Re MOB reviewIPM.Note
Re: MOB review
Re:
Gary Carlson
Joseph Butler
Gary Carlson
SMTP
joeinoly@yahoo.com
MOB review
EX
/O=CITYOFYELM/OU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=GARY
EX
/O=CITYOFYELM/OU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=GARY
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from psmtp.com ([64.18.0.209]) by server1.ci.yelm.wa.us with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Mon, 4 May 2009 18:30:43 -0700
Received: from source ([206.190.39.247]) by exprod5mx184.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Mon, 04 May 2009 21:29:23 EDT
Received: (qmail 15644 invoked by uid 60001); 5 May 2009 01:29:20 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1241486960; bh=Ly9ZqnD3A0mU6PTAzSTjTfxID9O+3Gg7I3IVNN6WsOs=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:F
om:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=O0OJ/m06ZA1UwyYMi8pFXBQ4ycgx9U/r6G53HbH0Ova/WGlnZ04mfEMKbuDLSi3Oyob94D1m7uML7udLYLEf0nO8jh4t7q2fIIO2nDe8BHBMdFhXyox8zs1BkdvuHstO8AO8lhnj+IIfb5kr
tEHCihgRbJj22V4DXmac8j7/bQ=
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
b=bLGKXFySP+eHB8RG4S11/hQCMMZ52d317YD6RahvPAr3x8x04MhAQeO5lSKKkFAdDCIXCAIW7cCxllKhk94QrTaVe+kcrI9ZHRLYs9UynfaQX1pkMfnKMwUw40RcQOMVq2Oml5rv5Tj32k5vEal16VDOOgiVCXwoG6RLP+yF2Mo=;
Message-ID: <349953.15629.qm@web54205.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: CrjF5NsVM1mawiHP9Y8H5MjtGwRrCSlbDe8J4XCiKukndBAGIcxWeIUXCDubB3_Dk31AKlR7xaXC7.sADt7lifKCfJeVQDuY3GoCSduuioto7K7TGrAsDwk2yeYDpRm08NHkkvjbjeQOCUrW0hd0xRAZZyWf_HxcXTwKj9j_wqZMY_a8WgmsV4q5VX
spspy4j_bUsT8luCtlIAEk46RIh9YkJorf8LwuvbjGofKsOwtqozwRrH1xuTh2fzG0axd2Lwm.ingQySqUY6hFZpfONtFC9.L88O1iB4_uamJWgdfN50-
Received: from [70.57.74.61] by web54205.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 04 May 2009 18:29:20 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1277.35 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.1
References: <DC90029353CCCD468AA2A2858FFCD8F596884C@server1.ci.yelm.wa.us>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 18:29:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Joseph Butler <joeinoly@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: MOB review
To: Gary Carlson <garyc@ci.yelm.wa.us>
In-Reply-To: <DC90029353CCCD468AA2A2858FFCD8F596884C@server1.ci.yelm.wa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-599082237-1241486960=:15629"
X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 CV: 4.0858 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 5 (2.0000:2.0000) s CV gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <joeinoly@yahoo.com> [401/17]
Return-Path: joeinoly@yahoo.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 May 2009 01:30:43.0562 (UTC) FILETIME=[1B7DE4A0:01C9CD21]
--0-599082237-1241486960=:15629
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
--0-599082237-1241486960=:15629
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
--0-599082237-1241486960=:15629--
Joseph Butler
SMTP
joeinoly@yahoo.com
Gary Carlson
MOB review
Gary,
In my opinion the length of landing at the inside corner of the dog leg
shall be 44" at a point below the handrail.
________________________________
From: Gary Carlson <garyc@ci.yelm.wa.us>
To: Joseph Butler <joeinoly@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2009 3:49:48 PM
Subject: FW: MOB review
Joe,
I know we talked about this, would email your answer to her back to me.
Thanks
Gary
________________________________
From: Gina Dais [mailto:GDais@TGBArchitects.com]
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 3:30 PM
To: Gary Carlson
Cc: Steve Harrington
Subject: RE: MOB review
Gary,
We are currently preparing the resubmittal, but wanted to verify the
stair issue has been resolved per my email last week (also below).
Just let me know!
Thanks, Gary .
Gina Dais
tgba | tgbarchitects
21911 76th Ave W Suite 210, Edmonds WA 98026
t: 425.778.1530 f: 425.774.7803
From: Gina Dais
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 11:08 AM
To: 'Gary Carlson'
Cc: Steve Harrington
Subject: RE: MOB review
Gary,
Please see my response below in red. We will be working on a resubmittal
to address your outstanding concerns and get that to you with in the
next couple of days.
Kind Regards,
Gina Dais
tgba | tgbarchitects
21911 76th Ave W Suite 210, Edmonds WA 98026
t: 425.778.1530 f: 425.774.7803
From: Gary Carlson [mailto:garyc@ci.yelm.wa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 2:26 PM
To: Gina Dais
Cc: Steve Harrington
Subject: MOB review
Gina,
Attached to this email are Joe’s responses to the resubmitted plans.
Our primary issue still remains on the landing length for the stairs.
Do you have the width at 5-9” for anticipated occupancy load of the
second floor?
Based on our calculations and Table 1005.1 to determine minimum width of
stairs: 2nd Floor Occupant load = 159 (shown on sheet A0.10), Required
width Multiplier (0.2 inches per occupant, Table 1005.1 with sprinkler
system). 159 x 0.2 = 23.85” required, but not to be less than 44” (as
required by 1009.1). The provided width (69”) is primarily for
aesthetic purposes and exceeds code minimums. We exceed the required
minimum width by 25”.
The concern is the length of the landing at the dog leg not being the
width of the stairwell.
Based on 44” as a MINIMUM which we have exceeded it seems to reason that
the 4’-9”(57”) provided (see 1/A5.00) is already in excess of the
minimum REQUIRED width of the egress path. Section 1009.4 also further
caps this minimum required width to 48”…”Such dimension need not exceed
48” where the stairway has a straight run”
Secondary concerns are the overflow drain locations and bases for the
light standards. The design of the overflow drains are code correct,
however, their proximity to the roof drains will require timely
maintenance.
Is this a requirement for us to change or just an owner maintenance
issue?
Neither, Steve nor I could find the pole installation requirements in
our drawing for the parking lot light standards. Are the light poles to
be ground supported like street lights or sit on a base as is typical in
parking lots? If they are to be ground set do you think the planter
strip curbing will protect them? If they are on a base what is the
height of the base and do you take that in to account for our light
height.
We will provide a detail describing this in a forthcoming resubmittal.
Thanks
Gary
<349953.15629.qm@web54205.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
<DC90029353CCCD468AA2A2858FFCD8F596884C@server1.ci.yelm.wa.us>
<DC90029353CCCD468AA2A2858FFCD8F596884C@server1.ci.yelm.wa.us>
Re%3A MOB review-4.EML
Gary Carlson
Gary Carlson
EX
/O=CITYOFYELM/OU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=GARY
gary
Gary Carlson
SMTP
garyc@ci.yelm.wa.us