Hard File Scanned
~
..
"
-
City of Yelm
105 Yelm A venue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
(360) 458-3244
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL FORM
TO COMPANY
INDIVIDUAL
{fi SCL -Plitt r t~
g 3(p().ljC;/--9790
f.
d j( IfGt t'-lex;-
INDIVIDUAL
FAX NUMBER
FROM
COMPANY
FAX NUMBER ( 360)
NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW
DATE .~> (p ~ TIME SENT
SUBJECT Pr/f)f/n{mrL
I -
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
*********IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL COPIES OR ANY COpy
IS NOT LEGIBLE, PLEASE CALL (360) 458-3244 AS SOON AS POSSIBLE
*
'---------
.~ .. un 'JPt~lklaf ~ airt!::~lrmtf~ .
. t!:er; (h~ r:~ af/or~ I. d
: __ __ _ _ -1CV!v{ to ~aIL~- _~ul~ UA1~- --
; . .... ~ t;ummut.t I~u~?d'li...
;Jet viR tie a 61i, ~f/J1I?
Yfl /)~ - ___ - __ - __ _- _H_ -- -
-_ I 1!{,cl
, /'
I _
~- - - ~ -- - - _.,-- - -
cJ b -to CJ;ttd.' klrf f-1!#J2-
1:1 Z u/rh 7 tflYi1() tdftll ryltJlJ,
~----------/
- -- -. -- - --
- - -
~~r~ &~~[z) -j'7~uJ- tfYI./2 r; /l/. ,mn n m,
'! O~
"..~ t~'mndo(lS
,m dJtaw;~.5
_. - - - - - -
~ - -
kUL -PAF'JI'R r1 .
- i
I
, '/)01,0 1 o~.=n~..~~.~.._~-~~~~.-=..-
7Jj)? / _ ./0.~.'t 2 . '2<1=-. _.___m-_
Z JI-(~-11-
- - __I ~ _._ - - _______ __.__.....____<" _~_ ~_
S I( - /0 - 1 ~
____ -_/-1__- u. _________ __ _______
~ - -!{~.Z::l-=-1J- - -_____ -_ _
d 12-//-11-
_4 _ ., _ ____ _..- ___~~ _ ____ _ ~
/)nt(tu~ GWX-.:&.-!~--iit
<? qJ II/'e (( ." . '. ,.. b -:: / fo J 2':::,
i
l
f
RUT
COMMUNnY
UNI(
of
WASH/NfjroN
LETTEi'<. OF CREDIT
Pirst. Community Bank he~eby ag::-ees t:.o issue ~ f1twetter of Cr~d.:T.t:"
maa~ 9~r~uant ~o tba provisions of Section 1~.20.030 and
16 0:20.040 of r:,he Yelm Municipal cocte for the purpostIIs of
providing funds in lieu of cCHn~l.at:ion of front.age improvements
p~~ plans approved cy the C1ty of Yelrn on the Yelm creek
.Apartm.ents davelcprn.4nt:. {The Rant:s GrOup as managing owne:r-sl. The
~ffec:lve date of this Letter of Cradic is Augu6t 30, 1994, with
a maturi cy dat:e of }~ugust: 29. 1995.
Fiv~ (5} worxins days ~fte~ nQtiflca~lon from the City of 1elm of
the c.fficial "occupancy" p@rm,it: ha-vi:':9 been issued, F.irs~
Cotr'.nn;mi::.y :Bank w111 modify H:a L~tcer of Credit to 2':e.Elec'C -!one
(1) yesr from the data of occ~pancy maturlty.
The undeY'signed hereby confirms th-a L~tt.a::: of Crtdit. shall be in
the amc~~t of $431906.00.
Dat&d this 30th day of August, ~994.
~.."-~ / -../ GIIJ fr'.,..- ~
Firsc communiey Sank
JOM R. JohnsonJ Sr.
Presid$nt./CEO
Acknowledged and approved by 'che City of Yelm
8-31-94
i~1 C.~lle~ ~tr~r e.f. .. "0. ~ ;-{ .. ~ca;, ""I':Si'l1l".;tOn" 9aso~ . {~C6} 456-<:$ \J
7 17. ='Qf.~f. QCf. Q07
i-t",U .JO )it\1\iQ 1::N
, \\I;JCO T
f.~- T~-Q '::II t" I C::I Ib-:nl -W Il)l':l't\I1\Il):l lQ IMJC
;, ~
I'IUr
COMMUNl1Y
BANI/.
of
WASH/NaroN
LETT~R OF CREDIT
First. Community Sank h~~eby Ilg:rees t.o iel6ue i HIwetter of CredJ.t: It
mad~ 9~~$uant to the provisions of Section 1~.20.030 and
16.020.040 of the Yelm Municipal Coqe; for t.he purposes of
providing funds in lieu of complll&'Cion. of frontage improvements
p-et~ plans a.p:p:r:oved by the C.:l.ty of Yelm on the Yelm Creek
,~partment9 developm.n~ (Th~ Ran~s Group as managing owners). The
effectlv~ date of this Letter of Cradic is August 30, 1994,with
a fllat.ur1ty date of Auguat 29 J 1995.
Five- (5~ working- days ~fte!' nQt.iflcat;lQn from the City of 1elm of
the official "occupancy" perm.it havi:'lg been i.sued) Firat.
Cornmunic..y Sank w:i.ll modify i.ta wtcer of Credi t. to r.~eflect a 'one
(1) year .from the data o{ oco'Jpancy maturlty.
The undersigned h.rebY_Q.Qnfirms eha L1l!tter of Crtdi1; shall be in
the amo'Unt of $43,906.00.
Daead this 30t.h day of August, ~994.
~~/ J.J~' ...
F~~st CommunIty 8ank
John R. Johnson, Sr.
President./CEo
~----
Acknowledged and approved by the City of Yelm
8-31-94
721 e':'lle~ G1Teer S.\:. to PO. ~ H . laeav \\lC5i'li!'\g1'Ol'l" 9850$ .~:ia6) c56.()$ I:i
I )7 ~'QtRt QCt n07
;.-\:1" -10 ~~r\iQ 1-::rn
t\1..lCO T ' t~-H'-Q '':/1\:11<::':/ "1\:1':/)/ "1\:1ll)/':/t\1t\10l 1~ I~C
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL FORM
COMP ANY nl/ls T (;;rrJ /J1 Cln, ~> 75/1-# K
INDIVIDUAL Cc\'QOL ""ru 1\\ S
FAX NUMBER ~ 30S ~ 79LJy
CI'~\ a-U Ve) lV\
'-.1 ~ '
IND IVIDUAL "T'-\, V e...k \(-spv\
'--l l .
. 0(
.
YELM
WASHINGTON
TO
FROM
COMPANY
FAX NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER OF PAGES
f3/?//qy
.;tJ <-R-oI
/L no c-J I /
SUBJECT
City of Yelm
105 Yelm A Vel/lie West
P 0 Boy; 479
Yelm, Washingto/l 98597
(206) 458-3244
(206)458-4348
TO FOLLOW
TIME SENT Lf.-'OS ;?'1--7
.
C1f/2/lir0J fY/c/~? I ~-J pv0(
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
~\~~~
'0 \ . r=s::-~-
~
********IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL COPIES OR ANY COPY IS
NOT LEGIBLE, PLEASE CALL (206)458-3244 AS SOON AS
POSSIBLE
*
R~C\'ckd pap~r
1111 VI:I I' 111 r 1 - 11
". .1 ..
Key Bank of Washington
A KeyCorp Bank
B2Nl
Real Estate commercial Banking -Tacoma MS 5781
Post Office Box 11500 . 1119 P~ciflc MAnus
Tacoma. Washington 98411-0500
FAX TRANSMITTAL SHEET
DATEt
g~l.~ Y
NUMBER OF PAGES l.INCLUDING COVER SHEET) d-
TO: ~ r ~
FAX NUMBER;
(~
FROM:
305-7944
~
RE:
'\
\
IF YOU HAVE ANY PROBLEMS WITH THIS TRANSMISSION, PLEASE CAllI.. (206)
305-7415
AIIIHri~;a's ll<$iyhlJUlhoOO l.Jllnk,
, iT n'Q~~~ QQ~ on,
...b'ij ..:ill \f~IVO 1':/\f
, \il..lH1 T H~- T~-Q '':/.Ib'IC,':/ ,V':/)/ ,VI1)/'JOOOOOl 10 IAJ':/C
~ ,., 1 V,] cl V 1" l' t, 1 ~, i
AUI.; 30 . 94 1 i : 3g E\.'ERGRE'Ef'l PLH2J-"
F' OW)....~
,- ~
-
RUT
COMMUNnY
UNit
01
WASH/NaTON
LETT2R OF CREDIT
Fir.st. C!Qmmunity Bank h~.eby a.grees t.o iS46ue ~ Hloetter of CredJ.t"
made pursuant to the p~ovision. of Section 1~.20.030 ~nd
16.020.040 Of t;he Yelm Municipal Cocte for t.he purpos.. of
providing funds in lieu of compl.ation of f:rontMge impr<.>vement$
pfl't plan~ approved by the C1ty of Yelm on the Yelm Creek
.~partment9 developmetl.l: (The Rants Group as managing owners). 'rhe
.ffeetlve date of this Letter of Credit is Auguet 30, 1994. with
a maturity date of August: 19~ :1,,995.
Fivlt (!} working days f,1fte~ nQti:flcat;;Lon from the City of :i.1m of
thl!! official II <:lccupancyII parmit having been i.sued) First
Communic..y aank will modify ita ~tter of Credi, t to !'eflect . lone
(1) year from the date of oQQupancy matur~ty.
The undersigned h..reby confirms tha L1I!tt.er of Crtdit shall be in
the amount of $4~J'06.00.
Oatad this 3Qth day of August, 1994.
<?'v7~.........I.:--/:-~ - ~". A...___
F;i.r!lt Community an,
John R. John8ouI Sr.
Pres1dent./CEO
721 C~llege ~tree' SE. "1"0 at;;. H . we,",' \'V'.:lUli",~,.... ~850$ .':i:06) ~56.{)$ W
, ;, ft'Q~~~ QQ~ QO,
....\1." ..j0 \lI\I\1'Q 1':/\1
, W..lQO T ~~- T~-Q '':/1\1' I ~':/ i\l,:/)1 i\1Ti)l,:/WWOl 1Q II\I':/~
AUu-i~-~q nUN ll,j~
1-'. U 1
~
FIRST
COMMUNITY
BANK
of
WASHINGTON
LETTER OF CRED!T
F~rst Community Bank. he:r:eby agrees rr- 'Letter of Credit"
made pursuant to the provisi~~- 0.030 and
16 020 040 of the Yelm TV, to .i;Jurposes ()f
providing funds i;- ,", , " "L:r;ontage improvements
per plans approvec + ielm on the Yelm Creek
Apartments develop &ants Group as managlng owners). The
effective date of t.:.b .Lettel- of Credit .lS August 30, 1994, with
a maturity date of August 29, 1995.
Five (5) working days after notlflcation from the Clty of Yelm of
the offJ,.cJ.al "occupancy'! permit having been lssued) First
Community Bank wlll modify its Letter of Credit to reflect a one
(1) year from the date of occupancy maturity
The undersigned hereby confirms the Letter of Credit shall be In
the amount of $43,906.00
Dated this 30th day of August, 1994
Flrst Community Bank
John R Johnson, Sr.
Presl.dent/CEO
n 1 College Street SE · PO 60x H . Locey Wasr,ington. 93503 . ,2Uo) 456-0&80
II~ ~ol-q l~ [IIFM !-lll
GUARANTEE OF "LETTER OF CREDIT"
First Community Bank hereby agrees to issue a Letter of Credit"
made pursuant to the provisions of Section 16 20 030 and
16 020 040 of the Yelm Municipal Code for the purposes of
providing funds in lieu of completion of frontage improvements
per plans approved by the City of Yelm on the Yelm Creek
Apartments development (The Rants Group as managing owners)
First Community Bank shall issue the "Letter of Cr~dit" within
five(5) working days after notification from the City of Yelm of
the official 'occupancy' permit having been issued
Maturity of Letter of Credit shall be one(1) year from the date
of occupancy
The undersigned hereby confirms the Letter of Credit shall be in
the amount of $43,906 00
Dated this
day of
1994
First Community Bank
John R Johnson, Sr
President/CEO
AUu-~i-~4 nUN lU,jl
!-" Ui
~
FIRST
COMMUNITY
BANK
LETTER OF CREDIT
~
l~ ~ to
This Letter of Credit is made pursuant to the proviso s of Section 16.20030 and
16.20040 of the Yelm Municipal Code for the pu oses of providing funds in lieu of
completion of frontage improvements per plans y the City of Yelm on the Yelm Creek
AssOC,ate~ (The Rants Group as managing owners) project.
AP ~/~r1ts kve\.<l-ft'W\4;\-.
Maturity uf Ll:!ltel of CreJil i~ DE:!cemLt::1 31, 1994 Notice of renewal of Letter of Credit
must be requested by the CIty of Yelm at the time the City of Yelrn issues occupancy
permit, but no later than March 31, 1995
Funding of Letter of Credit re uires a 60 da written notice of non-completion of
improvemen s It is understood and agreed that the elm reek ASSOCiates have one
year from occupancy permit to complete required Improvements.
The undersigned hereby confirms the Letter of Credit of $43,906 00
DATED this
day of
1994
First Community Bank
John R. Johr' "'t, Sr
PresidenUC
L~.\\ey c~ l~\j\- Murs\ he
t-~,,~ ~ (jCCw,~)(~~ c\r-
~~~~
'MeA- \\ r€- \ '4/Q'"",'V
~ A~ ~'OCCJP''0'
C:\WP51\L TRS'.CITYYELM.I.OC
5th & Franklin. 223 51': 5th AV~r"\IJ"'. Olympia WO~hin9ton 98501 · Phone (206, 352 2500. FAX (200) 352-2(,34 7U
MUlnr.c" .f Frrsr ,~oromulljl\' F,'),'JnClCli ,;nUlj . " .. . ;:;5?- L5' vl
II - ~ c-. ~ -li1 L 1 II 1.-.1''.[1 j II
AUG-Ib-~q lUt ll.bb
J-', UJ
. .
.-
fiRST
COMMUNITY
BANK
LETTER OF CREDIT
This Letter of Credit is made pursuant to the provisions of Section 16 20 030 and
16.20 040 ,of the Yelm Municipal Code for the purposes of providing funds in lieu of
completion of frontage Improvements per plans by the City ofYelm on the Yelm Creek
Associates (The Rants Group as managing owners) proJct.
Term of Letter of Credit is one year from the date below Notice of renewal of Letter of
Credit must be requested by the City of Yelm in writing 30 days pnor to maturity
Funding of Letter of Credit reqUires a 60 day wntten notice of non-completion of
improvements It is understood and agreed that the Yelm Creek Associates have one
year from occupancy permit to complete required improvements
The undersigned hereby confirms the Letter of Credit of $43.90600
DATED this
day of
1994
First Community Bank
John R Johnson, Sr
President/CEO
5th & Frankiin . 223 St 5th Av\?nue . Olympia, Washington 9650 1 · PhonlO' (206) 352-2500 · FAX (206) 362-2584
Mem/Jor or First Comm:.mity Firlor;c./al 3{oup
]1,-14 J~ 4FM <'ilL
RUlrl~-~4 t'Kl 18.1j
1-'. U 1
.
.
~
~II~
I nRST
COMMUNtry
BANK
.Meom~f IDK
.........----..-- ~....---...-------- .--.........
!f\X TRQN~~~-,n"J -~
DATE: . 'Y5~ 9
TIME: 3' to
ATTENTION: T
~
~
~..( ,tex ~(:S-"l\
COMPANY. (~, ~~ I\f: \ I .' "f'
PHONl!~ 4 '-:J~~ l\ ~~ S
FROM ~o.Jv\ \.--\..-'--~ _ k 3c, h 1'1
~HONE 60~~?S I,~
~ h '1-S(J)) ~
j
I II I I
Number of pages (including cover) d-
OTHER INSTRUCTIONS'
r('~ nnnmfh.h fur;" Ir~fl~l nr\1. ,g",1 . 'Ii , ,
, I
r I~ X F,JIlI,) :!.(i:! 3~,8i1
223 SE 5th Avenue, Olympia, Washmgton 98501
MaJlmg Address r 0 Box H Lucey, Washmgton 98503
F \USERSUKIES\Wr>OATA\FAKFRM
11111111111111111111111111I
1'--1 '\-j4 0- 4-11vl FOl
,
.
City of Yelm
YELM
WASHINCiTON
105 Yelm A venue West
P 0 Boy; 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
(206) 458-3244
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL FORM
TO COMPANY F,,,sf {(jMrv1c1YJ/Jy Dan)
INDIVIDUAL -:\ /) "'h", -:s- o~v\s~
FAX NUMBER ~S2 - Z 5'23 'f
FROM COMPANY Q ~ \-<.\ tf~ \/ pI W)
CJ I
INDIVIDUAL~ ~e.\erc;Of\ i Q \(i-~ '::r\ O\.V\vuY'""'
FAX NUMBER (206)458-4348
Nu~ER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW
DATE .8 / 2~ /9 i TIME SENT /0 . 00 11M
SUBJECT !c<k a. leN/ie a.1 A,~/ S~/b lS jni'I.L 1-0/7 f bot-
r~ ~'S r5 ct(1LN'.Q.c1\.L. - 'V0~ \\- o\/\. jour \R..\ey- Y
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS_ci- <;;C1^ ,- ~ C\~~ VJH\.. a (~\-
~'-'"S ~ \ e.-.\-- l'''-''- ~,w I ~ \\- c\(Je~~ \ W It(k ~ \\ o-v-
(2)("~. ~ ~~
********IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL COPIES OR ANY COPY IS
,
NOT LEGIBLE, PLEASE CALL (206)458-3244 AS SOON AS
POSSIBLE
V1~
t'U/
)J
@
R~C\'ckd [Xlp~r
JUfl 20 :=Ll 0'3 2'3 E' 'EF'I;F:EEfJ F'LH=H
P - -
..:. ~
CITY OF YELM
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
YELM BUILDING DEPAR~NT (206) 458-8407
Project
Type
Permits
Requested
Commercial L
--L
Plumbing ____ Se~er
.YACAuL ~J::J
Lot#_
Resident~al
Bu~lding
Mechan~cal
ProJect
Address
Block
Zon~ng
ProJect
Descr~ption
*
Iff~~.e,~-r
UIo'\.~+S
Bu~lding
Area (Sq FfJ. Floor;
3/,074 Basement
1st
Garage
Deck Patlo
Number of Bu~ ldings S Uni ts 40
Owne:- YEL-Jf4 Cfl.&€1<'- h4'R-r'4.t!"v, I1-s~ll{".:rA-7l!:S L
Address 7/1 -5 CMJ:]'1d.. ~~ '5u..:r-rE. 20 I
General
Contractor bZ,/\ j)etJeLoPM-~ NT
Address 9/IJ2- i,ZJ;.o6~pof?r (.)/.;'1 Sw
Yelm Bus. Li~ ~ &lfPLJ"-c~-,: c:tL..
Architect ~_~ I:L.-l:L
Address &:/1/;(:5"3 {-t. &1,J-
/-k~J h<D~ J- 01- ,4516 c..; a:f-eS.
;) 70 '8 W~1y\ EJ&-r C r, G-)
-
Engl.neer
Address
Plumb~no
Con"cractor
Address
Mechanlcal
Contractor
Address
6' fP""rw~rs
~r.l-JJ;~6J
/-~
Sign: New
Replace ___ Reface
parcel#h4~n1109200/~~~3
subdiv~5ion
Est. valul (. /00, OOOrOO
2nd 3rd
Carport
S~gn Face
Bedrooms
Bathrooms
Phone
City ~':4.t;,..rA
St l..JA
Zip '1~fDl
Phone ,~R4- 01 q2 F.~~~ ~ 7
City ~MA- 5t /JA lip 'l1l9..!l:j'
. D.tI<.DE.X*'
Contractor's L~c. # a770,-
Phone (20(P) :5 Co 1/- ';;. 96 t:.
en)' ----r;ac~"'- 5t t...Yi Zip 9 J%?
phone q43-/f9~
City dr~/}i~ 5t WA: Zip 9PSb~
Phone
City
St
Zip
Phone
City
5t
Z'P
I hereby cer~ify that the above information ~9 correct and that the' construction
on, and the occupancy and the use of the above descr~bed property w~ll be ~n
accordance w~th the laws, rules and regulations of the State of Washington and
the C~ty of Yelm.
. /l3c ~ lilt!' 16wr> 61&111
Appl.:il6ant s Sl.gn&ture QI/-3-&Yoo ;:. '1t.fS--r3Se
Please see additional ~nformat~on on the
reverse side.
ralQL'/9?
Dat~ .
After recordmg return to:
Yelm CommunIty Schools District No.2
404 Y elm Avenue West
POBox 465
Yelm, W A 98586
THURSTON COUNT':
JL '"j"'1P I A , l~A
11 -.. .....~.
04 "'-:'5 ,.'CI.:i ~~ rv'.l.
~Eill.I~~T 'RQ~ ~ ,t'~TJ~ 19tf~'1
~arl) ;:,. t:!f:!
BY: ILEANA, DEPUTY
$11.00 AGR
Attn. John Thomson
\lo 1 :
2264 Page: 663
File No: 9404.2512112181
MITIGATION AGREEMENT
~t,
TtIlS MITIGATION AGREEMENT ("Agreement") IS made this;lb ~ day of
~?RI ~ ,1994, between the YELM COMMUNITY SCHOOLS DISTRICT NO 2, Yelm,
ashmgton (the "DIstnct") and THE YELM CREEK APARTMENTS CO-TENANCY (the
"Developer;')
RECITALS
A The Developer has submItted an applIcatIon to the City of Yelm for the construction
of 72 multI-farruly dwelling units, commonly known as the Yelm Creek Apartments, File No.SPR
8092 (the "Project") The Project IS located on property that lies within District boundaries, more
partIcularly described on ExhibIt A, attached hereto and mcorporated herem by reference The
Project shall be developed m two phases, with the constructIOn of 40 multi-family dwellIng UnIts in
Phase I and 32 multI-family dwelling UnIts in Phase II.
B The State EnVIronmental Policy Act, Chapter 43.21C RCW ("SEPA"), proVIdes
processes and procedures whereby major actions by state and local agencies, includmg, but not
limIted to, plat or PUD approval or the issuance of building pemuts, may be revIewed to determine
the nature and extent of theIr Impact on the environment. Impacts on public servIces, includmg
schools, are envIronmental Impacts for the purposes of SEP A. SEP A requires the mitigation of
adverse envIronmental impacts.
C The District's student population and growth projectIons indicate that the Project
will have an Impact on the Distnct, when cumulatIve lffipacts of other projects are considered.
D RCW 82.02.020 authorizes the District to enter mto a voluntary agreement with the
Developer for payment to mItigate the impact of the Developer's Project.
E Pursuant to Resolution No 12-16-93-05, it IS the policy of the District to
recommend that the dIrect Impact of development be voluntarily mitigated by the payment of fees
and other ffiltIgatIon measures where appropnate.
F The Developer has agreed to mItIgate, on a voluntary basis, the adverse Impact of
the Project on the Distnct.
G The DIstnct has agreed that the terms of tlus Agreement shall only apply to Phase II
of the Project (as currently proposed) since the Developer had subrrutted some of the plans for
Phase I prior to the adoptIOn of ResolutIOn No 12-16-93-05 by the District's Board of Directors.
Therefore, Phase I IS not subject to ffiltIgatIon.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consIderation of the above recitals and the mutual promises and
covenants below, the Distnct and the Developer agree as follows.
1 The Developer acknowledges and agrees that there IS a drrect impact on the District
as a result of the Developer's Project and that this Agreement is necessary as a result of that impact.
2 The Developer acknowledges and agrees that in order to mitigate the direct Impact
of the Project, the Developer has offered to pay the Distnct the following sum of money' five
hundred and NollOO Dollars ($500.00) for each multi-farmly family dwelling urnt or the total sum
of sIxteen thousand and NollOO Dollars ($16,000 00) (the "Mitigation Payment") for the 32 multi-
farmly dwellIng urnts In Phase II.
3 Any extenSIOn, renewal, modIficatIOn or amendment to Phase II of the Project that
results In an adjustment in the number of dwellIng urnts shall result In a correspondIng pro rata
adjustment In the Mitigation Payment. If Phase I of the Project IS expanded beyond the 40 units
currently IdentIfied In the plan, the Developer also agrees to pay five hundred and Noll 00 Dollars
($50000) for each addItional multi-family dwellmg urnt beyond the number indIcated m the plan.
4 The Developer agrees that the payment of the full MitigatIon Payment (in the
amount of five hundred and NollOO Dollars ($500.00) per dwelling unit or SIxteen thousand and
No/IOO Dollars ($16,00000) for Phase II of the Project) shall be a condition of buIlding penrut
issuance and shall be made pnor to or at the time of buildIng penrut issuance for each apartment
buildIng in Phase II.
5
partIes.
The Distnct agrees to record this Agreement after It has been executed by the
6 The Developer acknowledges and agrees that the Mitigation Payment is authonzed
to be used for capItal Improvements to the following facilitIes. Fort Stevens Elementary, Mill Pond
IntermedIate, Yelm Middle School, and/or Yelm High School and/or any other facilitIes that may
be affected by the Project and/or the purchase of portable facilities and/or school buses.
7 The Developer agrees that the District has five (5) years from the payment date to
spend the Mitigation Payment for the capItal improvements or expenditures described in
paragraph 6 In the event that the MitigatIOn Payment IS not expended within those five years, the
moneys WIll be refunded WIth interest at the rate applied to judgments to the property owners of
record at the time of refund, however, If the MitIgation Payment is not expended within five years
due to delay which is attributable to the Developer, the Payment shall be refunded without interest.
8 The Developer WaIves and relinquishes its right to protest or challenge the payment
of the MitIgatIon Payment pursuant to this Agreement and hereby covenants and undertakes that it
forever reframs and desists from instituting, asserting, filing or bringmg any lawsuit, lItIgation,
claIm, or challenge or proceeding to challenge thIS Agreement, claIm any repayment or
reImbursement of funds, performance or improvements proVIded for thereIn, or any of ItS terms
and conditions, on any ground or basis whatsoever
9 The DIStrict hereby WaIves any objectIon to the Project as presently proposed.
-2-
Va ; 2264 P.:7t51?; 664
-1 l? .Jo: 9412242500=::= 1
10 The District and the Developer agree that the Mitigation Payment will be full and
complete ITIltIgatIon for the Impact of the Project as presently proposed on the DIStriCt.
11 ThIS Agreement shall be bmding upon and mure to the benefit of the heirs,
executors, adITIlmstrators, successors, and assigns of both of the Developer and the Distnct.
12 If an actIOn must be brought to enforce the terms of tills Agreement, such action
shall be brought in Thurston County Superior Court. The prevailing party shall be entitled to
payment of its costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.
13 Tills Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the partIes and any other
agreement either wntten or oral shall be null and VOId.
14 Tills agreement applies only If the Yelm School DIstrict has in place at the time
Phase IT applIes for building penruts, a Capital Facilities Plan and mitigatIon policy which mdicates
that Phase II creates an Impact necessitating mitigation for the Distnct.
YELM COMMUNITY SCHOOLS
DISTRICT NO 2
DATED" ?l'ps-:117
~~ ??/T'~
By. Dr Charles A. Hall
Its Supenntendent
DATED"
.y' /zu ft.y
,
YELM CREEK APARTMENTS CO-
TENANCY
/2/~
By' R. A. Rants
Its President, The Rants Group
I,ll) ; 2264 P.:,!;.:-: 665
-1 e .J,:I: 9404251.30=31
-3-
I certIfy that I know or have satisfactory eVIdence that Charles A. Hall IS the person who
appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed thIS instrument, on oath stated
that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged It as the Supenntendent of the
Yelm Community Schools Distnct No 2 to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses
and purposes mentIOned in the Instrument.
L/h5/9~
I /
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF THURSTON
Dated.
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF THURSTON
.",,"
....'t~~;_...~~~l.!',;"1,:), ;~l:;:;z;i~~
,--. .""A5~J" , ., ..,..
..--""1<".. ~..,. ,. "'&"... -,'. .
~Wl'~,'_:!,,~r ~"r) ~\. . v' .
~'~' ..;:-....., .e~~<a~lIol1l~".~~ ~, J ...~\ ~.;.~
~.(. G) ~o '". ':f,/'{j,':f..."'.~..t! ~.l!L ~ ,,\-{~fr
~~~ .:."!....:..~..,' '.':');~~~'('" ......-.~~
,'~~ ~', ..~""'".....""tt-1r".( ~ lt~J.;.,~..,.<~
~ :'\' \.- (,;~.: ',. ~
,,~ ~'~i ~"~7~{~~:<~U.::: ~ .~
~ .'-. v;..........-. ., ., """")
, . " . /> >,~~",; ',- ".,:"):",~;..:;,
TItle ~:. .' ..;-. :"....,~3. \..,"',__'
My appoIntment expIres . ':~'.':;'.'.ll~'!,J'..1>J':-' ;!'
'/1 '... ",. - )\.. ~
. .",~ .1t'''''1''~~.~'
~",_:(",~':.;:;N,' .
I certIfy that I know or have satIsfactory evidence that R. A. Rants IS the person who
appeared before me, and SaId person acknowledged that he sIgned this Instrument, on oath stated
that he was authonzed to execute the mstrument and acknowledged It as the PresIdent of The Rants
Group to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentIOned in the
mstrument.
Dated
~~~ /99/
J:\GTY\ 19406-00.061 \HRCAGRDOC
;;~ ,,3..: !!,c.
.p ..../'1 ..
t:': ,".\:c;'.\~J.J.-..: ~:- '.1 ;t
I'V '\' r:"'+ -\ ...~ ."~1~ ;::;l''$:;~ To> -..;~
~ ~ ~,,_'j--~'.j\)0 u,.v"._~
/J ~-... J t . -. _:'" ..... """.. ,,,''''":
,,~ /'I .: c,.,?:~..?, '''; "'I_I _' .,';,\
_ _- ~ _~ ____ _ L..! "") ..~_'-_! 1;..,4-::a.~""'/~~ ,;_
~ ' ".~t~3..;~;:~;::i~~.:~.~.~~~},~/
T'tl ~,. .~. ...'oJ.."# a. .....' ~,
Jyeappomtment expires JJ- 21- 9:~?.f~if"~ I~\~::/ ..:i"~
\.'01; -::.--:. "-4
~-=-b F',:t3J?: 6r=L~
~ 11- /' '-. .- ..-II.~1
-. l::' '~u. .:::l41--:j 4 -:. =- '-j I~ _
- -=- .-.J.t::. <, :=: 1
-4-
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
YELM CREEK APARTMENTS
THE YELM CREEK APARTMENTS CO-TENANCY will construct nme (9) 8 plex umts. EIght
(8) multI-family 2 bedroom units and one multI-family 1 bedroom unit. The project WIll be in two
phases, phase one 40 umts and phase two 32 units.
ConstructIOn WIll be on lots 1,2 & 3 of SS 8026 located in NW 1/4 ofNW 1/4 of Section 9,
Twp, 17N Range 2 East, W.M.
Total SIte Area 6 1 Acres, BUIlding area 31;000 square feet. Total family units 72.
l'/f'J II 2264 P.age: 6157
-1 e !-Jc.: 9404250..:-;:::: 1
-5-
After Recording Return To:
Mr. John H. Thomson
Facilities Director
Yelm Community Schools District #2
404 Yelm Avenue West
P O. Box 476
Yelm, Washington 98597
RELEASE OF PROPERTY FROM MITIGATION AGREEMENT
In consideration of the receipt of $ . Yelm Community Schools District NO 2
hereby releases any right, title or interest in the following described real property under that certain
Mitigation Agreement executed between Yelm Community Schools District NO 2 and Ron Rants
recorded on April 25, 1994, under Thurston County Auditor's No. 9404250081, Volume 2264 Pages 663 to
667
DATA RELATIVE TO DEVELOPMENT YELM CREEK APARTMENTS PHASE II
MULTI-FAMILY UNITS RELEASED
Dated. Date moneys received from developer:
YELM COMMUNITY SCHOOLS DISTRICT NO 2
By
------------------------------
Facilities Director
STATE OF WASHINGTON
}
} SS
}
County of Thurston
On this day personally appeared before me, John H. Thomson, to me known to be the Facilities
Director of Yelm Community Schools District No.2, the municipal corporation described in and that
executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be free and
voluntary act and deed of said municipal corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and
on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument on behalf of said municipal
corporation.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this
day of
.1994
-----------------------------------
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the STATE
of Washington, residing at
My Commission Expires:
., .1'> . 6
cy elIn
~
-,...~~
May 6, 1994
Mr Ty E Peterson
Ci ty Planner
City of Yelm
POBox 479
Yelm. Washington 98597
RE Yelm Creek Apartments Phase II, File No SPR 8092.
Dear Mr Peterson.
Enclosed IS a copy of the recorded MitIgation Agreement between the
developer and the Yelm Community Schools District. ThIs document is
now part of the process that leads to final plat approval. ConstructIon
permits will be Issued based on receipt of agreed fees as outlined in the
MItigatIon Agreement. The District collects the fees and Issues releases to
the developer All you need to do is ensure that the developer has a release
pnor to Issuing a bUIlding permIt for any construction in Yelm Creek
Apartments Phase II This MitIgatIon Agreement IS therefore a covenant on
the property
I have also enclosed a copy of the release of property from mitigation
agreement. (This is only a copy for your records we will prepare the
ongInals at the District.)
At any tIme, should you have any questIon give me a call.
Since ly,
t7L---
H. Thomson
cilitIes DIrector
'relm School District is an Equal Opportunity Emplover and follows Title IX requirements.
After recordmg return to:
Yelm Community Schools Distnct No 2
404 Y elm Avenue West
POBox 465
Yelm, W A 98586
THURSTON COUNT']
OL 'ir'1P I H' l~A
04 "'::'5,'>:!,;i it}.Q~ AI'1 ~
~~dIJ~ST 'RQr: ~ I''''' ~TJ~ r9?JW'1
~am ::;;. ,I::!f:: .
BY: ILEHNA, DEPUTY
$11.00 AGR
'I
Attn. John Thomson
'..'01: 2264 F'age= 663
File No: 9404250081
MITIGA TION AGREEMENT
~'"
THIS MITIGATION AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made thIS;:b ~ day of
~?RI.l ,1994, between the YELM COMMUNITY SCHOOLS DISTRICT NO 2, Yelm,
ashmgton (the "DIstnct") and THE YELM CREEK APARTMENTS CO-TENANCY (the
"Developer")
KECITALS
A. The Developer has sublllitted an applIcation to the CIty of Yelm for the construction
of 72 multI-family dwelling umts, commonly known as the Yelm Creek Apartments, File No.SPR
8092 (the "Project") The Project IS located on property that lies WIthin Distnct boundarIes, more
partIcularly described on ExhibIt A, attached hereto and mcorporated herein by reference The
Project shall be developed in two phases, with the construction of 40 multi-family dwelling umts m
Phase I and 32 multi-farmly dwelling units in Phase IT.
B The State EnVIronmental Policy Act, Chapter 43.21C RCW ("SEPA"), proVIdes
processes and procedures whereby major actions by state and local agenCIes, including, but not
lImited to, plat or PUD approval or the issuance of buildmg permits, may be reviewed to deterrmne
the nature and extent of theIr Impact on the environment. Impacts on public servIces, including
schools, are envIronmental Impacts for the purposes of SEPA. SEPA requires the mitIgatIOn of
adverse envlfonmentalImpacts.
C The Distnct's student population and growth projectIOns indicate that the Project
WIll have an Impact on the District, when cumulatIve Impacts of other projects are conSIdered.
D RCW 82.02.020 authonzes the District to enter mto a voluntary agreement WIth the
Developer for payment to rrutIgate the Impact of the Developer's Project.
E Pursuant to ResolutIOn No 12-16-93-05, it IS the policy of the DIstnct to
recommend that the direct impact of development be voluntarily IDltigated by the payment of fees
and other rmtIgatIOn measures where appropnate.
F The Developer has agreed to mitigate, on a voluntary baSIS, the adverse Impact of
the Project on the DIstnct.
G The DIstnct has agreed that the terms of thIS Agreement shall only apply to Phase IT
of the Project (as currently proposed) since the Developer had subrmtted some of the plans for
Phase I prior to the adoptIOn of ResolutIOn No 12-16-93-05 by the District's Board of Directors.
Therefore, Phase I IS not subject to rrutigatIon.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, m consideration of the above recItals and the mutual promises and
covenants below, the Dlstnct and the Developer agree as follows.
1 The Developer acknowledges and agrees that there IS a direct Impact on the DIstrict
as a result of the Developer's Project and that tlus Agreement is necessary as a result of that impact.
2 The Developer acknowledges and agrees that m order to mitIgate the dIrect Impact
of the Project, the Developer has offered to pay the District the followmg sum of money' five
hundred and No/lOO Dollars ($50000) for each multi-faffilly famIly dwellmg urnt or the total sum
of SIxteen thousand and No/lOO Dollars ($16,000 00) (the "MitIgation Payment") for the 32 multI-
faffilly dwellmg urnts m Phase II.
3 Any extenSIOn, renewal, modification or amendment to Phase II of the Project that
results m an adjustment m the number of dwelling urnts shall result m a corresponding pro rata
adjustment m the MitIgation Payment. If Phase I of the Project IS expanded beyond the 40 urnts
currently IdentIfied m the plan, the Developer also agrees to pay five hundred and No/lOO Dollars
($500.00) for each addItIonal multI-family dwellmg urnt beyond the number mdicated m the plan.
4 The Developer agrees that the payment of the full MitIgatIOn Payment (in the
amount of five hundred and No/lOO Dollars ($50000) per dwellmg unit or SIxteen thousand and
No/lOO Dollars ($16,00000) for Phase II of the Project) shall be a COndItIon of building perrmt
Issuance and shall be made prior to or at the tIme of building permit Issuance for each apartment
building m Phase II.
5
partIes.
The Distnct agrees to record thIS Agreement after It has been executed by the
6 The Developer acknowledges and agrees that the Mitigation Payment IS authonzed
to be used for capItal improvements to the followmg facilItIes. Fort Stevens Elementary, Mill Pond
Intermediate, Yelm Middle School, and/or Yelm High School and/or any other facIlIties that may
be affected by the Project and/or the purchase of portable facIlitIes and/or school buses.
7 The Developer agrees that the DIstnct has five (5) years from the payment date to
spend the MitIgation Payment for the capital improvements or expendItures described m
paragraph 6 In the event that the Mitigation Payment IS not expended within those five years, the
moneys wIll be refunded wIth mterest at the rate applied to Judgments to the property owners of
record at the tIme of refund, however, if the MitIgatIOn Payment IS not expended wIthin five years
due to delay which IS attributable to the Developer, the Payment shall be refunded wIthout interest.
8 The Developer waives and relinqUIshes ItS right to protest or challenge the payment
of the MitigatIOn Payment pursuant to this Agreement and hereby covenants and undertakes that It
forever reframs and desIsts from mstitutmg, assertmg, filIng or bringing any lawsUIt, litIgation,
claIm, or challenge or proceeding to challenge thIS Agreement, claIm any repayment or
reImbursement of funds, performance or improvements provided for therein, or any of its terms
and conditIOns, on any ground or basis whatsoever
9 The Distnct hereby WaIves any objection to the Project as presently proposed.
-2-
Va ; 2264 P.:tge ~ 664
-1 fa .Je.: 94~:::1425J.:::ij.3:=; 1
10 The Distnct and the Developer agree that the Mitigation Payment will be full and
complete mitIgatIon for the impact of the Project as presently proposed on the DistrICt.
11 ThIS Agreement shall be bindmg upon and mure to the benefit of the heirs,
executors, admimstrators, successors, and assigns of both of the Developer and the DIstnct.
12 If an actIOn must be brought to enforce the terms of this Agreement, such action
shall be brought m Thurston County Superior Court. The prevaIlmg party shall be entitled to
payment of Its costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.
13 ThIS Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and any other
agreement either written or oral shall be null and void.
14 ThIS agreement applIes only If the Yelm School DIstnct has in place at the time
Phase II applIes for buildmg pemuts, a Capital FacIlitIes Plan and rmtlgatlOn polIcy which mdicates
that Phase II creates an impact necessItating mitigatlOn for the Distnct.
YELM COMMUNITY SCHOOLS
DISTRICT NO 2
DATED' ?I' pr /77
~~ d/('~,
By' Dr Charles A. Hall
Its Supenntendent
DATED'
i/ /2U ft-y
,
YELM CREEK APARTMENTS CO-
TENANCY
/21a
By' R. A. Rants
Its PresIdent, The Rants Group
lllrj i 2264 P~ge: bb5
- €a .J':l: 94~:14251-30:=~ 1
-3-
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF THURSTON
I certIfy that I know or have satIsfactory eVIdence that Charles A. Hall IS the person who
appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed thIS mstrument, on oath stated
that he was authonzed to execute the mstrument and acknowledged it as the Supenntendent of the
Yelm Commumty Schools DistrIct No 2 to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses
and purposes mentioned m the mstrument.
~/:~5/9~
/ /
~
~,'i'<,..,~1.~Jlu'.1 .J,. r;;r~"i'r\;:t>
..........~.. :~,\.~,..r,~~~ J'"! -I., ~.,.,..,..
~1i1"''I-'''1'' ~~ \ ~.. . -J *
~'~.. ;:,.. .b~:.I:1I.~.fJ".~~ ./ .~~ "
l ~~~.....~.--./4c':~~;'.:1, ,~ ',.~:~
; . '-'. lJl' "e;-.... --1, '"-1 :..~ .~. ') :,/J -77'''__:
u""; .. rt.-__.,,'" !(.? . "
~J ~ .-:".., .'. ~l ~ ... .~ol:
. ,:. : ':; S;.'"..~;~{,~. ,-;: '.. ',.
( ~..~ . ~.. _ ~'." ,'"' ~ ,:..J~t. .I'~~" .'. It.,;..,. -:."
'~'. ." .:'_.~ i;.' $ ....v;;--- . ~ . .,'~;' '~.
v . .'. _", ~,
Title ./ ,# ,f' ~ ' " ..;) '~""''''''f;f:~~\;
My appomtment expIres loj-f".-.:.... !!'~ :~0~t~ ;i\ \..~. .'
I#,,?'!t;~.u. :'4~'~.'\
~"""~~.'""_ I . <
Dated.
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF THURSTON
I certIfy that I know or have satlsfactory eVIdence that R. A. Rants IS the person who
appeared before me, and saId person acknowledged that he sIgned thIS mstrument, on oath stated
that he was authonzed to execute the mstrument and acknowledged it as the PresIdent of The Rants
Group to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentIOned m the
mstrument.
Dated
/bu:.~ ~ /9 9/
l; ~ f: l. ! tt,
\ .;. . ~ } t) .,
It ""'\~;l:.,J.",'~..;:.- ~"It
" r:"_:..... ~f'J ..,i'~~ ""v
& & ,.. ','. ,Q ",'-
/J '.: '} .)~. '"'\0 '"I ~, ,-, ,
_ _- C,~ _- ;~:::~~;",.<~:~':\ ~'~~_~i~' ~
AJ _ ~ f..J -. ..'-' _,.,;7._ ., "
. ~ ~-~":' :: ".-.; ::: ..'."~:/ .::: "
;}~eapPointment expIres R-2 9 - 9:t:l~,;i0') ~;\~ ,-'-: ,,~
J:\GTY\19406-00.Q61\HRCAGROOC
ir_ .. .._ _
II Li i ~ ::::: ~ .::t '-1
. -- - ,... ~3&; 6";;,:...~
-1 e No: 941-14- "-:'C:-,- = ='
- -=- _1 ro...:.,i J...:.i :=: 1
-4-
After Recording Return To:
Mr. John H. Thomson
Facilities Director
Yelm Community Schools District #2
404 Yelm Avenue West
P O. Box 476
Yelm, Washington 98597
RELEASE OF PROPERTY FROM MITIGATION AGREEMENT
In consideration of the receipt of $ . Yelm Community Schools District NO 2
hereby releases any right, title or interest in the following described real property under that certain
Mitigation Agreement executed between Yelm Community Schools District NO 2 and Ron Rants
recorded on April 25, 1994, under Thurston County Auditor's No. 9404250081, Volume 2264 Pages 663 to
667
DATA RELATIVE TO DEVELOPMENT YELM CREEK APARTMENTS PHASE II
MUL TI-F AMIL Y UNITS RELEASED _________________________
Dated. Date moneys received from developer:
YELM COMMUNITY SCHOOLS DISTRICT NO 2
By
Facilities Director
STATE OF WASHINGTON
}
} SS
}
County of Thurston
On this day personally appeared before me, John H. Thomson, to me known to be the Facilities
Director of Yelm Community Schools District No.2, the municipal corporation described in and that
executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be free and
voluntary act and deed of said municipal corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and
on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument on behalf of said municipal
corporation.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this
day of
, 1994
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the STATE
of Washington, residing at
My Commission Expires.
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
YELM CREEK APARTMENTS
THE YELM CREEK APARTMENTS CO-TENANCY wIll construct nrne (9) 8 plex units. EIght
(8) multi-family 2 bedroom umts and one multI-family 1 bedroom unit. The project will be rn two
phases, phase one 40 umts and phase two 32 units.
ConstructIOn wIll be on lots 1,2 & 3 of SS 8026 located rn NW 1/4 ofNW 1/4 of SectIOn 9,
Twp , 17N Range 2 East, W.M.
Total SIte Area 6.1 Acres, Bmldmg area 31,000 square feet. Total faIll11y umts 72.
:'/0 11 2264 P:tge. 6t:7
- i ;;: NCI: 941-3425J..3J..3==: 1
-5-
Cii(ty ([)) f Yf({!} 1m
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
(206) 458-3244
TO:
HRC Associates Attn. Ron Rants
FRdM: City of Ye1m Planning Department, Attn. Ty Peter~cn
DATE. March 14, 1994
SUB~ECT: Floodplain Development Permit
Dear Mr Ra'nts;
Pur s u an t to t he C i t y 0 f 'Y e ] m Or din a I! c e 353 S e c 4 6 t he C it'-
requ-ires that the ~ny devel'opment within a Flood Hazard Area must
acquire a F160dplain Development P~rmit from the City Plannln~
Dapt prior to construction After review,of the information
presented in the repQrt titled Th~ 100 Year Ftoodpl~lQ
De 11 neat 1 on. Ye'l m Aoar tmen ts {prepared by John Wes 1 ey Jenn li~gS
dated January 24 1S94} and informatio~ on file with Clty, the
floodplain elevation is determined t'a be at 338ft 1n the
southeast portion where the creek enters the development area
From the area where 15ui lding 8 is located on the site-plat' north
to th,e 103rd street bridge the flood ~lE!Vatlon shall be 337ft
This means that no structure shall be built at an elevation lower
than 339ft and 338ft respectively unless floodproofed per
requlrements of the City .sui lding Code
Th i s, 1 et ter serves as your F 1 oodp 1a in Deve lopment Perm it f or the
Yelm Creek Apartmentsi please retain in your files
If there are any quest ions- or conc~rns regarding these find i ngs
please contact me at (206)458-'8408, or at Yelm City Hall
Sin~
~/~
Ty Peterson
City Planner
@
,Recycled paper
.. III
'~
City of Yelm
..- -""
105 Yelm A venue West
POBox 479
Yelm Washington 98597
(206) 458-3244
TO:
HRC, Ron Rants
FROM:
Ty Peterson
City of Yelm Planning Department
DATE:
March 10, 1994
Subject: YELM CREEK APARTMENTS
**This letter, and the conditions set forth, serves as Pre-
liminary Site-Plan Approval, Please retain in your files **
Dear Ron;
On February 22, 1994, the City of Yelm Planning Commission
conditionally approved the Yelm Creek Apartments Site-Plan The
following conditions must be met prior to Final Project Approval
1) Prior to construction or a building permit issued, a
Floodplain Development Permit must be granted through the Yelm
Planning Dept
2) That a variance be obtained from the drainage administrator
to utilize the reduced storage volumes as proposed by the project
engineer in the design of the stormwater plan for this project
3) That a deferral to the construction of the frontage
improvements be granted for one year provided that a bond is
posted in the amount 1 5 times the estimated cost of
construction ThlS deferral could be renewed for one year only
4) The applicant will be required to complete the design of the
frontage improvements prior to final engineering approval of the
civil drawings for this project
5) Mitigation is required for 32 PM Peak Hour trips per the
Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance for 5-corners
intersection
6) That all condltlons described in the Engineerlng Department's
letter dated September 14, 1993, must comply prior to final
approval See attached letter
@
Rec....cled paper
.;
7 That an agreement with the School Dist be worked out
regarding mitigation for impact, per the attached condition set
forth by the Planning Commission
If there are any questions concerning these matters, please
contact me at (206)458-8408, or at Yelm City Hall The
Floodplain Development Permit will be ready shortly you should be
expecting it soon
s~
Ty erson, City
-::::::::=-
Planner
-,
---0-, i....~~.---;-;-...~~-;-;--:;-:-,~."..~..,~,...,~..~.:_::-'~,.7""~-~~-;i~:-
:,,'--';:;:'--;:---':-M~.~~-"f""""7"-
'/ .r.
i
>. :"" ".
", '~,:fl~tYi:~,:~t;~10::;A~~;i;; ;'~~~e.i';~jm'i~j:K:{~~:~~;,~tgfJim~~i~' '
. )'~ I .:. . ~(,'~'\.~l"!1J.{,';~ ~t~ .."...;,;...'t~ ,<;, ,f', ........\},..'=tt; ,I..;,~'\ "
':;~i:;;,j;!:;_ ,: ":,., "r::: ~. ,: ~::" - .., , ' ".-~':~ '~\~~', '-;' ":/i'i;: :'l\i::{;~~,~ti~ ;).
<,: . ;.
)05 Yelm.Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm,Washington 98597
..' (206) 458-3244
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
72 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX
SITE PLAN
-r
the City of Yelm Planning Commission will hold a public
hearing to receive comment on a proposal for a 72 unit a~artment
complex located at the southeast corner of 103rd Avenue and Creek
St The hearing is scheduled for February 22, 1993, at 4~00 p.m.
in the Yelm City Hall Council Chambers, located at 105 Yelm
Avenue W. Yelm, WA.
The proposed site-plan is for 72 unit apartment complex to
be phased with construct~bn of 40 units first and 32 units later
The project is )ocated on about 6.1 acres on the east sid~ bf
Creek st. at the intersection with 103rd Ave
All interested parties are invited to attend. Written
comments must be received prior to the ,date of the hearing and
can be sent to' Planning Commission, P.O Box 479, Yelm, WA 98597
or delivered to City Hall. If there are any questions or
additional information is requested, please contact Ty Peterson
at 458-8408 or at City Hall.
NOTICE OF MITIGATED
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
The City of Y~lm issued a determination of nonsignificance CONS)
under the State Environmental Policy Act Rules C Chapter 197-11
WAC) for a 72 uriit apartment ~ite ~lan, proposed by HRC
Associates. After review of a completed Environmental Checklist
and 6ther information on file with the City, the City has
determjned that after mitigation, this proposal will not have a
probable significant adverse impact on the environment.
Copies of the ONS are available at no charge from City Hall, 105
Yelm Ave. W., Yelm, WA. The public is invited to comment on this
DNS by submitting written comm~nt no later than 2-22-94 to Ty
Peterson at the above addre~s.
----------------------------------------------------
DO NOT PUBLISH BELOW THIS LINE
Published; Nisqually Vally'News 1994
Posted in public areas 1994.
Mailed t6 adjacent property owners 1994.
r (
*
,
~ ~].
-{ :~- ~.>"
'J,
~~.
Rei:j'ckd,pa~r
.1,1,.
~~.:-, ......--
"-
~-----_...,
, "-
" .. "
~ ~ "-
,t ,,',
"'" ' ,
" '
"'" , ' '-<,
, ,
"'" "- ,
"-
'I
b'i\:l"g
:tSllDOIS)
Ef r\-f."",-\
1"\ \"1"1, \
q\~q, \
~I ,i~, I
~~
~~
\ \, \ \ \
~ S5
rt' ~~
\ ......
......
0'"
-pO
",0
-t
y"
/>j-P
V
<>
~
, \
i
\ i \ \
\ \ \ \ \
\ \ \ \ i
~ \ \ \ I j
~ .o'
~~\
,
"'"
,
,
"'"
,
"
"'"
\'~
~~\\ i t
~c li '\
ti\ \ \
, ~
"
,
"'"
-<
~
-<
p!
~
?O
~
-\
~
~
en
"
~~
,
,
"'"
,
,
~
)>
\\ \ \ ~
it~\\ \l~i\ jl ~ ~
\~~ ~\ \1 ~ ~ ~
\i\~J ~\! ~ ~ ~
it.
\\ \\ \ \\ ~~
\in i III ~ (; iii tin
~i~2. \\\ ~ 1 ~\i \~1;
",~~t. _ .' ~ ~ ;:,1 \ ~-
lt~i & r~ \ \:~ :<~
!: \, t ,- 1 ~
': e i t\. ...
\
."
~
t:.
t;
~
~
~
en
::t
rn
."
.....
~
~
~
,~ll\
~~\~
it.\:
} ..
toi.
~l
t-
"
- /'
\
.
~~.~ ~
\
\ ~
: .7'f
I I
I I
I \
\ I
\ '
\ \
\ '
\ '
\ \
\ I
\ \
\ \
\ ~
\ \
\ -< '
\ ~ I
I ~ \
>If I 0
i ~ "
\ " \
\~ I
\<1. I
\~ \
\ 1
\ \
\ \
, \
I '
: \
~ '
'\ '
\ \
\
\ \~
\ I"
\ I
\ \
\l
\
\
\
\\
,\
I \
\ \
II \
\ \
I \
, \
\ \ \
\ \ \
I \ :
, I
I I I
\ I
, I
, \
\ \
, \
, \
\ I
\ I
I I
"'" < \ /
I "'" \ I
,,~I
\
\
'\
\
\
\ i \
\ \
\ \ \
'I \ \
, \ \
i
\
\
\
\
,
I
\
i I
i I
!
I
/
l
I
~
.,.
\\
(~
\~
,
,
----
RICHARD J PRATT
436 RANCHIT~ VISTA RD
SANTA BARBARA CA 93108
EDWIN E LEWIS
16532 103rd AVE SE
YELM, WA 98597
JOHN T GRAVER
PO BOX 450
YELM, WA 98597
BEVERLY J MALAN
16547 103rd AVE SE
YELM, WA 98597
GLENN P JOHNSON
10336 TRANQUILITY LN SE
YELM, WA 98597
NORMAN N LUECK, ETAL
PO BOX 175
ROY WA 98580
JOHN DILLENBURG
10349 GROVE RD SE
YELM, WA 98597
JERALD LEON BAKER
10335 TRANQUILITY LN SE
YELM, WA 98597
ROCKY PRAIRIE CORP
17835 HWY 507 SE
YELM, WA 98597
BRETT J JACKSON
10343 TRANQUILITY LN SE
YELM, WA 98597
DAVID D SMITH
5836 GLENMORE DR SE
OLYMPIA WA 98501
ELGIE MESSER SR
10348 TRANQUILITY LN SE
YELM, WA 98597
ROBERT P LANDRUM
10342 TRANQUILITY LN SE
YELM, WA 98597
DONALD R MATTERN
10307 TRANQUILITY LN SE
YELM, WA 98597
JOHN R HOLDER
PO BOX 392
YELM, WA 98597
RICHARD L FLANNIGAN
4610 LAKERIDGE DR E
SUMNER WA 98390
DONALD R DETLEFSEN
7901 BROWN RD SW
OLYMPIA WA 98502
HOWARD N NETTLETON
PO BOX 217
MCKENNA WA 98558
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH
PO BOX J
YELM, WA 98597
YELM PRAIRIE CHRISTIAN CTJ
PO BOX 578
YELM, WA 98597
DAVID J MCCLAFLIN
16541 103rd AVE SE
YELM, WA 98597
DAVID RASHER
PO BOX 320
YELM, WA 98597
JUANITA L CRAWFORD
PO BOX 652
YELM, WA 98597
MICHAEL G. WORKING
7609 313th CT E
EATONVILLE WA 98328
WILLIAM R SCHOOLCRAFT
10339 TRANQUILITY LN SE
YELM, WA 98597
,'r' -' -- -- -- ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS
J PLE.4.SE NQTF:
P 1/2
...,sl-l.. I 3 ~ '1
· TYPE OR PIlINT LEGIBL Y IN BLACK INK
. MUST HA VE CORRECT ZIP CODES
. DO NOT WRItE PARCEL NUMBERS ON rnls FORM
. THUflSTON COUNTY PJlOPE/lT7ES ON! Y. OBTAIN ADDICESSES
fROM COUNTY ASSESSORS. BUILDING 11. FIRST FLOOR
. C11Y OF Ot YMPIA ProPERT7ES ON! Y. ADJACENt PROPEICTY
OWNERS LIST SHAll BE PREPARED BY A TIT1.E COMPANY FOil THOSE
PARCELS WITHIN THE CITY OF OL YMPJA.
. INCLUDE ALL fJROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET OF EXTERIOR
BOUNDARY OF THE PROPERTY IN VOL VED
CASE NO.
Jack SmltS. f.
4921 ~~a Street
Oly61tfii~ WA 98503
USE BLACK INK ONLY
v'-f~o-"?:.(p-oo?;,02.. 85B3-ou-CO~O ;)?7- ~o-II 010 (
e--i' ~ T. .p~tv* f3(e;fi- 0' :r a.c.k:8C7h... 1fv'~J- IV,. AJ.e;if1L+r:,h..-
I.f:sU ~~~ Vt~1a- flJ . {o3L{3 Tr~~l (, ~~, 1.0. Box. d-/7
S~tL @y;..rlotUD-CA\ CJ3LrS - ~ W"A q gs-ti 7 fV\-c ' Q9ss;:B
&L{?;.Cl -3tp-Oc-'l30 I es-<o~ -00 -0::5100 ;/-?t-bO-' J \ 0 10"2-
fJv., Ih t le-w1'S Dw ; d- ~ S~'1 ~k- l=~ +- r2>a..b -H r +- &/ufrc4_
ItR5~'2- I03Y'c 4.;eS(" S83~ 9La-Y\.~rl..,~, SC PI, tit 6CJK.::r-
'l..e.t V'I\- ~ C(2; S<:i 7 ~ (7~ ~ q 2,~'O ( L.), ~ ~ q 0,'S-q 7
~'SDr3J.{ -OO'DI 6'503 -00-0 I 000 f/Ll3o--3f.p--e:;/ ~D I
.:J:,~ \ tt-rMer ~lj-';~ V'Y\.e-s~y", Sr. y..dt'V'-- Pr?M.~Chrts+r~~
f Q B o'f... yC;o J d3t-/.:o /)'lI.,,~ j i ~ ~/'42. Sof. p, " & x. '57f:j
y-elr- vJA- q<O~7 ir--wA CfCOSCI7 "t/~ vJ'Pr- q~sq7
lRl./ SO-34 -00 (00 9"S133 -oO-o( (00
Uver~ J. k:ot; I\s ~~b4-v-+- ~ ~~
I \P 5 L/ T '0.3 (--..1 A<<..s~ lo3l/2- I1-tvn ~ Ii ~ ~ S
~lclr..- v../'ft Cj '6SCf7 <j..ejvv.--, ~ q0~7
e-S-B;3.-oo -00\ 00 c3s0,") -"00 - 0 I"2C> P
~\.J .T yY\.c. C-Ld-t; 1'\ ~~, ,P. ~Q-'~~
{LPsL{\ l03r-d ~A-J€. S'E.. 70??"J1..f --r~~ (l~~~_
~ \tJ~ qe,SCf7 . ~J"",,- v~qBSti7
0S03 -{)o -0-::5'2-00 saSe, ')-00 --0/300 ,
~C1Y'-~~. ~~, VVu--Mt.r y\-, ~ 'W j d.. ~ _ 4-! U,r
(030f -rl("tL~'~ \~~fU1UL ((.0, BO}L- ~
,t~ wA ~gS-q 7 l ~l Yl'-- vJA. qiJ,"5;q 7
f)5ro3 -00 -0 c.>s OD 8)03-00 -a ,L/ DO
N~ i-J /...u.. -e-,~Jc. I e~ :Jt' ~V'- R tk I dt-r
~. o. f2>oK (,S P at ~oX 312-
~L w)4-,IGs-8D ,eA~ CiCbSq7
B'58 '3 -00 -COOL/aD &lf3o.3l(,oo')o/
t h 1\ f' I ,~olvn.- b~ \~~
-T v...J-~ll(ll-... L C-'..fW -+Ov-d (LJ S' r
~,Q . R:.o Y, (VS;)- (D3L( ~ B~j~- .- < ---
Ltl<Y\.. vJV\ QgsQ7 ~vv.-'~ 96~7
0s93,~-tCO:EOD &L/?O'3~~OO?::bo
tf-~ c..lD..r ~ 1.-. ~V1^ (j L^- Jl1rc~/2 fl ' Wf).,.-~ "'I'-f-
l-flRlo L#-wA::l.-y-/'~P ~ ~ 7//100 3/3lJ'L.C,A- ~
cSu"rY\.-l\.C-.r LJf\ oqf; V-' "",-;11 Le. v1\ ~ 03 J
GSC03-oo--o0fpOD tRf13o,3 - 002.;oL/ II .
:!Q.:kJ.d. Leor\ ~r ()~J (2... D.e.,+~+s.el'\.
/ c)335:-rr~ 11'~'1IA.,r..e S'c- '7Qo( 6.('f)I,j)',^-l2~, ~w.
L r.t!.l~ ~V}q- 12:;5H7 ..-Xt. teL 0-.tA. 4i6SD2.-
'5-63 _00--001 03 ~9;;>7-30'-'(l.{O'-o (
lP \ \ \"l ~ ~, 56 ~ 1~~~# ~oc. k::v1 PY-A-,~, C~f
loJ3~' -r~~,~ 11<./..'-( ~~S( /7,035 .fLu~ 507 S~
L(f)Yk-- ~ C;g~q7 Y.el~ ~JA 4\.?;.~7
('(
...
..
~
~
'e
Ul
c:
~
('-
\/1
~
x
2
..; ""
oIL..
CJ ~ ~
OF C"YM/I'IA P~~.nTIES OMY
- ~ ,J{r;)
~~
~"a-,;;Itt ..11$;
Title Company Date
'F-k{;C<........, ?AI 1'7"1"-'
- ~_A ~,,>~___ _ _ ___ __ _ ___ _ _______
~;~- P{"-~ ~_~_ _ __ u~ _ _____ _ _ ___ __
c;l_~__ --t:l~ _~_ _ ___ _ _ ____ __ _ ___ __ _ _
_ J?fi '. ~<;I!~~~___~ _ __Q~lM_c..., ~~ ..-P Pd'-t.-t_5..(.,_.,{flc~ __J 2, _~_
___ __A--p_~~__ -~JJ. ~_'C_C t(a-L~ ~-L~~J__ _______n_____
- ---- - _ -~_ ~--~..c..(C-~.LJ~7----~ ~..{c; _lQ l~t~S 1- "'; ~(_ ~
-J~i~~M _~S__ _~_ ~$.~J ~_a+-, ~__eu-.5~~e~_C!F _~__ _
-----~f_~X ~~s~~_~~-.!.j-~-- _ __ _____ __
- _____~~'(-u-~cf-~/!.~j ~___$.~!'_Ls.___~_~__ <L~___ __ _ ___
_ ____0c.J1-"> ~~-'---___ _ __ _________ _______________ _ __ ______ ,_ ______ __ ____
-- ~__ A- ~ tL$ ~p--C!-J~c;-u.-~ _ ~~_ c;;,_~_~___ ~~tv~ _ _____
____~Ql-.~C9LUCJ L&_S.~ci.L.A.:I:~_.-- _~_ _ _fQ.~:c__ _s-hf-- _ > l(4(.~~.J _ _ __ _~ __ ____ ___
----- CJ..(lO?3J_&_____~_~c?.L__ 4_~~ -b --f-u.JO _.::>-YP ~~__~ ~~_ __________
--- - -~-s-Q ~---p~~-~~-cz.~8--. __ _ ___ __ _ _ _ __ __ ___ ___
-- .~if;tH ~~:-~-~-~~ .. .~_=~u.-- n'_~'.. ~ '~'__ _u.n~-
___~'S_~Jl.-~_rD(l.<~-,~ _________ ________ __ ____
-- r;..g~--~-~bq---~~l~nt!)(-~'h-~+ Ad~_<_.__ ___u__ _ ___ _________
-~ ----~~----~---------~--- - ~
/-.
I
I
!
I
t..
i
1
I
I
- /-- ",.. .--.. -.-
,
I
!
i
Ii
-IT--
j i I ~n;:: tZ-~/\J
I i Coy f//l9n1?c/L-
'2.:-~~-q ~
---t-.-----
......----1 'f=:-.--.------~ '-
_____. ! : ~ 'C'~~ ~ ___.8~~V"\~b~~=_ ~ ~~.L_ ~~\ c;. """e...e-~ 13-'-~ q "---
___.____ VLv.:\Ah\e... ~._~t:-__<<?v..~_r.f__~JI~_\~.___~ 1'\-~-(.6,)J~'~if ~_ s \--o~_____
._______________________~~--cPY\C4~~~..-y~~~~ ""' a----:t~~..:-1 ~-~-':2~t-tJp-~~~n-~b:,-CQ!.o/-L~-Y
... _ .'.,' ...._T.6'e.I"'-L:L.m(,c,"'n$b!oc./.d...jN/_..t.ik!"''1J<ld~~&''^>....Ld.<,jI r'--~
___________~_-'--A't.9!R..Lr:____THL5!_~'1 s:./xU.E-ItON__"-__ ___.________
---------- ; 11-!__lk. ~~__.J..L6_~~_...Jh~!!lJc~___2!..~~_.:d;__:ih~ -/- i1?-~~l!-L '-~fJ l6.__-?;
--u--n--.-----kt:r--y.ck:!~~L-~~--t:~lAJ/~k>-fi~..i-to__6-~7--/dd5....i{-'f1'1&'--.. .-9.Ni~_~___,
_._____________._~O,!..~~!2~J{__w_uf6---iA~-LIJ!L6L/,_-t------Q'---A-c!$.--~.! h:l__~~!~-_~J_-I;Zv('-o.e..-'-~d J-/~~/~4-
I. ______,____________L_..//V i.6.e.::___~Jt.. .____Cn~:e~____G~"X\___~__~~__n_~____~ ~~l_~~c.h_~__{.i:..__~~_.'~~
------.-------~-..::r:: ~,_~~s_~ .._\\__b..L~"'~~~___tlJ.s__J ~L_~_b.~~__~-<.d.---::i:.~A~ _.
_____u__________.___._~~~". r'\~--~-~d'~-s~~Y.\~~-...!.~~~-v:'o~<s" 'bt~C(:;._~_~_~$___sk~__~____~__
------~-~........-~)~-~\S\---h.='d~\O~ -~~~ ~_J~~~~\.~~ - 1"'C9~_'f-1!op_1e..- ~ _.
___________________.~____~l~.__~_~~,_ _ ~~~.......____\J_~~-b-'j-\\f<,----~::S-~.... ~--'---\!::"'~~... \ \:~--~~.~~----'-~--:t.~---~..." \.
_________________S:k~A:.J..~__~~~~~~~__.s.~LI~~~_~:~"'~.---~~f-t;-'^$~~~ ~~-,~~-----,
~'"'~-~~~>KL~~ ~'^~'" S\p~ It.v __~....~ ~_<:;,.~.:~-~~-\..\~~-
-------------i----.---I~\St1r--I"J-b.~~-~~f~''Cc'~'';)~-~\--~ ~@~-l~~~~~-b~-Jc.--D::&:--\ ~L___
_____________ .----i--J:.,-l.V ~___.....~~__.:fhe.- \...... fY-'.e.s5.,~-~-':tb~LL4 '" ~ S_--0'l""e.c~ eo" (y-L~~_~~~__~__...l?____
__ _ i. _~:':'~_~__::C".. cc_~ ~ (. ,(:.\ ~___d~,,_~\..,Q ~~~'"":~ N(1_:t:~_~ ~i_~_""j ,~y__________
----------------------r--4:sJ \)X:\~m ___!"-*___~n~~~-_~~c....~~_~___u;.~_~~ .....d----c.A-~_----e..~i-~ __
" '_."..~_~~k-~~.-~L.~"'-~...::; .~.A;y\<;"..a".L _'&"',~-;; L _,,__,,"__"'__._,
.1.--..-.......--.-...
!/flqse- C$.2Y)!i/-je/ tb. IS ~I/.e/t, (,Ad he~JSt:L6Sj.N4-_-:i'Ae..
~"f"<~tdm~~~C..._Ll/~~~rl
~Ldd. d. '
I
I
I;
i
i
!
._______~__L-_~^~______-~-.--.---,------,--------.--------------..------------.--.-.
i
i
!
s,,"-"..,....~ .. ~'
;87d/ ~- -
---_._------_.~_._-_.._<-_.
I
.___.___.____L-__._._~.__~.___.
- --~_._--~~---_._._.._._-------~-~.._----_.-~_.._--_.-..
I
I
I
I
i'
I
i
-_.._---.._-----,._------~----_._--------------_.--
_._----------_._~_.~._-_..._--_....._---'----~-----' .-.----- ._._-._._._---------_..._~
_.------_.-.._._-------------~-------------._----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
T
I'
i
.________._"[_________._.____.__.______.___.._____.___.- ______.._._______...____.._ ____.__________.___________.____m__ ___.__.._ _,_'__' '_"_-
.n.n,.._.._'~~-...._-_.n.......... ...",.............._,.. .m....' ......~........'" ... .......".. ',......"
II -.----------.
~
SkilliNGs ' CONNOlly INC.
CONsuLTiNG ENGiNEERS
Thomas E Skillings, P,E,
Robert G, Connolly, P.E.
Stephen T Thomas, P.E.
Michele S. Peterson, P.E.
Henry J. Borden, P,E" PLS.
Walter J. Mazna, P.E.
Glenn H, Hough, P,E,
Jon R Vanier, P.E.
Kelly D. Harris, P.E.
February 22, 1994
#93027
City of Yelm
105 Yelm Avenue
Yelm, WA 98597
John S, Crossman
Attn Ty Peterson
RE. YELM APARTMENTS
Dear Ty'
Please forward this letter to the appropriate personnel which is in response to Mark Cooks
review comment letter dated February 9, 1994
Comments are as follows
Drainaqe Plan
1 There is no sheet 1 of 2 associated with the Preliminary Drainage Plan.
2 The drainage pond which is partially located in the Right-of-Way near building #1 can
be located outside of the Right-of-Way However the treatment facility (swale)
preceding the pond will have to be located within the Right-of-Way behind the
proposed location of the future sidewalk.
Drainaqe Report
3 A variance is requested to size the storm water facility using 3,0001 1,000 cf/imp ac.
based on the soils information A representative from our firm visited the site to visually
inspect the open soil test holes on 2/17/94 Eight holes were examined, the depth of
each hole varied from 3-4 f1. The soil profile in every hole was nearly identical, sandy
loam-sand 0-6", gravelly sand-very gravelly sand with cobbles 6-40" These soils are
very typical of the Yelm prairie and are identified as a Spanaway by the Soil
Conservation Service for Thurston County Infiltration rate for this type of soil in the
Yelm area can be expected to be greater than 20 in/hr and past experience with these
soils has proven this also
4 Thank you for reviewing the project with the proposed storage design values
5 The client, HRC Associates, has submitted information regarding flood plain
determination If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Pat Rants at
943-8060
CIVIL TRANSPORTATION. ENVIRONMENTAL
~01 b LACEY BoulEVARd S.E. P.O. Box ~080 LACEY, WAshiNGTON Q8~0}
20b /4q1 }}qq FAX 4q1 }8~7 907/ 272-8}}} ANChoRAGE, AK.
!i
February 22, 1994
Page 2
6 The project engineer has verified the on site soils Please see the description of the soil
under item #3
7 The total site contains approximately 265,710 SF (6 1 ac) As shown in my
calculations, pg 1 of the Drainage Report, there is 170,819 SF of unoccupied area (#1
- #'s(2+3+4+9)) Recalculating the undisturbed area within the 50' creek setback and
the 25' property line setback yields a undisturbed pervious area of approximately
92,000 SF Therefore the amount of disturbed pervious land equals 170,819 - 92,000
= 78,819 SF The original estimate of disturbed pervious area was 54,710 The
resulting difference is an increase of 24,109 SF and the corresponding storage
requirement is an increase of 241 CF
The drainage facilities on the plan have a total storage volume of 8,500 CF The
required storage volume is 7,805 CF + 241 CF = 8,046 CF The proposed infiltration
storage facilities exceeds the required storage volume
The final determination for infiltration pond size will be determined when the final construction
plans are made
Sincerely,
SKILLlNGS-CONNOLL'f, INC
Consulting Engineers /I
. ~'-.J
Robert G Connolly, P E.
Principal
R GC\lr (q:project199393027Itr221 rc,doc)
I} Iso- i, ~~V\ 40 V tv\ ,
Evergreen Plaza 8ldg.
71' 5. Capitol Way
Suite 201
Olympia, WA 98501
(206) 943-8060 Commercial
(206) 352 7666 Residential
(206} 943-9368 F PX
TO:
FROM:
Shelley Badger
Ty peterso~
Ron Rants \
Yelm Creek ~partment Associates
(Formerly HRC Associates)
DATE: February 18, 1994
8un.:rEeT. EHY J.W:::~J. 4.ul.j Rt::L.UUI!Ilt::)Hlatiu)!~
for Yelm Creek Apartments
We were forwarded a copy of the engineering recommendations for the Yelm
Creek Apartments. We have a bit of difficulty with a couple of them and
ask your clar~f~catlon prlor to the Planning Commission's Hearing on
February 22nd.
We would
FeA,
A.
B.
suggest the following regarding Mr. Cook's recommendations of
1994: .L"~
~ ~~-~~j
We would suggest Mr. Cooks' tti~rd-0pt~on that the city of Yelm
would accept the project engineer's stormwater drainage plan
as submitted as it is based on the new drainage manual
requ~rements. "--We do not concur with the necessity of
undergoing a time consuming variance procedure and delaying
project review. - q v-vr,t'~o^,j e\~e. J..o'a5' ,
We have suggested previously that frontage improvements be
deferred until all of such improvements on Creek street be
designed and constructed. We had further suggested a waiver
of LID as a method of assuring our participation in such
improvements. Frontage improvements on a piece-meal basis
makes no sense and are frequently removed/altered when the
entire frontage is improved.
We will partic1pate with the improvements on the entire
street. Bonding as suggested is a waste of time and money.
A deferral of one year is very probably insufficient for the
cornprehenslve deslgn and construction of improvements for the
entire street.
c. Design of frontage improvements fits into the discussion of B.
above. Our exper1ence 18 that piece-mea1 des1gns get re-done
and are a waste of resources.
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT .... LEASING .... DEVELOPMENT ..~. SALES
.r
-j 3-H
U4 ~ jFNf
r CJ :'
'\0
D. We have no problem with mitigation of 32 Peak Hour Trips.
I'm a l~ttle troubled by Mr. Cook's recommendations as I felt items had
bee.n addressed previously and we were well on the way to reaching
concurrence.
Please advise.
cc: Bob Connolly
li~.- ::-:1.:1: 04 __:FVI FIJ~
FEB 18
94
FRI
F'
14:1=
.,( '''.r~,'':1''';.:~'1 ':, ';"
I.JRTH
:$,
ASSOCIATE::='
t- _ J::::I .L
'''',;:~7 '~I"~~ 'I"~'J;~.:'~"\,;'~:I':~lll ~I' ~ . .
<I , .....
DENNIS COCHRAN. P .E.
CIVIL ENGINEER
2626 12TH COURT SW
Ot YMPIA, WA 98502
206.754.1495
rnhlli.I', III 1994
MH >1'I)HHH G CONNOLL V, P E.
SkllfifHt, Gmmolly, Inc
P 0 H. I)oao
liWI1~ ,<'I)ft I1B503
Ri' \II! M APARTMENTS
OPrH ' I
I dill 1:1 r!-lI::o!l't ot your letter of 2.16.94 {which was "faxed" to me on the 16th and received by mml no file
i Ifni i\'q(lcstmg a variance from the current Yelm Drainage Manual criteria. I realize you are scheduled/of
puM( l\11:a(11:9 on Tuesday, February 22, 1994 and would like to have both the variance and an unqualifierl
apprmi ;tl from the City Engineer's office prior to the hearing. However, you have given me msufficient mt'll1
111ld d.lll 10 provide these items.
Th~ Or ;!m\~fl Manual adopted by the City of Yelm DOES NOT reqUIre soil data be furnished by an ARCPAC
I:ernljr~{~ SOli sCientist. I do not know if Mr Wright is so certified or not. Therefore, I would be relUtiam tn
accf:p! hiS sail analysis even had he given one. The data you attached very nicely details the soil IF WE
WERF rml V CONCERNED WITH WET lANDS. However, I cannot see any projection of infiltration rates ()f
Ilny dl~;,t:rlptJQn of the soil profiles. So until thIs data is provided, I cannot grant a variance and I t'rllilst stand
hv Mr (:ook's conditional approval.
1/ Vllr lilVP. further questions or comments, please advise.
SIIH" I "
( '-. <. "-" \ Cbe~
OHJNI.S COCHRAN, P.E.
I'np~ ;:iHEU Y BADGER, Administrator
i\AAr-lK COOK, ASSistant City Engineer
U ::. 1 = c! .;--' i..J--'---'_'..'j F M pel
,..
City ofYelm
~
105 Yelm Avenue West
PO Box. 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
(206) 458-3244
MEMORANDUM
TO:
City of, Yelm Pl~nning Department
ATTENTION:
. ,
Ty ,Peterson
En9inQJ.n9
!
15epartment
FROM':
Mark R. Cook
City of Yelm
DATE:
Februar~-l~, 1994
HRC, YELM CRE~K APAR'l:MENTS- PRE'LIMINARY APPROVAL
~OMMENTS
SUBJECT:
Upon revtew of the proposed project referenced abovel The Cit~ of
Yelm's Engineering Department has. the following comments:
RECOMMENDATIQN
THAT CONDITIONAL APPROVAL BE GRANTED TO INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS: /
A.
That a variance be
administrator to utilize
proposed by the project
stormwater plan for this
obtained from the qrainage
the reduced storage volumes as
engineer in the d~sign of the
project.
B. T~at a deferral to the construction of the frontage
improvements be grant~d for one year provided that a bond
is 'posted in the amount of 1.5 times the estimated cost
Qf construction. This deferral, should be able to be
renew~d for one year only.
C. That the applicant be required to complete the desigp of
the frontage improvements prior to final ~ngineering
af>proval of the civi~ drawings f,()r this project.
D. _That' mitigation be required for 32 PM Peak Hour trips ~
contributed to the hS Corners intersection".
*
Recycled paper
..
, i. Althoug,h the proJ"ectengineer' s traffic analysis does riot
, specify the number of PM Peak Hour trips to the "5 Corners"
in~ersection (generated b1 this proposal), tliis department's
conclusions as stateq ip it~s letter of 01/26/94 have not been
cha~lenged. It is reasonable to req~ire, mitigation based on
32'PM Peak Hour trips gener~ted by this proposal to the "5
Corners" inters~ction~
2. The stormw9ter_dr~inage -plan as submitt~d does not meet the
minimum storage requirements that are in place at this time.
This ciepartment sent a lettE?r to the project engineer on
02/09/94' explaining it's concerns and o~fered several possible
solutionsr One - solution would ~e to go through an
administrative, variance process (prior to'the public he9-ring)
with the drainp.ge administrator -to allow for; the reduced
storage volumes as proposed in the qurrent design. Another
option would be to design to the minimum storage requirements
that are in place at- this time without going through the
variance process. 'The third solution would be for this
department to recommend conditional approval - based on the
project engineer obtaining a variance to use the' re9uced
storage volumes in his, de~ign.
3. In~itially, this department requested that the frontage
improvements, as discussed in it's letter of 09/14/93, be
constructed - as a condition of approval. Subsequent
negotiations have resulted in increased onsi te pa-rking and
this department has agreed' to recommend de_ferra1 of t.he
construction of the frontage improvements for one year and
that a bond be posted in the af!lount of 1.5 times the estimated
cost of cQnstruction.
4. The ~pp1icant is also requesting that the engineering for the
frontage improvement also be deferred. This r~guest, is not
supported by this department. ~hotigh several deferra~s have
been granted for c:ommercial facilitief;j recently; all of the
deferral. requests have. been required to complete the
engineering for the frontage improvement prior ,to final
approval of the civil drawings. Given that. there is no long
range plan to reconstruc:t Creek Street , it seems reasohab 1e to ,
require that the proponent complete the engineering for the
improve~ent prior to fi~al approval of the civil drawings.
If you have any question~, pl.-ease
Engineering Department at 458-8816.
contact
,
the, City of
Yelm's
I1lrc
- .
~-,
cc: Shel~y Badger
Dennis Cocbran, P.E.
2626 12th Cou~t SW
Olympia, WA 98502
H.RC Associates
1'11 South Capitol Way
Olympia, WA 98501
Skilling~ and Connolly
Robert Conpolly, P.E.
5Q~4 Lac~y Blvd. SE
Lacey, WA 98503
'"
City of Yelm
YELM
WASHINGTON
] 05 Yefm A venue West
POBox 479
Yefm, Washington 98597
(206) 458-3244
TITLE (SPR-8092)
STAFF REPORT
FOR YELM APARTMENTS
Background
The City first received application for a 44 unit apartment
complex early last summer The project had been delayed while
the City was pursuing mitigation strategies for the five-corners
intersection After discussion with City staff last fall, the
proponents revised and re-submitted their proposal for 72 units
(nine bUildings) total Buildings 1 through 5 to be constructed
initially (40 units) and buildings 6 through 9 (32 units) to be
phased in later
Basic Facts
Proponent: HRC Associates
Proposal: Site-Plan approval for a nine building, 72 unit
apartment complex.
Public Notice. Posted, published and mailed to agencies and
neighboring property owners
Location: 6 1 acres located on the northeasterly side of Creek
Street, situated in Sec 29, T17N, R2E, W M
Comprehensive Plan: Comprehensive Plan designation is not
identified currently
Zoning: C-2 Commercial
Area Land Use: Property to the east is residential, to the south
is vacant commercially zoned property, to the west are
commercial warehouse building, to the north are residential
uses as well as the School
Shoreline: The east and northeast sides of the property border
Yelm Creek.
Critical Areas: Designated underlying critical aquifer Both
wetlands and floodplain reports have been submitted and
accepted by the City Planning Dept. It has been determined
that the project does not to adversely affect these issues.
@
ReC\'ckd paper
Resource Lands: N/A
Historic Structures: N/A
Soils and Geology: Both the wetlands and floodplain analysis
clearly identified soils geology characteristics of the
site Predominately Spanaway Loam
Topography: Site elevations range from approx 335 5 ft to 341 5
ft Slopes typically don't exceed five percent(5%)
Air Quality: If the project is approved, air quality would be
affected by typical construction practices and automobile
exhaust
Parking & Traffic: The project exceeds the City parking
requirements for a total of 160 stalls (2 2 stalls per unit)
Solid Waste. LeMay
Wastewater: City of Yelm Sewer Service and requirements
Water Supply: City of Yelm Water Service and requirements
Stormwater: See Engineering Report 2-16-94)
Power and Energy: Puget Power
Noise. Construction noises and automobile traffic
Disaster Risks: N/A
Fire Protection: Thurston County Fire Dist 2
Police Protection: City of Yelm Police Protection
Other
Applicable Standards and Policies
State Law: Applicable State Laws have been addressed
State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA): Mitigated Determination
of Nonsignificance issued on February 7, 1994 Fifteen day
comment period expires on February 22, 1994
Comprehensive Plan: N/A
. .
Yelm Municipal Code: Complies
Design and Development Standards: The City of Lacey Development
Standards are applicable See Engineering Report (2-16-94)
Other:
Staff Analysis
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Planning Dept recommends that the Yelm Planning
Commission grant an approval with the following conditions:
1) Prior to construction or a building permit issued, a
Floodplain Development Permit must be granted through the
City Planning Dept
2) That conditions A, B, C, and D, of the Engineering Report
and Recommendation for approval be conditions of Site-Plan
Approval
3) That all conditions described in the Engineering
Department's letter dated September 14, 1993 be applicable
for conditions of approval
4) That Building Permit Application be conditioned upon the
applicant/proponent negotiating with the Yelm school Dist a
resolution for school impact per the Mitigated Determination
of Nonsignificance Item No 15, Section B
~3fZ:: .~
T~terson ,
City Planner
Date: ~bI7/DI.'(7./ Ii: /??'~
I '/
:' ?
"'~
..:.. ~,'
1 .~' ";i~:' ,...'/
.j, ~ I. . -/ ~.~
. , ).' .::'~ '. ?
:',. ,
I.l' l~l-<'
~{~:~: ~:; {.. i,;;' (
.~:
'r',.
~"
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
"Yelm, Washiligton 98597
(2()6l 458-3244
February 9, T9g4 -
Skillings and Connolly, Inc.
Robert Connolly, P.E.
5024 Lacey Blvd~ SE
Lacey, WA 98503
RE: YELM APARTMENTS
Dear 'Robert:
The City of Yelm's Engineering Department has reviewed the
preliminary drainage plan for the above referenced project and has
the following comments:
SHEET 2 OF 2
1. Is there a SHEET 1 of 2? Is it pertinent' to the preliminary
drainage plan?
2. It appears that there is sufficient area onsite and site
topography allows for location of all drainage facilities to
located outside of the right-of-way. If it is not possible to
locate all of the drainage facilities outside of the right-of-
way, please explain why.
DRAINAGE REPORT
3. Please understand that, the minimum storage requirements that
are in place at this time are 6,000 cubic feet per acre of
impervious area and 3,000 cubic feet per acre of disturbed
area. The city has recently granted several variances to the
storage amounts (6,000/3,000) but only after the successful
completion of a variance request. The city has required that
several physical tests be conducted to verify the soils
ability to infiltrate at the higher end of the proposed
revisions (3,000/1,000) for each of the previous variance
requests. Should the applicant choose to proceed to the
public hearing prior to the granting of such a variance, a
conditional approval from this department .is likely. Should
the proponent wish to avoid a conditional approval from this
department, then a formal request for a variance tb use the
proposed revisions should be made prior to the public hearing
for this proposal.
Engineering Department Page 1
*-
:,' , ~
:... :
~':[.,:;~: j:"~i:~!
R<<}'ckd paper
~! .c t~'~
_;. .jle,
:~/t~:~ ,~,~',::~.~'
~ .":~
, . ..1,: ./':~;~;''':,~' . .
,'.:I..
~,'
-~:. ~. ;,.. - ..,
;.;,:,
':'~.- : '-I ',_. ,--' "
! ;'j~~
,)
--;'. (
"
.L -r .';
,
i;;;'.
"
..- .",
\~\i~:::.: \~f' ~ :<{~.,~:
.e,~:. ,,}-~.:.: 1~~.:;.
'r-
. ~~
;,,'
~.;..
. '1,
".,
expedie~ty, this pro'J~ct was _ reviewed' c
th~ prop6s~d tevi~ion criteria"of 3,DOOjl,noo. ;~
: ::',',;,,~,t: _ !,"-
~,
~,
.,
,.
5. On page 2 of the report, it is stated that: "The base flood
elevations and the flood hazard factors have not been
determined.."' Again a condition can be imposed' that would
allow this proposal to go to the public hearing conditioned oiL
resolution of the flood plain location/elevation issue and
relocation of any effected drainage components would be
manda;tory. ' :
6. The City of Yelm requires that prior to public hearing, the
project engineer or an ARCPACS certified soil scientist verffy
the soil type and soil profile. Is Mr. Wayne Wright an
ARCPACS certified soil scientist? will an actual soil profile
be provided prior to the public hearing? Well log number 19
(near the site) indicates that from 2 to 12 feet that gravel,
,boulders and clay are present with a hardpan located at 12
feet. Well log number 20 (also near the site) indicates that
brown hardpan and boulders are located at 2 to 33 feet.
Granted these logs are not associated with this site, it does
seem reasonable to require that the soil profile be examined
(prior to the public hearing) to ensure that this site can
support this drainage design.
7. It appears that the calculations (page 4) indicate that nearly
50% of the disturbed area for this project has not been
cionsidered in the storage being provided for this project~
The city calculates higher storage requirements than this
. 'project proposes ~ Please explain why nearly 50% of the.
I disturbed area is not included in the storage facilities for
this project.
If you have any questions, please contact The City of Yelm' s
Engineering Department at 458-8405.
Sinc'erely,
~~
Mark R. Cook
Assistant City Engineer
cc: Shelly Badger, Ty Peterson
Dennis Cochran, P.E.
2626 12th Court SW
Olympia, WA98502
HRC Associates
711 South Capitol Way
Olympia, WA 98501
Engineering Department Page 2
-,'.,'
... .1'
, -
_ '. _.: .;.:.', _~_._,. _~, .~. ~.,' 4 _. , .J ..
,
J- '"-_ ."_;'
;';h
; .";,, ,,;.-. .""'~-,--".,5 ~~;..Q,c.i..:.:-',-::-,~-d_.t,....;.._.
"- '"' -~.
J'T ...
>--':..:.:~s;~.~,,~~.--'"~ ~~~~,~~,_~"~,-.~a..:,...;,:"'~':l'<;,~ -.i.~ ,. -:-~~/.~
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal
CONSTRUCT A TWO PHASE APARTMENT COMPLEX:
First Phase = 40 units, Second Phase = 32 units.
Proponent
HRC ASSOCIATES
Location of proposal, including" street address, 1 T any
0.1 acrp.s
locatp.o on the Northp.astp.rly siop. of rrp.p.k Strp.p.t
It's locatp.o
within Sp.c_ 7.9 T17N, R7.F.. W M.
Lead agency
Cjty of Yelm
The lead agency for this proposal has determined tjat it does not have
a probable significant adverse impact on the environment An
environmental impact statement (EIS) is no: required under RCW
43 21C 030(2)(c) This decision was made after re'ieh' of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead
agency This information is available to the public on request
o There is no comment period for this DNS
~
This DNS is issued under
act on this proposal for
must be submitted by
197-11-340(3), the lead agency
15)da~ from the date below
~:1~ 7
/
wi 11 not
Comments
Responsible official
Kathryn M. Wolf
Position/title
Mayor
Phone
(206) 458-3244
P.O. Box 479, Yelm, WA 98597
/ ;' .)'n) I^L' JJ /.'
r: ~~Vt?-...1 . / I ..J/ ~'--
;I I j.
Signature
Address
Date
2/7/94
(Optional)
o You may appeal this determination to (name)
at (location)
no later than
by (method)
You should be prepared to make specifiC factual objections
Contact to read or ash about the procedures
for SEPA appeals.
o There is no agency appeal.
T\SEPADNS.FRM
City of Yelm
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
(:1
A BACKGROUND
1 Name of proposed project, if any
Yelm Creek Apartments
2 Name of applicant
Yelm Creek Apartment Associates (Co-Tenancy)
3 Address and phone number of applicant and of any other contact person
The Rants Group
Attn Ron Rants
711 S Capitol Way, Suite 201
Olympia, W A 98501
4 Date checklist prepared
April 14, 1993
Revised November 2, 1993
5 Agency requesting checklist
City of Yelm
6 Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable)
Desired schedule includes application for building permit upon
receipt of Shorelines and Site Plan Review approvals and
construction upon receipt of building permit
7 Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to
or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain
Yes Phase I consists of 40 units Phase II will consist of 32
units Phase II will follow in approximately one year
8 List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal
Wetlands Report
Traffic Study
Floodplain Identification
9 Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain
None known
10 List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if
known
Site Plan Review
Floodplain Development Permit
Building Permit
11 Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the
size of the project and site There are several questions later in this checklist that ask
you to describe certain aspects of your proposal You do not need to repeat those
answers on this page
Phase I is a five building apartment complex totaling 72 bedrooms
The buildings are set back (at least) approximately 75' from the
creek bank The buildings will be two story wood frame with
beveled siding Amenities include decks or patios, children's play
area, pedestrian paths, garden spaces, access to creek and open
space
Phase II will contain four buildings having 56 bedrooms
12 Location of the proposal Give sufficient information for a person to understand the
precise location of your proposed project, including street address, if any, and section,
township, and range, if known If a proposal would occur over a range of area,
provide the range or boundaries of the site(s) Provide a legal description, site plan,
vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available You need not duplicate
maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist
The complex is located on a relatively flat, triangular shaped
property bounded on the west by Creek Street and on the
northeast by Yelm Creek
ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1 Earth
a General description of the site flat
b What is the steepest slope on the site five (5) percent
c What general types of soils are found on the site? If you know the
classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland
Spanaway Loam
d Are there surface indicators or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? If so, describe None
e Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantity of any filling or grading
proposed Indicate source of fill
Anticipate cut and fill balance on site No import or export except
for structural import as required for compaction Approximate cut
and fill of 2,000 yards
f Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so,
generally describe
Yes, so erosion control methods will be utilized during construction, and
an engineered drainage system will be in operation upon construction
completion, to mitigate erosion potential
g About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after
project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
Thirty (30%) percent
h Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth,
if any
In addition to the engineered drainage system, areas disturbed during
construction will be landscaped
2
Air
a
What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i e , dust,
automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the
project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities
if known
Dust and heavy equipment emissions during construction Emissions
from tenants' automobiles after occupancy
b Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odors that may affect your
proposal? If so, generally describe
None
c Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if
any None
3 Water
a Surface
1 Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the
site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,
wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names If appropriate,
state what stream or river it flows into
Yelm Creek, partially seasonal, a tributary to the Nisqually River
2 Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet)
the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans
Yes, a number of units will be built within 200' of the creek
3 Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in
or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the
site that would be affected Indicate the source of the fill material.
None
4 Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give
general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known
None
5 Does the proposal lie within a 1 OO-year flood plain? If so, note location
on the site plan
Undetermined, a floodplain analysis report will identify a 100-year
floodplain elevation
6 Does the proposal involve any discharge of waste materials to surface
waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of
discharge
No
b Ground
1 Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground
water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if
known
No withdrawal Site storm runoff will flow into grassy swales for
pretreatment so some surface water could percolate into the soil
No actual discharge will occur
2 Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from
septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example domestic sewage,
industrial, agricultural, etc )
None
c Water Runoff (including stormwater)
1 Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of
collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known) Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe
Stormwater runoff will be collected by downspouts and catch
basins and, through a combination of piping and surface flow, will
enter grassy drainage swales and/or pond for treatment
2 Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally
describe
No
3 Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff
water impacts, if any
Comply with the City of Yelm Drainage & Erosion Control Manual
4 Plants
a Check or circle types of vegetation found on site
-L Deciduous trees alder, maple, aspen, other
Evergreen trees fir, cedar, pine, other
-L Shrubs
-L Grass
Pasture
Crop or grain
-L Wet soil plants cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
Water plants water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
Other types of vegetation
b What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Primarily grasses, shrubs, and scotch broom
c List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site
Unknown
d Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or
enhance vegetation on the site, if any
All areas disturbed during construction will be landscaped In
addition, some shade trees will be planted along Yelm Creek
5 Animals
a List any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are
known to be on or near the site Unknown
b List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site
Unknown
c Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain Unknown
d
Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any
especially shade trees along Yelm Creek
Landscape,
6 Energy and Natural Resources
a What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, woodstove, solar) will be used
to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be
used for heating, manufacturing, etc
The units will be energy saving - all electric
b Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe
No
c What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,
if any
Project construction will meet or exceed the requirements of the
Washington State Energy Code
7 Environmental Health
a Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill or hazardous waste, that could occur
as a result to this proposal? If so, describe
No
1 Describe special emergency services that might be required None
2 Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,
if any None
b Noise
1 What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (i e ,
traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None
2 What types of levels of noise would be created by or associated with the
project on a short-term or a long-term basis (i e , traffic, construction,
operation, other? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site
Construction period equipment noise during daylight hours Minor
automobile noise by tenants after occupancy
3 Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any None
8 Land and Shoreline Use
a What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Site and contiguous properties are vacant Across the creek is single
family residential and across the street is commercial
b Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe
Unknown If so, probably pasture
c Describe any structures on the site
None
d Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No
e What is the current zoning classification of the site?
Heavy commercial
f What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
None, annexed to city after development of comprehensive plan
g If applicable, what is the current Shoreline Master Program designation of the
site?
N/A
h Has any part of the site been classified an "environmentally sensitive" area?
If so, specify
Yes Yelm Creek - designated sensitive preservation corridor and this
site is located within the designated sensitive aquifer
Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed
project?
There are 72 bedrooms in Phase I and 56 in Phase II
Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None
k Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any?
None
Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any
Compliance with the City of Yelm Site Plan Review issues, Shorelines
requirements, and zoning ordinance
9 Housing
a Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether
high-, middle-, or low-income housing
Forty (40) Phase I, thirty two (32) Phase II units, middle income
apartments
b Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether
high-, middle-, or low-income housing
None
c Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any
None
10 Aesthetics
a What is the tallest height of any proposed structures(s), not including antennas,
what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
Approximately twenty (25) feet Beveled siding on exterior
b What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
The view from Creek Street toward the creek and the view from the
houses across the creek will be altered
c Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any
Project will be architecturally designed
11 Light and Glare
a What types of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would
it mainly occur?
Parking areas will be illuminated during hours of darkness
b Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with
views?
No, the Illumination will be aimed inward on parking areas
c What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
None
d Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any
None
12 Recreation
a What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate
vicinity?
Informally - hunting, fishing, hiking, horseback riding, etc
b Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe
No
c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including
recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any
None
13 Historic and Cultural Preservation
a Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or
local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, describe
No
b Generally describe any landmarks or evident of historic, archaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site
None
c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any
None
14 Transportation
a Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system Show on site plans, if any
Access from Creek Street
b Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate
distance to the nearest transit stop?
Transit is located within the vicinity
c How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many
would the project eliminate?
One Hundred Fifty-Nine (159) new parking spaces (Phase I, 88, Phase
II, 71) None eliminated
d Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing
roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate
whether public or private)
Yes Street frontage improvements, per the City of Yelm development
standards and approval by the Engineering Department
e Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe
No
f How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur
Estimated - Phase I The potential for 164 vehicular trips per day Peak
volumes would occur from 7-9 am and from 4-6 pm Phase II
Approximately 130 trips
g Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any
Traffic mitigation fees for rework of Five Corners
Preparation of Traffic Impact Analysis
15 Public Services
a Would the project result in an increased need for public services (i e , fire
protection, police protection, health care, schools, etc)? If so, generally
describe
Yes This project is intended for people to live in, public services are
need for those people
b Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if
any
Will discuss impact mitigation with the Yelm School District
16 Utilities
a Utilities currently available to the site
Natural gas is in 103rd Street Sanitary sewer via City of Yelm STEP
system is scheduled to be available prior to project occupancy
b Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the
service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate
vicinity which might be needed
City of Yelm water and STEP sewer system, Puget Power
SIGNA TURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge I understand that
the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision
Date Submitted a~. /;:: I ~ 7~(
!7
Signature
/2- /L~
I I
City of Yelm
YELM
WASHINGTON
105 Yelm A venue West
P 0 Bor: 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
(206) 458-3244
MITIGATION FOR YELM CREEK APARTMENTS SITE-PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL
CHECKLIST
The City of Yelm has determined that after the following
mitigation in conjunction with the checklist, the Yelm Creek
Apartments Site-Plan (SPR 8092) does not have an adverse
significant environmental impact
The applicant shall contribute financially to the five-corners
intersection improvement and/or the Y-2 Alternate as specified in
the 1992 Yelm Comprehensive Transportation Plan Contribution is
based on the number of automobile trips generated by this site in
the P M peak hour Contribution for the proposed use at this
site shall not exceed three hundred dollars($300 00) per trip
The applicant shall agree to submit an agreement waiving any
right the applicant might have to protest the formation of a
Local Improvement District(LID) or Latecomer's Agreement
Signature' /2 {)~
Da t e : 1~- / 7, / 5' I
*
ReC\'cled JXlper
\ l---~
"
"
~'!l
"''''
~11
Is!
5t
~
..~
'1 \$ ';\~~l i~-
<> i ~ t\l,~ .
U ! h ~~~\ "l~~
~ '! 1- \~,l~" -:OIl!
.t \\~ t! \! t-il :!\~ t.
~~~~i ,~~ ~ !~\a
\ \ \\
\
,\ ~ 2 ~
~\J 1 ,\~
u" \ ~~i i f!." ~ un
~. ....~ . ,'\ - ....~>\
~i' if ~ \h g51~
\\\\ T!\ 1 i\i I iii\
l'
~l \~ ~ \\ \\ \
~
...J
0-
iLl
t:
(/)
~
;.(
~
~
m
0:
0-
<l
3'
d
\"
/, "'- I
,l "
1 \ /"'-
I I'
I ','
I \ I' "'-
\ ,-' /
\ I, \ ~_, '",- S
\ \ \ ' ' ;
\ \ \ i '-', '",- I
\ I \ ,-,!<,
/ \ \ \ \ \,\, '",- i
I \,' \" i.. \, \ '
I \ \-i ,<'
: \ ,\ '\ ' "-
\ ~ \ \
\ \ \ \
\ ,\ \ I
\\\ \ \ \. \
\ \. \
\ ~ \ \
\\ \\ \
\ \ \
\\
\~
\
\
\
\\
\ \
, \
e\ \
\ \
\ \
I \,
\ \
\ :
, I
I 1
\ '
\ \
, \
\ ~
,,\
\ "'\
, ~\
\ y. \ \
\ ~ ~
\ o~ \ I
, cl \
\ .,. \
\ \
\ \
, \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
I \
\ I
, I v /./
\ I /
\ : /;/
\ \ ////
\/ ,l"',}n.P
-~
./ -
I
,
,
(/)
~
~
~
4
~
~
w
.,...
:;;.
Gl
r
,
,
"'-
\" ~
\
\
\
0-
'1:-0
0-"
",*'
'1:-0
(i
.c-'"
~~.
'~~ \ ~
\
\
\
\ \ \ ~ \ \
i t!~
\ ,t\ \~
'. i"'o\ I'"
\..-j;\ ..~
\\\V
~{
l~.
/
City of Yelm
<:?"-~""""-'.'"'liIi~
~-"~n;t210l~Jiilll.~~_".~:>>.~giI1Jlt.~n$SIIlI
January
105 YeIm A venue West
P 0 Bm: 479
Ye/m, Washington 98597
/20n) '158-J?44
26, '1994 -.
Skillings and Connolly, Inc.
Kelly Harris, P.E.
5024 Lacey Blvd. SE
Lacey, WA 98503
RE: YELM APARTMENTS - TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ADDENDUM
Dear Kelly:
On Wednesday, January 5th, 1994 - the proponents for the above
referenced project met with city staff to discuss the increase of
the number of apartments associated with this proposal.
In discussions with Robert Connolly, P.E. (Skillings and Connolly -
01/05/94), lt was agreed that the original TIA could be modifled
(letter format) to account for the increase in traffic generated by
thlS proposal and that the original distribution network would be
acceptable for the arnrnended proposal. The identified
area/intersection of concern is the "5 CORNERS" intersection and
not the intersection of Yelm Avenue and 103rd Avenue. Please
evaluate the impact to the "5 CORNERS" intersection as this is the
only intersection slated for mitigation at this time.
Utilizing the 5th edition of the Trip Generation manual (ITE) and
use code #220, it appears that a total of 45 PM peak hour trips are
expected to be generated by this proposal. Using "Figure 4" of the
original TIA, 70% of this PM peak hour traffic is expected to go to
the "5 CORNERS" intersection. It is expected then, that a total of
32 trips shall impact the intersection during the PM peak hour
period.
Please review the data cited/referenced above and respond at your
earliest convenience.
If you have any questions, please contact The City of Yelm 's
Engineering Department ~t 458-8405.
U'~
Mark R. Cook
Assistant Clty Engineer
*
n~.-.~] ,I_~~_....
cc: Shelly Badger
Ty Peterson
Dennis Cochran, P.E.
2626 12th Court SW
Olympia, WA 98502
HRC Associates
R.A. Rants
711 South Capitol Way #201
Olympia, WA 98501
...
. to
~-_..-~---=::~~- ,
~ r<:- (C::; I ,.., 'I '\"
\ ~;\ L~,-s::7_l;:: \..,__,_! I
I,
:, \ JAN 2 6 1994
, .
, , .
l
~ 1 1 \
.' l :
-- .._-~- .--.....-..---
-- .-~._--
The 100 Year Floodplain Delineation,
Yelm Apartments, Yelm, Ua.
Prepared for:
The Rants Group, Olympia, UA, for presentation to
the City of Yelm, Uashington
Report preparation date. January 24, 1993
Prepared by:
J U. Jepnings, soil scientist
Puget Land Consultants
P.O. Box 9635
Tacoma, tlA 98409
206-474-4718
. .
INTRODUCTION
This report documents the historic 100 year floodplain along Yelm
Creek within an area proposed for the Yelm Apartments. The
property is within Section 29, T17N, R2E, U.M. and located at the
intersection of Creek and 103rd. Streets, Yelm, YA. The applicant
ie HRC Associates. The City of Yelm has Jurisdiction for
environmental review. Field work was conducted during 'the period
of January 11-20, 1994.
City of Yelm Ordinance 353 states regulatory authority and
processes for 100 year floodplain determinations. Special flood
hazard areas for the City of Yelm and viclnity were identified by
the Federal Insurance Administration on October 22, 1976 (1).
This "Flood Hazard Boundary Map" is generalized in form without
1
flood elevations. In order to more accurately identify special
flood hazard areas, the CIty of Yelm has requested fIeld evidences
and floodplain elevation data in support of a 100 year floodplain
determination.
The information used to generate this report is from a variety of
sources and supplementary in nature. The list including direct
field observations of soils, survey elevations, aerial photograph
interpretations, inspection for waterlines on bridges, reference
to work of previous engineering and envIronmental sclence
reports, review of topographic maps, weather records, FEMA maps,
well logs, soil surveys, and lastly interviews with local
residents This required the synthesis of information to bear
upon the question: where is the 100 year floodplain?
GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Yelm Creek forms in an area dominated by glacial solI materials
from the most recent Puget Sound Lowland glaciation. The typical
sequence is to have a layer of recessional glacial outwash
materials at the surface, which rests above compact glacial till
layers which rests above advance glacial outwash materials. Each
of these layers typically range between 10 and 30 feet in
thickness, but locally can deviate beyond these limits (2). Below
the limits of the most recent glaciation is older glacial and
bedrock deposits whlch are not oE interest to this report.
The recessional glacial outwash was formed when the last glacier
melted away. These recessional outwash materlals are high in sand
and gravels. Local soils that form in this outwash are the
Spanaway and McKenna soils. Spanaway series soils are found in
upland positions and typically have black gravelly or very
gravelly sandy loam surface soils (0-15 inches), dark yellowish
brown very gravelly sandy loam subsoils (15-20 inches), and a
dark yellowish brown extremely gravelly sand substratum below 20
inches. Important Spanaway soil characteristics are a high
(rapid) surface water infiltration rate and a high percolation
rate in the lower soil materials, Spanaway soils are somewhat
~
excessively drained. Spanaway soils strongly dominate the surface
soil materials withIn the Yelm Creek draInage area. McKenna
serIes solIs are mapped In depressions In the landscape.
TypIcally McKenna solIs have black gravelly slIt loam or slIt
loam surface solIs (0-9 Inches); very dark grayIsh brown to dark
brown, and mottled, very gravelly slIt loam and loam subsoils
(9- 36 Inches); and a dense glacial till substratum below 36
Inches. McKenna solIs have outwash lIke gravels wIth fIne
textures from flood depositIons, and draInage restrIctions.
Important McKenna solI characterIstIcs are moderate percolatIon
rates above tIll hardpan layers and poor solI draInage (3).
In thIs area glacIal tIll layers are encountered below the
recessional outwash materIals. TIlls form dIrectly under a
glacIer and are compacted by the weight of the glacier. The
compaction effort of the glacier, compounded by chemIcal
cementatIon processes, makes these layers very restrIctIve to
water movement. They justly acquire theIr common name: hardpans.
Uhen tIll layers are exposed to the surface, solI formIng
processes start. As a result soil forms at the surface and
hardpan layers are located 20-40 Inches below the surface. The
local soil that develops under these condItions is the Alderwood
series. No Alderwood serIes soils are located in thIs proposed
development, although some are located near HammersmIth Hill.
Below the till layers are additIonal outwash deposIts as the
glacier advanced toward Yelm These materials are descrIbed by
Mundorff as beIng exposed along the bluffs of the Nlsqually River
(2). No local solIs are mapped in these advance glacial outwash
materials
CHARACTERIZATION OF YELM CREEK
Yelm Creek forms In an area dominanted by glacial soil materials
as previously described These glacial soil materials were
deposited during that last major glaciation about 14,000 years
ago. The landscape since that tIme has had relatively minor
modifications, and streamcourse development is poorly expressed.
Yelm Creek itself is an intermittent stream through certain
stretches and has minor flow contributions from tributaries This
tells a good deal about the character of Yelm Creek and the
surrounding landscape. A stream network does not form because
practically all rainfall goes into the soil rather than collect
into tributarIes that flow Into Yelm Creek_
Once InsIde the solI, water percolates freely but Is pulled by
gravIty to lower elevations. Uhen hardpan layers are encountered,
downward water movement Is severely restricted. Uater must then
flow laterally above the hardpan and typIcally forms a local
watertable DurIng seasons of high rainfall the local watertable
rIses. Yelm Creek and assocIated wetlands are low poInts In the
landscape where the watertable rIses to the surface
It is an important poInt to realize that floods in Yelm Creek do
not occur from a quIck gatherIng of runoff waters followIng large
storms. Floods occur by slow buIldup of the watertable and
release into Yelm Creek following seasonal rainfall patterns
Uhat effects Yelm Creek is heavy winter season rainfall: during
the period between November 1 and May 31. In colloquial terms,
Yelm Creek is a mellow streamcourse: it rises slowly and retreats
slowly.
LOCAL CONDITIONS
The Yelm Apartments are proposed near the intersection of Creek
and 103rd Streets, and this report must zero in on high
floodplain conditions at this site. For descriptive use in this
report, the following terms are defined for this roughly
triangular property.
THE BRIDGE CORNERS - the area near the 103rd. Street bridge where
the two close together corners are located
CREEK STREET CORNER - the southwest corner of the property
adjacent to Creek Street
UPPER CREEK CORNER - the southeastern corner of the property near
the furthest point upstream on Yelm Creek
hnalysis of the local topography of this site yields valuable
information. Yelm Creek runs close by the property line between
the upper creek corner and the bridge corners. There is a
distinct bank on the southwest side of Yelm Creek. The elevation
of this bank has been surveyed at between 338.41 and 339.22 feet
for 2/3 the length of Yelm Creek. However, in the area about the
bridge corners, the bank then gradually lowers to below 336 feet
and is poorly defined. The land to the southwest of Yelm Creek is
dominated by a nearly level outwash terrace with elevations
between 339 and 342 feet. There are a couple of minor depressions
where the elevations dip slightly below 339 feet. This outwash
terrace area is upland in character and outside the 100 year
floodplain area. This is the area where apartment structures and
associated construction activities are proposed.
However, in the land area near the bridge corners, the elevation
of the land gradually lowers to 335.5 feet at the lowest point.
Here there are transitional conditions between uplands conditions
on the outwash terrace above and watercourse conditions within
Yelm Creek. In this area occasional flooding does occur. This is
the most critical area for the analysis of high floodplains for
this proposed development.
Soils have been mapped in this area as Spanaway gravelly sandy
loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes (mapping unit 110); and McKenna
gravelly slIt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes (mappIng unit 65)(3).
Inspection of the sIte area, confirms the presence of Spanaway
soils However., McKenna soils were limited to within the banks of
the Yelm Creek stream channel and should be considered as part of
the streamcourse. On this point I would concur with the
conclusIons presente~ In the Applied EnvIronmental Services Inc
.
.
w~tland r~port about soil and wetland conditions and the
characteristics of Yelm Creek (4). As supplement to the soil
conditions described in the Thurston County Soil SUtV~y I
describe what I have determined to be a flood phase of the
Spanaway soil from previous project activity within the Yelm
Creek drainage (5). This phase of the Spanaway soil series has a
silt loam or gravelly silt loam surface soil. However, this fine
textured surface soil overlies the typical gravelly sandy loam
surface soil at betwe~n 3 to 9 inch~s in depth, and is otherwise
similar to the Spanaway series. The flood phase of Spanaway soils
was detected at lower elevations near the bridge corners, and
within a very narrow zone along the upper bank of Yelm Creek.
Additional data observed within the local area of the Yelm
apartments will be incorporated into the analysis discussion that
follows.
ANALYSIS
As mentioned in the introduction, data has been collected from a
variety of sources, restricted to bear on the location of the
100 year floodplain, and then synthesized within this report.
Here I will demonstrate the rationale used to reach my
conclusions.
The FEMA prepared Flood Hazard Boundary Map depicts a special
flood hazard area that runs across this property at a distance
b~tween 200 and 250 feet from Yelm Creek. No elevations were
given for this flood hazard classification. Uhen compared to the
soil mapping within the Soil Survey of Thurston County,
Uashington, there is a striking similarity. In this case, it is
obvious the flood hazard delineation has been accepted directly
from the soil mapping. The area mapped as the McKenna soil is
depicted as a special flood hazard area. However, this soil
classification is documented to be locally in error in this
report, and the wetland report previously prepared by Applied
Environmental Services Inc. (4).
In work I previously conducted within Yelm Creek drainage, I was
able to determine a flood phase of the Spanaway series soil. This
is an otherwise Spanaway lik~ soil, but with a layer of silt loam
material at the soil surface (5). The presence of this silt loam
layer over coarse soil materials is a reasonable estimator that
some flooding has occurred in the past. The shallower the silt
loam layer, th~ more infrequent the flooding. In the field I was
able to detect the flood phase of Spanaway soils at about 338
feet along the upper Yelm Creek bank near the Creek Corner, and
at about 336 feet near The Bridge Corners. This would indicate
that the high floodplain drops about 2 f~et along a traverse
across the property. As a check elevations were surveyed at the
upp~r and lower streambeds. The streambed fall was surveyed as a
2.72 feet difference in elevation. These numbers are in relative
agreement. The 336 foot contour should be considered a good
estimator of where historic high floodwaters occur at a frequency
of once per 100 years or greater (within the critical analysis
area near The Bridge Corners). This historic 100 year floodplain
grades upward in elevation to 338 feet, possibly slightly
greater, near the Creek Corner area
To get a feel for recent high floods along Yelm Creek I talked
with a local resident Joe Uilkinson who lives east of the 103rd.
Street bridge. He was able to give a detailed description of
local flooding along Yelm Creek. The discussion centered upon
flood conditions during the winter/spring of 1989-90. This was
the worst flood year he could recall for Yelm Creek, and is
considered at least a 100 year flood event by individuals
knowledgeable about Yelm Creek. This individual was able to point
out that water rose in his driveway and passed across 103rd.
Street with a spot o{ dry land on a mound in the yard (6). From
this information, elevations were taken at the mound, the road
centerline, the bridge bottom ({or streamcourse clearance), and
the streambed. This surveyed data was as follows
~
elf'-'
(/(
THE MOUND
ROAD CENTERLINE
BRIDGE. CLEARANCE
YELM CREEK BED
337.54
~1
336. 0
333.79
feet
t eet ~
feet
feet
that 1989-90 high floodwaters
ee . It is estimated the
was approximate ee at the 103rd. Street
br ona y, with floodwaters at eet, this exceeded
the strcamcourse clearance of the 103rd. Street bridge by about
0.5 feet. This indicates the streamcourse release under this
bridge is inadequate during high flood events. This locally
forces floodwaters to higher elevations. This data lends support
to the estimate that the historic 100 year floodplain is at about
336 feet. 7
-
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
1. The Yelm Apartments development is proposed on a roughly
triangular piece of property at the Junction of Creek Street and
103rd. Street, Yelm, UA. This development is partially in an area
identified in a FEMA generated Flood Hazard Boundary Map as a
special flood hazard area. The classification {or this special
flood hazard area how lacks elevation considerations. The City of
Yelm Planning Department has required further information to be
gathered in support of the 100 year floodplain elevations for
this proposed development This report uses diverse data to help
identify the 100 year floodplain elevations including. field
observations, surveyed elevations, maps and aerial photographs,
reference sources, and personal testimony.
2. Yelm Creek drainage is within an area strongly dominated by
glacial outwash materials. Layers of glacial till (hardpan) are
typically encountered ,at between 10 and 30 feet below the
surface, but may be l6cally shallower. The outwash materials have
very high water infiltration and internal percolation rates.
RainEal1 readily enters the soil and moves downward through sandy
. 0
soil mate~ials until the till ha~dpan laye~s a~e encounte~ed. The
ha~dpan ~cst~icts downwa~d wate~ movement and a wate~table fo~ms
above this laye~. Uate~s must then move late~ally f~llowing a
g~adient towa~d a lowe~ point in the landscape. The low spot in
the landscape is Yelm C~eek whe~e wate~tables ~ise to the su~{ace
and st~cam flow occu~s. Du~ing the winte~ and sp~ing ~ainy
season, Yelm C~eek slowly ~ises and then slowly falls du~ing d~y
months of the yea~. Some sections of Yelm C~eek cease su~face
{low du~ing the d~y season. It is impo~tant to ~ealize that Yelm
C~eek is a mild manne~ed st~eam that ~esponds slowly towa~d
floodwate~ conditions following season long ~ainfall patte~ns,
~athe~ than a quick ~unoff ~esponse following peak sto~m pe~iods.
3. Analysis of landfo~ms, the soils, and The Flood Haza~d
Bounda~y Map ~eveals disc~epancies in the data sou~ces. The Flood
Haza~d Bounda~y Map appea~s to be exactly the same as the Thu~ston
County solI su~vey maps, and p~obably was de~Ived f~om the solI
su~vey data sou~ce. The a~ea Identified as McKenna soils
co~~elates with a special flood haza~d a~ea desIgnation. Howeve~,
the solI su~vey maps a~e locally In e~~o~. This e~~o~ Is
documented In this ~epo~t and also a wetland delineation ~epo~t
p~epa~ed fo~ this ~epo~t. This ~equi~es {u~the~ conside~ation of
the solIs wIthIn this development.
4. The soils within the Yelm Apa~tments development a~e de~ived
exclusively f~om outwash mate~ials. The soil su~vey mapping
depIcts both Spanaway and McKenna se~Ies soils on the p~ope~ty.
McKenna soils a~e not p~esent in mappable size a~eas and a~e
~est~icted to within the Yelm C~eek st~eam channel a~ea. Spanaway
solIs a~e p~esent ove~ the ~emainde~ of the p~ope~ty, but with
two mapping units. The {I~st mapping unit is as desc~ibed In the
SolI Su~vey of Thu~ston County, Uashington, mappIng unIt 110,
Spanaway g~avelly sandy loam, 0 to 3 pe~cent slopes. The second
mapping unIt Is not desc~ibed in the SolI Su~vey of Thu~ston
County, but Is sImIla~ to mapping unit 110, except wIth a 3-9
Inch laye~ of slIt loam o~ g~avelly silt loam laye~ su~face solI
The p~esence of these slIt loam mate~Ials ~elates to Yelm C~eek
flood actIvity, and is called the flood phase of the Spanaway
se~ies In this ~epo~t.
5. UtilizIng the concept of the flood phase of Spanaway solIs as
a fIeld Indicato~, the p~esence of these soils was obse~ved in
the field. They a~e p~esent wIthIn the well defined bank a~ea
adjacent to Yelm C~eek. He~e the~e is a quIck t~ansition f~om
~egula~ Spanaway solIs, to flood phase Spanaway soils, to McKenna
soils, to the Yelm C~eek st~Qamcou~se withIn a few feet distance
(S- 10 feet). The uppe~ limit of the flood phase of Spanaway soils
is at about 338 feet at the fu~thest point upst~eam on this
p~ope~ty. In the a~ea,of the p~ope~ty nea~ the 103~d. st~eet
b~Idge, the uppe~ limited of the flood phase of Spanaway soils
was flagged in the field and su~veyed at slightly less than 336
feet. This hIgh floodplaIn desIgnation would the~efo~e fall f~om
338 feet upst~eam to 336 feet elevation nea~ the b~Idge. The
st~eam g~adlent fall fo~ thIs same st~Qtch of Yelm C~eek was
su~veyed at 2.72 feet.
~ '
. "
6. The testimony of a neighbor, Joe Uilkinson, who lives
immediately to the east of the 103rd Street bridge, was utilized
as an additional information source. Mr. Uilkinson is a long time
resident of Yelm. He was able to give a detailed account of the
high floods that occurred during the winter/spring of 1989-90.
Information like the water flowed across the road in front of my 1
house (surveyed elevation 336.31 feet), but this mound in my ba~
fr-ont yat~d stuck out of the watet~ (survcyed elevation 33'1.54 /'
feet). from this information it seems reasonable to estimate the
high flood level near the 103rd. Street bridge was about 33'1
feet. Mr. Uilkinson states this to be about the highest flooding
he has obscrved on Yelm Creek. Knowledgeable individuals consider
the 1989- 90 floods within Yelm Creek to be 100 year flood events.
'I. As a supplemental consideration to point 6, the 337 feet
flooding that occurred in 1989-90 exceeded the watercourse bridge
clearance by about 0.5 feet. This indicates the streamcourse
release under this bridge is inadequate during high flood events,
and this locally torces floodwaters to higher elevations. This
data lends support to the estimate that the historic 100 year
floodplain Is at about 336 feet at the 103rd. Street bridge.
8. Based upon diverse data sources and the rationale presented in
this report, it is recommended that the 100 year floodplain for
this property be considered to be an elevation gradient from 338
where the stream enters the property, to 336 teet in the area
near the 103rd. Street bridge. This high floodplain is within the
Yelm Creek bank until the elevation of the "top of Bank" line
falls below 336 feet as indicated by the Preliminary Site Plan.
At this point the 336 ft. contour swings interior to the property
and defines a small special flood hazard area~ This comes closest
to apartment building 1 on the Preliminary Site Plan. The
Preliminary Site Plan for the Yelm Apartments has all building
structures outside this identified special flood hazard area.
lf I may be of any further assistance in the establishment of the
100 year floodplain for the Yelm Apartments development, or for
any other associated matters connected to the Yelm Creek, please
feel free to contact me at 206-474-4718.
Ues Jennings, crss
Soil Scientist
Puget Land Consultants
206 ..474,- 4 718
.
"
REI.RRENCES
(4) Applied Envi~onmental Services, Inc. 1993. Yetland
Delineation for the Yelm Apartments Site, Yelm, Vashington.
(1) City of Yelm, VA. 1990. Ordinance 353.
(5) Jennings, J.Y. 1993. The 100 Year Floodplain Delineation,
P~airie Creek Subdivision.
(2) Mundorff, M.J., James M. Veigle and Glen D. Homberg. 1955.
Ground Vater in the Thurston and Pierce Counties, Vashington.
U.S. Dept. of Interior, Geological Survey, cIrcular 356.
(3) Pringle, Russell F 1990. Soil Survey of Thurston County,
Vashington. U.s. Dept. of Agriculture, Soil Conservation
Service.
WashIngton State Department of Transportation, AerIal Photo
Laboratory. 1966. 1.0. No. 3-702, Flight No.1, Photos 1 3.
Washington State Department of Transportation, Aerial Photo
Laboratory. 1992. 92 Sound Block, flight 14, Photos 749--751
(6) Vilkinson, Joe. 1994. Personal communicatIons.
......--.___ ~..... V' ~~-../,-,...r-...J____-../--...~___~"-......,-,-,~.v"--v-,-,,v-,,--,,,--,\...< ,,/..........-'V',../\./~._....../ ......' ....,_ -\.r,,- .........\J~~....../
I L(eCw1 wet 11)*.
I
l'
1 11,'d~D
l,
i 0& 750
, '31 60 ()
i/ftr;(( {ll~W APCfr'?fl.. j
(jlJYL /V/d({tl(~ 31% JOl Yion-f.JclAhtf."ICff{/~
fYm,m~ ~~' ! ~
i
I
~. I ! I )
i 1150D \...u/ro (,JjrJ~f c97/v
I 6r6()o ~ r;~~ ~
~ f) I () ()() LflO f~ fi7e/.J)
~
I 2q~l{) ((JVI~ttuct?o-)~' C06iz [)~ uL-T/;?r;I/lCacl
X 11<'
t J-ftf1D(P, 00 1J.c}(bI '156 vuc1{&
ill
...----'---
:' J-0tJr7o
(if
I'
+-l.
...
~
<<,
);1
'I'
,
,I
_ -~ -_J:_
07d ( 0S76 'OIr V( P1 {rf II'IC (uc-m meV, r:J
~lJtll)U> f6le~
0) fYI t5V~ - fJ /) (pc::
..
DEe 0b 0'33 10 27 E'/ERGREEf'l PLAZA
,1>
P 1/2
lAm
GROUP
To
Co.
Dept.
Fax II
Evergreen Plaza Bldg.
711 S. Capitol Way
SUite 201
Olympia WA 98501
(206) 943.8060 Commercial
(206) 352.7666 Residential
(206) 943-9368 FAX
Mr Ty Peterson, City Planner
City of Yelm
POBox 479
Yelm, WA 98597
December 6, 1993
Dear Ty
I am in receIpt of you letter of December 2, 1993 concerning Yelm Creek Apartments There are a couple of items
that need to be discussed regarding thIs project.
The Rants Group and our architect (at that time) met with the Yelm planner several times Unfortunately, we were
givIng erroneous mformation regarding zoning/conditional use permits, density, shoreline information, Dept. of Ecology
involvement, etc Unfortunately also, we acted on the information provided to the tune of approXimately $15,000 00
of our (hard) cost and 3 - 4 months delay in the project. We have now gone back to ground zero to redesign the
prOJect. We realize the increased density ,s to our benefit. However, we feel some consideration should be given by
the City of Ye/m for the cost and delay incurred I would like to discuss that with you and Shelley in the future
With that, I would like to address the Items in your letter'
1 / The information sheet submitted with the site plan Identifies Phase I and Phase II units (Phase I is Buildings
/0;1 - 5)
2 I firmly believe that a further traffic study is not necessary Phase I will have 40 unIts rather than the 44
Indicated in the traffic study I think we can extrapolate the necessary information for the reduced number
in Phase I and for all of Phase "
3 Preliminary dramage plans are on the site plan The basic system IS one of grass swales leading to retentIOn
areas This can be drawn on a separate sheet if necessary Other than that, we would have to fully deSign
the drainage system at this time (No storm water will enter Yelm Creekl
4 The project IS not in a flood plain per the attached document.
Please also flote that the sIte plan inclUdes the increased on-site parking that was recommended. We have also
exceeded the mmimum setback from the creek whenever possible. I believe only one building IS at the minImum
distance
Thank you for your early attention to these items We look forwal'd to working With the City of Yelm in completing
thiS project.
V7c?;U~
Ron Rants
President
RR'cg
.-I.J.;;l
cc'
Shelley Badger
Gene Borges PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
....
LEASING
....
DEVELOPMENT ....
SALES
~
"
__ ~-:,s I'n=.-~ 3~cl~
~oJ tCi'--'S \- ~~~""\
,.-
I
fl:OO a-nJ\L-^rU:l-I7g;-'-I;I\'I-=nr~rru-,~-,-,
'\,
5829 '$11\ sW.. SEATl1.L w.A$iINQlON 98106 · (Cl061167.4221
,.... l~te UCIM'''''
... ...,..un... .....,.
.. ,.,....#fIW .. t .... ,_..
,.s. "...'16 .flI1.
+
FLacO l..aUJANt. OiT11MltlAJ1D1I
H!AL i61.'.A't~ UIt&1AR7Hl'.NT
*'~,.- .... ~
T ....
MS ~ S781
---.... . .....
_~_~-".'__ '_fI'< .. . ,--
.-&RAAlrs _-=-.-:-1-'" ""'-1 -.-... __..____
PfdQ'"V AUI'IIl
_Mitt6'K.,$T /l4IP_~.agp /!~n,;i"e. .f~E ~~)y~ IVA,
04y l!.t-1:t... _...,_J~J(~~~d-.J.'_.w-.h._ '... e~-~~~.1LZI'I_J I
~1~__f't 4. .'Iplldn Inc:i.* s.ttio.. r~. avtte lk.. T'NQ.. Jl98.) w'
6!!.:r:g.l-'-tg_.3~~ /lie ~#A :Z:J1BttJ;4E 7?A~ t'I. .~..eJi~ ~
Al~ mr IQO tit M1l11ll1)
~ . _.. ._ .~. .. -~.-- - ~ Ji2.tLk
P*~". ~~7i
....1_..-..... ........~.......j.......__
-.-------.
11. II (OJft~I.ed By fl~...~!~!!!JM!~'!l.!.'*'
Tha Jbov~scrlbtd prgpttty'
I~ 1\4t IGCahG in a dlli1gnatld t\QQd ~lard area.
l! 115at~ In .a d.sionatfD ilaad ward and community Is partlclpalllt" in tM *NtUon&: Flced '"'''fanCt PtOQl'III.
{Lenders u,., NoaiCl of S_ F&OOd Hflard .,...)
· ~m.r;."ey Progrim Rood InwraattllW_
· TV RfgU!J( prCQrJm
~_:: i"~~d;;~:I' mmunllw 1t_:~I~m~ _I A* l.~~~j
- ~~;~::::;~:~f~~~)__ ~... ~ _;;- .~/_", I ;;:-~ _
SPECIAl. NOTATION _,..
....,-
TV
...~. ....
-."",.'1_
......N.........
.......~ ......
v-
"I" Fr
..
~..-;Q
'6Ioll _nn....
"'.1
I1f 1
..
..... [7'" __...-..-
..4I-.--~
ocr 21 S8
1 ,. -
-
.-.... ...A.... f 4 Q ..
12 06 93 12 02PM P02
,I' -"
I /tLL \~=Jt ~--
--..---.--.---
c( .; \ \-:;,{' \?v t;?~ cyl*,,'Ofw~tc U2--
~ ~ ic-lN\tJ \1</
;SPA oW. ~qth
Stuf/l ~~L ,yC)
Pw ~-1/1Y ,
AtA~ i~1/9~
City of Yelm
105 YeIm Avefll{e West
P-O Box 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
(206) 458-3244
'< '
TO.
Yelm Creek Apartment Associa~es. Attn -Ron Rants
FROr.,;.
CHy of '{elm Planning Department
DATE
December 2, 1993
SUBJECT. Yelm CreJ~k Apartments
D'3ar Mr Rants;
Review of your s'ite plan has begun, however the information
requested in the September 15, 1993 letter 'has not submltted and
further review cannot proceed without this information
I have included a copy of this letter statln~ what
ihformation need~ to b~ provided In additioh. please indlcate
on the site plan which units are to be built and WhlCh ones are
~0 be phased in A revised traffic studY and 'prelimlnarv
dr a i nage p Tans are a,l so go'i n9 to have to -be subrh it tea I
I advise that yo~ contact the 1elm ~lanning Department so
that a meeting ban 'b~ scheduled, with city staff and /ourselves
(includlng your consultants) this can clear up any to~fusion
and prevent turther delay of your proposal
S7~.
Ty <<t:;'s~~
City Planner "
(206}458-~408
*
Recycled paper
ttm
GROUP
Evergreen Plaza Bldg.
711 S. Capitol Way
Suite 201
Olympia WA 98501
(206) 943-8060 Commercial
(206) 352-7666 Residential
(206) 943-9368 FAX
TO:
city of Yelm Planning Department/Ty Peterson
FROM:
Ron Rants
The Rants Group
DATE:
November 18, 1993
RE:
Yelm Creek Apartments/Additional site Plan Information
Applicant: Yelm Creek Apartment Associates (Co-Tenancy)
c/o The Rants Group
711 S. Capitol Way, suite 201
Olympia, WA 98501
A-.lf,., YO'YI l?c;.lJ"ls,
1. Phase I consists of 40 units. Phase II will consist of 32 units.
Phase II will follow in approximately one year.
2. Two accesses from Creek Road are proposed.
?Wt~E .1.- ~CfS J- s-
Pt+4SL 2 - J3u~LJlX#4f /.p.-C1
- /0 ce>ptl44/
~~""'-e.- plan
Y"' <R J t(.c:H~
I 1/'1(/7
- I 6:>fX1 JJ.~~ ~ proposJ
..qot>(' p/~~ t:.vJ ~~
- 3 t.Y\\JlY-~N,e,ct-~ ~ sT
C_:n)I~ ENUJ-~e- &.0 C01\JIJI/L-L'"'I-
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
D...
LEASING
....
DEVELOPMENT
....
SALES
//
//
// _-------n
_ _.,r --.-:::::-- - - -- - - -- --
- ?~ - - -------- -- -
------------- // / - - -
-------- /
-------- / ./
-------- ./
-- ./
yE\..M C"EEI< ./ ./
/"- /
_",,'i- -' / - - - .-/
~Jf- ~.;..--
-- -- - -'-- -- -
//
//
/ ::::...../....... .......- ---.................. ""''''~
/ ...,."
/ ..---.'.--
---
--...-.".,...,..,.._._-----
oR~~"GE /<fl.EJ'
'"
Q\l\.Pfl:EtI'S pV. '{GR()IJtlO
\
/'
/
/
"gl
\
.}
....~
;,~
'?--
//
//
----------
--
-'
~~------
/'
.-/' I
.-
I
,II
I
.- I
, /.i
,:/ /' I{V
,....- .. I
/7 '/
,..--"j/ ,/"
,/ / ' I
/' I
/f ,/
I
/ I
I
,/& ,I
/ 't>~~ ,
* .- I
II
, I
:,'~. /1
'~~
, I
, I.
/'
~::~
~~:~
~ "":-, "-
'~"
. "0, "'~
' "<~~,.
/'
/'
-'
"
""/.,,
..
/ ~
~1~
~ 60
/
/
-v~
C~
<'~
-i-
>S-~
~~~?-
../
, I
?'_ /1
.-
.. I
II
I
'>;:::y'/
\
\
\
\
r I
/ ----/
/ I "-
. /
\/ I
/, I
/~ I
/ ..' II
/: /
/ '
/' I
/ I
\ / I
\/ ' I
/' ' I
'. ""/
/ ..
I
II
--~~
\
--
$I
\~
~
B
\
'tA'
~I
</>
%'
~
\
'/IeINli'< v,;..p
SEe ~ 'If.M.
~
HRC ~es
7\1 soot}> call\tcl WoY
suit" '2.0\
())"'pI<I, 'HCoh'nqt"" ~e50\
Ph""" \2(6) ~eollO
S\t\\l....il...connollY. 11'''-
SOl6 ~Y Il"",.,,,,,d S.(.
UlC"Y' 'IfOth\l\q\"" 9~
!'\lQ/\'" (206) 4ql-~
con~ RQt.erl CQ<\l\cllY
~~Ol'" ~~~~~",,,,w\/40f
",... \ 14 of sect"'" ~. 1~' \ 1tI
RoniJO 2 (ost. ....IA.
,,~1'
EllGl~:
;01/11. S11E
/oRU<
2il~ 709 'if \6.' "c) ""^ """
a..~...... - ... ~\,,,,,,,, ".-
I'Q'4Ol'l 0f"I"-
09"" opOC"~llr;:J oreo -
~
8 Il'''' 2 t><\t1"s/un1t . 8 oQ<lI
8 p'" , 'C#fO/unlt . , ..och
iotGl un\~ '" 12 unItS
\\.8 unl~/cPs
S11E llEllSlT(:
REOJIREP
I'lofI.l<Ill~
~
12 unlto _ '2.2 ~oJl./unit . \ ~ ot.oJl.
~ stoll. - n
\lQI\<l\<lOl> atdlS - 5
StQt\d IJo COl"poct stoia - ~
\1lO atoJle
\l1\U1\ES
iotal
-.tot.... - CItY 01 y"""
sor-er _ eM of YeI'" \$.1.(.1')
po..... - ?uiJOt 1'......
TeI~on. - \J.s.-'
aM-'" ,.0.
PRE\.\tA\MA.R'f s\1E p\-to"
~
1
f1f
1
~
im~~
\; -,. JJ
t:i~ ""~,,,~ - -...
'I~
~
s~~ \fIC.\ 'tEltA ~p ~R1tAEM1S
.....~.~
'0" ,,",c." at"'" ;< ,^c~."''' .asol . \vr-: t I
,,.,.,, .'" ". ,",,'" .",.r.,'"' __~ , LL~
........
~~
..r-ooc.c...~ CON#, ~?
l~~ i. ic'~.
:~ E
.. ... (l.
......~ ~...
_ -,.,pPR.OY,o.\.. fOR t~SiRDC\lOtl_... ~
>NI<' ~--
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
I
i
1
j
i
!
!
~
i
I
I
~
~
13.04.110--13.04.120
13.04.110 Service--Connection--General reauirements.
A. Except as otherwise provided for herein, no premises
shall be connected to the water supply system of the town
after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this
chapter unless there is a standard main owned by the town
in the public right-of-way adjacent thereto.
B. When a permit has been obtained for the installa-
tion of water service, the superintendent shall cause the
premises described in the applicat~on to be connected with
the water system by a service pipe extending from the main
to the property line and a stopcock and water meter placed
within the right-of-way. Every separate premises shall have
its own separate meter.
C. Service connections shall be installed by the town
at the expense of the property owner, which shall be the pre-
vailing cost of such installation at the time thereof. In
case of replacement of new service, no service smaller than
three-fourths inch shall be installed.
D. All connections to town service shall conform to
the standard specifications and regulations or the town.
(Ord. 337 (part), 1987).
13.04.120 Service--Connection--Hook-up and meter charge.
All persons connecting to the water system of the town shall
pay, in advance of connectlon to the water system, a hook-up
and water charge In accordance wlth the schedule set forth
below in this sectlon. In every case, title to the water
meter, meter box and service connection lines shall be and
remain with the town. The hook-up and water meter charae
shall be as follows: ~ ~
Pre tapped and Pretapped
Meter Size Regular* Duplex* Preplumbed Onlv
5/8 x 3/4" $ 375.00 $ 525.00 $ 150.00 $ 200.00
1" 475.00 700.00 200.00 300.00
1 1/2" 1,150.00 460.00 600.00
2" 1,800.00 720.00 935.00
3" 2,100.00 800.00 1,050.00
4" 3,770.00 1,100.00 1,300.00
6" 7,200.00 3,100.00 4,000.00
8" 9,500.00 4,750.00 7,250.00
* Includes installation of meter box, water meter and service
connection line from a water main in the water system to a
meter site on or in the public right-or-way adjacent to the
property to be served which is not more than fifty feet dis-
tant from the water main. Where the water meter site lies
more than fifty feet distant from the water main the charge
set forth above shall be increased by ten dollars for each
additional foot of service line required. (Ord. 337 (part)
1987) . '
112
(Yelm 3/88)
C<lt~~~~~~~~ ,..'W~J:.~~:\f:;~i }-::-:t;~~:~t ;,:__~ " .~
< " <, ~--'.: :....~." \';.-:- "'''-''f '1~~1 ~I'''..ii~'
Ciirty ((j) I J/ ce g1J1J1j
/0 -/;2.-93
,m ~==.~.~ ~AE;"'~;'-T-.Bl~~'~ ,on: <C~.; ~_~n~nlJ-C::~~J~'_'
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm, J-Vashington 98597
,(206) 458~3244
. ..' / I ~
. ~ \~""' A 3 B 8 0 ,0 #.... --404, S 3 S 9 1+-.= j 72. . 7 7 (.. , 40
II' ..~ ' J. (..,
" K\.~ p..~: l:- .fe, g,oC;;J . .:> I,""", f( '<:..f.)/~ Q 0 ('/0 "::~$ 8.1.7 S
'I! I ~.
I
f:(9)3' to 8 7o~..t--I-. y. -144. -5 ~/:}.":t:L~ -.r;cs" '72/,10 ,
I 7;\& f'~ ~ : -/- .tj .3 (" 0 . So r:'!a-.. A'~ v. eu> @ & 5" 70 ~ f' 88 ~4 3" ~
I! I
!: ;t>\d~ c. (P~4oryH- 1/1:".4.A-'53/7" -H. -=: -1'2 '15. G 7'7..2-
i, R\rk,./ex.~+-r.C3.25,.50 //~.. 4."",..'<.) ~05/r; ~ ~x{,1.53-,-----_
i
1,
'/ f /\ / /z C:;.'c:{ .
0&4-0 c-c ,-P-f ~ 44.51.'..>",'(""--L = '. /....:, 679. ?
I I ~ .
. ~."
___~_'_'______--,-_ .RId., . 1~",--...~-(/3?..'::::, '):r'J ;rICe"" ~c.~,,!,,~.J@ Go '>:5" -= i 8 (oj, -S 8
r; I
! J I /" /1/ /! f
__,______1-__xl :::. 13\<h:., ~",,-.+'2t05/ 00 nOq /&(.1,..-""....1' /12),' J(."
,... - ...'
i
i Bide;, TJ
J.
D \~ ~ 3< 20 --/<;,c,L x44!f-. -5 KL~'?~, :. .!/')4? .8 3'7,Ce.9_-"----'_
-"-,--~--L~~~7' A..__~_'!j,~. 5 ~>-11 .le(/I~.J/;;) bS'c' -~~ ~4 .eL
I l~ lJ '-"
I'
i
!l
Ii _,
1-\ ..3'1~\
!i --;-- ( !
i : I ^ --r-c. /Dlu__
I,:
i
?'IJ-
,"'I ~~
~
;tel';; r 'e-tt-<...)
f?~....._; ./-,. ..$70:3:?- ,,,.~;.'')
~.4- -
_.. ,07..)~7o
7;+a / ~/ (&15, '20
,
i-,
I:
~ i
-----:"~--.
I
, .
. . .
------_.__._----~---~
. .'
1<
I
I,
II
I'
i
I,
e;
,
i'"'~ E.jC? .J~~ ~ .t. e--P / .,. ,,--1- hi k-1-~d<:ft~~,:i.:!2--c:.!1J.'-rL.
t' 1" ' - )
( ,
C,\. (I 1,\' , , / ~/' , ,/ ,/ /
~ ~ ,_\J-v-......'OL V-_C.j\:-:~~~~~ 1C'"./f (.c er~;f:...-'c~..A.~~.A.(','~_\,.,~~
O-<~~=-..l<C...c. ri- . ~ l~ <:J 'LJ<?~
~~'~'
'" /'.
,
\
j
t.
I:
, il
-II
I,
!;
ii
U
-i
~
~t
~~~
:i!
-fl.ec'icled paper --.--,---,-----.....-'-~-~--.-----
City of Yelm
105 Yelm A vellue West
PO Box479
Yelm, Washingtoll.98597
(206) 458-3244
To
HRC-Associates/Attn Ron Rants
From
.
City Df Yelm Pla~ning Oepartmen~/~ttn Ty Peterson
Date
September 28!, 1993
SubJect
Procedu're for Slte Plan Approval ?f a propose9
~u1ti-famlly co~plex
Resubmit complete site plan lncorporatlng Clty staff
cQmments and recbmmendations to meet minlmum city requir~ments
,
2 Clty staff wlli then review the proposal for completeness and
issue SEP~ determination Approx 2-3 weeks
,3 Schedule a public hearing for the City of Yelm Plannlng
Commisslon- N~ttfic~tion of the public hearlng must be pUblished
10 days p r i or to the, hearl ngThe SEPA pr ocess mtlst 'be comp leted
prior to going to Planning comlT)ission Future Planning ,
Commission dates appropriate fOr your project-are 11-1~-93, 12~
6-93 and 12-2.0-93
4 If app~ov,l is grantad you may pfoceed with submltt~hg
co~struction plans for Engineerlng and Building review .
5 If there are additional' questions or mo're specific time
frames are needed, p~eas~ contact me at Yelm City Hall 4~8-8408
- I
*
Rec,>,c/edpaper
~ ~~nl" ...,. ri~~C7t'~ ~<AA7~~v w. '=:-.
1----- _A . 't-- --". -d~ /. 0.. L~ . '1 'f ~ C. cd t- ~J
I
I
I -.'---.-.. .. . ;( Jt-
: ~ \ b., fl. 388 0 ~j tt ~ 44 ~-fs i #::; I 72./ 7 7 ~, 40
Ii IS \~~" t Jr En 5, 9Q :? 1"",!h&.i..e,..J @0 ~'l1 ",;1(551. 75
I
!
:' 'ELder E_G:, 870, .1'1, 'X .f4~12$'1~H = "3" 5";.2 z{. 10
: 6\~ f'~vt-.t.:+ II 3~o_. S~~ /?~v;eUJ @ ~s,% ::. R884.:3~
Ii
if
, ,
Ii N<kc /P~.c:t. ~lT.{j., ~ ""2-2~ 7~ 2-
Ii -\ ~
Ii /J..(; 4/ /7 Co, Jt _
! E\~. r<i!;t."'"'-.I.f- L3..2. S- 50 ;v/~'" /rc(.!~~--&J 6') /(i ;:. 8_t,,_L_~8
!
l
I II ~-f'., /:'7
I B~.D (p~4o c-T,~41:..5~'~1'~~ ::: 2 5;(U'7.z.
.R !d::., Ie'~~...: f- 41325. so-L!ic....., ,,(ev/.."'v,;-@- c;,. 5'"~o -= ~8 (,:,/, S" 8
(
X"2 : T5\~, lelL.~"+ -I" 2~ 5/.00 f1!cu;t /&(,1, e"'J Jtj 7 Z)..JY
; :
I
~
;
,
II 13 \~ ~ 3"520 .%"{121- :<'" ~-:BI;-'<jL~ L :. .!/'/47, 83(7, ;-;>0
15 k!,; . .u'"",,,,,: fC. -16.0 7, $....fj..~ tell;_ f2 b S-'5a .;c.4 S z. 4 .e8
! ~
I!
i
i
! i
II
Ii \o+C4.\
Ii ___
i' I r:> -f-J-Pla.vr
Ii
i
! ,
! 1
! :
'B l ~ f?..e.~VlA-;..f-~ Jf 70"3 _'2 .5 Q
,t'eu / e-~:f 4<-5-]5~ ~
7;'f-a I Jf / ~~-.l5 1'20
;
i
i;
I
; ,
T-h aLe? ~ I '1--1L~.c r(... ~ / ~ ck 61 ~S-/li"&- ~~. I' .J..s- (1' #1< '1-'
~ \ u...~ 6 ~ V'-~ ,--lJ~,.J~'C&..~~1 cF I ~~~., 'c~--/!-~~~..e : -lLdc.
~ ~~ i~c-{~~_.
i
I
I
I,
j
,
.__...__.~~~-- ~~_._.-------_...-~.__.. '--'--'.'--"'-"'-"'"'~.--.....---......__.._-
". - 6
-J--~-~----~-------
I Ar.rv.""-,, ~\ B(d~'f,
o-e.,~ ~1f~ V CWoodFt~)
-
;( I J(
Rt~ It 388()'("j ~p~ 'X .o4~~LS3IS'7 1+ gr 172.1.:r2~.40
13 \~_&t-\AA. '; ~ .I( E:r, 5'. (.)~ ;> I ~ f< ~(J;ew @ t; r- 'a ~r5(5 fl.1 ~_ZS
b~C[ B
\
~87bq-./!-f. x~4=t'~*f~ ;:: ~05~2/. /0
.t'e~vt-l. : II .3 (,00 . So ,P'~ /?ev:et.,d-@~ 5"% ::. 1'884. 3 ~
/" h ~
:Bld~_C 4~4()~~'L-4-4-,,~ :r, -Pf., ~ 2" ~J-'-4L271. '2.
litd" I ~~\.;+ --Ii 3 2. S , So //~~ /(s(j~ @ 6 S-/6 ;;. JtB.-kL. S8
.(/' r
tf..D ~"fo c-7'~~.sr.r~ :: Z<7S;k.Z9..2-
de; . le~~: ~ .t/32...S-. So //c;..# ;1(~~@ ~ S-~ -= ~8 ~ j, S' 8
~ IJ ' . '" f1/u ~ vr
'2 :::. 13\ ,'f'e.Il.M.-.+ Zt;::,5L.OO . M /(e".<eC<.J /7z:L J~
13\ . € 3520fl.H.: )("-11.S.JIr;?~t :. .:t'L42; 83'7. ~o
~ j-...: t: -I &:, 7 ,S 1/(,)." t.ev;""<J r3 b :>'", .:...( S Z Lf ,gS
~jtt.,W\,.; ./-r;- f 7o~'2,SQ
.,tev " Q- t.A.) :l1-c.S-7':s' 72
Jf 1"/5,20
L-Tk eN f:.t.q.JLr.~ ~ "",pI uA- 6L~.., .. i:...- 11'0/''1-"
Uu...'-b: V'-'\:-t-~~~~ cFled"",'c.aJ ,4J"''''~<:~,
O-~ ~.i_J lA- c.-( ~~
j
To
HRC Associates/Attn. Ron Rants
From
City of Yelm Planning Department/Attn: Ty Peterson
Date
September 28,1993
Subject.
Procedure for Site Plan Approval of a proposed
multi-family complex
Resubmit complete site plan. incorporating city staff
comments and recommendations to meet minimum city requirements
2 City staff will then review the proposal for completeness and
issue SEPA determination Approx: 2-3 weeks
3 Schedule a public hearing for the City of Yelm Planning
Commission Notification of the public hearing must be published
10 days prior to the hearing The SEPA process must be completed
prior to going to Planning commission Future Planning
Commission dates appropriate for your project are: 11-15-93 12-
6-93, and 12-20-93
4 If approval is granted. you may proceed with submitting
construction plans for Engineering and Building review
5 If there are additional questions or more specific time
frames are needed, please contact me at Yelm City Hall 458-8408
:~~:~[_._.
, ~~1 ,_':7 15
II --
~I ~~ 4
,~.::;;~,'
, J@
ANDERSON & BOONE
ARCHITECTS . AlA
525 Columbia Street NW
Suite 201
Olympia, Washington 98501
September 30, 1993
(206) 754-7766
Fax (206) 754-1357
City of Yelm
PO Box 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
Attention:
Ty E. Peterson
City Planner
Subject:
HRC (Yelm Creek) Apartment Complex,
Creek Road
It appears, based on our discussion at the City of Yelm on
September 29, 1993, the proposed project has been designed around
erroneous information provided to our client. The current zoning
would allow for approximately twice the number of units shown on
our original submitted design documents.
We are confirming the current design requirements, in writing as
per our discusssion, to prevent any further misunderstandings.
This error in communication has caused time delays and will
impose redesign costs to th~s project which could have been
prevented.
It is understood:
1. The current property is zoned C2 in its entirety and can be
developed in it's entirety as R2 without the need of a
Conditional Use Permit (Uses Permitted Outright under C2
Zoning) .
2. On site parking requirements shall be
However, street frontage improvement
the incorporation of an additional 0
visitors parking.
3. Incorporate additional information noted on The City of Yelm
letter dated September 15, 1993 to HRC Associates.
Based on the above information, redesign of the project could
allow for approximately 85-90 units on the proposed site.
We shall discuss the above findings with our client and will
notify The City of Yelm as to our Client's final decision.
Should any part of the above information be incorrect or there is
additional information required, it is imperative this office be
contacted immediately.
Thank you for your assistance,
e Architects AIA
cc: HRC Associates
Ron Rants
Ciirty (())f 'J[ elm
105 Yelm Ave;lue West
POBox 479
Yelm,Washington 98597
(20fi) 458-3244
October 5, 1993
Anderson and Boo~e Architects, AIA
525 Columbia St N W, Suite 201
Olympia, WA 98501
Attention.
David L ,Levenson ,AS:30ci ate
Sub~~ct: .HRC (Yel~ Creek) Apartment Complex
To. confirm our phone conversar-lon on 10-4-93 and the' letter fr'om
yourself dated '9-30793, the Ci,ty of Yelm Planning Dept needs to
make certain ,that some of the issues are clearly understood
~egarding item #2, in your letter, the issue of deferred street
frontage lmprovementi and visitor parking the Cit~ has not
agr'sed defernng str~et improvements with the incorporation of an
add,itionalO 2 parking spaces per unit However, visltor park'lng
i s r'eco'mm~nded ,- and the City has agr.eed that wi t.h the '
'jncorporationof visitor parking we would look at the possi.b:I 1 ity
of deferred stre~t improvements through a signed Waiver of
~rotest A decisi~n has not yet been made
, .,
Addltiona'll:y~, the issue concerning number of units allowed based
on density requirements alorie, apprb>.imate.ly 85-90 units courd be
~llowed This does not take into account set-badk requirements,
par'k i ng arid 1 andsc8ge standards, opeG space des i gnat ion, r i gh t -
of-way dedi.cation,:fJood plain iqentification, buffers
t'O'nv~r'cnrr.ent<111y sensitive ar'eas "'equirements, 01" any other
requirements per'taining to th~ Cit)l of ''{elm's Municipal Code
_If" there are any more questions. concerning these issues or any
others, please feel free to contact me at Yelm City Ha.ll, 458-
8408
Sincerely,~
~~.~
Ty ~terson
City Plann~r
CC. HRC Associates
Ron Rants
@
Recycled paper
_'--_.~._....__,__.,.L~ _.~__. -!._.~~ ~. _~'_~ ~_'--.
[ -- ~--..-" - --~- - - -~ - - -- -------";.-----------.. ---~----~
) )~ ~
Du ; \0\ \ ~ I ~ ~ 11 l^liLr-,' ":'1
- f1ir (Vl it- .-t?S~c r \'Y\.Cv~ C~s. ~~
-- """'-l
-I ""fro ~ \c~-<-_ \ ffi~ PI' ~\'\ \9~rv~ - Wo.\ \.~" o-rv- p r6 ~.~
- <:;;c-~ \\ ~'-\ <Y-~ c;- ~ ~'S: ~ :(so c..Ls;;;.
.
LD~L I y//(J (It:'lft7\ 11'\ ~ li'-I!-l ;t c,." -.N~ y- ~ ~ 'fO Ii'-\~J-e , ;l'<I\~ \-o-..V/rl'J-r
--- do L\'_~G"
~o~ V
""'- _ C I..,) .[ f'L'N\- ~\~ (AA- ~C",,'l'e"') \. o.~~ ~ \~L--<fl
~ S (Of(\.e,.,.....~
~~~\ 0~" 1\ if'-
1'--"
L
,- \ ) \(~\~ >( < ~'{k.l
, ,
1
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-- , - - I
(\
~
- ~ i "f~OI/'v~.e..,u:S:~~~O\1€'fil\Q"~s. - - w~<:^-\-
t -- _cJ-tl r ro1es+; e.fc
1 ~~;~r:~ ~~
1-
- L I-!_r-L
Ot>\~C1vU ' ok..~-ey-r",,-); wU\:vev-
iJLh. 010 ~ 010 t--
~e... . ~
Cock.:s._ s:.,r CU-U2SS; '-\- f'/\C\V\U\.K.f~~;\'~ oQ.. \1e.\.{u\"'s
CO'^- \CLc:\- ~etf't Yfoc:.L - "\.\50 tcr-.r ~\I/'Q.. ~\Ov3S,_
~:~ w\l\ ~~\- S;:''''L '::\\Ou.)~,
---------
r
~_/
j Se.welf -
I
I
-I Ck~l
i
I
--I C9~e~
,
1-
CO'l.f-,<-c +--
G elM- ]'0'-<1 e. S
eD..S-e. ~V\i~S
S'\f ~ - 8 e.t- CCA.\UACA\-l'OV\'S
;)k. -ht:vl flv'()ef'rINrs ~
1-
-< - -
i
! -
,
i
..
I
,
!
--- I--
I
,
i
I
---
_ i\ -- - --1--- _h
\J --- i-
,
- -~---~- r---------------
.,.. - -~ ------ --- ---
I
50
1':. -
100FT
1
SCALE 1"- 50'
;~.
, 'ft'
'~
's....;
fE
;~:~
28'
10'
UTILITY
EASEMENT
AS REQ'D
5'
CLEARING
LIMITS
EXCEPT
AT
~FORI<lER
18'
10' MAST ARM
5'
CURB8.
WAlK
1 75'
5'
I
EX PAVEMENT
V ARIES
25 AC CLASS B
10' CRUSHED SURF ACING T C
67' GRAVEL BASE
[f;,..._
';;.' ,
~ I
U
I;~~
TYPICAL
SECTION
-:-;;---:::;,,-~~
>-
co
Cl J:
z z w
~
0 ~ U 'W w
V5 <{ w ~ ci.
w a::: :J: U
Cl Cl U Cl Vl
''1' - ~.,., .":-~,,.-.
lfJ. (j) (j)
(j) (j)
~ L() N
.-- <D
I I
E-e f"") l'
~ L()
(j) f"")
< r-.
<D X
0 <(
...... N lL.
'-'
U
0
if1
rn.
<(
<<S
(f)
a:::
E-e w
W I-
Z
<( 0 0:::
Z C
~ W L
---1 0:
0 > C
U c
t-' "'"
..c-
O ~
Z U
I- L
---1 -
~ :J
(f) c
Z c
Ct: 0 r
U (
<(
~ .E
0
::x::
"I-
i.;' ~.:
:~';;'
~i.:~.'
1:.
,,~.,
'.!Iii!'-
~.FI:.:'.
IZ!.
t~
~,
(ii,
ij,\"
~.
~~
~-
;1
~l
~\~~~
~;~
~i';.;'~:...
1. ,
..."'-"
.~;i,.>4<~
~.
(;-J~
It'
:f"
. ~~,,-
(STREET ~OAD CONSTRUCTION)
.~;:~!~\..
-;~~~:~:
: ~\ f:..~~~ :
Workmanship and matert'cns sholl be In accordance wlth",",J
Standard Speciflcatlons~for Rood Specifications forCthe~'
Bridge and Municipal Construction.H published jointly 'b;}R~~
Wash I ngton State Deportment of Transportat i on and Wash i ri~torp'-_,
State Chapter. Amerlca~ Public Works Association. and the City,~
of Yelm Development StandardS. Native materials meetlnQ the .~~~
specifications In 011 respectS. including sand equivalent.
wi I I be approved for construction use by the City of Yelm -
prior to construction.
2.
Construction staking shall be by the design engineer or a
Qual ified I icensed surveyor The developer or contractor is
responsible for schedulinQ work
T- _
3
Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation control shal I be
undertaken during construction to avoid damage to constructed
foci I ities or adjacent proPerties.
4 Prior to any on site improvements. roadway construction. or
improvements to existing roadway faci I ities. a pre-
construction conference shal I be scheduled with the City of
Yelm (458-8405) The developer and his/her contractor(s) must
be In attendance
5 If water. or other utilities ore required to be constructed in
the City right-of-way. the appl icant shal I secure the
necessary permits from the City of Yelm (458-8405) prior to
construction.
t
6.
The contractor shal I be responsible for al I traffic control In
accordance with the requirements set In the most current
edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
Prior to the disruption of any traffiC. traffic control plans
shal I be prepared and submitted to the City of Yelm for
approval No work shal I commence unti I al I approved traffic
control Is in place
n
7 Where new asphalt joins existing. the existing asphalt shal I
be cut to a neat vertical edge and tacked with asphalt
emulsion type CSS-1 in accordance with the standard
specifications The new asphalt shal I be HfeatheredH bock
over the existing asphalt to provide for a seal at the saw cut
location and the joint sealed with grade AR-4000W paving
asphalt.
8 See the City of Yelm'S Development and Publ ic Works Standards
for testing. sampling and inspection schedul ing requirements
9. Compaction of subgradeS for 01 I roadways is required and shal I
be 95% of the maximum density (per standard proctor test)
Proof rol ling may be required prior to paving to insure
stabi Ilty
10 It shal I be the contractor's responsibi I ity to located or hove
located 01 I underground utilities prior to beginning
construction Before the start of any construction. the
contractor shal I cal I the underground uti I ity location number:
1-800-424-5555
11 The project engineer. or q qual ified road Inspector approved
by the City of Yelm. shal I conduct the road inspections for
this project As a minimum. the fol lowing inspections and
Hsign-offsH shal I take Place - in the fol lowing sequence:
subgrade. bal last. crushed and asphalt Certified Inspection
reports are required and shal I be provided to the City of Yelm
in the sequence referenc9d above
Jil
~H
~ .~- ,< .
To:
From:
Date:
Subject.
HRC Associates/Attn: Ron Rants
City of Yelm Planning Department/Attn: Ty Peterson
September 15, 1993
Preliminary comments for HRC Apartment Complex
SITE PLAN REVIEW
In addition to what has been provided, the City Planning
Department must have the following to complete the Site Plan
Review:
l -;>-'-.'''-
\(1 Total area of the development site and of existing and
'proPosed impermeab le surfaces to an accuracy of one-hundredth of
an acre
2
less
A site plan drawing of one or more sheets at a scale of not
than on inch to one hundred feet showing:
~/~The location of proposed structures, including
(~~ buildings, fences, culverts, roads and streets
~) Street frontage improvements along Creek Street
~ Set back 1 i nes ~-~
-~ All existing and ~ropo~~/easements
~ The location of ~n Efxlsting and proposed utility
~~.'~structures and 11 nes
Ip) /l::::ocat ion of the proposed stormwater retent ion,
. ~ drainage, and treatment systems
vG) All means of vehicular and pedestrian ingress and
egress to and from the site and the size and
location of driveways, streets and roads, including
~the internal circulation and parking
vH) Landscaping location and type ~
I) A map showing contours of sufficient interval to
~ indicate the topography of the entire tract for a
V sufficient distance beyond the boundaries of the
proposed project, as follows:
1 Up to five~percent slope--two foot contours,
./'
2 Five-percent and greater slope--five foot
contours
'-
~ 3 The required amount of Open Space appears to be adequate,
however a final determination cannot be made until the above
in format i on has been prov i ded JJuJ. cC\\ l\J\O-\'<N\. S
..---
/4 Please indicate where the handicap accessible units wi 11 be
located, (a minimum of three are required, WAC51-20) and all of
the handicap parking Contact Jerry Prock with the City Building
Dept (458-8408) for more information
5 This project may fall under the City of Yelm's Flood Plain
Ordinance, please show the Base Flood Plain elevation level
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
1 A determination on the State Environmental Policy Act
checklist has not been made at this time Mitigation strategies
are still being processed with the City's Planning and
Engineering Departments with regard to the traffic impacts at the
intersection of Yelm Avenue and Creek Street We hope to reach
an agreement on an approved strategy by the end of September
2 The Wetland Delineation already provided is sufficient and
the City of Yelm's Planning Department finds the information to
be accurate and does not recommend any restrictions or mitigation
for wetlands based upon the study done by Applied Environmental
Services Inc
3 A minimum 50 ft structural setback is required from the
creek, an additional 25 ft is recommended The current site
plan meets the shoreline setback requirements
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
1 The City of Yelm's Planning Department recommends some
additional "visitor parking" be included
2 Please note the comments from the City's Engineering
Department attached
If there are any questions or more specific information is
needed please contact me at Yelm City Hall 206-458-8408 or for
engineering contact Mark Cook 206-458-8816
, ,
-;;-~.'----:---:-:--.~--:--:------;---:--
I .
· L\
./1
TO:
City of Yelm
ATTENTION:
Ty Peterson
'.'~--<.~'~
. ...,.. ,.' - '., '
f"
'J :-....~
;r.'
,.
City of' Y i!lm
105 Yelm A venue West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
(206) 458.3244 fll.6', _ tit ,,4,17
MEMORANDUM ~tf(fJj
p~ing Department
FROM:
Mark R. Cook
City of Yelm Engineering Department
DATE:
September 14, 1993
SUBJECT:
YELM CREEK APARTMENTS
Upon review of the proposed project referenced above, The City of
Yelm's Engineering Department has the following comments:
ACCESS
1. Creek Street is designated as a urban local roadway in the
City of Yelm's Comprehensive Transportation Plan. There shall be
no direct access to Creek Street other than the internal roadway.
Access to all parcels shall be from the internal roadway only.
2. The maximum access width to Creek Street shall be 26 feet.
3. Prior to the public hearing for this project, (as a minimum)
the following shall be required to be performed by a licensed
civil/traffic engineer (State of Washington):
A. Trip generation (daily, AM and PM peak hour)..
B. Traffic distribution.
A full traffic impact analysis may be required based on the results
of the trip generation and distribution.
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
4. All parking and maneuvering areas shall be provided for on
site which will necessitate a parking layout with an adequate turn-
around area. No backing onto Creek Street shall be permItted.
\
@
~C}'Ckdpaper
".~ -
"
,.
..
.'
"
,,' ,. 0,
5., The prapos~l is wi thin the City .of Yelm's Urban Boundary
requiring the paving .of all parking and raadway facilities. The
raadway/access aisle(s) must be a minimum .of 20 feet in width
(Urban Lacal Access Raadway crass-sectian) ta meet emergency access -
requirements.
..
6. It is required that all parking areas be surfaced with
asphalt.
DRAINAGE STANDARDS
7. Increased starmwater runaff fram the raad(s), building,
driveway and parking areas shall be retained an site and shall nat
be directed ta raadway drainage adjacent ta Creek Street. All
designed facilities shall meet with the City .of Yelm's Engineering
Department appraval.
8. Seasanal drainage crasses the subject praperty; na filling .or
disruptian .of the natural flaw shall be permitted.
9. On-site starmwater management facilities shall be required
with their cancept and design calculatians and shall canform ta the
Drainage Design and Erosion Contral Manual far Thurston Caunty and
the Cities .of Lacey, Olympia and Tumwater. This wark will be dane
by a licensed civil engineer and shall be submitted to the Publlc
Warks Department far appraval prior to constructian.
10. Stormwater runaff shall be controlled through all phases of
the praject by facilities designed to cantral the quality and
quantity .of discharges and shall nat alter nar impact the existing
drainage .or ather praperties.
11. All drainage facilities shall have sediment and ail traps
priar ta discharge.
12. All drainage and raadway facilities (ather than thase existing
in the city's right-af-way) are ta remain private and the
respansibility .of the developer .or .owner.
13. Starmwater easements shall be provided far drainage rautes and
shall be accurately reflected on the final drawing(s).
14. All drainage facilities shall be maintained by the develaper
and/ar hameawner's assaciatian.
15. The develaper shall file the approved agreement and financial
security as set farth in Ordinance 458. The drainage band- must be
set up far a twa-year periad ta ensure praper functian and
maintenance .of drains.
16. Prlor ta the publlc hearing far thls praJect, a prelimlnary
drainage plan shall be required - prepared by a licensed civil
'f'
~,
engineer (State .of washingtan). Please review the attached minimum
requirements far details.
ROAD STANDARDS
17. Design drawings and specificatians far all raadway
construction must be submitted to the City .of Yelm's Engineering
Department for review and appraval priar to carnrnencing
canstructian. Raadway sections, pavement sectians (surfacing),
specificatians and the submittal presentatian farmat required are
presented in. the Develapment Guidelines and Public warks Standards,
City .of Lacey. These standards are provided as "minimum" standards
and alternatives which provide superior design are acceptable.
18. The City .of Yelm requires that all 20-faat roadway sectians
be designed by a licensed civil engineer and shall address (as a
minimum) AASHTO (American Assaciatians of State Highway and Traffic
Officials) harizontal and vertical curve requirements in additian
ta the Development Guidelines and Public Warks Standards, City of
Lacey. Where the harizantal radii requirements of the City of
Lacey standards are less than thase of AASHTO, they may be utilized
pravided na adverse safety conditions exist .or are created by a
lessening .of the harizantal radii requirements set forth by AASHTO.
19. As a minimum, a Private Sectian Urban 20 faat roadway (meeting
the crass-sectian requirements .of the Develapment Guidelines and
Public Warks Standards, City .of Lacey) shall be canstructed ta
serve thls praj ect. The requirements far access .of the fire
marshall and building official of the City .of Yelm shall alsa be
met.
20. The cul-de-sac at the end .of the roadway shall have a minimum
50 faat right .of way radius and a 38 foat surfaced radius. This
will pravide an adequate radius to allow emergency, utility, maving
.or ather large vehicles the necessary area ta turn araund withaut
backing aut.
21. An appraved turn-around ather than a cul-de-sac may be
passible far this praject providing adequate access and turning
radii are pravided fa~ emergency vehicles.
22. priar ta roadway canstructian .or improvements ta existing
raadway facilities, a preconstruction conference shall be scheduled
with the City .of Yelm's Engineering Department at 458-8816. The
Develaper and his/her contractar(s) need ta be in attendance.
PERMITS/FEES
23. priar to final appraval, a final fee shall be paid ta the City
.of Yelm's Public Warks Department.
-.~~~-..~~
"
:.. ..~
.. ;-
~:.
-
24. If water .or ather utilities are required to be canstructed in
the city's right-af-way, the applicant shall secure the necessary
permits fraIll the city'5 engineering department priar ta
canstructian.
FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS
25. Creek Street is designated as a lacal raadway in the City .of
Yelm's Camprehensive Transpartatian Plan and is within the
currently adapted Urban Baundary Map. Creek Street shall be
upgraded as a minimum ta a Public Lacal Access Raadway Sectian and
shall cansist of the fallawing:
A. One 18 foat lane measured fram the centerline .of the
raad.
B. 28 feet .of right-of-way from the centerline .of the road.
C. One five foat sidewalk.
D. Curb and gutter.
E. Street lighting.
26. Where new asphalt jains existing, the existing asphalt shall
be saw cut to a neat vertical edge and tacked with asphalt
emulsian.
27. Priar ta canstructing the impravements, the develaper shall
submit (City .of Yelm's Engineering Department) a plan and prafile
.of the impravements to Creek Street. The design drawings shall be
in accardance with the Develapment Guidelines and Public Warks
Standards, City .of Lacey as adapted (interim) anSepternber 23, 1992
by the City of Yelm City Council.
28. priar ta receiving final approval, the required impravements
shall be canstructed and appraved.
29. Ta accamrnadate i~provements to Creek Street, an additianal 8
feet .of right-af-way will need to be dedicated ta the City .of Yelm.
Please have yaur legal representative or surveyar prepare a Quit
Claim Deed describing the necessary dedicatian.
30. It is alsa requested that a carner radius at the intersectian
.of Creek Street, having at least a 35-faat radius, be included in
the dedicatian.
---.--- -.~-
. . . . .
;. - (
.----;--:---:.~-. I
,,",,'.;.., ,...
--:...----;----~_:_~~'-~i.~.
'-
, '
.. fJ'
:... ~ ~ .....
f. 'r'
.,
;.
.j
~ r'"
t-,
:J.
.:> -"
.;.'
~~ ,:,>,..~
Ii ;s..
.v
UTILITIES
r-/'
,
31. City water service shall be required far this praject and the
required fire flaws shall be met. If extensian .or impravements .of
city water service are required far this praject, then the
service/ impravements shall be constructed at the expense .of the
prapanent. A late comers agreement may be passible if
extensian/impravement(s) are required. Please contact the City .of
Yelm's Engineering Department far details.
32. City STEP sewer service shall be required for this praject.
Please cantact the City .of Yelm's STEP Cbardinatar (Gene Barges) at
458-8410.
TRAFFIC - STREET SIGNS
33. All traffic cantral devices shall be in accardance with the
mast recent editian .of the Manual On Uniform Traffic Control
Devices.
34. Traffic cantral and street name slgns need to be placed where
required.
35. Permanent survey cantrol manuments need ta
establish all street center lines , intersectians,
curves, baundaries and other paints .of cantral.
be placed ta
angle paints,
36. A duplicate .original mylar drawing certified by the design
engineer as "as built" as outlined in the Development Guidelines
and Public Warks Standards, City of Lacey shall be pravided ta the
City .of Yelm priar to receiving final appraval.
ENGINEERING FEES
37. Engineering review fees shall be required far this praject.
The.fees are due at the time of submisslan far signing by the city
englneer.
38. Cantact this .office for final inspectian as saan as all the
required field wark h9s been completed.
. . " ','
. . --.~~----;---;---:-:-:~",,,,---;,-' .
--;-.- :-,~.~~-~~.,.-------,----.
. .'
.
(I')
(.
"
... ...
-
;-
,.' 39. Priar ta recei'l(~p.g. ,final <;lpprava;l;"ihe~ fallawi.ng items shall
be required:
A. Campletian .of all .roads ~~d drainage facilities.
B. Final ~nspectian. ,
C. Campletian .of all punch list items.
D. Street signs shall be in place. '
E. All required project signs shall be ln place.
F. As-built rnylars.
G. Financial security far necessary maintenance and
.operation .of drainage facilities.
H. Financial security far the completian .of all lmprovements
required, i.e. (sidewalks).
I. Payment .of utility fees~
J. Payment of all inspectian 'costs (city .or private).
k. Payment of final fees.
If yau have any questions, plea8e contact the Ci t~t of Yelm s
Engineering Department at 458-8816~
mrc
cc: Shelly Badger
.(1;. if }.~ T 1 .
lty () . e m
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479'
Yelm, Wa$hington 98597
(206) 458~3244
TO: HRC Associates/Rants Group
FROM: City of Yelm ~lannin~,Department
DATE: July ~ 1, 1993
SUBJECT: 'Ye 1 m Creek Apartments (SPR 8092)
The following ,is in response to the issues of congern disc~ssed
last~ week over the phone If more documentation is necessary, or
anything is unclear, please let me know
1) The drainage variance for storage capacity was granted at the
time thel,CityEnglneer signed the construction. drawings Had the
reque~ t for a reduct ion in storage capac fey not beeriappro\ ed"
the construction drawings wou'ld not have been signed' or '"JOula not _
reflect the request
2) Compliance for the 5-corners intersection upgrade is
satisfie'd by submitting the signed "wa'lver of pr,otesr-" r'equi,-'ed
by the Mitigated Determination of Nonsignifican6e The maX1mum
obl igat ion of the' appl icant by the "watver" is in the sum of $300
dollars per P M peak hour vehicle trip created by the 72 ur'it
apartment complex This must be submitted prior to occupancy'
3) The bond (or l~tter of credit) for the frontage impro~e~ent~
must be in the amount of $43,903 dollars: and must be recelved by
the City prior to occ~pancy' A break~own of'exp.ndit~reB may be
provided upon request
I hope this satisfles your request, again, if more fnformatlon is
needed, please let me know (206-458-8408) <
s~cere"lV.<; <" , < ,_
~~ ~ 'C-;::, ~
ryypeterson .
City Planner
Recycled paper C
t. )
,
\
\
\
____ 'lrI ..,..J
.."..,....",.r f
.....,........\
t<' \
\ ('~ \
\
._..,.J1#o..,--.-- "
.... ..,\1
I.)
\
......
.,
,')
,"
"."
,/
1"
~
\
------- ~---~ ---------'
I
------------- ~.,.--- -
\
,... \
J .
\ '.'r......\ 0 \ \
"1 " \ \
. . \ j
~ . _-----.'. ~ '-:;0 \
\
.,-------
." \ \0
. \
" \
'.........
""" 1,-')'
,J
\ ~.
... .. .
-",', ...., ~ \
-- '.....'
.... ....
-................." ,
.. \
....
f"
c'')
<.)
."
l"~
,~'
\
.,
\
\ .. ., .,
\ ; r.. '
\ .~/~..: ..
_4 \ ~ ..,..
- -...-' ,--
:: ~ :; \\:1: · "\"'~ \'-\~:,
.,' .,1 ,\.:J- \ ..
'~\. 'f;, ":.'\', . --'--r<J:\d7~'"
.' . i.<Ii I
..... ,'; .'
!'. ,,' ' ~ "- -;: ~""
~ ,k "'-
.\:
..
,
. '\
(~
f<",~ ,..........
:~/\- '~~ ~-~-
l') t") ·
.;~., / \
.
r
"
.
.. ..-
".' \-',
,.~..
\
.. '
('.
"
( . .'
\
\
i
,-.,,,
/ ~._-
. ---...".
..
~
", ;,j
..........
tOlt
tI)
-
'-,
....
~
.
I 'Ul#l#~"p,""''''''
, ~.
....
~.~.. ~
Pi.
',C) , C"l ,..,'
te'L ,l""
J ':'.:-~ ... (II" !"
r~*'\" .~ ~
~ I"')
r-g
'7 \
; () tfJ,
\ ~
~ ..."
..,.
c
~.)
.t
l')
~
c
()
"'"
tI\
\\
~
2,
,..
o
~
o
\
."
......
----'"
,.....~
l
<-)
\
.....
'. ' 0
" -----
'" --"-
------
. ,..:
-
"
J '..
~ \: .\~
\ ~)~
~
-
\
~
-
"
-
0
~ 2/Z'd 1
0
~.
o
"
\
0:;:
J
~
r-
-
,
~,
':1 t ",
\---:---';:'~ .,
- "".....
8 "
\ I "
\ ~~ \
o i
\
.-
.-
: \
I
\c
.-
\ ,}, ~
..',. J
\..1
f")
o
4""
o
).
.,..
i' \
J ~
\
\
,
\
\
\
\
\JZti'ld .o3>fJ'l3/13 2Z' 9' S6. 8' 53)
./
--,~,j --~----~ ------- ---.-.-
.." /- -,~-----------'-_. -------- - -------
l
l
l jr
'.
,~
[ rrraffic Impact )lnafysis
[ and
WetCand q)eEineation
I for
L
[
F ~PL:M. jlfPjl(j{PMP/f\ffS
I
L
[ 1fE CreetStreet
rye[m, Wasfzz1l{Jton
F
l
r
L_
Prepared for
I HRC Associates
L.
711 South Capitol Way
[ Suite 201
Olympia, Washington 98501
[ (206) 943-8060
l Prepared 6y
Skillings-Connolly, Inc.
l 5016 Lacey Boulevard SE
Lacey, Washington 98503
(206) 491-3399
l July 16, 1993
l
l
i
U
'I
U
TABLE OF CONTENTS
'I
LJ
INTRODUCTION
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Road Network
Traffic Volumes
Accident Review
Levels of Service (1993)
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Trip Generation
Trip Distribution
Projected Traffic Volumes
Future Levels of Service (1994)
MITIGATION
SUMMARY
1
1
1
.2
.2
.2
3
3
3
3
3
4
5
'I
LJ
,'I
J
n
LJ
'I
LJ
'l
APPENDICES
Appendix A Wetland Delineation
Appendix B Level of Service Calculations
LJ
'1
LJ
FIGURES
1 Project Vicinity Map
2. Proposed Site Plan
3 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
4 Project Trip Distribution
5 Project Generated Traffic Volumes
6 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
'l
o
'I
u
n
TABLES
1 Trip Generation Summary
2 Existing and Future Levels of Service
3
4
u
n
u
n
u
n
u
n
LJ
n
u
n
LJ
HRC ASSOCIATES
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
SKilLINGS-CONNOllY, INC
YELM APARTMENTS - 93027
!l
LJ
n
, I
u
Il
,
LJ
INTRODUCTION
'l
LJ
This report documents the traffic impact analysis performed for the proposed Yelm
Apartments on the east side of NE Creek Street in Yelm, Washington (figure 1) The
site plan (figure 2) shows the proposed layout and the access roadway The report
addresses the existing traffic conditions in the area and provides analysis and
discussion of the traffic impacts that will be created by the Yelm Apartments. The
proposed development will be composed of 44 apartment units when completed in
1994
n
J
n
LJ
n
LJ
The wetland delineation for the site was performed by Wayne S Wright, Vice President
of Applied Environmental Services, Inc. in July 1993 A copy of this report can be
found in Appendix A.
n
I
U
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Road Network
n
J
Yelm A venue (Washington State Route 507) is the principal arterial It presently has a
two-lane cross-section the entire length. Speed zones along Yelm Avenue include a
35-mph segment from NE 103rd Street to Five-Corners and a 25-mph segment from
Longmire Street to NE 103rd Street. All minor approach intersections to Yelm Avenue
are under stop control
II
LJ
n
LJ
Washington State Route 507 is another principal arterial This a two-lane southwest
to northeast roadway with a posted 25-mph speed zone within the Yelm city limits All
minor approach intersections are under stop control
n
U
n
I
U
Bald Hills Road SE is a two-lane minor arterial connecting the City and SR 507 with
the rural residential areas southeast of downtown It has a posted 50-mph speed limit.
At its intersection with SR 507, Bald Hills Road is one of the major legs of the Five-
Corners intersection and under stop control
n
U
Morris Road SE is a two-lane collector connecting the City and SR 507 to the rural
residential areas south of Yelm It has a posted 50-mph speed limit. All minor
approach intersections are under stop control. Morris Road is another leg of the Five-
Corners intersection Current geometry at the intersection has Morris Road terminating
at Bald Hills Road, approximately 100 feet southeast of SR 507
n
, I
U
J
NE 103rd Street is a two-lane collector east-west roadway northeast of the City Near
the Yelm city center, the roadway adjoins Jayhawks Shopping Center, the area's major
shopping center It has a posted 25-mph speed limit.
Il
I
LJ
NE Creek Street is a two-lane collector north-south roadway east of the City It has a
posted 25-mph speed limit.
n
U
n
,
U
HRC ASSOCIATES
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
SKilLINGS-CONNOllY, INC
YElM APARTMENTS - 93027
Il
U
n
u
'1
L.J
Traffic Volumes
n
U
The selection of the study intersections is based on the threshold requirement of
development traffic exceeding 20 vehicles in the peak direction of the peak-hour traffic
on the adjacent streets and intersections. The threshold requirement of the
development generating 25 percent or more of site traffic through a signalized
intersection or the "critical" movements at an unsignalized intersection shall also apply
The intersections impacted by this threshold requirement are selected for further
analysis. They are.
n
I
U
'1
u
n
U
. SR 507/NE Creek Street/Bald Hill Road/Morris Road SE (Five-Corners)
. Yelm Avenue/NE 103rd Street
. NE Creek Street/NE 103rd Street
. NE Creek Street/NE Algiers Drive
n
1992 PM peak hour turning movement volumes for Five-Corners and Yelm Avenue/NE
103rd Street intersections were based on the Yelm Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Supplement, August 1992 and the Prairie Plaza Shopping Center Traffic Impact
Analysis, 1993, S Chamberlain & Associates A four percent annual growth factor was
added to the 1992 intersection volumes to establish 1993 base-year traffic volumes.
Skillings-Connolly, Inc. performed turning movement counts for NE Creek Street/NE
Algiers Drive and NE Creek Street/NE 103rd intersections on June 23, 1993 and June
29, 1993 respectively The existing p m. peak hour traffic volumes in the project area
are shown on figure 3
u
.n
LJ
n
U
n
LJ
Accident Review
n
LJ
The Yelm Comprehensive Transportation Plan Supplement identifies the SR 507/NE
Creek Street/Bald Hills Road SElMorris Road SE intersection as a safety deficient
location. It has been targeted for immediate safety rehabilitation.
n
LJ
The other three study intersections are not listed in the Yelm Comprehensive
Transportation Plan Supplement as accident problem locations.
n
LJ
Levels of Service
n
All level of service (LOS) analyses were conducted following the procedures outlined in
the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, Special Report
209 The LOS at unsignalized stop sign controlled intersections is measured in terms of
unused or reserve capacity available for each stop-controlled movement and each left
turn movement on the uncontrolled approaches. The reported LOS is typically for the
worst case of all the calculated movements. Geometric characteristics and conflicting
traffic movements are taken into consideration when determining LOS values
u
n
U
n
,
LJ
Weekday PM peak hour LOS analyses were performed for the study intersections
using the 1993 existing turning movement volumes (figure 3), both with and without the
proposed project and summarized in table 2.
'I
U
n
. I
LJ
HRC ASSOCIATES
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
SKILLINGS-CONNOLLY, INC
YELM APARTMENTS - 93027
n
LJ
2
n
I ,
, I
U
n
i ~
U
n
I I
U
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Trip Generation
'1
u
The trip generation values for the 44 unit apartment complex are based on the number
of units. The average rates for apartment units (code 220) from the Institute of
Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation (5th Edition, 1991) were used to calculate
the number of trips generated. Table 1 reflects the average weekday daily traffic
(A WDT) and weekday PM peak hour calculation results.
r:
, I
U
n
U
Table 1
Trip Generation Summary
PM Peak Hour
n
J
Proposed Development
A WDT Enter
Exit
Total
n
I
U
44 apartment units
285
19
9
28
n
I I
U
Trip Distribution
n
U
Trip distribution to and from the proposed subdivision development was based on area
traffic flow patterns. Figure 4 depicts the trip distribution percentages used in these
analyses. Based on this distribution, the predicted project-generated PM peak hour
volumes were assigned to the surrounding street network (figure 5)
n
I I
U
Proiected Traffic Volumes
n
u
The estimated non-site (base-line) traffic volumes (figure 6) expected at project
completion (1994) were projected using a combination of an assumed annual growth
rate of 4 percent and traffic generated from "on-line" development projects Nisqually
Plaza Shopping Center and Prairie Plaza Shopping Center
n
I
LJ
n
I I
U
Future Levels of Service
n
LJ
Weekday PM peak hour LOS analyses (table 2) were performed for the study
intersections using the 1994 turning movement volumes (figure 6) both with and
without the proposed project. These analyses were conducted following the
procedures outlined in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual
n
, I
LJ
J
J
HRC ASSOCIATES
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
SKILLINGS-CONNOLLY, JNC
YELM APARTMENTS - 93027
n
I I
U
3
n
t
u
.11
I
u
Table 2
Existing and Future Level of Service
n
I
LJ
1m
1994
u
UNSIGNALlZED
W/O PROJECT
RESERVE
LOS CAPACITY
E 67
W/PROJECT
RESERVE
LOS CAPACITY
E 45
W/O PROJECT
RESERVE
LOS CAPACITY
-117 F
W/PROJECT
RESERVE
LOS CAPACITY
-133 F
n
I
II
SR S07/CREEK/
BALD HILL
A
887
A
847
A
855
A
819
u
CREEK/ALGIERS
A
773
A
771
A
715
A
713
11
U
CREEK/103RD ST
D
137
D
137
E
87
E
87
YELM A VEl
103RD ST
11
i
U
'l
J
SR S07/CREEK/
BALD HILL
B
DELAY
74
B
DELAY
73
LOS
SIGNALIZED
LOS
11
Reserve Capacity is defined as additional vehicles per hour that could be
accommodated for specific turning movements
I
LJ
LJ
The SR S07/NE Creek Street/Bald Hill Road SE/Morris Road SE (Five-Corners)
intersection currently operates at LOS E. When the predicted traffic from the proposed
apartment complex is added, it will continue operating at LOS E with a slight decrease
in reserve capacity
II
II
fI
The natural growth of traffic on Yelm Avenue causes the decrease in LOS from 0 to E
at the Yelm Avenue/NE 103rd Street intersection. However, with the additional project
traffic, there is no decrease in the reserve capacity for the left turn movement from NE
103rd Street.
u
u
II
,
LJ
MITIGATION
11
I
I
Mitigating measures will be required to the extent that the transportation facilities
operate at a recommended LOS condition or better The Yelm Comprehensive
Transportation Plan Supplement recommends LOS 0 for Yelm Avenue between 93rd
Avenue SE and Five-Corners, including all intersections. All remaining roadway
segments and intersections shall operate at LOS C or better
u
n
: !
U
n
LJ
The LOS E at SR S07/NE Creek Street SE/Bald Hill Road SE/Morris Road SE (Five-
Corner) intersection exceeds the recommended LOS 0 The Yelm Comprehensive
Transportation Plan Supplement identifies this intersection as needing a traffic signal
to help improve the over all LOS The proposed project should participate by providing
a proportionate share contribution of the costs for this improvement. The proportionate
share costs for the improvements will be based on the percentage of "new
development" traffic generated through the transportation facility The percentage will
n
I I
U
'1
J
HRC ASSOCIATES
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
SKILLINGS-CONNOLLY, INC.
YELM APARTMENTS - 93027
n
4
u
n
I
I
U
11
J
be based on the total projected peak-hour traffic volumes for intersection
improvements Based upon the criteria for determining the proportionate share, the
apartment complex will add another 21 vehicle trips during the PM peak hour to the
Five-Comers intersection. The total intersection volume projected for 1994 with the
proposed site is 1540 vehicles. The additional traffic from the proposed project only
contributes 1 5 percent to the total traffic volume of the intersection We recommend
the developer of the site participate in the intersection improvements as part of the
mitigating measures by paying 1 5 percent of the cost of the intersection improvements.
o
n
J
o
Il
u
The LOS E at Yelm Avenue/NE 103rd Street can be mitigated through the installation
of the proposed signal at the Nisqually Plaza Shopping Center The phasing from that
signal should provide enough gaps to allow the left turn movement to function.
No mitigation is required for the other study intersections as the LOS criteria is not
exceeded.
n
j i
u
SUMMARY
n
I
U
Establishment of base traffic volumes for 1993 included an annual average growth rate
of four percent, which was used to update the 1992 existing turning movement counts
for two intersections. The other two intersections were counted in June 1993. The
generated trips from Yelm Apartments were added to achieve traffic volumes expected
for 1994
11
J
(I
The proposed Yelm Apartments at NE Creek Street will generate a total of 28 vehicle
trips (19 inbound and 9 outbound) during the weekday p m. peak hour These trips
were distributed based upon the existing traffic flow patterns. Approximately 65
percent of the trips were distributed towards Olympia.
n
l.J
u
n
I
LJ
Mitigation is required for the Five-Comers intersection based upon a proportionate
share of 1 5 percent of the improvements cost of the intersection.
n
I I
U
The results of this traffic impact analysis show that traffic from the proposed Yelm
Apartments will not significantly decrease the levels of service at the intersections in the
surrounding street network.
r'
U
n
~ i
U
n
U
n
, I
U
n
J
n
u
HRC ASSOCIATES
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
SKilLINGS-CONNOllY, INC
YElM APARTMENTS - 93027
5
C:j-C~Y-C::__Y-L ::s--c ~-L: :J-C j-t: _ j-C:j-L-j-L- :r-C J-'C-: -y--"Lr L ~
~
NC>R'......
NO" TO SCALE
PROJECT
SlTE
NE
SR 507
n\J(
COt\~(t\S
w
If)
o
<(
o
a:
If)
a:
a:
o
2
r:.l Skillings · ConnollY. Inc.
COi6S\LfMG ~8
110I' ua:t "0;0. IL wzY,"'" 11II03 48\-D11
PROJECT VICINITY MAP
YELM APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
1
FIGURE
\
j
II:') '\ I > ..i\.
j /1
. '/ \
/,<;1' \
_ ~- 'r'>/j \:\
I ;i /
F' ,it \'
!' """t
I ' ,/ / ~:.
/k \' \,1.)'
,/ . <. ' I \' "~ V \
f' 0 i 0: I '
, Ii" 1) c8 'J . 'J
. ~ \1 IV ~ ~,\ Lie)' ~.; \~:J\\
,Jf! fJ/ , I lJ ' ! V ...-A ~\\J
, fJ """ V ' I \:J \' I
" " ., f" ' . ""'! \,,, '
;J ,~~ -,<(,0 ,iff' ,/1 <<t ~.: " \ ,',,\ ".'.,\~
/' t~: ~ L+' ;.1 W ~fJ1' "l\\ \' ) \
^' . ' \.l' ,,' "\,, '. ,,\
/ }'l': J; .u ,t ".".:.' \ I (r. ~
... , ft" Q' ~ ,;", \,..,
, _ il! ; "1''',. . ,., . .., ". o,~
. . _, 0-1' '. 7 'Q."
j / . J U, r' ' !./ '\\< u' \
/ /. f' -""'sf, ,. f- \J.J'''' 1,./ l / ...::.. 0
/ ,./19") '~,;' ,;:: '" .:,.. ~'qj r 1.~tf~'J' ty \
, .,.' fJ.. ,I ."'. "
I _' ., it ,;;-..' 1'- 'r ~~;' I...Y
"', ..'~ ",:'. , -, . ..... . ,
I ' l' " " ' I .; d tv:J \
I-... . / 'I! . ~ OJ' 0''0,) .\
.---:: I' l' .~_._-.,...-
, I,.? ..;:;,- -----'
~------= " }.5 'JG;l'Ii':> 1N
.if. t ~ .:,.
"
J
\
'>
...J
""\
'>
.J
'I
j
'\
\
...1
I"
\ \
,...1
'1
\.J
\,
\ \
IJ
\\
\
u
\,
\j
\,
\ \
\ \
(fl
(j)
~
:.:(
~
~ ~
t ~
-
Ul <.)
'= G:
fJ) ~
a ~
fJ) (fl
o I-
ea ~
~ ~
0.. ~
~
3
w
)-
d ,
S i
..
z: \
-0
i '
g ,
. ";
1a\9.
c=~.
ii ~\\
~ ,
\.'\
:J
CJ
CJ
C-'-'J CJ CJ
c:J c~'j
c_.J
CJ
CJ
L------------'
~.E.. ,Q3RO 51.
l4501
~
IW::......;JII
r-IoFt-r......
toO,. ,.0 sc"I..E
r-
3~.-
....-l>~
\'I.E. /'l.-GIER~
(4) 4,1
(2) 2'"
~t,
Nt;?
r- .:!:-
~
~
~
Q
w
5
ui
r--r--""_z
~~~
l95001 SR 507
\.EGE.~O
'/..'/..'/.. E'/..\SI\t-IG lR~ff\C \lOL\JMES
(,,,) (,is,,"" ",.ff\c "",-"\.IE' W/pROJEC1
LESS 1\-\~t-I 5 \IE.\-\\CLES
1993 pt6 pt."\<' "OURS 1R.,fflC '401._S
'/El\.l "" "R1\.\E\'I1S IR"fflC ,\.II' "C 1 />.\'l "l'lSIS
~ ,~ . coftl\Ol1. \IlCo
_'A~
__ tflI'iA' ---
3
: J c_J CJ C J CJ C J C J C J C) C J C J C j L ~
~
~
N c> Ft seA"'''
,..ot to
65%
N.E. ALG\ERS OR.
---I
o
~
~
~
~
OC
o
u.l
z
(SR 507)
PROJECT TRIP OlSTRIBUTION
'(ELM APAR1MEN15 lRAfflC IMPACl ANALySIS
~ 8ll_I1' · cOftl\O\ly, \nO.
__ t'/\iASIlLTIllll ~
_ ~ us;C(," __ .-1-:531'
35%
FIGURE
4
C-:J CJ CJ LJ CJ C-J CJ [-=:J C~~ C-J C_~ LJ [=:'J [-~ c.=J LJ L:J L~ LJ
~
~
N~R. -r ~
NOT TO SCALE
N.E. 103RD ST.
5,
(]1
N.E. ALGIERS DR ..
,
~
,...:
(J)
~
w
w
a:::
u
u..i
z
(SR 507)
FIGURE
r: Skillings · Connoll" Inc.
~ . COOOIUI. TIllIQ M!HEIiIS
_ lllII. LACEY ..lID.. IL UlCEY, IrA. _ 4411-_
PROJECT GENERA TED TRAFFIC VOLUMES
YELM APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
5
J c_J CJ CJ CJ CJ C J CJ CJ
NOpa.-rt-l
tlO~ ~O SC.....E
----
c- J c-- J \..--,..J
500
'\ Q3RO 51.
(70) 70....
l25) 20~
~
~
(}lUlU'
J'~
~LG\ERS # ~ , ,
t;~;~ ~q
(}l"""
---'N
~
~
~
w
5
u.\
-z.
'25 (31)
"'410 (410)
35 (35)
~
Sf<. 507
LEGEND
f\GURE
X" 1994 "","c "oL\l~(S 'HI"'''''' PROJ(C'
('X') 1994 ,",ffIC '/OI-U~(S ,,/P.OJ(C'
\ ,<<1<) ,'IE" ,GE oMl" 1RJ>ffIC '/OI-U~(S
6
'\994 ,11 ,E~ "OURS 1R~ff'C '40\.U1IES
'(tu.l I\P "R 1\AEl-l1S 1R"fflC 1\.11' "C1 {>.ll "L'lSIS
__ S\.. · conno'Y' \aCo
_'A~
- --..- ---
(l
I I
U
n
J
n
u
n
I
LJ
'1
LJ
n
!
U
jJfWESv(])IX ;I
n
I
LJ
n
J
n
J
n
U
r'
I
U
/1
,
LJ
n
LJ
n
!
U
n
I
U
11
I
U
(l
LJ
n
I ;
U
HRC ASSOCIATES
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
SKilLINGS-CONNOllY, INC
YElM APARTMENTS - 93027
n
u
ilA PPLIED
u ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES. INC.
o
o
Tuesday, July 6, 1993
n
J
J
Skillings-Connolly, Inc
5016 Lacey Boulevard S.E.
Lacey, WA 98503
Attention: Kelly Harris
n
I
LJ
Subject. Yelm Apartments Wetland Delineation Skillings-Connolly
Contract Reference #93027
n
LJ
Dear Kelly'
n
I
U
On June 29, 1993, AES, Inc performed a wetland delineation of the
property Skillings & Connolly, Inc., has identified for the Yelm
Apartments ( Figures 1 and 2). We contacted Mr Ty Peterson on June
10, 1993 (City of Yelm Planning Director) for clarification on the
City's wetland reporting needs. At that time Mr. Peterson wanted to
be sure that hydric soils were not present on the property and asked
us to focus on this aspect. He confirmed that the current plant
community was pasture and blackberries. The attached wetlands
delineation report IS our product for the contract.
o
~
o
n
G
We studied the site and collected the site specific information
required for the jurisdictional wetland delineation in accordance
with the Federal Manual (FICWD 1989). The completed data forms
are attached to this letter
n
U
n
J
o
o
The property borders NE Creek Street to the west and Yelm Creek to
the north. Other than the riparian area of the Creek, wetlands are
not present on the site A fence runs the length of the property
parallel to and generally delimits the creek and its associated
riparian habitat. A sharp topographic break also eXists Just beyond
the fencellne and further identifies the riparian zone
n
J
n
U
The soils of the property are mapped as Spanaway gravely sandy and
McKenna gravely Silt loam by the Soil Conservation Service (SCS)
(1990) (Figure 3) lihe Spanaway sOil senes IS not a hydric sOil,
(!
LJ
2501 Mile Hill Dr., SUite 104
Pon Orchard, W A 98366
(206) 895-8044 fax (206) 895-8046
n
r I
U
J
however, the McKenna series IS listed as a hydnc SOIl by the SCS
(1988). Soil pits dug along the fenceline and throughout the property
revealed a very sandy and gravely loam soil which appeared to be a
well drained. Comparison of our field data with the SCS soils map
suggests that the soils we observed were Spanaway senes due to
the well drained appearance and lack of saturation Indicators such
as mottling. Soils below the topographic break delimiting the Yelm
Creek corridor were saturated and for much of the length of the
property, had standing water. Our observations suggest that the
McKenna sOils are confined to the Yelm Creek corridor Hydrology
was not evident outside of the riparian area of the Creek.
n
LJ
n
r
LJ
n
,
u
n
J
n
The soils information is presented on the attached data forms. The
Spanaway soils senes has been identified by Thurston County (1993)
as an area of critical aquifer recharge with a Category rating of I,
Extreme Aquifer Susceptibility.
LJ
n
I
LJ
n
In summary, we did not identify any Jurisdictional wetlands on the
subject property. Yelm Creek and its associated ripanan zone are
well delimited by the fenceline and the topographic drop just beyond
the fence. We did not place any flagging in the field for surveYing
purposes due to the obvious nature of the riparian boundary. If
necessary, we would be available to assist the survey crew at the
time of the topographic survey in mapping the ripanan zone
boundary.
r
LJ
n
U
n
U
n
LJ
Smcerely,
n
u
r:
LJ
n
u
WSW'ww
"
LJ
attachments
n
U
Il
r
U
i'
,
u
nA PPLIED
u ENVIRONMENTAL
'l SERVICES. INC.
LJ
'1
L.J
'1
U
J
'1
J
'1
LJ
'I
I
LJ
'1
u
II
u
n
LJ
n
,
LJ
n
LJ
n
u
'I
LJ
n
LJ
n
J
n
J
n
I
U
WETLRND DEL I NERTI ON FOR THE
YELM RPRRTMENTS SITE
YELM, WRSHINGTON
Prepared For:
SKILLINGS-CONNOLLY, INC.
5016 Lacey Bouleuard SE
Lacey, WR 98503
July 7, 1993
2501 Mile Hill Dr., SUite 104
Pan Orchard, W A 98366
(206) 895-8044 fax (206) 895-8046
'l
LJ
n
u
n
LJ
n
J
'I
J
THOLE OF CONTENTS
'I
LJ
C HRPTER
PRGE
n
U
INTRODUCTION
LOCATION
SCOPE
PERFORMANCE
1
1
1
1
n
J
METHODS
PAPER INVENTORY
FIELD DELINEATION
WETLAND EVALUATION
3
3
3
3
n
LJ
n
U
RESULTS
PAPER INVENTORY
FIELD DELINEATION
4
4
4
r--l
I
U
n
DISCUSSION
IMP ACTS OF THE PROPOSAL
4
14
u
n
LJ
REFERENCES
n
U
APPENDICES
n
U
n
U
n
J
n
I
LJ
n
u
fl
LJ
Il
LJ
'1
LJ
n
,
u
'1
I
U
LIST OF FIGURES
1 VICINITY MAP
2. TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
3. NWI MAP
4 SOILS SURVEY OF KITSAP COUNTY
PAGE
2
5
6
7
n
LJ
n
LJ
LIST OF TABLES
1 SOIL PIT 1 DATA FORM
2. SOIL PIT 2 DATA FORM
3. SOIL PIT 3 DATA FORM
4 SOIL PIT 4 DATA FORM
8
9
10
1 1
'I
J
n
J
n
LJ
II
LJ
n
u
n
U
n
J
n
U
il
LY
I]
LJ
J
Il
U
n
, ,
I '
U
Il
J
'1
U
n
U
n
U
P REFReE
This report has been prepared by Applied Environmental Services,
Inc. (AES) following the descnbed methods and information available
to the best of our knowledge at the time of the work. The
information presented in this report reflects AES's best
professional opinion regarding the subject property. The applIcant
is advised to contact all appropriate regulatory agencies prior to
design or construction of any development to obtain necessary
permits and approvals Wetland boundanes, classifications and
discussions are based on our understanding of the local, state, and
federal regulations, and site conditions at the time of our work. The
final wetland boundary determination and wetland classification IS
to be made or verified by the appropnate jurisdictional agency
n
i
LJ
n
J
n
J
'I
U
'l
J
n
I
U
n
u
n
, I
LJ
n
U
n
1
U
'l
1
l.J
n
J
.n
J
(l
U
o
n
U
Ii
LJ
INTRODUCTION
fl
LJ
LOCATION
Applied Environmental ServIces, Inc. (AES) was contracted by
SkIllings-Connolly, Inc. to perform a wetlands delineation on
property located In Yelm This property lies wIthin SectIon 29,
TownshIp 17N, and Range 2E of the McKenna Quadrangle in the state
of Washington The local JUrisdiction and lead environmental revIew
authority is the CIty of Yelm. Figure 1 Illustrates the VICInity of the
subject parcel
n
I
LJ
n
LJ
n
,
LJ
n
J
SCOPE
The scope of this investigation was focused toward four specific
goals. These were.
· to identIfy any wetlands and assocIated boundarIes wlthm the
subject property,
· to evaluate existing conditions regarding wetlands functIon and
value,
· to discuss wetland category and buffer boundaries, and
· to assess probable impacts to wetlands as a result of the
proposed activity
~
u
n
J
fl
U
['
U
fI
U
PERFORMANCE
On June 29, 1993, Mr Wayne S. WrIght performed the wetland
delineation accompanied by Ms Lisa Berntsen Stephens. The weather
during the fieldwork was warm and dry throughout the day The
regIon was not experiencmg unusual or extreme hydrographic
conditions during the tIme of the delineation.
n
cJ
n
LJ
'1
,
u
n
. I
U
'l
L1
n
,
u
1
n
J
n
i
LJ
n
LJ
II
I
U
n
YELM
n
LJ
r:
LJ
II
i
LJ
n
,
I
U
n
i
U
..,
n
I
U
~
d
11(. "l.
n
U
~
u
I
------~- -
I
1
I
I
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
~R?lrTH
HILL ::oj"/...
- --~~'
n
i
U
Ii
\ -- ~
n
I
U
'l
U
'l
,
LJ
FIGURE 1. UICINITY MRP
n
I
~
WETLRNDS DELINERTION
NEAR YELM, WRSHINGTON
RPPL lED ENUIRONMENTRL SERU I CES, INC.
n
J
2
n
u
.11
I ;
U
I]
u
METHODS
"I
I
LJ
'l
f
LJ
PAPER INVENTORY
To prepare for the field delineation effort, a search for pertinent
and applicable literature was conducted. This method IS described
by the Washington State Department of Ecology (1989). Data sources
that were reviewed included' Soil Survey of Thurston County,
Washington (USDA, SCS 1990), the McKenna National Wetlands
Inventory (NWI) Map (USFWS 1988), and the McKenna topographic map
(USGS 1973). In addition to the above listed map products, the Draft
Thurston County Critical Areas Title 17 15 (1993) document was
also reviewed.
()
J
r:
u
n
I I
U
n
I
I
U
n
I
U
FIELD DELINEATION
Wetland boundaries on the subject property were delineated
following the Unified Federal Methodology (Federal Interagency
Committee for Wetland Delineation [FICWD] 1989). The delineation
for thIs work effort followed the routine method deSCribed within
FICWD (1 989)
n
u
~
LJ
n
WETLANDS EVALUATION
Many references were used in conjunction with expenence to
complete the evaluation of wetland functions and values. Reference
material is cited where appropriate throughout the text to justify
and explain the results of this investigation All delineated
wetlands were categorized separately by both the Washington State
Four-Tiered Rating System (Ecology 1990, 1991) and the Cowardin
System (Cowardin et al. 1979).
Il
LJ
f
U
n
u
'l
I
U
I)
LJ
'l
LJ
J
n
3
r ,
u
n
I i
U
n
I
U RESULTS
:1
u
n
I
U
PAPER INVENTORY
FIgures 2 and 3 are exerpts from the USGS topographic and USFWS
NWI maps. The subject property has been outlined to help in
Identification. The NWI map does not identIfy any existing wetlands
wIthin the property boundaries Figure 4 IS an excerpt from the
Soils Survey of Thurston County (USDA, SCS '979) Soil types
identified on the subject property are the Spanaway gravelly sandy
loam, and the McKenna gravelly silt loam. The Spanaway sOIl type is
non-hydnc and the McKenna soil series is listed as a hydnc soil
(HydrIC Soils of the State of Washmgton [USDA, SCS] 1988)
n
I
LJ
~
u
n
I I
LJ
i)
I
LJ
n
FIELD DELINEATION
Modified Corps of Engineers (COE) wetland data forms were
completed as part of the field effort. These forms are presented as
Tables " 2, 3 and 4. All of these tables present the necessary data
to conclude that wetlands are not located on the subject property
The Yelm Creek corridor does exhibit wetland characteristics and IS
considered as a stream system. ThIs area has not been treated as a
wetland in this effort. Plant species (abundance and dominance),
soil type, and hydrology Indicators are shown on the forms
I
L.J
n
J
n
I
J
n
I
U
n
I
LJ
n
u
DISCUSSION
n
I I
U
Wetlands are identified by the clear presence of three physical
parameters. These are. hydrophytic plant species, hydric solis, and
positive hydroloqy.
n
U
n
U
n
I I
U
n
I .
LJ
4
n
I I
U
n
I
LJ
n
I
LJ
n
I
LJ
1.,(" ...,
"
v
. ,
"0
o
- '7\
.... \,
"
-'. (
.:'.
<.
\Netl
..;-:"-
-?o
"0
n
J
1
LJ
, Well ~.
-~~~ 19 ~ o~,
:/ J. ')? ! ~ ,', "
;.t:.; . I -</' ,-
. . '.', . .--"
.,. -- / V
~, ~ -- .~,~,~~
... .; /
, ~
. .
, 0
~. ."
20
n
I I
U
.
./
{,...
~l
c .
Q:l
(,..0
~,'?f--K- ----
V
n
/
I
u
n
u
'j
:::
~I
'l:
e:. ..
--= =- i31 --1(":
~V
Five
Corners I"
Q "
I~
'-
ROAD
'"
l"~ ,I'
I
......
,0
111, 0~
291j Q.?'
...... /0/;;
, ~I
I HI , --
=~_-;Q'. ~u~______
, ~,
'?: ~..
/ f-.o
.1/
"
/
,I
'l
I
LJ
n
:
LJ
n
I
U
,
,-- -, "~/ ~ ~
-, J.~~ 'i
- ~ersmjth--:':' ;0011 .t
. " ___ -- ~-Hill--- - ~ '
_~_-::~,~:_~~/,~~__\'". I
~/ // /.~ ~ I ,\, F'tuM~1
_/ ~ /~ . I '\
....--/ /' -...-- ;.~.~" . ~ ~' \ \ -\V -
/ _ '...... ro., 'l: " ?,V( -
'~--' ,~l J~Q_' IQ: ~'.\ ~I
_; ",_,.v _ ;I~ 8,1;
_, ,,- / ~ .ILl I
Well
n
I
U
Q/ l"c"" '::
"
II
I
U
f"l
I
U
FIGURE 2. TOPOGRRPH I C MRP S29, TI7N, R2E
MCKENNR QURD (USGS 1973)
n
i
LJ
II
J
WETLRNDS DEL I NERTI ON
NERR YELM, WRSH INGTON
RPPL lED ENUIRONMENTRL SERUI CES, INC.
n
J
5
n
LJ
I
j
n
,
u
Ii
i
U
n
,
o
n
J
\I,
U
(I
i
U
n
,
U
n
. \
U
n
J
n
I \
U
r)
\ \
\
':~.Q :\\\,
2: Ii
--.", ~.1'l1
} . .......,.~.
, 0 -';~;'.t:'
"". ~'~.
. ;-.. -;~.:Q:
'Cl a: ? 7- ~'\
f\Gual3. l'lU)\ Mar S2l}. 1\1l'l. a2l
MC\(ll'll'la QuaD \USfU)S \ l}8 \)
U)l1lftl'lDS DlUl'llft1\Ol'l
l'llft" 'lllM. U)ftS\\\l'lG10l'l
ftrrUlD ll'oIU\aOl'lMll'l1ftl SlaU\ClS. \l'lC.
6
o
n
J
~
LJ
I)
LJ
n
I
LJ
1
u
Il
, i
U
1/
u
n
I
LJ
n
u
11
u
n
J
n
, I
U
n
, I
U
n
{ I
U
n
U
F IIiURE 4. SO I LS SURUEY OF
THURSTON COUNTY (USGS, SCS 1980)
n
LJ
WETLANDS DELINEATION
NEAR YELM, WASH I NIiTON
RPPLIED ENU IRONMENTAL SERU I CES, INC.
n
J
7
J
r)
u
n
J
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD
n
u
Field Investigator(s) Wayne S. Wright Date: June 29, 1993
Project/Site. Yelm Apartments NE Creek Road State: WA County. Thurston
Applicant/Owner. Skillings & Connolly, Inc. (Client) Plant Community#/Name: #1
n
I
U
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
n
J
'l
u
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes ~ No ___ (If no, please explain.)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes __ No ~ (If yes, please explain.)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
VEGETATION
n
J
Dominant Plant Species (Scientific and Common)
1 Circium foliosum Leafy Thistle
2 Solanum dulcamara Nightshade
3 Pha/aris arundinacea Reedcanary Grass
4 Misc. Grass Graminae
5 Rubus discolor Himalyan Blackberry
6. Rubus laciniatus Evergreen Blackberry
Ind. %
Status Cover
FAC- 10
FAC 1 0
FACW 30
NI 50
NI 50
NI 50
Stratum
H
H
H
H
S
S
r'l
U
n
I
LJ
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC, 25%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes ___ No ~
Rationale.
n
I
U
SOILS
Series/phase: Spanaway gravelly sandy loam SOIL PIT # 1
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes ___ No ~ Undetermined ___
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes ___ No.x Histic epipedon present? Yes ___ No ~
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes ___ No.x Gleyed? Yes ___ No ~
Matrix Color. 10 YR 2/1 noted throughout Mottle Colors: N/ A
Other hydric soil indicators: None
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes ___ No ~
Rationale: Other than color, no hydric indicators are present, Also the Spanaway soils
series is not listed as a hydric soil.
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes __ No .x Surface water depth: N/ A
Is the soil saturated? Yes ___ No ~
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: None
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation. None
n
I
U
n
I
LJ
n
LJ
n
) ,
U
n
U
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes __ No ~
Rationale: Hydrology is limited to the Yelm Creek.
n
U
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes __ No ~
Rationale:
Table adopted from the Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation (FICWD) 1989
n
U
J
r
u
8
n
LJ
n
LJ
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD
n
LJ
Field Investigator(s) Wayne S. Wright Date: June 29, 1993
Project/Site. Yelm Apartments NE Creek Road State: WA County. Thurston
Applicant/Owner' Skillings & Connolly, Inc. (Client) Plant Community#/Name: #2
n
I
U
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
n
U
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes ~ No ___ (If no, please explain.)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes __ No ~ (If yes, please explain.)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
n
I
U
VEGETATION
n
I
U
Dominant Plant Species (Scientific and Common)
1 Circium foliosum Leafy Thistle
2 Solanum dulcamara Nightshade
3 Phalaris arundinacea Reedcanary Grass
4 Mise, Grass Graminae
5 Rubus discolor Himalyan Blackberry
6 Rubus laciniatus Evergreen Blackberry
Ind. %
Status Cover
FAC- 10
FAC 1 0
FACW 50
NI 30
NI 50
NI 50
Stratum
H
H
H
H
S
S
'I
U
I)
J
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. 25%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes ___ No ~
Rationale:
n
I
U
n
SOILS
Series/phase: Spanaway stony sandy loam SOIL PIT #2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes ___ No ~ Undetermined ___
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes ___ NoL Histic epipedon present? Yes ___ No..x
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes ___ NoL Gleyed? Yes ___ No..x
Matrix Color' 10 YR 2/1 gravel/stones noted throughout Mottle Colors: N/A
Other hydric soil indicators: None
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes ___ No ..x
Rationale: Other than color, no hydric indicators are present. Also the Spanaway soils
series is not listed as a hydric soil.
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes __ No L Surface water depth: N/ A
Is the soil saturated? Yes __ No ..x
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: None
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation. None
,
LJ
n
LJ
n
LJ
n
, I
U
n
,
LJ
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes ___ No ..x
Rationale: Hydrology is limited to the Yelm Creek.
n
U
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes __ No ..x
Rationale:
Table adopted from the Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation (FICWD) 1989
n
\
U
n
I
U
n
9
,
U
n
,
u
n
I
U
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD
!/
U
Field Investigator(s) Wayne S. Wright Date: June 29, 1993
Project/Site. Yelm Apartments NE Creek Road State: WA County. Thurston
Applicant/Owner' Skillings & Connolly, Inc. (Client) Plant Community#/Name: #3
n
I
U
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
n
J
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes ~ No ___ (If no, please explain.)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes __ No ~ (If yes, please explain)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
n
VEGETATION
I
U
Ind. %
Dominant Plant Species (Scientific and Common) Status Cover
1 Circium foliosum Leafy Thistle FAC- 15
2. Solanum dulcamara Nightshade FAC 5
3 Phalaris arundinacea Reedcanary Grass FACW 20
4 Misc. Grass Graminae N I 60
5 Rubus discolor Himalyan Blackberry N I 50
6 Rubus laciniatus Evergreen Blackberry N I 50
7 Pyrus malus Domestic apple N I
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. 25%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes ___ No ~
Rationale:
Stratum
H
H
H
H
S
S
S
il
U
n
u
"1
I
U
n
I
U
SOILS
Series/phase: Spanaway stony sandy loam SOIL PIT #3
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes ___ No ~ Undetermined ___
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes ___ NoX Histic epipedon present? Yes ___ No ~
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes ___ NoX Gleyed? Yes ___ No ~
Matrix Color" 10 YR 3/3 gravel/stones noted throughout Mottle Colors: N/ A
Other hydric soil indicators: None
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes ___ No ~
Rationale: Other than color, no hydric indicators are present. Also the Spanaway soils
series is not listed as a hydric soil.
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes __ No X Surface water depth: N/ A
Is the soil saturated? Yes ___ No ~
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: None
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation. None
n
,
U
n
I
U
n
U
n
I '
U
n
u
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes ___ No ~
Rationale: Hydrology is limited to the Yelm Creek.
n
J
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes __ No ~
Rationale:
Table adopted from the Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation (FICWD) 1989
n
U
n
I
U
n
10
u
n
u
n
J
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD
n
U
Field Investigator(s) Wayne S Wright Date: June 29, 1993
Project/Site. Yelm Apartments NE Creek Road State: WA County. Thurston
Applicant/Owner' Skillings & Connolly, Inc. (Client) Plant Community#/Name: #4
n
I
U
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
n
I
U
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes ~ No ___ (If no, please explain,)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes __ No ~ (If yes, please explain.)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
n
! I
U
VEGETATION
n
I
U
Ind. %
Dominant Plant Species (Scientific and Common) Status Cover
1 Circium foliosum Leafy Thistle FAC- 15
2. Solanum dulcamara Nightshade FAC 5
3 Phalaris arundinacea Reedcanary Grass FACW 40
4 Misc. Grass Graminae N I 40
5 Rubus discolor Himalyan Blackberry N I 50
6 Rubus laciniatus Evergreen Blackberry N I 50
7 Pyrus malus Domestic apple N I
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. 25%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes ___ No ~
Rationale:
Stratum
H
H
H
H
S
S
S
'l
J
n
I
U
n
I
U
SOILS
Series/phase: Spanaway stony sandy loam SOIL PIT #4
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes ___ No ~ Undetermined ___
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes ___ No.x Histic epipedon present? Yes ___ No ~
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes ___ No.x Gleyed? Yes ___ No ~
Matrix Color' 10 YR 3/2 large stone at 3" Mottle Colors: N/ A
Other hydric soil indicators: None
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes ___ No ~
Rationale: Other than color, no hydric indicators are present. Also the Span away soils
series is not listed as a hydric soil.
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes __ No.x Surface water depth: N/ A
Is the soil saturated? Yes ___ No ~
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: None
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation. None
n
!
U
(I
I !
U
(I
U
n
U
n
!
LJ
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes ___ No ~
Rationale: Hydrology is limited to the Yelm Creek.
n
i
U
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes __ No ~
Rationale:
Table adopted from the Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation (FICWD) 1989
n
! I
U
n
i
U
(l
U
1 1
n
LJ
n
I I
U
Hydrophytic plants are those species that generally prefer to
grow In wet soil conditions The relative strength of Individual
species preference for wetness determines the Indicator status for
that specIes. Wetland plant indicator status is determined by the US
Fish & Wildlife Service and the summary of thIs Information for this
region is contained In Reed (1988). To meet the wetland cnteria
established In the FICWD manual, hydrophytlc vegetation must
exceed 50 percent of the total dominance measure for each stratum
(tree, shrub, herb) present. When more than 50 percent of the
dominant species in each vegetation unit have a wetland Indicator
status of obligate wet (OBL), facultatIve wet (FACW), or facultative
(FAC), the vegetation unit meets the hydrophytlc vegetatIon
criterion
n
LJ
n
,
u
n
U
n
I
U
I]
I
U
'I
U
n
LJ
Hydric sOils are defined as solis that are wet, saturated, or ponded
long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic
conditions In the upper layer (USDA, SCS 1 988) Hydnc solis can be
Identified by the use of a color companson chart. Soli color IS
typically identified by hue, chroma and value. These terms reflect
the variable amount of moisture, organics, and overall composition
of any given soil sample A commercial soIls color chart IS produced
by Kollmorgen (1988) and commonly used by wetland scientists In
general, the lower the value for chroma and value the more likely the
soil sample is to be hydrrc Field Identified results from the color
chart are used to verify soli types described in the SoIls Survey
(I
u
n
,
u
n
u
(I
U
n
,
Hydrology is defined as the presence of water Saturated soil,
ponding, streams, lakes, seeps, and springs are all hydrologIC
features that may supply land areas with the necessary water to
become wetlands However, sometimes the positive observation of a
hydrologic source is not readily evident. ThIs IS especially
prevalent when wetlands are delineated In the summer months when
springs or seeps may not be apparent. Under these conditions,
indicators of hydrology are used as positive identIfication.
Indicators such as dned algae, water stained leaves or bark, dead
trees (from drowning) or dried water courses are examples of
u
n
,
u
n
LJ
n
I
U
n
,
LJ
n
U
12
n
I
U
n
I
U
hydrology The presence of these (or other) indicators, hydric solis
and hydrophytlc vegetation, confirm the presence of a wetland
n
u
n
i
LJ
The subject property supports three distinguishable plant
commUnities The first lies in the south and east portions of the
site and consists of pasture grasses with mixed upland herbaceous
species. No wetland indicators were found In this area.
n
!
LJ
'l
I
LJ
The second plant community found on the site consists of a mixture
of blackberry (Rubus discolor, R laciniatus), pasture grass
(Graminae), reedcanary grass (Phalans arundinacea), thIstle
(elrclum foliosum), and nightshade (Solanum dulcamara) This
community lies for the most part adjacent to the Yelm Creek
corridor and extends south for several hundred feet Several small
apple trees (Pyrus malus) were also noted In this area. This plant
community does not meet wetland critena
I')
I
U
'I
u
n
U
n
I I
LJ
The third plant community lies within the Yelm Creek corridor and is
an emergent ripanan zone Reedcanary grass (P arundmacea) is the
dominant species present within the nparian corridor of Yelm Creek.
This community was not treated as a wetland, it IS contained within
the streambanks of Yelm Creek as evidenced by site topography,
vegetation and sOIls
n
\
U
n
u
~
LJ
SOIls of the site were mapped by the Soil Conservation Service
(USDA, SCS 1980) to consist of non-hydric Spanaway gravelly sandy
loam and McKenna gravelly slit loam, a hydric soil However, soils In
soil pits 1 and 2 exhibited non-hydric characteristics with a hue of
10Y, wIth a value/chroma of 2/1 throughout the 18 Inch pits.
Although this soil color rnitially indicates possible hydric
conditions, no other supporting indicators were observed in the soil
pits sampled on the site Comparison of the Spanaway and McKenna
soil descnptions In the SCS soil survey document reveals that both
of these soli types typically exhibit the 10YR 2/1 soli color wIthin
the top 1 5 inches The McKenna series IS deSCribed by the SCS to
exhIbit a color and texture variation at approximately 9 inches In
n
u
n
LJ
n
u
Ii
LJ
n
,
u
I)
u
13
n
u
n
J
depth to include a dark graYish brown color with yellowish brown
mottles. These characteristics were not observed in any of the soil
pitS. SOIl pitS 3 and 4 were clearly non-hydric Spanaway series soil.
n
U
n
U
No JUrisdictional wetlands were identified to eXist on the subject
property Yelm Creek and its associated riparian corridor borders
the site to the north and constitutes the only aquatic syatem on the
property Yelm Creek has not been treated as a wetland for
delineation purposes
n
, i
U
n
LJ
n
I
LJ
IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSAL
Yelm Creek flows in a fairly well established channel along the
north boundary of the subject property This segment of Yelm Creek
meets the criteria for a "Type 3 Water" according to the Washmgton
Forest Practices Rules and RegulatIons (1 992) Increased human
activity and storm water runoff may pose some Impacts to Yelm
Creek as a result of the proposed apartments Appropriate buffers
should be established along with sufficient storm water treatment
to preserve water quality and quantIty characteristics. In addition,
it IS advised that the proposed project consider a creek restoration
program to enhance the stream habitat adjacent to the project. This
suggestion builds upon the recent stream enhancement activities of
the city of Yelm and would also result in an added feature to the
proposed apartments
']
u
n
U
n
! I
LJ
n
I
U
(I
LJ
(I
U
n
u
n
LJ
n
LJ
n
i
U
II
LJ
il
\
U
14
If
,
u
n
I
U REFERENCES
n
,
LJ
Cowardin, L.M, V Carter, F C. Golet, and E.T LaRoe 1979.
Classification of wetland and deepwater habitats of the United
States. Performed for Office of Biological Services, Fish and
Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D C.
Il
I
U
n
LJ
Ecology 1991 Washington State wetlands rating system for
western Washington Publication #91-57 Olympia, Washington.
n
i
U
n
1990. Washington State four-tiered wetlands rating system
Olympia, Washington
I
U
n
I
LJ
1989. A gUide to conductmg wetland inventories Olympia,
Washington
n
LJ
Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation (F1CWD)
, 989 Federal Manual for identifYing and delineating jUrisdictIonal
wetlands. U S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S Environmental
Protection Agency, U.S Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S.D A Soil
Conservation Service Cooperative Technical Publication.
Washington, D C
n
I
LJ
n
i I
U
(I
u
n
U
Thurston County. 1993 CritIcal Areas Title 17.15, PlannIng
Commission Draft. Thurston County, W A.
n
I
U
Kollmorgen Corporation 1 988. Munsell soil color charts Munsell
Color, Macbeth DiVision of Kollmorgen Corporation. Baltimore,
Maryland.
II
I
U
If
LJ
Reed, P B., Jr. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in
wetlands' Northwest (Region 9) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Biological Report 88 (26.9), Washington, DC.
I)
I
U
1
LJ
n
,
LJ
/)
, I
U
II
J
State of Washington forest Practices Board and Department of
Ecology. 1992. Washington Forest Practices Rules and Regulations
Title 222 WAC, New Rules Effective 8-1-92, Adopted 6-26-92.
f)
LJ
IJ
J
U.S.D A. SOIl Conservation Service (USDA, SCS). 1988. Hydric sOils
of the state of Washington.
'l
J
IJ
J
1 990 SOIl survey of Thurston County, Washington. In
cooperatIon with Washington Agriculture Experiment Station,
Washington, D C.
if
i
LJ
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1 981 NatIonal Wetlands Inventory
Map McKenna Quadrangle 1.24,000.
Ii
i
U
n
U S Geological Survey, 1973. McKenna Quadrangle Map, 1 24,000.
~
n
I
U
n
u
if
!
u
IJ
U
n
I
U
if
I
U
f)
L.J
if
I
LJ
'l
I
LJ
In
I
LJ
n
U
~
n
J
J
'1
J
II
J
'l
\
~
il
J
'l
I
LJ
n
U
II
,
LJ
"I
u
II
u
n
I
U
'I
L.J
'!
~
'I
I
I
U
l
u
}l~:N(j)IX (8
'I
I
U
HRC ASSOCIATES
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
SKilLINGS-CONNOLLY, INC
YELM APARTMENTS - 93027
n
, I
LJ
J
n
U
II
J
1
u
~
u
n
iJ
n
,
LJ
n
u
,n
U
n
u
n
u
n
u
II
I
U
II
U
n
LJ
'I
LJ
1
u
'I
u
UNSIGNALlZED INTERSECTIONS
10.37
I
'1 a ~ ~J / r ~~!'(' [:: I' -
, - .-'
WORKSHEET FOR ANALYSIS OF T-INTERSECTIONS I
LOCATION. Yr;;LM IfvE. h) t /0 "3 if-D j-r NAME. J}( 7/;lf/q~
HOURLY VOLUMES VOLUMES IN PCPH
Y E_ /,,1 ^ eN
Major Street: I~ vE
,
__ Vs - -
N =ITJ V .,20
.. s/7c:::. - V2 V ;;:; n
Grade 000V ~ (r; ~'=m · r:::4 -
-:::- 2 VJ
0% ..:::.. V) ~7t?
V7 V9 (I --6
Date of Counts: ) q ~ 3 .51 ~5 % SIDP
-C.. '::::.-
TIme Period. Pl"l PF /-f;.t - - o YIELD
Average Running Speed.~ N=m
Minor
Street:
PHF- ,'1 Grade 0 % NE 1'0'3 2t 5 l'
VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS
Movement No. 2 3 4 5 7 9
Volume (vph) ~OO S l\-5" (.;, '30 c:::- ~. S
"-
Vol. (pcph), see Table 10-1 ~ SO ~ 0 SO
STEP 1: RT from Minor Street r- V9
Conflicting Flow, Ve 1/2 V) + V2 = 2.5" + ?-'::!O = ~o3 vph (V <9)
Critical Gap, Te' and Potential Capacity, cp Te = 5.S see (Table 10-2) cp9 = :,50 pcph (Fig. 10-3)
Actual Capacity, cm cm9 = cp9 = ..5:2:D pcph
STEP 2: LT From Major Street ( V4
Conflicting Flow, Ve V + V <"" + c~"" I -..:- h V
3 2=~ ~=~vp ( e4)
Critical Gap, T e ' and Potential Capacity, Cp Te = S' ('\ see (Table 10-2) Cp4 = ~30pcph (Fig. 10-3)
Percent of Cp Utilized and Impedance Factor (Fig. 10-5) (V4/Cp4) X 100 = .791 p 4 = .cis
Actual Capacity, cm cm4 == Cp4 = b 30 pcph
STEP 3: LT From Minor Street ~V7
Conflicting Flow, Ve 1/2 V3+V2+VS+V4 = c..'5'+G:,co+ (::1::'<4 '\-s = \ "2..7P,vph (Ve7)
Critical Gap, T e ' and Potential Capacity, cp Te=(..,.':- see (Table 10-2)cp7= /50pcph(Fig.l0-3)
Actual Capacity, cm cm7 = cp7 X P 4 = I So X -3.2.. = I 4r 3 pcph
SHARED-LANE CAPACITY
CSH = V7 + V9 if lane is shared
(v7/cnd + (v9/'-m9)
Movement No. v(pcph) cm (pcph) CSH (pcph) CR LOS
7 b I 4-3 LI-" I H- -':; -= I L"""' 137 l::l D
9 SO 'S -5"0 ""'-J\....- '-" A
...-..;,-1' SJo
.......-: -- "-
4 SO b30 - SRo A
J
J
n
LJ
i
u
n
J
'l
J
'1
J
n
J
n
LJ
n
u
n
U
rl
LJ
n
U
rl
LJ
n
,
U
J
J
J
n
LJ
UNSIGNALlZED INTERSECTIONS
10-37
~ T
fa'? '~
I', '; J VJ / r- K. "") C: L
WORKSHEET FOR ANALYSIS OF T-INTERSECTIONS
LOCATION. Y EL fVi /I. V(:: If) F- IO? i'.t.. ("7 NAME. -:Jk 7/;'1h :>
,.;) ;;
,
HOURLY VOLUMES VOLUMES IN PCPH
Ma jar Street: Yr=. ' AVE GN
. -- t-r-""
__Vs--
N = OJ",.. ... Vs 037 - V2 - r;:. V4 55.. -
Grade I.:>vD V2 V 5D
~ (r;. N'=[JJ V3
_% .5 V3 1n70
V7 Vq Jb
Date of Counts. )(19 3 2J Il(i ,QS! SIDP
Tune Period. Itv'! PE,4-K o YIELD
Average Running Speed: '35- N=[Z]
Minor
Street:
PHF: .q Grade 0 % IO~ ,et:, 5T
VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS
Movement No. 2 3 4 5 7 9
Volume (vph) fooS S So 0'37 S <\-7
Vol. (pcph), see Table 10-1 -- S5 '0 52
STEP 1: RT from Minor Street r- Vq
Conflicting Flow, Ve 1/2 V3 + V 2 = 2. S" +.kQD=.1all vph (V 09)
Critical Gap, Te' and Potential Capacity, c" Te = 55 see (Table 10-2) cp9 = ~pcph (Fig. 10-3)
Actual Capadty, Cm cm9 = cp9 = 5"Q-opcph
STEP 2: LT From Major Street t V.
Conflicting Flow, Ve V3 + V2 = ~ + k.<"j);::' = CoI'3 vph (Ve.)
Critical Gap, T c ' and Potential Capacity, cp Te = ~ see (Table 10-2) ~4 = 0 2.C pcph (Fig. 10-3)
Percent of cp Utilized and Impedance Factor (Fig_ 10-5) (V./S,4) X 100 = aaz p. = q S
Actual Capadty, Cm cm4 = cp4 = tc..2..D pcph
STEP 3: LT From Minor Street ~V7
Conflicting Flow, Ve 1/2 V3+V2+VS+V4 = 2.~ +6Cr + (c- :-----;' + SO = 12'1A vph (Vd
Critical Gap, T e ' and Potential Capacity, cp Te = (...,:S' see (Table 10-2) cp? = ( So pcph (Fig. 10-3)
Actual Capadty, cm cm? = cp7 X p. = I G'C'J X . q ~ =.l.i2.. pcph
SHARED-LANE CAPACITY
CsH= v7 + Vq if lane is shared
(v1/cm?) + (vq/cm9)
Movement No. v(pcph) cm (pcph) CSH (pcph) CR LOS
7 0 I q-~ .J.." ~ I <i. '"?, -::2/-, !~7 r:2 n
- ---~~ .......
9 Sz.. S~-C' '5"4--0 4-fF A
4 SS (cZ_C - 5icS rl
J
o
n
: I
U
n
I I
U
n
J
'I
u
n
I
LJ
J
n
LJ
n
LJ
n
, I
LJ
c
n
u
J
fl
LJ
'I
J
fl
u
J
n
I
U
UNSIGNALlZED INTERSECTIONS
10.37
} Cj 9 !-f w /0 ;:.: en IE," j
WORKSHEET FOR ANALYSIS OF T-INTERSECTIONS
YSI_r>1 livE. /IJE- ) OJ /2A (" -:j')< 7/;q/~3
LOCATION. ..;-r NAME.
,
HOURLY VOLUMES VOLUMES IN PCPH
Ma jor Street: \j E- !-- 1'7 4,/',::- G)N
1
__Vs--
N=CQ .... Vs~S - Vl - r:;:.. V. .c::;-o -
Grade v 3() V 1 V '-15
5 ~ (r.: N'=m VJ
J2...0/0 - VJ ~7~
V7 V9 .J. drc
Date of Counts. /1Cf4 r.::1 ~o o SlOP
......
Tune Period. ;- /v.... PEPK - o YIELD
Average Running Speed. '3 S N=D
Minor
Street:
Cf 0 ;(;)3 fJll 51
PHF. , ! Grade % AlE
VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS
Movement No. 2 3 4 5 7 9
Volume (vph) 8:2.(""' c: 4-S ,... -- /
0:::::::- C -' ........
---..- ._~ '-' ---'
Vol. (pcph), see Table 10-1 - ~ 9'J b fob
STEP 1: RT from Minor Street ,- V'I
Conflicting Flow, V 0 1/2VJ+Vz= "2..~ + ~-::>lJ =r'i::-::"vph(Vc9)
Critical Gap, To, and Potential Capacity, cp To = >;,5" see (Table 10-2) c1'9 = 4/0 pcph (Fig, 10-3)
Actual Capacity, Cm Cm9 = cp9 = ~ pcph
STEP 2: LT From Major Street ( V.
Conflicting Flow, V 0 VJ +Vz =~+8?,-:-=?- ?::':::vph (Vo.)
Critical Gap, To' and Potential Capacity, c1' To = 5 I" see (Table 10-2) cp. = '1-70 pcph (Fig, 10-3)
Percent of cp Utilized and Impedance Factor (Fig. 1O-5) ,? '1-
(v./cp4)X100=n,,,- P4=~
Actual Capadty, em c - c - 4Clr h
m4 - 1'4 -~pCp
STEP 3: LT From Minor Street ") V7
Conflicting Flow, V 0 1/2 VJ+Vl+VS+V. = 2,:: + ,~:. '"'+ ,~-; + ,,~'C: = 1'5,..-:' vph (Vd
Critical Gap, To' and Potential Capacity, cp To = ~.:5 see (Table 10-2) c1'7 = IDa pcph (Fig. 10-3)
Actual Capacity, cm I q-:z q~
cm7 = cp7 X p.. = ..i..S2.sl X ~ = -L....::zL pcph
SHARED~LANE CAPACITY
CSH = v7 + V'I if lane is shared
(V7/Cm7) + (V'I/c",9)
Movement No. v(pcph) em (pcph) CSH (pcph) CR LOS
7 fa I '?, '=I :;" ~......, /' E..
I __ ~ \~ : '- ~ d.... ("'. "
..... , I , I - r
9 0(c 4- ,':'" 4./:;> ::,r1-t1- 1""'
4 c:::o -t4 ,-- 4. ';:"0 f-!
I L' -
J
n
U
n
u
n
\ :
U
n
\ I
U
r'l
\
u
n
U
n
J
n
I
U
n
U
n
I
LJ
n
U
o
'1
1
U
J
n
U
n
LJ
J
n
, .
LJ
UNSIGNALlZED INTERSECTIONS 10-37
ICiqLj W)PC'1'ECT
'-' , , -
WORKSHEET FOR ANALYSIS OF T-INTERSECTIONS
LOCATION. Y b I- ,.." 4'16.. /NF=. )03;'.0 57 NAME. JJ:!- 7/1 !o) )"1 '3
. ~
HOURLY VOLUMES VOLUMES IN PCPH
YELiY1 A GN
Major Street: ,ll"E
V b'12 _ Vs - -
N-CP .. s- - V! . ~ V. _ _
Grade ",-,< V V 50
~ 2 ~ (r;. N:"[j] V3
Q% 5 V3 ~7~
V7 V9 I I
IqqA/ 51 d) ~sroP
Date of Counts. --
Tune Period. r I'-^- PIF/l'<:: o YIELD
Average Running Speed.~ N =/J]
Minor
Street:
PHF: ,q Grade 0 % IJ& /03t?b )r
VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS
Movement No. 2 3 4 5 7 9
Volume (vph) <3'3~ 5 s'O ~ 9 '2.- '5" '=::"2.
Vol. (pcph), see Table 10-1 -- S.::::- - <0 ~8
0=
STEP 1: RT from Minor Street r- V9
Conflicting Flow, V 0 1/2 V3 + V! = Z.5" + 83':'= ~ ~ (ovph (V 09)
Critical Gap, To, and Potential Capacity, cp To = ~ see (Table 10-2) cp9 = 4-co pcph (Fig. 10-3)
Actual Capacity, Cm cm9 = cp9 = ~pcph
STEP 2: LT From Major Street ( V.
Conflicting Flow, Ve c::- 8??' ~....,....,
V3 + V! = ~ + ~ = ...c:::rvph (Ve.)
Critical Gap, To, and Potential Capacity, cp To = So see (Table 10-2) cp4 = 4-76 pcph (Fig. 10-3)
Percent of cp Utilized and Impedance Factor (Fig. 10-5) (v./cp4) X 100 = lL...k.. p. = ~
Actual Capacity, cm cm. = cp. = .1::z..S: pcph
STEP 3: LT From Minor Street -:) V7
Conflicting Flow, Ve 1/2 V3+VZ+VS+V. = 2 5" + s::-=> + 10C( I, + '50 = 228 vph (Ve7)
Critical Gap, To' and Potential Capacity, cp To = ~ see (Table 10-2) cp7 = 100 pcph (Fig. 10-3)
Actual Capacity, cm 10 Cf~ 0"'"
cm7 = cp7 X p. = ~X...:.........d. = ~ pcph
SHARED-LANE CAPACITY
CSH = v7 + v'I if lane is shared
(V7/Cm7) + (V'l/cm9)
Movement No. v(pcph) em (pcph) CSH (pcph) CR LOS
7 b cr3 ::: If 93 ,11-? 87 ,/1 f..
4Cn ..... , .' '- '--
9 GB too ~;'""2./ e
4 ss 4-7< - 4-7":' A
n
LJ
,I]
u
n
, I
U
n
U
[1
I '
LJ
n
I I
U
n
J
n
J
.'l
, I
U
11
, I
U
n
I
U
n
i I
U
n
, I
U
o
n
I I
U
II
LJ
J
n
LJ
n
J
10.37
/ Cp ,- 1/ /e l.--/, JJEc-
WORKSHEET FOR ANALYSIS OF T-INTERSECTIONS
UNSIGNALlZED INTERSECTIONS
LOCATION.1'( I tl - I / Fie]. t2t.. :: T
HOURLY VOLUMES
, IlE / () r;> 121:, 5 7
MaJor Street:../ ~
G)N
Grade
.Q.%
N=f4
-7V
- 2
.JJ. V 3
Date of Counts: &/2 q/r 2>
rune Period. L/ -{.,. , P)V'
Average Running Speed. ;:..... S
PHF. (J Jet Grade 0 0/0
VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS
Movement No.
Volume (vph)
Vol. (pcph), see Table 10-1
STEP 1. RT from Minor Street
.. Vs 5:3
r-V4~
~ I r;: N~QJ
V7 V9
171 !u cr'SIDP
- 0 YIELD
N =IIJ
Minor
Street:
AlE.. C,eEt5,e S"T
2
-- ---.
.:.:;. I
~,?J-!
NAME. _
VOLUMES IN PCPH
- V2
V3
__ Vs - -
- r;:. V4 --2 -
~7~
i3h.
3
5
62
7
4
9
/?
c;
/7
! 1
) 7
~
Conflicting Flow, V c
Critical Gap, Tc' and Potential Capacity, cp
Actual Capacity, cm
STEP 2: LT From Major Street
I
;q
I
r- V9
1/2V3+V2=--L+ 57 = ~5 vph(Vc9)
Tc = s 5 see (Table 10-2) cp9 = 10.5'6 pcph (Fig. 10-3)
c = C = /CSOpcph
m9 1'9
(
, V4
V3+V2=~+ 57 = 7.3 vph(VC4)
Tc = 5,0 see (Table 10-2) Cp4 = !,2(JO pcph (Fig. 10-3)
(v 4/Cp4) X 100 = 0 Sq ~;p 4 = 3....J.....
Cm4 = Cp4 = / 200 pcph
:> V7
1/2 V +V +V +V - '] '57 53 L /25
3 2 S 4--+-+-+ =_Vph(Vd
C; ;:- 'X'nO
Tc = ---=- see (Table 10-2) Cp7 = ~ pcph (Fig. 10-3)
C 7 = C 7 X P = ZOO X ,'1 q = 7q :l.. pcph
m I' 4---
Conflicting Flow, V c
Critical Gap, T c ' and Potential Capacity, cp
Percent of cp Utilized and Impedance Factor (Fig. 10-5)
Actual Capacity, cm
STEP 3: LT From Minor Street
Conflicting Flow, V c
Critical Gap, T c ' and Potential Capacity, cp
Actual Capacity, cm
SHARED-LANE CAPACITY
CSH = V7 + V9 if lane is shared
(V7/Cm7) + (V9/Cm9)
Movement No. v( pcph) em (pcph) CSH (pcph) CR LOS
7 ) 1 792 f! r"; 7q2 -;1/ !/ 773 " I~
9 / q /050 ~
/05 tJ /:J 3,) Ii
4 I J:l..O') - / / Cj" It
~
o
n
u
n
I
U
n
, I
U
n
I I
LJ
lJ
n
J
n
J
n
LJ
n
J
n
LJ
n
U
(I
J
o
n
J
J
o
n
J
UNSIGNALlZED INTERSECTIONS
10-37
10 (::! --;,
I ,~
i _
~j / ;--1___:':-' i E cT
- -
WORKSHEET FOR ANALYSIS OF T-INTERSECTIONS
WCATION. AlE CK.fE~ 5 r/;tJf. to?'!!]; :;r NAME. -:IF!. l/IL-I/13
,
HOURLY VOLUMES VOLUMES IN PCPH
Ma jor Street: /)E j /1'2 121:> ,- 0)N
I..~ ..# ~r
__ Vs - -
N=l:Il - VsS3 - V2 ... r;:. V4 -L -
Grade --7 V V "
- 2 ~ (r;. N'=CZJ V3
12% 2:J. V) h"v7~
V7 V9 ~11
Date of Counts: 14 q ') BJ tL ~STOP
Tune Period. PM P E-4-K o YIELD
Average Running Speed. -:35 N =[]]
Minor
Street:
PHF. ,q Grade 0 0/0 /VE. CefEK ~T
VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS
Movement No. 2 3 4 5 7 9
Volume (vph) 57 2\ 6 53 I~ \7
Vol. (pcph), see Table 10-1 -- ~ 7 2.t 19.
STEP 1. RT from Minor Street r- V9
Conflicting Flow, Ve 1/2V3+V2= /0.5+ 57 = bB vph(Vc:9)
Critical Gap, Te, and Potential Capacity, cp Te = 5.5 see (Table 10-2) cp9 = IO~cph (Fig. 10-3)
Actual Capacity, Cm cm9 = cp9 = IOSbpcph
STEP 2: LT From Major Street ( V.
Conflicting Flow, Ve V 3 + V 2 = ...bL + i:i.:L = -Z6. vph (Ve.)
Critical Gap, Te' and Potential Capacity, cp Tc = 5.0 see (Table 10-2) cp4 = I 200pcph (Fig. 10-3)
Percent of cp Utilized. and Impedance Factor (Fig. 10-5) (v4/cp4) X 100 =0 5"~P4 = . '1'1
Actual Capacity, cm C = C = I zco pcph
m4 p4 -
STEP 3: LT From Minor Street ~V7
Conflicting Flow, Ve 1/2V3+V2+Vs+V4=IC.S"+S7 +.53 +~= \"2..7vph(Vc7)
Critical Gap, T e ' and Potential Capacity, cp Te = ~ see (Table 10-2) cp7 = 600pcph (Fig. 10-3)
Actual Capacity, cm cm7 = cp7 X P 4 = 5c:o X -EfL = 7l...1.: pcph
SHARED-LANE CAPACITY
CsH= v7 + v9 if lane is shared
(V7/Cm7) + (V9/Cm9)
Movement No. v(pcph) em (pcph) CSH (pcph) CR LOS
7 2.1 7Cf'L .....0- 797- ClA:::"'" 77 I ^ A,
1'1 ,-
9 10SO Ie CO 10 -=, \ A
4 7 \LOO - I II q ?-, A
n
U
J
n
u
1/
J
1/
U
1/
( I
U
Il
LJ
'l
J
1/
J
f)
iJ
n
I
L.J
n
U
(I
I I
U
n
J
:l
u
1/
( I
U
J
o
n
U
UNSIGNALlZED INTERSECTIONS
10-37
)QC1 'i -^),I(~ , ~ E'" -;
I I '-r --/
WORKSHEET FOR ANALYSIS OF T-INTERSECTIONS
LOCATION. IdE e IEEE-I::!- Sr JiVE. /03/2"; NAME. :r )C.. 7;) ~J13
,
HOURLY VOLUMES VOLUMES IN pePH
Major Street: tJ r:::. ! 03 i! b (' (])N
;;;,
__ Vs - -
N =[JJ V 55
.... s- - Vz - r;; v. .J.L-. -
Grade ~Vz V i 0
JL% 2J)v ~ (r;. N'=[Z] V3 ffi7~
3
V7 V9 zt 21z
Date of Counts. l!..j "f 'i ;d ko SSlOP
Tune Period. PI'" fEf1~ o YIELD
Average Running Speed. 5-5 N=OJ
Minor
Street:
PHF: ' '-1 Grade 0 % IJE Ce.E.EK S..,
VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS
Movement No. 2 3 4 5 7 9
Volume (vph) 70 20 /0 55 20 -z..o
Vol. (pcph), see Table 10-1 ~ ~ II 22- 2.2.
STEP 1: RT from Minor Street r- V9
Conflicting Flow, V c 1/2V3+V2=~+ 70 = Ro vph(Vc9)
Critical Gap, Tc' and Potential Capacity, cp To = 6:~ see (Table 10~2) cp9 =.LQ1Q pcph (Fig. 10-3)
Actual Capacity, cm cm9 = cp9 = 101(\ pcph
STEP 2: LT From Major Street t V.
Conflicting Flow, V 0 V3 + Vz = 20 + -:-'0 = 10 vph (V04)
Critical Gap, Tc' and Potential Capacity, cp To = SO see (Table 10-2) cp4 = /OCCpcph (Fig. 10-3)
Percent of cp Utilized and Impedance Factor (Fig. 10-5) (V,/'-p4) X 100 = ..'.O(%p. = Cf7
Actual Capacity, cm cm4 = cp4 = /t:::eQ. pcph
STEP 3: LT From Minor Street ~V7
Conflicting Flow, V 0 1/2 V3+VZ+VS+V. = JQ.. + 2Q + 55"' + /0 = i4s vph (Vc7)
Critical Gap, T c ' and Potential Capacity, cp / c. -'""f -.
To = ~ see (Table 10-2) cp7 =...L:z....:. pcph (Fig. 10-3)
Actual Capacity, Cm C 7 = C 7 X P = ""?,C X '17 = 73/ pcph
m ? ,,- - -
SHARED-LANE CAPACITY
CSH = v7 + V9 if lane is shared
(V7/Cm7) + (V9/c",9)
Movement No. v(pcph) cm (pcph) CSH (pcph) CR LOS
7 7-"2'.. 7-::'-' o c-~ 7?:;7 7t<::7 /1 A
- ( '"' /'~
'--'- - ~ -
9 ~ -,. , 'J!" 10lQ .96~~ H
c: ,
4 ; / !';"'~I- - 10(",'1 H
n
LJ
n
U
,/l
I
U
'I
I
LJ
n
I
LJ
n
,
u
n
I
U
fl
U
n
J
n
i
~
n
u
n
J
n
J
n
J
If
U
n
u
If
LJ
n
LJ
n
,
U
UNSIGNALlZED INTERSECTIONS
10-37
/714 w//:::)
,'" -r'-r~
'-" - j
_..-
WORKSHEET FOR ANALYSIS OF T-INTERSECTIONS
LOCATION. N'E- cetE/.! 5T /,VE.. )03~b S'T NAME. 3K 7/;'-1/'1 J.
,
HOURLY VOLUMES VOLUMES IN PCPH
Major Street: ~J F '0<.12 D 'Sf Q)N
/ ~
__Vs--
N =[J] .... Vs55 - V2 -- r;; V. -LL -
Grade --:'0 V2 a- r;::- V..!..E V3
_% ,:0.2 V 3 /)\ r; N=CZJ Wv7 ~
V7 V9 J iz.
Date of Counts: /11 '1 "-' 12.0 ef STOP
Tune Period. ,?/.... p G ti.t~ ~ - o YIELD
Average Running Speed...2..2- N=GJ
Minor
Street:
PHF: ' q Grade 0 % IJE CeEE,i:: ).-
VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS
Movement No. 2 3 4 5 7 9
Volume (vph) 70 Z.S 10 5S "?.."z.. 20
Vol. (pcph), see Table 10-1 - / ! - 7-~ !.--z..
==
STEP 1. RT from Minor Street r- V9
Conflicting Flow, Ve 1/2 V3 + V2 = 12.:5"+ 70 = 6'3 vph (V <:9)
Critical Gap, Te' and Potential Capacity, cp Te = 5. -S- see (Table 10-2) cp9 = /010 pcph (Fig. 10-3)
Actual Capacity, cm cm9 = cp9 = Ja1.Opcph
STEP 2: LT From Major Street ( V.
Conflicting Flow, Ve V3+V2= 25 + 70 = 9S vph(Ve4)
Critical Gap, Te ' and Potential Capacity, cp Te= 5. Osee (Table 10-2) cp4 = I070pcph (Fig. 10-3)
Percent of cp Utilized and Impedance Factor (Fig. 10-5) (v./s,.)X 100=~P4=~
Actual Capacity, Cm cm4 = cp4 = L.!22f2 pcph
STEP 3: LT From Minor Street '")V7
Conflicting Flow, Ve 1/2 V3+V2+VS+V. =/o.s: + 70 + S5 + /0 = ~ vph (Vel)
Critical Gap, T e ' and Potential Capacity, Cp Te = &:: ';)' see (Table 10-2) Cp7 = ~ pcph (Fig. 10-3)
Actual Capacity, cm cm7 = cp7 X p. = 7roo x..:J..:l...- = 737 pcph
SHARED-LANE CAPACITY
CsH= v7 + V9 if lane is shared
(V7/Cm7) + (V9/Cm9)
Movement No. v(pcph) cm (peph) CSH (pcph) cR LOS
7 '2.4- 7"':J.,7 (T') 1\ I 737 (") r-,,... 7/~ ^ A
9 lOin V''--' '-' ' '-' ergS \ A
72. IOIC
4 II In70 - IOS-q A
II
I
LJ
n
I I
LJ
n
LJ
Il
,
u
n
I
U
n
I
U
II
I
LJ
Ii
,
u
Il
I
U
n
I
U
Il
U
n
I I
U
n
I ,
U
n
I i
U
n
U
n
u
n
,
, I
U
i
n
, I
U
n
i 1
U
UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
10-37
/ '10 --: ~J () F ,_:~C J ~:"' ~
-
WORKSHEET FOR ANALYSIS OF T-INTERSECTIONS
LOCATION. ;\J E C/EEt:. :: T lUE /)!..6/E.R S 1 ~ NAME. ,k! D J-I 7 '7.,n 2. 7
,
I VOLUMES IN PCPH
HOURLY VOLUMES
Ma jor Street: IJ E c...;<- f: E. ).::l. e'- eN
... J
N =0 Vs::"'3 __ Vs - -
WI - V2 · r::::. V4 - -
Grade ':!d V 2 V :::.
.Q% -L V3 ~ (r; N:"QJ V3 h\7~
Date of Counts: C/:)::/13- V7 V9 I I
1(1 b 8SIDP
--
Tune Period. /...) - h ;~"'A - o YIELD
Average Running Speed. ;. 5 N=[[]
Minor
Street:
PHF: .,t2 Grade 0 % ItLG/Ep
VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS
Movement No. 2 3 4 5 7 9
Volume (vph) tf I - '1 -, f 2-
,A .... '
-
-- .-, - !-/ 2-
Vol. (pcph), see Table 10-1 /
-
STEP 1. RT from Minor Street r- V9
Conflicting Flow, V c 1/2 V 3 + V 2 = --L- + ~ = 5' vph (V 09)
Critical Gap, Tc' and Potential Capacity, cp Tc = 5',.5 see (Table 10-2) S,9 = /.100 pcph (Fig. 10-3)
Actual Capacity, cm c - C - !J.f'\tJpcph
m9- p9-~
STEP 2: LT From Major Street ( V4
Conflicting Flow, V c I LJ ~
V3 +V2 =---"-+-.!-=~ vph (VC4)
Critical Gap, T c ' and Potential Capacity, cp <:::' 0 ,,", 0
Te = ~ see (Table 10-2) cp4 = i ~ 1, pcph (Fig. 10-3)
Percent oicp Utilized and Impedance Factor (Fig. 10-5) (v4/cp.) X 100 = O,IS ~ P 4 = . Q'1
Actual Capacity, cm c =c =1'300pcph
m4 p4 -
STEP 3: LT From Minor Street ~V7
Conflicting Flow, V c 1/2 V3+V2+VS+V4 = ~ + -.:L + .2-:3 + ~ = 30 vph (Ve7)
Critical Gap, Tc ' and Potential Capacity, cp Tc = ~ '5 see (Table 10-2) cp7 = '700 pcph (Fig. 10-3)
Actual Capacity, Cm C 7 = C 7 X P = 100 X ,qq = HI pcph
m p 4---
SHARED-LANE CAPACITY
CsH= v7 + V9 if lane is shared
(V7/Cm7) + (V9/c",9)
Movement No. v(pcph} cm (pcph) C"H (pcph) CR LOS
7 ~ ~ Cj i ' } 9Yj7 )J
,...., Y\
~-. -~ ~ """':} .
9 r- ,.p -,- ~ 'v"-" I a- ::;1 H
- ! J..0 ("1 ...... . , f-J
/ I
4 r. i30n ...- ! .J.( A,
...... /- ,
n
, I
U
10-34
URBAN STREETS
'l
J
/ cr cl3 w /e12.0J EC r
WORKSHEET FOR FOUR-LEG INTERSECTIONS Page 1
J
Location. /JE Ce-rsBK 5 T / AlE ;J.u:;.J~Di
(
Name:
-:Ii<'
7 Jll/I'?:5
I .
HOURLY VOLUMES
Grade ~ %
G
n
u
n
i
U
N
...
Vb
V,
V4
I
4
5
N=m
n
u
Grade ~ %
:1-
?.'3
ILf
J
ma jor road
!J E Cf:.. E.Ek!. S 'T
t II rrSIDPB
N =[IJ V; Vg Vq YIELD 0
thiL
(
Grade ~ %
n
I
LJ
VI
V2
V3
..
n
,
minor road
N E A-LG / EK..$ J1
Date of counts.
Time Period.
Average Running Speed.
PHF: ,qo
/qq '3
PM P!3{)K..
;2..5
1/
,
U
LJ
n
I
Grade ~ %
u
n
VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS
Movement No, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Volume (vph) 2. \ L 0 7 4- 0 -z.
Vol. (pcph), see Table 10-1 2- L.. 0 ~ <\- 0 'Z..
VOLUMES IN PCPH
,
U
n
I I
U
n
U
~jlL (~
v12 vl1 vlO V
6 NA
) ~:... <0
(
2-
NA
NA
VI
n
, I
U
n
I I
U
D v2
n
J
~3
V7 vg Vq
1
z.. 0 8
---
n
I
!U
n
u
n
I I
U
n
: I
U
n
I
U
n
I
U
n
I
U
n
I
LJ
n
I
LJ
n
I
u
n
u
n
I
U
n
I
LJ
n
I
U
n
I ~
LJ
n
I
U
n
u
n
LJ
n
,
u
n
, i
U
I
'l
,
U
n
, I
U
UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
10-35
WORKSHEET FOR FOUR-LEG INTERSECTIONS Page 2
STEP 1. RT From Minor Street r V9 J V1Z
Conflicting Flows, V c 1/2V3+Vz=Vc9 1/2 V6 + Vs = VclZ
-2-+ "7..3 = 30 vph 5+~= ~ vph
Critical Gap, Tc (Tab. 10-2) -<;<. (see) 55 (sec)
~ ~
Potential Capacity, cp (Fig. 10-3) cp9 = 10 SO pcph cplZ = ) ) 00 pcph
Percent of cp Utilized (V9/Cp9) X 100 = ,7b % (V12/CpIZ) X 100 = .16 %
Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10-5) Pq = . 'iCf P = .9cr
12
Actual CapaCIty, Cm C = C = 10 So pcph cmlZ = Cp1Z = 1100 pcph
m9 p9
STEP 2: LT From Major Street t V~ ~ VI
Conflicting Flows, V c V 3 + V Z = V C4 V6+V,=VC1
J1:.+~= 37 vph ---1-+~= 5 vph
Critical Gap, T, (Tab. 10-2) 5.0 (sec) 5,0 (sec)
Potential Capacity, cp (Fig. 10-3) cp~ = II 58 pcph c = /2CO pcph
pi
Percent of cp Utilized (v jcp4) X 100 = .57 % (VI/Cpl) X 100 = . IF<, %
Impedance Factor, P (Fig, 10-5) P = .'19 P = ,gcr
4 I
Actual Capacity, cm cm4 = cp~ = /A.<;O pcph cml = CpI = Iroo pcph
STEP 3: TH From Minor Street t VB l VII
Conflicting Flows, V, 1/2V3+V z+Vj+V6+V ,+V~=VCB 1/2V 6+V,+V4+V 3+V Z+VI=Vcll
-.:L + 2.."3 + .2...- + . S +_~_+~+
--L-+~+ S = +7-vph J.1.... + "2.. 3+ ~ = 1-9 vph
Critical Gap, Tc (Tab, 10-2) 55 (sec) -S,$ (sec)
Potential Capacity, cp (Fig. 10-3) cpl! = IOSOpcph c = 1050 pcph
pll
Percent of cp Utilized (VB/CpO) X 100 = 0 % (VII/Cpll) X 100 = 0 %
Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10-5) P = 1.0 PII = /.0
B
Actual Capacity, cm cmo = cp8 X PIX P ~ cm II = Cp 11 X P I X Pol
!OZCJ- IbSox IDLer = 10 SOx
q9 X .9cr (pcph) . '1'9 X ,'1 cr (pcph)
STEP 4: LT From Minor Street lVi Lvlo
Conflictmg Flows, V, VeS (step 3) + VII + VI2 = V,i Veil (step 3) + VB + Vq = VelU
...R + LL. + ~ = -1:1:.. vph .-4::L+.Q...+-=-= Sbvph
Cntical Gap, T, (Tab. 10-2) (..,.5 (sec) (,.,. S (sec)
Potential Capacity, cp (Fig. 10-3) cpi = P 75 pcph CplU = 9?7 S pcph
Actual CapaCIty, Cm Cmi = cpi X P I X Pol X P ql X P 1Z cmlU = cplU X Pol X P I X PBX P 9
8<\-9 =BBx~x 8~-q =Rz.sx~x
~x-Lx .qq (pcph) .q~x 1.0 X ,~Fl (pcph)
n
, I
U
n
I I
LJ
n
I '
LJ
n
U
n
J
n
I
LJ
n
u
il
U
n
i
U
n
,
u
n
,
u
n
f I
U
n
, I
LJ
n
I I
U
n
( ,
U
n
u
n
I
U
n
,
U
Ii
, ,
,
u
10-36
URBAN STREETS
WORKSHEET FOR FOUR-LEG INTERSECTIONS Page 3
SHARED-LANE CAPACITY
vj+vj where 2 movements share a lane
CSH =
(vjcm,) + (v/cm,)
v-r+Vj+vk where 3 movements share a lane
CSH =
(Vi /Cm,) + (v/cmj) + (Vk/Cmk)
MINOR STREET APPROACH MOVEMENTS 7, 8, 9
Movement v(pcph) cm(pcph) csH(pcph) cR = CSH - v LOS
7 "' ~~q1 R1-7 A
L B+q ( Qd.n Q G... I ^
'-I' ( V , fi
8 0 I02.~ I (")? -'~ J 107_Q A
9 8 105(') I nSD 104- L A
MINOR STREET APPROACH MOVEMENTS 10, 11, 12
Movement v(pcph) cm(pcph) csH(pcph) CR = CSH - v LOS
10 <1- """' R4C, '" A
6 'r'\ 8ttS
11 0 10"2-'1 <1\q I07-c" ;:.. q \"3 ID7..9 A A
12 Z. IINi 110(') l[l~6 Ii
"
MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1, 4
Movement v (pcph) cm (pcph) cR = cm - v LOS
1 ""Z.. 1100 IOcr?, 4
4 0 /O<.SO /01-4- A
COMMENTS:
I)
u
n
I
I(j
n
f I
U
n
i
U
n
I
U
n
, I
u
n
,
LJ
n
u
n
G
n
I
LJ
n
I
U
n
I :
U
\I
, ,
U
n
I i
LJ
n
I I
U
n
f I
U
n
I
U
;
n
U
!/
I
LJ
UNSIGNALlZED INTERSECTIONS
10-37
J '1 c; "1 ;) , (/
,...r E/ T
--
WORKSHEET FOR ANALYSIS OF T-INTERSECTIONS -
LOCATION. IvE CEr:.!3Ji s, /tJE fl--L (7)Ei:..5 NAME. -:5!<- 7/IV/ar3
r I
HOURLY VOLUMES VOLUMES IN PCPH
Ma Jar Street: IJ E Ce.E-fa.. 5'1' eN
N=DJ Vs;:;"S __Vs--
.. - V2 .. r;;:.. v. - -
Grade S V.5
-=- V2 ~(r.:N-m V3
1l% 2 V3 h"v7~
V7 V9 I I
Date of Counts: )q q 'f r-I Is o S10P
--
TIme Period. p />~ pI- ;J.K .::::..- o YIELD
Average Running Speed...3E...- N=m
Minor
Street:
PHF: ,q Grade 0 %
VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS
Movement No. 2 3 4 5 7 9
Volume (vph) 5 <:: S -z..c:- <=::: $
"-' ........; '-'
Vol. (pcph), see Table 10-1 I G 0 cQ
STEP 1. RT from Minor Street ,- V9
Conflicting Flow, V c 1/2 V3 + V2 = 2.5 + -2 = -B- vph (V 09)
Critical Gap, Tc, and Potential Capacity, cp Tc = 5'.5' see (Table 10-2) cp9 = ..l1f?opcph (Fig. 10-3)
Actual Capacity, cm cm9 = cp9 = 17cOpcph
STEP 2: LT From Major Street ( V.
Conflicting Flow, V c V3+V2= :-: + '5 = /0 vph(Vc4)
Critical Gap, T c ' and Potential Capacity, cp Tc = 5 0 see (Table 10-2) cp4 = I 3ccpcph (Fig. 10-3)
Percent of cp Utilized and Impedance Factor (Fig. 10-5) (v4/cp.) X 100 = . '1~ p. = ~
Actual Capacity, cm cm4 = cp4 = l.3CDpcph
STEP 3: LT From Minor Street ~V7
Conflicting Flow, V c 1/2 V3+V2+Vs+V. = (.S-+~+ -z...S" + S =~vph (Vc7)
Critical Gap, T c ' and Potential Capacity, cp Tc = (" -S- see (Table 10-2) cp7 = BlCpcph (Fig. 10-3)
Actual Capacity, cm cm7 = cp7 X p. = B7ox..:.3:L =..6...2J. pcph
SHARED-LANE CAPACITY
CSH = v7 + v9 if lane is shared
(V7/Cm7) + (V9/c.n9)
Movement No. v(pcph) cm (pcph) CSH (pcph) cR LOS
7 (r') BC--I ~~~ 801 I c!;f '7 s::; S5 ~ A
~ ) 7 On IVV
9 I '2.cc I \ ~'\- A
4 b 1300 --- \7..'i+ A
n
I
LJ
n
LJ
n
[j
n
I
U
n
u
n
\
u
n
LJ
Ii
\ I
U
n
; ,
u
n
i I
U
n
, I
U
n
I i
U
n
I '
U
n
I I
U
n
i I
U
n
, I
U
n
, I
U
n
I
U
n
I
U
10-34
URBAN STREETS
WORKSHEET FOR FOUR-LEG INTERSECTIONS
(
NE ~~~r~~d S ~
I II rGlOP~
N =[[] V7 Vg V9 YIELD 0
ill?
Location. 0-) r::
Cf2EEfl. STJ/VE.. If-I.-G IE f2. S
/
Name:
-:Sf.!
HOURLY VOLUMES
Grade ~ %
rv( S 0 5 N-"'I
STOP 1,0 - - - - L./-J
YIELD 0 VI2 VII VIO
~ t ~ ~
N=f1J
~
Grade .12... %
)
5
25
/4
-
VI
V2
V)
minor road
N G.. ,4 L G ! E ;:::. VI-?
Grade~%
Page 1
'7 /11.:/J'l2
I (
e
N
Vb ;5
V S
5 ,-
'-
V4 --'
N =IIJ
Grade~%
Date of counts. I c; 9 'i
Time Period. P/V? PE.4,t:::
Average Running Speed. :2 S
PHP: .rq'
VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS
Movement No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Volume (vph) S 7-5 " S<s S z. 0 7 S- O S
Vol. (pcph), see Table 10-1 ~ b 2- 0 8 &; 0 0
VOLUMES IN PCPH
~ ~Q~ L
!J!L ~ NA
V12 VtI VIO V
b NA
) Vs ~
VI V(4 0
... Vz
~
NA
NA
~J
V7 Vg V9
1
-2.. 0 R
fl
u
UNSIGNALlZED INTERSECTIONS
10-35
n
U
WORKSHEET FOR FOUR-LEG INTERSECTIONS Page 2
STEP 1. RT From Minor Street r V9 j VI2
Conflicting Flows, V, 1/2V3+V2=Vc9 1/2V6+Vs=Vc12
.:l.- + 7...5 = 3"2..- vph 7~ .c: 8 vph
~+~=
Critical Gap, Tc (Tab. 10-2) S.S (sec) S-~ (sec)
Potential Capacity, cp (Fig. 10-3) cp9 = 1050 pcph cpl2 = I IOn pcph
Percent of cp Utilized (V9/Cp9) X 100 = .. 7 6 % (V12/CpI2) X 100 = .5S%
Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10-5) P9 = . q9 P12 = .<1Ci
Actual Capacity, cm cm9 = cp9 = 1050 pcph Cml2 = Cpl2 = I {(J 0 pcph
STEP 2: LT From Major Street t V. ~ VI
Conflicting Flows, V, V3+V2=VCJ, V6+VS=Vd
J1::.. + 25 = -::;'1 vph "5 <'" 10 vph
- -+-=-=
Critical Gap, Tc (Tab. 10-2) $'.0 (sec) S.O (sec)
Potential Capacity, cp (Fig, 10-3) cp4 = 11 5" C pcph cpl = 11..DC':' pcph
Percent of cp Utilized (v ./ cp4) X 100 = . 52... % (VI/Cpl) X 100 = .SO %
Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10-5) P = .cfCf P = .99
. 1
Actual Capacity, cm cm. = cp. = 1150 pcph Cml = Cpl = r2-00pcph
STEP 3: TH From Minor Street t V8 ~ VII
Conflicting Flows, V, 1/2V3+V 2+Vj+V 6+V,+V.=Ve8 1/2V6+Vs+V.+V 3+V2+V I=Vc11
~ + 2..5" + ~ + Z,S"+ S' +~+
~ S- c 52- ..J.J:..+ 7..S +~= 57vph
-=-+_+~=_vph
Critical Gap, Tc (Tab. 10-2) S. 5' (sec) S-. S- (sec)
Potential Capacity, cp (Fig. 10-3) cpH = / 0 ?-J() pcph cplt = I n30pcph
Percent of cp Utilized (V8/Cp8) X 100 = 0 % (VII/Cpll) X 100 = (':) %
Impedance Factor. P (Fig. 10-5) P = / 0 Pit = /,0
8
Actual Capacity, cm cm8 = CpS X PIX p. Cm II = Cp II X PIX p.
/0/0 = In3n X 1010 = 1030 X
,9'1 X .qq (pcph) . eyq X '14 (pcph)
STEP 4. LT From Minor Street lv. Lvto
Conflicting Flows, V, VeS (step 3) + VII + VI2 = Ve7 Veil (step 3) + V8 + V9 = VdO
~+-'L+ S =~vph S.2 + ("j + .l =.b1:. vph
Critical Gap, Te (Tab. 10-2) ~.5 (see) b. 5(see)
Potential Capacity, ep (Fig, 10-3) cpi = 8 So peph cplO = SSOpeph
Actual Capacity, em ~i = cpi X PIX p. X P 11 X PI' C~ 0 = Cp lOX P -I X P I X P 8 X P 9
,7 ~ _ ~,"\ CJC{ . L.. c::- ,;( c-('I q Cf ..) = !d.:::::.... X ~ X
--- -~X~X
q~ x.L X ,qq (pcph) q<1 X ~ X _~)c.r (pcph)
n
. I
I '
,U
!
n
I
U
n
LJ
n
I r
U
o
n
U
n
; ,
U
n
(J
n
U
n
I t
U
n
I
U
n
I I
U
J
n
I
LJ
n
J
Il
I
LJ
n
, I
LJ
n
J
10-36
URBAN STREETS
n
U
o
WORKSHEET FOR FOUR-LEG INTERSECTIONS Page 3
SHARED-LANE CAPACITY
v.+v
I J where 2 movements share a lane
CSH =
(vjcmJ + (v/cm,)
V-r + vi + vk where 3 movements share a lane
CSH (Vi Icmi) + (v/cmj) + (vk/cmk)
MINOR STREET APPROACH MOVEMENTS 7, 8, 9
Movement v(pcph) cm(pcph) csH(pcph) cR = CSH - v LOS
2 'b?-< 1- - ) ~..,...., f:1
7 0-, t'-"'" 825 5~ u
Irnn J v <--...... ) u~~ 1\
8 0 1010 J n\fl A
9 B }C~~ I ()C)(j J n4-Z A
MINOR STREET APPROACH MOVEMENTS 10, 11, 12
Movement v(pcph) cm(pcph) csH(pcph) cR = CSH - v LOS
10 ~ 82.5 -.... 8z.~ ) 819 A
11 0 /(')\() ~ q '1:~ JCJI () 1>- 9~\ )0\0 Pr A
I
12 b II ()() } I (")() I CCt4- A
MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1,4
Movement v (pcph) Cm (pcph) CR = Cm - v LOS
1 r 120(\ I f(~ 4- A
CO
4 {.., 1150 I I 4-'4- A
COMMENTS:
n
I '
LJ
n
I I
LJ
n
!
U
n
I
U
Ii
, I
LJ
n
I I
U
n
I I
LJ
n
I 1
U
(l
i
U
r:
LJ
n
I I
U
n
I i
U
II
I
LJ
II
J
n
I
LJ
n
I I
U
n
[j
10-34
URBAN STREETS
jC]CJ3 0JIO
i
,r"C t)j E ~ T
n
, I
U
WORKSHEET FOR FOUR-LEG INTERSECTIONS
Page 1
n
i .
U
Location. ~ 507/C/2E.f/<../E!A-lD ;fll-l....
I '
HOURLY VOLUMES
Name:-=S::: +-^- \(.
7/;i/C(J
( (
n
I
U
Grade ~ %
(])
N
n
I '
U
...
Vo 5
V 330
5
V4
-;<=
~ ~
N =[2]
n
i
U
Grade !!2- %
c
....
VI
V2
V3
)
(
Grade ~ %
n
i j
LJ
3/5
..?--90
----
n
I
U
n
u
minor road
,u E. Ct;t Ef:. r;-r
p/9-L..D '-111-'-- ED
Grade .-C.- %
Date of counts: 19<1?::
Time Period. 'P ~, P (;. A '(-
Average Runmng Speed. '~ "::7 I-'" PH'
PHF. n.90
n
LJ
VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS
Movement No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Volume (vph) 5 "35 z.qo sS 330 S 140 IS '-0 0 5 S-
Vol. (pcph), see Table 10-1 0--~c\" =:l\$'~ \/ 1."2. 0 " Co
VOLUMES IN PCPH
[I
U
n
U
n
. ,
U
~ jlt \ ~
V12 Vll vlO V
o NA
) v,. 3'"
v(
o
NA
NA
VI
n
I :
U
n
: I
LJ
... V2
n
u
~3
v7 Vg Vq
1
n
u
n
I
U
,5'+ J.2. 7~ '1_
n
U
fI
I
U
n
I
\-.J
n
LJ
n
u
n
LJ
.n
u
n
u
~
I
LJ
n
L.J
Ii
u
n
LJ
n
u
n
u
(I
u
Ii
!
U
n
LJ
Ii
LJ
(
'I
LJ
n
I
U
UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
10-35
rT
Iqc,~ l___.J / 0 PY--.O\~ ' I
I::) WORKSHEET FOR FOUR-LEG INTERSECTIONS Page 2
STEP 1: RT From Minor Street r v,/ j V12
Conflicting Flows, Ve 1/2V3+V2=Ve,/ 1/2 V6 + Vs = Vel2
14-5+~= 4 00 vph '2,5+ 330= 3?? vph
Crihcal Gap, Te (Tab. 10-2) S.~ (sec) 5,$" (sec)
Potential Capacity, cp (Fig. 10-3) cp9 = ~0 0 pcph Cpl2 = 7?$' pcph
Percent of cp Utilized (v'//cp9) X 100 = -:;S. ~3% (Vlz!C?IZ) X 100 = 0.. 7 7 %
Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10-5) P,/ = .96 PIZ=''1C\
Actual Capacity, Cm C = C 9 = (r.&C pcph Cml2 = Cpl2 = 7~C:
m'i p I '-' pcph
STEP 2: LT From Major Street t V. -.J VI
Conflicting Flows, Ve V 3 + V 2 = V c. V6+VS=Vel
LqO+~= faDS vph --.S:+~= 335 vph
Critical Gap, Te (Tab, 10-2) 5.5 (sec) 5.5 (see)
Potential Capacity, cp (Fig. 10-3) cp. = 5S0 pcph cpl = '7 75' pcph
Percent of cp Utilized (v ./ cp4) X 100 = "7. 01 % (v II cpl) X 100 = 1.7Cf %
Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10-5) P = .,9Z P = ..98
. I
Actual Capacity, cm cmol = cpol = $~(") pcph cm I = cp I = 775 pcph
STEP 3: TH From Minor Street t VB ! VII
Conflicting Flows, Ve 1 12V }+V z+V1+V h +V;+V .=Ves 1 12V 6+V;+V.+V}+V z+V I=Vc11
/45+ ::'\5 +~+ 2. ~+ 330+ ~S'+
~+3~c+ "3$= 83Svph 2..40+ 3\ S+ 5 =Q78vph
Critical Gap, Te (Tab. 10-2) b, $ (sec) b. 5 (sec)
Potential Capacity, cp (Fig. 10-3) cps = -z..qo pcph cplt = -ZSO pcph
Percent of cp Utilized (vs/cps) X 100 = 5.8(." % (Vlt/Cpll) X 100= ~:q..O%
Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10-5) Ps = .9 b PI1 = .<1'8
Actual Capacity, Cm CmS = CpS X P I X p. Cmll = Cpll X PI X p.
2.~4- = 2'10 X Z ZS = 2S-0 X
o9C\ X . '1 -z. (pcph) .~B X .9 -z... (pcph)
STEP 4. LT From Minor Street lv- LV10
Conflicting Flows. V, VeS (step 3) + VII + V12 = Ve7 Veil (step 3) + VB + V'/ = VelO
~ + '5 + -:S... = 8'1-5' vph <118. + ~ + 2.0 =lm.3vph
Critical Gap, Te (Tab, 10-2) 7~ 0 (sec) 7.0 (sec)
Potential Capacity, cp (Fig. 10-3) cp7 = 25"0 pcph cplO = I <1 0 pcph
Actual CapacIty, Cm Cm 7 = Cpi X P I X p. X P II X P 12 Cm I 0 = Cp lOX p. X P I X P 8 X P 9
Z. 'Z., - '2.S0X . <fer X J to I = flQ X cr Z.x
,9z. X .Cf5x .9Cf (pcph) ~X ~X c;S(pcph)
(I
u
10.36
URBAN STREETS
II
\ qy-=<- ~-,J!h Pv c'\F C
WORKSHEET FOR FOUR-LEG INTERSECTIONS Page 3
SHARED-LANE CAPACITY
vj+vj where 2 movements share a lane
CSH =
(vjcm.) + (v/cm,)
v,,; + vj + vk where 3 movements share a lane
CSH =
(Vi /Cm.) + (V/Cm;) + (Vk/Cmk)
MINOR STREET APPROACH MOVEMENTS 7, 8, 9
Movement v(pcph) cm(pcph) csH(pcph) cR = CSH - v LOS
-- 1/ _ A E
7 \Sc.r LL\ I ?. ""L \ (,.,7 ~
........,-
~ ?-'--...I \ - \ '-
8 \7 2G?t 'It..'\- 24-7 c...
'"
9 Z'L. to faO ( #,.J.... A
MINOR STREET APPROACH MOVEMENTS 10, 11, 12
Movement v(pcph) cm(pcph) csH(pcph) cR = CSH - v LOS
\ ~\ -......
10 0 I !(,..,\ 1(,,[ \)
11 0 2.25 >- 34L\ "2?C: >-337 -z.. \ ~ 6 e.-
12 (" 775 775 Iraq A
MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1,4
Movement v (pcph) Cm (pcph) CR = Cm - v LOS
1 ro 775 7C..f1. A
4 3~ 5'SO 61\ A
COMMENTS: v::: (p7
----
'\
n
LJ
fl
U
r'
LJ
II
u
n
u
fl
LJ
II
LJ
fl
u
n
u
n
u
11
,
U
II
u
n
u
n
LJ
LJ
'I
U
'l
LJ
r:
LJ
Il
I
U
n
LJ
n
,
LJ
n
u
n
u
fl
;
U
n
I
U
n
u
n
u
n
LJ
n
U
c
,n
LJ
'l
U
n
u
n
LJ
n
u
n
I
LJ
Il
LJ
10-34
URBAN STREETS
I
11'72 fN/::::-120\E--Ci
I
WORKSHEET FOR FOUR-LEG INTERSECTIONS
Location. "5 R. 507 /ceE.E~ ;BIN_})
/ f
HOURLY VOLUMES
Grade~%
!'l
'315
~qO
If! LL.
Name: T~ ~
Grade ~ %
~
VI
V:
V)
)
(
CD
N
/ J
V~
V,
V /l::-
4 --'-
-.--,r
.5....; :_
5 rI:l1a jor road
K 507
t "I UGwP %
N =[b] V7 VB V9 YIELD 0
/ik J :10
minor road
c' ,1/ J? ,.,
~':n,L r ii, L ~
Page 1
7 )/If Jq 3-
I '
N=m
Grade ~ %
Date of counts:
Time Period.
Average Running Speed.
PHF:
VOLUMES IN PCPH
~.2~
~J j-L ~~
V12 VII VlO V
~ NA
) ~:~ ~~
(
-
Grade~%
VI
.. V2
~3
v7 Vs V9
1
VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS
Movement No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Volume (vph) 1'2.. ~\S' 7-a...O ~ ~ 3::.0 \\ 1~o \5 ""2.0 ~ ~ 9
-...I
Vol. (pcph), see Table 10-1 13__~q 15<1;- 1- 27.. "':Z., -.., '-1
I I -- (
13
NA
NA
IS"-l 11 E
'I
U
UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
10-35
\C1 '-1 -::, .A) Ipf( ,~~ rr
r
LJ
, ' '
WORKSHEET FOR FOUR-LEG INTERSECTIONS Page 2
STEP 1: RT From Minor Street r Vq j V1Z
Conflicting Flows, Ve 1/2V3+Vz=Vc9 1/2Vo+Vs=VeIZ
I~$" + .=2, I$"'= 4-00 vph ~5'. ......~O ?- 'i- \
~+,;~~.= vph
Critical Gap, Te (Tab. 10-2) 5. S (sec) $"5' (sec)
Potential Capacity, cp (Fig. 10-3) cp9 = ~ (00 pcph cplZ = 7 W pcph
Percent of cp Utilized (vq/cp9) X 100 = 3 ~3 % (V12/CpIZ) X 100 = I. \ Y3 %
Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10-5) Pq = ,Cf1?, PIZ = . cr tp;
Actual Capacity, cm cm9 = cp9 = (,,~ n pcph cmlZ = cplZ = 7?;() pcph
STEP 2: LT From Major Street t V~ ---1 VI
Conflicting Flows, V, V 3 + V z = V C~ Vo+VS=Vcl
Zero + 3 \5' = ~o S-vph -11-+ 33Ck 34-1 vph
5' $' (sec) -c
Critical Gap, Te (Tab. 10-2) ::::. ~ (sec)
Potential Capacity, cp (Fig, 10-3) cp4 = '5 s-n pcph cpl = 775 pcph
Percent of cp Utilized (V~/Cp4) X 100 = 7.ng % (vl/c I)X 100= I,CoB %
l' ,.....
Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10-5) P = Cf'L p=,Y8
~ I
Actual Capacity, cm cm4 = cp4 = 55"0 pcph Cm I = Cp I = 775 pcph
STEP 3: TH From Minor Street t Vg l VII
Conflicting Flows, V, 1/2V3+V z+V1+Vo+V,+V 4=Vc8 1/2Vb+V 5+V~+V 3+V 2+V\=Vcll
I~$ + ~\S+ \""2.. + 5.5+~+ :'6+
\ \ 3::0 ':2 c B1E Zqo+~(5t-~SB2vph
_+---=:.'+~= . vph
Critical Gap, Te (Tab. 10-2) (0, '5 (sec) ro.S(sec)
Potential Capacity, cp (Fig. 10-3) Cpg = 28'0 pcph C 11 = 7_50 pcph
Percent of cp Utilized (vg/cps) X 100 = 0.07 % (~\I/CpII) X 100 = 2.'\0%
Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10-5) P = ,<1~ Pl1=.9B
S
Actual Capacity, cm cmS = cps X P I X P ~ cm II = cp II X P \ X P ~
?..S 2. = l.60 X '"2. 2. S = '2.. 50 X
.ct 8 X ,1'2- (pcph) .'1<6 X ,92.- (pcph)
STEP 4: LT From Minor Street lv~ LV 10
Conflicting Flows, V, VeS (step 3)+ VII +VIZ=V,7 Vel I (step 3) + V~ + Vq = VelO
B1:6 + ~ + -fL = 8", '2.. vph ..5.00+ -1S. + 7-0 = 1QB.rph
Critical Gap, Te (Tab. 10-2) (() (sec) 7.0 (sec)
Potential Capacity, cp (Fig. 10-3) c1'7 = 2.. 3 0 pcph cplO = \CfO pcph
Actual CapacIty, Cm cm7 = Cp7 X P I X P ~ X P II X P 12 Cm10 = CplO X P -I X P I X P 8 X P q
rqq =L.;:;aX~X I 0 I = I q 0 X . q 7_X
.Cf1..x .q(j X~(pCph) . er8 x..:J..h.. X . crS (pcph)
n
, I
U
n
I
u
n
U
n
LJ
n
,
LJ
n
I I
U
n
u
n
t~
n
, I
U
n
u
I'
LJ
II
LJ
o
fl
u
r;
U
,
It
, I
LJ
n
LJ
rr
, I
LJ
C
r
u
n
I
U
n
I I
U
f;
LJ
fI
U
n
I I
U
n
I I
LJ
n
I
U
n
I
U
n
I i
U
11
LJ
n
LJ
~
LJ
n
U
n
J
n
I
LJ
I]
U
10-36
URBAN STREETS
\q~3
WORKSHEET FOR FOUR-LEG INTERSECTIONS
SHARED-LANE CAPACITY
W/PKOY~(I
Page 3
Vi+Vi
CSH = where 2 movements share a lane
(vjcmi) + (v/cml)
Vt + vi + vk
CSH = where 3 movements share a lane
(Vi /Cm.) + (V/Cm) + (Vk/Cmk)
MINOR STREET APPROACH MOVEMENTS 7, 8, 9
Movement
v(pcph) cm(pcph) CsH(pcph) CR = CSH - v LOS
l~~ Iq.q ? -, 1'.... "':) 'Cier D '\-s E
'- '-' ~ IS \0 Z3 t: E-
17 -z.S"7 7_C:;7 C.
7_ L ~(dJ 1,.fA) (,..,39- ~
MINOR STREET APPROACH MOVEMENTS 10, 11, U
v(pcph) cm(pcph) csH(pcph) CR = CSH - v LOS
~ I~\ '- IG:,\-';
i I S~ b
.../
7 L 7 5' ~ "30<1 l.;ZS \ 7.. 90 "'2.\?' r~ E.
q 7&-,(") if..r: 7'3'\ A
,I
MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1,4
v (pcph) Cm (pcph) CR = Cm - v LOS
\--:, 77S' 707 A
""::2.<4 S50 'S I \ t4
.-I
E 45
7
8
9
Movement
10
11
12
Movement
1
4
COMMENTS:
'l
U
n
I
LJ
n
u
n
U
1
u
n
\ !
U
n
U
n
I '
U
n
U
n
~
n
I I
U
n
U
n
u
n
LJ
n
,
u
n
I
LJ
n
,
J
n
I
U
n
u
10-34
URBAN STREETS
i '1 '1 Li
!, 1/
IA../ /0
/
,-i:C i E: c. T
,
WORKSHEET FOR FOUR-LEG INTERSECTIONS Page 1
Location. 512.. So 7 / C12.EEIL )-BIft..D )././/... /...... Name: ~ \ \...I'-- Y. 7);t;)93
I I I ,
HOURLY VOLUMES Grade 2- %
CD
STO~ I S :10 1.2 N ~ml
N
YIELD 0 Vl2 VII VlO
~. ~ ~ Vb ;25
N=m .. V, LI/O N=[2;]
V4 "'"2::::'
~....-'
Grade ~ % 5 ) ( Grade ~ %
VI ma jor road
3,'-15 V2 a- t cL/V'1 4ve7se So7
;;70 V3 I I (fSlDP )?f I
')
N =0 V7 VB V9 YIELD 0
:::3b ik ~c Date of counts. Iqql-f
minor road Time Period. P/l1 P EItK
tvE ceEeK 5/ Average Running Speed. '35 ""'-P J...
ao I
Grade ~ % PHF, r I
VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS
Movement No, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Volume (vph) ~' 3\< 370 "'?5" ~'\b -z..$' '2-:2.0:::- IS" LO IS" La S
'-' -- ~ ' ------
VoL (pcph), see Table 10-1 ~~3~ 'ZS~ /7 -z.? \7 "Z.-z. b
VOLUMES IN PCPH
~jiL L
~ NA
V12 VII VlO Vb
NA
) v, ..
0 V4 31
NA VI (
· V2
NA ~3
V7 VB V9
1
15"1 J..l 1. 7-
n
LJ
UNSIGNALlZED INTERSEcrlONS
10-35
\s q Or Wi,. p~ r~r;: ('T
n
U
~ -
WORKSHEET FOR FOUR-LEG INTERSECTIONS Page 2
STEP 1. RT From Minor Street r V9 j V12
Conflicting Flows, V c 1/2V3+V2=Ve9 1/2 Vb + Vs = Vel 2
~+ 3~'5= ~O vph n_ $+..4l.9 = </- 2.. 3 vph
Critical Gap, Te (Tab. 10-2) 5" '5 (sec) S-S (sec)
Potential Capacity, cp (Fig. 10-3) cp9 = 5'70 pcph Cpl2 = foBn pcph
Percent of cp Utilized (V9/Cp9) X 100 = 3.B6 % (v 12/ Cp12) X 100 = .8B %
Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10-5) P9 = .crH PI2 = .9 C1.
Actual Capacity, cm c = C = 57 0 pcph Cml2 = Cpl2 = ~8 0 pcph
m9 p9
STEP 2: LT From Major Street t V4 ~ VI
Conflicting Flows, V, V 3 + V 2 = V C4 Vb+V,=Vel
~+39S= 7~5 vph 25+ 1JQ = ~ '3'5 vph
Critical Gap, Te (Tab, 10-2) s:- 5' (sec) s: 'S (sec)
Potential Capacity, cp (Fig. 10-3) cp4 = 4 5"0 pcph cpl = ({! 70 pcph
Percent of cp Utilized (V4/Cp4) X 100 = R.h7% (VI/Cpl)X 100= 0 '10 %
Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10-5) P = /1 CS" P = .Q9
4 I
Actual Capacity, Cm Cm4 = Cp4 = 4-~o pcph Cml = Cp1 = t,70pcph
STEP 3: TH From Minor Street t VH I VII
Conflicting Flows, V, 1/2V 3+V ,+V1+V 6+V s+V ,,=Vc8 1/2V6+V,+V,,+V 3+V z+VI=Vc11
\BS' + 395+..5.....+ I 2. ~ 't\ 0+ "">)5t-
7..S + <.'\ \ 0 + ~~ =/.Q$vph '2, 7q. :u'2+ "5 - Ie, '";?R, h
~ ~ --, - p
Critical Gap, Te (Tab. 10-2) ~ 5' (sec) b, S (sec)
Potential Capacity, cp (Fig. 10-3) c 8 = -:z. 7. Opcph CpI1 = q() pcph
p,
Percent of cp Utilized (v8/cpS) X 100 = 7. 73% (V11/CpI1) X 100 = I. 34- %
Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10-5) P8= .<1S PII= .99
Actual Capacity, cm cmS = cp8 X PIX P" CmII ?II X PI X P4
707 = 2. 20 X ~, - ~O X
.CfS" X ,'1'1 (pcph) .95 X . ~q (pcph)
STEP 4. LT From Minor Street lv~ LVID
Conflicting Flows, V, Ve8 (step 3) + VII + VI2 = V,7 Veil (step 3) + VB + V9 = VelD
~ 2.<::> + S =/D8Qvph ~+--12+2Q..=~ph
Critical Gap, T, (Tab, 10-2) 7.0 (sec) 7.0 (sec)
Potential CapacIty. cp (Fig. 10-3) cp7 = I 70 pcph CplO = 70 pcph
Actual Capacity, Cm Cm7 = Cp7 X P I X P" X P 11 X P 12 CmlD = CplO X P" X PI X P~ X P9
]57 =[ZQ>< HCf X t;"3 = -LO.. X ..ill... X
.95 X .;tL X ..B.i (pcph) ~X /fB X .erR (pcph)
n
I i
LJ
(I
U
n
LJ
,1
u
;l
LJ
fl
I I
U
n
i I
LJ
n
. i
U
n
I
u
n
U
n
I I
LJ
n
; I
U
n
u
n
. I
LJ
n
I
U
n
u
n
u
;l
u
10-36
URBAN STREETS
\ :~ c~ :1.,
I
\ i ~ Fe "....,.-" (~ T
n
I I
LJ
, : ' - --' ,--
WORKSHEET FOR FOUR-LEG INTERSECTIONS Page 3
SHARED-LANE CAPACITY
vj+vj where 2 movements share a lane
CSH = "
(vicm.> + (v/cm,)
v",: + vj + vk where 3 movements share a lane
CSH =
(Vi /Cm,) + (V/Cm,) + (Vk/Cmk)
MINOR STREET APPROACH MOVEMENTS 7, 8, 9
Movement v(pcph) cm(pcph) csH(pcph) cR = CSH - v LOS
7 -"2-$" C\ \57 ~ 167 ) -/07- F
8 t \59 (-/17 F
\i '2...07 7.D7 "'-, I qo c...
.../
./
9 "LL. S7n S70 54-8 P
MINOR STREET APPROACH MOVEMENTS 10, 11, 12
Movement v(pcph) cm(pcph) csH(pcph) cR = CSH - v LOS
10 \i b3 } -- '" ~ E.
" I
11 LL, 8~ ;> g4- r;-) ~ 39 0S E. E-
12 0 (~C?-. () ) - :::'/'" ) 074- A
MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1, 4
Movement v (pcph) Cm (pcph) CR = Cm - v LOS
1 0 070 c:- \C (\. A
4 3C, 4-50 4- \ \ A
COMMENTS: F - /17
S / bAlftL - 8 (,3
n
I ,
LJ
n
I ,
U
n
i :
U
il
I .
. I
U
n
, I
I ,
U
Ii
U
n
, I
LJ
n
I I
LJ
n
U
n
i i
u
n
U
n
I I
U
n
LJ
II
i I
U
n
, I
U
n
I
U
n
I
LJ
'1
J
n
I I
U
n
I .
. '
u
n
I
U
il
I
U
n
I
LJ
n
U
n
( 1
U
n
i ~
U
n
I
U
n
I I
U
II
I I
U
n
U
u
n
, I
1
U
n
I i
U
n
J
n
, I
U
n
i
u
10-34
URBAN STREETS
/ Cf CI L.! VJ / P 12 0 J EC T
WORKSHEET FOR FOUR-LEG INTERSECTIONS Page 1
-
Location. Name: ~l...A.." ~
HOURLY VOLUMES Grade -.fL %
CD
STOP~ I 1- ;L/ 11 N ~[1]1
N
YIELD 0 V:2 VII V10
~ t ~ ~ Vb 3/
N =[[] ... Vc, 4/0 N =(3]
V4 35
Grade~% /2 J ( Grade _ %
VI ma Jor road
'315 V2 ... S.R. S07
::'70 VJ 1 I rrswP ~
~
N=[]] V7 V8 Vq YIELD 0
nlsl210 Date of counts. ICfCfl/
minor road Time Period. ?M PE.f( ~
(Il E. CJ:..ESF::.. Average Running Speed. '3.So
8~i-b HILL.. PHF. ' '10
Grade ~ %
VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS
Movement No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Volume (vph) 1"2. :<c5' ~IC 35 '\-\ D "31 7.3$ 16 7..0 Ie "2.\ 8
,.,,1 (')
VoL (pcph), see Table 10-1 l~ '3:.~ '2..59 16 2..?.. '2..0 '2.3 C\
VOLUMES IN PCPH
~j<r"L L
~ NA
V12 VlI VlO Vb
NA
) Vs ...
13 V4 3'\
NA VI (
.... V2
NA ~3
v_ V8 Vq
1
'2 sct I ~ 1 Z.
n
i
U
UNSIGNALlZED INTERSECTIONS
10-35
(.A)/ PCpi)-IyC \
n
I I
U
l,~q 4-
WORKSHEET FOR FOUR-LEG INTERSECTIONS
Page 2
n
G
STEP 1. RT From Minor Street
Conflicting Flows, V c
n
~
Critical Gap, Tc (Tab. 10-2)
Potential Capacity, cp (Fig. 10-3)
Percent of cp Utilized
Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10-5)
Actual Capacity, cm
n
I '
J
Il
J
STEP 2: LT From Major Street
I)
U
Conflicting Flows, Ve
o
Critical Gap, Tc (Tab. 10-2)
Potential Capacity, cp (Fig. 10-3)
Percent of cp Utilized
Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10-5)
Actual Capacity, cm
n
I i
U
n
u
STEP 3: TH From Minor Street
n
I I
U
Conflicting Flows, V c
n
I I
LJ
Critical Gap, Te (Tab. 10-2)
Potential Capacity, cp (Fig. 10-3)
Percent of cp Utilized
Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10-5)
Actual Capacity, Cm
11
LJ
n
I I
U
n
U
STEP 4: LT From Minor Street
o
Conflicting Flows, Ve
n
i I
U
Critical Gap, Tc (Tab, 10-2)
Potential CapacIty, cp (Fig. 10-3)
Actual Capacity, cm
o
n
, '
, I
LJ
r Vq
1/2V)+V2=Vc9
/85 +.3.9:5= 580 vph
s: S (sec)
Cp9 = S70 pcph
(vq/cp9) X 100 = 3..S bOlo
P9 = .~R
c = c = S70 pcph
m9 p9
t v.
V) + V 2 = V c.
32D+ 3=l5 = 7?, -S- vph
5: 5 (sec)
Cp. = 4-$'0 pcph
(vjcp.) X 100 = ~. fa 7 %
P=o'1'5'
.
cm. = Cp. = 4-5""0 pcph
t VH
1/2V 3+V z+VI+V 6+V ,+V .=Vc8
le5+ 3ct5' +.Lh+
..:iL + ~ + ~ = ~ vph
~,~ (sec)
CpH = '2./ 0 pcph
(vg/cp8) X 100 = 8. S7 %
Pg= .95
CmS = CpS X P I X p.
Iq~ - 2-ln X
.11 fq X .q 5' (pcph)
lV~
VeS (step 3) + VII + VI2 = Vel
/IJ.oB + ....2..L + ..fL = .m..2 vph
j,O (sec)
Cpi = I 7b pcph
Cmi = Cpi X P I X p. X P II X P 12
I/J,,\ =I2n.x .96 X
o~ 00 00
~ X -"---'-- X ..:....!.....L (pcph)
J V12
1/2 Vb + Vs = Vc12
~+1.lQ= +2~ vph
5: 5 (sec)
Cp 12 = roBo peph
(V12/Cp12) X 100 = . ?18 %
P = .qq
12
C = C = (,. p.() peph
ml2 p12
.--J
VI
V6+VS=Vel
-.3l.+~= 1-41 vph
5. S (see)
cpl = (/")00 pcph
(VI/Cp1) X 100 = 1..9 7 %
PI = I er9
C = C = {c>CoO pcph
ml pi
l VII
1/2V6+Vs+V.+V3+V Z+VI=Vcll
~+.:lLD+ ~S'+
~+ 3~S-+~= 1'Z39vph
Co. ~ (see)
C =! ~O pcph
pi!
(VII/Cpll) X 100 = I~. 3 %
P1I= .9n
Cmll = Cpl1 X PI X Pol
J4q = J Con X
,cUJ x. er5 (pcph)
Lv10
Veil (step 3) + vg + VQ = velU
~+ --.ll:L + '2.0 = rZ74-vph
7,0 (sec)
CplO = 130 pcph
cmlU = CplO X p. X PI X PH X PQ
1\ 3 -l~ox~x
Cf~ ('~:7 r._~"'- '7(::-
~x~x ...~ (pcph)
11
J
10-36
URBAN STREETS
o
, ' . - -- ..
WORKSHEET FOR FOUR-LEG INTERSECTIONS Page 3
SHARED-LANE CAPACITY
vi+vj where 2 movements share a lane
CSH =
(vjcrn,) + (vjcrnj)
v.. + vj + v, where 3 movements share a lane
CSH =
(Vi /Crn,) + (vjcrnj) + (v,/crn,)
MINOR STREET APPROACH MOVEMENTS 7, 8, 9
Movement v(pcph) crn(pcph) csH(pcph) cR = CSH - v LOS
7 z.. SCi 14-\ ) I A A J 4 \ '\ -JIB r- F
S I \ \ 5-1:'3 r
8 16 Iq0 I'H. 17?=) D
9 I 2.;2- S7n -- <:::'4R ~
--, /(
MINOR STREET APPROACH MOVEMENTS 10, 11, 12
Movement v(pcph) crn(pcph) csH(pcph) cR = CSH - v LOS
10 '2-0 1\3 -; II ?, ) q3 E
11 23 149 ~ ISI /4'1 >qq } 2(,., ~ D
12 q ~An ) (",Ylo ) ?, 71 A
MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1, 4
Movement v (pcph) Crn (pcph) CR = Crn - v LOS
1 \3 (O~O b~7 A
4 ':~/1 450 4 \ \ A
COMMENTS: F -133
'!2 ( 'r 5',!",,;, /
i-'
\ qC( a.
.'1-,.. __ ~ _~-
it.) ,I \-'~... /~-. v:: i
n
u
n
I '
U
n
I I
U
n
J
J
11
U
o
n
, I
U
fI
( i
U
n
U
n
I I
U
n
I I
U
n
r i
U
n
, I
U
n
! I
U
n
J
n
J
o
O YELM APARTMENTS 93027
SR 507/NE CREEK ST/BALD HILL RD
1994 W/G PROJECT
07/14/93
16 31 57
n
I !
U
SIGNAL85/TEAPAC - Capacity Analysis Summary
n
U Intersection Averages.
Degree of Saturation .45
Vehicular Delay
7.3
Level of Service B+
o Sequence
11
Phase 1
Phase 2
J -------------------------
n
U
I + + + I
I I
I + + + I ++++
I I
:<+ + +> I <++++
I
I V I ++++
I I
I :++++ v
I
, <* * +>:++++>
I
I * * + :****
,
I * * + , v
I I
n
, I
LJ
0.' : G/C= .338 : G/C= .562
: G= 20. 3 " : G= 33. 7 "
: Y= 3.0" : Y= 3.0"
n -------------------------
U C= 60 sec G= 54.0 sec = 90.0% Y= 6.0 sec = 10.0% Ped=
.0 sec =
.0%
n
i I : Lane : Width/ :
U Group: Lanes: Reqd
G/C : Service Rate: Adj: HCM : L : Maximum:
Used: C (vph) E :Volume: Delay: S: Queue:
n
U SB Approach
8.9
B+
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
n :LT+TH+RT: 12/1: .05: .34: 312: 355: 44: 8.9: B+: 25 ft :
U -------------------------------------------------------------------------
n -_____________________________________________________-------------------
U -------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB Approach
10.5
B
: RT
:LT+TH
12/1 :
12/1 :
.03 :
.19 :
.34 :
.34 :
454 :
525 :
498 :
569 :
22 :
278 :
8.6 : B+:
10.7 :*B :
25 ft :
155 ft :
n -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, I
U
WB Approach 5.3 B+
n
LJ
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
TH+RT:
LT :
12/1 :
12/1 :
.30 :
.04 :
.56 :
.56 :
982 :
185 :
993 :
212 :
483 :
39 :
5.4 : B+:
4.2 : A :
178 ft :
25 ft :
n
U EB Approach
7.4
B+
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
n
I
U
RT
TH
LT
12/1 :
12/1 :
12/1 :
.31 :
.31 :
.16 :
.56 :
.56 :
.56 :
811 :
943 :
426 :
828 :
1003 :
484 :
411 :
439 :
6 :
5.5 : *B+ :
9.2 : B+:
6.8 : B+:
151 ft
162 ft :
25 ft :
n
I
U
n
U
n
U
YELM APARTMENTS 93027
SR 507/NE CREEK ST/BALD HILL RD
LJ~ 1994 W/O PROJECT
I
n SIGNAL85/TEAPAC - Display of Intersection Parameters
I
U
'l
u
5
o
o
I
I
20 15 I
I
12 0 I
I
1 0 I
I
I I
I I
\
+
\
235 15
0 12
0 1
n -------------
J
/
-------------------
-------------------
395
370
\
12
1
il
U
n
I
U
n
I I
, '
LJ
n
i I
U
n
I '
U
n
, i
LJ
n
u
1
u
(I
U
n
i
U
rr
U
Display of'
\
o 0
07/14/93
16:32.11
VOLUMES
WIDTHS
LANES
North
SEQUENCE 11
PRM N N N N
LDLG LD LD
25
410 12 1
/
35 12 1
-------------------
-------------------
/ -------------
20 Phasing'
12
1
LJ
J YELM APARTMENTS
SR 507/NE CREEK
n 1994 W/PROJECT
U
93027
ST/BALD HILL RD
07/14/93
16.37.29
n SIGNAL85/TEAPAC - Capacity Analysis Summary
U
:l
u
Intersection Averages
Degree of Saturation
.45
Vehicular Delay
7.4
Level of Service B+
Sequence
11
~ Phase 1 Phase 2
J -------------------------
J
J
+ + + I
I
+ + + ++++:
<+ + +> <++++:
v ++++:
++++ v I
I
<* * +> ++++> I
I
* * + **** I
I
* * + v I
I
-------------------------
n
J : G/C= .338 : G/C= .562
: G= 20. 3 " : G= 33. 7 "
II Y= 3.0" ,I Y= 3.0"
n
U -------------------------
C= 60 sec G= 54.0 sec = 90.0% Y= 6.0 sec = 10.0% Ped=
.0 sec =
.0%
n
I ) -------------------------------------------------------------------------
U : Lane :Width/: G/C : Service Rate: Adj: HCM : L : Maximum:
Group: Lanes: Reqd Used: C (vph) E :Volume: Delay: S: Queue:
n ______________________________________________________-------------------
i ,
u
SB Approach
9.0
B+
n =========================================================================
U :LT+TH+RT: 12/1: .05: .34: 306: 349: 52: 9.0: B+: 29 ft :
~ NB Approach 10.5 B
U =========================================================================
: RT
j : LT+TH
U -------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/1 :
12/1 :
.03 :
.19 :
.34 :
.34 :
455 :
523 :
499 :
567 :
22 :
279 :
8.6 : B+:
10.7 :*B :
25 ft :
155 ft :
~ ~~-~~~~~~:~--------------------------------------------~~~---~~----------
U1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
TH+RT: 12/1: .31: .56: 978: 989: 490: 5.4: B+: 181 ft :
LT : 12/1: .04: .56: 184: 212: 39: 4.2: A: 25 ft :
n ______________________________________________________-------------------
! )
U
EB Approach
7.4
B+
n =========================================================================
J
RT
TH
LT
12/1 :
12/1 :
12/1 :
.31 :
.31 :
.16 :
.56 :
.56 :
.56 :
810 :
942 :
420 :
827 :
1001 :
478 :
411 :
439 :
13 :
5.5 :*B+:
9.3 : B+:
6.8 : B+:
151 ft :
162 ft :
25 ft :
n
i i -------------------------------------------------------------------------
U
II
U
11
U
YELM APARTMENTS
SR 507/NE CREEK
n 1994 W /PROJECT
U
93027
ST/BALD HILL RD
07/14/93
16:37.35
II SIGNAL85/TEAPAC - Display of Intersection Parameters
LJ
II
I
8
o
o
Display of' VOLUMES
WIDTHS
LANES
u
II
, I -------------
LJ
\
31 0 0
/
410 12 1
'l 12 12 1 /
J -------------------
395 12 1
n -------------------
J 370 12 1 \
/ 35 12 1
I
I
North
-------------------
-------------------
-------------------
-------------------
/ -------------
II
J
20 Phasing' SEQUENCE 11
12 PRM N N N N
1 LDLG LD LD
II
LJ
II
LJ
n
LJ
f'
LJ
n
U
II
U
n
U
n
U
,r-'i
LJ
J
CITY OF YELM
YELM
WASHINGTDN
.1 Fee
Date Received
APPLICATION FOR & By
COND,ITIONAL USE PERMIT AI,N..
OR SITE PLAN REVIEW :y..
Conditional Use Fee: $75.00 ~' ~
Site Plan Fee: $50/mobile home space. $25/condo unit, ~\ \~ 0 .
$50 per 1000 sq. ft. commercial floor area ~ ~
$100 per 1000 sq. ft. industrial floor area G {p
(Plus any professional service charges per Resolution 252) iJ
P.O. Box 479
Yelm, WA98597
458-3244
OFFICIAL USE ONLY
A conditional use permit is an approval of a land use having slightly greater or unique impacts compared to those of
the uses permitted as a matter of right by city zoning Site plan review is a process for reviewing the design of certain
types of development. Site plan approval is required for mobile home parks, duplexes, multi-family dwellings,
commercial and industrial uses, planned development districts and for all land uses within the central business district.
Each requires a hearing before either the Yelm Planning Commission or City Council.
APPLICANT
Mailing Address
City, State and Zi
Telephone
,r/~ ~TdJPJur t:27g/~
t::'CA ;;(/.'
~
NAME OF PROJECT
OWNER
Mailing Address
City, State and Zip
Telephone
~~/J71I#> 4S' ;&J/b-/~r
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION .,. I
Ge~oca~~~~ ~iFl.,,~
d'! Md,... eN ~,J Land Arlla (acres)
Section Z't Township ,I 7
Assessor's Tax Parcel Number
Fulllegaljjescription of subject roperty (attach separate sheet if necessary)
::;F= 'P'2 ~
~/~. ~/t?~I?~t:?07 /.
", r ..
tP ./
Range ,z e.
PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS
ATT ACH EXTRA PAGES IF NECESSARY
1
conflicts with neighboring land uses? Explain.
~
5, What provisions will be made for electrical power, natural gas, telephone and other utilities? ~ ~G"
$f{t~~;7~.~~
6. What provisions will bo mado for stro . access, and/or sos? ~~~
/~~/~ ~"/TMU/ ~F~ ·
7 What provisions, if any, will be made for open space and/or recreation?
. ~ '~
~/.
8. Wh~rovisions will be made for schools and school children?
~~.
/
ATTACHMENTS:
o Environmental Checklist onduding150 fee)
o Ust of Owners of Property within 300 feet Ondude Assessor's Tax Parcel Numbers)
o Vicinity map showing nearby property, streets, land uses, streams and other features.
o Copy of any covenants or restrictions that will apply.
o Grading plan for cuts and fills over 100 cubic yards.
o Ten copies of Site Plan sho~ing:
1. Datum, north arrow, aate and ~e.
2. Boundaries of all lots !!.'ld st!'8ets in relation to city limits. section lines or comers, plus existing and proposed
survey and elevation monuments.
3. Lakes. streams. wetlands. trees and other natural features.
4. Proposed zoning, use of each lot and any public or commOn areas.
5. Existing and proposed buildings and other structures.
6. Existing and proposed parking, streets. alleys, sidewalks. railroads and any associated rights-of-way.
7. Wells and underground storage tanks.
8. On-site waste disposal systems and proposed sewer 6nes and tanks.
9. Location, size and any easements of existing and proposed street 6ghting, power, natural gas, television
and telephone lines, water mains, sewer, stormwater facilities and points of connection to existing systems.
10. Grade and curvature of strfJets to 300 feet from the plat.
11. Existing and proposed contours at two-foot intervals (or 5-1oot if >5%).
o A reduced size copy of the site plan not larger than 11-X17..
I affirm that all answers, statements and information above and submitted with this application are complete and
accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also affirm that I am the owner of the subject site or am duly authorized by the
owner to act with respect to this application. Further, I grant permission from the owner to any and all employees and
representatives of the City of Yelm and other governmental agencies to enter upon and inspect said property as
reasonably necessary to process this application. I agree to pay all fees of the city which apply to this application.
Signed
Date
POBox 479
Yelm, WA 98597
458-3244
tfol&rr -OWYVLY'
\20-\'\ U-CA'l'. \L. 1..-11 ~( ) Q'3
OFFICIAL USE ONLY
CITY OF YELM
Fee
Dale Received
YELM
...WASHINGTON
APPLICATION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
OR SITE PLAN REVIEW
Conditional Use Fee. $75.00 /, j -
Site Plan Fee. $50/mobile home spa'ce~,$:25/condo unit,_ '
$50 per 1000 sq. ft. commercial flo6rarea--,- J
$100 per 1000 sq ft. industrial floor area (
(Plus any professional service charges per Resolution 252)
By
File No.
/1> J /&'0, 00
-+-,~17
or"p',\;,,(~'\ '2-
l-:?''-J\ cL:,. 'J. ;;:z
/'" ,-;.0' ,~",\:.I,'" ~
I " " :h'f.'6Ci ~
~'
A conditional use permit is an approval of a land use having slightly greater or unique impacts compared to those of
the uses permitled as a matter of right by city zoning Site plan review is a process for reviewing the design of certain
types of development. Site plan approval is required for mobile home parks, duplexes, multi-family dwellings.
commercial and industrial uses, planned development districts and for all land uses within the central business district.
Each requires a hearing before either the Yelm Planning Commission or City Council
APPLICANT
Mailing Address
City, State and Zi
Telephone
,//~ ~Td1~1/ ~~~~
/</.'
~
NAME OF PROJECT
OWNER
Mailing Address
City, State and Zip
Telephone
<-<::";77JI~ 4S' ~~b/~;r
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION .... , j
Ge~oca~OV~~ .~n.~
~ Address t/Ai ~t?~,J Land Area (acres)
Section Z1 Township /7
Assessor's Tax Parcel Number
Fulllegalj1escription of subject roperty (atlach separate sheet if necessary)
~ 'tJ'2 'M.
A/~. ~/t?~t?~d07 /.
"" r ..
~./
Range ~ e.
PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS
ATTACH EXTRA PAGES IF NECESSARY
1
7 What proVisions, if any, will be made for open spacE\. and/or recreation?
, . ~ ~
t-J.
8. Wh:qrovisions will be made for schools and school children?
~~G2).
/
ATTACHMENTS:
tJ Environmental Checklist Oncluding $50 fee)
tJ Ust of Owners of Property within 300 feet Onclude Assessor's Tax Parcel Numbers)
tJ Vicinity map showing nearby property, streets, land uses, streams and other features.
tJ Copy of any covenants or restrictions that will apply
tJ Grading plan for cuts and fills over 100 cubic yards.
[] Ten copies of Site Plan showing'
1 Datum, north arrow, date and scale.
2. Boundaries of all lots and streets in relation to city limits, section lines or comers, plus existing and proposed
survey and elevation monuments.
3. Lakes, streams, wetlands, trees and other natural features.
4. Proposed zoning, use of each lot and any public or commOn areas.
5. Existing and proposed buildings and other structures.
6. Existing and proposed parking, streets, alleys. sidewalks, railroads and any associated rights-of-way
7 Wells and undergro!Jnd storage tanks.
8. On-site waste disposal systems and proposed sewer lines and tanks.
9 location, size and any easements of existing and proposed street lighting, power, natural gas, television
and telephone lines. water mains, sewer, stormwater facilities and points of connection to existing systems.
10 Grade and curvature of streets to 300 feet from the plat.
11 Existing and proposed contours at two-foot intervals (or 5-foot if >5%)
tJ A reduced size copy of the site plan not larger than 11.x17.
I affirm that all answers, statements and information above and submitted with this application are complete and
accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also affirm that I am the owner ofthe subject site or am duly authorized by the
owner to act with respect to this application. Further, I grant permission from the owner to any and all employees and
representatives of the City of Yelm and other governmental agencies to enter upon and inspect said property as
reasonably necessary to pr07iS ~'r;~~pay all fees of ~e ~;~~P~~:iS application
Signed ~ Date I; IC-:l
APPLICATION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
OR SITE PLAN REVIEW
Conditional Use Fee: $500 00
Site Plan Fee: $250.00 plus $25.00 per mobile home space
Multi-Family Building/Condominium: $100,00 plus $10,00 per unit
Commercial Site Plan: $100.00 plus $50.00 per 1,000 sq ft. of gross floor area
Industrial Site Plan: $100.00 plus $100.00 per acre
CITY OF YELMi
P.O. Box 479
Yelm, WA98597
458-3244
OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Fee
Date Received
By
File No.
A conditional use permit is an approval of a land use having slightly greater or unique impacts compared to those of
the uses permitted as a matter of right by city zoning Site plan review is a process for reviewing the design of certain
types of development. Site plan approval is required for mobile home parks, du'plexes, multi-family dwellings,
commercial and industrial uses, planned development districts and for all land uses within the central business district.
Each requires a hearing before either the Yelm Planning Commission or City Council.
,
NAME OF PROJECT HRC A~artment Complex
APPLICANT HRC Associates Attn: Ron Rants
Mailing Address 711 S. Capitol Way Suite 201
City, State and Zip Olvml?ia. WA 98501
Telephone (7.06\ '141-8060
OWNER HRC Associates (Hulbert Rants, Clees)
Mailing Address 711 ::; Capitol Way, Suite 201
City, State and Zip Olympia, WA 98501
Telephone \206) 943-8060
ENGINEER/ARCHITECT/OTHER Anderson & Boone
Mailing Address 525 Columbia St. N
City, State and Zip Olympia, WA 98501
Telephone (206) 754-7766
SUMMARY OF REQUEST Application to allow construction of 44 apartment units on the
property Property currently zoned commercial.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
General Location Corner of 103rd and Creek Street
Site Address Land Area (acres) 6.1
Section 29 Township 17 Range 2E
Assessor's Tax Parcel Number 64303400200/64303400202/64303400203
Full legal description of subject property (attach separate sheet if necessary) Par~els 1, 2 and 3 of
SS 8026 as recorded September 3, 1991 under auditor's file No. 9109030071
PLEASE ANSWER THE FOllOWING QUESTIONS
ATTACH EXTRA PAGES IF NECESSARY
1 Does the design minimize conflicts with neighboring land uses? Explain. No conflicts exist The
desiqn is sensitive to zoning requirements and its proximity to Yelm Creek.
2, Is the site within 300 feet of any .critical areas. such as wetlands or streams? 'I'hE" tri angular Sl te is
hr>11nr1pij on t-hE" hypotenuse bv Yelm Creek.
3. What provisions will be made for stormwater and/or flood control? Stormwater will surface flow to
drainaqe swales before entering Yelm Creek
4 What provisions will be made for water supply and sewage disposal? City water and the future city
S.T.E.P. Sanitary system will be utilized
5. What provisions will be made for electrical power, natural gas, telephone and other utilities? All are
riUriilrihlp j-o ~ij-p Must be extended into site for use by this proposal
6. What provisions will be made for streets, access, and/or buses? On] y one access is planned and it
will hE" from Creek Street.
7 What provisions, if any, will be made for open space and/or recreation? Most of the site to be left
natural. Children s play area and creek frontage public access area are
incorporated
8, What provisions will be made for schools and school children? No provisions proposed.
ATTACHMENTS:
o Environmental Checklist (including $50 fee)
DUst of Owners of Property within 300 feet (include Assessor's Tax Parcel Numbers)
o Vicinity map showing nearby property, streets, land uses, streams and other features.
o Copy of any covenants or restrictions that will apply,
o Grading plan for cuts and fills over 100 cubic yards.
o Ten copies of Site Plan showing:
1 Datum, north arrow, date and scale,
2. Boundaries of all lots and streets in relation to city limits, section lines or comers, plus existing and proposed
survey and elevation monuments.
3. Lakes, streams, wetlands, trees and other natural features.
4 Proposed zoning, use of each lot and any public or common areas.
5, Existing and proposed buildings and other structures.
6. Existing and proposed parking, streets, alleys. sidewalks, railroads and any associated rights-of-way
7 Wells and underground storage tanks.
8, On-site waste disposal systems and proposed sewer lines and tanks.
9. Location, size and any easements of existing and proposed street lighting, power, natural gas, television
and telephone lines, water mains, sewer, stormwater facilities and points of connection to existing systems.
10 Grade and curvature of streets to 300 feet from the plat.
11, Existing and proposed contours at two-foot intervals (or 5-foot if >5%),
o A reduced size copy of the site plan not larger than 11.x17"
I affirm that all answers, statements and information above and submitted with this application are complete and
accurate to the best of my knowledge, I also affirm that I am the owner of the subject site or am duly authorized by the
owner to act with respect to this application. Further, I grant permission from the owner to any and all employees and
representatives of the City of Yelm and other governmental agencies to enter upon and inspect said property as
reasonably necessary to process this application. I agree to pay all fees of the city which apply to this application
/2 12~ Date ~~ :2~ /5)3
Signed
City of Yelm
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
G')\J~
(If'\)
?-?
-;...;,
oJ)
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name .of prapased project, if any:
HRC Associates Apartments
2. Name .of applicant:
HRC Associates
3. Address and phane number .of applicant and .of any ather
cant act person:
The Rants Group, attn: R.A.Rants
711 S. Capitol Way, '201
Olympia, WA 98501, (206)943-8060
Anderson & Boone Architects AlA
525 Columbia ST. RW, '201
Olympia, WA 98501 (206)754-7766
4. Date checklist prepared: April 14,1993
5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Yelm
6. Prapased timing .or schedule (including phasing, if
applicable):
Desired schedule includes application for building permit
upon receipt of Shorelines and Site Plan Review approvals and
construction upon receipt of building permit.
7. Da yau have any plans far future additians, expansian, .or
further activity related to .or cannected with this prapasal?
If yes, explain.
No
8. List any enviranrnental infarrnatian yau knaw abaut that has
been prepared, .or will be prepared, directly related ta this
propasal.
None known.
9. Da yau knaw whether applicatians are pending far
gavernrnental appravals .of other praposals directly affecting
the praperty cavered by your prapasal? If yes, explain.
Hone known
10. List any gavernrnent approvals .or permits that will be
needed far yaur prapasal, if knawn.
Site Plan Review, -sh-o-l."e-l-ines-Subs't-an-t-i-a-l:-BeveJ.-epmen,t-Pe~
Building Permit, r\DO'd\ lo..1,r) \ Yul\"~.\r-
11. Give brief, camplete descriptian .of yaur prapasal,
including the prapased uses and the size .of the praject and
site. There are several questians later in this checklist
that ask yau ta describe certain aspects .of yaur prapasal.
Yau da nat need ta repeat thase answers an this page.
A seven building apartment complex totalling 44 units
comprising 88 bedrooms. Two of the buildings are within 200
feet of Yelm Creekand the other buildings are in the C2~
Zone. All buildings will be two story wood frame with wood
siding. Amenities include decks or patios, childrens' play
area and pedestrian access to the creek.
12. Lacatian .of the prapasal. Give sufficient infarmatian far
a per san ta understand the precise lacatian .of yaur prapased
praject, including a street address, if any, and sectian,
tawnship, and range, if known. If a prapasal wauld .occur
over a range .of area, pravide the range .or baundaries .of the
site(s). Provide a legal descriptian, site plan, vicinity
map, and tapagraphic map, if reasanably available. Yau need
nat duplicate maps .or detailed plans submitted with any
permit applicatians related ta this checklist.
The complex is located on a relatively flat, triangular
shaped property bounded on the west by Creek Street and on
the northeast by Yelm Creek
ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1.
Earth ~
a. General description .of the site (circle .one): ~
ralling, hilly, steep slapes, mauntainaus, ather
b. What is the steepest slape an the site (appraximate
percent slape)?
five (5) percent
c. What general types of sails are faund an the site (far
example, clay, sand gravel, peat, muck)? If yau knaw the
classificatian .of agricultural sails, specify them and
nate any prime farmland.
Spanaway loam
d. Are there surface indicatars or
soils in the immediate vicinity?
Ro
histary .of unstable
If sa, describe.
e. Describe the purpase, type, and appraximate quantities
of any filling .or grading propased. Indicate saurce of
fill.
Grading and excavation will be that required for
building foundations and creation of parking/driveway
areas and drainage swales. Excavation and fill volumes
will be approximately equal.
f.
Could erasian .occur as a result .of clearing,
canstruction, .or use? If sa, generally describe.
~'erosion control methods will be utilized
during construction, and an engineered drainage system
will be in operation upon construction completion, to
mitigate erosion potential.
eM \
~~
g. Abaut what percent .of the site will be cavered with
imperviaus surfaces after praject canstructian (far
example, asphalt or buildings)?
Twenty-One (21) percent
h. Prapased measures ta reduce .or cantral erasian, .or
ather impacts ta the earth, if any:
In addition to the engineered drainage system,
areas disturbed during construction will be landscaped.
~f re.ctO/~f/l15 of' ~ ye'V\A ~~;~-c..I<L~'rQ.s~ lc,,-~l\ ~1\<tCl\'
2 . Air
a. What types .of emissions ta the air wauld result fram
the prapasal (i.e., dust, autamabile, .odors, industrial
waad smoke) during canstructian and when the praject is
campleted? If any, generally describe and give
appraximate quantities if knawn.
Dust and heavy equipment emisions during
construction...emissions from tenants' automobiles after~\~
\- C~'- (
occupancy. 'Vv!:> ~
c. Praposed measures to reduce .or cantra1 emissions
ather impacts ta air, if any:
Rone
b. Are there any .off-site sources .of emissians .or adar
that may affect yaur proposal? If sa, generally
describe.
Ro
3.
Water
a. Surface
(1) Is there any surface water bady an .or in the
immediate vicinity .of the site (including year-raund
and seasanal streams, saltwater, lakes, pands,
wetlands)? If yes, describe type and pravide names.
If appropriate, state what stream .or river it flaws
inta.
Yelm Creek
~ Jv ~ ,vrs@ulAlj
(2) Will the project require any wark aver, in, .or
adjacent ta (within 200 feet) the described waters?
If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
Yes, two four-plex apartment bldgs. built
there. --ll\.~q~~k~ t' c~1~- ~~t'
(3) Estimate the amaunt .of fill and dredge material
that wauld be placed in .or remaved frarn surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area .of the site
that wauld be affected. Indicate the saurce .of fill
material.
Hone
(4) will the praposal require surface water
withdrawals or diversians? Give general
descriptian, purpase, and appraximate quantities if
knawn.
Ho
(5) Oaes the proposal lie within a 100-year flaad
plain? If sa, note lacatian an the site plan.
Possibly. The City Public Works Dept. will
determine line of flood plain at time of building
permit. 1
,
(6) Oaes the praposal invalve any discharges .of waste
materials to surface waters? If sa, describe the
type of waste and anticipated valurne .of discharge.
Hol
b. Graund
(1) will graund water be withdrawn, or will water be
discharged to ground water? Give general
descriptian, purpase, and appraximately quantities
if knawn.
Ho withdrawal. Site storm run-off will flow
into grassy swales for pretreatment so some surface
water could percolate into the soil. Ho actual
discharge will occur.
(2) Describe waste material that will be discharged
inta the graund from septic tanks .or ather saurces,
if any (for example: damestic sewage; industrial,
cantaining the following chemicals...; agricultural;
etc.).
Rone
c. Water Runaff (including starmwater)
(1) Describe the saurce .of runaff (including
starmwater) and met had .of callectian and dispasal,
if any (include quantities, in knawn). Where will
this water flaw? will this water flaw inta ather
waters? If so, describe.
Stormwater run-off will be collected by
downspouts and catch basins and, through a
combination of piping and suface flow, will enter
grassy drainage swales for pretreatment prior to
eventually entering Yelm Creek. SIOQ"v\.lI.3"1.\er ~ ~~ c..u \ \\
rnM.- -I- ~ Y.e \ W\. \':)""\ ~ ~Y\ v-v\ f'-etl v ,''''f ~
(2) Cauld wasie material~ ~nter graund .or surface
waters? If sa, generally describe.
Ro
d. prapased measures to reduce or cantral surface, ground,
and runoff water impacts, if any:
See item '3c above.
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetatian faund an the site:
x
Deciduaus tree:
Evergreen tree:
Shrubs
alder, maple, aspen, ather
fir, cedar, pine, ather
x
X Grass
Pasture
Crap .or grain
_X_ Wet sail plants:
cabbage, ather
Water plants:
___ Other types of
cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk
water lily, eelgrass, milfail, ather
vegetatian
- -~
b. What kind and arnaunt of vegetatian will be remaved .or
altered?
Primarily grasses, shrubs, and scotch broom.
c. List threatened .or endangered species knawn ta be an .or
near the site.
Unknown
d. Praposed landscaping, use .of native plants, .or ather
measures ta preserve .or enhance vegetatian an the site,
if any:
All areas distubed during construction will be
landscaped. In addition, some shade trees will be
planted along Yelm Creek.
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been .observed
an .or near the site or are knaWll ta be on .or near the
site:
Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, ather:
Fish: bass, salmon & traut (histarically), herring,
shellfish, other:
b. List any threatened or endangered species knaWll ta be
on .or near the site.
Unknown
c. Is the site part of a migratian raute? If so, explain.
Unknown
d. Praposed measures ta preserve .or enhance wildlife, if
any:
Landscape, especially shade trees along Yelm Creek
6. Energy and Natural Resaurces
a. What kinds .of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood
stave, salar) will be used to meet the campleted
praject's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used
far heating, manufacturing, etc.
Hatural Gas heat and electric lights
b. Wauld yaur praject affect the
energy by adjacent praperties?
describe.
Ho
patential use .of salar
If sa, generally
c. What kinds .of energy canservatian features are included
in the plans .of this proposal? List ather praposed
measures to reduce .or cantral energy impacts, if any:
Project construction will meet or exceed the
requirements of the Washington state Energy Code.
7. Enviranmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including
exposure ta taxic chemicals, risk .of fire and explasian,
spill, .or hazardaus waste, that cauld .occur as a result
ta this prapasal? If sa, describe.
Ho
(1) Describe special emergency services that might be
required.
Hone
(2) Prapased measures ta reduce or cantrol
enviranmental health hazards, if any:
Hone
b. Naise
(1) What types .of naise exist in the
affect yaur praject (far example:
equipment, operation, other)?
Hone
area which may
traffic,
(2) What types and levels .of naise wauld be created by
or assaciated with the praject an a short-term .or a
lang-term basis (for example: traffic,
canstructian, operatian, other)? Indicate what
haurs naise would come fram the site.
construction period equipment noise during
daylight hours. Minor automobile noise by tenants
after occupancy.
(3) Prapased measures ta reduce .or cantrol naise
impacts, if any:
Rone
8. Land and Shareline Use
a. What is the current use .of the site and adjacent
praperties?
Site and contiguous properties are vacant. Across
the creek is single family residential and across the
street is commercial.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,
describe.
Unknown. If so, probably pasture.
c. Describe any structures an the site.
Rone
d. will any structures be demalished? If sa, what?
Ro
e. What is the current zaning classification of the site?
Heavy Commercial
f. What is the current camprehensive plan designatian .of
the site?
Rone...annexed to city after development of
comprehensive plan.
g. If applicable, what is the current Shareline Master
pragrarn designation .of the site?
A portion of the site is in the Rural Shorelines
designation
h. Has any part of the site been classified an
"enviranrnentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
Ro
i. Approximately how many peaple wauld reside .or wark in
the campleted praject?
There are eighty-eight bedrooms planned in the
total project.
j. Appraximately haw many peaple wauld the campleted
project displace?
Rone
k. Prapased measures ta avoid .or reduce displa~ement
impacts, if any?
Rone
I. Prapased measures ta ensure the prapasal is campatible
with existing and prajected land uses and plans, if any:
Compliance with the City of Yelm Site Plan Review
issues, Shorelines requirements, and Zoning Ordinanc.
9. Housing
a. Appraximately haw many units wauld be pravided, if any?
Indicate whether high-, middle-, .or low-incame hausing.
Forty-four (44) units...middle income apartments
b. Appraximately haw many units, if any, would be
eliminated? Indicate whether high-, middle-, .or low-
incame hausing.
Rone
c. prapased measures ta reduce .or cantral hausing impacts,
if any:
Rone
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height .of any prapased
structure(s), nat including antennas; what is the
principal exteriar building material(s) prapased?
Approximately twenty-five (25) feet.
Wood siding on exterior.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity wauld be altered
.or .obstructed?
The view from Creek Street toward the creek and
the view from the houses across the creek will be
altered.
c. Prapased measures ta reduce .or cantral aesthetic
impacts, if any:
project will be architecturally designed.
11. Light and Glare
a. What types .of light .or glare will the prapasal produce?
What time of day would it mainly occur?
parking areas will be illuminated during hours of
darkness.
b. Cauld light .or glare from the finished praject be a
safety hazard .or interfere with views?
Bo, the illumination will be aimed inward on
parking areas.
c. What existing .off-site saurces .of light .or glare may
affect yaur prapasal?
Bone
d. Prapased measures ta reduce .or cantral light and glare
impacts, if any:
Rone
12. Recreatian
a. What designated and informal recreatianal appartunities
are in the immediate vicinity?
Informally: hunting, fishing, hiking, horseback
riding, etc.
b. Wauld the prapased praject displace any existing
recreatianal uses? If sa, describe.
Ho
c. Prapased measures ta reduce .or cantral impacts an
recreatian, including recreatian appartunities ta be
pravided by the praject .or applicant, if any:
Hone
13. Histaric and Cultural preservatian
a. Are there any places .or objects listed an, .or prapased
far, natianal, state, .or lacal preservation registers
knawn ta be an or next ta the site? If so, describe.
Bo
b. Generally describe any landmarks .or evidence .of
histaric, archaeolagical, scientific, or cultural
importance knaWll to be on .or next ta the site.
Ho
c. Propased measures ta reduce .or cantral impacts, if any:
Bone
14. Transpartatian
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site,
and describe propased access ta the existing street
system. Shaw an site plans, if any.
Access from Creek Street
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If nat,
what is the appraximate distance ta the nearest transit
stap?
Unknown
c. Haw many parking spaces wauld the campleted praject
have? Haw many wauld the praject eliminate?
Eighty-eight (88) new parking spaces...none
eliminated. \j~~\\o'r yo.-(\:..\~ o....~o... of2 \O~\~\\S
d. will the prapasal require any new raads or streets, ~~r~
<:im~ra~em~nt's-;-to-ex ~-R'''':-;'n-g7fi)ad-er-6r-st::tee1:s~;:\ nat inc 1 uding
driveways? If so, generally describe (ilidicate whether
public .or private).
110
e. will the praject use (.or .occur in the immediate
vicinity .of) water, rail, .or air transpartatian? If sa,
generally describe.
110
f. Haw many vehicular trips per day would be generated by
the campleted project? If knawn, indicate when peak
valurnes wauld occur.
Estimated: the potential for 180 vehicular trips
per day. peak volumes would occur from 7-9 AM and from
4-6 PM.
g. Prapased measures ta reduce .or contra I transpartatian
impacts, if any:
lIone
15. Public Services
a. Wauld the praject result in an increased need far
public services (far example: fire pratection, palice
pratectian, health care, schaals, other)? If sa,
generally describe.
~Yf:S - ,,/El-M.C;~ l>D\i~/\'<\r-L 2\r~~ L)<i-,/t\VV\ <9.c-~\ cA~s.\-r-\(.J\-
b. Prapased measures ta reduce .or cantral direct impacts
an public services, if any.
lIone
16. utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:
electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service,
telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, ather.
Batural gas is in l03rd street. Sanitary sewer
via City of Yelm STEP system is scheduled to be available
prior to project occupancy.
b. Describe the utilities that are prapased far the
praject, the utility praviding the service, and the
general canstructian activities an the site .or in the
immediate vicinity which might be needed.
City .of Yelm water and STEP sewer system,
Centralia electrical
SIGNATURE
The abave answers are true and camplete to the best of my
knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying an
them ta make its decisian.
Date Submitted: j1'/~" /.3
Signature~-
f~ ~O~/~
Flied for Record el Requesl of
I'\c.C/~lrYv {
o RIG I N A L Lc+- d- ,2::> \ - "J
Q//
--
@) g~f~~9
TIllS SPACE PROVIOEO FOR RECORDER'S USE
ADDRESS
314 E. Legion Way
Olympia, Wa. 98501
THIJRSTOrl COW Y
OL YrlP Ill. If
12/09191 4:21 M
~EQIJEST OF AF.C LMI D
Sam S Reed. AIJ ITOR
BY CARRIE, DEPI TV
$7.00 (,Ie))
1 ~::36 F'~9t? ;:" 1-8
1::::0
When recorded relurn 10
NAME
Richard L. Ditleyson
Vol
CITY STATE, ZIP
QUIT CLAIM DEED
THE GRANTOR, DONALD F DETLEFSEN and MARY JANE DETLEFESEN, Husband and
Wife
fOl8nd In conslderallon of Parti tion of tenancy in common
, '-------
conveys end qui! c~ Ern\ro H. HUL8ERT and BEVERLY A. HUL8ERT. Husband and Wife, as to
an undivided . interesh and JOlIN A. a..EES, a married man dealing in his separate
'tni.l1il,t&.Inif'u'hsc!i eil\l,"i'm4f.:i,~lT.\/.J.Qi'Il11,iali"MyltJ1 t Th u r s ton
SIal8 of Washlnglon. ~Iher wilh aU alt.r aequlled liUo ollho glanlor(s) theleln:
40"70
Parcels 1, 2 and 3 of SS #8026 as recorded on September 3,
1991 under Auditor1s File No 9109030071
//
"
=
llee.1 EB1n.te ~alea Tnx Paid ~ (.
Racelp:,l~o, !.fJ..b It<{. Date la - q -, ,\ I
MICh!lO~'iUl'Phi'. 'rhu-r:. Co, TI~~LI,
By LUClAr hllu Dcpu~y
;.:;;
en
I
<->
.....
=
By
(PRESJOENn
By
(SECRETARY)
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTYOF ~~
} 'L
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF
On Ihls day 01
19_ belOf. me.lh. undersigned. a NOla,., Public in and 101lhe
Slalo of Washington. duty commisstoned and sWOtn, personally
appearerl
} 'L
On this day personally appealed before me
OONAIO F OF.TIFFSF.N ~nrl MARY IANI'
11FT' """"Ill
10 me known 10 be the lndMduaf deSCIibed In and who execuled Ihe
wilhin and loregolng Inslrumenl, and acknowledged Ihal_
thpy
56gned the SarM as t h p; r
',.e end voluntary ael and deed. 'ot Ihe uses and purposes Ihelein
menUoned.
. P'esidenl
$ecfalary. ,especl;vely. 01
(
and
10 me known 10 be Ihe
and
GIVEN Und., my hand and olliclal ",eallhis
day of '-/]tl-U ' .19 &11 .
Ihe corporalion lhal execuled lhe IOfegoinQ inslrumenl. and
acknowledged Ihe said ~sltumenllo be lhe t,.. and YOIunlary acl
and deed 01 said cOIpOratlon. for lhe uses and purposes 'h.'....
mentioned, and on ollh Slaled lhal
I ,\ ~ It,' authotizod 10 e.KUla th. said instrumenl
~ A./ J /~ , .' ... and lhat lhe seal amxed, is lhe corporale seal 01 said cOlpotalion, '
'2.'.~"'- LA f 1,r:[&QS."::~ .~ ,
~ -, ' ~_,.""..~, Wllness my hand .,,~ oflKial soal hereto affixed lhe day and yea' 'usI
NoIary ~~~ Sial: o' Washinv1on. ,estdi'"\I.al ~boYe Millen.
~:..'- ~~ .>}O ':>/1; Notary Public in and IOf ,he Sial. 01 WashingTon, ':~dinQ al
, IV....4-
I'"
SAFECO Stock No, WATI.-GOOSIRev, 5-86)
LPG No. 12
......
"-,J-J"'o.. '-.-J
Wild
'\.
\'
~-
\3\ 5'1 - l..~
-<.-"
\
1liURSTON COUNTY nnE CO; (11, :> (
THIS SPACE RESERVED fOR RECORDER'S USE
FUod lor Roc",d II Roqul" 01
THURSTON counn
OLYtlPIA. WA
12109/92 09:28 Al
REQUEST Of: ITTC
Salli S Reed. AUDIT ~
BY ALAN. DEPUTY
$7.00 QeD
Vol: 2028 Page: 4412
File Ilo: 9212090012
NAME Edward II. lIulbert
ADDRESS 7505 Cooper Point Road N.W.
CITY AND STATE
Olvmpia. WA 99502
QUIT CLAIM DEED
THE GRANTOR
EDWARD II IIULBERT and BEVERELY A. IIULBERT, husband and wife,
lo..ndincon.iderllionol NO CONSIDERATION
GIFT FOR LOVE AND AFFECTION TO DAUGIITER
convoYlIndqul,clalmllo KATIILEEN S IIULBERT, a single woman
the 'ollowing described ,nl ISlile. situ. led in the County o'
SIll. of Wishington. including any ''It' acquired litle:
AN UNDIVIDED 50\ INTEREST IN TilE GRANTOR'S UNDIVIDED 90\ INTEREST IN:
THURSTON
PARCELS 1, 2 and 3 of SS '9026, as recorded on September 3, 1991
under Auditor's File No 9109030071
.....
.n
ex:>
a:l
<:>
.....
SUBJECT TO Covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations,
easements and items of record.
:RIIJ !l8tate 8ales tax p&1d.lb:1L
J\8oelllt no. 1(J'i!~s '< Date J2.:!l.:!l?'
1<<1ah&, Murpj:' Thurston Co, '.'reao.
By 0.( U WI ( L Deput,y
Informational Note 20\ interest of John A. Clees, as shown
record remains unchanged.
"
~~
of
en
,
'-"
.....
=
BV
IPrlSidontl
BV
lSoc:ra,arvl
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF Thurston
I",
l~
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF
On this day penon.lly appeared before me
Edward H. Hulbert and
Beverly A. Hulbert
10 me known to be thl individu.1 d.lCfibed in and who
.xecuted the within Ind foregoing instrument, and acknowl~
edged thlt t-hpy
signed th. slm. I' t-: h p- i r
trll end voluntlry act Ind deed. for tho Ule, and pWPGln
therein mentioned.
On this day 01
19 _. before me. thl undersign.d. a Notary Public in and
tor the St.t. of Washington. duly c:ommillioned Ind ,worn.
personally appeared
and
10 me known to be thl
and
President
Secretary. respectively, at
the corporation thlt ,.can.d the foregoing instrument. Ind
acknowledged the uid instrument to bllh, tree and volun-
tary eet Ind deld of Ilid CorPCWltion. for the USII and pur.
POMllhef.in mentioned. and on olth Italld thll _
authorized to .xecut. thl laid
inltrument .nd thlt the 5111 affixed il the corporate II" of
c 10 a~ fOr......'S\.urQ' WashlngtOll. re$lding uid corporltion.
Olympi ~ I'(.'t~"'yl (Tnmwl'IIt'pr l'T'hnr!Ci:t-nll County
t 'I ' /1. -. I /I,I'~ /" Wh~' my hand ~ offici.1 ...1 h.,llo .Uix.d thl day and
My conuni;;siqp ,eXpires U'di " IL(...") V"., lorn abovl wrlttln,
"(.. .; J, \, :""".!'~J~"::'
_. Net;;, P;;Ui: ::0 :=r.d fGf I~Sl S;;;r~........: ::..5t.ifll9~on. r.:i.d~"i
~' '\ ~f;.t1 at
ill s... this
,I
~(L
--
'-------------
/
//
(
'--
/__~/-.-===& VlCNTY ~-r~ ;;~N ~~~
SCALE: ~.. O"~ .''''''''-
\,.0'- 2, 8\..oc.\<, ~4, M~K~NN~
\IUl:,\6A"-e.O '1"~p.C."("'S, A~ R~O€o
,toJ VOl.. 9 of p\..PrrS ~ ~A6e 4-~~
TH U ft sTOf'l c:..o u ...1'" "t , W Po S '"' ,,,, Cj,"t"'Otl
~~AT:~ZY~/7.u;:-~JI{;K
~ t:. \.-('If ·
saono" e. 9 twP' 7
~A.L TRACT "
~~HO.
t)EDlCAnONS:
~~
('f\
~ ~
t\\ ~
~ (~l\
'"
~ ~
"t ~
~ '-l
~
~~,
YE'Ut\ "~
~c
"'\..~~
'?
I!A IICALE I" ~ /Ot) ,
:::--
/0:$ .4 V SE
t=
:=
.
....,
~~.
".
........
...... .
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
,..
. "~~
" ~~
~ .'c
, ..t~ "':!:..,>-
',"'. ...to '-J-,
"..~ <
..... ,)c () ~ ~ ~
....." ,'\.~
" ~.. ,
,~, .....
, ." "-
,. .
,"-
" t
'... I
.
..
...
..
..
..
.
..
..
.
,
..
,
5S 80rT
~ ,~
'.. '
, .
~
.
...
....
.
..,
", ......
//7; .,"4 /~7 0' ,'\ ....
. r. 7(?iJ" .fl.. ..,: r':\ ti -::r .1 "'.
......,,1 'I ........... .
:.... t":l._l ........: · ..... ,,-
......._ ,.CI_.lL"!:~~'" ,-,.r: ,""
_~__.--~9~P"'3- .~", ,'....
-=~.d9-.(; /-7-' /2'~$---'-'-----------=" ~," ....
.,~;'1
;'9::1-. ~,,' .......'
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
#7d.,-/7'/~"&
~. 7.,..'
,
"
..
~
~. pvr. t)~.
~
....
i
tot
%.'$) 1'.... 4' S 0'
~ ,.09996 (u.
.
977.1$/'
":?'~. /7' /r- ~
,-
e ..
ih~
;1~\
ll~~
api
,- ~
~
'-
t
II
. ~
. .
-"f'
.
~89- /'7-1 ZI
YEL,.. / ,Mf KEHN4 . H'~NM'''''''
-
01 r .... ,_....
~o . "l.9
-
,--~-- -.--'-.' - ----,------
----
.
,.'"
---------------
J '