TC 2013104498 DNS 09272013 Project No.: 2013104498
� SEPA Folder No.: 13 111890 XA
�
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Proponent: Thurston County
�� � M 2000 Lalceridge Drive SW,Building#1
i o Olympia,WA 98502
� ; cv Contact: Christy Osborn,Capital Facilities Projects Coordinatar(360)754-3355
� � Ex:4465
N Description of Pro�osal: This SEPA review is for the 2014-2019 Thurston County Comprehensive Plan-
� n- Chapter 6, of the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Amendments. The annual CFP
� amendment is the identification of new,revised and expanded capital facilities to be
provided in the coming six years and the plan for financing them.This amends the
'� � Original 1994 EIS far the Thurston County Comprehensive Plan and supplements.
� For further information please see Thurston County's CFP web page at:
� http://www.co.thurston.wa.us/planning/cap-facilities-plan/cap_facilities_home.htm
� Because the proposed code amendments are not associated with a s�ecific
development proposal, they are being reviewed as a Non-project Achon, in
accordance with the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). All
specific proposals will be required to apply for project specific pernuts and meet all
curtent regulations at the time of applicahon
Location of Proposal: Thurston County
Section/Township/Ran�e: N/A T�Parcel No.: N/A
Threshold Determination: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable
significant adverse impact upon the environment. An Environmental Impact
Statement is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(C). This decision was made
after review by the Lead Agency of a completed Environmental Checklist and other
information on file with the Lead Agency. This information is a�ailable to the public
on the Thurston County website or upon request.
Jurisdiction: Thurston County
Lead Agenc� Planning
Responsible Official: Scott Clazk,Director
Date of Issue: September 27,2013 .
Comment Deadline: October 11,2013
Appeal Deadline: October 25 13
,
� �t n f,.�` �,,,
�' ia ' on,Environmental Review Officer
This Determination ofNonsignific ce(MDNS)is issued under 197-11-350. The lead agency will not act on this
proposal for 14 days from the date of issue or until the appeal period has passed,if applicable. No permits may be
issued,and the applicant shall not begin work until after the comment and any appeal periods have expired and any
other necessary permits are issued. If conditions are added,deleted,or modified during the 14 day review period,a
modified MDNS will be issued. Otherwise,this MDNS will become final after the expiration of the comment
deadline and appeal period,if applicable.
APPEALS: Threshold determinations may be appealed pursuant to TCC 17.09.160 if: (1) a written notice of
appeal,meeting the requirements of TCC 17.09.160(4),and the appropriate appeal fee is recerved by the Thurston
CounTy Development Services Department within seven(7) calendar days of the last day of the comment period on
the threshold determination and; (2) the person filing the appeal is an aggrieved party and submitted written
comments prior to the comment deadline,per the requirements of TCC 17.09.160(2).
NOTE: The issuance ofthis Determination ofNonsignificance does not constitute project approval. The applicant
must comply with all applicable requirements of Thurston County Departments andlor the Hearing Examiner prior
to receiving permits.
Thurston County Development Services,Cynthia Wilson
Buiiding#1,Administration
2000 Lakeridge Drive SW
Olympia,WA 98502 (360)786-5475
cc: Department of Ecology Thurston Co Environmental Health Dept
Thurston Co Roads&Transportation Service Deparhnent of Fish&Wildlife
Roads Development Review Christy Osborn
Washin on Depzrtment of Transportation Town of Rainier,Mayor
City of�enino,Mayor Town of Bucoda,Mayor
City of Yelm City of Lacey
Holly Gilbert,TRPC Cliff Moore
City of Tumwater,Tim Smith City of Olympia
Port of Olympia Chehalis Tribe
Sc�uaxin Island Tribe Thurston Co Water and Waste Management
Nisqually Tribe Interested Parties
The Olympian Scott Clazk
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
"USE BLACK INK ONLY"
1. Proponent(c): Thurston Countv * * * * OFFICIAL USE ONLY * * * *
Address: 2000 Lakeridge Drive SW, Olympia, WA SEPA# (a): �3 i � f�� �� ����o�y `�
98502-6045 Case#(b):
Phone: 360-786-5490 Related Cases:
2. Representative: Christv Osborn, Plannin�Dept. Date Received: a���3 By: V�
Address: same Submittal: Complete_Incomplete_
Information Requested:
Phone: 360-754-3355 ext: 4465
3. Property Address or location(e): Proposal(d):
Coun, ide
4. 1/4 S/T/R(fl:
5. Tax Parcel#(g): * * * * OFFICIAL USE ONLY * * * *
6. Total Acres:
7. Permit Type: Comprehensive Plan amendment
8. Zoning: varies
9. Shoreline Environment: varies SEP 2 5 2013
10. Water Body:varies
11. Brief Description of the Proposal and Project Name: . _ � - �
Amendments to Chapter 6 Capital Facilities Plan of the Thurston County Comprehensive Plan This is a non
project action. See at the following link:
http://www.co.thurston wa us/plannin�p-facilities-plan/cap facilities�home htm
12. Did you attend a presubmission conference for this project? yes no X
If yes,when?
13. Estimated Project Completion Date: October 2013
14. List of all Permits,Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal(federal,state and local--including
rezones): Amendments must be certified bv WA State Dept of Commerce as in compliance with the Growth
Mana�ement Act.
15. Do you have any plans for future additions,expansion or further activity related to or connected with this proposal?
If yes, explain:
This section of the Comprehensive Plan is amended annually
16. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain:_
17. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable):
Adoption planned for October 2013 along with the Coun,t�ud e�t
18. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared,or will be prepared,directly related to
this proposal.
Final EIS, Thurston Countv Comnrehensive Plan 1994 and Supplements Required environmental review and
permittin�far individual projects listed in the CFP will be attained through project implementation
- 1 -
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST �
Purpose of Checklist
The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA),Chapter 43.21 C RCW,requires all governmental agencies to consider the
environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be
prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of
this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or
avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for A�plicants- USE BLACK INK ONLY
This Environmental Checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies
use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant,requiring preparation
of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known,or give the best description you can.
Please do not write in the area that is specified for ❑agency use only❑.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully,to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,you should be
able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. Ifyou really do
not know the answer,or if a question does not apply to your proposal,write"do not know"or"does not apply." Complete
answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations,such as zoning,shoreline,and landmark designations. Answer these
questions if you can. If you ha�e problems,the governmental agencies can assist you.
A site plan must accompany the Environmental Checklist. It should be clearly legible, scaled accurately and include
information regarding boundary lines of subject and adjacent properties;roads,existing and proposed;existing buildings;
wells and drainfields,if any;geographical features(such as steep slopes,low areas,seasonal or year-round drainages and
shorelines)and details of the project. Please submit one copy of the site plan 8❑"x 11" ar 8❑"x 14" in size.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on
different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that wili help describe your proposal or its environmental
effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional
information reasonably related to determining if there may be a significant adverse impact.
Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals
Nonproject proposals are those which are not tied to a specific site, such as adoption of plans, policies, or ordinances.
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals,even though questions may be answered"does not apply." In addition,
complete the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions(Part D).
Far nonproject actions,the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant,"and"property or site" should
read as "proposal," "proposer," and"affected geographic area,"respectively.
Fees: Thurston County Development Services -Minor Administrative Permits
Thurston County Development Services -Major Hearing Examiner Permits
STAFF ONLY
Environmental Checklist Submittal Requirements
Check all Front Page Entries
Check Signature and Date for Completion
Include any environmental reports required. (Wetland report, etc.)
Fees,Paid
Site Plan: Submit one copy of site plan 8❑"x 11" or 80"x 14".
Plan must be clearly legible and contain pertinent information.
K:�SEPA.SH�FORMSWPPLICAT�ENVCKOI.WPD Revised 12/29/00
ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
Evaluation for
To be Completed bv Appticant Agencv Use Onlv
1. Earth
a. General description of the site(circle one): Flat,ro(ling,hilly,steep slopes,
mountainous,other VARIES THROUGHOUT COLTNTY.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approgimate percent slope)?
N/a
c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example, clay,sand
gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.
N/a
d. Are there surface indicators or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? If so,describe.
N/a
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or
grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
N/a
f. Coutd erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so,
generally describe.
N/a
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces
after project construction(for egample,asphait or buildings)?
N/a
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the
earth,if any:
N/a
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would resutt from the proposal(i.e.,dust,
automobile,odors,industrial wood smoke)during construction and when
the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate
quantities if known.
N/a
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your
proposal? If so,generally describe.
N/a
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if
any:
N/a
-2-
Evaluation for �
To be Completed by Applicant A�ency Use Only
3. Water
a. Surface
(1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the
site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If
appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into.
N/a
(2) Wilt the project require any work over,in,or adjacent to(within 200
feet)the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available
plans.
N/a
(3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in
or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the
site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fll material.
N/a
(4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions?
Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if
known.
N/a
(5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so,note location
on the site plan.
N/a
(6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface
waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of
discharge.
N/a
b. Ground
(1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to
ground water? Give general description,purpose,and approximately
quantities if known.
N/a
(2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from
septic tanks or other sources, if any(for example: domestic sewage;
industrial,containing the following chemicals. ..; agricultural; etc.).
Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the
number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals
or humans the system(s)are expected to serve.
N/a
- 3 -
Evaluation for
To be Completed by Applicant A�ency Use Only
c. Water Run-off(includinE stormwater)
(1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of
collection and disposal,if any(include quantities,in known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe.
N/a
(2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally
describe.
N/a
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts,
if any:
N/a
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:N/a
Deciduous tree: alder,maple,aspen,other
Evergreen tree: fir,cedar,pine,other
Shr�bs
Grass
Pasture
Crop or grain
Wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup,bulrush,skunk cabbage,other
Water plants: water lily,eelgrass,milfoil,other
_Other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
N/a
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
N/a
d. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants,or other measures to preserve
or enhance vegetation on the site,if any:
N/a
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site
or are known to be oa or near the site:N/a
Birds: hawk,heron,eagle,songbirds,other:
Mammals: deer,bear,elk,beaver,other:
Fish: bass,salmon,trout,herring,shellfish,other:
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
N/a
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain.
N/a
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any:
N/a
6. Energv and Natural Resources
a. What Icinds of energy(electric,natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to
meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for
heating,manufacturing,etc.
-4-
Evaluation for "
To be Completed by Applicant Agency Use Only
N/a
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?
If so,generally describe.
N/a
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any:
N/a
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there are any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals,risk of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste,that could occur as a
result of this proposal? If so,describe.
N/a
(1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
N/a
(2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,if
any:
N/a
b. Noise
(1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your
project(for example: trafiic,equipment,operation,other)?
N/a
(2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or
associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term
basis(for example: traffic,construction,operation,other)?
Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
N/a
(3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any:
N/a
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
N/a
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe.
N/a
c. Describe any structures on the site.
N/a
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what?
N/a
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
- 5 -
Evaluation for
To be Completed by Applicant A�ency Use Onl_y
£ What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
N/a
g. If applicable,what is the current Shoreline Master Program designation of the site?
N/a
h. Has any part of the site been classified an"environmentally sensitive"area? If so,
specify.
N/a
I. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
N/a
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
N/a
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any?
N/a
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected
land uses and plans,if any:
N/a
9. Housin�
a. Approximately how many units would be provided,if any? Indicate whether 6igh-,
middle-,or low-income housing.
N/a
b. Approximately how many units, if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether
high-,middle,or low-income housing.
N/a
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any:
N/a
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas;what
is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed?
N/a
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
N/a
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any:
N/a
11. Light and Glare
a What type of light or glare witl the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur?
N/a
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
N/a
c. What existing off-site sources of light or g►are may affect your proposal?
N/a
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any:
N/a
-6 -
Evaluation for -
To be Completed by Applicant A�ency Use Only
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
N/a
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe.
N/a
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any:
N/a
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local
preservation registers known to be on or nezt to the site? If so,generally describe.
N/a
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological,scientific,or
cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
N/a
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any:
N/a
14. Transaortation
a Ident9fy pulblic streets and highways servirtg the site,and�escribe Qropose�access to the
existing street system. Show on site plans,if any.
N/a
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the
nearest transit stop?
N/a
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the
project eliminate?
N/a
�
-7 -
Evaluation for
To be Completed by Applicant A�ency Use Onl_y
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to egisting
roads or streets, not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate
whether public or private).
N/a
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity o�water, rail, or air
transportation? If so,generally describe.
N/a
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If known,indicate when peak volumes would occur.
N/a
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any:
N/a
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example:
fire protection,police protection,health care,schools,other)? If so,generally
describe.
N/a
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any.
N/a
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water,
refuse service,telephone,sanitary sewer,septic system,other.
N/a
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the
service,and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate
vicinity which might be needed.
N/a
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my lrnowledge. I understand that the lead ag ncy is relying on them to
make its decision.
J �S� ► � 1�''I� � ��
Date Submitted: Signature: ��
,
�.1 � .
- 8-
Evaluation for �
To be Completed by Applicant Agency Use Only
SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(do not use this sheet for project actions)
Non-project proposals aze those which are not tied to a specific site,such as adoption of plans,policies,or ordinances.
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the
environment. When answering these questions,be aware of the eatent the proposal,or the types of activities likely to result
from the proposal,would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented.
Respond briefly and in general terms.
NOTE:Projects listed on the CFP must undergo environmental analysis at the permit IeveC
Listing the projects on a Capital Facilities Plan does not guarantee that they will be permitted
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water;emissions
to air;production,storage,or release of toxic or hazardous substances;or
production of noise?
County Buildings:Major construction projects may produce periods of
limited-duration noise. Construction of new buildings are required to include
considerations for innovative use of alternative hours, telecommuting,
distributed service locations, and work at home opportunities. Priority is
given to long-term energy efficiency through design and construction.
Parks and Recreation: Chehalis Western Trail, Yelm-Tenino Trail, and Gate-
Belmore Trail improvements should provide alternative transportation
options that may reduce car trips and associated air emissions.
Water and Sewer Utility Development: Woodland Creek Estates Sanitary
Sewer Project, Tanglewilde Sanitary Sewer, Tamoshan Waste Water
Treatment Plant upgrades, and improvements to the Grand Mound Water and
Se�ver Systems, and maintenance and repairs of other county-owned sewer
and�vater utilities vvil.reduce the risk of water c�ntami:zation a:�d
degradation of water quality. Other Grand Mound projects are designed to
improve and assure adequate ivater and sewer service to an expanding
community.
Solid Waste: Waste and Recovery Center(WARC)projects such as, WARC
development, WARC Transfer Station Expansion, WARC Automotive and
Equipment Storage Area listed in the CFP are designed to control the release
of toxic emissions from the site.Addition maintenance and repair projects
will maintain safety, customer service, and environmental controls at the
lvaste recovery center and drop box areas.
Stormwater Capital Facilities:Maintenance and improvement projects for
storm�vater facilities are proposed to control stormwater discharges that may
contaminate water.New stormwater control projects are designed to reduce
water quality risks to groundwater from infiltration of untreated stormivater.
Installation of stormwater conveyance systems should reduce the possibility
of flooding and associated water contamination.
Installation of in-stream structures are intended to improve fish passage and
improve down-gradient shel�sh habitat including provisions such as the
placement of large woody debris, riparian cover, bank stabilization projects.
Habitat surveys will also be conducted to ident�and quant�stream health
and down-gradient shellfish area in association with capital facilities
planning efforts.
Roads and Transportation Services:Road construction projects have
associated shori-term noise impacts. Projects will improve traffic circulation
thereby reducing localized emissions from autos, improve fish passage, and
improve protection of groundwater from contamination.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
See above.Additional measures to be determined at the individual project level.
-9-
Evaluation for
To be Completed by Applicant A�ency Use Only
2. How wouid the proposal be likely to affect plants,animals,fish,or marine
life?
County Buildings: Construction projects such as the new Accountability and
Restitution Center F�pansion—Work Release and Campus Jail Tenant
Improvements would have locali�ed impacts that have been evaluated at the
project level.
Parks and Recreation: Trail impronements may disrupt some habitat areas,
but will also provide increased mobility for wildlife species. Development of
undeveloped park facilities could disrupt some species(e.g., Cooper Point
Park,Kennydale Park, and the Deschutes Falls Park).
Water and Sewer Utility Development:N/A
Solid Waste:N/A
Stormwater.•Maintenance and improvement projects will reduce
contaminated storm�vater emissions to�vatenvays.Improvements at Mallard
Pond Phase 2 will prevent erosion and improve spawning habitat for salmon.
Roads and Transportation Services:Road widening and construction may
result in increased traffic and impact some habitat.Environmental impacts
are to be evaluated at the project level. Roadlvay culvert improvements will
improve ftsh passage.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants,animals,fish,or marine
life are:
To be determined at the individual project Zevel based on the Critical Areas
Ordinance, Shoreline Master Program, and state and federal habitat
protection lmvs.
Acguisition of additional open space and critical habitat areas�vill provide
more habitat protection for important species. Thurston County also actively
conserves and protects important resource and habitat areas via the
Conservation Futures Program.
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
Roads and Transportation Services:Roads projects require material
resources, including asphalt to pave gravel roads and for road maintenance,
and gravel for road lvidening and improvement projects.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
County Buildings:Major maintenance and repair projects, such as repairs to
HVAC Renovation/EECBG in Building 1, 2, and 3, should improve energy
efficiency of buildings.
Gravel mining is subject to reclamation regulations.Individual project
impacts will be determined at the time of implementation and permit review.
All development proposals are reguired to comply ivith the Thurston County
Critical Areas Ordinance and Shoreline Master Program as well as state and
federal regulations that are intended to protect natural resource areas.
Review will also take place with the State Environmental Policy Act at the
project proposal level.
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive
areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental
protection;such as parks,wilderness,wild and scenic rivers,threatened or
endangered species habitat,historic or cultural sites,wetlands,flood plains,
or prime farmlands?
Development of existing park facilities from passive to active use may impact
sensitive areas by increasing human use of the sites. Raising roadivays and
installation of Zarger roadway culverts to allow fish passage ivill result in
- 10-
Evaluation for '
To be Completed by Applicant Agency Use Only
more opportunities to reach spawning habitat by listed salmonids.
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts
are:
See abone.Additional mitigation measures to be determined at the individual
project level in compliance with local critical areas regulations, shoreline
rules, and state and federal laws protecting sensitive areas.
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use,including
whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible
with existing plans?
All planned projects must be consistent with the county's Shoreline
Management Program, Critical Areas Ordinance, basin plans, and other
county, state and federal planning documents and regulations.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
To be determined at the individual project level.
- 11 -
Evaluation
To be Completed by Applicant Agency Use O:
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation
or public services and utilities?
No increase in demands anticipated. Proposals are geared toward
maintaining or improving the levels of service set for each faciliry,
including roads and utilities.It is possible that some road improvements
will result in increased use of certain roadways, with associated local
impacts from fraffzc.
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are:
CFP projects are designed to respond to forecast increases in population
and corresponding demand on facilities.
7. Identify,if possible,whether the proposal may conflict with local,state,
or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environmen�
None. The goal of this project is to be in full compliance with the Growth
ManagementAct.Additional environmental review to ensure compliance
with local, state, and federal environmental laws will be required at the
permitting stage for each project.
CFP 12/SEPA Checklist for CFP 12.doc
- 12-