Application and Originals
THURSTON COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD
APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION
(Please submit 20 copies)
1
JUrisdiction Requesting Annexation
CITY OF YELM
Responsible Official
Kathyrn M. Wolf, Mayor
2 If number of parcels IS less than three, please list the owners'
see attached list
Phone.
Phone:
3. Location (address, if assigned)' West and Middle Rd in East Sub-Area.
4 Legal Description (on separate page, If necessary)
see attached
5.
Size in Acres:
47 acres :t
6 Assessed Valuation $1,207,700.00
7 Please state the nature of this action and the relevant statutory cItation
(I.e., annexation for municipal purposes pursuant to RCW 35 13 180)
Direct petition method - Notice to legislative body,
assumption of indebtedness - proposed zoning regulation
Contents of petition. RCW 35A.14.120
1
8 Current County Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designation
Rural Rsidential - one unit per five acres
9 Proposed City Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designation
R- 6, Moderate Density Residential and C-1 District,
Commercial
10 Is this site within the present Urban Growth Management Area as
adopted and approved by Lacey, Olympia, Tumwater and Thurston
County?
x Yes No
11 Is the site currently served by sewer or water?
x Sewer
x Water
Neither
If no, specify services desired'
If sewer or water desired, Include map showing location of nearest lines
Is this site within any eXisting service areas or coordinated water or
sewer planning areas (water, sewer, LOTT Phase I Service Area)?
Yes, the area is in the current City of Yelm water and
sewer service area.
12. Does this proposal affect any other Interjurisdictional agreements?
Yes .lL- No
If yes, please list these agreements.
2
13 How does this proposal conform to adopted city policies on annexation?
Thi s propo!=:rll mpprc:: rlll rpC]lli rpmpnt9 lA7i rh rE'~pE'ct tr. rhp
City's Annexation Ord. #399 (5/8/91) and the Yelm-TC
Joint Comprehensive Plan.
14
Other specific Reason(s) for Annexation
The site is located
within the City's designated short-term urban growth
boundary.
15
Explain how thiS proposal furthers
Review Board (RCW 36.93.180)
necessary]'
the objectives of the Boundary
[attached additional pages if
a Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities:
Existing use in the area is predominately single family res.
b Use of phYSical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of
water, highways, and land contours
West Road on the south boundary.
c Creation and preservation of logical service areas
The site is
in the current water and sewer service area.
d Prevention of abnormally Irregular boundaries'
The annexation
corrects and existing abnormal boundary.
e Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and
encouragement of Incorporation of Cities In excess of ten thousand
population In heavily populated urban areas
The proposed annexation would prevent future incor9orations
I
I
of small citities. ,
I
3
f Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts
There are no
inactive special purpose districts effected by the annesation.
g Adjustment of Impractical boundanes. No adjustmests are
necessary.
h IncorporatIOn as cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of
unIncorporated areas which are urban In character
The area is within the City1s UGMB.
I.
Protection of agnculturallands'
There are no agricultural
uses in the immediate vicenity.
For your information, the Boundary Review Board can consider the following
factors (RCW 36.93.170) In deciding whether a particular decisIon furthers the
objectives stated above.
1 Population and territory
2. Population density
3 Land area and land use
4 Comprehensive use plans and ZOnIng
5 Per capita assessed valuation
6 Topography, natural boundaries and drainage basins, prOXimity to other
populated areas
7 The eXistence of pnme agricultural sOils and agricultural uses
8 The likelihood of signIficant growth in the area and In adjacent
incorporation and unincorporated areas dunng the next ten years
9 Location and most desirable future location of community facilities
10 MUnicipal services
4
1 1
12
13
14.
15.
16
17.
18.
Need for municipal services;
I
Effect of ordinances, goverhmental codes, regulations and resolutions
on existing uses
I
Present cost and adequacy of governmental services and controls In area
Prospects of governmental ~ervlces from other sources
Probable future needs for sl!Jch services and controls
,
Probable effect of proposa'l or alternative on cost and adequacy of
I
services and controls In are~ and adjacent area
The effect of the finances, ~ebt structure, and contractual obligations
and rights of all affected go:vernmental Units
The effect of the proposal <Dr alternative on adjacent areas, on mutual
economiC and social interests, and on the local governmental structure
of the county
(3/31/92 - 38610)
5
Anderson! Abby
POBox 5222
Lacey, W A 98593
I
I
,
I
M. Hall I
10336 West Rd SE
I
Yelm, W A 985~7
I
B Craft I
10328 West Rd SE
I
Yelm, W A 985,7
I
Loren SchmIdt
34323 78th Ave E
Eatonville, W A 98328
I
I
Annex~tion Parcel Owners
,
V Mattoon I
10320 West Rd. SE
I
Yelm, W A Q8597
I
I
E. McDuffie
POBox 927
Yelm, W A 98597
VickIe Hall I
10344 WestiRd SE
I
Yelm, W A 98597
D A venll
10242 West Rd. SE
Yelm, W A 98597
Kathryn Do~son
16440 Middle Rd SE
Yelm, W A ~8597
Hanna SchmIdt Trust
7920 340th St E
Eatonvtlle, W A 98328
i
I
Ruben Ortrernba
16415 Middle Rd SE
I
Yelm, W A 98597
E. TRUE & ASSOCIATES
LAND SURVEYING
POBOX 908
18225 COOK ROAD S E
YELM, WA. 98597
360 458-2894
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR CITY OF YELM ANNEXATION
That part of the Southeast quarter of Section 19 and the Southwest
quarter of Section 20, Township 17 North, Range 2 East, W M ,
being Lots 6,7,8,16 and 17, Block 36 of the Plat of Mckenna Irrrigated
Tracts as recorded in Volume 9 of Plats at Page 43, records of Thurston County,
Washington and ParcellA" of Boundary Line Adjustment No 0309 as
recorded under Auditor's File No 8510250041 in Volume 3 of Boundary
Line Adjustments, Pages 635 thru 639, records of Thurston County,
Washington
TOGETHER WITH that portion of Middle Street S E lying Northeasterly
of Lots 6, 7 and 8 of said Plat of Mckenna Irrigated Tracts
~, A. L
EddIe M. True P.L S
hAY I~ J999
98-86
e
:If
MOTION BY ADAM RIVAS, SECONDED BY DON MILLER APPROVING
,
ORDINANCE NO 626 AMENDING TIlE SIGN CODE TO PERMIT DISPLAY OF
I
BANNERS IN FOUR LOCATIONS. CARRIED
- I
Public Hearing - Proposed annexation of approximately 47 acres on West and Middle
Roads. Mayor Wolf closed the regular meeting and opened the public hearing at 8.42
pm. The time, date, place and reason for the hearing was announced. No objections
were voiced. Mayor Wolf caUed on Cathie Carlson to present the staff report.
,
Cathie Carlson explained that in the past the applicant submitted the 10% annexation
petition that was approved by the City The applicant then began the process of
collecting signatures for 60~ of the proposal's valuation. The issue was before
Council again when the annexation boundaries were redrawn. Since that time the
applicant has secured the sitWatures of approximately 80% of the annexation's
valuation. The Thurston Co.IAssessor's Office has verified the signatures. Council's
options are to approve the ~tion and instruct staff to forward the annexation to the
Thurston Co. Boundary Re~ew Board for final review or to deny the petition.
Mayor Wolf called for pubi~ comment. Lynn Jepson. Prairie Creek Resident - Ms.
Jepson indicated that she had received the map but was unsure of what was planned
I
for the property. She expreSsed concern that development of the property would
follow annexation. Her majpr concern was additional pressure on Yelm Creek, and
the flooding problems expetiienced in the Prairie Creek subdivision.
,
,
Mayor Wolf responded thatlthe business tonight is considering the annexation only
Any discussion of development would be reviewed as a separate item when the
property owners indicated that they wished to follow that course of action. Mayor
Wolf explained that the CitY has been working with the Water ConseIVation District
on Yelm Creek problems, ahd that the district had been monitoring the creek. The
,
City is also working with FEMA on a new flood plain map. Although the new map
has not yet been adopted, tij.e City has been using it when considering any
development along the c~k.
,
Councilmember Miller adqed that generally the purpose of annexation is to receive
City services including water, sewer, and police protection. Following annexation, the
applicant has the right to f~llow up with whatever use is permitted for that particular
property
,
I
Erling Birkland identified pimself as the annexation proponent. He explained that the
property between Y elm C~k and West Rd. is a very small part of the annexation
area. The reason the West ~d. to Yelm Creek area is included in the annexation is to
meet the City's guidelines! to avoid creating an island of non-city property In
addressing Ms. Jepson's cpncerns about Yelm Creek, Mr Birkland explained that you
can't build to the creek. He pointed out that where she lived was once a farm, and that
I
the property was sold and!developed as residential housing. The people living next to
you also have the right to 'sell their property The only way for that property to
become more valuable is to bring it into the City
I
I
Ms. Jepson responded ~t she didn't want to prevent anyone from doing anything.
Cathie Carlson added tha~ we have more and better information today than in the past.
Carson demonstrated the :annexation area on the zoning map. Carlson explained that
Yelm City Council
cc.98\5-27mndoc.doc
Page 4
I
I
G
11
98-88
as a shoreline, any building along Yelm Creek is required to have a 2oo-ft. setback.
Additionally, because of the new flood plain information we now have, where the
flood plain winds around we would require that any future homes in that area (beyond
the 200 ft.) build their foundation above the known high water marl"
Shelly Badger pointed out that staff has been working towards determining Yelm
Creek rehabilitation needed to alleviate some of the problems experienced in the past
two years.
Ms.1epson asked what happens now? Mayor Wolf responded that our policy has
been that if a person goes through the annexation requirements and is within the
Urban Growth Boundary the annexation is accepted. Then when the property owner
decides what they want to do with the property a new process is started that includes
public notification. Cathie Carlson clarified that adjacent property owners would be
notified only if they are within 300 ft. of the proposal. Shelly Badger suggested that
Ms. 1epson also monitor the city's legal publications in the Nisqually Valley News.
Cathie Carlson invited Ms. 1epson to stop by and she would show her what to look for
in the legal notices.
Councilmember Rivas asked if the new FEMA information makes it more restrictive
now? Carlson responded that the floodplain is increased for most property along Yelm
Creek. Councilmember Rivas added that although Ms. 1epson indicated that she was
here for herself, a lot of the photos and information gathered by the residents in her
development have actually contributed to developing more restrictive guidelines.
Being no additional comments or questions, Mayor Wolf closed the public hearing at
9:05 pm.
MOTION BY ADAM RIVAS, SECONDED BY VELMA CURRY DIRECTING
STAFF TO FORWARD TIlE ANNEXATION TO TIlE TIlURSTON COUNTY
BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD CARRIED
a.
Old Business:
BMX Bike Park Proposal- Chief Dunnam requested Council approval to prepare a
study similar to the one done for the skate board park. He expects to have the study
completed in September. At this point location, permanent or temporary nature of the
park, etc. are unknown.
MOTION BY DON MILLER, SECONDED BY GLEN CUNNINGHAM
APPROVING CHIEF DUNNAM'S PROPOSAL TO PREPARE A REPORT ON
TIlE FEASIDILITY OF A BMX BIKE PARK. CARRIED
b.
Staff Update - McKnown Use of Property research. Cathie Carlson reported that in
researching possible options for the McKnown property, she met with Sandy Mackie
and that a Binding Site Plan process offers an alternative to the C-3 zoning issues
facing the McKnowns. When subdividing under a Binding Site Plan process the
property owner identifies and creates commercial pads on the w!Io1e site. The pads
are identified by general use i.e. retail, grocery, industrial or manufacturing uses, fast
food, etc. This provides a picture of how the whole lot will develop and flow from
one commercial area to the next, and how it interacts with the neighborhood. Because
the Binding Site Plan is under our subdivision code, it can be sUlVeyed and a legal
description developed for each commercial pad and the pad may then be sold.
Yelm City Council
cc.98\5-27mndoc.doc
Page 5
,'I
f~ .r_~ ^ ~:'T
l~.. ~r-.' ;
CITY OF YElM
ORDIN;A.NCE NO 627
(ANX 978208 Yl)
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING CERTAIN RROPERTY TO THE CITY OF YElM,
WASHINGTON
WHEREAS, the record owners of at least sixty percent of the value of the property
,
described below have petitioned for anne~ation to the City of Yelm,
WHEREAS, the City Council of Yelm has held a duly-noticed public hearing
regarding such annexation,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds ~hat such annexation is in the best interest of the
City and conforms with annexation policies of the City as set forth in the Comprehensive
Plan and Yelm Municipal Code Chapter 2J,66
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCI'l OF YElM DOES ORDAIN AS FOllOWS
SECTION 1. The following described territory is hereby annexed and made a part of the
City of Yelm
That part of the Southeast quartenof Section 19 and the Southwest quarter f Section
20, Township 17, North, Range 2 East, W M ,being lots 6,7,8,16 and 17, Block 36
of the Plat of Mckenna Irrigated Ttacts as recorded in Volume 9 of Plats at Page 43,
records of Thurston County, WasHington and Parcel "'A" of Boundary Line
Adjustment No 0309 as recorded :under Auditors's File no 8510250041 in Volume 3
of Boundary Line Adjustments, Pages 635 thru 639, records of Thurston County,
Washington. '
TOGETHER WITH that portion of Middle Street S E. lying Northeasterly of lots 6,7
and 8 of sail Plat of Mckenna Irrig~ted Tracts
I
SECTION 2. Said property shall be subj~ct to the existing indebtedness of the City of Yelm
and to pay said indebtedness shall be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the
,
same basis as other property within the qity of Yelm
,
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall record! a copy of this ordinance in the Office of the
County Auditor and file a certified copy with the Board of County Commissioners.
SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall become effective on the _day of
a date not less than five days following publication
Kathryn M Wolf, Mayor
ATTEST
Agnes P Bennick, City ClerkfTreasurer
Passed and Approve.
Published Nisqually Valley News,
, 1998, being
. . . r )!f:;..~ ~. -;1j
s:~, .-'. .tI-
~ '.\ \~'
~ .
...#
~
,~ f~ / If
i~l~ \ ~ -' I%J,Y~
~, ~\~ \ ~ /j wf'\, (
. ~~t ___ \, ~"'" _ - S -:;, 1"t~ "i>\"\ - l
\II .' ~, ~ '7 '//
" >l \ ~ " 1. r. ' :.t, A~ ><- -, T" -"
, '" ';, 0i1\llff' \4 ~ -::J;; l-l-
, . \\\ " '~ )#<?""Z'\ " "-~;? ~ '" Pl "r ",,:: T ._, ,
\ \ _ 0C~ ,,"t '" .. ',-", - 'F '~C ~
'\1 ~ ,.' ili\" " ~J:. '7< '
, -,~ ~~~" ~ ' :-:
" __~'. foil \ r~~'~~ ~ ~'" - ~;i"":
',& ~ /'.JV< ,'11 iI' ' ..
~.,,\~~\ ' ~~ ~... - ~~~
""" ' . ' '" :::I--Cl \, ~.
\ ,., .. _ ....... ~\\'G'\ -
, _~ "I" \~~ - " 1 t7'Z' ~
\
, h~ t:l/I
f-\
A _ 1
\
. .
if
I'A _\' 1. -- '
- ~ ~
-1, 0-\
0" \---
~ 1: \
, ;.Ill
..~ 7
~~' -1
~~~ ,1-
.+\\
~
\
,~ \
" "'t'
" '\
~-
. .
-t-
\
\ \tit
\ ~
;---IlL.-
-A-
(L.i--' ~
\ ~-::-
. .
.
\
\
t\ ~ \
~\1\
,6 t
~
~.,~
h\\~
\~\l
~\\\
W;~
n\\A
-
-.. T e-- l-;
Ij,( '\ " \
.... '" .... .. ...... "," ,..-~
,}A - ~ ..~....,.. .;, . 0
w I>'''~':''''-' '" ~
1 '.. 'or.,.... 0" '4'. J"::
!l ~ \ '-l ' '::,
~ V~ \ -- -::
", \ '//' \-l , \ ~l" " ..~.
\.) Zd~ ~ 0.: "f~:" " ~~~~
In,' I,.." /~. ~ 0 ' . :ii ....
J , '" -IV' ' " . " ., ....
[ J "']. ,~. \, Jjr/"-'"
11 j j'/""- II ,)
\ lfl -r I ~';3C/] - '; :z;.'.--'
-ifI/-/'~-' .;: - ;
11j ~ ~ \ 15
_ /;.)" LPki ::>\t'~\\ ,. - "
~ 7 '\ \~"'- n
~ 1, ~-
~ \ p: \ \., '-- ~\'i~'
!! \
; \\.\,\\\\\,\,,'\\ ~
\ \~\ \ \ \ \ '\.' \ i
~ H'\\\\ \ ,\ \ \ \\~, \\ ~
\ \ ,%\"""~" ~.
.
0;\)0'"
'7
....
.
~ ~--
'4 (,
, :%,..
..
\ ,..... > l
- ' <'
~
1
"'\
-, -/\ "" " .,
-\ -{ rrri :;\
,\\""'f:J 1 li\
f- uU ~OC ~
VI T "1
-/
I \ \L \ \ \ lP' --::::J....~ -I~ ---1\": ~I
A - ...... ~" /
_~~ __ -::f~~" ;--'lfWJ:1 ~
L.,-." v ~ <;;.J. "'{ ~:ti', ',lJ(Y ..,
~: .."~ ~~~ f.[J{'7
. ~ ..y / \A~ /t--
.., I ..i/ \
":-':, ...#\ \ \ ,,:.: ~~
~ ~o/ \ \ V ~
~ " ~.
~ """ '" .> ~
" ;/y ~
~ \
........""" ~ ~
i'-
'-..J^ 0 fA I~/ ~
..., :j}" ""'" I'-.. C i. ANNE,,^1'ION AREA.
{l 'I, 'f/I!; l~lJ \ " Ii ..lJ.. '; ""
. lVA>" <. ~ (~I '':~ ~..J.l ~v1l
I)>~ .~~ "" u l.~ ~ '1 co N Q '\ -/1
)~ ,,~~' '4.!J;! _\" "ClLl '" 7 ,- v -.:,; " ..
l' ~ ~ ,;,;0, ~'':: rT n" "",' ;; / - 7 ~ ' /"
V l"'ur;: oJ' 'h" -/...:$ II ~ - -A' '"
~ ",'</}'iC ~ AT ')"1,( n .,. l- i/ / .
.,. "''''' '</I ~ "L 71
I '" ,<(II '7%!!!!l! I II ~ 71 Ii'-..
>>'" ~ I ~ " =
) 'l.J~ ~..,I ~ 1=
'-v ,<({l .~" VlI...... IT
> :, ;;;.'" . ~ ~~;,. ~ 111 T \._'
:~ ~7 T ~~~ ~ ""'-~ ~ II^\ 7
'" >..... '5'. V~ ill ~';:. ,,./Jf :;'
r~~~ / ,. ~~ ~ ~~ 'v~/
. ~ ~/ LL ," / 'A..
" ~. 7 / /':\
~ $ ~ ~~ Jj/~ '\r
~ ~tt 1~~1I ~~
"" .,'t' ~ \0 ·
, " \I'
~ " ~ /7 ~r~c-. r i1
g
""
1J1
'\.
\ \-.-..\ 1
\ V 1 I
$E
.
,\
II
-- I~
~'v@
'~
T"\ .I
-
,(
.~
....
~u
\~
.
Iii!
lD
~
......L .l-
L~ ~
L---
-
,L
--
._--~-!---
__ __ _ _ CITY UMtTS
s:
C/l
t::1
....
"-
~
..
e
00
~~~~
n
.
....
CO
..
o
~
i
8
proposed
Annexation
Site
m
H
t \
t
~~~
00
~
~ ]Q..
.c(
~
t
,
:;
'd
5
'"
Ill",
'i~
w~
~><
u'
a~t1
\
--- ~
.--
------------
-------~~~
-\
CIII ~~
~ \~
\\
\\~
,
--- '\
\\
l iYo
~ \~ ft\
. ~~ ~t~
1\ l \\ \'t
" \i \\\
, \t \\t
.; ..
NOTICE OF INtENT TO COMMENCE
ANNEXATI~ PROCEEDINGS
..
TO: The City Council of the City of Yelm
The unders1gned are owners of :not less than ten percent in value,
according to the assessed val~ation, of the property as described
below We hereby advise the C~ty Council of the C1ty of Yelm that
it is the desire of the undersilgned property owners of that area to
commence annexation proceedin~s:
,
The property referred to is described on Exhibit
I
hereto and as shown by the attached map
A
attached
It 1S requested that the City: Counc1 1 of the City of Yelm set a
date not later than sixty days: after rece1pt of this request for a
I
meeting with the petitioners ~o determine.
1 Whether the City Council ~ill permit a pet1tion regarding this
annexation to be circula8ed,
2 Whether the City Council,will require designation of zon1ng
upon annexation;
3 Whether the City Councill will require the assumpt10n of
exist1ng City indebtedness by the area to be annexed
T his p age 1 son e 0 fag r 0 u p :0 f p age s con t a i n i n g ide n t 1 C a 1 t e x t
material and is intended by the signers of thlS Notlce of Intention
I
to be presented and considered as one Notlce of Intentlon and may
be f i 1 e d wit h the 0 the r p a gels con t a i n i n gad d i t ion a 1 s i g n at u res
which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notlce of
Intention
forms\anx (5/92)
Page _ of _
~ ue pa...J....---.l:-c::--.C..l.,~rrrc::\:.:C.i-t:.-LU4.;.
J> 0
WARNING
EVERY PERSON WHO SIGNS THIS PETITION WITH ANY OTHER THAN HIS TRUE
NAME, OR WHO KNOWINGLY SIGNS MORE THAN ONE OF THESE PETITIONS, OR
SIGNS A PETITION SEEKING AN ELECTION WHEN HE IS NOT A LEGAL VOTER,
OR SIGNS A PETITION WHEN HE IS OTHERWISE NOT QUALIFIED TO SIGN, OR
WHO MAKES HEREIN ANY FALSE STATEMENT, SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR.
Assessor's
Value
Prooertv Owner
Assessor's
Acraoe
~
Parcel Nc
1A
..
..
Ander~on/ l\hby
P.O. nox 5222
1 .72
643036016
108,900
r-JaCC~l f T\L~ 98503
13
V.HQttoon 1 .77 6<1303601601 105,800
10320 We.st Rd. SE
Yelm. , lvA 93597
1 ~
-l.-
T;' ~1cDuff ie 3.34 64303601602 82,700
.L, .
P.O. Box 927
Yelm, WA 98597
~.:,
lD
D. Averill 1 . 1 J 6"',303601603 4G,300
10242 W8St Rd. SE
Yelm, WA 93597
1=
n. l\verill 1 . S 5 b430360i604 : ....... ^ ^""
ILV,::JUU
10242 H<:;st Rd. SE
Ye1rn, WA 08597
l~
_.I:
'1. Craft 2.71 6L!3036017 30,500
10320 West nel. r' '"
...) .IJ
~, t&k:~ J1SaT~
Qi._Hall . I 2.96 64303601701 23,700
10336 West '(d. S"S
Yelm, HI)" 93597
~
O~P"-"~--=--";:"---'~ --........---.- -.:- .;,........:~,-..:;-;-.;:- ....
WARNING
EVERY PERSON WHO SIGNS THIS PETITION WITH ANY OTHER TIL,\.N HIS TRUE
NAME, OR WHO KNOWINGLY SIGNS MORE THAN ONE OF THESE PETITIONS, OR
SIGNS A PETITION SEEKING AN ELECTION WHEN HE IS /\lOT .~ LEGAL VOTER,
OR SIGNS A PETITION WHEN HE IS OTHERWISE NOT QUA..LI?IED TO SIGN, OR
WHO MAKES HEREIN ANY FALSE STATEMENT, SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR.
P:-ooertv Owner
Assessor's
Acraae
-
? c:i':: C E: l 'i c
.~.ssessor IS
Value
ffiJ' ()~~ rt~
cy'.~~J
/" 10344' West TId. SB
Yelm, WA 93597
~}
'7
1 .0
..
'll.
64303601702
102,700
QTI~~ {J~
( ~L.Iall J' 1 .0
10336 West Rd. SE
Yelm, WA 98597
64303601703
59,100
H1
I<. Dotson
16440 Middle Rd. SE
Yelm, WA 98597
3.41
643036007
58,700
11\1
'1. Ortremba
16415 Middle Rd. SE
Yelrn, WA 93597
.63
64303600701
25,00
/
/
WARN:I:NG
I
EVERY PERSON WHO SIGNS THIS PETITION WITH ANY OTHER THAN HIS TRUE
,
NAME, OR WHO KNOWINGLY SIGNS MORE THAN ONE OF THESE PETITIONS, OR
,
SIGNS A PETITION SEEKING ~ ELECTION WHEN HE IS NOT A LEGAL VOTER,
OR SIGNS A PETITION WHEN Hf= IS OTHERWISE NOT QUALIFIED TO SIGN, OR
WHO MAKES HEREIN ANY FALSE StATEMENT, SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR.
Prooertv Owner
IA
Assessor's
Acrage
Assessor's
Value
Kathe,ryn Dotson
16440 Middle Rd. SB
Yelm, WA 98597
IE
Parcel No.
Benjamin C. Harper
16345 Railway Ro. SE
Yelm, WA 98597
Ie
9.70
64303500400
64,100
ID
7.08
64300600401
109,300
1':::
IF
IG
, SCALE 1"==300'
._ J
o 150 300 600
PROPOSED
ANNEXATION
SITE
SE 1/4, SEC.19, (T17N, R2E,
@
@
14
~
5
a:j)l1
18
30 29
,
,
(i1f1nn"rlflnn[lnrl(llln~1
,
rilhnnnnnnOflnnllm\'..
,~
, . ~ "'j .
~ 1_ .l f.... J ".-#
"'" 'W'.-.' ......~ ,.....
~ l/3 0:3 ~ 0 t 70 J
5 q) ID 0
J.O
'!11'"u ,.
ivA 'I
,....;...."'i..,'..-, "..,..1#.....
~ +~ t
J~' ;
,
,--" .---
'''J
, !
\.
. ~
Q
/fAY 1!J7 ?;?a"yt-
'" , :,:, ,"'~'" ,'\',THE'FACE OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS A RED BACKGROUND -.- NOT A WHITE BACKGROUND ," '': :'/~,:'::7~:' ;'J"
_.-..._._-'---'-_........;..-.-. _._-_.~-----,-~--:---'---:--.~-'--._~------_._._._---_.~--~-_.__._~_.".-.--:------:---.--.----.--,---..-
. . .. . . . ,- - - .
RECEIPT No 07376
=IVED
It .. 1< "'ONE THO US AN..P, TWO HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS & 00 CENTS
RECEIVED FROM
;PII y-p
~. ,.''-{ le.jl-hLJ~
K;;0~d><-q7 ~
lfi/f'~ ty)ff 9K)'17
DATE
REC, NO
AMOUNT
REF NO,
1.2/18/97
7376
1.250.00
CHECK
2875
M;ESCELLANEOUS RE:GE:IPT.. /}; ."'," . --1-.. '. . ~.,..<-.
A:NNEij)TE' ' f1tJf)'-Xa-II~ re.
BH & P
JOINT VENTURE
POBOX 875 (206) 458-3277
YELM, WA 98597
2875
/ c!) -I.$;
C>--J 98-800/1251
19~
'--;1
$,/~
. PRAIRIE SECURITY BANK
608 YEW A VENUE EAST
YEW, WASHINGTON 98597
~~
DOLLARS
11100 287 Sill I: ~ 2 5 ~O~OO 71:
-d-~.. ~::".z-:> _.. _...w
31 ~ 7 III 0 0... 2 2... III
)R
DATE
INVOICE
ACCOUNT NUMBER
NET INVOICE AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
06/01/98 ANX978208YL
50.00
CITY OF YELM, P,O, BOX 479, YELM, WA 98597
REMITTANCE ADVICE
Project Number ANX r! 8/q 2- YL
--
Permit Category JJi-
Applicant:
HiLl/ / :5ctrfcu 17
/
Phone.
Fax:
Site Address
/0-::;31 / lo~3 0
Vdm / tUrr
. J
/JJtAlLL
9fSQ7
120 Day Review Period
Start Date
Complete Date
Receipt of Application
5/11/17
I
Determination of Completeness
Request for additional Information
Determination of Completeness
Notice of Application
SEPA DecIsion
Public Hearing
NotIce of Final Decision
Appeal
Comments'
!
/,
I I
I
! I
/ I
"