Application and Originals
.'
THURSTON COUNTY
BOUNOARY REVIEW SOARC
Application for Annexation
Jurisdiction Requesting Annexation
City of Yelm
Responsible Official'
Kathryn M. Wolf, Mayor
2. I f number of parcels is less than three, please I ist the owners
Ma~ilyn &J Ri~hard Pratt
Parcel # 6430360030~-
436- Ra'chi to Vista- Rd
Santa Barbara, CA 93108
Phone:
(805) 969-4428
Location (address, if assigned)"
Phone:
3.
16530 103rd SE, Yelm~ WA 98597
4. Legal Description (on separate page, if necessary)"
Lot B of Boundary LIne Adjustment 1054. Situated in Thurs~on
County, State of Washington. Together with that portion of 103rd
St. SE, Yelm, WA
5. Stze in Acres 4.49
6. Assessed Valuation" $42,300.00
7 Please state the nature of thiS action and the relevant statutory citation
(i.e., annexation for munIcipal purposes pursuant to RCW 35.13.180)
Direct petition method - Notice to legislative body meetinq,
Assumption of indebtedness - proposed zoning regulation
Contents of petition. RCW 35A.14.120
8 Current County Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designation'
1 unit per 5 acres. Joint Comprehensive Plan Deslgnation -
moderate density residential (R-6)
.
9. Proposed City Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designation:
Moderate density residential (R-6)
10.
Is this
adopted
County?
site within the present Urban Growth Management Area as
and approved by Lacey, Olympia, Tumwater and Thurston
x Yes No Yelm and TC UGMA
11. I s the site currently served by sewer or water?
Sewer
X Water
Neither
If no, specify services desired: No services are requested at present
1 f sewer or water desired, include map showing location of nearest lines.
Is this site within any existing service areas or coordinated water or
sewer planning areas (water, sewer, Lott Phase I Service Area)'
No. _ The Sewer Comprehensive Plans designate the site
as Phase I - to be included in the service area in
12. Does this proposal affect any other interjurisdictional agreements'
Yes
x
No
I f yes, please I ist these agreements:
13. How does this proposal conform to adopted city policies on annexation?
This proposal meets all requirements with respect to the City's
Annexation Ord. # 399 (5/8/91) and the Yelm-TC Joint Comprehensiv
Plan.
14. Other specific Reason(s) for Annexation: The site is located within
the City's designated short-term urban growth boundary.
15. Explain how this proposal furthers the objectives of the Boundary
Review Board (RCW 36.93.180) [attached additional pages if necessary]:
a. Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities: Existing
use in the area is predominately single family residential.
-.
b. Use of physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of
water, highways, and land contours:
Physical boundary includes 103rd St. SE and Yelm Creek.
c. Creation and preservation of logical service areas. C:llrn~ntly not
lo~atR~ in thR C:ity's SRWRr ~prvic~ ~rp~
d. Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries: The site is
contiguous to the City on two of the four property lines.
e. Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and
encouragement of incorporation of cities in excess of ten thousand
population in heavily populated urban areas
The proposed annexation would prevent future incorporations :_-~
of small cities.
f. Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts: There are no
inactive special purpose districts effected by the proposea
annexation.
g.
Adjustment of impractical boundaries:
No adjustments are
necessary.
h. I ncorporation as cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of
unincorporated areas which are urban in character
The annexation area is not urban in nature, but is in the
UGMB and is olanned to accomate urban densities.
I. Protection of agricultural lands. There are no aqricul tural uses
Soils are not conducive to
in the immediate vacinity. agricultural use.
For your information, the Boundary Review Board can consider the following
factors (RCW 36.93. 170) in deciding whether a particular decision furthers
the objectives stated above:
.
1 . Population and territory
2. Population density
:..
3. Land area and land use
4. Comprehflnsive use plans and zoning
5. Per capita assessed valuation
6. Topography, natural boundaries and drainage basins, proximity to other
populated areas
_ 7. The existence of prime agricultural soils and agricultural uses
.
8. The likelihood of significant growth in the area and in adjacent
incorporation and unincorporated areas during the next ten years
9. Location and most desirable future location of community facilities
10;, Municipal services
11 . Need for municipal services
12. Effect of ordinances, governmental codes, regulations and resolutions on
existing uses
13. Present cost and adequacy of governmental services and controls in area
14. Prospects of governmental services from other sources
15. Probable future needs for such services and controls
15. Probable effect of proposal or alternative on cost and adequacy of
services and controls in area and adjacent area
17. The effect of the finances, debt structure, and contractual obi igations
and rights of all affected governmental units
18. The effect of the proposal or alternative on adjacent areas, on mutual
economic and socia! interests, and on the local governmental structure of
the county.
(6/20/86 -- 386.10)
..
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CCMv1ENCE
ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS
.,....... .
IV.
The City Council- of the
,.....; i-"
'" I V.,-
of Yelm
-.
The undersigned are owners of not less than ten percent in value,
according to the assessed valuation, of the property as described
below We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Yelm that
it is the desire of the undersigned property owners of that area to
commence annexation proceedings:
The property referred to is described on Exhibit "A": attached
hereto and as shown by the attached map
It is requested that the City Council of the City of Yelm set a
date not later than sixty days after receipt of this request for a
meeting with the petitioners to determine:
1 Whether the City Council will permit a petition regarding this
annexation to be circulated,
2 Whether the City Council will require designation of zoning
upon annexation;
3 Whether the City Counci 1 wi 11 require the assumption of
existing City indebtedness by the area to be anne~ed
This page is one of a group of pages containing identical text
material and is intended by the signers of this Notice of Intention
to be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention and may
be fi led with the other pages containing additional signatures
which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of
Intention
forms\anx (5/92)
Page L of ~
WARN:I:NG
EVERY PERSON WHO SIGNS THIS PETITION WITH ANY OTHER THAN HIS TRUE
NAME, OR WHO KNOWINGLY SIGNS MORE THAN ONE OF THESE PETITIONS, OR
SIGNS A PETITION SEEKING AN ELECTION WHEN HE IS NOT A LEGAL VOTER,
OR SIGNS A PETITION WHEN HE IS OTHERWISE NOT QUALIFIED TO SIGN, OR
WHO MAKES HEREIN ANY FALSE STATEMENT, SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR.
/-li?
Assessor's
Parcel No. Value
6i30~OD3ca- It ~JJ3DD
lA
Zc#H.40 .:r PR~
-S/'Y97
1f3fo ,RAttJCHITD U'SlA RD
~AtA.5TA S,4~)4-~ c..,q 93/08
.~ 105 Cjfo9 'fi'J-FS
Assessor1s
Acrage
-..
1C
1D
1':::
IF
1G
/#~ j-
.RECEIVEDFROM
"~(of'
RI,cWAI{l) & 'l{}\I{JL yN .PR.AT 'r
43s6R'FfNdHITO VIST'1\RD
""', '.,:} ..'/.'.... ,';'
S1V~T:~:,~]\~B}\R1\. d1\9:~,1:0B/
ANX-97B191-YL PRATT
"I3,~C~l~t:\)lO.
5826
FIFl:tY DP:tI:.1\'RS'& ~0: CE:NT~,
iDATE-REC. NO:'
0,6117t/~q, 5B 2;p
REfi::; .
,A~()I,:1NJ'
!'
3.50;~ 00
CHECK .'
MI.SCELL:AN:EOiJS 'RE:CEI/~T
kN~EtrE,' .. ",' /7
----.....-...-.- -- - -.---- ~- - -...-- ..- . - ..-. _.-_..- -..--- ----.
....
~
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CCMv1ENCE
ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS
TO: The City Council of the City of Yelm
-.
The undersigned are owners of not less than ten percent in value,
according to the assessed valuation, of the property as described
below We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Yelm that
it is the desire of the undersigned property owners of that area to
commence annexation proceedings:
The property referred to is described on Exhibit "A": attached
hereto and as shown by the attached map
It is requested that the City Council of the City of Yelm set a
date not later than sixty days after receipt of this request for a
mee~ing with the petitioners to determine:
1 Whether the City Council will permit a petition regarding this
annexation to be circulated;
2 Whether the City Council will require designation of zoning
upon annexation;
3 Whether the Ci ty Counc i 1 wi 11 requ ire the assumpt i on of
existing City indebtedness by the a~~a to be annexed
This page is one of a group of pages containing identical text
material and is intended by the signers of this Notice of Intention
to be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention and may
be filed with the other pages containing additional signatures
which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of
Intention
forms\anx (5/92)
Page ~ of ~
WARN:I:NG
EVERY PERSON WHO SIGNS THIS PETITION WITH ANY OTHER THAN HIS TRUE
NAME, OR WHO KNOWINGLY SIGNS MORE THAN ONE OF THESE PETITIONS, OR
SIGNS A PETITION SEEKING AN ELECTION WHEN HE IS NOT A LEGAL VOTER,
OR SIGNS A PETITION WHEN HE IS OTHERWISE NOT QUALIFIED TO SIGN, OR
WHO MAKES HEREIN ANY FALSE STATEMENT, SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR.
lA
iZ-c.#Al-Ab :r p~
-S/1'197
'130 !<AI\JCHrrD U,STA RD
CVAv0lA SA-~,4~ c..A 93/08
.~ 1D~ 9fo? lfi-,.J;:5
Assessor1s
Acrage
1,i7
Assessor's
Parcel No. Value
6'1303bo{)3d2- It ?tj/~OD
...
Ie
ID
l~
IF
IG
/,tHr~ :t-
)01
IRRIGATED
o6P
5
@
@l-003
4
GREENACRES
@
0)
@
5
ill
DIY 4
@l-0020:; ~
~1
(D-01
(D-Ol02
l!)l- 02
o
CSS-eo'V
@
f3-00202
@-0104
(!r0 10 1
o
~00203
2
~-802!:>
6430--@P0204
(9-0103
o
tGr0101
34
4
~004
Q)J-04
QS-064V
o
o
~005
~00501
5
1t3r03