Correspondence and Notes
"
i
~~
ei}
,t;
:l[.
(~.
~~
v.
.,
"'I>.
,ii
it.
~,,'~
l
t;;
.
e
City of Yelm
P. O. Box 479
"(aIm Wl>.. 98597
J!o
Yelm and to whom ever this concerns:
We rec8ived your form letter post roarked 01/24/94 weJcoming '.lS as
ne~'l City residences and explaining ou:&::" :Jany 11aT;l bene:t.J..ts. Firs'c
let me be very clear, We have been against this annexation from the
very beginning. You indicate that there will be quicker police
service. So what! We have lived here since 1984 without the need
of your reported quicker service. You state the City has better
roads. We dispute that, our road has been well maintained by the
county and we will venture to say that it is in as good or better
shape than most of your reported better City roads. You say "One
of the most important issues is that you are now permitted to vote
in the City of Yelm elections and run for an elected office". You
may be right on that issue. I can only say that both of us work
long hours to pay our bills, support or family, and pay
unreasonable taxes (which is the only [BENEFIT] we can see as a
result of this unwanted annexation.
It is our opininn that ....le have bS9n a.rmexed illto th!:l City net .::45
a benefit to us but as a benefit to those people who want to
become more wealthy on our back. And this includes our welcoming
cIty.
What benefits do you offer:
1) Raising our taxes.
2) Raieing our garbage collection costs (which I might add will
still be done by the same collection company who has been
recycling our recyclables for us).
3) Changing our address which means another added expense to us.
4) Permitting us to pay for new services that will benefit the
speculators that want to ruin our neighborhood by building
thousands of new homes around us.
5) Probably suck the water out of our well and there by forcing
us to ~onnect to tha city water system at great expense.
A
i~
~r':~
~I
l
t, 4~
&1
,~. p\
:1:,. ,;
\ ~~.;.r::t:'i .~,
~ .,d,~~j#lEj~
-::\'-,";.,., ~ JY~$
^i'e ,{ ( ".'~\j;:
~~..
-; )__ .i..
Mr. a
14940
Yelm,
Dear 1-1.. (;
:::Im',
~!'
\ '"~
1~ '-) 4
Mr C; ibson
..rrs:j Roa
'A. ::-195 7
:cs. Gibson,
Th"mk ',/ j jour recent letter expressing your feelings
con "~rn...D-, ur recent annexation into the city. I
app:CccJ. ,j:' ie concerns expressed in your letter and
understn ur frustration with your perception of the
city's n ;ion. Please be assured that the intent of
our le' e.r J ':3 to welcome you into the city and to invite
your p .tj. "ipation in your local government.
I do
conf iI".
S P: r'\.r ~ 1- C
always '
best t::;
you as
Sincere
!J~_
7/-, ^
(P. .
, I
Kathryn
Mayor
:>pt:' th ," 'Nil I give us the opportunity to
CL...__.",. '-tat we can help provide qual1..ty
you and YO)lJ:" famJ..ly. Ll ~a,-..::;h.M? T.!i 11 1'1ot
7;oleto Jlease you,. we will always do our very
ep your rights and needs in mind and to treat
rly as we possibly can.
; ;t:~j
,i
,If
*
-ReC)'Ckd paper
___-,~__.._e_~-
.1'.... ~. '(; 'i '.-..
.; . ," ,.'~' .. ,.
.. -..... .......
o
o
page - 2 -
City of Yelm
P. O. Box 479
Yelm WA. 98597
Benefits (continuec)
6) Probably come in here and rip up our road and put a connector
road between the proposed new development and the major down town
yelm.
7) probably find a way so that our son can not ride his horse or
keep it here.
8) Naturally the benefit of a larger population which will bring
in proportionally larger criminal element (quick police
response? ) .
9) Of course with the important benefit of voting in Yelm comes
the associated important benefit of having more government
regulations that we must follow.
Must we continue with the benefits you offer? We could.
Based on all of the above you may be able to see that we don't see
your touted benefits as being benefits. We feel weare only being used
to line speculato:c's ar....d..the Ci.ty of Yelm's pcckot.~. Na,turallY',ole
know that this letter is an exercise in futility because no
matter what a private citizen wants, his wants and dreams are held
for naught when it comes in opposition with the wants of a citizen
(or non-citizen) of greater wealth or of a governmental entity
who's officials throw up their hands and say, "It's not my fault,
it's the government".
Will this intr'.lsion ever end? Can't citizens ever relax and enjoy
the fruits of their labor? Do you know what you are doing with
your benefits?
Sincerely,
~~.
-~ ^
.I~. \, ........."..-. /f
I. ,,{Y! J ~). "",...l.:~' /
~'I I ~ \... ,"? ' ,~~..,
It L/' ~ _.......,.._1 -,....
Roy & Evelyn Gibson
'f';;
,~
II:
"
\'. I
if~
1i~"1., 1:;"
!(J tN ;,~!
~1j'
1
ItlAIIWIm-~
,~~
,~, 1.
';'c:;\/i':tyi'~,~
, ,cl'" "
. '-;- ", I , ~'>
"c, :1': .
.". ...
~:::.:~~~
~~-t:'
105 relm Ah' flU, t
P 0 B, 4:
Ydm lFashingtOli'7
(206) 458-324
February 14, 1994
Mr. and Mrs. R. Gibson
14940 Berry Valley Road
Yelm, WA 98957
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Gibson~
Thank you for your recent letter expressiT
concerning YCllr recent annexation intc
appreciat::;the concernf, 8Kpressed in
:..ma€:....atand yrmr frustrad.on with your r3~
city's in'L:-"sion, Dlease- "0 at: '_.-=>n t1-
our letter ,.ns to \iJe1\.;ctrit;. ._..:. ,U ,_,-1,. Y ;
your particl.pation in your lcc'3.1 gov<.. ~nt
c r :feelings'
"city. I
letter and
C 1_' n f') f t h
~i. fl '-..;; :l'~ .:} 1.
-0 invite
I do hope that you will give us t,
confirm our belief that we can hel
service to you and your family. Alt
always be able to please you, we will
best to keep your rights and needs in
you as fairly as we possibly can.
')1 ,':unity to
.:'! equality
'rt e will not
"i do our very
.ad to treat
Sincerely,
i(~,~t4
Kathryn Wolf
Mayor
o
*
o
-ReC)ockd paper
-- -~;
o
City of Yelm
,
1(J5 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
(206) 458-3244
Dear City of Yelm Resident:
I
You are probably aware that your prop~rty was recently annex~d to the City of
Yelm. We at City Hall. would like to welcome you and give you some basic
informatiQn on ~hat ~eing in the City means to you.
,
One of the mqst important issues i~ that. you are now permitted to votE:=: in
City of Yelm elections and to run for an electeq off~ce. TO run for office
you must be: 1) at least eighteen years of ag~, 2) a registered voter,
apd 3) a residentr for one year, of the City or any territory which has
be~n annexed to the City.
You don't have to re-register to vote ih City elections. Your pol~ing place
will probably change to Yelm Middle School, watch the paper/voter pamphlet
for details.' You will also ,be receiving a letter or ne~ voter registration
card ~rom the ELections sectidn of the ThurstbnCounty Auditor's 6ftic~. You
c~n reach them at 1-800-624-1234 ext. 5408 if you ha~e questions. WheIl you
go to your polling place to vote, if you find that your 'name has not been
intludedon the rolls please request a questioned ballot. This. allows you to
vote, your address will be v~rified by the Thurston County Auditor's Office
prior to counting your ballot.
Current Yelm elected officials are: Mayor Kathy Wolf, Coupcil: Amos Lawton,
Martha Parsons, Don Miller, Patty Forrester ~nd Bob 'Gallagher. Mail may 98
directed to them at the City Hall. address shown above. Y9u can leave
messages for elected officials at City Hall.
Tne Yelm Planning Commission, Historic Preservation Commission, :Pa;:'l'>:s
Advisory Commlttee, Library Board of Trustees and Historical Society members
are advisory commit,tees to the City Council. positions are appointed by t.he
mayor' with council approval. If you would like more information about any of
these, please tall City Hall.
At some point in the futqre Yel~ will assign a new, addresses to your
pfope~ty. We will notify you of-the change and we will aJso notify Thurstofl
County Communications ('911), utility companies, UPS, Thurston C'ounty ~udi tor
a:qd the post:office of the ac:idress change when it dccurs.
"
Another future change you wii~ se~ will be. in your garbage service. Curre~c
county pick-up, contracted with 'LeMay, will change to City service w'hich is
also with Lemay and includes residential recycling. Yelrh' s annual l! Sprin9
Cleanup" is .limit~d to City garbage .customers only ahdthe change would allo'jJ
you to particip~te. City garbage'rates are slightly higner than county rates.
Recv<:led paper'
o
o
CITY PHONE NUMBERS
City Hall/General After hours emergency Chief Administrative
Information.. .458-3244 911 Officer.. .... .458-8405
Treasurer. ....458-8403 City Clerk... .458-8404 Planning Dpt..458-8408
Sewer Dpt.. ...458-8410 Public Works. .458-8412 Building Dpt. .458-8407
Court Clerk. ..458-3242 Police Dpt... .458-5701 Library..... ..458-3374
You probably have some questions concerning how your property taxes will be
changed by the annexation. The following are the 1993 assessment rates.
PROPERTY TAX RATES
City Tax Rate
County Tax Rate
1993 COLLECTION REGULAR EXCESS REGULAR EXCESS
CITY/ROAD 3.1150 -0- 1.9576 -0-
STATE SCHOOL 3.3481 -0- 3.3481 -0-
MISCEL/MEDIC 1 1.7968 .2833 1.7968 .2833
LIBRARY .4850 -0- .4850 -0-
SCHOOL -0- 6.7078 -0- 6.7078
FIRE * -0- .9287 -0-
CEMETERY .1045 -0- .1045 -0-
PORT .2508 -0- .2508 -0-
Subtotal 9.1002 6.9911 8.8715 6.9911
COMBINED REGULAR & EXCESS TOTAL... 16.0913 15.8626
* Pald out of Yelm's budget current revenues at thlS tlme.
City residents also pay an additional utility tax of .0400 on utility bills.
ADDITIONAL FACTS
~ Police response time is faster within the City as officers are on duty
24 hours per day, have less land area to cover and are usually within
the City limits. Calls from county residents go out first to the
Thurston Co. Sheriff's Office, they have a much larger land area to
cover, after county notification Yelm P.D. will respond as/if needed.
~ Street standards are higher in the City.
~ Pedestrian areas are required in the City.
~ Permits would be handled locally, except for those requiring health
department approval i.e. septic.
~ Fire protection remains unchanged.
~ Service availability first to city residents, l.e. water, sewer.
The staff and elected officials welcome you as a new resident of Yelm and
look forward to working with you.
'"
o
SI< YEL'i ANNEXATION
LEGAh D~SCRIPTION
CITY OF YELM ANNEXATION NO 8100
EXHIBIT . A
EXHIBIT "A"
ORDINANCE NO 484
Section 27 Township 17 Nort:h Range 1 Ease
All of Section 27
THENCE North 89" 10' 47# Ease along the South line thereof 720 67 feee
THE-~CE North 28" 42' 32 Ease 2 038 89 feee,
THENCE North 73" 55' 14# West 999 71 feee
TBENCE Nor~hwesterl', 953 feet more or less to the Northwesc corner of
c~e Noccnwesc one-quarter ot the Southeast one-quarter of said Sect~on
26
~HENCE Soueh 00" 55 01 Ease 2 636 feee to the POINT OF 8EGINNING
Section 26 Township 17 Norch. Range 1 Ease
Cesc half of Seccion 26
Section 23 Township 17 Norch. Range 1 Ease:
South half of Section 23 and che South half of the Nor'theasc quarter of
See cion 23
Township 17 Nort~
Range
That: pa=-::
Ease \J:!
of the Southeast quar~er
descr~bed as follows
of Section 26
Sec:ion 24 Township 17 North Range 1 East:
The Southwest quart~r of See cion 24
BEGINNING at a poin~ on the South line of said Sect~on 26 Nor~h 890 lO~
~7 East 720 67 feet from the Southwest cor~e= of said Sout~east
quarter
THENCE Nor~h 28" 42' 32 East 2 038 89 feet
THENCE South 49" 04 03 East 1 148 33 feet: eo the Weseerly margin of
t:he Burlingcon Northern Ine Railway
THENCE Soueh 35' 44' 02 West along said rail=oad right: of.way 1 256 52
feet to the South line of said Section 26
THENCE Sout:h 89' 10' 47# West along said Souch line 1,113 23 feec to ehe
?OINT OF BEGINNING
The South half of che Northwest quart.er of Sect:ion 24
c)
The Sout.hwest: quart:er of the Southeast: quarter of Sectl.on 24
The Southeast quarter of the Southeast quart.er of Section 24 EXCEPT
chat part. being Nor:heast of the Northeast. Ilne of Mosman Street: S E
The North half of the Southeast. quarter of Section 24 lying West a.nd
Southwest of the following described line
BEGINNING at. the intersection of the South l:.ne of said Nor'th half and
t:he Northeast line of Mosman Street: Southeast:
THENCE Nor'thwest::.Iardlv along said Northeast: line of said Mosman Street
Southeast and the Nor'thwest"..Iardly prolongat:ion of said Northeas:: line t:o
its intersection wit:h che Northwest line of Longmire Street: Southeast:
THENCE Southwes C"..Iardly along said Northwest line to a point: which che
fa llowing descr:.bed Peine "'C'" bears Nort.h 53 30~ 30'" lJest
That par~ of the North half of the Northeast qua~ter of Section 2: Township
17 Nor~~ Range 1 East, w M described as follows
I
:I
"I
j
J
BEGINNING at a point on the North line of sa~~ Northeast quarter a
discance of 213 feet Nortb 890 45~ 40# East of ics Norc::bwesc:: corner
THENCE Souch 00" 25' 05# East 582 10 feet
THENCE South 81~ 46~ East 773 07 feec more or less, Co che r
Northwesterly r~ght-of way of che Burlington Northern Railroad, and C~e
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this desc=i?e~on
THENCE Northeasterlv along said railroad right-of way to a point on sa~d
right-or-way which is 150 feet Southwesterly of the intersec~ion of said
right of.wav with the Nort~ line af said Nort~east quarter
THENCE running Northwesterly at r~ght angles to said railroad right-of
~ay 122 31 feee, more or less, to ehe Norch line oi said Nercheast
quarter,
THENCE South 89. 45' 40H West along said North line 1,123 77 feee, more
or less. to a point on the North line or said Northeast quarter which is
nor~h 89" 45' 05H East 277 feet,
THENCE West:erly parallel with the North line of said Northeast quarter
213 37 feee
THENCE Soueh 00. 25' 05# East Co a poinr which is North 81' 46' West
from the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
THENCE Souch 81" 46' East:, 680 ieee more or less, to ehe TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING
,oJ
'1
oEGINNING at a point whicn is the. intersect:::..on of Sout:herly line of Yelm
j1.venue and the Northwest. boundary of Solberg" s 1st addit:.on to Yelm,
THENCE Nort.hwest along t:he Southerly line of Yelm Avenue extended 875
feet
THENCE
THENCE
THENCE
THENCE
Soueh 37 S6 West 620 00 feee to the rOINT
continuing South 37. 56" TJest 76 5 feet
N'orth 53 30" 30.... !Jest 50 feet
South 37 56' TJest 415 feet to Point ....C...
OF BEGINNING
THENCE Nor'th 53 30~ 30'" l.les't to Point: "'C'"
THENCE North 37. 56" East 'to the East line of the Northwest. quarter of
the Southeast. quarter of aforementioned Sec.tion 24 and the t:erminus of
herein described line
That: portion of Berr] Valley Road in the Southwes't quart.er of the
Nort.:heast quarter of Section 24
..
Section 19 Township 17 N.orth Range 2 East
The Southwest quarter of t:he Southwest quarter of Section 19 EXCEPT
that. part. being Sout:heast of the Nort.hwest. line of the Rainier..Yelm
Highway and ALSO EXCEPT that par1: being Nor'theasc of the Northeast line
of Mosman Screec S E.. and it:s direct prolongation Sout:heast...Iardly to the
Northwest. line of Rainier Yelm Highway
All sicuat:e in Thurston Coun~J Washington.
That portion of Mill Road in Section 19 Township 17 North Range
East TJ M lying South of Rainier Yelm Highway
A port~on of the Southeast quarter of Section 26 Township 17 North Range
East r.J M t described as follows
Exhibit "A"
Pg 2
City of Yelm
Ordinance No 484 ANX8100/SWYELM
BEGINNING at che Southwest: corner of said subdivision
City of Yelm
Ordinance No 484 ANX8100/SWYELM
Exhibit "A" Pg 1
CITY OF YELM
QIlDINANCE NO. 484
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE
CITY OF YELM, WASHINGTON.
WHEREAS, the record owners of at least siXtY percent of the value of the
propertY described in the attached Exhibit A have petitioned for annexation to the Cit'{
of Yelm.
WHEREAS, the City Council and Planning commission of the Cit'{ of Ye\m held
duly-noticed public hearings.
WHEREAS, the annexation has been returned by the Thurston CountY Boundary
Review Board to the CitY of Yetm for final action since the 45-day period of time
allowed for the jurisdictiOn of the Board to be invoked. pursuant to RCW 36.93.100.
has passed and no person or official entity allowed has filed such a request.
WHEREAS, the CitY Council finds that such annexation is consistent with and
conforms with the annexation requirements for code cities provided by RCW 35A.14
WHEREAS, the CitY council finds that the annexation is consistent with and
conforms with the annexation policies and criteria found at Yelm Municipal Code 2.66
and the annexation procedures found at Yelm Municipal Code 17 64
NOW. THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YELM DOES ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS
Section 1 ThefOllowingcdescribed.territory is hereby annexed and made a part
of the City of Yelm.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION _ PLEASE SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "An
Section 2. Said property shall be subject to the existing indebtedness of the
City of Yelm and to pay said indebtedness shall be assessed and taxed at the same
rate and on the same basis as other property within the CitY of Yelm.
C:IW!'S'\S7\YElMIORO.484.00C
Section 3. Said propertY, excepting the highway right-of-way, shall be zoned
as RA-5A as provided in Section 17 40,020(c) of the Yelm Municipal Code. Such
zoning designation shall remain in effect until further modified by master plan as set
forth herein
Section 4 This Ordinance shall become effective on the ~ day of
~cember _' 1993 being a date not less than five days following publication.
Section 5 The CitY Clerk shall record a copy of this Ordinance in the Office of
the CountY Auditor and file a certified COpy with the Board of Count'{ commissioners.
f(;tk JJ a-el
Kathy Wolf. Mayor /-
o
PASSED AND APPROVED' November 23 _,1993
PUBLISHED' Nisqually Valley NeWS. Dece!nber 2 _' 1993
o
2
C:IW!'S ,\S7\YEI.M\ORO.484.00C
"
..
! SW YELM IANNEXATION
CITf'OF YELM
484
:~NNEXATION
o
$VJ
A..!f ~~~
Oq;. ~~
(( @>~
~122
I 1000' ,
SCALE
~
o.
u
z
-
vi
a:
w
w
z
a
z
w
Cl
z.
5 i
~ 1
z "
0 ~
() ~
b
Z ~
w f
1Il
:J .;:
ct t
:I: Cl ~
a: ~
ct b
m"
~
o
o
THUP'; TON COIJr.JT:i
JL jlt'1F'-IH' 1,JR
~Jl, '07. '94 2 :.34 Pi:;
,~EQUEST OF; I lG(:'i
Sam s. Reed, RUDITO~
Ifl: SUE;t DEF'UT\'
$1 ~j . tl~.:..l opr
vol; .2214 F 39:;: 5~=::=.,
:- 122 J,:i ~ 94 f:i 1 07 )..:::1:2 6 6
CITY OF YELM
ORDINANCE NO. 484
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE
CITY OF YELM, WASHINGTON
WHEREAS, the record owners of at least sixty percent of the value of the
property described in the attached Exhibit A have petitioned for annexation to the City
of Yelm
WHEREAS, the City Council and Planning Commission of the City of Yelm held
duly-noticed public hearings.
WHEREAS, the annexation has been returned by the Thurston County Boundary
Review Board to the City of Yelm for final action since the 45-day period of time
allowed for the jurisdiction of the Board to be invoked, pursuant to RCW 36.93.100,
has passed and no person or official entity allowed has filed such a request.
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that such annexation is consistent with and
conforms with the annexation requirements for code cities provided by RCW 35A. 14
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the annexation is consistent with and
conforms with the annexation policies and criteria found at Yelm Municipal Code 2.66
and the annexation procedures found at Yelm Municipal Code 17 64
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF YElM DOES ORDAIN
AS FOllOWS.
Section 1. The following described territory is hereby annexed and made a part
of the City of Yelm:
lEGAL DESCRIPTION - PLEASE SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A"
Section 2. Said property shall be subject to the existing indebtedness of the
City of Yelm and to pay said indebtedness shall be assessed and taxed at the same
rate and on the same basis as other property within the City of Yelm.
C:\ WP5 1 \57\ YELM\ORD-484.DOC
o
o
Section 3. Said property, excepting the highway right-of-way, shall be zoned
as RA-5A as provided in Section 17.40 020(c) of the Yelm Municipal Code. Such
zoning designation shall remain in effect until further modified by master plan as set
forth herein.
Section 4. This Ordinance shall become effective on the 7th day of
December ,1993 being a date not less than five days following publication.
Section 5. The City Clerk shall record a copy of this Ordinance in the Office of
the County Auditor and file a certified copy with the Board of County Commissioners
Kafw~M-:!~
ATTEST'
1 )
S P Colombo, City Clerk
PASSED AND APPROVED. November 23 ,1993
PUBLISHED. Nisqually Valley News, December 2 ,1993
-- -
; ..;:.;:.: 1 4 ,_ _"_ ~ ~i! ==; ~::;
.. _.. ~: ~ 9.4~:i 1 J..:i-;-'J;:1266
C:\ WP51 \57\ YELM\ORD-484. DOC
2
CITY
SW YELM ANN~XATION
(~~GALoDcSCRIPTION
o YELM ANNEXATION NO.
'--.../'
ORDINANCE NO. 484
EXHIBIT ~A"
8100 0
Section 27, Township 17 Norch, Range 1 East
All of Section 27
Section 26, Township 17 North, Range 1 East
West half of Section 26
Section 23 Township 17 North, Range 1 East
South half of Section 23, and the South half of the Northeast quarter of
Section 23,
Section 24, Township 17 Norch, Range 1 East
The Southwest quarter of Section 24,
The South half of the Northwest quarter of Sec~ion 24,
The Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 24,
The Southeast quart2r of the Southeast quarter of Section 24, E{CEPT
that part being Northeast of che Northeast line of Mosman Street S E
The North half of the Southeast quarter of Section 24 lying west and
Southwest of the following described line
BEGI~NING at the intersection of the South line of said North half and
the Northeast line of Mosman Street Southeast,
THENCE Northwest...ardly along said Northeast line of said 110sman Street
Southeast and the Northwest~ardly prolongation of said Northeast line to
its intersection with the Northwest line of Longmire Street Southeast,
THENCE Southwes~..ardly along said Northwest line to a point which the
following described Point "G" bears Noreh 53" 30' 30N West,
BEGINNING at a point which is the intersection of Southerly line of Yelm
Avenue and the Nor~hwest boundary of Solbers's 1st addition to Yelm,
~HENCE Nor~hwest along the Southerly line of Yelm Avenue extended 875
feet,
THENCE South 37" 56' west 620 00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING,
THENCE continuing South 37" 56' west 76 5 feet,
THENCE Nor~h 53" 30' 30" ~est 50 feet,
THENCE South 37" 56' west 415 feet to Point "C",
rdENCE North 53" 30' .30# West to Point "G",
THENCE North 37" 56' East to the East line of the Northwest quarter of'
the Southeast quarter of aforementioned Section 24 and the terminus of
herein described line
That portion of Berry Valley Road in the Southwest quarter of the
Northeast quarter of Section 24
-~,
Section 19, Township 17 North, Range 2 East
The Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 19, EXCEPT
that part being Southeast of the Nor~hwest line of the Rainier-Yelm
Highway, and ALSO L~CEPT that pare being Northeast of the Northeast line
of Mosman Street S E and its direct prolongation Southeast~ardly to the
Northwest line of Rainier-Yelm Highway
That portion of Mill Road in Section 19, Township 17 North, Range 2
East, ~ M , lying South of Rainier-Yelm Highway
A portion of the Southeast quarter of Section 26, Township 17 Noreh, Range 1
East, ~ 11 , described as follows _ _ ,;::,;:: 1 --+ :- ::52, ,::.9'~:;
... _ _ 40: 94J..:11 Ci~]":i';:'b6
BEGINNING at the Soufhwest corner of said subdivision,
City of Yelm
Ordinance No. 484 ANX8100jSWYELM
Exhibit "A"
Pg. 1
-PIe AS!:
~
Noi
~IiCC~l)
fI'll1-P
CITy' OF YELM ORDINANCE NO. 484
15 14
~. .
, 221231'~--"- ,C 19J~orTHr'fb~:~]'TJ';]
\ , SW YELM IANNEXATION I -- H~L: ~f* -, "
f.\NNEXATION AREA~ I,] - iJIl- -- .,
1_' E
n_
--
, ,
'r
o
1000'
SCALE
o
~~
y<f; ~~
t- ~~
~O $
_hC;l1
~28
~
",'-I::"
~.r .}~
;]'{:f
<.i
z
-
I
iii
a:
Ul
Ul
z
a
z
w
~
~ i
~ i
Z i
o !
UtI
Z ~
1# r
:J "
~ f
~ .
a: it
~ i
m ~
-
-.:-
34 35
o
~'FCEIVE
[ ,-,.. "',\,'l"
r.f r ~ Y'..>
,...~: v:
CITY 0 F YELM
ORDINANCE NO. 484
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE
CITY OF YELM, WASHINGTON.
WHEREAS, .the record owners of at. least sixty percent of the value of the
property described in the attached Exhibit A have petitioned for annexation to the City
of Yelm.
WHEREAS, the City Council and Planning Commission of the City of Yelm held
duly-noticed public hearings.
WHEREAS, the annexation has been returned by the Thurston County Boundary
Review Board to the City of Yelm for final action since the 45-day period of time
allowed for the jurisdiction of the Board to be invoked, pursuant to RCW 36.93.100,
has passed and no person or official entity allowed has filed such a request.
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that such annexation is consistent with and
conforms with the annexation requirements for c6de cities provided by RCW 35A.14
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the annexation is consistent with and
conforms with the annexation policies and criteria found at Yelm Municipal Code 2.66
and the anne~ation procedures found at Yelm Municipal Code 17 64.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFYELM DOES ORDAIN
AS FO LLOWS.
Section 1. The following described territory is hereby annexed and made a part
of the City of Yelm.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION - PLEASE SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A"
Section 2 Said property shall be subject to the existing mdebtedness of the
City of Yelm and to pay sald mdebtedness shall be assessed and taxed at the same
rate and on the same basis as other property within the City of Yelm.
C \V1P51\57\YQM\ORQ,484 DOC
~ction 3. SaidOperty, exceptinglthe highway riC)-of-Way, shall be zoned
as RA-5A as provided in Section 17.40.020(c} of the Yelm Municipal Code. Such
I
zoning designation shall remain in effect until further modified by master plan as set
forth herein. I
Section 4. This Ordinance shall become effective on the 7th day of
Dece.mber ,1993 being a date not less than five days following publication.
Section 5. The City Clerk shall record a copy of this Ordinance in the Office of
the County Auditor and file a certified copy with the Board of County Commissioners.
i(~,:2f~
Kathy Wol ,'Mayor /
A TrEST:
PASSED AND APPROVED: November 23 ,1993
PUBLlSHEO' Nisqually Valley News, Dece.mber 2 ,1993
C-\WP51 \57\YELM\OAD,484 DOC
2
.. , ."l~
.~.
\:
o
G(
CITY OF YELM
-HURSTON COUNTY
uL'-,'t'1PIA, L.J,:;
~ 0/11/94 10 : 48 Ht1
REQUEST OF: OWENS DAV
3am s. ~~~d, AUDITOR
BY: ILERNA, DEPUTY
I;32.00 r1GR
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT
SOUTHWEST YELM ANNEXATION
This Agreement is entered into on this ;23!J' day of M//M hI') .J" 1993 ,
by and among: the City of Yelm (hereinafter referred to as "the City"); and Thurston
Highlands Associates (hereinafter referred to as "the Annexation Sponsors" or "the
Sponsors").
lol: 2~:33 Page: 286
Fil~ No: 9410110~367
Recitals
WHEREAS, the Sponsors are requesting annexation to the City of an area of
land comparable in size to the current City of Yelm;
WHEREAS, this request and the resulting annexation necessarily raise issues
regarding appropriate land use zoning, comprehensive planning, and municipal facilities
and services;
WHEREAS, the issues raised by a request of this significance and the resulting
annexation are not within the scope of the experience of the regular staff of the City
and present the City with expenses expected to be in excess of customary
annexations;
WHEREAS, the City has determined that it is necessary and in the best interest
of its citizens for the City to arrange for special assistance and to make special
expenditures to respond to this annexation;
WHEREAS, the City's need for such services and expenditures arises directly
from the annex(3tion;
WHEREAS, in accordance with City policy, the Sponsors should bear the
expenses imposed upon the City of retaining such assistance and making such
expenditures, to the extent attributable to the Southwest Yelm Annexation;
C:\WP5 1\5 7\Ya.M\ANNEX,5.CON
-\..
.
J
o
o(
WHEREAS, the City is bound by the terms of a settlement agreement requiring
it to develop alternatives to direct discharge of wastewater from its wastewater
treatment facility and such alternatives must conform with the Water Reclamation and
Reuse Interim Standards of the Washington Departments of Health and Ecology,
effective May 1, 1993 (the Interim Standards);
WHEREAS, the City intends to apply for pilot project status under the
Reclaimed Water Use Chapter, RCW 90.46 and to fully comply with the Interim
Standards;
WHEREAS, such settlement agreement also requires the City to upgrade the
wastewater treatment facility to advanced treatment if it wishes to exceed the current
rate~of discharge for such reasons as providing sewer service to the Southwest Yelm
Annexation area;
WHEREAS, the wastewater discharge alternatives identified in the Water
Reclamation and Reuse Interim Standards will likely require the dedication of a
significant amount of land, an amendment to the City's Wastewater Facilities Plan,
and additional financing;
WHEREAS, in accordance with City policy, the Sponsors should bear the
expense of developing discharge alternatives and amending the necessary community
plans accordingly, to the extent attributable to the Southwest Ye/m Annexation;
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act establishes the goal that "those public
facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve
development at the time development is available for occupancy without decreasing
current service levels below locally established minimum standards." RCW
36.70A.020(12);
WHEREAS, the City must begin the process of planning for the adequate
provision of services to meet the requirements of the Growth Management Act in
order to review future development proposals by the Sponsors;
WHEREAS, water and sewer service are in limited supply and any provision
thereof to the Southwest Yelm Annexation Area must be consistent with the
applicable plans, state law, City of Yelm ordinances and this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City of Yelm Planning Commission and City Council made the
following findings in approving the Southwest Yelm Annexation:
1. The proposed Southwest Yelm Annexation is consistent with the
joint planning done by the City of Yelm and Thurston County for
the property within the proposed urban growth area of the City of
Yelm.
/01: 2~:33 ~age: ~87
;ill? Nt): 94101 10067
C;\'NPS1\57\YaM\ANNex-S CON
2
~
o(
o(
2. The zoning proposed for the annexation area provides a variety of
uses and housing types, is complimentary to the existing
Comprehensive Plan for the City of Yelm, and would be in the
public interest if adopted by the City of Yelm.
3. The utility and transportation plans to serve the annexed area
provide reasonable alternatives, consistent with the City's growth
management planning and utility planning. The City is committed
to additional utility planning processes before any specific
development is approved, to assure that adequate capacity for all
necessary facilities is available concurrently with any proposed
development.
4. The Southwest Yelm Annexation Final Environmental Impact
Statement adequately and accurately describes the project.and is
determined by the Planning Commission to be adequate.
5. The City of Yelm may annex the property consistent with its
annexation policies and provide a significant benefit to the City in
terms of a well-planned development area and not provide any
undue burden to the existing taxpayers of the City of Yelm.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants
contained herein, the parties to this Agreement mutually agree as follows:
Section 1: Annexation Aooroval
1.1. The City agrees to render a decision approving the Southwest Yelm
Annexation, ANX8100. The area to be annexed as the Southwest Yelm Annexation
is described as provided in Exhibit A herein and is hereinafter referred to as "the
Annexation Area".
Section 2: Zoning
2.1. Upon such annexation, the Annexation Area will be zoned, with the
exception of the highway right-ot-way, as RA-5A as set forth at Section
17.40.020(C) of the Yelm Municipal Code.
2.2. Such zoning designation shall remain In effect until a master plan is
approved for the Annexation Area according to the master planning process set forth
in paragraph 3'-' herein.
'_.. -..-..-...-. r-t. 9~. -::..=-8
.'UL. .::..~--=-~ ,".::I '1;'- _c.J
Flit? No: 9410110067
C:\WP51 \57\ YaM\ANNEX.5.CON
3
'i
cS
o(
Section 3: Master Plan
3.1. The City agrees to exercise its best efforts to amend its master planning
process substantially in the form found in Section 16.44 of the City of Lacey
Municipal Code in effect on the effective date of this Agreement.
3.2. The Sponsors agree that the Annexation Area will be subject to the
master planning process provided in paragraph 3.1. herein.
Section 4: City Services
~ 4.1. The City will not approve any extension of water or sewer service to or
any change to City zoning for the Southwest Yelm Annexation Area, except in
compliance with the annexation ordinance and this Agreement.
4.2. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to obligate the City to
provide water or sewer service to any property within the Annexation Area, even if
and when the provisions of the annexation ordinance and this Agreement have been
satisfied and even if there exists either unused sewer or water capacity.
4.3. The Sponsors shall submit and the City shall consider and process a
conceptual master plan and final master plan for the Annexation Area, in accordance
with the master planning process provided in paragraph 3.1 herein. Such plans must
be consistent with the applicable transportation plan, sewer plan, water plan,
comprehensive plan, and any other applicable community plan.
Section 5: Financial Resoonsibilitv
5.1. The Sponsors agree to pay any and all of the City's costs of this
annexation, as identified in this Agreement and its attachments, and in the scope of
work, budget and contract schedule contemplated in paragraph 5.2 herein, including,
but not limited to: the costs of preparing and processing the annexation petition;
obtaining approval of such petition; negotiating and preparing this Agreement;
complying with the obligations imposed by this Agreement, its attachments, the Yelm
Municipal Code and state law; amending, modifying and adopting the City's
ordinances and community plans as necessary; defending the City's actions in
administrative and judicial appeals; and all staff time necessary for all such activities,
including attendance at meetings, hearings and conferences as necessary.
5.2. In order to fulfill the obligations expressed in paragraph 5.1. herein, the
Sponsors agree to develop a scope of work, budget and contract schedule, to the
satisfaction of the City, to provide for their payments to the City in a timely and
reasonable manner.
1'01: 2333 ~39~: ~89
File Nc: 9411-31 1 O~367
C;\WP51\57\YaM\ANNEX 5.COH
4
;'
o(
o(
5 3. To the extent allowable by state law, the City agrees to support the
efforts of the Sponsors to seek reimbursement for the reimbursable costs identified
in paragraph 5.1 herein and the attachments hereto by adopting a utility cost
reimbursement ordinance (latecomers agreement ordinance), establishing a local
improvement district, or by implementing any other appropriate and legal financing
mechanism, and by assisting the Sponsors in obtaining reimbursement through such
mechanism. It is acknowledged by the parties, however, that the s.tate Legislature
has only adopted latecomer agreement statutes for certain types of improvements
(street, water and sewer) and for certain types of work associated with such
improvements (design, engineering and construction). To the extent that this
Agreement requires the Sponsors to perform certain tasks and pay for certain
activities that go beyond the limitations of state statutes, it is understood that the
Spqnsors are solely responsible for those tasks and costs. In order to avoid such
circumstances, the City would entertain the possibility of establishing a local
improvement district, but only to the extent allowed by state law.
5.4. The provisions of the "Scope of Work: Zoning and Planning" and
"Wastewater Reuse", attached hereto as Exhibits Band C respectively, are
incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Agreement.
-
5.5. The City shall enter into independent contracts with the consultants
identified in the attachments hereto to provide such services as are necessary to
assist and advise the City in accomplishing the tasks outlined in this Agreement and
its attachments. Additional consultants may be added to the list identified in the
attachments hereto only with the express written consent of the Sponsors, such
consent not to be unreasonably withheld.
/01: 2333 :Wase: 290
FilE' Nc;: 9411-31 1121067
Section 6: General Provisions
6.1. The Annexation Area shall be subject to the existing general obligation
indebtedness of the City of Yelm, which is currently in the amount of $225,181, and
to pay said indebtedness shall be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the
same basis as other property within the City of Yelm.
6.2. No party to this Agreement shall assign or subcontract any portion of this
Agreement or transfer any duty or assign any claim arising pursuant to this Agreement
without the written consent of all parties.
6.3. The records and documents of the City, with respect to all matters
covered by this Agreement, shall be subject to inspection, review, and audit in
accordance with the laws of the State of Washington.
6.4. This Agreement, including attachments incorporated by reference,
represents the entire agreement and understanding between the parties in relation to
this Agreement and any negotiations, proposals, purchase orders, or oral agreements
are intended to be integrated herein and to be superseded by this written Agreement.
C;\'M'51 \57\ YaM\ANNEX.S.CON
5
o(
o(
6.5. This Agreement is to be governed by, and construed in accordance with
the laws of the City of Yelm and the State of Washington.
6.6. The signatories of this Agreement warrant that they have the authority
necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the parties they represent to the
terms and conditions of this Agreement.
Annexation Soonsors
~
THURSTON HIGHLAND ASSOCIATES
A Washington Limited Partnership
cOG. 90-1l~
--
Robert Welcome, General Partner
CITY OF YELM
~-'- I ., i L
'""" I~ \."1 .
c2 t/,.Jrl.. /r~__
Kathy welt; Mayor!
~~_C~ ~,_"..
->i'aul Liao, General Partner
,/
:/
----
~
lol: 2333 ~:'a3~: 291
Fill? No: 9411-3110067
C:\WP51 \57\YE1.M\ANNEX-5.CON
6
(",
~
(
o
o(
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
CITY OF YE~~ ANNEXATION NO. 8100
ORDINANCE NO. 484
Section 27, Township 17 North, Range 1 East.
All of Section 27.
Section 26, Township 17 North, Range 1 East.
West half of Section 26.
Section 23, Township 17 North, Range 1 East.
South half of Section 23, and the South half of the
Northeast quarter of Section 23;
Section 24, Township 17 North, Range 1 East.
The Southwest quarter of Section 24;
The South half of the Northwest quarter of Section 24;
That part of the East half of the Southeast quarter of Section
24, Township 17 North, Range 1 East, W.M., and the Southwest
quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 19, Township 17
North, Range 2 East, W.M., described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the West line of the Southeast quarter
of said Southeast quarter of Section 24, a distance of 470
feet Northerly of its Southwest corner; running thence
Northerly along said West line 850 feet, more or less, to the
Northwest corner of said Southeast quarter of the Southeast
quarter; thence Easterly along the North line of said
subdivision, 1,040 feet, more or less, to the Easterly line of
Rice Street in Solberg's First Addition to Yelm, as recorded
in Volume 9 of Plats, page 31, extended South 370 56' West;
thence North 370 56' East, 90 feet, more or less, to a point
on the Southwesterly line of Mosman Street, said point being
South 370 56' West 170 feet, more or less, from the
Southwesterly boundary of said Addition; thence South 520 04'
East 400 feet, South 370 56' West 120 feet, and South 520 04'
East 85.29 feet, more or less, to the Northwesterly line of
Railroad Avenue, in said Addition extended Southwesterly;
thence South,westerly along said Northwesterly line of Railroad
Avenue extended 40 feet, more or less, to the most Southerly
corner of tract conveyed to Lavera L. Case, by deed dated
February 26, 1949, and recorded under File No. 446474; thence
Westerly along the Southerly boundary of said Case Tract, 50
feet, more or less, to the East line of said Section 24;
thence Southerly along said East line of section 330 feet,
more or less, to the Northwesterly line of right-of-way of
Northern Pac~fic Railway Company; thence Southwesterly along
said Westerly line of right-of-way, 580 feet, more or less, to
Ci~ of Yel.
Ordinance No. 484 AHX 8100/S\lYel.
Exhibi~ -A- Page 1
/01: 2333 :'a9-a-: 292
File No: 94113 110067
('
..
.,
,.
o(
o(
the Northerly boundary of tract conveyed to Vernon Oberg and
wife, by deed dated November 17, 1951, and recorded under File
No. 495635; thence along said Northerly boundary of Oberg
Tract, Northwesterly 229 feet, more or less, and Westerly, 738
feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. EXCEPTING
THEREFROM that portion lying within Parcel B of Boundary Line
Adjustment No. BLA-1142 recorded December 11, 1991, under File
No. 9112110209.
Parcel B of Boundary Line Adjustment No. BLA-1142 recorded
December 11, 1991, under File No. 9112110209. In Thurston
County, Washington.
That portion of Berry Valley Road in the Southwest quarter of
the Northeast quarter of Section 24 and the following
described parcels in Section 24. (See attached Deeds)
..-. .--=- --::- .--::' ,::I::';le::;:: 9 3
lol; ~__~--.JM .....-
File No: 94101 11-:31-:367
City at Yet.
Ordinance Mo. 484 AHX 81CO/SWYet.
Exh;b;~ -A- Page 2
if I
.~'
.
o
Q
. '--:J~~~~1 ~
\\ .'"'if} G'O
iHI!;: SiClI C!JU~TY ~ i ~
:::L"~ ,-:' v'.~SH. ~ ~ ~
Co % Sa 5 3 lIS PH '67 ~ OJ ~
~ -t ;:~" --7 If ~=.:i 0
~ ,. '~ -.. L' _.;..:.~;:'r..~ Ii U
<;) "0-- - ::f::a r::
~ .. ' ~
IPio e~r N~IIO",,1 Title InoSU11r3nce ~.
Thur~::r. C~:J"lY Ice
:1 I Sl4 "',.l!:-'.U.!oo:,Jn Street
OlymQ:a. 'Nasnln~C"
~
e
o
8
~.
>-
d
II
I ~.
~\ ~ I
,,~~ I
, 767532
,- ....
Statutory Warranty Deed
nu: CKA.'"TORS Rt04ARp 9. L.!TTU:<tCl.O and CIU:~I l.ITTLCFIClO, husband and .ire
r.. and Yo ~lioe 0/ Ten Oall..rs a nd ather valuzobb cmside...aticns
.. IlucI paid. .........,.. and _am"1S to Cl.!.';N I.. NC:OSY and Cl.Clt It. NE::aaJY, hqsband and wUe
rlor f~ dncribod tal CSO&&2., Ku.a&od ill lbo Couaty vi Thurstan . S&at. '"
w uIliaC''''''
The /Nt or the swi or the so:i or See: %4, Twopl7n. II u: \lI.lII. EXa:llT the North
-~ ,_ 1 20 rut theraor rar COU'lty road mC1loln 5S /I'.a:tin Road;; ALSO That particn or the IIE:~
or the s~ or the sc:.l: or said Section 24. described a ro11a"ll:51 aeqinnJ.ng at the
~ po.1rlt or intarsacUan or the "'sst; lin. of slid NE:: or the SWt or the 5t: wUh the
Y Scuth litle or &aid COU'lty :oad 1cn0V'l as ~.artin Road; thanea South. aleng said '!lest
~ line. 1ll:S re.t; th.nca C<lst 25 raet; thenc:a North lCJ r..t; thence ",..t %S r..t to
~'-' the point or beginning.
" Above d.ser1bed proper~ has a mortgag. executed by grantors to '~d S~th, Ine:.
racorded ~ovelltler 4, 195 under audit~r's rl1. No. 727974. records or Thurston
Ccunty which the grante.e .ssume snd agreed to pay. The.... is a present prine1pal
balance due on &aid o>artqllqe or ~lA.467 .52. ., ., ' .
t;b
. .1 ~~~a.~~
ia~.;;...L..J~ ~rw.
~~.-1 ~ .~-~~..
1h-4.11L./
\..
~'o:r
l)r.ud lll.iro
~ut
'" ~ _., 1967 ~
~~ - 'Bf1"'"
. ,/L"2liULl
STATE or W.\.SHI~GTO.'l. l..
C-, '" Thurstan- \
00 lIaIa da, ~y awn'''' ~Ian -
Rlcha~ 9. Llttleft.ld & Cll..n Llttlefteld
.. _ ~ ... b. lbo *",,;dud s dDe7ibod ill ..... _ .:.c.....
~ It..u thoy _pod 1Iw ...... u their
_ UI4 ~ lbcnie -.cionod.
Ct\"L'= ...... "'y Ia.aM and oIlI<i&I .alllala :lIst
...."..
llw wi,. ..... 10""""" i......-.. ....
1_ UI4 ~;;. ~,~ tIoecI. I.. llw
f '-';~" '-:? ~-"c;,~,",
ugu.t 19~7 _~'.'-
~'- _.'
,
G
VlJl. 432 ~ 74
-::-
: ' ..:;' .::::" ~:.:f,{:\:,:;:.~:
817d4t/30JCO
l
'.
.....
/01: "='333 ?age: 294-
Fll~ N.:.: 941 '-311 0067
:!-4~ 304)0 1
!hi- (7JOhtbl- }lkJ.l~r ~~ J.-.~J.. SLiilfrLti-Sf c;;wrltf ct utA..
00 u411w [$ r- ?~w:Lr -Ilr ei -Ihi. ..soul/? E.i1.Sf 1;tliV -fc,l (; t 5Ld III II
d~ 1Q{)](lShIP n NO(-fh f Rtu7f)( I CctS-J I tv' (f)
~~\"_~'_......J::
~" ~ ~...
'" 0 .
. . <;-
" ,
~
-=:t
~
~
,
(
. ,.--.,
~~
~. 'I: /.
- -,~.r-c . . '_"'~' _
. . - .-...,. ..
. , -.- ,..... ~~ .
C,_.,~~:...."",.,.,,:.
.. . ,.-.
,..-... .
\..<...J
ft,.
u1'.j)
1]\ I::J
(',j I:s)
..~
g:~
c~ I~
~
. ('1 ":[
(~ IJ\
(1)
N~
01
--
_0 ...
-~ l1..
~
,-
/tE
J....
.. .
..:a."u.
/~/;
o
Y3.
~:?2 F.::I672
659682
\... -
TREASURER'S DEED
Tnis Incl!nturl!, Madl! this let!>
be tWif't"n aona 1 d ;. 9oon~
ilI4s"i,~q~on, ".r~y of thl! first p.art, .n:1
d..y of ...~V A. D. ~
as r"l!.su"l!r of Thurston County. St..t. of
C.~f~ ~~ WA~h.~Q.~~
".rty' of "th. second ~rt. ·
HITh'ESSETrf. Tha t. Wnere.s n~n.11 ~ T Q..."f"lp T-:--=t"!im-__ !l!
s.id 7hurston County and Ex-Qfficio Treasurer of the Yelm rrriqatlon District.
a puelic corporation exis~inq in said county and state, a~ beinq dissolved under
~e provisions of ~. C. W. 87 ~3.140, did, by virtue of the authority vested ln
hilll by law" .nd pursu.nt to notice qivl!n as by law.required, on the 30t.'\ day of
<: 0- A. D. 19 61 . be~een the hours of 10 o.clocJc A. II. and 3 o' clocJc
i'. )d...... s.l1 at ouolic auction, accordinq to th'l statu'le. in such ~Sl!S prOVided,
to ::>Ute of ~as"'noton for the SUlll of none
~ollars, the following dl!scribea :eal es~te situate in
!hursto~ ~un~y, S~t~ of .~shing~on ~---i~.
.J., S~ c:~ <:;yt. ~~ ...~ ":d_l~_1C' (T-o~<e,"_ra,..'<. "~pti ~""'I""'"
- :,..~
~
~"'-Pc. I
!. :h_. e~ <:;tt-J.. ~& ",,0 _17_,,:r 1'/'--.... c:'::' ,..,t f""\,,~r~'H'...,::tottlta.a. ':I_A ~~ ~ ~ ~ 'II
leu/~o ft.', striP-.2'~9.r.i~ ~ /" """'~ "---
-./ -------
~. ~cKenna ~iqated<'~~~ts l~ ~ 16 in Block 2
and did thereupon issued to the s..id State of ~ashinqton
Treasurer's cer~ificate of Sale for the said land ~ 47~ .~rl 47n7
~
And whereas, The said land describl!d hl!rein .as sold for the assess=ent
levil!d aqa inst it .on the . ..,... day of O"ce-.!:ler
by "':.'\e ao.trd of County ColMlissioners of Thurston County, State of Washingten,
pursuant to the provision n. C. W. S7.~3.140 which said levy was ~de for
the pur~Sl! of paying the rl!maining bond and other Ind.otedness of the uld
Yel:a Irrlqation District pursU&n"t to the provisions of R. C. 'If. 87.~.l.co.
AND MiEilEAS. The "1:i_ allowed by law for the rl!dlelDption of said property
h3s expired withou"t such redemption havinq been made by ~y person.
~ 1liE!lEFCRE. The said Oonald J. Boon. ,.. Treasurer of said
Thurston Coun~. SUte of Washinqton. and Ex-otf1cio Trusu.er of YdJII Irr19<1Uon
District, as the Party of the fus"t p.ar"t hereln. by ..irtu.. of the sald Sollle and purchase,
\ and in pursuance of the statu"tes of the State of Washinqton. in such cases lIIad.
and provided and for and in consideration of th. SUlll of ~~n..
Dollars, lawful money of the United States of
America, so bid ..feresald, the receipt whl!rl!Of is herl!oy acJcnowll!dq., haa
qranted. barqained. sold, convl!yed and confirmed. and by thl!se presents doe~
grant. bargain, sell. convey and confulII unto the sald party of the second part,
and to !.~ heirs and ..sslgns forever. the property sold as aforesa14
and as dl!scribed in the s..id Certificate of Sale, sltuated ln the Coun~ of
Thurston, Stat. of Washinqton togethl!r with all and singular the tene~nts,
heredl U_nts and appurtenances thl!reunto b.elonging or ln any wise apperulnlnc;.
lq~
TO KAVE AN:> TO HOtD. The nid prl!JIIises and a.s:r~~lUlnc.. th1!",,!nt.o 1>elonc;1"hg
un1:.O the s..id ~r~ of the second part. I h heirs ~nd ass1gns forever, ...
fully and absolutely u said par~ of u'le U.n"t pan an. MY or ~t. to by.
vir~ue of said sal. "00 the statuus in such caseS'lIlacM and p:rvvl~.
(
l~lvea under my,~hand" ~nd ~Ul of off~~e th1~
... ,. ~... "..':. 04! I
'.
~"
A. D.
.
.> ~!':~-
1\
TreaslUer of
. ,
: ....;
County rrus~e.r and Ex-oHlclo
" -.t::.-- Sal.~ !.~~, Ir~~n'~.a~a;.~
...~.;..~ -",,---:.- -...---... ; ::..: ~
_~.....-a-- ___
_), .... t :,.... .: r-.:.
7'P.... ~. .."
;14 ;I --r-'.:---,,~~ -- ~; -..-
.....;.
. .... t
7.: ~
:. I _
: ., :. ~.
~
~,
NJ ~ ~~
.
..~ .. "'..
~.., -..
.,
:.,J
---'-::~-'!'o-~- .---;:-~-."~. ~..I- -~
..~- -_::-~---~----:.:...;-- ~- .~--:,_.......
.-
.-'-"--
"'--'
.
, .
,
(-
@- ax 0
8AFECO~lu....~ua.!lI! Jl1~1!1 2JbJJc
$MECO TIT\~J(_E co-.......
\ )
TH'S V"CE ..ESE..VED....'~..- IO'CO"O''''S un I
8~07080044~/
.
~
.
Fllod lor RocOf"d .. Roqu.., 01
38625-5102
CITY AND STATE
Yelm. IIA 98597
THURSTOH GOUHTY
Ol Y~"rA WASH,
JlA. 8 r 5'1 PM '83
II!~UrST o~ -rc r-
.s~(:.J:!'OITOR:'"
- :l..ellll
-
ADDRESS
E.::.-rATE RS\J.T'f. INC.
Post Office 30x 718
NAME
~
STATUTORY
WARRANTY OEEO
T!-4E GRANTORPUGET SCl.~'D NATIONAL BANI< as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF
ALVA P RADABAUGt, Deceased
lor ar>d;n consideration of Ten Dollars and other good and valuable consideration
in hand ".id. corw"Y' and w....an,/ ESTATE REALTY, INC., a !1ashington corporation Z-
Ihe foHoW'inq desaibtd ,~.. ntate. Situated in the County 0'
Washinqtcn:
..
1HURSTCN
Stat. of
~
-...... ;;;.
cated
SEE mtIBIT "A" ATIAarED ~ AND BY iHTS REFERENCE HADE A PART HEREOF 7
'1."
J/" <f1J J. :--
/. 5:l.'4-~--::::-'
_ ?~~.l... (/0-:2._
.. '.. ,,,:.. 'f/Ild---
l. ,j t-""l' 0 1. I '
1. '3 Q _~.ft .
, I. _ ,..,~..
~&~.~
. 19 ....ll =to.
1'UGIT SOUND NATfCNAI. B~'I1<. <1S P"!'sonal
Re?r~;..~ent:l~ve~.;~ate of_.JUva F Radabaugh
'f~~'-~'~
r_/laIPfl-<. l"laCy.......~.~ VIce I'jes. ~ Irust Off
s, """""""" /, - ........-<. 'L/
,In aurer, S IS. an Ice reSlaent
... :&.~
't.4,~'"
-.
_"11. ......,;.:,;.
~
~
o
o
CO
o
S
M
CO
.,..-
June 30.
IIndividuatl
ISL
Notl,y PUblic in ,nd 'Of ,t'l. Stili 0' W.,hi"qton. USldln,
"
On <hi. 7th day 0' .';1.:.... '.
19-'l3b1for.me. th. unden~.. a..Nou'y Publtc in and
10. thl Sill. of Wlthi"",on. duly con;m'..ioned IrId '.....'n.
ponon.lI......,oe...., Ra 1 ph 0;: 'I"<!C!{I/ a:rtd ~ . ,
~i ";II 1.I;",rp,"
>'lIX , ". . . -
10m. kno_IO blUS. .\sst.fie,""JLl,.:~
and Ass1Hant Vice Pre~EWI1~..;..~...,y 0/
Puaet Sound rlational Banlc ~ '1~~inn~l
BanK "".ft..-cvttd th.. lor~i"91"u,um..nt. and
ICknowt.d~d m. uid imrrummt to bII d". fre. .nd yolun-
tlrv let Ind ckflf o' uid ~.tion. 'Of' ttlIII uln and 0\11.
po,.. tn""in mentioned, And on Ollh 1Utld uu, _
thpv ~ rp luthOft",d to ..t'CUI' tn. ...id
Inltrvmen! .nd ''''1 the 1f.1 .,II.1'd it the CO'OO'''' ".1 0'
lIld corporauon.
I
to me known to be the indi.idu" delCrlbtd in It'd ...no
..ecuted ttM' within.nd fOA'lJOinq imUUment. Ind ecknowt-
otdqod thll
lioqrwd th' lime H
'fH Iftd woluntMV let and dHd. 1M the VI" Ind ,"",POI"
I,,",lin rnonllonod.
GIVEN ur>dor my hand and olllei" sullhl,
_ dIVo' 18_
'/~L ill) 1 '1(( 506
-
WIt""1 my ...."d In
T\. I -1 ~4~~
.....". -...:...
I" .-" -. .-. .-. :- =. 9:'.' "_::. CI_. .:=:
..OJ.: '::'~-'="...,:j - "- .......,
Fil~ Nu: 9410111211367
1
-..
~
,......1'.::..
.q~ I~'"
'}:t':
-1.i'
..,t..:. ..~
,0 ".~;.
I ";.
I':i ; ~i
('
o
o(
EXHIBIT "A"
LeGAL DCSCRIPTlON
830'7080044
1
I
~
j
,;
That part of the Northe~st qu~rter ~f ~he Northwest qu~rter of the
Southe_st quarter of Sec:ion 4, Towns~ip 17 North, Range 1 :1st,
describ d as foIl s ~
I ,
Beginni g at the S utheast cor er df tn Northwest q arter of the
Northwe t quarter f the South st quar er of said S ction, th nce
Norther y along the North and 5 uth cen er line of t e Northwe t
quarter f the Sout east quarte of sai~section 24, 642 7S fe t
to I a poi t 20; feet outh 0 C the East: and West cen ter 1 ine 06 s . d
Section 4; thence orth 890 11 5" East ;'Iud parallel to the
said Eas and West nter line I Z Z3 fe t, thence So theasterl
and paraflel to Yelm Avenue 177 3 feet, thence South sterly an
at'right angles to Y 1m Avenue 6 0.42 feekio the East and West
center 1 ne of the N rthwest qua ter of t e Southeast q ter of
said Sect'oti Z4: then e ~esterly lon~ th said C~~t and West .
cC'1ter 1:1 e 414 feet~t the pOin~r begin' g EXCET'THlG TIlr:nr;FRl'1.H
portion ly' g within ~'Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter~
of said Section.
:;~~~
";a
._-_:~
- ~- ~~~~
~ .,~...:...~ ':'~
;.-"':=-'
~{cI
- LCjaJ
In Thurston County, Washington
,.'u- 1".. ..-. .-.. .-, .- ...
~...=.-=--.=: "age: 297
Fi Ie No: 941. 1.31 1. ;'21i-367
JVtbV dtq,t~.
u
r"'l 17'1 11!../ "70/00:
d '-fi;;cfJ), 1'6 &{,lI7dt:Y vr~/1J-- ~1!t(/)hn.:;1)-
No 8J...A., /030 I a6 j~r7tP.d ~an/;ltf(J !6J /qq /
VVJW .Jl-&Lctifor:. t,5. ..3~ No. '1/OI/gO/29
: e(J 71 1./1}2.JI 0 ! : .
: 0ruJ ;!, !IJ JMr+ J~tbd(.Llt6/m No 'S-c}O~7.
as r:~1 )r{U4 A~fj1A-5r ;]71 /Qc5 unduL At-~1;/Or:s VlLz
; No, '!50tJJ.70/.2.3 11n1 "07.
II ,Yell OJ rArlv .
I! dl17~ 1./ '-/2010;;' ~
~ Pa,m 3 r);. ~~hu(f .JubcLiUiYrJlL lVO 55-;2077 J;::;
r? UJV'cLLd Av.;}U5f d~ /955 ?-LnCUT ./-htd, fcr'5
::h1L;1)0 gSOBrJ70/:J..3.
(
'.
~.
-~
~O-O\ .
Fil" fOIl" Jhcord at Reqv..., 01
and :e=n aiteJ;" rec:ordin:;
. Cf7~ /) '!
,
to:
NAME ROGER ~. McKIBBIN
ADDRESS 15219 B,~..n-Y.A.U.!t~l_l3g_$..E
ClTY AND STATE
Yelm. ...,;1,. 98597
STATUTORY
WARRANTY OEED
~
o (...ocnOOGs
THURSTOIf -=OUHTY
I.n..~u-' "Y.\.~~
Ocr I
THEGAANTOR, ESTATE ~. I~C., a Washington Corporation,
10' ,nd in considcmiOR of T~N DOLLARS and other valuable consideration,
in h...d pa.d. co.....,. 'nd wll'..... UGER L. McKIBB!N and BEVERLY 1<. McKIBBIN, husband
and wife']/'
eM foUowin9de1ai~ f,.1 atlce.. SitUAted in lh_ Countv 01 Thurston . Stale 01
Wasnlnqton:
~
It)
~
Q
~
Q
Q
~
19
4 or ~T SU~SION NO~2077~ RE~D A~T 2)-r
1~a5 u ER UDIT~ FILE~O. S)ro8270~ ~ ~ ---
SOBJECT 0: DEED OF TROST~~D JUNE 30, 1983, RECORDED JULY 8,
1983 UNDER FILE NO. 8307080045, TO SECURE AN ORIGINAL
INDEBTEDNESS IN THE SUM OF $47,000.00. WHICH GRANTOR SHALL REMAIN
LIABLE FOR:
SUBJECT TO: DECLARATION OF SHORT SOBDIVISION AND COVENANTS
RECORDED ON AUGUST 27. 1985 UNDER FILE NO. 8508270123:
SUBJECT TO: ?ROHIBITION OF CONTAMINENTS WITHIN 100 FEET OF WELL
AS STATED IN COVENANT RECORDED UNDER rILE NO. 8508230042.
7dt.}Lj 20/03
)(t1/0 c&[liP'
Paw 0 1)9 5j~&ndcv:!J v0!7L ?11j,~/.2f{(l1f1,f AJo
BLA- 103:; ?~ lLL[or(,,~J ~anucYr71 /8/ r--iql VlfltLt/l
A~LCLI-!Dr:s .:1i&
O.ted <;8>;: ") ~
19~
.,---.....-.... .
~=. ..:~ .-l=~'~::--:-"-""
.f :....,....)0.,.. ,". ..
'-l u~gS:..:I~ '-_ !.. ~".I:.
- .,... ~, ' ....
-... :j":"'C~' ~:1..."!; :
;:;._-.-J_..=:..:~: ~~;:._..... ...:..;0.
- ~-
",. . - -..
::. :1 f... l~ !:
___t... t
On tIIis d,y penonolly ."".....od belOle me
to me known to be UUI &nd...icSull dncTlbed in JI'IO 'Woo
..ccut.d th. wiu"n and fOtf90i", ;n.1Nment. and adtnowJ..
tdfJe<I tn,l
si9f1Cd th. same ..
tn. Wtd YOfiunc:&t"I' IC1. and de.u. for U\. utc. and P\n POIft
the,ein m.."ioned,.
GIVEN under my 11_ ,nd official ...1 this
_ clIyol 19_
Notary P\,btic in "nd (ot the Stat, 01 Wa..nlnqcon. re',dinq
It
l"~.
~ ~ 5l:t 31. &_C) Z7!:~L'f(c;~~tf>)
....;(0.-2 -1~-=-
.;..~.
/115 '-t ~J
.t..
~.
. . , --.
--:....: .: ./ !!
, J>U\Jty 'rt~'''''
Q. -y?~,..t'"' t.t~...)
.n. IP.% ::"!~
No.
C} /01/801;;9.-
BV
t.epnenson
iP,nsiatnll
~...-.t---
IS..,n..", I
St.ephenson
:s.
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF Thurston
llL
On tlli, :z ,,"i~ doy 01 s;.e?T" .
19..a.~ belon m.. tn. undtni9n<d. , NotifY Public in _
for tn.. Slue ot W.sninqf.on. dulv commissioned and twOfn.
pttson.Uy,,,,,uttd -:OHN!(. STEPHENSON
,~ WIU.U\ J. STEPHENSON .
to m. known 10 be en, Sec:-etary ard. "",,fden,
~~x~~~~~~~~~x~~x~~~~ot
~~~~~Q ~o~lty. rnc.
th. COfpO'aUon tn., executed U\. foreqoJ'" .",trume1\t. Ind
IcknO'flr'cdC}fd U'l. said inluum..,t t.o be the ftM and 'WQ(",..
t~,.., ~cc Ind oetd of ....'d COf$JOl~.ion. fOt dw UJft and OW'-
pows the"ln mcntionC'd. and on 0.'" 'tlted '''at..he...-.
fA 'I.UhOfileQ to..,aC"CUce Ute Mid
in11fumenc and tl'l., the ~al..fti~\i~'t!.l""~09".u. --':'I'
l~id cO"OOlauOl\.. ..{.. ;~~.... .:J."
\~ "...... ',....
Witn"~r1IVt)'nd ,ne! olfici'I.~}i ~~t;;' .lliJ\~ to.... ~ ,Ad
yeat H, t Jt>lI... ItI.", /l . -..
I , ,......
NO';ry Pubhc in .net fot the S...!'t of WI.h"~,toa.. fft
os -;-:: '1~ ( .d f -j A');; .
'!~L 13(i4 P1l! ~Yl - -
lO 1: :;::..~ -=-..~
F'" '-"...........::.
ll~ No: 941
:>-9 . -.
_~ &. ~98
J....:J 1 100E:?
1 .11I& 1.1,
~". 'l"
, ~
~~
~
Rce<>td .1 RC"UUI ol
'~r~e Amerlcan Tlela 01ympla
cJ
First Amencslt Title
INSURANCE COMPANY
noos.-_Fot__.Uoc
\
&
T~,.
T1fJRSTO', ':orJl'ITY
iX:mF'IA, W~
041'Z1-'n 1Z I)') PM
~EQUEST OF /TF~T
$,allO 'S R<+j, l1IJDlTOR
F,'{ K Itl, DE?1JT't
'~7 .\)0 14D
YI: 15'35 Pi!~: 412
r l~ 1~' 92~::)42~:O 1 20
=TER RECORDING MAlL TO:
-am.
l)"nohn.. "'I')"'~~-,e~" "n
t::'o~rtl'tnv
~dr.ss
~'n ~T :"..~~ '<"~C"V ,,, ~'E"
~. SUI, Zip LACr.r 'J" 98~OJ
,5792/:34105
Finl Am",ic.n \o'7't. Statutory Warranty Deed
1,,1<, ,,~
'J
nlE ClUNTOR 7:l'I C 3utCl'tA..'f P~SOH"'L u:nESDlTAnVE FOR THE ESTATE OF !lActlELOH E.
~URCMAH DECEASED
for and in considcn.tion oC ~ OOUJ.RS ....'fD Onto. COOl) ANI) VAUlAllU: collstDEltAnON
:n!wld p~d. conwynnd wunnu IQ DONOHUE CONSTaUC':ION COlU'All"t. INC.. A 'JASl\INC't'ON COlU'ORATIOH
~1C CoU~ ddCribcd rw estate, Jilualed in lbe CoWlly 01 Thuneon . Slale 01 W~
THE \:"EST lIAU' OF nlE !lOll.nNEST QUAB.ttIl OF nlE HOll.TllIlEST QUAB.ttIl OF' THE SOU'IHEAST
QUAB.TE!l. OF SEC':':OIl 24, TOIlHSHIP 17 NOll.tH. lI.ANCE LEAST. 1f.1t.
m 'nlUllSrCN c::rL""m:'t. Wl\SHINGI'CN.
StraJECT TO;
RESERVATiONS CON'l'Ann::O !..'{ DEEO FROM '!'!IE STATE OF Illl.SHDlGTON
RECORDED UNDER NO. 68:3498 RJ::SERVI:NG TO TUE GRANTOR ALL OIL.
C:~ES. COAL. ORES. MI::1E!ULS. FOSSILS. E:T.. AND ':'HE RI:CHT OF
ENny FOR OP~'lI:NG. O~I.OPI:NG AND WORKnlG THE SAME AND
PROVIDING TP~T SUCIi RIGHTS SHALL NOT SE EXERCI:SED UNTIL
PROVISION HAS BEEN ~CE FOR FULL PAYMENT OF ALL DAMAGES
SUSTAINED BY REASON OF SUCH ENTRY.
:!~-. elltAUlSalM'I'ax l'!ud ~1 ?J
No.':.()Q'30?' !),u.H a3 l1)-
MUI1'PY, 't":'\t11'U,I,)tI ,:n or"...:
rn !loot...",
,..,
.,..,
...,
~...
<:'>
.44...
J..ed lhis
.
."'
06
d:ly oC April
. 1992
"..,
'"
~y ~e €S~4te of ~ad~e E !urrmen
r..:
n.
...
By
:!~..r:t'-r4-;""~) By
Y TlJa G. ,.ucpan/",;uonaL Rap
STATE 01': IlAonITHt:':"OH
COUNt'Y OF. 'rnIllI~H
} ss
1 ceni!y lllall.......... ha..... satisbClO<"f cWIence .bal TTM ~ "l,lII~'N
..12- lhe penot1- who .ppcarcd before IDe, :and s:ai4 po"""_~td Ibal
~ Jicned Ihd insltUmclll :and adnowIed&ed i& 10 be..ha- Cree :and YOlunuty act Ccw tbe uses and l""1"*"
",cnboaed in~' '~,i..,...
- -. /' - ~
D....... Y - "~'..'" ."
:.;..~..t... 'iI.....sJ,"::,;)J,
:r~"'o~, 1'o'''~'1
;::::~~ ~'tj.. "Q-~!
~:: - :.:,
, ~ , ~. ~
~.~4If ".~
;, /'r ,.....
I ~tJ>"! ~,.t- ,<v;
\, '~~y ~\l~':.--
,,---...----
1
~__':'4
/
, ;,
/'/<'/
/t . / /
I. . (I,.J I.
,
NOIU}' Public in and rot lhe SI.,e 0/ \1A~HT'ICTO"
RuidinC'1 EL'iA
Mysppoinlmcnl up...u: )/10/91
'$.IQ
--~.
'.
1
~
ot --
'.
& 17~.L/LjL0300
,
(
l01
.-.. ...-" .-. .-.
..::.. ~...;j";::"
;:1.age: 299
Fl.le No: 941011131367
J
!
I'
-~"" ~,!./ -;:;':-:--;-7
~ 4: -...; ""'1-'/* ~
... ~ ... -
..~~...
~;'"
~ ~.
~'
"'",
.,
.
~
...
:=t
<D
r--
~
C7>
~
~
"""'
U7
l'
,.J
_J
./
, ,::---_ ( if AD
u .
Sw !JW S€ ..2 4
o(
/7 -Ie
fat
@
SAFECC
1053439
QUIT Ct.AIM OEED
'i.M4 fot A.conI Ie A...... o'
. .J.
H.....E~1o
ADORESS ~ j "3
THU~sro
!'~ rJJPI.1~ ;~~~r'r
SU' 15 An ..
.r.''''s ~7B
......IoIl: Iti
SJH S ---
. "'.0, JUOITrlR
- - O(P!JTy
--1,;.6 7;;-(,
,~". q? -;17
A;;
CITY AHO 5T'" rE
--:'"':.22
()
THE CRANTOR , DAVID a ~""'mlS, & single lIIan.
...._..._......01 propen:y settlement pursuant to ce~of Decree of Di.solu-
tion, !J
-....M......d......... MARY LOUISE CL.:.->1L'lS, .-a.1Rgl_ .~-, ~SC:j... c~ "e.ftt
Thurston "'~~'r)~'t\C:: \r Ma(fl'l::~ c/
$\:\)c.e a.~ d~ j \9.1 ~
of ~~ It of NIl It of ~'f"\e.of~ ~ 5c-.\~ .
- ...,shio ~o)-t:h Ra e' ""asc \I M. ~ ~ c.\c..\ V"\
eet 1:::''ereo Also xce~t che 0 e.~~
e vest Z~et for ro poses ~
1Iee1 !:ala,. Sal.. Tax Paid ).,--<:.,.( ~ '
P..c.lot 112 9 5 9 3 1 ".'!" 2::.:z...~7
Hac: G. H\ln.er, ."ws"'" Count;' T......
a;Ll. ~/n">/r/.fl(~/ M...~
. , 0.-1;41- ,":, q, IV"2a.
:I ~. '/"r )Y;f/)j, . _ _ --'"'
-. U_I
....... 1Iy
'" 11_' \Prntd."..
,., IIy
. ..., ls.cr.'.,.."t
,.,
~ STATE OF WASHINGTON (IL STATE OF W'-SHINCTON {IL
,~C)
.- COUNTY OF COUNTY OF
;L/41.:f501
I
i'
I
I ,
~
I'
Wi....... '"" f\end and otfic~. .... "".'0 ,"inca tn. d.W 11'4 I t
.,.. tt..... ~ ..tlt9ft.
Nourv "'''1iIC 1ft et'd '01 tI't. S..... 0' W''''"''9fOft. ,....flIt . 0)\
II ',. SSG '"1. 5.J4
.--.....----. -r(-.......--~-~ ,j.
:3. . ......, ...... , ",."
:." - ........ _~', I '.
....~ ..'>-
0.. _day _Iy _ """"_
OAVID 3 Cll."1ENS
OnCftit. <<1..,01 .
tA _. ,be'Of....... ~ u~. I No,ary "'bite: I" ......
fot me St... o' w"","91Oft. dUly c:omm....tOftIId aftd twOIft..
-y-
I
~I
r".
'f"'/I,J)
I~G
(I) I::J
u'f"'/
~'f"'/
.lJ ~
c...1..:.!
'f"'/
(11 V
(')IJ,
(I) _.
('1) .;t
to ... ~ 10 bit cr.. ~.. c1etc1'It.d M'I and -.no
......... ~..Chift tNtd ......... ,","""'"'I. IfICI ~
__, ~..
....-_..-_ !"tig
..... ~ .-o4Uf'tUWV tc1 .,., drlNO. 'Of me u... tnd pWDOeft
-- ......-
-
to ..... known '0 De en.
.....
,,""'*"(
s.cr.,.,v. '"0eCt,..1'f'. of
).olo.
~
&
.. '11
..-. .......
() ....
-.,. LL
I
\
I
i
!
i
1
f
j
t
r' .
...
i
r
r\
'" (
I
f- .
. , \. -
! ~
)fcwclf~pP;,.
P;(rr>> fl v'tJ
~c..LO~C/r;-/( 1/ / q 75"
JhOltf ..JeL,WIt//S/en.... NO
vtI7~ +z,{b[1 icr ~ Jik ,Uo.
.,::)~. 0175 CllJ ./ULC.,du!
Qt/0434/,
1f'M ClDt"PQIf'...on en.. 'KltC\I'ed .,.. ,O'~,.. ''',IN'''.'''. M\d
~dqItctI Ut. wtd ......""".,,1 'CQ be .". h.. eno "oI~
ury ac1 ...... ~ 0' u.d COIOOttCIOt'I. ,~ m. U,",nd OUI'.
piOIlft I............ ",",UCMI<<l. and Oft 0'''' ...I'd ....., _
"""ewl,eet '0 ...cul. tn. .....
i",.~". .nd tn.. ,,\. Me. ,thud ., 1M COtOOU.. .... 0'
y.cf (.Of 00f'" Oft.
T.... .. .n.
,-
--
I .
n(
@ TICOR Tl\,......2
:::=J INSURANCE
4S:.t
rJ
.
.........-
","-,,, ....".... ".... .'1'"'' ."...
~
FILED FOR RCCORD AT REQUESTOF
'rnURSTNl COllfIT'
OLYMPIH' 101';
.:.::-..,. ~..;, '~=3 rrJ :(\:) i1
F.:E.:...."E3T OF ,'TPTC
Si~ 3. ~~j. "UDII:~
~,: '=kF.:RI~, DErIJr,
H.J .):) ~:::::
15..? 1 ?H~: :?:?:.;.
//0: ::::::1<;1 :::2 ..;..:;:. .:' Ct :::::
Wllll~ Rt:CO!l.Ot:D R!:TUR:-I TO
"..f
.,1.....
.il~
l'l~m~ __ \ <:.0 'i:. \", -r--'::
ALlLI,..,.. POc:,O)(' 0"'. CJ
C9~P\\~ ~Q,,~H:.
Ciry SI~I". Zil' \
ii:t
U'Il~
,\N\ llt'nUN'\I. l'IlUVI~IO:-l 'lOT INITlt\l,ED 11\ ,\1.1. /'EKSONS SlliNINO 111lS (:ON'l"R,\l"T - -
WIIFTIII'R fNDIVI/)I',\l.I.Y UR AS .\N UI'I'ICE!t OR ,\(;ENT - - IS NOT ,\ J',\R'r uF TIllS
l"ONTllAcr
REAL ESTATE CONTRACT
(RESIDENTIAL SHORT FORM)
:;1/7 2./ltf d07CC
='
I. P,\!l.Tlt;S AND DATI!.. This l.un'"..'l is cn,,,raJ inlu un
Auqu s t 9. 1988
FERDIE C. JAY AND MARY H. JAY, HUSBMIO AND ~IFE
u .S"llcr. ~nu
JEFFREY C. PRICE AND RE3EXAH S PRICE. HUSBAND AND wIFE
~s -Buycr..
2. SALEANO LEGAL DESCR1PTlON.Scllcrarees 10scUl0 Buycr:anu Uuyeragrecs to purcllase (rom Scllet1he
following Llcscnbctl rCo'lI estale in THU~SiON County. Stale o(Washin,ton:
SEE EXHIBIT A .\TTI\CHEO HERETO AHD MADE APART HEREOF I1T TIllS REFERENCE
~-
Re4I E61ate Sa.loo Tax PI1ld t::z.i 0 -
P.ecclpt No.1 (.201 V Dnl.e ?' --;{ </~J
MIC:~~o/ Q). Trea.'\.
l!'J nofll,:~
N
..-l
o
C
<.::)
-'
J. PERSONAl. PROPERTY I'cr:<nMI rmreny. ir;iny. indu.lcu in ,he "110: i. ,.. (nlln...:
N/A
I'll) l'"n of the: I'un:h"s~ prio:~ is anrihu,,,u tu l"'rsun~ll'rul"'rty.
4. Ill) PRICE. Duyer a~ 10 p"y:
S 39.500 00 TUI"II'ri,,~
Less ($ Z. 500 00 ) Down P~ynl~nl
Less (S -0- ) AssumaJ Oblig.tion (s)
Rcsults in S J7,OOD 00 Amoun' Fin.ncctl by Seller,
(bl ASSUMIlO OUL.IGA nONs. Duyer a~rces 10 p~y ,Il~ .bo.... Assumcd Ohli~lIlion(sl by ...umin~
and ;lgncint: to ray th..c certain ,"""::,--:: t_. _..... tJal~d . . ~ur~C'd ~s
Ai;. :scltcr W;Jrr:uus the: UUp~lIU b;d:u".:-: ,,' ~,d nbh~;;auun IS
S whieh is p.y.bleS on or neforc
lh~ u~y ~f 19._ ..... in.cres1 21 th~ """ uf
~ pcr annum on tile dedinin, loal.nee thcreof; .;.r;, like .mounl on nr ""{n'~ ".~
tJay uf C':t..:h amJ c"~ry ,hcrc:.aftC'f unul ('..ill in lull
NOll:: Fill in the: datc in the "ollowin~ rwOlm.sonly if there is 2n e.rly ";I.h UUI L12'e
NOTWITIlSTANDIN~ Tilt: AUOVE. Tilt:. ~NTIRt:. DAI.ANCli.OI' PRINClI'AI.,\ND INTlltESTlS DUclN
FULL. ~OT U TER THAN 19
ANY ADDITIONAl. ASSUMED OBLIGATIONS ARE INCLUDED IN ADDENOUM.
'.
----..-.- ..-.- .....-...- _.-....--.......
....---- -----.-
..
:;. - 3 -. .-., .-:-.. .-.,
I ~ ,. ..;,.t::..J....=.
Fll.:- r.Ja: 941121 1 10067
I -
'01.
.-. ..-, .--. ..---.
..:...""::'....;j"'::"
,
o(
o(
,-
/
EXHIBIT A
='
That part of the Northwest one-quarter of the Southeast one-quarter of
Section 24. Township 11 Horth. aange 1 East W.M.. described as follows:
Beginning at a point 1.314 51 feet Horth and 1.527 04 feet West of the
Southeast corner of said Section 24. said point being the most Southerly
Southeast corner of 1 15 acre tract conveyed to Jennie Little by Deed
dated December 16. 1919 and recorded in Volume 100 of DeedS, page 16,
runnin9 Harth 31"56' East 243 32 feet and North 52.04' West 439 feet.
more or less, to the Easterly line of Tract conveyed to James L Sample
and wife by deed dated December 16. 1959 and recorded under File Ho 620827;
thence South 1"04'20" East alon9 said Easterly line of Sample Tract 450 feet
to its Southeast corner; thence Harth B9011'05" East 40 feet, more or less.
and Horth 89006'52" East 141 IS feet to the point of beginning; EXCEPT roads
along Southerly and Southeasterly boundaries.
'1.,1: 1591 P;l'~: SI:?7
ril~ No: 8:3s.Z1:::,4e:tS.!t1!1::::
l.
_ -. ..-. ~-=. -, - Sh?: ::=: 1:~14
lol: ~:;.~_. ~.::f _ = ..--::-
N -. .:::a 4 :l 13 1 1. i;:j J:;j t::.o ·
Flle 0.--
~ . -.
. . r
'.'~'.~"':~<<.
_(-. ..F' -. (...-
J: () , .,', '. .z. - -" ~o,'
0" ; ", ~~~_~)o-i,:'_:~~r:. ~.~.c;~ "\..; \~.~?::\ ~_':-1~'-
. L :-"j~ '_-e .:'. ~..... ' . L.- ,";'.,- ...- , .... "
" - - . - ..:. .....:: - .": - . --... .....p. -
AIllMI!5J.~~'-~ --. - ...~-
, . .
:;: ~-:-
/Q~ '..
.~1-
--... """:'--~--~...-
....,. Nl!COIIlIDe) IIIIII!'T\.INII 1'0
-MNA.LrJJ__~Ji_~
'_ 15 f~).A8:!:l.~~~ U- .s:.€,.
_._zlLJit.L'=";~~'1'7
THURSTOH COUHTY
OLYMPIA, WASH.
Orr Z 3 u ffl'Sn'
1:t1llt!.ST ;F
UJf J. .tEn. ~U!1lTmt
QE1'tITY
/// s-c.*'T
;;Wr~A"'i:UCA nrlJ. IlIISUltA~
p,.. .J--', Assignment of Contract and Deed
11fE GiUNTOR S
llAL'I%X A. CII.I..."'"Tn:, JR... and DOa'IRA M. GII..U:'I'IZ.
h.:f..s vUe
do ~ eo<nle'J and q1IiI cbim lD
rOt'~ rea:iTed
. tile sam-.
...
-
~
w
Cl:l
OQ
=
R01fAI.D J. UUGaLnl..um LDmA. L. LAD'GHLIN, his vUe
eocmty, Stale 0( WKft;~....
tile (oDowin~ dcxrtbed rol estate. sill.W<ld Us nmxsTOX
~hc:r ,.;th all utJ:r aoquizai tiSle o( tile cnntor{s) therein:
ThOle part: of ehe nort:hsIese q=eer of ehe southease quart:er of Sect:ion 24.
Tawnship 17 Noren. Range 1 Ease W.M., described as follaws: Reginning ae a
poine d.esc-~bed as being 1314.51 feet norttl and 1998 08 feet vese of the
soucheast: corner of sud Seccion 24; =ning thence a1ot:lg t:he boundary or
5.125 acre ~aec eoaveyed co Jeanie Little by deed daced December 16. 1919
and recorded in 701U111e 100 of Deeds. .page 16. N 1- 04' 20" ~ 642.75 feer:..
H 89- 11' 05'. E 432 feee. llIO"re O"r less. S 37- 56' ~ 161 feee. ClOre or less.
and S 1- 04' 20n E 113.4 feee. mo"re O"r less. co the no~hvese corner of
1.75 acre crace conveyed co Jennie Litcle by said deed: thence N 52- 04'
... 60 feee. llIOre or less. S 1- 04' 20" E 450 feer:. and S 89- 11' OS" ~ 290
feee co the poine of beg:lTTrling.
3rd
day o( June
b.cr'Cby assicn. lnmfc:r md Xl O'I'CI' to the IWltcc tll.at ~ rc&l esI:lte == dated tba
a=ddo
,1980 bcnn:ea RONAIJ).J. GU.LIS .um MALESAIt GII.I.IS
aueJlc:r:md llAI.!Zll. A. cnr.xrn:. .nt.. AND OOR:IHA M. GII.IE1"1'Z
. putd>ascr fOC" me s:&le and ~ o( the abo-<<: dcaibed rc&l esut.c.. The IW!lC'Cl llcrdIy
ISIWDC UJd ~ ca !ultill tile conditioasof s;ai4 rc&l esUte cozuna..
:.f"-~
~.
"-' i:Ro.fllIo.\l,'T"l< P..1t;s'C 6.sd ~ d.ayo(
~ ~ ...,...~ 1..:c...>~Uft,.lc...&.
"=,:-:.. .;., _ _ .. c. ... _/'o".;:1-/E}
.tr ~.. .. -'-
a,. _ t""'-d.. -?; - _. ..~ I . ~-':..
Sf ATE OF - fr.-~} ........-""\"
. sa.
... Couaty 0(. Tburs cOlI .
~. !.:.~
OCTOBER.
,19 80
~./-:t1(~!k-
~ 4/ " :O?~
.}{lrr!'1~ - .~ ~PT 1 ~
On tlUs dal' pcnon.aUy appeua1 bc(o","", \.1a1cer A. G1.11ecce. Jr.. .tnd porc.b.a K..
CU1..ec.e
ca me: known to be the indiric!.>nI.. d<:scnbcd in .uuI who UC'C\ltcd tile within met (orqoUq
iu:mumcm..l1Iet od:now1ed&t:d th:Il they S>plcd the WDC 15 Cheir CRc 1.n<l..oIWlWl'
aa and deed. for tJ:>c \dC:I ~ ~ lbaan mentioned.
~ .und.Br'""",y Iw>d ~ offici:.haJ UIis ,b; daY" ~c:~ber yt 8~
. ,- - " _ ~tC-1kAU.""'1j
N<x-, PoJ1J;c .. ...J far rIt4t s...... of I</""'f';;;;-
~.. OlY"'PLL . - 1- t
l"o;;..10Z~'~ I-t
....JoII
.-,... -.q
dJ7dJ-/49D60Q
(
\..
....
.-...-,.-..-:;, ":'::.s~: 305
l01: - ""="":"-.J ~...'"
Flll? ~o: 941. 0 1 1. ~:3067
.. t:
1 .
~ \
~
t
.
~
~
.-~. ':>
._.....J-r~--=------n..:-
'II
~'::
36ti ...~[r02
~~('
o
....-,.. .; ...
lX"\~~ ~n
666511 "'-'13 ~~WJ"':'.J.
WAR RANTY DEED ~.",~;.._., i::.i' t'".
nw. Indenture. M... '^._-~----="f -""-,""-'-~ ,~
. ...
. . i
:1l U'" ~..c,. of avr Lord ~ t1lO'll.:...nd n~ hlln4rnf and__...1:.AU=-_.'IIa._________ . '--"".
~....n _ __~_~_:l:g, ~_ ~~__9~3.:t~r....!-::_<L...E_9!___b__~.B3.~!"......i::~~E_'!.'1.!L!!:1_~_~\.. .
t/16 pa7t~_ at tM ftT.t ~ aftd.._~I:"..1;::_..1~'!{~.A.~A_u:_..uJ. .~lt~l1...;..._~r.
__:::_3_=== 'lS __ '!-1-:!. _!!.1_ ~~....___
'.
pcut_...1.~ ot UI6 I<<Ond part:
Wjln~th. ~1l.at tlu .l4id pcu1.L~'!_ of tM ttrst part, Jar ane! m ~t1lm 01 tll4! n"" ot
~~r.~ ,~cu~sn~ (~~~QQ.' .............................-..... ~...D~
-----------------------.~--- . ----------------r------- ~~
1a>LT.u mcn~ of the llnlt<<1 Stilt.., tc_~~!..::'_..bI ......nd paid by tM ,ald ;:>art--~_ of flu UCCOId
;>4Tt. t1l4! Trt:.rpt ",!In"'f U hn.by ~..s. dD__ by tJLcu prUC1lt.s\.~. !lc:7ga.l7l, .a.
c:on~ ANI =n(lrm ll"tO UI6 JGjd pcu1_:"~ ot tM ~ part. aNI to _____=k_______ h-.
aNI A.U1\TlU. t1l4! f~v. tr=___.lot__ ar ~ Of land. nt1<4tc, 1~17 lnId bctn17 t7I tJlc
Covnt-I ofu_______'..:.;c:..-:: ~on St4U 01 W<uhtnVfml, 4nd llel~q
bo..1UU.d aNI 4uc:ribcd cu Joa.a-, to-....cc: !e.r1Zl1l1nG..t thf' 1nteraectlon Or thf
_ou\.~.erl: 'tour.~U7 o~ Yea J,.Tenue. 1n Yel~. ':ia::h'.::t:t.nn ",,~~ .~.. L,,:::,~,
5or..t.....,:. ~ ~~1::..dlJj or :i~ll."ro's Flrllt ....~dl tion. ~:1:.1eh ;o1~1. ls ~ri., I~"
~to~1. L~ feet ~ortt.we~terl: !rom. the l~~ l1ne c~ SeC1.10D 24. U~~ l;
''''''''-'' " ". ...... 1 1.}.X.; "'m ...U..~'o.". .,,'''' <t. ~,~.
_ _' e t: ... enl1e e7.'tenc:.ed "'~o ree~; tl".ence ~ou'tl. \ .~ ':.10
~7 ~ecr1i:<a ~E nI1n..;.tea lI'el:1: 10~~ feet to 1n1 Ubl' p01n1. or tl.1a .... ";'t6i'~loi
cl esc::-1.,t t or.; thence cor.t1nUe1ng on lr.rt r.1Wl:..c1 befo.I'1ng ..t~ !'ee't; ..:. ':",
the~ce ~ortr. 53 degrees ~O ~nutea ~O secOnds .est ~76.f~ reet; --'__
t~en~e ~orth 1 cleeTee 4 m1~~tes to se~onda ~est ll~.~ !ef't; thence
Korth ~7 degree. 56 m1nutea E&8t ~96.e6 r~et; thence SOl1th ~3 degree.
ZO alnutea ~O seconds East 4~O reet to ln1t1Ll polnt. CODt~1n1ng
4.92 acre.. lIor. or 1.... L71ng in the Ji:ortb h&.lr or l.t.e South...'t f\ n-h-1
~ ~uU'ter. ~=.. .:~~o, :; .~..~ ~:~elllent10ne4 !owual:1p and. R~e. E:ice.phtlJ fhl 6-rorn. l.C~ J
-;:;>~....""'<...,, ,II' ~Jtl f ..~~ :'I~~~' :::~'.,,; ....J. ....w.a ~.... f&1 Pa~d (/. road. O/(]/r;). SIucJ
... :::~. -,. - i~'l,,:: ., -18- - .ftt..-L
i ., _ ~:~I.:~ ~ ',<= ~ ,r:~. ~ ;- i w~;:~ ::o.~~~te.:'r-'Q. ,II, prvP.tf o1.d?q
~. -~, ~I '.1.1, ...,,,..... :;. -. .:~...,,,..... ~ .:.....1J. iloo~. r~:.cnCQW1Q' freall. .,U;;.d/;<::.f J!.-uIl.._,!/"r.(7-!
'\0 ~"1"'''''--- t" ..... ! <::OCA..:T { ~ r.::::T'-' tN1 ~ j
8J' ~ /. '" ~ /. ~1l1rt7
'1'ogc1llr ""{h f1I4! crp)7"~. to 1l.lrz. CZ>Id to 1Id4 tM MDd prnnUa, Z'UJl UI6 ~n>4ftca,
Illttc ",/d ~~_!!._ Of UI6 UCOnd Ft. =ad fn th e 1 r 1l.dn. ClOC'V.torz. ~on lnId
~lar.........
d J7dL/ 1../ JoqOo
....ftd th~ ".><1 ll<Z1't_.!.~ of t1lc tfnt pan, tar th~~!.!__. lnId tor_~he1~
hnn. C(t:Nan or admblutnrtan dD___ bv ~ prr:wntz. ~ CUId ~ tc <md >OWl tM
J.C;~1 ,~!'_'!.- ot t/16 '<=M. ~!-~~-!E~,a<IC'IltonCll'~..xd......aq,u.tJIC
u____ ---__It:>efvJJv uU:n1 bI JtC mnplc ~ oJ '"'If bllIll4nd ~ UI6 Abow grant..s..xd
ducrlbcrt prn7l.lla 4Kd UI6 ~ ~h '7 lla T. ~ good 4nd Lno1>Il f191\.t to ..a mod
C'Dftt'orJ' ~ -...: t1l4t th6 _ an tr- trvra ~ Una ad: ~ wh. t.~Ter
(
QdjAC_!.~!7.
dlI.t".. ~
I\.a-ebv W..LJtZ.IJIT _--""<f ..,az DUVlD lAc _ frtJM all I4>otal
La Timor- Wba-eol. nw xJd ,part. ~ -. 01 Ulc tfnt "..n A..1&. A.crnooto Ad ",.,..1,.
AAa...t1- &A4i acL....I._ tJl.c dq =ad __ /fnt ~ -ur...
.r~ ~ ...., Dclirwed fa ~ Of
, '-
__t_f~.f:1" .c--c--'<...:-.<----
___L? ~?/:./ 0<7 I....c~
17..:>'~~~LU.J
.h \ ,,'- -n. .. ..; ___....... " ; '_
---------___~_j.---f srALJ
~ -------------------------- (S~J
-__(~At.J
...... -- . ~ -- __~ .__ _ J --.. ..
-
~
-I
'.
,........
t)
(')
,........
/01: 2333 -'39l?: 31Z16
Fll~ No: 9410110067
~
... .
(
o
o(
Section 19, Township 17 North, Range 2 East.
The Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section
19, EXCEPT that part being Southeas~ of the Northwest
line of the Rainier-Yelm Highway, and ALSO EXCEPT that
part being Northeast of the Northeast line of Mosman
Street S.E. and its direct prolongation Southeastwardly
to the Northwest line of Rainier-Yelm Highway.
That portion of Mill Road in Section 19, Township 17
North, Range 2 East, W.M., lying South of Rainier-Yelm
Highway.
A portion of the Southeast quarter of Section 26, Township 17
North, Range 1 East, W.M., described as follows:
BEGINNING at the Southwest corner of said subdivision;
THENCE North 890 10' 47" East along the South line
thereof, 720.67 feet;
THENCE North 280 42' 32" East, 2,038.89 feet;
THENCE North 730 55' 14" West, 999.71 feet;
THENCE Northwesterly 953 feet, more or less, to the
Northwest corner of the Northwest one-auar~er of the
Southeast one-quarter of said Section 26;
THENCE South 00055' 01" East, 2,636 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
That part of the Southeast quarter of Section 26, Township 17
North, Range 1 East, W.M., described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the South line of said Section 26,
North 890 10' 47" East, 720.67 feet from the Southwest corner
of said Southeast quarter;
THENCE North 280 42' 32" East, 2,038.89 feet;
THENCE South 490 04' 03" East, 1,148.33 feet to the
Westerly margin of the Burlington Northern Inc., Railway;
THENCE South 350 44' 02" West along said railroad right-
of-way, 1,256.52 feet to the South line of said Section
26 ;
THENCE South 890 10'
1,113.23 feet to the
47" West along said South line
POINT OF BEGINNING.
That part of the North half of the Northeast quarter of
Section 25, Township 17 North, Range 1 East, W.M., described
as follows; and the SE 1/4 of Section 24, T 17, RIE, as
follows; Parcel A of Boundary Line Adjus~ment No. 1142
recorded December II, 1991, under File No. 9112110209.
All situate in Thurston County, Washington.
- ,-..-..-. :"- "e' .307
}ol: .::..:..J....:;..-.J I -=-~ . __
Fi le Nt): 9411-31 1. I-:U-3b .0'
Ci~ of Yel.
Ordinance No. 484 AHX a100/SWYela
Exhibit -A- Page 3
o(
o(
EXHIBIT B
SCOPE OF WORK: ZONING AND PLANNING
Yelm's annexation policies require that any costs incurred in connection with the
processing of an annexation petition, as well as all the resulting zoning, planning and
development reviews, shall be paid by the Sponsors of such annexation. Thurston
Highlands Associates (hereinafter referred to as the "Sponsors") agree that the
services identified below are necessary for and proximate to the Southwest Yelm
Anrrexation, all planning, zoning and development reviews for such annexation area,
and the modification of community plans to accommodate the annexation.
The City has determined that the annexation is in the public interest and should
proceed if the Sponsors can satisfy all requirements of the State, County and City that
apply to the annexation. The City shall use its best efforts to process all applications
for planning, zoning and development review in accordance with the proposed
schedule, but the City cannot provide any guarantee as to the outcome of final
decisions. Final decisions cannot be made until the factual showings required under
the City's codes and policies have been met and the statutory criteria under State law
have been satisfied.
In order to satisfy the obligations imposed on the City, by various State laws, the City
will have to process, adopt, amend, or change the following documents to reflect the
proposals presented by the Sponsors.
1 . The City Comprehensive Plan;
2. The City Zoning Ordinance;
3.. The City Sewer Plan; /01: 2333 ,:'.Else: 30:=:
4. The City Water Plan; File No: 9411-31 1 r2u.367
5. The City Transportation Plan;
6. The environmental review of the plans and processes discussed
above; and
7. The Urban Growth Management policies supporting the
application.
Compensable activities shall include all activities necessary to complete the processing
of the identified activities including drafting, reviewing and publishing documents, and
preparation for and participation in meetings, hearings, and appeals, either
administrative or judicial.
Yelm shall contract for or otherwise provide the services necessary to accomplish the
required changes and shall charge the Sponsors actual rates and charges, as provided
in the Agreement.
C:\WP61 \67WRM\ANNEX,6 .os
1
o(
o(
To the extent allowed by state law, the city will assist the Sponsors in obtaining
reimbursement of the above services and costs. It is acknowledged by the parties,
however, that the State Legislature has only adopted latecomer agreement statutes
for certain types of improvements (street, water and sewer) and for certain types of
work associated with such improvements (design, engineering and construction). To
the extent that this Agreement requires the Sponsors to perform certain tasks and pay
for certain activities that go beyond the limitations of state statutes, it is understood
that the Sponsors are solely responsible for those tasks and costs. Under such
circumstances, the City would entertain the possibility of establishing a local
improvement district, but only to the extent allowed by state law.
The City shall retain consultants to perform such services as are necessary to assist
and:advise the City in responding to and processing the above-listed documents, as
well as any other zoning, planning and development applications submitted by the
Sponsors or their agents pertaining to projects within the area known as the
Southwest Yelm Annexation Area.
Authorized consultants to the City under this agreement shall include, but are not
limited to, Skillings-Connelly and Owens Davies Mackie, provided that they agree to
be bound by the terms and limitations of the Agreement between the City and the
Sponsors. Other consultants may be added to the list with the express written
consent of the Sponsors, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld.
City Staff, including but not limited to Shelly Badger, Gene Borges, Ty Peterson and
Lynn Haigh, shall be charged to the project for their time at the same rates charged
to State and Federal grant programs for the fiscal year in which the charge is made
(including direct and indirect costs). Other City staff may be charged to the project
with the express written consent of the Sponsors, such consent not to be
unreasonably withheld. \. n ? ,,( ..1..") ..,...., / _ J,~
UZ-__ /7- -/-4 C4.-{??-
c+?J'; " J
"J, ';/0 /!o.A~A-
Expenses shall be reimbursed as incurred at actual cost.
_.,1.0 ; ..--:. .-. ..-. .-. _
.::..-=-....=.-=- . laSE-: 309
Fl I? No: 941 ~31 1 ~:::fl-367
C:\WPS 1 \67\ YEl.M\ANNEX-5.EXB
2
,. -
0\
o(
EXHIBIT C
WASTEWATER REUSE
The City of Yelm is in the process of constructing a wastewater treatment facility to
process wastewater for a service area that includes only the current City limits. The
system is not designed to accommodate any new annexations. This means that the
Southwest Yelm Annexation Area must somehow be accommodated, for purposes of
sewage treatment, in some other manner. Moreover, the Growth Management Act
requires that development only occur concurrently with the provision of adequate
services. The City must begin planning for the additional sewage treatment needs of
the Southwest Yelm Annexation Area.
In addition, the City agreed to the terms of a settlement agreement in an appeal of a
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Conditional Use Permit for the
discharge of wastewater effluent to the Nisqually River and the Centralia Power Canal.
The terms of that agreement require the City to actively demonstrate that it is
pursuing alternatives to such discharge points. Also under the terms of the
agreement, the City must upgrade its wastewater treatment facility to an advanced
or tertiary treatment level in order to expand the capacity of its total outfall.
The development of alternatives to the currently approved discharges to the Nisqually
River and Centralia Power Canal will be costly and time-consuming for the City of
Yelm. To the extent that they are attributable to impacts resulting from the
Southwest Yelm Annexation, these costs should be borne by Thurston Highlands
Associates, the Sponsors of such annexation. The costs and activities required to
develop and implement these alternatives are beyond the current staffing abilities and
expertise of the City of Yelm. Therefore, the City must seek independent consultation
and assistance in developing these alternatives.
The activities and costs required to develop alternatives to currently approved
discharges include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Review and modify the City of Yelm Wastewater Facilities Plan.
2. Develop an engineering design for a water reclamation and reuse
system.
3. Preparation, review and submission of an application for a Water
Reclamation and Reuse Permit to the Departments of Health and
Ecology pursuant to RCW 90.46 and the Water Reclamation and
Reuse Interim Standards, effective May 1, 1993.
4. Pursuing and obtaining alternative sources of financing, including
the State Legislature, Congress, federal agencIes and State
agencies.
"01: 2333 ?a;e: 310
rlll? No:,: 9411-311 OOt;7
C:\WP51 \57\ Yel.M\ANN EX-S.EXC
.~
o(
o(
5. Implement the water reuse and reclamation system, including
construction of facilities, purchase of property for land application,
leases and licenses for land application, transportation, liability,
and the maintenance and operation of such a system.
The Sponsors shall be financially responsible for the above services and costs, to the
extent attributable to the Southwest Yelm Annexation. It is understood by the parties
that some of the above costs are attributable to causes other than the Southwest
Yelm Annexation. It is also understood that some portions of the above costs will be
reimbursed with state or federal matching grant funds. The Sponsors shall work with
and cooperate with the City of Yelm in the development of a detailed scope of work,
budget and contract schedule for the provision of the above services and costs,
inclcding the apportionment of such services and costs to the Sponsors according to
their fair share.
-
To the extent allowed by state law, the City will assist the Sponsors in obtaining
reimbursement of the above services and costs. It is acknowledged by the parties,
however, that the State Legislature has only adopted latecomer agreement statutes
for certain types of improvements (street, water and sewer) and for certain types of
work associated with such improvements (design, engineering and construction). To
the extent that this Agreement requires the Sponsors to perform certain tasks and pay
for certain activities that go beyond the limitations of state statutes, it is understood
that the Sponsors are solely responsible for those tasks and costs. In order to avoid
such circumstances, the City would entertain the possibility of establishing a local
improvement district, but only to the extent allowed by state law.
The City shall retain consultants to perform such services as are necessary to assist
and advise the City in accomplishing the above-listed tasks, as well as any other task
necessary to accomplish the objectives set forth herein.
Authorized consultants to the City under this agreement shall include, but are not
limited to, Skillings-Connelly and Owens Davies Mackie, provided that they agree to
be bound by the terms and limitations of the Agreement between the City and the
Sponsors. Other consultants may be added to the list with the express written
consent of the Sponsors, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld.
City Staff, including but not limited to Shelly Badger, Gene Borges, Ty Peterson and
Lynn Haigh, shall be charged to the project for their time at the same rates charged
to State and Federal grant programs for the fiscal year in which the charge is made
(including direct and indirect costs). Other City staff may be charged to the project
with the express written consent of the Sponsors, such consent not to be
unreasonably withheld.
Expenses shall be reimbursed as incurred at actual cost.
"01: 2333 :'age: 3 1 1
Fllt:- No: 941 ~311 0067
C:\WPS 1 \S7\YaM\ANNEX,S.EXC
2
~ ,tffiJb &
R\lal!~t~!~~~W~
. ~
YELM, WASHINGTON 98597
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF WASHINGTON
County of Thurston
D.R. Miller
, being first duly sworn on
oath deposes and says that she/he is the edi tor
of the Nisqually Valley News, a weekly newspaper That said newspa-
per is a legal newspaper and has been approved as a legal newspaper
by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and
it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the
publications hereinafter referred to, published in the English language
continually as a weekly newspaper in Thurston County, Washington, and
it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained
at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper
Notice of Public
That the annexed is a true copy of
Hearing Southwest Yelm Annexation
as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form) of said
newspaper once a week for a period of
1
consecutive weeks, commencing on the
18
day
of
November
19
q~ ,and ending on the
18 day of November, 19 93
both dates inclusive and that such newspaper was regularly distributed
to its subscribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the
fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $
which amount has been paid in full.
42.00
b(/)(~;A}rbz/'\
Subscribed and .sworn to before me this
Novetmer
19 day of
19
93
\
, ;
. \
Nicole Ubby
) I
'-
i
\
\ 1)'\
,
, 1 \ \
, ,\
,
\
residing at Yelm, Washington.
" l'"40tary Public in and for the State 0
, l t
~ ~) . "'
\ \; 1" \ :.~ .~
\. ) '.
. L,"\, )....'"
. -\-
) \) "This form officially sanctioned by the
I! I i Washington Newspaper Publishers' Association
" ,
,)
o
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SOUTHWEST YELMANNEXA TION
The City of Yelm City Council will hold
a publiC hearing on Tuesday, November
23, 1993, at 7.30 p.m., to consider the
annexation of approximately 2,000 acres
commonly referred to as the Southwest
Yelm Annexation, No .ANX8100,
together with accompanying agreement,
in the form of an Annexation Agreement,
betwe~n the City of Yelm and the spon..
sors of the annexation. The provisions of
the annexation and the agreement can be
summarized as follows:
1 The property to be annexed is sub.
ject to the existing indebtedness of the
City of Yelm and will be assessed and
taxed in the same manner as other pro,
perty within the City
2. The property to be annexed will be
zoned RA,5A as provided in Section
17 40 020(c) of the Yelm Municipal
Code
3. The City will enter an agreement with
the sponsors of the annexation by which
the sponsors agree to pay all the costs
of the annexation, including all planning,
plan amendments, zoning, provision of all
services and utilities and the development
and implementation of sewage discharge
alternatives.
4 The City will agree to adopt a master
planning process to be applied to this an,
nexation area.
5 The Southwest Yelm Annexation
area is currently outside the City of Yelm
Sewer Service Area as established in the
Yelm Wastewater Facilities Plan and
Sewer Service Area will not be amend,
ed to include the Southwest Yelm Annex,
ation area unless and until the City Coun,
cil determines that it is in the best interest
of the City to do so
All interested parties are invited to at-
tend. Written comments must be receiv-
ed prior to the hearing and should be
directed to the Yelm City Council and
mailed to POBox 479, Yelm, WA
98597 or delivered to City Hall.
A TIEST'
Agnes P Colombo, City Clerk
Published in the Nisqually Valley News
Thursday, November 18, J 993. '"
<>
-10 "-t)
o
City of Y elm
WASHINGTON
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
(206) 458-3244
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SOUTHWEST YELM ANNEXATION
The City of Yelm City Council will hold a public hearing on
Tuesday I November 23, 1993 at 7: 30 p.m. " to consider the annexation
of approximately 2,000 acres commonly referred to as the Southwest
Yelm Annexation, #ANX 8100, together with an accompanying
agreement, in the form of an Annexation Agreement, between the City
of Yelm and the sponsors of the annexation. The provisions of the
annexation and the agreement can be summarized as follows:
1. The property to be annexed is subject to the existing
indebtedness of the City of Yelm and will be assessed and taxed in
the same manner as other property within the City.
2. The property to be annexed will be zoned RA-5A as
provided in Section 17.40.020(c) of the Yelm Municipal Code.
3. The City will enter an agreement with the sponsors of the
annexation by which the sponsors agree to pay all the costs of the
annexatlon, including all planning, plan amendments, zoning,
provision of all services and utilities and the development and
implementation of seWage discharge alternatives.
4. The City will agree to adopt a master planning process to
be applied to this annexation area.
5. The Southwest Yelm Annexation area is currently outside
the City of Yelm Sewer Service Area as established in the Yelm
Wastewater Facilities Plan and the Sewer Service Area will not be
amended to include the Southwest Yelm Annexation area unless and
until the City Council determines that it is in the best interest
of the City to do so.
All interested parties are invited to attend.
must be received prior to the hearing and should
Yelm City Council and mailed to P.O. Box 479,
delivered to City Hall.
Written comments
be directed to the
Yelm, WA 98597 or
\ J / /) 1
,-:.Cl:/~ ~I I-J l :J~lIllJ
Agnes P. Cilombo
City Clerk
Attest:
Published In the Nisqually Valley News - November 18, 1993
*
/?f'(~'cl('d rWlp,~r
o
o
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Judy Wilson
District One
Diane Oberquell
District Two
Dick Nichols
District Three
THURSTON COUNTY
.\'''~~~=--~-'--'-~.
SINCE 1852
ADVANCE PLANNING and HISTORIC PRESERVATION
Harold Robertson, AICP
Planning Director
October 19, 1993
Kathy Wolf, lvfayor
City of Yelm
P.O Box 479
Yelm, WA 98597
SUBJECT Case No. BRB-93-08, Southwest Yelm Annexation
Dear Mayor Wolf:
This annexation is now returned to the City of Yelm for your final action. The 45-day
period of time allowed for the jurisdiction of the Boundary Review Board to be invoked,
pursuant to RCW 36 93.100, has passed. No person or official entity allowed has filed
such a request.
Please send me a copy of the final ordmance and map of annexatLon, once it has been
adopted by the Yelm City Council and recorded. If you have any questions, please feel
free to contact me.
Smcerely,
~~
Shanna Stevenson, Chief Clerk
25:jlb
cc' Affected Governmental Units
2404 B Heritage Court SW, Olympia, Washington 98502-6031 (206) 786-5222/ FAX (206) 754-4413
*
Recycled Paper
o
o
Judy Wilson
District One
Diane Oberquell
District Two
Dick Nichols
District Three
THURSTON COUNTY
.\'_.-.....:_-~-~-.-~.
SINCE 1852
BOARD OF COUNTY CO:MM1SSIONERS
October 11, 1993
The Honorable Kathy Wolf
CIty of Yelm
P.O Box 479
Yelm, Vv' A 98579
SUBJECT. Proposed AnnexatIOn to Yelm (BRB-93-08)
Dear Mayor Wolf'
We have reviewed your annexation proposal and find that it appears to be consIstent with
the annexatIOn polIcIes of the Thurston County ComprehensIve Plan. We have no
ObjectIOn to the annexation and will send a letter to the Boundary Review Board to that
effect.
If we or our staff can be of assistance m developing or presenting publIc informatIon
material or otherWIse facIlItatmg the orderly transItIOn of this area from our JurisdIction to
yours, please contact us.
Smcerely,
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Thurston County, Washington
DIANE OBERQUELL, ChaIrman
&I d!M0
DICK NICHOLS, CommISSIOner
~ .
JV~
J Y~N, Commissioner
23 : sm\kb'lJxc\brb93 08
Building #1, Room 269,2000 Lakeridge Drive SW, Olympia, Washington 98502-6045 (206) 786-5440
<I
Recycled Paper
~
<I
THURSQN COUNTY BOUNDARY ~VIEW BOARD
!
APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION
(Please submit 20 copIes)
1
JUriSdictIon Requesting AnnexatIon
c~ \." (') ~ ~ Q\ W\
I
Responsible OfficIal
2 If number of parcels IS less than three, please list the owners
Phone
Phone
3 LocatIon (address, If aSSIgned)
4 Legal DeSCriptIon (on separate page, If necessary)
5 SI:;;e In Acres
6 Assessed ValuatIon
7 Please state the nature of this actIon and the relevant statutory c:tatlon
(! e , annexatlOn for municIpal purposes pursuant to RCW 35 13 180)
1
o
n.
I
o
~
8 Current County Zoning and Comprehensive Plan DesignatIon
9 Proposed City Zoning and Comprehensive Plan DesignatIon
10 Is this site within the present Urban Growth Management Area as
adopted and approved by Lac8Y, O!ympla, Tumwater ,and Thurston
County?
Yes No
11 Is the site currently served by sewer or water?
Sewer
Water
NeIther
If no, specIfy services desired
If sewer or water desIred, Include map showing location of nearest lines
Is this site Within any eXisting service areas or coordinated water or
sewer planning areas (water, sewer, LOTT Phase I Service Area)?
12 Does this proposal affect any other rntequrfsdlctJonal agreements?
Yes No
If yes, please list these agreements'
2
~
o
o
13 How does this proposal conform to adopted cIty policIes on annexatIon?
14 Other specIfic Reason(s) for AnnexatIon
1 5 Explam how this proposal furthers the objectIves of the Boundary
Review Board (RCW 36 93 180) [attached addItIonal pages If
necessary]
a PreservatlOn of natural neighborhoods and communities
b Use of physical boundanes, including but not limited to bodies of
water, highways, and land contours
c Creation and preservation of logical service areas
d PreventIon of abnormally Irregular boundanes
e Discouragement of multIple IncorporatIons of small cItIes and
encouragement of IncorporatIon of cities In excess of ten thousand
populatIon In heavily populated urban areas
3
,
o 0
f DissolutIOn of Inactive special purpose districts'
g Adjustment of ImpractIcal boundanes
\
h IncorporatIon as cltles or towns or annexation to cIties or towns of
unincorporated areas which are urban In character
ProtectIon of agricultural lands
For your InfOrmatlon, the Boundary Review Board can consIder the following
factors (RCW 36 93 170) In deCIding whether a particular declslO"n furthers the
objectIves stated above SV.J"le.\'M ~Y\~(Co'v~icrV"\ ~\'Q~C1.. 't=\(\c.\'\ ~V\.\ldan~~\e\
T hi"'-elA..fL.~ ~ ~S
1 POJJulptlOn .and ternt.qry
f'~P\) ItA.\-tM b rCl .N d--~ t~~ l)
- ~'o\lu~O-C\IIlt\ \:"O"::..<C\I..Y\,'JP~,^Aw."\' \o\.C\.O 20\0 fG\.4i.f
2 PopulatIon densIty \J
3
Land area ~nd land use
E'(.(s/"tf u"rrJ. VStZ$. ~~ 7 'I
C'crrf,p~eh~s~~ u~e'~Talls 'tn<fzo~)dg
7l"'€\.\~~~~ oJ.d~sr.J \", (~~1t-~ ~'I'-^ d;q d'~ ~l'S C\.~~\~(c.,.\lciv'\
Per capita assessed valuatlon~
?tr cu.~~\.""'" (.c16b o~ ~'-I'\ \~\.e...?::, ~.3 1\.-'-1 o-{L~ ~ c'-l'{Jev-A.f ~
Topography, natural boundaries and drainage basins, proxImity to other
populated areas,\o"o~lo..,\,\.-fc.. 4f '(t'l\. \'~ \\) I lAk-\-\."'-~ ~ ov\. \'~. -S\.
~lOf~~c\'~""l==>lV\\Mt.5c.. "'I\J, S<\Or!v\ (6\\"'c,'~n~f'\. Sys\eM.S:. P5 \\1
The eXIstence of pnme agncultural soils and agricultural uses
1>~~, fJ'1 a--'-S I F'ovt>L' \7 ,,,,-4.. ~c--~ ~:1-S
The lIkelihood of slgnlficant growth in the area and In adjacent
Incorporation and unincorporated areas dunng the next ten years
~t"o~cc\:ec^ \)e'Motl.-tt\.\l\-..Ic.. ~.~~ '?:J" .s,\d..-Co .
~oeu~O\.\-~<N' 9""0 ~ <.r '\~tl:,^S , '1:,\""'-.... ~cA.. ~'" !eL1
Loc~tlon and-jmost: cfesir?ble ruture li~cat~9n 'of community facIlltles
-Gv rNvvt\y 11...t."'€.. ~ 1'1l) (()YlAmuYlI~ r!-~rJ, f.~ tfl f.f1..u."\........k e\V\~~~-\\W\ CAN-,^! &.re..-
10 M I, W~\\ \0<. \~I'\-\\~u,,^ t...\O(,^-\.;~ "dd"- -\0 N'I-L\Of'WV~
. unlclpa servIces .
LunJ ~.) b\k <J.e 4 \t ~cO..S "'-~ to..C~~~.e.e \ '\ "'-. ~ \) ~ \' cs ~
\03 -\""2-3 o-~a.. ,; ~~~"('t"J-uuy.) ~-\ -i.:~" ~-~ o-~~ ~~;
4
4
5
6
7
8
9
j;; 0
11 ~eed for mUnIcIpal servl<;es II ,
~ Q>!{~\}'c\~(.. S'U\I{CllS o;h.{...&l.t:ta..~s<::;..ec\ I'f'o.. ~~s 'O'3--\b~ ,,~<\)s::'~S
. \ f"(lW'"s\>. f '"'^-~-CN"\ s~u&.'^' ' ~ 0 "- eC\ s g 2 - \ 0""1--'
12 Effect of ordlnances~ governr:nental codes, regulations and resolutIons
on eXisting uses. ~ Ci\-q b~ \( e\vv\s' o...d~'f-.o-lN.e.). (~I N..fj vlA.;hUv\S ~.. \---IS6l~ l.-(~
wou \~ 't e.. \ r<--. D...~.e.~ k ~ (),,)...eo..., \w w e ~'" C u r.:.e~ ,)<;.a.S \j)00\.d--... '<> e.. ~ ~~ ~~:..J
Present cost and adequacy of governmental services and controls In area
\()..'b~ \~ ~~ \"2" 61 t \)~J:.5
14 Prospects of governrr1enta~ servIces from other sources
I!h~ dtl-- <{/t/~ T :w..,L,
15 ~J? o,babl~ future) needs for such servIces .9-nd controls tJ.
.. ";\\~~ :r.~{c..s;\~..A" ~ cas,\c;;:. ~ \>~ \L.S ,6\j.,.)... 0"" <(() \ L. ,
16 Pro~~~~ffeJ}M'pro~~'s~I'-?,f1lfernffK,~'L~n cost and adequacy of
services and controls In area and adjacent area I \ \ ~
l\.),t'f,..~ ~~.)\ull'-L ~ ~ ~.)b\i'(... ~.u\){c.es ~V'{... ~y.t.S)~d\ ,,,\ S-u ((}'II.. \\.)
1:0..(\$ \ -V'V'-NlJ.'i^ '\:: t.ho., t;?~"\€..'S. /0;<' - n...~ o~~, \'~kS
17 The effect of t12.~ ftnances, debt struc-rure, and contractual obligatIons
and nghts of ,all affected governmental unltSJ, A h
~~V\..~ tt'l'-O\. el>\\~,^ \G\t'^f\.. ~\1-e\A~ 0 t... ~~ \~ - \"~o o-\t.....~I.Z..-'iI:-S ~,
~t,. ~()I.'2-.-.A:cLS /1."'\0 ~4~~ A.~\(P <:3(.:. ~ Ftfr.;r.s,
'~ 8. The effect of tne_~Qroposal or alternatlve on aOJacent area~on mutual
'-./'economlc and:, s~~cl~ntere;;f and on the local governmefl'tal structure
of the county.' .
o
13
,--
(3/31/92..386 10)
~rtv-JN--'Z> A". \ ~ro~'" A -~ O\.. ~t..
C.iC. ""'c
r :r.....t-. -.:>
5
. .
CREQUIRED ATTACHMEN():
THURSTON COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD'
NOT1CE OF INTENTION
II MAPS (NOTE: Must have legends/Colored maps are not acceptable unless 20 copies are submitted)
The folloWIng maps must be submItted with all notices of Intent
A MaD of Entire CltV An 8-1/2 X 11 Inch map, usmg as a base the
Department of Transportation Urban Area Map (scale 1 2000\ as
updated and kept on file at Thurston Regional Plannmg CouncIl, will
be used by all JUrISdictIon In the urban area to show the following
1 The general VICInity of the proposal
2 The area proposed for annexatIon highlighted In some manner
3 The boundarIes of other citIes near the annexatIon area
(highlighted If not readIly dlscernable)
4 Major streets/roads Identified
B Assessor1s Map showing speCific parcells) and ImmedIate VICInity
(reduced copy IS preferable)
C Phvslcal Features One or more maps shoWIng the folloWIng
1 Dommant physical features such as lakes, creeks, and ravines
2 Flood plain boundarIes (1 OO-year)
3 Railroad lInes
4 All public roads near the annexatIon
5 Commercial agnculture lands (when this Information IS
available)
D ServIce Area and Other Boundanes. One map showmg the
annexation and Its relatIonship to the followmg
1 UGMA boundary
2 Approved water service areas
3 LOTT I draInage basms
E Other Maps
1 EXisting county zonrng, zonIng requested by applicant, zonIng
proposed by CIty, contiguous city zonrng, as well as shoreline
designations and changes In tidelands and bedlands
designations, If applicable
2 Location of water and sewer mams wlthm proposed
annexation, If any, and those nearby (any Junsdlctlon)
1
i"
o 0
III DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE UNDER WASHINGTON STATE
ENVIRONMENTAL POLlCY ACT
IV $50.00 CHECK MADE OUT TO "THURSTON COUNTY"
V PET1T10NS (CERTIFIED IF APPROPRIATE)
VI EVIDENCE OF PREVIOUS STATUTORY ACT10NS OF PET1Tl0NER
REGARDING THE APPLICATION
(3131192 '- 38610)
2
o
City of Yelm
105 Yelm Avenue West
PO~ Box 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
(206) 458-3244
August 30, 1993
Dennis Craig, Chairman
Thurston ~ounty Boundary Revi~w Board
2000 Lakeridge Dr SE
u Olympia, WA 98502
RE: Southwest Yelm Annexation/Application
Dear Mr. Craig:
On behalf of the City of Yelm, I am pleased to submit for your
review the attached Application for Annexation and its enclosure~.
The City' of Yelrn prop6ses to annex appro~imately 2,058 acres of
property adjacent to the southwes,t border of the current city
limits. The qnnexation will allow the City of Yelm to provide the
careful plannihg necessary :for its community to retain the quality
of life it has known for so long~
It lS impoxt.ant, to uhderstandthat, while the acreage of the'
proposed annexation 'may be large, there are no direct lmpacts
, resul ting f,rom this proposed' p.nne~ation.' The annexation .is a mere
modification ,to the jurisdictional authority ov~r the area; canYu
impacts will occur with future development and will be considered
when development is proposed. Any impacts r,-esul ting from this
proposal have been considered and approved, by the City in an
Environmental Impact Statement. A copy of the EIS- is a,ttached and
referenced in the application. .
The City of Yelrii has determined that the proposed Sou.thwest Yelm
Anne~at~on is consistent with the City's annexation ordinance and
policies. The proposed zoning for the annexation complements ~he
.Ci ty' s comprehensive plan and is consistent with the joint planning
with Thu,rston County for the area within the City's urban g-rowth
area. The City has determined that the annexation will re~ult in
a significant benefit to the City and ~ili cause no undue burden~
In all' respects I the proposed, annexatlon will serve the publi<;:
interest of the citizens of the City of Yelm and of Thurston
County.
@
. Recyclt:d JXlper
o
()
\.......'
Bounda~y ~eview'Bo~~d
August 3'0" 1993
Page 2
<Please revi.ew the attached ;application and enclosures. If we can"
be of assistanc~ ih providing any additional informatioQi please
don~t ,hesitate to ask. We look forward to working with Boundary
Review Board ~nd its statf to prodUce a succ~ssful annexri~ion.
Thank you.
Respectf~lly submitted,
"
'/~ X'~
Kathy Wolf
Maxor~, City bf Yelm '
cc: Yelm'City Council ~embers
Ty ~etersoni City Planner
Shelly Badger, Chief Administrative Officer
Jim Blundell/Sandy Mackie, Owens Davies Mackie
Dennis Su,Thurston Highlrinds & Asso~iates
Jon Potter, Venture Partners Representative
r
, ,
o
o
APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION
~ Jurisdiction Requesting Annexation:
City of Yelm
Responsible Official:
Shelly Badger, City Administrator
2 If number of parcels is less than three, please list the
owners: See 'Certification of Annexation Petition
enclosed in the packet
3 Location (address if assiQned):
Southwest of the current Yelm City Limits See 'Description
of the proposal' and locational maps enclosed in the packet
4 Legal Description:
See Exhibit A
5 Size in Acres:
2058 +/-
6 Assessed Value:
$ 6,240,320 00
7 Please state the nature of this action and the relevant
statutory citation (i.e.. annexation for municipal purposes
pursuant to RCW 35.13.180):
This action is a proposed annexation of approximately 2058
acres to the City of Yelm for municipal purposes pursuant to
RCW 35A 14 120
8 Current County ZoninQ and Comprehensive Plan DesiQnation:
The current County Zoning and Comp Plan designation 1S
Rural Residential ( one unit to five acres)
9 Proposed City ZoninQ and Comprehensive Plan DesiQnation:
Currently, the proposed zoning for the annexed area will
remain at the same density as the County zoning More
analysis will be performed to determine appropriate future
densities The City is looking at the designation of a
Planned Development District, which provides for a variety
of uses and housing types, is complimentary to the
Comprehensive Plan for the City of Yelm, and would be in
the public interest if annexed
10 Is this site within the present Urban Growth ManaQement Area
as adopted and approved by Lacey, Olympia, Tummwater. and
Thurston County?
The area proposed for ~nnexation is within the current
Interim Urban Growth Boundary approved by the County for the
City of Yelm
o
o
11 Is this site currently served by sewer or water?
Currently, this site is not served by sewer or water The
City of Yelm is in the process of constructing a sewage
treatment facility to serve the existing boundaries of the
City The facility is not designed to serve this
annexation However, because of the unique opportunities
surrounding this annexation and potential development
alternatives, methods for wastewater treatment are being
considered Water rights and expanded water service
capability will be further addressed at the time of
development The Draft and Final Environmental Impact
Statements address these issues more thoroughly
12 Does this proposal affect any other interjurisdictional
agreements?
Yes An agreement between the City of Yelm and Thurston
County Fire District #2 allows for the Fire District to
collect more fees as the city expands
13 How does this proposal conform to adopted city policies
on annexation?
The City Council and Planning Commission have both found
that this proposal complies with the City of Yelm's
criteria, goals and policies described in Yelm Ordinance No
414 (Enclosed is a copy of this ordinance)
14 Other Specific Reason(s) for Annexation
After series of public hearings and workshops. the Yelm
Planning Commission approved the Southwest Yelm Annexation
and the accompanying Final Environmental Impact Statement
and made the following findings:
A The proposed Southwest Yelm Annexation is consistent
with the joint planning done by the City of Yelm and
Thurston County for the property within the proposed
Urban Growth Area for the City of Yelm
B The zoning proposed for the annexation area provides
a variety of uses and housing types, is complimentary
to the existing Comprehensive Plan for the City of
Yelm, and would be in the public interest if adopted by
the city
C The utility and transportation plans to serve the
annexed area provide reasonable alternatives,
consistent with the City's growth management planning
utility planning The city is committed to additional
utility planning processes before any specific
development is approved, to assure that adequate
capacity for all necessary facilities is available
o
o
concurrently with any proposed development
o The Southwest Yelm Annexation Final Environmental
Impact Statement adequately and accurately describes
the project and is determined by the Planning
Commission to be adequate
E The City of Yelm may annex the property consistent
with its annexation policies and provide a significant
benefit to the City in terms of a well-planned
development area and not provide any undue burden to
the eXlsting taxpayers of the City of Yelm
15 Explain how this proposal furthers the objectives of the
Boundary Review Board CRCW 36.93.180~:
A Preservation of natural neiQhborhoods and communities:
Currently the area is sparsely populated and the
annexation itself would not impact the existing
community The proposed Planned Unit Development
allows for a unique opportunity to preserve the
natural character of the neighborhoods and community
B Use of physical boundaries. includinQ but not limited to
of water, hiQhways. and land contours:
The proposed annexation uses SR 507 as an eastern
border, excluding areas that have determined to be
environmentally sensitive The area to the northwest
is Ft Lewis and bordered by forests This annexation
has taken into account the use of physical boundaries
when applicable
C Creation and preservation of lOQical service areas
All the land subject to this annexation area is within
the proposed Urban Growth Area and has been taken into
account with the development of Yelm's Transportation
Plan and Utilities Plans, further analysis and planning
will be done prior to development The City contracts
with Thurston County Fire Dist 2 for fire protection
services Once annexed, the City of Yelm would provide
police services The proposed annexation area is
within a three minute drive from the police station
D Prevention of abnormally irreQular boundaries:
The annexation area follows logical boundaries
The boundaries follow section lines, the Fort Lewis
Military Reservation boundary, and a State highway The
boundary excludes environmentally sensitive areas
because they are not appropriate for the proposed uses
and densities
o
o
E DiscouraQement of multiple incorporation of small cities
and encouraQement of incorporation of cities in excess of
ten thousand population in heavily populated areas.
This annexation would discourage possible future
efforts to incorporate a small city
F Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts:
Thurston County has established a Public Utility
District, but it provides no services to this area
There are no other inactive special purpose districts
in the area proposed for annexation
G Adjustment of impractical boundaries:
The proposed annexation would bring into the city an
area designated for urban growth and services The
boundary lines are concise and easily defined
H Incorporation of cities or towns or annexations to cities
or towns of unincorporated areas which are urban in
character
Although most of the area is presently undeveloped and
sparsely populated at this time, the designation of a
'Planned Unit Development could certainly provide for
densities of an urban character
I Protection of aQricultural lands:
A portion of the annexed area does have some smaller
pockets of farm land currently in agricultural use
However, there are no agricultural lands of long-term
significance designated within the annexation area
FACTORS STATED IN RCW 36.93.170
(Note: The Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) thoroughly address these
factors as well as provide an in depth look at impacts,
alternatives/scenarios, and land use analysis)
1 Population and territory
-Population growth, pg 56 of the DEIS
-Population projection, Yelm area 1990-2010, pg 64 of the
DEIS
2 Population density
-Density is very low and rural in character
3 Land area and land use
-Existing land uses, pg 74 of the DEIS
-Local housing units and types, pg 78 of the DEIS
o
o
4 Comprehensive use plans and ZonlnQ
-Previously addressed in items #8 and #9 of this
application
5 Per capita assessed valuation
-Per capita costs are in table 3, pg A-4 of the appendices
of the FEIS
6 TOPoQraphy, natural boundaries and drainaQe basins,
proximity to other populated areas
-Topographic map on pg iv, of the DEIS
-Wetlands map on pg 31 of the DEIS
-Storm water drainage and storm collection systems, pg 117
of the DEIS
-Locational map on Figures #1 and #2 of the Introduction of
the DEIS and FEIS
7 The existence of prime aQricultural soils and aQricultural
uses
-Soils delineation on pgs 67 and 68, figure 17 in the DEIS
8 The likelihood of siQnificant Qrowth in the area and in
adjacent incorporation and unincorporated areas durinQ the
next ten years
-Projected demographic trends, pgs 59 and 60 of the DEIS
-Population proJections, Yelm area, pg 64 of the DEIS
9 Location and most desirable location of community facilities
-Currently there are no community facilities within the
annexation area, these will be identified prior to
development
10 Municipal services
-Public services are addressed on pgs 103-123 in the DEIS
and in appendices A-1 through A-8 of the FEIS
11 Need for municipal services
-The needs for public services are addressed in pgs 103-123
of the DEIS
-Transportation study is in pgs 82-102 of the DEIS
12 Effect of ordinances. Qovernmental codes. reQulations and
resolutions on existing uses
-The city 6f Yelm's ordinances, codes, regulations and
resolutions would be in affect for the annexation area
-Existing uses at the time of annexation would be
'grandfathered' in
13 Present cost and adequacy of governmental services and
controls in area
-Level of service analysis, pg 100, table 17 of the DEIS
-Public service costs, pg 126, table 19 of the DEIS
o
o
14 Prospects of Qovernmental services from other sources
-None at this time
15 Probable future needs for such services and controls
-Current and future needs for public services are addressed
in section 0, parts 1 through 9, pgs 103-123 of the DEIS
-Transportation plan. pgs 82-102
16 Probable effect of proposal or alternative on cost and
adequacy of services and controls in area and adjacent area
-Estimated infrastructure costs by alternative, appendices
A-3 of the FEIS
-Estimated public service costs. appendices A-4 through A-6
of the FEIS
-Summary of total estimated costs for infrastructure and
services under proposed alternatives, appendices A-8 of
the FEIS
17 The effect of the finances, debt structure. and contractual
obliQation and riQhts of all affected Qovernmental units
-Revenue and estimated land revenues on pgs 128-130 of the
DEIS
-Appendices A-10 through A-16 of the FEIS address potential
and estimated land and tax revenues
18 The effect of the proposal or alternative on adjacent areas.
on mutual economic and social interests. and on the local
governmental structure of the county
-The current proposal would only change the governing body
for the area to be annexed It is not expected that this
would adversly effect adjacent areas The current land
uses and densities are not likely to provide a substantive
tax revenue for the county, and many of the residents in
the area already identify themselves with the City of Yelm
It is not anticipated that this annexation would result ln
any change to the governmental structure of the County
"
O SW YELM ANNEXATION 0
FOR THURSTON HIGHLAND ASSOCIATES
EXHIBIT n An
December 10, 1990
Section 27, Township 17 North, Range 1 East
All of Section 27
Section 26, Township 17 North, Range 1 East
West half of Section 26
Section 23 Township 17 North, Range 1 East
South half of Section 23, and the South half of the Northeast quarter of
Section 23,
Section 24, Township 17 North, Range 1 East
The Southwest quarter of Section 24,
The South half of the Northwest quarter of Section 24,
The Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 24,
The Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 24, EXCEPT
that part being Northeast of the Northeast line of Mosman Street S E ,
The North half of the Southeast quarter of Section 24 lying West and
Southwest of the following described line
BEGINNING at the intersection of the South line of said North half and
the Northeast line of Mosman Street Southeast,
THENCE Northwestwardly along said Northeast line of said Mosman Street
Southeast and the Northwestwardly prolongation of said Northeast line to
its intersection with the Northwest line of Longmire Street Southeast,
THENCE Southwestwardly along said Northwest line to a point which the
following described Point "C" bears North 530 30' 30" West,
BEGINNING at a point which is the intersection of Southerly line of Yelm
Avenue and the Northwest boundary of Solberg's 1st addition to Yelm,
THENCE Northwest along the Southerly line of Yelm Avenue extended 875
feet,
THENCE
THENCE
THENCE
THENCE
South 370 56' West 620 00 feet to the POINT
continuing South 370 56' West 76 5 feet,
North 530 30' 30" West 50 feet,
South 370 56' West 415 feet to Point "C",
OF BEGINNING,
THENCE North 530 30' -3D" West to Point "C",
THENCE North 370 56' East to the East line of the Northwest quarter
the Southeast quarter of aforementioned Section 24 and the terminus
herein described line
of
of
That portion of Berry Valley Road in the Southwest quarter of the
Northeast quarter of Section 24
.rl
Section 19, Township 17 North, Range 2 East
The Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 19, EXCEPT
that part being Southeast of the Northwest line of the Rainier-Yelm
Highway, and ALSO EXCEPT that part being Northeast of the Northeast line
of Mosman Street S E and its direct prolongation Southeastwardly to the
Northwest line of Rainier-Yelm Highway
That portion of Mill Road in Section 19, Township 17 North, Range 2
East, W M , lying South of Rainier-Yelm Highway
A portion of the Southeast quarter of Section 26, Township 17 North, Range 1
East, W M , described as follows
BEGINNING at the Soufhwest corner of said subdivision,
3687 07
-1-
e,"':"':,~'_"-.~'
4 ~.o.
o
o
THENCE North 890 10' 47" East along the South line thereof, 720 67 feet,
THENCE North 280 42' 32" East, 2,038 89 feet,
THENCE North 730 55' 14" West, 999 71 feet,
THENCE Northwesterly 953 feet, more or less, to the Northwest corner of
the Northwest one-quarter of the Southeast one-quarter of said Section
26
THENCE South 000 55' 01" East, 2,636 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING
That part of the Southeast quarter of Section 26, Township 17 North, Range 1
East, W M , described as follows
BEGINNING at a point on the South line of said Section 26, North 890 10'
47" East, 720 67 feet from the Southwest corner of said Southeast
quarter,
THENCE North 280 42' 32" East, 2,038 89 feet,
THENCE South 490 04' 03" East, 1,148 33 feet to the Westerly margin of
the Burlington Northern Inc , Railway,
THENCE South 350 44' 02" West along said railroad right-of-way, 1,256 52
feet to the South line of said Section 26,
THENCE South 890 10' 47" West along said South line 1,113 23 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING
That part of the North half of the Northeast quarter of Section 25, Township
17 North, Range 1 East, W M , described as follows
BEGINNING at a point on the North line of said Northeast-quarter a
distance of 213 feet North 890 45' 40" East of its Northwest corner,
THENCE South 000 25' 05" East 582 10 feet,
THENCE South 810 46' East, 773 07 feet, more or less, to the
Northwesterly right-of-way of the Burlington Northern Railroad, and the
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description,
THENCE Northeasterly along said railroad right-of-way to a point on said
right-of-way which is 150 feet Southwesterly of the intersection of said
right-of-way with the North line of said Northeast quarter,
THENCE running Northwesterly at right angles to said railroad right-of-
way, 122 31 feet, more or less, to the North line of said Northeast
quarter,
THENCE South 890 45' 40" West along said North l~ne 1,123 77 feet, more
or less, to a point on the North line of said Northeast quarter which is
north 890 45' 05" East, 277 feet,
THENCE Westerly parallel with the North line of said Northeast quarter,
213 37 feet,
THENCE South 000 25' 05" East to a point which is North 810 46' West
from the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
THENCE South 810 46' East, 680 feet, more or less, to the TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING
All situate in Thurston County, Washington
PROJECT YELM PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
December 10, 1990
3687 07
. . =---,~~"2: "-'-",~'.;~;.-~ ,.
o
.. '-'--..--,-' ____......__.__.. .... '___'___n'_"___~_'__'____I
TOQTTLE I
I
I
I
I
i
i
I
\-5
Pierce County
LACEY
\f[~ L. fvT
HWy S.t.
FO.RT LEWIS
0~j
W
~(
TO TENINO
SOURCE.
Yelm Com rehensive Plan & Zoninq Code _~__'
drn ~kd R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. Seattle/Anchorage
job dale19 910H Building 7052nd~ven~___~"atlle,WA 98104 (206) 624 6..?}~
SOUTWEST YELM ANNEXATION
NTS
~~~.._-
Planning ~
~~~f,~~'::;nt81 OOJ
Economics
-----
VICinity Map
---_.._-_._,------_..__.~-----~--,_._---------------~--
r'
.. ....t
..
. If . It
It ... .
...... '::,','
. .
..
..
,
..
..
.S/SI/8/aQds U()/SVQ pUrl A9.vns '[Ju/UUIJ/d PU81.
;1,
..~
.ONI 'Sl:l33NI~N3 ~NI.1'nSNO::> N3Sn"H~H"8
I
,
I
,
I
I
,
I
I
I
,
II
I
,
i------ ~---- --.....
,
I
,
,
,
I
I.
I
:/
! I
i ~ I I
,p:<. ''; I I ," !.
\'~,~-.,,..------~--- --.,.,,"--._-J-_.. ~
.:.i'f.'! I . I' .--~ -------- 1'-------------- '-i
~"J , ,;,
:', "i:~..\::I:'I' I' I , f
1 "'" " I'
),';r' ,~ \;~~ I J !' , ~;
':"....li\i~' I I" I .. f;
~ 't. ~ lp.~ ;. I ~ f I I
lb'f' \",;;'- I I' :. ~::
,}. , "~ I I I' ,ill/)
"......-.--:0-:0+ -' ,"
,!l( , y~ .'----..~.-.I--------.l--.-.-.--~I~:
i\ ~ I ! 'f~
N' ./ ~. . ,f " I ;,:\~,.~i-
!g~ ~ ~
, I. I I ~
_" ,I ,.' I ~
....,..--...t""'----_-...a...._.......___.,., -f I '1
I ----- ----...-------_J.. ,~~
I r- ,----------- '\
J' I r
I .,
f
" I ~
~Vt
}!
I I Ij.
r ~~/~ I .,~ (
.' I .j
-'- ..-- --- -1- __,,,--_,
, ..
.,
....
....
. ..
. ..
.. .
.... ,. , .... ". ...
. I' .... , .... II' ......
m:: ::::;::::,::::::::::
r-::.:: '.' '::'::::..:'
. . .... ...
..... '...
'T'-~~.
I
I
:u::-:--- "
" ,. ..
J1~::{i
.. .... ...
... ........
.:::-.::':::
.. ..". ,..
:;'::', ::.
.... .. ..
,..,....
. .......
........,.
-+-
I
I
----"'t---
,
I
I
o
l'
@
I
i
("') .... , I. I.
'I"" N z-
,
I
.,.
: ID
I
:.--[--to- ---t-
\ I
\ ...
, I
~ ~ :
'tJ, t--J.
'. I
, ...
" ,
---'1-__.__-
,
I ~.
I
--'_' -=..7::.::-!-:-..:..----
I
,
(',
~~--
I
o
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
I
,
I
I
f
,
I
, ,
I
---------------~._-
,
I
I
I
I
I
,
,
1
I
I
I
I
,
flr
'J
~ ,..
. 'hi
I
..! j; o'
0
~? ~J
J . -) \.
: of.
y.
1
\.,~
, )
~.1 ",
.,.
. r
~,..'
"T.
,
I
"
I
I
I
t
..
!-
!
I.l')
.,..
C
\: <(
m W
r:
I- 0:
- <(
m
-
J: Z
X
W C 0
--
0 w !cc
en
0 ><
a. w
0 z
a.: z
c. <(
o
o
o
UJ
..J
<(
U
en
, .)
}("~~
:'\ ,l~
~o
~ ~~
~~ ~~'I.~..
>.(. '7~~
cSo-O : ~
~
.
~
c(
'I
,ff
.)
..
,Y'
~
I
t.
''''-'1
j';j
'fr<
~..;.,
~\:1/~i'
..... ( ...I7h "
o
o
Southwest Yelm Annexation
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL
General Site Description
The 2,000-acre Southwestern Yelm annexatIOn sIte IS located dIrectly to the
southwest of the CIty of Yelm m northern umncorporated Thurston County m
portIOns of SectIOns 23, 24, 26, and 27 of TownshIp 17 North, Range 1 East W M
Most of the sIte IS compnsed of areas of once heavIly vegetated forest lands that
have been logged-off between eIght and ten years ago Some reforestatIOn has
occured through both natural processes and the plantmg of seedlmgs on some areas
of the central and southern sectIOns of the sIte
The northeastern boundary of the sIte IS contlguous WIth the southwestern
boundary of the CIty Yelm. The northern-most boundary runs m a east - west
dIrectlon and IS approxImately a quarter of a mIle south of 93rd Avenue S E. The
sIte is bounded on the north by both Fort LewIs MilItary ReservatIOn to the west and
rural reSIdential! agncultural lands closer to the CIty of Yelm to the east The
western edge of the sIte IS bounded by a sectIOn of the Fort LewIs MIlItary
Reservation. ThIs portIOn of Fort LewIs is pnmanly used for heavy arhllery practlce
and general trammg maneuvers The southern boundary of the annexatIOn sIte IS
dITectly adjacent to agncultural and wooded-open space lands about a quarter mile
north of Manke Road. The eastern boundary of the sIte IS, for the most part, the
Burlmgton Northern RaIlroad nght-of-way and the nght-of-way for State Route 507
There IS an area of land made up of several large parcels that front State Route 507
that are not mcluded m the proposed annexation sIte area.
Topography
The site contams a range of slope gradients from very steep ( possibly greater than 40
percent) In the far southern and western portions of the sIte to relatively level
through the northern portion of the site The northern portion of the site is made
up mostly of large open fields used pnmanly m the past as lIvestock grazmg
pastures The central and southern portions of the sIte are characterized by a senes
of undulatmg mounds and ndges There are several crater-lIke depressIOns located
on the southern sectIOn of the sIte, mcludmg one large pothole approxImately 95
feet deep The site's elevatIOn IS lowest m the far northern portIOn at approximately
300 feet above mean sea level and hIghest m the west central portIOn with an
elevation of 575 feet above mean sea level.
Alternative 1: No Action
The proposed annexatIOn would not occur Only those areas prevIOusly Identlfied
for "ImmedIate annexation" in association with the proposed Yelm/Thurston
County Joint Plan would be consIdered for annexatlon. Under' thIS option, land use
would remain as now zoned by Thurston County The proposal site could be
developed m accordance wIth Thurston County ComprehensIve Plan guidelmes
under the present zoning Thus future development would be expected to occur
consIstent WIth eXIstmg regulatIOns over a twenty year penod. Lands reserved for
rural use or preserved for envIronmental reasons would be assumed to remam m
theIr current use Forest lands would be assumed to be replanted for tImber
productIOn It IS expected that thIS approach would result m a lower denSIty of
development than the other alternatives, each of whIch antICIpates annexatIon and
develoment under CIty of Yelm regulatIOns
Alternative 2: The Proposal
The Proposed ActIOn IS for the annexation of approxImately 2,000 acres southwest of
the CIty of Yelm. Under the Proposal, a vanety of land uses could occur ThIS IS a
non-project actIOn under State EnvIronmental Polley Act WAC 197-11-704 (2) (b)
(IV) The annexatlOn propertles mclude two large ownershIps and a number of
smaller parcels Development plans for these parcels are not complete, however, a
mIX of reSIdential, recreatIonal, and commerCIal uses are planned Based on
prelimmary development concepts, approxImately 4,800 to 5,000 multlfamIly and
smgle family residential umts could be built ThIS total is prelIminary and
represents a maXImum bmld-out amount for conSideratIOn m the envIronmental
Impact statement The proposed development would include roads, landscaping,
landscape buffers and open space wIthm the annexation area Development around
sensItlve areas such as wetlands and steep slopes would be lImIted as much as
pOSSIble.
It IS expected that development wIthm the proposed annexatIOn area would occur m
phases Thus potential development Impacts could occur at the tlme of mItial
construction and are expected to be spread out over a number of years
Furthermore, site speCIfic development proposals would be subject to detailed
envIronmental reVIew at the time such projects are presented to the city That
review may include preparatIon of mdIvIdual project-level environmental Impact
statements as specified by SEPA under WAC 197-11-704 (2) (a)
Under condItIOns of the annexatIon the addItIOnal property ownershIps could be
annexed for potential development at a denSity of up to 4 dwellmg umts per acre
An eXisting golf course on approximately 130 acres would be allowed to contmue m
ItS present use after annexatlon. The exact number of potentIal dwellmg umts in
the other areas that would choose to develop at the higher density has not been
determined. For the purpose of analYSIS m thIS environmental Impact statement it
has been assumed that a portion of the remaining annexation area would adopt the
4 dwelling units per acre and thIS zomng could result m development of an
o
o
o 0
addItional 100-200 residential umts FIgure 7 shows a conceptual sIte plan for
potential land uses under the Proposal
Alternative 3: Compact Site Plan
This alternative would modIfy the proposed land uses to decrease the overall
amount of land area to be built upon. Under thIS approach addItional open space
would be provIded around environmentally sensItive areas, productive natural
resource lands and adjacent to the Fort LewIs MIlItary ReservatIOn. This approach
enviSIOns greater use of clustenng techmques, WIder buffer areas, and a general
increase in open space throughout the proposed annexation area. In order to
achIeve a more open atmosphere while mamtalmng the overall number of
dwellmg units, the proposed residential areas would have hIgher denSIties of
development. The potential urban area would be approxImately one-half the size of
the Proposal and include more intenSIve utilizatIOn of urban space In thIS manner
the Compact Alternative would mclude the same number of housmg umts, and the
same SIze commerClal and recreation areas as the Proposal, and It would occur at the
same rate of development. Land uses under thIS approach are shown m 8
Alternative 4; The Village Concept
ThIS alternaitve assumes a lower denSIty of development and a different mIX of
land uses than the other alternatives. ThIS option would mcorporate some features
of the Compact Alternative, but would mclude more extenSIve commerCIal
development and higher levels of on-SIte employment than the Proposal
CommercIal lands on the SIte would prOVIde additional employment opportumtIes
and would focus on providmg commerCIal and government offices and simIlar
non-industnalland uses The proposed commercial uses would be expected to meet
the needs of on-SIte reSIdents for dally and convenience goods and services, but
would generally be lImited to a Size and type that would largely serve only these
residents The number of potential reSidential umts would be reduced by
approximately ten percent to accommodate commercial uses Potential recreational
uses would remam SimIlar to those of the other alternatives ThIS alternative
would also attempt to identify additional opportumtIes for non-automobIle modes
of transportation within the proposed land use pattern m order to be more
pedestrian-onented. Figure 9 Identifies potentralland uses for Alternative 4
o
o
Table 1. Acreages and Uses for the Proponents' and Altemative Scenarios under the
Proposed Southwest Yelm Annexation
l.andUse AIt. 1 No Action AIt. 2 Proponents' Alt. 3 Compact All 4 Village
Residen tial 1,730 acres 975 acres 600 acres 900 acres
Housing Units 400 units 5,000 units 5,000 units 4,500 units
Commercial 0 35 acres 40 acres 11 0 acres
Public 0 20 acres 20 acres 20 acres
Open space 130 acres 830 acres 1,200 acres 830 acres
Other uses 140 acres 140 acres 140 acres 140 acres
Roadways 70,000 linear feet 140,000 linear feet 110,000 linear feet 128,000 linear feet
Sewer line 0 140,000 linear feet 110,000 linear feet 128,000 linear feet
Water line 0 140,000 linear feet 110,000 linear feet 128,000 linear feet
Note: Numbers are approximate, based on conceptual site plans prepared for the Southwest Yelm
Annexation Draft Environmental Impact Statement.
(J)~ z
,...c- (1U 0
+.J -
- ~-=' rot ~
..~ "[5 i <(
" oj ~
(J) z
(J) z
- ~--. '<x: I ~
~i I~ ~ ~
~ w ;
Q)~ ~
e- I-
o Cf)
.c w
I-t~
.el :r:
-. ---- ,~t ~
-- -..-- '0:; ~
LEGEND
~.I
- -
I
--- - - -- -1 .. "! ....-'!
. .- 1
I .- ~ - _ ~"::..,.. I
I "" '''-'''... -~F""I~"~'! ,.,
E: _. _.: . ::J.:.
~.
>-: ..
-'
o~
-~:
.. u;
PROPONENTS SCENARIO
/;1;
- If/-
,(;" -
1/' _
---
D RESIDENTIAL 975 AC
~ COMMERCIAL 35 AC
K~ PUBLIC 20 AC
\. ,,0
'-.../
I:"i~'~~' ~ OPEN SPACE
.~. ~'.. 830 AC
(GOLF COURSE, WETLANDS PARKS
BUFFERS, S'
B
Nole
;." ,
~'-
w
'"
~. - --
a:
w
~
o
II.
~
<(0.'1'
V /,,-
r;-/,. ...-
'-'of.)
-' c o9'~'
~ ,I ":>.,;
._~--, ""!"
-~-
...J
<
,..
z
w
,..
o
ll.
SOURCE.
A.W Thorpe and ASloelat., Inc./Design Team
,...
a:
~
C
22 . u.
c:
to
- 0
n. ?
Q) ;;
III E
::> ~
u ::;;:
c:
to
.J
H
:1-
li~
.z~
to
~
0.
Q)
t)
c:
o
()
~.g
Q) to
c: C
o Q)
0.<..>
~(f)
n.
o
c:
,,>
~
\; ,,~\\'ElUI"\\'i ...
U'End as" pU-e1 \-efl\oa::>uo'J ..::>evu.lo'J
.,&. .,. lio%l
,.""'OI~I""'"
~O\.L'Q')(3~~'Q' \'it31- .LS3Mr\:f\O:.
':>U\ 'S3\e\50sS;-' ~ ... adlO\.\.1. '~~
.', \ "",' \ "\\' \ \ \ \ I.
.\ I. . l" \ \
\ 1" \ I
: \ '
\' \ I
I \
I
, \
,
\'
"
~
",' . 'I
a
"0 I
'"
0>
;, .\.
1\
\
\
</>
~
<.)~
<!.'"
.,~~,\
.J" J .~".
":if" #: ~
'. ',1~/~~:~'
<f) ,,; ,.''''",
'" "'''' :1:: .!:",,,
00 .... .... ~>. ,,,,,,.,,,,
,,' x ., ..' ,
.' _ M ~~~.
'" dl- _ ..1" . '" >"., 'J
'" ... -."" ....... .
O - - , .-"....,'
0:. _,. ;,0''''--::'''.
<.) <.) I ,>' ,'"""\,., "..".".
.. <( . I> .'T'::'<~"';'
. z .. 'u .... x... ....,
</> \lJ 0 . F " .r""" ~,'..
o 0 cl")'" ' ,~",-,,"';:"\""'l
o " t>. '" " \..". n .';' $.' ...,,",.~ ,.
C'l ~ ..J \;;!, (l) '" 1\' .;};r .'" ,.' ,;,t,:::;':'-;"?""; 0 ;":;~~~ J
~ ..J </> .J": e, ~;:;' """ -.' . . '0 ;.'O:c,....~ "h',' ..'"
.... ",__ 0. \.~.;f.!, {'r:....."''-...:'r;';.~ ;;,:!-:.o, ;'J..,._.y,;!,/~-l/;'.l
" " ~ " I "..U'" ,c " . '. ~,,,.. · ,". " ',' ., ,.. ,
. " 0 <. ~*', ,. j' .,.,', .. :. 'r'~<"-::"": ..", ::,,,,.;. I'; 'I
'" ... \;, g; -' .' l',,?,J .i;" '. ,,,.' ',.. C., :k"""., ! ;{:. '.' ,!: /': 'i J
<.)""'" ;"\ 4. ,..",.)JJ.)\";..\,,'""\.<..J.,._r"'-.J..,,..-.....r, ,.} J)
,. ~... > ""..,.."'. , ".'".." :,> ,..""" ;" ! ,,,' .... ,'..
......cr.</> 0 ....,I.~~'h'JJ.J,.')/".,.""_,.r<;,.I"J .,..J' .Ill
0. 0 < ,. C'~~,.,""",. ;.7 ,." ..,,,",,,,,,",//,::.,,,.,,.....)
(j) 0 \lJ 0:. I- l/l, <'" ;"'C.; 1"1, ..,.:..'. .,or'.'c': ," ':' ",,}.
<.) ~ .., ell ~.:\'.?...rl"'.(h;"".>':~/'J)"".,);I' r1~~l~J,; ...~./:~/~...:..~...).......l~
~ _..... ~ , .r s~ -;. ~ J.r _oJ )'" .J.1'"' J .J,~ I' ...,..,.....,.. n),. I 0"') ....
II- u.. ? <. CG t.::!," ))~.;,1 "J,,' ,./;, ,.. "....'Sii;i"..~..., ",.,,""', .' ,. ,/.' , ........
u.l ~ to ~ ..... ,.....,,!JJ,. J./'} > 'J" "')J".)""'-'i"':--~"" ,-......-".-
,,0 -;:;::. W ~'.,,_:J;'I>J. ,'r)}J?)~"J' ""~JU;,;,':.,.~::;,~:;;v",.,,-.',;';:"'\I ....
..... ..... '0 ",,"'::;:'v P'fl"'J,' ;.',;!' ;'J"; .J.F';~'" '.~~ -"..:~,.~.,~ ;,
o "- 0. <. I r .~.-':<i,.;i' g':'-;"':"" ^".~' .,r~"-';' ,,'-"J ,
~ K\ ;( ~~t~,,:;;~~;:~:;?~~::l"'~~-::';.a
~ \)\ ~ C"" ",.,)0 a~J\3" ",,,,3>.0'
'Z
\
,
\
\ ~ \
1.,\ \'
,.
........
"":::......
-
C'>
'::l
<!.
r-
~
0..
':i
o
<.)
<.) <.)
<!. <!.
0 0
0
cD <
i .J
<!.
r- 0
Z. 0:.
Ul Ul
0 ~
(j) ':i
Ul 0
0:. <.)
<.)
<!.
o
C'l
c
~
W
o
W
~
<.)
'::l
cO
?
0..
,----------
QG 00.
.. ('~~\
~'O
-----~
. .'00(1
l~:o;,OOOO~:~O:O~
COMMERCIAL
OFFICE
PUBLIC
"'!: -J:
LEGEND
D RESIDENTIAL
900 AC
"1111
20 AC
~
~
.
o
U
i~
g
c ..
~ "
a.. .::
Q) (,j
CIl ::
::>.!!
,,;;'
c
'"
...J
iU
:J
a.
Q)
0
c
0
0
d>
01
~
:>
Q)
~
f-
VILLAGE ALT 4
~"
II II II
r-,
( \
110 AC
I
I
OPEN SPACE 830 AC I I
(GOLF COURSE. WETLANDS PARKS III
BUFFERS STEEP SLOPES) I
1---1 PRIMARY CIRCULATION CORRIDORS
TOTAL 1,860 ACRESI/
II
Note All Acreages Are Approximate /1
r":.::::..-'":::.----":::::.. -~,~~~,.,
11~\S'72~~~~~~~".....,~.,.., ',' ')"_~~~\,C; /.i~(J'
1 f,-, ,. ~',.. ,.' . r " , .'..!.
,:"\ :- "l..'i' ~:""~~~ ',.. /:- :r I ;.ft'/t .(, ';t.
~ t<,,+- ,",_.,c ~ f,.,;'_ ;r.r',
~ 11:~~~ ~\sf- ' , - .
w I I:-,:\:'~' ,~~ \~~!~
~ 1 ~-~'}.-;. -)~.";'
", ...;')-. ,-,\,.(.--
a: :-...;,' .. ,"
UJ 1 L,'"",,'
~ ,,';~;
,,~II<.,~:i,!
\ Il '"
"-....../1 r~{
w -1'
~ 1 f:;.:;
u .',
o I t.;.',-
..J t'.,
~ I t:<>i-';:
..J I'--'\~.' !p;
..: I':'';~'"
t= I 1'" '1\-'.1
m f:t;-. '
I- 1 ~'~l\
o 1 -.'1~:'\
n. t ,-,
1 ~;L
,-,
....'
I ".-'.,
--. ".
I Ji:;;' -,
a..:.t"7,.-----
II
II
I I
=-::.:..-...-..:.::.::=:::-:.
~Iz
- ....
"'- "~.I CO' 0
, ...~i ~
1--_ en Z
- ,..- I<tJ Z
_ c::::
~;;. '1~ 1 ~
S .--J
G)~UJ
0.>-
~ m
.... ~
I
:> f-
- ;>::>
--- , ' 0
a:;(j)
III
(f)
--1----,-'
ti
a:
-~~
SOURCE.
R.W Thorp" & A.ssoclates, Inc.fOesig" Team
.-~--
?~
,..-'
o
~
Annexation Request
J,
Threshold
Determination
o 0
SEPA PROCESS CHART
-I
I
Boundary Review
Board
Boundary Review
Board Decision
EIS Scoping
Environmental Analysis
Annexation Petition
Submittal
J,
Draft EIS Issued
J,
Comment Period
J,
Public Hearing
J,
Final EIS Issued
J,
Preliminary Decision
J,
Final City Council Decision
,
,
:
,
,
,
,
i
,
:
'------------ ---r' --..--. -----i-
I :
! I
: 1
: !
, ,
: ,
:;t:: ' l~~~ii,:~:~\l:. t~j:, ..~'. } :
tr;.,:, "~'':'i~' \ 1')'\ ';"""', .:
lj .~,. 111 Ji," 'f"'~""$fl' I I
"tL 4~ ;:l'h" J I
f.., '( ....'11..._.-...:'1.. I
:t1,. 'i~. 'l""i>:''-'\ 9.i";' ,n\,~ ~~';;;,. . I I I
(';"",.)\1 ~ ,'H1,:,;~': ~.: , .~ l"!:i~~ rn(. :1;' I
':il :;, ,,}:"fl;1'::"1f ' tj: .\.1 "";~ \ ..Jr:,,,,, I I,: '
~lrl ~(-t~(>>!\,t., I ,~. ,'" ~t \. Y"""J!:\ I I '
"'~,,:'.,l~f~;\~!?{':" f:~ ~-;-t~~~ {~~iX"------~I' --- --- --"---1'---':~-- --------+~------------
,~.':. ,:':,;',lU'I.' " "'),:;. ~ >..t, '1 ,:
I'ir-." ,~l i f), t.::~Y~': ,.. i. ~~': I .~.. :/1,~ i: ;, :~~. ~;.'i'
~r~"~' ,~. 'It.\~/'l:-"'tl .~I' ,!:".... ~::d~,l,., :~.HI,jiH~~~ I I
J./. "~hl.'~)l'lJh;..$"; I ~1.i:#,l'fiV),.~t,.~ J...~,~!.~r;'t~! ~< I' . I .. : .
i' \' 1.'.'1 '/.t 'll,:tl.'l.t.{~' ~ t k' .. JI,h",.y. r I
~f:(~..lq:lfi~(;,~'f.;;1~'11 ~I~, i~'~~~'\*\4.:~tc-') to'~1\::: )l:\r~:'~ ~1
,;~._...::.:q,\-, ~'--":":'-'II ,-,-.-,-.J,-.-.-.-..
Ir. I "I, I . J I
.;' ~ \ 1
Vfj I
"'0/
~ ".(~ N
'4t~> ~~~ ~
'<'~Q ~~
V'
co
...
M
...
L
~~
<C
w
a:
<(
b[~
0<"(
Ou
-U)
o
w
en
o
a..
o
CC
0.
z
o
-
~
><
W
Z
Z
.<J:
o
....
.
~
0(
;.
}.
',I'll)
.C')
\o:t
r
t
t
i
0) :')
C\!(I)
o
,
o
o
March 24
1993
felm Plannlng CommlSSlon
RE. Draft - Proposed Yelm Munlcloal Code Chapter 17 31
to create a new C-3 Low-Trafflc Commerclal Zone
~t nas recently oeen brought to my attentlon the concern
for zonlng regardlng the proposed Hlghway 507 annexatlon
I believe a resolutlon can be reached that would best serve
the lnterest of the city as well as accommodate the
annexatlon land owners The current zoning classiflcatlons
under Yelm Municipal Code Tltle 17 (zonlng) does not provlde
a sUltable zone for the area to be annexed
The proposed new zone should not be lncorporated lnto the
eXlstlng C-1 or C-2 zones because it would lose it s
lntended purpose The deslgnation of a C-1 or C-2 zone ln
the annexed area could have substantlal unwanted lmpacts
(unlike uses trafflc congestlon unslghtly strlp
development) Furthermore lt would dlsrupt the lntent and
function of ~he eXlsting commerclal zones
I belleve it is In the best lnterest of the City to amend
the current zonlng ordlnance to lnclude a C-3 Low-Traffic
Commercial Zone The puroose of creating a new C-3 Low-
Trafflc Zone is to encourage and enable a commerCia! area
wlth uses that would not generate heavy trafflc flow This
would minimize current and future imoacts on roadway and
street condltlons as well as trafflc problems generally
assoclated commercial uses
If you have any further questlons olease feel free to
contact me at Yelm City Hall or call 458-8408
#
~~1L
PROPOSED YELM MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER
o
~ '~
" j
~'r'6
17 31
C-3 LOW-TRAFFIC COMMERCIAL
Sections.
~ 17 31 010 Purpose
17 31 020 General requirements
17 31 030 Permitted uses
1i 31 040 Condltional uses
17 31 050 Special uses and planned develooment distrlcts
17 31 060 Standards
17.31 010 Purpose
The Low-Traffic Commercial (C-3) zone is lntended to provide
for commercial land uses which generate relatively low levels
of automobile traffic which are not orlented toward
pedestrian actlvlties and which which may reOUlre large
areas of land or convenient arterial access
17.31.020 General recuirements.
Only the followlng uses are perml~tea and allowed ln this
zone These uses are subject to off-street parking
requirements of Chapter 17 38 and the general provislons and
exceptions set forth in this title
17.31.030 Permltted uses.
Uses permitted outright are
All uses permitted In the Residential Agricult~re zone
except residential, subject to any more restrlctlve or
permissive provislons of this zone
Automoblle and vehicle salvage and assoclated parts sales
Automobile repair and service shops lncluding auto body
repair and tire sales but excluding sale of ruel
Appllance sales and service limited to large applicances not
readily transportable by pedestrians
Churches and cemeteries
Construction material sales buildings and yards provided.~
that such sales shall be limited to sales to licensed
contractors t
Furniture sales for households and offices
C-3 ZONE - DRAFT - 1/25/93 - PAGE 1
o
o
,.
Golf driving ranges
Hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities for wastes
generated on site, subject to state siting criteria
Horticultural nurseries
Livestock sales
Lumber yards and sales provlded that hardware sales areas
shall be llmlted to 1000 square feet
Moblle home and manuracured housing sales and storage yards
Parklng lots
lncludlng park-and-rlde lots
Recreatlonal vehicie parks storage and sales
Resldences slngle-famllyonly each on lots oT one acre or
more
Truck bus and other cransDortation termlnals
Uti I ity Tac1 1 itles excludlng offlces
Vehicle trailer boat
sales and storage areas
motorcycle snowmobl ie and
- R~Y\.\,,-\ '~G\.ll\,~,e~
similar
Warehouses lncludlng mlnl-warehouses but excluding
manufacturlng and production facllltles
Simllar uses as determined by the Clty Council
Accessory uses to those listed above
17 .31 . O~O Cand it 1 ana 1 uses.
Uses permitted subject to the grantlng of a ccndltional use
permit by the city council are
Outdoor and drive-in theaters
17.31.050 Soecial use/comblninq and olanned dev100ment
dlstrlcts.
Speclal use/combining and plannec development dlstrlcts in
the C-3 zone shall be in compliance with standards set forth
in Chapters 17 34 and 17 36
17.31.060 Standards
Those standards set forth at Chaoter 17 40 aopl~cable to the
C-1 zone shall be applicable to the C-3 zone
C-3 ZONE - DRAFT - 1/25/93 - PAGE 2
o 0
L-3
ARTICLE V. CO~..MERCIAL ~ ZONE STAND.i1.RDS
17.40.220 C-1 zone standards cenerallv Subject to the
general modifications and requiremen~s set forth in Chapter
17.28 and addltional requirements whlch may be imposed by the
town council for conditional uses, the following standards
set forth in this article shall apply to uses permitted In
the C-l zone. (Ord. 346 57 (part), 1988).
17.40 230 Lot area. Minimum lot area
is seven thousand two hundred square feet.
(part), 1988). ?, \ .
, ~1 'e~ \I/V-~~ .....Y\.M,'-''l'V\,
17.40.240 Lot width. Minimum lot width
lS sixty feet. (Ord. 346 57(part) , 1988).
in c:ne C-1 zone
(Ord. 346 57
\c) \- ~; "UZ...-
in the C-l zone
17.40.250 Yard reauirements. Yard requirements C-1
zones are as follows:
A. Minimum front yard:
1. b';:::Y v .i.l.,;C::; :It.]. tiOfi pump l.i 1 ~ flc1.!! aLe ca:r.opic::;:;" .c.l..~-
tC'2TI ::::ce-;
2. All other uses or structures: twenty-five feet,
based upon a sixty foot street right-of-way;
B. Minimum Side Yard: ten feet, subject to use;
C. Minimum Rear Yard: thirty feet from all RA, R-l and
R-2 zoned property. Twenty feet for all other zones, subject
to use. (Ord. 346 57 (part), 1988).
17.40.260 Outside storage. Storage or display of mer-
chandise is allowed for items that are to be used for retail
sale or rent, subject to use, provided, however, that such
use shall be confined to privately owned real property only.
(Ord. 346 57 (part), 1988).
o
o
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE SOUTHWEST YELM ANNEXATION
The Yelm Planning Commission has reviewed the Southwest Yelm Annexation and the
Final Environmental Impact Statement dealing with the proposed annexation After a
series of public hearings and worksessions, the Yelm Planning Commission makes the
following findings
1 The proposed Southwest Yelm Annexation is consistent with the Joint planning
done by the City of Yelm and Thurston County for the property within the
proposed urban growth area of the City of Yelm
2 The zOning proposed for the annexation area provides a variety of uses and
housing types, is complimentary to the existing Comprehensive Plan for the City
of Yelm, and would be in the public interest if adopted by the City ofYelm
3 The utility and transportation plans to serve the annexed area provide reasonable
alternatives, consistent with the City's growth management planning and utility
planning The City is committed to additional utility planning processes before
any specific development is approved, to assure that adequate capacity for all
necessary facilities is available concurrently with any proposed development.
4 The Southwest Yelm Annexation Final Environmental Impact Statement
adequately and accurately describes the project and is determined by the
Planning Commission to be adequate
5 The City of Yelm may annex the property consistent with its annexation policies
and provide a significant benefit to the City in terms of a well-planned
development area and not provide any undue burden to the existing taxpayers of
the City of Yelm
-------- .-------------------
r --, _ f'---' r-- C"- --
t l
MAR23&B
/
n
"-...J
n
'-....../
City of Centralia
City Attorney's Office
POBox 609
118 West Maple
Centralia. Washington 98531
(206) 736-6834
FAX. (206) 736-3878
.231993
March 22, 1993
~,\
Robert A. Sanders, Mayor
City of Yelm
P.o. Box 479
Yelm, WA 98597
Re: Final Environmental Impact Statement
Southwest Yelm Annexation
Dear Mayor Sanders:
The Centralia Light Department recently received the Final
Environmental Impact Statement for the Southwest Yelm Annexation.
It certainly is a bold and ambitious proposal, and we wish you
well. We are a little concerned, however, about one of the
statements contained in the report. On page 7, under Alternative
2: Proponents Scenario, The report says "Centralia Light power
lines would still be buried or relocated, however, these lines
would not be used for energy needs under annexation". While the
latter assumption is quite accurate, we don't want there to be
any confusion as to "burying or relocating" these lines.
Enclosed please find copies of two letters that City Light
Director Bill Cummings had directed to Mr. Jeff Buckland of R.W.
Thorpe and Associates, Inc., outlining the difficulties and
expenses associated with both these proposals. We would
appreciate it if you could give us some indication as what you
are intending for the power lines,! and who will be responsible
for the associated costs? Thank you.
:~A ~
ty Attorney
CAN:kme
cc: Bill DaVee
Bill cummings
o printed on recycied paper
Q
n
'--......J
n
'-..../
Ot,.
City of Centralia
Light Department
1100 Blk. N Tower Avenue
Centralia, Washington 98531
(206) 736-7611
17 September 1992
Jeff Buckland, Environmental Planner
R.W. Thorpe and Associates, Inc.
705 Second Avenue, suite 910
Seattle, WA 98104
Re: Southwest Yelm Annexation Draft EIS
(RWT/A Project # 110192)
Dear Mr. Buckland:
Please accept my apologies for this late response to your
letter of August 12, 1992. I was out of town for most of
August, and just recently returned.
In your letter
transmission line
system.
you
is;
asked what voltage
it is a 69,000 volt,
Centralias'
grounded wye
Although possible, placing such a high voltage line
underground is generally considered cost prohibitive. In
addition, once placed underground, the cost of special
repair equipment, plus the additional down time required to
make any repairs (as compared to overhead lones) would also
be quite costly; especially when lost generation is taken
into account.
So far as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission preparing
an Environmental Impact Statement for Centralias' hydro
project, no such document has, or will, be prepared.
However, the FERC did prepare an Environmental Assessment
for our project; a copy of which could probably be obtained
from their Washington, D.C. office.
":
o 0
'\
Jeff Buckland, Environmental Planner
R.W. Thorpe and Associates
17 September 1992
Page 2
If I can be of further assistance, please contact me at
(206) 736-7611.
sincerely,
william C. Cummings
Director
Wcc:amj
..
\J
o
o
.~
~
2 April 1992
Jeff Buckland, Environmental Planner
R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc.
705 Second Avenue, suite 910
Seattle, Washington 98104
Dear Mr. Buckland:
Centralia City Light Department appreciates the opportunity
to comment on the proposed annexation and development of the
approximately 2,000 acre area southwest of the City of Yelm.
In response to your questions, let me first explain that
Centralia City Light does not provide electrical services to
any area near the City of Yelm. In fact, due to a franchise
for all of Thurston County, puget Sound Power and Light
Company is the only provider of electrical services for that
entire area.
However, Centralia does own, operate and maintain a high
voltage transmission line that runs along a 150 foot wide
right-of-way almost diagonally through section 27 of the
proposed development. That line transports the electrical
energy produced at Centralias' hydroelectric facility along
the Nisqually River northwest of Yelm, to the City of
centralia, here in Lewis County.
According to the draft sketch of the proposed development
submitted with your letter, some consideration is being
given to a potential relocation of Centralias' transmission
line.
To explain the requirements of that transmission line right-
of-way, it is important you understand that full and ready
access by Centralia crews must be maintained at all times.
No permanent structures, tall trees or other obstructions,
that in any way would threaten the line or prevent, or
inhibit Centralia crews from constructing, operating or
maintaining that line is allowed.
D
o
o
o
'~
To relocate the line would involve the acquisition of a new
150' wide right-of-way with similar restrictions,
engineering and construction of nearly two (2) miles of new
transmission line, a shutdown of Centralias' hydroelectric
plant while the old line is cut over to the new one and the
removal of the old section of line; all costs of which would
need to be paid for by the developer.
The city would also require the developer agrees to defend
and hold harmless the city from any and all claims from
persons or entities adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
relocated power line who allege damages caused by the power
lines being near their property or person. In the event
said claim or claims result in an order from any Court or
agency requiring additional relocation of the power lines,
the modification of the pmver lines, or the addition of
protective devices to the power lines, such relocation,
modification or addition shall be at the sole cost and
expense of the developer.
In addition, such a relocation would result in lengthening
of that power line, which increases resistance power losses.
Those losses would need to be calculated and compensated for
on a long term basis.
I encourage you to evaluate the costs associated with such a
relocation, to determine if it is economically feasible,
before pursuing this proposal.
If I can be of further assistance, please call
Sincerely,
William C. Cummings
Director
WCC:amj
cc: Bill DaVee, City Manager
Craig Nelson, City Attorney
o
City of Yelm
YELM
WASHINGTON
105 YeLm Avenue West
POBox 479
YeLm, Washington 98597
(206) 458-3244
AGENDA
CITY OF YELM PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
MONDAY, MARCH 22, 1993, 4:00 P.M.
YELM CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. Call to Order, Roll Call, Approval of Minutes.
March 1, 1993
2.
SW Yelm Annexation - Final EIS
Copy enclosed
3. C-3 zoning - Staff memo and discussion
4. Development Standards Update
5.
6. Adjourn
Enclosures are available to non-Commission members upon request.
If you need special arrangements to attend or participate ln this
meetlng, please contact City Hall at 458-3244.
@
Rec\'c/ed paper
MINU~ES
YELM pLANNING COMMISSION
~UESDAY, MARCH 1, 1993, ~ 00 PM
YELM CI~Y HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Ager'ld8 I ttlll,f
t4.0tlon HC.
The Meeting was called to order at 4 00 by Planning
commission Chairman Tim schlosser
Members present Roberta Longmire, E J curry, John
Ki.nnee, Tim Schlosser-, Joe Huddleston, Tom cundy, Tom
Gor-man and Geor-ge Kni.ght Absent Jim Keyes Guests
Al Johnston Staff present Shelly Badger, Jerry pr-ock,
Tim peterson and Agnes ColombO,
1
o
Agenda additions/deletions
Agenda Item i5 _ C-3 Commercial zoning discussion was
added to the agenda
ShellY Badger informed members that the final SWY
annexation EIS would be ready for review by March 15, and
that council would begin the publiC hearing pr-ocess at
the March 24 meeting and continue the hearing from
meeting to meeting until satisfied that all their
questions had been addressed
o
MOTION BY JOE HUDDLESTON, SECONDED BY TOM GORMAN CHl\NGING
THE DATE OF ~HE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED pLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING ~O MARCH 22, 1993 MOTION CARRIED
Changes to the February 22, 1993 minutes include
1) page 1, para 1 ~ (addition] commission
members stated their opposition to granting access
directly onto Middle Road from any of the lots
2) Motion 93-10 MOTION BY JIM KEYES, SECONDED BY TOM
GORMAN RECOMMENDING ~ (deletion1 APPROVAL OF
THE SUBMITTED SITE PLAN CONDITIONAL UPON RESOLUTION
OF THE MCALEXANDER AND GRAMOR JOINT DRIVEWAY ISSUE
AND THAT ABSOLUTELY NOTHING BE DONE ON THE PROPERTY
PRIOR TO RESOLVING THE ISSUE
3) Motion 94-14 MOTION BY GEORGE KNIGHT, SECONDED BY
TOM GORMAN RECOMMENDING ~LIMINARX (addition1
COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE SOUTHWEST YELM ANNEXATION
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CONTINGENT
UpON SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSING ISSUES RAISED AND
IDENTIFIED AT THE FEBRUARY 1, 1993 pLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING (SEE MOTION 93-12)
MO'tION BY 'tOM GORMAN, SECONDED BY TOM CUNDY APPROVING THE
FEBRUARY 22, 1993 MINUTES AS CORRECTED MOTION CARRIED
Johnston Mini-warehouse site plan (SPRS083) public
Hearing continued from February 22, 1993 Tim Schlosser
opened the public hearing at 4 10 P m ShellY Badger
briefed commission members on the results of her recent
conversation with Yelm's attorney The attorney
Yl'UI plPIl11IG """'1551{111
.....0\ " ,993
93-15
93-16
2
p~E ,
of
indicated that in light of other- activity going on within
the city iwmediate compliance in meeting site
improvements should not be r-equired He recowmended a
two-year deferral on paving and sidewalk installation
He alsO pointed out that the city has a legal right to
set neW requirements upon expiration of a permit ShellY
Badger informed members that commercial and plat
ordinances needed to be brought up to date and that the
city should make a determination as to the future
development of second street prior to requiring site
improvements
DiSCUssion followed as to the situation(S) leading up to
the questioning of improvements being required Badger
explained that the city doesn' t have an or-dinance in
place requiring site improvements when/if expansion
occurs Existing ordinances r-equire review of site plans
only if they exceeded the arbitrary size of 4,000 square
feet Tom Gorman and Tim Schlosser- agreed that all
p<oj.ot' ,hould b. ,ubj.ot to tho ,.m. <."i.w .od
requirements Shelly Badger explained that in the past
the city had made decisions on an individual basis at
staff level and that the expected level of activity was
used to guide improvement requirements
Tom Gorman expressed his feelings that every businesS
should recognize that expansion means bringing property
up to standards Badger explained that improvements had
been required for buildings but that it had not been the
practice to do the same for site impr-ovements
Roberta Longmir-e felt very stronglY that an ordinance was
needed to insure that the planning cowmission and
Building Dept recommendations would not be overturned or
changed
ShellY Badger said that staff would try to expedite
passage of commercial and subdivision or-dinances
Roberta Longmire told members that past policY had been
to use Lacey'S or-dinances when the city did not have one
of their own in place
93-11
MOTION Bt TOM GORMAN, SECONDED BY JOE HUDDLESTON
APPROVING THE JOHNSTON MINI_WAREHOUSE SITE pLAN (SPRaOS3)
AS PROPOSED WITH SIDEWALKS AND PAVING TO BE MADE WITHIN
TWO YEARS OF OCCUPANCY MOTION CARRIED
AYES - 4, NAYS - 2
ShellY Badger pointed out the importance of applying
these same standar-ds evenlY across the board until
ordinances are in place
..
It was requested that the record shoW that commission
members felt a definite need for an ordinance addressing
the issue of standards and that the standards, both
inter-im and final, be applied evenly across the board
PAGE Z
Yl'UI pLAMMIMG <_1551{111
.....0\ " ,993
3.
o 0
Brown Annexation Boundary - Discussion. Shelly Badger
passed along Council's request for input and guidance on
this 10% annexation petition. She explained that what
had been happening is that Council has been approving
annexatlon areas as part of a petitioner's 10% initial
annexation petition. When the proponent had completed
gathering required signatures the annexation went to the
Planning Commission where recommendatlons have recently
been made to change boundaries. Council, not wishing to
delay applicants or have them lose their 60% approval by
the additional burden of gathering signatures to square
up boundaries, had not acted on Commission
recommendations.
<F
\
Followlng discussion members felt that the annexation
area outlined in red (on the map) formed a reasonable
boundary.
Some members expressed feeling a need for Council
direction pertaining to the application of established
policies requirlng squared boundaries. Members felt that
if Council's position had changed, approving any
annexation that falls within the Urban Growth Boundary,
that Councll should advise the Planning Commission of
that change.
4. Councilmembers noted receipt of a letter from Ken Garmann
expresslng interest in serving on the Planning
Commission. No vacancies exist at this time.
5. Members reviewed the proposed C-3 zone. Discussion
showed several flaws including limiting hardware sales at
lumber yards to 1000 square feet and questioned what
would be accomplished by adoption of this new zone.
Staff was asked to prepare a comparison table of uses
permitted in existing and proposed commercial zones.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:10 p.m.
Submitted,
Oem! y) (:!thd"
'/
YEUt PlANNING COMISSION
!tARCH 1, 1993
PAGE 3
o
March 15, 1993
o
Subject:
Southwest Yelm Annexation
Final Environmental Impact Statement
Dear Interested Party:
Attached is the Final Environmental Impact Statement
(FEIS) for the Southwest Yelm Annexation, a proposal to
annex approximately 2,000 acres lying southwest of the
City. The proposal envisions annexation of this area and
urban development over the next twenty years that could
include 5,000 or more housing units and supporting
commercial lands.
The purpose of this EIS is to comply with the State
Environmental Policy Act (RCW 43.21C), the Washington
State Administrative Code (WAC 197-11), and the City of
Yelm State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Ordinance.
The proposal and Final Environmental Impact Statement
(FEIS) will be the subject of a public hearing to be held
by the Yelm City Council, at Yelm City Hall at 7: 30
p.m., on Wednesday, April 14, 1993.
For additional information, please contact Yelm City
Hall.
Sincerely,
p~~ CC~
Robert A. Sanders
Mayor, City of Yelr f
\~ ....
"" l'
-.,\ ~ ~
sJ "-l ~
'.\ " 1
'.J 'V
~ ~
~ I '(J
~
~ 'v "< ~
'lj ~. lr) ~ "'
k ~
...
~ \!
G'>.... " ~ Q P
\ \~ '.\) ~
'0 {j 0
.......... \...J ~ ,
~ ~ ~ ~
I, ~ ~
~
- ---- -
~ -J
"K
\J
~
'l \. ~
'>
'1.\ '.
...
\~
YEL'M
WASHINGTDN
Yelm Washington 98597
(206) 458-3244
DATE:
TO.
FROM:
March 12, 1993
All interested partles
Shelly A. Badger~-~h
Chief Adminlstra~ive Officer, City of Yelm
Recently a Revised Public Hearing Notice was mailed to you
rescheduling a Public Hearing date to March 24, 1993, for the
proposed Southwest Yelm Annexation. It has become necessary to
move the hearing date once again. The following is a legal notice
reflecting the recent change. Please contact me at 458-8405 if you
have any questions.
"'." '" ~ ~ ... , ." _ _~" -',~~,,"-',".' t
;;~:;~;~~~:i~{i~;i1i~1~;~~~~~~~~~~~i~I~~%~~~!~flWf~,~~rtI~r~~~~i~~&,~~!;~~j*~;i~~~if:~~;;ii~~~~f:&ig~~~ik&~1;~~~:~;i
--- .' ,- -- ----- ~ -.. -" .~ ,.~......,~.,-"-~-~,.-....,~,-..,.;.."...,.~--~,.-"..,,,,,
PROPOSED SOUTHWEST YELM ANNEXATION
'-:c. -'v~;~"",--i':'-;;-_-'.",~":-,';"':~,::~j.-~,,,..-,".>:::_; .~: '~::.,,~i. "~" ~";:.~".;~_ '.' '.
.. ' .. "
.~ "';:':'''''~' _;;,._~ ,~~..:--;... "_~r._~c:._,'-:..'l~_!;,;:l:.c~:'::_.,:...2-:::":';~_~~,,-:~;~;;''',:;;"~.0_'~~".,:~."..-,
The Yelm City Council will hold a Puplic Hearing on Wednesday,
April 14, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers at Yelm City
Hall, 105 Yelm Ave. West, to receive comments on, a proposal to
annex approximately two thousand (2,000) acres lying southwest of
the city between State Highway 507 and Highway 510. All interested
parties are invited to attend.
For additlonal information contact Yelm City Hall at 458-3244 or
write to P.O. Box 479, Yelm, WA 98597.
ATTEST. Agnes P. Colombo, City Clerk
Published: Nlsqually Valley News, March 18 & 25, 1993
DO NOT PUBLISH BELOW THIS LINE
Posted at three places and at site:
Mailed to property owners within 300 feet:
Mailed to agencles:
@
ReC\'c/ed paper
0'
City of Yelm
i:';-
t'
..
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
(206) 458-3244
PUBLIC NOTICE
CANCELLATION OF REGULARLY SCHEDULED CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OF MARCH 24, 1993
The regular Yelm City Council Meetlng scheduled for March 24, 1993
has been cancelled due to lack of a quorum. The next regular
Council meeting will be held on Wednesday, Aprll 14, 1993, at 7:30
p.m., ln the Council Chambers at Yelm City Hall, 105 Yelm Avenue
West.
City Council meetings are held on the second and fourth Wednesday
of each month at 7:30 p.m., in Council Chambers at Yelm City Hall.
All interested citizens are invited to attend. For more
information please call 458-3244.
ATTEST: Agnes P. Colombo, City Clerk
PUBLISHED: Nisqually valley News, March 18, 1993
*
Rec....cled JXlper
- ,_"- '~"",,,.. ~, ~-t '-.~ ~__~ ~_,____._.___, ~~.
~ CITY OF Y.E,~J..M
~ P.O. SOX 419
~ YElM, WA gtJ591
)
.~ ~--, '~"-'--
/-:.:'~~.c:a .I",.~'.:... , ... ~
. - "~"}r~~' -:.' '~, :\ ~
,- . "'"~-A'\:j
· .." ~',::.~~-:' '~~'f)., ,
to.. .- ~,", .......
;~: .:,' , L~::Et:,
" .\~ t~ t~ ~') h~~" ~tt
I ,.. '\
tIt. \'r iF 1 r~~
US ARMY
WASHINGTON DC 20005
lIJi
I j !'Hil J j . . i. j . ij i
lli:!d,;i,H.: ! lulin:dl1!L I
~:-~-:;-~-~ ~tl. )~-~2~~
/' ,~ "- '- '1~<''St ......,."'! ! " " D -0 C-T ;i"?'C11~ ~
. ~,y "!' '-'., ""'"JCI
I _ H .
~ ""'l.....P'tI .
~ MAR 12'93 } r:/!;.~, :: :: 'J '"\ I.
I~'l - _.f.... YI
~'W. I
',. ",',:::-p...Wi>';,~''ij/P.!!.M'''H'j :
, '.-'..;' " ~~ ii9B295 ,
~}~-!
.........,..- ........
:....~.._. - ~ ; !
- 1 ) _
\ '1, ,_,,ll .: _._..:: '1,
.., .. .
.- .- ._, -....
/1
.:;.' /'
I' ~.~ Th Ot- FE'..
H.::..= OC i ':1.1". e.=:
':'~1E E ':'50 3~€1
./\
V
F . (12
is,. ~.
.'
.r.e:i
o
'..................
..
March 8, 1993
Memo to the File
RE' Phone ConversatIOn with Sandy Mackie, Attorney
for the CIty of Yelm tOilterning the Final ElS - SW Ye!m AnnexatiOH
This memo focuses on two areas of recommended changes in the City's
review Those are.
1 Wastewater and
2. School District Boundaries
Wastewal~r.
He suggested reviewing pages 115 and 116 of the Draft EIS and page 11 of
Technical AppendIxes He indIcated that there should be a change in the
language Note Key item for all of the language "That there will be no
impacts from annexation." It will merely change land use decision-making
jurisdictions, that any impacts will happen with development; that future
development wIll require further analysis of wastewater The potential
alt-ernatives for wastewater treatment that can be utilized such as
1 Re-use of the treated water, i.e. on golf courses
2. Irrigation systems
3 Wetlands/"leaky" wetlands systems
It should be noted that this should be examined at the time of each
developmen t phase
DOE is currently developing standards for treatment, irrigation and wetlands
systems as a part of sewer treatment plants. At this time, we have not
annlyzed the wetlnnds because the standards are still being developed
~EX-.I.S_S.!lF. Discharge to the canal or the river is D.9J a preferred alternative
and is not proposed at tillS hme
Page 115, change 80 gallons per houc;ehold to 105 and check rest of document
for change
The following language should be incorporated in this section:
.;..:- RWT/ A 705 Second AVl'J1ue Suite 910 Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) h24-6239 Fax 625-D9:'\O .:..:-
I.j Ij
] I' j 1,,1
~ II
F: ~.J T h Q t"" F eo _. H.= E Q C I o. T. e-=
;(' 04.
o
~0~jS0 3~0
F . 1;:13
Noles to the 5W Yelm FElS HIe! 520792
Robert Thorpe, Alep
March 9, 1993
rage 2
"A clarification from the City of Yelm is that the existing canal is intended to
serve the eXIstmg city and its HnmedIate environs and not intended to serve
the proposed annexation area.
The expansion of the existing system for the area to be annexed is not part of
the preferred dlternative tl
Issues such as alternative methods of sewer discharge, irrigation and
wetlands/leaky wetlands options will be considered. Such programs, alone or
in conjunction with the existing system, will be more appropriate to provide
sewer systems to the proposed annexation area.
DOE rules on re-use and wetlands treatment are now being developed
Once the annexation is complete, the City's Comprehensive Plan, together
with reVIew of specific project proposals, will be required together with
supplemental environmental review before a final determination is made on
the method of wastewater treatment
The key item here is to indicate that no proposal in increased outflow will
occur at this time This is particularly Important to address on the pages of
the Final EIS as flagged. That is, informatIOn give'n by Todd to Dana Mower
was that this additional sewer capacIty outflow occurred for the canal and the
river This is incorrect and may jeopardize the existing permit application for
upgradmg the sewer system. We have to clearly define throughout the EIS
that the upgrade is for the existing City, not the annexation
Based on Figure 5, it can be seen that the school district boundaries in Rainier
are adjacent to a portion of this property It is not the intent of the
proponents to move this section from Rainier to Ye)m School District
Rather, the development of thiS area will be based on a jurisdiction's ability to
provide public services to this section of land Provision of utilities to this
area will be based upon the capacity of the community or the service district
to supply them to that area The ability of the Rainier School District to
provide school services to this area will be the primary determinant of future
5chool sites in the' area
,:'V H.WT/ A 705 Second Avenlle Suite 910 Seattle, Washingtoh 98104 (206) 621-62.39 Fax 625.{)930 .;..:.
I) Ii .1- !
J ,! ~,l .lVl
F-JJ_
· The Wastewater Facilities section of the DEIS has a number
of inaccuracies, of which Mr Stamm is now aware Of greater
concern is the lack of discussion concerning alternatives The
proponents appear to assume that Yelm will accommodate a
"5-fold increase of the maximum currently anticipated
sewage flows" and "a significant expansion of the (sewage
treatment) plant." Such large flows cannot be fully
accommodated by the Centralia power canal under the
conditions of Yelm's hard-won agreement with the City of
Centralia. We understand that the Yelm Planning Commission
is asking the proponents for a broader interpretation of the
meaning of "expansion," and we agree that this is important.
J t/qAdvanced levels of sewage treatment at a central plant could
-J~V' be considered. as could on-site alternatives not discussed in
"1i'I Jf)J' yV" this DEIS
P V' 111
~vV
,
Council Membership:
Pierce County
Thurston County
Lewis Coun ty
State of Washington.
Parks and Recreation Com-
mission
Dept. or Natural Resources
Dept. uf .\griculture
Dept. ot Ecology
De?t or Fisheries
Dept. or Wildlife
Secretan of State
u W Pack Experimental
Forest
u.s. Ann\, Fort Le'his
Nisqual1\ Indian Tribe
Nisquailv National Wildlife
Refuge
Cifford Pincnot National
Fares t
Mount Rainier National Park
Tacoma Citv Light
Town at relm
TO\'v"Il or Eatonville
Citv of Rov
Citizens Advisory Committee:
Three Citizen Members
o 0
Nisqually River Council
P.O. Box 1076
Yelm, Washington 98597
" \-., \9g~
fV
:-
February 13, ~"
Yelm City Council
POBox 479
Yelm, WA 98597
Dear Council Members
The Nisqually River Council and its Citizen Advisory
Committee would like to take this opportunity to comment
on the Southwest Yelm Annexation Draft Environmental
Impact Statement. We have met with City Planner Todd
Stamm and understand that the Yelm Planning Commission
shares some of our concerns We wish to encourage the City
Council and Planning Commission to continue your
examination of these shared issues of concern and others
which have been brought to our attention
. The four annexation alternatives discussed do not cover a
wide enough range of possibilities Lower housing densities,
for example, should be considered in this analysis Similarly,
it might be in the best interests of the City of Yelm to annex
only a part of this large area. Section 27, for example, is
within the bounds of the Rainier School District, which is
contesting its annexation The Final EIS should consider a
more useful range of such alternatives
3J
~I
4
~)
o
o
Southwest Yelm Annexation Comments
Nisqually River Council - February 13, 1993
Page 2 of 3
. The Vegetation and Wildlife section of the DEIS offers almost no discussion
of ways to minimize the impact of any of the annexation altematives on
existing wildlife It is assumed that "most of the wildlife and vegetation
currently occupying undeveloped land would be displaced or destroyed
when development occurs " Priority habitats within the annexation need to
be determined, and more thought given to ways those habitats could be
protected Wildlife corridors and mitigation need to be discussed
. The Wetlands study and Thompson Creek discussion in appendix B appear
to be quite good The Yelm Planning Commission is aware of the problem
with the "off-site wetland" next to SR 507 and within the annexation
boundaries The proposed easement from Thurston Highlands to the Yelm
Highway goes through this large Category II wetland (Yelm classification
system) The wetland has interconnections to even larger wetland areas "to
the north, east, and south "
. The Transportation section of the DEIS has received some discussion by
our Citizens Advisory Committee We agree with the Yelm Planning
Commission that a better analysis of how the DEIS transportation plan
meshes with the new Yelm Transportation Plan would be helpful. Also, a
more thorough discussion of likely bottlenecks and arterial exits and
entrances would help to assess probable impacts Mitigation beyond traffic
signals at intersections should be considered The impacts appear to be
understated in the DEIS
. The Concurrency section needs to be carefully reconsidered It's difficult
to see how "the infrastructure necessary to support new development will
be in place by the time the development is completed" without additional
assistance from the proponents No unavoidable adverse impacts were
identified, and no specific mitigating measures were suggested A single
page of estimates summarizes all the infrastructure costs The origin of many
of these estimates, such as those in the Sewer subcategory, cannot be traced
back to the specifics provided in the "conceptual site plans" Given the
critical point that traffic and school congestion have reached in the Yelm
community, we hope that Yelm council members will lead the proponents to
an understanding of their responsibility to share in shouldering the costs of
a high quality of life in the Yelm area.
~)
· Perhaps a new "Quality of Life" or "Social and Economic Impacts on
Current Yelm Residents" section should be added to the Final EIS, as the
Nisqually Tribe has suggested What will the impacts of higher assessments
and taxes be on the many retired senior citizens now living in Yelm? Will
Yelm Community Schools continue to fall behind in providing the advantages
of new technology to its schoolchildren? Will rapid growth displace many of
o
o
Southwest Yelm Annexation Comments
Nisqually River Council- February 13. 1993
Page 3 of 3
the existing locally-owned businesses in Yelm? Will the annexation offer only
upper middle-class housing centered around golf courses? This appears to
be a critical time in determining the future of the entire Yelm area, and all
points of view need to be considered.
Thank you again for the opportunity to comment on the DEIS You may
contact us at any time for more specific suggestions from our agency or
citizen members
Sincerely,
/~,
~~~
Gordon Zillges
Vice-Chairman
'------:J
~ /- /
) ~ I "
~(-<____ /t"-'-c '-,
/1
, I
GZ pcm
o
o
FEB 2 1\ 1993
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
SOUTHWEST DRINKING WATER OPERATIONS
2411 Pacific Ave. . PO Box 47823 · Olympia, Washington 98504-7823 · (206) 664-0768
February 23, 1993
Yelm Planning Commission
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
Subject
Southwest Yelm Annexation
Draft Environmental Impact
Report
Dear Planning Commission
The proposed annexation represents a significant increase in future service area for
the City of Yelm water system The City's water system plan must be updated to
address water service in the annexation area and the impact on the rest of the
water system prior to any extension of water service into the annexation area
If you have any questions please call me at (206) 753-2452
arl Johns n, P E
'VVSDOH' egional Engineer
Southwest Drinking Water Operations
KWJ clu
cc Thurston County Environmental Health
Peter Beaton, Southwest Drinking Water Operations
~~.
o
o COMMUNITY 0
ft-~ !~~~
FfJ3 , 9 1993
824 FIFTH AVENUE, SE · OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98501 · (206) 943-0780 · FAX 943-0785 · DIVERSION 943-0889
February 17, 1993
Yelm CIty Council
Dear CIty Council Member
Please accept thIS letter as an mVItatIOn to attend the "Speak Out" portIon of the "Deal With It
'93" conferences.
"Deal With It" Conferences have been held m Thurston,...Mason CountIes for the last 5 years. It
IS part of a Youth at RIsk Project supported mamly by county grant momes and volunteer efforts by
youth and professIonals m both countIes The conference attenders are hIgh school age youth that are
consIdered "at nsk" It IS a day of workshops and actIvItIes that help break IsolatIon and offer educatIon
and resources to youth that may not have the OppOrtunIty to reach out and talk. The conference outreach
to 500 youth WIth the hope that they m turn can reach out to others who may not get the chance to
attend.
ThIS year we are offenng the partlCIpantsthe OppOrtunIty to gather together and "Speak Out"
about concerns and needs that they have and that theIr frIends have concernIng our communItIes. It IS
a wonderful chance for commumty leaders to hear from a large body of youth about what dIrectIon we,
as commumty people, can go m teachmg out to a populatIon that does not normally have a chance to
be heard. With the hIgh rate of school drop-outs, drug/alcohol usage, and VIOlence we are faCIng m our
communItIes, thIS tIme can offer us a pOSItIve problem-solvIng OppOrtunIty
The conferences will be held at the Evergreen State College The dates of the conferences are
March 23-24 The "Speak Out" workshops will be held from 12 45 - 1.30 p.m. on both days. Your role
would mamly be open ears to lIsten and observe what the youth are saymg. Hopefully, an open dIalogue
will encourage us all to look at the future WIth creatIvIty and hope.
Please call me If you have any questIons and/or concerns. I would be more than willmg to come
and answer any questIons you may have
I hope to hear from you soon concernmg your partlCIpatIOn In thIS project.
Smcerely,
-Rilt.l~VL Otclu~d~
9'-/3 -{ill J't7
Rebecca Cubbage
Project CoordInator
PS Please also feel free to attend any and all of the conferences plus lunch.
Board of Directors
Ellen Vaughn
President
KC Jones
Secretary
Doug Allen
Treasurer
Gene Asselstine
Walt Berggren
Sue Dubuisson
Jerie Longacre
Margaret McPhee
Paul Mena
Paul Meyer
Kathleen Plato
Judy Tennant
Charles Shelan, M.S. W
Executive Director
Neil McClanahan
President-Elect
Thomas R. Hill, Jr
Immediate Past President
~
A UNITED WAY AGENCY .
o
o
14812 Berry Valley Road SE
Yelm, Washington 98597
ffB \ 9 \993
February 17, 1993
Yelm City Council
PO Box 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
RE: Annexation
Dear Council Members,
I wish to express my continuing objection to have my property and
home annexed into the city limits. Why should I be forced to have
my property annexed in order for someone else to make money?
If forced into annexation, I plan to continue to use my property in
the matter that I have been. I will continue to run my farm,
raising sheep, chickens and other livestock.
My long range plan would be to sub-divide the property into the
smallest possible lots and leave.
sincerely,
~t~ 1f' A.-LtA-~-L.v--€-~--4-
Lila Willuweit
R. w. T-T.~ORPE & ASSOCIA TO, INC.
.:..:. Plan~ . Landscape · Environmental · Economics .:..:.
PRINCD'AL:
Robert W. Thorpe, AIel'
ASSOCIA TIS:
Jeff BucklOlnd
Stephen Speidel, ASlA
Len Zlckler, ASlA
~/~ Iq }
1-
Letter of Transmittal
Da.te'
Job Number IProject:
TO: -rO~ 5\b tJ. \'----(
Ct\Y Dr yec-'M,
We are sending you.
Copies Dale Dcsai pt ion
\ 'zI5(CY~ t::l2AF-r -PeLS
.
5W YE=e-K ~\l'J. N E)(A.T\ 0 N
FCK )Ou\Z.. \2.'8-[ l ev-J
~D CoNI-1l7NT r
These are transmitted as checked below
For your use: ~,
For your approval
As requested
For review and comment: 1*-
Comments:
Approved as noted
Returned for corrections.
Signed
R W Thorpe & Associates, Inc
~W\'C'7 j)
~ CT,,,,jL ET t\
Sealtle, Washington 98104 (206) 624~239 Fax (206) 625,0930.:":.
':.':.705 Second Avenue Suite 910
z(s{C)"'S
17
'-.
o
o
STAFF MEMORANDUM
February 1, 1993
To. Yelm Planning Commission
From: Todd Stamm, City Planner
Re' Southwest Yelm Annexation
This memorandum summarizes the comments received from the
public and agencies regarding the proposed southwest Yelm
annexation the issues raised by the draft environmental
impact statement (DEIS) and the options available to the
Commission
COMMISSION OPTIONS
1 Recommend annexation of the entire proposed area
2 Recommend annexation of a part of the proposed area
3 Recommend conditional annexation (subject to execution
of an agreement between the City and one or more of the
property owners)
4 Table the question until specified information is
provided
5 Table the question until a specific event occurs
6 Recommend denial of the annexation petition
PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS
. Request from Mark Carpenter to add his property to the
annexation
. Objections raised by Rainier School District - should
district boundaries be changed? How?
SWYA - Comments and Issues - 2/1/93 - Page 1
o
o
. Few options are addressed in the DEIS for wastewater
disposal - reflecting an apparent presumption that
expanded discharge to the canal will be available
Reliability of cost estimates for sewage treatment
plant expansion questioned More detail needed
· Is releasing stormwater to wetland potholes viable?
What are the environmental impacts?
· Lack of cross references between transportation
improvement cost responsibilities and Yelm
Transportation Plan
WRITTEN COMMENTS
Nisqually Indian Tribe
· Partial annexation alternative should be analyzed
· A rural density alternative (1 unit per 2 acres) should
be analyzed
. Annexatlon wlthout urbanization should be analyzed
· Increased volume of wastewater discharge to Nisqually
River will be opposed by Tribe
· Impact of lncome levels and lifestyles of new residents
should be consldered
· Impacts to current low-income residents from increased
public service costs should be considered
Department of Community Development, Office of Archaeology
and Historic Preservation
. Supplement Yelm s historic structure survey with this
area
· Any areas of archaeologlcal significance?
Department of Ecology
· Water rights are needed
Department of Transportation
· Failure to address trafflc impacts outside Yelm's urban
growth area
· Need for concurrent construction of area-wide
improvements
SWYA - Comments and Issues - 2/1/93 - Page 2
o
o
Department of Wildlife
· Need to address protectlon of priority species
· Analyze opportunities to retain habitat diversity
Thurston County
.
Golf course lmpacts on water quality?
.
Clarlflcatlon of wetlands sectlon Posslbllityof
avoidlng fill? Bufferlng conslstent with eXDected
final Yelm wetlands ordinance?
.
Consider electromagnetic radiation risks assoclated
with Centralia Power lines
.
Populatlon growth estimates questioned
.
Fallure to address traffic lmDacts outslde urban growth
area
.
School demand forecast questloned
crlterla should be determined
School slting
· Is expanSlon of sewer outfall to canal feaslble?
(Cost permits, etc) Denslty wlthout sewer?
· No dlScussion of hlstoric resources
· County prefers alternative 3 if annexed
Rainier School District
· Need to transfer Sectlon 27? Process? Alternatives?
Intercity Transit
· Alternative 3 (compact scenario) most supportive of
mass transit and pedestrian traffic
Joint Ventures
. Questlon commercial scale of village scenario
· Question traffic generation estimates for vlllage
scenario
· Need for recreation for commercial areas should be
consldered
SWYA - Comments and Issues - 2/1/93 - Page 3
~
o
o
· Infrastructure should not be included as a public cost
Permit fee and utility taxes should be lncluded in
revenue estimates
Mary Lou Clemens
· Increased police and fire protectlon needs accurately
assessed?
.
Table 19 -
growth rate
Capture Rate does not eoual service area
so publlC costs underestlmated
National Food Corporation
· Need to protect eXlsting chicken farm to south
Surroundlng open space lS needed for operation
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
See Ordinance 414 for general lssues gUldance Among the
major lssues raised by the DEIS are
· Unavoldable lmpacts listed at page 13 of DEIS
· Population projections higher than Thurston Regional
Plannlng Councll estimates
· Mitlgating measures outlined throughout DEIS - I
suggest a walk-through by the Commlssion to identlfy
those that are dlrectly related to the annexatlon
decislon and those which are development related
· Concurrency revenue shortfall of approximately $8 000
per household Potential facilities savings may
result from implementation of compact alternatlve
· Lack of information regarding potable water supplies
SWYA - Comments and Issues - 2/1/93 - Page 4
~,
~,\ fl.
- -
f
~
o CITY OF YELM 0
. PLANNING COMMISSION
SW YELM ANNEXATION DRAFT EIS PUBLIC HEARING
JANUARY 4, 1992, 7:00 P.M., CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tim Schlosser, Plannlng Commission Chalr, opened the meeting at
7:00 p.m.
Members Present: Tim Schlosser, Jim Brown, Jim Keyes, George
Knight, John Klnnee, Roberta Longmire, Joe Huddleston, Torn Cundy
and Torn Gorman.
Guests. Paul Steadman, Jon & Mary Lou Clemens, Ken Hofferber,
Elene Newby, Bob Golphenee of the Rainler School Dlstrlct, Ed
Kenney, Ronald Laughlln, Michael Ci trak, Mark Carpenter, John
Graver, John Tokarezyk, Kat Ravter, Charles Brown, Fred Enslon,
Michael Jlmenez, Brad Barrett and GeneVleve Glassy. Patsy Purvis,
David Purvis, Jess & Gayle Hoffman, Rhonda Eilers, Pepper Iverson,
Peter Paulson, LeRoy Bendien, Tom Cline &~y Healy and Bev Kolilis
Dennis Su of Kramer Chin and Mayo, Bob Hazlett of S Chamberlain
and AS,sociates, Robert Thorpe of R W Thorpe and Associates
Staff present Gene Borges, Shelly Badger, Todd Stamm and Agnes
Colombo.
By lot, the following staggered new terms 'Here selected for
Commission members (all terms will be three years following thlS
current term:
1 Year Term
Jim Keyes
Torn Cundy
Joe Huddleston
2 Year Term
Jim Brown
Tim Schlosser
Roberta Longmire
3 Year Term
Tom Gorman
George Knight
John Kenney
SW Yelm Annexation EIS Public Hearlna was opened at 7: 05 p.m.
Chair Tim Schlosser explained the purpose of the Public Hearlng
All speakers were requested to identify themselves prior to
speaking and to add their names to the sign-in sheet if they wished
to speak or be included on the malling list for future mailings of
Public Hearings concerning the annexation. Commissioner Joe
Huddleston identified hlmself as a neighbor of the proposed
annexation and asked if anyone present objected to his
particlpatlon. No objection was voiced. No audience objections to
any Planning Commission members participation was voiced. No
members had received information, other than staff reports, prior
to the public hearing.
Todd Stamm, Yelm Planning Department, gave a brief overview of the
Public Hearing. He explained that the annexation would include
approximately 2,000 acres belonging to 38 property owners. Stamm
indicated that the property could be developed outside the City,
possibly at 1 dwelling per 5 acres. Options available to the
Commission are recommending annexation of all, part or none of the
property. The Commission may also recommend conditions to be-
attached to the annexation.
The closing date for written comments is January 15, 1993. Comment
will also be accepted when the matte~ goes before the City Council.
YELM PLANNING COMMISSION 1/4/93
SWYA DRAFT EIS PUBLIC HEARING
PAGE 1
stamm pointed out corrections to the Draft EIS. On page 16 the
SEPA Process Chart should go from Preliminary Decision to Boundarv
Revlew Board. On page 114, paragraph 3, discharge to the Centralia
Power canal is authorized by a contract with the City of Centralia
The NPDES permlt has not been issued. Stamm also pOlnted out that
the permits requested for Yelm's Sewer . System do not accommodate
the annexation or development of the property.
-. 0 0~
meetlng. \~. ~6) 0'0 ~(
.... ~ 0 ,,0
c;> << '.y v 0'
defining ~0 'f:>0 ~0
cP 06)
-Q"o\-
~
")y c
-Q"o\-
r"
Additional copies of the Draft EIS were aVai)~'le at the
d. . b () d' 414' C . l. mb
Stamm lstrl uted~or lnance No. to ommlSSlon me ers
City objectives and policies for annexations.
Stamm advised the Commission that they would be deallng with
annexation questions only, any development issues would be resolved
at a later date Based on available information the Commisslon
must determine and make a recommendation to the clty Council to
elther approve or deny the annexation request. If the Commisslon
feels it doesn't have adequate lnformatlon to make a recommendatlon
the Commission has the option of requesting additlonal lnformation
from the proponents
\
'\
Dennis Su, representing the proponents, explained that he was at
the meeting to clarify any questions the Commission or audience
might have He introduced Bob Hazlett of S Chamberlaln &
Assoclates and Robert Thorp and a staff member of R W Thorpe and
Assoclates Mr. Thorpe lndlcated that he was there to respond to
any questlons the audience or Commisslon mlght have and that any
written comments recelved would be given the same conslderation as
comments made at the meeting
The floor was opened to public comment
Mark Carpenter - stated that he owned property aaJacent to the
annexation and requested the lncluslon of his property in the
annexation. Tim Schlosser indicated that it was loglcally possible
to include the property and questioned the legality of adding Mr
Carpenter's property. Stamm replled that he would like a day or
two to examine the issue and stated that If included as part of the
annexation It would also have to be included in the flnal EIS.
Dennls Su - proponent representative lndicated that he would take
the matter under consideration.
Peter Paulson - asked if Manke Road was lncluded in the annexation
Tim Schlosser replled that Manke Rd was not included.
Bob Golphnee - Ralnier School District Superintendent, read a
letter to the CommisSlon expressing concerns about the impact of
the proposed SW Yelm Annexation on the Rainier School District. He
stated that a portion of the annexation is located wlthin Ralnier
School Dlstrict boundaries and indicated that statute mandates each
incorporated city or town to be comprised in a single school
district. Exceptions may require invoking the ]urlsdiction of the
State Board of Education as per RCW 28A.315.
.~ ;:..
.1;:,;;;"..
;;-.~~'.c.., .~..
}.~1~;;'.~: .
'~~1W;j
:t~~t9;'(
YELM PLANNING COMMISSION 1/4/93
SWYA DRAFT EIS PUBLIC HEARING
PAGE 2
,
. kr- Golphnee requested that Yelm declare if CO"'oeir intent is to
ch~nge the propert,r )in question to the Yelm <'v-,lool Distrlct. He
requ,ested that th~,--..tnterests of the Rainier School District be
considered and that the district be kept fully informed of all
progress related to the annexation.
\
Jim Keyes requested that Mr Golphnee indicate on
property was wi thln the Rainier School District
indicated "Section 27"
the map which
Mr. Golphnee
Torn Gorman asked the percentage of total assessed value for the
district from the parcels falling within the proposed annexation
Mr. Golphnee replied that he did not have that information.
Dennis Su indicated that the Rainier School Dlstrict portion was an
isolated sector within the SW Yelm Annexation boundarles and that
no residences exist on the property He added that when the state
drew school dlstrict boundaries for some reason Section 27 as well
as part of Ft Lewis was placed in the Rainler School Distrlct
Gene Borges added that the issue of school district boundarles had
been dlscussed one to two years ago. The annexatlon proponents
',vere aware of the issue and had been in contact 'tiith the Yelm
School District
Ed Kenney - Commented on the Wastewater Facility Sectlon, In both
the Draft EIS and Appendices Mr Kenney indicated that it was nlS
belief that sewer was not reaslble as presented on page 114 (EIS)
much less wlth the proJected rive-fold increase He stated tha~
the NPDES Perml t was still being sought and that regulatory
agencies consldered Yelm's plan to be marginally acceptable for
Yelm's current population. He stated that the proposed lagoon would
treat just 65% of the sewage and that most indlviduals, fishlnq
groups, citizen's groups, agencies have a problem with that level
of treatment He stated that Yelm would have a lo~ or problems
trying to inc=ease the amount of discharge going into the canal. He
suggested that the entire section be reworked and stated that a lot
of the figures didn't add up.
Robert Thorpe, R. W. Thorpe and Associates, requested that l<f..r
Kenney slow his presentation so notes could be taken of hls
comments.
Mr. Kenney then addressed the concurrency portion of the
document, Table 18 (pg. 125) in the back of the EIS, he stated that
it was very brief, and that he (Mr. Kenney) didn't think it was
very well figured out. He questioned the figure of 5,500 units @
$1800/unit = $9,900,000 and stated that he didn't believe it was
fair to laymen to not identlfy what a unit actually lS. He asked
if a unit was an onsite step system that goes to the main plant?
He thought there would be a lot more detailed information in the
documents.
Tim Schlosser asked if there were any additional comments from the
audience or Commissioners.
YELM PLANNING COMMISSION 1/4/93
SWYA DRAFT EIS PUBLIC HEARING
PAGE 3
< 4
~:~;':..":';';':;~~::~~'.:~ ","r.' "~".
a'Kenney - aSken anyone wanted. to respondC-) his questions.
ROQert Thorpe sta.~~B that Dana Mower was not aDle to attend thls
evening. Thorpe thought that he understood Mr. Kenney's questions
and that a graphlc showing systems may be necessary. He will
provide a draft to Mr. Kenney to see if he lS headed In the right
direction.
\
Torn Gorman inquired about stormwater dralnage (page 119). He had
been on the property and asked which of the alternatives appealed
to the proponent as a lot of surface water doesn't run-off lnto
Thompson Creek; it accumulates in depressions where it eventually
evaporates or runs-off.
Dennls Su stated that he did not have an immediate answer as the
flnal layout for the site had not been determlned. It would depend
on wetlands use of open space etc and probably would be
combination of all.
Tim Schlosser questloned the percentage of responsibillty for
increased trafflc and road lmprovements.
Bob Hazlett stated that the amount of trafflc reflected In the
document was that expected to be on the road if the development
scenario took place Responsibility was addressed in the Yelm
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
The Publlc Hearlng was closed at 7.50 P M.
The audience was reminded of the 11 day period for wrltten comment.
The Planning Commission will follow up on this lssue at thelr
February 1, 1993 work session at 4.00 p.m., In the Yelm City Hall
Council Chambers.
Meetlng adJourned at 7:55 P.M.
Submitted,
I/) ~/)/)/' /
l4j/fJ U fJ L #Tm (J..-IJ
YELM PLANNING COMMISSION 1/4/93
SWYA DRAFT EIS PUBLIC HEARING
PAGE 4
". ~f);l~K\'l~\ ~1[~;~:-'.-;;"111111 Nisq'r~~IY fudian Tribe
,n",>! ~20 She:;l~ah-Num Drive' S.E.
I lympia~ Washington 98503
Phone: (206) 456-5221
January 15, 1993
Yelm Planning commission
City of Yelm
105 Yelm Avenue West
Yelm, Washington 98597
RE: Southwest Yelm Annexation
Draft' Environmental Impact Statement
Dear Commission Members,
The Nisqually Indian Tribe offers the following comments on
the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the proposed
Southwest Yelm Annexation:
Alternatives - The alternatives discussed are so limited that
the DEIS is practically useless as a planning document for the City
of Yelm. Other than the No Action alternative, all the
al ternati ves considered serve the interest of the annexation
proponents. For the Final EIS, Yelm should require analysis of a
much wider range of alternatives.
First, the EIS and the Yelm Planning Commission should
consider as an alternate annexation of only a portion of the
Southwest area. The EIS should evaluate the impacts of annexing
only the lands in sections 24 and 25, leaving sections 23, 26, and
27 under Thurston County jurisdiction. A second alternative that
should be evaluated would add section 23 to the annexed area. Yelm
is not limited to only the annexation area proposed by the
annexation proponents and, in fact, should evaluate alternatives
independently.
Second, the Final EIS should consider alternatives with a
substantially reduced number of residential units. The EIS, and
the Planning Commission, should consider an alternative of one
residential unit per two acres. This would be a 250% increase in
the number of residential units presently authorized, but would
reduce the inevitable impacts of the high number of residential
units proposed in all _ the alternatives presently under
consideration.
As the Draft EIS states, this is a nonproject planning EIS and
does not have to examine every conceivable alternative.
!I I.:i,',
~r \ ;;(!*~.~t~:.r.
o
o
Southwest Yelm Annexation EIS
January 15, 1993
Page 2
Nevertheless, to be legally sufficient, not to mention to be of use
to the citizens and elected officials of Yelm, the EIS must
evaluate real al ternati ves. The al ternati ves in the DEIS appear to
be contrived to avoid evaluation of alternatives of substance.
Finally, the No Action alternative is characterized in a
misleading manner. No Action does not require that the land remain
under Thurston County zoning and regulation. Yelm could annex some
or all of the Southwest area but is not obliged to change the
existing zoning of one unit per five acres; you could decide to
annex and retain the current zoning. The EIS should acknowledge
this alternative and the Planning Commission should evaluate more
fully its merits.
Wastewater - For the Nisqually Tribe, the primary impact of
the annexation and development proposed in the DEIS is generation
and disposal of wastewater. The DEIS states that the annexed area
will produce 1.26 million gallons/day and that discharge of this
wastewater will be into the Nisqually River. This is over a 400%
increase in the discharge proposed by the current Yelm wastewater
plan.
The Yelm Planning commission should know that any increase
above the proposed 300,000 gallons/day proposed by the wastewater
plan is not acceptable to the Nisqually Tribe. The Tribe, as a
matter of federal law, has the right to fish unobstructed in the
Nisqually River and to have its homeland and reservation, including
its waters, free of pollution. We cannot allow Yelm to use the
Nisqually River, our reservation and homeland, for its wastewater
disposal. Because Yelm faced a serious threat to its drinking
water, the Tribe in 1990 agreed not to oppose Yelm's proposal to
develop a wastewater treatment facility for the town with discharge
to the river limited to a maximum of 300,000 gallons/day. Yelm
should proceed with an annexation plan only if it will not increase
discharge to the river above this 300,000 gallons/day cap.
The Final EIS should include housing density alternatives
and/or wastewater disposal alternatives that will not require any
increased discharge to the Nisqually River.
General Comments A dramatic impact of the proposed
annexation and vital element of the annexation decision is not
discussed in the DEIS, but should be an important part of the Yelm
Planning commission's decision. This element is the quality of
life and image of the Town of ~elm. The annexation proposed to
increase the number will residences in Yelm from about 500 to 5,500
in ten years. All these new houses will be expensive houses (low-
cost housing is not generally built next to golf courses).
o
o
Southwest Yelm Annexation EIS
January 15, 1993
Page 3
If the annexation goes through as proposed, in ten years it is
likely that the majority of Yelm's population will reside in the
Southwest area. The current citizens of Yelm will become a
minority in their own community, to be dominated by the relatively
wealthy new citizens of the Southwest area. Yelm has been the
Nisqually Tribe's neighbor for generations; we have gone to the
Yelm schools and have life-long friends in Yelm. We are concerned
that Yelm will no longer be the friendly small town where one can
recognize just about everyone; long-term residents may not even
feel welcome in their own town.
Further, the substantial increase in demand for services will
bring an increase in tax rates and service fees. Some of the
oldest of Yelm's citizens likely will be forced to sell their homes
and property. As a matter of policy, the Yelm Planning commission
should require that the Final EIS evaluate and document the likely
and possible social and economic impacts of the annexation proposal
on the current citizens of Yelm. These impacts should be a major
element of the Commission's deliberations.
The Yelm Planning commission, and the City of Yelm, have a
choice. It is not inevitable that Yelm must grow rapidly. The
Growth Management Act allows a community to choose and plan for a
modest pace of growth. You do not have to be a "captive" of the
developer's proposal or the limited alternatives for Southwest area
annexation. You can and must evaluate additional alternatives and
include as a viable opti.on saying, "No!" to rapid urbanization.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the DEIS. Your
decision on this annexation proposal will in large part determine
the future quality of life of the Yelm area. We urge you to demand
a full and complete discussion in the Final EIS of a wide range of
alternatives; only in this way will you be able to make an
adequately informed decision on the proposed Southwest annexation.
S:;:/H
Dorian S. Sanchez
Tribal Chairman
'i9tr.i1f
-
---.;--,- ,....,.-......: -
;::,:.~;f';;'
,..' :,.-..,~..'.'-..,r.\.. ,r..
'{-~\\~;;(~{;;':~~~j1~i"rl~"$.~E -
~;,~~, .:..~5::i,k.:~.
"" -1~4~::~~
.~...""...t't-~':c.l.r.:;.:~~.;.;..."~_
i~If&.il:'~ I
,:r;,~".J ..~,,,,,,..,;c..,.,. " ':!~~:"" ;.)~~~?::"(.~~'
'+~.~,P,_..i-~',.";r..OEC-~2 9 1992
,t: .~,(\~ft~;~.:..:.;y~r~,~~i~~ '~~:"'G\ ;~ 'f
" '
~t I
>
'\.._,---
I,;,'
STATE OF WASHINGTON
I
J
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
711 27st Avenue S.W · PO. Box 43843 . Olympia, Washington 98504-8343 · (206) 153-4077 · SCAN 234-4011
December 28, 1992
Mr. Todd stamm, City Planner
City of Yelm
105 Yelm Avenue West
Post Office Box 479
Yelm, WA 98597
Log:
Re:
121892-18-TN
Southwest Yelm Annexation, DEIS
Dear Mr. stamm:
The Washington state Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP)
is in receipt of the Draft Environmental Impact statement (DEIS) for the
Southwest Yelm Annexation action. From the project description, I
understand that this proposal entails the annexation of 2,000 acres to the
City of Yelm, for eventual development for residential, recreational, and
commercial uses. Location of the annexation is southwest of the present
city limits.
In response, OAHP recommends that the City of Yelm consider the impact of
the annexation upon the area's cultural resources including historic and
archaeological properties. This process should include the identification,
evaluation, and protection of such properties. Already, the City of Yelm
and Thurston County have conducted surveys for historic properties in the
Yelm area. To supplement this data, we recommend a survey be conducted to
identify archaeological properties within the proposed annexation.
Following this identification process, identified cultural resources should
be evaluated for significance. Those found to be significant should be
protected through various incentives and planning mechanisms. We recommend
these steps be coordinated with the Yelm Historic Preservation Commission,
the Thurston County Historical Commission, and OARP. Also, the final
environmental impact statement should acknowledge the potential for
historic and archaeological resources within the annexation and identify
steps to address these issues.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this annexation. Should you
have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (206) 753-9116.
Sintlere~~
G~~ A. iffith
comp~hensi e Planning specialist
GAG:lms
cc: Shelly Badger
~3
'r)J
'.;.,.,
-
o
'0
::~:;~;'''~~w~'-r", 7/~ ~-:~:-
-- --'-'~~--'-'~.----'----'- -~;:;-:-;,~.,; - --:-c..:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
Mail Stop PV-7 7 .
Olympia, Washington 98504-8771 . (206) 459-6000
January 13, 1993
~\
~rc; ~7'-~\\
~~-=~__' . .~~_' " I
\ \ '. i
l,\ .1
~ ~.. I
\ 5 \993
'h~\\
V' J
Mr Todd Stamm
City of Yelm
PO Box 479
Ye1m VIA 98597
_.---~_.--'-'
\ ..-.-- -----
---
--
-.-.....-
Dear Mr Stamm
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft environmental impact
statement (DEIS) for the Southwest Yelm Annexation proposed by Thurston
Highlands Associates Vie reviewed the DEIS and have the following comments
Any ground water withdrawals in excess of 5,000 gallons per day or for the
irrigation of more than one-half acre of lawn or noncommercial garden will
require a water right permit from Ecology
The Department of Ecology encourages the development of public water supply
systems, whether publicly or privately owned, to provide water to regional
areas and developments
If you have any questions, please call Ms Jill Van Hu11e with the Vlater
Resources Program at (206) 586-5560
Sincerely,
7}UtL/y1,~~_~~ld.:-
M Vernice Santee
Environmental Review Section
MVS
92-7742
cc Jill Van Hul1e, SVlRO
Sarah Barrie, SVlRO
,~:.
....
.. ':";Tl,... u
~iJ.;~1~j~~i:~:
'"
.j-
f~'1'tij~~;' ~ '\
';s~~,:J:rJJJ~if;
;
~~-~{,-;;-'~
.-,-- ~ "',-. -;-~--:-T''''''- - ~,-..- ~ - -.~ -
o
~
(~
G
o
Washington State
Department of Transportation
District 3
Office of District Administrator
5720 Capitol Boulevard
POBox 47440
Olympia. WA 98504-7440
Duane Berentson
Secretary of Transportation
January 14, 1993
Todd Stamm
City of Yelm
Planning and Building Dept.
POBox 479
Yelm, WA 98597
5 1993
1 j.l
...)i~' L
Southwest Yelm Annexation
SR 510, MP 15.5 VicInity
E.C File No 93000-T
DEIS
~.~-
,~'i
I
--
Dear Mr Stamm.
We have receIved and reviewed the above proposal and have the followmg comments:
It IS noted that the proposed Southwest Yelm Annexation as subnntted is 'non-project'
m nature Although the annexation in Itself will not create any additional impacts to the
transportation system, the intent is to mcrease population denSIties to a level greater than
the eXistIng transportation infrastructure can accommodate
The DEIS as submitted does not address the unpacts, as far as capacity or level of
servIce on SR 510 and SR 507 outsIde Yelm's UGA. The annexatIon and subsequent
development of this proposal will have a sIgmficant adverse unpact on the entrre length
of SR 510 and SR 507 from Old 99 m Tenino (MP 13 64) to the Fort LeWIS Access
Rd.(MP 39 04) The traffic portion of the EIS should be expanded to incorporate those
sectIons, Identifymg unpacts and the appropnate mItig-ations. The Department requests
an opportumty to review and comment upon the revIsions
The proposed development of tlns annexation rehes heavily on the unprovements
outlmed ill Yelm' s ComprehenSIve Transportation Plan that are yet to be funded.
Should tlns EIS be used or referenced, for the actual development of tlns annexatIon,
the Department requests that the construction of those unprovements be m place
concurrent WIth the demand generated by the proposal. No development shall be
allowed WIthout fIrst secunng full funding for the necessary roadway mitIgatIons
Thank you for the opportumty to review the above proposal. If there are any questions
regardmg our comments, please contact Fred Tharp at (206)357-2667
Smcerely,
PAULA J HAM:MOND P.E.
~~7f:;);rer
By' PASCO BAKOTICH, ill, P.E.
Asst. Trans. Plannmg Engineer ,"
District 3 .. .. .,- ~.
. ',-
PIeR / PB.fot - ..~_"U7_..~';-"-r--'.. ,-.'
cc N Williams ~2i.:;::.~.;.;-'L~;"~;i::'
Bob Hazlett / S. Chamberlam& Associates / P O.Box 3485 / Lacey, WA 98S~3-04 '~_c.
File' 93000- T
,'c. ,".';. .~tt5r~.~~ y,
",:~~,~\;;~~;tif.V~';'"
-~"j~f{~~;~ki1~f~~t~_.
i;"
currrSMIKH
Director
o
CJ
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE
90S E. Heron A.berdeen. WA. 98520
Tel (206) 533-9335
January 8~ 199::'
("-------- -----.
--...... -~_.
""~N
I ? JCJ"
... J000
l'lr. Todd Stamm
Ci ty F'la.nner
Clty of {elm
P. O. Bo;~ 479
Yelm~ WA 98597
~----
~e: Draft Environmental Impact Statement--Southwest
Ye 1 in Anne~ a. tion
Section 19. Township 17N~ ~ange 02E and
Sections 2~. 24. 26 and =7~ Township 17N~ Range OlE
Thurston CClunt't
Dear Mr. Stamm:
The Washington State Department of Wildllfe (WDW; appreciates the
opportunit; to review and comment on the above-referenced Draft
Environmenta.l Impact Sta.tement (DEIS) on the anne~:ation of
appro;: ima te i y 2 ~ (l(i!) ac res in to the Ci tv of '{e I m wi th a proposed
development dwelling densit; of 5.1 unit,:; per acre with a ma'amum
of 5.000 developed units. After reviewing the DEIS and the
Technical Appendices~ our agency has the following comments and
concerns.
As you I< now. the l>JDW is mandated to "protec t ~ preserve and
perpetuate" Washington s wildlife, both game and non-game
species. With the -growing concern of Washington residents,
counties and cities to protect their wildlife and to prevent
e;:tirpation and/or possible listing of \<'Jildlife species, it is
essential that wildlife issues be adequately addressed. This
DEIS does not sufficiently address wildlife concerns, e.g.
protection for priority habitats and species, wildlife corridors,
proper protection for wetlands and wetland-dependent species,
protection of nest trees (as required by RCW 77.16.120), and
mitigation. The statement on wildlife on page 42 that: "Most of
the wildlife and vegetation currently occupying undeveloped land
would be displaced or -destroyed when development occurs", shows a
lacl-. of concern for Washington's wi ld 1 i fe. Since this anne::ation
would provide for the lncrease in housing density from the
current one house per five acre designation by Thurston County,
to 5.1 units per acre and the large area (2,000 acres) which will
be affected, our agency has the following concerns.
~3
7.........
. / .
o
o
,/
Mr. Todd Stamm
F'age 2
December 8~ 199~
In the preceding paragraph~ I have referenced priority habitats
and species. WDW has de~eloped a Priority Habltats and Species
(PHS) program to identify the most important wildlife habitats
and wildlife species in order to assist counties~ cities,
developers and others to ta~e a proactive approach to protection
of fish and wildlife. By ta~ing a proactive approach as opposed
to a reactive approach~ this will help prevent future wildlife
losses and it will be much less costly to plan now rather than
recovering losses once they occur. Thurston County is one of
the leading counties in protecting our natural resources through
their Critical Areas ordinance.
The DEIS does not address protection for the priority species
whic h aTe found in the proposed a.nne::a. tion a.rea. The fo 11 owing
is a list of priorit7 species which were 11sted in the DEIS but
were not ac~nowledged as priority species.
1. Pileated woodpec~er (Drvocopus pileatus) (Also a State
Candidate species)
..:... .
Western Bluebird (Sialia me~LCana)(State Candidate and
Federal Sensitive species)
~. Red-tailed Haw~ (Buteo jamaicenSLS)
4. Wood Duc~s (~ix sponsa)
:7,. Columbian Bla.cf:-tailed deer I,OdocoLleus hemLonus
cGlumbianus)
6. Great Blue Heron (Ardea heradias). There is a heron
roo~ery located in Section =0, Township 17N, Range 02E,
and this area~ with lts multiple wetlands and Thompson
Creek~ provide the herons with food~ water, alternate
nesting sites~ roosting and nursery areas.
7. Western Gray Squirrel (ScLurus griseus). This is also
a State Candidate species. Although there were no
sightings in the proposed area~ there are known squirrel
sightings in nearby areas. Therefore~ the oa~-conifer
'_a:-'~.-.
~~r.i)~ ~.;t:: ~-, :~\
~~~~.~$2
/.....~,.'.'
~?tY ,..,
~,,,,...-:
, .
t
o
o
//
!'1r. Todd Stamm
Page 3
December 8~ 1993
habitat should be protected as a potential dispersal area
for the Western Gray Squirrel.
~
Ii
W
f:
,
I
&
!
,
I
I
8. Elk (Cervus elaphus) (Possible use as a mlgration route).
This proposed area has diverse habitat types including forested~
open fields (which are important feeding areas for raptors)~
stream corridor and varying types of wetlands. Numerous
wintering waterfowl species utilize the open water wetlands for
feeding and resting habitat. In addition~ the wetlands and their
upland buffers are used to meet the life needs of numerous
wildllfe species who reside in the local area.
Wi th the anne::a.tion and hea,vy densi ty development planned for the
area, these diverse habitats will be fragmented, destroyed and/or
rendered unusable by area wildlife resulting in severely reduced
populations and/or local population die-offs, an increase in
animal damage by displaced wildlife, decreased recreational value
(e.g. wildlife viewing, hunting, etc.).
Wildlife 1S the property of the State and its citizens and
therefore,t is important to properly address protection and
mitigation for fish~ w1ldlife and th~ir habitats.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this
proposed anne::ation.
Sincerely,
~~
~g
DEBBIE D. CARNEVALI
Habitat Biologist
cc: Dave Gufler, WDW
Connie Iten, WDW
Paula Ehlers~ Thurston Co. Planning
".';--;.
:/~ .~...
;. ~j.
.., .-"
, ';,. i=':~_
...,... .
~;~~:~ii!f:~'" . ., 3\'iiii~:1[1I'~, ;:0. '. ,
.~.
SINCE 1851
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
(J George L. Barner, Jr
District One
.,--- Diane Oberquell
District Two
Nfl Linda Medcalf
J~N 2. G \~;:;.; District Three
_----.--~3ANNING DEPARThfENT
THURSroN COUNTY
m.\'dIf6\~) IrlfAl~'H<<tmlllIM!K'II!h...'n
~---~------.
Harold RobertSon, AlCP
Planning Director
January 15, 1993
Mr Todd Stamm, City Planner
CIty of Yelm
PO Box 479
Yelm, W A 98597
SUBJECT Southwest Yelm AnnexatIon Draft EnvlTonment Impact Statement
Dear Mr. Stamm.
We have reVIewed the Draft EnvlTonmental Impact Statement for the proposed
Southwest Yelm AnnexatIon and offer the followmg comments for your conSIderatIon.
NATURALE~RONMENT
Groundwater TIns section does not speCIfically address the Impacts of golf course
development on water qUalIty Table 18 mdicates that AlternatIves 2 through 4 would
devote 276 acres to golf courses. The enVIronmental Impacts of thIS use, partIcularly
the potential effects of femhzers, herbIcides, and pestICIdes on the groundwater
proposed to be used as a public water source, should be addressed. If the development
project proceeds, we suggest that you reqUIre a groundwater mOnitormg and mtcgrated
pest management for the golf course area.
Wetlands (SectIon B 1 Water)
AdditIOnal work IS needed m the wetlands sectIon. The report IS confusmg and the
analysIs IS not objective. ConfuSIOn could be reduced by overlaymg the delineated
wetlands on the 3 different scenanos EIS' are supposed to be wntten for the
JUTIsdictIOn as an objectIve analYSIS of the probable adverse envlTOnmentallffipacts of
a proposal. Statements made m the wetland analYSIS mdicate that the City is assummg
that the filling of wetlands IS not aVOIdable. Filling wetlands .lli aVOIdable and should
be the first mItIgatIon tactIC Adequate protectIve buffers should also be proposed. On
2000 Lakeridge Drive SW, Olympia, Washington 98502-6045 (206) 786-5554/ EA..,'( (206) 754-4413
*
Recycled Paper
~~:""!"~. ,. '.., . j -......
----- --.
./
?-
o
o
I
Mr Stamm
January 15, 1993
Page 2
page 32, a large forested wetland IS mentIoned (identified erroneously as #16), and
described as needmg a 100 foot buffer If Yelm's CritIcal Areas Ordmance is sImilar
to the Ecology Model Ordmance, then 100 feet is not an appropnate buffer width for
tills type of wetland. There IS also no other mentIon of appropnate buffenng for any
of the other 19 wetlands delIneated. We have several other comments regardmg the
wetland sectlon and they mc1ude the followmg'
Figure 10 The "off-sIte wetland" noted near SR 507 appears to be
partIally on-sIte
Pg. 32, first paragraph. Appears that you mtend to use the wetlands as
pollutant filters Untreated stormwater should not be dIrected to natural
wetlands
Pg. 32, 6th paragraph. How will wetlands be Impacted?
Pg. 34, last paragraph. It IS also difficult to understand how the wetland
losses were calculated at less than one acre smce the analysIs dId not seem
that specIfic
Energy All three development alternatives (2-4) call for the relocatIOn of the CentralIa
hIgh-voltage transrmSSIOn lIne bIseCtIng SectIon 27 Smce AlternatIve 2 and 4 show
resIdentIal development adjacent to the transmissIOn lmes, the Issue of electromagnetIc
radIatIOn should be addressed.
BUlL T ENVIRONMENT
Populatlon Growth/Housmg Demand. The Draft EIS estImates for populatIon growth
and housing demand m the Yelm area are considerably illgher than Thurston RegIonal
Planmng Council's (TRPC) estlmates.
ConsIdenng thIs large difference, the methodology and assumptIOns for the populatlon,
housmg and sewer servIce demands should be reevaluated to ensure that they provIde
a reasonable baSIS for assumptlons suppOrtIng the development alternatlves described
in the Draft EIS and for related plannmg m the area.
Natural Resource Lands All of the development proposals would result m the
urbarnzatlon of currently rural lands that support agnculture and forestry. If urban
development proceeds, the compact scenano, Alternative 3 appears to be most
compatible with the resource uses on adjoining properties.
o
o
,~
Mr Stamm
January 15, 1993
Page 3
Transportation. TIns sectIon should address the impact of traffic generated by the
proposed alternatives on county roads and state highways beyond the unmediate area.
These Include the Yelm Highway, ReservatIOn Road, RaImer Road, Old Highway 99,
SR 507 and SR 510 Impacts on roadway capacIty and any associated unprovements
should be Identified and dIscussed. In addItion, we encourage you to coordInate with
Fort LeWIS regardmg any anticIpated opemngs of roads withm the project vIcmIty
Schools It IS likely that any of the development alternatives will generate more
students than contemplated rn the EIS We suggest that the applIcant work With the
Yelm School DIStrICt to prepare an updated school demand forecast, consIdenng the
likely hOUSIng ffilX, demograplncs and eXIStIng school capacIty, and alter the amount of
land devoted to school uses m the alternatIves accordmgly
In addItIon, if the project proceeds, we suggest that conSIderatIon be gIVen to SIttIng
schools m close proximity to reSIdentIal areas to enable access by foot and bIcycles, to
reduce traffic and busmg, and to foster a greater sense of commumty
Wastewater FacilItIes. The Draft EIS rndIcates that rn order to serve the entIre proposed
development a new NPDES penmt (and approval from CentralIa Power) would be
needed to enable an Increased sewage outfall to the Nisqually RIver. A deterrmnatIon
should be made as to whether or not tlns IS possible or likely and generally what the
envIronmental unpacts would be. If a permIt for more outfall could be obtamed, a
detenmnation should be made as to whether or not the system can be cost-effectIvely
redesIgned to accommodate the projected sewage flow from the proposed annexatIon
(and the remainder of the mtenm growth area) WIthIn the lImIts establIshed by the
eXIstIng permIts. Also, what would be the alternatIve density of the annexation area If
sewer was not aVaIlable?
GENERAL COMMENTS
There IS no discussIOn regardIng hIstonc resources.
Alternative 3 seems to have the least envrronmental impacts and appears to be the most
cost-effective to serve of the development alternatives being considered. Therefore, if
the city eventually annexes thIS area, we urge the City to requIre thIS type of
development pattern.
~. -" C.,
,.
. .
/
o
o
Mr. Stamm
January 15, 1993
Page 4
Thank you for consIdenng our comments
Sincerely,
~~~
Paula Ehlers, Seruar Planner
37:lgd
cc Thurston County Board of COmmISSIOners
Tom FitzsImmons, CAO
CIty of Yelm Planning COmmISSIOn
City of Yelm City Council
,<,~;.:~;~~;~~\::,~J';1\7:,~"", .;~t~rr;~~ c ~~:-~ 'j~ (~'~'~",-:;, ,-.-:",- -,~,,-,-,..,-,
!~.~.,. ;:;:.:';,i"t. or.
'Ti:\ :~';i~~~c:~~~a~~o;r , 0
Kt:NNETli MARTIN
DON MARQ!.Jl(;
BETli WmCLt:(;WORTli
NATE TURNED
"~l.r;,
o
BOB D COLPUf:NU
~upcrinlc:ndc:nl
RAMONA CAQNW
Adminialrativc: &crdary
Telephone '206-446-'2'207
January 4, 1992
Planning Commission
City of Yelm
POBox 479
Yelm, WA 98597
RE. Southwest Yelm Annexation
Dear Members of the Planning Commission
As you are aware, a portion of the Southwest Yelm Annexation Site is located within the boundaries of
the Rainier School District No 307 Due to that fact and the fact that any development near the Rainier
School District will impact the District, on behalf of the Rainier School District, I wish to communicate to
you concerns about the proposed annexation
First, I believe the Planning Commission must give serious consideration to RCW 28A.315,250, the statute
which addresses municipal and school district boundaries. Although that statute would not win an award
for clarity, it does establish the basic legislative mandate that each incorporated city or town is to be
comprised in a single school district. The exceptions to that mandate that are stated in the statute are
not applicable to the annexation under your consideration. Hence, the annexation under consideration
may well not be legally possible without invoking the jurisdiction of the State Board of Education as
described in RCW Chapter 28A.315.
Secondly, the Rainier School District requests the City of Yelm to immediately and specifically declare if
their intent is to change the property in question to the Yelm School District. The Environmental Impact
Statement may suggest this to be the intent.
If the jurisdiction of the State Board of Education is properly sought, I anticipate that the Rainier School
District would find it in its best interest to advocate that the property subject to the proposed annexation
remain in the Rainier School District. The potential concurrent jurisdiction of the State Board of
Education and other municipalities will make the issues surrounding the proposed annexation even more
complicated. That brings me to another concern of the Rainier School District.
-
We believe that a number of the issues related to the proposed annexation could have been more refined
or eliminated had planning authorities been more cognizant of-the fact that the Rainier School District
would be significantly impacted by the proposed annexation The mitigating measures cited in the Draft
Environment Impact Statement are illusory if they are not impacted. The stated mitigating measures
were generated With little, if any, direct diSCUSSion With representatives of the Rainier School District.
~
/"
/' .
,-- ~.~'~.'r-'~'-'~-;-;---:,
'J~;;:'.~"~'~'~~ .,
;f: '!.;
o
o
The Rainier School District had made request of the City Manager of Yelm to be fully informed of all
progress related to the annexation.
Further, the district requests that consultants to the city and/or agents of the developers of the
property, keep the district fully informed of all their actions and recommendations related.to the
annexation.
Please be on notice that the Rainier School District No 307 is very concerned about the impact on it of
the proposed Southwest Yelm Annexation. The District seeks your assurance that its interests will be
conscientiously considered and protected as the proposed annexation is further considered. State law
provides a very deliberate process when changes in school district boundaries are being considered, The
legislature has recognized the need for such deliberative processes. City Planners must be equally
deliberative and conscientious when their actions involve the potential need for changes in school district
boundaries.
I trust that the City of Yelm's Planning Commission recognizes that the interests of the Rainier School
District must be taken into serious consideration if any phase of the proposed annexation is to go
forward, At this point, the exact interests of the District are difficult to determine because changes in
school district boundaries have yet to be formally advocated. Once the intentions of the advocates are
known regarding changes in school boundaries, the interests of the Rainier School District will be better
subject to identification.
Very truly yours,
~~I
./., W~
. D Golphen e .
Superintendent
BDG:lm
cc' Attorney Craig Hanson
.'
I... ~'" -
~ ;! ; ~
:t.
;.
,}~j1'~~~~,~~~
".,'" .,'_.'. '~~~""~\..'~f)f.i ;;~, "
,~~[A;,:,:;g,1f~il.Ilt~~iJ.l.i>~;'.l"; :.'
~t~;,:'~~,:~i~~~~j~:~?~;:::"""!"(J .. ....
j KENNE'TlI lfART' .
; KENNE'TlIMAQ'I'lN"
DON MARQ!JI~
BE'Tlf WIGL~WORTlI
NATE TURNER
o
BOB 0 GOLPlIENEE
~upc:rinlendenl
~
015ttlrt
'~:'::~;~n:~;;p,,~...:.r .
<'p 0 Box9S-
Rainier W A 98576
RAMONA GARNER
Administrative &crclary
Telephone 206-446-2'207
r
,~ f2 0 :-::::J ~ ~ - --~ -
~ ;-\ \ ,~ ~ "-- ;:....--:- ~; , : r:.....4 ~
~ i} ':"-::~~'J::':::'~'~'_:- !.... -- ~_'. ~.:'; j"'\ \
{ L...~ ~
JAN I 4 19S9
...............~
j; I
'L:::J
,........ ,-
,I J
January 13, 1993
- .
Planning Commission
City of Yelm
POBox 479
Yelm, WA 98597
RE. Southwest Yelm Annexation
Dear Members of the Planning Commission
On behalf of the Rainier School District I attended the January 4, 1993 public hearing regarding the
preliminary Environmental Impact Statement for the potential annexation Attached is a copy of the
prepared statement read at the hearing. Our attendance and comments were brought forth because
Section 27 of the potential annexation lies within the boundaries of the Rainier School District.
For the record we present these further remarks
1 Rainier School District, to date, has not been contacted by the property developers regarding
district interests. The property developers have contacted the Yelm School District officials
regarding the property within the Rainier School District property The Yelm School District
officials have been very forthright in communications with Rainier School District officials and it
is appreciated.
2. The E!S developers requested a written ccrrespondence prior to the EIS Rough Draft. The EIS
does not reflect Rainier School District interests as expressed in the correspondence
3. During the January 4, 1993 meeting a representative of the property developers commented
that it appeared to be "an accidenf that Section 27 was not originally in the Yelm School
District. We suggest this is speculation and likely a history of development of district lines may
suggest otherwise. Further, the comment may suggest the developers desire for a school district
changeof the property
4 A minimum of fifteen (15) acres must be set aside in Section 27 as a future elementary schodl
- site Future potential growth would require an elementary school and this would be an ideal
neighborhood school.
/.---'
! . ' .. - .
"
. .
. .l-"':~~' ~_::"~.':r''.' .7'; ..,,~- .,- -:--.-~-....., -'<;::.--0.-'
. '"\\\:' . ,
~.
!
I
t
r
i
r
t
~
~
,
o
o
It is not the Rainier School Districts interest to support or oppose the annexation of the property by the
City of Yelm. However, it is our paramount interest to support the interests of the Rainier School
District. This interest includes involvement and protection for all properties within itS legal boundaries.
On behalf of the Board of_ Directors these comments are given by
rv~~
, Superintendent
BDG:lm
attach
cc Craig Hanson, Attorney
t
~
~
.
~
~
~
i
~
f
~
~
r
~
L
."':
,,,.' ;;.;It'i1.~,,\,,
"
~
~
~
I ,~ ~
'.. ""i";;';~l~~'ili;};'~'fjl
----.., - . ".~.' -. ,[c',-" '.iir. - ~H'1';. ~ig ""\'~ I
i: Ji';;.'-~~;):i~.~1~':~~~"'!~&!f\~h~.}..~: ~{~ ~
'~nrlllllll"JIII///////// 0
Intercity T ran
.
S / t
January 15, 1993
526 S. Pattison Street, Post Office Box 659
Olympia, Washington 98507-0659
(206) 786-8585
Todd Stamm
Director of Community Development
City of Yelm
POBox 479
Yelm, W A 98597
Dear~~~
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Southwest Yelm AnnexatIon Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)
We appreciate that public transportation has been mentioned throughout the DEIS and
that the transportation sectIon identIfies pedestrIan-oriented features and transit as
mitigation options We hope that these mItIgations WIll be Implemented regardless of
which alternative is ultimately settled upon.
We judged the alternatIves on the followmg criteria.
. pedestrian-friendly onentation,
. connectivIty of roads/ operational feasibIlity;
. residential density; and
. mixed-use development.
AlternatIve 3, the compact scenano, IS the most attractIve alternatIve to Interaty
TranSIt. This alternative, as conceptually designed appears to be the most pedestrian- '
friendly The bulk of the residences will be within 1/4 mile of the major corridor and
the commercial areas, increasing the likelihood that people will walk or bike to the
commercial areas and will access transit for travel either within or out of the
developments. Alternative 3 also provides the most efficient through access for transit
vehicles. Service to this area would likely involve vehicles running northeast on 507
and up through the annexation area's main corridor, then out of the northeast section
into the City
The reSIdential density within this scenarlO also makes It more lIkely to support
effective transit service than the other alternatives. While It does mclude lImited
mixed-use development, our hope is that this can be mcreased, to provide more on-SIte
employment opportunities.
flJ
.._n _/_."_".",_
/ "
/'~
/'
n ":_;";:-'_~"'''''''"''':'_ -- ~.- -;-
O:-O-'~ ;;:-;-:~ ----;--~ --
:"
~, (~~J~~f~f~1~1l:
'i~-, I'. .~~},
o
o
.
i',
,~
.,,:
January 15, 1993
Page 2
Our observations and comments regarding the other alternatives are listed below:
Alternative 1 (No Action) - If development is to occur in this area, LT. prefers a higher
level of density than the one dwelling unit per five acres which development under this
scenario would allow
Alternative 2 (Proponents Scenario) - This alternative is less attractive for several
reasons. Much of the housing will be located over 1/4 mile from the corridor
Generally speaking, people will not walk further than 1/4 mile to access bus service.
Operationally, this scenario poses problems for transit because of the looping roads,
potential dead-end streets, and other barriers to road connectivity It should be noted
that this type of development is inconsistent with the Connectivity Policy called out in
the 1992 Yelm Comprehensive Transportation Plan.
Alternative 4 (Village Scenario) - While InterCIty TranSIt does promote nuxed-use
development, we have the same concerns with thIS alternative as listed in Alternative 2.
While this alternative offers more mixed-use development, it also lowers the residential
densities. It should be possible to maintain higher densities in some areas of the
development. It would also be helpful to know what levels of employment density are
antiCIpated with this alternative.
Thank you again for the opportunity to prOVIde input. Please keep us apprised of the
progress of this proposal. If the annexahon takes place, we would be very interested in
parhcipating in future parcel- or project-speCIfic planrung efforts
Sincerely,
Clanw /:) I .fktv~
;I;.e D Haveri
Planner /Policy Analyst
copy' Rand Riness, Director of Planning
R
,
I
I
I
,~ I
'~~/;-}i.,;:>'~:~Jf\t,'k '.:',.~; " ~ii 'I.
,,"..~~,,~ \-.. -"'-L "~""j' <'I....... '......._J. .;-
iC'_'Cii~Et~1;~'~:,:~\)~~;~~g~~~f.::t!#~~
',,t.,, '. "'~",>i~i,~~~;J~i~i:i~~:';i:9.i)~;:i.~i;)
~'~:~_;'~;j~f~4t~~~~~~f~';~~H,.ii~~:€~rL~;;r'~ 1
-
o
January 15, 1993 ;\:.1 2. 0 \993 ';\ I
\\ 'o! Jf\N \\~\ i \
! I I I.... I
" .-l \
\\\\~~ ~
Mr. Todd Stamm, Director of Coni~ ent
City of Yelm
P O. Box 479
Yelm, Washmgton 98597
OSHAPIRO&
ASScrLIATES~
Washington Mutual Tower
Suite 1700
1201 Third Avenue
Seattle
Washington 98101
Tel. 206/624 . 9190
Fax; 206/624 . 1901
Re: Southwest Yelm Annexanon Draft EIS
Dear Mr. Stamm:
ShapIro and Associates, Inc. represents Venture Partners, one of the two largest ownerships
WlthIn the annexanon area. The Draft EIS is a comprehensive and well-wntten document covering
a non-project proposal. We support the proposed annexanon and appreCJ.ate the opportumty to
comment on the City's Draft EIS The folloWlng are clanfications and questions we have
concerning the Draft.
1) It should be noted that neIther the No Acnon Alternanve, the Compact Scenano nor the Village
Scenario meets Venture Partners' objecnves. The ownerslup's objecnves are predIcated on
market demand and are to develop a IDlX of smgle-family and mulnple-family resIdences Wlth a
neIghborhood commercIal center designed to serve the project's resIdents.
2) We SerIously doubt there IS a market for the 110 acres of commerc13.l and office uses
represented in the Village Scenano. Tlus scenano raISes the following questions: What IS the
future land demand for profeSSIOnal seI'Vlce and government office uses, gIven the projected
populanon mcreases? Will there be a demand for approxunately 40 acres retail and 70 acres of
professional service and government uses m Yelm? If there IS a demand, would it not be most
appropriate to consolidate those uses near the lnghway to help support eXlSting downtown
commercIal uses and reduce automobile dependent tnps.
3) We quesnon the conclUSIOn on page 36 that the Village Scenano would mtroduce lower
quantines of pollutants mto the groundwater compared to the proposal The Village Scenano
would have higher traffic levels associated with 70 additional acres of professional service and
government office uses and m turn would cause lngher groundwater pollunon levels than
would be expected by the proposal.
4) In response to Natural Resource Lands rmtigaong measures, Henry Dragt has receIved
complaints from nearby property owners about the smell from his darry Further, potential
pollution from the farm and its impacts on groundwater quality decreases the farm's
desrrability Tlus is a common phenomenon and underscores the transmonal nature of a darry
m close proX11D.1ty to urban uses.
5) We do not understand how the Village Scenario concept would generate only 130 more peak-
hour trIps than the proposal when It would mcorporate three times as much commercial and
office-designated land and only ten percent fewer residences.
6) The Draft EIS generally describes the Village Scenario as potentially having the same or less
impacts on public services than would occur under the proposal. Although the Village
Scenano would have approxunately ten percent fewer residences, resultmg m slightly fewer
impacts on schools, we would expect that if the commercial and office land were built out, this
scenario would place a greater demand on police and fire servIces. We would also expect that
the employees on 70 more acres of professional ServIce and office developed land under the
~.1!lh - _._.....--=-~"
. ' .
.: f',,, ~ .~ -r ., t~ ~ ," :: ~ '.. ~ .. jJ " \. , 't' , I' . ' . , '.. >. -;
--
-~""""T'."r<",,,
~. ".
'"
o
o
Village Scenario would reqUIre as much recreatlonal opportunity as the occupants of the 500
more residences that might be developed under the proposal.
7) The fiscal unpact analysIs mcludes the impacts of infrastructure unprovements m terms of
costs. These improvements would be paid for by the developer and do not represent costs to
the pubhc. In addinon, revenue from pernnt fees and utility taxes would help offset service
costs.
AgaIn, we appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Draft EIS and welcome any quesnons or
clanficatlons you may have.
Sincerely,
S~IRO qClATES. me.
~
SHAPIRO &
~
,.1
.~i- ,
1~?;~~.'.." .~;S~~j;t41t
'''0'';'
"
o
Ii i'::'\.D f25 tC::,@n'\\f1 r:s F;1~.1
Il'lU5 ~ ~.= '- ,I ,= r I
I t\(! JAN I 5 I9!B -111111
IJ~I 1101
Mary Lou Clemens
15030 LongTfl..ire St. SE
Yelm, WA 98597
January 13 i 1993
Yelm Plawil.J.g Comn'lission
RE. Sot1thiy"e3t Yelm Annexation Proposal
Dear Plalll1il.1g Comm.ission.
I have concent:5 :regarding tjlt: Im.paJ:t StalEment's section on Police Protection for tjJ.e
propo:ged ~rll'Le:~e1 ~rea. If it no" requires fhre \~ t.ricles ~.nd. fi"~ oj. offiJ:e~ to provide pro\ec1ion for
7 '-10 acres and 1365 people, I fail to understand Jlo"T,r "riTe could expect one more vehicle ~nd triTO more
officers to e.deq118.tely prol.ride protection for 2740 acres art.d 13,865 people (13000 1J.nits 1. 2 5 persOD2
per 1mit + exi3ting population) I .realize the population increase would not OCCllI im..rJlt'diately i out
certainly tJ-re geog~phic 8...-rea ~101.1ld increase irrill1ediatelv 11pon aIlrl.exa1ion, tJ!ereby ca1lSing t,h.e
apparent need for an incre~e of more than one police car 10 !la,troI almexed :m~
T~.l)le 19 - Esti.ifl..ated P'"b1ic Sel'l,7i..ce Costs, page ,126, d.oes not ~,dequa~ly MdrezZ! t.hi<l eirjl...er
'TI'.e Cost. by Population table uses a 10 4% increase figure, -:o:;rJcll may accurar.ely refl..ect the Yelm.
,I:...rea. CaptlJ.:.re rate of tjLe C01mty projec1iort. HO'l;"el,rer, does ii accurately re!1ect tjl.e ~.ctll~l increase
within the Yelm City Limits? In 1994 ~lone, 247 ne" housing lrnit3 will s1lpposedly be built and
"i.rith m al,l'erage occ'lpa.ncy of 2 5 persons/mdt, tJl:i3 ~,701Jld. result L'l'l. an ID.cre8.3e of ayproxw.f.I,tely 617
people This figure represent3 a 54% increase in population. If the cost ft;ure:3 are computed on a
COST per person basis then the projected doll8r ~.Tfl.oun13 futed ~re z1..\bstan.1ially inadeqUAte
I ~k you 10 ple~e give further consideration to the impact this annexation would have on the
safety of Yelm residents and. to be S1JIe that acCUIate plannirLg in rJli:3 area is addressed, I belielTe the
3aJIle conzideration needs to be given to the pla.nni.ng for Fire Protection also
Th~.k :;'~'l for )lIJ1Jr attenlicm.
4':;' ~ ~
IYIarj Lou Clemem
;J;
~0;:
r~~:
~~
j-'~'~,~~;. ~:-
-'l;~.
~
.;4,t;'.~;~,,.... . .". 'l'l\ \..( :...;:~,~ \ ..... l' ~" '. " ~. _ ' . ,.';. 1',' .' .:: ......,~. '< : . .' ~ ;~,.. .. ~., ....~.
"~~~~~~~f~;4 ...
. ,~i'" i)...,1.t.~ ~".1.....J
~1;'~;~:~~~;~Niitioiia I
O;:,.{L -:;
.. '\' I.V
....----
',.... :-.~G.~
.' 11>.,
. ~~.;7:r-;~-.J-;:.-.~
...... ., -./ l
D!.:f' ~ '-.
.J ;; I /992
Food
r-~
\.....-1
Corporation
:".t.i~:: ~....
::~ .r.,i
-<.....'#.,.
. '\
\
,
206.546-6533 and 523-4900
Fax 206 - 542-0202
'\
\
PO Box 33745
16740 Aurora Avenue North
Seattle, Washmgton 98133
-'-,~
December 17, 1992
Yelm Planning Commission
P.O. Box 479
Yelm, WA 98597
Re: Southwest Yelm Annexation
Ladies & Gentlemen:
We have received your Not ice of Public Hearing regarding the
proposed annexation of 2,000 acres Southwest of the city and wish
to offer our written comment and opposition to the proposal.
This company operates a 300,000 bird egg layer farm which has
existed for nearly 30 years on approxiate1y.250 acres in Section
35, immediately south of the proposed annexat ion area. The proposed
annexation would convert substantial agricultural and timber land
to urban uses. Even though our property is not proposed to be
included, we would be severely impacted. It would not be realistic
to assume that we could continue our agricultural activity while
bordering an area of dense residential and commercial activity.
Agricultural activity such as ours is not compatible with such uses
being nearby. Furthermore, our operations require that significant
acreage of cropland or pasture land be available in close proximity
for utilization of chicken manure as fertilizer. This is becoming
increasingly important as government regulations are beginning to
impose specific requirements of available acreage for manure
utilization. Other agricultural operations in the immediate area
have similar requirements for available land.
Many people believe they can expand a city and engulf or border
farms, so long as they do not require them to discontinue
operations. Often times, the belief carries with it a good feeling
about preserving a rural environment. However, in this regard, a
dist inct ion must be made between n open spaces n and product i ve
farms. The farms which feed this country must be allowed to
operate in a true agricultural environment. The proposed
annexation cannot insure such continued operation.
Sincerely yours,
NATIONAL FOOD CORPORATION
~ ~
I/-
Br an V. Bookey,
President
:. ,'n:
........ ~j ....-;....
.1.,.;:".01 v..!" ?!~,f'r~'
....\.
.; ...t :..:;:.
.~'~.~ '~~
l'\.'~
CQUllcll Mcmb~r9h;p'
I'lcm: C\rnIlly
'Thurston County
!..eM& County
Sl.:1lc of Wu:shinglon:
Park3 and RecreQtlon C01Jl-
mlf>lllon
Dept. ot Nalural Rc:;~
Dcp!. of Agrlculluro
J)npt. ot E~()logy
Dl!pt. of Flshcrie:;
Dept. ol Wildlite
S('Q'ctary of State
lJ W PaCK Expcrimclltul
FOTC$t
U,S, Army, Fort Lcwi:s
NiNqually Indian Tribe
Nih"quaIly National Wildlife
Rdugl!
Gifford Plnchot National
ForC9l
MllUlll Rainier Naliol1111 Park
Tacoma City Ught
Town of Yclm
Town of Ealollvillc
Clly of Roy
ClI1zcns Advj~y CommHlcc:
Three CltilGcn Members
......
:':"
!'L':"
?J~:~i:
"..,~.
,i 0
River Council
P.O. Box 1076
Yelm, Washington 98597
January 11, 1993
Todd Stamm
City Planner
City ofYelm
POBox 479
Yelm. WA 98597
Dear Mr. Stamm:
The Nisqually River Council respectfully requests that the
City ofYelm grant the Council a two-week extension for
comment on the Soutbwest Yelm Annexation DEIS from
January 15th until January 29th.
The Council has not determined whether or not i1. wishes
to comment, and will do so at its next me~Ung on January
15th. Given the current deadline. we would not be able to
offer meaningful.Gomment unless we receive an extension.
Please convey your response to our St.aff Coordinator. Steve
Craig. at 459-6780. TI1ank you for your attention.
Sincerely.
{)~O
Diane Oberquell
Chairman
DO:pcm
'i~~{l~t., .I.v,i;....f' \ ,- L';7~~L:~i?~.:1
l~ .i':~
ou
!':::
.,,"~~'
'"'.1.
(~:- :..
,The Olympian
\.;;..... ;i.., .J.
FRIDAY, January 1,1993
OUND
of whom plan large housing and commer-
cial developments that may more than tri-
ple the population ofYelm,
The Thurston Highlands Association is
the largest property owner, with 1,200
acres and plans for a 1,600-home planned
community
With development plans of other prop-
erty owners, the annexation could bring
between 4,800 and 5,000 homes and apart-
ments to Yelm within the next 20 years,
The 1991 population ofYelm was 1,365,
The draft environmental impact state-
ment includes maps of the area and names
.. ",'C;,.
':;.... ;;h\..1:
-~;";~~,:~~J;" ;~'J~- :"i--
~~'CiROWTH
~t'!g tllings seen ahead for tiny Yelm
.. _:~,:~;,~~l~\?:;~::-;:?~ _ -~.~_ ..
~!f By Lorrlne C. Thompson
;'i'f~lhe Olympian i:
r~n:~;~e..city ~f Yelm is a step closer to
~~flapPFOxi.mately doubling its SlZe, with a
';j;i~;i>roposed annexation of 2,000 acres south-
ti;}l;i~t,~:~~~.~wn. -
,'~tf;:?:;tA\draft 'enVironmental impact statement
on, the'proposal is complete, and available
, forpublicLreView and comment. The an-
. nexation Would take the Yelm city limits to
he'feastem edge of the Fort Lewis mili-
'~~servation.
s~~{(TIie',annexation was requested by prop-
~,~):~,~;'c~~ers within the 2,000 acres, some
~";'-:~_;-:;'~':;:_: i.~-i:"''f:.~-',: "0
of parcel owners, the "unavoidable adverse
impacts" of developing the area, and the
effects on public services and schools,
"Most of the wildlife and vegetation cur-
rently occupying undeveloped land would
be displaced or destroyed when develop-
ment occurs," according to the statement.
About one acre of wetlands will be filled in
during development, the statement said.
However "the exact nature of future de-
velopment within the proposed annexation
area is not fully known at this time," so the
impact statement addresses specifically
the annexation itself, and in general terms
the development proposals.
)
· Obituaries /2 l'. C
:'~f~~~J:~j~~ 2'j':"::~' J " i;~'
.... I.\-.
o
Acting City Editor:
Jeff Smith /754-5423
',.~.
Public hearing 0
The Yelm Planning Commission will have
a public hearing Monday at 7 p;m, to hear -
comments about the proposed annexation
of 2,000 acres, The hearing will take place
at Yelm City Hall, 105 Yelm Ave, W
. Comments will also be taken in writing
until Jan, 15, People can mail comments to
the Yelm Planning Commission, POBox
479, Yelm, WA 98597
1'.;-
o
o
December 31, 1992
Mayor Robert Sanders
Yelm City Hall
P.O Box 479
Yelm, W A. 98597
Dear Mayor Sanders and Yelm City Council Members,
Yelm's Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS) for its
sewerage plans has been the subj ect of much concern among agencies
and individuals during this past month. I shared many of my own
concerns in a letter I sent to your staff during the public comment period
ending December 16 A copy of this letter is attached for your review
The MDNS contains language that would concern any careful reviewer
who has followed Yelm's plans since the first public documents were
released Page 11, in particular, describes sewer outfalls to the power
canal of 1 3 million gallons per day (mgd) and to the Nisqually River itself
of 1 0 mgd. These are much larger than those described in the earlier
documents referenced in this MDNS (ie , the 1990 E.A. and Yelm
Wastewater Collection and Treatment Plan.) Also, what these earlier
documents called a "top" flow of 3 mgd is now called an "average" flow.
Of further concern, there is no language in the MDNS which designates
the river as a 'backup' or 'emergency' outfall, but there is language which
suggests that "the facillity may require expansion in the future . ." My
concern here is that the river not become the vehicle for such expansion;
this month's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Southwest
Y elm Annexation clearly shows on pgs 114-116 that the power canal will
not fully accomodate the increased flows from the level of population
growth now contemplated.
I'm also concerned that the double lagoon system, which the EPA rated
"marginally acceptable" to treat a 3mgd flow, not be relied on to handle
"incremental" additional flows, as described in the annexation DEIS This
treatment system is at its least effective when the sewerage flows are the
largest - during the holiday season. Cold temperatures shut down the
biological treatment activity in the lagoons at the same time that the flow
from families staying at home during the holidays is the greatest. True
"secondary" treatment removes 85% of pollutants, but a removal rate of
65% would be the highest likely to be achieved under winter conditions.
Another concern is that the Nisqually outfall is planned for a stretch of
riverfront that is 1) listed by the county as "conservancy," 2) considered
by steelheaders as one of the top two stretches on the river, and 3)
directly across from the River Council's planned Interpretive Center
j
f"',
lJ
,/"'-I.,
l)
Yelm City staff have agreed to sit down with those of us who are
concerned about this MDNS January 5th They appear willing to consider
alternatives to a direct discharge of sewer effluent to the Nisqually.
According to discussions this week that have been reported to me
through staff members of the Nisqually River Council and the Nisqually
Tribe, Yelm officials consider parts of the MDNS "poorly written," and
never intended to indicate a collection and treatment system any
different than that described in the earlier documents.
If Yelm does not intend to expand its EPA-approved plans at this point,
and if Yelm is interested in seriously considering alternatives to a direct
Nisqually discharge, then I need not appeal this MDNS. I trust, however,
that the council will carefully consider all the concerns that have been
expressed by myself and others, and make sure that their plans meet the
needs of Yelm residents, but not at the expense of their neighbors in the
basin.
Sincerely,
-cf?( ~
Ed Kenney,
Chair, Nisqually River Council Citizens Advisory Committee
o
o
City of YellD
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
206-458-3244
MEMORANDUM
December 18, 1992
To Yelm Planning Commission members
From. Todd stamm, City Planner
,15
Re: January, 1993, meet i ngs
A REMINDER: Instead of a work session the Planning
Commission will be holding a special meeting at 7:00 p m at
City Hall on Monday, January 4, to receive public comments
on the proposed Southwest Yelm Annexation
It is important that you attend this meeting since this will
be one of the most significant decisions the City has made
in some time Please contact me (or Agnes) if you will not
be able to attend
Also, the City Council has reappointed all of you for from
one to three more years You will be asked to draw lots at
the January 4th meeting to determine the length of your
sentence -- I mean, term of office
The following week, the Step Forward Task Force will be
hosting a public workshop at the High School Little Theatre
at 7:00 p m on Monday, January 11 to discuss the "Look of
Yelm' I think you will find the planned slide show to be
an interesting and useful exercise Please plan to attend
Finally, please note that due to Martin Luther King, Jr Day
the regular January meeting of the Commission has been
postponed until 4:00 pm, January 25
o
o
December 15. 1992
Todd Stamm, City Planner
P.O. Box 479
Yelm, Washington 98576
Dear Todd,
I'm glad to have the opportunity to comment on the City of Yelm's
Wastewater Collection and Treatment System plans. I attended three of
the four public hearings and have folowed the plans as they have changed
over the years The only time I've missed an opportunity to comment
was the time Yelm neglected to send me its Environmental Assessment,
even though I was on several lists of people requesting it. I'm sure there
will be many more people in that same boat this time, who would like to
comment on your plans. but won't be able to because you have decided
not to send this MDNS to them or to those 400+ other interested
people on earlier lists Could you extend your comment period another
month to give you time to mail out extra copies?
I have a number of other concerns to share with you about Yelm's MDNS
* My five major concerns are and have been all along
1 That the system is sized to its grant-funded purpose cleaning up
the groundwater contamination in the existing Yelm city limits.
2 That the Nisqually River not have a direct effluent discharge.
3 That 'advanced' sewage treatment is used.
4 That an ongoing public education program be developed, and
5 That tough industrial pretreatment ordinances be adopted
* The MDNS is not very specific. which makes it difficult to compare the
documents referenced in the MDNS and the accompanying public notice
* This is not the same system referenced in the 1990 EA and FONSI
Instead of being built to "a final design capacity of 0290 mgd." the MDNS
describes a system built to a design capacity of 1 0 mgd or even 2 0 mgd
There is not enough information in the scanty MDNS to really determine
the "final design capacity" The clearest indication the reader gets is page
II's statement - "The peak flow may be as high as 1 0 mgd These flow
estimates are based on the initial capacity of the wastewater treatment
facility. The facility may require exoansion in the future. however, to
accomodate increased service population" The EPA officials should be
made clearly aware of this, and their comments attached to this plan,
indicating whether it will require another NEPA determination
* Gene Borges, Yelm sewer manager. has told me on numerous occasions
that the Yelm sewer system would be "capped" at a size of .29 mgd
Apparently, either the new plans need a new EPA review, or he was
misleading me Has a new "cap" been identified?
o
o
* Gene Borges, Yelm sewer manager, has told me on numerous occasions that
the Yelm sewer system would be "capped" at a size of .29 mgd. Apparently,
either the new plans need a new EPA review, or he was misleading me. Has a
new "cap" been identified?
* Yelm needs to put more detail into its sewer outfall design size The MDNS
does not specify any primary or secondary outfall, so the public must assume
that the twin 1.0 mgd outfalls indicated are designed to accomodate high
growth. Using the 1990 Yelm Wastewater Facilities Plan assumption of 100
gallons a day flow from each resident, that would put a city boundaries target
population at 20,000, whereas the earlier plan was sized at 1,400 That's
quite a change in plan
* If Yelm is still considering the Nisqually river as a "backup" outfall under its
agreement with Centralia City Light for those times when the power canal is
being worked on, then that should be specified Clear language needs to
delineate exactly those times when the Nisqually would need to be used
* Better yet, the Nisqually outfall plan should be abandoned Centralia
does not often shut down its canal for repairs or emergencies, so the
backup outfall into a river of "statewide significance" is hard to justify
The shutdown this summer was the first one in years I realize that Yelm
worries about using sewage effluent for irrigation or landfanning, just as
many of us outside Yelm worry about using that same effluent in the river,
but surely some irrigation plan or temporary lagoon detention plan is
feasible Notice what other agencies and people have to say'
1 Steve Wert, who did the goundwater studies for the 1990 Yelm
Wastewater Facilities Plan, writes on page 4-15 "Should the flow of the
canal be shut off temporarily, the effluent could be spray irrigated close to
the treatment facility"
2 Norman Shenck, writing in the same document for DOE, points out
"We would like to suggest, based on the information submitted, that the
discharge be limited to one point ie , the power canal, as originally proposed"
3 The County Shoreline Master Plan does not allow sewage outfalls into
either "Conservancy" or "Natural Environments", only into "Urban and Rural"
or "Suburban Environments"
4 RCW 90 58.020 indicates that sewage outfalls are not among the top
priorities for use of "Shorelines of Statewide Significance"
* Tom Connor, under a grant with the Nisqually Tribe, has monitored the
Nisqually mainstem over the past several years and found it to merit an
upgrade in status from 'A' to 'M." Water sampling results show the Nisqually
to be equal or better than other 'M" rivers in our state Others have requested
that it be designated 'M' in previous years and 1993 is the year when the
designation process for the river would start. The Delta Project, a diverse
group of citizens funded by a quarter million Bullitt foundation grant, is also
requesting a redesignation The MDNS shows a system that would interfere
o
o
. ..
with the redesignation process for this outstanding river.
* The MDNS does not show a plan which is in agreement with the goals of the
Nisqually River Council's "Nisqually River Management Plan." Since snow
cancelled Yelm's appearance before a subcommittee of that group last week,
and since full council will not meet until after the public comment period,
Yelm needs to allow more time for the Council to hear, review, and advise on
the specifics of the MDNS.
* The 5% cap on industrial flows identified in the earlier documents is not
evident in the MDNS. Isn't this an EPA requirement? Is there a new industrial
flow limit? Is there a draft available on an industrial pretreatment ordinance?
Yelm already hosts some of the largest pollutant-generating companies in
Thurston County.
* Most of the analysis, figures, schematics, predicted impacts, and technical
discussion in the 1990 Wastewater Facilities Plan are based on a system with a
top flow of .3 mgd. Have these been redone? Are the studies available?
* The population projections in both the Wastewater Facilities Plan and E. A.
"indicate the local population will grow slowly during the next 25 years" to a
"design population of 2,750 by the year 2010" Clearly, Yelm officials have
known these figures to be inaccurate for some time and are planning for
growth of much larger dimensions. Please specify Yelm's recent projections.
In conclusion, much more time needs to br given to a thorough analysis of the
environmental impacts of Yelm's Wastewater Treatment and Collection
System. Key studies and analyses are either not adressed, not available, or not
in agreement. I recommend that Yelm extend the public comment period for
its MDNS and then begin work on a full Environmental Impact Statement to
address the many unanswered questions about this important project.
Sincerely,
Ed Kenney
DID YOUR
THIS NOTICE?
PLEASE~~ASS THE WORD ALONG
U
City of Yel:m
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
206-458-3244
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SOUTHWEST YELM ANNEXATION
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AVAILABLE
The Y~lm Planning Commission will hold a special meeting and a
public hearing at 7.00 p m on Monday, January 4, 1993 to receive
comments on a proposal to annex approximately two thousand
(2 000) acres lying southwest of the Clty between State Highway
507 and Highway 510 See the accompanYlng map for a description
of the area to be annexed Annexation of this area would enable
urban development of the area over the next twenty years
includlng 5,000 or more housing units and supporting commercial
lands
A draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) has been prepared
for this proposal and may be reviewed during regular hours at
Yelm City Hall and the Yelm Timberland Library Copies of the
DEIS and accompanying technical appendices may be purchased at
Yelm City Hall Additional information may be obtained by
contacting Todd Stamm, City Planner, at Y~lm City Hall, (206)
458-8408 Comments regarding the proposal and the DEIS will be
accepted at the public hearing
The hearing will be held at Yelm City Hall 105 Yelm Avenue W ,
Yelm, Washington All interested parties are invlted to attend
Written comments should be directed to the Yelm Planning
Commission and may be mailed to POBox 479, Yelm, WA 98597 or
delivered to City Hall Written comments must be received prior
to 5 00 pm, Friday January 15, 1993, to be considered by the
Commission The Commission's decision will be in the form of a
recommendation to the City Council, which will also be holding a
public hearing
DEIS Issued
December 14, 1992
, {VI
/ - CJt.y ;-I/-J//", V
/ .- J.j/:J ~/1il!'1 (~
-"rsJ~-~ / - 6. ~c-eG.t? ,<,)
~ ,- / - iJd/Ul't V/J I ~j)
I - p~sc ~ff-NLf ~
DEIS Issued
r~S;z;.
Todd Stamm
City Planner
By'
-------------------------------------
DO NOT PUBLISH BELOW THIS LINE
Published. Nisqual'y Valley News, Thursdax,December 17/24, 1992
Posted in Three Places and at Site: !dP/IlR/tl&" 199~. ~h
Mai led to property owners within 300 feet ~~/ if tJjg@f 1992
Ma i led or hand-de livered to agenc i es' IJj_ /. LJ. ~ 1992
,
SUO!l:l8S pue ^l~\dOl
6C~g Hg 19o~)
alhlJoq')UVJallleos
f\
NOIJ.'v'X3NN'v' V'Jl3~,,-ls3MHJ.nos
trOl96 VM "JllleoS aml3^V pU(: SOL t1!Pllnn a oH 01 (.
'JUI 'SalepOSSV >g adJ04J. "Mol:)
_ ..<: i
,~:
I I
I
\ ()
/ /7 J}
\.-U,~ ..;.~,-/../
r-,
f ('oJ
/ ( /
/ L"V I
( J,
@ , ) ---.J ~~!,
,/ (a / '-1 --,L
, J ~ I )
" () {J ~..~ ('- ~l/~> ~;~
) :-> t .../~J ) J /
..--" " I /
.. ;' I, - ( d , J /. ~ ~c." '--..... .r~' \
,0111,\ --------'----'---..__o'f,., j (~--.....
" _-_-'.J \ ' , \
; ~~;::-::::::/c~~-'- \\ 1(.,' I
1 r..-' J, ' -, \ u\ I,[
1/- / ,/ \ f )
/ ___/ ...;,"::-, C -- .............) I ,./'---
lV ,- (;,"", / - \ "'/' ;
.-'1 "I ) '- --0'" __ / J ..
. \ r, \, \ ~
1 '.:, '--, ~~ """? C_ "
1 \.~ -) "\ '\ J I
r-""'" I / , J /') \ I
I '~ \ \ \~)~'J /-~ ~/ / \../~ I
)r-I~"\,T"ZcF'Y~~ ('))(( r I
( \ I \' '-J \:'-' I \ ~ " I " \ (- I
\ c-'* ~,')\.\ '.-',----111 I \. \, \ " (/ ('\
"........ I \ ;-\,\\....\"-~\ ....'-... '\ "\ - ,'\ ""
l!'- I \... \.jJB)C0::-............._) '\ .J I i /;: ,..J /~~
~I!",'!"!~I"'I_1 0.1 ) ~ -----r;---- II 11<'X7~'
v Ll I, n / / ...... ,--.. ......\ (<:D\ ! /r'\...~~
!~ _/ ~~IJ/-~_ (-- / ) I ((I'\~~ l> (f \ I,-~~ ~\
! :; f\:r ,.);\,~ ( ......, J\\)\f~,\\~ (..-.J~~;:=-/~ J)
, \ \... \ (.....) / \ ..... ~ \.. /~ ~ \ '...:..........
! <-... I,_/,))~~~/ \ \\~'l.,(~~\\\\ )) '::"i~,,-
I '-../ ,J1, '\. \~\.../ C... \ (::--:~1h() \\\1\\ I;\! ';",,>
........ ) / __ _ ~~./ / \ \ \ \ ) t'./ ) \.
4" . ~-.... \./- r;~--- //'-'j ;1 \\...(----~
1 '-) ,0' ('--... ...... (fIr (r"C........ )1 '-D'7f/~ I I,J r~
,/ '- \. ) C' \ '-. l~-..J ,f/.-'" --
I' .'t) ,"'J (: \........., .)~\ \..._::::;\\~ ~"".<~ ( I I ,'f(~~, ~
", ,..-.. -'1'''- /:\~, r- I \,,-:::::: ~ \.../// \ ) ,')(...
....... . . \ l t::::: I '- ) \\ ----
........... '\ r-'.I::;\. ..... \...'-:-... \ ;:,..c::..- //,0'/\....
.........,.........) "\' )) / /)))\}1 v/{'25'-- /./4(Jt..J I.. /) u
...........::-::---< 'v:\-./ I I \~~-7' ,0 ~~-/.;::.>:~~/' /r" _ / E
....,...... ... (\./~ ).J () I ( (-::::.......~ (~-::::'"\ (~~o"'- uf
...... )......... (,- r:--' r;; ~ (./ \..../ ( (jj
..... / / '--\ ~. A J \V}/ q I - C' <1>
I /, ,~rl ~ ,t,... ~ J \ J I \ I' \ c:
u/f I..).........J (./f~rJ).-! \ .))/0\-, 'a,
/'/1 ~ .....){ (/J Jr;, {J /,yi/- ~\ tD
(( ) ~'--... ":(:::\./) G \0 ..... c\. (r/};/-= ,)(\\ 0>
\) I \\ '\ ~/' -.::.;:-"" ~ ..J ~ (( \..1.'(-.....) ~
'-,.......~( ,'-.... 1'-0 (- ~\ 10.\... .J (,j? :i
J)/ ~~-)c3, )~.... l \...J\\)) \ ~t ~l ~
/./ 1 '-"--\~--..j I ()L-- '\... ........ I /( ( I) 8
/ /- /~..... ......'\...........) )) \'<'.......... .---, \... I \ --;..
\ l \ ~~"\ \. ~ .... --, (r....' ........ I ')
u"'..J J '\ () 0..... ('J I r;\ \L-...::::i\. r v.\
/~, / '-0 \~) . \ J...."\ A ') \ -
--, --' ~/..!'\\ /\ )/:t- J (,..- rJ l:::J....l
, /-;.-"'- 'I. /r -.J ...... ( \v, '-
(If '"7 '\ \. ''\ \ C ,~..J / ~/~-,~
I ~ ~)\\, .J (, ,\ fr ;,. ...::::: ........
\..\-?1'~ \\~'\~):::::~~~ \-. ~-.....::::-:::::-
.J '-:;-""1.... \. ~=~....:...... \ 3, -.., 0;
.-:-" ? I }(~\ 'r-...... r=' --,.., ./ U
/.,. - ---;; -....) 1\\\(,', ( (c:A...\ ~)I\\ :;
( ;1.<;;;n;;;-".,Bf~.- j \.... ~ ~ 1 c::- J ~
~
@
I't\i
. -- - ~-dd;j
";;:'1.~
~\:~;'I
;: [l' I
.. f '
-!f1 !
!
, i
I
"-,
1
1
rc;)\ 1 <(
~I~
<(
Iz
en oQ
i::i z ~!::i:
o OX
lB i= o..W
OJ 0 OZ
Ol tU a:Z
--1 en 0.. <(
c: '"
<1>0-
'" CO
~~
.c:en
[?(!J
caen
Cll:J
.:;'::=-..~~ --'
DID YOUR
THIS NOTICE?
PLEASE\SS THE WORD ALONG
,,~)
City of Yelm.
105 Yehn Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
206-458-3244
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SOUTHWEST YELM ANNEXATION
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AVAILABLE
The Yelm Planning Commission will hold a special meeting and a
publlC hearing at 7'00 p m on Monday January 4 1993 to receive
comments on a proposal to annex approximately two ~housand
(2,000) acres lying southwest of the Clty between State Highway
507 and Hlghway 510 See the accompanYlng map for a descrlption
of the area to be annexed Annexatlon of this area would enable
urban development of the area over the next twenty years
includlng 5.000 or more housing units and supporting commercial
lands
A draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) has been prepared
for this proposal and may be reviewed during regular hours at
Yelm City Hall and the Yelm Timberland Library Copies of the
DEIS and accompanying technical appendices may be purchased at
Yelm City Hall Additional informatlon may be obtained by
contacting Todd stamm, City Planner at Y~lm City Hall (206)
458-8408 Comments regarding the proposal and the DEIS will be
accepted at the public hearing
The hearing will be held at Yelm City Hall 105 Yelm Avenue W .
Yelm, Washington All interested partles are invited to attend
Written comments should be directed to the Yelm Planning
Commission and may be mailed to POBox 479, Yelm, WA 98597 or
delivered to City Hall Written comments must be received prior
to 5.00 p m Fr i day January 15, 1993, to be cons i dered by the
Commission The Commission's decision will be in the form of a
recommendation to the Clty Council, which will also oe holding a
public hearing
DEIS Issued' December 14, 1992
DEIS Issued By:
/" ~S7,. ~
Todd Stamm
City Planner
DO NOT PUBLISH BELOW THIS LINE
Published: Nisqually Valley News, Thursday', December 17/24, 1992
Posted in Three Places and at Site: i,df//w/Cla., 199. ~-I
Mailed to property owners within 300 feet' ;, - CJ ('@( 1992
Mai led or hand-del ivered to agencies. /.:' '2 g; 1992
suo!l:>as pue ^4deJ5odol
NOll'tfX3NI\J'tf V'J13^ lS3MHlnOS
6Cto H9 foot I
.aIlIO\/')UV'/.llle.S
l'<)196 VM'lImnS QI1t1Q^V puz ~OL lI\Pllnn 0 on 01 ~
'saleposs,\! ~ adJo4.L 'M-H
~ ..0: i
~~~:
,G.'" .
."~ ,
, ,
.. ,
) ()
/ /7 J J '
<.-If,\. -'~\.I../
-----, "
I ll'J
/ ~
/
(
@)
.:/ /;;>.J ._/ -I-
L I (~
~ ) ( ( r!'1 J ( c:
.)(, (c ,...-_ ('~ ",,/_J
. .....) ,,' '1,.......-____../ ) 1//
. I - . "" I J-' /. ~:::...... r ~
\ ( (/' / -- \
V ~ ~ V ,-. I
L -.=:'_.i) \ I - . ,\
~f;:~::--~(~-:::":_-' \\ Ie --' I
I / ~ ___ J \ '- -, \ u\ I,l )
,r'- .....-/ ~ ,_ _/ \ ) )'
/ ~ ..:~" L "....... / ,./'-.-
~~ ",J' ___ L.- '1 I
V \ r' , / "'\ ;
.--'1 (',r,\, ) ---o"E_~ / / ;
I \0'-"\ < j-:> C ~
I ~~ "\ J /j \ I
('.,I~ \ \ \~)~'J /---- / / / \ I
) '\."'-.. ",\>J-""F'yt (')) (( (' I
( --'! ';, -~ \.,--:, -,\')1 ) .~ ~ 1\' ,\ (~ I
\ \, ~ \. ---....~ I \" (_/ , ("\
\...., ....... ( \ --,' \ '- \. "-. '\ " ", "[ , , \ "'-
'II, \ ,,\,)%)(")0..-=:_) '\ .J I ,~/ /"....:::',::::,..
\!-'~--rl) C\J .... J ________J I( ((/'<<~~,
I':"V L) v J" -/"\ ---.. r-j ,"'-~-' -::--.,\ ((0\ I I /frC~~
, ..J I!/-~'l. ( ! -) I ((r\~\:V L\ (II' ~~~
! (r'-.I f t:::;-i \.J ( ", \\\r)\\\~ I '"' \~\ ,,':.~~ '5\
i \ \,)I( ("J/J \' ,,\_, ,-J:))::.\ (V~':::~_.J
" : _ ___:. J \~~ / \ \ \ O'r -, (>1;/'\\\\\ ) '::'0;',
'..:-.-i '.J ~i U \../ (..... \ l'::.-,~1J;~ III \\ I 1/' ')""-:
I __" ,oj /--~,;:://) \1\\\ )/ C',./ \\
'\--. / '\.../ ;:>..=::---- //'..:) ;1 \ (----~
I :;-) /" c----:::-\. \ (I( (/' (---- )l '-07f/- / J.o /~
I ~( ,"'J)\ \......, ) CJ\\\ \.. "-~'\S -:::.~~ (..J I I /!ftr{'3;~ ;::~
(' '-'-'I'~ \ /',,, \~,\,.- '\"-:::: - '-.//1, ) "-;;;....
, ',' L r::::, I '- ) \' -."
- "'-- \ ' r-~,\,-- "\.'-"\\ (,~r--:'- //i:[~\)
.....<::::::-',j) . ',( )) / ~))),I ().{<25;.._~~/1(~/' .J l / /' ~
.....<~:::. _ (\./ '\.ri\'-" () 'I '-(' (fCJr--'jj;if;;::::: - -:=;f?/ <~,r / uf
'-. J-...... ( // / 1 ( '---::':'-. r;; ~ ( (_/ '-../ ( Q;
'J, / --I I 0 AJ \,f)J 1 I (, Q)
f )? ,( 'rJ ,~ J'~'" L. \ / \ '\ \, c
U 1/ >Z:;-t,:,L "J !J:-r-'),.J \ I f) )//0\ -, .~
;,/( /_"Y --__JI c...J Jr.' I) /J.-/~-= ~\ w
(( ) ~~ -'-(.:::\./') C \0 ..... C \ f/II(!--= 1]0\ '_~
\) I \\'-. ",-~(,~-~~, 8 (_.J ~ \ Il.f( '-I} (,? S
/)/ ~~-)(~" ~'~~~ "/,~~) \ ~(~( ~
1/ ., "-~\~~ fOL._ '\"..... 1 /(l. I) 8
/,r /...-""'---,,,) _) \-_::----...... "-," \, ...../
\.. I \ --, L ~ ">-' Ir', '-, ')
'...J J ", C) Q" (':J I r,~ \\.....::::." (' v.\
..--_ / ~ , ) 0 \ )~.PI" \ -
r- --./ 1\ ) ~ ) ( ). ,,--;,
- \ .-~/~, ,\ /\J/ "f ..r"'\ /-l...y....l '-
____ (') r ,.) v, ~
( I/fe? \:\)~ \lJ (i, '\ r,../ '-/-~ '-.
\. \ \~ ') \ ) '- ~ -~~ ~\.......
- H/~--::. '<:........\\~ c-::s:;:;,~....... \\ j< "
u ) \ 1)( ~\ -,..", ,::5 '>--, ../
/,,'''-.r/-...) 1\\Il,',t(G'U ~;\\\
f .0;;m;:;-~;:J.~--J "- ~~lc- /
@
-Jlk}
....~~,1
"::!:, \1'~.l
TW
:,i ~7
':l':~~
;:: jC
.. t
,1:, ,". I
-~r'
!
I
I
@ I <(
C\J lli!
<(
Iz
en oQ
i::i z ~~
o OX
~ f= O-W
OJ 0 OZ
Ol W cr: Z
-1 (f) 0- <(
C 1Il
Q) a.
1Il rtl
~:2
.cen
~<.9
rtlen
CO:::l
Qj
()
:;
o
en
-.1'_,
;'
\.../
J
:.T' ' ":~~~,N~a,m~);~~ .
~~"a-p" -'a 't'a. c"l'.'e' d' ,D~",i1':t~*,h{,;;" .&J JI '
,'f..j. )"'1 ~ .:,., ~_ ~'..! ,~1 -::. ~"<..\.' '.... ~v
Lis t..:';'Pr~pa;;:'~d'~ By'" ''':k~c, '"'
.~~~" '~t: ;..." . .,'!} ,~.,'~ '~~i{: 't' :i~.' '
,". Date,;;,ma:l1ed':,;,;,:':- ?,' '
Jj";;.F
~...
';'J' ~ r,~
~!~
.., ~~,
TAX PARCEL; .,RECORD OWNER
NUMBER ~ bF PROPERTY
,MAILING,ADDRESS
~ .I., 'if'T'~' "!: 't...l/,
.;
'I
,,,TOTAL ASSESSED
VALUE (A/V') "
A y" f'0'; ~
. J
Ll/ } rrf~.;'~'
. ':" :"'J", - ' i
; yl 'r;--') !. D( .;2. !'~
d i ,'''''':/1
:;'
A.I ~ :..,
I'..,.. \'
\'
If
11 'r.-
1/
1/'
"
r~
",J nil J 1/. W!..10' 1 {':;1
f=:';;!.l..U i" '!.,_ i.:t -1
-H ~, (,-i i{.;
'1:-"'J\d /-'-lie:.., 5"::
~t!_
~~ ':-, ~
~
'c' ,.(<~8d " ." .~, .J,,,,:;;,.'~\%:'p1;':J:;;::.
~~t. .~.(:( '!L 'N,'!; r; e s ~. / "~~':i:' ~!~Un1.'j3I!'; !~.
Fee.:gt$50." plus $1Iowner,i.,;i>';.i,50
_<,c. .)0",._.." i:)~,t;~{~r Rec:"d ::,' '" ' ' ,;~(} ";"~Y::;~
,. ,!~{ ~~,l ,~Reqbest!' Rec ':,d "By:' "'f
:"~fr"~"\Jt'![{JS'ee1t pai d? :'
'!, ~-'1;.,.: '" f-r~:f:;',~l.!'ts;i.: H <~ ',~ '...
~',,-..;, i-
.,
TAX PARCEL-
NUMBER'~;
RECORD OWNER~~"MAILIN'G~:;ADDRESS
, ,.
OF." PROPERTY. \ j}<.;'}~{f, '
TOTAL ASSESSED
VALUE (A/V)
"
, I ,... - -
l"lC'lr1 111 ,,:" r (:.~
"Id:5'h
1\\, 1! r.t 1';1 i~ -.,'-
1(':<",(<1/' '16.Aa, .r~ /;~ :5":
" ,~l '/'11
I 3 q ;3 7 . :.; Ad /-t u.:: ::8.
\.i ,;:: i /Vt
.}..cJ:2.0 S. 3 lo2 ..,.. d
F/Cf. ,. ), ,I' qRO ~
131(5 45-A;;r ...+~ ~~
'f ~ Y1t1
.J(o$c)7 74, ,n ,,,,,-Jc:.
~ .V, I /111 n ~7 1:37-=
P, I B6X ,;;.q(., , \j,.:7) (lIt
i '65 '-T I -f 5..lL,~ it Uc:. '5 C
\1 e./ 1>11
':;'
1.' , f j'"
r\ ,,; V 1\'1 lA, t 1<(11'1
'~'. t"
:1
II
I i;~,.
-."
~' ~~
_,,'i'
-'f~
i<'
;~.
..~
"~;
:t~;.
. <.~,
~, '.~-
:-:~
\.r~
;~.T':.:
.,
"
\.
-l".:
-l: "~...r
:, '~~t;o;M;':Y"<:":;.):Y::~'('A'''d' ;d-"r"~'e"'"s("':'si"i>\
'~rPt'~~''.I!f, .1' ,1_ '!.;\r".~ . .f' J
F ~'~:'~~~r$ 5'O"ip'Tt:i~~t.$-: i:?~w n er.:
Da t'~.~~Rec-";d ;~:{t~~~l~+~1 _:~'1}~:. ~i'*i:t.1.'
'.11, Requ~st Rec.1 d li.~Y-: V'
- Fee"" pai d?
-;,;.
,';- ~\'}o'" 1
-, ,
"
'''', .,
.~'-',
..,;;- ~; ,J
i~;'
;; \-' -r-:....
"T -t"
.T AX, P ARCEL:. -,~ , RECORD]. OWNER MAILING ADDRESS
NUMBER tOF PROPERTY
TOTAL' ASSESSEO I :
VALUE (A/V)
';" .....
"
///
(
\
\
~ /). fl, ~ y. "'/7/;
\r-~ I ~1
7-==) 7 .
\ I --. , , .Jl
. , I, \
'Vc LLJ .~ (,j /
/
i-' ) ": l"U
\),":;; /".'1
...... f
\
\
II
iI
I
j
!
-' -
.:.; (:=
\
II
\
,
i -'- i 1;,1
./ j", ,v..u
j
/
~..<-.:.
~~= ':~f
.~
-'f.
\ J ( : I ,'. .....
(.? /), 1;/),/ i~J II') \/ ~I ~ I
\l~- ! V'vl
\j .;: I iil
52
TOTAL ASSESSED
VALUE (A/V)
~
\
\
)
RECORD OWNER
OF PROPERTY
MAILING ADDRESS
, ' .....
r~ ) () Y' i.....' .J f -~r )
2
,] , ~j, ~.:" ~;.;:." or....
:5~L"'.l~:-
.:) .:7 .:l , '~ r:~
/
I
jl
1/
I'
I i
"
It
"
I I
) . \
L-. r~ [Jt.) X I I "-_' ~ j /. 4/1
Cr ~$i : i /~ c:: Ur'. i\J Lu
q,!?.:::'.,x;"\
. ,; -Li~""l~' 1 :~~...J-f"f\ j-"".~
..J <..~/; i)::~S'~ ~)J !, I.' J II: 0 q,;;;:::.<7'-1
\
\
\
\
/
I
!
!
~:;-. ":";
., I
\i - f VY"
i
\
" ,
,/ ..... t, I~:/~
\
j V,/)
-;. -\
i
.'
'~'.
}'
i<" '-'i
!'.'
-, '1;,~ 1._ ;~,i1'"
.
"
\.
c\
\
-,::... {',
.-( ,__!;;? ~~~ ~~y --:(:i~? .~ ~.
':-'" \-'
\'.
,~:i:{~1~;~~!;~~}~~{i~1~J~~o,i:"~':~j ,.
'Request,~Rec'd By'
Fee paid?
i ,,:;:~::.. .~. tf~1.f~'~";~~,;~'
"'; ~ Map/~at tc3:'ched?
x" , ~,.
,List-Prepared By'
" .D':l t e f!1c:.,~< Te;j
'" 3 01 ,~ ! '-' - :-;10 ./'
~II ,I I
~; I-TAX PARCEL, ! RECORD OWNER"
'}!!.17 Ill, NUMBER 'I o~ .,~ROPERTY I
fl./-i ... - I V:::; I Jl - I'
;.\-;{/ /(}t) /,_",..., I (1,
11..1i' ' I~-_ /. '-- '. I
fl. I:~;;' /1 }~!I 1 !I""\, ~ \h
L?~ ';, --v J.),~ I i\t'l' ,'\,\ (-, I, I
tf-tl 1: 6')0 ~'.,,) 1',
~~/.)il ~.' I . I
f II 6()r:} \.\ J ; / (~
i/.{~311 '7Lf(j ~! V';; I J. /t, "'c J ...\
- r I ~ ~,-)' I
;. ?5 (j) - / '
. {,; ~ ~
"I .
I-
I \ ~ '
i
I
I
I
l-n H (-S5.1~,..J. /',\le :52 :a';;..ql
Yr!m I
I
, - .r, .., \;,' I
j./ ;, /.; /' ~~'~...::. ... :...;., I>: I
'j i I
;--7 \ ~!,.\'l i
I
I
I
i
I
I
PJ! p.JV~:.;.:/-Vt!'ll'l1 I
I
I
,-./ ' I i I
" CI,'., \. !..;: f l} , I
I
I
I
I
1-
MAILING' ADDRESS .~
p ) 1 t- ),-"
ii Ii
;) . I I" , ~ ..,
{-, J/ -'
! i -
\i "-- i
:f
II
1/
-~ ,.;
~~~
;;'!: ,.(\
It
TOTAL ASSESSED"
VALUE: (A/V) !I
II
II
II
,I
II
,I
il
II
II
J
/
I
I
i
\
\
\
\
/
I
/
I
f
i
--d'
,;-.
"\ ~'.o'
,
. \.~.
\'
i
(
/
f
I
)
t- ~~"
.
.k
'.~
!t:
.-If:i.
,~
-"
.,;:.- .;..
.~ "-..:,. ~t '\:;",
TAX pARCEC RECORD OWNER
PROPERTY
MAILING ADDRESS'~';:~"
I) /)
f (." I
\, ~.i
(,""'-' r ,r,,1
. \. .t f II.
:),
~ " '
I, /) f
11
It
...... J' r--, _, ~ ,J..
Vi) , H/)'X ,:'5(J(}
V:~! 1'/1
/OI..j.t'Y'
/~
"......
-,-
!
hue
.;;145, Vr:lrvr
/\ '\1 ; /' -1" \)..: '1: .
U,^ '>"}'J oJ; \ c.... iV,,/1
'2
J
~..... l
:!
I
I
i Ip () , Bo
I ,
\l;
_r "~'.;.._>
~
...
.'
"
!"'!,
h i'
,~- 11-""
TOTAL ASSESSED.!II,
. "11-"
VALU~ CAN)' 'I.
/ "
I
II
,I
II
I
""
\ - :
...... /::;~
I
I ",,,"C"'
I
I
/
/
i
II
II
_-::'C
',;i':,~~11!1,;!~~~~~~~~;',
~,'.'
Irirl~'l:Ak PARCEL,"' I RECORD, OWNE'r:r.::'l' -~.'I-"~AILING
I ~,,,;<,'''II',~,, NuuBE:::)"'.;'
~~'1,1.;,,, I" 1\;",
./": K t. I ..
p"'~
~
J.
I
I
I
il
!I
II
II
I
~" "~ '
. ?~t;~t~:.t:~,
I ., -" ,', ILt;;
I TOTAL ASSESSE~J{II ;:i~;" .,
I V,o..LUE (A/'I).'''"'III~:~t:~..~!
/ / l~t~.~
, 11" ,
II'
.1
iL
II'. .~.
I\;
II ,"
'~~
I,!l ~~ ,,:: ,
.\'<;--.
!I
II
11 ..
ADDRESS' . ;
.:..,
v,...;:> 1 !I\'"
..__ .. '/f
I't"
I
I
!
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
': .. -I.
L ~
""" I;
I,
I
I
-,.
-.";:1,
,2<'>....~
! /"
1/< ,i. I. ,;L ~ ;;:',,,,~:d~~
.. I.
"\ I
I
I"'
I
I
I'"
L.;~.
I
/I
-v;t,;
_;1:.. ~,{.;
..J;.",
" "
. .~."
II
1\
"1/ :)
\)~} '(v1'
, I
( .~-t(.,~>'( -,..
7 I r
II
'f '~./t!:l,.;:t. .'~;:
.. IT
~~.,. ~ .'_.
\
I
/
/
/
!
\
\
\
'j
i
{
\
\
\
\
.. \
, ,
'\-+.:- ~~.,... I ,~ .!-
:;.
".1-<,
I
I.
f- ." ,..,
-.......-'
., <Il..'
"."
.- ~'.
;"
...q-
~.. .:.., ~ ..;.
J. ~: ~
0::;:'(,
.:.;:. ,..:.
:1;- .,' 't" ,
~), :);'f':~!
'f" 'l.l. ~I:! ,;, 'j
_::. ~ .0;," .,' ~ ,'';Ir'':'i;,.~}'f~.~~' ::
I 0 IA[~" ASSESSED!;;lI,'i:'~:':;'!; ,t~
. VA,LUEd A/V}, "II ;';;;,{i\ "," ,
.~ II', 'i :;-.<", ,".~
t:~ 'y' ~..._
1\ ' ,"
11";"\"
II ;~t .0.
I ,>
il ~~
III :iC
-~, .~'
il - ~
II
iI
II
II
~AILIN~ ADDRESS~
'i-
li '-{11~V1 bc~r'3C 'fd SE
II
/I
\.
Ii
\
II
\
\
\
1,-
'; I ~~
~ ~ ~rf 1:~ . If
i
/
77/ , \j~1 VY7
I
\
\
\
'-;./
,i'Jt.;;
,"
~;\.~i~:'AdB>i:;,e'ss;-")~
, "~~~~: ':WJ::!},,'l~, ';l~;~:~'-,(:,,~~/f',X\'"
,eel:,~$50~ phis; $l!pa'rc''e:
.;;<" ~!< l' ~, .',:" ~:.'l' ."';:;i;
'Da te Rec d' ',.r, , ,
Requ~est "R'ec ,. d'; By
Fee pa'i 'Cl? ' ,i f
.1,
0i
i,,;':;_'~~\r' .,;~
'+1'
II TAX PARCEL:i~\:RECORO~ OWNER, 'I: :'MAILING" ADDRESS
II c,: NUMBERA."l OF.I. PROPERtY.~" \'.. .~.
2 7 JJ- - h /~' I ~a;}j~+ I'Pi ,OQX I a.: /) ,
-I ;;~tJo I. n/).I~' ~tri'~" I:z) ~n(i MW...,
"~/iplt>O.'-.t5it'k' 5.lJ~>'Y:2;,)I: f, c) t~)X I 37 y...;j (Vi
.1, '_/ /iJ~ dO ,z I ; r,; n7 C' 'D2id:J:0< 1,"JfX ,D Id eft?!, ;t-+U) I.f Sf
~//iJS ()/) I~Xl~t~.~, O!+.~ ( '1:1/" ~eo x >( j ;{;::; , / ,:.1 ~'.."" ~3-~
-/ IIJ'f (}Ol!.. --:;- {. - - ,": kt.--
II j" \"fIL ,f) I r i L /4;24 t ~ ,t...; _J-; :'';::'
.. 0'/0 ' . w V r ~ '\ /,.j ni I.Y~" i ,tYl I
-1/.0'1 tJ2. I;' It I i.,,';~ I ,L ., , It
..;.,... ~/'IIJ 70 () I!'u l.l L tartt ,\p,.->"!:Jf.: I" r I SJ6 ~ ~fpe'(1. ka. :5';;:'
... .H"'''Ar!..t+<H''d :~' ,/,/ .
o<,:.,:;'~ .~ [' .},- ~~~ ...~. ':' I'~~- '?1~ ~7: ,;~~~J,'~ :~r'~1f,{+r~-~:.;~{rt~r 'I~~tj, ?~~~~ ,;~ ---:
.' -rJlJ!{)() . ,.~,,'t"'"'''~;'"{';;:'':'''''!''l:''''>i.'''
; }:.:!:;fj:i'J.,;fj{c-(~';,1 Na..+\tJr:1a..l 'k,t'I.O I tjox.
",' -lZ 0000' "IF".. t'f~ rOI ,,,' i:.:!') ~-:1 +:t:/ '
'''-2'/:\0'''''0' po I,: ,",;;>;!I:' .", 'I ., " /1,,1.'>"
" 'l ": ,,... ~". ~~ :it'.' .~..,.
,~,' ',c:;; \: 11- I./.T,:-: I
.., '- 21 (}r{)O~" \', I
-' '\
; I
I
il
H
il
II
I
-'
{I
~; 7'
,....
.1;+;~ :.-_
/1' ,,'
f I.
'1
:Fr.
1~~' ~"I~~~};j'Ji'I*~;?v ~
,.. .... " ~~,~. . ...\ "I." !
, .".. ~.. \"'~f' ~ .l:r.-
{....!~( ,f
~ '"\\.
~\,!,"~r~" ;;
I,
".1
I
i
I
I
I
I.
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I~
,:,;,..:f//;li';:::";:~f~~fF
/..-:. ).~1-~~<. ..,'i~;' ,,,/,
,,'_ '''...i, I..r~.)"1"'<'
/' ,.." ~~'~t~{<~l~~.
/
C -t (j
I V of YelDl
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
206-458-3244
CERTIFICATION OF ANNEXATION PETITION
SOUTHWEST YELM ANNEXATION
I Shelly A Badger, City Clerk of the City of Yelm. do
certify that I have reviewed the attached Petltion for
Annexation and find that the petition includes the
signatures of the owners (as deTined by RCW
35A 01 040(9)) oT sixty percent in value according to
the assessed valuation Tor general taxation oT the
property for which annexation is requested as descrlbed
thereln
The total assessed value of said property is
$ 6,240,320.00, and the total value of the petltioner's
property is $ 3.843.250.00
Further, I have reviewed
the petition and find it to be substantially in
RCW 35A 01 040
accordance with the rules of petitions as set forth at
Certified this
/ J J--!
"i~'I
...."
I I
I !./ - j ./,1--,/; ^
day of'....:....",J,F i(// _ ,i-- 1992
S '
'I II " /
'--- j-, I i~/'If!, {)!] /I;('l ,) SEAL
She l',!lj A Badger,' -
City Clerk J
o
o
S.W. YELM ANNEXATION PETITION
SIGNATURE AND ASSESSED VALUE SUMMARY
Subtotal Subtotal
All parcels Petition parcels
Page 1 ~ $2,009,260.00 2 parcels $1,959,660 00--
Page 2 .; $479,240.00 1 parcel $3,240.00
Page 3 I $642,490.00 3 parcels $443,400.00 v
Page 4 j $379,600.00 1 parcel $50,800 00 ~
Page 5 ' $982,580.00 4 parcels $917,480.00 I
Page 6 / $346,800.00 3 parcels $253,200.00,
Page 7 $423,710.00 1 parcel $132,170.00
Page 8 $908,290.00 o parcels 0.00
Page 9 .. $83,300.00 1 parcel $83,300.00
Total $6,255,270.00 $3,843,250.00
60% $3,753,162.00
o
o
s.w YELM ANNEXATION PETITION
SIGNATURE SHEET
WARNING
EVERY PERSON WHO SIGNS THIS PETITION WITH ANY OTHER THAN HIS OR HER TRUE
NAME, OR WHO KNOWINGLY SIGNS MORE THAN ONE OF THESE PETITIONS, OR SIGNS A
PETITION WHERE HE OR SHE IS OTI-IERWISE NOT QUALIFIED TO SIGN, OR WHO MAKE
HEREIN ANY FALSE STATENfENT, SHALL BE GUILTY OF A .MISDEMEANOR.
Signature of Assessor's 1992 Assessor's
Pronertv Owner Parcel Number Acreage Value
217-23-130000 3939 Ac $3,170
217-23-300000 160.00 Ac $400 ,000
~9A L (1=1 217-23-420000 80.00 Ac 81,800
217-26-200000 320.00 Ac 654,700
217-27-000000 640.00 Ac 674,600
Thurston Highland Associates $1,814,270 I
1917 First Avenue.
Seattle, W A 98101
217-23-140000 35.00 Ac $19,690
217-23-140101 5.00 Ac $125,700
John Purvis $145,390 /
14504 Berry Valley Road S.E.
Yelm, W A 98597
217-24-430400 2.8Ac $7,000
Washington Public Lands
Public Lands Building
Olympia, W A 98504
217-24-440000 218 Ac $5,200
217-25-240000 18.88 Ac $32,500
217-26-440000 2.98 Ac $4,900
Burlington Northern Inc. $42,600
Honeywell Center, #290
304 Inverness Way South
Englewood, CO 80112
SUBTOTAL THIS PAGE $2,009,260
page 1
1 of 2
/
o
o
S. W YELM ANNEXA nON PETITION
SIGNATURE SHEET
WARNING
EVERY PERSON WHO SIGNS THIS PETITION WITH ANY OTHER THAN HIS OR HER TRUE
NAlv'fE, OR WHO KNOWINGLY SIGNS MORE TIiAN ONE OF TIIESE PETITIONS, OR SIGNS A
PITmON WHERE HE OR SHE IS OTHERWISE NOT QUALIFIED TO SIGi'T, OR WHO MAKE
HEREIN Al"lY FALSE STATEMENT, SHALL BE GUILlY OF A MISDEMEANOR.
Signature of
Pronertv Owner
Parcel Number
Assessor's
Acreage
1992 Assessor's
Value
217-23-130000
217-23-300000
217-23-420000
217-26-200000
217-27-cDOOOO
3939 Ac
160.00 Ac
80.00 Ac
320.00 Ac
640.00 Ac
$3,170
$400,000
81,800
654,700
674,600
$1,814,270
Thurston Highland Associates
1917 First Avenue.
Seattle, W A 98101
/a4f/' X~~~
f" John Purvis
14504 Berry Valley Road S.E.
Yelm, WA 98597
217-23-140000
217-23-140101
35.00 Ac
5.00 Ac
$19,690
$125,700
$145,390
217-24-430400
2.8Ac
$7,000
Washington Public Lands
Public Lands Building
Olympia, W A 98504
217-24-440000
217-25-240000
217-26-440000
2.18 Ac
18.88 Ac
2.98 Ac
$5,200
$32,SOO
Burlington Northern Inc.
Honeywell Center, #290
304 Inverness Way South
Englewood, CO 80112
$4,900
$42,600
SUBTOTAL TIllS PAGE
$2,009,260
page 1
2 of 2
/
sQ YELM ANNEXATION PETITIONO
SIGNATURE SHEET
WARNING
page 2
1 of 1
,
J
o YELM ANNEXATION PETITIONO
SIGNATURE SHEET
WARNING
EVERY PERSON WHO SIGNS THIS PETITION WITH ANY OTHER THAN HIS OR HER TRUE
NAME, OR WHO KNOWINGLY SIGNS MORE THAN ONE OF THESE PETITIONS, OR SIGNS A
PETITION WHERE HE OR SHE IS OTHERWISE NOT QUALIFIED TO SIGN, OR WHO MAKE
HEREIN ANY FALSE STATE:NfENT, SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR.
Signature of
PropertY O'Wller
Parcel Number
Assessor's
Acreage
1992 Assessor's
Value
217-24-230102
0.69 Ac
$93,600
David & Nannette Baker
14544 Berry Valley Rd. SE
Yelm, W A 98597
217-24-230101
0.7 Ac
$72,600
Dan & Julie Schaefer
14538 Berry Valley Rd. SE
Yelm, WA 98597
R I~
Virgil & rlene Baker If-0- <:]"2.-
14501 Berry Valley Rd. SE
Yelm, WA 98597
217-24-230601
17-24-230600
2.30 Ac
2.07 Ac
$9,700
$127,700
$137,400
217-24-230400
217-24-240400
14.72 Ac
5.0Ac
$41,300
Lila Willuweit
14812 Berry Valley Rd. SE
Yelm, WA 98597
$85,190
$126,490
~ I'
...it""
217-24-240000
217-24-240200
217-24-240300
17.83 Ac
7.72 Ac
5.0Ac
$80,200
$42,200
$90,(XX)
$212,400
Elaine Horsak
14848 Berry Valley Rd. SE
Yelm, WA 98597
$642,490
SUBTOTAL THIS PAGE
,~
111_J'0~(S~C.
lJ ........ ,..f""-..-.
I _ -:: ()
(~/, 1;:;
~/- Ij Ii.//;;;W_:-)
1,,__; "'o.J~ _
IrRIlI/i -' lBs2 I{J;
cR, CIi.
ItV' &
page 3 41IlYi
1 of 3 V, /N~
j
. .
o
o
THURSTON HIGHLAND ANNEXATION PETITION
SIGNATURE SHEET
MAY 1991 ASSESSMENT
WARNING
EVERY PERSON WHO SIGNS THIS PETITION WITH ANY OTHER THAN fITS OR
HER TRUE NAME, OR WHO KNOWINGLY SIGNS MORE THAN ONE OF THESE
PETITIONS, OR SIGNS A PETITION WHERE HE OR SHE IS OTHERWISE NOT
QUALIFIED TO SIGN, OR WHO MAKE HEREIN ANY FALSE STATEMENT,
SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR.
Signature of
PropertY Owner
Parcel Number
Assessorls
Acreage
Assessorls
Value
217-24-230102 0.7 Ac ' ,'~~, :.:$78,500
David & Nannette Baker
14544 Berry Valley Rd. SE
Yelm, W A 98597
217-24-230101 0.7 Ac $59,500
Dan & Julie Schaefer
14538 Berry Valley Rd. SE
Yelm, WA 98597
217-42-230601 2.30 Ac $10,600
217-24-230600 2.07 Ac $116,500
Virgil & Darlene Baker $127,100
14501 Berry Valley Rd. SE
Yelm, W A 98597
217-24-230400 15.0 Ac $41,300
217-24-240400 5.0 Ac $82,890
Lila Willuweit $124,190
14812 Berry Valley Rd. SE
Yelm, W A 98597
217-24-240000 17 83 Ac $56,700
CJt2.~~2~) 4~Qk 217-24-240200 7,72 Ac $24,600
217-24-240300 5.0 Ac $80,000
Elaine Horsak $161,300
14848 Berry Valley Rd. SE
Yelm, W A 98597
SUBTOTAL THIS PAGE $550,590
page 3
2 of 3
v
Thurus.ton Highland Annexation Petition
Signature Sheet 0
WARN ING
EVERY PERSON WHO SIGNS THIS PETITION WITH ANY OTHER THAN HIS OR
HER TRUE NAME, OR WHO KNOWINGLY SIGNS MORE THAN ONE OF THESE
PETITIONS, OR SIGNS A PETITION WHERE HE OR SHE IS OTHERWISE
NOT QUALIFIED TO SIGN, OR WHO MAKES HERElN ANY FALSE STATEMENT,
SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR.
Signature of
Property Owner
Parcel Number
Assessor's
Acreage
Assessor's
Value
217 - 23 - 300000
217-23-420000
217-26-200000
217-27-000000
160 Ac $ 15,090
80 Ac b,.510
320 Ac 20,680
640 Ac 52,750
Tnurston Highland Associates
1917 First Ave
Seattle, WA 98101
-- 217-24-230101 0 7 Ac $ L3 ,300
):
,- "-' / /'/' 7;:- /
David Baker
14544 Berry Valley Rd SC:
Ye1m, WA 98597
217-24-230601 2 30 Ac $ 9,700
217-24-230102 0 69 Ac 64,700
217-24-230600 2 07 Ac 87,300
Virgil Baker
14501 Berry Valley Rd SC:
Yelm, WA 98597
217-24-230400 15 Ac $ 33,050
217-24-240400 5 Ac 57,170
Lila Willuweit
14812 Berry Valley Rd SC:
Yelm, WA 98597
217-24-240000 17 83 Ac $ 57,100
217-24-240200 7 72 Ac 24,600
217-24-240300 5 0 Ac 68,500
Carl Horsak
14848 Berry Valley Rd 5e
Ye1m, WA 98597
SUBTOTAL THIS PAGE $
page 3 I
3 of 3
SOYELM ANNEXATION PETITION 0
SIGNATURE SHEET
WARNING
EVERY PERSON WHO SIGNS THIS PETITION WITH ANY OTHER THAN HIS OR HER TRUE
NAME, OR WHO KNOWINGLY SIGNS MORE THAN ONE OF THESE PETITIONS, OR SIGNS A
PETITION WHERE HE OR SHE IS OTHERWISE NOT QUALIFIED TO SIGN, OR WHO MAKE
HERE:rN" ANY FALSE STATEMENT, SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR.
Signature of Assessor's Assessor's
Prooertv Owner Parcel Number Acreage Value
217-24-230103 0.67 Ac $84,800
John T Harmon
14610 Berry Valley Road
Yelm, WA 98597
217-24-230104 0.66 Ac $52,600
John Sherfey
POBox 774
Yelm, W A 98597
217-24-230200 1.63 Ac $1,100
217-24-230201 1.00 Ac $39,000
Barbara Soetebar $40,100
14505 Berry Valley Rd. SE
Yelm, WA 98597
217-24-230800 128 Ac $12,800
Neal Soetebar
14507 Berry Valley Rd. SE
Yelm, W A 98597
217-24-230900 1.48 Ac $75,400
Mark Soetebar
14503 Berry Valley Rd. SE
Yelm, W A 98597
cQ j7f-L// 217-24-420100 2.99 Ac $14,800
217-24-420101 2.00 Ac $18,000
/ t";"-"""';; (,1 ~ 217-24-420102 2.00 Ac $18,000
, Estate Realty ('?R"? 6::72/ $50,800
( c/o John Stephensen
POBox 718
Yelm, WA 98597
217-24-420103 1.93 Ac $63,100
Roger L McKibbin
15219 Berry Valley Road
Yelm, WA 98597
SUBTOTAL THIS PAGE $379,600
page 4
1 of 1 j
- ---_.-.--
, '
S.C'ELM ANNEXATION PETITION 0
SIGNATURE SHEET
WARNING
EVERY PERSON WHO SIGNS THIS PETITION WITH ANY OTHER THAN HIS OR HER TRUE
NAME, OR WHO KNOWINGLY SIGNS MORE THAN ONE OF rnESE PETITIONS, OR SIGNS A
PETITION WHERE HE OR SHE IS OTHERWISE NOT QUALIFIED TO SIGi"I, OR WHO MAKE
HEREIN ANY FALSE STATEMEi'IT, SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR.
Signa hue of
Propertv Owner
Parcel Number
Assessor's
Acreage
1992 Assessor's
Value
217-24-420503
1.85 Ac
$77,700
Ronald Rothwell
15050 Longmire St. S.E.
Yelm, WA 98597
217-24-420700
2.18 Ac
$65,100
Jeffery Price
15128 Longmire St. S.E.
Yelm, W A 98597
/J1~ ~ 11~1(fl~
/ /l::5-rlJ1//i/l1; c't/ f 217-24-410900
.... 'Marvin Wagner
15234 Longmire St. S.E.
Yelm, W A 98597
4.92 Ac
$106,200
217-24-240201
1.52 Ac
$118,100
Robert Overton
14636 Berry Valley Road S.E.
Yelm, WA 98597
217-23-410000
217-23-440000
217-24-310100
217-24-320000
217-24-330000
217-24-340100
40.00 Ac
40.00 Ac
40.00 Ac
40.00 Ac
40.00 Ac
20.30 Ac
$5,360
$2,600
$591,470
$6,400
$6,400
$3,250
$615,480
Henry Dragt
14848 Longmire St. S.E.
Yelm, W A 98597
SUBTOTAL THIS PACE
$982,580
page 5
1 of 4
I
i! /1 I (oJ r--. ~-..,
1/ .. !......-...,. 0 ,If'" ~-_~..._
,;'. ,.. 'f ~ I - -_
1,//' ' , -"""
."t ....................
f ""', 'I ' -.'-
j -~ - -.
Ii'> / 2 y 1992 ,If,; Ii
..... /(P!l',~ ,".' 1.1, !
. ""-.... ',lWeI? ' /'!... '!
SE.4.Tr(ri-Ji/i'i.7 -, -- j
'-. yt,.~ 9-~M4(n""" /
' '-101 U, i
EVERY PERSON WHO SIGNS THIS PETITION WITH ANY OTHER THAN HIS OR HER TRUE "-.._ !
NAME, OR WHO KNOWINGLY SIGNS MORE THAN ONE OF THESE PETITIONS, OR SIGNS A...........;
PETITION WHERE HE OR SHE IS OTHERWISE NOT QUALIFIED TO SIGN, OR WHO MAKE
HEREIN ANY FALSE STATEMENT, SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR.
s.OYELM ANNEXATION PETITION 0
SIGNATURE SHEET
WARNING
Signature of
Propertv Owner
Parcel Number
Assessor's
Acreage
1992 Assessor's
Value
217-24-420503
1.85 Ac
$77,700
Ronald Roth well
15050 Longmire St. S.E.
Yelm, WA 98597
217-24-420700
2.18 Ac
$65,100
Jeffery Price
15128 Longmire St. S.E.
Yelm, WA 98597
217-24-410900
4.92 Ac
$106,200
Marvin Wagner
15234 Longmire St. S.E.
Yelm, WA 98597
.'" \
\\ I '<_. 1...,.,.-.
~\- '\ I '-.
Robert Overton
14636 Berry Valley Road S.B.
Yelm, WA 98597
217-24-240201
1.52 Ac
$118,100
217-23-410000
217-23-440000
217-24-310100
217-24-320000
217-24-330000
217-24-340100
40.00 Ac
40.00 Ac
40.00 Ac
40.00 Ac
40.00 Ac
20.30 Ac
$5,360
$2,600
$591,470
$6AOO
$6,4CQ
$3250
$615,480
Henry Dra gt
14848 Longmire St. S.E.
Yelm, W A 98597
SUBTOTAL THIS PAGE
$982.580
page 5
2 of 4
I
;...;.:~
S.OYELM ANNEXATION PETITION 0
SIGNATURE SHEET
WARNING
EVERY PERSON WHO SIGNS THIS PETITION WITH ANY OTHER THAN HIS OR HER TRUE
NAME, OR WHO KN'OWIN'GL Y SIGNS MORE THAN ONE OF lliESE PETITIONS, OR SIGNS A
PETITION WHERE HE OR SHE IS OTHERWISE NOT QUALIFIED TO SIGN, OR WHO MAKE
HEREIN ANY FALSE STATEMENT, SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR.
Signature of Assessor's 1992 Assessor's
Propertv Owner Parcel Number Acreage Value
217-24-420503 1.85 Ac $i7,700
Ronald Roth well
15050 Longmire St. S.E.
Yelrn, WA 98597
217-24-420700 2.18 Ac $65,100
Jeffery Price
15128 Longmire St. S.E.
Yelrn, WA 98597
217-24-410900 4.92 Ac $106,200
Marvin Wagner
15234 Longmire St. S.E.
Yelrn, WA 98597
217-24-240201 1.52 Ac $118,100
Robert Overton
14636 Berry Valley Road S.E.
Yelrn, WA 98597
217-23-410000 40.00 Ac $5,360
217-23-440000 40.00 Ac $2,600
217-24-310100 40.00 Ac $591,470
217-24-320000 40.00 Ac $6,400
m~04 217-24-330000 40.00 Ac $6,400
217-24-340100 20.30 Ac $3,250
Henry Dra . '\ - , $615,480
14848 Longmire St. S.E.
Yelm, W A 98597
SUBTOTAL n-ns PAGE $982,580
page 5
3 of 4
)
- - -- -- --.-.---;;.;;J ~'- - --~----------- - -~-
WARN ING
EVERY PERSON WHO SIGNS THIS PETITION WITH ANY OTHER THAN HIS OR
HER TRUE NAME, OR WHO KNOWINGLY SIGNS MORE THAN ONE OF THESE
PETITIONS, OR SIGNS A PETITION WHERE HE OR SHE IS OTHERWISE
NOT QUALIFIED TO SIGN, OR WHO MAKES HEREIN ANY FALSE STATEMENT,
SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR.
o
Signature Sheet
o
v
Signature of
fZt;U;/a:,C:_124N_U:2bo~:,
Ronald Rot:hwell
15050 Longmire Sc SE
Yelm, WA 98597
Assessor's
Acreage
Assessor I S
Value
1 86 Ac
$ 60,800
217-24-420700 2 18 Ac $ 38,100
Jeffery Price
15128 Longmire Sc SE
Yelm, wA 98597
/ 217-24-410900 4 92Ac $ 61,400
ManTin Wagner
1523L.. Longmire St SE
Yelm, WA 98597
217-25-110400 .19 Ac 1,000
217-24-440100 2 73 ac $ 778,300
217-24-440200 75 87 Ac 60,700
Charles Brown
P O. Box Q
Yelm, WA 98597
217-24-240201 1.52 Ac $ 8 1 , 400
Billie Thacker
14636 Berry Valley Rd. SE
Yelm, WA 98597
217-23-410000 40 Ac $ 5,740
217-23-440000 40 Ac 2,400
217-24-310100 40 Ac 479,850
217-24-320000 40 Ac 7,000
217-24-330000 40 Ac 7,000
217-24-340100 20.3 Ac 3,550
Henry Dragt:
14848 Longmire St SE
Yelm, WA 98597 I
SUB TOTAL THIS PAGE $
page 5
4 of 4
~f\:;i:r~-;:-~-.-::~ ~-_..~--
=:-:~-~
... : \7"' ~
.---------
.: ..... ... ..... '-' - :.' ,-.~' -..
.. .~-;.-_...- -
~ ..~~.......--...:'----.~.....~~-~
. , . .
s.OYELM ANNEXATION PETITION 0
SIGNATURE SHEET
WARNING
EVERY PERSON WHO SIGNS THIS PETITION WITH ANY OTHER THAN HIS OR HER TRUE
NAME, OR WHO KNOWINGLY SIGNS MORE THAN ONE OF TIIESE PETITIONS, OR SIGNS A
PETITION WHERE HE OR SHE IS OTHERWISE NOT QUALIFIED TO SIGN, OR WHO MAKE
HEREIN ANY FALSE STATENfENT, SHALL BE GUILTY OF A NfISDEMEANOR.
Signature or
Propertv Owner
Parcel Number
Assessor s
Acreage
Assessor's
Value
217-24-420200
4:86 Ac
$93,600
Everett L. Hendrickson
10535 Berry Valley Road
Yelm, WA 98597
~/ p!lL
Kenn~th A. Donohue
Donohue Construction Co.
730 Sleater Kinney Road. S.E.
Lacey, WA 98503
217-24-420300
5.50 Ac
$25,900
217-24-420800
4.70 Ac
$92,400
Ronald Laughlin
15132 Longmire Street SE
Yelm, WA 98597
217-24-420501
5.52 Ac
$134,900
Jesse Hoffman
9910 Durant Road SE
Yelm, WA 98597
SUBTOTAL TIllS PAGE
$346,800
rage 6
1 of 3
j
s./~'ELM ANNEXATION PETITION 0
SIGNATURE SHEET
WARNING
EVERY PERSON WHO SIGNS THIS PETITION WITH ANY OTHER THAN HIS OR HER TRUE
NAME, OR WHO .I<1\fOWWGLY SIGNS MORE THAN ONE OF THESE PETITIONS, OR SIGNS A
PETITION WHERE HE OR SHE IS OTHERWISE NOT QUALIFIED TO SIGN, OR WHO MAKE
HEREIN ANY FALSE STATE1vfENT, SHALL BE GUILTY OF A NllSDEMEANOR.
Signature of
Prooerty Owner
Parcel Number
Assessor's
Acreage
Assessor' 5
Value
217-24-420200
4.86 Ac
$93,600
Everett L. Hendrickson
10535 Berry Valley Road
Yelm, WA 98597
217-24-420300
5.50 Ac
$25,900
Kenneth A. Donohue
Donohue Construction Co.
730 SIeater Kinney Road. S.E.
Lacey, W A 98503
/J d~r -).
(XL'A..C..le\--. v-- "-
Ronald Laughlin
15132 Longmire Street SE
Yelm, WA 98597
217-24-420800
4.70 Ac
$92,400
217-24-420501
5.52 Ac
$134,900
Jesse Hoffman
9910 Durant Road SE
Yelm, W A 98597
SUBTOTAL THIS PAGE
$346,800
page 6
2 of 3
v
~f I O~~, If IT:?~. ---..-_.
If~
117 I -, -
UtJ' -.'''"k>- il.
I OCT - 2 J.0CYl !/ /' j I
I Vv(;' lj IJ J 1
Ii.....,; "
I ,i(RAA~~R ~ . j
, ~ "It.. CHIN j I
vEATTIE W. & M.4~ '
, 'A 98101 ' 1
. <
EVERY PERSON WHO SIGNS THIS PETITION WITH ANY OTHER THAN HIS OR HER TRUE J
NAME, OR WHO KNOWINGLY SIGNS MORE THAN ONE OF TrlESE PETITIONS, OR SIGNS A
PETITION WHERE HE OR SHE IS OTHERWISE NOT QUALIFIED TO SIGN, OR WHO MAKE
HEREIN ANY FALSE STATEMENT, SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR.
SOYELM ANNEXATION PETITION 0
SIGNATURE SHEET
WARNING
Signature of
Property Owner
Parcel Number
Assessor's
Acreage
Assessor's
Value
217-24-420200
4.86 Ac
$93,600
Everett L. Hendric..1.(son
10535 Berry Valley Road
Yelm, WA 98597
217-24-420300
5.50 Ac
$25,900
Kenneth A. Donohue
Donohue Construction Co
730 SIeater Kinney Road. S.E.
Lacey, W A 98503
217-24-420800
4.70 Ac
$92,400
Ronald Laughlin
15132 Longmire Street SE
Yelm, W A 98597
~ T ~ 2>217-24-420501
sse Hoffman/.
9910 Durant Roaa SE
Yelm, WA 98597
5.52 Ac
$134,900
SUBTOTAL THIS PAGE
$346,800
page 6
3 of 3
/
s.OYELM ANNEXATION PETITION 0
SIGNATURE SHEET
WARNING
EVERY PERSON WHO SIGNS THIS PETITION WITH ANY OTHER THAN HIS OR HER TRUE
NAME, OR WHO KNOWINGLY SIGNS MORE THAN ONE OF THESE PETITIONS, OR SIGNS A
PETITION WHERE HE OR SHE IS OTHERWISE NOT QUALIFIED TO SIGN, OR WHO MAKE
HEREIN ANY FALSE STATEMENT, SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEAt'JOR.
page 7
1 of 2
Thur-ston Highland Annexation Petition
o Signatur-e Sheet 0
WARNING
EVERY PERSON WHO SIGNS THIS PETITION WITH ANY OTHER THAN HIS OR
HER TRUE NAME, OR WHO KNOWINGLY SIGNS MORE THAN ONE OF THESE
PETITIONS, OR SIGNS A PETlTION WHERE HE OR SHE IS OTHERWISE
NOT QUALIFIED TO SIGN, OR WHO MAKES HEREIN ANY FALSE STATEMENT,
SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR.
Signature of Assessor's Assessor's
Property Owner Parcel Number Acreage Value
217-26-410200 40 Ac $ 81,300
Jerry Bosequett
14409 Hwy 507
Yelm, WA 98597
L~ 1(0
217-26-420000 60 Ac $ 189,'220
David Doyle )
14045 George Road
Yelm, WA 98597
217-24-430100 9 76 Ac $ 59,900
Glen Newby
15105 Longmire St SE
Yelm, WA 98597
217-24-340000 9 7 Ac $ 88,700
William Parker
14947 Longmire St SE
Yelm, WA 98597
217-24-420502 2.3 Ac $ 65,300
Mary Louise Clemens
15030 Longmire St. SE
Yelm, WA 98597
SUB TOTAL THIS PAGE $
page 7
2 of 2
o
o
S W. YELM Al'\fNEXATION PETITION
SIGNATURE SHEET
W ARNTNG
EVERY PERSON WHO SIGNS THIS PETmON WITH ANY OTHER THAN HIS OR
HER TRUE NAME, OR WHO KNOWINGLY SIGNS MORE THAN ONE OF THESE
PETmONS, OR SIGNS A PETITION WHERE HE OR SHE IS OTHERWISE NOT
QUALIFIED TO SIGN, OR WHO MAKE HEREIN A1'\JY FALSE STATEMENi,
SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEAl"IOR
Signature of
Pro'Oertv Owner
Assessor's Assessor's
Parcel Number Acreage Value
217-24-340200 10 00 Ac $600
217-24-410401 8.23 Ac $490
217-24-410400 0.50 Ac $200
217-24-430000 9 94 Ac $600
217-24-430200 10 00 Ac $600
217-24-430300 7.50 Ac $450
217-24-440100 2.73 Ac $778,300
217-24-440200 75 87 Ac $91,040
217-24-440300 6.77 Ac $410
217-24-440400 1.20 Ac $200
217-25-110400 0.25 Ac $1,000
227-19-330200 110 Ac $4,400
227-19-330300 0.30 Ac $15,000
227-19-330700 0.35 Ac $15,000
134.74 Ac $908-,290
Charles Brown
POBox Q
Yelm, W A 98597
page 8
lof 1
o
o
S.W YELM ANNEXATION PETITION
SIGNATURE SHEET
WARNING
EVERY PERSON WHO SIGNS THIS PETITION WITH ANY OTHER THAN HIS OR HER TRUE
NAME, OR WHO KN"OWINGL Y SIGNS MORE THAN ONE OF THESE PETITIONS, OR SIGNS A
PETITION WHERE HE OR SHE IS OTHERWISE NOT QUALIFIED TO SIGN', OR WHO MAKE
HEREIN ANY FALSE STATEMENT, SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR.
Signature of
Property Owner Parcel Number
Assessor's
Acreage
1992 Assessor's
Value
",N1 f) /1 .tJ-r).
Vi j ~/~~"- 217-25-111301
V Paul Steadman
1801 W Day Island Blvd.
Tacoma, W A 98466
15.27 Ac
$83,300
SUBTOTAL n-ns PAGE
$83,300
page 9
/
~- - +.- :-.-.- - '";"" .-
,="= T 1::: ":3 c.. 1 1 1 5
FF"OII=fl
'f"
o
F' H I:; E D D1
~
PETITION FOR ANNEXl'.Tll Il'~ to THE an OfYEl.rv~ WASIUNGTON
TO The City Council of tht Ci ty of Yelm
105 Yehn A venue West
Yelm, W A 98597
We, the undersigned, being the o","'11;;rs of not lpss lhan sixty percent (bON) D"'\ va.lue
according to the assessed vahl.ltion for general taxahon of the l'ciill property within the
boundary described on Exhibit" A" attached hereto and wi.L.~n Thurston County, lying
continguous to the City of Yelm, Washington, do hereby petition that such territoY":, b~
annexed to and made a part of the City of Yelro under the provisions vi
RCW 35A.14.120, ~., and any amendments thereto, of the State of Washington. This
petition is accompanied by a map, Exhibit ''Un, which outlines the boundaries of the
property sought to be annexed..
These pages are a group of pages containing an identical text and petition intended by
the signers of this petition to be presented. and considered as one petition and. filed with
other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively be considered as a
single petition.
WHEREFORE, the undersigned respectively petition the City CoW1d1 and ask
1
That appropriate action be taken to entertain this petition, fixing a date for a
public hearing, causing notice to be published and posted, specifying the time
and place of such hearing, and inviting all persons interested to appear and voice
approval or disapproval of su~~exation, and
That following such hearingB subsequent to approval of the Thurston County
Boundary Review Board if such is convened, the City Council determine by
Ordinance that such annexation shall be effective; and that property so annexed
shall become part of the City of Yelm.. Washington, subject to its laws and
ordinances then and thereafter in force.
2.
The Petitioners agree that all property within the territory hereby sought to be annexed
shall be assessed. and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as property within the
City of Yelm or any now outstanding indebtedness of said City, including assessments
or taxes in payments of any bonds issued or debts contracted, prior to or existing at the
date of annexation simultaneous with annexation, and that the property shall be zoned
as Residential-Agricultural within the Thurston Highland and the Dragt parcels to be
designated as Master Planned Community, subjected to future council approval and
governed by the zoning ordinance of the City of Yelm.
P"l!'
++ TOTHL PHGE DD1 ++
! II I - ,I ~ 1 1 4 C i'.M F II 1
. --
o
o
Land Use & WCM
Development
Consultation
A Division of Kramer Chin & Mayo, Inc,
August 5, 1992
T odd Stamm, Director
City Planner
City of Yelm
PO Box479
Yelm, W A 98597
{Ii I"
,
Subject: S. W. Yelm Annexation
Dear Todd,
Just a word of appreciation from me to say thank you for taking the time to attend
the first S. W Yelm Annexation meeting on July 16, 1992, It was our first effort to get
the property owners together and we were encouraged by the show of interest.
While few people know exactly how to do an annexation of this magnitude, as a
novice I have been lucky to have the support of an official like you to lend me a
hand whenever needed.
I shall be out of the country until August 10, 1992. I hope to finalize the DE IS and the
petition signature drive before the end of the month,
Again, thank you for taking on some of the tough questions with informative
answers to some of the future Yelm citizens.
Sincerely,
~=~~~_~~TION
(d" Dennis T Su, A.LA.
Project Manager
DTS'jad
1976-02
1917 First Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 443-3537 Fax (206) 443-5372
'\
o 0
Community Meeting in Yelm
Thursday, July 16, 1992
~
The meeting was attended by Dennis Su of KCM, Robert Thorpe of R.W
Thorpe & Associates, and Bob Hazlett of Skillings & Chamberlain. In
addition, Todd Stamm, City Planner ICity Attorney and Gene Borges, City
Manager were there for the City of Yelm. The following is a summary of the
subjects discussed after the introduction by Dennis Su concerning the
annexation process, Robert Thorpe-EIS, and Bob Hazlett-concerning the traffic
and circulation issues The following outline was suggested as points of
reference
I. Annexation
A Process
B Who - When
II. Land Use
III. Timing
IV Transporta tion
V Community FacilIties
A Parks
B School Site
C. TraIls - Open Space
D Golf Course
VI Conceptual Site Plans
The following issues were covered in outline points
1 The number of years to bUIld out Answer PopulatIOn change for the
area and potential for employment would determine the buildout
period. It was indicated that the growth rate in the past had been 2.7%
to 3% and thIS would reflect approximately a 30 year growth. However,
the amemties in the community such as golf course, community
facilities and others may provide for a shorter term buildout
1
"
o
o
2. Value of homes Dennis Su indicated that originally when proposed
in 1990, the homes were envisioned to be $200,000, but at present the
average would probably be around $150,000 It was also noted that the
townhouse units may provide opportunities for homes in an
affordable range and up to $100,000. It was noted that there are
variable sizes for lots which would affect various home values, with
those around the golf course being higher than $200,000
3 Timing as to the annexation was discussed Todd Stamm and Dennis
Su indicated that it would be 3 to 6 months. It was noted that it would
only go to the Boundary Review Board if there is an appeal It was
further noted that the timeline is based on the EIS, when the DEIS and
FE IS is issued Todd Stamm and Robert Thorpe indicated that it
would be approximately 4-6 weeks before the draft is issued.
4. Questions of the urban growth area. Todd Stamm indicated that the
area is within the proposed urban growth boundary for Yelm, now
before the Thurston County staff and council.
5 The DEIS was discussed indicating that a 30 day comment period with
the option for 15 day extension would occur and during this time there
would be a public hearing on the EIS by the City In addition there
would be a Planning Commission hearing on the land use issue. After
that the Council would hold a hearing following the issuance of the
Final EIS Input would be taken from public agencies induding
Thurston County If there IS an appeal It would go to the Boundary
Review Board and then to Thurston County
6 There IS a question of creek flooding concerning the road across 93rd.
A neighbor (Roy) noted that it is under water at tImes The design
team indicated that this would be addressed by Barghausen Engmeers
in the EIS
7 Transportatlon.
1) What access to annexation area? Answer undetermined to the
north, state highway to the south.
2)
Transportation plan
transportation plan.
Bob Hazlett reviewed the current
3) Concern was indicated by some members of the audIence
concerning the issue of "trust" over the transportatIOn plan.
The major concern centered around the Y-2 alternative and ItS
impacts on views of the valley and Mt. Rainier from homes on
the hIll. Concerns were also evidenced about the Y-l and Y-7
al terna ti ves
2
o
o
4) Transportation plan, can the proposal be changed? Answer: yes
by City Council.
5) It was noted that new property owners would benefit at the cost
to existing residents (Note: by RWT, this is a quality of living
issue and should be considered in the Draft EIS for both the
transportation and the annexation issues)
8. Why should some residents annex if they are opposed? Todd Stamm
answered that and explained where they have a say in the process as
follows'
1) Initially the owners of 10% of the value indicate an intent to
annex,
2) The City said yes, but required an EIS,
3) An EIS is required,
4) Signatures of 60% of the area affected are necessary to carry the
item to Step 3 Step 3, public hearing by the CounciL Note this
is a legislative process and the options are to cut out or delete
certain properties, then approve or approve with conditions, or
deny He noted that all that the applicants are asking at this
point is an opportunity to get to the hearing by performmg the
EIS
It is noted that other governments will look at thIS issue, ie,
Thurston County, CIty of Rainier, school districts, etc. If there is
an objection then there wIll be a hearing at the Boundary
Review Board.
9 Question was asked about transportation corridors, how road right-of-
way is acquired. There was a discussion by Bob Hazlett concerning the
plan, design alternatives, selected roadway, EIS, hearing and
condemnation. Robert Thorpe mdIcated that there were a number of
opportunities for individual property owners to object to corridors and
that any final design would be after an EIS and then the property
owners had a 2 or 3 year process to interact on condemnation, to object
and to seek proper value for property taken. He also noted that these
processes become very political with city counCIls and State legislators
10 A question about the Transportation Plan taking traffic off of state
highway to put on city arterial was raIsed Answer move highway to
Y-l or Y-2, and then Yelm Ave. becomes local. Bob Hazlett indicated
that Y-1, Y-2 and Y-7 may not happen, but he indicated that land use
decisions may change If there are no roads and this may have a very
3
o
o
significant effect on Yelm's central business area and adjacent land uses
from business. Gene Borges indicated that the State does say under
Growth Management it must plan, including a transportation element.
He indicated that Y-7 is a major concern, but said the corridor is better
than last time, but he still has reservations
11 Citizen (Roy) said he had a concern about water levels in existing wells,
that any development in the area might draw down existing wells.
12. Citizen (Betsy) asked what provision there would be for property
owners in the area to continue to have animals She noted that they
would like to have animals in the future. Todd Stamm indicated that
was based on lot size, they can propose 1 acre, 2 acre, 5 acre, 10 acre can
have animals He indicated that urban zoning does not permit
animals. He said however, that the existing uses would be considered
agricultural/residential and animals would continue to be permitted.
13 Citizen (Marylou) asked about the amount of single family and the
amount of multifamily At this point Robert Thorpe brought out a
site plan and explained some options for the Thurston Highlands
property He indicated that some development plans were being
considered for the Venture property and would be considered in the
overall denSIty for the EIS He explamed the sIte plan and the range of
land uses. A question was asked about schools and it was indicated
that elementary only was envisioned for thIS site. This was based on
Dr Hall's recommendations and Vision 2002 Plan.
14. Question of tax impact was dIscussed with discussion by the City
Manager, then went into a discussion of item 15
15 Benefits of annexation. Gene mdIcated that he felt the annexation
benefits were as follows
1) Development standards and consistency of neighborhood,
2) Zonmg predictability;
3) Protect property values,
4) Taxes would be less,
5) Better local councIl representation,
Some resident indicated the following possible disadvantages
1) Freedom of land uses,
2) Loss of freedom to do what they wanted with the property;
4
o
o
3) Conditional government considerations
The meeting then broke into individual discussions with property owners
and various representatives at the meetings reviewing the annexation
outline and the conceptual site plan. It was agreed that the following would
occur 1) that a summary of the minutes of the meeting would be sent to all
property owners who left addresses at the meeting, this would be mailed out
by Dennis Su after a review of the draft, and Todd Stamm representing the
City 2) comments and suggestions on these minutes should be sent to'
Dennis Su,
KCM
1917 First Ave.
Seattle, W A 98101
Robert Thorpe
705 2nd Ave. Suite 910
Seattle, W A 98104
5
.- - -. --~~ --~~.-
0 , 0
$ Su/!/J - -ft'~ tf'tv4P/' ~d/~ 4##t1{).(/c-e
- /2f!p r,f' i T,A;/t-.k.J j/t/(}CIC /:le-.-9-/i'/..v6
~ fit v/ J,.v i?LJ tl~ :2 "2-
- .....
t!~~- ~7//~ ,dI/-
- -- - jJ ~ ---
~~b#' c#fA' ,4/ E;f~ &Ptl ;'J./I,J/ /1/1#/ hl
- ? - )!/1 SiCJt/7 r&;'{ ct /J/!/~oP~ tfIfFtfA/1/,{};V t-- - ---I
-
- I GilL L [)})/cl! - w!lpi)/ /'?J
I t
/vIE G~/ CCl/'lA'IJTe ,P~T,IJ ,
1/
:EL /J571/!~~CA/1- /}/l5 -
/(jvtA/l/J: )";J<PI/i" ;;~I/'/
- /) III!!?I ~tJfill#(J. . -t-
/
&11 ~/I7I/s ~-'6CJ 7:
.I - {/c,6,~ -
- - /.5':> VI"
/Ajx
- /
/
I
.---- -
--- ---~~
\
J.ff.r't.o~
o
~
U
1-:"r.=-J-=-;::--~::;--' C.-
'; ,'\ I ~ (c--' 15 Ii ... ,j/; , j ,
l'~ ~"7 L5 U U L:c': i.
I: i :
I i 1,1
L I 51992 '~i
'~,
\'-' "~
\) ',' '-~,-""
\J d'
(laUam
o
'<7d 0-,
~,Graw (G--/i, 909 Sleater-Kinney Rd S E., Suite 1
\ Harbor ,Ma<o",~,_'~, LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503
~~ ~j~J~ ~_ (206) 43~~~11_~83000~422-5623
~ \ Thmton ,'--r J July 10, 1992
,...,...-, \
~ (POCifl< 1\ r>.. f) I
l~#( · .~
f~~t~o~f4~~lm Mayor ~\0' ~ ofJfffh0 ,rrW( ~~~~J ~ .
, Yelm, WA 98597
".~ Dei'lr Mayor: ~ ~ ~ ' r~ ' 0;;
The Washington Clean Air Act (RCW 70.94) requires that prior to~
the fourth Monday of June each year, the Air Pollutlon Control
Authority shall notify each city, town, and county, within their\/~
L ,jurisdiction, of their assessment. ~J \.rr II
I'l' It ~I\\J
We are very sorry to be getting this to you at such a late date. U
We were in the middle of relocating to a new office and there wa ,{ ~
much mayhem. We hope that this does not cause you too many ~,~ ~~
problems. r~ ;}.\)
At its June 10, 1992 meeting, the Oly~pic Air Pollution Control~t~
Board of Directors established the per capita assessment for 19 '
at thirty-three and a half cents ($.335). The population figure
for the City of Yelm of 1,365 is based upon the publication by
the Washington State Office of Fiscal Management, Forecasting
Division, "1991 Population Trends for Washington State".
Air Pollution Con
This letter will serve as notification that your Contribution for
calendar year 1993 to the Olympic Air Pollution Control Authority
is $457. You will receive a statement for this amount in
January.
Sincerely,
/l' - //}
~,Il.:vzL'<.4~ ,~~
Charles Peace
Control Officer
CP:djm
An Agency of Government Having Regulatory and Enforcement Authority in and for
Clallam, Grays Harbor, Jefferson, Mason, Pacific, and Thurston Counties of Washington Slale
-----~-rl
II
o
::)
il
I,
, I
II
II
.!.!---t--
II \ 1"
I
I A~~_ ~~ ~ ~~Jc ~~~-\dk *-s
llw><- ~_(,.~_SS~, A\~-., ~- ~,-k.$L.~~
, I \
! I~f f~":u-....~.o'- ....S_-.:>.D~lQ__-<J:-h.~~_a ~'Sc>.J_:',S
IG ~ '-'i ~__~_;;_L <-............ "",-1. ~ \.,.~
II--\-.., ""~ ......, ~ ::b._fil..>l... ~ \ -=- ~ {. u.J.) ~ ~ ""
Jb L If 0 -. b... ~ '^-kr v f.f J..... 7 u-. s~ ",-,.Q ---:t ' --...
!* ""- L{j 1.2' ~ -::t:b;. c;, L...-.....o C ~ :- ~ _
I
I
? \u....~ C- -. \ \ tL~ ~~ Oa-~ ~ ->L-U ~s
I
~ \ "'" ~ '--"--A-"-'~\ -'-NO "J,,-'40..Q ~~
II ~ ~ ~ ~ <" ~ '-'~ k <<. ~~ · CA. \-:-...... 4-~ '-'L.
II u.. '-'- fJ-. '<-;, c... '-' " ., "- s .......>c ~/ .....1 C9 ~~J
I
~-:~
Ii
: I
II
I
i
!
I
I
'I
:1
]
,I
I
i
:1
o
o
APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION
~ Jurisdiction Requesting Annexation:
City of Yelm
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
( ';''v>ru-\ L
NP'" "V-
I ~f\ \0--
10
Resposible Official:
Shelly Badger, City Administrator
If number of parcels is less than three, please list the
owners: See 'Certification of Annexation Petition'
enclosed in the packet
Location (address if assigned):
See 'Description of the proposal and alternatives' enclosed
in the packet
Le~al Description:
See Exhibit A
Size in Acres:
2058 +/-
Assessed Value:
$ 6,240,320 00
Please state the nature of this action and the relevant
statutory citation (i.e., annexation for municipal purposes
pursuant to RCW 35.13.180): ~~
This action is a proposed annexation of approxim~~y 2058
acres to the City of Ye lm l\t:t:irldCf'%CW 35A 14 120 I' \ _ \
..:.('VI" ......J... \~ ~ ~.....\ f>'"' r~c~c.f, ~ '" ,Sou...... v..""t- ~
Current County Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Desi~nation:
The current County Zoning and Comp Plan designationAis ~
Rural Resid~nt1alckoneAto five acres ) (\~"","-L- p..o,'<)s -----.
Oe..("' ~ (1N..c..,..~. J~ \ i L -, ,,,,:...10- ""+CJ -' .\.. --'~
'\ "\'6 v 6- '^- ""tt....,~~, ~ -..-
Pro osed Cit onin and Com rehensive Plan Desi nation:
Currently, the roposed zoning for the annexed area will ' ~
remain at the sa e density as the C~g More~~f~~~
analysis will be ~o determine~' e in dens'ty ~~{~~
& later tim~ The[zonlnglproposedJ ';Planned
Development District'-provloes a var~~~v~f uses and housing
types, is complimenta^ry to the Comp~ ~lan for the City of
Yelm, and would be in the public interest if annexed
Is this site within the present Urban Growth Management Area
as adopted and approved by Lacey, Olympia, Tummwater, and
Thurston County?
The area proposed for annexation is
Growth area designated for the City
within the current
of Yelm ,^"
Urban
LOJ~~ -t'c:-- c.l,
cJ-:) ~ ~ () -k_ 2JL -- 1..
,\ \J ~---!S I ~Q.fj ~
c.M- 1-e- wL 6 ~ u
0\ \.0.... -. J) ~
11
w~ tv
l
12
- ~
/~ ~.~ J..-c
< L., ~
~'" (")
13
14
- -- ~,,<-<-- ....,,;J'+ -- u --7-
o ~ II I ;~:~ :;eft-qJ-t.~:;5-~' +-7~
i.r .,.... Iv...... ..,J"::-J-<--:A- ~ v.,D1' #-'L";~j.r \ n ~
~ L \. J L E> J..-.... a-?~ A..- q.. -; <;; 7'.S" ~ ~ tfi) v- I co ~ "".:> J ex-e....r-
l cY~S{J/t)v $~-J<L--~ ~~~dlA. j
Is this site cu~entl served 0 sewer or wate ,
Currently, this site is not served by sewer water
However, because of the unique opportunitie surrounding
this annexation and potential development ternatives,
methods for water treatment are being looked at~Water
ri and expanded service capability will be futher
ddressed at the time of development The Draft and Final
Environmental Impact statements address these issues more
thoroughly
A-V\.
Does th' 1"0 osal affect an other inter 'urisdictional
nts?
Yes ~reement between the City of Yelm and Thurston County
F ~ D i s t r i c.t-2r Tl;e 8greempR.'L-hetweell Y.., l..~.J r i r~ D is t ~
~allows ~ the Fire Distr'~ collect~fees as the
~ty expands :~~r~~bL
~
How does this proposal conform to adopted city policies
on annexation?
This proposal complies with the City of Yelm's criteria,
goals and policies described in Yelm Ordinance No 414 ....( ~
(Enclosed ,is a copy of ~is ordil").anc~ A.'l1..e...-L.'~ c.'(J v~L... <J.-. .
~kVo"'"3 Le 4.A._ ";~~t'tJ -- A..Vc- La f\- 'f'.dV'~ ~+ t;,~<-- fF'<3(4S')
Other SrCifiC Reasoncs: for Annexation u_p/. . 52-
~~~~~~ ~~~~loim~:~tS~~ ~~~:~tA~~C~~~~~~t~~~ ~~~~n:~ries
of public hearings and workshops, the Yelm Planning ~
Comm,issi~nAmade the following findings::.tn 5upport or Lhe ~
Sout~lm Annexation: L. ;\
---
Io.{)PC'DVJ;.. ~v A
n /\,.. 9- fVtv
:/...)Yr' ..---- ?~l?o.JJ-
'" 1.((jV-~#I i)
The proposed Southwest Yelm Annexation is consistent
with the joint planning done by the City of Yelm and
Thurston County for the property within the proposed
Urban Growth Area for the City of Yelm
B
The zoning proposed for the annexation area provides
a variety of uses and housing types, is complimentary
to the existing Comprehensive Plan for the City of
Yelm, and would be in the public interest if adopted by
the city
C
The utility and transportaion plans to serve the
annexed area provide reasonable alternatives,
consistent with the City's growth management planning
utility planning The city is committed to additional
utility planning processes before any specific
development is approved, to assure that adequate
capacity for all necessary facilities is available
concurrently with any proposed development
D
The Southwest Yelm Annexation Final Environmental
Impact Statement adequately and accurately describes
o
o
the project and is determined by the Planning
Commission to be adequate
..,
\ I ,\t---
~ ~(~
. I'f\- t) d
/~~r~~ E
~ ~ ..~ ,,-'
t:~~<~ '-0"--s~
/' O~ 917
~" v,,\.l>'
I}.;;-~
E The City of Yelm may annex the property consistent
n. with its annexation policies and provide a significant
r n. ,,~ benefit to the City in terms of a well-planned
~~~~~~\~ development area and not provide any undue burden to
c:+-; U\Jk/~ the exisiting taxpayers of the City of Yelm
JJ }5 Explain how this proposal furthers the objectives of the
1.(1)0(0 ,) Review Board RCW 36.93.18 :
l' v\' 1"t1:..$C..cv, lAd\) (".,. l \A,,<-<,-\U"'D~ Loo~~ o....J2.--c.o.....-I.J....:4iv
y the area s"""'sparsely populated and the ---.
itself would not impact the existing
The proposed Planned Unit Development
allows for a unique opportunity to preserve the
natural character of the neighborhoods and community
U Sc... ~ .;'\ c..-\ k>c u...\) ....,..~ c....'S .. .
e ropos annexation uses Sr 507 as an eastern
border, excQuding areas that have determined to be .-- p ~S
environmen~y sensitive The area to northwest is ~~~
bordered by forests This annexation has taken into _O\~ I
account the use of physical ~oundaries when applicable
/>> <-,,-I SlU-""~ c...<- a...r""lA-, r. ~.j...~_....Y- hy' () L> '8 71''''-''' ~ "'t- u-J.:f, P/""'t.5
AIlJ the land subject to this annexa~ion are' is within
1the proposed Urban Growth Area and has been taken into
account with the development of Yelm's Transportaion
Plan and Utilities Plans, further analysis and planning
will be done prior to development The City contracts
with Thurston County Fire Dist 2 for fire protection
services Once annexed, the City of Yelm would provide
police services The proposed annexation area is
within a three minute drive from the police station
.A II"....!> c/
The annnexation area^eoRtai~ logical boundaries
The boundaries fOllow~ection~lines, The Fort Lewis
Mi 1 i tary Reservat ion ooundary, ~a State highway. ~n<... h~v~
excludes environmentally sensitive areas^Ret a~~]icaBlcL- /'
"t t" in t'me f", od,,," type de-v.. 1 opm..nt "'llou~J;~ ~';:1fr"::::-t.-t
This annexation would discourage possible future ~~, ~fP~~l
ef for ts to incorporate a sma 11 c ity \J?(...~ ...""~ ~"kc..
~~~l"~J.l)i"; L;./~~t; ~~~~~~;; i~ Ut il ity Distr ict, bv+
+tuwcv~it provides no services to this area "'There
are no other inactive special purpose districts in the
area proposed for annexation
\ ",+f' -t ~
~
,. d-iJD
o '" J''''
B
~k.
;---
C
D
F
G
o
o
APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION
~ Jurisdiction Requesting Annexation:
City of Yelm
Responsible Official:
Shelly Badger, City Administrator
2 If number of parcels is less than three. please list the
owners: See 'Certification of Annexation Petition'
enclosed in the packet
3 Location (address if assiQned):
Southwest of the current Yelm City Limits See 'Description
of the proposal' and locational maps enclosed in the packet
4 Legal Description:
See Exhibit A
5 Size in Acres:
2058 +/-
6 Assessed Value:
$ 6,240,320 00
7 Please state the nature of this action and the relevant
statutory citation (i.e.. annexation for municipal purposes
pursuant to RCW 35.13.180):
This action is a proposed annexation of approximately 2058
acres to the City of Yelm for -mu,dCTPa I J21, urposes pursuant to
RCW 35A 14 120 "/
,.
8 Current County ZoninQ and Comprehensive Plan DesiQnation:
The current County Zoning and Comp Plan designation is
Rural Residential ( one unit to five acres)
9 Proposed City Zoning and Comprehensive Plan DesiQnation:
Currently. the proposed zoning for the annexed area will
remain at the same density as the County zoning More
analysis will be performed to determine appropriate future
densities The City is looking at the designation of a
Planned Development District , which provides for a variety
of uses and housing types, is complimentary to the
Comprehensive Plan for the City of Yelm, and would be in
the public interest if annexed
10 Is this site within the present Urban Growth ManaQement Area
as adopted and approved by Lacey. Olympia. Tummwater. and.
Thurston County? \1f'.l(tAW"-"
The area proposed for annexation is within the current~Urban
Growth Boundary approved by the County for the City of Yelm 7
o
o
11 Is this site currently served by sewer or water?
Currently, this site is not served by sewer or water The
City of Yelm is in the process of constructing a sewage
treatment facility to serve the existing boundaries of the
City The facility is not designed to serve this
annexation However, because of the unique opportunities
surrounding this annexation and potential development
alternatives, methods for wastewater treatment are being
considered Water rights and expanded water service
capability will be further addressed at the time of
development The Draft and Final Environmental Impact
Statements address these issues more thoroughly
12 Does this proposal affect any other interjurisdictional
agreements?
Yes An agreement between the City of Yelm and Thurston
County Fire District #2 allows for the Fire District to
collect more fees as the city expands
13 How does this proposal conform to adopted city policies
on annexation?
The City Council and Planning Commission have both found
that this proposal complies with the City of Yelm's
criteria, goals and policies described in Yelm Ordinance No
414 (Enclosed is a copy of this ordinance)
14 Other Specific Reason(s) for Annexation
After~eries of public hearings and workshops, the Yelm
Planning Commission approved the Southwest Yelm Annexation
and the accompanying Final Environmental Impact Statement
and made the following findings:
A The proposed Southwest Yelm Annexation is consistent
with the joint planning done by the City of Yelm and
Thurston County for the property within the proposed
Urban Growth Area for the City of Yelm
B The zoning proposed for the annexation area provides
a variety of uses and housing types, is complimentary
to the existing Comprehensive Plan for the City of
Yelm, and would be in the public interest if adopted by
the city
C The utility and transportation plans to serve the
annexed area provide reasonable alternatives,
consistent with the City's growth management planning
utility planning The city is committed to additional
utility planning processes before any specific
development is approved, to assure that adequate
capacity for all necessary facilities is available
concurrently with any proposed development
o
o
D
The Southwest Yelm Annexation Final Environmental
Impact Statement adequately and accurately describes
the project and is determined by the Planning
Commission to be adequate .rJ, fteu. /
W'" 1.U~l.F '5
The City of Yelm may annex the prOD~y consistent
with its annexation policies and~ovide a significant
benefit to the City in terms of a well-planned
development area and not provide any undue burden to
the existing taxpayers of the City of Yelm
E
15 Explain how this proposal furthers the objectives of the
Boundary Review Board (RCW 36.93.180):
A Preservation of natural neiQhborhoods and communities:
Currently the area is sparsely populated and the
annexation itself would not impact the existing
community The proposed Planned Unit Development
allows for a unique opportunity to preserve the
natural character of the neighborhoods and community
B Use of ph~sical boundaries. includinQ but not limited to
of water. hiQhways. and land contours:
The proposed annexation uses SR 507 as an eastern
border, excluding areas that have determined to be
environmentally sensitive The area to~rthwest is
Ft Lewis and bordered by forests This annexation has
taken into account the use of physical boundaries when
applicable
C Creation and preservation of 10Qical service areas:
All the land subject to this annexation area is within
the proposed Urban Growth Area and has been taken into
account with the development of Yelm's Transportation
Plan and Utilities Plans, further analysis and planning
will be done prior to development The City contracts
with Thurston County Fire Dist 2 for fire protection
services Once annexed, the City of Yelm would provide
police services The proposed annexation area is
within a three minute drive from the police station
D Prevention of abnormally irreQular boundaries:
The annexation area follows logical boundaries
The boundaries follow section lines~ Fort Lewis
Military Reservation boundary, and a State highway The
boundary excludes environmentally sensitive areas
because they are not appropriate for the proposed uses
and dens it i es
o
o
E DiscouraQement of multiple incorporation of small cities
and encouraQement of incorporation of cities in excess of
ten thousand population in heavily populated areas.
This annexation would discourage possible future
efforts to incorporate a small city
F Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts:
Thurston County has established a Public Utility
District, but it provides no services to this area
There are no other inactive special purpose districts
in the area proposed for annexation
G Adjustment of impractical boundaries:
The proposed annexation would bring into the city an
area designated for urban growth and services The
boundary lines are concise and easily defined
~
H Incorporation 06 cities or towns or annexations to cities
or towns of unincorporated areas which are urban in
character
Although most of the area is presently undeveloped and
sparsely populated at this time, the designation of a
"Planned Unit Development could certainly provide for
densities of an urban character
I Protection of aQricultural lands:
A portion of the annexed area does have some smaller
pockets of farm land currently in agricultural use
However, there are no agricultural lands of long-term
significance designated within the annexation area
FACTORS STATED IN RCW 36.93.170
(Note: The Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) thoroughly address these
factors as well as provide an in depth look at impacts,
alternatives/scenarios, and land use analysis)
1 Population and territory
-Population growth, pg 56 of the DEIS
-Population projection, Yelm area 1990-2010, pg 64 of the
DEIS
2 Population density
-Density is very low and rural in character
3 Land area and land use
-Existing land uses, pg 74 of the DEIS
-Local housing units and types, pg. 78 of the DEIS
c)
o
4 Comprehensive use plans and zoninQ
-Previously addressed in items #8 and #9 of this
application
5 Per capita assessed valuation
-Per capita costs are in table 3, pg A-4 of the appendices
of the FEIS
6 TOPoQraphy. natural boundaries and drainage basins.
proximity to other populated areas ~
-Topographic map on pg iv, of the DEIS I
-Wetlands map on pg 31 of the DEIS
-Storm water drainage and storm collection systems, pg 117
of the DEIS
-Locational map on Figures #1 and #2 of the Introduction of
the DEIS and FEIS
7 The existence of prime aQricultural soils and agricultural
uses
-Soils delineation on pgs 67 and 68, figure 17 in the DEIS
8 The likelihood of siQnificant Qrowth in the area and in
adjacent incorporation and unincorporated areas durinQ the
next ten years
-Projected demographic trends, pgs 59 and 60 of the DEIS
-Population projections, Yelm area, pg 64 of the DEIS
9 Location and most desirable location of community facilities
-Currently there are no community facilities within the
annexation area, these will be identified prior to
development
10 Municipal services
-Public services are addressed on pgs 103-123 in the DEIS
and in appendices A-1 through A-8 of the FEIS
11 Need for municipal services
-The needs for public services are addressed in pgs 103-123
of the DEIS
-Transportation study is in pgs 82-102 of the DEIS.
12 Effect of ordinances. Qovernmental codes. reQulations and
resolutions on existinQ uses
-The city of Yelm's ordinances, codes, regulations and
resolutions would be in affect for the annexation area
-Existing uses at the time of annexation would be
"grandfathered" in
13 Present cost and adequacy of Qovernmental services and
controls in area
-Level of service analysis, pg 100, table 17 of the DEIS
-Public service costs, pg 126, table 19 of the DEIS
o
n
v
14 Prospects of Qovernmental services from other sources
-None at this time
15 Probable future needs for such services and controls
-Current and future needs for public services are addressed
in section D, parts 1 through 9, pgs 103-123 of the DEIS
-Transportation plan, pgs 82-102
16 Probable effect of proposal or alternative on cost and
adequacy of services and controls in area and adjacent area
-Estimated infrastructure costs by alternative, appendices
A-3 of the FEIS
-Estimated public service costs, appendices A-4 through A-6
of the FEIS
-Summary of total estimated costs for infrastructure and
services under proposed alternatives, appendices A-8 of
the FEIS
17 The effect of the finances. debt structure. and contractual
obligation and riQhts of all affected Qovernmental units
-Revenue and estimated land revenues on pgs 128-130 of the
DEIS
-Appendices A-10 through A-16 of the FEIS address potential
and estimated land and tax revenues
18 The effect of the proposal or alternative on adjacent areas,
on mutual economic and social interests, and on the local
Qovernmental structure of the county
-The current proposal would only change the governing body
for the area to be annexed It is not expected that this
would adversly effect adjacent areas The current land
uses and densities are not likely to provide a substantive
tax revenue for the county, and many of the residents in
the area already identify themselves with theCi~ of Yelm
It is not anticipated that this annexation would ~esult in
any change to the governmental structure of the County
o
o
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Description of the proposal (summaries are also contained
in the Final and Draft Environmental Checklists)
2 Application for annexation
3 Legal description
4 Vicinity map
5 Site map
6 Yelm Zoning Map
7 City of Yelm Ordinance NO 414, pertaining to annexations
8 Certification of annexation, list of property owners and
assessed value
9 Final Environmental Impact statement
10 Draft Environmental Impact statement
o
o
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Description of the proposal (summaries are also contained
in the Final and Draft Environmental Checklists)
2 Application for annexation
3 Legal description
4 Viclnity map
5 Site map
6 Yelm Zoning Map
7 City of Yelm Ordinance NO 414, pertaining to annexations
8 Certificatlon of annexation, list of property owners and
assessed value
9 Final Environmental Impact Statement
10 Draft Environmental Impact Statement
/ i i ..... /--~
{ , \ ~
II
Ii J
-
-*. tD ~
I
G-~_ ~ ;I}~ Of!tvav;i
J{-.2(J/C(J- - j)vnn0 s}l ~ ~~
~ rp;~M<:od~ /8aci S-WiJl ~ ~'r i3a,*~
-----PatvL ~_'~ ' 6
StUve..GF 7buJ _
jl
L--- .--
- L OM ~ L/<!00-- {AX 1JIjleL 7u (;,;?/MCCJ201 ,dowu /&f-I'V
'lIJ-C- ~ hclZAJ _ _ _ _
[
I ~c~o.p.JOU-
- ~..~ r /eitcrtf~d.
- VlIIt- Wi ULr tAlfl/L wlr~;j~Ci,dr~
. t~df LJI
1- n - - - - T - ---- <2-- -
- l!l7brvn~ /h=~ r~ t (l1froPw.n~ .
~ rr ~.17t/) tsZ'Pf-(]rflL0( (Qr/!Y/hJc-
ollYe~o . ~ _n.o _
- ~ Ihd:L ~~ ~. 1Jz~0 ~~- nCf1A7. ~
/ I~d~. ~ ~ /tAYWo l))o~~ ~~._...
t6M7Udv. 1 11/1+. ra~ f !Af~ ~
--- -----
~ 1J-ii+ wi ~vtw1' ~mv \V!fi) h Y&K ~"-- w/F
. f1S '0h Cit"' ~ 0 o. ... .
11- - .
-rr -.--
II
't
I'
II
II
------- ~~ -- - ---~ ------~----- ~-~- -------
'\ ~--
, ,-
'-J "- .Jr
n i
&.el1..€ 8, f- /'!itJ12J/79/.,; 1"'/6dL,l/-iI""J?5
C / tit L f'-e 1/ 111~J SU !
!
_ _1!J,v. ~"-,._.
'- /AI/I'../,IE " --.-.
~- -? C9L-/f.Ll0J~t.?- 'h--ic/Jtl{t '\/ ,
--- - .-
-------.
- . --- - - -
- :::> C;7L;J~~ jtL4v2;.tm~ ,Ae~ 5 p J-td~ ~~/ ~' c.~~ 0-!JL~;Lt-
..
-....... . S,{J ~ s ~ s ;r~" - /2 .a~ s> r.e LC e;:.:.", J-~-T:/e.~
-" ,.S7~ r;~/k// r~d~ /_/!:!::;:z~!;;L/1Zc'~ --. .5'e'h-~e ~JL.P/H
- r
/)!/ ...at JYd~7 ,-
//v~U.~ #cT~
-
a .- /L'1 J-
t'otru(~ /7U~ 0 7"tl -7
- f
I~~ - tL
iN .--
-_CJ ff~~~~~~d4Jt i~/'P>'l'-
-.." (2) I~ " ""M~
. pR lLtt.€' ,.-0
OJ /pc; c~ m /~~/r
-
. _ t:::ye.. I-~ ,.(')-.rl PV< ft ~ci' ~ ~ C;-9~-Cp~-r1/f Ii./"'L__.__.
I
L-I J /W~...
- I~ --
..
.~~~~ Jf-c~&. ~
--'
-
-
- ._.
.. ------------------- - - - --- -- .-
------ --
r .. ..
-0
..
-
- 1__ .-- ---- -------- -~--
(J
Of
City of' YellD
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
206-458-3244
j
February 24, 1992
Attn Shana Stevenson
Thurston County Boundary Reivew Board
2000 Laheridge Drive SW
Olympia, WA 98502
PRELIMINARY NOTICE OF INTENT TO ANNEX
Pursuant to HeW 36 93 090, the City of xelm hereby gives notice to the
Thurston County Boundary Review Board of the City's receIpt of notice
of a proposal to commence annexation from owners of ten percent of the
property outlined in the attached map On August 28. 1991, the City
Council of Yelm modified and accepted this proposal, thereby
authorizing the proponents to prepare and circulate a petitIon for
annexation
Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act a declaration of
significance has been issued by the City with respect to this
proposal A preliminary environmental impact statement is anticipated
in May of this year The City has not received nor will the City act
,upon a petition to annex this area until such time as a final
environmental impact statement has been issued Upon receipt of this
petition the City will provide a final "NotIce of Intent to Annex"
with all appropriate information as outlined in the Board's notice
format
~
D
o
Accordingly, the City requests that the Board take no action with
respect to thi s proposa 1 unt i 1 such time as the City prov ides "F ina 1
Notice" of intent to annex this area Please feel free to contact
either Gene Borges, City Administrator, or myself should there be any
questions regarding this proposed procedure
Sincerely,
~ J;cz-
Todd Stamm
City Planner
cc Jon Potter, Entranco
Dana Mower, Barghausen
Robert Thorp, R W Thorpe and Associates
Dennis Su, K C M
Henry Dragt
J Paul Steadman
John Purvis
Robert Welcome
William Parker
..
I
Southwest Yelm Annexation Petitioners
a
(]
Kramer, Chin & Mayo, Inc. KCM
February 14/ 1992
Mr Gene Borges
City Administrator
City of Yelm
POBox 479
Yelm, WA 98597
Subject:
Annexation
Dear Gene:
The enclosed packet was obtained at the public hearing of the Bothell Annexation at
the Snohomish County Boundary Review Board earlier this week.
I find it very useful in our case because not only the size of the city is doubled, the
information prepared is exactly what I have been trying to gather for our public
presentation.
Please go over the materials and let me know your comments. Maybe with help
from the city staff, you can supply me with answers to those standard questions and
conditions.
Thank you for your help
Sincerely /
------
DTS:sf
Enclosure
1976-02
1917 First Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101-1027 (206) 443-5300 Fax (206) 443-5372
/
[~
c~'
City of YelDl
105 Yelm A venue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
206-458-3244
February 13, 1992
Attn:
Annexation Petitioners
v
Henry Dragt. J Pau 1
John / Purvis, RoberJ
Wi 1 1 i am .1i'-+s~
#If.../'-~It.-
Steadman,
Welcome,
Re'
"Longm ire Road
annexation
Area/Thurston
Highlands/Dragt
Dairy"
Dear Sirs'
I have recently been informed of concerns among certain parties
regarding a lack of communication surrounding the 2000-acre
annexation now pending before the City of Yelm This letter is
provided to reconfirm the City of Yelm's position with respect
to the cosigners of the annexation petitions
From the viewpoint of the City this annexation request
constitutes a single application by the group of property
owners. Decisions to be made by the City will be made with
respect to the area as a who 1 e. Thi s approach does not mean
that the City will not decide to annex only a portion of the
subject property However, such a decision will be made within
the context of the ent ire area proposed for annexat ion rather
than on the basis of any particular property boundaries or
ownership.
Since internal dissension will not be viewed favorably by those
reviewing the proposal, any differences of opinion among the
many petitioners should be resolved prior to presentation of the
environmental impact statement and final annexation petition.
Of course, subsequent to an annexation decision we look forward
to working with each owner with respect to development of his or
her particular property
Accordingly, you and the other petitioners are urged to work
together toward your mutual goal of annexation to the Ci ty of
Yelm. To avoid any confusion and to ensure proper distribution
of information I would appreciate it if y:>u would provide the
City with a letter setting forth the authority of one
spokesperson (or, if neces sary , up to th"~ ee ind i v idua Is) who
will attend meetings and speak for all of the petitioners. For
its part, the City is prepared to distribute copies of all
future correspondence and notices to up to :3ix individuals to be
designated by you and the other petitioners.
Your prompt response will be appreciated
/d/~
Todd Stamm
City Planner
cc Jon Potter, Entranco
Dana Mower, Barghausen
Robert Thorpe, R.W Thorpe and Associates
Dennis Su, K C M.
[,:)
CJ
"
o
o
"L/b/47-
, I . 3?-- '7: 4- c;
)d ~",,:\V"1-
II 'L j
"'. '" ,e~. .' .
\ , (-r liO......+ yt/l o."tl~e-... If;l....t -s..,-;/-z. ~rr
.q::p!- I '> Ti?~Ov~ 01 l4'j &u~ c: "e ,<-0 V'- ~ ~
..,) C'~'" A 'F'-...J,':~ II"" _ 0-- Gov. "PC";'+--.ciJ <1 ,<?v
-:l> ) ~ M P. ~ C ,-/'"2-<'-> ~ / ",lev 7""":.,,+;.(-\ V'd~ s-~' - 7~ ~,j,M
h-J Ie."", i ),:3f "(0 po v k..{- 6" ~"A J~ """ -fz, ~
L) cJ,<?Jj",,(-<;/ I V> ,.<"" -1-zJS
U5:e
~) {,,1 '?rEs Q ,,--tz. -(,~ s
~.r>bf~~ 1 - --z.. a"",C"...",-~~ lcs
#-_. C , ). -r' ~
u '__~ / ~~W"-1.."
I
d~
,Vee) tfL""""J ~;-L-ov"~. ~ +
i _ L ~~~<::.t.<--t::-~-c. ~C <..i~ -(j-'"
-< S o;-I-n>. A &. 7re~ - "<'- -3" 0 ~ <P-5 P"' WhfI-kJ ~ k
to"" .
q ")'4~ "" \'-'d+ >AV.t- I ~ -A~lj .Jl (G e
".....5+{ '-7 ~J, -hL-<-~< l~ - ." , ,,""" J -(.c.
r J I /
M-f """,f,) Wi+/' 6kfl f-r~~ ..,;b> -{-t,:",
~ s~ bn~.Q c.}/,o,< - j?.r-_J-
~, ~ ::;,J. ,....".,.-.S"
,-(~...:.;::::l~".,I'\.) ~ 0"(----
e~f""V-1-e--~le
o
o
. , ,
'Pov-I::. [Of/to' ~~
-5Y('$~ ?q;~
~q-H-e-v1 c70 JeV
U I P (j\~{-3l ~v\..
T :)- (. fi-t .:;- Loce/ ~e"l/'"C::e
'fsc ! ~. I-h S })[..J c.z:- ., r:1 'Le q
+rJtrC d~ 1 ~ (~ 1.,5' )
LO;c <:-'7 T==>~ ~c::;..",
CfJ~ C1J.Q<(VC,~'
Jo~~v~~_
F'"l V) (,' ... e q (
C'--C:7'~f ........
q-e<:t.
- S -(~.:-~ ~ +er c.../L 5<::' ~i
,/1 cJ't!!-O Ja-r + <<-,~';.j-s'vLd,~j
u p "'"'7 ~'-'<< """,J ~ z:.
C i V I C Ce ~ -4 - i..<} I:~" ~ l...e- +-z ~ sI--z7 k......, <;-0 <;.01 <iL ; j.,::)"'"-'-r ~VJ
L .-10 ~c~Vr +-s
CO,~ ~/AC-( / lc:......!"") -f..z,-,,,~J /C)~ v"t F ~(c:x_L<:; ~-,-.y U-~~
C.. ~ b- r.e~c:Ji"'j 'lJ (J~({.:-uzs l~p> tc-..~ -J.J ~ v v rU J)
O~~ I-'re vV\~ )'-1 F ,=-- -f-z, s[.~ F _ t/l.,;?U3L. bo.-L~J,:;..
"..;Zed +-0 (/'""-~ it--t F ~ + <; F- bv+
c..Jv"" + Sv' l-~ ~.37 ~ ( 0 - S -bt c> ~ r '1 6i~ +w- q c.. -I-iJ-€ ~
I<J""+ !".. '" "'{' . t:, V + I <;. d:"Jt-.zJ W '1 J- ~ U;-" T H - s,~
r-b'S:S:\. C... +-Lv-v ; vt.-t.~c--I- s'
~'7 wJI ~ \ WlCJ4., ~:J::'~> _tr<C..
, f - C ) .J
4 ~,",Cl t--(; '-'"\ 5 "" 1 /"'€. ~....... . 1,\
~ u,ef ~ s.r-- d a-t c.sz, tI e.C -?o r Lz.. v Q I
ct S; ~-<)~.., 0.0
{~-e-iI>, l/.~/~ c=/kcb
0, S "---ol,)).:"{ J<-
~~..
c.-.--+Z &.u~+S PlCc.e~ -b ~ 7"" k jD-J""~I..)V1. T ct.J~J.~
i5e-r-y [/-fCy OC'~(,-,-f ~~(..r-e IC(S ~-wJ~
~.,J ~~~~~~ <-=~
o
-<'? ,ok,J- S~Il'~5.5
- ","'&-r[ '==" Y
-:9~ I{z-:)s ~4=e.-kl 1,,7 ,H
,...----
U
j 00- Tr~llS'~
....cb...;::.<2
~ ~p<:'-.e = 'I
~; Alf--ty..,iy~e
CJ
o
L?~fi1/}I:J
(J
S t/-tIJII" - / / ~
/b ;:JIJ?(, S: J GiF c.n~.v tPr E.,. f, S. c.p~r/fI3c.r.O/f ___.____ ._. _, ___
Z-,4.Flr/~ t:
/??G ;e;r/#~_ .t7JFr ""~~~.. .~./ry .__~_. c;;<)~~IJ_~'(o/{__.
- -
,/lJC,;?78elZ flllr. Dr r6c.1I.;v1'~L. /1~//l.JtJ/!/'-.. C(')~~j;rrJfJ'€..
r EtF.s ICt) ST.> .C;b~rflt:}c r._.__=~_ ._.~_._ __ _____._.__ .__,____
J/ct3/J 41Jl7~/? rt? /!t/7~/'/J.' ~~,~.~__/.?J..f!.~_.R~. ___ ___
/1Vhe:. /~ 'rt.l"'....
I
I
J, ~~ e;;:-- t/L t/ 5
T /t/4t.;iiJ/~ 1/ ~ ~ /-
~ 1Ztv. f17:
IJa'7;)._h 1 ;I;./(-I/-ftJ'M)'
h~,j -tl<./t''''ei h fv/."'1 flprrer
r- jY d /:1/ W ~ -fft
- ~/-/~ ~
~c!r ~ lc-
fl~su!M- Y 1
s1;/1o ~
".' .' . l ._. _ __.. ..
.~y~-
J'f- C ~J=. . ;-' . ~"'-<.
~
---7
~ tkAw!J ~/~'~~~-1-- ---'
. rl /~J...v ...
Ik (! efT1 {,ld7V
-- _._~€~>~~ &,~
&/hzf.#VP
-- --- - iv/~&IA/#./JV1f,
J -- - - --. - -~_..-
~ ----..
-------..
0 0
,
--- z~
( I :::.tJ~h~ ~ /'it;- GJ
~r .. ~ /zl'~ I
.
- \ /.- /
'~ ~~--
1/1- I ~ ~J ~ /,//' , %
:;>.~
)
-~ ../
- -
'--./
5 ~//P~ -~ 3.G. 93. /70.-- /}/ltJ .,f'4Ckn
( \ (9X;) j'/Y
...
t 1 t~/J
Cj{h /' /,L/f,v.S' + /j""';>- $x ((CI- :J.,r /J / 7 ?
)J:c, J /tJo
-
.
~
o
o
L!-<='!d,Z-
II ~~ 17: '-(- ~
~~~~
~~ C~ v-c;~<J+L YI/7C.'"I.le-.lSl~t ~,-j;/z /nor
~ I) T-?~OUVl cJ R'.25 CoP""", c..- C~ ""2.-0 !/-z... ~ r-
""2) CiI1.1 A ~tjh,;"" V<... 0-"-'\, Go..) PG?''':.-f- J't v I<P-"";
'b) ClbM P. ~ C! ;"-h"Z.~ <;: / dev F~ + 04) Vle~ c;)..,...,;." ?t-~!-h,)_~
Av~);;~ i )CJV~:"'I~ v~+G~1.1A J..,ec -10 ~
L) oJ't:?Jk~~/ I (/f II,?~ -/c'S'
sIll" ~SG,,--k+>~S
~<<>y<;'~. I - L a.x-c...",,-~~ k.s
U~
......_ c if- ~
u ___-~ /-~~~..
!
tC!' l5R....
J 1 ~ 1
N'(2e>d til"",..c,)
~ .-z.7~" ~ -I-
i - t. s;:. ~ ~Ct:.< ~f'. -c. -4 C c;../5 75 or,
.-'t~d-rc.C-+ ~ 1rer- -' 7-5: ~ ~(/5 z>7 k'Mi# nil: Is
to..::> .
q /.,)10; a: 't'""'c::i.'-)- vtU+ i '"1 ~~rJ cA (C ~
~5~ C>rs:.j i-::;;.&/iL<-<<-'l<;./ ~~s. ''/''t n~ j -fc:,
O'1~-+ ~~4/ 4J1-k 6~fi f-r-",,~ ~~ +t, r~
't. 5.a--.~ hr( e...q ~ + It ~e - h'./"t!:Ja J --
~:::~xz.. -"j a-'A.e/~y.P2.~
e~r-v-+e--~l€
o
o
-.:=?' , ,
\ ov-I::. [Of/to' ~~
-5Y('$~ ?q;~
L OiC C--'7 T==>~ ~c::;..",
CfJ~ C1J.Q<(VC,~'
-Pq+f-erv1 c70 JeV Jo~~...~~,
U I P (j\~{-3l ~v\..
T :)- ( . fi. t .:;- Lo Ce / c::;;, erv 1"C::e
~c! ~ I-h S }ll#c.z:- f~, ~?q
+rjfrc d~ 1 ~ (~ 1.,5' )
F'"l V) (,' ... e q ( c.o'~f ........ Q;e<:t.
- S -(~~~7 ~ +er e-/L 5<::' ~i
,/1 cJ't!!-O Ja-r + '-<.J~';.j-s'vLd,~j
u p "'"'7 ~'-'<< ,",.,.,J ~ z:
C r V I C Ce ~ -4 - i..<} I:~" ~ l...e- +-z ~ sI--z7 ~......, <;-0 <;.01 <iL ; j.,::)"'"-'-r ~VJ
L'-IO ~)r+-S
CO,~ ~/AC-(/ lc...,,!") -I-o-,,,~J /C)~ ~<"tF b(c:x_L<:; ~-'-yU-k~
C. ~b-r~c:h"'j 'lJIJ~({--uL<;' '~p>ic-..~-hJ -f{v v rUJ)
O~~ ,-'re VL-'"I(.,K' ~)'-1 F ~=-- -f-z, 'S F -: t/l.,;?USL, bo,-L~J:J.
"..ee,) +-0 (/......~ it--t c-- c.J +C <; F bv+
c.J~ + sA",--,-1..,..,1, d </ - S -h.~ = ~ _ r -, C4~+W- q C'~-J.1<.J-e ~
I<J",,+ !"", '" "1" . t:, v+ 1 <;. d:" ~.zJ W "&- ~ U;-=> T H - s,~
r-b 'S: S ~ \. (:--- +-Lv-v ; vt.-t. ~ c--I- s '
~'7 w)! ~ \ W(CJ~~ ~5 _tr<C.. ctS; ~-<) '~.., o~
~~UCl f t--(; '-'"\5 "" I~ ~~~.r-eJ ~I~J ~-e-ilY lJ&'/~ c=/kcb
~U~/ ~ ~"d a-t ez,t/e_c-?or kVQ I
0, 'S "---oI,)J.:"{ J<-
~~II'
c.-.--+z- &.u~+S dtCc.e~ -b -~ 7"" k jD-}.A ~>..)Vl
___-is-y r)jCy_ o,r'~,J ~"-'iJ-e =<S ~wl"'7
~ ~-
PLPJ..~ ~J ~ ::>~-h "l-S r-es e~1 <.' "")
- ( J
..L ct. C) t..h<J. "fc:::!
o
t , .J-. <s\::-;j)i~55
--Pert( g,~>, Oi.
9~ 1/,-;,<;; <V"'-\=,c-W 67 ,f--I
o
J ~ \J='<;'~
...... c.b...::><=?
i-c' ~ p~-""'" .;:. 'l
~t Af!-ty,.,r,.,vc
[)
o
L? P'./,7 /} /5
kf)
St/4B' - //~
/P tJIJ??.'-S: J c:;t&= c.,7/~;v tP"c C;:r. S.. c.p~r/f~cr~~
Z;~/r//d ~ /o/EI!3;r/.,v~ t?'zA--~~~ _~~!::?..__~_ q;~~/Jc."!o~
/lJc,,??/Jel? {1I/~ Dr r6c.1I."vIC~l. /9~I/IJ(jfi!,:, _.Ct:!~.~j;rrl1?~
r E ~.s Ie (.) Sr.$ C()~1"fl':; c /_ .__ ~ _ ,___._, __ __ _____._ ._ __,_______,
-
J/,6 Ell 41117~/I r6J 4p'r~I'IJ-' 64',.; _~_I.;J..~~_P~ _ ._ ___._.
/It/Ae. /~ 7"'''' '"
-
-
~
I A/4wJ!~I/~ ,A:tz -- __sf;/!,~__ - ..
/7 q, ~ /(hl:t';: ~y~ \
3a?-4._h 1 f,/;c-k_J/ -h)/w_ ___ $~t5 ~~~ \
\-..7 r.W " )v';)'.~ I'orr_r . .. __ .~ /_
~ "vd 1-/1. U ~ M f:r.C ~J~./ . 0<-",-,- .
- ~/-/~ ~ --
~ckt~A'c-
--7 tm!!hI- Ij 1-
__ ___j;.Y.Qi--;.~1/ &/KRFLI':.
~ ilPAwiJ ~/i~~/:i- )
. f ~-J'J_ -
Ikt eft'1 ad/rI
&/hz~
- ,-. - '--- _, n:::' -- - --
-W-jt;,& I/V r)/VV 1'-'
- -~ - _. -. ~--- - - -.-..------ -
---
----------
"""c r,\ 0
, u
/1 :::f..J;t" ~/rt;- @ z~
jz?r .. lJ. /2- 1'6>
- v r::~-I-
.
tll- I () tu/J ~ j//' . %
~'2P
/
.~. .-/
-
"-./
5 ~///6 -~ .1~ 9.3./?O_~ ~/?t) .p~c/ffn
( \ (9X;) j"/ Y
..
II &/t ,;J
C~{h /' 'pL,/f/V.5' -I- /j"""" I?'x' Cf..c.. J,.... :J~/'] /7?
)J:c, J /~~
-
I
~I
.
j
i I
I I
I
I
~>J'C7' ~" /?;,..-;-,>/-
y
/20 ~r
,/'"
//"
Iv
~ / J/~ /'~ av/l1/1
/' ~-
(J~~ /td>"I..40 YA~q"/~)
.),. 'y~"/5-.J J~- 4,...6.<';zJ
~.-/ 7'Z' ..r,....- .:='...,,'v.... c "'<..o,...~
, ~"? '"
~ tlf;'~ Aedv'd~:n~.r- 'r-<-1 PL~ ~,.J~ '
/' / j/
A
m ,hfi-;{-
.
__ ...>- e~~:e ,f",.. 4 ~Cj ~..'''2
~-------- /
// 7:i/f.tf/tht:/ff~~/- #/~ k/f"':F/'''--c
-~
? -/fok "\
~ \
I
:...----
....-
----
/f7l1 h. IC
,572",.:.
/--;P/I..../.J ~h../'/ ~ 7-'--./P-...~L
-J/JIP'~ f/J){i
/
- () (; fiJIV';
')
I
P&I?A 5.:JiI!!I!IP)//5t';? r {O/ltA.17/-;-t 1; ~cj?1l C~~JWt'1<.
iC L
J;VlI'c I> mf'C l]1(8 ),rB-p;:=P
5Glf
(iUe
['II) .If ,~J,. b<<D
MIff q 1--11
/l
~/lt~2-
'/ ( /
--C.c C'A "'7 - H-- / ,0_'7
S ff 13 ;J! 2-:).>~2
:~/!,J..A;.,,A;"'/~//.. 'A.~f'-/",
-
p.>#P'.!./"A..-,t:'
'.."
I~ '\
~~
\
'-..,j
c: ,1/,4-"",/9 t"4/f'/t;-/?
< 5t/
iJGjv~1 " ,_......,//7
/70 IJ .,-trv'-ja-p/l
/ - tPf&' ,J();:tffl-'
1/ /'t ~() 1'1 ;/
~/)h
__ ~~7 __ ____ ___ ~___ __
I<
;j; (p /f 2-
___. __ _ ____ -_rJt~,f ~E
rM --.
~_._.
~j)~ -.;;;;~-~(~~ SP;~~ _(~1~~-r~_;~~_ -:~-~/. _r~ ~= --- -==-~ ~~ -_"~ "-
11' J) tJEve:tP;p,C~j- EJJ.." wILl- ~If)T ..re~VI,;; TM
-" -- __ - - ----- ." -.- -___ ____ ___________ ~_n _.__. ____ ______ __ _ _ __.__ ___.__
- --- - - .- '- --- .. . .-- -- --- - ---- ... __vzell@VJt/kS n'__ ___
/ J) ~ j).e,., ~,;",-9I'II~ C.<: ~.f!F't~ h~ k,vT" ~~~ _ __ _~ ~<: r_;P'i/tOlo-&7_ ~__ _
. _. __ __ ._-=~e t?1P ~f) 7(#! It) !'-'.___P-~_. _. ~E Co,/p"'E /'1/-1 ,A/_~_ ___ _ _ _..___ on
;@
? _"__J&FJ~._YW~l1/VO.!!_ _f]~9SC;T2.~V~t:"_) !!-<~~~~=~________ _.___ ._
-. ---- -A ~'" -_:!' #P/(le_____~4f!!_ /~__Z7'!//?..[7c; /I/_t:~ ~~!:z _ ______ _u.
"_. _ ___ _/1,."Y-- J~lt!!.U.c" QPt'"~'4/!..~/~ _ue~Vk.~{J ____________._____
- --- -- - -~~ -- - ------- - --- ----- ---- ---
-------- --- ----- ---------. -- - ------ --- -~------ -- ---- - --
- --(j)-.
-.f;:/---
;/) / J{.. {/"sJ SU?lj?//V6> L.r'TTe ~
___ _.f'_ ____ .____ _______ _~ ___ _~ .___ __ ____~_
--- _.h --.----1!:-----u --- _.
,/ ,tv
---pd- - .--- --~_
-- tI- - ____d___ ----.-
~ TGc-!II4t,/t'- /JriJJ/IStP/(~ C~/t/Ii /7/-9/5 cj
.. . --------~--- - - ~------ --~ --- ---- ----~- -
- - - -- - ----
- -
_ _ _. _ .___ _____~/F/t( OIJI~_~_rf2C~/I__ _._.
- wlft?
----~-- ----- ~ -- ----- .-- -----. - -- - - ---------------
W;'/7/Je--/S
_ ---- -- --- ~P~. - __ .
JJ !J I..
/l)1~tt_tJh--(" /Cll/lzIL qU~!-,/~
Pro Lcw(>
- --- --- -
iri
jJt~atJ/l 7 fZ ( /.S 6
_ _. ) c../f()_o?- __ ._
0~(jI7A ~~-: ?) __ ____
--- -- - -)- - ----- - -
(Sff/lv/Ct:5' )(
.. - _ ._"_ l _ . _ . _~ __
-.
lS
/\
\...~
11 /);- ;# c
f\
"--~
____'_tl- C/fV1f---=-_pjl,,___20_/lAf!I4___ _ __f _-=-.--L.
.-0)-
_ ~~_ _._____ _ k~ ~__ ~/Zt. __ _. .
;/~ H_ _~ ___ H
jJ ~dt:t._. fi k /' ~__ _ . __ _ .___0~e?!!_~__. __ l/l~_.
u_ -fr-;;c ~____u________ - - ---- - -~ - - - u__ - --~- -- - - -
_ _ ____ f7~::_J.._C~__r------. n ________ _u_ .n___~(,nf4/c;F t,y/I2~
_n_~_~___~t-eve_r4rr:errcy_f.9~~~ __ _ ___c~~~~
- - --- Lr- _~Lp'v;L u_ ---~- ____n_ ------ --- fM:S''':l?c.'71 TI"~(';1(,/IJ11?
.____u._____ ____ C tcY../.6'~__/!~.!!If~r 7/ /' f'-....
===~_~t,r;~~?~ h 7'-[1) J /~~ (Gf!~ ~n ~;~z~~r-
_._ _ _ __~ _ _ _ d!!.fJ.J. I/~H:.L-/~:l___~ I'I~ ~~ 1~'JI/~?:c __ _______ _'li.. ~ _f.1:P;w..,,:!=_ --- --.-----.
n u_ __n_ -.:;=- (,fp';j-? . ~al,.,X ~i;tf-~,~--- ---- - -..
._. __ _ ______un / - ~h5~1-u~!:.15jf --:_ffl!!.t.!!~1 . ~________ _ ___ ___ C~r/_ __ _ ._. _ _._____
=~_~ _ _f-_~ -~~r-t~~~~~/c~~AD ---_ .=_=~n~-=~__=~~-=-=_~_
l#-~ ~ ~-;~~~-:.~~:&:&?r.~-~-- --~--~~-~-~_~_
_ .__ ________ ;11<< Li.&'~:...rl..&Ltll3jV __ _u. __ ___._._ _ . __ _ d___ '_nn _.
---6-:)-- If IV$I2__U2VNCI? -- - -------- -f ------ -- - --- - -- - - - - - -- -
---t~~__---=-5r?~pcr~-1h~~,u~~'-- -- nn_~_______~____
. _Ji-t.v-f" C./UVf-r - __un __ oj0
( __ n _.____u_ n __ __ __ ____ __ ______ ____
_____ n __ ___ 5C-1:{CJ..~.'::_~_'_
H _ _ ~_ ___ __ _ _ ~ _.i.Er75d.~,j 4 _ _v__~_= ._-_ - __ ~-=-_n ~~-_==~ _ _
( ~
~------~- -.-.- -----~- ~----_. -..--.--- ---- --
--~~_-~ -F!Ae.tp:~~ ~dter0-~I_~ .
d
;"
\J
,1"\
o
-- ift~- -----------.
t~!5~- ----~ 4e-:-:f.e~fi-
/-' ~t' ~(
--t.zrp<?~
--~-- --- ~-----
:)-r6
.-- - --1'(-- "t. --
/c-~ 7/--~c.e~__
---
-----
~W:z jfp_L~~ ;eu-:~7~<':~;~~k# ~ -
_ .-_-cfJffJ~ ~~/"'M~ .- ---- --
________tJ:h;-YP..~qp~__5j.5P;v. _ _u -- - -'-
------------ -----~--- --------~ --- --------------
___ __________ ---____7.0/2;-fJfd-zp--I~__ - ---------------------------
__._ _ ~-~-~L1l4.w=---=-~~J ---- .----
___ ________ ______ S -t C-=-Z('t?>'~ ______ --------
________ _____~___ /Cph~f'" PoJlt _~e; 7-,-,t~___ ___ _________
-----~---- ,... - ------------- -
_ _. _ _ ~__ -b d. '7 1'tpL. 0/ ~/y.o"l_lfdk 1''7 ,!,C f___ _ !'" / ?,e~ /ie Y-'-'.d4',- -- -
//p;r--~Y7~ -
____~l-- --------------. ~~-!'-7~=-
___ . ____ iJL_.:-_~_c!~.h> Le~~u'?/S/v..J.&.~_____n__-~J~~ j/~~-~~!.Q> -
__________ /5 _ v/tI & ~5;'-J/ Ih /,pl/#7:-s..~~ _ ___ _ _____ __ n ___
- u__ ----- -----:.f ){lCI!-~J_~_ -.--
_ _.S!r{/~_::_-[}I/J - ~ (/Vr~()~ 2t_~/~~J/f-eJ~~ ----- ---
____. .___ 37M, ,t--.,,~ /..,""pj1-~~---{;J,{J,z ""',,,././h~~)
- - -- -- ----.---- VfJZL~~/I.z#~
-- --------- ' ~--- --- ----1'-- -7-- - -----.------------
_ 17,.16 c.., 7PtT'6,x ... L. ??
__--.I!lt:r~/z1__-- S~ ~/ y9~~.?_~~?__ ~!Y_J!cf'I-_!.._ V-:iJ!v. ____ -
----~ ----- -~ --~ -~----_._- ~- - - - ---------- ,---- - ---~~_._------
--~~- - ---- ---- -------------- ..---.----------
I ;~--_.~--_._.-
._/--'" ,,- ~,/
all
/.. -'l' - / ;2 - a-.q-
-~--_._._._~~
I
.-L-.5, _.:iLl
, I
I
1
I;
I,:
o
"/ ?/4/?~
/\
o
__a>./'~:s,_/~ai/ ~~Z~-----
1 ~ gZS
r:fJ-~~~-yL
!' --~GL';?==::Z-------- -- ----------- --- --- - ---------
__________4 ~0d'?'~__U-~~z{~----------- ---- --- -- ------.-
u__@_~~
~~
I
I -------------.-- -
---(fJ~~-d~------- --- --- _n ------------ ---
, I
I
I
I I
_________ __:,_,_______________ ___ ______.~_ ~_ _ _____. m__
i
I
- ----------r.t
I:
I';
---~------.--++_t---~
, ,
11'
.
I.
I'
I!
;
!d
,---- -----.-----------4i-------------
I"~
,
____________.1"'-____
I I
-----------i"..,------ --.--------------------- ------ --------------
! :
--.--~~r+-
I
---r;-'- -----. ------ ---
---------___,__1.,
f,
I
j:
------ -+-++---~---~------- -------- -- ----~- ---
j
1
-------------1'---------------- ____n_ --.-.-.-. ------------------------.~-
1
I
------------------+~----- ------- -- ----- - ------.
1
--------------l~-----------------------
,
____.____~__L~__________ ______
i I
. I
I.
1,
j '---
o
Ci
N,bY_ g. c; I
fu\;tS1;o/\.{
!R@@fl!10Lt7&
NOli -'! 1991 W
THURSTON HIGHLANDS KRAMER, CHIN &
PLAN, ZONING MAYO, INC.
~ENTATIVE SCHEDULE
ANNEXATION, COMPREHENSIVE
AND
SEPA REVIEW
Interim petition
Wednesday, August 28, 1991
Wednesday, August 28, 1991
Wednesday, October 23, 1991
Wednesday, November 13, 1991
wedneSday,(~~, ~()1991
Monday, Dacember lGL 1991
-
NtN;. 'to.
Amended Letter of Intent and 10%
annexation petition submitted.
petition accepted by Council.
Yelm issues Determination of
Significance and Seoping Notice.
scoping meeting - close of scoping
comment period (2l-day minimum - WAC
197-11-408 (2)) .
Yelm issues scope of E.l.S. letter
(maximum of 30 days from OS - WAC
197-11-210(4)).
Applicant notifies Yelm of
consultant selected to prepare
E.l.S. (target date)
E.I.S. Review.
Monday, February 24, 1992
Monday, May 13, 1992
~,
Week of May 25, 1992
Friday, May 29, 1992
-""'"'
"""""",Int I<h
Yelm issues preliminary Notice to
Boundary Review Board (laO-day
maximum from "acceptance" RCW
36.93.090)
Draft E.l.S. submitted by applicant
(target date).
Yslm publishes notice of Planning
Commission hearing (minimum lO-day
lead).
Yelm issues D.E.I.S. and Notice of
Availability (target date).
o
Month of June, 1992
Week of June 8, 1992
wednesday, June 10, 1992
Wednesday, June 24, 1992
Monday, June 29, 1992
wednesday,\JU1y 1, 1992:L
Monday, July 13, 1992
wednesday, 0uly 29, 1992
~, qv ~ Cf)}.1f-
~.
o
Per agreement with Thurston county,
Yolm to complete environmentol
assessment of proposed urban growth
boundary.
Yelm VUblishes notice of council
hearing (lO-day lead).
Planning Commission holds public
hearing RE: zoning and plan
amendments. (Decision within 90
days RCW 35.63.120). (All
hearings to be within 15- to 50-day
window after D.E.I.S. issued - (WAC
197-11-535(3)).
Yelrn city council D.E.I.S. public
hearing (ORD 399).
Close of D.E.I.S. standard comment
periOd (30 days) (WAC 197-11-
455 (F) ) .
Deadline for Thurston County to
adopt "county-wide" growth
management policies (SHB 1025 ~2).
Close of extended D.E.I.S. comment
period (45 days) (WAC 197-11-
455(f)).
Target date for city to issue final
E.I.S. (deadline is 60-day maximum
after comment closure) (WAC 197-11-
460(6)).
Annexation Deoision , hppeals
wednesday, August 5, 1992
Wednesday, August 5, 1992
Monday, August 10, 1992
~
"."'Ill\>,.Im..-ll
First day for council action (7 days
minimum after F.E.I.S. issued. (WAC
197-11-460(5)). If approved,
applicant instructed to submit
annexation petition (YCC
17.64.010(H)).
Applioant submits
17.64.010(1)
(target date).
petition (YCC
RCW 36.93.090)
Yelm validates signatures and issues
final notice of intention annex to
Boundary Review Board (target date) .
2
WV '- I 1 V V, I ... .l. \- V 1 I' I '- " .J. '-
}.
o
Thursday, September 24, 1992
Friday, January 22, 1993
Week of January 25, 1993
Monday, February 1, 1993
wednesday, February 3, 1993
Week of February 8, 1993
Week of February 8, 1993
Week of March 8, 1993
Thursday, 'JUlY 1, 19931~
."'.....".1...0<11
,.,UV ...)'-IJ.. J.J. ..., tOfU '-,_,....... 1 v_
o
Deadline to
jurisdiotion
36.93.100).
invoke
(45 days)
B.R.B.
(ReW
BRB publio hearing (30 days' notice)
RCW 36.93.160(1)).
Deadline for BRB decision (40-day
maximum after final hearing (RCW
36.93.160(4)) 120 day maximum after
jurisdiotion invoked (ReW
36.93.100(4)) .
Yelm publishes notice of council
publio hearing (IO-day minimum lead)
Deadline to appeal BRB decision to
Superior Court (10-day maximum after
decision - ncw 36.93.160(50)).
.conolusion
council public hearing and decision
(YCC 17.64.010(K)).
Yelm amends plan and publishes
annexation and zoning amendment
ordinance - effective 5 days after
publication (YCC 17.64.010(K)).
Yelm publishes official SEPA notice
of appeal period.
Deadline to appeal SEPA issues to
Superior Court (30 days after
official notioe is published) (WAC
197-11-6BO(4) ee)).
Deadline for Yelm to Submit GMA
Comprehensive Plan (ReW 36.70A.040)
(up to laO-day extension possible -
SHB ~15)
3
.{)
(;.
o
o
OWENS DAVIES MACKIE
A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F"RANK .J, OWENS
ARTHUR L. DAVIES
.JOHN V LYMAN
ALEXANDER W, MACKIE.
RICHARD G, PHILLIPS. .JR,
BRIAN L. BUDSBERG
MICHAEL W, MAYBERRY
ROBERT F" HAUTH P,S,
926 - 24TH WAY S W
POST OF"F"ICE BOX 187
OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON S8S07
(206) 943-8320
BURTON R .JOHNSON (970)
.JON E, CUSHMAN
KIRK M VEIS
TODD M STAMM"
CYNTHIA D LABRANCHE
-A.LSO ADMITTED IN WASHINGTON, D.C.
-ALSO ADMITTED IN IDAHO
TELECO PI ER
(206) 943-6150
TELECOPY /FAX TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET
TO
Gene Borges, City Manager
DATE
November 6, 1991
City of Yelm
FAX NO 458-4348
FROM Alexander Mackie
OUR CLIENT City of Yelm
NUMBER OF PAGES
3
(cover sheet not included)
DOCUMENT(S) SENT Tentative Schedule - Thurston Highlands Annexation,
Comprehensive Plan, Zoning and SEPA Review
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
Gene, give me a call after you have had a chance to
review this and we can discuss both subjects
If you do not receive all copies, or if any are not legible, please call Linda Feldtman at
(206) 943-8320
OUR FAX NUMBER IS (206)943-6150
"
o
1\'
O.
FRANK J OWENS
ARTHUR L, DAVIES
JOHN V LYMAN
ALEXANDER W MACKIE"
RICHARD G, PHILLIPS JR,
BRIAN L, BUDSBERG
MICHAEL W MAYBERRY
ROBERT F HAUTH, P.5
OWENS DAVIES MACKIE
A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
926 - 24TH WAY S W
POST OFFICE BOX 187
OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98507
(206) 943-8320
BURTON R, JOHNSON (1970)
JON E, CUSHMAN
KIRK M, VEIS
TODD M STAMM*"
*ALSO ADMITTED IN WASHINGTON, D.C.
**ALSO ADMITTED IN IDAHO
November 5, 1991
TELECOPIER
(206) 943-6150
Gene Borges
City of Yelm
POBox 479
105 Yelm Avenue West
Yelm, WA 98597
Re Thurston Highland Annexation
Dear Gene
I am enclosing a copy of RCW 28A.315 250, which discusses the issue of
annexations involving two different school distncts The statute was called to my attention
by Craig Hanson, who is the attorney for Rainier School District, as the Thurston
Highlands annexation does appear to encroach on a portion of the Rainier School District
boundaries I have enclosed a map showing the boundary limits for both Rainier and
Yelm School Districts
I have not had the time to study the ordinance in depth, but it may affect Yelm's
ability to unilaterally annex the entire Thurston Highlands site Without obtaining some kind
of concurrence from either the local ESD or the Superintendent of Public Instruction
I anticipate this matter will be raised in the context of scoping, but wanted to bring
it to your attention sooner By copy of this letter, I am also advising Dennis Su of the
matter
Sincerely yours,
OWENS DAVIES MACKIE
Alexander W Mackie
AWM/kr
Enclosures
cc Dennis Su w / encl
#.1
"
~1:
i~,
accordingly Thereafter th~'board of directors Of the district shall organize
in the manner provided by law for the organization of the board of a
district of the class to which said district then belongs. ,
Formerly ~ 28A.57.140, enacted by Laws 1969, Ex.Sess., ch. 223, (28A.57.140, eff,
July I, 1970. Amended by Laws 1969, Ex.Sess., ch, 176, ~ 125, elf. July I, 1970;
Laws 1975, ch. 43, ~ 1, eff. July 1, 1975; Laws 1975, 1st Ex,Sess., ch, 275, ~ 89;
Laws 1975-76, 2nd Ex.Sess" ch. 15, ~ 3, eff. Feb. 18, 1976. Recodified as
~ 28A,315,230 and amended by Laws 1990, ch, 33, ~~ 4, 306.
annexation to the school district in which the town is located or to some
other school district or districts any part or all of the remaining territory of
the school district affected by extension of the limits of the town~ Provid-
ed, That where no school or school site is located within the territory
annexed to the town and not less than seventy-five percent of the reg-
istered voters residing within the annexed territory present a petition in
writing for annexation and transfer of said territory to the school district in
which the town is located, the educational service district superintendent
shall declare the territory so included to be a part of the school district
containing said town. Provided further, That territory approved for an-
nexatiOn to a city or town by vote of the electors residing therein prior to
January 12, 1953, shall not be subject to the provisions herein respecting
annexation to a school district or school districts. And provided further,
That the provisions and procedural requirements of this chapter as now or
hereafter amended not in conflict with or inconsistent with the provisions
hereinabove in this section stated shalI apply in the case of any proposal or
proposals (I) for the alteration of the boundaries of school districts through
and by means of annexation of territory as aforesaid, and (2) for the
adjustment of the assets and liabilities of the school districts involved or
affected thereby 1 ,
In case of the incorporation of a city or town containing territory lying in
two or more school districts or of the uniting of two or q10re cities or towns
not located in the same school district, the educational service district
superintendent, except where the incorporation or consolidation would
affect a district or districts of the first class, shall: (I) Order and declare to
be established in each such case a single school district comprising all of
the school districts involved, and (2) designate each such district by name
and by a number different from that of any other district in existence in
the county
The educational service district superintendent shall fix as the effective
date of any declaration or order required under this section a date no later
than the first day of September next succeeding the date of the issuance of
such declaration or order
Formerly ~ 28A,57 150, enacted by Laws 1969, Ex.Sess., ch. 223, ~ 28A,57.150, eff.
July I, 1970. Amended by Laws 1969, Ex.Sess" ch. 176, ~ 126, eff. July 1, 1970;
Laws 1975, 1st Ex,Sess., ch. 275, ~ 90; Laws 1985, ch. 385, ~ 19, Recodified as
~ 28A,315,250 by Laws 1990, ch. 33, ~ 4.
Historical and Statutory Notes
1990 Legislation' i) J :
Laws 1990, ch. 33, ~ 306, changed in-
ternal references to correspond with, re-
codification, and made gender related
changes.
Notes of Decisions
For basic development, see Notes
of Decisions under ~ 28A.57.140 in
main volume
,
,I
) ~ ~
Ii) j
if..J ~.
28A.315.240. Classes ,.of districts-Change, of classification-Delay of
authorized < ,
Notwithstanding any other provision of chapter 43, Laws of 1975,1 the
educational service district superintendent,2 with the concurrence of the
superintendent of public instruction, may delay approval of a change in
classification of any school district for a period not exceeding three years
when, in fact, the student enrollment of the district within any,such time
period does not exceed ten percent, either in a decrease or increase thereof
Formerly ~ 28A.57,145, enacted by Laws 1975, ch. ,43, ~ 35, eff.~ July I, 1975.
Recodified as ~ 28A.315,240 by Laws 1990, ch. 33, ~ 4. '", .
1 For disposition of sections of chapter 43, Laws of 1975, see Parallel Reference
Tables. .
2 Reviser's Note: "Educational's~rvice district superintendent" has been substitut-
ed for "intennediate school district superintendent" pursuant to RCW 28A,310.010
and 28A.310,900, i ,
, ,
I 1 ll'
28A.315.250. City or town districts l,
Each incorporated city or town in 'the state shall be comprised in one
school district: Provided, That nothing in this ,section shall be construed:
(I) To prevent the extensionofthe boundaries of a school district beyond
the limits of the, city or town contained therein, or (2) 'to prevent the
inclusion of two or more incorporated cities or towns in I a single school
district, or (3) to change or disturb the boundaries of any school district
organized prior to the incorporation 'of, any city or town, except as hereaf-
ter in this section provided. ',J, " , ,
. '. l . , I l .
In case all or any part of a school district that operates a school or
schools on one site only or operates elementary schools only on two or
more sites is included in an incorporated city or toWIl through the extension
of thl;! limits of such city or town in the manner provided by law, the
educational service district sup~rintendent shall: (1) Declare the territory
so included to be a part of the school district containing the city. or town
and (2) whenever a part of a district so included contains a school 'building
of the district, present to the regional committee a proposal for the
disposition of any part or all of the remaining territory of the district.
In case of the extension of the limits of a town'to include territory lying
in a school district that operates on more than one site one or more
elementary schools and one or more junior high schqols or high schools, the
regional committee shall, in its discretion, prepare a proposal or proposals
for annexation to the school district in which the town is located any part
or all of the territory aforesaid which has been included in the town and for
246
Historical and Statutory Notes
1985 Amendment. In the second and
third paragraphs, substituted "regional"
for "county", in the last paragraph, sub-
stituted "shall" for "if he deems such
action advisable, may" and substituted
"a date no later than the first day of
September" for "the first day of July"
Severability-Laws 1985, ch. 385: See
Historical Note following ~ 28A.315.020.
did not request or demand that he trans-
fer annexed territory and who claimed
that he was unaware of transfer petition
filed approximately 14 years ago when
predecessor was in office, had no oppor-
tunity to function on petition, further
request would have to be made of the
superintendent before mandanius action
would be proper; however, if superin-
tendent had opportunity to function on
valid petition, mandamus would be prop-
er Stellacoom Historical School DisL
Notes of Decisions No. 1 v! Winter, Wash.l~88, 111
Wash,2d 721, 763 P,2d 1223.
For basic development, see Notes Second school district did not have
, of i:!ecisions under ~ 28A,57150 in standing to compel action on registered
: matn volume voter's petition for transfer of territory,
2. City or town districts which was located within first school
If educational service district superin- district and which was' annexed by city
tendent, who claimed that school district situated in second school district, from
247
o
first school district to second school dis-
trict; plain language of this section al-
lows transfer petition to be presented
only by registered voters of annexed
territory, and statutory policy providing
that cities and towns be served by single
school district did not confer standing on
second school district. SteiJacoom His-
torical School Dist. No, 1 v. Winter,
Wash,1988, III Wash,2d 721, 763 P,2d
1223. .
This section, which concerns transfer
of property from one school district to
another school district, does not suggest
that valid transfer petition filed under
the statute becomes nullity when incum-
bent educational service district superin-
tendent leaves .office. Steilacoom His.
torical School Dist., No. 1 v Winter,
Wash.l988, 1ll Wash,2d 7lh, 763 P,2d
: 1223. " ",
This ,section. which concerns transfer
., of property from one school district to.
I another school district, requires edu:
cational service district superintendent
to transfer annexed territory when valid
petition is presented; therefore, duty to
transfer arises automatically and addi-
tional demand does not have to be made
of superintendent before mandamus will
lie, Steilacoom Historical School Dist.,;
No. 1 v Winter, Wash.1988; III
Wash,2d 721, 763 P,2d 1223.
"i
28A.315;260. Reorganization of districts by transfer of 't~rritory ot'
annexation '
! I ~ i~' J
A new school district may be formed comprising contiguous territory'
lying in either a single county or in two or more counties., , Such new
district may comprise two or more whole school districts and/or a part of,
one or more school districts and/or territory which is not a part of al!Y
school district The boundaries of existing school districts may be altered'
(1) by the transfer of territory from one district to another district, or (2) by
the annexation to a district of a part or all of one or more other districts or
of territory which is not a part of any school district:. Provided, That such:
territory shall be contiguous to the district to which it is tran~ferred or
annexed. Territory may by transferred or annexed to an existing school'
district without regard to county boundaries.
I !l-,
Formerly ~ 28A.57 160, enacted by Laws 1969, Ex,Sess., ch. 223, ~ 28A.57 160, eff.
July I, 1970, Recodified as ~ 28A,315.260 by Laws 1990, ch, 33, ~ 4.;
Notes of Decisions
For basic development, see Notes
of Decisions under J 28A.57 160 in
mam volume
I [, \1
28A.315.270. Petition 'for reorganization-Conditions
For the purpose of forming a new school district,' a' petition' in writing'
may be presented to the educational service district superintendent, as
secretary of the regional committee, by registered voters residing (1) in
each whole district and in each part of a district proposed to be included in
any single new district; or (2) in the territory of a proposed new district
which comprises a part' only of one or more districts. A total Of ten or
more registered voters re~iding in such affected areas or area as the case
may be may sign and present such petition with the approval of the boards
of directors of the affected school districts. A total of ten percent or more
of the registered voters residing in such affected areas or area as the case
may be may sign and present such petition with pr without t~e approval of
the boards of directors of the affected school districts. The petition shall
state the name and number of each district involved in or affected by the
proposal to form the new district and shall describe the boundaries of the
proposed new district. No more than one petition for consolidation of the,
248
,I '
ailma two school districts or parts thereof will be"considered during a
achool fiscal year
Formerly ~ 28A.57 170, enacted by Laws 1969, Ex.Sess., ch. 223, A 28A.57 170, eff.
'July 1, 1970, Amended by Laws 1969, Ex,Sess" ch, 176, ~ 127, eff. July 1, 1970;
'Laws 19,5, 1st Ex.Sess., ch, 275, ~ 91, Laws 1982, ch. 191, ~ 1, Laws 1985, ch. 385,
,f 20. Recodified as ~ 28A.315.270 by Laws 1990, ch. 33, A,4.
" Historical and Statutory Notes Sections 3 and 4 'Of this amendatory act,
1982 Amendment. In the first sen- Laws 1982, ch. 191, are codified as
t.ence, substituted "by registered voters ~.~ 28A,58,131 an~ .28A.58,~35, respec-
residing" for "signed either by ten reg- tJvel.y The remammg sectlOns are ef-
istered voters or by a majority of the fectlVe June lO, 1982.
registered voters residing", inserted the Severability-Laws 1982, ch. i91. "If
second and third sentences, and added any provision of this amendatory act or
the last sentence, its application to any person or circum-
l, 1985 Amendment. In the first sen- stance is held invalid, the remainder of
t.ence, substituted "regional" for "coun- the act or the application of the provi-
ty"; ..in the second and third sentences, sian to other persons or circumstances is
; added "A total of" and "residing in such not affected." [Laws 1982, ch. 191,
I affected areas or area as the case may A 14.]
'. be"
~ Severability......Laws 1985, ch. 385: See
Historical Note following ~ 28A.315.020,
Effective date-Laws 1982, ch. 191:
,"The effective date of sections 3 and 4
of this amendatory act shall be Septein- '
ber 1, 1982," [Laws 1982, ch. 191, ~ 13.]
,
+
'1..1
;, j'
Notes of Decisions
For basic'development, see Notes
of Decisions under # 28A,57.170 in
mciin volume
28A.315.280. Transfer of territory-By petition-By ESD superintend-
'. ent-When election required
. '. For the purpose of transferring territory from one school district to
another district, a petition in writing may be presented to the educational
service district s\l.perintendent, as secretary of the regional committee,
signed by a majority of the registered voters residing in the territory
proposed to be transferred, or by the board of directors of one of the
districts affected by a proposed transfer of territory if there is no reg-
istered voter resident in the territory, which petition shall state the name
I and number of each district affected, describe the boundaries of the
territory proposed to be transferred, and state the reasons for desiring the
change and the number of children of school age, if any, residing in the
territory' Provided, That the educational service district superintendent,
without being petitioned to do so, may present to the regional committee a
proposal for the transfer from one school district to another of any
territory in which no children of school age reside: Provided further, That
the educational ,service district superintendent shall not complete any
transfer of territory ,pursuant to the provisions of ~l1is section which
involves ten percent or more of the common school student population of
the entire district from which such transfer is proposed, unless he or she
has first called and held a special election of the voters of the entire school
district from which such transfer of territory is proposed for the purpose of
affording said voters an opportunity to approve or reject such proposed
transfer, and has obtained approval of the proposed transfer by a majority
of those registered voters voting in said election, and if such proposed
transfer is disapproved, the state board of education shall determine
whether or not said district is meeting or capable of meeting minimum
standards of education as set up by the state board. If the state board
decides in the negative, the superintendent of public instruction may
249
,;.J
o
v
iii
~
~
""
----------..-------------'
r l-'""'
~ ~
~ ~
~ ?-<
;::>
0 0
(.) p:\
~ (:1
~
~ u ~
~
0
~
~ r..f)
en ~
~
~ ~
~ 0
0
pj
~ u
r..f)
i . ..
.
"- .
~ .
t' ~ . i ~
~ j i
\ l ~ 1 1
\ "4 \
~ 1 .g l 5
.. -a " 5 -i a
-( ~ . l. . .!! :>
. ~ ;; ..
.. ~ @
~.. . 0
., ~
.,
..
.-
.-
o
(J')
(J')
...-I
~
~
\0-
;....
'?,
~
...
u
;::
'It.
.,
i:
~
<(.
.,
...
?::.
u
i
...
~
u
<>
...
...
'It.
~
~
';:)
~
~
...
'"
...
\0-
:.
5
<fl
<fl
\>l
l:G
(;)
~
~ \ l
\ H! ! ; \
~ r 1 l ~ , '
\ \ '; 1 t l ~ ~ 1--
\ i ~ i ~ ~ : z .. -
'\ \ '\ \ \ \ \ \ \.11
..
"
r
t;.
;:>
o
.v
~
II
----~
~
~\
{::
'Z
;:>
o
iii v
v
l:G
~
""
~~ ~~
1 ~ ~ P'
if\ \ ~ ~?j\\-~
'"'- ~ ::t
~,~ "'-----.' \ C / f
.... ^', ',.../
...... l'
,
\
r.
'z. \ \
;:>
0
'z. v
0
~ ~ r.
~ .....' 0 'z.
<fl ~
~ ;:>
<. 0
:e v
..." Cl
~~~'
~~'~'~:~Ij.t ,\ .:1' <If'" I, '" ':' I'
." "../,.: \1.,1. .' ,t.,\\). ','I. " .. -. ' .,
\.,\!, ,'..' ': irl' 'l\'~" ",111\4,1'" '
'.. ' ".;,} 'i, , 'l'i\\~I\ 1 ' .
~. i ," '\",1\ \ ..;,'1 'I: ~
,1 \jJ., 10 ...
, \ 1" \' '
f I;
,
~
.,.
~
::c.
~
~
~ 'C.
~
0 $
t-'
@ e
\ t \
~
1 ~
~
vi, ~
?
~
~
c.
;:l
,~
~ '" ~
<II
c: <:)
.0 ',3
0 ~
~ ~
'"
~ 0 ~ ~
... ...
.. ,.. ~ .,
.c .. A1 0 II
.... ';:.
...> '" ~ ~
0
\ \ \
\ \
\
\
\
"
..--::;;
"~,,r'" f t ,J/!"~:4 ..
.~,.
. '
,
- -
(\
\~J
~
~
~
?
{;11 0
u
u
(:C.
~
.......
p...
~ ~
~
~
p
{;11 o.
u o'
p:. .\
~
p...
~
r.fl
~
t:<->
{.:>..o
~
tfl
(/1
~ C)
p \
9. ~
9~
o;l.
~),.
..~
tt
~
tt
~
It
~ t..
ot ~
p
0
III 0
,
'\ \ I"
~ .\
"
,<
,.
III
Ll ~
;
91
;'l
\ \
,;:
~
~.
.....
~
.....
U
~
'Z.
o
-
\:-4
~
~
o
Ia.t
Z
-
o
OJ
OJ
~
@
u
~
~,,;'t ,I
L I' ~. \ ~ '~. '; , ,'~ ~
. . ,', O~. .1. .
1'1;.1 ~.:...^
~ \ \. ~~ 1 ;- ~ ..~~ ~:' h\(
\ \\~' : '"...."~~:~i:.
" II ,~'.... '.1"':\
.' ,,\\' ; ; O'~ ,~ .1,':.,1.
" \~ \~,\l; \ \\ ~.~ ,~.. ,.~\. '.
!l "~\ 'a l~\"\~' ~ ~ U)rl~~~, :~{, ~
~ }1:':'<!.~~\\\N'';' ,\ ~'';'~M~'':.~ ..'f' .t
a ,'." ~ ~:\\ rei ~~~,l~"!'{t., .f,.(~ >1!
~ ' ~, .::. ,"" ."" '/:',,,- .', "". .
. "" ll' I" '\:-4 l,,,t"'''\} "
.0 "J t\\,\~~~~",,,; ~,.}r1r~;,,~' .,':', <,
~'.. ~l(i~' <\' \~ ~......,\',~~:t '.'
IA /,\~\,'\~~~: ~~:h;~:~r:'" ,~ f~.~'.'J'
.:t. 1 t:a \"'\~'t ,\ : ~ fIN': t: c
II . c: ,'1. rl' ,~.., ': . \"
p.. , 0:-- \ \' :\'..1' -< ",,' ".
\ "'~\\~' ..~,ltl,'.;1
"I(-\\-\ \1\' j~ ~~::~;~:, , '-:~
~..'" WV:\\II\,;~. ,;~'/t,.W':~".' ,. '",'
... ..... ~\<( \1' '; 'it ,~\,~;,~:'~ 1
... ... ",:'l"" \1 (' ,". \ " " "
\' . ,i.l, \ ~'~c;\.."ll ( .... "
" " r ,', '.W~;~l\:'\f I"" '
,\.' ,,' ' f \ ~
I,
"
~i ~.:~\..
/''l'''~ ~
','
'l
, "~;"'~~~:~i^j
I ~..:\~~.~\~'a:'\ -\ l \\
..k..... "
l. .r-;~"\'." g '\'
~. '\,\:' ~'f~'.. ~
\~ ~~ ,~.; .1
,\' J .FL
oWl~
.'
I'
'll,
~ \ l \,.
\ ",
~I
tl
~I
II
illl
&
-"
(
"'-..J
o
"'-/
..,..
hb
-----
~.
\
\
\
J' ...""
("
"-./
~\
'-.../
=
111 tJ~ ~--hV1J;!J i fl: C -r:J ftc~ --..e:
~ cl !>>--!.
,
I
~
\
\
\
I -~
DirFctors
o
o
KENNETtI tlART
KENNETtI MARTIN
DON MARQ1II~
BETII WQlCLE~WOmll
NATE TlIDNEQ
BOB D COLDtlENEE
~uperintendent
RAMONA CARNER
Administrative Secretary
Telephone 206-446-2207
November 5, 1991
Mr Gene Verges, Manager
City of Yelm
POBox 479
Yelm, WA 98597
Dear Mr Verges
My correspondence is in reference to the potential annexation and development of property by the City of
Yelm that is referred to as the Thurston Highlands Addition
Some of the property considered for annexation is in the Rainier School District. The Rainier School
District is very concerned that city annexation may raise issues regarding school district organization
and boundaries.
A review of RCW 28A 315 suggests certain procedures, limitations, and issues for consideration
Because this development could have a great impact on our district, the Rainier School District requests
a resolve of our concerns and issues prior to development.
I would request to be kept abreast of all progress in the development of the annexation process Due to
the impact upon our district, we wish to be notified of and involved in'matters relating to the project.
Sincerely,
B DG rg
cc Craig Hanson, Attorney
10/31/9\
.~\;. r ~
15 25
"0"206 786 5223
n
THURSTON CO AUD
(j
I{lJ 001
p ~D FROM THE OFFICE OF THE
THURSTON COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
TO:
BUSINESS:
ATIENTION:
-\TE FAXED:
COMMENTS:
~I
~~
FROM:
$1:~~
..~ ~
,~~~
/)/3'/7/
~
,tl
PHONE: L/s-J'-~3 '1/
_uP
-v-lJ-Jr
11
~
\ME: ~&
, ~)HONE NO: (206) 786-S4'-i~
Y<: '1re missing, PLEASE C L)
t
." ,-
Number of pages: P-
(Including Coversheet)
--
_,"Fr:-..._
111-_1-=11 u45CFM FOl
10/31/91
15 25
"0"206 786 5223
-0
THURSTON CO AUD
o
~~~..
AI; BERRY Vfl.U...EY fa) Sf: flR: 1 0 ML~:1 09656
Lsz= RCREfi6C ACR= 1200 PRlCE/fICR:.l0_ ZDrf:X
Y II::":" IJF /FT: YF fl",.ftC: tiA UTY:
DWI'IER:-~rlJl1 HllSH PH: LA TRPIS::~REI:t'SUM~OIV..
TBR.:RIlL~Plrnt StPTICllY SCHDDLS ttP-CD
LEI'UER= ~= It GS=YUI ~...
00l S ",nER: CITY JH=YLM SUB-tD
PI'rr S IrtT: ;( 1Khs... RSPH. SH:;YUI YUI
TAXES: YR 19= POWER: Y
LIn: IlTIf I"~
RfB(P1l3IR= HW'Y :UO TO YELn, R Dt BEl<RY YflLLEY 1m. nAY ~S Ylf1
6EUItbI:: RD OFF HWY :J'U.. ~nr HAS BEBf fIIWfBCEB BY CITY OF' YEI.11
:m IT WILL lIE SERYII:ED n CITY 1m1l1::1( & SE'YER. 1ltlJRS1lJN HlSiLAfiII
DEY - I:IYl"IER WILL ACCEPl III B LRS loti ROE ItDlDUt IUY.. ~
2 ~F ~y 58 ~ CDiI--cf#lL, PARK .. SDIDDL. l1I111L DF
1610 mE HALF ACRE DLDli "SITES... PK~Im CIlS'B & BRIDIURE AYR-IL
AmM L#"fi.. EX:Ca.. FUR ftNY ~ rUlER. YE...M IS mfE OF THE ~ltST
6RDUnt6 cr"~~lTIB.. sm..n DIRT Dl'tLY DR I'faiIl DE.YEl..IAIElf'..,
PRELUlIttflR p~ I U:JJ.
~11.iD:1; rnt.msHIP~
L6L"'flU])/fflX~
LfKiT= "ITOf~1Cs l..OFF: ER9 BEl..m RE
J
"
'':' ~= ~
FUJ"tCTlDi'f? PR...
PRINT FULL LISTinGS
LISTING Hl.Jt't1llER(S)? 10%56
<<< L-S127000y008 s-
HEY
~:.
MBH=
Nt:. r ~~
:.:...:
'-
)))
.-
:~"$'"
ERL:
PP ItfF: y
PH:439-39-38 c:s::a:2-5
I - -I 1 114- 1-11'-1 r roil r i i ,_
..
c.
Kramer, Chin & Mayo, Ine
1917 First Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101, (206) 443-5300
7110 SW Fir Loop, Portland, Oregon 97223, (503) 684-9097
230 South Franklin, Suite 306, Juneau, Alaska 99801, (907) 586-6400
()
I'
\
\ )
\...
Lettelr of Transmittal
KCM
TO
'f..
DATE
WE ARE SENDING YOU
~ttached
o Shop drawings
o Copy of letter
o Under separate cover via
&. ':@'\'\
~t)) re ~ tt t ~ ~ t\l~
b~fOII~jtl i~111j 19m ;,.,
o Samples 0 Specifications
_".,.., nf\\I\i=c. MI-\CK\E
O\Nt\\1~ un\i .--
o Prints
o Plans
o Change order
o
COPIES
DATE
NO
DESCRIPTION
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below
o For approval 0 For review and comment
i::r your use 0 Approved as submitted
o As requested 0 Approved as noted
0 For your information 0 Returned for corrections
o FOR BIDS DUE 19
o Resubmit_copies for approval
o Submit
copies for distribution
o Return
corrected prints
PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
COPIES TO
SIGNED
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once
OiURSTON HIGHLAND ASSOCIAC.>
Proposed Yelm Annexation
Parcel Listing
May, 1991
Updated July 26, 1991
Current Owner's Name and Parcel Number
Address Qtr-Sec-Twn-Rng
\/ David Baker 217-24-230102
14544 Berry Valley Rd SE \"W-24-17-1E
Yelm, WA 98597
Dan & Julie Schaefer 217-24-230101
14538 Berry Valley Rd SE N\V'-24-17-1E
Yelm, WA 98597
Virgil Baker 10,600 116,500
14501 Berry Valley Rd 217-24-230601 217-24-230600
Yelm, WA 98597 N"w-24-17 -IE t';"W-24-17-1E
John Harmon 217-24-230103
14610 Berry Valley Rd SE N"W-24-17 -IE
Yelm, WA 98597
John Sherfey 217-24-230104
Box 774 N"W - 24 -17 -IE
Yelm, WA 98597
Barbara Soeteber 1,200 48,000
14505 Berry Valley Rd SE 217-24-230200 217-24-230201
Yelm, WA 98597 1'41,.1 - 24 -17 -IE NW-24-17-1E
Lila Willuweit 41,300 82,890
14812 Berry Valley Rd SE 217-24-230400 217-24-240400
Yelm, WA 98597 NW-24-17-1E NW-24-17-1E
Theodore Foritd 217-24-230500
14502 Berry Valley Rd SE \/ NW-24-17-1E
/'-
Ye1m, WA 98597
Ernest Burnell 217-24-230700
14507 Berry Valley Rd SE r-o"W-24-17-1E
Yelm, WA 98597
Neal Soeteber 217-24-230800
14503 Berry Valley Rd SE t'oc'W-24-17-1E
Yelm, WA 98597
Mark Soeteber "l 217-24-230900
14503 Berry Valley Rd SE 'f N"W-24-17 -IE
Ye1m, WA 98597
Subtotal
1992
Assessed Value
$ 78,500
59,500
127,100
73,200
40,800
49,200
124,190
114,300
99,800
11 ,900
61,100
$ 839,590
---------------~ - ~----- -~-_.
'.. ...:- ' . . . ,.. .
Carl Horsak
14848 Berry Valley Rd SE
Yelm, WA 98597
I
v' David Purvis
14444 Berry Valley Rd
Yelm, t"A 98597
, / John Purvis
V
14504 Berry Valley Rd SE
Roy Gibson
14940 Berry Valley Rd SE
Ye1m, WA 98597
Bob Overton
14636 Berry Valley Rd SE
Yelm, WA 98597
Milton Butler
14630 Berry Valley Rd SE
Ye1m, WA 98597
Henry Dragt
14848 Longmire St SE
Yelm, WA 98597
William Parker
14947 Longmire St SE
Yelm, WA 98597
Marvin Wagner
15234 Longmire St SE
Yelm, VIA 98597
Estate Realty
~~Jon Stephens en
POBox 718
Ye1m, WA 98597
o
56,700
217-24-240000
t'oiw-24-17-1E
17 82-2 17 AC
18,600
217-24-230105
W-24-17 -IE
19,690
217-23-140000
8,000
217-24-240100
\)1-24-17 -IE
578,370
217-24-310100
SE-24-17 -IE
40 Ac
2,600
217-23-440000
40 Ac
14,800
217-24-420100
SW-24-17-1E
2 99 Ac
Roger McKibbin
15219 Berry Valley Rd SE Box1317
Ye1m, WA 98597
Everett Hendrickson
10535 Berry Valley Rd SE Box 434
Yelm, WA 98597
24,600
217-24-240200
f'.;l,oi-24-17-1E
7 72 AC
o
80,200
217-24-240300
\l,oi-24-17-1E
20 81 AC
3,140
217-24-230100
NW-24-17-1E
123,700
217-23-140101
108,900
217-24-240101
NW-24-17-1E
217-24-240201
t'-.'W-24-17-1E
217-24-240202
Nw-24-17-1E
6,400
217-24-320000
SE-24-17-1E
40 Ac
3,250
217-24-340100
217-24-340000
SE-24-17-1E
9 7 Ac
217-24-410900
SW-24-17-1E
14,400
217-24-420101
SW-24-17-1E
2 Ac
217-24-420103
SW-24-17-1E
217-24-420200
SW-24-17-1E
-2-
6,400
217-24-330000
SE-24-17-1E
40 Ac
14,400
217-24-420102
SW-24-17-1E
2 Ac
Subtotal
$ 161,500
21,740
143,390
116,900
99,000
76,700
597,020
107,700
70,400
43,600
51,800
64,600
1,554,350
G F Burgman
POBox 3276
Lacey, ViA 98503
Jesse Hoffman
13530 Solberg Rd SE
Yelm, ViA 98597
Mary Louise Clemens -
15030 Longmire St SE
Yelm, ViA 98597
Ronald Rothwell
15050 Longmire St SE
Yelm, ViA 98597
Jeffrey Price
15128 SVi Longmire St
Yelm, ViA 98597
Ronald Laughlin
15132 Longmire St SE
Yelm, WA 98597
Elene Newby
15105 Longmire St SE
Yelm, ViA 98597
Washington Public Lands
Public Lands Building
Olympia, WA 98504
Charles Brown
P 0 Box Q
Yelm, WA 98597
J
\f Jerry Bosequett
14409 Hwy 507
Yelm, WA 98597
) David Doyle
""
14045 George Rd
Yelm, WA 98597
\/ J Paul Steadman
1801 W Day Island Blvd
Tacoma, WA 98466
\;1 Thurston Highland Assoc
%1917 First Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
Total owners 36
,
I ~ ~ ~ 1
L:'ivi /
o
\ ;'
\;
778,300
217-24-440100
SW-24-17-1E
2 73 Ac
78,900
217 -25-111301
652,800
217-27.,.000000
217-23-420000
80,000
-i /1 --;
~.i'~- ._~ ~
--, '"', .,-
i /\~
o
217-24-420300
SW-24-17-1E
217-24-420501
SW-24-17-1E
217-24-420502
SVi-24-17-1E
217-24-420503
SVi-24-17-1E
217-24-420700
SW-24-17-1E
217-24-420800
SW-24-17-1E
217-24-430100
SW-24-17-1E
217-24-43n400
SW-24-17 - .1."
'\\
91,040 1,000
217-24-440200 217-25-110400
SW-24-17-1E
75 87 Ac 0 25 Ac
217-26-410200
SE-26-17-1E
217-26-420000
SE-26-17-1E
633,600
217-26-200000
217-23-130000
63,000
320,000
217-23-300000
Subtotal
TOTAL
25,000
$ 109,800
79,900
73,200
47,000
84,300
76,900
7,000
870,340
10,540
131,770
78,900
1,749,400
$ 3,344,050
$ 5,737,990
Q
()
OWENS DAVI ES MACKI E
A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
FRANK J, OWENS
ARTHUR L. DAVIES
JOHN V LYMAN
ALEXANDER W, MACKIE'
RICHARD G PHILLIPS JR
BRIAN L, BUDSBERG
MICHAEL W, MAYBERRY
ROBERT F HAUTH P,S
926 - 24TH WAY S W
BURTON R, JOHNSON (1970)
JON E, CUSHMAN
KIRK M VEIS
TODD M STAMM"
CYNTHIA D, LABRANCHE
POST OFFICE BOX 187
OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98507
(206) 943-8320
-ALSO AOMITTED IN WASHINGTON, D.C.
-ALSO AOMITTE;.O IN IDAHO
TELECOPIER
(2061 943-6150
October 25, 1991
Gene Borges
City of Yelm
PO Box 479
Yelm, WA 98579
Dennis T Su, AlA
1917 First Ave
Seattle, WA 98101
Jon Potter
Entranco Engineers, Inc
10900 N E. 8th St., Ste 300
Bellevue, WA 98004
RE: Tentative Schedule for Thurston Highlands Annexation, Comprehensive Plan,
Zoning and SEPA Review
Gentlemen
Enclosed is a tentative schedule for the State Environmental Policy Act review of the
Thurston Highlands annexation petition and accompany plan and. zoning amendments
This schedule presumes that all statutory and rule-required deadlines will be met and that
the maximum period of time will be taken in each case by each reviewing party It further
assumes that all appeals and requests for extensions allowed by law will be requested
and granted In other words, from the proponents' standpoint it constitutes a worst case
scenario for local government review periods
Nonetheless you will note that the City would either reach a final deCision regarding the
proposal prior to the deadline for adoption of Yelm's new comprehensive plan as
mandated by the Growth Management Act. Of course judicial review is an unpredictable
factor and cannot be built into the schedule
OWENS DAVIES MO-<IE
A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION
ATTO~NEYS AT LAW
()
Mr Borges
Mr Su
Mr Potter
October 25, 1991
Page 2
Please review this schedule I invite your comments, especially with regard to the
feasibility of meeting the various "target dates."
Very truly yours,
OWENS DAVIES MACKIE
U/y~
By' Todd Stamm
TSjlf
Enclosure
cc Alexander Mackie wjenc
/
Q
Q
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE
THURSTON HIGHLANDS
ANNEXATION, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ZONING
AND
SEPA REVIEW
Interim Petition
Wednesday, August 28, 1991
Amended Letter of Intent and 10%
annexation petition submitted.
Wednesday, August 28, 1991
Petition accepted by Council.
Wednesday, October 23, 1991
Yelm issues Determination of
significance and scoping Notice.
Wednesday, November 13, 1991 Scoping meeting - close of scoping
comment period (21-day minimum - WAC
197-11-408 (2)) .
Wednesday, November 20, 1991 Yelm issues scope of E.I.S. letter
(maximum of 30 days from DS - WAC
197-11-210(4)) .
Monday, December 16, 1992
Applicant notifies
consultant selected
E.I.S. (target date)
Yelm of
to prepare
E. I. S. Review.
Monday, February 24, 1992
Yelm issues Preliminary Notice to
Boundary Review Board (laO-day
maXlmum from "acceptance" RCW
36.93.090)
Month of June, 1992
Yelm to complete environmental
assessment of urban growth boundary.
Monday, June 15, 1992
Draft E.I.S. submitted by applicant
(target date) .
Week of June 26, 1992
Yelm publishes notice of Planning
Commission hearing (minimum 10-day
lead) .
stamm \yelm.sch
Q
Tuesday, June 30, 1992
Wednesday, July 1, 1992
Week of July 13, 1992
Wednesday, July 15, 1992
Wednesday, July 29, 1992
Thursday, July 30, 1992
Friday, August 14, 1992
Tuesday, October 13, 1992
o
Yelm issues D.E.I.S. and Notice of
Availability (target date) .
Deadline for Thurston County to
adopt "county-w ide" growth
management policies (SHB 1025 32).
Yelm publishes notice of council
hearing (10-day lead).
Planning Commission holds public
hearing RE: zoning and plan
amendments. (Decision within 90
days RCW 35.63.120). (All
hearings to be within 15- to 50-day
window after D.E.I.S. issued - (WAC
197-11-535(3)) .
Yelm City Council D.E.I.S. public
hearing (ORD 399).
Close of D.E.I.S. standard comment
period (30 days) (WAC 197-11-
455 (F) ) .
Close of extended D.E.I.S.
period (45 days) (WAC
455(f)).
comment
197-11-
Deadline for city to issue final
E.I.S. (60-day maximum after comment
closure) (WAC 197-11-460 (6)) .
Annexation Decision & Appeals
Tuesday, October 20, 1992
Wednesday, October 28, 1992
Wednesday, November 4, 1992
stamm \yelm.sch
First day for council action (7 days
minimum after F.E.I.S. issued. (WAC
197-11-460(5)). If approved,
applicant instructed to submit
annexation petition (YCC
17.64.010(H)).
Applicant submits
17.64.010(1)
(target date).
petition (YCC
RCW 36.93.090)
Yelmvalidates signatures and issues
final notice of intention annex to
Boundary Review Board (target date) .
2
Q
Monday, December 21, 1992
Monday, April 12, 1993
Week of April 12, 1993
Thursday, April 22, 1993
Wednesday, May 1, 199s
Week of May 6, 1993
Week of May 6, 1993
Week of June 4, 1993
Thursday, July 1, 1993
stamm\relm.sch
CJ
Deadline to
jurisdiction
36.93.100) .
invoke
(45 days)
B.R.B.
(RCW
BRB public hearing (30 days' notice)
RCW 36.93.160(1)).
Deadline for BRB decision (40-day
maximum after final hearing (RCW
36.93.160(4)) 120 day maximum after
jurisdiction invoked (RCW
36.93.100(4)) .
Yelm publishes notice of council
public hearing (10-day minimum lead)
Deadline to appeal BRB decision to
superior Court (10-day maximum after
decision - RCW 36.93.160(50)).
Conclusion
Council public hearing and decision
(YCC 17.64.010(K)).
Yelm amends plan and publishes
annexation and zoning amendment
ordinance - effective 5 days after
publication (YCC 17.64.010(K)).
Yelm publishes official SEPA notice
of appeal period.
Deadline to appeal SEPA issues to
Superior Court (30 days after
official notice is published) (WAC
197-11-680(4) (C)).
Deadline for Yelm to Submit GMA
Comprehensive Plan (RCW 36.70A.040)
(up to 180-day extension possible -
SHB 915)
3
'\
/J
"--../
'---.../
,
':J ,
d.0>' - <-
~ .
Vi (/Z,~ JI~1o (2H/1baf7?il-'
~ \
V
~
J
'\
, .-/
:J
WI J60r~
'I<L 7q/4cp~
,i!!i~~
i~ &r
. t- ~a/JJ]\ ffa,n ~
, 14> ~ Stl{o{r' /10 ?vL1J..Or-Jr/L!JfJmbmCIb~
df (~1' 1/ r-:vafxJ- '
wl'Wlh 0, L~ArJWfd F7Jizt -10 d& It7IhV7/!) (8
. ~ ~ WdUc.
rUt'fit ~ ~t, ~ -rr1n1~1 f/BaJ, htv:w.IA ~
, ~1--}J{f)( t~ 0 vI. . . - fIJ1L if (17-'
I r) IA dt-i/nr fII'W t2JLtt t/0 ,
,. vtPr- j!?: ~/),t1 uh'V'- 0 h-.~/A X ! L / ~(X -
, If-
(;1.ff' :J67D/:C;1 t P-~ !/'yJuaL~t-il}('u{ -bCt-Jt7ce-
/1, . to tM.t1/L-' fUj bl!~ lraffitJ'
I mi!f7h'u~l:) "~_~0 bod?/if1-jj~L?C CL-
~~c:-ujCM- 2Uf?-if2ai!;z110 V~. +7~- ~. 1kK:> L'Mr
~0 miJti? _ 'k I:IL!!dOJxcL CU' /CVtd'- 1- 17,,-<, /Icwv
I Jfl]v,O/ hU()( ~--~m.-/tk ,/r/rT15 I-J ~&&t /l1~r
. ~d~X~ ddb-J/rJtl7e- /JiJF' t /C{nc&
{L tL--r-'1I1fL.LVd1tJ-.Vlb ;J;J~Lt~
}1 u. 7 1'10 tA~ i /Ci/1111-t1: _ /f7~ 1 c&td22. {i:1L; ODb
I el>_op-~1/'1 "d-t ~7JL5;rT--
\
---'::/
.2.
(\
I I
/
/
\.0
If/)
\ --
'--
;.... ./)
, I
(
I;; jvn-
.\
J
r
~
'\
~.J
")
;b
~
, '\
,
,)
/. t\
\....,- ('\
'\~
J
z..'
(
1 __
,~/}
l ~ !
-- _..~ -- ------------
-- -, - -
'\
J
c
o
r--...
'-..-)
...-..,
.......)
~..' I j;tUW) 1//JIi'6'~ akovb l/!Jl1J ,[}.v c1dJaceJ.
I ~ mwYi1f1-.
I okl/ V"fm (;,i1Y"f1ri..- ~t. (f'ld ude-IflPiu ~ -#'5.
f1J[,UJrb~ hattt- f.AJJ;wvf '4/ !luIJiXAt tf)II 5fa~.
"IIl~ /J I
) v 'I V /I!)~ _' 'OJL rrajJ11/;JAM t/'i'A r PlY r"--"~
.' ('J!7 ~ {I ~~J GMe'IU;,.1/ {i;r:fr~</h' jf!1<-Jr
(f,r: ~ fliy}=---/)! XL) /.bl/C-t- /f1f]{,11'fl #}.. TYa.L
.1!/ -tJ/?t. -
?z: lnj/i;tL.{f/(~..~4') !~h:J:1 J11&dd, -!J..vIJVJrf[13
Y(Jd , , : v'<' " f1MU ~. '
41 ~O ,-~Irn 0jt20k.?fA ~~rit>>v i
I_~ ~ ~lkL..La,~d&t-/a~h.rJ6
(. , ' LZlm-'- ~ I
.----....
~,
- " ~j
'-..-/'
.,..~
~'
~
~
o
~~ j4~~
'0
<J 71!?"
/\
o
/".'\
, )
r--.
~!
r--...
l'~f~
>~j
~
/' ~ ...J
"'"
-=1'.J
'--,
.----.,J JO-/
.-.,
....J
- - ,~
J ~in
.....J
, ~_1Jf~2?. ..+J46v.-ffi'>---.-1/,kL ,V (l 'P--~ 7'2J
Ur. )(;1.- I (, I,;) () ()
-lC~AU7- ·
tf2 t S=a~ 'fa F tl'iLL--b. '~uJ)wL_/MM f/
~;t'0lLAL1~flx-,,' . '. .' f r. ~~~
I.~ ~ . .?dcM...Ltlh Jt ~1tJJild1'A:P-' - '=-.' ~ ~
\;;f;/::!t--tJih1;: ~ -r;;,. '3_:j)J!.u,. '. rl4j;.1l. ,S, ,
ijUt___&nsrJJ.tan13...---t1LLd....J~~ I'~t- ~ (.{/$lv::"
i~5 ':"(-
V'l.'ffr.1tU..'i.cdl1J0 "'l.mU-;:JlI~ QfPD-~;l azt:&~hc.C-- '
WCV_~11:l:tJj()&,L'---~C/MJ!2~~Jl]ud' ~-a
MCit:jl)~()V..tda,.M-_Jt----cftc(/dC[).J&1 . ~ ~,In.
/\
c ~)
.5fh~
(/\
-0
'. "
:J-
"'\
~
~
~.J----
"
~
--<
'" ~
J
~!liJJ .
/ ~ ...J
,
~J
~
\. )
~'"
J
.......,
J
r"\
J
r ---
o
o
~ It, 1r d;{A;)L tl.un(JTf iAJt/.gA& -h be ticuycl.
f:;::rr:0tP~:fl~:5f/!~fJf~t::::~~
j'-jffA, ~
I '
I
() ,
o ' . ~ t/Ct/Ylll~ 1m 77JP/Js V'j/Jodd (}A Ll2J~5
o tdt~
_J.~' ~ _ h~ 12 citA./v((});J (~ :J 1t/~}'7. ~. ~~
:1~ Iw 'lj -Iv JuT ~ IzwJJAJ 17a( 1dliL_~'fI7,: la-- '
-~ C l~fD f:( 'P.~~wv tLJ;i~~~ f~/?0-r ar'?'-'
-0 'll-g /7!1q/C JJfMl,
'!~ :5 . WI? CflmL-kuJc-1Jl Uo, u7sll;/du/? 1>>- dulh
\~ , h n~tr;c{l 51-u-tr f}1L~~C]L~ Irq/. UI I~
--~ -tune 10 mu't hi /Tl111 Ph ntn F1J/l~ / -;
-~ ~~ . if1Vfr~ty#d-<<? 5~' . ~
. 9Ih:y.,;~/l-q,o; L)tu~ h S rl5PY~ 117 /':1-1 tfficL4dJtfoZr/L
~ rv~tr 1 / tV &/1 }/\
r~'j/ . ''i'h ~~
I~\. ~iV?lf1'i oct;
/~rD 11/11/1 '; tpL~-
;::-flp:f~ I.. V-~ft:1d~ df1k~~~ !1l4!f$.
(\ V&tw o;;;7IVJr&tb2-.'.. .;.2~~~11
-0(\ J~-
~r"\ \
~ . \ ~ i7J h.bC;U~(LeU1tJ'a17'~ ~ ()16, k~J
~ JI-~' . vJ!5C&w:' tu. tfh C ~~f-rz--Rf 25Z2Q
fS. 10 . --,-
\/ ) I C
'"
~L
\......J
\
J
"'\--
~
\::>
-7"" \
U
'\
,..--1
-I
I
c
o
_/~ "
~
-'I
..J
/
~\ 4, ~
~2 ~~ 4I'i ''I-L.~oun1y---)NifJ{J/o r dvn?'1J Vf11~dJJ'LJY~L -
_~ I V'l~~l21t pttJ" / /,.py;-fJ1~dt~]'k ('(#l~, &m1!0(ba~
;--.. ! ' /J (}/ It&rJ'vta ! fa.
~ i J
bn1 I YL0/~--i-tv~/I tv~J,1fM1chML j!7 ad-.
I
, [il (/W n. ~, ~A \ ~kP_I!ki-f/.0T'~cLrg
/~ ~ <fj-.l12e/2v (J (tM:J~'--~td1hJ:t ~ 7
/~ t.~
,-.J p~tl/X
~J ~IM:" It d . .' {',g {;J.fh.a.fL *:5, ~ d~..-fiJ / nCtlVl-iJl4'1i
~2 v idmtflf" 'rJ fat/l/h~5 .~Um. ,
,)-~, l(;;: ,ift :t:!:~/ akul..'~df?~ ~1}' ~ n
~8 wYV:.t---Ldh d .' 7~ff~j,HLI.-W<J', . .
/ ..... ~. n~ ~ tvtJh~~-r.. tyl7i~~f2<:9.
'V .71" J~1d]12~A</ ddl, tE~!lMIMM4I~----Aimn~
',-, {LV 7 tf/7JC~ ~/kw~..i!fiic.(.,~1d h:L..lM ?l6.
/ ' ' 1-j!lLt 12(J s~ (/!l?151 7hStilll!l1LaflkL /P.,
, '-....J
~~___ ;5m.- '. /(t; .0P /ilA kt~t4/#J~_2Z O/^d'~ /#zanHd
"~ f/-.n~6.{R'fr~tJutClo tJUz.v z;f ~;nI<t.1i:- ~~
\ C) 11M . v tJ rJ
\
~.~ ?;/!2, l/#JuMJ7}JfL~;1t4&1lk-i-q,ddf a{7~/ ~ ~
; /at. m?hn nucl j'J// "i/S'''ih2t1J>t,d1_f1'tR~ ~)&I.a<yc---
~.~ 1JJ~/lr-EJI.1.d:J -}JJ---~ add essuf. 11....- ~S'... .fL
~ D ~~ .
.' J-drtJ- /fhU;JJ71JJ-dML f5--~<<ff?<<U ~P2;;y, ~zurnL-NL
<:J./ CcwnfL~u.-.I2'1~-' ~/d fjl1-4/.ZJu.7~!f-#tYhU~
lJh tz)[ cfdtlL&-Dv;. ~/5. ·
..J
,_0;6Jn. ~ t4:? j}l0;1A.lwl. 1Y1..f.e.~ in(e a WWTlofi, / )-'2&~
..<J 1 -I"--'-(F ~'ff F'4 0
/"
-"
u
.~'\
~
'0
----("'\
- .-
!J1vill I' P" I ' hi jJ (I /' d(lftj12 /llc:e 7;'/,? a/I dt'iLJ 'u
fm //'01,7:( w ? /rt" .h~ !A-L ;JY! (~ I" t?y- OJ! f' C('- 111 i)/t
J. J
o r -113 ,t,- jtv (l" ;J df..ed u Ie i J fn tV!c1 Wtr: pt 121 /YUI){(.LC.
1. Ji1..1 ' \
{l/-f;( {', I -. ..' I . U - 7~-'
.fi/.1. }i I 1(.. a. 5 U iJi" 'v W).{( fJ1 'Y fL t 1M- 10 )3-1/ Ll-"
~ ~ . I ~ ~ .
/i it!,. Ij'. 71-- -. -- ---- -
AM,/flL ____ I I ~
~'Jt1(.Jr- 1/ (3 - / I 77
l/~Lt,L I}:'/intlc. iltt,,-, I!~ druJ'/lzm ( hc!}, P 7{uL
/::t Co !-1} r: <t)/~ / Ifl tt51- L.t.1 ,__ . .:;.- -- - ,
.)! ;)/[; ( elL} [tZ/r.,.c L/;'S-.c{ l f' {lflLU {{l/i!. '1~i {L(~ -
(nf! {oiid.} l"ti'J!tt J I)"{ [Udi;) 5Hr/N]! 10: lie- .
-k Jll!i;) !,'H){t' IJ Ii ~[ /llf7zo1!d {{II /i;S ar !/[i::Jr . --...
;J / (let vr /] 'J; n..-5i!{'lLt?)- r nil /J-/')- - ..'.-
-.. - --- -. - - --. -
--i tfC,ILM. /l? 1H1 ~rj ri;;{(l{ "2I)~(~ ttl.JhlT
1Z !,'L- kJ{{( /[2 /1/hc.1/ /1 ptlbk l7'ec;/);:J-
-J -f&id l{tlc ti "6!ttlJt /701[~" .-.. - ...- ~--
, 1
L/
17\ /J - I -- - .-
j 11M >4 /Jt(if7lf,:; me /C'::Lt~-r;; .5!{j)O;r/Itf;(L
V~l ((f ~3'7//1d tieT " 5Ic/tll~ Crt 17 {{. L .
SUj :hy fYJed}rf$ 07 /ltY. ~3 '-
t;{ or{j~f kt/-;'/v j,!111 k (( tit L L Fez ;3
~ ~ ' ~
f- ! ltt.~\d --Ir:rJ - J; {F.'~. l' (J hOP", _1' ~ ;-fD !i1 i lJ~ d c7. ,--,}
'd. ~ ({U[,L 7'v' fiLL /(L~. / A Q,Ue fA (<<'fU~ft1f'.1J) (Jtf)f:(U,
T- ---
I
I
I
I
o
'''\
V
'\
J
...--...
J
"
.J)
\
~--;, g" 41,10
'FfIA~ f /0' ~1 f!llf1/Q, 1jJ VI '
7M7Lf)r _ jJ, ~()oo. c) '---~-f!lft-~U2 f
lf1-\j~1 1;1> :::?m .
~~
~
--.J
...
J
o
?
o
r-, -
~ L
-.. i"
~
~
~
0 -'
j"'-""
/
,\a
/~
0
"-....J
-
\)
---..
"
..J
~
0
"
.....J
-'\ \
)
/
-0
/
~
,
U
"..........
V
\ '
1 b ' ll-q ~
----
~~/Z;N-::?- -
-- --c "'-)-
('\
.0
('
\~
_ __ _____.-L, ~J2vaL;I~-&~-lL.~U~.~L5------
_____n_______Z-,_Lr/l,N~/J _t:fY:.2!!.-'I.~_Jf!!k"eY~1. 6-_____-- --
_ ___'_ ~C~~V{L;.;,-.... _4' ~~/../-j~l..x7!.- ~~4,;/:' /'0 ,(7A-~--..t.tP~ ?D ....""''''''...-1/_ --~~)c:-
;t~~~ 4>_~-----c./..V /-~/,.'c ~""'?1: - ~
~ _~r; -~';~_A"" - ~__"1-'<a,-~ r-.<y-L -l--C.;';-~Z:'k7-) -2:
______~.. t-V.4I::V' ~~4-~ - ~t'_43:7~ ~T-:s-=-J-~4-/5/~-~/0"/L...'J-
- ___~2}rft/:::I:I.~-I-_Lh-eYr-~~~<..~L-J-&LC r -
-----~
_ _____~_I!?75l. -_____
/1l#d;J-. ~ /V--A-f:r -~
____~I/!_-L,-kl~~4~Pl-t~iV ~ __
. __..rJct-L~/~- c--s-~_/~_~'ZJ~T_~
* jlJuJ 13
---. - - -
\~------- ,- - ---- -- --.----- ------ --
,
t""'-- ---.----..-~---- - ------ --- -~-~------ ---------------------- ------ ---~------ -~--
\..-- ---------- --
\
~
()
u
flljjfS;I',; #1/
Ijl&~-
\~ '~,
~
I ,/ "'...., ____3 h ~ -----
" VJ2'..!J/f_v-~'-::::--- ,! ' Ifi 'L~
_ ~ 1"- w-~(#CY'~
_______ ".r- - - ~ -------------
.-------- ~---------~~
.-------- .
. ~~" _ _ A'1' ~ I'.Pfi J!'J'ld..-----
~ ~IfX R.t1$-~ :" ~~ ~
,--- __~ f.r' r JV~~
-r'P~ , R j__)
,~
\ ?
1,- i!1,,~I!'f-1LIL
r
'~ ~
f/[./Jf1le 1"'
\
~
\ 1 ~ -
- ' /!!!.I/II. J
.-------- _~_c.--
'i"
\
\
\~
\ -
\
~
\~ .
.-------- \
to
n
u
(\
\ .
o ?w~d 4"~G-1/
s~~
....-r
7;Z;J1-''J/1i jArI}TI#f/ __ 5 ~ <:;-
)tv-f;rr;y SA.~~
\) \ /1 "A
.frvlocrJ~
~
- - --. .~ /);( ~.r:~ _
~
2 d It ~ C/?
20 FrY 42c
.711
Vf
~ /6 tJ() '#,tJ tJ.
-? / ;2 Of)
'1.0-'" / 2~~s-
r- 2GY~
-.:;:> (p ~ tJ
~38
---
L6 0 de" Cu ,<MA.~</ [-
1'7
r~J~;-r- M/c.c:;~ _
,.t?4 v / . /d:/o - c.4 /2" ~~
IfrA/fer c4/), c;.. (II~, _ /('c/W.
tJe.H.I1J'J -t
/i1Jf5~
I /It! ~
.... E/l :f;, ~ /",,~/i~ - .. _ .
:;;f
;~"<. '1(r'~'
"'-;"f': 3~~:.'~~.~,~!1.r ! r;",f;~
'I"~\i
1;
~,~
.f'
<'!
-.
..>" .
lO5. Yelm Avel1,\.l.e West
" POBox 419
Yelm, Washil1,gton 98597
206-498-3244
?'c
:~l-' ;
TO: -
Sandy MackIe
Denms T. Su, AlA
Jon Potier
Gene Borges
Shelly Badger
Thomas Sk.illings P.I~.
Perry Shell. P.l!:.
t::
.,.
FROM: Crry OF YELM
Date: October 2,1991 .".
~ .... ~I ;".
RE: Agenda Cor Octobcr 8th Mcclwf,
Jhc~ 3gcOUJllof the IJJr.ctJnl: 3t O(y lI.a1( (JJJ Octooer tlth Ish.rtr.rl oc!lm-: P1e3Sc JrV/CW IhrlleOJs 3DII COO/3d
CC'JlC' Bo'lJt::S 3/43/1-3.241 shOllld there bc ;u~v 3d,dilmos Of c{)m.'Clmlls.
, ' -1'
# J)JSCIlSS Ihe Scope ql WO[!;/!Dd ~'c:lJr.rI{J/r/Of the Ol)':~ .'{i'':JIlSpor/a/loll Sludy.
'DISCUSS the wod prograOJ lor the ;l9?9 Cmw(4 M3niJgcOJCI1/ Plall 3Dd Ihr. fr./31IoD.rhlps lo/ht'
r.JIVlrollOJr.nI:ll A.ssCSSOlCl1I (eq/llrcd /{1f the propost:rl 3DIlCY3/1l1J} IJIld the {IrMIl Crowth
Bt1uodaty. . . ,
, D!scuss the dc,'vr./oPOJt"JJ/ iI/lhr. ':5"cop/llg" Iilf Ihe EIJvlfWIOJr.n/a/liop3CI 5Yalr.nJr.nI/Of 7lJru.s'/oll
//J.iJol.-uJds. (Scilpe Iii o(.'prcpllfC'd oy S.-uidy .J{itcbc)
.. .olsalss cOlllnoulmn /C'C'S lor Q~ s servIces /J/Jd wor.(- efforl
;>/
"
.'j,
-
.,
:,1
fl,
: I
t I
I,
--,~)----t-r~-=-~K'~ .~LfP1f~-1dlQ~lZ--J'LI--tlf)J-Pd.-td1 --..-
___ -.lL.l ~'~ J____aM~--t/IdL-~~-u uu___m.Ltf;tJ~_~____ ----
I'! ---~ &7 / A ~,)-
i i-'-;J4f~-frt rr---~-J})-2;'T---------
- ~--------------------------------------
__06__~__~ll~~3'I0Ui!:L -h,Je.IiP. [~w3inm~,,"-_~uJ@/fC- -tLUfL?FJ2. J::~,
'I L6~ tt.----- - () fI @t, /
r~----~~;~l~; ::-jrcrL-_LiJweiL--ftr~ ~'~~~ -- ----
: _~ __________!l5u_~m___I_rrL~----
f:1
I
-.-------;:r"~----------- - ---- - --- - ------- ________,______.___n____ ----- --------.---
_ . __~:_+-~)LViL I~s, ~tt( ~?1oiJ[-[)1uLlftl.J5lrjl:h~)r;:::-----
. .___+:_o&LIQjJ~~wj</dQ-_C:hP/;v-~~d.~---
--------T~--Ag& Q j(7ll/:-.!Jf:"Jeturzlpi...--u -- -- ---
_____________L.,-_ _______________'_ ----- -,.- ndO - dO __ - -~- dO - ~4/VVYN/; --
- I &61"'~ fru/> c[ 1ft '1 VVY2/!-:; h ~~ /. ' 'P1/ Yl '/ . ~ t wtt9
-()~...~~=--=--c~=--~ ~_-_~__ ---_ ~/~_-~~---=__-_?-1~ -!~-~tr-i
= _~==j_~J=; 1!::tl);~ !@lJ/O~~~ J~~u_~~t1es_~
: I
___________ _.I;\--_h ______ _ --- n_______
! ,
i'l
__ ___ _.~_____________~i.~-_- ~- ----- _.. - --
III
; ,
j I
-----~----r..--------------- ---
; i
1
___________H..._~-,-_--U------..----- - __ __ __ - ___ ____ .... --.--- ------------------ ____n____ -- _n___
----~-i; J;?Mt-fJ!evn ~hV-U{Ol1fH-- _mn _HU_ __~u__n
___ _.__----=:::._~..'----~J.t!.-zf0 -->>5111 cl _ l/VlLL!D _ _no_ ______~__ ______________. -------- - -- ____on
, 1 ~
_______~~- I____~___ ,'~.. - --- _u. ,_.~- ------- ---- -.. --- -- ----- - ----------,,-
_______~;,; 'CCJfl41v?l~~ CLo()iS-taA1l~ .._un .n__ -------.- .--
-------------- +4-------- _u,_~___..------ -- ---------..--- -- ----- u___. - - -----,--- _____'_n__~-- -D---
_C_n~l,-n----ukjc:g-'JPm . m TIrrr: ~.- {JhJ f~J~
__ -------------nJL _______ Y-:2D (o~~11 _ _ ____no_____ ________ ___14_.._ ___ __ -- - ____m_ -
.' 1/-VY -/ _
( --... ,
\ '
~/
I ---',
\..........J
------~-----------~- - - ----- ------.-.------ -- -------_._----
,
I
I,
<.-.--- ~-----.f_T_.-------------~-- -.-------
I
j!
,----- ---- -- -----o.. -~l - _ ---
I
.
- --~- - ------- ---.- --- -
SE P 5' 9 1 1 1 S30F P()~l I, Cf'l
o
F'HGE DDl
MEMO'
Thurston Highland 1976-02
Co,
Post-It'" brand fax transmittal memo 7671 '" of p~ ~
....
TO'
FROM.
SUBJECT
File
Dennis T Su
~,
r~ }LtVi
4 UfLtUUtLt i
Sewer Treatment Plant/Meeting with Parametrix
DATE.
Spetember 41 1991
Meetmg a ttended by' Mike Ollivant, Project Manager of Parametrix
Jon Potter, Planner for Venture Partners
Gene Borges and Agnes Colombo of Yelm
Dennis T Su of Thurston Highland Associates
Gene brought MIke up to the current Urban Growth Boundary/Annexation
situation since the last Parametrix Sewer System study was done in January 1990 and
the boundary for sewer study shall be revised to covered the new areas.
The status of the WWTP as now stands has been approved by EPA along WIth
funding earmarked for the plant construction. It is up to Yelm to seek funding for
the collection system and Gene confirmed that it is in place. The design is for areas
with 450 Gal! Ac/Day within the existing CIty limit. Yelrn is waiting for the letter
from Centralia Power to allow the outfall into the canal before releasing funds and
authorizing Parametrix to proceed with final design. Gene assured us that the letter
will be forth corning.
For Thurston HIghland and other parties petitioning for annexation, now is the time
to prepare an All1endment to the Parametrix's plan for City Council to adopt then
the City will forward to DOE for approval under the same process as the original
WWTP plan.
The amendment to upgrade Yelnl'S WWTP must be prepared to address all issues
related to WWTP design such as land size, receiving water, collection system, waste
strength, etc.. Mike estimated the document/study may take three months and the
DOE will need four months to review It will be too late for the current" plant design
to wait because of the deteriorating ground water quality and the funding deadline
which requires the Yelm WWTP to be operational by November 1993 Parametrix
may havp to proceed without the expanded system to be approved by DOE
However, we will be able to provide basic data on waste strength, volume and future
connection locations for design consideration.
We determined that Yelm will issue a Tech Memo to Parametrix to request
upgrading the WWTP design as we discussed. However, Yelm needs some
commmittment fro.01 THA and other annexation petitioners to pay for the
additional construction costs on top of the current design like paying for the change
from 8 inches to 10 inches pipes. The EPA IS only paying for a system to serve the
existing city limIt.
u - ------------
..... FJ ~l( ~/r/""-\ld7J tfJ"J7Vl/1 ~-fi.v 0-/ !"'I /( ~/A---Va~
r~ { l) . ". \ /kLd/DJo, "'. \~ ~, ~
/Jiyt4 ~ /1/f'~ ~ /~7cR 1;W7w$ ,-r--,.- fg-?f <) - 932- -7 17-- D
I_~-
_____ #-/fH.v /V"'CI;,....~wZ...7 _~~i~,T,.L &.v....,./~ -
--~?.~// ~~ ~ ~~5~~z~-(b~9- ~///-
__ _ ______.__(.C<l .J?Je~~_~~_"#~~-"Z/~- 7~~... . ~_~;A/';~
.___ ~;~ ~$c~7iT ?Y)7?____.J._~_?_~ _~ /~~-~-
_ __ ___ __ __. __cl:7 )_ _ A'J-I/I!~ ~,/.t..VPx,/ 5.,,~ ./~~/47; ~ ~""~~~~~..s---_.
"_ ____ _______ ____~ ~_4v/"'...v~~ ?vA'7}~A./ /~//f-~V'~6;-"k~~--_--
________ _____ _(.4)__~~!.~:V _T2-~A./.J!-4/p'~/~ /ft~.> ~ ~ l/f-_.h4p/5t.;,2J.t-_~~---- - ____n.._____
6: L;~ItJ,?~~ ~ ~ ~J;?'-'dC"'.L____
$2{f2 fi~'l :-~~ut'_~_~A/3-;;;-~"jJ-~d-~ ~ ~~,;~-~//~~-
_ c~$~~ ~ ~~?"z 7~d~ f:?' ~.:;;7 7' ----<' /"'" ~ J-
;11::- /I//~ ~ ~// / --' -- - ---
(!?-L~I./R"Y~ /' /l.-- ~ ~...., 7/"p'-' _~ '_"_L~_fo- c /2) r~ /9"fl /~------
.~c:..Jt7~.,fr- SbP'/~~~ ;:?V_~.A:--J-,(a~.s ~ ~~<S'.5-r--- ---
CJ,2f!-Y'oL/,dt: dy""fT .e'd"T._~ .r~A~L I.A/~'?-Z.A..___
4 A ?/;;;,~~ ~;'.j ~ ~ H*d~.....L ~~_.
_ I.,f 72.e:-~... "/ "
/.,v/-#'~J~
(f!L2 J'f~/k~lA/'-'e A. ~ ~/ ?J_~A'// cP5/.f
t~;V~I/;'" //4'~1
_____.________?yPtH~~ ~~,.,.A/~ U,p-..../~.J ... L- -..z.J ~.
_____ _ _Jf ~0vzra/Vk,.. tA_L~!&E~ -I .#/V,It/~r.,N..;;~L_;-V~~~f-6-(/~//v4~--
ItP'11'~ , ~
J5tJ~~-..LttV/~-W--1!~~/~........../ ~~J_~LR.l:M.Z!:..-R'W~-!f./~~ --~-
fr/!lij~~,--~-z:;-77~~~ C~.v) py-- Jh~~tV".rh_7Z~- - -.
C?'~ T .,
'JVt/J/b/--Y//~,tc s ~ uCt?.w,/ ~;'t?v.t~?.f-
..
G
, (Yh LA <S sC'ysuL ~ bv
) \ S II V' t in le- It-.q;V ~
~.A/V)v;'~n? ~V)'; v -
- ~?I~ ~_ d/;"'/7j ~ L.,).v/ ..v#7Y~_-
-- C./..s - ~ ~ tA/;// ;L / 1-1, ~//_f/~ /~.J J4.P,t 4;/~ -
U// /'1 J2,..,,/t/!;'p..M7;~ ~v/.t.A>
-~
______ ____~~_~A--ZU~ _/,pf; ij ~.~_.~ ~--- -
_______(1) .!1~~Pi~-J. .__ Sh_'/~.~T _h~"~.__$_.5-~0~_ __ __m_____
__ f~..~ _l~ i __0/~~~__ _~-'!'A ---"~-!~-~ - ~~-- ..
_~ ~_ 5.4.;--:,/ /4J/~ ~ .rl-!:~A-_~,s_ r - .:t../~~~4/~n
~?"'~r /7Y~~
(2-)_-4~~ Z/~ sA~// ~ Ift"~f/';T~ #v;72 ~/~ _
//#VL _{~ __q',v~--t.~_~J;~~~.5___~ ~~.>---~;~~-"'~.._--------~-
~_~rl.A.~~/ ~_ ?~__ ~_ 4. ~_______ - -- ---
__ _ _ ___ _ ~.$$u4- _.;t'~P''''Z€ h~,,4~e/A'L_ ~.c:.-<<~~;;;? _ _ __ _ _____ _un__
I __n_________j(-& ~~~~kn !.?_~~:!n& _~/?~4 .-- - -- ---
_ __ _._ ____ _m ___ok Pd~~~~-!_ .#~~__~.<f. ~9 t_~_~ #~._!t:!_,_"__:..__ - - .. - ---
___ ____ _ _n__ __ C0' ~/.?~~-.5;7:J-~t:-~~~~~~-~?)-- _____no_
(1<<) 4vJ/~/t.7 tv;/"?. e4~s ~l4a/ - I ~.;vj;2 f-~ ~?~;
TY'/7~J/;'-}';b Tirv t ~ ~ p
(l) .4)V~7/~ /h1./,f.> .1'A;//_/~//y__y/e"..'f.~
___ _____ ____ __ _!-~__/~Jd~__ Y-"-L:-t_~____~_ Y/4'.-t:_~_ ~ ---------
. ... -- -- J u-2/,1'7;,a ~ ~.-'<-'~"",??/r'^, -
--------~._,-- --~-_.~-- -~------ -~ - --- - --- - ------------ - -- ~ --------------- ----~- --- ---------- ---- - ----
.-- -~----- _______{f2 _~~!0_?n_Sil/// /-~~~l ~;'~JY-: ~~_. - -:-- --- ---
~-~- .. --~- - -Z,f:f~/~~y~-~~~4~---
/' . ~ Y6 .
Ji
t:>
r\
u
c)
w --- ---- n -- -. -- --- - -- ----
____ __ h//;~ /_ff?V~f~~"- 7' 4 //N'/lAeX4 Zi.fht.J
_ ___ _____ A//// ~V.J~ ?V//7 .7Ze. __'!f?'/"L~.!!~_u.~-/4A/~
____ .___ <...P ~A/..!/",,- -/- ;:,,~--~~L~-- ~.-v.!>~~P!j/~
_____________ pts/Wk-L ?v/-/Z ~ ~{J-.n/ ~/~~L7/~~&-
_ _______~~_/p,;V {~7<e s:-/~;4A/~/~.p'!_ _ ~~____ _____
"______._____,(~!:-P~--~~,A/.!/&-v'~ -r./ ~;rZ~.9~-?-I-- ____ _ __ -----------
LCo J_ ~ct:-~,(,Z2--4f/L- I!Y'~U'L~ ~L 72jv~,t7 p ~__d______ --
___~-~'-- c;,-lJ.!! ~~~A/t~~L~t'~ - ____ _ _ _____
L~ ;.:2e..-iS/: zp__/l'.N~ R-~~-7 /S ~/~--~~
/..v;n.... /;(~z/P7U ~T4~V'/k1 C;7-~~"'/c. rk
AC:lp~J),vt~ ~ .4N .4'.A-~k:*T~-' A./#C:;-h p;vT~ -Y-~ /L~
__~ ;A-t'/-~~.J? ~~.-:T~-r-~~Z1~/!~,!!tt!i~> /~
___~~~ T;~ C""-i/.t72.,f ~w/1 j2A__?~&L~_~ ~
__~~~l/~~LA/Abf. ~ ~ ~.A/~ Z/~_#hZ/-i-~~~.,...;;:~G~-
~
~ ~?/~ Ih-- "Z c;:> ALc~T A'A.-/, /J1A/ ~~z:/~ ~/// ~~
--bf'-pJ ~- ~L{~.i~~_7Z.:: _0:?~N~L-C. z- ~,/ ~ ....,//A~~_ .d-.~~______
~A~~~7~[.dL~_t-Ji,..L]-2,. /u:/~ ~ na. //U~,4'/~----------
__t1Y" /;;J,I1m Vu ~ ~j~~~~L/~ /R/; z /t_L.. F;"A/"'? A7 .;'/~A.c 4- ---- -
7Ze .#.N~-1.CHJv /1. ~$ h/~A/'~_~ >~"-e ~ s.'~Z!~_~ 72-e...
{,r TfI-ijj!-/I?v N f~~__ 74~_!_e__ __/VV ~ 11~ ;/_,,4~ -;/- ~~R. ~7-/-.5
___ ~UA !~2:o ~ ti~ ~ _~(/L/~ ~~/2 _Be_C:;:~J
_ ___J11t-U~/V~-M~~I,;/l?_-'.~2&. _~/~ 72.e /A/~7~
__~A/;vtt. Lj-.--f~> ~_~ ~~E.{_______
r~u ued. 7
______._~ t ______
~ft I
~ -;t././" I
./ ,'I
~ !
&~- t) i
___In?~_: tJ jy LVI ..Qla_J!~___JK~ n_ ~___
S !~~ ~ f
u_____uu J~~~L~L~)~;LJ;'~0L 449u--:7J~T ~:/U~~-
, I
I
- -- ---------z: ,-,-- - 1:.71
i d/ -f 1A)sd;;:itd~':;"2vjtJf - ~ f,.,/.!!!)L-b.I-Jdj1Ll1..L f >6'1J;,L-
-~~_.~1i~LV~ _ .1/~~~db_-zi----
,::~~~~~~~~ ----
I
tI ------ --------- ----------------
: i ~ ~Aj//;;u ~~dtL4{J2v;_J.LJl~ i~74-
:.[6;~d~/)j;4 ~/k/I> j-~' -~-
, I
"
JJ-~ .J CUltdt&_dtZJ-'
:! / )l1AbflUJ, -9 ~ ?
I;
I
I
l' ~.A~~tdJ -4JtMI;;;; ~ __u_u
i~ bweJ ~ - ZJt;d ttL $ w f/-r-L2f!IflWcd,
1,1 1--
1:1
:1 (!;{ 7 -MJ.w. ~Ji'
:;1 -<jju f.iLfJ m)b~ f2~ -
i,l I. .~LSW!J ~i~ Wid cVM/ 4~~
,I 4- a~:YJ"wMLyJpk;~ - ~d&~~W.1lL1f) -
:;: L4LrLa;~--~~ ~~ ?J~t~A21t1f~Wd~
'I I
-------:t
~ rr:01f ft}~!~t b4~flJ~CwW~,___
II! ~;jjllLd~_ -. -
,I,
Iii
ld
!Il
I"
(- '\
"'-..../
/' \
~ /j,c2tJ-
'-..../'
I,
II
,;
"
- -- I --
I
,
,
: I
, I
(\
\.....~
/\
'--....J
:! J4;0J - ~z;/nk 4-~4ttJ-- -=--~_~~l#A_ - .
I
- I - ----------------- ---
-11~~: ,;s)f/LLL~ LtduflttIL-
.oJ~ ttu --------
_Jd'~) i (jXJLW-1kL_.0'JMd'r-__L2_~R<L_iyo_-~-._--
I
.
-+-'1
, I
I
, i* PJwCUd
-J~- jOkA-------------
, , o/k.tJ:,.
'~
!! /~JiLiJJd/4i 2:I-hljlddtLi - ~ ~
:1 I ~ /IUd ~ C?206
-:rr / J ;J}::!. // flu h
/i WW--A1-t.d-Il~)Z,nJIJ ytJ/lTr~
:i .&Jw%/L~f'---~Jr-~
[,; !1wu) '~J
rr
J I
:[ {!.t2bJJdL~W ./fL HIYZLL-4-1WJJ.._JL)lU~
~-~~~,
:1 I
: I
i~~" ~!l b;t.J.tJiH.t~~c0L~_&
,[ ~sl&./;J P/ri!ft/l~tL&~ - __h__ ________
:1 I
:! ~~7/! d/W- iM-4dL-~-~_b/r-~
ii; -tpnM fdl.- d/ &/~-~~ - ~€4fi-~ .
, I <Y...J_,,/b
: I
I
1 I
:1
! I
itl
.1
i I
11
"I
i'l
._1....1__ _~___.__ __
,
"
;1
/'
o
....-\
"-..~
,
; (/J~ #tfj}~flA'
~~ ~~--~:4-jJ~Wi/i'-.d~tfhy-r-Lc~~-h~
;,.1 ZaJL_4~~ ,-- - _m i---U-w- -.----.-.
i'l _ _;;;lvb.JaL1. ~d;AfLiJL dJt/P. zL~~
, 4 0
I . _ jJt1r y I/u.,(Ji 4 ~, ,.;1'/!A tA(V", ' .
.IL -u___=-- ---
;1 ~1buId4t ~~ dE ~ 4t.j)~ r -
'fi ~ ~-j/llwu) ~
I
i
--T
i i
~:- ~ #o/J4dM-~-t~~ ~U L1~"
I,! ~1LL....dL._L2~d ~~L._ZJ~~ ~b
: ~ _/ ~~
l' ~-~~ ~, _t&c!/ /J~~ U (J'h.?/lfU"/ I( 5Z1cJ f~
!: ~_vy~ ~6~Jf!xv~~~
I, ~~t,.Jh!i:.a LIl1j~w'~ ;I-.idL.
j!
I:
, I
if ~C4~ U/-M.-. Y7M/W
ii ~~ f-7~fL-PU-A'-~'
'I
;i~PiA[dIIL LUIJfltJ-ifalk>", AUUHrdL - dJUd'(j cf=
I I ;J.., , J.Ii /J /> .L." . . - ,/.Ii.
r~.A.-V.Jk.~, ,h)11 If.
-1B;A l~~~-Jd~,()JUtli&~d_~_L~
-)V= : 1-4mLU1uL1~~~J / td-d fL';t ~ r---
-y;4'L, i~iiLfd i ~/f-_~~._7lf/A ,~
~~'j~ :'; ~vU_ I ~~ - ~ 4t~ d LL; ~~ ~
l:! - (T .--/
i! dLlJ~
j,1
_ ._ /1
'I
o
~
"-..J
~
d
,'I
-~--~-:r~Z!~L~~-:--k-JLi&~ff~'~--
------------'.1-:::- Ji~/1) --:---- ____u__________ ~_______u_
-/jpt- :.1 - 2LL'tJJi;-'- N~-ffi-L-jLfMUf2,---= ~
i jPl'~v-i-~~;f4d~
-p~~-- -- -~-'!4Itt . -~--- - - '14 / w;ei1Uf /flt/AA ,
~kul, t' C'.':..--~~Adftd~ "i~ d
1rS~lv!/i - I
---:::tJ~-=-u~~1Ad- , ~u1-L.4iflM_ll~L-;~.Ld~-
:: ---1>>#- ~dJLhLJ2L-Aidfj~ ~&V
:: 1~~~-o/lj? /JLllb-zi
II ~~ ,&1dd~:..JZ~ cM-ttld J&;Ul' i
! . /J y A I I /, } J." Jt "I /\A A ,j} 6 At fJ )/ # , -<' ..&. ~ A ./ E
: i ~'&~ - (fl~~k:74L~&.BLV_~ ~L --
i.;k--Zlt/JLJJUd ~ -
i'
, I
- 0~~--1-~~~:,~ -;~ iP cJ1f1l1l ~I :lJ~)D1J!Ji:<pd::I
! I "" 4i-uW, tv 'ljJW ,~
-13 :i* 'L)luL~ ~irv (lm;;dL
-:mV ffU :1* ~~ ,b~~ /mtt4 ~.kM
~ j!4~ . ~&~~ / ,~0(j ~ ~ -~),
~ J-J1 :!!
-f'N ~ _rU -4-~-.-i\t , - LE:I~/J111/l1/fi ~uA -' 'uti: <_
Y !I
~y .JlJ. ! I . . (&/tJaJ t~-J
--~W-c ,~ ~~.d4_~__
~Md L~ ~L~ ~LLJfLlL__
,:1 t - -~ilAt//.vJhU' ~ f;,C/YI (ju-uad~
+h--AwLw---+-yJ~~I1det~dL~
.---f+P-.tLd!i~~_L./f>Wk kf;Auv-d ,_U~ ~ p-/u1
--W.vdt.tt:-L -~-d _~Lr!//w~) / d. dl2~/J1,
I.-P--<
o
a
Land Use & WCM
Development
Consultation
A Division of Kramer Chin & Mayo, Inc
August 29, 1991
Mr Gene Borges, City Administrator
City of Yelm
P 0 Box 479
Yelm, W A 98597
Dear Mr Borges.
We are writing to thank you for your support in Yelm's effort to establish the future
growth boundary with the Thurston County officials.
Ever since Thurston Highland Associates selected the Weyerhaetiser site as a
potential development site, we noticed how the Thurston County Planning folks
arbitrarily divided up the parcel and left an undesirable portion between Fort Lewis
and the County preferred Yelm's boundary
Your action definitely helps all those who have been working hard for Yelm's future
growth to achieve their goal. By logically including the whole of the Thurston
Highland property, the new map will make our task of annexing to the City a lot
easier
Our work has just begun and the road to an environmentally sound master planned
community is long and difficult. We look forward to your continued support.
Sincerel y,
Dennis Su, AlA
DS:sf
975-01
1917 First Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 443-3537 Fax (206) 443-5372
~ - "
o CI'lY OF YEIM ~~IL MEETQ
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1991, 7:30 IM, YEIM CI'lY HALL CCXJK:IL aI1\MBERS
The Regular Meeting was called to order by Mayor Robert A. Sanders at 7 30
H>1 All present joined in the flag salute. Councilmembers present Kathy
Wolf, Amos Lawton, Arnold Drogseth and Martha Parsons. Rick Kolilis was out
of town. Staff: Shelly Badger, Gene Borges, Glenn Dunnam and Sandy Mackie
(Owens Davies Mackie). Visitors: Stephen A. Masini, Frank Densrrore, R.A
Rants, Jocelyn Eastland, Bill Tipton, R. Loden, Miriam Lange, Nny Fortier,
Jane A. Betsacon (all of Thurston Vision 2020); Jerry Morrissette and E.A
Wiltsie (both of Morrissette and Associates); Joe Huddleston, D Ney, M L
Clerrens, E. Newby and Don Miller.
The following was added to the agenda:
7(g). Police car
The agenda was approved as arrended on a rrotion by Arms Lawton, second by
Kathy Wolf. Motion carried.
The minutes of the August 14, 1991 Regular Council Meeting was approved on a
rrotion by Martha Parsons, second by Amos Lawton Motion carried.
Payroll for the rronth of August 1991 was approved on a motion by Martha
Parsons, second by Kathy Wolf. Motion carried.
At 7 :32 H>1, a Public Hearing was opened on the proposed arrendrrent to the 1985
Yelm Comprehensive Plan adopting the Yelm/Thurston County Joint Plan as
Yelm's extraterritorial plan and the proposed arrendrrent to the Yelm Zoning
Ordinance adopting the Thurston County zoning ordinance for those areas
outside the City of Yelm.
Gene Borges, City Administrator, stated that the Yelm Planning Corrmission
recorrmended unanimously that the City Council approve of the above stated
arrendrrents as they are consistent with the recomrendations of the
Yelm/Thurston County Joint Planning Corrmittee and the motion of approval by
the Thurston County Corrmissioners. He illustrated on the map dated August
20, 1991 the expanded Sphere of Influence boundary line (west to Fort Lewis)
which has been approved by the Thurston County Corrmissioners as Yelm's Urban
Growth Boundary.
Sandy Mackie explained to all that the arrendrrent to Yelm's 1985 Comprehensive
Plan adopts the Yelm/Thurston County Joint Plan as the extraterritorial plan
for areas outside of Yelm but inside the Sphere of Influence (as illustrated
on the August 20, 1991 map) with the following arrendrrents:
1. The Urban Growth Boundary map in the Joint Plan will be replaced
with the map dated August 20, 1991 showing the expanded Urban Growth
Boundary.
2. The zoning map and future land use map are to be replaced with
the "Yelm Joint Plan Area Proposed County Zoning" map dated August
20, 1991.
3. The Joint Planning Area map to be replaced with the August 20,
1991 map showing the expanded "Sphere of Influence/Urban Growth
Boundary" and "Imrediate Annexation Area".
The Council also must consider adoption of pre-annexation zoning for those
areas identified on the map dated August 20, 1991 (zoning) for those areas
east of Mill Road within the immediate annexation boundary. These
properties, upon petition to annex, will be allowed to proceed under the zone
identified on the August 20, 1991 map. The properties west of Mill Road, may
proceed after an environrrental review and master plan proposal to the City.
The Public Hearing was closed at 7:42 H>1.
Martha Parsons rroved to adopt the Yelm/Thurston County Joint Plan as Yelm's
extraterritorial plan as recommended by the Yelm Planning Corrmission Second
by Arnold Drogseth. Motion carried with Kathy Wolf abstaining due to her
participation on the original Comprehensive Plan Corrmittee (1984) and the
Yelm/Thurston County Joint Planning Corrmittee.
Martha Parsons moved to arrend the Yelm Zoning Ordinance by adopting the
sections of the Thurston County Zoning Ordinance that pertain to the zoning
identified on the Yelm Joint Plan Area Proposed County Zoning map of August
20, 1991 as part of the Yelm Zoning Ordinance. Second by Kathy Wolf. Motion
carried.
\
Ron Rants, r~3enting Thurston Vision 2020, intrOecl. Frank Densrrore to
explain the goals of th organization. Developing a vision for Thurston
County through public involvement is the number one goal. First, the
question of what the communities in Thurston County see as a vision and set
of values for their corrmuni ty will be answered. i next the planning can be done
to meet the vision using SHB 2929 & SHB 1025 regulations i plans are then
implemented and rronitored.
The group feels there is a lack of cohesiveness at the Thurston County level
and they hope the visioning process will bring all together to work toward
coomon goals.
Bill Tipton, also from Thurston Vision 2020, highlighted the benefits of the
visioning process:
1. An opfX)rtunity to create a future in Thurston County that the
citizens want.
2. The vision sets the building blocks to carry out the planning to
achieve the goals.
3. Bridges can be built between corrmunity groups, fX)litical groups
and citizens on significant issues.
4. Public confidence in community leaders can be increased.
5. Thurston Vision 2020 sees the process as having fX)tential to
rrotivate the public more than any other method.
6. Implementation of growth management is aided by a vision.
Jerry Morrissette, Morrissette and Associates, was present to re-introduce
himself to the Council. The engineering firm specializes in serving
municipalities He introduced Ed Wiltsie, an engineer with the firm, who
lives in the Yelm community
Gary Tuller was not present to discuss his complaint regarding mandatory
garbage service within the city limits of Yelm.
Resolution No. 226 allowing for orderly and proper growth of corrrrercial and
industrial areas within the City of Yelm and to insure that future corrrrercial
and industrial developrrents incorporate proper design practices as they
relate to engineering factors including surface drainage and runoff, waste
disfX)sal and traffic control was approved on a rrotion by Kathy Wolf, second
by Martha Parsons. Motion carried. Effective date September 5, 1991.
The park use request submitted by Leona Coombs to use the Yelm City
September 7, 1991 for a family celebration was approved on a rrotion
Lawton, second by Kathy Wolf, subject to a sani-can being provided
carried. .
Park on
by ArIDs
Motion
Ordinance No. 414 relating to consideration of annexation as a means of
meeting community needs and establishing definitive objectives and fX)licies
as an official City fX)sition regarding annexations was approved on a rrotion
by Martha Parsons, second by Kathy Wolf. Motion carried Effective date:
August 28, 1991.
THURSTON HIGHLANDS ANNEXATION Thurston Highlands & Associates submitted to
the Council an "amended" Notice of Intent to Begin Annexation Proceedings, in
response to staff's request due to the delay in approval of the Yelm/Thurston
County Joint Plan and to conform with Yelm's annexation ordinance No. 399
dated May 8, 1991. The original 10% petition was submitted. on June 13, 1990,
approved by the Planning Commission on July 10, 1990 and accepted by the City
Council on July 11, 1990.
Kathy Wolf rroved. to accept the arrended. "Notice of Intent to Begin Annexation
Proceedings" to include all properties depicted on the map attached to the
petition and to begin processing of the 10% Annexation Petition in accordance
with Yelm Ordinance No. 399 & 414 Second by Martha Parsons. Motion
carried..
The NE portion of Section 26 and the NW fX)rtion of Section 25 were
intentionally left out of the annexation request to preserve the open space
and agricultural nature of the properties.
Kathy Wolf rroved to direct staff to proceed imnediately with the scoping
process of the envirorurental impact statement for the Thurston Highlands &
Associates profX)sed annexation in accordance with the State Envirorurental
Protection Act, second by Martha Parson. Motion carried.
Gene Borges Qmed the Council that the City was () able to purchase the
vehicle that had been found for the Water Department as planned. Staff will
continue the search for a different vehicle.
ASHER ANNEXATION: Staff informed the Council that originally West Road had a
40' right-of-way, an additional 10 I was dedicated on the north side when the
four lots were short-platted, for a total West Road right-of-way of 50'
Arnold Drogseth moved to approve Ordinance No. 408 annexing lots 1-4 of SS
1948 to the City limits of Yelm, second by Arms Lawton. Motion carried with
Kathy Wolf abstaining. Effective date: September 5, 1991.
Resolution No. 225 supporting the statewide implementation of Enhanced 9-1-1
emergency communication service and encouraging voters to approve Referendum
42 during the general election this fall was approved on a motion by Martha
Parsons, second by Amos Lawton. Motion carried. Effective date September
5, 1991.
Gene Borges informed Council that they would receive a draft of the ordinance
relating to public nuisances prepared by Bob Hauth, Owens Davies Mackie at
the September 11, 1991 Regular Council Meeting.
Aroos Lawton moved to allow Chief Dunnam to search for a used vehicle to
replace the 1985 LTD & 1986 T-Bird surplused at the August 14, 1991 meeting,
second by Kathy Wolf. Motion carried.
The minutes of the August 20, 1991 Planning Corrmission Meeting were presented
to the Council.
Yelm has drafted a proposed scope of work for the traffic study. Currently
Thurston County Planning and Department of Transportation are reviewing the
scope
YELM POLICE REPORT: Chief Dunnam informed the Council tha t the oar work on
SR 510, including the reduction of speed to 35 MPH has kept the Yelm Police
Department very busy. Council stated that they were against the lowering of
the speed limit and asked that Chief Dunnam only respond to life safety calls
due to the fact that the area is not under Yelm's jurisdiction
YELM MUNICIPAL COURT REPORT: Reports were submitted for June 1991 showing
that 157 tickets were processed and July 1991 had 166 tickets.
STREET REPORT: Chip-sealing has been canpleted, Yelm Street Department did
excellent job in preparing streets. Chip-seal work was very well done
GRCWIH MANAGEMENI' WORK UPDATE: Staff has been busy attending required
meetings on SHB 2929 & SHB 1025. It is critical that Yelm be represented on
the county-wide carmittees. The Urban Growth Management Steering Corrrnittee
initially agreed that Yelm be funded separately than other south county towns
because we are ready to proceed on many growth management requirements.
In the event that Gene Borges, City Administrator or Mayor Sanders can not
attend a meeting relating to growth management, Martha Parsons moved to
authorize Sandy Mackie to serve as Yelm's alternate and be allowed to vote on
issues, second by Kathy Wolf Motion carried. Mr. Mackie has agreed to do
so within Yelm's present retainage
Yelm received a letter from Bill DaVee, City Manager, Ci ty of Centralia,
stating that Centralia agrees in principal with the draft interlocal
agreement for wastewater disposal to the Centralia Power & Light Canal.
Technical issues are currently being resolved, then a meeting will follow of
the elected officials for a recommendation to their respective Councils.
Leslie Taggesell, Acting Comnunity Librarian, Yelm/Tenino gave the August
1991 Library Report. She provided statistics showing circulation through
July 1991 at 7,038 items, 1990 total circulation was 5,333 items. 323
children participated in the Summer Reading Program.
At 9 00 PM, Yelm City Council went into an Executive Session to discuss real
estate negotiations. At 9 16 PM, Council reconvened.
With no further business before the Council, Arnold Drogseth moved to adjourn
at 9:17 PM, second by Martha Parsons. Meeting adjourned.
^'I'I'EST
o
o
CITY OF YErM
ORDINANCE ro. 414
PURPOSE In considering annexation as a means of meeting community needs, it
is first necessary to establish definitive objectives and policies as an
official City position These objectives and policies can then become the
frarrework from which specific annexation requests can be reviewed and
evaluated
SEcrION 1
DEVEIDPMENT OF UNIFORM CRITERIA
The City of Yelm should develop uniform criteria to use in evaluating
annexations
A. Annexations shall comply with all requirerrents with respect to the City' 5
Annexation Ordinance No 399, dated May 8, 1991
B The City should evaluate all annexations on the basis of their short- and
long-term corrmunity impact. Annexations shall be consistent with City
plans for urban densities and uses within the urban area of the City and
to assure adequate financial capability of the annexed area to meet the
criteria for urban areas under SHB 2929 (the Washington State Growth
Managerrent Act) and SHB 1025
C 11 response to SHB 2929, the City should, as a llUmmum, analyze and
evaluate the condition and safety of all streets, the availability and
condition of public utilities and the demand for emergency services
(police, fire and medical) Public services and facilities to be
analyzed may include
1 Public areas;
2 Transportation needs;
3 Necessary utilities;
4. Sidewalks, curbs and lighting;
5 Recreational services (includes parks and open spaces);
6 Human services (health care, social services);
7 Development of an urban center; and
8 Support a balance of housing, commercial and public
recreational needs
D The City of Yelm may require the development of a plan for public
transportation to serve the newly annexed area. When possible, plans
should be consistent with plans of Intercity Transit for public
transportation in South Thurston County
E Annexation of land should be directly dependent upon the City's ability
to provide, acquire, operate and maintain general services and utility
services Annexation will take place only after the City is satisfied
that general services, utility resources and necessary utility plan
capacity can be made available in a manner cost effective to the City
F In order to accanplish the above, the City of Yel.m has adopted Ordinance
No 399 to establish uniform annexation procedures
1
In addition to procedures stated within Ordinance No
the City shall designate staff to perform the following
399,
a
b
Receive and process annexation requests
Furnish the public and City officials with annexation
infonretion
Prepare technical studies and assessments
impacts from annexation
on
the
c
2 The City may require property owners wi thin an annexing area to
assume a pro-rata share of the City's bonded indebtedness existing
at the ti.rre of annexation.
3. The City may require impact fees and/or assessments as a condition
of annexation
4 The City should cause a comprehensive plan and/or proposed
zoning to be prepared for all annexations Existing zoning of
the area may be honored, provided it is consistent wiLlI tll"
Comprehensive Plan The zoning classification spccif.i.ncl ill: t.he
o
time of annexation should be in effect for a
of time after annexation, before a change in
considered.
o .
reasonable perlod
classification is
5 Prior to any annexation, the City should confer with affected
special districts and other jurisdictions to assess the impact
of annexation
6 The City rray require the applicant to prepare a report assessing
the probable short- and long-term financial, economic and social
impact from annexations
7 If the annexation is acceptable to the City, the City shall forward
reports, plans, studies and agreements of areas requesting
annexation to Thurston County and the Boundary Review Board
(when required) to facilitate processing
SECTION 2
ANNEXATIONS TO MEET GOALS AND POLICIES
The City of Yelm should consider annexations that best rreet the growth goals
and policies of Yelm to include the goals of SHB 2929 and SHB 1025.
A. The City rray, by Council approval, utilize the extension of utilities and
services to encourage and guide needed and desirable urban growth,
provided that:
1 The area served by water and/or sewer be subject to a contractual
arrangement wherein it is agreed that all utility improvements
rreet City standards and that residents of the area to annex to
the City at such time as the City deems appropriate
2 The owners of lands to be served by such water and/or sewer
service agree to participate, financially, to the extent and
in the rranner agreeable to the City, in capital improverrents
taking place, or projected to take place
3 The owners of lands to be served by such water and/or sewer
service provide, when requested, by Local Improverrent District
or other non-City funds, specified water and/or sewer supply,
transmission, distribution and storage facilities, inter-tied
with City systems. Ownership and control of such facilities
shall be transferred to the City following construction,
inspection and acceptance
4. In those instances where extensions or improvements to City
water and/or sewer are provided, the City rray waive all or any
part of surcharges and/or utility charges which might otherwise
be applicable.
SECTION 3
PRESERVATION OF NEIGHBORHOODS
The City of Yelm should consider annexations that preserve established
neighborhoods and community identity.
A. The City rray support individual area identity and citizen participation
within newly annexed areas by
1 Adopting land use controls in newly annexed areas which favorable
characterize that particular area
2. Encouraging and providing opportunities for a maxlinum degree of
citizen participation in governmental planning and decision-
making processes
SECTION 4
JURISDICTIONAL COOPERATION
The City of Yelm should cooperate with Thurston County
jurisdictions in addressing areawide comprehensive planning,
service provision to areas outside its corporate limits that are
its Urban Growth Management Boundary and Sphere of Influence
and other
zoning and
included in
A. When determined to be advantageous to the City, the City should assist in
the CL'l:)citioll uf interlocal agreelU:mts tu (.ll,uvitk: twdud.'-c,d "I,d t ,11,.,1\,_.1(\.1
support to planned urban areas within the City's Sphere of Influence for
'.
'.'
j.
o
o
the extension and improvement of public services and facilities
B The City should cooperate with Thurston County and other jurisdictions to
establish uniform road and utility standards within adopted service areas
of the City, in accordance with the Yelm/Thurston County Joint Plan.
C The City should participate in the planning for areas outside its
boundaries but within its Sphere of Influence to ensure that land uses
are compatible with the Yelm Comprehensive Plan policies and land use
designations
SECTION 5
ANNEXATION LEGISLATION
The City should encourage the provision of ITDre favorable urban annexation
legislation to facilitate ITDre orderly planning and growth of the City
A. The City should support s tate legislation which improves, simplifies, and
gives cities ITDre authority in the annexation process
B The City should support state legislation to simplify Boundary Review
Board procedures and otherwise make annexations easier, while complying
with the goals of SHE 2929 and SHE 1025
C The City should participate with other municipalities in proposing
improved state legislation on annexation policy and procedure
SECTION 6
ACCEPl'ANCE
A. The decision to annex a property is vested in the discretion of the Yelm
City Council. The acceptance of a Notice of Intent by the City
represents a commitment by the City to process an annexation consistent
with the requirements of the Annexation Ordinance l'b 399 and the
annexation policies described above
B The decision to accept an annexation will depend upon the decision of the
Council that the applicant has adequately satisfied the requirements of
the annexation ordinance and these annexation policies Final acceptance
of the annexation is within the sole discretion of the City upon a
finding that the annexation, as proposed, is beneficial to the City and
consistent with the City's adopted plans and policies at the tine the
annexation request was considered for approval
SECTION 7
SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this chapter be held invalid, such invalidity shall not
affect any other provision, or the application thereof, which can be given
effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this and the
provisions of this ordinance are declared to be severable
SECTION 8
EFFECTIVE DATE
The City Council of Yelm determines that this Ordinance is essential for the
public health and safety of the connunity and shall take effect inrnediately
upon its passage and approval.
ATIEST
Shelly A. Badger
City Clerk
Robert A. Sanders
Mayor
PASSED
APPROVED
PUBLIfHED
August 28, 1991
August 28, 1991
September 5, 1991
~9 I _ ,III _II i
~ I ~ (I I!
ii, ~::F'M Hi'}!! CIIt) YELM
o
F'II)
it
City of YellD
:I;-."~-- -
105 Ye1m Avenue West
POBox 479
Ye1m, Waahinqton 98597
206-458-3244
FASCSIMILE TRANSMITTAL FORM
TO
(DktC1'l~ l:<< Ii I ~'C; rkh rk' I~_
'-- ' Iflli I
ATTENTION , iudt;n fr !uc.!:iJ!.-.
- FAX- NUHBE; C tv) qL/3 ~ &) /5 c'
COMPANY
INDIVIDUAL "
FROM
COMPANY
-FAX- NUMBER
( 1b6 ) 458-.( 48
lLi
NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW
\"
DATE Of Jf"q /
-7 (0
TIME SENT d : fiIf? ./111
SUBJECT 6f/flJ!./ ! /' -l AiLe. !(7( (---/ t7
, . /'1 /
/7 '-,~ "! ;11_,/ 1//)//') d'
t r I ,icr r'{v~~ ' -r Ir?r,-i. 'Jr, r.e 1/ / f?-{.( ~,
/ J '
~J.1/ (;-fd ()fI, o {l)r--' (D7'Ylfy;rl/)f5
ITIONAL COMMENTS .
1f/Y'1i!- kl''JC?-L) ;~,
/. \
/ f ji{ 1~.{ -----....
'.11.. ~ .-
//,'11\./ _.
i ,- ./
\ /
/'
If ./0,,-_,,- dc":ot receive all copies or any copy is not legible.
please cal~ ~~~) 458-3244 as soon as possible.
.., "<':_1') II' ~'-:F'lli! FRill,.:! CITY OF YELM
o
P 11 ~
o
CITY OF YEIM
ANNEXATION POLICIES
August 28, 1991
In considering annexation as a means of meeting community needs, it is first
necessary to establish definitive objectives and policies as an official City
position. These objectives and policies can then become the framework from
which specific annexation requests can be reviewed and evaluated.
OBJECTIVE 1. The City of Yelm should develop uniform criteria to use in
evaluating annexations.
Policies:
1 Annexations shall comply with all requirements with respect to the
City's Annexation Ordinance No. 399, dated May 8, 1991.
2. The City should evaluate all annexations on the basis of their
short- and long-term community impact. Annexations shall be
cons1stent with C1ty plans for urban dens1tles and uses w1thin the
urban area of the City and to assure adequate financial capability
of the annexed area to meet the criteria for urban areas under SHB
2929 (the Washington State Growth Management Act) and SHE 1025.
3. In response to SHE 2929, the City should, as a min.imum, analyze and
evaluate the condition and safety of all streets, the availability
and condition of public utilities and the demand for emergency
services (pollce, f1re and medical). Public services and facilities
to be analyzed may include:
a. Public areas;
b. Transportation needs;
c. Necessary util1ties;
d. Sidewalks, curbs and Ilghting;
e. Recreational services (includes parks and open spaces);
f. Human services (health care, social services);
g. Development of an urban center; and
h. Support a balance of houslllg, corrmerc18l and public
recreational needs.
4. The City of Yelm may require the development of a plan for public
transportation to serve the newly annexed area When possible,
plans should be consistent with plans of Intercity Transit for
public transportation in South Thurston County.
5. Annexation of land should be directly dependent upon the City's
ability to provide, acquire, operate and maintain general services
and utility services. Annexation will take place only after the
City is satisfied that general services, utility resources and
necessary utility plan capacity can be made available In a manner
cost effectlve to the Clty.
6. In order to accomplish the above, the City of Yelm has adopted
-1-
~';'- "'-1.1: Ii: ~:'F'M HII},;! CITY OF YELM
o
o
F'II :
Orchnance No. 399 to establish uniform annexation procedures.
a.
the
In addition to procedures stated within Ordinance No. 399,
City B~ designate staff to perform the following:
::17-h1-/'{
1. Receive and process annexation requests.
2. Furnish the public and City officials with annexation
infonration.
3. Prepare technical studies and assessments on the
impacts from annexation.
b. The City may require property owners within an annexing
area to aSSUlre a prorata share of the City's bonded indebt-
edness existing at the time of annexation.
c. The City may require impact fees and/or assessrrents as a
condition of annexation.
d. The City should cause a comprehensive plan and/or proposed
zoning to be prepared for all annexations. Existing zoning of
the area may be honored, provided it is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan. The zoning classification specified at the
time of annexation should be in effect for a reasonable period
of time after ~1nexation, before a change in classification is
considered.
e. Prior to any annexation, the City should confer with
affected special districts and other jurisdictions to assess
the impact of annexation.
OBJECTIVE 2.
growth goals
1025.
f. The City may require the applicant to prepare a report
assessing the probable short- and long-term financial,
economic and social. il!lfXlct from annexations. 77
I{- '(42.. /l;v~'77N1/ /~//./6AP.?< ,);p h_Q/~ '
r $/1h~,rt"- ~/
g. )The City ~ forwar~ports, plans, studies and
agreements of areas requestlng annexation to Thurston County
and the Boundary Review Board~. wf€h the r~yu~~L Lll~:y.thcy 1:l5!B:s-t
the City in Hw:i r im@lcm::mta on.
CCV~~#:lPd) [;p {;;,~t".P7Y ~~~p~
The City of Yelm should consider anne!futlons that best rreet the
and policies of Yelm to include the goals of SHB 2929 and SHB
Policies:
1. The City may, by Council approval, utilize the extension of
utilities and services to encourage and guide needed and desirable
urban growth, provided that:
a. The area served by water and/or sewer be subject to a
contractual arrang~nt whereln It is agreed that all utility
improvements rreet Clty standards and that residents of the area
to annex to the City at such bIne as the City deems
appropriate.
-2-
911"_ I 1_111
I (.11 -i 1
II "'F']II! ~DIIM CITY (.IF YELM
I I :,..11 11 .. 1 l'lJ. .._
o
F'114
o
b. The owners of lands to be served by such water and/or sewer
servlce agree to participate, financially, to the extent and in
the manner agreeable to the City, in capital improvements
taking place, or projected to take place.
c. The owners of lands to be served by such water and/or sewer
service provide, when requested, by Local Improvement District
or other non-City funds, specified water and/or sewer supply,
transmission, distribution and storage facilities, inter-tied
with City systems. Ownership and control of such facilities
shall be transferred to the City following construction,
inspection and acceptance.
d. In those instances where extensions or improvements to City
water and/or sewer are provided, the City rray waive all or any
part of surcharges and/or utility charges which might otherwise
be applicable.
OBJECTIVE 3. The City of Yelm should consider annexations that preserve
established neighborhoods and community identity.
Policies:
1. The City may support individual area identity and citizen
participation within newly annexed areas by:
a. Adopting land use controls in newly annexed areas which
favorably characterize that particular area.
b. Encouraging and providing opportrmities for a rrax.imum
degree of citizen particlpation in governmental planning and
decision-making processes.
OBJECTIVE 4. The City of Yelm should cooperate with Thurston Cormty and
other Jurisdictions in addressing areawide comprehensive planning, zoning and
service provislon to areas outside its corporate limits that are included in
its Urban Growth Management Boundary and Sphere of Influence.
Policles:
1. \A1hen determined to be advantageous to the City, the City should
assist in the creation of interlocal agreements to provide technical
and financial support to planned urban areas within the City's
Sphere of Influence for the extension and improvement of public
services and facilities.
2. The City should cooperate with Thurston County and other
jurisdictions to establish uniform road and utility standards within
adopted service areas of the City, in accordance with the
Yelm/ThlITston County Joint Plan.
3. The City should participate in the planning for areas outside its
bormdaries but within its Sphere of Influence to ensure that land
uses are compabble with the Yelrn Comprehensive Plan policies and
-3-
'<I
<'/_Ii) Ii' ,-/IFNI FEI!1 CITY OF YELM
o
r"\
(--.J
land use designations.
OBJECTIVE 5. The City should encourage the provis1on of ITDre favorable urban
annexation legislation to facilitate more orderly planning and growth of the
City.
Policies:
1.
The City
simplifies,
process
should support s ta te
and gl ves ci ties rrore
leglslation which
authority in the
improves,
annexation
2. The City should support state legislation to simplify Boundary
Review Board procedures and otherwise make annexations easier, whjle
complying with the goals of SHE 2929 and SHE 1025.
3. The City should participate with other municipalities in proposing
improved state legislation on annexation policy and procedure.
The decision to annex a property is vested in the discretion of the Yelm City
COWlCll. The acceptance of a Notice of Intent by the City represents a
comnitment by the City to process an annexation consistent with the
requirements of the Annexation Ordinance No. 399 and the annexation policies
described above.
The decision to accept an annexation will depend up::ln the decision of the
Council that the applicant has adequately satisfied the requirements of the
annexation ordinance and these annexation policies. Final acceptance of the
annexation is within the sole discretion of the City upon a finding that the
annexation, as proposed, 1S beneficial to the City and consistent with the
Clty'S adopted plans and policies at the tirre the annexation request was
considered for approval.
-4-
o
(~f~i;;pm~nt K 'LVI
~nsul[anon .1 ~'-...J
J ...
FAX TRANSMITTAL
A DivIsion of Kramar Chin & Mayo, Inc,
SUBJECT/PROJECT ;
TOTAL PAGES
DATE: -I\U6t~,~L
~~~ --
---1--- ~ -4~4B
~N-l<) I~~
--1Ft Uerra N H l 'TH- tAND
~
TO
F A..'\ NO
FROM
MESSAGE
Q~~~
MR. \Ll.~M~ I<? NOT f<<f\.l~
IHIS frr'~Lc90N lb SKIN 1B~ fF=Trf!ot'!
-A> '111~ ~f\ttt:rltJvr ~TH~.
~a>r:1I't>~~ ~rk1 IS <;l~!\N=D
ftf t1F:-.J6 1l'lr Vl='-8t~1f=Pfffl=.NT
fd}Z..- TO l4lun.n .) jc?~11'(.
111F:: O~VrI~ )'.IILL, "Be.. f'1t1ILa? 10
l0-f 1Z>M't>~N. --rRf'rt1~Y&y ~
17~~ 0A14=- of- lfH > l1FM' () N 1H~
Of) drl-Uv ~~A fDK- U) ·
~ //7
\ :" "~~~
1917 First Avenue. Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 443-3537 Fax: (206) 443.5372
II - ; - -I I II C I, ['11 ]- II 1
)1
.
o
August 28, 1991
Land Use &
Development
Consultation
KCM
o
A DIVISion of Kramer Chin & /Yuyc> Inc.
Mr Gene Borges, City Administrator
City of Yelm
P O. Box 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
Re: Amended "Letter of Intent"
A.IUlexation for Thurston Highlmd Associates, et. al.
Dear Mr Borges,
On bph;:tU of thp Thurston Hlghl~nd Assodatesf we are SUbIDitting tills amended
Letter of Intent/l0% Annexation Petition as suggested by Mr. Sandy Mackie, Yelm's
City Attorney in the August 14, 1991 City Council meeting We are doing this
because of the delay in the approval of the Yelm/Thurston Connty Joint Plan and to
conform with the current Annexation Ordinance #399 dated May 8, 1991
Our original 10% petition was submItted on June 13, 1990, approved by the Planning
Commission on Ju1y 10, 1990 and accepted by the City Council on July 11, 1990 There
is no change in the annexation boundary and therefore original legal description and
map are still valid. An executed copy of the amended "Notice of Intention to
Commence Annexation Proceedings" is attached for your records.
It is our intent to comply fully with Yelm's annexation polides which are being
developed and adopted by the City Council jn the coming months The proposed
axmexation will be within the urban growth boundary approved recently by both the
County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners. The
establishing of the urban growth boundary is to meet the requirement of the HE 2929
and HE 1025 The area covered by this petition includes thirty six properties with
Thurston Highland, Dragt and Brown being the three largest parcels.
In the next and final petition (60%) submittal, we shall address the issues of the
environment, infrastructures, financing and methods of meeting the provisions of
HB 2929 and 1025 and the sped.fics of the annexation policies.
Sincerely,
--
DTS:br
Attachment
c Thurston Highland Associates
1917 First Avenue Seallle W3shmgton 98101 (206) 443-3537 Fax, (206) 443-537'2
II
i! III
]- Ii
Ii'!
'0 AMENDED 0
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCE~DIN'GS
TO The City Council of the City of Yelm
105 Yelm Avenue West
Yelm, WA 98597
The undersigned, who are owners of not less than ten percent In value, according to-the assessed
valuatIon for general taxation of the property for which annexation is sought, hereby advise the City
Cowned of the City of Yelm that It is the deSire of the undersigned property owners of the following area.
to commence annexatIon proceedings
The property herein referred to is described on Exhibit "A" anached hereto and [s deplc:ed on Exhibit
"S" further attached hereto
It 1$ requested that the City Council of the Crty of Yelm set a date not later than sixty days after the filing
of thiS request for a meetmg with the undersIgned to determine
1 Whether the City Council will accept the proposed annexation;
2. Whether the City Council will permIt the adoption of zoning for the proposed area In $ubstanbal
compliance with the ordinance which permits annexatIon of property at the nearest compar2ble
zone, under the Yelm Code which the parties believe is the Residential Agricutturai Zone with an
RA-SA deSIgnation. The annexa:lon and proposed zoning are shown on the attached map
(Exhibit "B"). and
3. Whether the City Council will reqdre the assumption of existing CITy Indebtedness by the area
to be annexed
This page IS one of a group of pages contaIning identical text matenaI and is intended by the signers
of thIS NotIce of Intention to be presented and conSidered as one Notice of Intention and may be filed
With the other pages containing addiuor'lal signatures which cumulatively may be conSidered as a single
Notice of Intentiqn
Owners SIgnature (pnnt name
and addre Is
cud Welcome, 'Managing Partner
Thurston Highland Associates
1917 First Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
Parcel Number
217-27-000000
217-26-200000
217-23-300000
217-23-420000
217-23-130000
Date
August 28, 1991
.,'1 TIITHI F HI.,F 1"'1"'.-: I I
n
August 28, 19';~
Q Land Use &
Development
Consultation
KCM
A Div:sicm of Kramer Chin &. Mayo Inc.
Mr Gene Borges, City Administrator
City of YelJn
P O. Box 479
y elm, Washington 98597
Re: Amended "Letter of lntentll
Annexation for Thurston Highland Associates, et. aI.
Dear Mr Borges,
On bph:.lf of thf! Thurston Hlg-hl.\>nd Associates, we are submitting this amended
Letter of Intent/10% Annexation Petition as suggested by Mr Sandy Mackie, Yelm's
City Attorney in the August 14, 1991 City Council meeting We are doing this
because of the delay in the approval of the Yelm/Thurston Connty JOint Plan and to
conform with the current Annexation Ordinance #399 dated May 8, 1991
Our original 10% petition was submItted on June 13, 1990, approved by the Planning
Commission on July 10, 1990 and accepted by the City Council onJuly 11, 1990 There
is no change in the annexation boundary and therefore original legal description and
map are still valid. An executed copy of the amended "Notice of Intention to
Commence Annexation Proceedings" is attached for your records.
It is our intent to comply fully with Yelm's annexation polides which are being
developed and adopted by the City Council in the coming months The proposed
annexation will be within the urban growth boundary approved recently by both the
County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners. The
establishing of the urban growth boundary is to meet the requirement of the HE 2929
and HB 1025 The area covered by this petition includes thirty six properties with
Thurston Highland, Dragt and Brown being the three largest parcels.
In the next and final petition (60%) submittal, we shall address the issues of the
environment, infrastructures, financing and methods of meeting the provisions of
HB 2929 and 1025 and the speCifics of the annexation policies.
- ~ ~.-
Sincerely I
---
DTS.br
Attachment
c: Thurston Highland Associates
1917 First Avenue Seattle W3shlngton 98101 (20fi) 443-3537 Fax, (206) 443-5372
i I ~ '- -i I III
F 1./1
r i i
n AMENDED ({
NOTICE OF, INTeNTION TO COMMENCE AN~-..~TtON PROCEEDINGS
TO The City Council of the City of Yelm
105 Yelm Avenue West
Yelm, WA 98597
The undersigned, who are owners of not less than ten percent In value, according to-the assessed
valuatIon for general taxation of the property for which annexation is sought, hereby advise the City
Council of the City of Yelm that It is the deSire of the undersigned property owners of the following area
to commence annexatIon proceedings
The property herein referred to is described on Exhibit "A" anached hereto and IS depic:ed on Exhibit
"S" further attached hereto
It IS requested that the CIty Council Of the CIty of Yelm set a date not later than sixty days otter the filing
of thiS request for a meetlng with the underSIgned to determine
1 Whether the City Council will accept the proposed annexation;
2. Whether the City Council will permIt the adoption of zoning for the proposed area In substantJal
compliance with the ordinance which permits annexatIon of property at the nearest comparable
zone. under the Yelm Code which tl"'18 parties believe is the Residential Agricultural Zone With an
RA-5A deSignation. The annexa:IOli and proposed zoning are shown on the attached map
(Exhibit "8/1), and
3. Whether the City Council will reqdre the assumption of existing crry Indebtedness by the area
to be annexed
This page 1$ one of a group of pages contaIning identical text matenaI and is intended by the signers
of thIS Notice of Intention to be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention and may be filed
WIth the other pages contaIning addluo(lal signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single
Notice of Intention
Owner's Signature (pnnt name
and addre Is
~.
Parcel Number
217-27-000000
217-26-200000
217-23-300000
217-23-420000
217-23-130000
Date
-ud Welcome, 'Managing Partner
Thurston Highland Associates
1917 First Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
August 28, 1991
.1',1 T I I T f:1 L 1- H 17, r:: 1", U "'-: I. .1
n
u
Q
August 27, 1991
Mr Gene Boyes, City Administrator
City of Yelm
PO Box 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
Re: Amended "letter of Intent" of 1,750 Acre
Annexation for Thurston Highland Associates, et. al.
Dear Mr Borges,
We are submitting the amended;. Letter of Intent annexation petition as suggested by
Mr Sandy Mackei, Yelm's City Attorney in the August 14, 1991 City Council
meeting
This letter is a s~lement to our original 10% petition submitted on June 13, 1990
and modified or{] ctober 24, 1990) The area covered by this petition includes thirty
six properties with Thurston Highland, Dragt and Brown being the three largest
parcels.
The proposed annexation will enable the city to establish the urban growth boundary
as required by the HB 2929 and HB 1025 It is our intent to comply fully with Yelm's
annexation pol;icies which are being developed and adopted by the City Council in
the coming months.
In the next and final petition (60%) submittal, we shall address the issues of
infrastructures, financing and methods of meeting the provisions of HB 2929 and the
specifics of the annexation policies.
Sincerely,
LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION '
Dennis T Su, AlA
DTS br
c Thurston Highland Associates
1976-02
TO" / AttLrV}
Date ~ -;).11 Time ~;35
While ~l ou Were Out
M Sh.-eJ 8
of V -t.l VY" I I
\ ~ S <g 5;) U fj
Phone 1 '1
AREA CODE NUMBER EXTENSION
TELEPHONED
WAS IN TO SEE YOU
WANTS TO SEE YOU
RETURNED YOUR CALL
Message At ~'d- u{ t,{)~l t (Y\'e~~
J't0^- ~ rt eeL tv rl~F'L (A Vl (t./(t<-A..--R
~~\IC~. I~(' tA~vrh~oJ- ~D
If\\~~ w...e.-do. ~~.ff l;J~~
\fil"U\~W A- ~,(5~) be.fe~e... V"V',~y...
PLEASE CALL
WILL CALL AGAIN
URGENT
Operator
r",,,'
4~i~t" 1
:~~(:SECTION E
:::Frlday, August 23, 1991
;;iThe Seattle Times
~~-*~~ '<
1f.:
Ii
.i:r{n,
,~~tate OKs expansion
:gf Black Diamond
",' .'1
bV;'JiII Leovy
,Times South bureau
. 'i'.
"~
~In a move that will put King County's
g., ~?wth regulations to the test, the state
BQ'undary Review Board has approved a
controversial annexation of 783 wooded
a~res to the' city of Black Diamond - a
'9~~ision that' eventually could more than
~;J;;
~
t
double that city's population,
The board voted 5-3 last night to allow
the former mining town to annex property
owned by Black Diamond Associates, Palm-
er Coking Coal and the Plum Creek Timber
Co,
The M and H Development Co, Inc"
managing partner of Black Diamond Associ-
ates, plans to build a luxury-home subdivi-
sion combined with golf courses or an
equestrian center
The firm wanted the land annexed so the
new homes could be served by city sewer
lines,
Cis
WeaU
'\1.
t
h rules
The development is expected to add
about 2,000 people to Black Diamond's
population of 1,422.
The annexation was opposed by King
County, which has been trying to channel
growth into urban areas.
County Councilwoman Cynthia Sullivan!
has called M and H's proposed subdivision
"the worst kind of sprawl development."
She also has said it's likely the council
will challenge approval of the annexation in
Superior Court, It has 10 days to do so,
In March, the County Council adopted an
ordinance opposing expansion of citIes into
rural areas. the measure was prompted, in
part, by Black Diamond's annexation effort,
Board members Richard Burhans, Paul
Mallary and David Boerner argued the
annexation should be rejected because there
had been inadequate environmental review
Board members Richard Schoon, Ben
Werner, Ethel Hanis, A.JCulver and Don
Aicher said Black Diamond is closer to the
property and therefore better able to control
growth there. ,
Jack McIntosh, of M and H Development,
said groundbreaking ,may take place by
1993, he said.
TlJ-Yf JV7J Ah l/~
AvJ (\I) ~l<~~ lb..,
'& 1(P \l
.:~
.M w~~~e~~r(~,!~) 1
;~one ~VV\~~~ I ~ ~.f )}
AR A CODE ~
~
1
~
~
Message (}./~ ~ ~lll a.1()vJ- sk-k to. '~
.... GL" n...,.J; 1f"-"n~ lli wsk ('"u.~, ~
~~f(~ jl'f1'V'f ~ -0~~ p~r~-id q
1.1. jOvV\ \,~~ \..0 0.. \J\ V"-t. Yo- ~ ~-Ji.r"~ "\ '" ~
-\t...L (A L_ t +-- l.{ ~J YY\ ~
.- ~ ~ ~
.L'S4.A7tJ. (JO,r;.1'/o"rf;-I ;P.~"~. .A ;~:.IU ?hVk. ~.
Ii" hOT I K G'.-,J-: 'fhP/lH/.osr ';?
.'
To
Date
TELEPHONED
W AS IN TO SEE YOU
WANTS TO SEE YOU
RETURNED YOUR CALL
PLEASE CALL
WILL CALL AGAIN
URGENT
o
OWENS DAVIES MACK
A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CORPORAl
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
FRANK J OWENS
ARTHUR L. DAVIES
JOHN V. LYMAN
ALEXANDER W, MACKIE*
RICHARD G PHILLIPS, JR.
BRIAN L. BUDSBERG
926 - 24TH WAY S.W.
POST OFFICE BOX 187
OLYM PIA, WASH I NGTON ge50~
(206) 943-8320
-ALSO AQMITTED IN WASHINGTON, C.C.
TELECOPY /FAX TRANSMITTAL CO
TO
~bf'.. rG ntA tD
DATE'
FAX NO. )~-'i - 1'13 ~
FROM ~d tJ /YIo t: fv'J?
OUR CLIENT
NUMBER OF PAGES.
I
(cover sheet not included)
DOCUMENT(S) SENT
d-77-/?33
\.bh (tJ;.. ' 'neb
c;eo~1vJ K
~YlQyAve s#c
Ate C(n /) v ~ fg {JS'-~5-
, uur TO 0C h (f)j
~
~/;6/fO-
, f
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
I f you did not receive all copies, or if any are not legible please
call J''::>~~ at (206) 943-8320.
OUR FAX NUMBER IS (206) 943-61 SO
..
o -.""",-".,, -I
[prnill~ill~arn illillillrnuw ~QJrnm~rn \
( )
YELM JOINT ~lAN AREA
~~ ,i ;;~i,t;;~,~,
~
i
i r
SCALE:
1-
/
.s'au
1.500 0
I '~-,j-
1.500 3,000 feet
..I.. J
R R 1/5
t
~
,,!
.e...................
~I
--RR 1/2 *
NORTH
...
~
C
:;
.Q
1:.
t
V
i
"I..
:r-
~
+
R R 1/5
R R 1/2
..
..
&IIIU':
""
..
..
..
..
.
..
III
..
..
..
..
III
..
.
..
..
..
'"
1230 Ave
~
~
I_U_U
...
JOINT PLANNING AREA
ZONING BOUNDARY
YELM CITY LIMITS
NEIGHBORHOOD CONVENIENCe
COMMERCIAL
LI: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
AC: ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL
RR: RURAL RESIDENTIAL {UNITS
SR: SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL {U
MDR: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENi
CX:t. ~mtp
l~qD~C1
YM~
-
U_UIliIIllIIlU_IIS..lIl
............a.......
-._......." ~ ~nv .adll~..,."dJ~
*
Thl' area Is subJect to change to .SR" upon availability of Yelm utility services
So~~\i\)~~~ 0(/
o
o
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE
THURSTON HIGHLANDS
ANNEXATION, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ZONING
AND
SEPA REVIEW
Interim Petition
Wednesday, August 28, 1991
Amended Letter of Intent and 10%
annexation petition submitted.
Wednesday, August 28, 1991
Petition accepted by Council.
Wednesday, October 23, 1991
Yelm issues Determination of
Significance and Scoping Notice.
Wednesday, November 13, 1991 Scoping meeting - close of scoping
comment period (21-day minimum - WAC
197-11-408 (2)) .
Wednesday, November 20, 1991 Yelm issues scope of E.I.S. letter
(maximum of 30 days from DS - WAC
197-11-210(4)).
Monday, December 16, 1991
Applicant notifies
consultant selected
E.I.S. (target date)
Yelm of
to prepare
E.I.S. Review.
Monday, February 24, 1992
Yelm issues Preliminary Notice to
Boundary Review Board (180-day
maximum from "acceptance" RCW
36.93.090)
Monday, May 13, 1992
Draft E.I.S. submitted by applicant
(target date) .
Week of May 25, 1992
Yelm publishes notice of Planning
Commission hearing (minimum 10-day
lead) .
Friday, May 29, 1992
Yelm issues D.E.I.S. and Notice of
Availability (target date) .
Slamm\yelm,sch
o
Month of June, 1992
Week of June 8, 1992
Wednesday, June 10, 1992
Wednesday, June 24, 1992
Monday, June 29, 1992
Wednesday, July 1, 1992
Monday, July 13, 1992
Wednesday, July 29, 1992
o
Per agreement with Thurston County,
Yelm to complete environmental
assessment of proposed urban growth
boundary.
Yelm publishes notice of council
hearing (10-day lead).
Planning commission holds public
hearing RE: zoning and plan
amendments. (Decision within 90
days RCW 35.63.120). (All
hearings to be within 15- to 50-day
window after D.E.I.S. issued - (WAC
197-11-535 (3) ) .
Yelm city council D.E.I.S. public
hearing (ORD 399).
Close of D.E.I.S. standard comment
period (30 days) (WAC 197-11-
455(F)).
Deadline for Thurston County to
adopt "county-w ide" growth
management policies (SHB 1025 92).
Close of extended D.E.I.S.
period (45 days) (WAC
455(f)) .
comment
197-11-
Target date for city to issue final
E.I.S. (deadline is 60-day maximum
after comment closure) (WAC 197-11-
460(6)).
Annexation Decision & Appeals
Wednesday, August 5, 1992
Wednesday, August 5, 1992
Monday, August 10, 1992
stamm \yelm,sch
First day for council action (7 days
minimum after F.E.I.S. issued. (WAC
197-11-460(5)). If approved,
applicant instructed to submit
annexation petition (YCC
17 .64.010(H)).
Applicant submits
17.64.010(1)
(target date) .
petition (YCC
RCW 36.93.090)
Yelm validates signatures and issues
final notice of intention annex to
Boundary Review Board (target date) .
2
. .
o
Thursday, September 24, 1992
Friday, January 22, 1993
Week of January 25, 1993
Monday, February 1, 1993
Wednesday, February 3, 1993
Week of February 8, 1993
Week of February 8, 1993
Week of March 8, 1993
Thursday, July 1, 1993
slamm \yelm,sch
o
Deadline to
jurisdiction
36.93.100).
invoke
(45 days)
B.R.B.
(RCW
BRB public hearing (30 days' notice)
RCW 36.93.160(1)).
Deadline for BRB decision (40-day
maximum after final hearing (RCW
36.93.160(4)) 120 day maximum after
jurisdiction invoked (RCW
36.93.100(4)) .
Yelm publishes notice of council
public hearing (10-day minimum lead)
Deadline to appeal BRB decision to
Superior Court (10-day maximum after
decision - RCW 36.93.160(50)).
Conclusion
Council public hearing and decision
(YCC 17.64.010(K)).
Yelm amends
annexation
ordinance -
publication
plan and publishes
and zoning amendment
effective 5 days after
(YCC 17.64.010(K)).
Yelm publishes official SEPA notice
of appeal period.
Deadline to appeal SEPA issues to
Superior Court (30 days after
official notice is published) (WAC
197-11-680 (4) (C)) .
Deadline for Yelm to Submit GMA
Comprehensive Plan (RCW 36.70A.040)
(up to 180-day extension possible -
SHB ~15)
3
r\
\...J
\J
~ -~4-oq
___d~/l/v(.~l!~ __c::::t-~~~~e______
-_______ ~_/'--~/<<-4-/~"'/~~~-,-'I>.
_ _ _ ___ ~.~_.!?.!/ t' /2?/_~t.Z..y s1,/ / 4__.,[~~_..;..(._ 'T To
--..----- -- ---.-----..--------- -/!//kZ/~l-F---L~~,,~,~~ Z;~__~/~_-.-------
--_____________. ____ __ ..,_ __"'^' _/9~!P>:"~..y~__ E:V//~~~t:~--&~s-'?+-~- ______________
..____ ~w,"Jl,.;( w//i __S'M/c__ ~~_/2 .N?.....A/~~.c~~,,--=--
11
-----_._-------~--------
__~ _~~ 5
-----t<J-- ~&v:::: //,n;v' /H~LLfc",,1'r'~ '='_______
.. (b'- 1w4?3-~;-, ~&h?,,//~-
--- --- .-- tt:O_ ,c~A'~/.~-~fi'~~.~~-.,.,.#,:,Hc:--~~ _~
------ ---- - - _ .___.&12.__& ~~~PL'!~~_~ -- ______________
---,----- - .-----C~ ) _~~/ /P1V _~~~~~
---------(f2g U~"-~9~~~-/~;!e-<- ~~~.
_ PA/~ ~y~ 4-')T...cr./;,.:_____ _
---- ----....- ~ -- ----- -------------~------_._- -----~-- '-----------
---------~-~------ - ----,------~------- ----.-.------ -. ---- ----_._-_.~_._- ..--..--- -----
-""'"--.---------.---------- - - ---.------------.---- -- ----------~_.__._.---_._-_._----------- ~--
'0
~0
CITY OF' YELl'[
ORDINANCE NO. 309
AN ORDINANCE relating tu procedures and kees kor the
~nne~ation of property to the City of Yelm. Washington
BE IT ORDAINE~ BY THE
COUNTY, WASHINGTON:
COUNCIL OF'
THE CITY
OF YE.Li1.
THUESTul-i
Section 1
Prucedu).'es.
A. All ann0}~tions will use the petition methud.
B. An dnne~ation will be considered either a
(i) simple annexation, involving a single anne 'ation within
an urban area and exempt frum Boundary Review Board
procedu).'es (i teills G through K below), or a
( iil
cOlllplejo' annexation,
~nneKation and will
which is any other type uk
involve the Boundary Review Board.
C. The applicant meets with City officials to discuss the
~nne~ation and the first petition, a Notice of Intent
(sample 10l'm attached) is pcefJared and C.Ll'cul.",t..':>,j .:.lllon9 :lll
affected property owners. It must be signed by ownecs of
10% or mace of the assessed value of the p\oposed anne)at.Lon
axea. Value is determined according to CU1'). enl: ThuL s1:un
County ta) record.
D. A~te~ the signatures on the Notice o~ Intent aLe validated
and found to be suf~icient, the City Council ho~ds a publ~c
lneeting, usually within 60 days o~ ~iling the pet~tion. The
City Council decides whether to accept the proposed
annexation, and i~ so, under what conditions
E. At a public lIlee'lin~l, the City Cuuucil de.....~des Wh",,'U12r t\...1
require: (a) the adoption o~ a comprehensive plan and
zon~ng, and/or (b) the assumption of a proportionate share
Llf E....is'lin\:l Ci ty debts by -LhE- G.L' ea to be annt:",'Ct:,:d.
AnnE--^at.J..on ItIC:iY also involve: (c) a CCII,'fllitlflE-!','L f~ Coli. f.ruf.lt:",i"ty
owners to iorm a Local Improvement District (LID); and/or
ld) jurisdiction of existing seWE-r and water districts.
F. A~teT the City Council accepts the Notice oi Intent, ~t ~s
T ei E'.r T ed t.o t,he P lanninfl ComTuissi on to .rev i EW thE- p~ a[loiJl(]
and .zoning at a pubic hear'ing. The Pla[H'lin~1 C:OllllilissloII
loakes their recommendation to the City Council ior iurth~r
.t,earin~ls.
G. The City Council holds the first oi two public hedr~ngs to
review the Planning Commission's recommendations on the
planning and zoning ior the Brea to be anne~ed.
H Ii approved, th~ Council then instructs the appl.J..cant to
prepare a Petition for Annexation (sample ~or attached)
signed by the pLoperty owners o~ not less than 60% o~ the
asst2ssE-d VLil ua 'ti c.n o~ the f!.L- operty bei ,1(J 8'l1lE'A2d
:::. Ai'-le.c 'U-'l:' signatures on the Feti ti on i \-IT AJlneAati on Eir e
validated and ~ound to be sui~icient, B notice ~s sent to
the Thurston County Boundary Review Board.
J. The Buundary Review Board holds a publIc meeting tu d~ ide
if the ann2,atlon proposal should be approv~d.
K After approval by the Boundary Review Board, tn~ C.J..tj
C'::lunc~ 1- hold;:;; its second flubl io heal' in~l. AI, Ui dol, i.d',,_.t:" i u,
t.hc- uI,02 'LclLiuo dnd zonino j,;;; 1.1' (=-P;".f L,d :Lu" CUl>l l. .1 <.'1-'1" (,0,/;,,[.
CIS well as a ri?solution Jelr 81112tldillent ",I Lt..:- C ,1.t)" ~',
['()fllprE.hE'ns.J..Vt? Plan. Tr,e Ei/'lflt?,.Elt.iofl ordiJii:lflC,,' ,.. put..1J...~r t.c'c1
C. i 'l Y CI i Y e Ilfr
Ord..LJ'ia Jce No
PC:~~tC'" i
c.J~ ...
::::-::!:;J
CJ
O'
in the newspaper and the annexation becomes effective five
day::; aftel' the publicat ion date. Co pies of the ann""" a 1.. ion
ol.'dinance are sent to various state and local govel"nm'?l,t
agenc ies.
Sect ion 2.
Fees.
A.
The i t::.e i Of a si mpl e anne..,a'li un. descT i bed
(B)li), shall be $250. payable tu the C~ty ui
successful completion of the annexation, up to
See shall be reiunded to the applicant if not
C-1.t,y
lfl ~.ect-1.on 1
Yel'll. Upon
~;100 of tht:.-
uSE'd by thE'
B.
( i )
The fee for a complex annexation, described in Section
1 (A) Iii), shall be 51000. payablE' .to the Ci.ty oi Yelnl.
(ii) In addition. the applicant shall pay the City's actual
costs for the annexation by advancing the Clty lor its
out-of-pocket expenses. hourly rates, using the
procedure as follows:
(a) The applicant shall deposi t a SUill of 1I,one f, the
amount of which will be determined by the City
Administrator. into a separate fund wh-1.Lh sha~l be
maintained by the City.
(b) The City will bill for the charge~ pertainlny to
applicant's annexation against thlS iund.
(c) When lOX of this fund remains, the City shall
notify applicant and request appl-1.cant to depos-1.t
an amount similar to what was prt:.-v-1.ously paid.
This procedure shall continue until the proJect
has been completed.
( d )
At any tillle.
and r'eceive
the fund.
applicant may terminate the project
a :.r'efund cd the rernainin~1 lllCJ(jies in
Section 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be
t21iE-ctive immediately upon its passafle.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. signed and approved
Nay. 1~j91.
tblS 8th d<:iy vi
Robeet A. Sanders, Nayoe
ATTEST
5hE-ll1' , 8adg'el, City Cieri,
,... .
PASSeD AND APPROVED. tiay 8, 1991
PUBLISHED. l-.lisqually Va.lley News,
May lb, 1'3'31
C 1, t '" ,J f Y >2 1 m
r"LJe
LJ.f ...~
( ~ ,"'>1
PtaA-~~~'
) (UN vt;St ~<j~ ~'..
~ ~'^--~~. ~~
'()1JkJ I~\ ~ (}.. w-€Q.! ~ ~. ,.
~ ~+,t~~ i ~~ ~~I
Ob~~Lt.. iI\i<.- ~o..~~.1 01 Ow- ~&.u f
vfC}J.~~1\M.-l ~~~ 6 - ~y
f/V' *,d . . ~ fuw) ~ -L:tt1'!--tl~l7111~
{p 1~' ~ ___~.~ T- -
W~.~ ~ 0, ~ ~ ~ U' t7o')(-4~0
-af~ a.. ~tt- ~~/! Ll II/}
~ ~'t . ~ ~ -~rIlJ(,l.\A-'_uJ~
t;:-e...fi~\ill~M ~.ct\OC '181701
it~,~~,,~tr, MAN ~S~1t .
I J J >, ''',hI - ~\Z(>-. C
\P"ot09J8p:,ybyKeithMa'Qrl c "'\~ \>.-"0' ~/1U \!-'7h"-,IIJEl0foC'7f')7 C')t,^ -t/9-1J)'"''
___ ' ,~~' ~ ,X 'r1 ,iC j" 1~"
V HONG rONG 6' ' "~5/'T 1 ^ 7,7'7 v c:f- @IT]
-.,.- - --- ~~ -.--, - ~........ ~-:... --', -- -~~-....
~- xv -~~1-~~S~r~dr:~~9-Oh~ ~jhtyC#7tt) &y~~u~
~ tv0t" .~!}' UH,/1 (Q 1 ~ l'JcvrJ ~) /Ii e-I( ~d
C;f 1 11/IO~CtD
-\8--, -~ I. . t~,~.._t!~/~ .
-r;&- 3.. ---,
~~;e~ 1rfh{{c~~LjJLh&ih:e~-D_---LkL~ f)tc41- t:dz~ /~O/'0ftrb
5. . '5f\.~ L1 1m:- mou, _.
*: . Q1tn :_lddC~ 4p _LjJNhWi&-t ,odL r-t",LeS;;;dutaf_-
8 -i1:Jo yk-D.t/~_-fMiU L!-2 ]!};~-1JiKtI:~l-lgehl~-
~ ~~JI't-1 ~Zz,' W!vnz6 b11fv,~ _~n:{X_~4---:?-f;J')
. 12 ~~~~ ~d;J~~'-~~-f;4a~-~VzCMktd;:C~d;:
~ fj2urti-tD:JS-~wtdlULJ)th:&. l--1J.mjj (LAj:''-'UJ.L'L--4LL
14 Cc ~ ~tt J/YIod/-FzaI7i12---4q1z~ ~a--0!"J(d,
:: +-9~ MLth_-1JJ 14 hh~ _ &/ 51r~'7 hv .
IllI-04b(r"L~-b.tq- /[;-LL~
17
18 ~ rdt-S-b-: '
--'9. _o_J)/ZJ3_f:-:i/m ~&hrJ . .. . .
Y' f) id fl t 1M (31ft1ic2;flJ---frl-{ fJl1J i11ckl-r . .
~21 fuJdJ-_tIJ_6tJ3 "-/II? ~ti2~ct . -10 ~ N{/lCL~IkL~S__
-22 .J1CLSj}l)~--6_t- __fj It. 16_1lL ... tJ)Ui]Lf/C fIt_/? ~ -n_~ !/!07J7Le-.
23 ... /'J 7./-.............
. t<M./ :lUL{j.,d.t-d . .' .
- 24 l312.6 ?;0N rLui-&) A- 1:u-U4,_~
25 ()
28 ]JCJA,.{C~~~('dLLW'F ({If f 1vl&~
27 - id{tifJ. 'rfh)
. . M YYh - ILV,k jL~._ .,41.. LLLLLv ..
28
, . - .
~
t1'IrAl7
fjt-rJC)Dr
1}~1
""-
o
o
1"IE~ET I NG NOTCf:;
THURSTON HIGHLANDS/VENTURE PROPE~TIES
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990
YELI'! C I TV H(\LL
Dennis Soo (Thurston Highlands Associates)
Jon Potter, Entranco Engineers (Venture Properties)
Gene BOI~ges
Stlell ';/ B,::\d(]E~r
I\!E~ll (\al df"ld
FF\ESENT:
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINTS
1 . c; row t. h B Q Ll n d a r y [l e t tJ_q e n Y elm / T b..1:.:!.1~:fi'~.:t9.!:LJ'::~(2.!:-mt.Y.:.
Jon ment 1 oned a di scus,si on wi th Judi th F\Llnstad, attorney and
member of Governor's Growth StrategIes Comm1ssion. She
believes 1f cities and countIes cannot agree on a boundary,
the state Department of Community Development (DCD). has the
author1ty to arbItrate. There is some uncertaint~ whether
OeD can merely arbitrate or actually Impose a deCISIon.
[NOTE TO GENE/SHELLY: I WIll try to do some checf1ng on that
pcnnt. ]
80 un rJ..~u~e './..1 e_iILJ3C?i3. r' L ( DR E<.LF'I~ q,~~_? s
The dIScussion centered around what 1S li~ely to occur at
the BF.:B st;:,te of the anne,: .:It ion pr"uces;s. The ",\s;sLlInpt ion
that jUl~isd1ctiClIl !:::!.lJ~ bE~ invof t~'d, pl~obably by Thur-ston
County. The Town of RaInier IS 11~ely to support the
:\nne"atlon, ,::'\nd Tenino i::,nd [lLll:ocja mdY i::\ls;o.
1<=
, ~
"
~ 1984 d~cisIon was discussed where Ldc8( s propoEed
annel atlon of the Haw~s Frairie Flanned Communities was
denIed. The baSIS for denial was primarily the uncertainty
of development; the BRB felt it was premature SInce it was
unc el~t ",d n the pr clper t. i E~S WClLllcl bl:'~ c!(:0Y (21 up f~c:1 in trle i1idnner
anticipated. "or ----
Another issue, dlthough a secondary one, was the fiscdl
lmpaGts upon cIty ser-Vlces. An economIc Impact study done
by Ldc~y showed that the propert~ would be a net draIn for
appro:, i matel y 20 yeal~s ~-:\ftel~ anne:: at Ion. Then. 1 of SOinf~
development had occurred, It would become a net revenue
garn. Tllis mi;\Y have tleen i~ fact.or" in the denial.
Based on thIS discussion, Jon Sclld the B~8 should probably
be given fiscal information up front. He said he lools at
the pnB a;; a "onc~"-~ohot dt;~all', c:\nd if it, I oo~ s 1 i I €~ the BF<B
may be heading tor a denial, he WIll consider having Venture
~:: t-(.)per' t 1 t':'<', be annE>:: Pel .:11 r.me. [: Hl <" imp 1 i c:: ':"It.l Cln i Si tt'l at. thE'
B~B may 1001 more favorably on just anne:ing Venture, since
""'"
/
o
o
/
.-
I
it is closer in pro::imity to curn:::mt city lifllit~~; he coulcl
be correct in that assumption.] He wants to have an
"i roncl ad proposal" ,for the BFW that they ~'Ji 11 h,:':\ve a hdrd
time re':lecting.
-'. Envirqnmental (:hecl.ll~;t
Several points about the environmental checll1st were
d1scussed. Development of the properties should be
dlscussed under the 1 unit per 5 acre zoning, since the
future development capabIlity of the land is uncertaln unt11
det <:\i I E~d e.n v 1 r' Dn mEm t i:\l r0?V i f?W oc: C Llr"S. f~ ques; t.l. on ar OS;!?
about the other parcels included in the anne. dtlun but not
part of the developme.nt proposal. These. should be addressed
under the 1/5 zoning, since there is no way of Inowing what
w1ll occur with them.
Jon asled about includ1ng the Town's posit1on on the j01nt
plan 1n the environmental ch~cllist. Neil said probably
not, since the joint plan i~:; not adopti::~d by any luri.sicl1ction
and 1S a subject of disagreement.
It was also decided not to mention anything about 1600 units
in the. checllist, since the development potential is unlnown
(as discussed above). These numbe.rs need to wait until
detailed ErG is completed.
The meet 1 ng adj OUrlli?d at apPI"'o:: i matf?l y
__ -1'-
::.': ,.::.(J.
o 0
BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
~-~
~~"\ 0). 1'--',
- ( Ili",-"
\_J,,/I{ , ......
/1' 'J-
(j
"Land Planning, Survey, and Design Specialists"
November 16, 1990
/
{/
Mr Dennis Su
KCM
1917 1st Avenue
Seattle, W A 98101
Re Yelm Annexation
Our Job No 3687
Dear Dennis.
In accordance wIth your request, we have expanded the proposed annexation area for the above-
referenced project to approximately 2,058 acres. I am including copies of the penmeter legal descnption
f or the overall parcel, as well as the site legal descnption which reflects the additIOnal areas lD Section
26 and Section 25 relative to the proposed annexation. I am also enclosmg a revised map which shows the
new overall annexatIOn area
Please review the enclosed information and, unless additional changes are made, please forward thIS
information directly to the City of Yelm or notify our office and we will forward this informatIon to
Mr Gene Borgess.
If you have any further questions, please contact me. Otherwise I will anticipate working through
the annexation process wIth you and assist with technical backup on the completIon of the annexation
forms.
Respectfully,
"
)~ ~ jl;~
Dana B Mower, P.E.
Vice President
DBM/sg
C586.35
encs. As Noted
cc. Mr Gene Borgess, City of Yelm
Mr Sandy Mackie, Owens Davies MackIe
Mr Rob Armstrong, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Mr Dan Balmelh, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Mr Hal Grubb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Mr Ah Sadr, Barghausen Consultmg Engmeers, Inc.
Home Office. 18215 72nd Avenue South. Kent, Washington 98032. (206) 251-6222. Fax (206) 251-8782
California Office 4612 Roseville Road, Suite #103' North Highlands, California 95660 . (916) 348-3057 . Fax (916) 348-0953
"\
Kramer, ChIll & Mayo, Ine U ~
1917 First Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101, ; ,.,6) 443-5300
7110 SW Fir Loop, Portland, Oregon 97223, (503) 684-9097
230 South Franklin, Suite 306, Juneau, Alaska 99801, (907) 586-6400
()
KCM
Letter of Transmittal
TO
Owens Davies Mackie
DATE I JOB NO 1975-01
11-14-90
ATTENTION
Alexander W. Mackie
RE
,; -- h I.'ili,... . ,,~... -
HJ J 0; ((i) '? ll. \V/ 1~
Hr~\ lb f .! ,[
U1L
[;OV 141990
!1.':,....~
. '.t\
.' ~,
,.f:'l
, e..r}
"'.~';.
926 24th Way SW
P.O. Box 187
Olympia, WA 98507
WE ARE SENDING YOU
QcAttached
o Shop drawings
o Copy of letter
o Under separate cover via
the following items
Ul/'Iti\!'''': n ~'/ir:('
o Plans < \ ''''....' ~D~ ~arrrt:5ilsMACK'iEi Specifications
o Prints
o Change order
o
COPIES DATE NO DESCRIPTION
1 Annl;(,.<lrinn fnr A nf 48fi 260 acres Lacev
,
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below
0 For approval o For review and comment
0 For your use o Approved as submitted
Kl As requested 0 Approved as noted
0 For your information 0 Returned for corrections
o FOR BIDS DUE 19
o Resubmit_copies for approval
o Submit
copies for distribution
o Return
corrected prints
PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS Your 11/8/90 letter indicates you have sent a copy to Gene Borges, so I
only made copies for ourselves and Dana of Baryhausen. We shall complete the
documents by next week. Thanks.
COPIES TO
If enclosures are not as noted
SaiJ>D
tr ~ Dennis T. Su, AlA
kindly notify us at once
\1'~
() ()
OWENS DAVIES MACKIE
A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
FRANK J OWENS
ARTHUR L, DAVIES
JOHN V, LYMAN
ALEXANDER W, MACKIE'
RICHARD G PHILLIPS, JR
BRIAN L, BUDSBERG
926 - 24TH WAY S W
BURTON R JOHNSON 11970)
POST OFFICE BOX 187
MICHAEL W, MAYBERRY
JON E, CUSHMAN
KIRK M VEIS
TODD M STAMM"
OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98507
(206) 943-8320
.ALSO ADMITTED IN WASHINGTON, D.C.
"ALSO ADMITTED IN IDAHO
November 8, 1990
TELECDPIER
(;"061 943-61S0
Dennis T Su
Kramer, Chin & Mayo, Inc.
1917 First Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
Dear Dennis
Enclosed please find sample Notice of Intention and Petition for Annexation The
signature page for the petition should be similar to the copy attached, which has
acreages, values and a summation The number in left-hand column refers to the property
numbers of the attached map
I am also enclosing a copy of the Lacey-Hogum Bay Road/Marvin Road
application for the Boundary Review Board This is the kind of material and information
that we would expect for the application in your case Note, the content would have to
be changed to reflect the recent amendments in the Boundary Review Board statutes
Sincerely yours,
OWENS DAVIES MACKIE
~)GVv-.{J ~ Vr'\o..-cJz.u jtA....
Alexander W Mackie
AWM/kr
Enclosures
cc Gene Borges 'vI/COPY of t1artin Way/r~arvin Rd Boundary Review Board application
~.... ;~:f T:t~-<f'<~".,')~,r;... ""' ~~~?{~~~~~r.::.~1i'~::,l,~~~';;""'P>-~~>;r.;-r ,1f:F~:;r:.r'i;;' ,:!':-H?";,,,,-~'~<{"':jr.AtW,1.~'!ii~~..r-~',~~'1!"'~"---f'_""'" '-;:-C--'"
T owrDof
Yelm
POBox 479
Yelm, WA 98597
Date:
Oct. 31, 1990
o
Town Hall
Phone 458-3244
Yelm Municipal' Court
Phone 458-3242
Police Department
Phone 458-5701
To:
Ronald G. Rada
P.O. Box 3354
Leavenworth, Kansas 66027
This is in response to your request for
information regarding the developers of
Thurston Highlands. Hope it will be of
some help.
I
i,
I
Sincerely,
Shelly Badger
City of Yelm
Dennis T. Su, AlA
Land Use & Development Consultant
1917 First Avenue
Seattle, Wag 98101
Phone: 206-443-3537
Fax: 2D6-443-5372
J
1
I
I
'I
I
"
I
i
I
1
j
I
l
j
j
1
I
I
j
J
I
I
1
'1
1
o
0....
o
F'II (1 # E:CI :3354
Fer t Le.;:.l!ent..'.Jor th, !-: ,;:"n~ ,=,,':;: ::;:..::;:.02:-'
:"':'':: Ue t c be r 1 ':;:":;:'0
C, it, of lei ITI
Cit, Cier~:;:. CH+ice
lelm, j~i~shinQton 93597
[Ie .9.1 ~I f r '= :
;:"IT! ,;:"n ;:.,c t I II e du t" mil i t ;:"r ~ ot fie e r Il.Jh 0 1.0,1 ill be r e t.: i r i n '~
net '5 U mm e r .;:., n d p 1 ;:., n t.: 0 m c, II e tot h e i elm ;:., r e :i.. I 01,.>,1 n
pro per t, i nth e ,:i. r' e:i. :i, n d h a.... e bee n f 0 1 1 01.'.1 i n 9 the c omm IJ nit "
9rol,.>,' throu9h the f1t"ji :q'J:i,11, 1,1;:,,11e',- t"jel,.>,J':" for m:i,n', ,e.:i,r':_
:i.m intere~ted in obtainin9 an addre~: and or phone number,
if ,9,1!9.i19,ble, for the de....eloper': of the Thur':ton Hi9hl,9,nd':
de,,'elopment currentl, beirlf;l p19,nned '::outh of the cit,_
I p19,n to e:t9,bl i ':!- ,,=,, de"ei cpment corpor 9,t i on 1,.,li th the
i n ten t 0 f b IJ i 1 din 9 :i, IT 0 t e 1 ,'3. n dot her r e ': 0 u r c e ': the c omm u nit :'
Ii,J ill nee d du r i n 9 f Ij t u r e 9r 01.',.1 t h _ I 1 0010' for Il,.1 ,="r d to 1,.>,.1,;:" t chi n 9
lelm gr'ol.',J, hopetul1, 1.'.Ii thin :i, 1"o,lel1 pl,:i,nned +r,9,mel.',lor'~:_
'::,!ncerel".. ,
8r~
LTC, t",jP
11 -; h-~t_
11 ;)1'.]\1: P~\{:1 CICJF YELM
o
p n 1
,
9" _-.-!' - ~~
~~~'TI!,Q~~I 1fu:J~ @f/'U@DJ:ffi
. --0 =C--_ =_~- -=-=c:.' C'f ~ r--- - _
eo ~c:J ;,D5 ifeh~ AV0El,D@W@tla
J?O, lElM t5?9
l!@!mO W&~hm9a!JE1\ 98591
'rrffiR,M 2()6.4158032~
~I~~
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL FORM
'lFAX~Q
'COMPANYftJ~_ ~t:-:1J1/!!aJ.J~ .-
INDIIJIDUA~bm'&/~j_ .
k~UMBER~ 4J-13-lf:LSI2~~_.~~_.~_~, =~_
TO
COM'i'AloJ"(_~" U~~>. . .~...~
!NOXVXmYA~, ~~_'Jh4~~<_>__~____.__
NllMBER.L20~6L~ ,!~~}4~_== ,~=_~~~~~ _~~
NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOi.i:.OW= ;l__~~=_ ~~_ =,
,:)ATE=~lQ:j~=_C}D _~_~ '('J:ME SENT,~ I f): tj.L&((2. u== _ __~ <==
SUf.lJ:CT~f1ja.~. .~~1. ;f~i!Jl j~'l!f't'fYA-
7iYtib~ AL WUf113.. ~ 1'a.y rLft ~ lL<,t!J.
",D0)'T10""AI", CO\lf!MEN'X'S L;;.." "'~_../~ 7}~.de, >.Jfte.n::),-m" iM l'h'{'-r,1 .",b
~4 ' 1 ~ ~oil:~-~T d;;.li1~0;;:~ ~VL
J~ :-~r:~1:;~~-i~1c~W&::;c:~tJ/;;;l
;':MiA} t J /Ill" vhMd -Iv Ju -1J;t41?it- it'zr
'C1 0 00 <;( P YOU DO NeT RECB:"VlF AU., c'C:P'i'lES OR AMf ~~ p I/!
C)v'",-'A/!hj
ccrt IS ~o~ ~R~~B~F~ ~.EA~i ~A~~ ~20S: ~58=~244 I
fROM
C: FJ\){"
A~ son~ A~ ~CSSlrLB WOLO
, ,
[,:
Ii
,,1-~,j
1'1
i, ~
>..,!;
, ,
I,
P
~.~
~""
, ,
H
!fl
I"
~;j
! .~ I
I
I
I
I
,
i
I
i
I
~I
I
\
j ::-j ::-'~ U
j:i ~,jA:~ FR'iM CI(jOF YELM
F02
o
l I
"-......1
I
~
I
i
I
I
1
"
ED/'i:)jIj,':'.s !s an optional municipal code city
I
j
f
i
I
?~ i
WE. r. "Ie u:-ders.\gned, be"ng the owners of ll10t less tha~ scvcriltyofivc percent ~7~%), Inj
v~lue (accor.dlng to ~he assessed vlllh.llatson for generaR taxadon), of the real property 1
described on Ex~'libit "Au attached hereto, lying contiguous to the City of ~::l::~~::~:;.~~~
YhsJun:tcn r c;~ :~e::eby petition ~ ~hat such teniW:y be anneJtcd ~o and made a pan: of i.
!,he CHi c. i:.ClIT::onds under .~e p:rQVlSJOr.s o. RCW 35A.I"g 120, et seq., and any 1
amenClmer.:ts O"c"'cw of the State olf Washington. i
"
i
!
~
l
PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ~~~'i)S, WASHINGTON
TO'
The CI i Y Cound!
City of Edmonds
Civic Center
Edmonds, Washington
The ~crniOry 1;)i:Opos~d to be annexed AS within Snohomish County, Washington, and IS
descr bed lK1 JExn.oxt itA", a.~~ache~ Kl1ereW
iVFJEREFOxE, the unr.ie!signe~ rr:1;s~ective\y pethio)l'! tht Honorabie City COlUncil and ask
((;.} rh:1t apjy'op:ria&<;. aC1ion roe takej[jj to critenain tAlns petition, fixi'llg a date for
:lJ'lO!!C 0.ear.n8, causi.ng '10Lce to be p~bHshed and postd, sIJecifying the tlffiC ilnd
plE(;e 0':- sue!, ;1~3dng, Z:.1C l:IVi:il:;g 2\1' persons intelTeste~ to 'tPPCell'" and voice app-oval
Ci d!Silppron! of sucl1 ar.i1excLon; and
n -s/,h.-J
(b) Th~,1 i':>1jowmg such hearing, and! subsequent to approval of ~i-te ~::::\.:;.;,;,:;'t
::::~l1n:y BOUIC~;2 ''.1 ~GV1CW Boali"d ,:r such is conveneci, the City Council dtcrmmc by
(";dl\"~n:::e: trt\Z S c;.\ 8Jm!c]{a~ion shaH be effectnve; ~nd that propeny so ai1inexcd sholl
b(,;"oP:r. ~ .jH: of 'ihe f'i~y of ~t.,mu;), Washirn.gto.r., subjec~ ao its laws u:ld o'i'Ginaoces
"'("1 '1-r' t";".rn.">. r.r-. In ~orc'" e::..../-"-\.
... M:' U. /..... t,.,.....'" l.r:";:'! ~~/,I .. '\,r. /1
,
I
I
~
I
1
1
I
j
1
"
~
\
4
1
;
-::'::e ';:~~itlOr:ei'S subscr.bii~g h~reto agree " tha~ an! property within t.he tl:rr tory
'-er"b:' scught ~o be :'/r;iitJl.;;d s'1<lln ~e assessed 21i1dl ~u.e6 a~ the s~me r:Hc allCl on the
3-~':r,C cas s :"S ;:;;roper.,y wit!:.i~'1l ~he City of Edmonds for any now ou~stnrdlng
I~r'('jtcc:less 0<' sai0 City, i.ncluding assessments Of taxes in payments of Uf'Y bones
.ssucd C 9t'tf~,:: cO!'Hracted, prior to or cx.!stili1lg at the datc of anncxation. and that
,~ mU\l;:nCOI.!,~ nclop!'on -;" 1r"v:J....;)..~ .!.Uttih5 ''':6'''':;:~'-';':; ~,:;. '.."F'H....:ff inaccordaO);c with
l~c c~\.\!rr.-nc'".:ts of tb: Cty {:'cl.lKlcii of s:ui Ct'\!, "'ild as quo&ct hercin from the
!I'; l1LtC :::~Hj~' :)f ~he i:"....:r.' ds of g~"\1 City CCi.iInc;1 mr.e,ing. It IS fMrther J1:::";','-"Wod the
p;OPOSC(; 2-Dt iT' g r>.:: sa' j :Jl i"-::<.!! ::>::-~;posedl f'2,& a1 nneJtt' don proposed
:o-'''\~'.c\.eli~fVt; -;::,n as cloopted ,by ~,",~:;on Ji2.J4091 of the Edmonds City Code IS
Sde.JG",S ? A;va~L Y JRJcSHJENTIA[ /
~/.AJ!, t:VJI>~/, J2..L S'vl6ThNt.;'/I;?,I'/;"'''/+.:( ~ 7<e t::vY-::[7~~"
::~',,~~;-;:^::. 0'1 is ~~~c~:nPa~I:C! 3J!il:,...~t;S ~Har.~:):.ed, ~ere~~ as lExh~bh "B" a d~agrar.J whIch
Or.. ,eo; ,c bc(".,,,,,<..rt~S o~ ,r..e p.~",',JJ" Y SOLl",... .G :Je a.,nel'HlQ
1'7 ~
I
I
j
l
I
1
i
1
1
j
-~,- t' . , . 1 d'~ d" b
"I,eseJ::<g~s 2;:'; (;, g:cu'Q 0 o2ge3 cOZl,8m".').8 tl'. 'c.e.lttC8 text. -:;;n prasa In.C::1 ec. y
tl1C 5jgi'~ers of 1,~."s t('t!~!Cl1 to br Z)t:1;s,;n~ecl [no. C.Jli1S~oered !ts one c,~zBCn :llnd mi\:' be
L- /1''' T2-c. ce>"''''''~ .
14- h/)..,#v ~,A)~ 7lc-.
, t/" ~~ 1M" /
'C,M! ~1 c..__. l" ~~p/L#jr AMv/t'/[ 1
;t, d II \~ ~JflI /11;'IJI,J he fr~ ~ ~ {
1ft ~ lIlY: pltP ~~ ~~)(I(~ ~/.bvT;...t "f/hl"ITw/l '~
pJ ~,p p,vcR 54//14 6s ~~,4),j"'~ ;
r ~ A -S-A 4
lIN
~96
ll\-: '_qli
\!AM IR'.M CIOOF YELM
o
FUJ
..
,.;7' ~,i'ie p:1!gc~ contt~tr.i~';) ;cd :,Ot;a" S"gj1,"~;JfeS Vlthich cllmula~ivcly may be
CO~;i0(', cd as I: sll'!glc pcthlOn
tiA~IY1NG, 12:vcry y(;tson who Stgns ~r:IS lOetJtl~n with BIllY other than tllS true name. Of
.\, r ',nowi :gly signs morc than one of these pe~ltioYlS, Of signs a p.ct:tion see" ing 211
c1CCltOr w }It;Ti h,~ is ;:ot a legal vo~cr. Of' signs a petition wheE he IS othcfWiSC net
aerl.;fi d to SIg'''- a.. who makes he"eLn any faise sta"cP-'lelit, sl-a!l lJ':: g.JiHy of a
m LSioc'1iCa nor
e~PRAYE~ Q? PETITfO~ (l) PL1i1c;l.iHlon or :Hca described in Exhibit!; "A" ~lfld "BtI, and
(~2; Z,SSL mpdon of, ll'ld~~ecl\lr.ss of Y~'e ~;;.Y of E~mof!.ds, and (3~ adoPt~ol'l o~ the Cny "r"']
- ~_C00f!ds CO':;;!~"i:,,'';'!l''!l:)!\''c ZOfimg 1'1;:'11 0! ~!NG1LE fAM!L Y RESADENT,AL.
"'O'\VNER'S SIGNATURE FRINTED NAME ADDRESS AND LEGAL DATE
(Husband 2nd Wife) DESCRIPTION SIGNED
-- ----. ----~ -~...'------- ---.....---
M'<__ _ .____ __ _____._____..
--~- -- -~- ---- ..'---.-..-.-. .........-----~..~- ----~~
"jY;~ '':.1 t 3~r .,,>tiot!) :;11 ~G"C"" S;1ee.,
F~) 0'\J(;' f..J ,.~ ;~~&~iOl1~;
(lSclm<'IT1ds 3lt'i:aches a COiJY of ~ ::::"\\'
E)~J-n Err" &':
~:;,;ga t :;\"sC"~ Jl Of" O'1'l'~t~c'.]
f~
- I( 1f-5f)
.~~~ '1;3~_l__H;I'i.
F0ap ori.;-~_edl
i97
?~/h~
The Purvis's
14504 Berry valley~Rd.
Yelm, WA 98597
October 18, 1990
VENTURE PARTNERS, ING.
610 MARKET SI SUITE 100
KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98033
(206) 822-2275
FAX NO. (206) 827-1566
Dear John, Patsy & David Purvis:
Because of the recent actions of the City of Yelm con-
cerning annexation, I thought I would write this letter on
behalf of Venture Partners, Inc. to clarify some issues under
our agreement.
We think it is imperative that there be one representa-
tive for your property as to annexation and related issues.
If the City and Thurston Highlands Associates are able to get
one answer from us and anot.her fro:m you, thG:Y can cont i Due
to divide and conquer and will have their own interests in
mind before ours. The end result will be that neither you
nor Venture Partners will have much say about either annex-
ation or the long-range use of the property. We are con-
cerned that the final result will be either a denial of the
annexation, or annexation at a low density zoning which will
not justify the price we would otherwise be willing to pay
for your property.
We are sending this letter to clarify what we intend by
the "Seller's cooperation" section of the Purchase and Sale
Agreement. Under that provision and under the balance of the
agreement, we will continue to pursue annexation with or
without Thurston Highlands Associates. In the meantime, you
should not sign any annexation petition without the consent
of Venture Partners, Inc. Any questions concerning annl~X-
ation by either Thurston Highlands Associates or by the City
should be directed to Venture Partners. Venture Partners
should have the right to make all decisions with respect to
annexation and related land use matters during the term of
the agreement as long as you also approve these decisions.
We think this arrangemen~ is the one best calculated to
expedite the annexation and to insure the highest and best
land use zoning. If you have any questions or comments,
please notify me immediately. If this arrangement is ac-
ceptable as a clarification of our agreement, please sign
one copy of this letter and return it to me. I am sending
two signed originals of this letter so that you can keep one
for your file.
S~~jrelY, // ( P <~
td#/d~. ?idee
William A. Fisher
Vice President
John B. Purvis
Patsy L. Purvis
David A. Purvis
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENTS
o
o
(l
TowD of Yelm
105 Yelm Avenue West
P.O. Box 479
Yelm, Waahinqton 98597
206-458-3244
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL FORM
II FAX"
COMPANY f)/JJtn5 ilw-l?2 (tJClUJ//
INDIVIDUAx..~t !J7ralih /lUALA. )
NUMBER 41-/3-' i;;o I
TO
INDIVIDUAL
FROM COMPANY
"FAX" NUMBER (206)
NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW
~
DATE ID-I ~ - q6 TIME SENT /f): "-15' tf7.y)
SUBJECT &nn?! ,SIr, f'~cI e( rtt,u.t:1i flu_ fMllJVlL-
f,fJh~, /v- uJant? ~To 7j:d d-itJ ~d ,1/5,#.
ADDITIONA~ COMMENTS 1tl/lH:;; Ii, ,~~liftov.-. M~;Z;&d
~, Ik ~ rfu)~, _ __ oUJ _ __ __~ tO~-(Urj
tm ffr:Ch -Iv 2f)f/l11 ? CITldd r pU<lt- Urdu
rY/tIW t J wf-vhmv't -fo ~, ---rJ,C#}~ t[trU-
**** IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL COPIES OR ANY ~j~A
COPY IS NOT LEGIBLE, PLEASE CALL (206) 458-324~-~-.7
AS SOON AS POSSIBLE ****
~
fl
I
:~
11
.~
~
~
f
I
I
I
!
l
,
,
I
!
/7
o
o
I
1
1
j
I
t
I
i
I
~
I
I
I
I
!
(a) That approprIate actIOn be taken to entertam thIS petItIOn, fixing a date for
a publIc hearing, causing notice to be publIshed and posted, specIfYIng the time and
place of such hearIng, and inviting all persons interested to appear and VOIce approval I
or disapproval of such annexatIOn, and I
(b) That folloWIng such hearing, and subsequent to approval of the Snohomlsh .,1,
County Boundary Review Board If such IS convened, the CIty CouncIl dtermlne by
OrdInance that such annexatIon shall be effectIve, and that property so annexed shallt
become a part of the CIty of Edmonds, WashIngton, subject to ItS laws and ordinances ..'.,'
then and thereafter In force. ~
1'71
. . ~
1
I
I
.J
I
I
J
1
4
"
.
~
~
.~
.~
jl
EDMONDS is an optional municipal code city
PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
TO' The City CouncIl
City of Edmonds
CIvic Center
Edmonds, WashIngton
WE, the undersIgned, beIng the owners of not less than seventy-fIve percent (75%), In
value (accordIng to the assessed valuatIOn for general taxatIOn), of the real property
desCrIbed on ExhIbIt "A" attached hereto, lying contiguous to the CIty of Edmonds,
WashIngton, do hereby petItIOn that such territory be annexed to and made a part or
the CIty of Edmonds under the prOV1S1ons of RCW 35A 14 120, et seq., and any
amendments thereto, of the State of Washington.
The terrItory proposed to be annexed is within Snohomlsh County, WashIngton, and IS
desCrIbed In ExhIbIt "A", attached hereto.
WHEREFORE, the undersIgned respectIvely petition the Honorable CIty Councll and ask
The PetItIOners subSCrIbIng hereto agree " that all property wIthIn the terrItory
hereby sought to be annexed shall be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the
same baSIS as property WIthIn the CIty of Edmonds for any now outstanding
Indebtedness of said CIty, Including assessments or taxes In payments of any bonds
Issued or dbts contracted, pnor to or existing at the date of annexation, and that
Simultaneous adoptIOn of proposed zonIng regulations be required" in accordance WIth
the requtrements of the City Council of said City, and as quoted herein from the
Minute Entry of the records of saId CIty Council meetIng. It IS further understood the
proposed zoning of saId area proposed for annexation as shown In the proposed
ComprehensIve Plan as adopted by SectIOn 12.04091 of the Edmonds CIty Code IS
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
ThIS petItIOn is accompanIed and has attached hereto as ExhIbIt "B" a dIagram WhICh
outlmes the boundarIes of the property sought to be annexed
These pages are a group of pages contammg an Identical text and prayer Intended by
the signers of thIS petItIOn to be presented and conSIdered as one petItIOn and may be
196
o
o
t~
r
t.,
f:
~ .
flied wIth other pages contammg additIOnal signatures which cumulatively may be
considered as a sIngle petition
f:
,
1:-
t.
f
....,
,
k.
;
I'
f'
i;
WARNING. Every person who sIgns this petitIOn with any other than hIs true name, or
'Who knowmgly sIgns more than one of these petItions, or signs a petItIOn seeking an
electIOn when he IS not a legal voter, or signs a petitIOn when he IS otherwIse not
qual1fied to sIgn, or who makes herem any false statement, shall be guilty of a
mIsdemeanor
PRA YER OF PETITION (I) Annexation of ar'b described in ExhibIts "A" and "B", and
(2) assumptIOn of indebtedness of the City of Edmonds, and (3) adoptIOn of the CIty of1
Edmonds ComprehensIve Zoning Plan of SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
!(
\:
~:~ .:-
~,,,,
~
L'
i
*OWNER'S SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME ADDRESS AND LEGAL DATE
(Husband and WIfe) DESCRIPTION SIGNED
.See special Instructions on cover sheet.
35A 01 040(9) to all petitions.]
[Edmonds attaches a copy of RCW
t'
f
..:!'
f."
r~
1:;:
f;~:
~?
Ii'
tf
D~
~"
p;,
tSO~
i
f.1
f
fl::C"
."
{'
I,"
t
~l;'
}-
f
EXHIBIT "A"
[Legal description omitted]
EXHIBIT "B"
[Map omItted]
".
'J,\
~~:'
~~!
:~r
.-
t~
J
.:~
t;~
~;:
I'
f,
.~
~
197
'I
I:
:1
!
o
~ -T1JIe5i?J IV #J illJ-/V'MJ
',,)
?!
c
1tl6 h
-c
t[;p/( (c / /JLd/-Ic1tfy{f{~
Ii
,I
/>>VAil, .du /f0
<J
~rr
_ CUrt /J1 f~ ;I JfVu
I() Z
J[~..{ f./ - ~~f/1j jJtJttld Itt.-. a:.~'l1IU;{ ul' ,LV if A ./ (/- Iff /L)
A -dpmk {J/ft!/KJ h .-11 ia_titV jJA4jiAfr
J. _/fY!AI/WI%.Y..YJf)' jDJAAlxVH.A ,-I'~y J/lnt1(/ jjA_;It~ ~; ~/ U
k.J
~J
--------
/ '
Iii
Iii
1:1
1:1
<<)1:1 4 ,A2!J!/JIYJta!-Iftu - / IJ % Jd/fJ aI-IAdz;;t/ ,/.utHdtl ~/4L/u
III ;:f~lh t~7WtJ:!:h :y~ ~/Jclj ~< /7/H~~
~ .ilA .;fA} -~ei, ~tfm,/JAth~"~I: #Lh-L /I i/
1:1 t1JiA n/iJilfd-!ill/ - jP~liff/l-~ -!dL/h ~, 41.1/'(;1 j}/H'1I
1,1 tJ~~.d/Jiil1/i(': - :, cd< /I~t .)$1</# ~ .
1,1 j '~,,' M 7JUJhL', ~~ - :;! &
,
~--~-------- I__.___------~ __ -
-c
/
o 7J-t/t/,!cA ~
~\z;</ ,771~J~()JY
0c0L5: 7)!LatLL
~a;;~ {;Jfv,1Gc;
JIM"'''r<t ~ - ,_~ Ii.~r'u \)0.--'- fu
jJ !vv\);P fA ~ .
r
~
Ii
c
iI ~
f ,'",M/'vJr".
,
~ ~ uS-
Gv4
.'\
U~
(0
\ fiA .
~ 'Y'"~0 '
I
I
I
, l~ j. !:Jf)O JLJ ))1), ,J 9 J.9,
[- v
(S) AJo pfC'~' ,eft Au )eO~,_Jc;,) -cf).I.~{/-fk~
I
J ~_~ _~ ___
!I
I
I
,
(\
u
~JJ~ rO jf~ 10bD
:P
-c
~
j\"J fA ,+ ,
~ 1
//l~...~ v, ---,
\
.)
(\
G
At IJ \ fw ~tl f'A'ilA JU)1h-bj. (PfL e'l(<')
--:2- ~ti1-G1j'J1 {~~ j
; 1 t't-vG
~ J '-..J A ' ' '/
,b~j j;{L, th(u.~_Jr \(~ .
U
t L/hf1 ~
~
5 G ~ \ I< ,D illt J' "'^" I n.tal ~ m u.d, l.,j"~.J, ~ ~ I {I'M'" ri<uU
~."", [... ~ -~... J C
\e::.. . r, ,-~L n ) r
~ / ~~ xl . L . JI ii j ~'...<.A..{.~
'f'--
_ ~ I ____
- --------
o
/"\
,----)
- .~- - ----------~
"
~
--....
-- -=----- -~
C0b (},
("'\
U
,
\ :,\
\\ ~ LS -
\\
\
\
I
\
~ 1;
f;t /lL fJ! Jt~~ /
- - - --------------
- -- ------~-- - ~---- - -- ~
- --- ------- -
i
II
II
!I
il
\:\5';
, ,
!I
o
r\
"--../
b
-c'
U1LAj
ti~h1M/ Jft~~~
r; 1M. / l/U-~ /~ (~
^/\ fl./' ~-
.1' - U ~
c
fA . Wlv Jr c IO~~J ~
lb "L %u !,) I(JlUA! In f r
I
^ ^ ~ '\\ \A ,! I .
J ..A ~ f'ktJA-;tv}
j'~",;~ J -' OU'-- 01"0 ,_.. V
-c
Ii
Iii
~~~.
o
Town of YelDl
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
206-458-3244
PUBLIC tVI'ICE
The Yelm City Council workshop scheduled for Monday, October 1, 1990,
6 : 00 PM has been cancelled.
The Regular Council Meeting of September 26, 1990 has been continued to
Monday, October 1, 1990, 7:00 PM, Yelm City Hall Council Chambers, 105
Yelm Ave. W, Yelm, Washington, 98597. The meeting has been continued to
discuss agenda item #6, Thurston Highland & Associates vs. Venture
Partners annexation petitions.
Any questions, please call 458-3244.
A'ITEST:
~ t. cThctJ-
Shelly A. Badger
Yelm City Clerk
cc: Nisqually Valley News, September 28, 1990
Yelm City Councilmembers, September 28, 1990
Thurston Highland & Associates, September 28, 1990 (by mail)
Venture Partners, September 28, 1990 (by mail)
Yelm Planning Committee Members, September 28, 1990 (by mail)
9-26-90 City Council Meeting mailing list (by mail)
~ . - - --------
"
o
o
PRESENTATION BEFORE YELM CITY COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 26, 1990
FOR
THURSTON HIGHLANDS
1. Review Aerial Photographs--Present Site Characteristics
a) Site has already been cleared
b) Access considerations.
c) Relative proximity to the downtown area of city and Fort Lewis
II Existing Zoning
a) The SIte IS in an unmapped area. Default density is five acre lots.
b) The 5-acre lot design would most likely result m one access road to project
c) Each site would incorporate septic systems.
d) Each SIte would incorporate its own separate well.
e) Five acre densIty would virtually guarantee urban sprawl by forcing low density growth
to occur over a very large area with little contribution to mfrastructure
III Present Topographic Survey Information
a) Discuss topographic amenities to SIte
b) Discuss sensitive areas on site
c) Wetland, Fort Lewis buffer
IV HB2929
a) Requires for planning for growth for the next 20 years. (City should require minimum 15
percent greater land area than necessary)
b) Growth Management Act requires planning for future growth and placing this growth
within cities with sufficient infrastructure to accommodate growth
c) Plan requires that little or no growth occur outside city boundaries.
V Thurston Highland Associates have filed the following documents with the City
a) Letter of intent filed on June 13, accepted by City Council on July 1I.
b) Environmental documents submitted to City staff on 9/19/90
c) Thurston Highlands has contemplated annexing entire 1800-acre parcel from its
conceptIon in June with mput from Yelm.
VI City Sewer System
a) Project would help defer cost of City sewage treatment plant and sewage facilIties.
b) STEP system would be required on project to mmimize envIronmental impacts and sewage
treatment requirements.
c) Only project this size 1200+ acres---is feasible to consider new additional sewer treatment
plant.
..
o
o
~
VII City Water System
a) Project would incorporate extension of city lines in order to obtain servIce which would
help disburse the city water system costs.
b) AddItional well sites could be placed on the property which would Increase city water
capacity
c) Prehminary findings that the sIte has deeper and better water system per CIty staff
VIII Project and annexation will have folloWIng benefits to City'
a) Long Term assistance to the school district.
b) Construction of championship golf course
c) ConstructIon of a wide range of housing including middle and upper end housing types
consisting mainly of single family residential homes.
d) A planned commumty would be allowed In accordance with City of Yelm critena at
reasonable urban densities whIch would allow for the payments of and f air contributIOn
f or infrastructure construction
e) A planned community would eliminate urban sprawl in this area (reference Puget Sound
Vision 2020) Puget Sound Council of Governments--Small Towns
IX. Benefits to City for Preparing a Single Annexation PetitIon
a)
b)
c)
d)
Would result In a strong positIon from the city to the Boundary Review Board
Significantly easier to process environmental review of entire 1800 acre site.
In accordance with planning objectives of HB2929 (Growth Management Act)
Would allow CIty to address annexation Issues one time rather than multiple times.
V J;AJI\'111..2--
(~,
~b)
r.. c. )
(t'A )
(c)
/ /'Y"li'4A - It If t3
~I'iv.....e.i ,,Jylv-l,,It.IU ~(J H1;f~"-~"~ ;//.9,(/- u.-/~r;,,""/;t> wll1 ~.....",..- /~.....-
t..ofr,"" If ',:'Fv..Js/" 4> ..
A / / IN- /OJ IJ 7),,;V ~ _ N (/ T TJ--H -e ~ 1/ ,..,... ,.,... t "P'Y 7:i j-o.> -
I. ) J......,~ __ ;IIt~,..,,,,,/1..2 ir"",,;f/,v- ;6'II.v~.-'/#-
J VV'I'/u ~ hO/P.I/'" , /
..I) ;<7V1f 1v-n/7vl.I t.. f1/,u,)Aliltl,fj_
/...Ofl u,v 11t?J,fI///kl: f
tyf--R-(l ~ (,,( /h/tN ~Ar..,;
fJJMvH;l/Y 1~I"'hv h;p~k;.., -
U";V 11"\t1-"'~7:' /4/,"", l) -
/Z-f~ AI()'{;' ,I'l/d //JJ~?J-
o
Town of Telm
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
206-458-3244
September 21, 1990
'10:
FRCM :
Property owners in proposed annexation area
Yelm City Clerkls Office
Attached is an agenda for the September 26, 1990 Yelm City Council
meeting. Please note that the Thurston Highland vs. Dragt Property
Owners (Venture Partners) proposed annexation will be discussed in
regards to the annexation boundaries (whether the city will require one
annexation petition or allow two separate petitions).
y
.;
>!]
September 21, 1990
o
Town of Yelm
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
206-458-3244
'10:
FRCM :
Property owners in proposed annexation area
Yelm City Clerk's Office
Attached is an agenda for the September 26, 1990 YeJm City Council
rreeting. Please note that the Thurston Highland vs. Dragt Property
Owners (Venture Partners) proposed annexation will be discussed in
regards to the annexation boundaries (whether the city will require one
annexation petition or allow two separate petitions).
'::,E F' ;::'0 'gO 1 S 0':3
FF'Yk ,=rl
l-"
o
F'H/:,E DOl
!F~G;f;;c!MJff!L.E TRANSMISSION
__.. . _l.-
-
Kramei\ 4?bin ~ ~o,_Inc.
Oats:
September 20~ 1990
To:
Name.
Gene Botges
OrganiZ21~d<<din
City of Yelm
Fax #:
458-4348
From:
Name:
Dennis Su
Office
KCt~
Project Name/No.
No of Pages (inc. cover) 1
Remarks:
Li 1 a Wi 11 uwei t
14812 Berry Valley Rd. SE
Yelm) HA 98597
Carl Horsak
14848 Berry Valley Rd. SE
Yelm. \~A 98597
Henry Dragt
14848 Longmire St. SE
Yelm. HA 98597
t.Jilliam Parker
14947 Longmire st. SE
Ye 1m, l~A 98597
Glen Newby
15105 Longmire St. SE
Yelm.. tlA 98597
Charles Brown
P.o Box.@).,
Yelm. HA 98597
John Purvis
14504 Berry Valley Rd SE
Ye 1 m, t~A 98597
If transmission is not complete, please call: .!:!.i!11J.Jf
at [3,(1.61 4-4kJM1
--:!"".
KCM .. 1917FtrstAvenue .. Seatt1eWA 98101-1027 <> Phooe(2OS)443-5300 0 Fwd208)4A1$.~
tt TOTAL PAGE 001 *t
Ilj--II--111 rl~ ::~FIVl Fill
,
,,/~ s-(;.F' ~o ' ':30 11 07 F Y f' (tu1
t.! ,l> ..
f
6
F'H\~E 00 Ii
dI-
ll.:
-1
Land Use &
Development
ConsultatIon
A Division 01 Klamer Chin & Mayo, InC'
FAX TRANSMITTAL
"~I.
DATE: q(~(~O _ !I
~~ i70R~ .~
C~ ~~~ :'M
~~~;r~ ~
--r~QtLKI6rtll:t\f.L~.~J='0r ~
/1 ~ IIJ,
. V In
:li
.,
?~~:
TO
fAX NO
FROM
SUB-JEeT /PROJECT
tOTA!, PAGES
MESSAGE
,
1:
~ :
I
/
~~F7
~po ~ ~~<- 1< ~
~ &Y-lN~ INc:!--U1?W IN '1t:NTi
~'TN~ fY-k'f~---ANN~ON'
~ \NtKI<-' TYfp ()P(flKINC-t UBdNOG
~11N0 y{ILL c:lA\2Jf'i [1-l~9lTuATLON :;
fb-r- ~~ "-
pG~-AS~ CAlL: ~~ ~-44~S~;7 ir
tOZ-{ ~\{p ~ 1!?FA- GIN. THLS ,
oj
,
.,
I'
:/
.\ t
~' (
I \'
l~'
f~Nl.-S '
I
I
1917 FirS! A'/enue Seattle, Washington 98101
t
~
l
f,
(206) 443-3531 Fax. (206) 443-537 :~1
""" "" ".1'" ,M' f!
j i
'~
';EF' ':::'D
'-..
, '3 D
1 1 en::
F~ f,'=ruJ
6
F' H I~ E
J;
D[18
, l~
.'
~
A......
';;
:;ii
u,
September 20, 1990
~'t
)
I;l
Property Owllers on Geornetrix letter
Dragt
Brown
Newby
Parker
Horsak
Willuweit
Purvis
Yelm, WA 98597
0\)
J:
,'I
,"'1
r'i
I,'
..:}
,(
t'j
I
~I~
~~
''',
[I'"~
,,'
Subject
Propos ed Anr.Bx.'lt ion
if I
"
~,)
I'"
Dear I'lr &: Nr-s
We would like UJ invite you to attend t.ne nex,t Yelm City Council meetIng;
",it
''I
I-
I',
~.
As you ~lOW, ever since the Thurston Highland project filed for annexation '~
to the City of Yelm in July, it ge.nerate a lot of interest by adjacent and .Ii
surrounding propcr't-)y Ow"1wrS Currently, there is a real estate group .
called Ventur~ Partners representing you to seek approval for annexation ,~
on a smaller scale ~
I'
Wednesday, September 26, 1990
7 .30 P. M
Yelm Council Chammber
:l'
~rf
~il
i~'
1-:1
Every pr ivate property O1;\"Iler has the r ig.ht to request annexat ion .f,
However, with the concept of a plannd community develpment, the Thurston .':/
Highland project in its full scale ca~1 prov~de the arneni~ies and . '/1
infrastructllL'0 oecesSdry to protect tn8 enVl,J.'Ol11l'1ent ~.lld J_S more benefJ..cl.al!.
to the City of Yelm f
~i.\
The Yelrn Planning Committee met on 9/18/90 and moved to recommend a single \.1
and more complete annexation to the City Council for COIlS ideration We ':1
urge YQuto al t.,md this cou,i'lcil m~eting On SeptembeJ: 26; 1990 to proVide
Y01.1r. cOlument and .idea.s reg"ll~d:Lng a better future fOI~ Yelm.
i
Thank you
~'
S in cere ly,
~:'j
)i
J
~.
Gene Borges, City Administrator
(I)
r
1
,I
r:
,I'
\:)
:~ ,
+*
T ,=, T H L F' f=,I'~ E
1 I ~ l_'1M I' 'I
,;~
DDc:" **
<l
,,,'
U Ij -- _II-l.i II
o
Town of Yelm
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
206-458-3244
September 19, 1990
Gecmetrix
ATIN: John C. Minato
140 Rainier Ave. So., Suite C
Renton, WA 98055
Dear Mr. Minato:
Please consider this letter official notification that on August 30, 1990
the City of Yelrn received a Notice of Intent to Coomence Annexation
Proceedings for the property owned by a group of property owners entitled
the "Dragt Property Owners" for the land southwest and contiguous to
Yelrn's city l~its.
On July 11, 1990, the City of Yelrn granted approval to Thurston Highland
& Associates to proceed with their annexation request (originally
submitted to Yelrn on June 13, 1990). This approval involved the sane
parcels of property as your request, of which you were notified upon your
submittal.
The City of Yelrn is currently receiving input from its Planning Comnittee
and legal counsel dn how to proceed with the two annexation requests
(whether to require the two petitioning parties to submit one annexation
petition or two petitions developed concurrently).
The conflict will be discussed further at the September 26, 1990 meeting
of the Yelrn City Council. A Yelrn Planning Corrrnittee recoomendation
(generated at the September 18, 1990 rreeting) will be presented to the
Council to require one joint annexation petition submittal for all
properties involved with Thurston Highland & Associates and Venture
Partners. Shortly thereafter, the City of Yelm will be able to formally
suggest a method to you to proceed with the annexation and submit the
formal 75% petition and legal description.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerel~~
Gene Borges
Yelrn City Administrator
cc: Venture Partners, William A. Fisher
September
o
TowD of Yelm
."
q./
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
y elm, Washington 98597
206-458-3244
KCM
A'I'I'N: Dennis T. Su, AIA, General Manager
1917 First Ave.
Seattle, WA 98101
Dear Mr. Su:
Please consider this letter official notification that on June 13, 1990,
the City of Yelm received a Notice of Intent to Comnence Annexation
Proceedings for the property owned by Thurston Highland & Associates and
those properties northeas t of the Thurs ton Highland parcel making the
annexation request contiguous to the city l~its of Yelm.
On July 11,
presented in
City of Yelm
armexation.
1990, the Yelm City Council approved of the boundaries
Planning Coomittee "option All and granted approval for the
and Thurston Highland & Associates to proceed with the
Since the July 11, 1990 approval and nlllTErous rreetings discussing the
final 75% petition with you and other representatives of Thurston
Highland & Associates, the City of Yelm has received a second Notice of
Inten~ to Cornrence Annexation Proceedings fran the II Dragt Property
Owners II (Venture PartnersjGeanetrix, Inc.) for a portion of land that was
included in your original letter of intent. I irrrrEdiately infonned you
of the August 30, 1990 Venture Partner's Notice of Intent and the
conflict that arose from it (due to the fact that the sane properties
were involved in both letters).
The City of Yelm is currently receiving input from its Planning Carmittee
and legal counsel on how to proceed with the t'WO annexation requests
(whether to require the two petitioning parties to submit one armexation
petition or t\\U petitions developed concurrently).
This issue will be discussed further at the September 26, 1990 rreeting of
the Yelrn City Council. A Yelm Planning Carmittee recoomendation
(generated at the September 18, 1990 rreeting) will be presented to the
Council to require one joint armexation petition submittal for all
properties involved with Thurston Highland & Associates and Venture
Partners. Shortly thereafter, the City of Yelm will be able to formally
suggest a rrethod to you to proceed with the annexation and submit the
fonnal 75% petition and legal description. We currently are in receipt
of the envirorurental checklist sutrnitted to Yelm on September 12, 1990.
Thank you for your cooperation and patience in this manner.
SinCerelY~ ~
Gene Bo~s
Yelrn City Administrator
cc: Dana Mower, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.
..
o
o
Town of Yelm
""
105 Yelm Avenue West
P.O. Box 479
Yelm, Waahinqton 98597
206-458-3244
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL FORM
II FAX II
.YAt
TO
NUMBER
II FAX II
COMPANY{~(~ {j!/l.~J
INDIVIDUAL ./. /J4..J
!
NUMBER (206) 458-4348
FROM
DATE
NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW /
vi ,;{1 TIME SENT ~ f 3 D
SUBJECT
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
**** IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL COPIES OR ANY
COpy IS NOT LEGIBLE, PLEASE CALL (206) 458-3244
AS SOON AS POSSIBLE ****
.-S
o
o
THURSTON HIGHLAND ASSOCIATES
1}
..4%~
o ..() ~
\ ~ ~
~~((\
., (J2 '"0
LP '
(:)
September 19, 1990
Planning Committee
City of Yelm
P.O.Box 479
Yelm, Wa 98597
Attn: Mr. Tim Schlosser, Chair
Subject: Thurston Highland Development
Dear Mr. Schlosser,
I am writing to thank you and the committee members for your action during
yesterday's meeting to recommend to the City Council to accept the
original Thurston Highland annexation petition.
We are puzzled by Venture Partner's intent to apply for a seperate annexa-
tion for a smaller parcel. Our consultants, Dennis T. Su and Dana Mower,
reported that the committee was very knowledgeable on the concept of growth
management and has the foresight for the future of Yelm. We believe that
the Thurston Highland project will have much more positive impacts on the
community.
We are committed to the project and to the future of Yelm. We also stand
by the belief of planned community development is the logical way to grow
in the future. Your on-going support to our endeavor is much appreciated.
Sincerely,
/lLI; 2J~
Bob Welcome, Managing Partner
BW/bjs
P. O. BOX 97055 REDMOND, WA 98073
Q
o
... fo' P t ,:,,' In b r.': (' J,
_, :I -)( )
~
& ~a
~ ~ ~~
'~./t9 ~
'~ (9, ,
,~
I., !'i
1 .-)
11
t; r,',:' J
(,
"/ f::'f"l Ltt::::~i
.~ .L ~ 'I 1
~:jE' .~.
i,I-.,l""1
t,t t ~:~i ,'1.1.,
L '0:,' ('I 1"", .i. s; ~.. u
Ti'lll" t "
. I.., I In l"'il qfll dr\ '0;
DC'd!" ',..}1 r
I.'~,,", .J. E~ <~\ ~:~ {.;~ I' ,. t-.",'~"
, '!. j"l Cl
I ~,,:~n '" ,i '_,I f {f? ,n
p _, .,], l,.c ,11"', IJ 1,'r,':I. ! ,i
I Ll"( ;:}.i:/ n .a t Ll -( f:.!
,':,"1' "f ,/, 'L') ,
d ~,; ,..,) ,,,,' -a ",. r' ' " ... r.:\ I ,r 1 f' !'
, .._ <. I ",> C), I J. r" "1 t. . d,] '-'11
, ,J. r' , !" ".,,,,, . .., ' ", ' , I) I ' ' -
t.. ,1..1 \. (-;! [! -J:; hi" ,-"II . I.. V.' ,I .,. u! I /1 \..:
_ ~~ rl E'I"', 'I" Ill". ,... "
.~.. t:.~ r" -1.1 t l:.. r
1::Jt:"t it i, '1'1 'to t I.
. I \J '_I ,'1 (::.\
"[; /1<::: ,\nll,'".\' ",.~). -
..' \C:\ l,., I In
!. n ~:; t E~<:~ci "
'3i j"')l
(.:~: ( (.:-:.\ 1 ~ ~l
CI
'1', ",,)1"', "f
Vf:,II"',tL.1. '-:;,'
\{ r:;2 1. ('0
F :i,Y' t: nf?~J'
! r
''II'
, r" <::11"1,'1 Iv:..." '"
.1 '1':::""" '~ 'I ~::,,, ), Ii'l ('I F<" F" "" ..
., ': _, .J ',J, U I:::' ,,_ '( \' ,., ' L. I v J. S
Y F-"I ,." I '" , ,/ i d.1. !. to~ y F:, ,._, ,':\ d f:" F'
_... .Ily "f^': ),j"::;:I/ ... ,_1._ /
51 d (?O r
(;/ofl.4A D (j?t.</7P~
,~~_, '/ 1c;2-f./ ,-c/<...-<='
/'
I:: ,_ :
_I
'5i~.
::r:--~tAd- _'tf>t;.t ___~(A. ; ne/"'''-e- tJ fA r
"'.___f41YuI ~___ /On.L_itl ~e &/m'nf
If2. ~cL Onl?~ ~~i-iOh aLr6Jf~ ~iY1~ <:!At?-
_ ~~ I d.E.'Y-E'J. b ~---~gCJ""v---62 {I> 1"1"" i n ~_ _~~u e .
- -------1~ (j2\[t)_~V'~--~ (l~ ~lJ~t~-~i-
,--, --- -- __I~~6~___a1"',,",~)L___-=b>___~__ -t~___l(~~_di ~4-I'3-__-
__ _ ___ --1..$Ov..'\-h~ oY\_L ~.....J ~i r1 :3- ()>'\_ _ ~-<2.___ IJ i 'S ~l.l'" B ~ ____ n
. . Ir~cll-L- G....vs c::.. HenJ: i{r....cb___wi th___ ~~____:.-
----------,4~ ~c.e.I____:tb _:t~-=z~ _B!:3 ~). '7&___hE.l~~~ n _ ___ ,_ __
____ ____~ 1'_~6U.~__\k~\9 j c~: 6!:l____~__ ___~S_ ~__~~y ~~~-;----_-
__ _ _ __ !~-e- ~'f!!'~'L__~e.V' _~~___~Ay~~yi~_C\{"..et!.~~_
n -.. .---11-- ........- -_I~.-~"blj- 'th.:tJ:>G'h-.__~._ ....
_ __ _____~~Y\---~-~lrl\ ()."I'-J.._ __u~___~s__~~ ti es ___
- - __ ___ __ ~-,ltl~~Iot.~ J __ ~h~~__'__~Y~m__--':l-C\.k:.L~~)~~L_, uJithi f'\ __
~...=~_ r~ ~___~"J ~L.m _~~~~J-"...i~S_~ ~~l~=L_~_._
. --_ --___-_~-I- __~~-~.. _~~;:I?~- _.-----~~-n.. --
---- ----- jl___,- __ _____ ____ _____,______ - ___________,______ ___
- --- - - IJ~~~__ ,__W,~ ---~ ~~~!'j-- ~.\~4. _ _________,_ __ ___ u,___ ___
~CO~L~-~~-< _ ~'ft,~n. .un --
- ,
/6wn
- -----
~- ---- /6$'
--- I r? (j.
_J c--Ydm,
-~ ----
---- (ll~v
--_.~
~S- Ll<-Y
I - -r..~ -
-- -- --
, \lrV'V .,,_~vv v ~,~v ~~v VVv vvv vV v v ~v.~ _~~~v v v v vv ., ," v V 'v v vv.. v v,~ vv-'_ . . ."-.'"_/' ~,
IL \ / "- )~m~ (*)oj I'1.Qo
of__-7Jt:'~--- _________________d______ ___
'9;:--~;. _ if) ~H__~_________ .--~__~-.-
lJ.iI-_9! S~?
o
o
" -
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gene Borges
FROM: Neil Aaland
DATE: September 12, 1990
SUBJECT: Annexation Questions
You asked me to do some research regarding two specific aspects of
the proposed annexations. In addition, I have done some additional
research on the required environmental review, ~n~ have several
other comments for your conaid~ration.
1. RESOLUTION FOS CHARGING AQDITIONAL FEES.
A proposed resolution is attached.
~ DOES THE CITY HAVE TO ZO~~ THE PROPERTY AT THE TIME IT IS
ANNEXED?
The short answer is yes. Technically, an annexation could occur
without zoning, but you wouldn't want to do that intentionallY.
That situation would create all sorts of problems. For example,
if the parcel was unzoned, what would you do if an individual
property owner asked for a building permit for a mini-mart? There
would be no guidance on whether to allow that, and the city could
be open to lawsuits no matter what you did.
~ WHAT SHOULD THE PROPERTY BE ZONED?
My r.oo~en4a~ion tor zoning the Venture properties annexation is
to bring the entire area in under R-l, single-family, and apply
the "Special Use - Combining District.. overlay to the golf oourse
since thare is no zone that specifically allows it.
I realize the property owners have asked for R-2 MUlti-family,
since they want to develop multi-family dwellings. My reasoning
for R-l is the draft joint plan identifies that area as single-
family. It would be a gesture of good faith to the county to
suggest that zoning, and may allay their concern that part of the
area is outside the future city limits identified in the joint
plan. The property owners COuld, of course, apply for a re~one at
a labar dat$.
~ TIMING OF ZONING AND COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING FOR THE
ANNEXATIONj"
According to the "Annexation Handbook for Cities and Towns in
Washington State", comprehensive planning and zoning must be
completed before the 60 days expires after they first file their
notice of intent. In other words, the clock began running on
August 28, and recommended zoning has to be in place by October
o
o
..
27. Although not impossible, it i~ difficult beoause prezoniny
stAtutes require at least two public hearings at least 30 days
apart, along with the public notice.
There are a couple of "outs" sU9gested by the Handbook. Firet,
adopt an ordinance whioh automatically zones all annexations a
speoific zone, such as R-l. The ordinance also provides for review
by the city within a certain time to determine the most appropriate
zone.
Se.cond, adopt an ordinanoe which providea that, upon annexation,
zoning most closely matching the previous county zoning will be
applied. Then, review by the city would occur within a certain
period of time.
The Gooon4 option Goems the
juris4iotions do it this way).
past?
beat to me (and I thtnk other
How has the city done this in the
I AM GOING TO DO SOME ADDITIONAL RESEARCH ON THIS ONE.
~ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR THE ANNEXATION
-U'
I've been thinking about what needs to be done for the annexation
itself, a ONS or an EIS. I believe an EIS will eventually need to
be done tor this project, since they plan to build a larger multi-
family project.
Environmental review can be split into two phases (the ~nn~x~tion
.......""...._ u.u~ ....n... Q""l...U(;l.L \,4t;:v~J.upm~nI..J' J.-uece.1S a J.ocal. prat!~O~tlt::
for phasing envIronmental revi~r" s-1-nce other] jurisdiotions in
Thurston County have issued DNS,'.s on major annexations. It's
basically what you feel comfortable with.
('MY qoneral reelin9 is to ~equiro an BIB now r~ther ~han sp11tt1nq~
; review into two phase.. This 1s more consistent wi-th SEPA' s (
'--:r:equirements of early review. .-r
~ OTHER THOUGHTS
If the developments occur in the county and not in Ye1m, I see two
issues:
(1) an increase in the existing fiscal drain on the city to
service the unincorporated area (police protection, increased
use of city roads, etc.);
(2) the oi 1:.y wouldn't have had any control of how the
development occurred (even at 1 unit per 5 acres, 1600 acres
= 320 homes = 900 additional people).
POTENTIAL PROBLEM: On the larger annexation, if jurisdiction is
invoked for Boundary Review Board, the BRB will probably have
concerns and dt:ny it.
IICI-] -'-10 LI__ 41FM FII
o
IF THE COUNTY IS GOING
Qhould present its case
pressure the county for
not annexing.
o
TO CONTINUE TO p~y HARDBALL, the city
for annexation (as diacuG~eQ ~bove) ana
revenue ~$sistance as the trade-off for
However, the Venture properties annexation seems reasonable to me
in any case.
II ',1'- 1 - ',III II ,j 1 F 1'/1 111'1
o
o
~
ATTACHMENT A - DRAFT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, RCW 35A.63 authorizes the city to administer a zoning
ordinance and other land use regulations; and
WHEREAS, the fees e5t~bl ished by the city to review proposeQ
developments Bubj eat to land use regulations do not cover the
actual coats borne by the Town, including staff costs; and
WHEREAS, several large-scale developments have been proposed that
will tax the Cit~'5 ability to conduct an adequate review; and
WHEREAS, the City will have to hire outside staff to assist in the
review of these large-scale developments, which was not anticipated
by the city; and
WHEREAS, the city Council wishes to establish a policy whereby
large-scale developments must cover the costs incurred by the Town
in reviewing such developments;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TtlE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
'lELM AS FOLLOWS:
1. Costa incurred by the City for reviewing large-scale
development proj ecta shall be recovered from the proj act
proponents. Large-scale developments are typically those that
require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement.
2. Applications for large-scale developments shall be accompanied
by a deposit of $500. The city will charge its costa against
the deposit to cover review costs.
3. When the $500 is gone an additional $500 must be deposited
with the City by the project proponent. This will continue
until review of the project is completed. Any portion of a
deposit remaining after review is complete will be returned
to the project proponent.
..).
GEOMETRIX Architects/Pla~"rs/lnteriors
140 Rainier Avenue South'; / Suite C
RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055
[LJ~uu() @[f uOO~~~[KjODuu~[L
TO C\T'( or '1~
_'P,O.~)< A-~
'1E:.L.M I WA 4~Sl'1
RE:
ONNef&
(206) 277-1933
WE ARE SENDING YOU .,s. Attached 0 Under separate cover via
the following items:
o Shop drawings
o Copy of letter
o Prints
o Change order
o Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications
~_~ OF [N.~\
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below'
o For approval
o For your use
o As requested
~For review and comment
o FOR BIDS DUE
0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit_copies for approval
0 Approved as noted 0 Submit_copies for distribution
0 Returned for corrections 0 Return_corrected prints
0
19 o PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
COPY TO
SIGNED' \J~ MtN~
PROOUCT 140,1 /NeBS! Inc., Groton. Mass. 01471.
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
.~
o
0'
"
<
J?~c "
, . ,~/f;rL'
o 4&1-. G ", ~7!J'
U',J' '
1'Q~ (J 199, ,
~ ,'Y' Of,f~ '0
< 1" , ,
'7'
IX'
P 'f 0
o 0 0 0....
o 0
G
J',t
. ;. ~
.' ~o
!' "
o 0 0 0 r'o 'p
o 0 p
"
'"
"
';
J,
,
,August 28, 1990
- ~
t
Mr Gene ,Borges, 9ity
P 0 :Box 479
Yelm, , W A 98579,
AdmInistrator/Planning & " CQl\strhction ~
,
'I
! J'
.'
C,,; At
,-
Re No!~teof I rni~nt to Commence Annexat1~,n Proceedtngs
1', 'I,
;
, 0
I
pear Mr :B.Qr~es"
-
~ I I'~, I
GEOMETRIX -ArchH~cts/Planp'ers'/fn(eriQr~ represent the propqty" .owners of
_, .'_ .' i'" \
the Dragt, :Ne~py, :parker, PUrVIS', Horsak,W,illuweit,," 'and Brown: parcels" qf
laIid,:herem:,lfrer I collectively t~terred - to' a,s dIe ,Dragt Property Owners pn
../ . - - <' " \ " ,I '
behalf of our'''ClH~nts, \Afe herebx respectf!ll,ly. gw~', J)otkeof intent ~nd request'
app~ova~',from the. CIty 'Of' Yelm to < commence' WIth the 'legal I pr<;lceedings. for"
, I l " 't
an.nexatloli.
, ,
At' 'thIS t~my,. it IS the" mte~t of, the D,nigt' Property Owners to ~~vel'()p the,'
prop~rty as L~ 'planned devdopmelltto lIic1tide~ingle' ;a,nq JIlultI"' farrnly
resIdentIal units, wIth -recreatl(;mal' facih~ies with, anR-2 zoning' c!a:~sifjc'atioh~:,
\ I I 1:-
. \ f "'t,, _ -
'T411" Br,own' parcel 'Win rem~in a~ an eighte~n:ho!e ~~olf c.ourse with no' ,changes
planned 'at thIS tlme'
1\ ~
?:;
,
"
-;>: \
,The pa~t~es n,dteq, aboveuhdetstupd that the anIieX~lt-i0njnto the City of Yelm
"wIll ,allo~ thein' the public -utilities,.,'facllities and mumclpalservites e~Joyed'
pres'e'htly by,' City residefit~ J:he a,nnexiltIon .partIc,ipants also u~derstand
\,upgradmgof' socme . public utilities, > may rbt? "requf~ecl to facilitate., this;.,
an~e~atio~ J)r09~ss. : it, i,s furtheL un4en~tood_ bY" thelllvolvedparties' th,~t-
~p6n th,e effective datc;(of an,pexation th~ parceJsof' propeJty annexed WIll, be
~sse~~:ed,~nd taxed at the 's:,lme rate . anef on J the' samepasis ~~s property, 'w~thin
_ 'dle 'boufldarit(s 'of' Y ~lm, which at thIS. time we'are ;told,' IS a rate lower, than
- , '
that of l'hurston County ta,x rates.' "
, ,
,
1\"
'.,
(
i,\"
(0 II) !i 0 G
~ 0
o 0 '0 ? .6 0" 0 0 ~: ~o 0 b 0
000,.00
0'" -19
, I
o. 0 0\0 l o( 0 '0 9
O'! 0
140 RAI'NIER AVE. so'; SVITI;: C RENTON W,A., 98055 (206) 277.1933
I'"
---,
. ~ 1-'
~-~
/t,-
o
o
'"
,:
",
y
,
"
,
.
I'
I ,
ThIs notIce is .,her~by "giveulll accordance wit~.' ~RO~' 3~A.14.120. We;'
anxIouslY' look }opvard to _meding with, you on thi'~ -m,aner .Pl~ase' don 't
,'hesitate, It<;> <;ontact us ~houid, y<;m need aqditionat information to "process this. '. 'l < \
I f ~~
-'
1:... ...~
L,
, ~ f I
~Si~cerer~ttm~.",:~ J.'
._<.~
I ' C , ..-:
I. "("
Jolin C Minato.. 1}rch~tect/Gener~l
"
'.'
.\ }.... r
Partner
I'
, I
"
cc
Venture 'Partners
Newby 'E,e,sicience'
'Parker Re$ide,nce,
Brown Residence '
Purvis 'Residence.
Hotsak;- .Re'sldence'
,I . <..'
<, Wilh~weit Residen.ce
" ,
.)'
.... ,~ h
,
I
\'
I'
l -
,;
,~;-'
r
-,.
'"
.i'
\ ~ I
J
" -
i .~
,
,f
~ ,
"
, J
-<: '-~ '..,
"I 'J r
5 "'f
,~."
<',
f
c "
l'
I -
,
,.
I ::. )~.l.j~
'~\ }.A' ~
I>;\~:
T ::1~1
~,~\~~~'
\ . ".J; 1
;','::':;'f
"
1,( If loJ'
:J /.j' !
.':ftL~'::1
~ 1',h"'.J\t i
"
;j. ,
1
~ ,
~ '! \ ;
I;.
,~ \, I
'l'~ \ \
II, ,I, :11
i
...1
~. ::t'~;:
.
l\ !
}, \~,~r,.'11
):\y"N ~.~ ~
i;;~I~t':.'!;l\
i\1 "I:,f
i~',' \.'>
i:' 'I'
~. 1 .. I'
\ /,
'.,
I
~,
"
q
\'
'I
I ~~
~
Z
.'
, .
1
~
....... '.
..... "
" ,
,
t .t.
",'
1
1
-I
1
I
rl.
\U
'~;I.
Ie
~'....
" '! I ;
"'" ,,;. 1 .
~:, ..
" ~ II.
" :'
~!- ~ ~~~
~). ,
! '.
....: i~: :
~
~
~'1 '"
' " ~~--c-~.--_. ~c;,___ '<-J' :~.--
"I, ~ -~- .__n
t1 " l", I
~ ~ r.:;~~~n~\,~-" ,,' I ~ l'
~ G [, i --;" -- --~ - ~~_..c.-- ~ i'
m} - t;;,~' ~ ~ -,! , -- -.. - -. ". i. -:- -- ,--, -- -" -- -',:
~~'{ " , ,~....
1. : '~~ m~ .... I-~: u.l :/",' ' .....
';E '~~' '~ '~_-'~"~, ~
~.... .... ~'>~E F :
:" ~,/x;'o"~ ~ Z. :
1, "/ ~ - -.,"" , 4 ,1U, I
"" ...I , __--- > : "
/ '~'" '\ ~""':'i~\ ~ t "t' : ' , "
,~- . ~: '" \ (---------i--------c.--~ I
, I :
.... , .... ----I , :
...., I
i
, '
.1
1
I
"
I
I
I
I
, J
I
*
~
" " ,J('I
,~--'-~"-
.
.\.:l:lj
'Ii
1
.,
~ . ~
"
'~,
~
1
,;
"I
,
,
n
.......
,
.....
c
~ ~
.
,
j
~ ~
, ~
.
;.;, t
,,~ i
\', t
"
,;,;
....
,
'; "
...., 1.1
. T ",' I> ..n
.' r'"t " '" ....
\ J, / \ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .:. '- _ __ _ \. _ " ...:. _ _ ~ ,_ _ J _ '
<~;,\~ 0'- - -- - ....... >
1,!(,,;\,',' 1 '. 'J ....~
.';~'~;" :,','i&. I> ~
~!.~:T:."\ l "-'-'
":'~""';~\' --c-a------.- ^. "
.,:.: I. , u..;
J,:~. -:!'I'~' :~:. ::, ; ~' ~-, c
:J ;\'li" I ~
I.~.l':.~ ,;.,~~~_.;. ........_..__
'j!/I)~\u:" ;~~;i\~,-., - -
1/'1 ',,", ,\ '
h' ': ,; ':r;',ii ,
';f .: LB, ~;i1 ' i,
I>} .....:.-;,~ (I S'
I t~;(r~J. ;t,(
;)~;-"/ i~'i',
~: ;:..: . \ ~ ('I (I .
I.~l. ~
,:,1';'; ji; .~. 1 . fIIV V
'll;~ ",1' Wi t
ik I ,,' ,.. - - - -
, bi; i -; ~-&. '~'c
'C\1,I -'--- \~ 1 t
, '~;~I'; \ .,' I.. O.
OJ J
llill ~
';; r:;? '1 . -
, ,
-- ',----'.......~--',~- ',- -- ,
", "
....,
- "~~,..,
"I
i'
,
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
.r
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
t .!"
-----------~---------~-
"
,:1
I ,',:1
I, )',1 ;1~fJ
, !.\L'V
"'I.'J
;! ',.
t.,.
.... I,
I
~ l
. ~, ' .....
" l I
\ , ........ .... \
, ,
I', ~ '
'., ..~-~- -......,' ,
,- ....
.... '
~
.~:. ,:~
, ..1
I~
.~,.
;ii
I
.,. .~
,) -) ,
,
,.
,
I
I
1
, ---.!
/ I
1
I
I
I
'\
I
I
I
I
l
1
\
I
I
I
1. :
I
I
I
I
I
----r----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J,
, --,
I
" t I
,/~ ~ /, ~ --- ----
~-~'~ ~~::\--~-=-~r-:------ ---..-..
"-" ~"~ ~ r1 ,
. I I ) iJ
~ .~ '~,~I
~----------1 ----------l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o
"'0
~
o
Q
August 28, 1991
Land Use & NCM
Development
ConsultatlOn
A Division of Kramer Chin & Mayo, Inc
Mr Gene Borges, City Administrator
City of Yelm
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
4~
R
8~~(
~.
Re: Amended "Letter of Intent"
Annexation for Thurston Highland Associates, et. at
Dear Mr Borges,
On behalf of thp Thurston Highlsnd Associates, we are submitting this amended
Letter of Intent/l0% Annexation Petition &s suggested by Mr Sandy Mackie, Yelm's
City Attorney in the August 14, 1991 City Council meeting We are doing this
because of the delay in the approval of the Yelm/Thurston County Joint Plan and to
conform with the current Annexation Ordinance #399 dated May 8, 1991
Our original 10% petition v,as submitted on June 13, 1990, approved by the Planning
Commission on July 10, 1990 and accepted by the City Council on July 11, 1990 There
is no change in the annexation boundary and therefore original legal description and
map are still valid. An executed copy of the amended "Notice of Intention to
Commence Annexation Proceedings" is attached for your records.
It is our intent to comply f-:11l y with Yelm s annexation policies which are being
developed and adopted by the City Council m the coming months The proposed
annexation will be within the urban growth boundary approved recently by both the
County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners The
establishing of the urban growth boundary is to meet the requirement of the HB 2929
and HB 1025 The area covered by this petition includes thirty six properties with
Thurston Highland, Dragt and Brown being the three largest parcels.
In the next and final petition (60%) submittal, we shall address the issues of the
environment, infrastructures, financing and methods of meeting the provisions of
HB 2929 and 1025 and the specifics of the annexation policies.
Sincerely,
DTS.br
Attachment
c: Thurston Highland Associates
1917 First Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 443-3537 Fax. (206) 443-5372
..
08/28/05 57
AUG 28 '91 15:45 FROM KCM
z: 206 869 0987
OELCOME CONST
02
F"AGE 002
TO;
AM&NDED
NOTICE OF INTeNTION TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS
.,~
<?<I
~
The Cfty Council of the City of Yelm
105 Yelm AvenU8 West
Yelm, WA 98597
The undersigned, whO ere owners of not less than ten percent In value, according tQ.the assessed
valuation for general taxation of the property for which annexation is sought. hereby advise the City
Covncil of the City of Yelm that it is the desire of the undel'Slgned property owners of the following area
to commence annexatlon proceedings:
The property herein referred to Is described on exhibit -AtI attached hereto and I~ depicted on Exhibit
liB" further attached hereto.
It is requested that the City Councll of tha City of Velm set a date not later than sIxty days after the filing
of this request for a meeting with the undersigned to determine: .
1. Whether the City Counoll will accept the proposed annexation;
2. Whether the City Council wiU permit the e.doptlon of zoning for the proposed area In substantial
compliance with the ordinance which permits annexation of property at the nearest comparable
zone, under the Yelm Code which the parties believe is the. R~idintial Agricultural Zone with an
RA-5A designation. The e.nnexation and proposed zoning are shown on the attached map
(Exhibit liS'.); and
.
3. Whether the City Council wiD require the assumption of existing City Indebtedness by the area
to be annexed.
This page is one of a group of pages containIng Identical text material and Is Intended by the signers
of this Notice of Intention to be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention end may be filed
with the other pages COntaining addltior1a1 slgnatul"8s which cumulatively may be considered as a single
Notice of Intention.
Own.f, Signature (print name
and .address' alSO)
~
Parc.' Number
217-27-000000
217...26-200000
217-23-3QOooO
217-23-420000
217-23-130000
Cite
- -
...
Bud W'e1cMle' 'Maug1llS Pa'l't21
Thur$tonBig~14nd As80c1ateB
1917 First Avenue
Soattle. WA 98101
AUIUSt 28t 1991
JV
W;l\ ~
rM()t'~'>-O < ~
~- 't~ '
\Ar€- ~t' \
I' ,
"'---.-.
:I.AY~
"j1~~Yl( 'rt"~'
l
'J'
'1
J.
.f
.,
I
I
f
1
;....-____________...1 ________
... . .J .
'I
i
J
". f
-"1
A:~;~E:,.7 i~~: "
.. -.;, 4.
.~ .,~::~.., +
.:'~;t~/;'; .. .,....-..; -l..~=-,.'~'
'I
J
;r ,j~' ,..
T
."
" :l
f
,
-oJ
~.5i:i'~.t~'; ~~f.~~
'4,~: .!.
O.
.-
PROPOSED
ANNEXATION
~
1# ~~
~':" ~~
oq;. g-
<( __LIC?J1 22
q;.V28
-f-:;'f}{$:.,
,-2t;t:-"
~ :fV;":f
<:..,.">:'
~~
~
,pc>
4}p
.~
''l- ~;
..;",;.,.
.;...d:
'"'!"-~
t>
~
"-<;.,,'
)
'"
)
~
28'7
33 34
I
ADMAN/
lARCELI
----l-l ~sf~::j------ ---I
- ~~l~~i' j
-I~,/ , I
~~ l!-=,I_~_!
~~+11 i - LLj-z .~} z
. . I--+--~--L.-:. I"'"
- - L - : - ~:,.:!~ .....
I-I ~t
I
i
f
------1
f
I
I
I
i
r
_~?j 30
36 31
o
<e:>
I
0I-
I
13
..._.....
...........
..........
...........
:::;:::::1:
...........
...........
...........
........... ......
: ::-:::::::: ~~::::;.;.:::::
............ ...........
........... ...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
..X............... .
W: ::::: :::::::::::
.. ..................
................. .
................
..............
...............
..............
..............
............
..........
..........
........
...........
...........
..............
..............
.............. ..
...............
.... ...... .......
. .................
... ...... ..........
........... ........
.... ...............
.................. .
.. ...............
...............
0
Z
-
en
a:
w
w
Z
-
CJ
Z
W
CJ
Z .
5 :!
~
.!!
;::) U
Gl
UJ ~
Z c:
0 ~
..
0 Gl
Cl
'\:)
Z c:
'"
W ..-;
UJ ~
;::) ::.
l/)
< tii
J: .s:
CJ c:
c:
a: .!!
Q"
< '\:)
m c:
'"
..
f
j:
..'
I
I
I
I
---~--
I
I
I
I
I
I
-__L
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
-----'""--
ALT 4.
o
--
~,a,....- _u...... --
D,r'\lopmem K ILL VI
Ctr~.....fulratlon .1. ~
J..........:: 't"'/'~
FAX TRANSMlTI AL
.~, DivIsion 01 Kr;~n1er C!'rin & M3YO. Inc.
1n~()M
..-"-...~...-Io
. DATE: --lill!!r .z,0~L
/~~~ e- ~~r..g
--Gti ;t1SV4--
. ---1:- ~ 4?_1:B
___rn:!N-1S~~l,--.---
'Jf' · U.~>::'~', U',"Nt L1l il,c-y1tL..6.1.1n.
SUBJECT/PROJECT, q"'-"') r"- -rrl'i,:./
-~= ~----_.....- -~-----~.......--~-
?
,..,...-.....-..-......-
TO
F A.X NO
..,........c---~._-
TOTAL PAGl-:S
MESSAGE
O~- dT~~
MR ,1'-L~Me- \~ NOT ~l~
!HIS ~~L~aN ID sterN 1T-t~ ~TloN
-A>'1l1~ ~M-c.rIlJvr ~TN~.
-m::-et>t7\ l'tJG! ~ ~t-k1I<; ~lltNt=0
~ t1=--i6 1Hr (/l:;81d1tJA1~-h11aNT
~'tL-- to t-Uurtll ~ i<9~1-rf.
~1=- O\E::.lVri~ ~ Il.l." ~ f'1AIlJa? 10
'(p<.-t 1Z>M'c?~N. IRA+H~/ 't~ ~
-r~~ ~ of- 1ft! > 1"Tl=:M tJN WE-
CJ?)dl-\lAv -meN~A Ft>K. U) ·
'~n
~'-=U;I~~r~/;'~~~"
_'..---' IH \ ,1\
'J.. ,.;;>' '-""
'-
1817 First Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 \206) 443-3537 Fax: (206) 443-5372
I ! ~.;.., I 1 1[- F 1/1 F II 1
HUI.:1 ..:.:=: ::! 1 1, ~..l:-:
(:~:S.I f.' 1_1-'
o
t- H 1.:1 C Ll ~:J ..:.
...
C>-
August 28, 199'1
Land Use & N CUM
Develol.lment
Consultation
A. Dl'/J~infl ot Krarnpf Cllii! & ryL.J}'D In:.;,
1\11' Cene Borges, Clty Administrator
City of Yel.m
POBox 479
Y 1 W ' 98. r(~)"/"
_ li.~ U"\ asnmg;tor: J .
Re: Atne!ldedfi'Le.tt~! or IntentH
Aii.llcx;1tion for Thurston HighlJJ'!d As~odates, d. at
Dear Mr Borges,
On bpho:ttf of thf! Thurston Hlg-h11,md Associates, we are submitting this amended
Letter of Intent/10% Annexation Petition as suggested by Mr Sandy Mackie, Yelm's
City Attorney in the August 14, 1991 City Council meeting We are doing this
beu:n,LSe of the delay ill the dpproV~J of the Ye1m/Thurston County JOi.llt Plan and to
conform with the current Annexation Ordinance #399 dated May 8, 1991
Our original 10% petition was submltted on June 13, 1990, approved by the Planning
Commission on July 10, 1990 and accepted by the City Council on July lL 1990 There
is no change in the annexation boundary and therefore original legal description a.."'l.d
map are still Ilalid. An ~xecuted copy ot the amended "NoLice of I.ntention to
Commence Annexation Proceedings" is attached for your records.
It is our intent to comply fully with Yelm's annexation polities which are being
developed and adopted by the City Council in the coming months The proposed
annexation will be within the urban growth boundary approved recently by both the
County Planning COrnmiS$lOn and the Board of County Commissioners. The
establishing of the urban growth boundary is to meet the requirement of the HB 2929
and HB 1025 The area covered by this petition includes thirty six properties with
Thul'ston Highland, Dragt and Brovvn being the three largest parcels.
In the next and final petition (60%) submittal, we shall address the issues of the
envirOnT.l1ent, infrastructures, financing and methods of meeting the provisions of
HB 2929 and 1025 and the speolH::s at the annexation policies
Sincerel y,
Oem1is
,'ou"
--......
DT5:br
Attachment
c Thurston Highla1i.d Associates
1917 Fi,,;\ ;.\venue Seattie Washington Sl8101 (206) 443-3537 Fa.~, (;::'06) 443-5372
il -
~ I II'
If'
}-li,_
HIYi .::.::::
, '31 1 ~ ~71:=:
F(j1 f'l=rl
o
F' H I~ E LJ [1]
<?
AMENDED
..",
j~OT!CE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE ANNI=XATI0N PROCEEDINGS
TO Tne City Council or the City of Ye!m
105 Yelm Avenue West
Ye!m, WA 98597
The undersigned, who are owners of not less than ten percent In value! according to-the assessed
valuatIon for gener2! taxation of the property fOi which annexation is sought, hereby advIse the City
Council of ttH3 City of Y~!m that It 1:;) tile desire of the u!1(jerslcned prooertv owners of the following area
01 o,J 1-1"
to commence annexatIon proceedings
The property herein referred to is described on Exhibit lIA" attached hereto and is depic:ed on E.xhlbit
"8" further attached rlereto
It IS requested that the City Council of the City. of Yeim set a date not later than sIxty days after the ming
of tillS request for a meetlng with the undersigned to determine
1 \Nhether the CIty Council will cccept the proposed annexation,
2. Whether the City Council will permit the adoption of zoning for the proposed area In substantJa[
compliance with the ordinance wr.lch permits annexation of property at the nearest ~',0r j i,;l:'2ble
zone; under the Yeim Code WhiCh tj-'i8 parties believe is the P.esidentJal Agricuftur'al Zone v,/!th an
RA 5A designation. HIB anr.exa:lon and propo~ed zoning are shown on the attdCtled map
(Exhibit 118"), and
3 Wrlether the City Counc:! will reqL.:lre the assumption of existing Cfty Indebtedness by the area
to be annexed
This page IS one of a group of pages containing Identical text matenal and is intended by the Signers
of thIS NotIce of Intention to be presented and consIdered as one Notice of Intention and may be filed
With the other pages containing additJc~c! signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single
Notice of intention
Owner's Signature (pnnt name
and addre Is
Parcel Number
Date
tt".
217-27-000000
217-26-200000
217-23.-300000
217-- 23-420000
217-23-130000
~ ~d Welcome,~~naging Partner
Thurston Highl'ind Associates
1917 First Avenue
August 28, 1991
S~attlej wA 98101
-.,..,---'.-
"'-~-
~-
-~
*1 TI='Tf~L F i~!:lE 1:w :::\ j
~j 1 i I L=t 1- Iv1 } II
~~
-~~
~
---':)NI 'S1:l33NlDN3 DNUlnSNO:J N3SnltHDI:llt8 I
':i
<
-1
~%-
.~~
4:: -"
-0
li.'
~
<C ~~:
w
c:: t
0-,
o <t
<( Ou
-(I)
Z
C 0 ~O
-
w t:c
(/) U'~ ~~ N
0 >< ~~) ~~~.~
a. w ..(. ~~<St
0 z <$tO '
a: z '" 0
" , a.. <C 0
r
:~ . ~
\;,
~~
-~~
~
--- "::>N I 'S1:J33t,m:>N::fDNU 10SNO:) N3SnVH~1:JV8
.
~
'"
-J
~%
,~~
4: ---
-0
ll'
~
( ~~:
<t
w
0: t
o <l:
<J: Ou
-(J)
Z
C 0 'YO
-
w t:i
en ~~ ~~ N <t
0 >< C')
"4t~> ($.-~~ ~
0- W
0 z ~<YO ~<Y
c: z
~ ~ 0
~ , c- O
,-
~
I!
"'"..
---..--f1
/' "
(~ "J
?~~;/~~
16 August 1990
VENTURE PARTNERS, INC.
610 MARKET SI SUITE 100
KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98033
(206) 822-2275
FAX NO. (206) 827-1566
Yelm city council
Attn: Mayor Robert Sanders
P.O. Box 479
Yelm, WA 98597
Dear Mr. Mayor:
We are contract purchasers of an approximate 220 acre
parcel of property adjacent to and west of the Town of Yelm,
bordering along Berry Valley Road and Longmire street, pres-
ently known as the Henry Dragt Dairy Farm (see attached map
for our location).
It is our intentions to develop this property for single
and multifamily housing with possible golf related recre-
ational facilities.
In order to achieve this goal, it is imperative that we
are granted approval of petition to annex into the Town of
Yelm. Also we respectfully request a revision to the pro-
posed comprehensive YelmjThurston County Zoning Plan. The
proposal as we understand, does not include our parcel. We
strongly feel that since we are adjacent to the city bound-
ary, we should be included within the areas to be considered
for future urban growth. Historically speaking, residential
growth compliments development adjacent to golf courses. Our
parcel therefor would be a natural extension of the existing
residential areas. It is our intentions to request a zoning
classification of R-2.
Since we are new contract purchasers of this property,
our concerns regarding urban growth boundaries and zoning is-
sues are very real. Unfortunately, due to the timing our our
purchase, we were not able to participate in public comment
periods involving boundary and zoning issues. We are not
sure if our inpu't: uIHler t.ile rULe::. uf ~8':1&l !Ji.0':;~S5 Ca:i1 .c'3:
considered at this time.
;de~elY' C(. y~
'll~' h . 'd
Wl lam A. F1S er, Vlce Presl ent
cc: Thurston County Commissioners Diane Overquell, Les
Eldridge & George Barner
Yelm city council members Kathy Wolf, Arnold Drogseth,
Amos Lawton, Martha Parson & Rick Kolilis
1
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENTS
.pqlJ
TI:.L No.
III
T0071:166
~UQ~4~bl~U Hug l~.~V
.
"....<43
P.02
r . 'JL
. ". .- - . '111....
OWtNS DAVIES NHLKIE
^
U
. ,
D 08/16/l9ge 1:1127
YElM JDINT~~N AREA
[JJrnillrPID~ U ill rnUJlU[l]u\Y llmmomrn '
.. ..
... ..
seAL E:
..._,
!
I
I
i
~
"I.
I
i
ii
v j
I ~
f
,. a:;
!.. n
lV
. "~T/
; I VEt-rrU~
~ · ~lNet\~
;PN'Cel-
- i RR 1/6
I
I
t!OO 0
~
UeJO s.ooo 1_
I f
t
NORTH
..!!h
~
"
;
t
RR 112
..
..
~
..
.
...
...
..
:1
..
..
..
WI
In ~ A,...
I
. I
l
.,
I
)
),
II ..
or
'.
.1.......1..........
,
JOtNT P1.ANNt!'fa AflEA
ZONING DOUH~ARY
Ul UeJiT INDUSTRIAL
AO: ARl'Q'mAL OOMMEAC1AL
RR3 RURAL RebtDENTIAL (UNIT8IACRE>
6A: 8UUURUAN R~~I~NTIAL iVNIT,,'ACRe)
MDft t.tIiOIUM oeNIlfTY RIIIOINTI...L (UNITS/ACRE>
"_"_--1"'"
1
,.
YEL'" OITY 1..1 MITI
A NEtGHBORHOOO CONVENIENce
COMhH!RCIAL.
* TllI, aff" 't ,utJ!tot 'Cl ohlll\ge to 'SR. upon anllabJllty of Yelm II1111t1 '.Nlc...
1 [ I V -- - -.
.~ ,I
-
. .
\.
11_"" t-rO..
TOTAL p.e2
PAGE.002
RUG 16 · 90 16: 14
..
..... ~~'-
o
o
Co
HILLIER &. SCHEIBMEIR, P.S.
WilLIAM T HilLIER
MARK C SCHEIBMEIR
299 N W CENTER STREET
POBOX 939
CHEHALIS. WASHINGTON 98532
TELEPHONE 748-3386
AREA CODE 206
WilLIAM C BOEHM
of Counsel
August 15, 1990
Yelm City Council
Yelm City Hall
P. O. Box 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
Re: Henry Dragt/Annexation of Property to
the City of Yelm
Dear Councilmembers:
Please be advised that this office represents Henry
Dragt, the owner of property being proposed for annexation
to the City of Yelm. On behalf of Mr. Dragt, we wish to
notify the City Council for the City of Yelm that our client
is in approval for his land to be annexed to the City,
provided, however, that certain conditions be met.
Those conditions include the following: Mr. Dragt is
agreeable to the annexation of his property if the
annexation will result in the property being zoned either
"R1" or "R2". A further condition Mr. Dragt would place
upon his agreement to this annexation is the recognition
that the existing agricultural use, which would necessarily
be an existing nonconforming use, would continue to be
allowed for so long as Mr. Dragt, or his successors and
assigns, would desire to use the property for farming or
other agricultural purposes.
Assuming these conditions are met, Mr. Dragt then joins
in the petition for the annexation of his property to the
City of Yelm. Mr. Dragt understands that the annexation
into the City of Yelm corporate limits will allow the City
of Yelm to supply water, sewer, and other utilities to the
annexed property. He agrees to participate in the upgrading
of facilities, as necessary, to facilitate this annexation
petition.
,. CJ. ....D.
o
o
t>
Yelm City Council
August 15, 1990
Page 2
Re: Henry Dragt/Annexation of Property to
the City of Yelm
If we can be of any further assistance, please let us
know. Any prior correspondence from this office in this
regard should be ignored, as this is the true intent of Mr.
Dragt.
Very truly yours,
HILLIER ~~CHEIBMEIR' P~S.
I d '\~:Ih
By I '\ ~ 0,)\: r.\
I J'l ,/, 111\ \
! '\ '\ ~ J I ('J
WilliL~ 1 ~ Hill:~r' I
WTH:tl
cc: Mr. Henry Dragt
- ~-,---- ~-
~,
,--)
-" -~,--'- ~ -~~ ----- - ~
.~. 0
?~L~
\
\ - .
\\ C-J&~f)e~ia__~)~~~r !lMA-r~==-
\\ Z Ii J-- /1 A ^" 111/'
~--:'6r-
----\;I~~~.
\c\ '} 1'hn1~A- ~~f[JJ~1
---------v\.\ ~r-p{I-f1.vv'--r1 ~~d-If---leS-'2
~G>'~--L- _.. -__..~. if ~ ~-~
~~~~/ ~
__-- \\ I ,-
_______ \\~r;~J)f"nJ:-}lg~.-f)~~!J~~j(J~
~\. tPa~aOv. _ V -- .----
_~ .r--~
..0--~------r\ .-
~c- ~/.Q1'1~~~
;;: \\ ./7V n^ ",,- r AX1 11~ ----
".,,\\JJ-E ~~-~.-::::==~... ~
~ . ~~ t vu ~
~-~ ~~
\\
\'
\,
\ '
\\I
\' \
<\
"
\\\
~\
\\
--------
--
--
---------------
z
Q
CJ)
a:
w
>
o
en
en
~
I.
ZCOB6 VM "US)!
'S "S^V pUZl5~ZBI
'ON! 'S1:I33NI!;lN3 ONll.lnSNOO N3S0\fHOl:l\f8
~
00(
~
~
~
>-
-
:::J
..,
~~ !
z
c 0
- ~
W ~
(/) O~
0 X \S}4! ~ ~
~ ~ ~"
0.. W > ~~~
0 Z ('.1M
~~ ~ ~-D It /1
a: Z () ./ j f /"SX
O~ )/
a. <:( .....v . ~V
~.
o
\J
The Company has not surveyed the premises described in l-- S 5 b Co ~
The sketch below is furnished without charge solely for the purpose of assisting in
locating said premises and the Company assumes no liability for inaccuracies therein.
It does not purport to show ALL ~ighways, roads and easements adjoining or affecting
said premises.
i
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
\
i
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
,
i
o
tfl
~
/
/1>" " / t>-oof
, p
",
\"' -r- --I '" \
q-.J' ..... \.
....., ,
~~' Q,/
v' 'I '" . ~ ,\/
o e .~. rr; ,...)
(f) -, --:, rh () ~ {.f
,I --;-D 'T 'v \
! /3':> \'^
I
i
r, 0 \ 8 Ii:. I 5 I
..{
I
/
/
.--..-..-.,. ......../
L-ON(',M\PF:
5-,.
P TN. N W YL\ .s E Y.q
5 E c.. c.. ~I 'T W R 17 N R N G- I E W M.
<I
WT I Co. 3 Map Dept. Rel~..........................................................
(!/JU -,~~-~5tw ;--:~ 'J ~~--~-;;:;;~-~;-l ~------
~,,d 'tu7i vi "J -<i/J -1-0 J': ~~ !'-AI",,, ,JlJ "''7 A/At~4-&
7/211l6 - --UJuY fi d~ -JJ-/J t if /J t ...-t" ,//;1. ~ M/c.JL{,j/
PJ&1IIl ~ 0/ d?~ bitAdd AfUj </ .14 /> uti /; M/Jl/
4JLd."""- reM. -1 J'_ t!;t L1I "'- i IV ..;1;. /wu,) 0 -'<J aJ fi~
-4i rJj /"l t fA /J.- LY!1u J.-J& :UJ Jul f ,P-- 11Jv., ~ ~tfuA1::j
Jf}A) .411 i ~fJiJ ~1. ./uwL ~. bLl~/Vt vciJif.L;~!-it/-
-...
o
o
..
Yelm Chamber of Commerce
Helpmg to shape Yelm's future
August 5, 1990
George Barner
Diane Oberquell
Les Eldridge
Thurston County Commissioners
Thurston County Courthouse
2000 Lakeridge Dr
Olympia, WA 98502
Dear Commissioners
Approximately two years ago the city of Yelm initiated a joint planning
process with Thurston County to establish an orderly and progressive
approach to the inevitable growth affecting Yelm and its surrounding "sphere
of influence" This planning process is in concert with a Comprehensive
Plan which Yelm developed in 1985 to provide for a progressive
infrastructure to serve the desires of the majority of the citizens of Yelm In
the way of quality residential areas, community service areas and
development of a local employment base.
Since then, the city administration, staff, planning committee members,
residents, and the business commumty have been working to achieve the
goals of the Comprehensive Plan which culminated in the forming of the
Yelm/Thurston County Joint Planning Committee. The Chamber has been
following closely the proposed development by Thurston Highland &
Associates of their 1200 acre project consisting of 1600 residential homes and
two PGA golf courses. Their latest actions have been to acquire the property
and file with the city of Yelm for annexation
The Yelm City Council appears wIlling to expand the growth boundary of the
joint plan to include the area scheduled for development by Thurston
Highland & Associates. (Incidentally, thIS appears to be a more natural
boundary line as it takes in the land to the boundary of Ft. Lewis.)
The potential action of the council to expand the boundary appears to be in
conformance with the Urban Growth Bill's intent for long term planning as
passed by the legislature and accommodates the present annexation request.
The city has agreed to study the annexation in a favorable light if the
-
o
o
I>
developers adhere to the city's development standards and criteria. The Yelm
Chamber has been following these developments closely as it relates to our
growth and economic welfare.
The reason I am writing to you at this time is to voice our concern regarding
the reportedly unfavorable comments made by your planning staff regarding
the proposed annexation area. It is our understanding that the planning staff
does not intend to recommend that the Yelm boundary be extended to
include this proposed residential area.
At this time the Chamber has not had an opportunity to fully review these
new events but in preparation of doing so, I need to know your views and
any points of issue concerning the reasons why the planning commission
would object to the city's determination to accommodate growth in and near
Yelm.
Sincerel y,
~h1c-l< C ~ II
Patricia C. Lall~
President
".
o
o
August 1, 1990
'10: Ute Allen, Vice-Chair, Thurston County Planning Commission
FRCM: Shelly Badger, Staff, Yelm City Hall
RE: July 19, 1990 meeting with Thurston County Planning staff
Those present: Harold Robertson, Fred Knotsman, Kathleen Burgess, Todd
Starrm, Gene Borges, Shelly Badger and a woman that I did not get a name
of (will get from Todd).
Purpose of meeting was to discuss the annexation request by Thurston
Highland & Associates to the City of Yelm and how it will be handled in
regards to the Yelm/Thurston County Joint Plan.
Harold stated that the amendment of the urban growth area boundary around
Yelm and the annexation request would be handled simultaneously, however,
an amendment must be approved by Thurston County and may be very
difficult (Harold: "I am highly skeptical of the project") to include
the area proposed by Thurston Highland & Associates.
Harold stated that he was against the annexation request and the
development proposed by Thurs ton Highland. Gene asked why, what are the
negative impacts that can be given at this time? Only reason given was
that the Thurston County Comprehensive Plan policy does not urbanize
southern Thurston County, therefore the request is inconsistent with the
comprehensive plan.
Gene asked Harold & Fred the following: If the County denies the
annexation request, would they allow the development to happen in
Thurston County? Fred: Yes, on 1 to 5 acre lots. Gene: Would golf
courses and carrnercial areas be allowed? Fred: Possibly, yes, with a
special use permit and rezone request. Result: A second city just
outside of Yelm.
Gene asked those in attendance if they had any suggestions to assist Yelm
economically, if they would not allow quality development to be part of
Yelml s corporate limits. Gene mentioned cost-sharing with Thurston
County due to Yelm's small city limit population (1450) in relationship
to the large population served by Yelm (10,000).
If annexation and amendment to the Yelm/Thurston County Joint Plan were
considered, Thurston County staff stated that there would be a joint lead
agency status between Thurston County and Yelm, with Thurston County
taking the lead. Statement by Harold: Even after a favorable
environmental review process, Thurston County Planning staff may still
recommend denial to the Thurston County Commissioners.
Todd stated that the developer would have to persuade Thurston County
that the development would be a benefit to South County.
In conclusion, County staff asked that Yelm adopt the Yelm/Thurston
County Joint Plan (after settling the difference on the urban growth
boundary between the present proposed line versus Yelm's 1985 established
Sphere of Influence) and then deal with an amendment to include Thurston
Highlands in the Yelm urban growth boundary. Statements made earlier
I
".
o
o
lead Yelm staff to believe this amendment probably would never happen.
The following day, at a workshop of the Thurston County Board of
Conmissioners, after the Thurston County staff report on the meeting, a
Conmissioner stated: if we are going to deny the amendment to the plan
and the annexation request, why are we stringing Yelm along'?
At the July 25, 1990 meeting of the Yelm City Council, they made the
following motion:
Rick Kolilis moved to table the approval of the YelmjThurston County
Joint Plan until the Yelm City Council and Thurston County Conmissioners
meet in a workshop to discuss the following in regards to the joint plan:
1. To review and agree upon urban growth boundary lines outside of Yelm
city limits.
2. To discuss and agree upon the specifics as to how and why an
amendment could or should be made to the urban growth boundary lines.
The motion was seconded by Martha Parsons. Motion carried, with Kathy
Wolf abstaining.
o
o
Land Use & WCM
Development
ConsultatlOn
A DivIsion of Kramer Chin & M3YO Inc
July 31, 1990
/3P4 ~dv
~Sl- dL/tj7rJ
SE
Jeffrey Price
15128 Longmire St
Yelm, \vA 98597
RE City of Yelm Annexation
You may have learned from the news that on July 12, 1990, the Yelm City
Council has accepted the annexation request from the Thurston Highland
Associates, owner of the 1,200-acre site formerly the Weyerhaeuser
property We are the consultant to the owner
The attached map shows the proposed area to be annexed and when approved
by all government agencies involved, this will be the new city boundary
Your property marked in blue is within the proposed boundary
We would like to extend to you the opportunity to participate in the
annexation and to become part of the new City of Yelm A petition is
enclosed for your signature if you choose to do so Please make a copy
for your records and return the original to this office for processing
The Washington State law on annexation requires only 75 percent of the
properties in assessed value within the annexed area to participate If
you are not sure about the annexation or have questions regarding the
process, the City Clerk, Shelly Badger, has prepared copies of the
regulation regarding this subject
We plan to have the application process completed by mid August and would
appreciate it if you would sign the petition within the next week We
look forward to your favorable response
Sincerely,
Dennis T Su, AlA
Attachment
1917 First Avenue Seattle Washington 98101 (206) 443-3537 Fax (206) 443-5372
(\
o
-c
/}- /f/\ 0 ::]
~, ~
, ~. lr~~~,11v-~Y1z,~
~,_ ~~. {~M tawcM;. jet-_~~
L.,~" ~ <1, (. I
!dfL{,_ _ e::s 0 llM1 7J7..- ,...
c
I
I
II
I
11
O ,~
. ~~
~~ ~~M~~ . 1/Z5~o
\~ / ~5-ffi-
ra.rll:~~lkuJ ~~I~S1 ~~ ~ ~,'e4 to
~W'. ~/
~luv)nL'io-. -' } blJh~~ iYl~ecut erF-
~~
~ .f~
. JL<;;bO/:ODU3Wl<&~ VVOjrli1ll3<- 2,yvql -4<J ~ew.t~
~~la lie {'67<cl ~ rLCQY~_ct ~k :p~yY\0At4 ~ IOD} bOO
\ 1-
--C~ I i"l~ra?3 I ~Ilt'-.fh ~~&"1!1GO
I I . ~t~lJlllL1Y-~
s :-n &L-hruL~1S\r-~lT-CIDiLlse-_.
! ~ Cu.ae - 2 o:s--anM~-1:Mh , ~lk ~ I YL
/ ; tl-ar~'
~ Ctn,.;tJ. ~ I Y,-. f'>-._C r,V'Cvbci~
~~1-4l3) w~ CjtfjD1 [(Ie.. ~
I
rvb-!~~_j?h~_~~~S '
I
I
II
r-',
"--~
G
, .~
.~
__________ \\1
\\
\'
\\
< '-a~J .JJr ~.~..J~/~O ~ ~-~
\V"III~~l<i> ttt- .J'J~/// /'
~,cL ~~-)~-Ui k.hrfl2~) ~-f1,v(~
II ~l/j'>rJ;J:kLJmmvn;
I
i ~lv~ . ~ ~~~-84!-aA ~~
~ t~-VlC- -
--- I / ~i ~!dmt~p:;;~-r;:: ~ ~vr~ fW~
lVMl Jrt- ~ 11111.
+~JtuyL~~~/
I -
C k~~7 -
Wr -~"--M~~
, - - -u.mMa
-~ livvn~~~J1~l~ Ie ~~
h1L !~
. lil~r~-t ~ ~ur-~W:~-~-t<~~
I' . It - \'1iFYY\"'9
~0Q I~~l ~ Ml~i ~~J)!W4
~ u-
J ~
I ~~~L . fM~'U~ ~'
00' I~~ Vp-j IMMhl~~ !L Ily"-Cnct-
~ ~~'
7; !11~d hv- I
-=-UML ~I . ~ ~f:; ~ ~ . F'N16/2~- ~(;;J;Li~ ,t;;
~WL<-G$ ~c.~~aLf-q~~ ~~_EK--Ih14-L~~ '
~
o
i! ~"
c
/'",\
\"--'/'
-Cl1fL,illf1bk-~-MuJ~ ~ l"'tan<;t5~!~ 'f11, Pfl'~-
I
I ~flA1.JDd t!S -~ t10(hl~ Lea.cL
!I ~ ~A >A/I __..4
. -\Mtr--f~~
: t!P-A~
I! ~M ~_
:~~~ ~~S. Uh1vU~~
II ~~ l1J!Wltt~~~ luu1 '
-4Qrli !I (!JUA- ~ V ~ O~)&~- k1s :
- ~~1~~ ~tL ~ '1ud17 ~,tM /
,/'C X' ~II ~ ~. _~ dt -. --c--~~-
\,J if!f P~) t. &~, ~ 7."~~OS~
II, f !X_fA_S5UiJLLi-. ;x411z ..-c- ~~ ~J-
~ V ~cl--1hJlOO- fiJf,jf1, 1M"h\ ~ ~ 0-5 ~ >Y'tJv--r
F-~OIM-_~ -
-~~ ~. fiiMfO- Tpm
/fJi!1/ I fiPr ~ >L t1tiLU1J1~J3:1!Jd: 14~tW-Cfl-~
I~__~~~~k < .
_~~~ ~._ .~itlLVP-rfJ;;~!lff~ it2. 0/
CJ~ II, VA;. .~~tiJa_. ~. ~V-!tjl;uu; ~
~ I ~fYJfJ-~~~d~lM~ /nU.S{- ~
l.:m ~ u_f--'I104-QrLtlJ>>11af_n::Md . G
l~ ,
d ..
~
ktrL
~
( ,
o
\.,./
(----..
V
f\
"--J
~
I~~~~~ ~~~.~
II {_Ll~d&L Jwijl1f ~-Ll '
II .. ~-~_W~ ~ l""'~~~OY>HG
! ')IS1~-4~1f-_- 6VWlf~~~~
! ~~1lKI
I
, I
II
1'_ -~oJnW1 {1M M>~~~' :
II
II (~~~3~i1l1tdLffLL~71AL .
I /wiVl~~ 1; {OJIL~-~ ~ ~
I'). Q~ 'tIS g:;J ~, /WWlIHuL
I 4. ~tJlk'--CbrJ-4-~- t1l- Wnudzf
! Lv~ >-~~
16~~~f - .
~ utff).-~[jLOi'! e~ IJr'rrvH#l
11 j!J-+-1-_~~_ll.t!b^.ilL4Ltf1&{}LI& P2iJ/~ldC;.
1ijJ!1IL-Ct1'Jf1li~ -UOOllJfll~l2bLc ~1M{JpLeeL.
I
I
II
~
III
o
BARGHAOSEN CONSULTING ENGINEER'S, INC_
. . .
U'/lb/l':'':::Il:1 l~ -,
- U t-KU1'1 tiHKllHHU:::.t::.N t::.Nlll Nt::.t::.,..,.~
14::'C;l4-J4C;l t-' l:::11
-
"Land Planning, $ufV'ey,and Design Specialists"
" . FAGSIMILE C9V~R SHpET
*
,(0 C4v9
9 \7"
~f ~t'
/. C)q/ 4(0
x. ~.
~
>--
DATE.
-:z I J t> ! qO .
?(p~':1"
OUR JOB NO'
.
TO~ G.1!....h~ ~l.466.
C~\-1'''' of- y~
"
FAX NO:
(
1 ..q~fb .. 4~1'~
COMMENTS: ~f"'~ J "".6-' ~~ ~k...s-~ ~() ~ I:>oi.\-6-
~p ~~6"'f"" ~-C,~~ -10 --r~ ~~@
~~N~AJt.\~ ~ ~ ~"t'1 C-:oV\"'-I(..}l... ~t-6oPc ~...x.. --rt\-,~
1.1..p N"C Y ~(.. 1'"1~'1't...x. VJ\"1' ~ -n-\te.. c.:O\.('hJ1"l A~t:> ~...As.<! f.A.S
\~ -rt'\GP.6. u.l. ~ j f(l.Q 0<...6H c;... \N E tJ e~ -r~o;o f'4-~ t=o
2-QM",<:. <:"Oa.>..............,o ~l$&.-&- ~c:.'SO -.
. . .
NO. PAGES (Including Cover Sheet). 'Z-.
NOTE: If you do not receive all the ptlges indlcated, pl~c contact:
BARGHAUSEN
. CoNSULTING
ENGINEERS, INC.
"lAND PLANNING.
SURVEY, AND DESIGN
SPECIALISTS"
GARY Y. LEE
F'IartnGr
t$21S 72ncI Avvnuv Soutl'I
K.nt. W8l5hIngtQn 9llO32
(roe) 251-6t22
Fax No: (~) 251-8782
G1-22
~._- - ....,"''''---9R032~(206) 251--6222
,
)
0" ~,.. ,~, .. .~~....., ...., ,"'.. ,..........,'~
fU OJUly
4 -,.-'U-,.~....,.W r. t:..J.:::.
11, 1990 VERSI
,
-
-
.
I
_t--
,
1
I
I
- I
... .. t..
!
r--'l i -~
!. I ...
I .!~
....
-
i>f
.
-+
I
c;:.
I
,
I
I
,
,
I
I
" :
<f _ .!
.---,~
,'. !f.;:~}jg
-
---------~--------~-----
,
j
I
I
I
,
.,.
,
I
I
I ;
_26i2.? --- _-1. _ ___,
35 36
j
I
~~~
j'
I
J
.
t
I I ~ 1
,L~_-__L___~~ 3.
36 3'
--..~..,.
..
co
MINl1IES ~ '\
CITY OF YEIM REGUI.AR axJNCIL MEE'l\J
WEDNESDAY, JULY 11, 1990, 7:30 IM, YEIM CITY HALL
The regular meeting was called to order at 7 30 I'M. All present joined in
the flag salute.
Councilmernbers present: Ka thy Wolf, Amos Lawton, Arnold Drogseth, Martha
Parsons and Rick Kolilis. Staff Daisy Lawton, Shelly Badger, Gene
Borges and Glenn Dunnam. Visitors: Judy Zinmennan, Don Miller, Krag
unsoeld and Arm Watanabe (both of the Puget Sound Water Quality
Authority), Michael Greco, Lloyd & Jan Reichel and Harry Lewis.
The evening I s agenda was approved on a motion by Martha Parsons, second by
Arnold Drogseth.
The minutes of the June 27, 1990 Regular Council Meeting were approved on
a motion by Rick Kolilis, second by Kathy Wolf. Motion carried.
Vouchers numbered 8092 through 8173 totaling $38,520.08 were approved on a
motion by Arnold Drogseth, second by Martha Parsons. Motion carried
Current: $ 7,997.36
Police: $ 7,911.95
Water: $ 6,425.49
Street: $ 5,217.49
Garbage: $ 8,049.61
Art. Street: $ 773.06
1990 Water Construction $ 2,145 12
'IDI'AL :
$38,520.08
Harry Lewis was present to discuss retention of the Burlington Northern
Railroad fran Yelm Avenue north. He explained the history of the railroad
use in Yelm and that currently he has been working with Select Wood
Products and Burlington Northern to establish rail service for the
industry Mr. Lewis stressed that he feels the City of Yelm has an
excellent chance to retain railroad service as he has been meeting with
Burlington Northern in recent months. Mr. Lewis sugges ted that the City
of Yelm concentrate their efforts to retain the valuable rail service that
will aid in industrial growth by following the below recommendations:
1 Increase the volume of the railroad usage
2 Pursue a strong continuing effort to encourage support from
all available sources
3. The City Council should provide the leadership for the corrmunity
to maintain the railroad.
Mr Lewis suggested that an ad hoc corrmittee be formed, chaired by a Yelm
City Council Member, with staff support, members fran private industry and
elected officials (Port of Olympia, Thurston County Commissioners,
adjoining cities Mayors, Deparbrent of Transportation. etc.) to educate
the corrmunity about the positive affects of maintaining rail service in
Yelm and to work with industry to utilize the valuable resource
Rick Kolilis moved to
chair and aid in the
Wolf. Motion carried
the committee.
direct Mayor Sanders to appoint a Councilmernber to
setup of a "railroad corrmittee", second by Kathy
Councilwoman Wolf volunteered to serve as chair of
Krag Unsoeld and Arm Watanabe, both staff to the Puget Sound Water Quality
Authority were present to explain the "Draft 1991 Puget Sound Water
Quality Authority Managarent Plan". Public comments on the draft will be
received through July 20, 1990. The Puget Sound Water Quality Authority
was established in 1985 to serve as the coordinator for the regulatory
agencies and to prepare the overall framework within which the
regulatory agencies develop the specific rules and regulations
Krag Unsoeld highlighted the changes in the draft plan
1. The plan serves as the federal conservation and rranagement plan
to canply with the Federal Clean Water Act.
2. Provides for non-wetland habitat protection and preservation
3. The plan encourages proper use and disposal of pesticides and
provides for education elements
4 Establishes the Puget Sound Foundation, a state-operated
non-profit entity to serve as an envirorunental education outreach.
Ann watana0"-'Thli9hted how the plan and the ~ ,",Sound Water Quality
Authority aL'b'--.--'"ying to coordinate efforts to rreet0~rements of House
Bill 2929 (Growth Bill):
1 Stonnwater control program proposes that local gove:rnrrents
develop strategies and local ordmances to deal with stonnwater.
Integrate the stonnwater element into the city's comprehensive
plan.
2 Wetlands program will require that local gove:rnrrents adopt
minimum standards (developed by Department of Ecology) to protect
wetlands and critical areas.
3. Fish & wildlife habitat program (non-wetland): In participation
with the state and federal gove:rnrrent encourage that local
governments identify critical habitat and make decisions on how to
manage them on a regional basis.
4. Non-pomt source pollution control: In addition to stonnwater
control, the plan encourages a planning element for non-point
pollution.
5. Point source pollution program: Plan calls for increased
monitoring and public participation during the permit process.
Krag explained some of the funding sources that Puget Sound Water Quality
Authority is proposing to raise the revenue (approximately 8.5 million
dollars) needed to fund the program and to allow the program to offer
grants to assist local governments in meeting the requirements:
1. Conmercial marine fuel tax at .04c per gallon
2. Motor vehicle fuel tax charged to the manufacturers of auto-
mobiles at .07% tax on value of car
3. Increase rate for food, fish and shellfish tax to 5.35% uniform
rate
4. Increase the lease-hold excise tax (in 12 Puget Sound counties)
to 7%, which is a fee paid in lieu of property tax by private lessors
of public lands.
Departrrent of Ecology is proposing the following fees to assist in the
implementation of environmental control issues:
1. Non-point pollution control fee of at least $12.00 annually on
all parcels of land except designated "open space" lands
2. $75.00 annual "avoidable" surcharge levied against property
owners with septic tanks or own livestock. Avoidable if belong
to septic tank utility with annual maintenance and inspections
and if livestock owners adopt best management practices
3. $6.00 annual avoidable fee for all lands in a stormwater
management area, as soon as the stonnwater management plan is
developed, the fee becorres avoidable.
The above Department of Ecology fees would raise approximately 10-12
million dollars, with 85% of the money to go to local governments for non-
point pollution control.
Judy Zimnennan, citizen, was present to express concern over the clear-
cutting of property and specifically rrentioned an incident in the Bald
Hills where wildlife was lost from the clear-cutting She expressed that
she feels strongly that citizens should take a stand to support ecological
balance and integrity and that timber be logged in a thoughtful manner.
She asked that the Yelm City Council take a stand on the issue.
Councilman Drogseth stated that since the mcident occurred in
unincorporated Thurston County, that the matter be brought to their
attention. Councilwoman Wolf and Councilman Lawton expressed their
sympathy, but stated that as a Council, they could not take a stand on an
issue outside their jurisdiction. Councilwanan Wolf stressed that a
"grassroots movement" to educate property owners would be valuable.
Lloyd & Jan Reichel were present with a complaint regarding the unpaid
utility bills of some of their rental tenants that have been forwarded
to them for payrrent. The City of Yelm has forwarded the unpaid bills to
Mr. Reichel as per RCW #35.21.290, which states that the City shall have a
lien against the premises to which water service was furnished. Amos
Lawton directed staff to research and bring forth a reconmendation on a
possible utility deposit increase to cover the larger bills, i e. those
customers who have a garbage container, and to check with other cities on
the amount of their utility deposits, second by Rick Kolilis. Motion
carried. Rick Kolilis moved to direct Kathy Wolf, City Hall Liaison, to
rreet with staff to access the delinquent accounts and to assist in the
recommendat~'~n a possible deposit
Motion carrie~
increase, (\~"'lnd by Kathy Wolf
U
Rick Kolilis moved to deny the Koprek claim at this time, as presented,
second by Amos Lawton. Motion carried.
Council supported the hiring of Neil Aaland, to provide planning seIVices
to the City of Yelm, on an "needs" basis, $25.00 per hour, to assist the
City in rreeting the requirements of the new growth bill and to aid in the
planning needed for the proposed Thurston Highland & Associates annexation
and developnent.
Yelm Historic Master Plan proposal Gene Borges explained that
approximately one year ago, the Nisqually River Council budgeted and
received monies for a grant to the Yelm Historical Society, but Yelm was
not ready at that time. The grant money is available again this year for
the Yelm Historical Society to hire a consultant to prepare a
"canprehensive historic master plan" that will be used to obtain funding
for a Yelm Museum and Interpretive Center (of the Nisqually Basin) Total
needed money is $10,000, grant YoDuld be for $5,000, with a %5,000 local
match (Yelm Historical Society has approximately $2,000 raised to date,
the remainder YoDuld be raised fran community donations). Martha Parsons
moved to support and act as the lead agency on the planning grant request,
second by Amos Lawton. Motion carried.
Rick Kolilis moved to adopt Ordinance #380, amending the canpensation paid
to Yelm Municipal Court Judges Pro Tempore to $35.00 per hour for attorney
judges pro tempore, $8.00 per hour for non-attorney judges pro tempore,
second by Kathy Wolf. Motion carried.
Yelm City Council received papeTh'Ork that the Friend & Rikalo, Inc. claim
had been dismissed and settled.
Yelm/Thurston County Joint Plan Council received letters to date
regarding the joint plan. Staff rret with Todd Starrm, Thurston County
Planner and went over all the comments and requests for zone changes from
the June 20, 1990 Public Hearing and letters received. Staff will canpile
the comments and bring forth recommendations to the Yelm City Council and
Thurston County Commissioners for their review.
Yelm Planning Committee Special Meeting of July 10, 1990 Rick Kolilis
reported on the special rreeting that was held to discuss and review the
Thurston Highlands annexation petition sent to the City of Yelm. After
staff review of the boundaries, a recommended boundary (marked as Option
A) was presented to the Planning Committee which runs south fran 93rd
Ave. following the Yelm High School boundary, then west and south along
the borders of the Purvis property; then encompasses the Thurston Highland
parcel and heads east and back to the city limits following the southern
boundary of the Dragt and Brown property. MarION: Kathy Wolf moved to
accept the Yelm Planning Committee's recommendation to approve of the
Option A (as described above) Thurston Highland & Associates annexation
boundary and grant approval for the City of Yelm and Thurston Highland &
Associates to begin annexation proceedings. Motion seconded by Kathy
Wolf. Rick Kolilis abstained. Motion carried with all other
Councilmembers voting yes.
The following correspondence was received by the Council:
1. First Community Bank ribbon-cutting and grand opening -
July 20, 1990
2. Letter from Thurston County Board of Commissioners regarding
growth management
3. Departrrent of Community Development - Growth Management
legislation information
4. Thurston County Board of Freeholders upcaning rreeeting dates
With no further business, the rreeting adjourned on a motion by Martha
Parsons, second by Kathy Wolf. Meeting adjourned at 9 50 FM
ATl'EST
Shelly A. Badger
City Clerk
Robert A. Sanders
Mayor
I
o
WD of elm
,.
:"\.
~\>\>
s~
~
YELM
WABM'NDTON
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washinqton 98597
206-458-3244
\
\
CITY OF
PUBLIC NOTICE
YELM PLANNING COMMITTEE
SPECIAL MEETING
The Yelm Planning Committee has called a Special Meeting
to be held on Tuesday, July 10, 1990 at 4:00 p.m. at Yelm
City Hall, 10S Yelm Ave. W. to discuss the annexation
petition of Thurston Highland and Associates.
ATTEST: Shelly A. Badger, City Clerk
Published: Nisqually Valley News, Thursday, July 5, 1990.
o
o
r
LAND DESCRIPTIDN
YELM ANNEXATION
ALTERNATIVE NO 1
JUNE 25, 1990
Section 27. Township 17 North. Range 1 East.
All of Section 27
Section 26, Township 17 North. Range 1 East
West half of Section 26
Section 23 Township 17 North. Range 1 East
The Northeast quarter of Section 23, EXCEPT 93rd Avenue S E
The Southwest quarter of Section 23,
The West half of the Southeast quarter of Section 23
Section 24, Township 17 North, Range 1 East.
The South half of the Northeast quarter of Section 24,
The West 906 6 feet of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of
Section 24, EXCEPT 93rd Avenue S E
PROJECT YELM PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
3687 04
,
\
\
JUN 26 '90 11 33
206 251 8782 PAGE 003
J
o
o
LAND DESCRIPTION \
YEW ANNEXATION
ALTERNATIVE NO.1. BOUNDS DESCRr~TION
JUNE 25, 1990
Alternative 1 - Bounds Description
A tract of land being all of Section 27, and parts of Sections 23, 24, and 26,
all in Township 17 North, Range 1 East, Willamette Meridian, Thurston County,
Washington, being more particularly described as follows
~~
BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of said Section 27,
THENCE West along the North line of said Section 27, to the Northwest corner
thereof;
THENCE South along the West lineaf said Section 27, to the Southwest corner
thereof,
THENCE East along the South line of said Section 27 to the Southeast corner
thereof. said point also being .the Southwest corner of the aforementioned
Section 26,
THENCE East along the South line of said Section, 26 to the South quarter
corner of said Section 26,
THENCE North along the North-South centerline of said Section 26, to the North
quarter corner of said Section 26, said corner also being the South quarter
corner of the aforementioned Section 23,
THENCE East along the South line of said Section 23 to the Southeast corner of
the West half of the Southeast quarter of said Section 23,
THENCE North along the East line of the West half of the Southeast quarter of
said Section 23, to the East~West centerline of said Section 23,
THENCE East along said East-West centerline to the East quarter corner of 'said
Section 23, said corner also being the West quarter corner of the afore-
mentioned Section 24,
THENCE East along the East-West centerline of said Section 24 to the center of
said Section 24,
THENCE North along the North-South centerline of said Section 24, to the
Northeast corner of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said
Section 24,
THENCE West along the North line of said Southeast quarter of the Northwest
quarter to the Northwest corner of said Southeast quarter of Northwest
quarter;
THENCE West along the North line of tho Southwest quarter of the Northwest
quarter of said Section 24, to the East line of' the West 906 6 feet of the
Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 24,
THENCE North along said East line to the South line of 93rd Avenue S.E ,
THENCE West along said South line to the East line of the aforementioned
Section, 23,
THENCE CONTINUING West along said South line to the North-South centerline of
said Section 23,
THENCE South along said North-South centerline to the center of said
Section 23,
THENCE West along the East-West centerline of said Section 23, to the West
quarter corner of said Section 23,
THENCE South along the West line of said Section 23 to the Southwest corner of
said Section 23, said corner also being the NQrtheast corner of Section 27 and
the POINT OF BEGINNING
PROJECT
3687 01
YELM PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
,
\
'6 t.. ..
.-...a. '"~.
~-~.~
: ~'
o
;
I \\\ \ ~ _ ~ ~ . I ~-_I:- ~:::
I . ,J' 7. \ ~_ . ., 1 I ,
I ,. ~ \_ f- I " .. I' .)
I ). \ ~ \ _......-- ' ".
. I 4-- 6.l~~'-- ......-.....-'\......-----...-- " t.-'-,- -,.. - . ..i
_-*-t--__-_-_Mllf' (~ J\ I -....r ....- Il .,.1
" . ' ,-' ",
.' . It" ,,>,
I ~ 1\ ~ . ~ ,\' I I '1 I '\(-; ~ 'I!
\ . 0\; () \ <>.. \ ~~ ~ ~, '1.'.
\ l' \, ~ . ' ":--''; '. ' \..T-, ! r, ,.~{~
~ \ I. .r<:< ,...",1
\ 'N' :;\']'
I - \" ;.i " \ · #",:
\ \ . \ _ I t.
\ \. . \. · ~ \- . f~ .' \",.'.
I . \ \ I I\!.\.
\ \ . . I;, . .*--- \,~( ~
--........--.-",.
.. \ 1_-'- I~
____- _--------------~r
-' . -"
\ .' ' ~., \. co,
\ " \ ;:.>':;
" . ;-';.
, ~~
\ ~ : I '" . , ' ..
\ . '" _ ill 'i', \ ~ - . - L
\ L. . ,,' ~.~.\.~,.\7.1 ..:\..,: ~~
---.--- ~--_.- .' '
._.' "'. ~ . c.-. ",. ;
, t' . i' ~ \ ,-. It' .. , '
I I __' - _-.-----r-, ,.!.' \' \ \. --
~. \ ,-', ~ ;" ~, \ ~
" ~ '~' tie
""~.. . . " \; . . - .
"'> . l' \ - '~. -1 ~,~. \ \.\. , \
~~ ..,' .__- ..._........ , .J
._-~ ~~___._ {[. t \ " . t" -.' ,~~"
~~ ~7' t '\ . ' I ..-l \ t ..~' ~I'
'}J' ", ,+, \.' ~\ t
~ ,~_.' __- .. __ I \ ," '\ t I
8 - ""'~.~ --..:~ \ · ~ - \ 'r. - \ \'
,,"';&,. ,~\ 1-' ,
I \ I ':~~ 'r-L \ ~ '1 ' ;. ' '. ~
\ \ \ '..~ "~>' - - . \ '\ I, \ ,,' ,
'~"'-" " - \ ' · ., \. - ~
\ ,\ I \;~ ri"',' I ~"'\ ,,' '\
\ r \ \'-~~._ _,\.-,......-.-.\.- ..,'-' )' 'r .,. 1 \
\.._._._-~ ,_ ~ \ , \ '. ~ I
. ~\ \ \. I~ I I \ - ~' I :.. -II
\ ,\ l \ '" ~ \L4. Y .'ri.....)~' r'.~ '1\
\ ---' \, \ \ " '/ ';ji{j<' . . '- '.
\\ ' " T I \, ' - ., , \.1,;\ ' I~.'u;" ~.,,, ~...., I
. I , ~ ~"'" ;rk~' r!..t>>'II' lr7,0' j
I \' '1 ,~ ',~ ~ ;...;" ~ "'" j,<:"',:"" I '" ""'I: ,Jn/l; - "'-
'J:. \~. I -F\ I -to \'1~.' ,\ I \. '\ ,...~ \Go\', - "\ ,,;P' '''f; ~ 'I
1 ' .,..\'1 hi. .' -' ~ \::S ,,-, '1':' -ze.
,,-~
200'39tld
28L.8 '~2 9C""~'\
_ lJ.> .:i '1 ~
--
.
\
-
~
\
.
~ ,...
'V
-r-~
,t.~
tf,:,\l
~..y'\l
-
-
..
--_._-,-,--~--
..
o
o
Joe and Nancy Huddleston
AMBLE\lVOOD
14129 93rd Ave. SE
Yelm, WA 98597-9707
July 5, 1990
Gene Borges, City Administrator
City of Yelm
105 Yelm Avenue W.
Yelm, WA 98597
Dear Gene,
After Nancy and I had the discussion with you on the evening of July 3, we
rechecked the notice that Shelly had mailed. That notice announced the
special meeting of July 10 to discuss the annexation petition of Thurston
Highland and Associates. The notice included a map and legal description
of the sections and quarter sections Thurston Highlands is petitioning the
city to annex. Both the map and the legal descriptions include almost 3/4
of a mile along and south of 93rd Ave., including our 6.2 acres. Clearly
there is no mistaking the intent of the annexation request to include the
smaller acreages located in the northeast corner of Section 23 between the
Purvis property and 93rd Ave.. We can only assume you were correct in
stating the position of the citflhat the request, as relates to annexing
properties that would include 93rd Ave., would not be looked upon
favorably.
We do not wish to have our property annexed to the City of Yelm.
As a citizen of the region and a member of the Planning Committee, I find
the handling of this annexation request deeply disturbing. To the best I can
determine, none of the small property owners that are my neighbors in this
area south of 93rd Ave. were contacted by Thurston Highland concerning
this request. Our wishes in this matter were not sought nor were we given
the courtesy of any notification of the Association's intentions. Their
handling of this matter reveals an arrogance of power and disregard of
established residents that I find degrading and insulting.
o
o
While I am aware that Thurston Highland probably has the 75%
valuation required to make this request valid, I am also aware that Yelm,
in the past has taken pride in not annexing anyone against their will. I
hope that integrity will stand against the seduction of potential money
brought to the area by Thurston Highland.
Sincerely,
(bp~
~'D. Huddleston
-
JI~~~
Nancy J, Huddleston
cc:
TIm Schlosser
Chairman, Yelm Planning Committee
o
Town of Yelm
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
206-458-3244
PUBLIC NOTICE
CITY OF YELM PLANNING COMMITTEE
SPECIAL MEETING
The Yelm Planning Committee has called a Special Meeting
to be held on Tuesday, July 10, 1990 at 4:00 p.m. at Yelm
City Hall, 105 Yelm Ave. W. to discuss the annexation
petition of Thurston Highland and Associates.
ATTEST: Shelly A. Badger, City Clerk
Published: Nisqually Valley News, Thursday, July 5, 1990.
---~
2 2. 1 1 D 6. -' -'
, 200 3S'dd
::3L8 1 S20-',\32
l~ !i ~ ~
~ ~
o
..,.......... r
,~ ~.
~ l$
'.
..
,
I
\
tt\~ f
.. J'~~ t="
,...1'-
\ (' I, Jl"
1\ <L--!-=F \"l. ~ . \
~ 0 \~ v \
----~-r\. ___-----'t?-'r~---C------------- r---'-- --.----.
I' 11 ~ ~ . :
\ -<\;o:;?>. . \
\ ,.. \ 0 \
\ ,t I
I ~ '
. ' \ "": '
I -. \ .- ~ :
\
\
\
\
\
.......-_1-
, .
'"
1
\
\
\
0{
;
I'
i
~
l
.
~,
~.t
~' i1'
.~(
E-':./
.
.
t
a
,
,
,
,
I
,
,
..
,
,
\
I
,.
I
,
.
..
:..
~- ---------------~~-------
,
,
\
\
I
I
I
,
,
I
,
I
I
,
I
,.
..
i
__04...--~--.----
~
~
~..
1. ~~
~~'"
'- ~"~
.:..J.~
...
..
"~.. ,
\
I
I
,
,
I
I
,
I
I
.
,
I
I
I
--===---..,---.-. =------
I , _.__ _'_ \ 1 I -~. ~ i ,-,
\ I -:- ,I ",,' I
I .. ~ I
" ~ J\ I \\ ~ ' \
""-"X . . · · ' '
"':':< ' ; + I.. \. \ :
.---' , ---.-- -'!.- " --' .--------- ." . - - . .
'~" ~l, . - I \ . . - -1
~~ ~_ I ~ " ,.: '\ \ I" -'-
'~' . ". \-:- 1'\ \ .'TTI1 I ·
j I~' \ ' ! I '-i
1\ \ ;- "'~,~~ '-/L-- · -- I f I I .\ \
I L-I '.""'''' · I '-' \ ,- · · I
I 1 ~. '<" .' ~.\ I . \-I \
. \
1\' ~
" If' t.
. I \ 1. r
. I
'\ -;__~ ---I ~ A ~~....- ::t.'-- -----r I --;'-')!i; -, .. - I \
I \ _ \ \. " S ~ I I \ ~~ ~, \ :... -Ii
. " l' \ \1 ~~ \ ~"" ~~~ :~1'~:'~ 'Ii
____I I \. \ I · " · I . D '~. II~ ~,' \
I I .' l! ~,~ ~. - '-. , :, '11< "",:!..:,,' N' ' \
t\- H I \ ;\ i'. \1 t-\l.' I \, ~I~~ ~ 'l2.d~L.... ~~';'.sJ: '/ ');;J~J
1 \.\'"1 W. .T ~ \:3 ~~~: 'Z~. O! "J)'!~"'J T<ii:( '1
&
"\
t
t
\
.
"
~ - - -.
~~_-i ~:,;7 1 ".~...~ ';:;\
t d 1 !
. l
I
t . ,-",,--.-'" '
~
~.~
-
I
.
'. ~
.~. ~
1
~~~~j
.~~\MIII
d~. ~II
t
~
~~
-
t '
. .
. ,.......
1
1'1
1 >t ~
Int
u--a .
\i':'f\!ll.
,;..'Jf~ <II
--
-
,
;;
"'.
o
o
LAND DESCRIPTION
YELM ANNEXATION
ALTERNATIVE NO 1
JUNE 25, 1990
Section 27, Township 17 North, Range 1 East
All of Section 27
Section 26, Township 17 North, Ran&e 1 East.
west half of Section 26
Section 23 Township 17 North, Range 1 East
The Northeast quarter of Section 23, EXCEPT 93rd Avenue S E .
The Southwest quarter of Section 23.
The West half of the Southeast quarter of Section 23
Section 24, Township 17 North, Range 1 East
The South half of the Northeast quarter of Section 24,
The West 906 6 feet of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of
Section 24, EXCEPT 93rd Avenue S E
PROJECT YEL~ PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
3687 04
"
,
\
JUN 26 '90 11 33
206 251 8782 PAGE 003
I'
o
o
LAND DESCRIPTION
YELM ANNEXATION
ALTERNAT!VE NO. 1
JUNE 25, 1990
Section 27, Township 17 North, Range, 1 Es.st.
All of Section 27
Section 26, Township 17 North. Ranse 1 East.
west half of Section 26
Section 23 Township 17 North, Range 1 East
The Northeast quarter of Section 23, EXCEPT 93rd Avenue S E
Th@ Southwest quarter of Section 23,
The West half of the Southeast qu~rter of Section 23
Section 24, Township 17 North, Range 1 East.
The South half of the Northeast quarter of Section 24;
The West 906 6 feet of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of
Section 24, EXCEPT 93rd Avenue S.E
PROJECT YELM PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
3687 04
\
\
JUN 26 '90 11 33
206 251 8782 PAGE 003
I'
o
o
LAND DESC~IPTION \
YEUt ANNEXATION
ALtEP~ATIVE NO. 1 - BOUNDS DESGRI~TION
i
JUNE 25, 1990
~
Alternative 1 - Bounds Description
A t~act of land being all of Section 27, and parts of Sections 23. 24, and 26,
all in Township 17 North, Range 1 East, Willamette Meridian, Thurston County,
Washington. being more particularly described as follows'
BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of said Section 27,
THENCE ~est along the North line of said Section 27, to the Northwest corner
thereo f;
THENCE South along the West line of said Section 27 I to the Southwes.t cornet"
thereof,
THENCE East along the South line of said Section 27 to the Southeast cot"ner
the.reof, said point also bfiling .the Southwest corner of the aforementioned
Section 26.
THENCE East along the South line of said Section. 26 to the South quarter
cot"ner of said Section 26.
THENCE North along the North-South centerline of said. Section 26, to the North
qua.rtet" corner of said Section 26, said corner also being the South quarter
corner of the afot'ementioned Section 23,
THENCE East along the South line of said Section 23 to the Southeast corner of
the West half of the Southeast quarter of said Section 23,
THENCE North along the East line of the West half of the Southeast quarter of
said Section 23, to the East"'WElst centerline of said Section 23;
THENCE East along said East-West centerline to the East quarter corner of said
Section 23, said cornet' also being the West quarter cot'ner of the afore-
mentioned Section 24;
THENCE East along the East-West centerline of said Section 24 to the center of
said Section 24,
THENCE North along the North-South centerline of said Section 24, to the
Northeast co~ner of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said
Section 24,
THENCE West along the North line of said Southeast quarter of the Northwest
quarter to the Northwest co:r:net' of said Southeast quarter of Northwest:
quarter;
THENCE West along the North line of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest
quarter of said Section 24, to the East line of the West 906 6 feet of the
Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 24;
THENCE North along said East line to the South line of 93rd Avenue S.E ,
THENCE West along said South line to the East line of the aforementioned
Section 23t
THENCE CONTINUING West along said South line to the North-South centerline of
said Section 23;
THENCE South along said North-South centerline to the center of said
Section 23;
THENCE ~est along the East-West centerline of said Section 23, to the West
quarter corner of said Section 23;
THENCE South along the West line of said Section 23 to the Southwest corner of
said Section 23, said corner also being the Northeast corner of Section 27 and
the POINT OF BEGI~ING.
PROJECT: YEW PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEm'
3687 01
\
'<.
<<-- .---
o
-
,~"......~
I . h\\I1.$.
...... ~ ~
.',ij
H, , \ \
r
\
-.. .
. .
\ \
1
). .l~~
- (.,..~
'i \ Y I.
" ~
...) ~ \t..
'-
1 .,
l i W',
~
~ \ I
. --- ~' j~' , ~ 1
. \.... '-
~. Wl \ ~ . . . 1" \ '
~ -~ ~i I ' ,.. \. ..,'
\ t
_L
-
~
. ~
-
llO
~
1
1
, ....
\ ~ ,.. .r
, ~k..:'~
~ ....,.-
I ~.;~J.," ;
"''''r
\ y ~~ ;;
,
;"'.\ t
4': .,
~./~1
'\I\ m ~~. :,
~;'~' ~.~ .. ..
" \
'i;' .
Y\;';c 1"
.....~
~~:~:(t
'irT"~ ..... ~
"!;t:<~[:J ~ l · \, '-
t~~~ ..... \,~
~..'/;: ~\i ,;'./"- !
'~,~'1 1 ..1, .
~~~ \\ ....:..r..
'{' .....;- I .'1 ....
~?:.)\. ~ - ..,.-- I
r %~ \ 1
.
.L ,,',
,.f;~, ...'~
..
" \..~
-'
__-........._'t-_.#I>.""'--
..
i
.
!
}-
i---'" ---'
=
JUN 26 ''30 1132
t
.
,
1
1
I
't
o
t<'!'~
~ :~
~ ~
t'l~t:i
~.
\
i
,
-
::;;----.
:-.;~:-,.
~..~
".;
'.
t
t
<;i
206 251 8782 PAGE 002
~
JUN 19 ~~" 1 -;' 12 F(rr-~,t~Cr'~~ CJ II ,.... P~GE 002
____~:.~. h/u.~.2ELM I' !~~~ ,('\~~ . - - ""I
o~ ................ ....,;J. l-6 L--..l.Il!I: ~l'c ....iT I9L' <1'.
- 1 A"'~_~~~ ~~ . ~r;.J. ~r~~f~Yl"'?~~~!!l~":l ~ ~
- ~L A. OQ I.' \l) 9 " c: ..,..lIQ....,CQ'('~ id< l~ """- ~-.;~ ...
....;;;;;..-. ~ ~ _-:"' r ~. ~ - ""-WOOl ~ not....-Io~
.' ~.w. ",,0 ~..., .... ".I).;!bu ",o..;!;../;'-;;:'-
;;:;;o.;t\OtW\p,oW 'I:" . (..,'" ~ 9 ~ 4 ~ WM.~ .JU-R~ I 't' ~-i~o II ~ """--..:;..
~ FW. .....~vvr~~.l r,,, Oi,g;"" Q) ;,.. ~I.& ;'';.'U}--oJ1 ~8n~ AV 1\';. -..::
.. PQWE.U. qtS ~i$" 1'5 . C>IlA'" 11." ~ J LA!. It{
.... \ _I TON ~l4!OU.N . ~ Iu <\~ ')
t c- ~ 'I..' l~ <:) I. ....... IMO.~ I~~~' ,tnll,OMI, -! 4utZ:IETTI l'i \..,
I "I'.N\~~ t~\i~ 0" 1:1 ~ -;r:: l, ~~: U"t",,'T~IS~ f, ~ L, n
. ('-it 1(;\., r~ ~ .... ~...\...~:;& ~ ""-'
.r ~ ~
. v....;:II;r~ I, \.~ ~'~~(: ~~.1~ >~<t I ~
A e i.T .....M. 6UR)lE.TT j.;;;.;.. ... ,,\'~ u. t ',.,,; ~ '- \ .....
. ..... "" +,:,,, J.."I. Ilo...~. ~ iii~. ?" ~ ~
.. k:~1 MMIN:: ~-' (j. V &. I ~ kAi'6Ir.",- Il~ ~ .'1"'''' ...
.. 'O!j~ ).~~ P..H.PETE.RSO~ ~ 1/0(" ja:fi ~ ), I.:i>'~ ~ ~
. r<lr ~ 3'3""/ AV..-. ff = . .J..~'" ~ \i
"{ , ~. ~ ~I ~~... 1 : \}f '-'-. ~ ,..",,-& .J'T ; f--::r::
.., 0: ~ Il~ ~ ~ ... r\ ~ .... ILI;- ~~_... ~
. ~ ,,~~"",.1 lllWU' '~~~~"'1 0.1 M'(E.R5 ~ .....~~HUTO-IIH.,..., :: ~
. ~ ~ P I" ~r ,~.P~' _..... ~~.u,:.~ .., H ~
. ; ~~t-': -.- h~"" =-~~ Q.C SttAw 1(, . S(j( ~:' -1-~ f.r~ (~~WV
'~M I"~~ m ~~
. ~i~..~M'M rr eu(oo""rz.. . Iw f~ ~
. ~;:; .~ lR.7;Q6Ju. PUR V I S ~ l' [: KOc.~~ )0 ~l)\lJ '#... --..y ~ - j
. "/~L....J~.FoRTVNQ PARCEL ",>.<(. .> Lo~4 f~ YI. ftte.!.~..ir
'..1 fu-nA/l1 Lci!' - ~ .8~"Y' I'~SA'4 ~:.c!';~q,(,' ,'"tY oll
... -"",......1:0 ,,-- .... . ~ '"'"""
~ ~_. .. .-.. -- - 1'l<'t";,~,-;.--~~ ~;.-' ,~~~~~~; : ~;~~<c,"';: /~
f'\_'\IV. " . __';0, ,~, ooi" .1'<.... Q f.-"t).4l \ I
/: foft}6F'{':::'~::~.EL'I- r~ ~~i) .
, . ~~""~r~~ '~;:-~,.... ~ -~~
I /: wE'(ER. TIMlltll. ' =,::'~,,;;:-~_,:.~:;.>.J iJ;i :' hY0 000
~~ ,l!! ifl, -, 0 co, A _-_ ='AA'j,. · .4.~. ,-, ~ ~/I g .':.v~"'.,'\ ·
. --..~~ __ J .: .....i.- _' - ~,=- ::;Qfby C/(...:. ~
!,,-"!"',",~~ -;, · J-"--'~ l l~aC ~Zle:'~" ~ ~
I~ / C:J I ;, . to'\.~_' .
,<f'~'-p~ 1'I1URS'rON~. RT.E46f1lT A~~fo "'~..,<J. . ~~ "'AV, ~~
r" ,"~ .. '......j...~: M. MC~E.Nz:.la - ST.7.111r ~~..aI IT'
i' " . ~'''' ~
~!/Wtt\I'I~GH LAND I~ }-, ~~ rf) " ; ~ ~ ~c6.\Lr::
7 ~ 'J/1 \ ~ ~.. ~~m ~,. so. "",;: ~'r~ ~
" ~ .. t ~ ,;:~E::. ti " --~.G. ~~ t~~f1~.'~:\l~H -I:
.R'H. co. " ..~ ,~ MC.lU:N- ..;:-;~~'1;, ~V' ,,):'/," ~~. ......
',..: # II PARPEL - ~ ~~ 'M G l~u: &-.. ~. ~ k':~
t;J ~/'~ C);. \ ,. :O~O,(LE. l' j~ BFl"f:we.R~~~I~ .,'1, ,
~ _ _ '... ~,/ VI l. S ~
I,~ _ "-;'y ~ 60.,-0" M E
_ .. ~ ,,'':!--~~ {~ ' . 0 ~ ~..e~JotOER II i iJ_ Lu,..c6U.
,. '\ ...<J!. . ~ .. _ ~~(1.1.. '?~. ~KAtlI 'to ~ ~_ (J:>
, ~ - . _ _ .. r - ._~ "~'7'L. .:. - ~t. a,L. -.4-
_40 .....~'f~ '$(On
* ~ ~ ~ ~T A iE. ~<:.H OOL..
<t c;t. FUL.I-c.R NS\110NAL t:.~
. ~ ~ 8 fQoo COM~~ ~ t&.'tA.\Jl)~ 'I,..ANO~
Il.I t ~ J 11 I~ r I! UJ ~
~ w ~~_ ~ r.J ~ :i ILi g l' ::rn~~t ~~ ~ a
. _ Q ~ n ~ ~ .'~ J~' fi:. ~ '- 4:
;1 ...1' ~l' :=:;/ .J ~, -... '" '1' ~~ i I.)
....J~ ~,u. , .... 1 It'''' 6 U'lo..
:sir ~S :1 ~~_ ~~t, ~ ~~ ~Q."" ~ 3 ':Q~ ;- ~: ! E ~ ~ &\ ['iT'" 5 ~ )
~ j i~e ~ ~ /A2~~ IO~'" ,I I,~ ~~ TJ1rl
I '..... ~ W.i-M-- ~Kl. ,fAl~ / ~ R-.o ~ r f ~ I 1 J is 1 b Ilr,.~~+t' g Rl e
I ~J"'"",,~, ,:y'/t!>,,,i!J~. "." ~ r.:.~"" ,,,.0 c\. uJU~~ <t"I'
"_~'l,_ · . "=~ \ r..r..J _~_L I- '( N :?: N . . \!!
--,-~,_._-~",. .'
u.s.
2
:::.
cz
20
<1=
...1-
:1:1-
~W
-0..
::r:
ZZ
00
....-
cn~
rrX
:)UJ
::J:Z
I-Z
<(
_._~ -' ----------..--------'
---------~ - ---- -------------- . ~
o
o
) b/))-10 - 5rvx fYJeI!;!fl- fh Chj ?3Kl)
t:br<)~) / ~ 0 ip; We) ~ I (kt/L- m~
)
::) OV'1k 8(28 rbtvll/V' ~t. J 14 ,~/jf?clfo
o lfIn~ qOlJVl ar(yS tJ7.>>2~ -1lcuj hCwe--
o tic; dcu(:> ---Iv j}?uf7a/Ju/13 tAroh~. Jr flO
o 1/,1Al1"0dJ' ~ 0 {Yll1tfUV ;;r ~ ba~~
o ~ ~vrn -IV fOYly1d1 -Al~ tJ/if/l-tV a~
('
i Jt f~ fWtl /}1/){k:bO jw/!is J ~ It 0/
t1 D be ~ . 612 f3 &0 V0~ 14!JuUow
f'/J'ylW C ffitvrdArt;f ()A r;{tYAe- of j hU:;:~)
I3K6 :;u"ck tfWf {~6Vi'~V~~ /Ilon'fpO <~
fYi's, 3 1/111;/(-; r tIfl 10 ~ t!/uk -
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
~
'J
o
r'-"
~---------------------
o
o
1
02
3
4
05
6
7
OB
9 .
10
011
oi
Ol~
1Bi
I~
O~
H
'22
Ol~
~., .
~
aiO~
~ ~,.
:: 128
::!:O:29:
~30,
o
O~r5 ~V\, --G;
\A~~ DOLvJt17-
-, / ~f-!-o r6
.f-'-.:I.h~~~. Q.;\ I '0J~"'~fi:c~
lV' ~
<" /
'- P'i~1 L
m U"L' 51 1" ---' .,-1/; fO.....7\
.......~t/........... AJ"~ .u
.~d 1!rj)3
. .ru-u/S j
.
~. VMakM ffflifgl~
Pra;"f jfJ/JO']d~/1~,bh . .. ..
, f j' I \ ,
..l4t7'1&1w/Z/L .!iJ . tZ-z ) cJ(A~I~w7n'LlcI
I, .', l 4 I Y-1 /J . 1 . .'
jCt,,;>, !;A 't:~J k / /1.' i. .~, <k7 ~1,- ...' ",.:" 4l .z' --
I
JI}/It,n 1 en A ,l tJ ( i u:;; .~lJAJhtL2>1yif.
~. '.
....l;Lntl~/2. *i,~ ... .P/Cd~1,)f'u.(/..J)AJ '..
)
~,(L <4< ,~t.tl Jt2,t?_
[)CwYfd,
. .J)?;/) . ,c.,.-
IkI.
I
C&rJ- I
I
~+~~ 7- I
-
",' ,
.52
O~
/54
If'"
'35r
'~ .
01561
\e.~' .
o
L _ ---------
~)
--- -- ~~- -
~ Yl L~tCIJ
I
~~~--
o
I ~ =J1
1;-_
-/ p-
-G
\.~~
M~
( \
({/<f /
~
0rr= (ItO l ~ ~
c
---------
~
,,--)
c
dv/2 '
~0-
7~
ry
ou-cd
'1~.,-
I ()Jt~
l~~
(;;~ s--------
,~
(- .
\. /
_ ___~ ..L...
(~
u
r'\
"----~
"
\~ ff,P(2,
\ I ,1 ;/ , //7 ' 67
\i\ . \.VlJi '- V?' /[ ~
~I\ ! - ~
~ -=
\ \\
(), A \~ ~ 'v c1:g
_ ~-j:. . 5) _~~~/ (-j--';. (fd ~"f'-rlL- QNJ. Z-
\\~ ~ .. . a .--P_ onA .) tke
~ III ~_:dC7 ~ ~~-A~ ~ "'0f
III ~'-
J
=
-
~
~
rrJ-ol~~- ~
c
Lf L~rry,/-d7AA ,j'I,~
\
II
= ~
~ :
\
I
\
I
\
II
------------- - ,-_. - _.-
~
"'- ~/
I'^'-.
\_~/
(-
~
o
o
...
ILl JUNE. 90
(}.E.N6;. BrlL/J vJ 1"'/
US/O l?uOLJE;L.L ffOrlO <S"E:. #/..38
kAce~ td//, 98503
I
I;)EHI? CiTY (iOVAlCIL of Ye-LH
I
..I BEe;; Y"ou 10 C-OAlS I06,e TI-I~ I/nPAC T
IOF TH€. L/4RGE- .06'1/6 L-OfO/nc:,v 'T YOf.1 filet:::
PL///VItJING 70 I/O <TE. ON1
I
I WH--Om Nlt.,.{... R€:.ALL V 8E/tIE.FI T F,eo;n IT?
k -LJouer THe O/C-LllAlI1Ier' COUN7~ MXP/lYeJ{' WILL,
,.
/IS /ll-vJ/4YSj /:7S TN€: H1/..ooC-c c~s '2'Pr,.rr"'AY~
'/lI71r e:lVlJS' (/,;<7 PRY/NG h~ C-CJS rS' TN/1T ,viLe-
'CO/UT/A/(..(E 70 a~&JA$ TH/S ~~~vt;;CT G~AIS<,
CP{4I'TE.. FI'e/4-A/KL II WHOSe GO/NG -To /3e: ,rJoc.-c
70 /nove: //U7(,) HL t.- T#€oc fI/CJo/ 000 'S--#RC/C"S;"
Y~LrYJ WILL FoJe... €t/67e LcrsE. /TS COC/NT/C- Y
1/1 Th1 OS~Ht:.~ ONce r~ LJB7/c::z.o.;o~~exJ T
I ST/4-~ [3') T#~tZ. ~c.- {fg O/"H'6~...s)0/L. S'v,eE,.
'I I F You woe" t.-tJ LI ke 70 -Sl:=:c:: //01.'-<.1 THeSE:
Jf)€l//?20/I/7'1e7UTS' NoJek' LOOI-<' -4 T #.;rCG/ks P~//e/E
1//
WI:!7fLLJ; Look /1 7 IHE_ SrI/71/?1/J/?'JASH L4k'C:
~L,4T€:}l/t(1 Yes, 8/~ GOL-P (]:.yf//C<S'G"'S/ ~~ I t?1-AZG€"
k-XSP'a/S/vc I-Ic?VSG:S "T/I/lT RLL LooK ALike:
W-PO /t?OST /i),;e SA-L~) 8t1T 'TII-E /I-/CEJ4 W~$
h?'6lJ c'lr /75" /3E/rtlTV ;::b,eEVc-Jf( ..
I
I -TillS P;eoJE::cT YOC/ fi7e-e: vO -r / ptl C o~ cv/t.-t-
l/(/OT AJi:?V e fC/ T YcJC--f /e. If L-r /t!..Pl-t.. C--f?J /~? /?4 O.IU /7 r'
14-T/Y1o<SPHcec THE t:.AJV/oJe/V~c7t}'T &;f Tlfe:-
I I
I
o
~---l
I
d. r
bXPHY~'
I .::r O;JL'Y WI-SI-l :r 11/10 TilE MILt-IoAlS 'THE
GJ€E:ED Y ..{)6VEl.-O,;::'t;::'?i?,s /Mi/E. .:z /VOU ~o aU Y
J17/~ ,4C-Re:.r16E- rl/JO P?/T/4 PA/<?l< /A/ ..so
If . /1' ,-
/l LL ~e?:J/'L.E Cdc~ L<J I:=-:7\.JJ o}.J YOl/1C A/ere/1"
o
o
I I!G,4/~ PL674SE/ LJo /!/o'T VO T~ RJ~
vilE:. IJtt/cLo~m~/U T
r-; If~AJI< Jrbtl ;q~ M{/~ 71ft1~
c
a;GAJE8A~LJtu /;;
c
..
16,41/ ~(/#';; (Iq~
f/~"f g W.t1: ,<
~~
oc- fa,i
. I 2 5 1991 ~~
In the absence of Mayor Sanders, who was attending the Association of
Washington Cities annual convention, Arnold Drogseth nominated ~ati~~~-W0lf
'J!J.:L~I\j"'" DAV
to serve. as Mayor Pro-Tern. Martha Parsons rroved to close the n(irr\lrtat:i~ns rES MACKIE
and appolnt Kathy Wolf as Mayor Pro-Tem, second by Amos Lawton Motlon
carried
~ \ MINt1IES C\\
U CITY OF YEIM REGULAR COONCIL MEE:T1:.~
WEDNESDAY. JUNE 13. 1990. 7;30 EM. YEIM CITY HALL
Mayor Pro-Tern Kathy Wolf called the meeting to order at 7: 35 Hv1. All
present joined in the flag salute. Council present: Arnold Drogseth,
Amos Lawton, Rick Kolilis and Martha Parsons Visitors Archie McLean,
Patsy Gudgell, Pat & Jake Purvis, Dennis T. Su, Penny Williams and Mark
Schwindt. Staff: Daisy Lawton, Shelly Badger and Chief Glenn Dunnam.
Amos Lawton moved to approve the evening I s agenda, second by Martha
Parsons. Motion carried.
The minutes of the May 23, 1990 Regular Council Meeting were approved on a
rrotion by Rick Kolilis, second by Amos Lawton. Motion carried.
The following vouchers were approved on a rrotion by Amos Lawton, second by
Martha Parsons. Motion carried.
Vouchers numbered 8011 through 8088:
*Current: $32,797.60
*police: $10,519.86
*Water $ 4,299.35
*Street: $ 2,298.30
*Garbage $ 6,804.44
*Art Street: $ 2,073.83
*CDBG $ 3,300.87
'lOTAL :
$62.094.25
Mr Maurin was not present to address his garbage refund complaint Since
this issue has been on the agenda several rreetings, Amos Lawton rroved to
once again deny the garbage refund request and close the complaint issue,
second by Rick Kolilis. Motion carried.
Archie McLean was present from Harper, McLean & Co. to present the Council
the purchase agreement for YeJm's $178,000 bond issue to construct well #3
& purchase real property. The average coupon rate for the issue of bonds
is 7.04890%, with a net effective interest rate, including the discount,
of 7.37610%
Rick Kolilis rroved to adopt Ordinance No. 375, adopting a system of
registration of bonds and obligations of the City, second by Amos Lawton.
Motion carried.
Rick Kolilis moved to adopt Ordinance No. 376 relating to the waterworks
utility of the City; specifying and adopting a system or plan of additions
to and bette.J::TTents and extensions of the waterworks utility and ordering
the carrying out of that plan; authorizing the issuance of water revenue
bonds in the amount of $178,000 to obtain a part of the funds with which
to pay the cost of carrying out a portion of that system or plan; fixing
the date, interest rates, form, maturities, terms, covenants and uses of
the proceeds of those bonds; creating a special bond redemption fund and a
construction fund; and providing for the sale and delivery of the bonds to
Harper, McLean & Company of Tacana, WA. Motion was seconded by Martha
Parsons. Motion carried
Dennis T. Su, representing Thurston Highland & Associates (1200 acre
subdivision), presented the City of YeJm with a petition to begin
annexation proceedings, signed by at least 75% of property valuation in
the proposed annexation area. Mayor Pro-Tern Wolf explained that the
minutes would reflect receipt of the petition and that it would be
forwarded onto the YeJm Planning Cannittee for their review. Shelly
Badger, City Clerk, explained the annexation procedure for a code city and
Mayor Pro-Tern Wolf asked that she provide the Nisqually Valley News with
information on the procedure for publication.
Ordinance No 377, relating to eligibility in the National Flood Insurance
Program, and amending a portion of Ordinance No. 353, was approved on a
""tion by -Darsons, second by Anns lBwton. i'Ocarried.
Ordinance No. 379, amending City of Yelm Ordinance No. 334, changing the
prescribed rate for a I-yard garbage container fran $31.60 to $36.15 per
rronth, was approved on a motion by Rick Kolilis, second by Arnold
Drogseth. Motion carried.
Chief Dunnam rep::>rted that the City has obtained a DARE vehicle fran
Washington State for $2,500.00 and asked for formal approval fran the City
Council to purchase and make needed repairs to the vehicle. The purchase
will be made fran carrnunity donations and much of the needed repairs have
also been donated, i.e., paint, wheels & tires, etc. Martha Parsons moved
to approve of the purchase of the DARE vehicle for $2, 500. 00 and to make
needed improverrents to the vehicle, second by Alms Lawton. Motion
carried.
Rick Kolilis rroved to purchase a sweeper broom unit with a water system to
be mounted on Yelm's Case Backhoe for $4,900.00 plus tax and a $200.00
delivery fee, second by Martha Parsons. Motion carried.
Council received copies of Yelm Municipal Code 2 24.020 relating to
canpensation paid to Yelm's Judge Pro-Tern. Current code canpensates pro-
terns at the rate of fifteen dollars per session or p::>rtion thereof.
Shelly Badger stated that the rate is very outdated and that other
carrnunities pay fran $25 - $50 per hour for attorney Judge Pro-Terns. Alms
Lawton, Court Liaison, will rreet with staff to corre up with a recorrrrended
change in the ordinance.
Martha Parsons rroved to allow non-profit and service club organizations to
utilize the ad space on Yelm's concrete refuse containers for upcaning
events and carrnunity-minded statements, second by Arnold Drogseth. Motion
carried The clubs w:>uld be resp::>nsible for the making of the signs,
installation and take down after the event is over. The Council
reiterated that the ad space is not to be used for advertiserrents for
businesses A letter will be sent to service clubs to notify them of this
opp::>rtunity
In regards to an ordinance to change Council Meetings to the second and
fourth Wednesdays of each rronth (including sumner months), it was found
that the existing ordinance is correct and needs no amending. The Yelm
Municipal Code will be corrected to reflect two rreetings per rronth
throughout the entire year.
Ordinance No. 378 establishing a change am imprest fund for the City of
Yelm Municipal Court was approved on a rrotion by Arnold Drogseth, second
by Martha Parsons. Motion carried
Yelm/Thurston County Joint Plan Public Hearing: The joint Public Hearing
of the Thurston County Commissioners and Yelm City Council will be held on
Wednesday, June 20, 1990 at 7:00 HVI, Yelm High School Little Theater.
Staff will be available in the cafeteria fran noon to 7: 00 HVI to meet with
property oWners on a one-on-one basis. In reviewing the plan, it was
noted that there is a discrepancy between Yelm's existing "sphere of
influence" (as established in the 1985 Canprehensive Plan) and the current
prop::>sed "carrnunity growth area" boundary established in the joint plan.
Council agreed and recorrrrended that the "comnuni ty growth area" boundary
should be consistent with Yelm's established "sphere of influence" The
matter will be discussed further at the Public Hearing.
Arnold Drogseth rroved to
acres, auditor's parcel
approval at the June 27,
Parsons. Motion carried.
direct staff to exercise the option on 11 95
#64300900400, and to prepare the check for
1990 Regular Council Meeting, second by Martha
Rick Kolilis rroved to grant an extension on the hours of operation of the
comitional use pennit for the Fanner's Market at 202 Jefferson Ave NW
extending hours of operation to 9 AM to 4 HVI on Saturday and Sunday.
Original approval was to operate fran 10 AM - 2 HVI, Saturday and Sunday.
The rrotion was made subject to canpliance with all provisions of the
conditional use pennit approved at the April 25, 1990 Council Meeting,
specifically the parking requirements. As there have already been some
ccmplaints on the parking during the event, Council advised staff to
contact the market manager to correct the problern for continuance of the
penni t . Motion was seconded by Amos Lawton. Mot ion carried.
'-
. d 'ka(\lUla' ( al . ad C(j . ed
Frlen & Rl 0 C 1lIl Cryst SPrJJlgs Ro ProJect) : 'A Il1EmO was recelv
from Attorney Randall Walker stating that the claim (for construction cost
overruns) had been settled out of court as previously approved by Council.
Rick Kolilis moved to pay the claim of $9000 and directed Mayor Sanders to
sign the "Release of all ClaiIrs" which ends the lawsuit formally, second
by Arnold Drogseth. Motion carried. Attorney Walker is currently
researching the possibility of reimbursement from the State Urban Arterial
Board Grant which funded the project.
Yelm Parks Advisory Comnittee Meeting of June 12, 1990: Martha Parsons
reported that after discussion between the Park Comnittee and the U03O, it
was decided that the U030 proposal for a comnunity center and the Park
Comnittee I s proposal for a park & recreation facility would not be
compatible in the sane building As the UCBO grant application process is
well underway, with the City of Yelm as the lead agency, the Yelm Parks
Advisory Coomittee expressed full support of the project and wil.l not
apply for a block grant in competition with the U030 The Park Comnittee
will continue its long-range planning for a future parks & recreation
center, possibly located in Cochrane Park. The U030 still is in need of a
site for the facility.
New time table for Cochrane Park has been es tablished wi th the punching of
the initial trail to be done by July 1, 1990.
Martha Parsons asked that the Council forward any corrrrents they have onto
Clerk, Shelly Badger, on the proposed ordinance revisions on Yelm's parks
drafted by the Park Comnittee.
On recorrrrendation of the Yelm Parks Advisory Comni ttee, Martha Parsons
moved to approve the following park use requests, second by Amos Lawton
Motion carried:
1 Request by Karen Crawford to use the park on Saturday, July 7, 1990 at
1:30 PM for a graduation family picnic. No alcohol will be consumed
2. Request by Yelm Prairie Christian Center for park use on August 12,
1990 at 2:00 PM for a church picnic. Due to the large croMl expected
(100-160), Council asked that one sani-can be provided to supplement
existing restroom facilities.
Council received a copy of the 1989 Annual Report.
Council received notification from the Department of Retirement that the
PERS (Public Employees Retirement System) employer rate will increase from
6.5% to 7.61% effective September 1, 1990.
Council received copies of the 1990 Legislative Bulletin, from Association
of Washington Cities, highlighting major legislative action.
A copy of a letter from Jolene Unsoeld, Congresswoman, to Ken Anderson,
was reCeived by the Council, congratulating Officer Anderson on being
nanro "Yelm Police Officer of the Quarter". Special recognition was given
to Officer Anderson on his work with the DARE program. Council asked that
a letter of congratulations be given to Ken Anderson also.
With no further business, meeting adjourned at 8:40 PM on a motion by
Arnold Drogseth, second by Martha Parsons. Meeting adjourned
ATIEST:
Shelly A. Badger
City Clerk
Robert A Sanders
Mayor
o 0
BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
"Land Planning, Survey, and Design Specialists"
June 13, 1990
RECEllfED
JIJ. -
iii 18 1990
lOuIA,
c""l" O..E~
Mr Gene Borges
City AdminIstrator
City of Yelm
PO Box479
Yelm, W A 98597
Re Proposed 1600-Lotj1200 Acre SubdlVIsIOnj Annexation
for Thurston Highland & AssocIates
Our Job No 3687
Dear Gene
In accordance with your request we are hereby submitting the sIgned 75 percent
petitIOn which has been prepared in accordance with RCW 35A 14 120 as apphcable to
the above-referenced project
Please proceed to process this annexation application at your earliest
convenience We look forward to workmg with your staff through the annexatIOn and
ZOnIng process and will be available to provide you wIth the necessary technIcal
documentatIOn upon request. If you have any further questions, please contact me at your
convenience
~~~,p.v~tfuny ,
I/~'- ;-...... .../
\-..(.",._/ G.-. /3, /;f3:i;;;;.7
Dana B Mower, P.t.
Vice President
DBMjsg
C539 18
enc. Petition
cc Mr Doug Garland, Thurston Highland & Associates
Mr Dennis Su, Thurston Highland & AssocIates
Home Office 18215 72nd Avenue South, Kent, Washington 98032 . (206) 251-6222 . Fax (206) 251-8782
California Office 4612 Roseville Road, Suite #103' North Highlands, California 95660 . (916) 348-3057. Fax (916) 348-0953
We, the undersIgned property owners, do hereby request that the City of Yelm annex the property
indicated on the attached maps and as setf orth in the attached legal descriptions. We understand that the
annexation mto the City of Yelm corporate limits will allow the City of Yelm to supply water, sewer, and
other utilities to the annexed properties. We hereby agree to partiCIpate in the upgrading of facilities,
as ne~essa , to(facilitate)~nnexati~ petition
'rL-fw7 R ~ r<u/z.41.."-v ,..-
L u:~-x:c2~
Name ~S P-73..:::L..;L
{~~l/ Jiv=;i/~ r t~
/~nk-I-#. ~ mJ'~
U - .
Name/'
o
o
PETITION
ANNEXA TION TO THE CITY OF YELM
2.
3
~4~1zc/~r
~ @.~
Name
/7b2~"-./l5 b)7t~~~j-L
Address
4
Name
Address
5
Name
Address
&-/;1.. -90
Date
?-o-;; cJ
Date
6-/3 -po
Date
Date
Date
o
o
Dana Mower/Gary Lee - Barghausen Consulting Engineers
Douglas Garlarrl - Garland & Associates
Dennis Su - KCM Land Use & Developcoont Consultants
As Mayor, I have asked the above individuals to make a public
presentation to the City Council on the proposed development. This is a
chance for the Council to hear rrore information on the proposal. The
II Appearance of Fairness Act", in regards to land use proposals, prohibits
the City Council fran asking questions and/or hearing questions being
asked regarding the proposal, unless it is during a Public Hearing.
Tonight is a Regular Meeting of the Council only, therefore, there can be
no questions asked or comments made by the Councilor those in
attendance.
There will be no decision made tonight by the Council. A public
question/answer Period will be held at a future advertised Public Hearing
when more details have been studied and are available.
.,-'
o
o
sma motOflS~~\are easuy ms- 111t:f VIYlllJJ'al1 . ! I.t r:'To ~ t,o i?~venl that ;-I.that's our jo~,"
a crane oripaVing truck in op- The ,Washmgton ,State Patr~t ~a~ "iri:li) Junk ) said. 'f'We-.'~hjoyed.!a '~Mer' year' last
I that acciderit~ can result, "We structed troopers to step up patrols for year but this year' we got off to a bad
people disy:a.~~!;l;'\f ..if!;) " " speede~s . and: ,drupkeri~~ve~ ;:,~hr?u&~ ".start.~' ii' i,,: t,,: ".
'rk'resum:~'s; cr:ews:WiII,be back Memonal'Day wee~end; :' . '~'\":}~:;:fi,. .",~~t;i\ r,~,~frM~'~eople di~dl'aridJ'59i people were
npiaporti~~)of~the fre~w,ay frOffi': \ ;,:~Ii,of ~his is..m p~pa~a"ti~~: fOI\~4r'ru;~f;~!'~ ihjured'.state,Wiq~;)n,' vehicle ~ccidents dur~
et fo'l( theli'Capitol1iL8ke inter- major holIday of the year,., said .PatrQI.Sgt, ;:ring,.lasf' yeaes: 'Memorial Day weekend
)rkers,wui:i1)e~testiJ1g;.ihe pave- Leonard H, Junk. "We need toslowiJ?~ople1'''; ':ic~6roHig 'tOfiP~frol'recotds; The patroi
"e ,~a~ng.;~'ill(sii p'~t; ~e final dO~,~nd.sto~ them ,fr'~~. ~~~;5i,::?~:'#; )j!i,~;~~~~lly .,tak.~~>:~to acc~upt.a., 78-hour time
yer I on .rthoound and Troopers Will betaking a':cntIcali:lo()kiat~t~~,spanl,:between.'late' Friday afternoon, and
1 la~e~, : l' lioN,: . ",I m6toii~t~,,100k!ng ~~~~f~~~I~\V,,~oI~~~~,::!<;~;~~~~;,~~?,d~r!1ight.,. j~.}~!j \ i: ,';
md ofth., _ ,.,er werWIll have Junk" ~aId, pnmarilY,,09 \mters~~~'i~nd.t~Cit- D\1rIIlg\a;7~\hour'crackdown on. speed-
lice i ridingWsu~~e;i\81I:the!, way " statehlghway~. ,I,r-,,, . ~ . :\'d'~ ti' ,;(,iJ: 'iif!:)~"~';~:.:~fS::iMay 'l1'~'ih 'ThUrston CoUnty,. troopers
n, Wa~ tcf >,'..1 ~etDaYtoIi , "But do~'t btt~\l,('lri~~tiii"btj:M~~~~sl1it~j,~(~:stopped~238;Yehicles" issUing 139 speeding
I ;.1 . ,"'j' , ..,.I1lk . "..,..,~, '."".'...'........,'..".,.ti.....c. ~..."Ttin" It....d.' " , ,
i J;;:" 'i ,:iJ;>-.1";"(,;, r{ ,trooper man unmar edcar working,isom '" c!\e,~j,iJ .. .s~ ':'Pi 'r;~,' ',1, ,
Ijll. rot b~r't q.rt.;>Wit~out some of our sec~ndary roa~~ays;':'re:~t;I;~e~;if.!.:' !,.r.r.~i:~R~~ple:J.wt~~~i~diri:\yhat it: will 'cost
:lce 1 to tij~j.!~~IOO~.Fp~~ple, who i "JuIik'said speeding,i'diiInken'~~,hg'i~ if;i~~~,~~,~.g~~~"c~u@f.vlOl~b~g ~raffic ,"a~,
Igh thec~~~,~~~o~1.>~~~eevery fail~re:to yieldrig~t'of~ay~a~e;beeni,th. ~\1tiKpf.o~~~gktp~(\~~~,~~~g.~~de: ~ ..'.
. \,! .' Yi:;1Jt'f~!~J' o:r! N)1~),:. . " !,; ,1 "mam .~~ses of accI~ents~'!\(t~ti1~l+!l, ,. ",.,~p~~dil}~:f'f9,:: ,mph",'over~peed limit: '. i
III.be ,doVV'tijt,O",f;Wo laqesm each, Be' k.;een Jan' '1 an' d j'Ma'y" '6, :~;1 ' !193AY1'$3,8!<i;,!IM",h',>l..,1\!\1.''''l'' ('<'.I. \ : ,. .
I' th' r dB'''' ." 'IT'h' LW, ' ,. ,. <, .'. ,..,..., ,"'" ..." 1 ' .1 n.! .,. ,. ,
unng" .~!l_,.r".une:!~~ e con~ i., .fatalities stateWide{'resu,lfed'rror~Neliicul~tlfJ~:,w.'Sp'e~ffing'ii'~15riiph;(jver $66, .t,,"
permlsslon.toJake tratIicdown"accidehtsl according'" 'fo.i"State'h'Patro}'i'h,ll,.' "F";.{:'I.;..r;"'t""""10 .. ht' f .. ,. $47'"
. lane each,,'way' after'8 pm . . '.., . .,.... ,: In..,' ':';"..,,,,'1\>':;" <W\l~ o)'le 'ng (j way" .
'I Th . '1\:;:'.~L,,., h "65' d 't" }records. Dunng the same penM-thls;year;"VJ~I\.L.. N' ';~l')1'd"J,I!"t'i'dri'L,'I'!;'.i.l.'l'3\'3 \.
, econu'a or as , ays 0 '234" .... I'd' d....- h' "I,.I"'-"'dii"t'""J"'" '. eglgen vmg,~ '"
: ''-''.J'''',,;.';),:;'I. ,(ri.,\' peop.e Ie m"ve Icuar,accI "n s;'.m~' ....,..",..\.. '."" ': "., .,.. i. f, :"
Ie work. ,}'l~II~girr .~;:-:;)r,11 J.". ,. cludmg two iIi' Tliurstoh '",i;CouritylWth '. '!. ~eck1e.~s\~V1Ilg: $300, 1 '"
I "i.', Kt;!~':,;~ee . Fre1ewaY/2C' records showediThat's\4.1>iirio~ dea.t~s'fo .~'Di::iVirig~hile.'intoXicated: $300.
i~11 "1 j~~1,'~J~~~'fJ! j~,'~.~~~j. ~ {i '! 1"111 f:lf.,~~;~.~,}~'tf'~~lt~~u~~~tr;\.~l: rP.il:1t't-Jt~iJ~~~:~~!~~ '~..~t,.;-
: . r~' 1.': ~~;,y l :!!ii!" . 'Rl~
i ~'~~I\ If,1 I ~ " :"1'1 ~; -:. ;t!'I;'T:"/~~A,'IIf.t~'.{};ii!l~' ij'I['-: fl' I)- r !
I f 'l!:~ "'W"d " ; '\;, .. .."...,,.,,,, ',"
~:: CS':, m'~" raws 200' r:. *^1:' ",ijl>" \~tJ~~/;~, 'o~:'',,''i\~o\. '.ll':'lc'!,,~:
,d '.r.~!" "",pi ,.' . il' i. "; ,"f1'S' ~ :I\i \ DI;'"I':' n, sa., .,
'I i It ..:/I')tNr:1~"I~~. ~ ,,:,~'~n' I \ '1-t' "}' \oj .\l~j~ ",'~~$ft''"'~~'i'J<}:<~t'~''3i'1f)i;.f'''^'+~^~''''~ t.~~ f .
. ireco~~~~~tio.ri.~ tentatively set 'for mid;:sum~er", dii,..,i .\,\' "riaa";';il.\:' ';;:(S~)ji;i;~J~I-"mH"'\~~~Ae'''rr> n~ "s" '~
i:l ',.One:)keJl~.question emerged from. the forum au ence:;j;, ,I' C ,;J:'t: " .~Ulil" ' ,
f ,What .~tthe county do about septic systems thaLwere.t'l}" ;,.,".1g' ');;.,~~1'i,,'V~'%F'Vrff\' \)' ,.,I;h ;.>.',1 t'l ,
t ' tall 'd' :t' 'd'" , b t t' '-1'1. .. y'"ralg nsrrls''i'l ' , " ' ,<, ..I
I ms ~ n Qi co e 1: m nast years u are now po entia d' ,..-:,' "0 .;JJ.~ ' '" ,') ,~, ."l.'LI;. , '- 1
. trib t'''''"' t " II t~ f th .? Wh t 'II b I ,I.ne 1,....... 1: . .. !;
con ~ ~rs, 0 po u Ion 0 e spnngs., a,~. e ,11.: '\11,'" """'LM '. 'J! '''nJ..:;;;.I' .., . q n'
I" propeJ:1;Y;;o~ers' responsibilities? How will they be paidy~ ~ ,.lJll . ,. ,~rs}h ~~ .t',,,$~,l,~~ac~ ,resl- ,
. Jor?, r dt ';'1' ".... ,'" "1:1 .;\'1 ,\'1' ,de~ '." ,opmen~.,,~~~~e~~s~y ~~Yjvould
I 'i I "We1 .,,' 'h~ve\'any real inkling about. what c~n be: done ,~,! _ ~~t" ,'... nex.~e property;'outslde, ofYe~;ihUi ~e
" : abouVth~se/' said Art Starry of the '~ounty Department of]-" Clty,~tsi l ;', "'.', ,'tr". ::. _ .. ~u . , . \
- :~ ': Environmental'-Health. fl ., ,":/\ "'11&',. .J.;,.' ..,., .~1~~: for ,~hedutel .one and, a.-half nilles' west of
l,~! ~"Idei1t~g.the concerns of residents was the rea~on fot'I;:l ." :Xeliilt~canJorl~G~O~homes..two.18"hole golf.co~es
: I the fotUrtly<St8.rrY."said, .j. LJ' ~ " , :\ ", tV+,1 and t a ,59-acre, ~mm~r,Ci,al. ~~rtter. " AI;\nexa~on.
. '! I' ,\ "We:t'eh\'fippy With the-turnout,!' he 'said. "Those are ,the j' ,!O\.dd mean the cl~ wO~,d provige ~.erytces,such;;.~
I' 'sortS\oc"i.", entiJwe were wantirig,", - '." .1" ,. Ii' '~f.:~~,~e~~~~,w~te~}in~s.tot11~~~lJ:.t~::,::~'i"'+.. ~.
h'l 'In!lr1:9' 'omniis~ioners put density limits' 'on' new"lots'j ".,.1" Thef~~e is ;soutneas~: ~Lth~ F'Ott,~WlS !lI4ili~ !
: 'iu'sing:!O' e septic; systems; instituted, ennanced"septic:t'\~ ',,~"~S:~~,~:dan.~;l:,b~fdJe.S ~bYt~~~e ~d or
. 'desi~~s'"c.da~ds!lfor. new septic systems on eXis~in:g-I~~;:):\' '\,:\J ,. '~mdjl<r~ t"~~' . ; .o~:,., ~;tl~~~ ;~!r
, ! andcan"rei81E!.ttfor'vqluntary "best management prac, tice!!,".',.for ':'k\"mJ~,:?;lg'':}'~~l:~..t; ....l.t.....d~.vEda~;~.: IM~w:tri
, . .. "''''"''~ ., . "'f ~ rt'l' d t"d . .' .""1(" en """nu "\.Vnl:iWIAlI \ a,nWI .....u 'MSOCIau::S
~ i comme . .use ,0 'Ie Ilzers an pes ICI es, ,. i ,. 'H' .!;t"1 .,~}>,1 . . f' ,., '''Ed: 'd' '.' I" ." ,< ,~" '" ~...' ,~ ". .
, s.:" . .. ,',.....:.""-1 t di 'h .... b'" d" t d' ':f""t"li':'N;:'o' 'oiiui eve 6Jjers' 01' 'e(i).u~saL!1:t;tS'not
, ". iseverCU sues ave een con uc eo. e,l';\'li.l.i;t' :fk'1i.,'" '" "",..,t;. " ".r' '.& 'I' ".,,,,,,,' . " . .,... ."
. I ' ,.' , . '.:..L'''t'} '1 'f .. II .. . d th ...., "", tneau I. u>",ompe~.." . ,.!,n,,,-, .,,,. '.)~'",' '. ,,t 'hI"
!' ,sp~ tCtIr~n.. eve 0 ~o u.bon an .. e, v811.9us.p. . !\. ;.';,' 1 . .,4-<'~ "' 'i' .ji'\"Y1' off ~',;':"'.1' .,.~" ~'.
r Icon~, to,potEmbal contammation." ,.~,>lr f;rkr>i'l,~'"lfl:: <!1?'};"'iCTitf:/ ''''Vi''' pL.,,' 'iir';;~Wi ~ ., f.See. ~elm/2C;i
I"i;;' ;\,;;;.::;~~': i. d~ 'j .~;., 'j, .~ 'S~e '~a.t~f/2.C.tYI'1 ,g;b0: ~~:~~l;~;';;.~ ::"~.~'~ ~I'.:;~~;~~;l~:' ;::,: ~ 1\. ' ,. . \ '
~j,' .-;r-:t}{!A" 1.':; .~,H ' ~. < ~. ,L j~ ;1" '11". -~'~-.' l/'4 ;lH:.l ;~L,~ L..~~ "..' '~<:'$irj:~,,,!?n'H l -l' I ' <,
, ;i'ap~f~v~d, a:bid (if ri~~rlY' $50,000; f~fchaits aA~ ' ,TUn1Wat~~:~e~iO~~Winsscholarlship 'f'
iiy ~m.~~.;-at Its new middle '~chool",~;late~ t~ ope~, .t:rj/' iir.rLERO,CK',.'-7H:;teven :Hall,,:a rllmwater 'High, I
all: '"~,~, ,I, , '" I 1 i ! Ii: .x~l'il: ',' School. senior;' has been. awarded a :$200 scholarship ,
ebid~as"awarded tllesday to Western'SchooI-1 !,fromi the I, LittlerockElemehtary'~,School Parent-, ,
'ly ~~I~Portland, Ore., said Superintendent H,./ ~Teacher.Organiiation,' 1'lft{! ,r!}': ,,,
,~ro.m~"H~sen, The district'will'purchase about 350 'I j fi'. ,ill,\:., i~llVi;;. . ,1 .'i t' ~:" i! . n'h l '.1.1 i.
, "j tS 'at..$29.40. each and about 640 'study: units at"". Th~j scholarship, \Vinner.i had ,to :~ave. at!ended
5#'~h~"i I, .,,',' ,1'" ~'" \ {I Ii .~,.{Llttlero~~"i'Elem,entary;d~c~~ol,.tiWhlCh .,IS 10 the
i ,1/:11!1",\, ',.. .... . , "Ie," " . ....~. '..';(11 ~m,~~ter.\hSc,h.o~l! DIstm:t,. said ,Debbie Mounts,.
e~~~~t!mlddle scho.ohat ~mth and ft'anklm..1 cO!1.1~lttee'~haIr; Mo~tih,SaIdj.ij1e~ were 12 appli-
ts;:: ~~:,:sched,~le~ to, mov~ m Octobe~or NO.p,\cants ~~)l~tqe,~~holal1!hlp, \' ":'';' . '", \', Hi . '
. ,e~.. to.:thenew site o~ Spnngs Road,adJac~nt .t/>'':'f,{I., .ArolJhd ISbuth S'oUnd is .~ bompilalion 'of hews items
J~en !1lgh ~fhool. . .,. 'i' ;. A:\f'YVfJ 'i :i;1'from'Thurston,~:Mascj~;\Gr8ys~Ha'rbor,,'PiercearidLewis
n~other.\business at the meeting, fuembers"~ofth~'!'~: tdLlntiesY:"It: :is':published">daily fin the South Sound
tirlit}'i'Center Planning Team discussed opEmlP" 'sebtioJ';;'~~' ~\;'\l"f'\:, ,bi.,'fJ "j rrfj ,,i I: ",- 'j' !
commUnity center in Shelton i . ,I,. ;;'i l:'M'li~I~'A' t" ''al,' , , . ., "
.h.....,.l!J.tt.:M>.,~,. ~~,..,,:."!r\ .<<' ,~ ,I,.'. ./. -t!k'1:r~l?',(1),v:~he.~~fi;'2;1tN!>t, ,~~ .l1g~., 0, ~Y~~~h~;1C:~;..~J.lf\~'!.h'~i~;~'!~ ~'\' '\'\",il:~::H-~l f~~~t..J,fr)?~' ":tAl). -:;": '-I'
.,
ih 'Cen-;
llongef
Ity,i said
'j; ,(
to' ~~~.'
~}! i~ <~~ :f-'
loiied ~,
te Rai
t l'p,
g, lot)'
'r3 ~U~'~~(~~f.
~lh
i-
~
, I,
-I
'5-~~-9D
~~:'Qn
!
I
,
I
t.
!
!
I:
e
~
,
r
t ,1\. t,
\
I
\
~~:",'J
!' ,
,
,.
! 1
t i
, I
! ~
r
i
I'
i'i:
f.',>:r
~. .~- ..j3 I...." _;'~:;-;";;':;;;:"~}~;fi;.4-'''_L'4;~.;J~~fj{t~S~
---- --- . .. - '-"'~~:-"'-!'~-'~.,~","":- ~~D.O ....A W we OWfewas1to,;{"Any lfiaDi~~r~v~~ ;uii:5~ ~~-1E}J~~}{~
-- .,- - __u_ --- .y. tee on public lands, national parieS, preserve .i~ an. ~ld-growthforests -cent of 'aspeC1esmC()nsIdera.b.llb~J.~!R-~
' !!ienist who heads the team, smd and (orests }.s '''''''''tors clashed, whe~ the owl os found "but o!wi- decline Iii not tiinmimal risk P1a:n:^"'i/<,i'<
his fi!"t job would ,b" to. look over over the-validity OIlhe clwIcon,,"ously ~t wonldb" politically and AmiidmaJ risk 'plan w~nI~ ..veall.,,\~',\'\'orJ!e.....,~'WJ!
the airplanes and their air syste~s'servation !Strategy . offered last e...c onomlCally unac~eptable. i " . ~e habitat. There ~as. be. en '~. cg.R:.. \_J.,:.~. g.... 2~. ,~....O!d. .'P..,V. ."e"~.,,
to .make sure t.hey are wO~kinbg month by a panel of government, .,"Other alternatives were too _ ...derablecomprpm...."he smd,o: .~i)01,Ji!:!~~
properly Then, a.rsamples will e, " "'" ., .,.J.;,_. .",..,. , :. ,,,. .' T' _ " '.:_ '" _ ,to Ab"",,,w.eoIii
takenJor analy.is. ", .' i <'re\j<s lo':~
dEventually,he sa!d" flightatttm- ;.y, el'm"" ,it .r /, """;iWays. 'in favor ~fexpansi~n ~thtremehd~us ~pact on o. ur schools g::~:~.ul.~~..I..
c1ant. enuld~e medically tested . , - , ; . ,: housmg and mduslry It will help I wonder U our fire, department ., __' 'K ,\I[
during fiights. . From 1 C ..... " update the eiIY:, W!ll b" able to bandle It, Our roads ~orl<..on lhe"
N .>- t' gear 'I.. . ,A few. reSIdents who. attended will be more con~est~d. B~dge.m Tum~
avy Pf9Jec In . . Mower Dennis T Su a land-use . the meebog asked quesbon. of the Yelm's populabon IS about 1,425. qu.cIdy .onee ~
BREMERTON - The Navy os eonsnltu:t and another' project -'backers after the presentation. The The new development wonldpUSb " 'tJi~:
pushing abead with plans _tobmld a__~ supporter 'attended the YelmCity" residents srod they wanted to know the population to more than 5~OO, i MUch:'ldei'J
$16 million repair and m"'~tenance 'Council meeting Wednesday to in- '''inore ~bont the plan. ,- ,",sed On each new household hav- co ~D' . "
facility .in Everett, desP.te .rea,..,. tr9duce"tbe -plan ..toc-Ma>,!,rfBob:,j;MWe..are 'ki!!d J>f nenlJ'al:'said inganayenige of 2.' -members, _,.ilo~~ than:.r
that tbeiNaVYbom~port l\>e~e 1"'11 cSandersand council members" ,.,'"...'Davul-Il9y1e, '.who..<lWDS G5acres Mower smd_" . ~.'.." :k:vin throu8b:
~.s,cr~pped. Navy _~fIje.a1,..~:,~, ~" Sanders . would .not .let 'counCil,~~~ear the'pr,>posed ,~evelopemenl." Mower .~d none 01 the properly, -much gmoreVisij)
The. ropo.ed repror plan~ to be ,'members ,.orth~ ~~:jiO :!1':'!'~",:A~-.fin;,!, ~~,.t~ a proposal ::..presently"owned by.the .,We-and harrier$ A
known~a.a Shore Jnten,pedu,te ,dents "~opacked"the '.~1DaJI ,.Clty"~,,,...But. It .WiJl.~ -'",?,~~m ,~: yerba~..erCo., bas '!een,boughl tbinl; ~ : :C.J
. t.. '. A.t"ty .woul. d..-.,be.... ,'..CouncIh,chambers ~iW. ednesday",".,...such aIaTge way """"""~'''''''''''V' "~.'""HesaId the property IS worth $3.5_ ',' "'.' ,,'.<
Mam enance c IVl , ' '" '.' . " '. " . '. '.., _ " , r.d"'" . . " . .' ,
used malruy lor uPkeep"on,,!~ee 'jUgbl"skqu..tiO"'-A'.,Pn\!ij~,~_:,~<, Maek ,~ood;f wh~ lives south or ~".!" l5 million, ,. ': , _:.. 1. ... _, ,LIke~e, .wory
ship. based 'in 'Eyerett, sa,d Ll .:mg on.,the,p....posal ,w;n,1>\! ,se)>ed,,*cY ~Im, smd be was <oneerned about 'S~ bas s",d.t !,unportant to Road Bndge OVJ
Mary Walker, 'NaV)'"Sp<>keswoman ,.,~u1ed ah "!,te,r.,do~ SaAd"f',SlUd.. o-,tbe "d:amatic growth lbat couldl"OCe1ve the .co,,!,ciI'ssupport b~-, the south ~~d ot:'
in Washington -D G..;"" .,,'''''4r.''!'lr"''.''''!landers 'anil, C,ty, A<lininislrato~ !\\j,occuru_ lbe pim! goes il!rongb,. can.e the ..te lies. outSIde .Yelms ,;;be moreVlS!blc-,1
- ' "., _. ,'ii'''' "Gene Borge. support the plan._ i! :~'D1.mlerestedbecause the SW! . "unmapped use area" and "",nld..: 1M! "'".'odel"!.'..
She.'.saId,th.e actIVlth.-would sup-"-,,.,.,~ "I'.th:.;.'"..t....:,,'''.''.,''. '~" '-'.d. '.'-'" '. .~".".'~. '.. "f~'U... ..,-'..,...:"."'.........--. ". H ....1.-""-..-0 ....~..",'~... " '.. ,.....' ..... '''. .., . '_.." '" '."'a".''''Wl der bndge ""_"1'
"'" ~, , . .. -. .-J'. ~. " . . c."";,,,,.. . lUA I Wll1ut:: a goo move lor.' "f,.'O ~eUll"WlU "ut::moreLUau ou- ~'i;:reqwre .a _ zonmg.,. vanance .,or .Ci', ,i., .W1!.
plement"hip:n;~udding and ..ep,,!r"k'tbe..c;ty" 'SanderS -Said.' "I ;am- a1;;;~'bled,~ -WoooloSrool "There wilJka :;~Change,in 'zOn~ ;; ....,.~w'f:,~""..,.. CoDlPletion"of th
t f~cC~~;~~t!nl-~~?fc~fiI:~;~~~k:-:=~~:~r.~ ;fJ~~,;~&r !:", ,;~~;);)t:, ~,mJ :: 1:::/"~i~!;~, .. _:,: f'=,' ,:-: ,,~': ~if,~ i
I urren .~ ,n..,..,_ ,:' . -' - -'t;:.o..;. . o' .. :,.".. Sf Pete, Ho:ip"; Olympia;' "w" - 'wnl begl" at 2'p.m. Frid,y, M.y 25, loth. ,boy, ay. . ,
tena"ce"cliVl!Y;t9 _tie '" operabon "'Ob Ituan es .. '..i:..'i1,.,C\.. She .....bom..b. 13, 1926, 10 .Yuma,...: FJm ....'" enu",h, Olympia. The Rev' Roo~u, Mege,.~
by.! 9~,7, five years. .n~rlj!s.~g~~-"". '., , Mz.. "''''' "eod -Etta _en)' WD"!\WaJte, ..Pulliam will offi"'te.""m"1<'" ,"" . 9'", M,y,
port's .eheduled opem"g. "''lk''-'', " "''''''!' ~M,<~.,__..~",,","~,,~_"_ -'C _ughby nn'.....'.h' .... illsduat'd c'wlllb, 10 .Olym~, Memo,'" Geolens, ea.h,!,eo, Kate ";'!,
A. ---id' '-'t 'us R'epNormDicks ,PaulineK':Jenneson ~:"'j 'from Poitlaiid (Ore.) Union Academ. yand c. Tumwater<'Arrangements'are 'b~'Mills _: 9Irt,MGaYi23l. d~JI
n a eo" . ., .n.. .' "'. , .,' . tt d d Wall wan CollOM h" d M'II F e alO' ctors . Fullerton, a an .
D W h 'd th lans .show the ' Pauline :c;f<athaleen Tenneson, "84, ,~~ a en e.. a a ege. n. arc.,an . " s l!,n r Ire . _ 'rt M 22 '
- as ., sal e p, ...' .'~ '01" .' ,. 31946 .she was married to JackR 'f'" "';', (, gl, ay .
Navy remains seriou.,about op~n- Doooa, T'","" ."me"y'" .' ymp",d..d '.. , " . . Th, "mlly .u"oslo m'm..'eldo"" Sea"",o, Tammy, Y,
ing the Everett bomeport, wluch Wedoasdey, !>ley 23,.1990,.n he, horn.. eM",O "o~and. 'tlo"" mey be made '''he Rm ....'" Thompson, N.oey,.
Id b h t the aircraft car- .l~he was born Oec., 24, .1905, to Arch-Mrs, ElVin worked as an office m~n. Church. twin girts, May 2;
":'OU SSe N' o~~ 0 lbaldat>d ;:au", Jeeo McDoo"d In Halt 'age"" ,h" husband'. d,"'" """on , , '.
ner U Iml. . Mich., where she attended schools. for more than 20 years In Oregon and F I P I_ D ~
O~mp'an staff, new. .e""ee. M". Teoo"oo ,,'" lI,ad 'n Cal_,. :;:aoey She ,,'" II".., I~ e,umol'" eod unera s 0 Ice nA
for five years and before moving to In 1980 m~ved t? Olymp!!i. . . ~:
Olympia in 1979. She moved to Texas in Mrs. ElVin enjoyed her grandchildren " .f
W t ' 1987 . .. 1. " _and .was a m~mber o.f Seven~h-day f'd- Today, May 24' Olympia
- She en'o ed cooking. ventlst Church, OlympIa.
a e r . . J Y Su"""'o,, bas'd" he' husbeod '" 1he "'heo.leon." J'm" D.,., 47, _.ny P No""
From 1 C Su~,", e'e. fi~ da"~hte", Mooa faml~ home e'e "'",e SO"' Jeo' R J, F",okfnlt Ge"""oy"o""",,>, '" .'''''" ,Tumweta" "
Lou Forrester, Vlsaha,. Calif., Laura ~ay Robert 0 'd J M, all' 01 '.': ' 'Rainier, memorial serv.ice, 7 p.m. Tuesday night by O~
Early returns, according to F"s'o,. K1emath, CaJ'" le'h. Pauhoe "''''e d,u "::te"~~d'-8,,;~~ OJ':;:P:: R"n'" Chap~. '." __0 "'second,
Thurston County slaflers, sbow H'ho, '" Donoa, eod Katheleen Pauh~e en"e ~" Sumae, and Ro~.e.b- _ ."g, G.yl' '" 40, Olymp.., 3 p.m. ''. _ .belo, !"'d In-~
that McAllist r Springs water con- Baker and Banda Lee ,T~rver, both In ';be d' 'E " , . '.' :,.~:" .~. Luth~rarJ,f,Churchl'ofj.';t~. ,'-Good";;"JJail Wednesdaynighf1
- . e 'th Olympia: ",,0 ,. '''''''oh''~'e",od 25 , , - "n" n_. -", _b""""". ......,. ::- ." Shephe"""MIII;' eod ;Mnla . Fuo... <:. '.. _. --A,
lains a !!4:1!er ,level 01 mlra~ - an:'g,eai-g""''''''''dren.' '_""""''''"''"'. Willou,h~,: Po~ond, ~ _'"An", ~~ _.{ __ -01_. '" .... "" ~ ''''-__ . . ,_ --Jl1!!~lH!. COun
other~gw~terso~s,m the .:' 'Th --will "be no funer8l'''serv;ce for' -- San.FranClSco, Calif., also 14 gran~C~II->Umler Anna Lena:'.84"~Centr~li"',n'ri>"",,,- ,_ .",'_ "
counhi Though the spnngs level,' ere " dren. '''.i '..... it'" .--';''''''''''':';-'tl~'''''';:P~~l'..#.~!..-,,,,,,.,"',
oJ'inilligicuiI'" .... r liter IS' well - -Mrs.. Tenneson. ~Arrangemen~,^,are,..by.:";;;t"'1I;n;-'i..$!tL\i;n~I~~!!~~"!.lW.:t.'~~~",,,,~~~?,,:~,~~S!q~;1l\1_1
s ~...", ."=c.,,, "'.......-''''..'''''. ..<<--~,,,-~.,,--...:. j"'::""'~lJ"ere.WI ~""'no"lu,,e'..."seMCef"Uf' '.. '''Ii'''':' >....~'l,li,
~ 1..8 -' ' ~ ..... '~".._,;"':i\'~;,~" (ff."sagmlller,FUneial.Home;\ln.aonna"~B.F'..".r">"" f';;' <'f.".",. ......."~~_ :'~~.,.,.~_ "'~ .. _ '~:'~ "1etery,',:( '''__
. . l.C:r ";:)WUI,-' ........._<.w"""'=.1>~.".."'''''-,~._..., f~"'h""'_ ..,...." ' , ." l~."" C ".' " '...0 ~..~'. "PO'''',' .,>,"~ ^' U_',_' ....,";." .., ''l'
' ,'- --:'~tbi!'1;:,s~te8:~!!1ri!:!~~~'th'~"GSA' "~hn"~ G .. H.".. J, -:- " --.;:gi..~f..-;~.,.~ '.' --"'OM~. .~~..nM'" r,'~~-'G'!l~mW~~T,~ll,,-~ .In:,,~~;:jFiCh~; yemralla'~~f{j.~#<r",g; ~">"..'" . ;i:":~-'County Stieffif deputil
", --,~'" WIUll1J e ,- ... - ."",-'"' ~ ~,.,#jlh""..~._.,. "'.. IC emo..... a,uens ~ umwater' ,<, _, " . ; . '"
· .,!fBriIS~ Otli~ ('~. '- .._- _c_--"'''~'_..,'',...-_-4'''~.,~c ~'"""---~-.!Yi!'R~_.,. ,~ . __ _. . __ '_' __ _," A ,.M'''h.II, ,,.n. Me" 50, R~n''', _ '" dOv,", wh<, ,""'"
,< Sbow readings of ,'ll!7 lffil1igra,ns"C' ...John G. H"" 74, a Ion",me "'''em '" .....~meots ~e by M,ns eod M'~' Fu- . ,"'_d" 11 e.m. Velm Camele<y _ $300 _bell and __,
' per :tiler, Starry. smd The state ,Y~m, ~..~ T~'f'aY, M'9' ,;!2, 19"", '", ..,,, 0'_., , .'- . .... ;.. WOod'..,oFuo""Home:--~ __ ___ Thu""'o CO""~ Jan.
s~= is ~~. oxi~.d fo':" ,; ';:"'h'~~~bom Ap"'24,,~~, InSOb,- iGertrude M,-Kenr\edy . ~:. _ ,_ _.
trogen; is' potentially.dan~~rou~_ for ane, to Calvin and Lora (Harvev) Hill GertrlJrlA lA J(aM~"'" M _
._~,.._.._ ...._..J__ II
1,200-acre project to get Velm council review
Pilot hears
call of wild
By Jason Smith
;:"0. Olympian
( )rery summer Bill R. DuVall
1",~V'es the secluded Cougar
Mountain Airport in the Bald
Hills, where he runs a small
flight-training school, to. visit
even more secluded territory
DuVall, 56, and his wife Ede-
ltraud, 55, pack a tent and fish-
ing gear, then take off from the
airfield, 10 miles east of Yelm,
for the remote lakes of British
Columbia.
''We go primarily to get back
to nature," Bill said. "We're
usually the only ones up there."
DuVall attaches floats to his
specially modified Cessna 172
and lands on Canadian lakes.
Most of the lakes in Western
Washington aren't hospitable to
CPlanes, Bill said. "Seaplanes
.-/less environmental damage
than other craft," he said.
Before starting Cougar
Mountain Aviation, DuVall was
in the Air Force for 20 years
"and three days," he said.
Shortly after leaving the Air
F'orce, he walked into a propel-
ler and lost an ann.
He had to show the Federal
Aviation Administration that he
was fit to fly Shortly after get-
ting licenses reinstated, DuVall
opened an &r .taxi service,'
which he operated until three
years ago.
A handful of other Cougar
Mountain families also use the
airport for their private planes,
but small flying businesses have
been hit with recent financial
By Craig Harris
The Olympian
YELM - Backers or a proposed
1,200-acre residential development
that includes two 18-hole golf
courses are scheduled to make a
presentation to the Yelm City
Council tonight.
The plan calls for building 1,600
homes and a 50-acre commercial
center on land bordered by George
Road and Longmire Street, about
one and a half miles west of Yelm.
The site is located southeast of
Fort Lewis Military Reservation.
One organizer said it was im-
Each week
health care
h its road
Mobile clinic makes
rounds to towns
By Brad Sevetson
The Olympian
YELM - The town Moose
Lodge, with an antler~topped totem
pole standing near the entrance to
the dub's bar off State Route 510,
doesn't look like a health clinic. ,
But walk through a side door of
the building on the fourth Wed-
nesday of any month, and you'll
enter a world of immunization
shots, child exams, blood pressure
tests and family planning.-
Every Weanesday, the Thurston
County Health Department sends
~ '
portant to receive support from the
council and Thurston County offi-
cials because the site lies outside
Yelm's "unmapped use area" and
would both parties to approve ei-
ther a zoning variance or a change
in zoning.
Currently zoned for a density of
one house per five acres, the pro-
posal would require a density of
two housing units per acre.
A Yelm-Thurston County Joint
Plan is in the works to define how
land will be zoned in that area. The
zoning is expected to change if the
Yelm City Council and Thurston
County commissioners adopt the
plan.
Meetings to review the joint
plan, drafted by 10 residents, have
not been scheduled.
"The current zoning code pro-
hibits current plans," said Dennis
T Su, land-use consultant for Gar-
land and Associates of Redmond,
developers of the proposal.
"It's outside the urban-growth
zone and outside Yelm,so what are
we going to do? We have to find a
solution," Su said.
The meeting is scheduled to be-
.gin at 7:30 at Yelm City Hall, 105
Yelm Ave. W
Cio/. Administrator Gene Borges
said if city services are brought to
the area then it goes to a different
zoning classification, which is de-
termined piece by piece.
Borges said the city would want
the right to annex the development
if it occurred.
''Yelm certainly does not want
two cities this close together,"
Borges said. "I don't want to see
two complete different commercial
areas. That affects our schools, po-
lice and fire.
"They should be dealing with us.
\
\
\1/
...
Wednesday
May 23, 1990
The Olympian
Page 3C
.... .....;.:;;::: ...;....;;-;.:.:..
'H. .... .......
........ .......... ......
....... ......... .....
It would be[oor planning if we did
not procee in that manner We
feel we should be the lead agency
on determining what type of
growth should happen."
But Borges said it still is too
early to make definite plans for the
site. The land presently is owned
by the Weyerhaeuser Co. and the
developers are in the process of
purchasing the site.
"All they will do Wednesday
night is tell us who they are and
what they want to do," Borges said.
"They won't won't be asking any-
thing of us."
Charity is
no stranger
to inmates
By Craig Harris
The Olympian
.SHELTON -David Hawkins
arid Milton Begley probably would
admit their Circle K Club, a Kiw-
anis-sponsored organization, isn't a
run of the mill program.
Hawkins is president and Begley
is treasurer for a club that consists
of 25 inmates at Washington Cor-
rectionsCenter near-'Shelton.
It is the only knoWDcactive'Circle
K Club behind bars. Until a few
years ago, it was a one of a kind,
according to Denny Temple, prison
recreation director
However, just because the
members are felons, it does not
'C
,.'t:.
..----- -----~~
~- ---------.---- -- -
1',
\
\
----
--------
I
\
IiI
Iii Ci/IIC \, ' c d- '^{IS4Lt,>~
II ~ \ ""'-
,I
\ wr~ (iJIJf----
\\\
III ~ J />/, ,
Iii V=
Ii'" ~~G-{jlJLL-- crC(r
~~~~~t:l S; ~
~ Q)~
C \
i '
-it?' V1,/\, , 1\0~~~~-----
~~
\ '
'\W'~' ~~--
.-+--==
_~ ~ 'lcs ~f~'"
')\~
\\
1.\
\\
. ~\\ \Al
1\
-----
~ ~ -
o
G
f)~
\ \
I
\11,
\\\
II
\
\
1\
----- ------- ~ ~------ --
\
II
'\
i,
II
-- --- ~~
------------- ~
:_7';;; ~~'"" :"" 1
o
Town of 'Yelm
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
206-458-3244
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL FORM
"FAX"
COMPAN;j1,fa haul) f.j1 IJms ulr-J
INDIVIDUAL f ('--(Vrt-L U .~(lj_
NUMBER ;?5 i - :l~f,~ .
fh-JheMSJhC.
j )
TO
"FAX"
11 J I
COMPANY elM lk- uum
h (J. [
INDIVIDUAL ,-':-Y0MA' ~lJd~
- / --- j
NUMBER (206) 458-4348'
NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW ~
FROM
DATE t:)- ~ - 1 0
SUBJECT ~ hiD M
(J~ /J
ADD:4IONAL COMMENTS
TIME SENT LI.' ~'5 fm
7
() t7 hjl )( a/!7' /J7....-J.-J-D 0/ ()yd~~
(!/() I.lM)
w/an't
/
P / -eMf tAw (j ~ -i:/Z / Jm/? --
{I ~/
/h >>4 ht'J/7 ';
o
**** IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL COPIES OR ANY
COpy IS NOT LEGIBLE, PLEASE CALL (206) 458-3~44
AS SOON AS POSSlBLE ****
\'
o
~nl.
f
, . 't" it' RCW 351\.,14.050
.' f'led ",'th 'ount' e ,sla\lVC "u " r
DC \Slon '
, the rcvicw board {with or ",ithout
U"o "",,,, ,[ ,,, ",,"". "'. 0<"" " ~, , "" [0<
.,,,,,,, ",,,). ", ",'" "1"""" '"::",,;,'", .,d' " ," ,<, ",
",,,,,,,," ,[ '" '''''',' ,. ", '"' '" " b< '00"". ,"' ,,00"
M' ,d) " ," .,,,,, ,[ ," ",,,,,,, """,d , , '''' " ,n "" ,," '"
legislativC authoritY mu,t talee a.e~~n :Oo~ deat~~ ;f\cr TeCeipt of the revieW
. 'f . to be held ""t",n" J . . d
"",,", , ,.,,,. .," 0' h,Id .",'" ,'" ,,'" .
board'~ decision, other"'l~ at a Weela mee I
,,,or'" ,"' [ '" ,.r[""" D" "or"~ ,. .
. anva~,ing of the vote, effec\\ve
f" ;0[".",'0 ,0 ,,, ",,,,,0 '''''"; ',Id " ",,0. '" """",. '"
date of anne1<ation and notIce that.s ~ 12
,,,,; '"' ,G. " ,... ,[ "" "",,,. ",,"",0' " ,," .
..~,,,....I>>'nQN ME.-OiQt>.
G.
f ne1<ing unincoTPorated tc"itOTY i~ bY
,"' .'" [",,,,,,, or"~ .""d , ;;% [", ,,,,,,,, ",,, " ," "".
"'",;,. o[ '" ...", ,[ ",,,~, , ,',. ,[ ," ",""" ,0 ,,, ,,",or"~
computcd according to the a~~~~e va ua I
anne1<atiOn aTea for geneTal taxatIOn purt'ose~.
If the \cgi~\ati\'e b06
rcgu\ation and/or the, a
conditions to annc1<atlon,
19
l
\
C
\
. . recedent to cireulat',on of
._ ",;,,,,," Md> " ' ~o:~;~,: ,[ ,h' "",'''''' hOd>
...' < ,S nO at't'eal frOm t e
2.
3.
4.
D
---------= . . ""umed th:lt
. "' ).{d)" It IS "
fefefS to subscctlon' ,3. '
. A""'" '" "",,, d' " "",""" -" ).,,)
reference ",:I' intended to be ma
BO
1,
/
rr
It
o
o
(
a. Published in one or more issues of a newspaper of general
circulation in the city and
b. posted in three public places within the territory proposed for
annexation.
E.
tjn1itatiilll on
35A.14.230
f Conflietin" Pc
After the filing of an annexation petition (with the city council, the
county legislative authority, and/or a review board) and pending its final
disposition, no other annexation petition, annexation resolution, or
incorporation petition which embraces any of the territory included in the
first petition may be acted upon by any public official or body
F
&arin2 and Decisiilll RCW 35A,\4.140
Following the hearing, if a legislative body determines to effect the
annexation, it shall do so by ordinance. It may annex all or any portion
of the area proposed for annexation, but may not include any property not
described in the annexation petition. (Centerlines of public streets, roads,
or highways are not to ~ used to define any part of the new municipal
boundary RCW 35A.03.180)
Cities in counties having a boundary review board, when they have not
previously received review board clearance, often first pass a motion or "-
resolution of intent to annex, After approval is received from the review
board, the formal ordinance is passed.
G.
Rc\'i~
L Boundar\' Review Bo:uQ.
If a boundary renew board has been established within the county
a notice of Intent to annex must be filed with it. Most boundary
review boards will accept and process the notice of intent on the
10% petition or after favorable action has been taKen on the
completed 75% petition, Since statutes are silent on when review is
to taKe place under this annexation method. procedures can vary
between counties, It is advisable to contact the appropriate review
board for specific proccdures. (See Chapter \.1\1, Section L)
2, Cguntv Annaatior, Rc,.iew...lli@Id for C~ RCW 35A.14.::20
The count)' anneution revieW board for code cities docs not review
annaations under the 75% petition method.
H
Wecthe Date of Annc'.Jtiiill RCW 35A.14 150
Upon the date fixed iT, the ordinance of annexation, the area annexed
becomes a part of the city If the petition so provided, on the effective
81
r
I
\
\
\
\
\
I
I
!
\
\,
.date of annexation, the property annexed shall be subject to the proposed
zoning regulation and be assessed and taxed at the same ratc and on thc
'same basis as property within the annexing city to pay for the portion of
any then outstanding indebtedness of the city that the city has reQuircd to
be assumed.
'-
l.
~0tiee of AnnexaliQn.
of
at
IV
by
or
RCW 35,6,.14.700
V
For information on the notice that should be given once the tcrritory is
annexed, see discussion in Sec. I.L.of this chapter at page 76.
ANNEXATION OF FEDERAl LY OWNED ARtM
A code city may annex any contiguoUS, unincorporated area within four miles of
its corporate I~' . s an ordinance accepting a gift, grant or Icase from the
US. """,.Z" .r , , ,"" " ~~"""". ;m,""'. 0< "M" " ro<
".."';'1. _ ",r,," ;.,..' ;.,,,'",' '" \ "" RCW }sD..J ro
A. Th n i i CW 35A^l4.320
vlncn annexin~ pur . nt. to ~ift./ gra~ or lease
}overnment, a Clt ay In Its ord1nat./
I Include such tide and shorelands as may be necessary or convenient
for the us~ thereof, and
~r
s.
2. Include an acceptance of the terms and conditions atl3ehed to the
gift, grant, or lease.
82
)
ANSWER. Statutes governing Ihe election melhod do not rcquirc a public
hearing, The state Supreme Courl held in ~ck v. Thurston Count.Y, 60 Wn.2d
461 465,374 P,2d 558 (1962):
o
\T]he statulOry procedure for the ...\eleetion melhods of
annexation] does nol require the city legislative body 10 hold
a public hearing upon Ihe filing of a pelilion for an
annexation election.
X 75% PETITION METHOD
9 QUESTION: May owners of la..-exempl properlY, such as cities and special
districts, sign annexation pelilions?
ANSWER. Yes, owners of la...e..emp1 property may sign annexation petilions jusl
'.Y " ,..'" ,f ",,", '''',,'' n, ,,," Coo" ,f A""" ,,, ~",,',',
f'\. ~ RCW 35.2\.010 gives the Cil~ of Spokane Ihe power to own
t}J' land; therefore, the Cily or Spokane, as an owner of land
\r\1, I siluated outside an incorporaled city, has the right to petition
~.r en for Ihe annexation of lhat property under RCW 35 13.130.
~~ ---{\~v ..,the phrase 'value, aecording to the assessed valuation for general
~ \ \ laxalion of the property' docs not require Ihat the property actually
be taxed.
illhnson v. Sooka~, 19 \\n, App. :22, 577 P.2d 164 (1978). fewew dell/cd 90
Wn,2d 1026 (1978). See also f].!"so, v. TacomJ!., 57 Wn,2d 409 357 P,2d 873
"Wi ",,0), ~"'"",, "" ,', "" ,f T><,m. ,,' .",,,, '" " ,d"'" ," CiO, or
\,\1 _ T><'m< f" .""'" or," ,f ,.. '''''' " ' ."" ,"' ,f ," .w,,,,,, of ",'
~\; ownerShip is the right to petilion for annexation by a city
10
QUESTION: Is property owned t~ a school districl which is considcrcd for
annexation by a firsl, second. third, or fourlh class municipality under the 75%
petition melhod trealed any differel:,IY?
o
ANSWER: There is a stalute ~hieh relatcS specificallY to Ihis type of
anncxalion, RCW 28A.58,044 authenzes a school district board of directors 10
sign an annexation pelition under I!-,< 75% petition method 10 first, second, third.
and fourth class municipalities .....h<n Ihe school dislrict properlY is all of thc
propCrlY included in the anne~3ti,_,n pelition. This s\3tute waS most likely
enaeled to clarify an ambiguity ..hich arOSe from time to time before Ihe
decisions of the Washington COUf" which are described in the prcceding
question, However this statute ClaV noW serve as a limilation on school
districts, requiring that school distri-t property be the only property included in
the 75% petition 10 a first. second. third, or fourth clasS municipality By its
terms, Ihe statute does nol appl to other methods of annexation, or to
annexations 10 code cities.
114
(
(
11
QUESTION: May state-owned land be annexed?
ANSWER: Yes. However IWO opinions of the attorney general (AGO 1947-48, p.
22 and AGO 57-58, No. 107), casl doubt on the ability of state officials to sign
annexation petitions unless there is a specific statute authorizing the signing or
petitions applicable to Ihe stale agency involved, They state thai the legislalure
itself could authorize the anne~ation. Allernatively, the annexation of state land
could be accomplished through a method which does not require a petilion to be
signed on behalf of the state properly, such as Ihe election method, initialed by
resolulion, or the 75% petition method where enough signatures arc obtained
from private property owners to meet the 75% requiremenl.
The State Supreme Court and Courl of Appeals have concluded Ihal when a port
district and a cily own land, as aulhorized by law, they may sign a petilion for
the annexation of that land. One of the attributes of land ownershiP is the
right to petition for annexation by a city fA-Tosa v. Tacoma, 57 Wn,2d 409 357
p.2d 873 (1960); Johnson v. Sookan~, 19 Wn. App. 722, 577 P.2d 164 (1978),
review denied 90 Wn.2d 1026 (1978). It is arguable under these cases that a
state agency which has authorily to own land would have similar authority 10
petition for annexation if it desired to do so.
12,
QUESTION: Must bolh the husband and wife sign an annexation petition?
K..
ANSWER: In firsl, second, Ihird, and fourth class CitieS, both Ihe husband and
wife should sign an annexation petition when property is community property or
owned jointly by them. In MeAlmond v. City of Bremert<ill. 60 Wn.2d 383, 374
P,2d 181 (1962), the signatures "John and Mary Doe" were held to be valid,
where the husband and wife had both signed theiT names.
In .e~ RCW 35A.OL040(9)(a) provides thai the signature of a record
own~lsWbe sufficienl without the signature of his or her spouse. However,
it still may be advisable for both spouses to sign the petition.
13,
QUESTION: Who should sign an anne..ation pelition when properlY is being sold
under contract?
ANSWER. The "safest" praclice is to have both the contract vendor and vendee
sign an annexalion pctition when property is being sold in first. second, third,
and fourth class municipalities, However under committee of Prolestin iti],ens
v. Val Vue Sewer Districl, 14 Wn. ApP. 838, 545 P.2d 42 (1976), the signature of
the vendee (i.e. purchaser) is sufficient when a real estate contract is of record
in the office of the county auditor
..1 I~dc ci~'RCW '\5A.0I.040(9)(c) provides thaI the signature of the controct
,V"--pu haser as shown by the records of the county auditor is sufficient (wlthollt
the signature of his or her spouse),
14 QUESTION: Once properly owners have signed an annexation pctition, may the)'
withdraw their names from it if Ihey change their minds?
115
""'0
~f
o
~
ANSWER Yes. The rule In Washington State for most annexatIOn petitions IS
that names may be wIthdrawn from petItions at any tIme pnor to the assumptIOn
of JunsdIctlOn over the petItIon by the, appropnate authonty It has been held
that JurisdIction IS assum~d,.in .tl1e,75% petitIOn method of annexatIOn when the
council formally entert~lOs th,~ ; p~qtion and fIXes a day for the pu bllc hea n ng.
McAlmond v. Bremerton, 60 Wp.:2d,,383, 374 P.2<i 181 (1962)
ANSWER: Yes, as long as they take this action before the city has assumed
JUflsdictlOn over the petit~g,n. ,(McAlmond v, Bremerton, 60 Wn.2d 383, 374 P 2d
181 (1962))
In code cJties, the action would be required to be taken before the terminal
da te, as explainc:d in the p'rec,~din~ question
'~
16
i
QUESTION: May neIgl1boring landowners, who are located outsIde of both the
annexing city and the area proposed for annexation partIcipate In publIc heanngs
on annexation? \
\.,i
ANSWER: Yes. rThe State SllpremeCourt concluded in Tukwlla v. King County,
78 Wn.2d 34, 39, 469 P.2d 878 (J970) that neIghboring landowners should be
notJfIe,d of annexatIons in, the g~neral viciqity of their property and be given a
chance to appear and be heard.
'-
17
L
MUNICIfAURPOSES METH I D
Q~ ON: Must a; city d";'~', ~he ee
urposes, ~nder RfW,3? I) J 80? ,
ANSWER' N It IS conduded In an inform 0 inIOn
dated December 19, 1~68,/t9 Ern~H H Campbell, 'then
Bureau of Govern~ResearCh and SerVIces:
(At p 2) All that is reqUIred, in our OpInIOn; IS hat the
CIty, in 8004 f;tith, inten<i to use,the land, wIthm a re sonable
tIme after the annexation takes plac~, for the park, c metery,
or other municipal purpose specified in the an exation
ordInance In order to make such use"o the Ian, it will
116
,~~ ~
if I^r~
~ Jl ()'
\5 XU ,. ~~s~
~i\ \^if ~\)ANNEXATlO]\; CHECKLIST
A'v\D \ It); ,.\,)\
" \ 1 ' \y ~Q; Code Cities
~ 75% Petition MethOd
See Chapter VII, Section HI, for detailed explanation and statutory reference for each
step.
o
o
2.
WiM I-.M(J1e'lt/
Nolice of intent filed (signed by personY9r1Gh
representing owners of not less than 10% itr fA \
of assessed value) 't\
Signatures certified as sufficient
3.
SEPA compliance (see local ordinance &< SEPA
Rules)
Environmental checklist filed
Threshold determination made
Negative declaration procedures
or
Environmental impact statement
procedures
4.
Date set by city council for meeting ...-ith initiating
parties (within 60 days of filing of petition)
5. Meeting held and council action on:
Whether to accept proposed annexation? -
Whether simultaneouS adoption of zoning
rcgulation required? -
Whcther assumption of indebtedness requircd? -
Council action recorded in council minutes
6.
Notice of intention filcd with boundary review board
(where applicable) utilizing its procedures
8.
Legally sufficient petition of 75% of .-aluation
filed ~ It/' p~<-S fq~~ {C(?-
commenceme~ of determination of sefficiency of
petition (within 3 working days after filing) and
filing with city council a certificate containing
this date
188
Date Comoleted
(
c
9
Signatures certified as sufficient
10.
Date set by city council for public hearing
II
Noticc of hearing
Submitted to newspaper
Published _ one or more issues of newspaper
Affidavit of publication received
posted in 3 public places within area proposed
for annexation
Actual notice (optional) to:
Petitioners
Other property owners
Neighbors
12,
Hearing held and council action:
APproved as proposed? -
Ap!lroved portion of proposal? -
Disapproved? ~
13,
Annexation Ordinance No. -'
Presented to council
Adopted
Either.
Submitted for publication
published
Affidavit of publication reccived
14. Effcctive date of annexation (as fixed in ordinance)
15.
Three copics of ordinance and map filcd with county
legislative authorilY (Notice to county auditor,
asscssor and other officers rcquesting notice whcre
county legislative authority may not readily
forward information.)
16.
Ccrtificate of anncxation filcd with statc Office
of Financial Management (as soon as possible, not
latcr than 30 days of effective date of anncxation),
17
Not ice to:
Washington StatC Departntent of Revcnue
U.S. Burcau of CensuS (oPtional)
City departments
Public works
Fire
Policc
Park and recre~tion
Other
189
)
TECHNICAL RULES FOR PETITIONS
APPUCABLE TO CODE CITIES
35,\..01.040 Sufficiency of petition. Wh.rev.r in this
lill. pelitions or. requir.d 10 be signed .nd fil.d. th.
. following rules sh.1l goy.rn Ih. suffici.ncy th.reof:
(I) A petitiOn m.y includ. .ny p.g. or group of p.ges
con.,ining .n id.nti'" I.~t or plOy.r iOl.nd.d by the
circul,'ors. sign." or sponsors 10 be pres.ntccl .nd con-
sid.r.d OS on. p.tition .nd eonuining the following es-
s.nti.1 clements when .pplie.ble. e~eept th.t Ih.
c1.m.nts r.f.rred to in subdiyisions (d) .nd (e) hereof
or. ....nti.l for petitions referring or initioting legis~'
O'iye. m.n.rs 10 ,he vOlers. bul ore direclory .s 10 oth'"
petlttons:
(.) The t.xl or pr.yer of the pe'ition which sh.ll be a
concise SlOlem.nl "f lhe ,clion or relief sougkl by
petiL\Oncrs:
(b) If ,h. p.lilion initi.les or refers .n ordin.ne.. a
true copy 'hereof;
(c) If Ihe.pelilion .eeks lhe .nn.xotion. incorpolOlioll.
wilhdT:lw:1l. or reduction of an ~r~ for :lny purpose. ~Il.
accurol. l.g.1 description of Ihe are. proposed for such
:1ctlon:
(d) Numbered lines for sign'lures with space provided
beside e.eh sign'lure for the d.t. of signing andlhe ad-
dress of Ih. sign.r;
(.) Th. warning stalement prescrib.d in subseaioft
(2) of ,his section.
(2) Pe,itions sh.1l be print.d or Iyped on single sh=
of whi,. pap.r of goo<! quality .nd ...h shcc' of pelitio<t
pap.r haying a sp.ce Ihereon for sign'lures shall conuin
lh. le~1 or pray.r of Ih. p.tilion .nd lhe follo,.in!
warning:
WARNING
o
Ey.ry p.rson who signs lhis pelilion with any olhe:"
Ih.n his Irue name. or who knowingly signs more
Ihan one of ,hese pelilions. or signs a petition se.i-
ing an el.clion when he is nOl a legal vOler or signs
a p.tition when h. is o,herwise nOl qualified to sigr~
or who makes herein any false st.tement. snall be
guilty of. misd.meanor .
EJ:ch signature shall be e:(ccuted in ink or indcl;:ie
p.ncil and sh.ll b. follow.d by tne d.,. of signing 1'l<l
,h. .ddr.ss of ,he signer
(3) Th. term signer me.n. any p.rson who signs ;'is
own n;J.mc to the pct\tion.
(4) To be sufficient a p.tition must contain .alid sig-
nalures of qu.lified elec,ors or properlY own.rs. as ,he
ca.e may be. in the number r.quired by th. applicable
stalut. or ordinanee. Wilhin thre. working days after
lh. filing of a pelilion. Ih. orlic.r or officers whose dUlY
il is to delennine th. sufficiency of the petition shall
proce.d to make such a determination witn reasonable
promptness and snaIl fiI. with th. officer receiving the
pe,ilion for filing a <<rtificote sta,ing the dat. upon
whIch such d.t.rmination waS begun. wnich date shall
b. referred to as the lerminal date. Additional pages of
one or more sign.tures mal' be added to lhe petition by
filing the same with Ihe appropriale filing offic.r prior
to sueh lerminal dale. Any signer of a filed petition may
withdraw his or her signa,ure by a wriLlen r.quesl for
withdraw.l filed wilh the rec.iving offieer prior to sucn
,ermin.1 date. Such writt.n requ.st shall so suffici.ntly
describe the petition as to make id.ntification of the
p.rson .nd the petition c.rtain. The name of any person
s..king to withdraw sh,ll be signed "aclly th. som. as
contained on lh. petilion .nd. aft.r the filing of such re-
quest for withdrawal. prior to the terminal dat.. the sig-
nature of any person seeking such ",ilhdrawal shall be
de.med withdrawn.
(5) Pe,itions containing Ihe requirccl number of sign.-
tures sh.ll b. accepted as prima faci. valid until their
invalidilY hos b.en pro,.d.
(6) A yariation on peti,ions b.tween the signatures'on
tn. petilion and th.1 on Ihe .ot.r s perm.nent registra-
lion "used by the substitution of inili.ls inste.d of Ihe
first or middle names. or bOln. sh'll not invalidate the
signa lUre on lhe pe,ition if the surn.m. and handwriting
are the same.
(1) Signatures, including the original. of any person
who has .sign.d a petition lWO or more ,imes shall b.
stricken.
(S) SignaturtS followed by a d.l. of signing which is
more Inan six months prior to ,he d.te of filing of the
pelition shall b. stricken.
(9) When petitions are required to be signed by the
owners of prop.rty. the following shall .pply'
(a) Th. signa lure of. record owner as det.rmin.d by
tne records of th. counlY audilOr shall b. suflicien'
without the sign~tUrc of his or hex spouse:
(b) In th. case of mortgaged property ,he signalur.
of the mor'gagor shall b. suffici.nl. wilhout ,h. signa-
ture of his or her spouse;
(e) In the cos. of prop.r'y purchOS.d on .ontract. Ihe
signature of the contrac, purch..er .. shown by ,he re-
cords of ,he county audilOr sh.1l be de.med surr"ient.
without the slgn.3ture or his or her spouse;
(dl Any ofr,c.r of a corporation owning I.nd within
the ar.' inYOly.d who is duly authorized to e~ecu'e
deeds or .ncumb"nees on behalf of ,h. corporation.
may sign on b.half of such corporation. .nd shall allach
to th. pelilion a c.rtified .~cerpt from the byl.ws of
$ouch c:orpont\on ,howing such :luthority'
(c) Wh.n property llands in the name of , d.ce,.ed
person or any person for whom a guardian hos be.n '1'-
point.d. th. sign.ture of the .xecutor .dministra'Or or
guardian. as th. cas. may be. sh.lI be equival.nl '0 the
signature of Ihe owner of the propeny.ll985. 28\ ~ 26.
1961 ex... c I \9 ~ 35A.O\.040.J
190
v '---'
....J
\~
'--" I '-..../
EDMONDS is on optional municipal code city
I; .\~ -Iv {}
tfi1'f rrj(()Jl
;, 4i/ (5 I
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS
~ --
TO: The City council of the City of Edmonds
Civic Center
EdmondS, Washington
Gentlemen;
The undersigned, who are the owners pr not le:s than ten percent in v&~ according
to the assessed valuation for general t~the-p~or-W1liCh annexation is
sought, hereby advise the City Council of the City of Edmonds that it is the desire of
the undersigned residents of the following area to commence annexation proceedings:
The property herein referred to is described on Exhibit "A" attached heretO and is
depicted on Exhibit "BO further attached hereto.
It is requested that the City council of the City of Edmonds set a date not later than
sixty days after the filing of this request for a meeting with the undersigned to
determine: 2'
(1) Whether the Cit~ Council 'rill accept the proposed annexation;
(2) Whether the City council will require the adoption of zoning for the proposed
area in substantial compliance with the Proposed Comprehensive Plan as adoplCd
by Section 12.04.091 of the Edmonds City Code; and
Whether the City council will require the assumption of e~isting city
indebtednesS ~y the area' 10 be annexed.
This page is one of a group of pages containing identical te"t material and is intcnded
by the signers of this Notice of Intention to be presented and considered as onc
Notice of Intention and may be' filed wilh other pages containing additional signntUTCS
which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention.
(3)
.OWNER'S SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME ADDRESS AND LEGAL DATE
(Husband and Wife) DESCRIPTION SIGNED
'Sec special instruClions on cover sheet.
\9\
EDM01,'DS is an optio1lal mU1Iicipal code cill'.
PETiTION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CiTY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
- .-
TO: The City Council
City of Edmonds
Civic Center
Edmonds, Washington
o
WE, the undersigned, being the owners of not less than seventy-five percent (75%), in
value (according to the assessed valuation for general taxation), of the real property
described on Exhibit 'A' attached hereto, lying contiguOUS to the City of Edmonds,
Washington, do hereby petition that such territory be anne~ed to and made a part of
the Cit)' of Edmonds under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, et seQ., and any
amendments thereto, of the State of Washington.
Thc territory proposed to be annexed is ",ithin Snohomish Count)', Washington, and is
described in Exhibit 'A", attached heretO.
WHEREFORE, the undersigned respectively petition the Honorable City Council and aslc
(a) ThaI appropriate action be taken to entertain this petition, fixing a date for
a public hearing, causing notice to be published and posted, specifying the time and
place of such hearing, and inviting all persons interested to appear and voice approval
or disapproval of such annexation, and
(b) That following such hearing, and subsequent to approval of the Snohomish
County Boundary Review Board if such is convened, the City council dterminc b)'
Ordinance that such anne~ation shall be effective; and that property so annexed shall
becomc a part of the City of Edmonds, Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances
thcn and thercafter in force.
o
The Pctitioners subscribing hereto agree" that all property within the territory
hcreby sought to be annexed shall be asS<"Sscd and taxed at the same rate and on thc
same basis as propcrty within the City of fdmonds for any now outstanding
indcbtedncss of said Cit)', including ass<:5smcnts or taxes in payments of any bonds
issucd or dbts contract cd, prior to or e1isting at the date of anncxation, and thnt
simultaneous adoption of proposed zonin[ rcgulations be required" in accordance with
the rCQuircments of the City council of said City and as Quoted herein from Ihe
Minute Entry of the records of said CilY Council mecting. It is further undcrSIOod thc
proposcd zoning of said area proposed for annexation as shown in the proposcd
Comprchcnsivc Plan as adopted by Section 12.04.091 of the Edmonds City code is
SINGLE F AMI1. Y RESIDENTIA1..
This pclltlOn is accompanied and has atu:hed hereto as Exhibit 'R" a diagram which
outlines thcboundaries of the property soqht to be anne~ed.
These pages are a group of pages eontair.:ng an identical tc~t and praycr intcnded by
the signers of Ihis petition to be presentd and eonsidcred as one petition and may be
196
filcd with other pages contalOlOg additional signatures which cumulatively may bc
considered as a single petition.
WARNING. Every person who signs this pelition with any other than his true name, or
who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an
election when he is not a legal VOler, or signs a pctition when he is otherwise not
Qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statemcnt, shall bc guilt)' of ·
misdemeanor
EBA YER OF PETITIQtl: (I) Annexalion of area describcd in Exhibits A" and "B" and
(2) assumption of indebtedness of the City of Edmonds, and (3) adoption of the City of
Edmonds comprehensive Zoning Plan of SING1.E FAMI1. Y RESIDENTIA1..
.OWNER'S SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME ADDRESS AND 1.EGA1. DATE
(Husband and Wire) DESCRIPTION SIGNED
(
{Edmonds attaches a copy of RCW
sheet.
~
Q(HIBIT "A"
{1.egal dcscription omittcd]
EXHIBIT "K
{Map omitted]
197
o
35A.0\.010
Title 35.\ R("W: Opti"nal Municipal Code
the text or praver of the petition and the following
warning:
shall be construed as in addition and supplementary to
,he powers conferred in general terms by this lille. All
grants of municipal power to municipali'iC' elecling to
be governed under the provisions of this tide. whether
the grant is in specific terms or in general terms. shall be
liberally construed in favor of the municipality [1967
ex.s. c I 19 ~ 35A.0\.010.1
35A.01.020 Noneharter code <it>. A noncharter code
city is one, regardless of populatio~. which has initially
incorporated as a noncharter code city subjecl to the
provisions of this title, or is an incorporated municipality
which has elected, under lhe procedurc prescribed in this
tille. to be classified as a noncharter code citv and to be
governed according to the provisions of thi; title under
one of the optional forms of government pro,'ided for
noncharter code cities. (1967 e~.S. c 119 ~ 35",.0\.020.}
35A.OI.03O Charter code city. A charier code city is
one having al least ten thousand inhabitants at the time
of its organizalion or reorganization which has either
initially incorporated as a charter code city and has
adopted a charter under the procedure prescribed in this
title: or which, as an incorporated municipality. has
elected to be classified as a eharter code ciW and to be
governed according to the provisions of this'title and of
its adopted charter [1967 e~.5. c 119 ~ 35A.0\.030.1
35A.0\.035 Code city. The term code cilY means
any noncharter code city or charter code cit, \1967
ex.s. c 119 ~ 35A.01.035.}
o
35A.01.040 Sufficieney of petiti"R. WherC'o'er in this
title petitions are required to be signed and flied. the
fo!lowing rules sha!l govern the sufflcicncy thercuf'
(1) A petition may include any page or group of pages
containing an identical te~t or praycr intended bv the
circulators, signers or sponsors to be presented and con.
sldered as ooe petitlon and containing the following. es~
sential elements when applicable. except that the
elemcnts referred 10 in subdivisions (d) and lei hereof
are cS'ential for petitions referring or initiating legisla-
tive matters to the voters. but are directory as to other
petitions:
(a) The text or prayer of the petition .....hich shill be a
concise statement of the action or relicf ,ought by
petit ioncrs:
(b) If the petition initiates or refers an orcin:1ncc. a
true copy thereof'
(c) If the petition see\;s ,he annexation. inco7-'ration.
withdrawaL or reduction of an area for any p-..:rp"'sC, ;,1:n
accurate legal description of the ar"" propose.: for such
action;
(d) Numbered lines for signature, "ith spact provided
beside each signaturc for the date of signing ar,~ the ad.
drcs~ of the s.igner
(e) The warning ,tatement prescribed in ,,,'Q>ection
(2) of thi, section.
(21 Petitions shall be printed or IVpcd on sin,l< ,heets
of "hitc papcr of good quali'y and each sheet 0' pc,ition
papcr having a space thereon for ,ignature, shaH contain
fTil't' '~A Rr\\' --fill
WARNI1'<G
Every person who signs Ihi, pelilion with any other
than his. true name~ or who knowingly signs more
than one of these petitions. Of signs a petilion seek
ing an election when he is nol a legal voter or signs
a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign,
or who ma\;es herein any false statement, shaH be
guilty of a misdemeanor
Each signature shall be execuled in in\; or indelible
pencil and shaH be followed by the date of signing and
the address of the signer
(3) The term signer" means any person who signs his
o~'n name to the petition.
(4) To be sufficient a petition must conlain valid sig-
nalures of qualified electors or property owners, as the
case may be. in lhe number required by' Ihe applicable
statute or ordinancC. Within thrcc working days afler
the filing of a pelition, ,ne officer or officers whose duty
it is to determine the sufficiency of Ihe petition shaH
proceed 10 make such a determination with reasonable
promptness and shaH file wilh the officcr receiving the
petition for filing a certificate stating lhe date upon
which such determination was begun. which da,e shall
be referred to as Ihe tcrminal date. Additional pages of
one or more signatures may be added to the petition by
filing the same with the appropriate filing officer prior
to'such terminal date. Any signer of a filed petition may
withdraw his or her signature by a written requestJor
withdrawal filed .....ith the receiving officer prior to such
terminal date. Such wrillen request shall 50 sufficiently
describe Ihe petition as to ma\;e identification of the
person and the petition certain. The name of any person
seeking to withdraw shall be signed e,.el\Y the same as
contained on Ihe petition and, af,er the filing of such re
quest for withdra"al. prior to the terminal date. the sig-
nature of any person see\;ing such withdrawal shall be
decmed withdrawn.
(,) Petitions containing the required number of signa.
tures shall be accepted as prima facie valid until their
invalidity has been vroved,
(6) A variation on petitions bet",een the signatures on
the petition and that on the voter s permanent registra-
tion causcd by ,he substitution of initials instead of the
first or middlc names. or both. shall not invalidate the
signature on the pe'ilion if the surname and handwriting
are the same.
(7) Signatures. including thc original. of any person
who has signed a peti'ion t"O or more times shall be
stricken.
(8) Signatures follo"ed by a date of signing which is
more than six mon,hs prior to the date of filing of the
peti'ion shall be strie\;en.
'-J/ (9) When petitions arc required to be signed by the
.{'o"ners of property the follo"ing ,hall applY'
{a \ The signature of a record owner as determined by
,he records of the county audiwr shall be sufficient
without the ~ignaturc of his or her ~rouse:
~lqllQ Ed.}
~.. -<..
Chapter 35A.02
City or Town to Nonchartcr Code City
(b) In lhe case of mortgaged property the signature
of the mortgagor shall be sufficient, without the signa-
ture of his or her spouse;
(c) In the case of property purchased on contract, the
signature of the contract purchaser as shown by Ihe re.
cords of lheCounty audilor shall be deemed sufficient,
without the signature of his or her spouse:
(d) Any officer of a corporation owning land wilhin
the area involved who is duly authorized 10 execute
deeds or encumbrances on behalf of the corporation.
may sign on behalf of such corporatiOn, and shall attach
10 the petition a eertified e~cerpt from the bylawS of
such corporation showing such authority.
(e) When property stands in the name of a deceased
person or any person for whom a guardian has been ap-
pointed, the signature of the e~ecutor administrator or
guardian, as the case may be, shall be equivalent to the
signature of lhe owner of the property ll985 c 2&1 ~ 26:
1967 ".s. c 1\9 ~ 35A.01.040.1
s.,....b;liIY_19SS e :!81: See RCW 35.\0.905.
(5) plan of government' means either the mayor-
council, council-manager or commission form of gov-
ernment in general, without regard to variations in the
number of e1eclive offices or whether offIcers are e1ec
tive or appointive.
(6) Reclassify means changing from a code city to
the classification, if any, held by such a city immediately
pdo! to becoming a code city
(7) "Reclassification means changing from city or
town operating under Title 35 RCW to a city operating
under Title 3,A RCW or vice versa; a change in
dasslflcatlon.
(8) "Reorganize means changing the plan of govern-
ment under which a city or town operates to a different
general plan of government. for which an election of new
officers under RCW 35A.02.050 is required. A city or
town shall no(be deemed 10 have reorganized simply by
inereasing or decreasing the number of members of its
legislative body
(9) "Reorganization" means a change in general plan
of government where an election of all new offIcers is
required in order to accomplish this changc. but an in-
crease or decrease in the number of members of its leg-
islative body shall not be deemed to constitute a
reorganization. [1979 ex.s. e 18 ~ I]
s.wrab;lily_1979 ...~. e t8: "If ,oy p,O'i,ioo of Ihi' ,cl or il>
,pplic>lioo 10 aO) pc<>oo 0' ci<cum"'o" i, held io>>"d. the <<maio.
de, or ,he act or ,he ,pplicalion of Ihe p,ovi,ion \0 o.her pc''''o' or
,i<cum'''oc", j, 00\ ,Hccled. 11979 ".'. c tS \ 36.]
35A.Ol.050 The generalla... For the purposes of this
optional municipal code, "the general law" means any
provision of slate laW nol inconsistent wilh this title,
enacted before or after the enactment of this title, which
is by its terms applicable or available to all cilies or
\Owns. Except when expressly provided 10 the contrary
whenever in this oplional municipal code reference is
made to -the general law or 10 specific provisions of
the Revised code of Washington. it shall mean Ihe
general law or such specific provisions of the Revised
Code of Washington as noW enacted or as the same may
hereafter be amended' ll967 e~.S' c 1 19 ~ 35A.0\.050.1
35A.OI,{ISO "councilman" defined. As used in this
title. the term councilman or councilmen means
councilmember or eouncilmembers. ll981 c 213 ~ 2.1
Chapter 35A.02
PROCEOURE FOR INCORPORATEO
MUNICIPALITY TO BECOME A NOl'oCHARTER
COOE ClTV_SELECnON Of PLAN Of
GOVERNMENT
35A.Ol.060 Optional municipal code--This title.
References contained in this litle to "Optional Municipal
code, 'this title "this code or to any specifIC chap-
ter section. or provision thereof shall refer to Ihe whole
or appropriale part of Title 35A RCW as now or here-
after amended. l1967 e~.S' c I 19 ~ 35A.01.060.]
Section!'.
35A.02.0<H
35A.02.0tO
35A.02.020
35A.02.02S
351\.02.030
3~^.02.03S
351\02.040
ActlOf'lS !;Ubjccl to rc..ic.... by b\)undary review bo:JfC.
Adoplion of nonchaW:r c<'Jdc city cI:ls"ifll::ation
~ulhori1.ed.
Petition tncthod--Direc\.
Referendum.
ResQlution method.
Referendum
CcrtiflC;l.lion of ordin3f1CC"---- Tr;lfoSd1pl of record 10
\<ccrC\3T)' of stale.
Ek-c\ion of nt.... Gff\ccT~.
Elcc\ioJ) of ncV. officcr~____E"ccrtion ...here !><lmc ~cn-
CT;l.\ plan of ,"o'icnllTlen\ \" rc\;lined
Petition (Q( election.
Rc~o\ulion for ckction.
Election of offu;:co> Ui""HI <lflrnw,ll of p\;;l11 or ~n"'CTf\'
mcnt byvO\CT!i.
^'tcrTlilti\'c pl:ln of g~wcrnrnc"\'
No\\CC of clec\ion.
C;.tfWa~~ or rClurfl~_Cer\ific(\tc" of dcction-
Tr3n~a'rp\ of recuro \0 !oco..:rc\:H)' o{ \1;)tC
[ffec\ive dale of fl:da~~irlt:....\\~'n ;:Ind tNft.anil..:l\lon.
AdoptioO of ct""if",.ion 01 oonch"'''' ,,-.Ie <it) ~ilh.
Oul ch...nl!-c of g\Wcrnnlcn\;\\ r1;ln
35A.01.0iO Oefinitions-Change of plan or classi-
fication of municipal go,crnmeRt. Where used in lhis ti-
tle with reference to procedures established by this title
in regard to a change of plan or classification of govern-
ment, unlcss a different meaning is plainly required by
the context.
(I) Classify means a change from a city of the first,
second. or third class. or a town, to a code city
(2) "Classiftcalion means either that portion of the
general law under which a city or a town operates under
Title 35 RCW as a first, second. or third class city or
town. of othcrW1SC as a code city
(3) "Organize means to provide for officers after be-
coming a code cilY undcr the same general plan of gov-
ernment under which the city operated prior to
becoming a code cily pursuant to RCW 351\.02.055.
(4) Organiz"tion means Ihe gencral plan of govern-
ment under w'hi.ch a city operates.
351\.U2.0~O
3,/0..02.05)
35f\.02.0bO
351\.Ql.010
)51\02080
351\.01.090
)5^.02.100
3~^.02.110
351\,02.120
351\.02.\30
\1'.lk 3~i\ RC\\'-P ~l
-~,-
\\9119 [d.}
- ------------------ ------
- - - - - -------
DvVlV'4'~
.- ,II. .
\~
---
~ "-\ ~ov;::t ~
--
-L,
_.- ----- --.------.---
-~-_._-_. -
~~-~- -~~-~
L -Z-@J-:
----
~
~~
e
(rQ:C0J0
\ ------
--
\
\1
{ (,st /'
--
~
------
\~
----
------
--
------- -~-------------------- \ _...------
~-- ------------ "
\
..---------- -~---_.--~--- -----/-
---~---------------------------- ------
~-+ -------
..-------- \-
\\
~------~---------------------------------------------------_------i --
-------------
--
--
----
--
-------------
Ii
_t\ --
.---
---------
,/- .... - ..... -' ...-....- -,-,/____~ -/.'...- __.-.---.,,~..r-Jv-v \.. ...... .-1"-,, ~ ~ ~"~~ ~ .......~........... - ....-
?~, ~o~
~
~ ~jJlfAl ,&dtA.#1Jt ~1-9.D -
LjMm-.f2 '5 Du /! LJle-d 10 (!JV~.. h- e 15,.
=- Sb-~~~eiJ'~l~)Ju61U~h}~/ 17vJ;;[,-L
[/D' ~ ~(OWA 0trfj h-lJu,
_ ,,\}J
~- ~D~tL 11 L/(~ rCY'f ~ Cui/f/? c~m/
'0-s. 1wt'PAfJ cfv,. - t&fuhlf? ~cI
~~_~l)
-:1. ~ tJ, _Qmnm,;. 6AJW cJ ~ ~ Vlftl r5l.J'VZ to 1) 'i) t>
-- . ~o 4~#MTtL- ,)
o
-c
--~-
o
de ' . .1-1, -~./hwt ()j~ -e:Lc vk~( ~ ~W) l~
- ]jCMJn~ COYliJ.aLde<{~(JA - ~ ( rLfi~O)3U
~_ I rJ![(Jyvvx.r uwis lL1~r~ / Vv[t tr ~ (
=-~=)j( ;Adr1f~_~eJro~:-dIU ~~~ (~ -
-.- -- --- ~2C~L_~_JJJILdJ.dhj,'S /.. Ivv-J --4 -
_____OW-~-rJ:~--c~L-~~- ---- ---- -
,.--- . - ------ -
.--. _..- _iZei0kli -. - ~a' _drr2,JJLCUj~~l~-.zu..-.~lB1;0 -
C _- -1~-h~__I~t-~c5..._''YUi UU_l!5,fJliLP ~h''''t:r--
_ _____ __ __~W'LlL)_~_ ____ _ __ _ ___ _n ___________________ ___ ________ ______
-- ----i~AiL -]~_Iit .~;~-.-bu~~.i' -tD--l4eA- ~])~p ~
o
o
May 7, 1990
POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO YELM
1 Traffic and Access
A Onsite impacts access onto state highway, large numbers of
vehicle trips
B Offsite impacts likely that most traffic, whether heading to
Qlympia or to Ft. Lewis, will go through downtown Yelm -
heavy impact to main intersection
2 Drainfie1ds - impacts on groundwater
Density probably won't be great enough to be cost-effective for
sewer
3 Groundwater withdrawals - is there enough water for 1600 dwelling
units?
4 Public Services - serious concern This one development will more
than double Yelm population Need additional fire, police,
school, park, etc services
5 C1earing/clearcutting - aesthetics of removal of 1200 acres of
ground - buffers for viewing, nearby neighborhoods
6 Environmentally sensitive areas' - any wetlands, sensitive animals
(nearby bald eagles?), etc ?
GENERAL THOUGHTS
o Will require large commitment of time from Ye1m
o Must do EIS - very significant project
o There are ways to have developers cover staff costs
-charge them fees for staff review time (as TRPC does)
-give lead agency status for SEPA to Ecology
o Will need large public involvement component - many public
meetings throughout process, be sure town residents know what is
happening
~-
--
~-,
"'-/
--
\.
f
\',\
,\
I,
I
, \
\
\\~'
\','.' ~
\ \ - -
-------tt --
\ "
III
\
(-,
/J
JI1/QV
--
(-',
o
o
'"
-------
-- ------------- --------
- -----
-------- - -
C)
-_.~- --
~
j
in!! mtAdO J rfr 5J e
~&:?-) / J
L1L
U~:U~~
D(1- / . (JdJ-
{kD
--~
r
o
..
('\
,--,)
-------- -------------"-.-
c
f~ )
. 'V 01 D
I
. _ //"/1 >ALl I .. ~ ,;. J!E.
k2 _1-VV-7-hJL-~
(~,
'" )
r~V
c
'"
.7~
,~(-
.-/
f/~~
i 0 i?J2~t'-"1f
---
---
(--- \
\... l
II
t
!
..