MOB reviewIPM.Note
MOB review
Steve Harrington
Gary Carlson
Steve Harrington
EX
/O=CITYOFYELM/OU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=GARY
MOB review
EX
/O=CITYOFYELM/OU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=STEVEH
EX
/O=CITYOFYELM/OU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=STEVEH
Gary Carlson
EX
/O=CITYOFYELM/OU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=GARY
Steve Harrington
Gina Dais
MOB review
Gina,
Attached to this email are Joe’s responses to the resubmitted plans.
Our primary issue still remains on the landing length for the stairs.
Do you have the width at 5-9” for anticipated occupancy load of the
second floor? The concern is the length of the landing at the dog leg
not being the width of the stairwell.
Secondary concerns are the overflow drain locations and bases for the
light standards. The design of the overflow drains are code correct,
however, their proximity to the roof drains will require timely
maintenance.
Neither, Steve nor I could find the pole installation requirements in
our drawing for the parking lot light standards. Are the light poles to
be ground supported like street lights or sit on a base as is typical in
parking lots? If they are to be ground set do you think the planter
strip curbing will protect them? If they are on a base what is the
height of the base and do you take that in to account for our light
height.
Thanks
Gary
<DC90029353CCCD468AA2A2858FFCD8F592F219@server1.ci.yelm.wa.us>
MOB review.EML
Steve Harrington
11.0
TGBA Response Ltr RES 142509
TGBA Response Ltr RES 142509
Gina Dais
SMTP
GDais@TGBArchitects.com
'Gina Dais'
Gina Dais
GDais@TGBArchitects.com
Steve Harrington
EX
/O=CITYOFYELM/OU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Steveh
steveh@ci.yelm.wa.us
458-8423
Community Development
Steve Harrington
Steve Harrington
steveh
TGBA Response Ltr RES 142509.pdf
tgba 14 April 2009 Gary Carlson Grant Beck 105 Yelm Avenue West P.O. Box 479 Yelm, WA 98597 Dear Gary and Grant, This letter is in response to the email from Gary dated 0l April 2009:
1. Please reconcile the lobby angled stair landing with IBC 1009.4 and 1009.8. (also there is a typo on A5 at the 4 treads note) a. See reissued sheet 45.00. 2. The tenant improvement
drawings must show model and manufacture of the door hardware. a. See the attached door hardware specification for the building core doors; tenant improvements to be issued under separate
permit. 3. The tenant improvement drawings must show restroom fixtures meeting the type and number from the Uniform Plumbing Code. a. Attached are the cut sheets of the plumbine fixtures
that will be issued under the deferred plumbing submittal per sheet 40.00. All tenant improvements to be issued under separate permit. 4. ls there an lnsight geologic report stating
that the allowable soil bearing is 4K? a. See the revised note on sheet S1.0. The allowable soil bearing is 2000 psf per lnsight Geologic, lnc. Report # 441,-00ç01, which has been changed
on S1.0. S1-.0 reported the allowable soil bearing in error as 4000 psf so it has been changed to 2000 psf to reflect the Geotech report. The submitted calculation package used 2000
psf for all calculations so no action is required. 5. Detail 5 on 46.10 calls a reference to 1/48.00. ls there an A8.00? a. See the revised detail reference on A16;1rQ, reference to
be 7/46.10. 6. For both general and testing special inspections add the Yelm building officialto the copy list. a, See added note to sheet S1.1. t 425.77s.1s3o I zrsr r zerl ,0,,,,1,0,.,,i,
I ;.;""r;;:",:;sure2ro I ;ffi;:i::::.'jï""'"'*'""* I tghpl 6icûg Plan review responses 4/25/09 Joseph Butler
7. Watch for conflicts between 2/A6.LO and 3, 5,6,9,f5t.3 a. Details shown for general reference; see revised sheet $3. 8. 8/54.L is called out on S4.0. There is no 8 on 54.1 a. See
new sheet S4.1. 9. Please show a complete detail and full height section of the drain leaders from the roof. Show them on the foundation drawing, include the eventual termination point.
Please provide an analysis of the capacity of the two leaders using the 10 year storm as a base flow and the correct tributary area for each leader. a. See details on3/L}and L2/A2:L3.
b. See deferred plumbing submittal, as well as attached UPC storm drainage analysis used for the basis of design. Accompanying this letter is 2 sets of revised drawings, plumbing cut
sheets, and door hardware schedule. Please let me know if you have further questions or comments. Kind Regards, 2./-r'*2r2 Gina Dais t 425,7g.1530 | zrstt 76rhAveWsuire2l0 | tncorporatedinlhesrareofw
shington I taylorgregorybutterfieldarchitects I 425.774.7803 | Edmonds\ry4 98026 | www.rgoarcnitects.com I
.pdf
TGBARE~2.PDF
TGBA Response Ltr RES 142509.pdf