File
ZONING CERTIFICATION
The undersIgned OfficIal does hereby certIfy to PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY as
follows
That thIS IS the duly appomted CIty Planner
of The CIty of Yelm
and IS authonzed to make thIS certIficatIOn.
2
That he/she IS familIar wIth the plans and speCIficatIons submItted by.
Nisqually Plaza. LLC. Oregon-Tno LImIted. L.P.. Melvm P. SpItz and Barbara S. SpItZ. as
Trustees of the SpItz Commumty 1990 Trust dated December 18. 1990; Martm J. Roe. as
Trustee of the Martm 1. Roe Trust: and Stephen LeWIS Sebolsky and RIta DIane Sebolsy. as
Trustees under declaratIon of Trust dated February 25. 1975. as amended. known as the
Sebolsky Family Trust.
m connectIOn WIth the constructIon of Nisqually Plaza. Yelm. W A
m the real property described m ExhibIt A attached hereto and made part hereof by reference
(heremafter referred to as the "Property")
3
That the Property IS m the C-l. CommercIaL Chapter 17.26
Zomng Dlstnct, as provIded m the Zomng Ordmance or Code of the
CIty ofYelm
(heremafter referred to as the "Code"), WhICh zomng IS the proper zomng for the Improvements
that have been constructed.
4
That~lllmprov~lJ1~nts a_ndth~J.lse ofthePrQpertyc()mplY w!!h all}:l_pphcable~pro:vlslons of the-
- Code and-do not violate any current applIcable zoriingor-occupancyordmance,~resohitIonor _u___
regulatIOn of Yelm- ,. W A
(CIty) (State)
5
That no actIon or proceedmg IS pendmg before any Court or admmlstratI ve agency WIth respect
to the Zonmg of the Property or any Improvements located thereon.
6
That no actIOn orproceedmg IS pendmg before any Court or admmlstratIve agency WIth respect
to the valIdIty of the Code or any certIficatIOn or penmts Issued thereunder
7
That attached hereto are true copIes of all applIcable ordmances, vanances, resolutIons or
regulatIOns, relatmg to the zomng and use of the Property
(1/ .. :~(l
March 6. 2000
(Date)
Pnnted Name. Catherin
Title. CIty Planner
[" 981-00fl4iC J"'l yFiles ,( ATH I E1oning{ elt-I)OC]
FAX TRANSMISSION
CITY OF YELM
PO BOX 479 - 105 YELM AVE W
YELM WA 98597
360-458-3244
FAX. 360-458-4348
To: {arvlb.zl'j , . .
Fax#:0-z<;) 4S~ - ;;811
From: c. 1.- ;J II
-Il{{1(G ~1.~~~
Date: :3/0/ DO
Pages: L ' including this cover sheet.
Subject:
CO~~S Jlzt{~ ,0?j !D f/(a~,
/' 11 c "Jj, -r ~I/L r7Cr-r
. ___ I '^-- .:.:xe4-~ J CV;-i<J. cJ.-~-' - J---
alIi!! - // fftup'~&f C-t/'l 0""0 {;c rft/c"-t+
()lr ~ ~;JtJ:L - W fJ/:U ~ LA-- 56 ftLw /zty:
~o '+LG 'rfl?Ue -
**
If you do not receIve all copies or any copy is not legible, please call (360) 458-3244 as
soon as possible.
dslc: \office\forms\fax. 3
Page 1 of 1
.'
From. Berg, Karen-BEL <BERGK@PerkinsCoie com>
To 'carlson@yelmtel com' <carlson@yelmtel com>
Cc Gilbert, Craig-BEL <GILBC@PerkinsCoie com>
Date Thursday, March 02, 2000 4 41 PM
Subject. Nisqually Plaza--Yelm, Washington
Kathy'
Pursuant to Craig Gilbert's request, listed below are the names of the
borrowers regarding the above-referenced real property.
1 Nisqually Plaza, LLC,
2 Oregon-Trio Limited, L P ,
3 Melvin P Spitz and Barbara S Spitz, as Trustees of the Spitz Community
1990 Trust, dated December 18, 1990,
4 Martin J Roe, as Trustee of the Martin J Roe Trust; and
5 Stephen Lewis Sebolsky and Rita Diane Sebolsky, as Trustees under
declaration of Trust dated February 25, 1975, as amended, known as the
Sebolsky Family Trust.
Karen Berg
Perkins Coie LLP/Bellevue
Secretary to Craig Gilbert and Jeff Wyszynski
Direct: (425) 990-7487
Fax. (425) 456-3899
bergk@p~rkiD$c:Qiec:Qm
NOTICE This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information If you are
not the intended recipient, or believe that you have received this communication in error, please do
not print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information Also, please indicate to
the sender that you have received this email in error, and delete the copy you received Thank you
03/06/2000
Page I of I
.-
From: Gilbert, Craig-BEL <GILBC@PerkinsCoie com>
To' 'carlson@yelmtel com' <carlson@yelmtel com>
Date. Thursday, March 02, 2000 4 02 PM
Subject. Nisqually Plaza Zoning Cert.
<<BA003675154 DOC>>
Cathy - please find attached for your review and completion the Zoning
Certification, which is required by Protective Life Insurance Company, the
lender in a loan transaction we are involved in with respect to the
Nisqually Plaza
I am assuming the information contained in and the attachments to the
certification have not changed since 1994, when Shelly Badger issued a
similar certification for the same property If this assumption is not
accurate, please feel free to update where necessary
I appreciate your help If you need anything further, please feel free to
call
Craig S Gilbert
Perkins Coie LLP
411 - 108th Avenue N E , Suite 1800
Bellevue, Washington 98004-5584
Direct Dial No (425) 456-3881
E-mail gilpc@perkinsGQi~GQrn
NOTICE This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information If you are
not the intended recipient, or believe that you have received this communication in error, please do
not print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information Also, please indicate to
the sender that you have received this email in error, and delete the copy you received Thank you
03/06/2000
FAX TRANSMISSION
CITY OF YELM
PO BOX 479 - 105 YELM AVE W
YELM WA 98597
360-458-3244
FAX. 360-458-4348
To: LftV:)~1 Ibwr:t
Fax #'@ZS J ~ -~ 38 f1
17) ,/1, 0' /Ic::...--J'
From: L~CL-TO/~(0 -F( l' .ff7/~
'2IC!~)
Date: ,:J or--''''~
Pages: 20, includlllg this cover sheet.
Subject:
COMMENTS
**
If you do not receive all copies or any copy is not legible, please call (360) 458-3244 as
soon as possible.
ds/c:\office\forms\fax.3
Chapter 17.26
COMMERCIAL ZONE
(C-1 )
i.
Sections:
17.26010 Purpose
17.26 020 General requirements
17 26 030 Permitted uses
17 26 035 Prohibited uses
17.26 040 Special uses
17.26 050 Environmental performance standards
17 26 060 Site/building area
17.26 070 Building location
17.26 090 Height
17.26.100 Ingress and egress
17.26.110 Off-street parking
17.26 115 Parking area and circulation design
17.26.130 Landscaping
17.26.140 Stormwater runoff
17.26.010 Purpose. In furtherance of the comprehensive plan, this zone is intended to provide for
the location of business centers to serve the needs of the community for convenience goods and
services such as food, drugs, household supplies. automobile servicing. recreation, entertainment
and other uses related to, but lesser in scope, than downtown core area uses
17.26.020 General requirements. The following uses only are permitted as hereinafter specifically
provided and allowed by this chapter subject to the off-street parking requirements set forth in
Chapter 17 72 and the general provisions and exceptions set forth in this title
17.26.030 Permitted uses.
A. Uses permitted outright are as follows.
1 Apartments at a density of 16 units per acre as part of a mixed use development.
Apartments shall represent no more than sixty percent (60%) of a mixed use
development. All other residential uses are allowed provided the development occurs
on existing lots of record. 1 acre or less.
2. Antique shops,
3 Appliance stores,
4 Auction house/barn, excluding auction house/barn for vehicles or livestock;
5 Automobile laundry (including as an accessory use to a service station) based either
upon a totally-manual or fully-automatic process capable of servicing not more than two
vehicles simultaneously;
6 Automobile sales, minor;
7 Automobile supply stores,
8 Automotive repair station, minor;
9 Bakeries (retail only),
10 Banks, savings and loan associations and credit unions,
11 Barber shops and beauty shops,
12 Billiard hall and pool hall, provided such uses not be permitted to locate within five
hundred feet of the exterior boundary line of any public school grounds measured along
17.26 - 1
,,~
:(
/' ~.:'~
?
...
the most direct route over or across established public walks, streets or other public
passageway to the nearest public entrance of the premises provided for license,
13 Blueprinting and photostating,
14 Books and stationery, video and art supply stores,
15 Bowling alleys,
16 Building, hardware and garden materials,
17 Bulk retail stores,
18 Business and professional offices,
19 Clothes cleaning agency;
20 Confectionery stores,
21 Conservatories of music, drama and instrument instruction,
22 Convenience food markets,
23 Delicatessen stores,
24 Department stores,
25 Drug stores,
26 Dry cleaners, laundries, automatic or nonautomatic, doing retail piece work and using
noncombustible materials, provided not more than ten persons are employed at any
one time and with building facilities containing not more than five thousand square feet
in gross area,
27 Fabric stores,
28 Flea market when in an enclosed building,
29 Florist;
30 Food stores and drug (variety) stores,
31 Galleries, art or museum,
32. Garages for minor automobile repair;
33 Garden supply shops, including plants in pots and containers,
34 Gasoline service stations,
35 Gymnasium, public or commercial or physical culture studios,
36 Hobby, toy and game stores,
37 Home furnishings sales and/or service,
38 Hotels/motels,
39 Hospitals,
40 Ice, packages and storage retail dispensing not exceeding five-ton capacity;
41 Jewelry stores,
42. Laundries, automatic;
43 Liquor stores, off-sale, provided such uses not be permitted to locate within five
hundred feet of the exterior boundary property line of any public school grounds
measured along the most direct route over or across established public walks, streets
1726 - 2
or other public passageway to the nearest public entrance of the premises provided for
license, ~"
44 Locksmiths,
45 Millinery shops,
46 Mini-Storage Facilities provided they are not located within 500' of an Urban Arterial,
47 Mortuaries,
48 Musical instrument manufacturing with associated retail,
49 Newsstands,
50 On-site treatment and storage facilities for hazardous waste, subject to the state siting
criteria adopted pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 70 105 RCW,
51 Parking lots, provided any area so used shall be improved and maintained in the
manner required by Chapter 17 72 and provided further that any such area shall not be
used for a vehicle, trailer or boat sales area or for the accessory storage of such
vehicles,
52. Personal services,
53 Pet shops and hospitals,
54 Photographic, electronic and video stores,
55 Post office branch,
56 Printing establishments except for newspaper letter presses,
57 Radio and television retail and repair shops,
58 Restaurants, cafeterias including drive-through (car service), and restaurants including
cocktail lounges,
59 Secondhand store,
60 Sporting goods and related stores,
61 Stationery and book store, including incidental printing,
62. Studios, such as record recording, couturier, artist, music, dancing and photographic;
63 Swimming pools (commercial),
64 Tailor shops and wearing apparel shops,
65 Taverns, provided such use shall not be permitted within five hundred feet of the
exterior boundary property line of any public school grounds, public park or public
playground,
66 Theaters, when within an enclosed building,
67 Tool sales and rental,
68 Trade schools,
69 Veterinary clinics and hospitals,
Similar or related uses permitted as follows:
1 Other unlisted, similar or related uses, and criteria for determination of similarity or
relatedness, as follows
..
"
~.
B
1726 - 3
" -""
~
'- <J'
a Uses similar to, or related to, those listed in subsection 17 26 030(A) are permitted
upon a finding of the approval authority and/or the site plan review committee that a
particular unlisted use does not conflict with the intent of this chapter or the policies of
the Yelm development plan
b The criteria for such finding of similarity shall include but not be limited to the following
(1) That the proposed use is appropriate in this district,
(2) That the development guidelines for permitted uses can be met by the proposed
use,
(3) That the public need is served by the proposed use
17.26.035 Prohibited uses. Uses other than those identified or described in Section 1726030
of this chapter are prohibited, including but not limited to
A. Automobile sales, major;
B Recreational vehicle storage, personal recreational equipment and accessories, unless fully
contained within an enclosed structure
17.26.040 Special uses
A. Outdoor flea market and farmer's market are special uses allowed under Chapter 17 66,
subject to the following conditions
1 No more than four per year per location,
2. Not more than three days at a time,
3 Not to cause a public hazard relating to traffic, sanitation, etc.
B Special uses as permitted as provided for in Chapter 17 66
17.26.050 Environmental performance standards It shall be the responsibility of the operator
and/or the proprietor of any permitted use to provide such evidence and technical data as the
approval authority may require to demonstrate that the use or activity is or will be in compliance
with the environmental performance standards of Chapter 17 57 of this title Failure of the approval
authority to require such information shall not be construed as relieving the operator and/or the
proprietor from compliance with the environmental performance standards of this title
17.26.060 Site/building area. The size and shape of sites shall be as follows
A. Minimum size of any parcel to be developed in this district shall be five thousand square feet.
B Twenty-five percent (25%) of the floor area of a building with single-story gross floor area in
excess of 40,000 square feet shall be sited within 1,000 linear feet of a double arterial
17.26.070 Building location. Location of buildings or structures on site, if adjacent parcels are in
same zoning district or in another commercial or industrial district, shall be as follows
A. Setbacks from side property lines ten feet;
B Setbacks from rear property lines twenty feet;
C Setbacks from front property lines. fifteen feet.
17.26.090 Height. Maximum height of buildings shall be forty feet.
17.26.100 Ingress and egress. Ingress and egress at the site shall be consistent with the Yelm
Development Guidelines 48 140
17.26.110 Off-street parking.
A. The provisions of Chapter 17 72 shall apply
17 26 - 4
B The minimum parking requirements specified in this section may be adjusted in the site plan
review process under the following conditions. when in their opinion an adjustment will be in
accord with the purposes of this code, and will not create an adverse impact on existing or
potential uses adjoining the subject property, or in the general vicinity of the subject property
The following factors shall be considered in the determination of such impacts and such
adjustments
1 Two or more uses may share a parking area or garage if"
a. The total number of parking spaces provided is at least equal to the sum of the
minimum number of spaces required for each use, or
b The uses are operating during different hours and the number of parking spaces is at
least equal to the minimum number of spaces required for all uses operating at the
same time, and no greater than the maximum number of spaces permitted for all uses
operating at the same time
2:oWhere adjoining parking facilities of two or more ownerships are developed and designed
as one parking facility, a reduction of up to fifteen percent of the total combined required
parking spaces may be permitted
3 The continuation of joint or shared facilities shall be assured by a sufficient legal document
such as a covenant or reciprocal easement agreement or recorded covenant on the
approved site plan or by participation in a local improvement district.
Alternative programs that may be considered by the approval authority and/or site plan
review committee under this section include, but are not limited to the following
a. Private vanpool operation,
b TransiUvanpool fare subsidy;
c. Imposition and maintenance of a charge for parking,
d Provision of subscription bus services,
e Flexible work hour schedule,
f Capital improvements for transit services,
g Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools,
h Participation in the ride-matching program,
Reduction of parking fees for carpools and vanpools,
, J Establishment of a transportation coordinator position to implement carpool, vanpool
and transit programs,
k. Bicycle parking facilities.
C Off-street parking requirements for uses similar or related to, or any use not specifically listed
in the Yelm Development Guidelines, Section 4, Transportation, Table 1, shall be determined
by the approval authority and/or site plan review committee after consultation with the director
of public works on the basis of the requirement for similar uses, and on the basis. of evidence
of actual demand created for similar or related uses in Yelm, and such other traffic
engineering or planning data as may be available and appropriate for the establishment of
minimum and maximum parking requirements
D Parking spaces may be designed and constructed for up to twenty-five percent of the required
number for compact size cars An applicant must clearly identify all spaces designed and
constructed for compact car use The approval authority and/or site plan review committee
1726 - 5
-~"~!
may approve the design and designation of more than twenty-five percent of the spaces for
use by compact cars if the applicant demonstrates that no adverse impact will result.
E Parking areas or garages shall be designed to provide for off-street vehicle circulation to
adjoining property and parking areas where physically feasible, except that driveways and
parking aisles should not cross pedestrian linkages in C-1 land use districts
F Convenient, marked pedestrian access shall be provided from parking areas to pedestrian
linkage systems and from parking areas to principal uses
G An owner/developer may install the required parking spaces in phases if a phased schedule
has been approved by the approval authority and/or site plan review committee This schedule
must specifically indicate when the minimum parking requirements of Section 17 24 140 will
be provided The approval authority and/or site plan review committee may permit the use of
temporary parking areas with appropriate screening as part of a phasing schedule In
addition, the approval authority and/or site plan review committee may require a performance
assurance device to insure conformance with the requirements and intent of Section
17.24 140
17.26.115 Parking area and circulation design.
A. The city public works department or approval authority shall have the authority to fix the
location, width and manner of approach of vehicular ingress or egress from a building or
parking area to a public street and to alter existing ingress and egresl) as may be required to
control street traffic in the interest of public safety and general welfare
B Internal circulation of the lot shall be so designed as to minimize in-and-out driving time, idling
time and time spent looking for a parking space
C When off-street parking is provided in the rear of a building and a driveway or lane alongside
the building provides access to the rear parking area, such driveway or lane shall be a
minimum width of twenty feet with a three-foot minimum width sidewalk adjoining the building
and curbed or raised six inches above the driveway surface
D Parking areas shall include landscaping as required by this chapter or by Chapter 17 80
17.26.130 Landscaping
A. Landscaping shall be provided according to Chapter 17 80 and the provisions of this Section
17.26 130 are supplemental thereto
B Parcels or lots which share a common boundary with properties in a residential or open
space/institutional district shall, in addition to the rear or side setbacks required in Section
17 26 070, provide a ten-foot strip for landscaping along said common boundary
C Refuse
1 Refuse container screening shall be required and be of a material and design compatible
with the overall architectural theme of the associated structure, shall be at least as high as
the refuse container, and shall in no case be less than six feet high
2 No refuse container shall be permitted between a street and the front of a building
3 Refuse collection areas shall be designed to contain all refuse generated on site and
deposited between collections Deposited refuse shall not be visible from outside the refuse
enclosure
17.26.140 Stormwater runoff All stormwater runoff shall be retained, treated and disposed of on
site or disposed of in a system designed for such runoff and which does not flood or damage
adjacent properties Systems designed for runoff retention and control shall comply with
specifications provided by the city and shall be subject to its review and approval, and shall,
1726 - 6
moreover, comply with Chapter 5 of the Yelm Development Guidelines, Drainage Design and
Erosion Control Standards for the City of Yelm --)
):
1726 - 7
Chapter 17 72
OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING
-"''',
;
Sections.
1772010 Intent
17 72 020 General requirements
17 72 030 Minimum requirements
17 72 050 Mixed occupancies
17 72 060 Off-street loading
1772075 Landscaping
17 72 080 Development guidelines
17 72 090 Incentives for reducing the number of parking stalls
(:
17.72.010 Intent. It is the intent of this chapter to:
A. Assure that space is provided for the parking, loading and unloading of motor vehicles on
the site of premises or uses which attract said motor vehicles,
.":..,
B Prbvide minimum standards of space and parking arrangements, and for the movement of
motor vehicles into and out of such spaces,
C Avoid or reduce traffic congestion on public streets by.
1 Keeping the need for on-street parking to a minimum, and
2. Controlling access to sites,
D Enhance safety for pedestrians and motor vehicle operators, and
E Encourage the creation of an aesthetically pleasing and functionally adequate system of
off-street parking and loading facilities
17.72.020 General requirements.
A. Off-street parking spaces and driveways shall not be used at any time for purposes other
than their intended use, ie, the temporary storage of motor vehicles used by persons
visiting or having business to conduct on the premises for which the parking is provided
B Minimum parking space required and intended for use by occupants or users of specific
premises shall not be leased or rented to others, nor shall such space be made
unavailable through other means to the users for whom the parking spaces are intended
Tgis, however, does not preclude shared parking arrangements
C Whenever a building or a piece of land is put to a use different from the immediately
preceding use, or when a building is remodeled, reconstructed or expanded, adequate off-
street parking shall be provided consistent with the new use, reconstruction or expansion
of the premises
D Consideration from the site plan review committee, planning commission and the city
council should be given as to the requirements/standards for off-street parking as they
pertain to the central business district.
E Off-street parking facilities shall be located as hereinafter specified, where a distance is
specified, such distance shall be the walking distance measured from the nearest point of
the parking facilities to the nearest point of the building that such facility is required to
serve
F For a single-family dwelling or multi-family dwellings, the parking facilities shall be located
on the same lot or building site as the building they are required to serve
,
,~
}
i
'.r
1772-1
G For churches located in any zones, parking facilities shall be located on the site,
consideration may be given to parking facilities located not farther than one hundred fifty
feet from the building
H For hospitals, sanitariums, homes for the aged, asylums, orphanages, rooming houses,
lodging houses, nursing and convalescent homes, community clubs and club rooms,
parking facilities shall be located not farther than one hundred fifty feet from the facility
For uses other than those specified, parking facilities shall be located not farther than
three hundred feet from the facility Consideration from the site plan review committee,
planning commission and the city council should be given as to the
requirements/standards for off-street parking as they pertain to the central business
district.
J Exceptions or modifications to the provisions of this chapter shall be processed as a
variance application
17.72.030 Minimum requirements
A. The requirements for off-street parking and loading facilities and their design shall be
regarded as the minimum, however, the owner, developer or operator of the premises for
which the parking facilities are intended shall be responsible for providing adequate
amounts and arrangement of space for the particular premises even though such space or
its arrangement is in excess of the minimum set forth in this chapter
B For special uses, as identified and described in Chapter 17 66 of this title, the parking
requirement shall be as provided in that chapter or as determined by the approval
authority/site plan review committee
C Residential Uses
D
Single-family homes
Duplexes
Multi-family dwellings
Commercial Uses
1 In the several commercial districts, off-street parking requirements shall be as shown
herein, provided that all of the property is controlled by a single person or corporation,
or written agreements for shared parking, acceptable to the city, are filed with the
approval authority Shared parking agreements are acceptable only if the physical
relationship between the premises makes such sharing possible and results in superior
design in terms of layout, access, reduced curb cuts and the like
2 In the following list, the parking requirements for specific uses listed shall be
determined through a formula of one stall per number of gross floor area (GFA) or as
specified.
Banks, saving and loan associations, One per 300 sq ft. of GFA.
Number of Spaces Per
Dwelling Unit
2
2
217
17 Housing intended for exclusive use of, and occupied by, senior CItIzens shall provide one space
for every three dwelling units plus two-tenths space per dwelling unit in buildings contammg five or more
dwelling umts Housing in which the dwelling units are charactenzed by one room enclosmg all actIvitIes
(sometimes referred to as "bachelor" or "efficiency" units) shall provide one and one-half parking spaces
for each dwelhng unit, plus two-tenths space per dwelling unit in buildings containmg five or more
dwelling units
1772-2
business and professional offices
Retail establishments, including
grocery stores
Establishments for the sale and
consumption of food and beverages,
including fraternal and social clubs
Boarding, lodging or rooming
houses
Institutions, sanitariums,
and long term facilities
Churches, mortuaries or funeral
homes
Hospitals
~.!. .:i.
;.L
Libraries and museums
Medical or dental clinics
Motels, hotels
Motor vehicle or machinery
sales, wholesale stores, furniture
stores
Schools
High schools
"~
Elementary and
junior high schools
Places of assemble without fixed
seats, e g stadiums, auditoriums,
and churches
Assembly areas, less-concentrated
use, e g conference rooms and
gymnasiums
Theaters
One per 250 sq ft. of GFA., minimum eight
stalls
---...
r-"f
One per 200 sq ft. of G FA.
One and one-half for each sleeping room
One for each two beds, plus one per
employee based on the greatest Dumber of
care employees on a single shift.
One for each six seats in the principal
place of assembly or worship, including
balconies and choir loft.
One for each bed, plus one per employee
based on the greatest number of
employees on a single shift.
One for each eight occupants, based on
maximum occupants per the Unified
Building Code
One-and-one-half per patient treatment
room/area, plus one space per employee
based on the greatest number of employees on
a single shift.
One for each unit, plus one per employee
based on the greatest number of employees on
a single shift.
One for each 400 sq ft. of GFA.
One for each four students that are
normally enrolled and are of legal driving
age, plus one per classroom and office
Public assembly areas, such as auditor-
iums, stadiums etc., that are primary uses,
shall be considered a separate use in
determining parking
One for each ten students of design capacity
One for each ten occupants, based on the
maximum occupant load per the Unified
Building Code
One for each ten occupants, based on the
maximum occupant load per the Unified
Building Code
One for each six seats
1772-3
E Industrial Uses
1 General
a One space per employee based on the greatest number of employees on a single
shift, plus.
b One square foot parking per square foot of display or retail area, plus,
c One space for each vehicle owned, leased or operated by the company
2. Specific Uses
Tvpe of Use
Minimum Parking
Reauirements
Warehouses 1 space/1000 sq ft. GFA plus 1 space/400 sq ft. of GFA
used for offices or display
F In the case of a use not specifically mentioned in Section 17 72.030, the requirements for
off-street parking facilities shall be determined by the approval authority Such
determination shall be based upon the requirements for the most comparable use
specified in Section 1772.030
17.72.050 Mixed occupancies. In the case of two or more uses in the same building, the total
requirements for off-street parking facilities shall be the sum of the requir~ments for the several
uses computed separately Off-street parking facilities for one use shall not be considered as
providing required parking facilities for any other use, except as hereafter specified in
Incentives for reducing the number of parking stalls, Section 1772.090
17.72.060 Off-street loading
A. Off-street loading shall be required for all commercial establishments which are engaged
in the retailing or wholesaling of merchandise requiring regular delivery such as food
retailers, lumber yards, hardware stores, department stores and the like
Total Gross Floor
Area of BuildinQ(s) Space Reauired
Less than 5,000 sq ft.
5,000 sq ft. to 25,000 sq ft.
25,000 sq ft. to 50,000 sq ft.
Each additional 50,000 sq ft.
or fraction thereof in excess
of 25,000 sq ft.
1
2
3
1 additional
All off-street loading and unloading spaces shall be of adequate size and with adequate access
thereto to accommodate a vehicle forty-five feet in length, twelve feet in width and fourteen feet
in height. Each loading space shall be surfaced with an asphalt, concrete or similar pavement
so as to provide a surface that is durable and dust-free and shall be so graded and drained as
to properly dispose of all surface water, and shall, moreover, comply with Yelm Development
Guidelines
B Any floor area provided by additions to or structural alterations to a building shall be
provided with loading space or spaces as set forth herein whether or not loading spaces
have been provided for the original floor space
C Consideration from the site plan review committee, planning commission and city council
should be given as to the requirements/standards for off-street parking and required
loading areas as they pertain to the central business district.
1772 - 4
17.72.075 Landscaping.
A. Landscaping shall be provided according to Chapter 17 80 and the provisions of this
Section 17 72 075 are supplemental thereto
B All parking areas located adjacent to any private street or public street right-of-way shall
provide a minimum five-foot planted buffer strip between the parking area and the private
street or public right-of-way
C Refuse
1 Refuse container screening shall be required and be of a material and design
compatible with the overall architectural theme of the associated structure, shall be at
least as high as the refuse container, and shall in no case be less than six feet high.
2 No refuse container shall be permitted between a street and the front of a building
3 Refuse collection areas shall be designed to contain all refuse generated on site and
.;-Qeposited between collections. Deposited refuse shall not be visible from outside the
)r:.efuse enclosure
..,c..,;
-,
..~ . 'l
"
..
..
..
17.72.080 Development guidelines.
A. Parking area design shall include
1 Ingress and Egress The location of all points of ingress and egress to parking areas
shall be subject to the review and approval of the city engineer
2. Backing Out Prohibited In all commercial and industrial developments and in all
residential buildings containing five or more dwelling units, parking areas shall be so
arranged as to make it unnecessary for a vehicle to back out into any street or public
right-of-way
3 Parking Spaces-Access and Dimensions Adequate provision shall be made for
individual ingress and egress by vehicles to all parking stalls at all times by means of
unobstructed maneuvering aisles Maneuvering aisles, parking stall dimensions and
requirements shall be as shown in drawings 4-21,4-22,4-23,4-24 and 4-25 of the
Development Guidelines
4 Small Car Parking Spaces In all parking facilities containing twenty-five or more
parking spaces, a maximum of twenty-five percent of the required parking spaces may
be reduced in size for the use of small cars, provided these spaces shall be clearly
identified with a sign permanently affixed immediately in front of each space containing
the notation, "Compacts Only" Spaces designed for small cars may be reduced:in size
to a minimum of seven and one-half feet in width and fifteen feet in length Where
feasible, all small car spaces shall be located in one or more contiguous areas and/or
adjacent to ingress/egress points within parking facilities Location of compact car
parking spaces shall not create traffic congestion or impede traffic flows
5 Surfacing All parking areas shall be surfaced with asphalt, concrete or similar
pavement so as to provide a surface that is durable and dust free and shall be so
graded and drained as to properly dispose of all surface water
6 Lighting Any lighting used to illuminate any required off-street parking area shall be so
arranged as to reflect the light away from adjoining premises in a R zone
7 Signs Must meet requirements as set forth in Chapter 15.24 of this code
B. Stormwater Runoff. All stormwater runoff shall be retained, treated and disposed of on
site or disposed of in a system designed for such runoff and which does not flood or
damage adjacent properties Systems designed for runoff retention and control shall
comply with specifications provided by the city and shall be subject to its review and
"'
~
1772-5
approval, and shall, moreover, comply with Chapter 5 of the Yelm Development
Guidelines, Drainage Design and Erosion Control Standards for the City of Yelm
17.72.090 Incentives for reducing the number of parking stalls.
The city may allow the overall parking ratio (stalls/floor area, people or employees) to be
reduced for buildings of 5,000 square feet or more, provided such reductions are consistent
with the intent of Chapter 17 72. Reduction in parking areas may include any combination of
incentives, provided that the overall reduction does not exceed twenty-five (25%) of the
minimum area required by Section 17 72.030 herein. Reductions in parking requirements may
occur pursuant to, but are not limited to, the following guidelines
1 A reduction of the required parking is possible with coordinated design and shared
access to consolidated parking areas linked by pedestrian walkways
2 Multiple parcels, under separate ownership, be treated as a single development site if
all owners agree
3 In a mixed use development a reduction of the required parking is possible if, through a
quantified parking demand analysis, it can be demonstrated that parking requirements
for the highest and best uses occur at off-setting peak times
4 Primary night-time uses such as theaters and bowling alleys may receive up to a fifty
percent (50%) reduction in providing the required number of parking stalls if"
a. A lease for the equivalent parking stall reduction is obtained from a primary daytime
user such as a bank, office or retail store
b Leased parking is within three hundred (300) feet of the associated use, as long as
a pedestrian walkway exists or is provided between parking area and use
5 Off-site leasing of parking areas may be utilized to meet the required ratio of parking for
the proposed use provided that the leased parking is within three hundred (300) feet of
the proposed use, as long as a pedestrian walkway exists or is provided between
parking area and use
6 Alternative programs that may be considered by the approval authority and/or site plan
review committee under this section include, but are not limited to the following
a Private vanpool operation,
b Transitlvanpool fare subsidy;
c Imposition and maintenance of a charge for parking,
d Provision of subscription bus services,
e Flexible work hour schedule,
f Capital improvements for transit services,
g Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools,
h Participation in the ride-matching program,
Reduction of parking fees for carpools and van pools,
Establishment of a transportation coordinator position to implement carpool, vanpool
and transit programs,
k. Bicycle parking facilities
1772-6
Chapter 17 80
LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS
-""":",
i
Sections
17 80 010 Statement of intent
17 80 020 General requirements
17 80 030 Special requirements
17 80 050 Types of landscaping
17 80 060 Alternative landscaping option
17 8'0 070 Species choice
17 80 080 Maintenance of plant materials
17 80 090 Performance assurance
17 80 100 Landscape features
f
17.80.010 Statement of intent. The purpose of this chapter is to establish minimum
requirements and standards for landscaping and screening where needed to promote safety, to
provide screening between incompatible land uses, to safeguard privacy and to protect the
aesthetic assets of the city
17.80.020 General requirements.
A. A plot plan of the proposed landscaping and screening shall be submitted for preliminary
plat, site plan review, administrative design review or building permit review
B Landscaping plans shall be drawn to scale, including dimensions and distances, and
clearly delineate existing and proposed parking spaces or other vehicular use area,
access aisles, driveways, the location, size and description of all landscape materials (new
and existing), setback lines, buildings (structures)--proposed and existing--and identify
existing significant trees and/or other landscape features and topographic elevations
The applicant shall utilize tree protection techniques approved by the approval authority,
site plan review committee and/or approval authority in order to provide for the continued
healthy life of retained significant trees including during land alteration and construction
C The applicant shall submit the information required in subsection 17 80 020(8) In addition,
the applicant shall provide a drawing including all adjacent property and their uses
17.80.030 Special requirements.
A. The following uses require Type I landscaping on all sides when located above ground
ahd not housed within a building or accessory to another use, and if located outside a
public right-of-way'
1 Utility substation,
2 Sewage pumping station,
3 Water distribution facility;
4 Communication relay station
8 Whenever a non-residential activity is proposed adjacent to a residential zone or use, a
minimum fifteen-foot buffer area of Type I landscaping shall be provided along the
property boundary between the uses
C The following uses require Type III landscaping along the street frontage and throughout
the required front yard area and Type II landscaping between the required front yard area
and improvements on the property and along interior property lines unless a more
stringent requirement is specifically identified in a land use district:
\
)
~j.:. "
.(
__;r
I 7 80 - I
1 Church,
2 Commercial or public parking lot or structure not serving a primary use,
3 Government service building,
4 Community club,
5 School,
6 Hospital
D An area around the base of each utility pole, ground mounted sign or similar fixture must
be landscaped to improve the overall appearance of the area This landscaping must
include vegetation and may include other materials and components such as brick or
concrete bases, planter boxes or decorative framing
E In front yard areas required to be landscaped under city requirements, the grass areas
shall be designed and constructed in a manner that will make possible normal
maintenance such as mowing and watering
17.80.050 Types of landscaping
A. All residential and non-residential projects with the exception of individual single family
residences shall be required to provide landscaping that satisfies the functions and
specific requirements of this Section 17 80 050
B Type I
1 Purpose Type I landscaping is intended to provide a very dense sight barrier and
physical buffer to significantly separate conflicting uses and land use districts
2. Description.
a. All plant materials and living ground cover must be selected and maintained so that
the entire landscape area will be covered within three years
b Any combination of trees, shrubs, fences, walls, earthen berms and related plant
materials or design features may be selected, provided that the resultant effect is
sight-obscuring from adjoining properties
c Trees shall be a minimum 1 Y:z inches in caliper measured six inches above the base
at the time of planting and shrubs must be capable of growing to a minimum of five
feet in height, within three years
d A minimum of fifteen feet of width shall be required when Type I landscaping design
is utilized
C Type II
1 Purpose Type II landscaping is intended to provide visual separation of uses from
streets, and visual separation of compatible uses so as to soften the appearance of
streets, parking areas and building elevation This landscaping is used around the
perimeter of a site and adjacent to buildings and may be augmented by the applicant
with a Type III landscaping to provide interest along parking lot pedestrian corridors
2. Description
a All plant materials and living ground cover must be selected and maintained so that
the entire landscape area will be covered within five years
b Any combination of evergreen and deciduous trees (with no more than fifty percent
being deciduous), shrubs, earthen berms and related plant materials or design
features may be selected, provided that the resultant effect is to provide partial
1 7 80 - 2
screening and buffering between uses and of softening the appearance of streets,
parking and structures
c. Trees shall be a minimum of 1 Y:z inches in caliper measured six inches above the
base at planting and shrubs must be capable of growing to a minimum of four feet in
height, within five years
d When Type II landscaping is used to provide partial screening between uses, a
minimum planting area of eight feet in width shall be provided When Type II
landscaping is used adjacent to a building, a minimum five-foot planting area shall
be provided
D Type III
1 Purpose Type III landscaping is intended to provide visual relief where clear sight is
desired. This landscaping type is utilized along pedestrian corridors and walks for
separation of pedestrians from streets and parking areas while providing an attractive
~.~etting and overstory canopy
~k:.
2"Description.
a. This type of landscaping consists of street trees for a large overstory canopy along
streets and pedestrian corridors and grass or other approved vegetation for ground
cover
b Turf grass developed for conditions of the northwest shall be planted. Other ground
cover may be used if it is designed to provide green effect for aesthetic relief
c. Street trees along arterials and collectors shall be those species described in the
city's urban beautification program Trees used along local access streets or
pedestrian walks through parking lots shall be a species approved by the planning
department or approval authority and shall be chosen for attractiveness, rooting
habits, disease and pest resistance and habitat value All trees shall be a minimum
of 1 Y:z inches in caliper measured six inches above the base at planting Decorative
protection may be placed around trees
d Earthen berms with grass or other vegetative ground cover and other'design
features may be worked into landscaping provided the resultant effect of providing a
pedestrian friendly environment and visual relief where clear site is required can be
achieved
...:e The minimum width for Type III landscaping shall be six feet to provide adequate
rooting area for large street trees and to provide adequate streetscape A four-foot
width may be used through parking area pedestrian walks where accent trees are
used and less width is required
E Type IV
1 Purpose To provide visual relief and shade in parking areas
2 Description
a. Required Amount
1) Parking areas shall have at least twenty-four square feet of landscape
development for each parking stall proposed
2) The requirements in subparagraph (a)(1) above are considered a minimum
Additional landscape area may be necessary to meet design requirements
below
b Design
17 80 - 3
~
{
1) Each area of landscaping must contain at least one hundred square feet of area
and must be at least six feet in any direction
2) Each planting area must contain at least one tree Planting areas shall be
provided with the maximum number of trees possible given recommended
spacing for species type Deciduous trees shall have a minimum size of 1 %
inches in caliper measured six inches above the base Evergreens shall have a
minimum height of eight feet at planting
3) Live ground cover shall be provided throughout each landscaping area. Ground
cover may be any combination of grass, shrubs and trees that provide the
desired effect of providing visual relief and green space within the parking area
Grassed areas are recommended Utilization of beauty bark shall be
discouraged and shall not substitute for live ground cover Ground cover shall be
selected and maintained so that the entire landscaped area will be covered
within three years
4) A landscaped area must be placed at the interior end of each parking row in a
multiple lane parking area This area must be at least six feet wide and must
extend the length of the adjacent parking stall
5) Up to one hundred percent of the trees proposed for the parking area may be
deciduous A minimum of seventy percent must be deciduous
6) No parking stall shall be located more than fifty feet from a tree
7) Landscaping islands and landscape portions of pedestrian corridors may be
used for drainage treatment and given credit on drainage calculations under
Chapter 5 of the Development Guidelines However, the primary purpose shall
remain landscaping and health of trees and ground cover and aesthetic
character shall not be compromised Additionally in no case shall the grade
between the parking lot surface edge and the landscape island or pedestrian
corridor surfaces be greater than six inches when a swale concept is utilized and
it is intended to meet minimum landscaping space requirements
F Type V
1 Purpose To provide visual relief in storm water retention/detention areas
2 Description
A. The floor and slopes of any stormwater retention/detention area shall be planted in
vegetation that is suitable and will thrive in hydric soils.
B The landscaping of the stormwater facility shall be incorporated with all on-site
landscaping
G Type VI
1 Purpose Type VI landscaping is intending to create a decorative landscaped display
with colorful flowers or foliage as focal setting for signs, special site elements and/or high
visibility or pedestrian areas
2 Description
A. All plant materials and living ground cover must be selected and maintained so that
the entire landscape area will be covered within three years
B Shrubs, at least 50% of which must exhibit decorative floral or foliage, shall cover at
least 50% of the landscaped area
17 80 - 4
C The remaining 50% of the landscaped area may be planted with trees, shrubs,
ground cover, or cultivated flower beds
H Type VII
1 Purpose Type VII landscaping is intended to enhance natural areas and to integrate
developments Into the existing site conditions
2 Description
A. Landscaping shall consist of trees, shrubs, ground covers, and/or grasses that are
native to the Puget sound basin and are appropriate to the conditions of the site
Species are subject to approval by the City
B Arrangements of plants shall be asymmetrical and plant material shall be sufficient
in quantity to cover the soil in one growing season
C If landscaping is used as part of a required landscape strip along Highway 507 or
"r~10, the planting shall include at least one evergreen tree 3' tall planted at an average
of 20' on center, but no greater than 30' on center along the strip
..~x-;
17.80.060 Alternative landscaping option.
A. The applicant may request a modification of the landscaping requirements set forth in
Sections 17 80 030 of this chapter
B The approval authority and/or site plan review committee may approve a modification of
the landscaping requirements of this chapter only if"
1 The proposed landscaping implements portions of an urban forestry program or plan
duly adopted by the city council,
2 The proposed landscaping represents an equal result that could have been achieved by
strictly following the requirements of this chapter; and
3 The proposed landscaping complies with the stated purpose of this chapter
C Natural vegetation or stands of trees existing prior to development of the site may be
acceptable to meet all or part of the landscaping requirements
17.80.070 Species choice. The applicant shall utilize plant materials that complement the
natural character of the Pacific Northwest.
17 80.080 Maintenance of plant materials.
A. The property owner shall replace any unhealthy or dead plant materials in conformance
with the approved landscape development proposal and shall maintain all landscape
material
B All areas where new landscaping is being required shall be provided with irrigation
systems or shall be within 75 feet of a hose spigot. Said irrigation systems shall be
designed, installed and operated to maintain the plant materials to the standards detailed
in subsection 17 80 080(A)
C All trees, plant materials and landscaped areas shall receive sufficient water to be kept in
a healthy and growing manner
17.80090 Performance assurance.
A. The required landscaping must be installed prior to issuance of the certificate of
occupancy unless the approval authority or site plan review committee determines that a
performance assurance device, for a period of not more than one year, will adequately
protect the interest of the city In no case may the property owner/developer delay
performance for more than one year
17 80 - 5
.~
"
.
)
B The city may accept, as an alternative to a performance assurance device, a contractual
agreement or bond between the owner/developer and a licensed landscape architect,
Washington-certified nurseryman or Washington-certified landscaper, along with a rider or
endorsement specifically identifying the city as a party to the agreement for purposes of
enforcement. Nothing in this alternative shall be interpreted to in any way modify the
conditions of subsection 17 80 090(A)
C If a performance assurance device or evidence of a similar device is required under
subsections 1780 090(A,B), the approval authority shall determine the specific type of
assurance device required in order to insure completion of the required landscaping in
accordance with the approved landscaping plan. The value of this device must equal one
hundred fifty percent of the estimated cost of the landscaping to be performed, and shall
be utilized by the city to perform any necessary work, and to reimburse the city for
documented administrative costs associated with action on the device If costs incurred by
the city exceed the amount provided by the assurance device, the property owner shall
reimburse the city in full, or the city may file a lien against the subject property for the
amount of any deficit.
D If a performance assurance device or evidence of a similar device is required under
subsections 1780 090(A,B), the property owner shall provide the city with an irrevocable
notarized agreement granting the city and its agents the right to enter the property and
perform any required work remaining undone at the expiration of the assurance device
E. Upon completion of the required landscaping by the property owner, at or prior to
expiration of the assurance device, the city shall promptly release the performance
assurance device or evidence thereof
17.80.100 Lan~scape features. Landscape features such as decorative paving, sculptures or
fountains are permitted in the required landscaping area. The area devoted to such a feature
may not exceed twenty-five percent of the required area.
17 80 - 6
YELM
W....SHINGTON
FAX TRANSMISSION
CITY OF YELM
PO BOX 479 - 105 YELM AVE W
YELM WA 98597
360-458-3244
FAX: 360-458-4348
T~/1{,~tlfLI O()WI
Fax#: 9i!3/(PfS()
From=tW0 iPcIs/Wj n'7J of-~
-;J fA Cf\;;-
Date: :J -7 - (a
~ges: :;;)-, including this cover sheet.
Subject:
COMMENTS Pl, (f (), e cU )e..1f e:L (Jilt) m.(! --10 J lot uds )!J ( {?l?-
~ 0Vf;2, 1A)pr/ /irv1 w.. U1-ro. Wi R,dUhd Srv,Sflt
(~. J1f~~ ~C12& Ihf/IJ[,.eC..h~ /7P,a!r14'<~r'1 (
yv.v posa./ UIt' 'cl[oCLIs~cI bot IAJk. Jk rs 'J!r'Js'70
Gt4't ~ ~ 1f'iS 0c0 fI0 - rCc fer 9cJie, -/ lee Mr elL
~ UJn add! (O'wimeJJcr{d fud 1< f/lrIoy~ '-h,~
fee woW/d 1;-f tZra C(, ?f!)~mta- .~M.tW d,c!
~ ifJ1t50 /f11/U /uj-!i.e #rfhcd2~^-- oFf{. Lie c~
-oJ ~h(vc1 . .
.(),. If~u do not receive all copies or any copy is not legible, please call (360) 458-3244 as
soon as possible.
dslc:\office\forms\fax.3
Richard Embry, Project Manager
Gramor Development N W , Inc.
1133 164th St SW, Suite 107
Lynnwood, WA 98037
RE: Nisqually Plaza, Yelm Avenue Traffic Signal
Construction and Participation
Dear Richard:
To confirm our previous conversation, we will require Gramor
Development to construct the traffic signal at the Nisqually
Plaza main access driveway/Vancil Rd intersection with Yelm
Ave We will, as a condition of future project approvals,
require that those developments and projects that will
directly impact the service of the traffic signal enter an
agreement with Gramor Development concerning its prorata
share of the traffic signal construction and design costs
Said agreement will be required prior to issuance of any
construction permits respective to said developments and
projects Typically, the agreement will involve a prorata
share that will be determined by a calculation on the
estimated vehicle trips that the development or project will
contribute to the intersection
I trust this brief acknowledgment formalizes and satisfies
your lenders concern regarding the issue surrounding future
prorata share of the costs for the traffic light
Sincerely,
~1~~ive
Officer
November 15, 1994
Ri!c'. NisquaHy Plaza Shopp~ng Center
Zoning Certification
~().;\Lj YlJ,
\ V '0- S~
Ty Peterson
City of Yelm
POBox 479
Yelm, W A 98597
Dear Ty'
Gramor Development IS m the process of placmg permanent financmg on Nisqually Plaza.
ProtectIve LIfe Insurance Company, the lender, reqUIres a "Zorung CertIficatIOn" be
completed by the appropnate JUrISdIctIOn. I have mcluded the form whIch was drafted by
ProtectIve for your completIon and SIgnature
We appreCIate your attentIon to thIs matter Please return the form to Gramor m the
enclosed self addressed stamped envelope by Monday, November 28 If possible
Thank you m advance for your aSSIstance m thIS matter
Smcerely,
Gramor Development N.W., Inc.
JG
enclosure
~.
, Property Manager
1133 164TH ST s.w / SUITE 107/ L YNNWOOD, WA 98037-8121 / (206) 742-0520 FAX (206) 742-5553
SEATTLE I PORTLAND I SAN DIEGO
~ M,moo,"
..< InlernatlOnalCounciI
" ot Shoppmg Centers
'_0__ ..:........,--:I~~.il:..:..::..:::..:.i.~.i~..--:.\ .~,,,,,,,._,,-,,:,_.~ ~ ,_, ~_ _~.__ _-,-,_____.___ _, .....__... ~_' ~_.~:.._..~.>._.___.. '. .:~____... _~_ _~..___ ___
...:._._~-__~__..:.-__._,_._":_.~...______-----..i_____,_____,_:.___'...~_~~'___
",
11/14/94 09 56
--. '
.....
,
'fi"2066782298
DALE K ROUNDY
IaJ 005
ZONING CERTIJFIC~Jl!:lli
The undersIgned Official does hereby certify to PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as follows:
,
tt.-t ~;,'~
1. That this is the duly appointed City Administrator
of the City of Yelm
she and is authorized to make this certification.
she
2. That he is familiar with the plans and specificatlOns suhmltted by
Gramer Development
-
._-_ in connectIOn,.:, with the
constnlction of Nis<JJ..1B.lly Pl ('l~i'}. Yelm, WA
in the real property descnbed in Exhibit A attached hereto o.nd
made part hereof by reference (hereinafter referred to as the IIPropertytl )
3. That the Property is in the C -1, Corrmercial
Zoning District, as provided in the Zoning Ordinance or Code of the
Ci ty of Yelm
(hereinafter referred to as the "Code"), which zoning 1:) the proper
zoning for the improvements that have been constructed
4. That all improvements and the use of the PTopcrty c.omply wIth all apphcable
provIsions of the Code and do not violate any curr~nl applicable zoning or occupancy
ordInance, resolution or regulation of Yelm WA
(City) (State)
5. That no action or proceeding is pendmg before any Court or admInIstrative
agency with respect to the Zoning of the Property or any Improvements located thereon.
6. That no action or proceeding is pending hefon: any Court of adlmmstratlve agency
with respect to the validity (;f the Corle or an)'certlfi~ation or permits i!'.suc:I thereunder
7. That attached hereto are true copIes of all applicable ordInances,
resolutions or regulations, relating to the zoning and lIse of the Property
, !JJ, jfl~
;4-d /111//1 ( 8fraln.
vanances,
11- ~?y1 1-
(Date)
Z.oNING/ni,.qua~Ii' pia,..
__~~,-'~~:, .'G..:..~~. ..;_.~'...L:::'-.:Io_~.~ ....~... _ ~ _ .
,-. .,
--.-._-_..:.......:_.:....,~~:..~.. .-'-..,-..<----'-
'. "-'" -- ".
.:.--~....~...:.,,:.:..;....__-"'-_..z
.- ~ .-. , . '" ". - " , .
'4";' ...._,:"."._.:.0 o~._1;..:-----
EXHIBIT" A"
(pROPERTY DESCIPTION)
That part of the northwest quarter of SectIon 30, TownshIp 17 North, Range 2 East, W.M.
delmeated as parcels A and C of survey recorded III volume 21 of surveys page 182, under
audItors File No 87015220173 SItuated m The City of Yelm" County of Thurston, State of
WashIngton.
~...;."';:':;.",.J..:.;.':'_;'_.~. ;':'h__":"'::~':"':':'~--"~__:'_.':-'_~ .;,~..._...._ ;.___ ....' __..:....:~...:..;......:~ ',',~,'::~',;-D.":IT..5~, "':',~,,
17.26.060--17.28.010
,.-~.-
2. No business, trade or industry shall be permitted
which is noxious or offensive by reason of emission or odor,
dust, smoke, gas, vibration or noise or which imposes any
extraordinary hazard to life or property. (Ord. 346 S6
(part), 1988).
17.26.060 Off-street parking. For off-street parking
requirements applicable to CBD zone, see Chapter 17.38.
(Ord. 346 S6 (part), 1988).
17.26.070 Loading and unloading space requirements.
All commercial buildings within the CBD central business dis-
trict shall provide space for loading and unloading as fol-
lows:
The loading space where the property is surrounded on
all sides by streets to be within the property sufficiently
far so that no part of a vehicle, loading or unloading, shall
protrude onto the street. Where the building borders an al-
ley, the loading space shall be along the alley and shall
extend not less than fourteen feet in depth back from the
alley and no less than twenty-five feet bordering the alley
and sufficiently high for clearance of vehicles. (Ord. 346
S6(part),1988).
17.26.080 Standards. For standards applicable to the
CBD zone, see Chapter 17.40. (Ord. 346 S6(part), 1988).
Chapter 17.28
C-1 COMMERCIAL ZONE
Sections:
17.28.010
17.28.020
17.28.030
17.28.040
17.28.050
Purpose.
General requirements.
Permitted uses.
Conditional uses.
Special use/combining and planned development
districts.
Standards.
17.28.060
i
\
17.28.010 Purpose. In furtherance of the comprehensive
plan, this zone is intended to provide for the location of
business centers to serve the needs of the community for
convenience goods and services such as food, drugs, household
supplies, automobile servicing, recreation, entertainment and
other uses related to, but lesser in scope, than downtown
core area uses. (Ord. 346 S6(part), 1988).
159-2
(Yelm 2/89)
.'.-..... ,
.\ :~ :.....:.~~.,. ...I.....~-'.._-_.'-...~.
...... -.' "",".' ", - -,.... .' .,'
~1..:.._~___,_y;~__.,___ ~_. _... .__~_. ._.~......:...._~_......:......~.~._____.,___--...-..:.............~....~"'.
17.28.020--17.28.030
(
17.28.020 General requirements. The following uses
only are permitted as hereinafter specifically provided and
allowed by this chapter subject to the off-street parking
requirements set forth in Chapter 17.38 and the general pro-
visions and exceptions set forth in this title. (Ord. 346
S6 (part), 1988).
17.28.030 Permitted uses. Uses permitted outright are
as follows:
[
\.
All uses permitted in R-1 and R-2 classifications sub-
ject to the least restrictive applicable standards and condi-
tions;
Antique shops;
Appliance stores;
Auction house/barn, excluding auction house/barn for
vehicles or livestock;
Automobile laundry as an accessory use to a service sta-
tion based either upon a totally manual or fully automatic
process, capable of servicing not more than two vehicles si-
multaneously and having no conveyor or pull-through system
and operating without blowers or steam cleaning facilities
where not more than one employee is necessary to the
incidental operation thereof;
Automobile service stations;
Bakeries (retail only);
Banks and savings and loan associations;
Barber shops and beauty shops;
Billiard hall and pool hall, provided such uses not be
permitted to locate within five hundred feet of the exterior
boundary line of any public school grounds measured along the
most direct route over or across established public walks,
streets or other public passageway to the nearest public en-
trance of the premises proposed for license;
Blueprinting and photostating;
Bowling alleys;
Business and professional offices;
Clothes cleaning agency;
Confectionery stores;
Conservatories of music, drama and instrument
instruction;
Delicatessen stores;
Department stores;
Drug stores;
Dry cleaners, laundries, automatic or nonautomatic, do-
ing retail piece work and using noncombustible materials,
provided not more than ten persons are employed at anyone
time and with building facilities containing not more than
five thousand square feet in gross area;
Convenience food markets;
Flea market;
159-3
( Ye 1m 2 / 8 9 )
; c,:", 'W":~\~'-.; ...,~,.-,~"
..-,~._:'....~.:.::':" ':'..~_"'--''':::''~;:'':'':':'':'''..':_~_i_---:'_~-:'''_.--'''--'''::'''
....:;~~;:~..
17.28.030
/"
f
Garages for minor automobile repair;
Garden supply shops, including plants in pots and con-
tainers;
Gymnasium, public or commercial or physical culture stu-
dios;
Horticultural nurseries;
Ice, packages and storage retail dispensing not exceed-
ing five ton capacity;
Jewelry stores;
Laundries, automatic;
Liquor stores, off-sale, provided such uses not be per-
mitted to locate within five hundred feet of the exterior
boundary property line of any public school grounds measured
along the most direct route over or across established public
walks, streets or other public passageway to the nearest pub-
lic entrance of the premises proposed for license;
Locksmiths;
Millinery shops;
Mortuaries;
Newsstands;
Onsite treatment and storage facilities for hazardous
waste, subject to the state siting criteria adopted pursuant
to the requirements of RCW Chapter 70.105;
Parking lots, provided any area so used shall be im-
proved and maintained in the manner required ~y Chapter 17.38
and provided further that any such area shall not be used for
a vehicle, trailer, or boat sales area or for the accessory
storage of such vehicles;
Pet hospitals;
Pet shops;
Post office branch;
Printing establishments except for newspaper letter
presses;
Radio and television retail and repair shops;
Restaurants, cafeterias including drive-in (car ser-
vice), and drive-in (self-service) restaurants including
cocktail lounges;
Secondhand store;
Stationery and book store, including incidental print-
ing;
Studios, such as record recording, couturier, artist,
music, dancing and photographic;
Swimming pools (commercial);
Tailor shops and wearing apparel shops;
Taverns, provided such use shall not be permitted within
five hundred feet of the exterior boundary property line of
any public school grounds, public park or public playground;
Theaters, when within an enclosed building;
Tool sales and rental;
Trade schools;
Similar uses as determined by the town council.
(Ord. 346 ~6 (part), 1988).
159-4
(Yelm 2/89)
.. .,', ,'.'
___.-"-'____.....:....:. ,J ~ .:.-
- _.._.~_ ~...,__., 2-
. .,
~'-_'~~ d__..._,.,
., .r:" - , . ;.' "._. ,.
_.......-'- _''; ..-'-..:...l..~~_'-'!-.~~
'-. ; .,. :':"i ,-....:/: ~' ; 1
". ,~,.;~. :':~q:.~:~F~~f-~~.~~~~~TIT};'i:'.:~;l>.
17.28.040--17.30.020
i~.
"
17.28.040 Conditional uses. Uses permitted subject to
the granting of a conditional use permit by the town council
are as follows:
A. Automobile laundries which utilize blowers and/or
steam cleaning facilities;
1. The town shall investigate uses and zoning of
adjacent lands and shall impose such conditions as may be
deemed necessary to protect the public interest and welfare;
B. Mobile home park, in accordance with standards in
Chapter 17.42. (Ord. 346 56 (part) , 1988).
17.28.050 Special use/combining and planned development
districts. Special use/combining and planned development
districts in the C-1 zone shall be in compliance with
standards set forth in Chapters 17.34 and 17.36. (Ord. 346
56(part),1988).
17.28.060 Standards. For standards applicable to the
C-1 zone, see Chapter 17.40. (Ord. 346 56 (part) , 1988).
Chapter 17.30
C-2 HEAVY COMMERCIAL ZONE
Sections:
17.30.010
17.30.020
17.30.030
17.30.040
17.30.050
Purpose.
General requirements.
Permitted uses.
Conditional uses.
Special use/combining and planned development
districts.
Standards.
17.30.060
17.30.010 Purpose. A. In furtherance of the compre-
hensive plan, this zone is intended to provide for the loca-
tion of nonretai1, commercial and semi-industrial establish-
ments which are primarily oriented to automotive rather than
pedestrian buying activity.
B. It is a further intent of this zone to provide for
the productive use of land already oriented to the above-
described activity, consistent with the requirements of pub-
lic safety and the maintenance of property value in the sur-
rounding area. (Ord. 346 56 (part) , 1988).
17.30.020 General requirements. The following uses
only are permitted as hereinafter specifically provided and
allowed by this chapter, subject to the off-street parking
'.
159-5
(Yelm 2/89)
(
\
Sections:
17.38.010
17.38.020
17.38.030
17.38.040
17.38.050
17.38.060
17.38.070
17.38.080
17.38.090
17.38.100
17.38.110
17.38.120
17.38.130
,...., :,: *":~ . "-".;~~',,fJ._,. _
'1:,~,,,>-r;-~~~-::-;J;;,,;,L..
+,-.';'.-\:.':;.f~'.~.:..:.]'
. " '. .
._.....:.~--,_..:...~-'--_. ......; _._-~ --....::.-.---. ------:...:.....-..---
17.38.010--17.38.020
Chapter 17.38
OFF-STREET PARKING
Automobile parking spaces required.
Size and access.
Location.
Unit of measurement.
Expansions or enlargements,
Mixed occupancies.
Uses not specified.
Parking spaces required for particular uses.
Special requirements.
Conditional accessory parking areas in R
zones.
Required loading areas.
Exceptions and modifications.
Special zone exceptions.
17.38.010 Automobile parking spaces required. A. Off-
street parking spaces shall be provided as an acce5sory use
in accordance with the requirements of this chapter at the
time any building or structure is erected, enlarged or ex-
panded.
B. Consideration from the planning committee and city
council should be given as to the requirements/standards for
off-street parking as they pertain to the central business
district. (Ord. 344 ~l, 1988).
17.38.020 Size and access. Each off-street parking
space shall have an area of not less than one hundred sixty
square feet exclusive of access drives or aisles and a width
of not less than eight feet. There shall be adequate pro-
vision for ingress and egress from each parking space. (Ord.
344 ~2, 1988).
159-20
(Yelm 2/89)
17.38.030--17.38.060
(
17.38.030 Location. Off-street parking facilities shall
be located as hereinafter specified; where a distance is
specified, such distance shall be the walking distance mea-
sured from the nearest point of the parking facilities to
the nearest point of the building that such facility is re-
quired to serve.
A. For a single-family dwelling or multifamily dwell-
ings, the parking facilities shall be located on the same lot
or building site as the building they are ~equired to serve.
B. For churches located in any zones, parking facilities
shall be located on the site; consideration may be given to
parking facilities located not farther than one hundred fifty
feet from the building.
C. For hospitals, sanitariums, homes for the aged,
asylums, orphanages, rooming houses, lodging houses, nursing
and convalescent homes, community clubs, and club rooms,
parking facilities shall be located not farther than one
hundred fifty feet from the facility.
D. For uses other than those specified, parking fa-
cilities shall be located not farther than three hundred
feet from the facility. Consideration from the planning
committee and the city council should be given as to the
requirements/standards for off-street parking as they per-
tain to the central business district. (Ord. 344 ~3, 1988).
17.38.040 Unit of measurement. In stadiums, sports
arenas, churches and other places of assembly in which
patrons or spectators occupy benches, pews, and other similar
seating facilities, each eighteen inches of width or eighty
square feet of open area of such seating facilities should
be counted as one seat for the purpose of determining require-
ments for off-street parking facilities under this title.
(Ord. 344 ~4, 1988).
17.38.050 Expansions or enlargements. Where any struc-
ture is enlarged or expanded, then orf-street parking spaces
shall be provided for said expansion or enlargement in accord-
ance with the requirements of Section 17.38.090. Nothina in
this chapter shail be construed to require off-street pa~king
spaces for the portion of said building or structure existing
at the effective date of the ordinance codlfied in thls
chapter. A change in use in an existing structure shall re-
quire additional off-street parkina spaces as set forth in
Section 17.38.080. (Ord. 344 ~5, 1988).
17.38.060 Mixed occupancies. In the case of two or
more uses in the same building, the total requirements for
off-street parking facilities shall be the sum of the require-
ments for the several uses computed separately. Off-street
parking facilities for one use shall not be considered as
(
\.
160
(Yelm 7/88)
"'~::'~~..c~C---7"
.~~. !!';.".j{::~<''r,-::r:~S;~'=-:'1.;:-;:'''' _,l~~..,'t~:"'i.'.._p.. :.
;_.n_~~_'':__;':__~''"'~'_H
(
17.38.070--17.38.080
providing required parking facilities fer any other use, ex-
cept as hereafter specified in Section 17.38.080 for joint
use. (Ord. 344 56, 1988).
17.38.070 Uses not specified. In the case of a use not
specifically mentioned in Section 17.38.080, the requirements
for off-street parking facilities shall be determined by the
planning committee. Such determination shall be based upon
the requirements for the most comparable use specified in
Section 17.38.080. (Ord. 34457,1988).
17.38.080 Parking spaces required for particular uses.
The minimum number of off-street parking spaces required shall
be as set forth in the following:
Use
Single-family
Multiple-family dwellings
Automobile laundry
Banks, savings and loan
associat~ons, bus~ness or
professional offices
Bowl~ng alleys
Boarding, lOdging or room-
ing houses
Children's institutions,
rest homes
Churches, mortuaries or
funeral homes
Dancehalls
Establishments fer the sale
and consumption on the prem-
ises of food and beverages,
~ncluding fraternal and
social clubs, retail stores,
except as otherwise specifi-
fied herein
Hospitals
Libraries and museums
Parkinq Spaces Required
Two for each dwelling unit
Two for each dwelling unit
Minimum of two storage spaces
for each individual car washing
bay, or not less than four times
the total vehicle capacity
accommodated on a conveyer system
One for each two hundred square
feet of gross floor area, or based
on occupancy, whichever is greater
Five per each alley, plus re-
lated occupancy factors
One-and-one-half for each sleep-
~ng room
One for each two beds
One for each four seats in the
principal place of assembly for
worship, including balconies and
choir loft
One per fifteen square feet of
skating or dancing area, plus
related occupancy factors
One for each two hundred square
feet of gross floor area, or
based on occupancy, whichever
is greater
Two for each bed
One for each three occupants
161
( Ye 1m 7/8 8 )
;", _/"~'~~~'\"I;~,C.-.i'~~~::,~ l~.~
_._:_--_._--_:...__.~--;.._.~-:.~-~~....-:--~..:...;..~~.........:..._~~~~. ::.....:......
(
Manufacturing uses, research
and testing laboratories,
creameries, bottling estab-
lishments, bakeries, can-
neries, printing and en-
graving shops
Medical or dental clinics
Motels, hotels
Motor vehicle or machinery
sales, wholesale stores,
furniture stores
Sanitariums
Schools:
High schools
Elementary and junior
high schools
Skating rinks
Stadiums, auditoriums,
community clubs, community
centers and other places
of assembly
Theaters
Warehouses and storage
bUJ.ldings
(Ord. 344 ~8, 1988).
17.38.090
One for each one-and-one-half
employees on a maximum shift
Six for each physician or
dentist
One for each unit plus employees
One for each four hundred square
feet of gross floor area
One for each bed
One for each four students plus
one for each faculty member
(exclusive of loading and un-
loading areas) -
One for each eight students
plus one for each faculty mem-
ber
One per every forty square feet,
plus related occupancy factors
Based on occupancy use
One for each three seats up to
eight hundred seats, plus one
for each five seats over eight
hundred seats
Based on occupancy or parking
requirements for that occupant.
17.38.090 Special requirements. In any zone, a parking
area for five or more vehicles shall be developed in accord-
ance with the following requirements:
A. Landscaping. A landscaped area not less than three
feet in width shall be provided continuously (except for
authorized curb cuts) along any front, rear or side boundary
property line abutting a public or private road. Landscap-
J.ng shall consist of a variety of hardy evergreen planted
material consisting of trees, low-profile and high-profile
shrubs together with suitable ground cover such as native
grasses, bark, rockeries or a combination thereof, and shall
be designed and maintained in such a manner as not to impair
vehicle visibility at corner intersections or adjacent to
points of ingress or egress.
B. Screening. A vertical sight-obscuring screen not
less than four feet in height shall be provided continuously
(except for authorized curb cuts) along any slde of an
r
(
\
"-
161-1
(Yelm 7/88)
.__~.____.~._..'}..~..;..:..::.;;~_~:..;:;' ~'_.....;,-' __o..'_.;,,";:''''..C';':':;''~~~~_'';:'';':''':'R___~_._ . __~ ._~____~_,;"___':....._,-_",:,-,.~,_~~~""",~~,:..cw::,~~~,,..
17.38.100
f
f
(
off-street parking area that is
which abuts a residential zone.
be designed and placed adjacent
tions and ingress-egress points
traffic hazard.
C. Border Barricades. A curb, rail, fence or wall or
other similar type barrier sufficient to contain vehicles
completely within the property and outside of landscaped
areas shall be provided and maintained in a good and attrac-
tive condition.
D. Entrances and Exits. The location and design of all
entrances and exits shall be subject to the approval of the
planning and public works departments, provided that no
entrance or exist shall be closer than fifteen feet to any
adjoining lot located in an R zone.
E. Surface of Parking Area. Off-street parking area
shall be surfaced and maintained with a durable and dustless
surface consisting of oiled and crushed gravel, asphalt, or
concrete, and shall be graded and drained as to dispose of
all surface water on site. Surfacing and drainage shall be
subject to approval by the planning and public works depart-
ments.
F. Lighting. Any lighting used to illuminate any re-
quired off-street parking area shall be so arranged as to
reflect the light away from adjoining premises in a R zone.
G. Signs. Must meet requirements as set forth in Chapter
15.24 of this code. (Ord. 344 ~9, 1988).
next to a street or alley
The required screen shall
to corner street intersec-
so as not to constitute a
17.38.100 Conditional accessory parking areas in R
zones. In any R zone, off-street parking areas for five or
more ven~cles may be permitted for any use first permitted
by the ~1H zone or for any use first permitted by a C or I
zone upon the granting of a conditional use permit by the
examiner and subject to the following:
A. Such parking areas shall abut upon or be directly
across a street from an RMH, C, or I zone;
B. Such parking area shall be used solely for the park-
ing of private passenger vehicles;
C. Such parking areas shall be subject to all the re-
quirements of Section 17.38.090;
D. Approval of access and drainage by the planning
and public works departments;
E. The issuance of a building permit;
F. Any permit issued by the building department may
be revoked any time that the aforementioned requirements are
not complied with; and any permittee who uses or permits
the use of premises to which said permit related in vio-
lation of any of the conditions specified by this section
or included in such permit, shall be deemed in violation of
this title and shall be subject to penalty. (Ord. 344 ~10,
1988) .
161-2
(Yelm 7/88)
.,\ ...10 /
---~---.._--- .. ----
-.-.-..... .~---_. .:..-..-- .._-'.__.._._~- ~,-_.,~-'_':.,
~-'-"J_~_:""n-"--";;";'__'_'__"';'_-<"_:":'~'_~~'~~_._______:...::~.:..._~~,:L:...___.~_'.~~ ':~';,,;.'.'!.,/'G~:'t,~:' ";,,
:~~;~1,-~
17.38.110--17.38.130
C
''-2--.
17.38.110 Required loadinq areas. A. In any C or I
zone, and for any institutional use in whatever zone it may
be located, every building or portion of building hereafter
erected or structurally altered to provide additional floor
space shall be provided with a minimum of one off-street or
off-alley loading space for each twelve thousand square feet
of floor space or fraction thereof within the building, which
floor space is intended to be used for or is used for mer-
chandising, manufaGturing,'warehousing or processing purposes.
If the building contains more than twenty-four thousand
square feet of floor space so used, then there shall be one
additional twenty-four thousand square feet of floor space.
In no case shall less than one loading space be provided.
Each loading space shall measure not less than thirty feet
by twelve feet, and shall have an unobstructed height of
fourteen feet, and shall be made permanently available for
such purpose and shall be surfaced, improved and maintained
as required by subsections A, Band C of Section 17.38.090.
Such facilities shall be so located that trucks using same
shall not encroach upon or interfere with areas reserved for
off-street parking nor project into any public right-of-way
and shall be adjacent to the building to be served thereby.
If the site upon which such loading space or spaces is to be
located abuts upon an alley, such loading space or spaces
shall be off-alley. If the loading space is incorporated
within a building then, as to location, the requirements of
this sect~on shall not apply.
B. Any floor area provided by additions to or structural
alterations to a building shall be provided with loading
space or spaces as set forth herein whether or not loading
spaces have been provided for the original floor space.
C. Consideration from the planning committee and city
council should be given as to the requirements/standards for
off-street parking required loading areas as they pertain
to the central business district. (Ord. 344 ~ll, 1988).
17.38.120 Exceptions and modifications. Exceptions
or modifications to the provisions of this chapter shall
, be processed as a variance application. (Ord. 344 ~ 12, 1988).
17.38.130 Special zone exceptions. The provisions of
th~s chapter shall not be applicable for any special zone
distr~ct or unclassified use which requires approval of a
specific site plan by the examiner. In reviewinq a site
plan for any such situation, the examiner shall be governed
by this chapter in determining the requirements for off-street
parking and loading. (Ord. 344 513, 1988).
~-
161-3
(Yelm 7/88)
._' ____;~_____~:d:.......:.,:.:::.-_=:....:::T.'::_=..:__~~_==r_:L.:_~...:::2::;.-_,~_._.:.._::.....~_..:.;~h_~___.__~ .:....u,..;_._._.~:_...1....;.;:._._...:.:..._.:...~2.;..:.::-'-.:..:...:.~,~~:..:.-....;..:.:.:...:.,--'~' .:-. ...~~....
17.40.190--17.40.260
,
i.i
\
B. Minimum Side Yard. There is no minimum side yard in
the CBD except where abutting a residential zone, a side yard
of ten feet or one-third the building height, whichever is
greater, except where separated by a public way or street.
C. Minimum Rear Yard. There is no minimum yard in the
CBD except where abutting a residential zone, a rear yard of
twenty feet or one-thid the building height, whichever is
greater, except where separated by a public way or street.
(Ord. 346 S7(part), 1988).
17.40.190 Building coverage. There is no maximum
building coverage in the CBD. (Ord. 346 S7(part), 1988).
17.40.200 Building height. The maximum height for
buildings in the CBD is sixty feet. (Ord. 346 S7(partJ,
1988) .
17.40.210 Outside storage. No outside storage or dis-
play of any kind will be permitted in the CBD. (Ord. 346
S 7 (part), 1988).
ARTICLE V. COMMERCIAL (C-1) ZONE STANDARDS
17.40.220 C-1 zone standards generally. Subject to the
general modifications and requirements set forth in Chapter
17.28 and additional requirements which may be imposed by the
town council for conditional uses, the following standards
set forth in this article shall apply to uses permitted in
the C-1 zone. (Ord. 346 S7(part), 1988).
17.40.230 Lot area. Minimum lot area in the C-l zone
is seven thousand two hundred square feet. (Ord. 346 S7
(part), 1988).
17.40.240
is sixty feet.
Lot width. Minimum lot width in the C-l zone
(Ord. 346 S7 (part), 1988).
17.40.250 Yard requirements. Yard requirements C-l
zones are as follows:
A. Minimum front yard:
1. Service station pump islands and canopies, fif-
teen feet.
2. All other uses or structures: twenty-five feet,
based upon a sixty foot street right-of-way;
B. Minimum Side Yard: ten feet, subject to use;
C. Minimum Rear Yard: thirty feet from all RA, R-l and
R-2 zoned property. Twenty feet for all other zones, subject
to use. (Ord. 346 S7 (part), 1988).
17.40.260 Outside storage. Storage or display of mer-
chandise is allowed for items that are to be used for retail
161-5c
(Yelm 2/89)
':." 1"'" ,.
~-,,,... _ ~:_ ~J..._;;.__.
.'" "
. ;;;~..h'__;.
" ~lL'. ~l.:i..:..J:':'_:~u_r_ __.:.."-....:,,~::,~:...._--"- _ :...~.......:..::.:_.:...:.......:':2~'..~~~!~~_~~.:.:..3.../.J.. .._.~,~
1 > :~_~~r' :~..~3_L.:;~;.c..~'];..:t~J~;.:t..~:\\.,.:~_
17.40.270--17.40.340
/"
i
\
sale or rent, subject to use, provided, however, that such
use shall be confined to privately owned real property only.
(Ord. 346 57 (part), 1988).
ARTICLE VI. HEAVY COMMERCIAL (C-2) ZONE STANDARDS
17.40.270 C-2 zone standards generally. Subject to the
general modifications and requirements set forth in Chapter
17.30 and additional requirements which may be imposed by the
town council, the following standards set forth in this arti-
cle shall apply to uses permitted in the C-2 zone. (Ord. 346
57 (part), 1988).
17.40.280 Lot area. Minimum lot area in C-2 zones is
seven thousand two hundred square feet. (Ord. 346 57(part),
1988) .
17.40.290 Lot width. Minimum lot width in C-2 zones is
sixty feet. (Ord. 346 57 (part) , 1988).
17.40.300 Yard requirements. Yard requirements in C-2
zones are as follows:
A. Minimum tront yard:
1. Service station pump island and canopies, fifteen
feet,
2. All other uses or structures: twenty-five feet
based upon a sixty foot street right-of-way;
B. Minimum side yard: ten feet, subject to use;
C. Minimum rear yard: thirty feet from all RA, R-l and
R-2 zoned property, subject to use. All other zones, twenty
feet, subject to use. (Ord. 346 57(part), 1988).
17.40.310 Building height. Maximum height for build-
ings in the C-2 zone is sixty feet. (Ord. 346 57 (part) ,
1988) .
17.40.320 Outside storage. Storage or display of mer-
chandise is allowed for items that are to be used for retail
sale, rent or for items used in manufacturing or production,
subject to use, provided, however, that such use shall be
confined to privately owned real property only. (Ord. 346
57 (part), 1988).
ARTICLE VII. INDUSTRIAL ZONE (IZ) STANDARDS
17.40.330 Lot size. Minimum lot size in industrial
zones is one acre. (Ord. 346 57 (part) , 1988).
'l
\.
17.40.340 Yard requirements. Yard requirements in in-
dustrial zones are as follows:
A. Minimum front yard: forty feet setback, subject to
use;
161-5d
( Ye 1m 2 / 8 9 )
~I:tr:;,,' ·
-, ,
.....;t j
City of Yelf!l
, <
t. .0)',,(
~.. r' ~ ..:' (,
, ~.. \ ;
\ \\ ':
\-
, ,
,') TO
\:. i;;
,~ 'F
t ~ttr~~~ :, \
J \~~.."!.~.:I, .
, .
- "
: :'~~~ ';-
~" .J :t,l
~ ,.
.r'.,
"'- ~.
(,~t_ '.~''': r
\ .,j. ~. ,";' ~ ~
l.... -;
i ~ 1. t.:. ;
I,
t ~ ....
~ \
..: l:'~~'; \
: >~' ~~
i~' :1'
f.- ~
,
"
I
:ffi;ti.;~' ..
.,~.;;~.~~11i; ~
'.\:;Ir':-..,~;
f .il
": .j-.,
I . ..-;.~
, ~.
,...... .
\0 ~ ~." .:
;"1 -f:
~~ ~~.~i"~
:;. ~ '
I', '
~ ,;'.;': -~ )
~ '..~,..
.I ~
,
,':t. I
;-. (:~. ,..,~
>
l. \ II;
~'.) .... ~,
,.
.~~. "
"I. .
105 Yelm A venue West, ,
POBox 479
Yelm. Washington 98597'
(206) 458-3244
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL FORM '
COMPANY (ifr~ JJ&fJt:!IvDf/h!/n f
INDIVIDUAL PrcLC/AC,( h~!Y; i
FAX NUMBER;JO[;-'74).-!5653
FROM
COMPANY
INDIVIDUAL
,
FAX NUMBER (2 6)458-4348
NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW ~
DATE/---- 7/1/ . TIME SENT d.'t/5 Nil .
SUBJEC~ ::;~ c~~r J 6ai% to ~a:1 ~~' ~
;Jl17f;- (10 c - :t4-D.e clekc._cfl ~ /(h~_ .
ADDITIONAL COMMENT~ -::t~PX~<5 :I1tfarnE1 .
JUtA/rf7j lA)Jr~ Lfhr CL ~. ~')fz;Jn.r:7.71td.>lz-
********IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL COPIES OR ANX COpy IS
NOT LEGIBLE, PLEASE CALL (206)458-3244 AS' SOON AS
POSSIBLE
r) 0112 f/JOvtJ-jfO Ix /f1~/udg~ / ~1{/102U ht~ Maile? 0
~
'hll (ah fr l uuy~ f- j} WMa .ue, /1101-10 l~.o{/,-
(r('i.1~7C/ ~ #ttJlAer! ff L'tJ6li.. d~1~L4 /bfJUI)
~OJ .thb r~ f tl ?~d :~ar!kJ-u .
tf I. - {~/I/In U11 flu" I:I\. I <: j 11..1; ."
. . /lrY} Uli I, I I '(f W .. c:f(lJ!"
. Rcn'drd ["!''' i . . :
01/07/'34
11 45
GRRMOR DEl)ELOPf'lE~n N W ,I NC -> 205 458 4348
t'JO 782
January 6, i 994
Editor
The Nlsquallv Valley News
Box 597
Yelm. Washington 98597
Dear Editor'
I represent Gramor Development N W , the developer of NJsqually Plaza. We are excited
about the project, and anticipate the opening of Burger King in February. and the grand
opening of the new Stockmarket grocery store in April
To begin. we would like to express our sincere appreciation to the Yelm townspeople who
have continued to patronize the shopping center and Its businesses during the course of
construction You loyalty and support is vital to the continued success of the existing
tenants!
Gramor is based in the Seattle area. We almost exclusIvely develop neighborhood shopping
centers, and typically develop one shopping center per year Our typical project is usually
about the same size as that of Nisqually Plaza. We take a lot of pride in our workj and our
projects are usually quite successful Because we are a relatively small office, we become
very personally Involved in projects N;squally Plaza is an important part of Yelm, and we
are excited to be part of the YeJm family
The "new" Nisqually Plaza will have a new look. It will include a new parking lot with
defined parking areas, lighting, landscape and numerous pedestrian walkways The existing
structures will get a new face lift. and the existing Thriftway will be remodeled to a PayLess
drugstore. The new food store will have the same operators and management as the existing
Thrlftway, but will be a Stockmarket food store roughly twice the size of the existing
Thriftway
The new paving, landscape and sidewalks are SCheduled to be completed In February The
first new tenant to open will be Burger King, which Is anticipated to be open in February,
New tenants to be in the new retail building east of the existing Thriftway currently include
Radio Shack, Young's Teriyakl, and a laundromat. These tenants will open at various times
throughout the months of March and April Stockmarketls grand opening is currently
scheduled for April 7
/7
Yelm Avenue will be widened in front of the center, and a w
t the shoppfn center's main entrance Yelm Avenue, with the
exce tio ortion directly west of the Center, will be widened from the east SI e of
e shopping center to the wes 81 rame ecurity Bank. The various property owners
along this portion of Yelm Avenue are paying for their respective portion of the street
improvements The road widening and improvements will Include new asphalt and striping,
landscaping an sidewalks This work will greatly improve traffic cIrculation and pedestrian
movements, and the streetscape will beautify and improve immensely the look of Yelm
Avenue.
1133164TH ST !j W / SUITE lUll L YNNWOOD. WA ~HI()37-812! 1(206) 742-0520 FAX (,206) 742.555.)
SE:AnLE I PORTlAND I SAN DIE;GO
.1_ l"l"'''II.\II'1I
Gl0'
"
i
II
I;
l'
Ii
It
ij
'I
i~
',1
:!l
,
1. I
i/ !
~1r
I'
.W
II'
p!
, .
.
if' ,,"
" j
r f'
~. ,]
~ ~ [~
L
!
Ii i
t"'::'
~------
1'10 '762
/Q)'f /'3A
1.1. Ao
Gl'Rl'1Cl" tEve-DP-" N l,\ , lNC " 206 456 4348
ad\\Or
'The Nle<\uallV ValleV NeVIS
page twO
nln 0\ Ine "neW" Nis<\ua\ly plaza and can speal< 10'
Again, we eagerlY 1001< \otWard to the ope 9 our cOntinued patlonage and patience tnrougn
tne e"isting tenants in saying lnanl<d y~u 1\Of Ylew months '/ elm will na.e a bright, new, sn,ny
the construoliOO pnase 0\ tne r.mo e n a
shopping cente! at which 10 shOP
s\ncere\'J I
G~p,1oI0~ OI",l<1.0PIoll<N'T 1'1.'11., INC.
~Ichard Emo'Y' proiect Menage'
p.E'\<.P
\ ~l:i> 'ii~\
i';',",.~.;.\': ':.".\.'
~: :',:".j
.,'.....\;..'..
,~.,,\
.J \,\'
~~:.~
~;~f,..,".~~~.' .: . ..
'',1i
;~
~
I
+/~
OWENS DAVIES MACKIE
A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
FRANK J. OWENS
ARTHUR L. DAVIES
JOHN V LYMAN
ALEXANDER W MACKIE.
RICHARD G PHILLIPS JR
BRIAN L. BUDS BERG
MICHAEL W MAYBERRY
ROBERT F HAUTH P.S.
926 - 24TH WAY S W
BURTON R JOHNSON (970)
POST OFFICE BOX 187
KIRK M. VEIS
CYNTHIA D TURNER
MATTHEW B EDWARDS
JAMES H BLUNDELL, JR
OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98507
(206) 943-8320
-ALSO ADMITTED IN WASHINGTON, D.C.
TELECOPIER
(206) 943-61S0
September 20, 1993
Mrs. Shelly Badger
City of Yelm
105 Yelm Avenue West
P.O. Box 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
RE: Nisqually Plaza, Gramer/McAlexander Joint Driveway Issue
Dear Mrs. Badger:
We have been asked to provide you with an analysis of the options and an opinion on
the potential ramifications of those options in the matter involving the location of a
driveway access in the area between Gramor's Nisqually Plaza project and the
McAlexander property.
As I understand the facts, the current driveway is located partially on the
McAlexander property and partially on the Gramor property. The current location of
the driveway, assuming that the improvements required by the City are completed,
does not pose a threat to public safety Gramer has developed its site plan with the
driveway in the current location and has agreed to make the necessary improvements.
McAlexander has requested that the driveway be moved to a location entirely on
Gramor property and has argued that, only if the driveway is moved as such would
the driveway be safe. Engineers for both sides have presented conflicting opinions
about the safety of the two locations.
Meanwhile, on February 22, 1993, the Planning Commission approved the site plan
for the Gramer project, conditioned on "resolution of the McAlexander and Gramer
joint driveway issue and that absolutely nothing be done on the property prior to
resolving the issue." The City issued a building permit to Gramor, but conditioned
occupancy of the site on the resolution of this joint driveway issue.
OWENS DAVI ES MACKI E
A F'ROF"ESSIONAL SERVICES CORF'ORATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Mrs. Shelly Badger
September 20, 1993
Page 2
In an effort to assist the parties in their resolution of this issue, the City proposed two
alternative driveway designs, both of which located the driveway approximately
twenty feet to the east and placed the center line of the driveway on the boundary
separating Gramor and McAlexander. These alternatives are referred to as
"Alternative 1 and 2". Both alternatives are unacceptable to McAlexander, but
acceptable to Gramor. McAlexander then proposed her own design at the latest
Planning Commission meeting on September 14, 1993. The McAlexander design
proposes that the driveway be moved to a location entirely on Gramor property This
alternative is referred to as n Access A".
The first question the Planning Commission might have is to what extent can it
impose any location of the driveway on Gramor and McAlexander, given the condition
it imposed on site plan approval. The Planning Commission's condition, that the issue
be resolved, gives authority, albeit limited authority, to Gramor and McAlexander to
negotiate the location and design of the driveway Presumably, when the parties have
negotiated the location and design of the driveway, they will present the plan to the
Planning Commission for its approval. The condition retains the Planning
Commission's jurisdiction and final approval authority over the issue of driveway
location, but delegates the details to the two neighbors. This was an issue for Gramor
and McAlexander to resolve, not the City.
It would appear, however, that the two parties are completely unable to reach
agreement on the location of the driveway. As such, the City must reassert its
jurisdiction and authority to determine the location of the driveway. This is
completely appropriate and highly recommended. Whatever authority the Planning
Commission had to. establish the location of the drivev....ay before it delegated the
details to the parties, it still holds now. If the Planning Commission had the authority
during site plan review to approve Access A, and require Gramor to locate the
driveway entirely on its property, it has that authority now. If the Planning
Commission had the authority to approve Alternatives 1 and 2, it has that authority
too.
The next questions might be whether the Planning Commission has the authority
specifically to approve Access A and whether the Planning Commission is exposed to
any liability if it makes such a decision. The answers to these questions are,
respectively, yes and no. The City has the authority, even the duty, to ensure that
a site plan "makes adequate provision for the public health, safety and general
OWENS DAVI ES MACKI E
A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Mrs. Shelly Badger
September 20, 1993
Page 3
welfare." Yelm Municipal Code, Sec. 16 32.060. Under this broad authority, the
Planning Commission has the discretion to impose conditions on a site plan as
common as the location of a driveway. The condition must have a public health,
safety or general welfare basis and the Planning Commission must cite that basis
when it reaches its decision.
(The Planning Commission also has the authority to amend a site plan that it has
already approved and to require that a new site plan be submitted if such an
amendment is determined to be substantial. Yelm Municipal Code, Sec. 16.32.070.
Although the Planning Commission is not amending the site plan in this case, and is
merely monitoring and enforcing its own condition on that site plan, should the
Planning Commission decide that it wishes to amend the site plan, it has that
authority if necessary.)
The City will incur no liability largely because it has the broad authority to condition
approval and enforce its conditions on the basis of the public's health, safety and
general welfare. It has been suggested that Access A will affect Gramor's building
pads and that Gramor could argue either that the City made a material
misrepresentation or that the requirement would constitute an unconstitutional,
uncompensated taking. Clearly, Gramor knew, or at least should have known, that
the Planning Commission's condition requiring resolution of the driveway issue could
have an impact on its building pads. Gramor was not, in any way, guaranteed that
the driveway would be located according to its wishes. Any reliance by Gramor on
any statement or decision of the City that the driveway would not affect its pads was
misplaced. Therefore, a claim of material misrepresentation would fail.
A takings claim would also fail because any action taken by the Planning Commission
would not satisfy either the physical occupation or regulatory taking tests. The
Planning Commission is not appropriating Gramor's property for public use or
physically occupying it any more than if the driveway were located according to
Alternatives 1 or 2. The Planning Commission is not appropriating any property at all.
The Planning Commission, well within its authority to require safe access to the
Nisqually Plaza, is simply enforcing the condition it imposed on Gramor's site plan.
Nor is the Planning Commission's requirement a regulatory taking. It does not deny
Gramor all economically viable use of its property and it does not interfere with an
investment-backed expectation of Gramor.
OWENS DAVIES MACKIE
A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Mrs. Shelly Badger
September 20, 1993
Page 4
(It should also be remembered that, if the driveway is located according to Access A,
and entirely on Gramor's property, McAlexander would have to obtain an easement
from Gramor. This is not an appropriate issue for the Planning Commission to
consider, for the reasons discussed below, but it should be aware of the issue and
perhaps warn the parties of the possibility.)
The final question that might arise is whether the Planning Commission can locate the
driveway access, with the required improvements, according to Alternatives 1 or 2,
against the wishes of McAlexander. The answer depends on the extent of Gramor's
easement, express or implied, across McAlexander's property as well as any additional
burden placed on the easement by Gramor
The City cannot and should not involve itself in the interpretation or enforcement of
the easement between the parties in this case. Easements between private parties
are subject to private enforcement We will not provide a legal opinion on the scope
and meaning of the easement. Those issues are to be settled entirely between
Gramor and McAlexander. The Planning Commission can only locate the driveway
subject to a lawful easement.
The Planning Commission is, therefore, left with three options: (1) approve the
location of the driveway, with the required improvements, according to either
Alternative 1 or 2; (2) approve the location of the driveway, with the required
improvements, according to Access A; or (3) approve both locations, in the
alternative, depending upon the scope of any easements. This last option might be
the most attractive. Allow me to explain.
Because the easement issue mayor may not pose a problem, the Planning
Commission could approve the two locations in the alternative, depending on the
resolution of the easement issue. If Gramor can legally burden the existing easement
with its proposed development, then either Alternative 1 or 2 is approved. If not,
then the Planning Commission approves, in the alternative, Access A. The Planning
Commission's language might read as follows:
The Planning Commission approves the site plan with its driveway
access in the location identified in the attached drawing labelled
· Alternative 1" or · Alternative 2", to the extent allowable by a lawful
easement for the benefit of Gramor across McAlexander's property,
together with the improvements required by the Planning Commission.
. .
OWENS DAVI ES MACKI E
A PR'OFESSIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION
ATTORN EYS AT LAW
Mrs. Shelly Badger
September 20, 1993
Page 5
In the event that such driveway access is not allowable under a lawful
easement, the Planning Commission approves, in the alternative, a
driveway access in the location identified in the attached drawing
labelled "Access A Alternative", together with the improvements
required by the Planning Commission.
This option allows the Planning Commission to resolve the issue. It also provides
some flexibility for the parties to resolve an issue the City is in no position to resolve.
Should the Planning commission decide to approve the third option, it should make
very clear on the record, that there should be no question its approval is of Alternative
1 or 2 and that Gramor may proceed with design and construction accordingly. It
should also state that it cannot provide an opinion, or enforce, or resolve any
easement conflicts between the parties. Finally, the Planning Commission should
state that, only in the event that Gramor is precluded from using its easement
according to its plans, to be determined solely by Gramor and McAlexander, is the
approval of Access A to take effect.
I hope this analysis is helpful. If we can be of any further assistance on this or any
other matter before the Planning Commission, please call either me or Sandy Mackie.
Sincerely yours,
OWENS DAVIES MACKIE
~
JHB/sr
cc: IA{ Peterson
Mark Cook
Alexander W. Mackie
City of Yelm
YELM
WASHINGTON
105 Yelm A venue West
PO BOt 479
Yelm, WashillgfOll 98597
(206) 458-3244
August 31, 1993
Graham
Doug Sherrow
3214 16th Avenue SW
Seattle, WA 98134
RE: NISQUALLY PLAZA PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING
Dear Doug:
The City of Yelm's Engineering Department has revlewed the meeting
minutes sent by you to this department on August 28, 1993. The
engineering department has the following comment(s):
NEW BUSINESS (page 6):
Item 2.03 The installation of the stormwater system shall be
inspected by: THE PROJECT ENGINEER OR A LICENSED CIVIL
ENGINEER APPROVED BY THE CITY OF YELM.
This may include an inspection service providing that the inspector
for the service is a licensed civil engineer approved by the city.
Item 2.06 It is the understanding of engineering department that
restrictions were placed on work hours by the city
building official: Jerry Prock. Please contact Jerry
Prock to clear up any misunderstanding (206) 458-8407.
If you have any questions, please contact the City of Yelm' s
Engineer Department at (206) 245-8816.
Sincerely,
UiLc;L
Mark R. Cook
Assistant City Engineer
cc: Richard Embry
Attendees
Shelly Badger
Dennis Cochran, P.E.
@
ReC\,cled paper
~
City of Yelm
August
]05 Yelm Avenue Wes!
P 0 BoY: 479
Yelm U ashinglOn 98597
(206) 458-3244
25, 1993
~N
f'Lt-~
Donald S. Cunningham, Jr.
10209 244th Street SW
Edmonds, WA 98020
RE: NISQUALLY PLAZA PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING
Dear Don:
The City of Yelm Engineering Department has the following
comment(s) regarding several issues raised at the above referenced
meeting on August 24th, 1993:
1. Dan Brown (AERO Construction) requested a separate precon
regarding water service for August 25th at 10: 00 AM - job
site. Tim Peterson of the City of Yelm committed to
attending. Several issues were raised and will be discussed
at this meeting.
2. The city informed all present that any alternates to the
signed construction drawings shall require a formal submittal
to the city engineering department and approval shall be
required prior to construction.
3. AREO committed to handling all locates.
4. The issue of staking was raised. The city restated it f s
position that for those areas referenced on the signed civil
drawings, staking by a licensed land surveyor or the proJect
engineer shall be required. Don Cunningham requested the
opportunity to discuss this requirement further, Mark R. Cook
agreed that this would be possible but at this time the
staking requirements as referenced on the plans would stand
and remain in effect. (Should this requirement change or be
altered through future negotiations, the city engineering
department will inform all parties involved by means of
written correspondence).
5. The city made it clear that the stormwater facilities shall be
inspected by the project engineer or a licensed civil engineer
approved by the city. Don Cunningham committed to conveying
to the city whom that individual would be and it was agreed
that the city and Don would get together prior to that portion
of the work to further discuss the inspection process.
*
ReC\'cleJ JXlper
. City of Yelm
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
(206) 458~3244
NOTICE OF PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE
ATTENTION: All affected parties.
pROJECT: NISQUALLY PLAZA
PROJECT' LOCATION:
MEETING LOCATION:
$R 507, MP 28.91 VICINITY (YELM AVENUE)
CONTRACTOR'S JOB TRAILER - ONSITE
'WHEN:
TUESDAY, AUGUST 44TH, 1993
TIME:
1 0 : 00' AM
cc: RaY Fasnis
Graham Contracting
3214 16th AveSW
Seattle, WA 98134
FAX (206) 343-1457
Norm temay;Sherri Grice
Lemay Garbage Co.
POB 44459
Tacoma, WA 98444
FAX (206) 537-8689
Gramor beve~opment Company
1133 164th Street SW #107
Lynnwood, WA 98037
Ken Morgan
Washington Natural Gas
3120 Martin Way East
FAX (206) 357-1496,
~
S. Chamberlain and
719 Sleater-Kinney
POB 348'5
FA~ (206) 493-2476
Associates, Inc.
Road Suite 120
Glen McCarten
Yelm Telephone
POB 593
Yelm, WA 98597
FAX (20~) 458~j909
Arnold Poach
VIACONCable
2316 SobthStat~ Street
'l;'acoma, WA 98405
FAX (206) 272-4062
Dan Reed
puget Power
POB 486
Yelm, WA 98597
FAX (2 0 6) 7 8 6 - 5.928 ./
,/
*
Recycled paper
I '
"':::'"
- "
"
I'.... ;:.0
\"'
'City of Yellh
105 Yelm A venue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
(206) 458-3244
July 20, 1993
Steve Chamberlain, P.E.
S. Chamberlain and Associates, Inc.
POB 3485
Lacey, WA 98503-0485
RE: NISQUALLY PLAZA
Dear Steve:
The City of yelm Engineering Department has reviewed the comments
(letter of 07-16-93) and the revised drainage and erosion contrOl
plans for the above referenced project and has the following
comments:
ITEM # per letter of 07-16-93.
1. No reference to a Type II catch basin appears in thedrywell
detail on sheet C-4, please review.
2. It is understood that the silt trap tee detail appearS on
sheet C-5.
14. Please provide proof of access to Plaza Drive.
15. Please be advised that structural' fill shall meet the
appropriate WSDOT requirements.
18. Please change note #8 on page C-2 to read: "..by the project
engineer or a licensed land surveyor."
29. Once parametrix has reviewed the S.T.E.P. details, comments
will be sent to SCA.
34. It is understood that the reference is to Yelm Avenue.
38. Please include the actual test sheets.
SHEET C-5
L -Please add to the inspection notes - to the effect of:
Inspections shall be made by the project engineer.
,..;, -
,G}- '
'i ~
~. \'
,.
Rec)'c/ed"paper
:'l
'J'"
-- ,-...;
VARIANCE _REQUEST
2. Please justify the use of the 10 foot filter strip as opposed
to the typical trapezoidal biofilter. The proposed revisions
allow for the 10 foot filter strip only when uniform sheet
flow can be "guaranteed". The current design/grading of the
paved area in the back indicates that resultant flow not be
parallel to the flow path.
3. Acceptance of the proposed revisions as they relate to storage
would require only 3,000 cubic feet per acre in lieu of the
6,000 that currently is in place. The results of the
percolation test would seem to substantiate this request. It
does appear that basin #3 would still fall short of the "NEW"
storage requirement.
4. Once the above additional information has been provided, a
decision regarding the variance request shall be made. For
questions regarding the request for a variancer please contact
Shelly Badger, City Administrator for the City of Yelm.
If you have any questions, please contact The City of Yelm 's
Engineering Department at 458-8816.
~.
Mark R. Cook
Assistant City Engineer
cc: Dennis Cochran, P.E.
2626 12th Court SW
Olympia, WA 98502
Gramor Development Company
1133 ~64th Street SW #107
Lynnwood, WA 98037-8121
NISPLAZ #2
'\
$L\
719 Sleater-Kinney Rd.'SE
Suite 120
PO Box3485
Lacey; Wasliington
98503-0485
(206) 493-6002
,(206) 493-2476 Facsimile
: (907) 279-5929 Anchorage
s. Chamberlain & Associates, Inc.
July 16, 1993
Mr Mark Cook
c/o Denms Cochran, P.E
2626 - 12th Court SW
OlympIa, W A 98502
RE Nisqually Plaza
ResubmIttal of CIVIl Plans & Dramage Report
SCA Project #92070
Dear Mark.
We have reVIewed your comments contamed m your July 8, 1993 letter to
Ms. Badger Based on our subsequent dISCUSSIOns with you and Jerry
Prock, we have reVIsed our desIgns accordIngly Enclosed are four sets of
reVIsed plans, and four COpIeS of the reVIsed dramage report for your further
reVIew and approval.
Please allow me to summarIze how we addressed each of your numbered
reVIew comments
1 Our drywell (DW) detail on Sht C-4 now refers to a "Type II
CB modrlied for DW mstallatIOns"
2,3,5,6
~,.,
All storm dram lmes now have a mmImum slope of 0.5% The
dramage report mcludes a table of calculatIOns for conveyance
capacIty and cleansmg velOCIty
4
The "slit trap tee" is descrIbed in the "Slit Trap Tee and
Depression DetaIl" on- Sht C-4.
7
ConstructIOn Note #58 now reads," (curb cut or break m
curb )"
8 & 13
The callout has been corrected to abandon the eXIstmg pIpe
and to remove the existmg structure
9 Cross sectIOns "A" and "B" now refer to Sht C-4
10
Plans callout "extruded curb, typ " on C-1
/
ENGINEERING
PLANNING
.
SURVEYING
.
I
~
Mark Cook
July 16, 1993
Page 3
24,25
We have revIewed fire protectIOn, access, and hydrant spacmg
wIth Jerry Prock. We have added one fire hydrant at the rear
of the buildmgs, and have adJusted the locatIOn of the hydrant
at the southwest corner of the shops to mcrease hydrant
coverage
26 See Note #17
27,28
RestoratIOn detaIl has been reVIsed to mclude "contmuous
tracer tape" and a sawcut note
29 S T .E.P system detaIls have been compiled from both Yelm
and Lacey standards Both standards are compatIble and the
combmation wIll prOVIde for an excellent commercIal S T.E P
system. The detaIls shown were already on AutoCADD and
were therefore used.
31 SIze of drywell dram rock has been speCIfied as 3" to 6"
dIameter per the detaIl on Sht C-4.
32 Reference to Lacey has been removed, and a rock floor dram
has been added to the vault floor
33 The hydrant detaIl now mcorporates a Storz Connector
34 Due to the nature of the eXIstmg proJect and onsIte soIls, a
separate Erosion Control Plan has not been created for this
proJect; however, we have added Sht C-5 wInch mcludes.
*
ErOSIOn Control - ConstructIOn Sequence and
Procedures
ErOSIOn Control - InspectIOn Notes
SIltatIOn Fence DetaIl
StabIhzed constructIOn entrance detaIl (for the non-
paved constructIOn access pomts to Yelm HIghway and
lO3rd)
Filter FabrIC Fence Inlet Filter (for CB's)
*
*
*
*
. , ~ ' , ~J
'. ":. ...:. :~~
ENGINEERING
PLANNING
SURVEYING
.
.
,
~
Mark Cook
July 16, 1993
Page 4
35, 36, 37
Based on chscusslOns wIth OlympIa and Thurston County
staff, we understand the proposed reVlSIOns to the Thurston
RegIOn Dralnage Manual wIll be adopted by October or '
November of thIS year We also understand some agenCIeS are
already allowmg use of the revIsed desIgn crItena specmed in
the RevIew Draft. Thus, we have mcorporated aspects of the
ReVIew Draft mto our desIgn. One example would be our
proposal to utIhze 10 foot WIde grass filter strIps to cleanse
paved area runoff that travels m a sheet flow manner toward
the grass stnps I swales. We ask that you also conSIder that
runoff wIll be further cleansed by the shallow grasslined
swales that convey paved area runoff to the underground
percolatIOn gallenes
We have also utIhzed the ReVlew Draft's retentIOn system
sIzmg methods for roof runoff. Please conSIder that our
retentlOn calculatlOns do not fully utilize storage and
percolatlOn potential of grasslmed conveyance swales, tills
excess capaCIty should be conSIdered a safety factor provmg
that our treatment and storage desIgn IS conservative,
especIally when compared to the eXIstmg shopping center
storm dramage system.
We have submItted a wrItten request to Shelly Badger to
utIhze the proposed reVISIons to the Thurston RegIon
Dramage Manual. Weare seekmg varIances to the Yelm.
Dralnage Manual WIth respect to both treatment (e g, 10'
filter strIps) and retentIOn storage deSIgn crIterIa.
38 We have performed two physical infiltratIOn tests at separate
locatIOns Results are mcluded m the reVlsed dramage report
and concur WIth design parameters used m sizing retentIOn
systems.
39 An mspectlOn report form IS enclosed for your reVIew and
approval.
40 Conveyance hnes have been checked for capaCIty and
cleansmg velocities, CalculatIOns are mcluded in the revised
dralnage report.
~i~"~~ ~> . <~~
41 The retentlOn pond at the northerly corner of the SIte has
been detailed on Sht C-5
ENGINEERING
PLANNING
.
SURVEYING
.
..
~
Mark Cook
July 16, 1993
Page 5
We apprecIate your comments and cooperatIOn on thIs proJect. If you should
have further comments, please call me at 493-6002
Smcerely;
N & ASSOCIATES, INC.
PrmcIp aJ.
Enclosures
cc DavId Kehle ArchItect
ATTN Alan Bylsma
SLC/gJd
(d: \corres \20707148 .ltr)
ENGINEERING
PLANNING
SURVEYING
.
.
~ . .. ' ;
. ,':" , R, .1 ".:;--
. ~, ... ::~
~..
:'19 Sleater-Kinney Rd:SE
,uite 120
'0 Box 3485 -
.acey, Washington
)8503-0485,'
.,.
i'
206) 493~6002
206) 493~2476 Facsimile
9(}7l279~?929 Anchorage
s. Chamberlain & Associates, Inc.
July 15, 1993
Ms. Shelly Badger
ChIef Admrmstrative Officer
CIty of Yelm
POBox 479
Yelm, WA 98597
c---.:.--=----_.
.2r;:::.~n\ ,i
- ~ . c:: U \ IJ
J~1~7;~~
f
-~~
RE Nisqually Plaz~
Storm Dramage VarIance Request
SCA ProJect #92070
Dear Ms. Badger
Weare m the process of finahzmg constructIOn documents for the proposed
rmprovements to Nisqually Plaza. Our rmtlal- cIvil engmeermg plans and
calculatlOns have been reVIewed by Denms Cochran and Mark Cook. We
have reVIewed therr draft reVIew comments, and a couple of Issues WIth
respect to dramage need your mput.
Our ongmal understandmg of the agreement the CIty had with Gramor
Development was that the eXIsting storm. retention (drywell) system for the
eXIstmg impemous areas would not need to be "retrofitted" to meet CIty of
Yelm dramage reqUIrements. The proposed dramage rmprovements to the
eXIsting parking areas are mtended to correct a pondmg problem, elrrninate
ov~rflow to 103rd Avenue and rmprove the overall functlOn of the system
but are not mtended to be a retrofit to current standards.
With regard to new rmpemous areas (prunarlly the new market, shops
bmldmg, and rear pavement areas), we have deSIgned new storm dramage
treatment and retentlon systems m accordance wIth the "Thurston RegIon
Dramage Manual - ReVIew Draft" ThIs "ReVIew Draft" 13 a modrfied
verSIOn of the ongmal manual adopted by Yelm, that is currently out for
pubhc comment. Adoption of proposed manual modrficatlons IS hkely to
occur by October or Novemper of tms year We understand other
JUTlsdictlOns in the county are currently usmg the ReVIew Draft.
We are requesting a varIance to the current dramage manual requrrements
to allow use of the "ReVIew Draft" verSIon for tms SIte It was our ongmal
perceptIon that the "ReVIew Draft" verSlOn would be acceptable, and was
therefore used for the storm dramage deSIgn. Mr Cook millcated we would
need to request tms m wntmg smce the reVISIons have not actually been
adopted yet.
/-.
ENGINEERING
PLANNING
.
SURVEYING
.
~.,""'"
-
,
.,'
,~';;:~_...;~t"
--~-..=::..-.-.
Shelly Badger
July 16, 1993
Page 2
If stormwater desIgn standards cannot mcorporate the proposed "ReVIew
Draft" verSIOn, extensIve storage volume changes to the proposed retentIOn
swale sectIOns will be reqUITed to accommodate the 6,000 cf of storage per
acre of rmpemous I t IS our consIdered op1lllon, that the proposed dramage
improvements WIll more than adequately treat and retam stormwater
runoff. Furthermore, we feel proJect SIte condItIOns do not warrant the
reqUIrements of the old manual. The extenSIve use of rmpemous filter
stnps, grasshned retentIOn / mfiltratIOn swales, and rock-filled gallerIes m
the charactenstIc well drammg on-SIte solis prOVIdes for preservatIOn of
water quahty and the capaCIty to retam all runoff on-SIte and meet the
mtent for storm dramage management.
We are ready to resubmIt the plans for final approvalli our varIance
request IS granted.
Please feel free to call me at 493-6002 If you have any questIOns Thank
you.
Smcerely,
cc Mark Cook
David Kehle Arcmtects
Attn. Alan Bylsma
SLC/g)d
(d: \corras \2070714_.ltr)
, ,
(.,l";."" '
; ': ~ . .'
ENGINEERING
PLANNING
SURVEYING
.
.
~~<\
Coo k.,
D~NNIS COCHRAN, P.E.
CIVIL ENGINEER
2626 12TH CT SW
OLYMPIA, WA. 98502
206-754~1495
JULY 8, 1993
MS SHELl! l\i\lII,FR
CITY ()I- 1 I 11
POB 47q
YELM, WI. I' ",'! I
RE: NI ',)11/\1.1 y PLAZA
1 havl:;' r I I' \oll'd the civil drawings for th~ abov~ r:efe:r:I:;>Twed proj,o, I ,11,i h,"lvt~
the f<:ll I "I" 1\11 \.. ummp.nts:
SHEET I
i
.. .
1.
Ar Iii
1II:JI,h I,
,La,ldard 48 inch c~)ncJ::etl!:~ drYi-Jel1s rr'ype II catch bd,: 'I
Please reference the stand~rd.
I , VI t!W the 8 i neh 1 i ne C(HII1~:( t j ng catch bas i n:s >>:3 fUll I II
, I ' fit .-H.;; t 0 I) e 1 e s s t h ,:1 nO, r:, '1,;, , ~ rril n i mum f. low ve h. c 1 t ~ "I
I '1Id.i.llt.din~d.
['h(
t [, ~,
1'1, I
I : I
~ J ~! I I
(
r' I, I
I 'I
II I I
I' \I I. (,'W rh~ 8 1nc'h line urlf/t'lt.llV:J ("lite: 1'1 bi3.:.;.i.ns #~) (wI!
'i I i I d, 5 to bel e::; s t h a h o. r;, \. , d 11'11 n i mu III f low vel 0 c i t: 1
i,/lid i n l a i n ed .
T ~l~'
I' P ~
4
l' !
I' II V :1 d e d d ~ t Cl i 1 ~) 1: 'l b l: I! 5 .i 1 t L:t: d [J t. (! I:! I' ~ t G i,,\(: (, h b il \ I II
Ii ! , I , I I view the
Ii r I I, t 119. The
v". i I i i J (I f' 2 fps
8 inch line ber.wl-:'en Lilli: e:dstinq c,:ltC'h br.i i I II ,rid
!:ilope appears to be le~s than 0, ~)%, ~ millllll!! II r I II';
shell be maintained.
t.~
" .
b.
i' .l I 1
Th'
c, II I
, .
nF I'r\
I \'vic.:w the 8 inch linE:: I:Jc.~twcc.n (dlch ba:=ln #9 i:lnd (1r" I I! I W)Cl.
II i' apl:)ears t.:cJ be less than 0.1;%, ~ nliniH\Um vp.locity ,,1 fl'.)
r1\<i i nta i ned.
r 1\
What is meant by 1\ or other B.pr..r:oved method."
8.
,1 I ~)7 ~/nJ:::eC't at. PAD >>2'"
9. P] e 1 , r ,'retence the cros~-sections A and B as to page and dl t II I I
10. D~~tilj #3 l:eference:3 "..concJ:::ete curbin<3..", please provide i liltdil or
~ t d I I I nli $ i s II h = 1: <]I' Ul :r: b 0 r (~ x l r Ll J t:' d c: u r b .
@
r 1 t~ a '
AVPl)'1
l.>r<)vide C siz~ or deb:lil I)f the ~id~w;:lk section .:llon'! I, tnl
(!,R 507). Have l~h(~s~ det~lJ!3 bf"t"n d[lproved by WSD01'-
'_' 7 - 1 ~ ~ = 1 1 II cI },Ii! F II 1
J U L - 1 ..:;:. - ::;0 ~ t1 0 t~
q~ ~ as \ f#V~k,I
\ .:.4 ' ,I 1.; LiHlCl t. ha t L ho 1 J1'i(lt uv t~lllf! n l :', L (l
pl,ii ' ltlllr'd pr ior to f I rlcll 13CC.~~Lal\(;'~.
1 ~ .
1 4 .
I ~:. ,
11(,,,1
i3 b.., I \i I,
I f \.11
dntJ ! I
at : I
~.l t' ,
tit f" , f.
::;0 SE
OF-TH
H::::OCIHTE::
F _ (:I 1
~~
I II'
" I
existing drainage
() 3 r d e~ nuS H ',J () 7 . I, I I It, j 11
(requiring ab~.mdonm(,\,1 ) lw
~ I ( , ';i i::) t a ken 0 n t D P L A Z A DR r VI:!; i nth i s It r 0 p 0 sa 1, t. hell
I,' with a drainage rel?ort (Eo PLAZA DRIVE) shall bf':
i P l in
I" "qlll I: ed
\ ~ \ l f.
,1<\ ,'I referenc(ol to Chaptt.y '10 of the tlnifcrm Building (, \,
~ll ,; N () 'r E .
In
if). A~; I.i I a'lum, down-turned elbows ~1hall be requited in catch bd' ! l' that
I?id 1IIIl"',rvio1.ls ~re(~s .and provide ["\0 other form of ptet.r,f.:.dlllf'lll
~
t "/ .
18
") .
: HEET I'
)0,
Hand 'i
<:find I'
tl't
\;l~ N I' I,
di
, ,
.11 i
Wl ! '
1 I
1 I,
'l'h,
( /. l
I 1
f' l t ,
,'Ill' ,
" I
I.
1'1
I J t I
23.
P l.
r 1"1
lr'l I
~W.cE't' '
11..C.e55 ramps ~~hall tl(': I:(:quin:d at tbe: ends of ,-'Ill ~;'Id, idlY,
i t.rossin9s. Plea.se ~rovid~ ,a detail of the rGlmp(:~) ".
\ tl(' ';tandard.
Ilfl\'E;S (ASPHAL" CONCFU;~TE PAVING): Pll.ed!H~ ddJ d Ili)tf~ I
i ,t ~.l J. 1 ::; t a kin (d s hall 1",= d (I1H~ by the pro j e c t t:? n 9 i, 1"1 e ('0' I
:",1<1 ::.>utVey()t7.
111
~lrnJect. adV(~r,5ely cff(~c.:'" t'hf'l f'xisting drainage prill, II '11
,.11;' ArE' llle ~rQ1"'()$c<J VHl'll'l'J lot ~~levatil)n:i C()Il~>1 'II' \vdh
i !. (J \l t., ,. I'd I.' 'I ~ ./.:. t i (') I j" ,~ t 1) ., I d I>, 1/ ,., n \ 1" "
.1' t ('m Hh,dl ciLl(l b(-: ,!;,\/\,~'oI('r:l Liy th~: City of. 'f~>ll\'l, . "I!'
ill ~It'(d by PARAI1ETRIX.
"I, I t () t: h ~1 pr ~(;' onf:>t r. IJ~: t..\ utI IHil t.: ,:1 ~ tat t':ll\ent t () t. hII-' \.1 I ,
I 1 L'j of Yelm has receiv~d copies of the siqned/clp~r('\ ,I
'II will i':hen b..~ ~;(,":h~'dul~!<',
t h,~ t
(.1 I ,)11';
1;lllql~ nott: UB to r(?,~d'
l .lnd Gur veyor . II
.hy th~ project ~ngineer ' :
l!
"j,! t.o the notes a notltl to) t.h~ eff~ct thaI.: the City (I!
) ,i It" ,3:s-bllilt clt:awing~ h~ l;lJt,mi,tteo prior to final
w("~pt.~lice .
,I I IIi wi 11
" UVli:l.t:age
';I~
P"l' (",- Tl"r:; ..t;h~l; the "lacement of fire hydrants may not ltJ::uV le!.
.... , ,. I , ,,1 r 1 r~ n f.; ~ ~ t ~ ~ 1 O;! '" s 1" n . 1 1 t . .
J' If:':oJ '. ~r. (.{l.f..~ 't ~ D ,,. Ol~.~ ~ "QT,'I.~, Q.'f. t1;v~ t'I~l1. "I A; 1"\....) ( '" \
~..:... .~~(. ~ l ~ r" ./' -, ,'J 1.. t)) t /> I' /"'t l"~ ~)~" (' r.., 'f., ( .' I -) J l "'I' '4' , f ~ ~ ~ ) ( ,
, ....~, ,," ..\h:.........\.''t'<,. '1 \ ";..~~ .., 'l >'.7:.
(' ') 1 ...... .....". ~.t
'I'"
-t-'
~-
.4...........
, }J" --.J
1. ~ ~ ,.... ",.\'
~iS
P 11" ;
~Ild 1 I
SHEBT (' ;
27.
Pled' I
(cord J '
!l1,J ,3 llote to tl"le effect t..hiit ,).\1 wat.er 1 j n~l;, ,1lJld Wl'l;,I' I II!
"[I!itl'" e,~Se\TIent$ and bills 0f f;ale prior to final apbH" ,J
III d t h eo a p pro p ria tel 0 cat c wi r \: t (l the r e~) tor a t ion d <:' t ,I I
1 Ii I~ C i t Y 0 f Ye 1 m tv atE' r Del? art men t f Q r d eta i 1 s ) .
I: 8 . P 1 (~ '" I " d ,'i not est a tin 9 t hat ~ lIe \1 t :s s I'l a 11 h e saw ,~ \1 t..
i'3.
All
D~t ,
30
,I'i ,IJ~tClil:s shall be to the City wf Yelm standard detall
qr .:lvailable at the City of. '(~.ltn - S~wer Departm~nt
P 1 e .i. I hdl1gt:: notes 3 .and 11 t(l 1: ~ad .
1 ie,. II I] .\nd surveyor."
II . . b)' the p:r: Q j ~ c l;. tHI9 j t , ; I IlL a
31. PIe "' ,
DRYWi'l
)2 P J I j
VAl
U P 1 (Id ,
t hi
r, t e the ,s i z e 0 f the wa $ he d J::() C k that twill be I.l S e (,1 j 11 I Ii
II. '!'AI L.
III'JI/l' tb(~ !efR:t:r~nC'l:: t:o th,' ('ity U1: r,..H::~Y in IOh(..; DOUIII,i
r"I1BLY d~tai 1. What pt()vi~ i\;ll wi 11 b..1 lTiad~ fell:: a fl.,
111"'X
It'll n?
Jrl"V~ the .re!E::!i!'rK(~ t:CI t~(;, 4,". irl(~h HOl.:-e l.()lllit~cti(lt, .-.1 'i, w,'r
lid :;;ull$tit.ute: STORZ C'c'nnf:!ctot.
34. P J ,
llH^ I NA('J. 'ill ;. [:'I/o':;! ON CON'l'ROL P!.JAN/RE:~(.lRT
( {.J! ~ !
3S.
P 1 (',
t () :)
~ f"f I! i
tn"i
;';"Vi{JI~.:'In erosiQn conttu1 pliZlll detaili.li/3 wh.at specitl /-i',',lon
I 'I h tl i que s w 111 b Ie' U t. i "! i:t 1-' 1'1 d n I,l t h ':: i .r t e:: ~ p ,.~ <.: t ,1 v t':' 1 () I I I I II
Vl,t'W ;section 7.4.1 ()f till: y,'lm (l{.=Iinage In'3nu~1 a.) it
II I : \ 1 1\ I IJIlI f] (J W P Q t. 1'1 1 t": II 'J t II r v r f J. '1 h.J~ S t. :d p ~ . A L r Ci f) C " (I : ,! , I
11111 h.;iV~ tl,) be utilized tQJ:; tdofiltratioll r.ather th,il I r',
Ii 1 (\' ;~trj.p that is cllrrcntly t)rr.)t)os~d.
.1 t t;'s
1 (i
.31), It i;ll'~rstcod that r'r~trl,-fit.till'~" Qf the enti:t:e site ["Il, 1.1 I "t 1://1
p"J'11 r I The desiSln of b,=~;..;in::.; tril;\Jhuy t:() t'NEW" irnpe!v.i/'Jli II' 'l
"L ,I' ", I thf-' minil'i'Ium r~g1,lir.liIIF'r,t..:: If th~ 'fp.lln (:h:,.1in.:lljf~' II1dl'l i
37. Pl,,,
i I ,dew thG-\ minimlJm ;Jl~ltaIJI\ dt1d t:r~~~t.:mt~nt r.~q\li.tel11ent
38. Th, 11'11, Il,t'~ soIl logs (pits) waul!:! se!;'nn to indicate infiltr;;lt: il'll I :ltt:S
in Ir'l '{lc.inity of the estimate, a minimum of two physical t, <,I :Cihall
/)~., , q Ii lJ I" d a t s e p a :c ate i n f i It r at i f.i Ii 1 0 c ~ t 1 0 n s . The pro ~ 0:$ (' , i .f j, l 0 n s
to 1.", c1rdinage rnanual will allow for 30me telief tel the stU! d J'
rl:"Ju II I:ments These :l;'evisi on$ h.;ive not .Y~t "cleareClI/ the It'l lilli' j 1
Coml!lI I 1.1''-' but this is anticipated to oC:CL'lr in the near futu!I' ^
val'l ifl " to the existing storage r.equirements (in favor of th~i' r)roposed
n~'w 'llurements) may f.)€ possib1<:.~ from tht'! DXc3inag~ Adrnini::'ltl" II r
t(,! "Ity of '{elm. This rl:qul'<:')t ~h,':lll be I'IHlde in writill'l
39. ltld~.,r I j(.)B reports shall be requlrfo:d l'i~ pl~r ~ject;ion 2.6 (;'if tit. lelm
D,., J" I I Man u a 1 . ~ 1 € as e pro v i cJ ~ " r t, [i r, r i fur mA t. .
Ii 7- 1 ~
I J i ii/i
Fill
_T U L - 1 ..:;:. - 3 ~ tl 0 t~
3:57 OF=:TH
H==OCIHTE=
F _ .;::~..:;:.
oj U . f' II .
",vide r.l [low .an",lysis (01. the pipe n~2twod,.
~ 1
!' , j
I ,vide at detail of each pond/retp.ntion area.
42 . fl.l)
l. i, ,
1\ r.:J e facilities shall be 5 t ~1l< e c1 by the p 1.': 0 J e c t ~ n g i I I ,
, : I ;~nd sl...1l:veyor.
tll
If you lid I' 'lilY qllGstions, please contoct Mark R. Cook at 458-881f ,r Dennis
Cochran, ,'it 754-.1495.
~~ln(,.~rl I
~ 0. '"~, (I( , : ( L ~,_
Mark R
'(-....
\ /
/
//
:'.~
'"
S. Chambe.rlain & Associates, Inc.
Letter of Transmittal
Date. June 29, 1993
Project Number/Name. SCA #92070 / Nisqually Plaza
TO' Dennis Cochran
2626 - 12th Court SW
Olympia, WA 98502
Weare sendmg you.
COPieS Date DescnptlOn
1 June 1993 Drainaae. Erosion Control. and Maintenance
Plan report for Nisqually Plaza Shopping
,.,~~~~~ v~l~ r.77\
Theso are transmItted as checked below.
For Your Use. xx
For RevlCw & Comment.
For Your Approval.
As Requested:
Approved As Noted.
Returned for CorrectIOns:
Comments.
SIgned. Steven L. Chamberlain
S Chamberlain & Associates, Inc.
Engineering, Planning, and Surveying Services
719 SJeater.Klnney Rd. SE. Suite 120 . PO. Box 3485 . Lacey. Washington 98503.3485
(206) 493.6002 (206) 493.2476 FAX
05.2'::1'33
15 10
5PRnop IIEllELOpnENT N Lo.! ,H~C """* 205 458 4348
tjO 334
[1101
I
I
)
_ IfP~-/~
- P1f () j/~1J~~
~A;;~~..r~Yi
:: ;;~rl vi ~ June 2R, 1993
.tJs-g- - J/, 3cfl?
.~
Jerry Prock
Cit~' of Yelm
101 Yelm Ave W
POBox 479
Ye}m, W A Y85Y7
RE. NhqualJy Plaza Remodel
Sewer Hilokup-New Buildings
Dear Jerry
Per your request, we are wntmg to confirm t.hat. we understand we wlH not re.cewe the
CertIficate of Occupancy and will nut open to the publk for bu~ine~s, pnor to the
connection of sewer servlce(5) of any of the new proposed structures of the Ni<:;qually
Plaza proJ~ct My understandmg IS that the sewer dIstrIbution lines and system h
scheduled to be complete by Febnlilf), I ()94 The eXIstrng facilities dUrIng COfl'mUCllOn
of the new structures will continue to use the septIC system(s) they have been using owr
the years, 8.nJ wl11 C"on\ert to :1 "ewer ~ystt>,11l once the st,:v.er dIstribution v, avmlabk
I hope thiS adequatdy S,Hl1>fie!' your r~ljll~sl
Sillcc;:rely,
Gramor Development N.W., toe
Richard Embry ProJect Manager
r I i- - <'_ I i - .1
u i c r M
r II I
x:;A
.
719 Sleater-Kinney RcJ SE
Suite 120
POBox 3485
Lacey, Washington
98503-0485
(206) 493-6002 ~
(206) 493-2476 Facsimile
n I"'\.=->'\---!:'o-="o_o::.n.!\r._4__ L___.,~_ _
s. Chamberlain & Associates, Inc.
tcg\p~
June 25, 1993
Ty Peterson
CIty of Yelm Planmng Department
105 Yelm Avenue W
Yelm, WA 98597
'"
RE Nlsqually Plaza CIVIl DesIgn Plan Submittal
SCA #92070
Dear Ty
Attached are four sets of the CIVIl drawmgs, (Sheets C-l, C-2, C-3 and C-4)
gradmg, dramage, sewer and water plans, for City reVIew A prehmmary set
was already gIVen to Denms Cochran. We have mcorporated IllS ll1Itlal
rovlOW comments mto the attached drawmg The arclutect SIte and bUllchng
plans were already submitted to the CIty several weeks ago
To help exped1te the process, I am send1ng a set of the latest plans dIrectly
to Denms.
We are requestmg cIty revICW and approval of these plans with the hope of
reCeIVIng approvals by June 30, 1993 We recogmze tIllS IS an extremely
short turn-around tIme but due to the strmghtforward work mvolved,
prevIOUS dISCUSSIOns with the CIty and ImtIal plan reVIew by Denms, we are
hopmg the process can be expedIted.
The plans clearly explam and depict the proposed Improvements Two
copIes of the storm dramage report and supportmg calculatIOns are mcluded
wIth the plans.
We have shown some dramage Improvements to the eXlstmg dramage
system m the front parkmg areas Our understandmg would the CIty was
not reqUIre that the owner upgrade to current dramage standards These
upgrades were done pnmarIly to Improve some mmor pondmg problems and
was not mtended to be m compliance wIth all the dramage reqUIrements of
per the Thurston County Storm and Surface Water DeSIgn Manual.
Grad1ng will be confined to the area behmd the eXlstmg bmldmgs and the
proposed shop area to the east of the new drugstore FmIshed grades are
shown on the plans
Water system Improvements WIll consIst of relocatmg several eXlstmg fire
hydrants, mstallmg a few new fire hydrants along Yelm Avenue and behmd
the mam bUIld1ngs, loopmg the eXlstmg system between 103rd and Plaza
Drive and reroutmg a few sectIOns of watermam to accommodate our new
r:1'\.Ic:.'~ II::CDJ",rr
nr_AJ\.II\.IIJ\.lr
C'UD_\ {C\D!\ rr
~
Ty Peterson
June 25, 1993
Page 2
bUIldmg configuratlOns New water serVIces WIll be extended to ,serve the
front pad areas and new services added to service the new food market, the
drugstore converSIOn, and the proposed shops on the east sIde
Sewer Improvements WIll consIst of mstallmg new septlc and S T E P tanks
for the mam bUIldmgs, new 2" chameter S T E P collectlOn hnes, JunctIOn
boxes, etc. The plan at tillS time IS to abandon the eXIstmg septic tanks and
dramfield systems and hook-up to the new sewer system at about the same
tlme the new bUIlchngs are ready to be occupIed. The eXlstmg bUIldmgs wIll
remam on the dramfields untIl then. The new S T E P tanks and serVIce
Imes WIll be mstalled prIor to thIS but set up to be easIly converted by Just
turmng a couple of valves.
All constructlOn wIll conform to the CIty of Yelm reqUlrements as speCIfied
on the plans
Should you have any questIOns please call us at 493-6002
Smcerely,
TES, INC.
SLC/gjd
cc Denms Cochran
Enclosures
(d\corres \92070625.ltr)
'~~~~Y: ".. .
''', .
C"- lC..... Icer"",,.--..
,
~tHl!~ City f Yel
'-"~::r;;""'1f:l'::~}~ : ~-. .' - ~'""'.; ;",:t7"I~"t:i;~~b2:~io5 "y elm A~~h~~':'W~~~~~~~R~?;;~2rt;~f~Yf~:r~~ qt;~~;~~:f~~'~
POBox 479' .' , . . , ". . ,....
Yelm, Washington 98597
206-458-3244
FASCSIMILE TRANSMITTAL FORM
TO COMPANY (;,~VV\...Ov ~c.v-e...\c,\?~,^ \-
ATTENTION]?; L h ~V'\I\\{\ ~
"FAX- NUMBER ) '1'-12 - S-SS~
FROM
COMPANY
INDIVIDUAL
'pill pi f1.L.~
"FAX- NUMBER
NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW (
S - If ~ 13
TIME SENT
DATE
SUBJECT
fi'L"Jlr C-L
c:.C/ /l Le it' /'I I r V'-{!1
V
if;
/
I .' r--
~~O"... " C
/ ,f0 ~ l-
v
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
If your do not receive all copies or any copy is not legible,
please call (206) 458-3244 as soon as possible.
City of Yelm
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm,WashingtOll 98597
(206)' 458-3244
May 11, 199.3
Richar'd Embry, Proj,ect i'-1anager
Gramor De.velopment' N W , .lnc
,1133 164th Sf SW Suite 107
lYnnwood, WA 98037
RE: ~isqually Plaza, Yelm Avenue Tfaffic Signal
Co n s t rUG t 'j 0 n and Par tic i pat ion
DEmr Richard:
To ccnf'j!rm our: previous conversa~ion, we wi 11 require~ Gramor
Developmern t.o constt'uct the traffic signal at the Nisqua11y
PH~?:A flle.~n access dr'lveway/Vanci 1 Rd- intersection with Yelm
Ave We will, as a ,condition of future project approvals, (
~equire that ~hose developments and projects that will
dil'6Ctly impact the se.rvice of the trflffic signal enter an
agreement with Gramor Deve10pment concerning its prorata
share of the traffic signal construction and design cost~
Said agreement wiT1 ~~ required prior to issuanc~ of any
cor~str'uction permits respective to said developments and
projects Typ'; ca 11 y, the agreement will i nvo 1 ve a prora ta
~hare that will be determined by a calculation on the
est'imated vehicle trips that the development 01' projec't will
cont.r.ibute to t;he i.nter'sect,ion
r tnJst this br'ief ,f:lckhow"iedgment formalizes ahd satisfies
your lenders concern regarding the issue surrounding future
_ j:H'cwata sh~re of r.'he costs for the traff ic 1 ight
Sincere l'y,
_ ,() c
c}f ' !
~~~~~~ve
Officer
*
Recycled paper
J _
I
I
/
------ -__--I ---------~ --------------------------- -----~-~ ~u~______
------1) - 0 ~-----'s--~'? -=\2LQ(j ~5&__ -(;"-0.,,,- "fj~~""LwL~___. .
__~_ __________ ___0\LA1-~1?-~~-{" -t---~----------------n-- --~-- ------ m_
_~i-=~[1-4oD-'T-~-CUf~"'~~ c<<lw_LcjecJ f?{"w-~-~=
_____.__ _____ ___ - J,'Q:Jo-<=---~~-I-\~~- k S:~y c"'-\L~~~.:.OX\._~--.lk)~---
-_= ...~--=-_r....-.-----Lo-.k"5L--C"~~!--~----~~-~- .--===_-=~=-=
___~_~.. ~_ {OrvL-<- _~/2-wJ-L!ZL~E(L~-d /---------
\ / 7
_ ______________ __________ ----:-5(~C\..~tt \J3::e..v".)___~_e~s__(--~--
____________ _________ - ?e:'f "'^:_~____~ -e..o-=-'S._ ~_____
~~-..=~=]F-=~--- -... ----===-.~.=.=-==-. ---- .-- .----- .-
. .. ---. - -_.~~._-- .-.. .-------- . --- .. - - -- - ----- -.--.. -- .-- - --.----
~'11
-- [-hI' -'.---- ------------------------ - ---------- .
l.,
__~~_____, ____ ____~___'..__~____._______.4____.'___ ~__~______.___ ,-- - -----------~----
_____________ _ ~~ S __~_\S:.S_~~'_.n______h ~___ _______________ -- - ----- ---- -------
____ __.__ --.---l-s-t"."'--~~-"'-~.~-"O~i.-. b"'SeA_ ...0>1\. .__C 0 "S\5UL".'O_~ .-""""'--- -- . -- ..-.
-~-etrL"-"c~ ..u_,,- \.: \ -"-8 ~'^'t.v:>)_-t:lJ..-~-~- 1:.'>._.=o.L\",)"._
-------liLt",~\ >>~~;~ -.\0 '--~=------LuO\ -----.-----==
________._l==~-~~ _._-=-c=-s'''0~c~~~~--=-- ~=?L'd=C.=_=_=..
- -----.-=:-: _~0-qc-c.--~ Cl-q':J _r&_~lcuJ~-J=i2J.J! ----...-
-,----- -- ,- -+.~._----- --------~---- ------ ~---- _.- --- ------~------ --_._-~----~-~ ---
, \.
~tH~ City of el
""f '..,,,:;':"::,;..- ''"-~.'"'+~ "':~;~:~~r~ : "W . ."" iii''''Pt?:_~~~':';'"''''4:~i7.iFil05''Yelm A~';f~~e yt:~trr;'fB~~?~~l;6Xf~~.f~B~~f~1 ~]t~~~::;i~~~~;tH
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
206-458-3244
FASCSIMILE TRANSMITTAL FORM
TO COMPANY (7 fttl/VJtlJrtA./ /L<.M) +' () MLJ&.
ATTENTION &t/JJ-lJ ~/V}I1NA I./L:.NLJ
"FAX- NUMBER ( r2()6) ~q:3- cJ.</7~
t!-~f1V11J
( 206 ) 458-4348
FROM
COMPANY
INDIVIDUAL
-FAX- NUMBER
NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW ~
5-/ 1~98
TIME SENT
?j;/3 11-fYJ.
DATE
SUBJECT ,-)j~ ~ A Cl/f I ~ ~d Cl./Y/A 'Y7/Jtl(1~) ~
~j)(Pt!tJd- WW"TP - I2#A0a/Ynm f!tm,,<)i
I
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
If your do not receive all copies or any copy is not legible,
please call (206) 458-3244 as soon as possible.
~">;;::1' '1"--
05. 10.33
18 11
5PRflOP [lEI IELOPr1EtH n 1,.1 ,I t.le -'; 20E, 458 43'-18
t10 355 [;101
-Q
[GRAMOR
GRAMOR DEVELOPMENT N. W., INC.
1133-164th St S W #107, Lynnwood, WA 98037-8121
(206) 742-0520 · (206) 742-5553 FAX
FAX TBAf'JSt\(1ISSION S~Hr;l;T _-- _
// 4sts - t.f"3-+B
To b~e.... ~~? __ FAX#' /, ~~
Date S J, 0 k1.3.._ Sent By _ ~__
I f-L
#01 Pages Including this sheet .~~_
Q-.
"
Remarks
05 1033
18 11
5PRflOP DEIIELOPr1Etn t1 li.1 ,H~C -;0 2DE. 458 4348
~m 35E.
[1102
..;,
134"-30 "~3 14 54
a 2GE 4"3 2476
P.o-,-
~
..
"V! V T 1 r _J
.h. I
S. ChRmberlalt' & Associates, Inc.
April 30. 1993
Alan Bylsma
David Kohlo An:hitoct
12878 Intorurban AvonuG Bouth
Soattle. WA. 98168
RE: Nisqually Plaza
Onsite Wastc Dis))()S8.) Design
Doar Alan:
Hor(~ is tho wrItten follow-up to our phone conv(mmtion that I ptomisod you I am nlso
sondmg a copy to Richard Bmbry.
WJthin tho last t.wo duys. tho Thurston County Environmental Health Doparl.mont.
(reEl-I) hilS auvisod us that tho following ltoms must be providod 01' nddrossod boron.! tho
Bubjoct desIgn will bo approvod,
1. 'rho wator motor roadings (i.e. wator usago) from tho compal'Ablo storos must covor
A. ono yoar period 'rho data supplied from tho llolfair nnd Gig Harbor stores
covoted only two mont.hs.
'rhe usage recordA for tho onsito mini-moll bUSi11CSSOS also for n oIw.year' period
'J'his 'usage mfOl'nH\t.ion will provIde an indication of the qUllntlty of wasto wator
hkoly to be genorated by tho rodevolopod site. Ousite dispOSf\J in tho project: area
i rcstric d to u maximum of 450 gallons per day, pot nCl'O
A lottor f!'Om tho CIty orVolm reporting the ,!:ltatl1~ of the sowora.ge dischargo
1J~~l1lllt /'IJI. U,(, tll'o)~I)"'ed tr6utmont. l~lfl.n. lr Uw pormit hoo boon iO(l\.\odl oomo
reduGtion in tho }'oCluircd drninfiold 817.0 may bo allowed. If the permit has not
hoon ifolsuocl. tho ufninfiold c108igJ'1 must comply fully with tho Dopartmont of
Health (DOH) l'oquil'cmonts fot I..argor Onsito Sewage Systoms (those nru 8ystern~
whICh havo discharg(! rotes grontor than 3500 gallons pOl' cia .
Complianco with the Largor Onslto Sewage SY9tom requiroments will inchtdo:
Preparatwll and submiUal of a preliminary report;
Preparation of the s,ystern design a.nd submitt.al for opprova,l b,'Y DOll;
Preparation and sulmHUal of a COfl...<;tructwn repo"l.
(l'hm was not antlcipa.ted in our origmul dosign eost propo8ul.)
~
o.\re~""1 ~A\ie.
A 1l.:1ttor from thu City of Yolm stuting that wutor sOl'vicc is availablo for thiM
project.
~ ~ ~ ~~~~
Engln~erlng, Planning, and Surv.yln~ Servlcei
719 Slcatcr-Kinney Road Sf . Suilc 120 . I~ 0 00)( 3485 . tacey. WashinglOO 96503-0405
(lOf,) 493.6002. (007) ~79-S929 12061 49J.247b fAX
11:-:"- 1 U
,
i I f II T 1\/1
f- I i ~
05. 10. '33
18 12
GPRr'10P DEIIELOPr1Er'n tj IAI ,H.le ... 20E, 458 4348
rm 355
[;103
...
04 '~/'il3 141~!!I
2'1: 2ih 4n 20lh
r- 0:
- A
111
-~ --
Alan Bylsma
April 30, 1993
Pago Two
4. Tho mlmbnr of water fixturos in tho Jll"oposed internnl delicat.ossen 'rho gron~(~
trflp must bo largo onough to provido n 2.day fot..onhon timo. and its. si:t.o will bo fl
function of the number of wnt;or fixt~ures thaI. it. servos.
u. A mochanical drawing of tho proposed buildings' plumbing systems with stub out
(jJovntjon:~ Soparatl! plumbing will lw nocoBsary from tho dolicat.osson to the
groaso trap, lInd from tho grotlse trap to tho common sop tic tank for tho gJ'ocory
market building,
(}~~, A statement of conceptual appreval eft.he p~joct frem the City ef Yelm,
~I~\) ~:CgH will probably roquiro 11 Method ]] nnlllysis fol' tlw projoct, rogfll'(UO.fM:l or wh(\thol'
[S tiP they allow somo reductIon m drain field sizo Hl }'ocognition of Em apptovod dischnrgo
~ permit for tho City's sower system. And tholr starr reprosentative indicntod thoy would
likely rO(luil'o that the systom bo dosignod to accommodato waste dJ9Chargo flows 50%
groator than thoso oxtrapolated from tho water uS8g0 data. Wo should also ant.iClpllte
that au Oporulions & Maintonanco ManUlll for tho systom will now 00 roquitod.
Nono of thoso rcquiromcntR arc insurmounta.ble, Howover, I am vory concerned that tho
tlmaframo for I)'CEH dosign l'oviow and ap}lrovnl wHl bo tloverfl] wooks IOllgor than
nnticipat.od in your projout gc:hcd\.llo and. if reviow and approval oro preompted by DOI.I,
th(~ J))"ocQssing tirno will almost 8Ul'(,Jly be OVOll longor. We will do illl wo CRn to oxpodiLo
the process, but wo muet all rocognize that tho roview time may be boyond our ability to
influonce.
Whon wo initilllly preparod tho scopo of work nod cost oatimate for this olomont of the
projoct, it wa.s our undorstanding that wo would bo designing fI. rather strnightJot'Wfll'<l,
tompornry 'soptie system, Now it apl)UflrS thut rrcm-I may have something considOl'Holy
morEl $ophisticatod or oxtenSIVe in mind. Bofore we proceod much furtherJ I ro(;ommond
wo moot with TCEH to sort out what thoy really neod. I will try to set somothing up fm'
tho first of noxt woek.
SincorelYJ
S. CHAMBERLAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC,
s~~r.
SLCI
cc: Wehard Embry
f.__----.-.-..-_..___
II r. - 1 U
I J I II L F M
F II
05 10.33
18 12
5PRrlOP DEI 1ELOprlE~H ~~ I!.I ,Hll: .... 20E, 458 4348
r.m 355
[;104
. .
-'"
.~-
.,.
I 17lX1 """'l"""
AC,'TION MEMd' Chamberlain & Associatesl Inc.
Date:
May 4, 1993
RECff"'~ .~D
MAY
," 3
,,~ ld9
From:
H Chambl:-lrlalIl & A1'iI'lOCH.lteH, Jw'
To:
All ProJl:Jd Team Memb~'H'ii
GF ..1; r-v N W
Pret1Uhml~RlOn COl1ff>l'fmcn for tho Nisqually Plaza On~nte Wa1'lte' . .
Disposal System
Subjea:
A n1eetm~ wIth thc-: 'T'll.llrstun Cuunty EnvItonmental Hp.alth Departmont ha:=; boun
~chudu18d for 9 3.111 on 'T'uesday, May 11, 1D93. at th~~ Thurston County Coul.-thoLl13G Ill.
the EnvIronmental Health Deparbnent eonferel1ce foom 'T'he following items wIll be
dl~cussed at tlll.'S meetmg:
1 ReductlOll Hl111tcrim on site wast;p dl1'lpoRal ~lzmg requll'emHnts due to near futlu'p City
l:5anlLary Hewer S 'T' E P ll1stallaLlOIl.
2 Wator W5H data. and Rpedfic flow requll'(.nnHntl'l f(ll: 011f.nte wasto clispo:sal de~ngn.
3 SeptIC tank and gteal'lf-' trap 81Zm.g roquirelll~IltH.
4 Spc(~ific rElqUlrpmAntR regal'di.ng the dei=ngn~ for larger ollsitEl wftl5te dUlpo.'Jal !-!YRtnll.lS
5 City of Y 81m eom ll]f!nts or CUlleetI11'l.
Wf-' IU'P. l'8qnc~t.lIig' thUl mf-'etm~ WIth the ThurHton County 8nvh'ollIliental HeHltb
Depart.mAnt to nWf'IVe their comments prJor to dAsign submittal. Sil1(~e thiR cljsposal
"y~tf-'rn wIll be abaIHlolied 111 t11f~ npal' future, we feel somA l'nductiOlllli the overall de.'31gn
requlrpm~mt.q for larger :.-systems IR approprIato
The H<:mlt.h Depal'tmr:>.nt reptHsentatlVe has incUcated thi:lt chal'ge~ f(Jf thli:) meetmg wIll be
adde(l to the appI'oprmte permIt f~f'S
Cc RH;hanl Embry, Gramol' Dnvelopmenl /"
At-uI Bylsma, Davlf1. Kef-lie & ASI'OCI.1V-'H
CUll!~ Borgf-'S, Clty uf Yelm
(::2U?(tl ~().1J.1}'~.l:L1j
Engineering,. PlannIng, and Surveying Services
719 Sleater-Kinney Road Sf .. Suite 120. POBox 3485 - Lacey, Washington 98:;03.0485
(2061493-6002 - (907l 279-5929 (206l 493.24i~ fAX
!! 1"]-111 I_i
111- II F M
F I!"
City of Yel1lD
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
206-458-3244
FASCSIMILE TRANSMITTAL FORM
TO COMPANY
ATTENTION '\L.tbh (.Y-J\. ~ 'f'f
n FAX- NUMBER (20t~ ) '11..\ L.."- S=S-f'3
FROM COMPANY c: \.--{ (7 \:.. Y -e\ M,
INDIVIDUAL ~ ~c\-e.'f~aN
-FAX- NUMBER ( 206 ) 458-4348
NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW ~
DATE
'--/ l'J /13
/
TIME SENT
SUBJECT
All ~(<UM_-L Y 7/A-?h
u ,J.f"tAVlf F/ nu.. ~
> ~
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
lA.f kn /+
tfZ."h - ?~A9.-<'-
(Oi1..iJ~11\~
U / ~ j1A..e- (_.<71)4/
l<::.
If your do not receive all copies or any copy is not legible,
please call (206) 458-3244 as soon as possible.
-H-P-F--=-'::;"-3-=-3-::'"-T-R-O-1-';:1-:1--;",--;:::'Y-I-CL""f t~ I~ = - 1_ U t~ t~ U L L I
Sheat1/l
L
I City of Yelm
I
I
I
I
! HydrMt Loc'<3.tion DatI) Slatic
.'", ,. - '-p_'_'___ ,..1~,~~ .;... ,..J!.~
A~o~t.~ Plu", , A.3
A~ostl) Pl~la , A.3
Agost() F'1a7a I A-2
Agost,) PIc ~a # A-?
Agostr:) P137a# A.?,
Agosto PI(\7a ;A.6
A~05h) PI~d it A-6
Agosto Plal<:\ , A 5
A'Jost<i Pkv.:\ , A.5
i..
i Hydrant flow resullts Apnl 29 1993
[Thomas E Skillings P'E.
i
'2/8/8.,
4/23/93 I.
5/17/8~ L
8/31/871.
;,,1_ 4/23/93 i
6/9/87 r
4/23/93 !
12/3187 i
'0/23193 ~
58
58
57
51
58
58
54
58
54
F.0:2.
Residual Mea&ured Calculated
Yr~i .~~:}c:.~.<;€-~tL~~ @ 29. pSI
I
45
50
26
42
50
41
48
46
48
950
1130
650
920
1130
790
1075
890
1075
1700
2625
717
1800
2625
1220
2750
1660
2750
I
I
l...
Flows calculat"d by TES ~PTlI_ 29 1993
_...:.R,2sujts FAX~d!o _TYE5.<te!s'?0~_2.~~9_3....
Page 1
~l~e-~ H-l:~ ,~
HFF.-~3-3~ THU
1 0 : 1 3 == ~ ILL I t-l G == - C 0 t-l t-l 0 L L
F _ 0 1
I'; Skillings - Connolly, Inc.
..... ConsultIng Engineers
FACSIMILE
TRANSMITT AL
To
Cornpany
Individual
Fax #
____c~. \:::.t~ ,~,~ .. E. l.. -.. *" r ,Q I{ Y.. L.,...._.
..., " D \ ') p \ - -)
_"~_M"_"-;.-\'-~'J'<'!.:."-' lL l\.. ~._
_._~.::"J~:::~,:~ 41 Yl\~,":L._.
From
IndivIdual
Our Fax #
(20~i~{~~..~~e'\ \ \ vY>~
I
Number of pages to follow. _ '.___
(' - C Cl ~
Da te _..L:~.a..:'~.:-_:1..;l~) ,.
Time sent. _L"-...,_0~2...._ _...._ _. '__
PrOject Number- C\ (,) ~;) l-.-Q CA
Project Name J-tn:, ~ik~(;':C..:
. [ ;l 'Y"\_h I... f: ,'; _;) .~___~, .___. _ _'.
SUbject.
Additional Comments
_\A,_"-' \ "L \.U~. (':" . ;y... C;\.!1.~ ',,:...>-9. .
~.~.>.-~. ,\:~~t(, ~ \_\.:..,,{,,\.C,- :.-r-e, .i~\.~~...__..- \(\r-~- .;\..~1..(:,,~
( (.j \ t \.~ ( '-- ,f " I( , ..... \ ," \) ,,', U".f
_"."-."",?:a._,.; o~,'., 3.._~_......':>.i~'_~', ~~. .\..\"..\.';0,./1. ..,.
\ t "\l...... \,,- . 'I C:~ '...\ "\L".\..N:: (L"""'\\.Jrj C()U.._t:. J.\,'--:!'\\....
U IF yOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL COPIES OR ANY PAGE IS NOT LEGIBl.E
PLEASE CALL (206) 491.3399, AS SOON AS POSSIBLE i1U
rhl~ f.:l.:Slrrlde t"'JnSr.1~SSiOn (and or d(', I1rner'I1':'~ c1(...LOrr1parlVlng It) m~w contain confidential InfOrn13t10n
beion(,1Inl~ to a sender whIch IS prrJte:ted bv t'!c "cm5uitaflr-c!lcnr privilege The Inforrn.ai:IOn 15 Intended
oniy for ~,tk; use of the :ndlVlduJI or entlt y ndrnei:1 ,.:J1:>Jve )f IOU Jr't nnt the Inte.(ldt::d reclpler';[ you ar'c
ht rd. y notified that c:;nv dI5clo5ur~. t-(.iPylritj. dISUI[JUrlr,r1. x rr1t~ tJkmg nf .elny iilctlon In reilarlO': Or: the
conte:m5 of rhl5 Infori"t1at.lt1!1 IS srncrly flr?hrbte:,;l. if /OU r'ccClvt)d tfllS tr.an~)nll;;/Slon :n aror. plt';,::j~5e
notify ue, tly teleprlone ImmedlClt.eiy t:(j 'l((,;1no,e rr,r re~um or ar~5trl1ctlon of the dOCUl'ntritf>
5016 lAGOY Boulevard S E ,P 0 BOl( 5080 Lar:ey Washington 98503~5080 (206) 491-3399 FAX (206) 491.3857
U 4 -- - I
j 1 ::. ~ "Jvl
f 111
H F F-' - .:;:. 3 - 3 ~ T H U 1 ~=1 : 1 3 :: ~ ILL I t~ G :: - C 0 t~ t~ 0 L L I
F _ (:1':;:'
Sheet'/l
.'
,
I
I
I I Hydrant flow reslJllts. April 29 1993
I Thomas E Skillings P E. ,
I
!HYdtMI Location Dato
. . . Test~d
......, J,.... ....,Wfo',....~.-,-..- ~.; .....':'_tl.....
A90S.!'~ Pl(.v<l. , A.3
A,.ost,' Pl~M , A.3
Agost.) F'l37a I A-2
^gOS!() PI~ ~a , A-I'-
^9ost" Plual A.2
Agosto PI~:ra ;A.6
AQOSh) f:'l~a 'A-6
Agost.:) Plaza , A 5
^QostQ P131;a I A.5
Crystal Sprin9'i Rd
I.
t.
I Cit,y of Yelm
I '
12/8/8'
4/23193 I.
,.
5/17/87 :
8131187 ::
4/23/93 i
6/9187 i-
4123193 !
12/3/87i
~123193~
i? 4/29/93
T-
I
I t
Static
,.
.:.",.-1>11,
Resldua.1 Measured Calculat(~d
p~i 'Flow GPM How @ 20 pSI
....'''1......' "~,..'- .'1.... ..""..,_......_...,....'I:_.....~oIi".-v.'_..'.
58
58
57
51
58
58
54
58
54
66
45
50
26
42
50
41
48
46
48
55
950
1130
650
920
1130
790
1075
890
1075
10'0
1700
2625
717
1800
2625
1?20
2750
1660
2150
2190
!
Flows calculat<jd by T ES ~PT1L?:~ 1993
L __, _.,.'R2sl.!.!ts FAX~d!o.Ty?~to~s~~2.~~9.3.
Page 1
e>?\Fe-~ ""'2-"$ ,~
114 1- I
] l - M
P II ~
-H-t= -F- -=- ..2. -:o<-=- :O<-:::-I-A-CI-1-';:1-:-1- :o<-=--~, -I-C-c-I-fT,::;-S;-'- c. 0 t.~ t~ 0 L L I
~ lydrMt Loc.1.tion
F_0:2.
Sheet1!l
!..
I Cit.Y of Yelm
I
I Hydrant flow resullts Apnl 29 1993
lThomas E Skillings P"E.
DatI)
T est~d
I. ......'. I'. - ....''fI-.'I....~.-'- -- ~.. ......~. ",-"-_.,_.
I
A~os.t,~ Pk'll"d , A.3
^9ost" PlaTa , A-3
^gost,) f-"'137i:\ I A-2
I ^gOS!c) PI~H.a , A-?
^gostr) Plan\ I A.2
Agost.; PkvaiA.6
A~OSIl) Pl~a t A.6
Agost,) Pfala , A 5
l^lJO~t() P137:a , A.S
ICrystal Sprin9s Rd
I
i
I
l.
1218/8.,
4/23193 L
5/17/87 :
8/31187 ::
4123/93 i
6/9/87 r
4/23/93 !
12/3187 i
'0/23193 ~
? 4/29/93
Static
pSI
'~"("-"-'
I
58
58
57
51
58
58
54
58
54
66
Resldu~.1 Mea$ured Calculated
Y.~~~:'?y.'.S'~~tL~~~ 2? pSI
45
50
26
42
950
1130
650
920
1130
790
1075
890
1075
1010
1700
2625
717
1800
2625
1220
2750
1660
2150
2190
50
41
48
46
48
55
Flows calculat,jd by TES ~PT11_?:~ 1993
_" 'R2sl!lts FAXo_d!o .TYE_HO!S~.~L2.~~9_~,. _
e>?lRe-~ II-l-"S ,,~
Page 1
01J/Z9/93
05 IJZ
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTER
(UTILITIES URG LOC CTR - WAl
04/29/93 GOOD MORNING, 05 42 56
THE CENTER IS READY TO SEND
PLEASE CHECK YOUR MACHINE AND PAPER
THANK YOU I
n4~,- l-~I
II ::= 4., ?..lvl
Page
F 1-: 1
\
\
\
\
-#'
~
City of Yelm
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98591
206-458-3244
FASCSIMILE TRANSMITTAL FORM
TO
COMPANY
L
\ ),
ATTENTION
n FAX- NUMBER
C klrnbtlfal4'1 (I}-SStJt/tI 10-
~~d
(~ 7tJ)L/ q 3/) L/1{P
FROM COMPANY CTf;t ~ I~Jm
INDIVIDUAL ,,5/!/jj1 /1acJ;U--'
-FAX- NUMBER ( 206 ) 458-4348
;;;;-
NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW
DATE L-I/d--&~q 3 TIME SENT c5,' 60 t/l1
"-T::;;2f /1 (;10 (~( ?HarZ} (}tim /11eYl h
SUBJECT ,It YJJrUkJf"tI ~cnJ~~ r ~
-pt/ffl.-tfIU.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
If your do not receive all copies or any copy is not legible,
please call (206) 458-3244 as soon as possible.
~
CITY OF YELM
YELM AVENUE & 10JRD AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT SCHEDULE
28 I April 4 I April 11 April 18 April 25 May 2 May 9 May 16 May 23
ID Name TI F Isl SIMITWT I F I slslMIT twITIF Is SIMITIvvITI F Is SIMITIvvITIFls SIMITIvvITIFls SIMITIvvITIFls slMITIVVITIFIS SIMITIVVITIF
1 Notice to Proceed (4/1/93) I .1
~ Notice to Proceed (4/1/93)
I I
2 Project Set-up 1llilliffi%-*t%.~~1
3 Surveying & Mapping i r
.. .. ..........
4 Base Map Preparation I
!
5 Preliminary Channelization Plans ~ , .%..~ .
~,.. ..
6 Submit Plans to City for Review (5/3/93) I . Submit Plans to City for Review (5/3/93)
7 City Review & Comment ~
8 Prepare RI\N Legal Description for Texaco ~
,/~'/
9 Review Plans With Property Owners (5/7/93) . Review Plans With Property Owners (5/7/93)
I I I
10 Preliminary Engineering (50%) ~;!1m:mt:~rmlllllWffi~:@M1imIWn
11 Submit 50% Plans to City for Review (5/28/93) I .
12 City Review & Comment I
I
i I
13 Prepare RI\N Plans
14 Final Design PS&E (90%)
15 Submit 90% Plans to City for Review (6/23/93)
16 City Review & Comment I
17 Review Plans With Property Owners (6/29/93)
I
18 Revise Final Plans , I
I
19 Submit Final Plans to City for Approval (7/6/93) I
20 Assist Property Owners in Obtaining Bids
21 Award Contract to Successful Bidder
22 Start Construction (8/9/93) I I
, ,
,
Project: Critical ~121 Progress ~. - Summary .., ..
Date. 4/20/93 Noncritical W~fft'.~;J Milestone . Rolled Up 0
S CHAMBERLA/N & ASSOCIA TES INC
-~
CITY OF YELM
YELM AVENUE & 10JRD AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT SCHEDULE
I
I
I
I I
I I ! I
! I I
,------ __ _ _ u_____ .. I '.
kubmit 50% Plans 10 City for Re~e0(5;28/93) 11-- I
I I I
~ Iii
~I I I
~:"""'~II I
. . ^ ., .:~~",..., , I
. Submit 90% Plans to City for Review (6/23/93)
~f I I I
'I . Review Plans With Property Owners (6/29/93)
I I '
I rhWWt\~ I
I I. Submit Final Plans to Clty'for Approval (7/6/93)
: I I I I
i~
I I I Wfff2%f~rY~ Start Con~truction (
- -
I
Project:
Date. 4120/93
Critical ~
Noncritical 1~1
Progress
Milestone ..
Summary
.--~
Rolled Up 0
S CHAMBERLAIN & ASSOCIATES INC
------ ,~----------
,
i
I'
Lc._J; ~ ~___~0\,i~L~_2e f",Je LL.L'>~S
i
I
i I
I
G ro_~.{fy___S:,,_~-.E~___-=--__ 3--j~l-- ____ --~------
, ,{ : ~
! : 4 ct,_LCalQ_2>-E ~,-:-k31- ~~_ _
____~-o.J1--e y (4 h [\ :::LJ\\----- ___ _ _~ _________________________ ___
I
----~-- i'i /3tQ!5:'='" . r,t'zZ 00
- ..,----.----
I
I
I
I
f;:
i!
,
-=h~W&~~--i~
- -~'~"C1~~~('~-- ~: -~~-~V~~t------~------~-
_t._-,H 8L_~L"'-_ C: Q- --1:-4'''L------- _____________ _____ ____ -_
i
----- ----+------- --f -----------.------------------
_~C-~_~_____~__1~~ ~~_j~J-w---w~\---~-'f:~ou)-- .~~_?-W L\- \-s
) i: ~ . \~ j
_______ __ ______~-----. -'_________L.Q.._.s3----,___.___I-_____________________________ ____u________. __
___~--S-~0~K----______j _
, - I
--- --- ---r-1 -L OWl L dL='-p-t -?if-/ "'l<'V__(2.'O_(),j\,~, J - - - .-- -~. - ---
,
I
-t----------.------------ ----- ----------------
I
i ;
-----;-'"i"--------------- --------------- ------+-------- ---
~------ -- --.-- "--..--. -"-----
!
.---++-----------------------. ----t------------------------------------
I
I
i :
.-----~--~------- ------- ----.~--J- -~---_.~ ------- --~---~-----.~-- ------------------
, . ,
~~~\c..~--=~M--j - ~ ,---i ?;r-=-~-
-1__3:>&___ -~'1-.~--- -- qgj-~a?Bx:----~y;-t.--Ao-r::--!,-t..~"LL--f-(-
----~'- C0--~___G__~~___~ (J-(1L.~-)--~~--a~-~ ~~,_lli.__2-'-~~---------
; i I
___.___.-l-.o-_______~____~____ _____________.~_~_ ~_ ____.___j__ ___.____~~__ __ __~_____~___________~ _ _ ____ _~___.___
, ,
I
I
I
-- ----r--------i-......-----------~-------- ------ ---~ --~.-~--.- --------- ___~__"____ ______ __~_______ _ ____________________
----~..l..-;;:>\ Ll~\;_ ",<::\--1> R..fffii.r:,__ -_ n____~____ -- ---
I ~!}J n!
----- _H -J-- ----1...- -:..- _- eY10_ _ ,r;:s_b.ZOj~.,__ _~___ L-~ __ __ ____ ____ ____ __ _____ ___ ___ _________
; ...--,----..'; \' i
j I --S~~-- ~~V\ ~)__~~-~----------- _.__ ____________________
1 ~ '0' \1 :
_____u_.__ -~-~e-'-L\Q--~---~S--- t-------------- - -- -----
1 I I
, . L
I
I
,
I
April 6, 1993
Gramor Dev N W , Inc
1133 164 th SW #107
Lynwood, W A 98037-8121
Attn. Richard EmbIY, Project Marager
I
I
RE Nisqua/{v Plaza Site Plan approval and Determination C?f Non-Significance.
I
Dear Richard.
The CIty of Y elm Plannmg CommisSIOn has granted approval for the Nisqually
Plaza Shoppmg Center However J this approval IS condItIOnal upon resolutIon of
I
the IvlcAlexander and Gramor JOl1\t dnveway I have mcluded the mmutes
recorded on Feb 22, 1993, page 31contams the condItIOnal motIon. Also mcluded,
IS a copy of the DetermmatIOn of Non-SIgruflcance Please contact me if there are
any questIOns concerning this ISSU~ Sorry for any inconvemences thIs delay may
have caused. I
Smcerely,
Ty Peterson, CIty Planner
---
~
..-. ~
@
DENNIS CdCHRAN, P.E.
CIVIL ENGINEER
2626 12TH COURT SW
OLYMPIA; W A 98502
(206) 754-1495
AprIl 16, 1993
Ms. Shelly Badger
City AdmIDlstrator
POBox 479
Yelm, W A 98597
RE. Nisqually Plaza
Dear Ms. Badger.
In revlewmg the utility plan prepared by S Chamberlam and AssOcIates for thIs project (dated 8-27-92), I
have the followmg comments.
1. There IS an eXlstmg water lme runmng between the two eXlstmg buildings and servmg a hydrant at
the rear ThIS line will need to be abandoned. Any other CIty water lines must be rerouted from
under bUIldmgs.
2. Areas covered by new pavmg and illcreased ImpervIOus areas creat~d J2Y buildings will need to
proVlde dramage and pretreatment m accordance wIth the "Dram~ge Manual" Roof areas do not
requITe pretreatment.
,,--
3
A preltmmary dram age plan accompamed by calculatIOns IS desIrable (but not requITed smce project
has SIte plan approval) Th.Is will help elimmate problems later.
4
The paved area between the h.Ighway and the stores IS now and has been IIDperVlOUS for some tIme.
As long as there IS no mcrease ill IIDperVlous surfaces (i.e., areas current]y gravel whIch may be
paved or build upon) and as long as the dramage system functIOns proper]y, no further msta.l.latIOns
are reqUIred.
JHowever, any and a.l.l deficIencIes must be corrected and brought to c~rrent standards. Any eXIstmg
mfiltratIOn systems whIch are WIthin proposed building areas are to be relocated (desIgn and
mstallatIOn to current standards)
5
Drywe.l.ls (except for roof drams) are not allowed WIthout pretreatment.,
6.
Water meter SIZes need to be sIZed and calculatIOns JustIfymg the SIzes Il).ust be submItted.
,rv---f ~ r ("o~fs.
Fire hydrant locatIOns, fire spnnk.ler volumes and hydrant flow volumes are to be submItted for
reVIew and approval (by Buildmg Department) ___ (",1 ->-..<... -\\~~~ \'o--s' L \ V\~
7
8.
Street and utilIty IIDprovements along the penmeters are reqUIred. I understand there IS a dramage
problem on 103rd whIch IS at least partla.l.ly attributable to run-off from thIS SIte. ThIS will need to
be addressed.
EXlstmg septIc tanks wh.Ich will not be utilized m the S T.E.P sewer must be abandoned per County
speCIficatIOns.
sl}'~ Yrl-(l'l\ ,I t- C"'-'A \.: -c- t SS u-e.o~ /
(3) 0. (O/L(), r 1-/cN\ 0 {L f-;.c.- /;/1,1-0
OCc.u ?C"'^j
np--f",j 5' e.(CJ€/"
V\ It"- \e
;; y s Ii f/VJ
qlbU/4
'" .
.. Ms. Shelly Badger
Page 2
10. S.T.E.P system connectIOn and extensions will be submItted to and reVIewed by the City Sewer
Department.
11 Accesses to eXlstmg streets may need to be upgraded and addItIOnal Improvements may be reqUired.
Radii at eXlstmg pomts of access may not be adequate. Traffic sIgnals at the mam entry (Vancil
Road) and the hIghway may be requrred.
12. W.S.D 0 T reVIew and response on the highway Improvements should be obtamed.
13 Easements and bIlls-of-sale for all mumCipal utilItIes will be reqUired along wIth record drawmgs (as-
builts) followmg constructIOn and City acceptance but pnor to occupancy.,
14 The street to the east of tills project IS pnvate. No access IS allowed (none IS shown so thIS IS no
problem)
15 Access to 103rd and to the eXIstmg dnveway at the southwesterly corner may have sufficIent Impacts
to tngger addItlonal mtersectIOn Improvements (or partIcIpatIOn therem)
,
,
i
I
I
I
i'3erelY'
I '
! \' .....l \, . L' )
I
! DENNIS COCHRAN, P.E.
,
! DC.ls
! cc: 17-93
I
I thmk I have covered all the requrrements. Please mcorporate these and any other Items you thmk of along
WIth Planmng, Buildmg and Sewer Departments mto your response to the proJect.
a~
-
.-:,
,
i
~
DENNIS COCHRAN, P.E.
CIVIL ENGINEER
2626 12TH COURT SW
OLYMPIA, WA 98502
(206) 754-1495
Apnl 16, 1993
Ms. Shelly Badger
City AdmInIstrator
POBox 479
Yelm, W A 98597
RE. Nisqually Plaza
Dear Ms. Badger
In revIewmg the utilIty plan prepared by S. Chamberlam and AssocIates for thIS prOject (dated 8-27-92), I
have the followmg comments:
1. There is an existing water line running between the two eXIstmg buildings and servmg a hydrant at
the rear ThIS line will need to be abandoned. Any other CIty water lines must be rerouted from
under buildings.
2. Areas covered by new paVIng and mcreased Impervious areas created by buildings will need to
provIde dramage and pretreatment in accordance wIth the "Dramage Manual" Roof areas do not
reqUIre pretreatment.
3. A prelImmary drainage plan accompanied by calculatIOns IS deSIrable (but not reqUIred smce project
has SIte plan approval) This will help elImmate problems later
4 The paved area between the hIghway and the stores IS now and has been imperVIous for some tIme.
As long as there IS no mcrease in ImperVIOus surfaces (i.e., areas currently gravel whIch may be
paved or build upon) and as long as the drainage system functIOns properly, no further mstallatIOns
are reqUIred.
However, any and all defiCIencIes must be corrected and brought to current standards. Any eXIstmg
infiltratIOn systems which are WIthin proposed building areas are to be relocated (desIgn and
installatIon to current standards)
5
Drywells (except for roof drams) are not allowed WIth<?ut pretreatment., (It())l/lIY\L!') J +0 fllH +, e-..
fVl r Do[ o.4=Ctlh s-l-v tlf) ~c.t \ 1<;.. '/-U-r on 1>1 ~ f [ctVJS -
Water meter SIzes need to be sIZed and calculatIOns justiffing the SIzes must be submItted.
6.
7
Fire hydrant locatIons, fire spnnkler volumes and hydrant flow volumes are to be submItted for
reVIew and approval (by Buildmg Department) wi provlc,k, ()1onclO..~ -to G-a.,VY\or
Street and utilIty Improvements along the perimeters are reqUIred. I understand there is a dram age
problem on 103rd which IS at least partIally attributable to run-off from thIS SIte. ThIS will need to
be addressed.
8.
9
EXIstmg septIc tanks whIch will not be utilized in the S T.E.P sewer must be abandoned per County
speCIficatIOns.
<.
l.1s. Shelly Badger
Page 2
10. S.T.E.P system connection and extensIons will be submitted to and reviewed by the City Sewer
Department.
11. Accesses to existing streets may need to be upgraded and additional Improvements may be reqUIred.
Radll at existing points of access may not be adequate. Traffic sIgnals at the mam entry (Vancil
Road) and the hIghway may be reqUIred.
12. W.S.D 0 T review and response on the highway Improvements should be obtamed.
13. Easements and bIlls-of-sale for all munlClpal utilIties will be reqUIred along wIth record drawmgs (as-
builts) followmg construction and City acceptance but prior to occupancy.,
14 The street to the east of thIS project is private. No access is allowed (none IS shown so thIS IS no
problem)
15 Access to 103rd and to the eXIstmg dnveway at the southwesterly corner may have sufficIent Impacts
to tngger additIOnal mtersectIon Improvements (or partIcIpation therem)
I think I have covered all the reqUIrements. Please mcorporate these and any other Items you thmk of along
wIth Planning, Buildmg and Sewer Departments mto your response to the project.
~ely,
\W-lt~ vI-' )
(lJ---_
DENNIS COCHRAN, P.E.
DC.ls
cc: 17.93
City of Yelm
"'
YELM'
_ WASHINGTON
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
(206) 458-3244
Apl;} G 1993
Unllllor ))o;;'.N W lUG
113l If),l. 111 S\\ !il U'1
Lvmv()od ,\- '\ l)X()~7-X' )1
\lln Vlch:ml j',1llt'i"\ Pru!l:(~ t [Vlallagcr
h.E \Ii'dlll iii r}!c.<'~t7 >de /"/'1/7 ,..i!)!" 0\ (Ii ,;1111 ('Jefc t"'llmUIlUIJ ('I !Vnli-,')1\!liljlc a/?( L:
j k;ll ]?ll hard
rile '"ii;, of \ thn Pla1inlHg.f~(\IJHlllssJOn has grallh~ J "pproval for the NI~quatl~l
I;Ja;~(i :)hnppmg C~nl('r HG\v~vcr tIllS npprrwalls com!itlcinal upon resolutIOH of
the hlLAk\anl!er and GranlOr Jumt dnvewav I have JJu:Jud~d the mmutes \
recorded 'on Pch 22, 1991 page 1 l(lntaifls the l,on(hlwnaltn\1!IOn Also mcluded
J'; a \.np\ of Ih" DckrnunallOn oJ ~~on-SlgllllicanL~ Please LPll/act me If thel;':': ;\r(..
;Hn questIOns concemmg thIs. J"SUC Son'." for an~ l1lc()'riVenlcnccs tills dd:w JH~ry
h,_ve caused.
(;mcere!v
I\' P _tcrson. C It\ elamkr
. . .
*
Recycled paper
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal
Nisqually Plaza Shopping Center.
Remodel and Redevelopment of shopping center to include a
49,000 square foot building with additional 14,400 square feet
of other buildings.
Proponent GrRmnr Opvplnpmpnt
Location of proposal, including street address, if any
Nnrth nf
HighwRY ~n7 Rt it~ intpr~prtinn with VRnril RnRn.
Lead agency
City of Yelm
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have
a probable significant adverse impact on the environment An
environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43 21C 030(2)(c) This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead
agency This information is available to the public on request
~ There is no comment period for this DNS
o This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(3), the lead agency will not
act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below Comments
must be submitted by
Responsible official
Robert A. Sanders
Position/title. Mayor
Phone(206) 458-3244
Date 4/5/93
Signature /)
U
WA 98597
Address 105 Yelm Avenue W.
(Optional)
o You may appeal this determination to (name)
at (location)
no later than.
by (method)
You should be prepared to make specific factual objections
Contact City of Yelm to read or ash about the procedures
for SEPA appeals
~ There is no agency appeal
T\SEPADNS FRM
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal
.N f~O /If;{ Ilv ~/a? C\.
L ( ,
,.,Q.. ~ ""-01'\"'1\1:1 (,
\. ~ lJ ~\I:\ ;.u, ...\ ~l -" f1\..\,(\\\t"~L
(; riA. "'^", -r \:\ 12 \J'o~rJ 1':\\IU.t\A *
'" '\
0.
,
~ 11f}/ ov-ton \- ,,~d ~I/'"
'tou: \o\"I-\~
Proponent
Location of proposal, including" street address, if any
A ),,~
~
AS;.
'.;'''1 \ ~ b.. \ , ';:;0
U I
r~ \ ~ \..Pllc:.er\:UIA. ....\ ~~t t AtI\.J\ ~
Lead agency
^~ 't ~\ \J\A,-
Q~ \-~\
~
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have
a probable significant adverse impact on the environment An
environmental impact statement (ElS) is not required under RCW
43 21C 030(2)(c) This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead
agency This Information is available to the publIC on request
~ There is no comment period for this DNS
o This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(3), the lead agency will not
act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below Comments
must be submitted by
Responsible official
Position/title
Phone
Address
Date
Signature
(Optional)
o You may appeal this determination to (name)
at (location)
no later than'
by (method)
You should be prepared to make specifiC factual objections
Contact c.\(~lA t5~ '\J.t> '''''' to read or ash about the procedures
for S E P A a p p e~ 1 s , '
~ There is no agency appeal
T\SEPADNS FRM
_.-''-......,. _,__.......~ r u
F ~3':::'
NIJ. 5'52'--r;~
04 0 1 ~, 0, 11
2i: ':::'Ot 4~, ':::'4;'t
C>,.. .:(j;..>.. ~~ d
DRAFT
~~
~
RIc.hSl'd Embry. projcc.t. Manager
Oramo1' Development N.W., Inc.
1133 164th St. SW, Suite 107
L)~l\nwood, W A 98037
Re. Nis'lually Plaza
SR507 Traffic Signnl Construction llnd Participation
Deat' Richard'
To confirm our previous conversations, we will require Gramor Development to C0115U'UCt
the traffic signal at the Nisqunlly Plaza main ace.ess drivewayNancil Road intersection
Wilh SR507. We will, as n condition of future project approvals, require that those
<kvclDpments and projec.ts that will directly impact the service of the traffic ~ignnl
rcifllbHr5<.~ Gmmor De.ve.lopment fOf its pl'orata share of the traffic signal construction and
design coslS. Said Iti.mAlltl'-~..,..t will be required prior t.o issuance of any constructioll
pcrmils respective to said developments and projects. ~rorala sh(\r~~ill be
calculated on lhe estimuted vehic.:le trips that the devdlopmCnl or project will contribute
to the intersection.
1 trust this brief acknowle,dgment formalizes and satisfies your lenderH concern
regarding the tssue of reimbursement of the signal costs. Feel free La have them c.:all me
if they have any que.sllons.
t'Ll-~" C\i'- ae~Y""N\~- \.,U'~
Sincerely,
~~ ~~ ~~~ <-).I,ll \'^ItA~
"cc:.- 'J/. . ~
~l~' -)1/\ ~H... 0"0".1 0.. ~\(~re./'r'2---
S~
.Ao.~~\-
''J
Shelly Badger
Cit.y of Yelm
~
0____
114 --Ill - i
c. FM
F II
- ~ --~---- ~~,---
04 01 ~-:: 0-:: 10
21: ;:'0t 4~-:: ;:'4;'t
F 01
S. Chamberlain & Associates, Inc.
FAX TRANSMITTAL
TO:
C'7 of 7ft/wJ
INDIVIDUAL: ~ k11r 6t:1JjRr
FAX NUMBER: {.2.tJ6j 7'S8 - '/:3'18
OFFICE NUMBER:
COMPANY
FROM: p~ 11. #I6It
NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW: J
PROJECT NUMBER: Cj'3 tJ z..,b
PROJECT NAME. '1eJ.o\ A.J~./J(),~C\ IUS \y~\ ~~
DATE: r//19~
COMMENTS:
"$k//(. ;(NM ({!~d Pt .utdp~j ~-rf,r
(JraptJrdd 7' ~<ivd ~/r,,,tj... /he-t"r'J ~4t> ('1INPit 1, iJ
Hu+ 1-/lI!- ~~ t~ $lj;uJ 7. ~ C; r. Pr 4c.-bo/~
..f fa WIll.' p~""1. ~/ld/'fri<P'f trVLd~ to Pay ;~
~. ~ I Me of' (J~f / W~r,J; ~ ~ Vow/ z.d
prtJ -YAf"L i7 f\. 11> If /'/ II
I -f-: -. _A. ktf:<< (> /)11/V ~ rI yl/' r-r }' ~ ell/(..
$IjJf<' ~y:?~. 7 111$ / J ~ d
~ ~ I t or ~ J ftV/~e q f, Jl4Cl!>>..... d- . .::r.. ~ I ~.c.-.,. ~
iI~UdO"~t,,~;b~:~:~r;,:j~,~t:~;;ft;br:~mu,~~~ ~
(~ncJ or docvm~n[j ~ccoll1p;tnyinc it) /lI.1Y contai" confidential i"rOrlll,ltiOn belonei"e 10 /lIe ,ender wllich is protected by th~
consvllan(.c1k'nl privikj;c. Thc ill/of/ml/c)/! is only {ur lht: list' ur till' imJividu;lf or cntity 1I,11lleu .lUow. If you ;an' 1/01 tile ill/ended
TC'Cipic/ll, )'OV arc licrcb}' no1/{ilxl (/,.1( ,111)' disclosurc, COP}'illl:, <Iislrilmlioll or t/'e l.lkinc of "ny "clion in wli:l/lcc 00 !lIe conlentJ of
IMs inform~{io/l h stricti)' prohibited, If )'OU reccive lhi /r;lIlSmiHioll ill errur, p[e;uc nOlify us as soon .1l p(Jllible 10 mmcc (Ot thl! [)
,,,",",,,tI,,doc~""". ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ I p~ uJ).. tMV
Engineering, 1'lannln1:, ami Surveying Services ~
71!) Slcillcr-Kinncy Road se Suite 120 . P,O. Oox 3405 . lacey, Washinlllon !l0503-0405
(206) 4!J3-G002 . (!}Q7) 279-5929 . (20G) 4!J3-H7G fAX
'\
114-11!.-Cj_ II ~ 1'1'0'1 Fllj
u ...
DEVELOPMENT
March 29, 1993
MAR 3 I I~~j
Shelly Badger
City of Yelm
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
Re
^Ti~qual!jl P!::.:::-
!IE?A.. !!J::! Sit2 P!a:x ApprovQl
Dear Shelly
From my discussions with you and other City of Yelm staff, I understand the
Nisqually Plaza remodel as proposed by us is approved. However, probably
simply by oversight with Todd leaving, we have not received from the City
formal written notificaticn of either the City's SEP A determination nor formal
notification of the Planning Commission's site plan approval We would
appreciate you providing said notification at your earliest convenience
Thank you in advance for your assistance
Sincerely,
G:a;JENT N.W., INC.
Richard Embry, Project Manager
RE l:-n
~
1133 164TH ST S.w I SUITE 107 I L YNNWOOD, WA 98037-8121 1(206) 742-0520 FAX (206) 742-5553
SEATTLE I PORTLAND I SAN DIEGO
4< Mem"","
InternatIonal Coun<;il
of ShopprngCenters
6. The city made it known that it will conduct inspections for
the water and sewer. The varioUs tests will be "put on" by
the contractor and observed by the city. 24 hours notice is
required for these inspections.
7. The issue of work on weekends was broached. The city stated
that stormwater work could proceed on the weekend since an
independent inspector was responsible for that portion of the
work. Mark R. Cook raised the issue of compliance with the
City of Yelm Municipal Code as it relates to weekend work. It
was left as provided that there are no neighborhood
complaints. Weekend work shall not include any work requiring
city inspection. Tim Peterson (City of Yelm) cautioned
against utility breaks on the weekend.
8. The Plaza Drive access location was raised by Don Cunningham.
Towards the close of the meetlng, Mark R. Cook, John Knowles
(SCA), the project architect and Don Cunningham examined the
impact of the proposed realignment. It was determined the
proposed realignment was significant enough to warrant a
redesign of the stormwater facilities in that area. It was
agreed that the redesign take place and Mark R. Cook committed
to a timely review of the redesign. A new sheet will be
created (signed by the city engineer) and a note added to the
other sheets that the realignment will appear on all of the
civil drawings at the time of the "as-builts".
9. Traffic control was stressed by Mark R. Cook when working
within the city right-of-way(s).
10. In closing, Mark R. Cook discussed the unresolved issues
regarding access. It was reiterated that prior to receiving
an occupancy permit, these issues would be resolved to the
satisfaction of the ci ty. Douglas Sherrow (GRAHAM
Contracting) inquired as to the possibillty of obtaining a
temporary occupancy permit in the event that the access issues
discussed remain unresolved at the time of constructlon
completion. Mark R. Cook indicated that he would not support
such a thing and that he would recommend against it to the
building official.
The summary above is the recollection of the Assistant City
Engineer as to those issues that specifically involve the City of
Yelm. The above discussion may not exactly reflect the sequence i~
which they occurred. If I have misunderstood any of the issues,
resolutions and/or commitments that are referenced above, please
let me know.
If you have any questions, please contact the Clty of Yelm' s
Englneering Department at 458-8816.
Sincerely,
~~
Mark R. Cook
Assistant City Engineer
cc: Douglas Sherrow
Graham Contracting LTD.
3214 16th Avenue SW
Seattle, WA 98134
Dan Brown
AERO Construction Company
POB 295
Snohomish, WA 98290
Dan Reed
puget Power
203 1st Street North
Yelm, WA 98597
John Knowles
SCA
719 Sleater-Kinney Road
Suite 120
POB 3485
Lacey, WA 98503
Sharon Kresse
2316 South State Street
Tacoma, WA 98405
Gary McKay
2348 Holgate South
Tacoma, WA 98402
Shelly Badger
City of Yelm
Gene Borges
City of Yelm
Tim Peterson
City of Yelm
Jerry Prock
City of Yelm
Wally Purdun
105 Second Street SE
POB 593
Yelm, WA 98597
CITY OF YELM
ORDINANCE NO ~
AN ORDINANCE adopting a Drainage Design and Erosion Control Manual for
the City of Yelm
WHEREAS, as property is developed, the amount of impermeable surfaces
such as roads, streets and parking areas grows This increases the
amount of surface water runoff and greatly alters natural runoff
patterns; and
I
WHEREAS, if not properly controlled and managed, this increased runoff
tends to cause problems such as erosion and flooding, and carrying
contaminants into fresh and marine waters; and
---"
WHEREAS, the City of Yelm needs written guidelines addressing drainage
design and erosion control for projects so that both the city staff and
all property owners, developers and contractors can better plan and
implement development projects;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YELM, STATE OF
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS;
Section 1. The document titled "Drainage Design and Erosion Control
Manual for Thurston County and the Cities of Lacey, Olympia, and
Tumwater," dated September 1, 1991, hereinafter called "Manual" and copy
of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk, is hereby adopted
as an official document for use in reviewing and approving all
development projects within the City of Yelm, with the modifications
noted in sections 2 and 3 of this ordinance
Section 2. The soils typing and infiltration rates determination
specified in section 4 4 1 of the Manual may also be performed by a
licensed civil engineer or person working under the supervision of a
licensed civil engineer
Section 3. In addition to the criteria for biofilters shown in section
7 4 1 of the Manual titled "Biofilters", the following criterion is
added "For conveyance channels in areas where the Administrator
determines the soils are too pervious to allow the required pre-
treatment to occur, the Administrator may require sealing of conveyance
channels by lining with a layer of tighter soils or other impervious
materials "
Section 4. If any provision of this ordinance or its application to any
person or property is held to be invalid, the remainder of the ordinance
and its application to other persons or circumstances is not affected
Section 5. This ordinance shall be effective on gf- ~~ , 1993,
being a date not less than five days following pu lication
ADOPTED THIS
Lr.~
{;..- DAY OF
Fi b r LJ {ita
/
1993
Robert A Sanders, Mayor
ATTEST
Agnes P Colombo, City Clerk
PASSED AND APPROVED
PUBLISHED Nisqually Valley News,
?-fO
,;;( - f,f
, 1993
, 1993
CITY OF YELM
ORD INANeE NO 458
PAGE 1 OF 1
-'" t.
MINUTES
YELM PLANNING COMMISSION
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1993, 4:00 PM
YELM CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Agenda Item/
Motion No
1. The Meeting was called to order at 4:00 by Chairman Tim
Schlosser.
Members present: Roberta Longmire, E. J. Curry, John
Kinnee, Tim Schlosser, Jim Keyes, Torn Cundy, Torn Gorman
and George Knight. Joe Huddleston left due to illness.
Guests: Margaret Clapp, Yelm Chamber of Commerce; Dennis
Su, KCM; Robert Thorpe, Thorpe & Associates, Bob Beaupre,
Gramor Development. Deborah McAlexander, Al Johnston and
Ted Foreid. Staff present: Shelly Badger, Jerry Prock,
Tim Peterson and Agnes Colombo,
Agenda additions/deletions:
Agenda Item #5 Rainier View Shopping Center was
withdrawn by the proponent.
93-09
Clarification of 1/25/93 Motion No. 93-02 indicated
that the Planning Commission's intent through the motion
was that no left into the McDonald's site be permitted
from Yelm Avenue until a 3rd/turn lane is added and that
the city engineer's recommendations be followed. The
Commission stated its preference would be to also not
permit left turns out of the site onto Yelm Avenue.
MOTION BY JOHN KINNEE, SECONDED BY ROBERTA LONGMIRE THAT
THE JANUARY 25, 1993 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES BE
APPROVED AS PRESENTED. MOTION CARRIED.
2.
The East "50711 zoning (ANX8042 tabled from the January
regular meeting) was tabled to the next regular meeting
on March 15, 1993.'::~ ,He... ~~~ L{ c ~ I -' '.J ': j -
The Commission would like clarification from City Council
on squaring of annexation issues. Questioned is whether
squaring up of boundaries for individual annexations
should still be considered or if this policy should no
longer be considered by the Commission as annexations now
fall within Yelm's Urban Growth Boundary.
Commission members felt the proposed C-3 Low Traffic
Commercial Zone being requested for a portion of the
"507" annexation should be formally adopted through an
Ordinance of City Council prior to being recommended for
use by the Planning Commission.
3. prairie Creek Subdivision (SUB8079) Preliminary Plat.
The Planning commission had recommended approval of the
plat with conditions applying to stub roads and meeting
ci ty engineer's requirements. Members were given and
reviewed a copy of a letter to the developer (Leo
Deathrage) which addressed City requirements for the
YELH PLANNING C~"ISSION
FEBRUARY 22, 1993
PAGE 1
Agenda Item/
Motion No
development. Commission members stated their opposition
to granting access directly onto Middle Road from any of
the lots. Members felt that access to all lots,
including existing lots, should be through the
development access only.
4. Nisqually Plaza Site Plan (SPR8074) Continued Publlc
Hearing. The public hearing was opened at 4:20 p.m. by
Tim Schlosser. Shelly Badger explained that improvements
for the north side of the road will run from Clark Rd. to
Plaza Dr. Improvements being made were through the
combined efforts of all the property owners. Frontage
improvements will include a light at the existing exit
that will control traffic into and out of the Plaza and
from Vancil Rd. (similar to the light at Sixth and
Sleater-Kinney in Lacey) as well as the highway. Also
planned is channelization and a blke path along the
route.
Bob Beaupre, - Gramor Development, stated that Gramor and
Key Bank had reached an agreement about blending their
properties and Gramor's concept. He also stated that he
didn't believe that the Plaza should have to provide
space for a bus stop, which could result in the loss of
approximately 20 parking spaces. Discussion on the
matter with InterCity Transit is continuing at this
point. When questioned Beaupre said that at this time it
didn't look like Jayhawks would continue in the Plaza
that unresolved issues for both parties exist.
Deborah Mcalexander - submitted a letter requesting that
approval of the site plan include a requirement that the
roadway issue be resolved. Bob Beaupre stated that he
was working with and would continue to work with the
McAlexanders to resolve differences and improve access to
their property.
Shelly Badger pointed out that the Planning Commission
would be giving final approval of the site plan, it would
not go before the City Council. Any restrictions or
conditions imposed by the Commission would be enforced by
the Yelm Building Department.
John Kinnee questioned access from what are proposed fast
food pads. Bob Beaupre replied that while the conceptual
plans indicated this use, users had not been tied down
for the sites and that businesses other than fast food
could go onto the sites.
Jim Keyes stated that he had no problems with the site
plan and that he did not favor attaching conditions. He
also fel t the Ci ty' s suggested requirement for
lmprovements on 103rd to the end of the Texaco property
was not objectionable.
YElIt PLANNING COMISSION
FEBRUARY 22, 1993
PAGE 2
Agenda Item/
Motion No
93-10
93-11
6 .
Public Hearing was closed at 4:40 p.m.
MOTION BY JIM KEYES, SECONDED BY TOM GORMAN RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF THE SUBMITTED SITE PLAN CONDITIONAL UPON
RESOLUTION OF THE MCALEXANDER AND GRAMOR JOINT DRIVEWAY
ISSUE AND THAT ABSOLUTELY NOTHING BE DONE ON THE PROPERTY
PRIOR TO RESOLVING THE ISSUE.
Johnston mini-warehouse Site Plan (SPR8083) Public
Hearing. The Public Hearing was opened at 4:45 by Tim
Schlosser.
Shelly Badger explained that the original, scaled down
version of this project, had been submitted to the City
in 1989. The project is before the Commission now
because it has increased in size.
Tom Gorman questioned using gravel instead of paving the
driveway. Discussion on the driveway indicated that an
existing mini-storage, within the clty, has been allowed
to build additional units without being required to pave.
Members wanted staff to check the legality of: a)
requiring paving on this project considering that the
project was originally submitted in 1989 and, b)
requiring paving when an existing business is operating
without paving.
Members discussed frontage improvements and the possible
deferment of the requirement. Keyes stated that while
the City had deferred improvements In the past this
should be based solely on the needs of the City, not the
developer. When questioned Jerry Prock, Yelm Building
Inspector, stated that he had seen it done both ways.
Schlosser emphasized that it should be for the benefit of
the City.
Al Johnston, project developer, felt that sidewalks could
wait due to the upcoming sewer project. Shelly Badger
explained that the sewer lines had a very small diameter
and should not be an issue. Tim Schlosser explained that
unless the City indicates to the Commission that they
want improvements deferred the Commission is inclined to
not allow deferments.
Al Johnston expressed his desire to begin the project as
soon as possible.
Public Hearing closed at 5:00.
MOTION BY TOM CUNDY, SECONDED BY JOHN KINNEE TO TABLE THE
ISSUE UNTIL THE MARCH 1, 1993 MEETING WHEN INFORMATION AS
TO THE LEGALITY OF QUESTIONS RAISED CAN BE CLARIFIED BY
CITY STAFF. MOTION CARRIED.
YEUI PLANNING CO'UUSSIOH
FEBRUARY 22, 1993
PAGE 3
Agenda Item/
Motion No
93-13
7 .
Mini-Warehouse in Coounercial Zone Public Hearing. Public
Hearing opened and closed. Commission members
reemphasized their concern about permitting the location
of mini-warehouse facilities in commercial zones. C-1 was
intended more with pedestrian traffic in mind, not for
traffic oriented businesses.
8 .
Southwest Yelm Annexation - Members discussed the minutes
from the February 1, 1993 Planning Commission Meting.
MOTION BY TOM GORMAN, SECONDED BY GEORGE KNIGHT THAT
MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 1, 1993 BE APPROVED AS CORRECTED.
MOTION CARRIED.
CORRECTION: ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED CONDITIONAL TO
RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL OF THE SOUTHWEST YELM
ANNEXATION:
Waste water Rainier School District
Transportation Ground water supply
Concurrency Wetlands
population estimates
Planning mitigation
ISSUES NEEDING TO BE ADDRESSED AT SOME POINT, BUT NOT
INCLUDED AS CONDITIONS TO BE MET FOR APPROVAL
RECOMMENDATION:
population estimates
Storm water
wildlife
Coounercial element
Rural use buffers
Planning mitigation
Lifestyle impacts
Power lines
Rural use buffers
Historic structures,
etc.
Tim Schlosser asked for the feelings of the group. Torn
Gorman asked if the goal/intent/objectives addressed in
the Draft EIS were adequate?
Shelly Badger explained that the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement was for the annexation only. Issues
raised would be addressed by the City Council in the
final EIS, some issues wouldn't be known until the
actual platting phase of the project.
Dennis Su, KCM, and Robert Thorpe, Thorpe & Associates,
explained that the final EIS for Annexation would go to
the City Council for approval. If approved it then goes
to the Thurston Co. Boundary Review Board for approval.
Approval would be for annexation with the current 1
dwelling per 5 acre zoning. (This process would be
repeated at each stage of the development, i.e. zoning,
platting. )
Roberta Longmire questioned the Rainier School District
lssue.
Dennis Su pointed out that they (KCM) could choose to do
nothing, some cities are in more than one school
district, Lacey for example. It is also possible that
YEUM PlANNING C~ISSION
FEBRUARY 22, 1993
PAGE 4
Agenda Item/
Motion No
when developed residents could submit a petition to be in
the Yelm School District or, some land could be
exchanged/switched. KCM has been in contact with the
Rainier Superintendent and will be meeting with the
School Board. The goal is not to have the School
District invoke jurisdiction.
John Kinnee explained the funding issues raised when
children attend schools outside their district.
Petitioning is allowed by law, however, the district that
gains students doesn't get full funding benefit. Taxes
would continue to go to the district that the home is
physically located in.
Robert Thorpe, Thorpe & Associates, stated that in his
conversations with Rainier School District they have made
their position very clear, they will not glve up any
land.
George Knight pointed out that there didn't appear to be
a way to be more objective at this point. Tim Schlosser
questioned if the Commission should indicate a preference
of one of the scenarios offered in the EIS.
93-14
MOTION BY GEORGE KNIGHT, SECONDED BY TOM GORMAN
RECOMMENDING COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE SOUTHWEST YELM
ANNEXATION DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
CONTINGENT UPON SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSING ISSUES RAISED
AND IDENTIFIED AT THE FEBRUARY 1, 1993 PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING (SEE MOTION 93-12). MOTION CARRIED.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:00 p.m.
Submitted,
, ,I) //j /' j"
l~i/1J {J f-/ L t'-r jrrI 'vQ
YELJt PlANNING COMISSION
FEBRUARY 22, 1993
PAGE 5
February 22, 1993
10230 Green Lane South West
Tacoma, Washington, 98499
Re: NiSlually Plaza Site Review
Dear Planning Commissioners,
Please refer to our letter of January 23, 1993. We are again writing
about the building located along State Route 507, and located essentially West
of the planned site development.
We request that if the Planning Commission approves the site plan for
the new development, there be some sort of requirement or resolution that the
issue of the roadway through our property, be resolved, before the Council
grants final approval of the plan.
o
There has, as yet, been no resolution of this problem. We are willing
to work with GraiIDor' on resolving the issue. Perhaps some sort of proportional
placement of roadway on both properties may be a solution.
In studying the site plan for the new development, we note that they
allow 60 feet between the two edge lines of a two sided row of angle parking.
25 feet is allowed for the turn radius between the two sides, and 17t feet
of length is allowed for each parking stall. This totals 42.5 feet for one
stall, plus the 25 foot turning radius. We have 46 feet between the concrete
parking curbing and the edge of our property, along the roadway in question.
Thus, by Gramor's planning, using undoubtedly correct vehicular allowances,
we need most all of our property to safely back out vehicles from our premises.
Safe access in and out is a very major concern. Hany cars travel far too
fast on this roadway. Not only do they not slow down from the highway speed,
many speed up, adding to the danger.
I enclose a copy of the recorded survey of our property, done by Jim
Keyes in September of 1991. It shows the distances I mention, and also the amount
of roadway presently located on our property.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
Respectfully,
~~
Robert A. HcAlexander
i);pA-Ghed,/ 2J I 7rlrC2~;?i'~v4~/
De borah G. McAlexander . ,
~
ili
Washington State
Department of Transportationf~B \ l) \99'3
Duane Berentson t
Secretary of Transportation
.....~--
\ District 3 Headquarters
5720 Capitol Boulevard, Tumwater
\ POBox 47440
qlympia, WA 98504-7440
,
i
__--~(206) 357-2600
-- Fax (206) 357-2601
-~<--.-
February 8, 1993
Shelly Badger
City of Yelm
Planning and Building Dept.
POBox 479
Yelm, WA 98597
Nisqually Plaza Shopping Center
SR 507, MP 28 91 Vicinity
E.C File No 93030-T
Dear Ms Badger
We have received and reviewed the above proposal and have the following comments
Any changes to SR 507 shall conform the WSDOT Design Manual and shall be subject
to Headquarters review prior to final approval. The Department requests the
opportunity to review and comment upon all proposed changes to the existing state route
during the design process
Road improvements on SR 507 shall require the execution of a 'Local Agency
Agreement' prior to constructIOn. The essential components of that agreement will
include, final desIgn drawings approved by the WSDOT Headquarters Design Engmeer,
project cost estimates, special conditions specific to thIS project and a traffic control
plan TypIcally It takes four months to execute a complete agreement.
In addition, the Department requests that the CIty agree to and execute an I Overhead
RecIprocating Agreement' with the WSDOT
Thank you for the opportumty to review the above proposal If there are any questions
regarding our comments, please contact Fred Tharp at (206)357-2667
Sincerely,
PAULA J HAMMOND P E.
Transportation Planning Engineer
District 3
~6;k
By PASCO BAKOTICH, ill, P E.
Asst. Trans Planning Engineer
District 3
PJCH
PB fot
cc N Williams
Bob Hazlett / S Chamberlain & Assoc /719 Sleater-Kinney Rd. SE / Lacey, W A 98503
File 93030- T
6'
Yelrn leleohone
-CDrnpany
Communications fOil" tooay & tomoll"row
~:;-I-~
J I ':" ~, ,! r.:- -..
1;11 ,I,,~ \0' r~~
;/ L.' J r--::~-~.,.< 1(-- if:-, :---..
If" -~".'lj,,0~~
j; r I ~' . \ I I> ~
- _...t...... I r::t I r-
/lli i:-- ....'>'1,\
J U rt/j ._;/
j/J U! 8 _ /i!
'~ ,IJi
, f ~, f I
~
Department: ot Commnunl ty Develc -.- . '"
PO Box 479
Yelm WA 98597
RE Nisqually Plaza Slt:e PLan
Dear 1'11' St:amm
After revlewing the aoove mentioned project we have the fOllowing
concerns
l)What does the developer plan t:o do wlth existing
ut:illty easements
2)What easements does ne plan to provide for future
expansion
3)Concern eXlsts as to hOW the developer pLans to
communicate with the utility companles
If you have further questions or desire further itiformation please
feel free t:o contact me at (206) 4~8-5343
uncerer- fb6
wa~' Purdun
Fa~~r~les Englneer
105 Second Street S.E. D Po. Box 593
Yelm, WA D 98597 D (206) 458-2171
A subsidiary of COMERCO, INC. t
100% Recycled Paper
~r'~~~~u;;;,...~.
CITY OF
YELM
POBox 479
Yelm, WA 98597
\::
t:
2 If / f J
Date:
To:
/)~ /e HI-lt?O
YELM
WASHINGTON
f/J; 8Jf/
~~ -~-
City Hall
Phone 458-3244
Yelm Municipal Court
Phone 458.3242
Police Department
__ Phone 458-5701
(' j/J:Jfrl ell. tlE!/E! () //1 F-j
IllY
L //L-'/~
/ (. '/:T /-I f:7 J".tv. .) v 11>-- / () 7
/
,/ i (. II,.'? /I 1//
~r' /I,Ai
j.-
1,'- () c. ,0
~
w)1 :7))' r;;l? -?/2/
i r /_1//1" RIA- t
I t
:71-/lf I C /f"/?' FdA yo",e
Ie T ft./? L f,. Y /;Jir,"'rv(//;
/ '- E /7)1' (IJ '" 7 r /'
/17 It' /~71 u /~ ~
~ ;:J P" " IVI
/ - j ;-/1/
~
,
,I
j
j
A
,
j
.j
:1
1
~
j
i
j
J
'J
'j
j
1
~
J
1
'1
~
1
I
:j
I
~~ .e:e'lr: NJl-~
f\J' IS'iyJ\1 ~~
~
? A "", [. "" lJ I~"ll '" IL \ ( i;!. \
L ~V ~.~,-
I </dJ.... _;W,...r i~ ~
0; V I
/
'V~ ~ e..- ~
~('..).<:J .. ~ :\ ~ ~~ f"5( '\\~
W..)..-~ ... V>~ ,'\
~ ~ 1000 l-\""IL-u" t;?/f!;.~
._ I, ~~
\) ~~ \~,^,:(j(\
~~~
/~----...
.,..-
,)
/' V)
1)
~I---'
3~
~r1
-::: G~6~
(j " \. ~.,''''
~ ,V'-'\.J" ~
Ce c iA-G"'- ~..........
~~
~\1NN'"'-
;/ ~
/ ~
I G~
~
\
~~~ \..&~~
lI-r~ \ j 'I""
~ \ u.a?! .
<r, 1::" S~ \....\ '('oS "'-
fe.(,4 - O'bGtS
J~'~
."",111111111111111////// / /
Intercity r ran s i f!
January 25, 1993
526 S, Pattison Street, Post Office Box 659
Olympia, Washington 98507-0659
(206) 786-8585
Mr. Tim Schlosser
Chairman
Yelm Planning Commission
City of Yelm
PO Box479
Yelm, W A 98597
Re: Nisqually Plaza Shopping Center
Dear Mr. Schlosser:
Intercity Transit is very interested in working with the City and the developer to secure
bus service for NisquallY Plaza Shopping Center The shopping center will be a
significant generator of vehicle trips in Yelm once it is developed. It will also be a
major draw for other county residents. Bus service to the shopping center will mitigate
some of its vehicular traffic as well as provide a source of customers
Intercity Transit plans to provide hourly service between Lacey and Yelm and other
south county towns beginning this fall. The redeveloped shopping center would be a
good location for a small transit center as a destination pomt to transfer passengers
between these services By locating a park & ride lot at the shopping center, Yelm and
south county commuters could take advantage of bus connections to the urban area as
well as the shopping center's services.
We have held a preliminary discussion with city staff and developer representatives on
how best to route buses and transit vans through the shopping center While no
agreement has been reached, Intercity Transit believes the best location for a bus
pullout area would be along the main entrance by the proposed drugstore. This
location would enable transit passengers to have convenient access to the main anchors.
It would also provide flexibility in routing buses and transit vans through the shopping
center should the parcel to the south east be developed. Another important advantage
of this location 1S that 1t mmimizes trans1t vehicle routing along the fire lanes adjacent
to the shopping center We recogmze that locating the bus pull out area near the drug
store will mean that 9 parking stalls will be lost. However, this 1S only about 1.5% of
the total parking available.
There 1S a potentlal for traffic problems with the 22 parking stalls located adjacent to
the proposed shops at the south-east end of the site. These parking stalls are likely to
OJ
Mr. Tim Schlosser
January 25, 1993
Page 2
be problematic for vehicles exiting from the bank as well as for vehicles entering the
shopping center from the south-east entrance. This problem could be resolved by
removing these stalls or by significantly increasing the width of the firelane so that cars
exiting these stalls will not conflict with other traffic.
Intercity Transit looks forward to working with the City and the developer on this
important project. Please call me at 786-8585, should you have any questions or
comments
Sincerely,
8kF<<- ~{,c4~(U/b
Stefan Fabian-Marks
Senior Transit Planner
SFM/sfm
cc: Randy Riness, Director of Planning
Todd Stamm, City of Yelm
~.r ...........
\
1 ' " lAM 2. 5 \993 " \)\\
\\ \\ \ ~, \~ January 23, 1993
\\uL--.-----' \10230 Green Lane South West
'P .. .. .. acoma, \iashington, 98499
, .
Re: Nisqually Plaza Site Review
Dear Planning Commissioners,
We are the owners of the building (existing) located essentially West of
the planned site development, and located along State Route 507.
We would like to commend all concerned in the schematic plan for the site.
It will retain a sense of openess, have well marked parking, and excellent
placement of the shops and buildings.
We do, however, find the entrance and egress located next to our building
to be unacceptable. Sometime in the summer of 1991, without our knowledge or'"
consent, a portion of the entrance to the State Highway at the edge of our build-
ing and closest to the existing Jayhawks, was blocked off by parking berms, and
all traffic entering from what is essentially the West side of that huge property
and serving the retail center recently developed on Algier's Drive, and also
traffic to Jayhawks and adjoining businesses, CQIlle through what has been parking
for our building. At noon or day's end, it is really dangerous to back out into
this traffic. All but approximately 7t feet of that new roadway is on our
property.
In fact, it is very dangerous at any time of day, as customers of our
Center back almost directly into the outgoing lane of traffic.
I parked my mid-size station wagon directly flush with the curbing surrounding
our building. There is only 17t feet of lane available for my car to back out,
before I cross the center line dividing the two lanes. An Oldsmobile two door
Omega parked extending sixteen inches over the curb of our building had 18 feet
4 inches of turn space before it crossed the center lane divider line. Pick ups
and vans have even less space to manuver.
I have received numerous comments from tennants about the dificulty manuver-
ing, and the speed with which cars enter and leave the area on that road.
j
This is not an acceptable use of our property.
We wonder about therollowing suggestions:
An entry site for the new development located just East of Fast Food Pad #3.
It would lead directly to the Algiers Drive Shops, the proposed future shops, and
the Fast Food Pad. Such an entrance would be about 38t feet beyond the main
entrance and signal light entering the Center, the same distance as the ~ntrance
to Fast Food Pad #1 from the primary entrance. We recognize the State will only
allow a certain number of Highway entrances and at certain intervals. This inter-
val, being the same as the one by Fast Food Pad #1 may be acceptable to them.
This would, however, leave the highway entrance to our property closer than that
interval. vlould we be "Grandfathered In?"
-'
Nisqually Plaza Site Review-2
Obviously this l,olestern entrance to the site is planned to ca:rry heavy traffic,
as shown by the turn lane for those heading toward the center of Yelm. Traffic
will be much greater on these lanes than it is now.
The most logical solution would seem to be unblocking the portion of highway
entry that was covered with parking berms in the summer of 1991, and placing
two lanes of traffic on the property involved in the new site development. This
would leave our property for parking by our tenants and customers, and carry the
expected volume of traffic for the new center.
We had understood that a master plan was beiJlg developed for thepew site,
and had hoped it would solve the problem of use of our parking area for a roadway
to other property. Unfortunately, this is not the case.
We met with a Planner in the early summer. His suggestions included land-
scaping of about four feet abutting the new site being developed. This would
""
tie our property "together" and help prevent it looking so rather sterile. As you
are aware, we have vinyl clad the building, done a new roof, placed illuminated
canopy awnings, and done some major interior remodeling. We had hoped to begin
this process in the spring or fall.
IV'e appreciate your consideration of our concerns. We believe you will agree
tha t the roadway as it exists and is proposed, constitutes a taking of our
property, and in addition lessens its value and is unacceptable to us.
Respec-tfully,
~~~~
Robert A. McAlexander
1J:d~7;2.t J(/t )/J~~ndc~-'
Deborah G. McAlexander
~. liJ.\:
i \ I
Key Bank of Washington
<\ KevCorp Bank
~<>-w
S2BANK
Propenies & POlchat"iir'lg
1321 '14lh AVi"fiUA East
fac:(Jrn;;, WilshinglQn 98424-1103
January 25, 1993
Todd Stamm
City of Yehn
Planning Department
Fax Number 458-4348
Re: Nisqually Plaza
Dear M1:'. stanun:
We are in receipt of the proposed site plan for abov~ referenced
project. We fully support the idea of a redevelopment of this
property and desire to cooperate with the developers to this end.
We have COnCe1:'hS, however, regarding the propose.d site plan. While
we have not completed a formal analysis of the project and .Lts
lrnpact on our banking facility, our preliminary review raises
several issues which we feel should be add1:'essed by the developer.
These are as follows:
1. Traffic Circulation: Our banking operations attract
significant vehicle traff~c which needs to be addressed.
Peak days can produce up to 1000 customer visits to the
d1:'ive-up facility alone. We do not believe that the
current plan provides for adequate ingress 01:' eg1:'ess from
the facility.
2. Exist~nq Easements: The proposed development appears to
encroach onto an easement granted in the deed to the bank
property. This easement is noted on the attached
existing site plan.
3. ~tinage Field/Surface Water Retention: Our existing
facility utilizes a drainage field and surface water
retention swale on the east s~de of the property. We
believe that the operation of both items will be affected
by the proposed development.
We would request that a 30-day cont~nuat~on of the hearing on
this project be granted. We would propose using th~s
additional time to more fully review the site plan and
coordinate our efforts with thOS(=J of Grcnnot- Development
N. W., Inc.
Arn9m::a '" nelghborhocd bank
II I - _ S - I
1 PLl
[- u (
;P: a l'~.l. ...;:) ~J;J
- "\60-
.l'!.l.l r-..\A ..1l0 :)/.. ;)lJ/:)
r~a bbnbK4L ~Vl ~
L.f[JUlJ... lJlJ..
};1-
*Todd st.amrn
City of Yelm
1/25/93
Page Two
Please feel free to oontact rue at (206) 593-3939 should you have
any question!;> in this regard. Thank you for your time and effort
in this matter.
SincerelYI
KEY BANK OF WASHINGTON
Q/~ .1
/GuiL_t :{' ~~~~,
Kendall ~~ eman
Corporate Real Estate Officer
KSB:lb
cc: Ron Peterson
Gramor Development N.W., Inc.
Lyle Burstad/yelm Branch Manager
i l
lie. ! H/j
[ 11-
I
i
-..
City of Yelul
105 Yelm Avenue W~'Jt
POBox 479
y elm, Washington 98591
206-458-3244
January 21
1993
Gramor Development NW Inc
1133 164th St SW #107
Lynnwood, WA 98037-8121
Attn. Richard Embry
Subject Site Plan #8078
Dear Mr Embry,
Enclosed 1S a copy of a staff memorandum regarding the slte
plan of your proposed shopping center remodel in Yelm
Copies of this memo are being provided to the Planning
Commission and the City Council and are available to the
general public As you know. your appl1cation w1ll be the
subject of a public hearing before the Commisslon at 4 00
pm, Monday, January 25 at City Hall I encourage you to
attend that hearing
You should be prepared to comment on the issues raised in
this memo when your application is considered by Commission
Please contact me if you have any questions or corrections
regarding this memo
Sincerely,
T n1/ S~
Todd Stamm,
City Planner
Enclosure.
Staff memo
PSI apologize for the late delivery of this memo;
holidays and a blt of a breeze have put us beh1nd schedule
'L'~:~'-lmE-=~~~~"H& / /
!~~~~ :,1 ~ ~ ~a~8!~~
JJ-=-=--~ t2 _~_~_!'_~!'.!"!"
i:\~;:;
~, '.0,
\'I ""'\~'i
\...\1/ - :'
It~ ""
&~ .,' OX
\1 <)\ ~
-4--00
f\10:l
~ tf:>> 0>
.. (~''O
.z ':.t"" ..(
~ ';P.: "~~~ \!1.
~(!)I:<e
"-- ~U ~, ?JlO
;\~ ~
J '\ / .~
:\ /9h
" Pc?
\
\
"
I
,
II
\
\
\ ~
l I~
\ \.
\
l-
'~
\::;--
\;....
-
~
~
;:.
..
':::.,.
-:
~,
~
~
::.-
-
;:;
..
..
::.-
':::"
':
~
..
~,
~
..
..
~
..
-::-
':::"
-;....
c_
~
~z:
<.0
to
<.Q
VJ
t'1(3@
~W~
~~
r--I ~
~~~
_ W
~
'P
\.0
Cf)
W
'fJ
"'\"\\~~ (,
fI'\U>':'" '-;:.
C\.;.\\.: '.1'
tf\\.I'V~ \-;:,
'IosJ ~... '"t"\,..
~;.V\ 01.).
~~:: ~.
~~\4 t, ,"
~'1?,":-~ ':! '~.
:...t-~.~, ':J" \
i'"' .... r'.~t.\
~.~:t. 'ZJii
~.....".~~ ....l\.t-\
~..w \$1' '~\!'
~ -\11
"""'.~ \-\ C!
QO ~.J
lJ\ \t\ f\\ \""
m~ ,\1,11
~"'\ ...,.~c.
~:.i ~\..o\
;> f', \~ ,";:,
l'" t\'\\:'''
o~,
~7
"~...
~\.
\.0.
~.
..,,,;.~
.~
'''0
......
-;t,.
...;~
"~~
~
\
I.P
--(.
';' i\
.}~.\
l;;,.
City of YellD
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
206-458-3244
January 20, 1993
To:
Yelm Planning Commission
From:
Todd Stamm, City Planner
((f
Subject: Nisqually Plaza Site Plan (SPR-8074)
Issues identified by the city staff (thus far) for consideration by
the Planning Commission
(1) Is the access package acceptable? Continued access to 103rd
with increased traffic is proposed. Continued shared access
wi th McAlexander property to the west is proposed. A new
access is proposed west of Key Bank Discontinuation of
access using "Plaza Drive" is proposed - but the adjoining
landowner is interested in arranging for shared access and/or
dedication of Plaza Drive.
(2) Should the site plan provide for internal bus access and/or
park & ride space? The City has no specific policies
regarding such provisions.
(3) Should a bike lane be provided in this section of Yelm Avenue?
The new transportation plan calls for such improvements and
the applicant proposes such a lane, but it may create a hazard
in association with right-turn lanes
(4) Should participation in the cost of Five-Corner improvements
be a condi tion of si te plan approval? (These improvements
area an existing need that will exacerbated by more
development in the vicinity)
(5) Should frontage improvements along 103rd Avenue be required?
DID YOUR
THIS NOTICE? PLEASE PASS THE WORD ALONG
City of YellD
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
206-458-3244
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NISQUALLY PLAZA SITE PLAN
The Yelm Planning Commision will hold a public hearing at 4:00
p m on Monday, January 25, 1993 to receive comments on the
proposed site plan for remodel and redevelopment of the Nisqually
Plaza located north of State Highway 507 at its intersection with
Vancil Road The proposed development would inlude removeal of an
existing 16,000 square foot building and construction of a new
"food market of 49,000 square feet, the addition of other shops
with a total of 14,400 square feet, and the addition of three
. fast food pads," plus redesign of the parking lot and its
access Additional information and copies of the site plan may
be obtained by contacting Todd Stamm, City Planner, at Yelm City
Hall, (206) 458-3244
The hearing will be held at Yelm City Hall, 105 Yelm Avenue W ,
Yelm, Washington All interested parties are invited to attend
Written comments should be directed to the Yelm Planning
Commission and may be mailed to POBox 479, Yelm, WA 98597 or
delivered to City Hall Written comments must be received prior
to the hearlng to be considered by the Commission The
Commission's decision may be appealed to the City Council
Notice issued by
Published: Nisqually Valley News, Thursday,
Posted in Three Places and at Site: I//~
Mailed to property owners within 300 feet.
Mailed to agencies: '//If 19936
DO NOT PUBLISH BELOW THIS LINE
///Y,
, 1993 .
flit(
I
1993
7k2;J/PLr r?
f) 7..o~J 1P
(1/,/)J ~b
~h4 @)
(, L~ {;tJ.L~ fiJ
T o-zIc/ Srr
Todd Stamm
City Planner
-
, 1993 @)
f() 10'
------------
11/1 S ..,. U Y ,,/I 2"
S.', /t,v,fW
~ .
j{)3R()
/'11.5 G. l/ JQ L.L Y
P/.112~
srr13
l:1-0tO\
..-
::t_02
lS-uot
..
-----
~l-LQ
__._._~___---o
\1.-10. 11.-0901
\
u-M
,.-.-
~
~
,.--
----- ll-Il
lS-O't
,0-4. \
\o-d ,.-0'
$
"
1'-- ~
...... .
,~....
..-
l" 1,-4-401
,....
~ ---.------.
';l) \.3-Go\ \
..- ~
--.-----
";l)
c:::.
~ tS-Q6
~
"....
"....
11
1,-1.6
,,-<>0
~
~
~
(\
"
r U........
';:> <€.3'
<:l
~ .
0 U-04oa
,-
......
..-..
1\-0401
tl-G'T
...--
//J/
/...i~0'3
..-
..-
<1....
.._~_._-'-~------
.....t
S\-460l
..-
II
,
i
t-
,~oo'
-f
/-/1/-93
fJ Vi'''' III!
,Ill
..
1.1-4\
ll-<ltOl
"
.
11_0urs
14-c/1101
11-0.4
~
11-
,.-
.
u--. c8> "
..-
..
..
......
41-41
......
l.
t
~
\.
~
~
"
fl
1.
\
"
I
,
t
.\
\
~
'l
1
I
1-
.
1
~
'1
t
\
-t
j-
~
t
1
i
')
<:i:!o
....
:Ie)
l
I
i
~
T
1
'I.
-,
...
(l
:b
,
,
.\
,
'\.
~
~.
1,
c~
-1
~,
9tJ17
GENE BORGES
S fr<- o()l~
STEVE GILBERT
PARAMETRIX
P O. BOX 460
SUMNER WA 98390
LARRY KAAR
?UGET ?OWER & LIGG~
? 0 BOX 486
YE LM iN fl.. 9 8 5 9 7
T~URSTON CO PUBLIC WORKS
ATTN 21LL TURNER
2000 LAKERIDGE DR SW
OLYMPIA WA 9850:
SECT
711
~ICHAEL 'iAN GELDER
PLANNING COORDINA~JR
INTERCI~Y TRANSIT
P 0.. BOX 659
OLYMPIA WA 98507
GLENN DUN~AM
,
~
THURSTON CO FIRE
ATTN BILL STEELE
P.O. BOX 777
YELM WA 98597
DEPT
WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS
ATTN CHUCK WILLIs~S
3120 MARTIN WAY EAST
OLYMPIA WA 98506
DEPARTMENT OF EC:~OG!
ATTN PAT LEE
MS LU 11
7272 CLEANWATER LN
OLYMPIA WA 98504-6811
THURSTON CO PLANNING
2000 LAKERIDGE DR SW
OL::'lvlPIA i'JA 9850:
ATTN JOHN SONNEN
OAPCA
AT TN JAMES A. WILSON
909 SLEATER KINNEY RD SE
SUITE 1
LACEY WA 98503
f
/11/
~1.M1~
/ / J 3 - /~
YE LJ.'1
ATTN
P.O.
YELM
TELEPHONE CO
GLENN MCCARTEN
BOX 593
WA 98597
WA ST DEPT OF TRANSP
DISTRICT 3 HEADQUARTERS
P.O. BOX 47440
OLYMPIA WA 98504-7440
E:'iVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DE?'='
A~~N PHIL BRINKER
2000 LAKERIDGE DR SW
C:!MPIA WA 98502
SE
!I ~ I J'/tirC.
$W I~?
PI'()J7-K-/2/
SPR 8078
GRAMOR DEVEL. NW, INC.
1133 164th ST SW #107
LYNNWOOD, WA 98037-8121
UCO OIL
PO BOX 4218
WHITTIER, CA 90607
MARILYN COFFELT
PO BOX 1201
YELM, "ltJA 98597
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH
PO BOX J
YEIM, WA 98597
HOWARD NETTLE 'ION
PO BOX 217
MCKENNA, WA 98558
ROCKY PRAIRIE CORP
17835 HWY 507 SE
YELM, WA 98597
BONNIE LITTLEJOHN
PO BOX 318
YELM, WA 98597
PSB
PO BOX 11500
TACCMi\, WA 98411
OOUG CAMERON
PO BOX 1221
YEIM, WA 98597
TEXACO
PO BOX 7813
UNIVERSAL CITY, CA 91608
ROBERT MCAlEXANDER
10230 GREEN LN SW
TACCMA, WA 98499
ARNOLD BALL
2329 LOG CABIN RD
OLYMPIA, WA 98501
OUR REDEEMER LUTHERAN CHURCH
10325 HWY 507 SE
YEIM, WA 98597
LLOYD REICHEL
12306 BALD HILL RD SE
YEIM, WA 98597
JEHOVAHS WITNESSES
16549 148th AVE SE
YELM, WA 98597
MIKE NORQUIST
14022 YELM ffiVY SE
YELM, WA 98597
PAULINE JABLONSKI
402 URSULA ST
AURORA, CO 80011
JACK PEUGH
10704 VANCIL RD SE
YELM, WA 98597
LEO LEFEBVRE
PO BOX 1056
YELM, WA 98597
PRAIRIE PARK
PO BOX 5210
YELM, WA 98597
NEIGHBORHOOD PROPERTY OWNERSHIP REQUEST
Reques ted by C(;.AI}/)?()Il0fVFI.(),/fIt'/vT AI IV, ;""~. /1 g J-/ ~Yr/l g-r .$w #/07
(Name) , (Address) L)/NNIV#t>t:;".,~ 9/t)J7..J>/~1
F, 1 e No S f? If J>' Ii 7 J>
Map attached? ~o
List Prepared By
Date mailed
Fee $50 plus $1/parcel > 50
Date Rec' d: /2./~e/,~
Reques t Rec' d By. 7T
Fee pa i d? y,.r (#-.f/'?.r;J
(ANt)
II I I I I
I TAX PARCEL ! RECORD OWNER MAILING ADDRESS I TOTAL ASSESSED I
I NUMBER OF PROPERTY VALUE (A/V) I
22 73~-//{) 1 0 U{!/) OIL- I P,O I ~O X J../~I8' I
U)Ji.if leI'" I Cd. Q()1067
M%tlL1p ,
- /1 f) / 0 PIL), Box 1;)..01 \ Vel YYl / II
('/) +el \
~1''tf5+ ~Gl".j..(s"'" , \ / II
__1/ () I ()2. PIt) I f3e))( J, \)~ I
(' f)1-IY'C
HD Wt:1.. ra I P, () ,86)( ~/7 Mc/(pnY1a 0If6# I \ / I
-II~/OI ( 1\J e++le.h~n
() ~~~~l6 Co rt> , \ / I
I -llblQY 11 1\
-II ()IO 1 1 ~OcXl,1 , III ~r ~ I-t /Ii\) so 7 SE. I \ /
I ( ('/1 I Y' (6 lJ.> rf) I
-IY~I Q / ( , I 1/ /I \ /
-/'101 ~r'\;V\le- P,I) ( Box 3/ e-, Vel WI \ /
o L 1-+l~\/) h II
"'oJ ii&' Sox ((5'OO~ 4 Y
-/217 [ PsB a~ l'Vla I? (I
-/2Ir ( I Lr L) OIl.,. 5 ee CiLM V~ 1\ I
-/I()~ () 2. ( '1)1.)lltA r31~r/)fI PI!) I 8CJ >( {;:J;ll . Y f:.-[ VlI1 I \
.J _ U'~e(sa..l Ci~ I \
-If ()2~ / ( -';:')(t:)I"'/) (J,/) I &x 7R1R, I ~ I &.,t.)
R.a6ert ,IOa.SO ~ reef14'a..n.e $W I \
-/'J./' 0 f'^L A-l eX-a.. nd.eV'" -ra.C6 VV1.a 84 qq I
- /2) ~ C u_xa ,co I \
-/~DIO/ ( Air (l/) IA 811 II ~fi~ '-t(fffoal i t1 RA / \
, -..J I \
-/2JJ() I "1\ 11 '1l 11
ou...r R.e~e(" loao<s t'"!W,"" 667 5E. J \
- /2/1 ( i.U-./..h~r-d Yl 6v1.r.d1 v .PJ YY\ .
- /212 ( LllJud l2f'-id\el t'ft.60h FXth::t: HIt / ~ 5E I \
\.. ~J lIVl
-/2J,j ( ~e.~ v tthS I 'C.t;5'1 q II.{ 'ff+h A ve. s~ I \
. )t ne5Ses \J p, {W\
I l \
-121Y (J 1/ Il II
. , ~L..J Of,'~ 't' el y\rt N-Wl.( :S~
-I J. I.> . tf\ I Ke N 0 (11 /J 15+ ~_ VY\
.../1 03 , Ifa..tlt l V\e- \I ief('tr~s CA./ t~ ~+ t)OO II
Ja.. 10 nt'l)( I
-IIOy ( : ~cJ( P ~u.a h 1~..f>704 Va.Y\.c.t I Kcl Sf
elWl
\J
-I '/03 ( Le.o Lc;~ebv re PJ) ,60)( 105ro. Y~IYYl
.
F ;: 1 e No
Page L of 2..
NEIGHBORHOOD PROPERTY OWNERSHIP REQUEST
Requested by
(Name)
(Address)
Fee. $50 plus $1/parcel > 50
Date Rec'd:
Request Rec'd By.
Fee paid?
F i 1 e No
Map attached?
List Prepared By
Da t email ed .
17C K .rfftl .
1M' .,~-/
II I I II
I TAX PARCEL , RECORD OWNER MAILING ADDRESS I TOTAL ASSESSED I
I NUMBER OF PROPERTY i VALUE (A/V)
~iJf()- 3)dl/ C l Pt1. ('~ I P II) , &x ~::210, '\) ~I YYl I
f r"al r I ~ I
I "
-()l7fJ'- -e- II
-()/7b/ 1 I'
II
-I)/g I
I -de,/ W I I
I I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
F ;: 1 e No
Sf//( -fc7~
Page Z. of '2...
01 17:'13
1:3 29
GPAr-'-lOP DE' JELOPflEtn [-j Ld , U-j'= ... <=J:Jc, '-t_,_
(GRAHOR
GRAMOR DEVELOPMENT N. W., tHe
'133-164th St. S W #107, Lynnwood, WA 98037-8121
(206) 742-0520 · (206) 742-5553 FAX
FAX TRANSMISSION SH~ET
~:,,-~;,1;; ~=-~_~,___~ ~~l#B~~_~l1:t~~
#Of Pages Including this st\eet r
Rema~s -
_ /'.e: ;:;;.~ ~ If~ --
--ilL ~ b- /'~ --Yue"~ "~
~__ ~ d~ WU-fflbJ) ~-t4' ~L_~
_~~ ~~k~, ;T_,/~
~~Z~~-,~tiL~~
~ -- ;~~ ~ r~i ,Lh..-
A~.tl<I. i!t- ~ i::2C:~/ .~~~_ _ ~/6
t':~A7{~;.t. ~~~~::;;i-- A:tv -:
.____~~-.-_----.-0/L-"--~~?l~~.-- ~. -- --::;f--.-
fill
-~.
s. Chamberlain & Associates, Inc.
Letter of Transmittal
Datc: 1/15/0(3
..- - ~;::::-:;::::----
,.. ,(
~'~ :: \'.
1 ! t r- ,.
f j
t! '.( JAN 2 2 1993 t
':;'1\ '; Ib'
~l.i\'~~- J
1 "
L_----.
ProJcct NumberlName: q Zoo::;-'
TO: I-Av fYeof ~
\A/S1=b / -. D1\strlcA-3
Sq-D Co-p t' 1-0 i 131 vd
We arc scndmg you. T LAV0-WtILW Cf gSO'L
COPICS
Datc
DcscrIptlOn
if A
a?o-.-
Thcsc are transmIttcd as chcckcd below'
For Your Usc. X
1"01. Rcview & Comment:
For Your Approval.
As Requested. X
Approved As Noted.
Returned for Correctlons:
Comments:
~ ta"'NA?NEP' TW S~ IPtx.5> reF ~
GtvOly~ 6rJ.(A.[e-( ~+ CZcc.e~s: -to -plcA~ "Dr) Vi2. t()u..K'"
5~ CASsu..W'e-S C<...ccess' ()..J0~~s ~ s I\k.-P/~
Slgtl~d. I c:k> +,) ( .
s. Cham crlniu :::SO~in~~n~L(. Per {-@v.e. 0 V--Y [,Iv'-t'+f~~
~ 0~.e.s. vVl#-Otp{- ~ CA.-CUL5S.
. [,.Ui?' ~ S - 1-<ZCL~- ~ r ~S
Engineering, l'lanning, and Surveying Servic
-Kinney Road 51: Suile 120 . I' O. Box 3485 lacey, Washinglon 90503-04G5
(206) 493-6002 . (907) 279.5929 (206) 493-2476 FAX
cc ~
72lclAavd Evf^.~ I ,4 ra~r 1:;;t;w.elo~+ 10/,J
TCldd .s-ITA~~-I-....) L' ch c+ Ye I w--.. ( -
DID YOUR
THIS NOTICE? PLEASE PASS THE WORD ALONG
City of Yelm.
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
206-458-3244
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RAINIER VIEW SHOPPING CENTER REZONE
The Yelm Plannlng Commision will hold a public hearing at 4.00
p m on Monday, January 25, 1993, to receive comments on the to
change the zoning of approximately twenty acres southeast of
State Highway 510 CRainler Highway) from Residential Agriculture
to Commercial (C-1) to permit development of a shopping center
and to amend the Yelm Comprehensive Plan accordingly The area
to be rezoned is more specifically descrlbed as the northerly
two-thirds of that part of the west one-half of the northeast
quarter of sectlon 25 township 17 north, range 1 east W M
identified by Thurston County Assessor's parcel number
21725130300 and being located adjacent to Hlghway 510 and
southwesterly of 104th Avenue Additional information and a map
of the site may be obtained by contacting Todd Stamm, City
Planner at Yelm Clty Hall (206) 458-3244
The hearlng will be held at Yelm City Hall, 105 Yelm Avenue W ,
Yelm, Washington All interested parties are invited to attend
Written comments should be directed to the Yelm Planning
Commission and may be mal led to POBox 479, Yelm WA 98597 or
delivered to City Hall Written comments must be received prior
to the hearing to be considered by the Commission The
Commisslon's declsion wl1l be in the form of a recommendation to
the City Council
Notice issued by.
~~
Todd Stamm
City Planner
DO NOT PUBLISH BELOW THIS
LINE
II/y,
/
1993
1993
Published. Nisqually Valley News, Thursday,
Mailed to property owners within 300 feet.
Mailed to agencies: 1993
Pc7?
Ryal~!~~t&"
....- '
c;; fit ~'t5; t
YELM, WASHINGTON 98597
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF WASHINGTON
County of Thurston
D R Miller
, being first duly sworn on
oath deposes and says that she/he is the edi tor
of the Nisqually Valll~y News, a weekly newspaper That said newspa-
per is a legal newsp(lper and has been approved as a legal newspaper
by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and
it is now and has beEm for more than six months prior to the date of the
publications hereinafter referred to, published in the English language
continually as a weekly newspaper in Thurston County, Washington, and
it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained
at the aforesaid plac:e of publication of said newspaper
That the annexed is a true copy of Notice of Public
Hearing Nisqually Plaza Site Plan
as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form) of said
consecutive weeks, commencing on the
JanuEry 93
~ 19
14
day
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING \
NlsaUALL Y PLAZA SITE PLAN
The Yelm Planning Commission will
hold a publiC hearing at 4'00 p.m. .on
Monday, January 25, 1993, to receive
comments on the proposed site plan for
remodel and redevelopment of the Nis. \
qually Plaza located no~h of. State
Highway 507 at its intersection With Van'
cil Road. The proposed development
would include removal of an existing
16,000 sq. ft. building and construction
of a new "food market" of 49,000 square
feet, the addition of other shops with a
total of 14,400 square feet, and the ad-
dition of three "fast food pads'," plus
redesign of the parking lot and its access.
Additional infonnation and copies of the
site plan may be obtained bycontacti~9
Todd StalTlm..City Planner~ at Yelm CIty
Rail, (206) 458-3244 .
The hearing will be held at Yelm City
Hall 105 Yelm Avenue W , Yelm, Wash-
ingt~n. AU interested parties are invited
to attend. Written comments should be
directed to the Yelm Planning Commis-
sion and may be mailed to P O. Box 479,
Yelm WA 98597 or delivered to city hall.
Writt~n comments must be received prior
to the hearing to be considered by the
Commission. The Commission's decision
may be appealed to the city counCil..
Notice issued by' Todd Stamm, City
Planner
Published in Nisqually Valley News,
Thursday, January 14, 1993.
newspaper once a week for a period of
1
and ending on the
14 day of January ,19 93
both dates inclusive and that such newspaper was regularly distributed
to its subscribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the
fee charged for the foregoing pUblication is the sum of $
which amount has been paid in full.
28 50
b r 7/~ ~/ -eJ-4~
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
January
15 day of
19
93
~,_:L
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,
\ ' 1
) residing\at> Yelm, Washington.
) )
, ,
This form officially sanCtioned by the
Washin!lton Newspaper Publishers' Association
i
!
I
I
I
.\
.. CO
I -'
L=
j 0
.J rl
J ~ ~ .~
I- '" \;is'
\: \:
t " e
~ ~
'"
-",
':
''''
ABO:lllJ3HJ
UVO
A8NMWbO
Ctl\:l3/'OUd 101<l1\l:>S30 31'0 ""
o 9 , 0 6~
NOWNIHSVM'31-\-lV3S ~
S AV NV8HnH31NI OlO,1 aIY~~
piKep
~.... . .,
... . .
L 6 6 0 €, ~ 190 , ~'
..
r
i[
3
<!t'
r~
~\:
~\:..
g;t'il r
~"~j~
...!j II
ar-r -l
.J aT
~?i5:O "
~~~5'5
r
~
,/
tr
"'
'f
~
~~:l
0"
iE,,:s
~'!i5"
~~l~
~~rr
1U"~l:;
'>~so
~ill~
I~
'^
"
.
!
I
J _I
II ~
~ I!
r!l I \}
f:l ..
~ II .1 ~
5~ I ~
~
I
I
1
.'
1
1
1
-I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
8'
I
1
.1
1
I
I
.\
\
I
01
I
I
I
.'
__ _:.J
I
I
N0.1DNIH8VM 'V41iA
.,..
I
Q.
l::I3.1N30 eNlddOHS
",1.<: .'.7-,~
lrtts
lri>iE
~
--111
I
I
.\
I
I
.1
I
I
.'
I
I
I
.1
I
I
.1
1
1
I
-\
I
I
1
-I
I
I
~_I
;& .
d l:i
't ..
C\ 1 ~
t! I ~
h-I ~
:J~ I ~
In (l
uw \
~
I
I
I
-I
I
I
.\
I
I
I
-I
1
~
I
I
---
;l
'l
J[
d ~
~~Ql~
B\;~8
O;a:3l
J.... ~
e"'~~h
J"! \.J
~~~~f
"lP~~u
'l
..-~
I
I,.
I
T::
j
II..
J
J -;;
S. -~
I-s:
Ci
~
'"
...
.
I
I
~_J
. ,'-'. ",,- ,':- ..':'
.,._ __,_.___ __.~.._.__'._'__A+~-'- __.'
_..:_ _~:":_A'.' .________,__....__..+_.C+__..__~.__ .~~__~__,";""":..4:..'",,"""'"
..
17.40.190--17.40.260
A.(-.--
Ii
\.~
B. Minimum Side Yard. There is no minimum side yard in
the CBD except where abutting a residential zone, a side yard
of ten feet or one-third the building height, whichever is
greater, except where separated by a public way or street.
C. Minimum Rear Yard. There is no minimum yard in the
CBO except where abutting a residential zone, a rear yard of
twenty feet or one-thid the building height, whichever is
greater, except where separated by a public way or street.
(Ord. 346 S7 (part), 1988).
17.40.190 Building coverage. There is no maximum
building coverage in the CBD. (Ord. 346 S7 (part), 1988).
17.40.200 Building height. The maximum height for
buildings in the CBD is sixty feet~ (Ord. 346 S7(partJ,
1988) .
Outside storage. No outside storage or dis-
will be permitted in the CBD. (Ord. 346 . U~~~~~
t I'~~ ~v ~-\'11JtY
0.0..~ VN
t.~O~
17.40.220 C-1 zone standards generally. Subject to the
general modifications and requirements set forth in Chapter
17.28 and additional requirements which may be imposed by the
town council for conditional uses, the following standards
set forth in this article shall apply to uses permitted in
the C-1 zone. (Ord. 346 S7 (part), 1988).
17.40.210
play of any kind
S7(part)
ARTICLE V.
COMMERCIAL (C-1) ZONE STANDARD
17.40.230 Lot area. Minimum lot area in the C-1 zon;l
is seven thousand two hundred square feet. (Ord. 346 S7 ~
(part), 1988).
17.40.240
is sixty feet.
Lot width. Minimum lot width In the C-1 zon~
(Ord. 346 S7 (part), 1988). /
17.40.250 Yard requirements. Yard requirements C-1
zones are as follows:
A. Minimum front yard:
1. Service station pump islands and canopies, fif-
teen feet.
2. All other uses or structures: twenty-five feet,
based upon a sixty foot street right-of-way;
B. Minimum Side Yard: ten feet, subject to use;
C. Minimum Rear Yard: thirty feet from all RA, R-1 and
R-2 zoned property. Twenty feet for all other zones, subject
to use. (Ord. 346 S7 (part), 1988).
17.40.260 Outside storage. Storage or display of mer-
chandise is allowed for items that are to be used for retail
'~..
161-5c
(Yelm 2/89)
17.40.270--17.40.340
(--
sale or rent, subject to use, provided, however, that such
use shall be confined to privately owned real property only.
(Ord. 346 S 7 (part), 1988).
ARTICLE VI. HEAVY COMMERCIAL (C-2) ZONE STANDARDS
17.40.270 C-2 zone standards generally. Subject to the
general modifications and requirements set forth in Chapter
17.30 and additional requirements which may be imposed by the
town council, the following standards set forth in this arti-
cle shall apply to uses permitted in the C-2 zone. (Ord. 346
S 7 (part), 1988).
17.40.280 Lot area. Minimum lot area in C-2 zones is
seven thousand two hundred square feet. (Ord. 346 S7(part),
1988) .
17.40.290 Lot width. Minimum lot width in C-2 zones is
sixty feet. (Ord. 346 S7(part), 1988).
17.40.300 Yard requirements. Yard requirements in C-2
zones are as follows:
A. Minimum front yard:
1. Service station pump island and canopies, fifteen
feet,
2. All other uses or structures: twenty-five feet
based upon a sixty foot street right-of-way;
B. Minimum side yard: ten feet, subject to use;
C. Minimum rear yard: thirty feet from all RA, R-1 and
R-2 zoned property, subject to use. All other zones, twenty
feet, subject to use. (Ord. 346 S7 (part), 1988).
17.40.310 Building height. Maximum height for build-
ings in the C-2 zone is sixty feet. (Ord. 346 S7 (part),
1988) .
17.40.320 Outside storage. Storage or display of mer-
chandise is allowed for items that are to be used for retail
sale, rent or for items used in manufacturing or production,
subject to use, provided, however, that such use shall be
confined to privately owned real property only. (Ord. 346
S 7 (part), 1988).
ARTICLE VII. INDUSTRIAL ZONE (IZ) STANDARDS
17.40.330 Lot size. Minimum lot size in industrial
zones is one acre. (Ord. 346 S7 (part), 1988).
17.40.340 Yard requirements. Yard requirements in in-
dustrial zones are as follows:
A. Minimum front yard: forty feet setback, subject to
use;
161-5d
( Ye 1m 2 / 8 9 )
(
17.38.070--17.38.080
providing required parking facilities fer any other use, ex-
cept as hereafter specified in Section 17.38.080 for joint
use. (Ord. 344 56, 1988).
17.38.070 Uses not specified. In the case of a use not
specifically mentioned in Section 17.38.080, the requirements
for off-street parking facilities shall be determined by the
planning committee. Such determination shall be based upon
the requirements for the most comparable use specified in
Section 17.38.080. (Ord. 34457,1988).
~17.38.080 Parking spaces required for particular uses.
The minimum number of off-street parking spaces required shall
be as set forth in the following:
Use
Single-family
Multiple-family dwellings
Automobile laundry
) Banks, savings and loan
associations, business or
professional offices
Bowling alleys
Boarding, lodging or room-
ing houses
Ch~ldren's institutions,
rest homes
Churches, mortuaries or
funeral homes
Dancehalls
Establ~shments fer the sa e
and consumption on the prem-
ises of food and beverages,
including fra~ernal and
social clubs, retail stores,
exce t as otherwise specifi-
fied herein
Hospitals
Libraries and museums
Parkinq Spaces Required
Two for each dwelling unit
Two for each dwelling unit
Minimum of two storage spaces
for each individual car washing
bay, or not less than four times
the total veh~cle capacity
mmodated on a conveyer system
One for each two hundre square
feet of gross floor area, or based
on occupancy, whichever is greater
Five per eac a ey, p us re-
lated occupancy factors
One-and-one~half for each sleep-
ing room
One for each two beds
One for each four seats in the
principal place of assembly for
worship, including balconies and
choir loft
One p~r fifteen square feet of
skating or dancing area, plus
related occupanc factors
One or each two hundred square
feet of gross floor area, or
based on occupancy, whichever
is greater
Two for each bed
One for each three occupants
f! 00 t1I re it rO'hiJj(]2 f//r { RuM {;j f/020 ut0 / sI1))//j(Jl pod
{)Do p1 ~ r 6s 17 O. 7JY liu tI ' .ffr; h{ iii 4f !J} MaiiS -i~P{lJft ef-
WfiO &X7 - a 'fapo ~ I 161S+aU f~ (yYim f/8lr)
Ig-(P j2f
,
\
.,
d
;.,~~-
City of Yelm
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
(206) 458-3244
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL FORM
TO COMPANY HUFI.Vf- J rSc, it t t
IND IVIDUAL ?Jl (lYi / /51 City HU n/..!A. ./
FAX NUMBER 5:Y-f- q~3rt
FROM
D ft 1)+ tj; m-,
INDIVIDUAL S wtu; 6';c~a
FAX NUMBER (206)458-43 8
NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW .3
{Df jI / (I tf Lf ~ >2LjDS)
COMPANY
DATE !f).' 36 -/rrY)
SUBJECT I ,j
nO it 15
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS iieJ(}f. '?
!7U7/l ~/;n( ~
?ut0!/-'
********IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL COPIES OR ANY COpy IS /1
NOT LEGIBLE, PLEASE CALL (206)458-3244 AS SOON AS
POSSIBLE
~*
Rec)'ck.d paper
._-~-~"""""-"-~~':""""""""""~
PAY
AMOUNT
OF
EXPLANATION
AMOUNT
19-2
1250
0113
GRAMOR DEVELOPMENT N W INC.
YELM PLAZA
1133 - 164TH ST S.W , SUITE 107
L YNNWOOD WA 98037-8121
(206) 742-0520/ FAX (206) 742-5553
-
OQl..LARS
CHECK
AMOUNT
DE5CRIPclON
CHECK
NUMBER
$I~I\~.~I
l
Dlli3
~?0'
f1' CASC/MAIN
~SEAFlRBTBAIJIf SEATTLE, WA
111000 . . :illl I:. 2 5 0 000 2 L, I: b? L, 5 2 g. 2 III
I-~
I
I
I
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I By
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
"-.
~-c)~~,
8175
CITY OF YELM TREASURER'S RECEIPT
, \
~ 1 1
/7
19, LfC2
~
{i" j . j I
lAw y!/ ( v'b~ M
/.)
o /5c)
TOTAL
...--'
Deputy
Yelm Clerk-Treasurer
ORIGINAL-WHITE
DUPLlCA TE-CANARY
TRIPLICATE-PINK
/.1 .;..,_...,~
CITY OF YELJ\I
PO Box479
Yelm, WA 98597
458-3244
APPLICATION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
OR SITE PLAN REVIEW
Conditional Use Fee. $75.00
Site Plan Fee. $50/mobile home space, $25/condo unit,
$50 per 1000 sq ft. commercial floor area
$100 per 1000 sq ft. industrial floor area
(Plus any professional service charges per Resolution 252)
OFFICIAL USE ONLY
..g ~'
Fee ...,1./If,l.(/...-:- ~
Date~eceived /.:l:/cJ.tf :2.-
BVtll?t!...... "fir
File No. ~QJJ.fpg.8.4.z,
"
A conditional use permit is an approval of a land use having slightly greater or unique impacts compared to those of
the uses permitted as a matter of right by city zoning Site plan review is a process for reviewing the design of certain
types of development. Site plan approval is r~quired for mobile home parks, duplexes, multi-family dwellings,
commercial and industrial uses, planned development districts and for all land uses within the central business district.
Each requires a hearing before either the Yelm Planning Commission or City Council
NAME OF PROJECT Remodel of Nisqually Plaza Shopping Center
APPLICANT Gramor Development N.~ \~.
Mailing Address (see owner)
City, State and Zip
Telephone
OWNER Gramor Developuent N. W. , Inc.
Mailing Address 1133 164th St. S.W. #107
City, State and Zip Lynnwood, WA 98037-8121
Telephone 1-206-742-0520
ENG IN EER/ARCHITECT/OTH ER David Kehle. Architect
Mailing Address 12878 Interurban Ave. South
City, State and Zip Seattle, WA 98168
Telephone 1-206-433-8997
SUMMARYOFREOUEST Slte plan approval for re-develooment of the existinq
Nisqually Plaza Shopping Center to include the addition of 14,~00 s.f. of .
rpr <'l i 1 shops. al?prox. 50.000 s.f. Food Market and creation of 3 retail pad
.-
areas.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
General Location S.R. 507 and Vancil Road. 103rd Ave. and Plaza Drive (private road) .
Site Address Land Area (acres) +/- 15.5 acres
Section 30 Township 17N Range 2E
Assessor's Tax Parcel Number 22730110200 TCA 170: 227101 7.1 ROO 'T'C'A 170
Full legal description of subject property (attach separate sheet if necessary)
See attached
'~t
J) ~ '!,
f/~
------...:.
/
. ~
PLEASE ANSWER THE FOllOWING QUESTIONS
ATTACH EXTRA PAGES IF NECESSARY
1 Does the design minimize conflicts with neighboring land uses? Explain. Yes - there is an existinq
shopping center established with commercial uses to the West, and commercial
zonin~ South and East.
2. Is the site within 300 feet of any "critical areas. such as wetlands or streams?
No
3. What provisions will be made for stormwater and/or flood control? Existing site is paved and drywells
are utilized. New paved areas will drain to grasslined swales and then to drywells.
4 What provisions will be made for water supply and sewage disposal? Water is available in SR 507,
Plaza Drive and 103rd. All facilities will connect to the new step sewer system
and have on site tanks and pumps.
5. What provisions will be made for electrical power, natural gas, telephone and other utilities? All
utilities exist at the center. Some on site utilities will be relocated due to
new construction.
6. What provisions will be made for streets, access, and/or buses? Access exists from SR 507 and lO3rd.
Improvements to SR 507 are anticipated to include curb, gutter and sidewalk and
deceleration/acceleration lanes along proiect frontage for 1/2 street.
7 What provisions, if any, will be made for open space and/or recreation? No formal open space or
recreation space is anticipated.
8 What provisions will be made for schools and school children? Nothinq lS anticipated.
ATTACHMENTS.
0 Environmental Checklist (including $50 fee)
0 Ust of Owners of Property within 300 feet (include Assessor's Tax Parcel Numbers)
0 Vicinity map showing nearby property, streets, land uses, streams and other features
0 Copy of any covenants or restrictions that will apply
0 Grading plan for cuts and fills over 100 cubic yards.
0 Ten copies of Site Plan showing
1 Datum, north arrow, date and scale -
2. Boundaries of all lots and streets in relation to city limits, section lines or comers, plus existing and proposed
survey and elevation monuments.
3 Lakes, streams, wetlands, trees and other natural features.
4 Proposed zoning, use of each lot and any public or common areas.
5. Existing and proposed buildings and other structures.
6. Existing and proposed parking, streets, alleys, sidewalks, railroads and any associated rights-of-way
7 Wells and underground storage tanks.
8. On-site waste disposal systems and proposed sewer lines and tanks.
9 Location, size and any easements of existing and proposed street lighting, power, natural gas, television
and telephone lines, water mains, sewer, stormwater facilities and points of connection to existing systems.
10 Grade and curvature of streets to 300 feet from the plat.
11 Existing and proposed contours at two-foot intervals (or 5-foot if >5%)
0 A reduced size copy of the site plan not larger than 11"x17"
I affirm that all answers, statements and information above and submitted with this application are complete and
accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also affirm that I am the owner of the subject site or am duly authorized by the
owner to act with respect to this application. Further, I grant permission from the owner to any and all employees and
representatives of the City of Yelm and other governmental agencies to enter upon and inspect said property as
reasonably necessary to process this application I agree to pay all fees of the city which apply to this application
Signed colli Date \"2 '24:12-
k~~~k_Q~~~RIEILQ~
That portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 30,
township 17 North, range 2 East, W M , delineated as parcels
A and C of survey recorded in volume 21 of surve~s page 172,
under auditors file No 8705220173, situate in Thurston
County, State of Washington
Tax Account Numbers
22730110200 TCA 170
22730121800 TCA 170
~
~
(
--i:...
~^
EXIST'G
BLDG.
EXIST'G
BLDG,
-
~
PI
~
LEGEND
~
SITE PLAN
SlHl
SCALE I ~ 50 - 0
vi
'/
!!J
;/
~
= - PROPOSED CATQt BAS I N
@ - PAOI'OS<D DR'IWEll
[SJ] - PROPOSED SEPT leT N<<
't1 - PROPOSED F' I RE HYDRAKT
V - PROPOSED CA TE VAL. YE
_,- PROPOSED DRAINAGE GAL.L.fRY
OCO. PRCPOSEI) SoW'TARl" SDI:R Q.EANOUT
-PS~ - PRCPOSED STORM LINE
--rss--- - PROPOSED SAN I T Nf'( SEWER
~ - PROPOSED WATER WAIN
,.l &-8- PVC WATER "'IN
~~ ....<1,; ~P_' :d-:::': I 0: '1
. ~~ I I _
"& "b-.
'''''<.,. ~
- "t) ,.c'
~ ,''V.
...........
"o;,,~ ~.,_
/-,.,..,.'.....
l'>I ~ ----,
< s ~
! ~
" ..... "" .
~t.,.l. (A ././ /'
j ..II,~I..----... II' I
~
"
1
! LEX.........
. 10 . .....
u ~
~ __u A
_.,-- (nP.~ av
~~
Q~I ~ IIII II
.~~
~ .~~~
FAS FOOO
2
~I~ I =
tll To P C~,!,.
NOTE
0- 25 50
/,V/S 15 A CONCEP7Z/AL DRAk//N6 ONLY.
D~.t7/\.6 / DIA/"7E7CR':5 SI-/OLo/N ARE
5l/BJECT 77? CHAM::-,E AT7h'E LJES/6N P~.
FUTURE
SHOPS
I~ ~ ~
of*P
~~
La n
,~'\= ~~.-
~i o.w
.... OJ
.' ~
~HConc. w.t.,. 801:
~ ~ ~1~
n
~
1=
~l=- ~
1<; ...____
o
~ --.:.:......J
~
)
.. -nttddh.
OT
~la.I-'Lf"
-
~
;>-H2O
""-
....
S R 507
---0 (
\ ~~_._u-
?'
8/27/8'l
Ijle/8Z REV I SEP
10/ '/92 REVISED
till r/82 REVISED
11/1Z/8Z REVISED
100 FT
-y
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
\j
\
~
~~ Z
o e
CJ ~
.Z %
_ CO
D.. oC
D.. ~
o -
~
IZI~ ~
0-1
G ,.
i
~ :
CITY OF YELM
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Instructions:
The State Environmental policy Act (SEPA) requires all governmental
agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before
making decisions. The purpose of this checklist is to provide
information to help ldentify impacts from your proposal, to reduce
or avoid impacts from the proposal if it can be done, and to help
the City decide whether an EIS is required. An environmental
impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for any proposal with
probable significant adverse impacts on environmental quality.
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic
information about your proposal. The City will use this checklist
to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are
significant and require preparation of an EIS. You must answer
each question accurately, carefully and to the best of your
knowledge. Answer the questions briefly, but give the best
description you can. In most cases, you should be able to answer
the questions from your own observations or project plans without
the need for experts. If you do not know the answer, or if a
question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or
"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid
delays later. If the space provided is too small, feel free to
attach additional sheets.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning,
shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if
you can. If you have problems, the city staff can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal even if
you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels
of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe
your proposal or its environmental effects. You may be asked to
explain your answers or provide additional infor~ation for
determining if there may be significant adverse impacts.
Nonproject Proposals Only:
Complete both the checklist (even though many questions may be
answered "does not apply") and the Supplemental Sheet for
Nonproject Actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references
in the ckecklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property
or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected
geographic area," respectively.
CITY OF YELM
CITY USE ONLY
FEE: $50.00
DATE RE~ :~~
:i~E Nt. C?IY? ':5? ~Zi'
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
A BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if any:
Nlsqually Plaza Shopping Center.
2. Name of applicant: Gramor Developnent N.W., Inc.
3. Address and phone number of applicant and of any other contact
person:
1133 164th St. S.W. #107
Lynnwood, WA 98037-8121
4. Date checklist prepared: 12-15-92
5. Agency requesting checklist: Planning Department
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if
applicable): Demolish existing Jayhawks and build Food Market building, proposec
shops, re-strip and landscape under Phase I upon issuance of permit. Phase II wil]
be the remodel of the existing grocery store WhlCh will start 6 months after start
of Phase I. Phase III will be the pads. Estimated time frame 9 to 18 months.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or
further activity related to or connected with this proposal?
If yes, explain. There is a potential for future cormnercial developnent North
of shopping center which would face 103rd street. This area presently serves
as the septic drainfield area.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has
been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this
proposal. None.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental
approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property
covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
Government approvals for the City wide step sanitary sewer has been given.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed
for your proposal, if known.
Building, Health and State permlts for work in State Right-Of-Way.
CITY OF YELM ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
forms\sepa
PAGE 1
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including
the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There
are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to
describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to
repeat those answers on this page.
See attached.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a
person to understand the precise location of your proposed
proJect, including a street address, if any, and section,
township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over
a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the
site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity
map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. You need
not duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit
applications related to this checklist.
The project is located on North side of SR 507 and West of Plaza Drlve
(a private road). Vancil Road intersects the Highway about mid-point
of the site.
Section 30, Township 17, Range 2E.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1.
Earth
a. ~al description of the
flat rolling, hilly,
o er
site (circle one):
steep slopes, mountainous,
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate
percent slope)? 5%
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for
example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the
classification of agricultural soils, specify them and
note any prime farmland.
Gravely sand, gravel and sand from 0' to 10' which is the extent of
exploration (see soils report).
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable
soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
No.
CITY OF YELM ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
forms\sepa
PAGE 2
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of
any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of
fill. Limited amounts of fill may be required to bring the floor
areas to final elevations (+/- l' over area of bldg. = +/- 2000
cu. yards).
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,
construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
This site is presently paved so only erOS1on could occur at the building
floor areas which would be minimal. Ground perculation 1S very good.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with
impervious surfaces after project construction such as
asphalt or buildings? Approximately 96,000 sf of site is existing pervim
as drainfield and is designated as future commercial development. The actual
shopping center being improved is approximately 578,000 sf and will have
Bn impervious area of approximately 85% (491,345 sf).
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other
impacts to the earth, if any: During construct1on, silt fences can be
placed around the f1ll areas as requ1red. Since the site presently has no
landscape areas, the redeveloped center will greatly increase the pervious
areas and will reduce run-off.
2 . Air
a. What types of ernlSSlons to the air would result from the
proposal (i.e., dust, automobile exhaust, odors,
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the
project lS completed? If any, generally describe and
gi ve approximate quanti ties if known. Auto and truck exhaust
will exist during construction and auto exhaust will be the predominant
source after construction. Exhaust emissions from kitchen hoods will
likely come from the fast food pads and possibly the Food Market.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that
may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe.
Auto and truck vehicle emissions already exist at this site with
SR 507 bordering the site and a restaurant exists to the West.
No detrimental impact is anticipated.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other
lmpacts to air, if any: State laws already govern vehicle
exhaust. Any commerc1al kitchen hood has a f1ltering system which
trap particulates and has some effect on odors.
3 . Water
a. Surface Water
1) Is there any surface water body or wetland on or in the
immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and
seasonal streams , saltwater, lakes, ponds)? If yes,
describe type and provide names. State what stream or
river it flows into? No
CITY OF YELM ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
forms\sepa
PAGE 3
2) will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent
to (within 300 feet) the described waters? If yes,
please describe and attach available plans.
No
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that
would be placed in or removed from surface water or
wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be
affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
None
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or
diversions? Give general description, purpose, and
approximate quantities if known.
No
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If
so, note elevation on the site plan.
No
6)
Does the
materials
waste and
None
proposal involve any discharges of waste
to surface waters? If so, describe the type of
anticipated volume of discharge.
b. Groundwater:
1) will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be
discharged to groundwater? Give general description,
purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
See attached
2) Describe the underlying aquifer with regard to quality
and quantity, sensitivity, protection, recharge areas,
etc.
Reference item 1.
3) Describe waste material that will be discharged into or
onto the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if
any (such as domestic sewage; industrial byproducts i
agricul tural chemicals). Septlc tanks are being ellrrunated
by connecting to the step system in December 1993 when it is due
to be on line.
CITY OF YELM ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
forms\sepa
PAGE 4
2)
Water Runoff (including storm water):
Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and
method of collection and disposal, if any (include
quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will
this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
See B,l) New paved areas will have the runoff treated via grass-
lined swales to remove oil deposits prior to going into drywells.
The existing paving is being drained via drywells and perforated piping.
Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If
so, generally describe. Yes if anything is spilled on the
asphalt surface it could enter the ground via the drywells.
c.
1)
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground,
and runoff water impacts, if any: 1) New paved areas will have the
runoff pre-treated via grass-lined swales. 2) New catch basins will be oil/
water seperator type to trap solids. 3) Maintenance of catch basins will be
4. Plants stressed. 4) Existing paved areas are being reduced by new landscaping.
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple, oak, aspen, other
x evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
x shrubs
x grasses
pasture
crops or grains
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush,
skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
x other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation wlll be removed or
al tered? The existing bank pad has landscaping which may be modified
on the East side of it's building. The balance of the site does not
have any formal landscaping. Non-paved areas have scotchbroom and
weeds.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or
near the site. None.
5.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other
measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,
if any: New landscaping will be placed in the parking lot and grassed areas
with street trees will occur along SR 507. At entry drives, trees will be
placed to reinforce the site entries visually. The fast food pads will be
. landscaped when they are developed. Drought reslstant materials will be
AnJ.mals utilized.
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on
or near the site or are known to be on or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, ducks, eagle,~~gbir~
other: -
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, shellfish, other:
CITY OF YELH ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
forms\sepa
PAGE 5
b. List any priority, threatened or endangered species known
to be on or near the site.
None
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explaln.
Not to my knowledge.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if
any: Introduction of additional landscape areas and trees.
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, gasoline,
heating oil, wood, solar etc.) will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it
will be used for heating, manufacturing, transportation,
etc. Natural gas will be used for heating and cooking, electricity
will be used for lighting and equipment.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar
energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe. No
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included
in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed
measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
The buildings will be designed to meet State energy codes and
equipment be energy efficient, application for funds via the public power
utility for utilization of higher energy efficient lighting may be used.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including
exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion,
spills, of hazardous waste, that could occur as a result
of this proposal? If so, describe.
No
1) Describe special emergency services that might be
required.
N/A
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental
health hazards, if any:
N/A
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect
your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation,
other)?
None
CITY OF YELM ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
forms\sepa
PAGE 6
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or
associated with the project on a short-term or a long-
term basis (for example: traffic, construction,
operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would corne
from the site. Short term nOlse generation would be via
construction equipment. No long term noise will be created other
then auto and trucks.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if
any: Auto and trucks already exist and utilize the site. No
additional measures are required.
8 .
b.
and Shoreline Use
What is the current use of the site and adjacent
properties? Current site is a shopping center with vacant land
to the East and North, commercial to West. Mixed cormnercial and
residential and across the Highway to the South.
Has the site been used for mineral excavation,
agriculture or forestry? If so, describe.
No
Land
a.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
Existing wood f~ame shops (13,275 sf), a Jayhawks store (16,200 sf),
Food Market (22,061 sf) of wood frame and banks w/covered drive-in area.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
The existing Jayhawks building will be demolished as well as a
small shop attached to the Food Market.
e. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the
site?
Commercial
f. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
Cl
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master
program designation of the site?
None
h.
Has any part of the site been classified as
resource", "critical" or "environmentally
area? If so, specify.
No
a "natural
sensitive"
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the
completed project? Employees of the retail stores could be
approximately 90-110 people. Existing employees are approx. 50.
J. Approximately how many people would the completed project
displace? Workers at Jayhawks and the shop would be approximately
12 to 20. New facllitles would generate approxlffiately 60 new jobs.
k.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce
impacts, if any: Potentially these workers will
Jayhawks or could apply to work at the new stores.
CITY OF YELM ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
forms\sepa
displacement
re-locate with
PAGE 7
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible
with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any:
The existing uses and lana adjacent to the site are commercial zoned
and will be developed commercially. The property across the highway
is being proposed as commercial and the property to the North will be
developed commercially (motel). This existing shopping is compatible
with land uses and plans.
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any?
Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
None
b.
Approximately how many units,
eliminated? Indicate whether high,
housing.
None
if any, would be
middle, or low-income
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,
if any:
N/A
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),
not including antennas; what is the principal exterior
building material(s) proposed?
See attached
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or
obstructed?
None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,
if any:
Refer to a. above
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce?
What time of day would it mainly occur?
Existing parking lot lighting and securlty lighting eXlt on site
and operate in the evening.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a
safety hazard or interfere with views?
No
CITY OF YELH ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
forms\sepa
PAGE 8
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may
affect your proposal? There are some light standards on the
highway and the existing commercial shops to the West have
lighting. No adverse impact is anticipated.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare
impacts, if any: In the redevelopment center, new light
standards will be used with new metal halide light fixtures utilizing
a shoe box design whlch "cuts-off" the light source and glare.
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities
are in the immediate vicinity?
Unknown
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing
recreational uses? If so, describe.
No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts or provide
recreation opportunities:
Nothing is proposed.
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed
for, national, state, or local preservation registers
known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally
describe.
No
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,
archeological, scientific, or cultural importance known
to be on or next to the site.
N/A
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
N/A
14. Transportation
a. Identify sidewalks, trails, public streets and highways
serving the site, and describe proposed access to the
existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
See attached
b. Is site currently served by public transit? By what
means? If not, what plans exist for transit service?
Unknown. There is a proposal for an innerCi ty transit
system by September 1993. Access to the center could be provided.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have?
How many would the project eliminate?
The site wlll be re-striped In total with a total of 627 stalls.
CITY OF YELH ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
forms\sepa
PAGE 9
d. will the proposal require any new sidewalks, trails,
roads or streets, or improvements to existing sidewalks,
trails, roads or streets, not including driveways? If
so, generally describe (indicate whether public or
private). Yes (reference a. above).
e. will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity
of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally
describe. No
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by
the completed project? If known, indicate when peak
volumes would occur. See traffic study.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation
impacts, if any: See attached
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public
services (for example: fire protection, police
protection, health care, schools, other)? If so,
generally describe: Public services already exist since the
shopping center is operating. Police and fire protection will be
needed but no additional mitigation would be required.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on
public services, if any. The new structures will be sprinklered
and monitored and burgler detection will be encouraged.
16. utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:
electricity, natural gas, water, refuse serVlce,
telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, oth~r.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,
the utility providing the service, and the general
construction activities on the site or in the immediate
vicini ty which might be needed. Utilities to the site exist and appear
adequate. The step sanitary sewer system is scheduled to be on line in Dec.
1993 which the center will connect into. Some utilitles will be relocated
C. SIGNATURE due to new construction.
See civil conceptual utility plan
The above answers are true and c.omplete
knowledge. I understand that the City of
them to make its decirty~.
Slgnature: ~~ i
Date Submitted: ~~,t4.~~ I
to the best of my
Yelm is relying on
CITY OF YELM ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
forms\sepa
PAGE 10
A
Background II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
The existing Nisqually Plaza shopping center has 13,275 sf of
retail shops, Jayhawks building of approximately 16,200 sf,
Thriftway food market of 22,06~ sf and an existing bank pad of
I
3,970 sf. The site is presently paved and the parking lot
stripped and illuminated Thel existing access points are the
major entrance off SR 507 which was recently improved to state
DOT requirements and a common hccess with adjacent uses to the
west An additional common acbess is to 103rd and an access
to the private street (Plaza D~ive) The proposed pre-
development is to include remo~al of the Jayhawks building and
an attatched shop to the food ~arket and then construction of
a new Associated Grocers food ~arket containing approx 50,000
sf and construction of 1~,~00 ~f of retail shops The
existing food market would be &emodeled into a drugstore or
some other large retailer. Th~ existing shops and bank pad
would remain The new fast fo~d pads would be built by new
tenants and would not be inclu~ed initial building permit
application I
The site area of the shopping Genter is 67~,052 sf which
includes the future commercial{existing drainfield to the
north and excludes the existing bank pad (55,300 sf).
Common ingress and egress easements and convenants will exist
between the two sites. I
I
I
I
Water is presently being dischJrged into the ground via septic
tanks and drywells for storm wdter. The septic tank discharge
will be eliminated when all of Ithe buildings connect to the
new step system due in DeCembeD!, 1993 The drywells will
remain active In newly paved areas, the storm run off will
be directed toward a grass lined swale and then drywell catch
basins will be utilized \
Aesthetics i
A I
The tallest portion of the new ~UildingS occurs at the entry
area of the food market and is at + 31' above grade The
design concept for the center wbs to tie with the existing
shops which also ties with the bxisting bank Materials
used are wood siding and metal btanding seam roofing. In
addition, concrete masonry unitb are being introduced for the
I
food market, new shops, and re-facing of the existing food
market The concrete units wil~ be textured split faced and
an accent smooth band will break up any large surface areas.
Canopies at the food market andl new shops will be the blue
metal standing seam. The exist~ng food market will be re-
roofed with the metal standing I earn.
Environmental Easements
3 water, b ground water
Expanded Information
B.
10
Also at the new food market, In internally illuminated awning
will project above the entry ~estibule with the store name and
logo To add vertical texture to the overall facade, a wood
faced parapet Clap siding to ~atch existing) will be' created
above the existing shops and dt the new shops and existing
food market. It varies in hej.ght to provide variety
Signage on the new shops will be placed on the horizontal sign
band similar to the existing hops with the potential for
major shops tenants to sign a~ove the canopy. The columns at
the new shops building will be concrete units and the existing
shops with also have the same units The use of the same
materials and introducing the new material to the existing,
and by providing additional height and variety to both new
and existing, an overall re-developed cohesive shopping
center will be developed
1~. Transportation
A.
The proposed project anticipates participation in street
improvements to SR 507 which w~ll included street widening for
deceleration lanes at the entr~es to the shopping center, a
bike lane which will be adjacept to a curb, gutter and
sidewalk The improvement wil~ occur along the frontage of
the shopping center. In addit"on, a traffic light is
proposed at the major site acc ss City has indicated they
may participate in the cost of said signal
An internal pedestrian linkage system is proposed to connect
the pads to the street sidewalk I via on site sidewalks
Traffic flow will predominantlill occur at the central
signalized entry which will aliow for full movement (left in,
right in, left out, right out)lwith adequate on site stacking
for left out and a right out lane The existing common access
to the west onto SR 507 will r~main with full movement but
without a signal A limited m~vement curb cut is proposed
east of the signalized access ~hiCh will provide ingress and
egress for the bank and pad 1 ~nd will also serve as the
delivery/service vehicle exit J Since Plaza Drive is a private
drive and access is unsure, this curb cut provides the only
exit for the trucks and emerge~cy vehicles should the signal
intersection have a blockage Access is also available to
103rd via a common access with the developement to the west
1~ Transportation
G
Mitigating measures are accomp]ished by limiting access to
SR 507 to 3 points, one of whidh is signalized and is
dominant and providing on site \stacking room at the
signalized access and limiting cross-access on the incoming
side and into the site 180'. ~eperate service vehicle access
to the most western and most e~stern curb cuts and providing
all loading behind the buildings This eliminates conflicts
with trucks and autos (note that no backing movements occur
into the access driveways).
Another mitigating measure for transportation impacts will be
participation in the 1/2 of street frontage highwa~
improvements and the traffic signal The new signal will be
placed at the existing improved curb cut which DOT previousl~
approved and directed for its location Reference also the
traffic stud~ for additional information
4
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 30,
township 17 North, range 2 East, W M , delineated as parcels
A and C of surve~ recorded in volume ~1 of surve~s page 172,
under auditors file No 8705220173, situate in Thurston
Count~1 State of Washington
Tax Account Numbers
22730110200 TCA 170
22730121800 TCA 170
~
-'
---
"
-------
--
........---
"
"
"
.... .n
'\/-
[;;:J-
-
.-
\-~-L---------_/
\
\.
..,
,- - - \
: /-"---'\
" \
\
,
/
I
\
\
\
,
\t~\
i. c\
\
\
\
'0
\
\
,~J
t....,
<>
01
,-~--
\
;
\
\
\
I
~.. 0
'--
-,
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
.\
{\
,
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
,
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
,
,
\
\
\
\.
c;
q
\ \
\
\
1\
\
\
\0
n
r'J
"
"-,
"-,
"-',
.. '~.',
"\ ....! '\.'"
.; ~.../ J "',
-_/ "-...
"
'''\"..
. ,
\\
1\
\\
l\
'I
.\
''\...... \
"J
"
\
I
--\
,/
~{
./
"
\( /..-.
/
'<':----.-'
)
j
/
/
/ -"\,
\
J
\
\
'')
'.
\
'<;
',-
(
\
\"'--,
\
'--\
\ i
\'\
J
\
\
\
'<,
I'
F
r''''"
, ,
",. 1
\"\ _1 \,
'\_ r./'- ).--. t
l
,.
\
<..=~..( {
i
_\
\
,
!
->~
r-
\
/ ,
I ,
I,
-~
'-...".._-\
\
,
\
\(
.r /.f ''\'.......
)-....."
./ "'.
\'-7
Y
, j
/
"\
\,:
.'
.'
"
'~
'-.
, ,
'.,
)
/
"
'.
........"
" '
/
/
/~
(
\
/.
\
1
I
r
,
\
.:..,
--
----------
-....
........-
\
\
\
\
"
.--"
-.---....
f~l
;""
r~
1.------.
--~~"."
--\
\
\
\\
i \
\'
<>
\
\
\
I
\
\
\
\
\ .....
\
\
\
\,
\\
, \
\ \
'; ';
'{ \
'>. \. \
\
\
\'
\ (.'3
\
\
\
--------
~
........--............----
\
,
I
\
... Q<'
i
,
I
.
)
~
---
..
, ,
\ \
0'
\
\
\
J.,
1\
\
~-+--
A \J(.
,<(l-~~__-------
--
--
-
.-'~/' -"'\
",
fi
,
;
)
'<
\
,
!
i
~
/.....
i
,
......._~...\
\,
i
/ '
"
, >
I
i
\
"
j
I
,
:~
!t
'\
f)
~
T-
l::0>
..:::.
~
~ ,~
~-+-
~ .~
~ 1. ~
~--r
~<::(
~
.
,
,
,
/
"
/
"
",
"'-"
",
"
"
')
".
"-",
",
"
"
".....1'
/
,
,
,
,
\
"l,.........,
"
",
"
"'-.......
,
,
o
C;
/
<,
"
"
". ", -------
~~
, -----
~
~
~
----
o
_.\O';""r".,
-:" .~
~ .. ~
,-.
~
--
.~t
-::\F
//5<, (
~// \:~',
// "\
'~,\
"~~\
"~\
,,\', ,
BUILDING & SITE STATISTICS
Building Code UBe 91
Zoning C-l
Site Area 729, HiJ !I.r
Bulldlrra Areas:
ExIsting Attached shOps 13,725 s.f
Proposed F"CXJdlllllr-kat 'is,160 !I.r
Proposed Drugstore 22,061 s. f
Proposed Attatched Shops l't,'iOQ !I.f
Proposed fast food Pad .1 -'i,eOO s.r
Proposed Fast Food Pad 12 -'t, 125 !I f'
Proposed Fa!;t Food" Pad.3 oJ 'f 800 5.r.
Total BulleH"g Area 112.621 !!II.f.
/
/
/
N
// /
// / /
// //
//;/;.;/
//;// //
// /
// //
Ai
C1
C2
'<.-?-
,~R-
SITE PLAN
''':50
EXISTING
DRAIN FIELDS
FUTURE
COI\IIMERCtAL DEVELOPMENT
IjQce
o '21100
I I
SCALE W fEET
/
Bulldlna TUDes;
Existing Attached Shops,
Proposed Foodmarket.
Propcssd Drugstore -
former Focdmarket.
.Proposed' Attached Shops:
Proposed fast Food Pad .1
Proposl!d Fast food Pad '2:
Proposed Fest Food Pad 13:
/
/
V-N Non sprinkler-ed
I I I-N sprlnklaf"ftd, with "i:-hour
seper-ation _115
Y-N Sprinkler-ed
Y-N Sprlnklered
V-N Non-sprinklered
V-N Non-sprinklered
V-N Non-sprlnklered
\
1/IFR2
/
----I
I~
I
I
I
I
DIST'Cl a.D;,
TO IE JlDENO) ~ 1
I
J
\
~:
N~ Foodmarket. 22't Stalls
Remaining Center: ~
Total 527 stalls
1 Stalll1B6 !I.f
lID'UQQQ.
MARKET
49 160 s.r
'\:
----EX I ST I NG SHOPS II
13,275 IL~
C1
\
\
EX I ST G
SLOG
C1
-~-
~
- <<~ ;,~,,,,,,,,,,,,,"-"..',,-,.<.,,, - - - - - - -
=- S R 507 ~---~- -=-=-"-L
- = ~-=--~-
~- -, - - - - - - -/- - - - -[:- .f"_L'-
, - \ '-\"T'O V,,",'L'"
C1
1_,_-
t~~
'-
--..
-~
~
'-
COllI
~
'"
'"
'"
~
M
.
w
o
N
~~~I
11'.' rom
lit..:: ...to.sc: .
z
o
~
C!I
z
%
II)
oC
.~
:i
....
UI
~
8D-1
:=-~~~
I~--.--~~
_---...t#fI'...~
...~."..~..
~~--~~,::,.
~.~~~<
~;:,::~
~~
...~-
_~~'If"~..;:--r
~
/~._fJ/1I~II.'I~~
_____fI11I"-~...""p.
/ -_.~~~
_.~-~~~~
ol"~""""
__ll\-~-~'~
I//;/ /
//1'/
"
PL",NT SC\-lEDI)U..
S........ c1' ..","IC"," ..... I """""" .....
&A.B.~lCt-U-" ,-
\_3/4- C}.\..
1_3/4~ c,t.L.
1_3/4" eM-
4-5' t11
B60B,*lC~O f~
a&a.lIJIiC'tlEO fOfll'l
BAoB,rUlL 1 BUS'ri'(
~
@
o
l~ES-
autftCU"S RuaAA I RE.O 0>>'
""ERCUS R()llIlR ,.IS"e." I Ill"""''' O,,;eIS"
p,,",S C' '",,""ooD I 'C""""''''' p<>J'
PIKUS N\~ I >>JS1R1...r4 p,tIlE
. G>l.
.G>l.
, G>l.
..
//5<, <
~/ ^~'
/ / / ", ,'",,-
/ / //, '~""-',
/ // I /'.R(/'.S 10 8( cON1RO\. ,," ~'"
/ / /.. DISIURSE~11\'1 (ROSIGN ", "'"
' _/ /'.\.\. ROSE(D(D
/ / / . ~~~O MIY; / '" ~ "
/~/ // , / ""-<~~,
;/ S~A\.( ~ ~
/ / / / GRASS \.INEO 8\Of\!..1RA110N " ~
" 11!6:-<-
/ / / /.. .... '.' ".....: ,?~.. '~ ", . '~~.~ . p.j
/ ;/// / /../ .~.~..~ .~ ~/ -. ~ ~~~~. ~~ -'.=~~'.". ~ ~
// # ~ "
/ / //,
..
'"
.. a.C.
.. 0 c.
3~- Q c.
s~u&S '
p~i\N\1I. fAA5t~1 I p-tiO.f\N\~
E"""_s ","." '",,",'c'us' I .,,,",,0 E"""_S
P I ,,"S t>P' t>P' I t>P' PI"'
"
.
\ZZ1
,,,
,0
t"~ a.C.
4 pOlS
~OCO\lER
CO,,,",IS,ER 0""'"'"" I CO,,,"E"'''.
~
L",NDSCI\PE NOTES
c","sCAP'- c<>''"^C1'''- S_L CcE'" ""'; ~~~~~~.:t ~:::
c","sc>"E ",u. p,,,,,,- TO,~~~;' .S .".".EO ."'- ."" PL""""" ISL"""S,
~i~l~ 10 RL~E. p~,.<--o 3'1" tw
-'" ~_~ .. ""'.. ~ ..,"' · t"::' " ..:,,~.::'~;.."
,oPSOIC ,....., ." loPSOIC I' T';;,;;' .C:::~E;:{;(>IS I' ",EIS ,.,E.E ".,""
S_L BE PL",EO IS .E"",eEO "'" BE ,- acc"" ,"" loP Of "",CEN'
~ .:.:;~:;;;;.'':i'';;':,;. ~,.. ...."". " -~.
--. -, . .."". ~ ~ -",."::;"". :::,..::::';.'':
S_C at IM51"ctO c<lI<lI",""S o~~",,::~~.o;: ~"" pc"''''''' ",u.s
f 1t4E. (jR()\.It'lo ~j( .....n..01 StV-LL --
SC^l'E c<lI<,,..c''''- s","cc """^,,TEt ","L "",,,.,,,,-s "., _""",,",P ."'-
~I'" Of (>IE ,u.R ,.... ,"t o.rC ~ fI,,^L ,."."",'c
-'" ~"...::" ,'~"'~':"~::' .;:.i'~~;:'.::"""" .,.
iO ~~~l'l1" 1.,1< ,....~. ...........
.. ~ ~ ~. ,,-'" .. .-,,, -- ,.,.", ....
.' ",- """ ~ ...... ,- -'" -.' -~.
.,," ,51.'t ""p",,,EO E"""I'" c<>".Ol $tEO."
..
I-~
N \ 0
'" "'
"- .
~
N
-~~ ~
~ 0
g VI
.-.~---
-
f:\ n '1 f':\ ' ,
~ ~ ,~~
\
w,,1"4- -0- ~ 1>')' .
~~~-
. ._-
,.
_~,f~~""
.'
~
L"",OSC"PE ~
~~~~"
"
,,0'; fOOO
,,^R~n
PROPOSEO ORUGS1oRE
PROpOS(O S\'IOPS
(XIS1\NG SHOPS 'I
~\IT\~i~ \
ARD
q\ S1ANO ~
)\ \ !..IG\'I1 W/\"
1
~rIf
\' " \"
~\y
:\: ~.
~:~' " "/t~
/~t ' /; /
~~
\ \ \ /.
:;::::::--
(y;IS1 G
SLOG
\
\ \
\\
\ :
\ \
\ \
\
/ \/
\
\"
\
~~
/\. / ~. /
,.- ../ / "
l' / // /
//'/ / //
,,/.' / ,/ '"
@@ //
//
/ /'\"
"., ~
/ /
/ .. //
/'
,/ .. /
/ AI '
.~
___ L/'.NOSCAP( BY 01HERS
:;::::::--
/ 1/
(1W)
-::;:::::::.---
810fl!..1RA11GN s//A!..E
~
'-..-_, !..AWN (1YP )
-:;:::::::..--
!..A"OSCAPE B'f 01~ERS
----
507
5 R
s//A!..E
_"B\O~
'-.--.-
"-
'"
'-...-- L/'.'i4\'l (1'fP
~
-:::::----
III
O~l~~ Is
,. : \1.'1:::
.. . t ii
:.. :. ~\il'
.
aa..:\'"
~
..J
Q.
Ul
~
o
en
o
~
..J
)-
"
4:
~
~
'j
Ul
"
Q.
::::::--
4:
N
4:
...J 2:
Q. 0
~
~~
...J 'i
4: ""
::> ~
o .
q)~
- 111
%'>"
L-1
,9231
'", ..
l I
I ,',
~, i:
. -,,-.
i j
i
~,
l 1]
I , 'I
l
.1
I
f l J
I
~
1
, :)
[ i
,
IJ
r tl
!
~',
I," i 'J'
t '
I l
,
II
:J
r 1"1
. .
11
J
~
I J
~I
t ~I
GeoEngineera
,. -.- --------,..-~-....._.....,._..=:...._~"......''':l_..."".,.,~-z...::_,_=~~,,~_ ~____ '-'"_
@
Report
Geotechnical Engineering Services
Ttvtftway Shopping Center
Yelm. Washington
October 1. 1992
For
Gramor Development
File No. 1124-018-1'0-3
J
I
I]
lJ
J
II
I
.1
J
U
n'
l
t:
rl
n
~l
r.
~
q
L.
n
11
u
; -j
1\
-, -,
, '
~8!t.
Geo.Engineers
October I, 1992
Geotechnical ,
Geoenvironmental and
Geologic Services
Gramor Development
Suite 107
1133 - 164th Avenue Southwest
Lynnwood, Washington 98037
Attention. Mr Richard Embry
Report
Geotechnical Engineering Services
Thriftway Shopping Center
Yelm, Washington
File No 1124"{)18-T03
INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE
This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering services for the proposed
improvements to the Thriftway Shopping Center located in Yelm, Washington. The project site
is located north ofYelm Avenue and south of 103rd Avenue Southeast, as shown on the Vicinity
Map, Figure 1 We understand that preliminary project plans consist of remodeling and
enlarging portions of the center to provide a larger space for the Thriftway store, and
constructing a number of smaller shops in the undeveloped area north of the bank.
The purpose of our services is to explore the subsurface soil and ground water conditions
at the site in order to develop geotechnical recommendations and design criteria for the proposed
improvements Our specific scope of services includes
1. Excavating seven test pits in the unpaved areas of the site with a rubber-tired backhoe to
explore shallow soil and ground water conditions.
2. Providing recommendations for site preparation including removal, recompaction, or other
reuse of the existing site soils, evaluation of the requirements and potential problems
associated with site grading, earthwork specifications, and temporary erosion control
3. Providing recommendations for foundation support of the structures This includes
recommendations for shallow spread footings, as appropriate, and evaluation of potential
settlement.
GeoEngineers, Inc
5631 Tacoma Mall Blyd. Suite 7
Tacoma, WA. 98409
Telephone (206) 471-0379
Fax (206) 471-0521
printec on recycled paper,
-I
11
-I
m
Gramor Development
October 1, 1992
Page 2
~
4. Providing recommendations for support of slab-on-grade floors
5. Providing recommendations for paving in parking and access roadway areas, as needed
6. Providing recommendations for site drainage and control of any ground water which may
be encountered.
7. Preparing a written report containing our conclusions and recommendations along with the
supporting data.
8. Commenting on any construction problems anticipated from the results of our explorations
and studies
~D
.1
~
SITE CONDITIONS
The subject property is a commercial/retail development located at the corner of Yelm
Avenue and Plaza Drive, as shown on the attached Site Plan, Figure 2 The site is currently
occupied by an operational Thriftway store, JayHawks store, Puget Sound Bank and several small
retail facilities. The entire site is relatively level with extensive asphalt paved areas Some minor
graveled areas with a sparse cover of grasses and shrubs are located to the north and east of the
existing structures
pi
fJ
n
rn
,~,.
SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS
Subsurface conditions at the site were explored on September 15, 1992 by excavating seven
test pits with a rubber-tired backhoe to an average depth of 10 feet. Explorations were
continuously monitored by an engineer from our firm who visually classified the soils in general
accordance with the system described in Figure 3 Logs of the soils encountered in the test pits
were maintained and are presented in Figures 4 and 5. Test pit locations were determined in the
field by our representative using hand-taping or pacing methods Their locations should be
considered accurate to the degree implied by the method used Approximate locations are shown
on the Site Plan.
fJ
f,1
I D
, ,
1"1
L
a
L_
11
t,
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
The subsurface soils we encountered on-site were relatively uniform Soils exposed in the
test pits are glacial outwash deposits consisting of dense sandy gravel and gravelly sand
Occasional minor lenses of clean sand are interbedded with the sandy gravel and were generally
exposed at about 6 feet below the ground surface.
Roughly 1 foot of silty gravelly fill material was uncovered at the ground surface in Test
Pits 6 and 7 This fLII material is underlain by the glacial outwash deposits mentioned above
No ground water seepage was observed in any of the test pits We expect permanent
ground water levels to be Significantly below site grades
11
, ,
]
,1
-1
GeoEnginccrl
Filc No. 1124-018-1"03
i
J
Gramor Development
October I, 1992
Page 3
j
!
11
J
I
I;
J
1:1
II
II
I
.,
')
if
!
II
11
~l
I
1-1
i
11
-')
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
GENERAL
The site is suitable for the proposed development. Based on our findings, we conclude that
the proposed structures can be supported on shallow spread and strip footings Concrete floor
slabs can be supported directly on grade and additional drainage measures such as perimeter
foundation drains should not be necessary as site soils are highly permeable and ground water
levels are expected to be well below the construction zone.
While little to no surficial topsoil was encountered in the areas of the test pits, it is probable
that the grassy areas north of the existing structures may be overlain by silty sand with roots and
organic material If such material is encountered during grading activities, we recommend that
the soil be removed.
Specific site development recommendations are discussed below
SITE PREPARATION AND GR,ADING
Site Preparation
We recommend that all vegetation, organic material, trash and debris be removed from the
ground surface and wasted prior to beginning grading operations The exposed subgrade in the
building areas should be compacted, and then proofrolled using a grader or fully loaded dump
truck. The purpose of proofrolling is to delineate any soft areas which may be present.
Soft, loose or otherwise disturbed areas which are evident during proofrolling should be
excavated to firm soils and replaced with structural fill. We recommend that a representative of
our firm be present during proofrolling to aid in identifying any areas of unsuitable subgrade and
advise on the extent of remedial work to be performed
Structural Fill
All new fill used to achieve design grades should be placed as structural fill The fill
should be placed in horizontal lifts of appropriate thickness for compaction and each lift should
be compacted to at least 95 percent uf the maximum dry density in accordance with ASTM
D-1557 The appropriate lift thickness will depend on the fill characteristics and the compaction
equipment used. We recommend that we be consulted in order to determine the appropriate lift
thickness during construction. We also recommend that our representative be present during site
grading activities to observe the work and perform field density tests
Except for surficial topsoil, the existing site soils are generally suitable for use as structural
fill Should additional imported soils be needed for use as fill, the soil should be limited to a
maximum fmes content of 5 percent based on the minus 3/4-inch fraction. The suitability of the
fill material will depend on the gradation of the soil and moisture content during placement. As
the amount of fmes (material smaller than the No 200 sieve) increases, the ability to achieve
adequate compaction becomes increasingly sensitive to minor changes in the moisture content.
GeoEDllineera
File No 112+018-1"03
[-
fJ
:J
If
If
i I
I
Gramor Development
October 1, 1992
Page 4
Fill containing up to 10 or 12 percent fines may be suitable if prolonged dry weather prevails
during the earthwork and foundation installation phase of construction.
All structural fill, including the existing site soils, should be free of organics, debris, trash
and cobbles greater than 6 inches in diameter. Particle sizes larger than 3 inches should be
excluded from the top 1 foot of fill. The moisture content of the fill should be adjusted as
necessary for proper compaction.
Temporary Erosion Control
Temporary erosion control can he provided by constructing berms, swales, and/or drainage
ditches as needed around the site perimeter to intercept any surface runoff Disturbed areas can
be protected against erosion with a temporary covering until construction is complete
r
~
II
I
I J
I
i I
I-
I
'1
I
-~
-1
j
1
-J
--J
BUILDING FOUNDATIONS
Shallow foundations are recommended for support of the proposed structures Spread and
strip footings which bear on the underlying dense glacial outwash or on structural fill compacted
to at least 95 percent of ASTM 0-1557 can be designed using an allowable soil bearing pressure
of 3,000 psf (pounds per square foot) for combined dead and long-term live loads, exclusive of
the weight of the footing and any overlying backfill This value may be increased by one-third
for transient loads such as those induced by seismic events or wind loadings We recommend
a minimum width of 2 feet for isolated footings and 16 inches for continuous wall footings All
footing elements should be embedded at least 18 inches below lowest adjacent external grade.
We recommend that any disturbed soils in the footing excavations be removed or, if practical,
recompacted prior to concrete placement. All fou~~~<?.!!..s.!1~J~!:ades_ should be examined by a
~pre,s.en.tatiyeJrom.-01lLfirm to verify adequate bearing surface preparation prior to placing
concrete.
Lateral loads may be resisted by friction on the base of the footings and floor slabs and as
passive pressure on the sides of the footings We recommend a coefficient of friction of 0 5 be
used to calculate friction between the concrete and the outwash material or structural fill Passive
pressure may be determined using an equivalent fluid density of 400 pcf (pounds per cubic foot)
This assumes that structural fill is placed against the sides of the footings and that the top of the
fill is confined by either a concrete floor slab or pavement. A safety factor of 1.5 should be
applied to these values
We estimate that settlements of footings designed and constructed as recommended and
supporting column loads of up to 100 kips will be less than 1 inch, with differential settlements
between comparably loaded footings of 1/2 inch or less. Settlements will occur essentially as
loads are applIed Disturbance of the foundation subgrade during construction could result in
larger settlements than predicted.
GeoEn,ineerl
File No 1124-018-1'03
~
__,.....--,-~._,_....----.---..~_ __~_~~__~....------c--_._-~_.......---,-~.- -c-' - .-
-I
1.-
. '.~
I
,I
Gtamor Development
October 1. 1992
Page 5
I
FLOOR SLAB SUPPORT
The floor slabs can be supported on grade if site preparation is accomplished as previously
recommended. The subgrade soils exposed by excavating should be proofrolled as recommended
above. A subgrade modulus of 400 kcf (kips per cubic foot) should be used for design. We
estimate that settlement of floor slabs designed and constructed as recommended will be less than
1/2 inch over 50 feet for the assumed floor loads.
If moisture control in the slab is critical. (e.g. where adhesives are used to anchor carpet
or tile to the slab). a polyethylene liner can be placed as a vapor barrier below the slab A thin
layer of clean sand may be placed over the vapor barr~er and immediately below the slab to help
protect the polyethylene liner during steel and/or concrete placement.
-I
il
I
I
DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS
Roads and open-space areas should be sloped such that surface water runoff is collected and
routed to suitable discharge points We recommend that building floor elevations be designed
above surrounding grades and that ground surfaces adjacent to the structures be sloped away from
the buildings. We recommend that all downspouts be tightlined away from the building
foundation area. Footing drains are not considered necessary
I
PAVEMENT
We recommend that pavement suhgrades be prepared in accordance with the previously
described site preparation and structural fill recommendations. We recommend that subgrades
be compacted such that the density of the top 12 inches of the subgrade is not less than 95 percent
of maximum dry density based on the ASTM D-1557 test procedure.
For automobile parking areas. we recommend that the pavement surfacing consist of
4 inches of crushed rock overlain by 2 inches of asphalt concrete. The surfacing should be
increased to 6 inches of crushed rock overlain by 3 inches of asphalt concrete in truck traffic
areas
I
I
-I
-,
The crushed base course should comply with Washington Department of Transportation
Standard Specifications for Road. Bridge and Municipal Construction. 1984. Section 9-03 9(3)
"Base Course." The asphalt concrete materials and procedures should comply with specifications
in that document for Class B Asphalt Concrete Pavement.
The existing paving is in relatively good condition and may be incorporated into the new
paving by use of an asphalt overlay. We recommend a minimum overlay thickness of 2 inches
I
1
1
UTILITY EXCAVATIONS
During excavation of the test pits, significant caving of the sides was experienced Shoring
for utility excavations must conform to excavation support regulations of the Washington State
Department of Labor and Industries
l
I
GeoEniineerl
File No. J 12~18-T03
~......__;.,_"'~-:~~"'4
j
J
r
-I
I
I
I
J
I
~
i~
~
m
Gramor Development
October 1, 1992
Page 6
The site utilities should be placed on bedding material which meets the manufacturers'
specifications. This is especially important where maintenance of precise grades is important.
All utility excavations should be backfilled and compacted according to the
recommendations presented for structural fill Backfill placed within the first foot over utilities
should be compacted to 90 percent of the specified maximum density Rocks greater than 1 inch
maximum dimension should be excluded from this zone.
SOil PERMEABILITY
The soils encountered in the test pits have large continuous voids and are highly permeable.
Based on an estimated grain size, the average permeability can be expected to be on the order
of 03 feet per minute. For this mat~rlul, the horizontal permeability is typically several times
the average and the vertical permeability is less than the average.
~
LIMITATIONS
We have prepared this report for use by Gramor Development and their agents for use in
designing a portion of this project. The data and report should be provided to prospective
contractors for their bidding or estimating purposes, but our report, conclusions and
interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of subsurface conditions
If there are any changes in the grades, locations, configurations or types of facilities to be
constructed, the conclusions and recommendations presented in this report may not be fully
applicable. If such changes are made, we should be given the opportunity to review our
conclusions and recommendations and to provide written modification or verification of these
recommendations When the design is finalized, we recommend that we be given the opportunity
to review those portions of the specifications and drawings which relate to geotechnical
considerations to see that our recommendations have been interpreted and implemented as
intended
There are possible variations In subsurface conditions between the locations of the
explorations and also with time. Some contingency for unanticipated conditions should be
included in the project budget and schedule We recommend that sufficient monitoring, testing
and consultation be provided by our firm during construction to confirm that the conditions
encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations
Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in
accordance with generally accepted practices in this area at the time this report was prepared
No other conditions, express or implitXl, should be understood
II
fa
(
~
~
a'.
r:
1-;.
~~
<I
;'~.
i;
t.
~B
GeoEogioccrl
Fuc No. 1124-018-T03
t.:1..".,...
1'-
II........"
f'.f...."..>
, i.
'..
I"
'.d
-.
f
I
.r
, J:
II
iI
[
l
il
1-1
~i
11
I .
~-J
-I
'I'
..;-.
I -
Gramor Development
October I, 1992
Page 7
The conclusions and recommendations in this report should be applied in their entirety. We
are available to review the final designs and specifications to see that our recommendations are
properly interpreted. If there are any questions concerning this report or if we can provide
additional services, please call.
Yours very truly,
GeoEngineers, Inc.
~~
Susan Ashbury
Geotechnical Engineer
, 0 I , I~."t.
I EXPIRES 0 ~ - I 0 - Clj 11
d:::ri:= ~
Senior Engineer
SMA:1EB:OWH:db
DOCUMENT 10: 1124018R.R
Attachments
Four copies submitted
OeoEngineer.
Fate No. 1124-018-1'03
_I
I
-I
--
I
I
-I
I
~I
I
N
0\
-I
0\
o
-I
i
I
'"
o
i-i
I
-.:1'
('-.,
-I
-l
1
rl
)
\, ,
. \1
.'
all
~~:~
,
.., I I
1
I
,.
. .
. ~ ~I D
(I D U ,'"
III, if '/ G,
:, 29" Q."t ~
".....: II II ~
. .....~" t~ 11/
. . " . ., ,/
n' "'}, . ....l'
IIln::~~\!i: .
---' L;... . -.
; ~'--:A'i"'- .';Q l =t='"---
0,0 ..;.;~l/'<s>, ~
\ ,,~/~ ::~~)~\
..
'"
()
N
o
I
4000
I
2000
I
SCALE IN FEET
REFERENCE USGS 75' TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE MAP ENTITLED "MCKENNA, WASH"
-1(iI'"
Geo ~~ Engineers
VICINITY MAP
FIGURE 1
J
I
REFERENCE SITE PLAN BY JAMES KEYES
& ASSOC., ENTITLED "NISQUALL Y PLAZA'
/
- ----
l c:::t~ -__~ - ""--'oC"lIL......,"-JAo- _~:>
----- --
-.~--
-~ u "~E-
'- J Be>~
r
...... -~-~ .... .--..
c::t .Ia IIL5! A+-'B.
I
)
JI
~ -, ~-=--
. -............
r--=-ll
" / I
'1 --"'....::::: I
117 -~i
t:~ -~:J
'.-- ,
/
/
I
///
-I'jI- TP-6",,- ,f/"
/'" (~,,~ /'
^ ", "~,s;. ~'l
0/ '-, ~'" 'y "'1-
~ \- ~;> '1
_",,-T~-7 J<' "'~.' J:
y /', :,;."f' ~<:)~ f/
' ) ~ ~ -15' /"
~ /~"f'~~~ '~F,/
~" .f's ^.c~ / ~_":~
~~ / 1L~~;y:--=:::
/ ~-
. THRIFrw A Y
<~'oCE'Yu STORE
I
,
~~
...
I I
I I
I
I
I
J
------
-$-TP-4
. -f$t- TP-5 _. _
" __ A.__ _ ..a.2~-
I
I
I I I
!
"u
'<<'
*
!~
t~
lw.
:A,j
.~~~
it
]I
11
-I
'~
ii
~;,,~
:'j
I'
~--'''''-~
APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET
o
~ 100
11
II
- -~
11
"11
i)
ll~
-$- Test pit location and number
-~~
Geo ~~ Engineers
SlTE PLAN
FIGURE 2
I
,.
1m
rit
:-1...
r-
1-1
It
I
II
I
I
I
i(
I
II
I
,-'I
I
i1.'
I '
j=
I
I
-I
i
1-'1
I
I
1;,
, .
~
II
-'~"._'1- ;!,~,j...,.'!l>.~\"j'''-''''-'
II)
II)
I
II)
II)
SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP GROUP NAME
SYMBOL
GRAVEL CLEAN GRAVEL GW WfiLL-ORAOEO ORA VEL, PIN! TO
COARSE COARSII ORAVEL
GRAINED GP POORLY-ORADED ORAVEL
SOILS MORI! THAN 60'4 GRAVEL GM SILTY ORAVEL
0' COARSE FRACTION WITH FINES
RET AINEO
ON NO. .. SIEVI! GC CLAYEY ORAVEL
MORE THAN 10'4
RETAINED ON SAND CLEAN SAND SW WELL-ORADED SAND, FINE TO
NO. aoo SIEVE COARSI SAND
SP POORL Y-ORADED SAND
MORIl THAN 60'4 SAND SM SIL TY SAND
orr COARSE FRACTION WITH FINES
PASSES
NO. .. SIEVI! SC CLAYEY BAND
SILT AND CLAY ML BILT
FINE INORGANIC
GRAINED CL CLAY
SOilS L10UID L1a.4IT
LEU THAN 60 ORGANIC OL ORGANIC BILT, ORGANIC CLAY
SIL T AND CLAY MH BIL T orr HIOH PLASTICITY. ELASTIC SILT
MORl! THAN 60'4 INORGANIC
PASSES NO. 200 CH CLAY orr HIOH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY
SIEVE
LIQUID LIMIT
60 OR MORE ORGANIC OH OROANIC CLAY, ORGANIC aiL T
HIGHl Y ORGANIC SOilS PT PEAT
NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS.
1. Field claaalfleallon la ba.ed on Dry - Aba.ne. 0' molature. dusty, dry
vllual examination 0' aollln general '0 Ihe 'ouch
accordance with A8TM 02<488-84.
Mola' - Damp, bul no vlalble water
2. 5011 claaalflcatlon ullng laboratorv
lula la baud on A8TM 02<487-8:1. Wel - Vlalble 'ree waler or sAluraled.
3. Oucrlpllona 0' loll denally or ulually .011 la oblalned 110m
conllllency are baled on below waler lable
Inlerpre'allon 0' blowcoun' dala,
vlaual appearance 01 aoUa, and/or
'ea' dala.
'~l'" SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
Geo ~~ Engineers FIGURE 3
w
o
~...=.:.:::=~'"="~-.
I ~
II
I
Li
t
~I
I
I
~I
II
II
I
il
I
,I
"(
if
I
II
;')
II
11
I
,.;{~. '::-::"';;""~<.oO'4.~~"".~;-~. '<?::~":;:".:",
DEPTH BElOW
GROUND SURFACE
(FEET)
SOIL GROUP
CLASSIFICATION
SYMBOL
0.0 - 9.5
SP
0.0 - 6.0
OP
6.0 - 10.0
SP
0.0 - 10.5
OP
0.0 - 6.0
GP
6.0 - 7.0
SP
7.0 - 10.0
GP
LOG OF TEST PIT
DESCRIPTION
1'EST PIT 1
Brown ,ravally IInd Ind IIndy ,ravel (denK \0 very denK, moist) (glacial oulwuh)
Ta.' flll ~llll1fllelld II 9.5 feci on 09/15/92
Nllllnlllnd Wiler encountered
TEST PIT 2
Orlylllh-brown ,ravel with lIod (dense \0 very dense, moial) (glacial oulwash)
Brown IInd (medium denK, moist)
Oraylllh-brown llravelly IInd (dellBC \0 very dense, moisl)
T.., pllllOlnploted al 10.0 feel on 09/15/92
NllllnllllKl wiler encountered
TEST PIT 3
Oraylllh-hrown sandy gravel (very dense, moist)
Tlal pll oomploted al 10.5 feel on 09/15/92
No ,nlllnd waler encountered
TEST I'll' ..
Orayillh-brown gravol with sand (dense \0 very dense, moial)
Brown ..nd (medium dense, moial)
Orayish-brown sandy gravel (dellBC \0 very dense, moist)
Tesl pll oompleted al 10.0 feel on 09/15/92
No lIround wiler Clncountcred
THE DEPrHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, ALTIIOUOII SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF
MEASUREMENTS ACROSS THE TEST PIT AND SIIOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT
~~
Geo ~~Engineers
LOG OF TEST PIT
FIGURE 4
..::,,,'';.'''''''''';'''Y.--
i
1
I'
'i
il
-I
I
II..
r
....(..
,
i
II
:'1
~i
11."
\ ~
I~
~,.I
i,
"Jl:." ".'
~:l
:1
r-
~~'-:- ':;M~.:'::~~f': ',,"~".,.di'~'~"
. po
DEPTH BELOW
GROUND SURFACE
(FEETI
SOIL GROUP
CLASSIFICATION
SYMBOL
0.0 - 6.0
OP
6.0 - 7.0
SP
7.0 - 11.0
OP
0.0 - 1.0
SP-SM
1.0 - 10.5
OP
0.0 - 1.0
SP-SM
1.0 - 10.5
OP
LOG OF TEST PIT
DESCRIPTION
TEST 1'1T 5
Ol1lylah-hrown at'llVel with ..nd (dense to very dense, moilt) (glacial outwaah)
Brown Nnd (modlum dense, moist)
Or.yllh-hruwn aaoo)' al1lvol (dense to very dense, moist)
Tul ph oomploled .t 11.0 feet on 09/15/92
No around w.ter oncounteRd
TEST I'IT 6
Dark IIr.)' .i1ty Nnd with gravel (very dense, moist) (pit run fill)
Oraylah-brown Nndy aravol (dense to very dense, moilt)
Tul pit olllllploled.1 10.5 feet on 09/15/92
NlI II roll lid w.ler oncounleRd
TEST 1'1T 7
Dark ar.y .Uty aand with gravel (very dense, moist) (pit run fill)
Or.ylah-hrown aandy gravel (dense to very denae, moist)
T..t pit ollmploled .t 10.5 feet on 09/15/92
Nil IIrt1llud w.ler oncountered
THE DEPrHS ON THE TEST PIT LOOS, ALTIIOUGH SlIOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF
MEASUREMENTS ACROSS THE T6ST PIT ANI) SIIOULD BB CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT
~~I'"
Geo ~~ Engineers
~~
LOG OF TEST PIT
FIGURE 5
"".~'~'~~-O-':::"-:~~~~~~,-<-.,,~,-
-u.... ,.-
"-~~-:::;","
", .,,,,,~,,,--,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,.....,,,..,",",,,,-~