant Beck Approval of Agenda: MOTION BY JOHN THOMSON, SECONDED BY ANNE WAHRMUND TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Approval of Minutes: MOTION BY JOHN GRAVER, SECONDED BY ANNE WAHRMUND TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 19, 2020MINUTES. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. 2021 Comprehensive Plan Update: Tami Merriman shared a PowerPoint presentation showing two rezone requests by private citizens. The requests include land in the Industrial Zoned area of Railway Road, and land in the Commercial zoned area of Killion and Mountain View Roads. The presentation also included surrounding areas that should considered to be included in the requests. Discussion focused mainly on transportation impacts, access to the SR510 Yelm Loop and the Prairie Line Trail. Upcoming meetings will include analysis of impacts of the proposed rezones. Subcommittee Reports: Anne Wahrmund reported that Memorial at Yelm City Park. Anne also reported that funding for the trail may be in jeapordy, however there is a positive outlook for future funding. Adjourn: MOTION BY JOHN THOMSON, SECONDED BY ANNE WAHRMUND TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 5:00 PM. Respectfully submitted, Tami Merriman, Associate Planner Y ELM P LANNING C OMMISSION A GENDA F EBRUARY 16,20214:00PM Click here for meeting link 1.C ALL TO O RDER 2.R OLL C ALL 3.P LEDGE OF A LLEGIANCE 4.A GENDA A PPROVAL 5.A PPROVAL OF M INUTES Minutes from January 19, 2021attached 6.P UBLIC C OMMENT OR C OMMUNICATIONS 7.2021C OMPREHENSIVE P LAN U PDATE R EZONE R EQUESTS 8.S UBCOMMITTEE R EPORTS 9.A DJOURN Next Planning Commission Meeting March 15,20214:00 PM Virtual Meeting: ŷƷƷƦƭʹΉΉǩƚƚƒ͵ǒƭΉǞĻĬźƓğƩΉƩĻŭźƭƷĻƩΉ‘bΗǒb5ƒ9/Ɖ.wğYhǝ{9h/.DƷǞ MEETINGINFORMATION All regular meetings are recorded and may be viewed at www.yelmwa.gov. least four (4) working days prior to meeting. Information on the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Title VI Statement is available at www.yelmwa.gov/human-resources. The public comment portion of the agenda is an opportunity for the public to address the Commission regarding matters that are not on the agenda. Comments are limited to three minutes and five speakers. Comment on matters listed on the agenda are welcomed. nd 106 2Street SE Yelm, WA 98597 360.458.3244 www.yelmwa.gov The City of Yelm is an equal opportunity employer and provider YELM PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES VIRTUAL MEETING VIA ZOOM JANUARY 19, 2021 4:00 PM Jerry Fugich called the meeting to order at 4:00 pm Members present: Jerry Fugich, John Thomson, John Graver, Anne Wahrmund, and Bob Howard Members Absent: Carlos Perez excused, Floyd Sheldon Staff: Tami Merriman, Grant Beck Approval of Agenda: MOTION BY JOHN THOMSON, SECONDED BY ANNE WAHRMUND TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Approval of Minutes: MOTION BY JOHN GRAVER, SECONDED BY ANNE WAHRMUND TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 19, 2020MINUTES. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. 2021 Comprehensive Plan Update: Tami Merriman shared a PowerPoint presentation showing two rezone requests by private citizens. The requests include land in the Industrial Zoned area of Railway Road, and land in the Commercial zoned area of Killion and Mountain View Roads. The presentation also included surrounding areas that should considered to be included in the requests. Discussion focused mainly on transportation impacts, access to the SR510 Yelm Loop and the Prairie Line Trail. Upcoming meetings will include analysis of impacts of the proposed rezones. Subcommittee Reports: Anne Wahrmund reported that Memorial at Yelm City Park. Anne also reported that funding for the trail may be in jeapordy, however there is a positive outlook for future funding. Adjourn: MOTION BY JOHN THOMSON, SECONDED BY ANNE WAHRMUND TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 5:00 PM. Respectfully submitted, Tami Merriman, Associate Planner To: Planning Commission From: Tami Merriman, Associate Planner Date: February 11, 2021 Subj: Rezone Request Analysis The City has received a Comprehensive Land Use Map Amendment (rezone) request from a private citizen. 1) 9410 Mountain View Road. Two parcels equaling approximately 19.23 acres, located between Mountain View Road and Killion Road. Current Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Designation: Commercial (C-1) Requested rezone: Moderate Density Residential (R-6) Option 1A. Killion Road. Property owner of a 9.5 acre parcel directly east of the subject parcels wishes to include his property in the rezone request. It is also zoned C-1 Commercial with requested rezone to Moderate Density Residential (R-6). R EZONE 1 AND 1A S UMMARY AND A NALYSIS: The parcels are currently vacant. City water, sewer, and other utilities are available in Mountain View Road and Killion Road, which also provide access to the sites. 1: The properties to the north of 1 are zoned Moderate Density Residential (R-6) and currently under construction for a 118 lot subdivision. The properties to the east are zoned High Density Residential (R-16) and are improved as an Assisted Living Facility and multi-family adult housing. The properties to the south are zoned Commercial (C-1) & High Density Residential (R-16). They are developed as a Veterinary Clinic, vacant commercial land, and multi-family adult housing. The property to the West is zoned Commercial (C-1) and is currently Vacant. 1A: The properties to the north and east are zoned and developed as Moderate Density Residential (R-6). The property to the south is zoned Comercial (C-1) and is currently vacant. The City of Yelm is an equal opportunity employer and provider R EZONE 1 R EZONE 1A L OGICAL ZONING B OUNDARIES 1. The parcels are rectangular shaped, located between, and accessed from, streets classified as collector streets. Collector streets are designed and constructed to accommodate larger amounts of traffic that is required to serve both commercial and residential development. If rezoned, the location and boundary of the parcels will keep a consistent and logical boundary between the commercial and residential zones. 1A. The parcel is reticular shaped, bordered on the north and east by residentially developed properties. The property to the south is zoned C-1 Commercial and is vacant land. If rezoned, the location and boundary of the parcels will keep a consistent and logical boundary between the commercial and residential zones. The following analysis includes both options 1 and 1A, unless otherwise noted. C ONSTRAINTS/E NVIRONMENTAL I SSUES The properties are mainly flat pasture land with very few trees. There no known wetlands, flood zones, or high ground water flooding on the site. The area does contain " more preferred" soils for the protected Mazama Pocket Gopher, so critical area site analyses would need to be completed before future development could occur. B ACKGROUND The properties were annexed into the City in 1992 as residential agriculture. The 1995 Comprehensive Plan Update required by the Growth Management Act changed the properties zone to Commercial (C-1). In 2008, the owner of the 20± acres, along with other commercial properties in the surrounding area prepared a Transportation Impact Analysis that projected these parcels to build out as a shopping center, however no development on these parcels have occurred. The City of Yelm is an equal opportunity employer and provider R EVIEW AND A PPROVAL C RITERIA Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map amendments (rezone) require a Comprehensive Plan amendment which must conform with the requirements of the Washington State Growth Management Act, Chapter 36.70A RCW, and all amendments for permanent changes to the comprehensive plan must be submitted to the Washington State Department of Commerce, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106. The Land Use Map amendment considered must be in accordance with the City's annual Comprehensive Plan amendment process, as required by RCW 36.70A. If the amendments are approved by the City Council, proposed amendments will be submitted to the Washington State Department of Commerce pursuant to RCW 36. 70A.106. Changes to the Comprehensive Plan must be consistent with the goals of the Washington State Growth Management Act and the goals and policies of the City of Yelm Comprehensive Plan. 1. The amendment must meet the goals of the Washington State Growth Management Act as follows: (1) Urban growth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. The properties are located near the central commercial area of the City, but not directly on Yelm Avenue West (SR 510). Utilities including sewer and water are located within the property frontages. The properties are close to services including gas stations, restaurants, and other retail. Elementary, middle and high schools are close by. The proposed amendment would provide more housing in close proximity to services and jobs. (2) Reduce sprawl. Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low -density development. The proposed amendments would be consistent with the goal as it would allow for higher density residential uses in close proximity to jobs and services. The requested R-6 residential land use designation allows up to six dwellings per acre. (3) Transportation. Encourage efficient multimodal transportation systems that are based on regional priorities and coordinated with county and city comprehensive plans. Yelm Avenue West (SR 510), Tahoma Boulevard, and Killion Road are constructed to approved City standards, which include public sidewalks, bike lanes and transit services. Killion Road intersects with the SR 510 Yelm Loop, which when complete, will provide alternative access around the City. Development on these parcels will require the completion of frontage improvements to Mountain View Road, as well as internal streets. These improvements include public sidewalks. Development must also provide for transit services. Page 3 of 7 (4) Housing. Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of this state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing housing stock. The R-6 zone allows for single and multifamily development and would allow for a variety of housing types in the City. (5) Economic development. Encourage economic development throughout the state that is consistent with adopted comprehensive plans, promote economic opportunity for all citizens of this state, especially for unemployed and for disadvantaged persons, promote the retention and expansion of existing businesses and recruitment of new businesses, recognize regional differences impacting economic development opportunities, and encourage growth in areas experiencing insufficient economic growth, all within the capacities of the state' s natural resources, public services, and public facilities. The proposed change would reduce commercial land available for development by 30± acres (approximately 8% overall). A retai included Yelm, Roy, & Rainier, with a secondary trade area of Tenino, Eatonville, Graham, and part of Spanaway. Without an updated market study, it would be safe to assume that the primary trade area is still applicable, however with recent commercial growth in Graham and Spanaway, the secondary trade area is most likely reduced. If this holds true, the future commercial land needs would be reduced. A change in land use designation and zone district would allow the proposed amendment area to be developed with residential uses as compared to the Commercial designation. Generally, businesses need residential uses in close proximity in order to survive. The proposal provides for an increase in single family residential uses within close proximity to business centers, which is consistent with the goal. (6) Property rights. Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation having been made. The property rights of landowners shall be protected from arbitrary and discriminatory actions. The proposal does not require any taking of private property. (7) Permits. Applications for both state and local government permits should be processed in a timely and fair manner to ensure predictability. The proposed Comprehensive Plan map amendment and corresponding rezone are being considered as a part of the City's annual Comprehensive Plan amendment review. (8) Natural resource industries. Maintain and enhance natural resource - based industries, including productive timber, agricultural, and fisheries industries. Encourage the conservation of productive forestlands and productive agricultural lands, and discourage incompatible uses. Page 4 of 7 The properties, and those in the vicinity are not designated for natural resources. (9) Open space and recreation. Retain open space, enhance recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural resource lands and water, and develop parks and recreation facilities. The site is not designated for open space and recreation. Future development of the site would need to comply with all development regulations that pertain to the creation and protection of open space and parks requirements. (10) Environment. Protect the environment and enhance the state' s high quality of life, including air and water quality, and the availability of water. Any future development would need to comply with all the applicable environmental regulations. (11) Citizen participation and coordination. Encourage the involvement of citizens in the planning process and ensure coordination between communities and jurisdictions to reconcile conflicts. City residents, interested parties, agencies and jurisdictions will be notified and encouraged to participate in all review, and at a public hearing for the proposal as part of the 2021 Comprehensive Plan amendment process. (12) Public facilities and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. The City provides sewer and water service to the area. Streets in the general vicinity are operating within the expected levels of service. Future development of the proposed amendment area would likely require a traffic study and mitigation of the impacts. Development requires findings of concurrency for utilities, transportation, schools and fire. (13) Historic preservation. Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and structures, that have historical or archaeological significance. The proposed amendment area is not the site of known historical or archaeological significance. 2. Text amendments and site -specific rezone should be evaluated for internal consistency with the comprehensive plan, and for consistency with the county -wide planning policies, related plans, and the comprehensive plan of Thurston County. The applicable goals of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan are as follows: policies include 5.2 Adopt development standards that allow duplexes, townhouses, and accessory dwelling units within residential areas to increase the variety of housing in the community. Page 5 of 7 policies include 11.2 Plan for land use patterns that provide most neighborhood residents an array of basic services within a half mile or 20-minute walk from home. The Housing element of the Comprehensive Plan encourages a variety of housing types and a range of affordable housing, with additional goals to provide energy efficient housing. The proposed Residential zoning allows for, and encourages a variety of housing types. The location near commercial areas provides for basic services within a half-mile. The amendment would allow for residential uses, close to services, which is consistent with this goal. The proposed amendment area is close to a commercial center, and medical facilities, restaurant, and childcare. Nearby is more convenience retail such as gas stations and fast food facilities. The amendment should determine whether conditions in the area for which comprehensive plan change/zoning amendment is requested have changed or are changing to such a degree that it is in the public interest to encourage a change in land use for the area. Ecommerce (online retail sales), while in existence for many years, has experienced exponential growth since 2015. Studies show that brick and mortar establishments will always have their place, and the shift to ecommerce allows for less inventory and expanding more retail opportunity online. Whether the proposed comprehensive plan zoning amendment is necessary in order to provide land for a community -related use which was not anticipated at the time of adoption of the comprehensive plan. N/A Does the Comprehensive Plan map amendment create an impact to the City Water System? Commercial uses vary in the amount of water used. For example, a retail establishment would use less water per day than a restaurant. The Water System Plan for the City projects commercial establishments would use 135 gallons per day, and a single family home 215 gallons per day. In order to compare the two, you would need to look at total projected commercial square footage in comparison to total number of dwelling units. The 30± acres, if developed commercially could equal up to 315,000 sq. ft, using approximately 42 million gallons per day. 30± acres, if developed residentially could equal up to 180 dwelling units using approximately 40,000 gallons per day. Page 6 of 7 The waterline distribution sizing was established to serve the commercial and residential growth in this area. The change in zoning would reduce the amount of water used per day, and would provide less impact to the water system plan. Does the Comprehensive Plan map amendment create an impact to the City Sewer System? The City sewer system is a reclaimed water system, and tank sizing and treatment facilities are determined mostly by total water usage. The contemplated differences are the number of STEP tanks to be installed in regards to maintenance, and protecting the system from fats, oils, and greases (FOG) that are found in many commercial uses. Based on the analysis for water, and sewer system planning for the area, the change in zoning would provide less impact to the sewer system plan. Does the Comprehensive Plan map amendment create an impact to the City Transportation System? A single family residence creates 1.01 new pm peak hour trips into the transportation system, creating a total of 181 new trips at 180 single family residences. Commercial development projects 2.66 new pm peak hour trips per thousand square feet into the transportation system, creating a total of 837 new trips based on 315,000 sq. ft of projected commercial. Killion Road, Yelm Avenue West, and the SR 510 Yelm Loop are constructed to City standards at this time. Development of the parcel fronting Mt. View Road requires that Mt. View Road be upgraded to City standards. The reduced number of trips will provide less impact to the existing streets. C ONCLUSION Is the Comprehensive Plan map amendment consistent with the goals of the Washington State Growth Management Act? Is the Comprehensive Plan map amendment consistent with the Land use and housing goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan? Have the potential impacts of the proposed Comprehensive Plan text amendment been considered? Page 7 of 7 YELM PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES VIRTUAL MEETING VIA ZOOM FEBRUARY 16, 2021 4:00 PM Jerry Fugich called the meeting to order at 4:04 pm Members present: Jerry Fugich, John Thompson, John Graver, Anne Wahrmund, Bob Howard, Carlos Perez, and Floyd Sheldon Members Absent: None Staff: Tami Merriman, Derek McCoy, Ashlee Sund, Michelle Christin, and Kathy Linnemeyer. Approval of Agenda: MOTION BY CARLOS PEREZ, SECONDED BY JOHN THOMPSON TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Approval of Minutes: MOTION BY BOB HOWARD, SECONDED BY CARLOS PEREZ TO APPROVE THE JANUARY 19, 2021MINUTES. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Public Comment: Mike Avila, Pacific Rim Real Estate Group introduced himself as representative of the Guizzetti family for the inclusion of their commercial land in the proposed rezone. They wish to be included in the rezone from C-1 to R-16. 2021 Comprehensive Plan Update: Tami Merriman shared a presentation providing analysis of a Comprehensive Land Use Map Amendment (rezone) that was submitted by private citizens requesting parcels to be rezoned from Commercial (C1) to Moderate Density Residential (R-6). The analysis included impacts to City utilities, zoning boundaries, constraints/environmental issues, and conformance with the City of Yelm Comprehensive Plan. Planning Commissioners presented further information to be considered, such as different options for logical boundary, and requested that staff provide updated information on projected water usage, impacts to tax base, and additional impacts if the property were to be rezoned to High Density Residential. Tami Merriman will research questions and options, and will bring it forward at the next meeting. Public Comment & Communications Mike Edwards addressed the commission as the property owner requesting the rezone. Mr. Edwards discussed the change in retail by online retail sales, and the need for utilization of city assets. Yelm is experiencing a greater demand for multi-family housing, which is allowed in the R-6 zoning. The property would be better utilized as residential, while still providing commercial along Yelm Avenue. Commercial is dependent on residential growth, and with the water rights, residential is going to provide that residential growth. Joe Guizzetti wishes to include two 10-acre parcels east of the 20 acres being review for rezone, possibly even high density. The Guizzetti family has marketed the property for many years as commercial, however have never achieved any interest, due to its location off Yelm Avenue. Mike Avila addressed the Commission that there is support that the neighboring properties should be considered as part of this rezone due to their location, the lack of need for more commercial and that high density residential is needed. Subcommittee Reports: Anne Wahrmund reported that property has been purchased for access to the WRF facility and that the property may become a dog park in the future, with design work being completed by students at St. Martins University as part of a senior project. Anne Wahrmund also reported that work to upgrade the Veterans Memorial continues. Adjourn: MOTION BY JOHN THOMSON, SECONDED BY ANNE WAHRMUND TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 5:27 PM. Respectfully submitted, Kathy Linnemeyer, Executive Assistant THE CITY OF YELM PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING FOR MARCH 15, 2021 IS RESCHEDULED TO MARCH 22, 2021. Y ELM P LANNING C OMMISSION A GENDA M ARCH 24,20214:00PM Click here for meeting link 1.C ALL TO O RDER 2.R OLL C ALL 3.P LEDGE OF A LLEGIANCE 4.A GENDA A PPROVAL 5.A PPROVAL OF M INUTES Minutes from February 16, 2021attached 6.P UBLIC C OMMENT OR C OMMUNICATIONS 7.2021C OMPREHENSIVE P LAN U PDATE R EZONE R EQUESTS 8.S UBCOMMITTEE R EPORTS 9.A DJOURN Next Planning Commission Meeting April 19, 20214:00 PM Virtual Meeting: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_OgFLcn9iTyy_yE08HyGY2A MEETINGINFORMATION All regular meetings are recorded and may be viewed at www.yelmwa.gov. you require least four (4) working days prior to meeting. Information on the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Title VI Statement is available at www.yelmwa.gov/human-resources. The public comment portion of the agenda is an opportunity for the public to address the Commission regarding matters that are not on the agenda. Comments are limited to three minutes and five speakers. Comment on matters listed on the agenda are welcomed. nd 106 2Street SE Yelm, WA 98597 360.458.3244 www.yelmwa.gov The City of Yelm is an equal opportunity employer and provider YELM PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES VIRTUAL MEETING VIA ZOOM FEBRUARY 16, 2021 4:00 PM Jerry Fugich called the meeting to order at 4:04 pm Members present: Jerry Fugich, John Thompson, John Graver, Anne Wahrmund, Bob Howard, Carlos Perez, and Floyd Sheldon Members Absent: None Staff: Tami Merriman, Derek McCoy, Ashlee Sund, Michelle Christin, and Kathy Linnemeyer. Approval of Agenda: MOTION BY CARLOS PEREZ, SECONDED BY JOHN THOMPSON TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Approval of Minutes: MOTION BY BOB HOWARD, SECONDED BY CARLOS PEREZ TO APPROVE THE JANUARY 19, 2021MINUTES. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Public Comment: Mike Avila, Pacific Rim Real Estate Group introduced himself as representative of the Guizzetti family for the inclusion of their commercial land in the proposed rezone. They wish to be included in the rezone from C-1 to R-16. 2021 Comprehensive Plan Update: Tami Merriman shared a presentation providing analysis of a Comprehensive Land Use Map Amendment (rezone) that was submitted by private citizens requesting parcels to be rezoned from Commercial (C1) to Moderate Density Residential (R-6). The analysis included impacts to City utilities, zoning boundaries, constraints/environmental issues, and conformance with the City of Yelm Comprehensive Plan. Planning Commissioners presented further information to be considered, such as different options for logical boundary, and requested that staff provide updated information on projected water usage, impacts to tax base, and additional impacts if the property were to be rezoned to High Density Residential. Tami Merriman will research questions and options, and will bring it forward at the next meeting. Public Comment & Communications Mike Edwards addressed the commission as the property owner requesting the rezone. Mr. Edwards discussed the change in retail by online retail sales, and the need for utilization of city assets. Yelm is experiencing a greater demand for multi-family housing, which is allowed in the R-6 zoning. The property would be better utilized as residential, while still providing commercial along Yelm Avenue. Commercial is dependent on residential growth, and with the water rights, residential is going to provide that residential growth. Joe Guizzetti wishes to include two 10-acre parcels east of the 20 acres being review for rezone, possibly even high density. The Guizzetti family has marketed the property for many years as commercial, however have never achieved any interest, due to its location off Yelm Avenue. Mike Avila addressed the Commission that there is support that the neighboring properties should be considered as part of this rezone due to their location, the lack of need for more commercial and that high density residential is needed. Subcommittee Reports: Anne Wahrmund reported that property has been purchased for access to the WRF facility and that the property may become a dog park in the future, with design work being completed by students at St. Martins University as part of a senior project. Anne Wahrmund also reported that work to upgrade the Veterans Memorial continues. Adjourn: MOTION BY JOHN THOMSON, SECONDED BY ANNE WAHRMUND TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 5:27 PM. Respectfully submitted, Kathy Linnemeyer, Executive Assistant To: Planning Commission From: Tami Merriman, Associate Planner Date: March 12, 2021 Subj: Industrial Rezone Request Analysis The City has received a Comprehensive Land Use Map Amendment (rezone) request from a private citizen. R EZONE R EQUEST: 16330 AND 16314 R AILWAY R OAD. Two parcels of land equaling approximately 14.89 acres, located on Railway Road, between Middle Road and Canal Road. Current Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Designation: Industrial (I) Requested rezone: Moderate Density Residential (R-6). R EZONE A NALYSIS: The two parcels are improved as residential uses. They are served by onsite well and septic systems. City water and sewer is currently located at the corner of Railway and Middle Road. Adjacent properties, as well as properties to the north and west are zoned Industrial (I). Properties to the east are in the Urban Growth Area and are zoned have future zoning of Moderate Density Residential (R-6) and Industrial (I). The surrounding properties are either vacant or developed residentially with the exception of 1 parcel at the northeast corner which is developed at T&P Automotive Service. L OGICAL ZONING B OUNDARIES The parcels are located in the center of other industrial properties. The rezone of these zoned property. The City of Yelm is an equal opportunity employer and provider The most logical boundary would be to include all properties on the west side of Railway Road that are located within the current City Limits. The total acreage is approximately 49.27 acres. R EZONE R EQUEST R EZONE L OGICAL B OUNDARY Page 2 of 11 C ONSTRAINTS/E NVIRONMENTAL I SSUES The properties are mainly flat pasture land with very few trees. The most southern property is encumbered by a flood zone, and developed as residential. A cell tower is located on this parcel. The second parcel from the south is developed as an electrical substation for Puget Sound Energy. This parcel and use would be considered an Essential Public Facility, a permitted allowed use in any zone. The area contains "more preferred" soils for the protected Mazama Pocket Gopher, so critical area site analyses would need to be completed before future development could occur on these parcels. B ACKGROUND The properties were annexed into the City in 1994 as residential agriculture, one unit per 5 acres. The 1995 Comprehensive Plan Update required by the Growth Management Act changed the properties zone to Industrial (I). The City of Yelm is an equal opportunity employer and provider R EVIEW AND A PPROVAL C RITERIA Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map amendments (rezone) require a Comprehensive Plan amendment which must conform with the requirements of the Washington State Growth Management Act, Chapter 36.70A RCW, and all amendments for permanent changes to the comprehensive plan must be submitted to the Washington State Department of Commerce, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106. The Land Use Map amendment considered must be in accordance with the City's annual Comprehensive Plan amendment process, as required by RCW 36.70A. If the amendments are approved by the City Council, proposed amendments will be submitted to the Washington State Department of Commerce pursuant to RCW 36. 70A.106. Changes to the Comprehensive Plan must be consistent with the goals of the Washington State Growth Management Act and the goals and policies of the City of Yelm Comprehensive Plan. T HE AMENDMENT MUST MEET THE GOALS OF THE W ASHINGTON S TATE G ROWTH M ANAGEMENT A CT AS FOLLOWS: (1) Urban growth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. The properties are located near northeastern edge of the existing City limits. Utilities including sewer and water are located at the corner of Railway and Middle Road. Any future development of these properties will require the extension of water and sewer infrastructure. The Capital Facilities section of the Comprehensive Plan and City infrastructure planning documents plan for this future growth. The proposed rezone meets the urban growth goal. (2) Reduce sprawl. Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low -density development. The proposed amendments would be consistent with the goal as it would allow for higher density residential uses in close proximity to jobs and services. The requested R-6 residential land use designation allows up to six dwellings per acre. (3) Transportation. Encourage efficient multimodal transportation systems that are based on regional priorities and coordinated with county and city comprehensive plans. Railway Road is classified as a Neighborhood Collector, and is currently improved as a paved two-lane street. Development on these parcels will require the completion of frontage improvements as well as internal streets. These improvements will include travel lanes, shoulders, public sidewalks and street trees. Development must also provide for transit services. Page 4 of 11 (4) Housing. Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of this state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing housing stock. The R-6 zone allows single and multifamily development and would allow for a variety of housing types in the City. (5) Economic development. Encourage economic development throughout the state that is consistent with adopted comprehensive plans, promote economic opportunity for all citizens of this state, especially for unemployed and for disadvantaged persons, promote the retention and expansion of existing businesses and recruitment of new businesses, recognize regional differences impacting economic development opportunities, and encourage growth in areas experiencing insufficient economic growth, all within the capacities of the state' s natural resources, public services, and public facilities. The proposed change would reduce industrial land available for development by 50± acres (approximately 29% of property within city limits, and 19% of industrial land in the City limits and Urban Growth Area). An Industrial Market and Development Assessment completed in 2001 showed that total industrial area equals about 300 acres, 190 within the City limits, and 110 in the urban growth area. Since the time of the study, the County rezoned a group of properties, and the City Maps have also been updated to reflect zoning changes. Actual acreage of Industrial zoned land is approximately 172 acres within the City limits, and 94 in the Urban Growth Area. The study completed 20 years ago discusses the challenge of competition with industrial areas in the Olympia, Lacey, Tumwater areas with access to I-5, industrial development in neighboring counties, as well as transportation challenges of the Yelm area. The completion of the Yelm Loop in the next few years will make transportation to the industrial area better, however the subject properties are some distance away from the Loop, using side streets to access the Loop. The study also reflected that the City had recently purchased the rail line that borders the rear of these properties with the expectation that the rail line would eventually connect to Tacoma. Since that time, it has been determined that this rail connection is not feasible, and the rail line is planned to be converted to a public trail system. The study also discusses the residential encroachment of properties in the urban growth area. The study provided three possible scenarios for future development, 1) Opportunity Driven Marketing, 2) Master Planned Business Park, 3) Reconfigure the industrial area. The reconfiguration included parcels that have since developed residentially. The reconfiguration described in the plan is no longer an option. Without the future rail service, lack of direct access to the Yelm Loop, and the encroachment of surrounding property developed as residential, the industrial zoning Page 5 of 11 of the subject properties may not be beneficial for industrial development. In this case, the 29% loss of industrial zoned land may be appropriate. The industrial area northwest of the subject properties are within a Foreign Trade zone which provides tax benefits and custom duties under certain circumstances. The subject properties are not within the Yelm Foreign Trade Zone. A change in land use designation and zone district increases residential capacity, and decreases industrial opportunity. The 2001 study determined the need for industrial land, but that the need may not be realized for some time, and growth patterns are such that other types of industrial uses should be considered. (6) Property rights. Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation having been made. The property rights of landowners shall be protected from arbitrary and discriminatory actions. The proposal does not require any taking of private property. (7) Permits. Applications for both state and local government permits should be processed in a timely and fair manner to ensure predictability. Page 6 of 11 The proposed Comprehensive Plan map amendment and corresponding rezone are being considered as a part of the City's annual Comprehensive Plan amendment review. (8) Natural resource industries. Maintain and enhance natural resource - based industries, including productive timber, agricultural, and fisheries industries. Encourage the conservation of productive forestlands and productive agricultural lands, and discourage incompatible uses. The subject properties and those in the vicinity are not designated for natural resources. (9) Open space and recreation. Retain open space, enhance recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural resource lands and water, and develop parks and recreation facilities. The site is not designated for open space and recreation. Future development of the site would need to comply with all development regulations that pertain to the creation and protection of open space and parks requirements. (10) Environment. Protect the environment and enhance the state' s high quality of life, including air and water quality, and the availability of water. Any future development would need to comply with all the applicable environmental regulations. (11) Citizen participation and coordination. Encourage the involvement of citizens in the planning process and ensure coordination between communities and jurisdictions to reconcile conflicts. City residents, interested parties, agencies and jurisdictions will be notified and encouraged to participate in all review, and at a public hearing for the proposal as part of the 2021 Comprehensive Plan amendment process. (12) Public facilities and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. The City will provide sewer and water service to the area when the service mains are extended. Streets in the general vicinity are operating within the expected levels of service. Future development of the proposed amendment area would likely require a traffic study and mitigation of the impacts. Development requires findings of concurrency for utilities, transportation, schools and fire. (13) Historic preservation. Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and structures, that have historical or archaeological significance. The proposed amendment area is not the site of known historical or archaeological significance. Page 7 of 11 R EZONES SHOULD BE EVALUATED FOR INTERNAL CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE COUNTY -WIDE PLANNING POLICIES, AND RELATED PLANS. City of Yelm Comprehensive Plan and Joint Plan with Thurston County. Land Use Goal 3 Establish a variety of land uses and densities that supports a compact form and urban densities. Policy 3.7 Adopt industrial land uses to meet community needs. There is approximately 172 acres of industrial zoned land in the City limits, with another 94 in the UGA. The rezone would remove 50± acres, leaving approximately 21 acres vacant or re- developable land in the City limits and 94 acres in the Urban Growth Area. Land Use Goal 6 Encourage commercial and industrial growth that serves the needs of the City. Policy 6.6 Locate industrial areas on major transportation routes, near existing utilities, and where they can be appropriately buffered from adjacent land uses. Policy 6.7 Locate warehouse, assembly, and distribution land uses on the perimeter of the industrial area, with manufacturing/industrial located toward the center of the industrial land use designation. The current industrial zoned area is located at the northern edge of the City limits. Properties on Rhoton Road will have direct access to the Loop. The subject properties are located further from the Yelm Loop, are separated from improved industrial areas by the Prairie Line Trail and the Rail right-of-way, and is bordered by residential uses to the south. Page 8 of 11 Economic Development Goal 1 Encourage commercial and industrial growth that serves the needs of the City Policy 1.9 Join with the Thurston Economic Development Council to identify The City Council is currently reviewing its economic development goals, and industrial uses have been part of the conversation. Economic Development Goal 6 Ensure adequate supply of shovel-ready land along primary transportation corridors and invest in commercial and industrial redevelopment. Over the last 20 years, there has been increased growth within our Industrial zoned area to include the Yelm Community Schools transportation facility, the construction of the Yelm RV & Boat Storage, ICE Equipment, Yelm Auto Recycle, and a new cabinet manufacturing facility currently under review. The 2001 Industrial study acknowledges the challenges of industrial growth in Yelm of competition of other major industrial areas in Thurston, Lewis and Pierce Counties, as well as transportation challenges. The study considers other industrial use types such as business park or a possible reconfiguration of the industrial zoned areas. Land Use Element Goal 5 Encourage diverse residential growth. Policy 5.2 Adopt development standards that allow duplexes, townhouses, and accessory dwelling units within residential areas to increase the variety of housing in the community. Land Use Element Goal 11 Create safe and vibrant neighborhoods with places that build community and encourage active transportation. Policy 11.2 Plan for land use patterns that provide most neighborhood residents an array of basic services within a half mile or 20-minute walk from home. The Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan encourages a variety of housing types and a range of affordable housing, with additional goals to provide energy efficient housing. Housing Goal 9 Increase housing amid urban corridors and centers to meet the needs of a changing population. The land use and housing elements strongly encourage housing variety and affordability. T HE AMENDMENT SHOULD DETERMINE WHETHER CONDITIONS IN THE AREA FOR WHICH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE/ZONING AMENDMENT IS REQUESTED HAVE CHANGED OR ARE CHANGING TO SUCH A DEGREE THAT IT IS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST TO ENCOURAGE A CHANGE IN LAND USE FOR THE AREA. Page 9 of 11 Rail service is no longer an option for industrial development. Access the Yelm Loop would be by neighborhood collector streets. Properties the southeast are prezoned as residential, with residential uses encroaching in future industrial zoned properties. With industrial land available in the Olympia, Lacey, and Tumwater areas accessible by I-5, as well as industrial growth in adjoining counties, the Yelm industrial area may still be slower in development. T HE AMENDMENT SHOULD DETERMINE WHETHER THE PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ZONING AMENDMENT IS NECESSARY IN ORDER TO PROVIDE LAND FOR A COMMUNITY -RELATED USE WHICH WAS NOT ANTICIPATED AT THE TIME OF ADOPTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. N/A D OES THE C OMPREHENSIVE P LAN MAP AMENDMENT CREATE AN IMPACT TO THE C ITY W ATER S YSTEM? Industrial uses vary in the amount of water used. The Water System Plan for the City projects industrial establishments use 200 gallons per day per acre, and a single family home 215 gallons per day. In order to compare the two, you would need to look at total projected commercial square footage in comparison to total number of dwelling units. The 50± acres, if developed industrially could equal up to 10,000 gallons per day. 50± acres, if developed residentially could equal up to 300 dwelling units using approximately 64,500 gallons per day. The increase in gallons per day is 600% increase in water usage. The waterline distribution sizing was established to serve the industrial and residential growth in this area. The change in zoning would increase the amount of water used per day, however the water infrastructure planning accommodates this amount of usage. D OES THE C OMPREHENSIVE P LAN MAP AMENDMENT CREATE AN IMPACT TO THE C ITY S EWER S YSTEM? The City sewer system is a reclaimed water system. Tank sizing and treatment facilities are determined mostly by total water usage. The contemplated differences are the number of STEP tanks to be installed in regards to maintenance, protecting the system from fats, oils, and greases (FOG) that are found in some industrial uses, and impacts to the sewer basins by increased pressure in the lines. Further analysis is underway to assure the increase in sewer demand is acceptable. D OES THE C OMPREHENSIVE P LAN MAP AMENDMENT CREATE AN IMPACT TO THE C ITY T RANSPORTATION S YSTEM? A single family residence creates 1.01 new pm peak hour trips into the transportation system, 300 homes would create 303 new pm peak hour trips. Page 10 of 11 Industrial uses vary in trip generation, however with the exception of very heavy industrial plants, the trip rates range from 2.16 to 8.84 new pm peak hour trips per acre. At 50 acres that would equal 108 442 new pm peak hour trips. Depending on industrial development the residential development trip generation would fall between lowest and highest trips generated by industrial development. Railway Road is not constructed to City standards at this time. Development of these parcels will require frontage improvements. If the amendment is approved, the number of residential vehicle trips generated would be similar to the number of industrial generated trips. C ONCLUSION Is the Comprehensive Plan map amendment consistent with the goals of the Washington State Growth Management Act? Is the Comprehensive Plan map amendment consistent with the Land use and housing goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan? Have the potential impacts of the proposed Comprehensive Plan text amendment been considered? Page 11 of 11 YELM PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES VIRTUAL MEETING VIA ZOOM MARCH 24 4:00 PM Jerry Fugich called the meeting to order at 4:00 pm Members present: Jerry Fugich, John Thomson, John Graver, Anne Wahrmund, Carlos Perez, Floyd Sheldon and Bob Howard Members Absent: N/A Staff: Tami Merriman, Grant Beck, Ashlee Sund, and Michelle Christin Approval of Agenda: MOTION BY CARLOS PEREZ, SECONDED BY ANNE WAHRMUND TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Approval of Minutes: MOTION BY JOHN THOMSON, SECONDED BY BOB HOWARD TO APPROVE THE FEBRUARY 16, 2021MINUTES. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Public Comment or Communications: Tami provided information from a property owner within the proposed rezone area in favor of the rezone request. 2021 Comprehensive Plan Update: Tami provided analysis for a rezone request from property owners of 16330 and 16314 Railway Road. The subject properties are improved as residential uses, and are currently served by on site well and septic systems. City utility services are currently located at the intersection of Railway and Middle Road. Tami informed the Commission that she has not been able to complete research regarding possible B&O or real estate tax impacts, and that the Public Works department has not completed their study of impacts to the sewer system with the possible zoning change. The Planning Commission is in favor of moving forward with the proposed rezone, subject to the future analysis of tax and utility impacts. Commissioners Graver and Perez suggested that Council and Mayor update the Commission on their thoughts for economic development within the City. Grant Beck responded that Council is just beginning their review of the Comprehensive Plan in regards to future development. Subcommittee Reports: Anne Wahrmund reported that Yelm City Park & play area are getting good use at this time. There is a proposal for an exercise pad/facility adjacent to the Community Center, and Public Works is looking into funding. This is the early stages of planning and getting funds for the project started. John Graver reported that the tree board has not met for some time now. There will be no in person Arbor Day Celebration this year, it will take place online different from the traditional th eventthat normally would take place. This will be the 25 year of Arbor Day Celebration and will be postponed in person until next year. Adjourn: MOTION BY JOHN THOMSON, SECONDED BY BOB HOWARD TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 5:08 PM. Respectfully submitted, Ashlee Sund, Administrative Assistant Y ELM P LANNING C OMMISSION A GENDA A PRIL 19,20214:00PM Click here for meeting link 1.Call to Order 2.Roll Call 3.Pledge of Allegiance 4.Agenda Approval 5.Approval of Minutes Minutes from March 24, 2021attached 6.Public Comment or Communications 7.Thurston Regional Planning Council Buildable lands presentation 8.2021 Comprehensive Plan Update 9.Subcommittee Reports 10.Adjourn Next Planning Commission Meeting-May 17,20214:00 PM Virtual Meeting: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_Ar6duKCcTMSCr5C6wlu0dQ MEETINGINFORMATION All regular meetings are recorded and may be viewed at www.yelmwa.gov. reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities. If you require reasonable accommodations to participate least four (4) working days prior to meeting. Information on the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Title VI Statement is available at www.yelmwa.gov/human-resources. nd 106 2Street SE Yelm, WA 98597 360.458.3244 www.yelmwa.gov The City of Yelm is an equal opportunity employer and provider YELM PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES VIRTUAL MEETING VIA ZOOM APRIL 19, 2021 4:00 PM Jerry Fugich called the meeting to order at 4:00 pm Members present: Jerry Fugich, Carlos Perez, John Thomson, John Graver, Anne Wahrmund, Floyd Sheldon, and Bob Howard Members Absent: N/A Staff: Tami Merriman, Casey Mauck, Grant Beck, and Brianna Feller Approval of Agenda: MOTION BY JOHN GRAVER, SECONDED BY BOB HOWARD TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Approval of Minutes: MOTION BY CARLOS PEREZ, SECONDED BY JOHN THOMSON TO APPROVE THE MARCH 24, 2021 MINUTES. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Buildable Lands Presentation Thurston Regional Planning Council Michael Ambrogi and Allison Osterberg gave a presentation on the Thurston County Buildable Lands Report. The plan analyzes Growth Management Act goals including achieved densities and urban capacity, and regional goals such as the Sustainable Thurston plan. Findings are that we meet or exceed these goals, and there is no further action needed. Commissioners Graver and Perez expressed concern over the availability of affordable housing and why it was not addressed in this plan. Mr. Ambrogi clarified that the buildable lands report provides the foundation for analyzing the future demand of housing and commercial space. Tami Merriman asked if the analysis included the growing trend towards online shopping rather than traditional retail space. Ms. Osterberg clarified that this topic did come up in discussions but it is difficult to forecast these trends as there is a high level of uncertainty around how online shopping will affect retail space. Commissioner Perez inquired if this year of COVID-19 is an anomaly that affects the model. Ms. Osterberg clarified that buildable lands takes into account a large period of years, though it will be interesting to see how this year affects long-term changes. 2021 Comprehensive Plan Update Tami Merriman presented several requests for changes within the Unified Development Code (UDC), which included associated goals and policies from the Comprehensive Plan, code references, and possible impacts to be considered. The requests were presented to the Commission for information to determine proposed changes, if any to the UDC. These request included: Allowing drive-through establishments in the Central Business District (CBD); Increase residential density in the C-1 Commercial Zone; and relax or reduce standards for chain link fencing and RV and mini storage. Commissioner Thomson requested clarification of businesses with drive-through that are grandfathered in. There are 2 establishments in the CBD that were are considered pre- existing non-conforming uses. Commissioner Wahrmund requested clarification on maximum building heights and how this would affect increasing density. Staff clarified that several regulations may need to be changed to accommodate additional density. Commissioners Wahrmund and Graver expressed that increasing density may be a way to increase affordability. Upcoming reviews include looking into regulations for tiny homes/alternate housing and discussing a fee waiver for non-profit housing. Jerry Fugich asked the Commission to review and be prepared for further discussion at the next meeting. Subcommittee Reports: Commissioner Wahrmund reported that Cochrane Park restrooms are being installed and pond #1 will be cleaned out. Expecting to receive funding for construction of the Prairie Line th Trail. The Splash Pad will open on May 28 and the community garden is undergoing improvements. An initial grant has been given for the fitness pad in City Park and there is hope that JBLM will provide additional funding. Adjourn: MOTION BY CARLOS PEREZ, SECONDED BY BOB HOWARD TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 5:26 PM. Respectfully submitted, Casey Mauck, Assistant Planner Y ELM P LANNING C OMMISSION A GENDA M AY 17,20214:00PM Click here for meeting link 1.C ALL TO O RDER 2.R OLL C ALL 3.P LEDGE OF A LLEGIANCE 4.A GENDA A PPROVAL 5.A PPROVAL OF M INUTES Minutes from April 19, 2021attached 6.P UBLIC C OMMENT OR C OMMUNICATIONS 7.2021C OMPREHENSIVE P LAN U PDATE 8.S UBCOMMITTEE R EPORTS 9.A DJOURN Virtual Meeting: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_qZibyHhlTzeJ9-RogRdU0g Next Planning Commission Meeting June 2120214:00 PM MEETINGINFORMATION All regular meetings are recorded and may be viewed at www.yelmwa.gov. It is the City of least four (4) working days prior to meeting. Information on the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Title VI Statement is available at www.yelmwa.gov/human-resources. The public comment portion of the agenda is an opportunity for the public to address the Commission regarding matters that are not on the agenda. Comments are limited to three minutes and five speakers. Comment on matters listed on the agenda are welcomed. nd 106 2Street SE Yelm, WA 98597 360.458.3244 www.yelmwa.gov The City of Yelm is an equal opportunity employer and provider YELM PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES VIRTUAL MEETING VIA ZOOM MAY 17, 2021 – 4:00 PM Jerry Fugich called the meeting to order at 4:01 pm Members present: Jerry Fugich, John Thomson, John Graver, Anne Wahrmund, Bob Howard and Carlos Perez. Members Absent: Floyd Sheldon (excused) appeared late. Staff: Tami Merriman, Chris Vaccaro, AshleeSundand Casey Mauck. Approval of Agenda: MOTION BY JOHN THOMSON, SECONDED BY JOHN GRAVER TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Approval of Minutes: MOTION BY JOHN GRAVER, SECONDED BY BOB HOWARD TO APPROVE THE APRIL 19, 2021 MINUTES. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Public Comment: N/A 2021 Comprehensive Plan Update: Tami Merriman presented an outline of the process of amending the Unified Development Code (UDC). Tami reviewed the staff report presented at the previous meeting regarding possible changes to the UDC,including allowing drive-through establishments other than food service, in the Central Business District, increasing the density allowance in the commercial zones, allowing chain link fencing, and reviewing design standards for RV and mini storage. John Graver and Anne Warhmund expressed concern regarding transportation impacts that drive-through establishments could have in the CBD and suggested that ingress and egress be strategically placed on side streets. John Graver suggested allowing drive-through’s off back streets while prohibiting them on the main street. Jerry Fugich and John Thomson suggested that ingress be allowed on all streets, while egress prohibited on Yelm Avenue. Consensus was reached that drive-through establishments, other than food service be st allowed in the CBD as long as they did not exit onto Yelm Avenue or 1 Street/SR 507. TamiMerriman reviewed a request to increaseresidential density in thecommercial zoning districts. John Graver, Anne Wahrmund and Jerry Fugich voiced support for increasing the density allowance and encouraging “2 up 1 down” development where two floors of residential sat above one floor of commercial space. Tami expressed that it should be considered if the City would lose too much commercial space to apartments. Consensus was reached that the density should be increased to 32 units per acre. In regards to chain link fencing, TamiMerrimanexplained that there are instances where state and federal lawsrequire chain-link fencing, which overridesthe City regulation. This includes uses such as for schools, vehicle impound lots, and essential public facilities. John Graver, Jerry Fugich and Carlos Perez suggested to requiredense landscape screeningwhen chain link fencing is used on street frontages, howeverif a developer does not wish to install dense screening, they would have to use alternative fencing. Tami Merriman clarified that currently RV, boat and mini storage are allowed in the C-2 and C-3 commercial zones when they are located 500 feet from an urban arterial. John Thomson and Carlos Perez expressed support for the current policy. Anne Wahrmund asked whether road classification changes should be considered after the completion of the loop. Tami Merriman clarified that street classifications willbe analyzed and potentially changed in an update of our Transportation System Plan. Carlos Perez expressed support to keep current regulation and review again after the update to the transportation system plan. Tami Merriman informed the commission of the request to review fee waivers for nonprofit housing. The current fee schedule allows non-profit organizations to request a waiver of permit fees within the City. Jerry Fugich voiced that property taxes for development would outweigh the cost of waiving fees. John Thomson expressed that it should be defined whether this would concern nonprofit housing or affordable housing. Consensus was reached that the commission supports looking into fee waivers for affordable and nonprofit housing, after a housing needs analysis is completed. Tami Merriman and Chris Vaccaro presented information about tiny homes, which are not prohibited in our current code. Floyd Sheldon expressed concern that allowing tiny home villages could mean allowing RV parks, as RVs can technically be considered tiny homes. Anne Wahrmund suggested the commission tell City Council that they will need a Housing Action Plan to make determinations about tiny homes. Consensus was reached that the City Council should be asked to create a Housing Action Plan before the commission can address these matters. Tami Merriman reviewed a request to rezone 40 acres between Killion Rd and Mountain View Rd from Commercial (C—1) to Moderate Density Residential (R-6). Consensus was reached that parcels should be rezoned. Tami Merriman reviewed a request to rezone 49 acres on the East side of Railway Rd from Industrial (I) toModerate Density Residential (R-6). Consensus was reached that the parcels should be rezoned. Staff will present code language to reflect the consensuses of the commission discussed today in the June meeting. Public Comment & Communications N/A SubcommitteeReports: Anne Warhmund stated that the Parks Advisory Board has many events coming up this summer, and that the water park is opening soon. John Graverrequested ChrisVaccaroto speakregarding the Tree Advisory Board. Chris informed the Commission that trees are being removed on Creek Street by the Yelm Creek Apartments. Adjourn: MOTION BYANNE WARHMUND, SECONDED BY CARLOS PEREZ TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 5:41 PM. Respectfully submitted, Ashlee Sund, Administrative Assistant Y ELM P LANNING C OMMISSION A GENDA J UNE 21,20214:00PM Click here for meeting link 1.C ALL TO O RDER 2.R OLL C ALL 3.P LEDGE OF A LLEGIANCE 4.A GENDA A PPROVAL PPROVAL OF M INUTES 5.A Minutes from May 17, 2021attached 6.P UBLIC C OMMENT OR C OMMUNICATIONS 2021 UDC Update Redlines 8.S UBCOMMITTEE R EPORTS DJOURN 9.A Next Planning Commission Meeting July 1920214:00 PM Virtual Meeting: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_Ar6duKCcTMSCr5C6wlu0dQ MEETINGINFORMATION All regular meetings are recorded and may be viewed at www.yelmwa.gov. It is the City of Yelm’s policy to provide reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities. If you require reasonable accommodations to participate at a meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s office at 360.458.8402 at least four (4) working days prior to meeting. Information on the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Title VI Statement is available at www.yelmwa.gov/human-resources. nd 106 2Street SE Yelm, WA 98597 360.458.3244 www.yelmwa.gov The City of Yelm is an equal opportunity employer and provider Y ELM P LANNING C OMMISSION The public comment portion of the agenda is an opportunity for the public to address the Commission regarding matters that are not on the agenda. Comments are limited to three minutes and five speakers. Comment on matters listed on the agenda are welcomed. YELM PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES VIRTUAL MEETING VIA ZOOM June 21, 2021 4:00 PM Jerry Fugich called the meeting to order at 4:00 pm. Members present: Jerry Fugich, John Thomson, John Graver, Bob Howard, Floyd Sheldon and Carlos Perez. Members Absent: Anne Wahrmund (excused) Staff: Grant Beck, Ashlee Sund, Derek McCoy and Casey Mauck. Approval of Agenda: MOTION BY JOHN THOMSON, SECONDED BY JOHN GRAVER TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Approval of Minutes: MOTION BY CARLOS PEREZ, SECONDED BY JOHN THOMSON TO APPROVE THE MAY 17, 2021 MINUTES. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Public Comment & Communications: N/A 2021 Unified Development Code Update Redlines: th Casey Mauck presented changes in the code requested in the May 17 meeting which includes the following: drive-throughs in the Central Business District, residential density in the Commercial zone, chain link fencing, RV & mini storage, fee waivers for non-profit housing, and tiny homes. Planning commission confirmed that the staff report reflected their consensus accurately on all changes except regarding chain-link fencing. Mauck presented staff reports regarding a rezone of Commercial land to Moderate Density Residential, and Industrial land to Moderate Density Residential. Commission members confirmed they were in favor of both rezones. A public hearing will be held during the July meeting to receive public comment on the proposed changes. Public Comment & Communications N/A Subcommittee Reports: John Graver stated the tree board is looking for members. Jerry Fugich thanked staff for keeping things on track and appreciated all the hard work being conducted. Adjourn: MOTION BY JOHN THOMSON, SECONDED BY CARLOS PEREZ TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 4:44 PM. Respectfully submitted, Ashlee Sund, Administrative Assistant YELM PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES HYBRID MEETING VIA ZOOM & YELM CITY HALL July 19, 2021 4:00 PM Jerry Fugich called the meeting to order at 4:00 pm. Members present: Jerry Fugich, John Thomson, Anne Wahrmund, Bob Howard, Floyd Sheldon and Carlos Perez Members Absent: John Graver (excused) Staff: Grant Beck, Brianna Feller, Chris Vaccaro, Cody Colt, Derek McCoy and Casey Mauck Approval of Agenda: MOTION BY JOHN THOMSON, SECONDED BY BOB HOWARD TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Approval of Minutes: MOTION BY CARLOS PEREZ, SECONDED BY BOB HOWARD TO APPROVE THE JUNE 21, 2021 MINUTES. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Public Comment & Communications: N/A 2021 Unified Development Code and Comprehensive Plan Updates: Casey Mauck reviewed requested changes to the UDC and Comprehensive Plan and planning commission recommendations which includes the following: drive-throughs in the Central Business District, residential density in the Commercial zone, chain link fencing, RV & mini storage, fee waivers for non-profit housing, and tiny homes. Planning commission confirmed that the staff report reflected their consensus accurately. Mauck presented staff reports regarding a rezone of Commercial land to Moderate Density Residential, and Industrial land to Moderate Density Residential. Public Hearing on 2021 UDC and Comprehensive Plan Updates: Jerry Fugich opened the Public Hearing at 4:13 pm. Debra Larson Debra Larson is the director of Love Abounds in Yelm and spoke in support of a housing action plan and tiny housing in Yelm to provide shelter for the unhoused. Allan Hatcher, 16639 Canal Rd SE Yelm, WA Allan Hatcher expressed concerns regarding water availability in the City. He has heard from several people that water is a big issue in the City, and apartment buildings would increase that problem. Hatcher does not oppose RV storage but does not believe tiny houses will solve the homeless problem. He spoke about his love for the community and concern that tiny houses would downgrade neighborhoods. He also had concerns about tiny homes not being a permanent solution, and bringing more homeless people to the area. Hatcher spoke about trucks on Canal Rd SE degrading the County roads and creating potholes. Suzie LeFurgey, 17621 Valley Ln SE Yelm, WA Suzie LeFurgey is the founder of Love Abounds in Yelm and is in support of a study into housing availability in Yelm. LeFurgey states that Love Abounds supports homeless as well as low income residents of the City, and is looking into many options of alternative housing for the community. LeFurgey believes that the homelessness task force has been doing good work to support the homeless but there are still many unhoused people in the community. Ashley Atkins-Mackie and Richard Mackie, 16314 Railway Rd SE Yelm, WA Atkins- Railway Rd SE which is currently zoned Industrial, and are very excited to hear about the possible rezoning of the property to residential. They would like to state their support for the rezone as the community is growing. Cody Hutcheson, 16630 Railway Rd SE Yelm, WA Hutcheson owns a property in the proposed industrial to residential rezone and would like to state their support for the rezone to residential. Michael Edwards, 6535 Seaview Ave NW Seattle, WA Mike Edwards spoke in support of rezoning the commercial land between Killion Rd SE and Mountain View Rd SE to high density residential R-16. Edwards is part of a long-standing pioneer family and has been involved in several projects in Yelm. Edwards stated that higher density allows for greater real estate opportunities, tax revenue for the City, a mix of housing types, increased affordable housing, and better use of existing water and sewer infrastructure. Jerry Fugich and Anne Wahrmund expressed gratitude to the public for attending the meeting and sharing their input on the future of the City. Subcommittee Reports: Anne Wahrmund reported that there are many events going on in City parks this summer. Construction is coming along at Cochrane Park, and soon it will have restroom facilities. The commission expressed support for continuing hybrid meetings at the Council chambers and on Zoom. Derek McCoy stated that the City has made recently made repairs to the intersection of Canal Rd and Railway Rd. MOTION BY JOHN THOMSON, SECONDED BY ANNE WAHRMUND TO SEND FORWARD THE UDC AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS AS WRITTEN TO CITY COUNCIL. ALL EXCEPT CARLOS PEREZ WERE IN FAVOR. Carlos Perez expressed support for changing the commercial to residential rezone to a recommendation to high-density residential rezone, but would like updated analysis showing that water and sewer infrastructure are capable to support the rezone. AMENDMENT TO MOTION BY JOHN THOMSON, SECONDED BY ANNE WAHRMUND TO SEND FORWARD THE UDC AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS AS WRITTEN TO CITY COUNCIL WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE COMMERCIAL TO MODERATE DENSITY RESIDENTIAL REZONE CHANGED TO HGIH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. THE HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL REZONE RECOMMENDATION IS DEPENDENT ON ANALYSIS THAT SHOWS INFRASTRUCTURE IS CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING THE REZONE. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Adjourn: MOTION BY BOB HOWARD, SECONDED BY JOHN THOMSON TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 4:58 PM. Respectfully submitted, Casey Mauck, Assistant Planner Y ELM P LANNING C OMMISSION A GENDA J ULY 19,20214:00PM Click here for meeting link 1.Call to Order 2.Roll Call 3.Pledge of Allegiance 4.Agenda Approval 5.Approval of Minutes a.Minutes from June 21, 2021attached 6.Public Comment or Communications 7.Review Staff Language of Updates to 2021 Unified Development Code 8.Public Hearing a.Updates to the 2021 Unified Development Code and Comprehensive Plan 9.Subcommittee Reports 10.Adjourn Next Planning Commission Meeting August 16,20214:00 PM Virtual Meeting: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_YSdUeLCMS1m1chd8Dw1ulg MEETINGINFORMATION All regular meetings are recorded and may be viewed at www.yelmwa.gov. you office at 360.458.8402 at least five(5) working days prior to meeting. Information on the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Title VI Statement is available at www.yelmwa.gov/human- resources.The public comment portion of the agenda is an opportunity for the public to address the Commission regarding matters that are not on the agenda. Comments are limited to three minutes and five speakers. Comment on matters listed on the agenda are welcomed. 1| Page Y ELM P LANNING C OMMISSION A GENDA S EPTEMBER 20,20214:00PM Click here for meeting link 1.Call to Order 2.Roll Call 3.Pledge of Allegiance 4.Agenda Approval 5.Approval of Minutes a.Minutes from July 19, 2021attached 6.Public Comment or Communications 7.2022 Transportation Plan Update 8.Subcommittee Reports 9.Adjourn Next Planning Commission Meeting October 18,20214:00 PM Virtual Meeting: https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_wJIh7gsxTQesflnGRc6g-w MEETINGINFORMATION All regular meetings are recorded and may be viewed at www.yelmwa.gov. office at 360.458.8402 at least five(5) working days prior to meeting. Information on the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Title VI Statement is available at www.yelmwa.gov/human- resources.The public comment portion of the agenda isan opportunity for the public to address the Commission regarding matters that are not on the agenda. Comments are limited to three minutes and five speakers. Comment on matters listed on the agenda are welcomed. 1| Page Y ELM P LANNING C OMMISSION A GENDA O CTOBER 18,4:00PM Click here for meeting link Call to Order Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Agenda Approval Approval of Minutes Minutes from September 20, 2021 attached Public Comment or Communications 2022 Transportation System Plan Update Subcommittee Reports Adjourn Virtual Meeting: https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_Kl6YVGCmSnKNp8P_IcImvQ MEETINGINFORMATION All regular meetings are recorded and may be viewed at www.yelmwa.gov. to provide reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities. If office at 360.458.8402 at least five(5) working days prior to meeting. Information on the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Title VI Statement is available at www.yelmwa.gov/human- resources.The public comment portion of the agenda is an opportunity for the public to address the Commission regarding matters that are not on the agenda. Comments are limited to three minutes and five speakers. Comment on matters listed on the agenda are welcomed. Next Planning Commission Meeting November 15, 20214:00 PM Y ELM P LANNING C OMMISSION A GENDA D ECEMBER 20,20214:00PM Click here for meeting link 1.Call to Order 2.Roll Call 3.Pledge of Allegiance 4.Agenda Approval 5.Approval of Minutes a.Minutes from October 18, 2021attached 6.Public Comment or Communications 7.Home Occupation Unified Development Code Updates 8.Subcommittee Reports 9.Adjourn Virtual Meeting: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/82602636482 MEETINGINFORMATION All regular meetings are recorded and may be viewed at www.yelmwa.gov. to provide reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities. If office at 360.458.8402 at least five(5) working days prior to meeting. Information on the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Title VI Statement is available at www.yelmwa.gov/human- resources.The public comment portion of the agenda is an opportunity for the public to address the Commission regarding matters that are not on the agenda. Comments are limited to three minutes and five speakers. Comment on matters listed on the agenda are welcomed. Next Planning Commission Meeting January 18, 20224:00 PM YELM PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES VIRTUAL MEETING VIA ZOOM October 18, 2021 4:00 PM Jerry Fugich called the meeting to order at 4:00 pm. Members present: Jerry Fugich, John Thomson, Anne Wahrmund, Carlos Perez, and John Graver Members Absent: Bob Howard (excused) and Floyd Sheldon (excused) Staff: Casey Mauck, Sara Williams, Landon Hawes, Brianna Feller, Chris Vaccaro, and Savana Cervantes Approval of Agenda: MOTION BY ANNE WAHRMUND, SECONDED BY JOHN THOMSON TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Approval of Minutes: MOTION BY CARLOS PEREZ, SECONDED BY JOHN GRAVER TO APPROVE THE SEPTEMBER 20, 2021 MINUTES. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Public Comment & Communications: N/A 2022 Transportation System Plan Update: Casey Mauck reported changes to the Transportation System plan, including a priority list of projects in low, medium, and high categories. Mauck also delivered a proposed timeline of the plan, with a goal of presenting at the City Council Study Session in December, and the January City Council meeting for adoption. Planning Commissioners asked if golf carts will be accepted, under the WATV approval on city streets. Mauck will research an answer to the question, and will bring it to the next meeting in November. Public Hearing on 2022 Transportation System Plan: Jerry Fugich opened the Public Hearing at 4:24 pm. There were no staff reports, questions for staff, or public testimony. The Public Hearing was closed at 4:25 pm. Staff Report: Landon Hawes reported that due to an item on chain-link fencing, the 2021 Code Update was th rejected at the October 12 City Council meeting. The topic of the chain-link fencing will come back to the Planning Commission meeting next month, with a goal of being presented at the Study Session in December. Subcommittee Reports: Anne Wahrmund reported that the design for the dog park by the water reclamation facility is moving forward. The project is utilizing design work being done by local students at Saint Martins University. Phase one includes grading and putting in a new road. Phase two will include fencing and amenities. Regarding the bike trail, Wahrmund reported that design, development, and planning is currently being done on the stage of the trail that goes to the river. MOTION BY JOHN THOMSON, SECONDED BY ANNE WAHRMUND, TO SEND THE 2022 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN TO COUNCIL. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Adjourn: MOTION BY CARLOS PEREZ, SECONDED BY JOHN GRAVER TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 4:39 PM. Respectfully submitted, Savana Cervantes, Administrative Assistant Y ELM P LANNING C OMMISSION A GENDA A UGUST 16, 2021 4:00 PM 1. Call to Order 2.Roll Call 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Agenda Approval 5. Approval of Minutes 6. Public Comment or Communications 7. Subcommittee Reports 8. Adjourn Next Planning Commission Meeting September 20, 2021 4:00 PM MEETING INFORMATION All regular meetings are recorded and may be viewed at www.yelmwa.gov. you office at 360.458.8402 at least five (5) working days prior to meeting. Information on the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Title VI Statement is available at www.yelmwa.gov/human- resources. The public comment portion of the agenda is an opportunity for the public to address the Commission regarding matters that are not on the agenda. Comments are limited to three minutes and five speakers. Comment on matters listed on the agenda are welcomed. 1 | Page Y ELM P LANNING C OMMISSION A GENDA , 2021 4:00 PM 1.Call to Order 2.Roll Call 3.Pledge of Allegiance 4.Agenda Approval 5.Approval of Minutes 6.Public Comment or Communications 7.Subcommittee Reports 8.Adjourn Next Planning Commission Meeting 20, 2021 4:00 PM MEETING INFORMATION All regular meetings are recorded and may be viewed at www.yelmwa.gov. you office at 360.458.8402 at least five (5) working days prior to meeting. Information on the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Title VI Statement is available at www.yelmwa.gov/human- resources. The public comment portion of the agenda is an opportunity for the public to address the Commission regarding matters that are not on the agenda. Comments are limited to three minutes and five speakers. Comment on matters listed on the agenda are welcomed. YELM PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES VIRTUAL MEETING VIA ZOOM September 20, 2021 4:00 PM Jerry Fugich called the meeting to order at 4:00 pm. Members present: Jerry Fugich, John Thomson, Anne Wahrmund, Bob Howard, Floyd Sheldon Carlos Perez, and John Graver Members Absent: N/A Staff: Savana Cervantes, Chris Vaccaro, Casey Mauck, Sara Williams, Landon Hawes, and Brianna Feller Approval of Agenda: MOTION BY CARLOS PEREZ, SECONDED BY JOHN THOMSON TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Approval of Minutes: MOTION BY BOB HOWARD, SECONDED BY ANNE WAHRMUND TO APPROVE THE JULY 19, 2021 MINUTES. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. Public Comment & Communications: N/A 2022 Transportation Plan Update: Casey Mauck reviewed changes to the Transportation System Plan which is updated from the 2009 plan. Changes include the project list, a new implementation and funding section, and topics to focus on in future updates. Commissioners requested that the map in the plan be updated to have street names, and that the plan have priority designations with each project. Mauck asked if commissioners would prefer to have an in-person or virtual open house to solicit feedback on the draft, and commissioners stated that with COVID-19 it may be prudent to have a virtual open house. Subcommittee Reports: Commissioners discussed if Jerry Fugich should continue as chair. Fugich will continue as chair for another year with Floyd Sheldon as vice chair, and Sheldon will be the next chair. Anne Wahrmund reported that there are many events going on in the parks this summer. Students from St. Martins University are working on the design for a new City dog park, and there is funding to construct the Yelm Prairie Line Trail to the river. Adjourn: MOTION BY JOHN GRAVER, SECONDED BY CARLOS PEREZ TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 5:05 PM. Respectfully submitted, Casey Mauck, Assistant Planner Savana Cervantes, Administrative Assistant Sara Williams, Assistant Planner