RE Peer ReviewIPM.Note
RE: Peer Review
RE:
Steve Harrington
Clint Pierpoint
Steve Harrington
SMTP
clint.pierpoint@kpff.com
Peer Review
EX
/O=CITYOFYELM/OU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=STEVEH
EX
/O=CITYOFYELM/OU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=STEVEH
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from psmtp.com ([64.18.0.118]) by server1.ci.yelm.wa.us with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Wed, 27 May 2009 17:12:38 -0700
Received: from source ([63.249.27.195]) (using SSLv3) by exprod5mx232.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Wed, 27 May 2009 17:10:37 PDT
Received: from NBK040 ([172.16.1.101])
by mail.seattle.kpff.com (VisNetic.MailServer.v6.2.2.0) with ASMTP id DTF37927;
Wed, 27 May 2009 17:10:35 -0700
Received: from 172.16.12.19 ([172.16.12.19] helo=NBK040) by ASSP-nospam;
27 May 2009 17:10:24 -0700
From: "Clint Pierpoint" <clint.pierpoint@kpff.com>
To: "'Steve Harrington'" <steveh@ci.yelm.wa.us>
Cc: <mark.steepy@kpff.com>
References: <DC90029353CCCD468AA2A2858FFCD8F554E3E0@server1.ci.yelm.wa.us>
Subject: RE: Peer Review
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:10:18 -0700
Message-ID: <002501c9df28$b3862a50$110c10ac@kpfflacey.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0026_01C9DEEE.07275250"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
Thread-Index: AcnX9S25EKMRLiA0SEmYLTUhUVoAVgABwEhAAcmRr0A=
In-Reply-To: <DC90029353CCCD468AA2A2858FFCD8F554E3E0@server1.ci.yelm.wa.us>
X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 CV: 6.4138 FC:93.6803 LC:93.6803 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 5 (2.0000:2.0000) s CV gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <clint.pierpoint@kpff.com> [49/2]
Return-Path: clint.pierpoint@kpff.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 May 2009 00:12:38.0734 (UTC) FILETIME=[029E1EE0:01C9DF29]
------=_NextPart_000_0026_01C9DEEE.07275250
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
------=_NextPart_000_0026_01C9DEEE.07275250
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
------=_NextPart_000_0026_01C9DEEE.07275250--
Clint Pierpoint
SMTP
clint.pierpoint@kpff.com
mark.steepy@kpff.com
Steve Harrington
Peer Review
Steve,
We have reviewed our invoice and hours billed for the for peer review of
Eagle Plaza Civil Construction documents. All hours billed to this
project were legitimately spent in review of this project.
Our work included review of 21 sheets in the plan set for consistency
with Yelm Development guidelines, review of WSDOT and Thurston County
access constraints for the proposed site, review of the drainage report
and calculations, and review of the STEP tank sizing report. KPFF also
attended a design review meeting at the City of Yelm to review comments
from public works and other departments.
However, we realize we have been considerably more efficient on other
review projects. Typical review fees for projects of this size and
scope are roughly $200-$250 per plan set sheet. Rudimentary cost
calculations for this plan set would be $4,200 to $5,250. In the
interest of preserving the relationship with the City and the developer,
we are willing to accept payment for $4,200.
I appreciate your cooperation in this matter, if you have any questions,
please don’t hesitate to give me a call.
Cordially
Clinton D. Pierpoint | Associate
KPFF Consulting Engineers
4200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 309
Lacey, Washington 98503
O: (360) 292-7230 M: (360) 790-6832
F: (360) 292-7231
clint.pierpoint@kpff.com <mailto:clint.pierpoint@kpff.com>
www.kpff.com <http://www.kpff.com>
________________________________
From: Steve Harrington [mailto:steveh@ci.yelm.wa.us]
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 2:11 PM
To: Clint Pierpoint; Ben Enfield
Subject: FW: Pier Review
I am forwarding this onto you to take a look at. It looks like Scott
has some issues with the hours. Could you brief me better on this so I
can provide an answer to him?
Thanks,
Steve
________________________________
From: Scott L Ritter [mailto:scottlritter@comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 1:14 PM
To: Steve Harrington
Subject: Pier Review
Steve
I just received the invoice on Friday for the review of the Eagle Plaza.
Not sure who to discuss this with so thought I would start with you. I
am having a hard time getting my head around that kpff would need 63.5
hrs to review these plans. Can you confirm that this is not a billing
error on their end?
Scott L Ritter
Ritter Holding Company
2840 Crites St. S.W.
Tumwater Wa. 98512
360-791-1589 Cell
360-292-7850 Office ext 121
360-292-7851 Fax
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should
delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
Sharing or fowarding this information is not permitted unless written
permission has been given to recipient to which it was intended.
<002501c9df28$b3862a50$110c10ac@kpfflacey.com>
<DC90029353CCCD468AA2A2858FFCD8F554E3E0@server1.ci.yelm.wa.us>
<DC90029353CCCD468AA2A2858FFCD8F554E3E0@server1.ci.yelm.wa.us>
RE%3A Peer Review.EML
Steve Harrington
Steve Harrington
EX
/O=CITYOFYELM/OU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=STEVEH
steveh
'Steve Harrington'
SMTP
steveh@ci.yelm.wa.us
mark.steepy@kpff.com
SMTP
mark.steepy@kpff.com
mark.steepy@kpff.com
mark.steepy@kpff.com