The URL can be used to link to this page

Hard File Scanned City of Yelm 105 Yelm Avenue West PO Box 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 (360) 458-3244 April 23, 2002 Mike McKennon 7310 Huckleberry Rd NW Olympia, W A 98502 Re Street Improvements for Plaza Drive Dear Mike This letter is to clarify what improvements the City would require on Plaza Drive in relationship to a land use application for your parcel on the northeastern corner of Yelm Avenue E. and Plaza Drive As the project developer, you would be required to make full frontage improvements on the eastern side of Plaza Drive and core road improvements, including stormwater and vertical curb, along the western side of the road You would not be required to construct the sidewalk or planter strip along the western side of the road The stormwater for the entire road would need to be brought to the your site for treatment and infiltration These improvement requirements are contingent upon both the improved area and unimproved area reserved for future sidewalk and planter strip on the western side of the road, being dedicated to the City as public right-of-way This letter assumes the site will be developed with a Dairy Queen and general retail/professional offices for a total of approximately 9,000 square feet. If the scope of the project should change significantly the Transportation Impact Analysis that will need to be done at the time of land use application may indicated additional improvements are necessary based on safety and capacity issues If you have any questions, please contact either Jim Gibson at 458-8438 or Tami Merriman at 458-8496 Sincerely, [" Gl I 'J //; ,) , , lei ;'i).Y.J JLj/it Cathie Carlson Community Development Director cc Jim Gibson Tami Merriman C \MyFiles\CA THlc\DQ street impro'/ements.doc City of Yelm 105 YelmAvenue West POBox 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 (360) 458-3244 August 27, 2001 Mike McKennon 7310 Huckleberry Road NW Olympia, WA 98502 Re Dairy Queen Binding Site Plan Approval SPR-00-8095- YL Dear Mr McKennon The Binding Site Plan approval for this site will expire on August 28, 2001 The City has received your Civil Plan Review Application for Dairy Queen, and will proceed with the project review You should have received initial plan review comments from our Development Review Engineer just recently In regards to the sewer and water Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) fees, Since your application was received prior to the August 28, 2001 deadline, the costs for each water ERU required will be charged at the current rate, at time of building permit issuance The cost for each sewer ERU required will be $2,480 00, if your building permit is issued prior to December 8,2001 According to Resolution No 392, development projects platted under the original 1994 sewer capacity, the cost per ERU shall be $2,480 00 The hook-up fee shall be valid for two years from the effective date of the resolution (which is dated December 8, 1999) Upon expiration of the hook-up fee established by this resolution, the new hook-up fee for unpaid capacity commitments for development projects shall be at the amount of the ERU connection fee at the time of this resolution expiration ' If you are unable to secure a building permit prior to December 8, 2001 , ERU fees will be charged at the current rate at time of permit issuance ERU fees cannot be collected without building permit issuance If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (360) 458-8408 Sincerely, /1 ;./ lJ)/iL00 (I ' i' .) tvc.!17/. '- __ II Cathie Carlson Community Development Director ~ ~ CITY OF YELM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PO BOX 479 -105 YELM AVE W YELM WA 98597 (360) 458-3835 FA.,~: (360) 458-3144 TO: Mike McKennon DATE: AUGUST 28, 2001 FAX #: 943-5154 PAGES: ~, including this cover sheet. FROM: Cathie Carlson Community Development Director SUBJECT: COMMENTS: Mike, Hard copy to follow. Give me a call if you have any questions. ,fo,., IF YOU 00 NOT RECEIVE ALL copms, OR ANY COpy 18 NOT LEGIBLE, PLEASE CALL (360) 458-3835 AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. C:\ WlNDOWS\D.:sktop\!sx COVl:f,doc ********** -vv~8 89v 098 *** A30 WWOJ W13A ***************************************************************** ^30 WWOJ-W13A jO AlIJ- OV 00 00 lOO/lOO S8~l2d v9~98v66 'oN 181/ 8W12N UO!l12lS )10 wo UO! ll2.WO 'ON ~88~ 'wwoJ oN ulS 98 80 8l ~n~ PU3 v8 80 8l-~n~ lJ12lS 9 ~9 ON 8 I ! j UO!SS!WSUI2Jl AJOW8W 300W ** ~O 8~l2d ********* 98 80 3WIl **** ~00l-8l-~n~ 31~O **************************************** l~N~nor 'WWOJ - ********** FAX TRANSMISSION CITY OF YELM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PO BOX 479 -105 YELM AVE W YELM W A 98597 (360) 458-3835 FAX: (360) 458-3144 TO: Tim Rants DATE: JULY 18, 2001 FAX #: 943-9368 PAGES: 13, including this cover sheet. FROM: Cathie Carlson Community Development Director SUBJECT: COMMENTS: Klapp Property - The letter was written when multi-family was 10 units per acre - so just use 14 when calculating the density. The letter was written based on the map indicating ownership of lots 5 - 14. Schorno Property - The amended site plan does shows a 12,000 sq ft. retail building was approved. However the binding site plan approval is for 5 years and as you can see it expires on August 22, 2001. Resolution 392 - Section 1.11 states that the $2480.00 hook-up fee is valid for 2 years from the date of the resolution or at time of land use approval expiration (8-22- 01). Basically new land-use approval is required for the site and all current fees (at time of building permit issuance) will be applied. I know you'll probably have plenty of questions - give me a call and I will try and get back to you as soon as possible. * * IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL COPIES, OR ANY COpy IS NOT LEGIBLE, PLEASE CALL (360) 458-3835 AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. Document 1 City of Yelm 105 Yelm Avenue West POBox 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 (360) 458-3244 December 9, 1999 Mr Mike McKennon 7310 Huckleberry Rd NW Olympia, WA 98502 Dear Mr McKennon After we met in November, there were a few issues that needed clarification and some questions you had Following are the issues/questions and their respective answer 1 What is the sewer connection fee for each Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) needed for your project? The fee for each ERU is $2480 00 This rate is valid until December 8, 2001 At such time the rate will increase to $4850 00 (subject to rate increases) 2 How many ERU's has the City committed to your project? Your project was approved as an entity of the Prairie Plaza Shopping Center The City committed to 63 ERU's for the shopping center, of which 57 remain The City did not assign ERU's to specific uses within the shopping center The purchase of the ERU's from the City's perspective is on a first com~ first serve basIs 3 What is the traffic mitigation for the project? Referring back to the January 8, 1998 memo from me, the traffic mitigation for your project has been established at $6,300 00 This fee is payable at time of building permit issuance 4 What is the approximate cost for a building permit? Based on the assumption of a 2,400 square foot store, the Building Inspector estimates the building permit to be approximately $3,000 00 Additional permits required are mechanical and plumbing, which will cost $300 001 5 Are the preliminary Civil Plans ready for final design? Ken Garmann, Public Works Director, has reviewed the plans They are ready for final design, but he would request that the engineer contact him regarding a few items Ken can be reached at 458-8499 I believe those were the only outstanding issues If I can be of further assistance or you have any questions, please contact me at 458-8408 Sincerely, {JJtUAL /LU (~. L - Catherine Carlson ~~ City Planner cc Ken Garmann Gary Carlson City of Yelm 105 Yelm Avenue West POBox 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 (360) 458-3244 December 17, 1998 Mr. Larry Schorno Rocky prairie Corporation POBox 1262 Yelm, WA 98597 RE prairie Plaza Landscape Bond Dear Larry, Enclosed is your receipt for the landscape bond at Rocky prairie Plaza Phase II Upon completion of the required landscaping improvements, the City of Yelm will return your bond to you. Sincerely, City of Yelm ~i:n Public Works Director cc Cathie Carlson File enc 98-ppsml ~ <.0 ct> 6> C> o "Z \':'"' ~ Ul ~ ct. d z \t~ ((. .~ ~ ~ ~ U ~. U tJ1 f:-4' .~ ~ u U'\ .t- U'\ ~t- ? .. aU'\ 'Z.~ 4t- .. ~ .~ a oiJ' z. .0\. ~O\ ((. dJ 0\ \l.l- \;iU'\ oS -, ~. ..-" ~ b;c.<> O~ a> ill 0 ~ :<g,~ ~~ S~~ --- - ~ ~ ~ t.> fA' ~, tj) ..t:) (;) '.~ .~ ~J~ ~".f:-4 ~.f:-4 Qta.. u),~ .c.l'~' ~~ ~ ~o ~ ot.> \tl [.~~~ ~ ~ ,('l Z H'~ ~.~.~~ ((. "" ~ ~ ~o~ <& .c:. ~ ;, FAX TRANSMISSION CITY OF YELM PO BOX 479 - 105 YELM AVE W YELM WA 98597 360-458-3244 FAX. 360-458-4348 To: f( ML/c {),..xrt Fax#: (5er:;) 0~:; -~3 3 ? From: Cd/1IG &(~ Date: 1 /3-0/ 7 t3 Pages: 2 , including this cover sheet. Subject: COMMENTS ** If you do not receIve all copies or any copy is not legible, please call (360) 458-3244 as soon as possible ds/c:\office\forms\fax.3 Q City of Yelm .; 105 Yelm Avenue West PO Box 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 (360) 458-3244 September 28, 1998 Mr Larry Shomo Mr Frank Witt Rocky Prairie Development POBox Yelm, WA 98597 Dear Larry and Frank. As Frank and I discussed last week, item #5 on the letter dated September 22, 1998 (attached), needs clarification Rocky Prairie Development is responsible for street improvements, as described in the above referenced letter, along Algiers Drive only where Rocky Prairie Development owns the adjacent property Improvements to Algiers Drive that is adjacent to the US Post Office is the responsible of the Post Office Improvements to Algiers Drive along the frontage that is adjacent to Howard Nettleton's property will consist of core road improvements from centerline and will be paid for by the City I hope this clarifies your firms responsibility for improvements to Algiers Drive Again please let me know if you understood differently or if I can answer any questions. Sincerely, W1uCU1J--/ Catherine Carlson City Planner cc: Mayor Wolf Shelly Badger Ken Garmann C:\OFFICE\CATHIE\8095ALGI WPD ~ ... September 22, 1998 Mr Larry Shomo Mr Frank Witt Rocky Prame Development POBox Yelm, W A 98597 Dear Larry and Frank. Thank you for meetmg wIth us last week. Ken has researched the two unresolved Issues the aVaIlabIhty of CIty funds for half street core road Improvements along Howard Nettleton's property and Gramor's wIllmgness to partIcIpate m landscapmg along Plaza Dnve. Unfortunately Gramor dId not agree to partIcIpate m the landscapmg along Plaza Dnve, however the CIty does have funds avaIlable for the half street core road Improvements along Howard Nettleton's property Shelly Badger IS revIewmg the proper method for trackmg the CIty expenses and payment to the contractor for the CIty'S portIOn of the street Improvement. At the conclUSIOn of the meetmg, the group agreed to the followmg: 1 Full street Improvements, mcluding SIdewalk and planter stnp WIll be reqUIred on both SIdes of Plaza Dnve untIl such pomt Plaza Dnve IS adjacent, on the west, to Lot 3 of the Gramor SIte and on the east by tax parcel 22730110102 and 22730110101 Where those parcel's are adjacent to Plaza Dnve you WIll be responsible for core road Improvements only 2 You may submIt to the CIty for a latecomer's agreement for the core road Improvements adjacent to the parcel's described above. 3 Along the westerly SIde of Plaza Dnve where landscapmg stnps are reqUIred, a modIficatIon to the locatIOn IS allowed. The planter stnp can eIther be placed between the road and SIdewalk or It can be placed behmd the SIdewalk and shall be a mmImum of 6' The CIty WIll also conSIder ehmmatmg the planter stnp along Plaza Dnve where a outbound center lane IS reqUIred. ., <> 4 Upon completIon of the Improvements to Plaza Dnve as described m #1 above, It shall be dedIcated to the City as a publIc nght-of-way 5 Improvements on AlgIers Dnve shall mclude full street Improvements (two- 12' dnvmg lanes, two-5' sIdewalks, two-6' planter stnps, street lIghtmg and landscapmg) where Rocky Prame Development owns property on both sIdes. Half street Improvements are reqUIred along AlgIers Dnve whIch IS adjacent to Howard Nettleton's property Core road Improvements from centerlme frontmg Howard Nettleton's property wIll be paid for by the CIty 6 Upon completIOn of the Improvements to AlgIers Dnve as described m #5 above, It shall be dedIcated to the City as a publIc nght-of-way 7 The landscape stnps and the SIte IS reqUIred to meet mmImum CIty landscapmg standards. The CIty encourages the use of natIve and drought tolerant vegetatIOn m both the landscape stnps and on pnvate property Please provIde the planmng department WIth a landscape plan for approval. 8 The modIficatIon to AlgIers Court, from a street to an mternal cIrculatIon road, IS acceptable to the CIty As stated m the August 22, 1996, approval letter the reqUIrement to construct AlgIers Court to publIc road standards and that It be dedIcated as a publIc nght-of-way are Waived. I belIeve thIS covers all the Items we dIscussed at the August 4, 1998, meetmg. If you understood any ofthe above dIfferently or If! have not mcluded all the Items, please let me know I can be reached at 458-8408 Smcerely, Cathenne Carlson CIty Planner cc Mayor Kathy Wolf Shelly Badger Ken Garmann c-\OFFICE\CA THIE\8095DEV WPD ...a ~ .ea . '" - City of Yelm 105 YelmAvenue West PO Box 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 (360) 458-3244 August 12, 1998 .-r \" _. '\. ,_\ \. ,,\.--' \ t.- ,,~i. ,...-... ~'j "~ ~.- I . ~' \1- -'> Mr Larry Shomo Mr Frank Witt Rocky Prame Development POBox Yelm, W A 98597 Dear Larry and Frank: Thank you for meetmg wIth us last week. Ken has researched the two unresolved Issues. the availabilIty of CIty funds for half street core road Improvements along Howard Nettleton's property and Gramor's willmgness to partICIpate III landscaping along Plaza Dove. Unfortunately Gramor dId not agree to partICIpate m the landscapmg along Plaza Dove, however the CIty does have funds available for the half street core road improvements along Howard Nettleton's property Shelly Badger IS revIewmg the proper method for tracking the CIty expenses and payment to the contractor for the CIty'S portIOn of the street Improvement. At the conclusion of the meetmg, the group agreed to the followmg: 1 Full street Improvements, including sidewalk and planter strIp WIll be reqUIred on both SIdes of Plaza Dove until such point Plaza Drive IS adjacent, on the west, to Lot 3 of the Gramor site and on the eaSt by tax parcel 22730110102 and 22730110101 Where those parcel's are adjacent to Plaza Drive you WIll be responsible for core road Improvements only 2. You may submIt to the City for a latecomer's agreement for the core road improvements adjacent to the parcel's described above. 3 Along the westerly SIde of Plaza Dove where landscaping strips are reqUIred, a modIficatIOn to the locatIon IS allowed. The planter strip can eIther be placed between the road and sidewalk or It can be placed behmd the SIdewalk and shall be a mInImUm of 6' The CIty will also consider eliminatmg the planter stop along Plaza Drive where a outbound center lane IS reqUIred. * Recycled paper .- .r~ ~ "" r....... .........,..", ~.".,..'''\\ '---f- r ,,) . \ t f ' ," It' ".....L .; ~ .,...-.... 4 Upon completion of the Improvements to Plaza Dnve as described m #1 above, It shall be dedIcated to the CIty as a public nght-of-way 5 Improvements on Algiers Dnve shall mclude full street Improvements (two- 12' dnvmg lanes, two-5' sIdewalks, two-6' planter stnps, street lightmg and landscapmg) where Rocky Prame Development owns property on both sIdes. Half street Improvements are reqUIred along Algiers Drive WhICh IS adjacent to Howard Nettleton's property Core road Improvements from centerlme fronting Howard Nettleton's property will be paId for by the CIty 6 Upon completIOn of the Improvements to AlgIers Dnve as described m #5 above, It shall be dedIcated to the City as a publIc nght-of-way 7 The landscape strips and the site IS required to meet mimmum City landscaping standards. The CIty encourages the use of native and drought tolerant vegetation m both the landscape stnps and on private property. Please provide the plannmg department wIth a landscape plan for approval. 8 The modIfication to AlgIers Court, fn;>m a street to an internal CIrculation road, IS acceptable to the City As stated m the August 22, 1996, approval letter the reqUIrement to construct AlgIers Court to publIc road standards and that It be dedIcated as a publIc right-of':way are waIved. I belIeve thIS covers all the Items we dIscussed at the August 4, 1998, meetmg. If you understood any of the above dIfferently or In have not included all the items, please let me know I can be reached at 458-8408 Smcerely, (J tJ ~ ~ vrr-- Cathenne Carlson . "- CIty Planner cc Mayor Kathy Wolf Shelly Badger Ken Garmann C'\OFFICE\CA THIE\8095DEV WPD ~ t ~? City of Yelm 105 Yelm Avenue West POBox 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 (360) 458-3244 July 27,1998 Mr Larry Schomo Mr Frank Witt Rocky Prairie Development Company POBox 480 Yelm, WA 98597 Dear Larry and Frank: Following our meeting on July 21, Ken Gannann, Shelly Badger and I met to review your request to revise the road standards as specified in the site plan approval letter dated August 22, 1996 After review of the file we found that the original decision by the Planning Commission to require full street improvements and for those streets to be dedicated as public right-of-way directly corresponds to the traffic report. The enclosed Trip Generation Figure illustrates the number of new trips to the development spanning a single hour during the busiest time of day (pm peak hour) As you can see once the project is built out, 249 trips will occur an hour during the pm peak time, which translates into approximately 2490 trips a day With that many trips each day both auto and pedestrian safety considerations require that full improvements be constructed for the project. The original approval and the subsequent amendment is classified as a Binding Site Plan The Binding Site Plan process is an element of the Yelm Subdivision code and is very specific on who has the authority to approve changes to an approved plan. Chapter 16 32.070 states that "a site plan approved by the commission shall not be altered unless such amendment is approved by the commission" While too much time has elapsed from the Planning Commission's decision for you to file an appeal to the City Council, you do have the option of requesting an amendment. If you proceed with an amendment the Planning Commission would review your request and render a decision Following the Planning Commission's decis.on you would have an opportunity to appeal the decision to the City Council, if necessary If you would like to proceed with ail amendment, please have your engineer contact me and I will be happy to discuss the contents of the application. If you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance please contact me at 458-8408 Sincerely, Cmuu Wff'--- Catherine Carlson City Planner Enclosure cc: Dennis Hanberg Shelly Badger Ken Gannann * C:\OFFICE\CA THIE\8095REV WPD Recycled paper lR\P GeNeR~ 1\ON _ LAND ~ER E~11 --- PHASE \ _ AU,O CARE COHER · 5 PHASE II - U S pOS, OffiCE ,," PHASE III _ SHOPPING CEN,ER 79 79 101 AL "NEW_IO-NElWOR\\" lRIPS '03RO AVE ALGlt:.RS SI PROJECl S\lE IOIAL - 9 82 '08 - 249 ...-4- ",8 ~ 4- .....\~ f o '"" 0 ct) '0% I- U1 ':t. 'cl e:: _0 Ii) 8 ]" \... 28 '"" \ ~ FI'IE CORNERS ~\\ \ ~ SR 507 .... 1'01'AL SI1'E GENERA1'ED 1'RAFFIC \JOLUMES - PROJEC1' BUILD oU" PRAIRIE plAZA S\-IOPPIl'lG CEl'l1ER (A\.,\El'lOEO) 06 09 98 12 27 FAX 253 473 0599 APEX ENGIN PLLr l4J 001 002 I ..c:;:..,' . I,S1_v --'6. / FAXJTRANSMITTAL \ TO- Cathie Carlson City of Yelm Public W9rk~ DATE. 6/9/98 REGARDING: Prairie Plaza Ph. 1 FILEfTASK. 25507/0 FAX NUMBER. (360~ 458-4348 PHONE NUMBER. 1360) 458-8408 TOTAL PAGES. 2 WE ARE TRANSMITTING THE FOllOWING: [8J For approval/review/comment [8J For your use DATE, DESCRIPTION: 619/98 Relocated Refuse area for Phase 1 building COMMENTS Attached is a sketch of the relocated refuse area for the Phase 1 building of Prairie Plaza as we dIscussed this morning. Please review and let me know of any comments as I am forwarding the sketch to t~e contractor and landscape architect. We will show the revised location with the civil as-built drawings. o D o COpy TO' Fred Reevis Lynn Horn FAX. (360) 458.5588 (253) 582-4442 SENCER: Matt Weber 2601 South 35th, Suite 200 Tacoma, Washington 98409 (253) 473-4494 Fax. (253) 473.0599 apexeng@wolfenet,com PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY IF NOT RECEIVED PROPERLY II--II,I-'J u[ IluFM Fill 06 09 98 1Z Z7 FAX Z53 473 0599 APfX ENGIN PLL~ 141 oOZ oOZ ~<:, ... '- .................. ............---..... " '~_\\ I I I . I ~ ~-------~-~~/--=~~ I t- / SCALE, 1" "'" 10' fa I / 1/1 JOB #25507 3: I , / ~ I / /// ~ i / / / <. - ......--- ~-I~~ .....- ~~--~~I----- I I I~ I J I 2l. I I I I I I '1 Ll ~ L1 ..:J .:l <J ..1 ..:J 14' ,~ .j - .:\ 4 ... S' 14' 3 ~\() ~[Q] <I '\: <J. 20' 8' ,\ ~ -'1 ..j ~ '1 -'1 ,j L\ " //. /' / // / , / / / // //, /' /' / / / /' ,/ '// / / / / / /, / ' /" , '/' / / ' / / /' / / V / / ," '/. .I /~/ / /~:-- ~. / / ..// "./ / ,/ / . , / /, / > //{/ / / / // /4' / /.l'//.E // / , / / ,/, /,/ / / / / / / '/ ,//// ",/// ,/ ,/ // / / / // ~./ "./ . / /" '" -" .. <::J ..j .:l '(/ <J ,j :J R~!I! 2601 South 35th. Suite 200 Tocome. WashIngton 98409-7479 (253) 473-4494 FAX: (253) 473-0599 Ilt-U I-',L III IIIIFNI Fu=. ~ o City of Yelm fdt ... 105 YelmAvenue West PO Box 479 Yelm. Washington 98597 / (360) 458-3244 SEWER INVOICE DATE. May 6, 1998 TO PraIrie Busmess Park I Howard NettletoJ1, JudyC. Nettleton PO Box 450 McKenna, W A '98558 (360) 458-2195 The followmg fees are due and payable regardmg 305 Creek Street. . Sewer ERU $1,00000 . InspectIOn $ 125 00 TOTAL $1,125.00 *PAID May 6, 1998, CHECK #2566 THANK YOU! * R.ecycW paper o PRAIRIE BUSINESS PARK I HOWARD NETTLETON JUDY C. NETTLETON PO BOX 450 (360) 458-2195 MCKENNA, WA 98558 FOR hu-~ ~tB fiRST P.O. BOX 5060 360-458-2265 COMMUNll1' 608 YELM AVENUE EAST MNK YELM, WA 98597 Fltatconnectlon (360) 92U332 (800) <451-1785 11100 2 5bblll~I:. 25.o?b? .1: o 2566 98-76711251 . DATEmot; !7ff ~_-=-__ . $ L4<L.:tS_~_J .. M' m=- Delal& on ~ o RECEiPT No. 09015 Ol1ERUl1DRED TllEl1TY tlVE ll(jl"Io~RS& 00 CEl1TS RECEIVED FROM PRAIRIE BUSINESS PARK I HOWARD NETTLtTON pO BOX 45QJ MCKENNA. WA 98558 458-2195 DME 05106198 REC. NO. 9015 AMOUNT 1.125.00 CHECK REF NO 2566 }(~SC!:SL~ANEOUS'RECEtPT Bft:~B o SEllER ERU 1000 ll1SPECTlOl1 125 ~...J ~/ .-( - City of Yelm / YELM WASHINGTDN i05 YelmAvenueWest PO Box479 Yelm, Washil1gton 98597 (360) 458-3244 Date January 8, 1998 To Mike, DmryQueen From. Cathie CarlsW Re PM Peak Hour Tnp l)lstribt;ttlOn The formula to determine the: number of new tnps generated by the Darry Queen, dunng the pm peak hour,.is taken from the CIty Concurrency ManagementOrdmanye (TFC) Once t11e pm peak 'hour number IS <;!etellIUIled It must be established how many of those tnps will travel. through the 5-ComersIntersectlOn. ThepreVloustrafficstudyfor tlns site mdicatesapprmamately 50% of traffic generated by your SIte will travel through the 5-Comers Intersection. TFC table shows that a fast food restaurant generates 18.27 new tnps during the pm peak hour for every 1;000 sq ft of gross floor area. The 18 27 figure recogruzes many velncles usmg the SIte will have already been on the transpOl:tat1on system fo~ other uses. Therefore\he 18 27 new trips reflect a 50% dlscount for "pilss-by" traffic 1827 x 23 (2,300 sq ft offloor area) = 42 new pm peak tnps 42 tnps x 50% will travel through 5-Comers = 21 tnps through S-Corners 21 tnps x $300 00 == $6,300 00 - SEP A MitIgatIOn for 5-Corners ~ ew V( - 10 Mt) /c... ' vtfJ::> 2- nO ~ -- 4f>5D ~r~, ":""':"--f . k ~ :' , "'-'1!r' ,./!~ ';;1 VV 2-4-800 ~ / 00 45 SOD -- I ?CLUU':'OO ~ 11 2- 3 7t.)0 I W/501o , ~J., ") L.i 10_2,7 .fA f 5 p/:.,.y I dO d q. ~:," t' /}.~ fJ ;1' L .. 1 fi ~.p~ tj ~j ~Lt0 ,.HI V'R01'-'~ 113 (IQ~ oQ ::- 1f L,~, 9 ~ .~ '5J) I "If){p I Ra:ycld paper --Lu~'i 10 ~/~ ,/ 1/1; ~ / f' If I !~.e /; ~ I -'''-'', kJ(t1~~ ~ ' .'1 I J.'~ " W~.in @ .~. .'~"..~f-0if- ~~:),'JOL,';I;."d/C<>s:t: I If 00 i> - / B ()Y 48~l:. - . -1(;. !'j I),. ~ ~!I) .~., , .., II ","-?,--".. I ' ~ ... '-1fti-III...~' ~ \ .. 'I~-j ,# f ;,:/ .n,: ,: ~, h_""L~ ~ f! . .:.-' - :5 ~ '/BI16 I /{,'/~ r;. f' " ...-,. 1" ~. ~!.t ~I \. ...:Ji !' tft.."',: ,A-cL. , ~, /' b (. z,-5'Q 00 /) 1/~!n0 /1) f/l -I 1,./ t' Ii / I'J ,t. .,.- IIv .dA1 rJUAJ' 'k,!p-.,(rl( f I he i'; 1 i.' t ~ J ^ J ",/f1/ ';'( ,.', ' ',' ~'J' ". ,,(, ~I---l"" ... ~-"'"'" :1'" , P . -?' J 7U7( ~~ - ~ - .' ( ~ j t)fI ' ('1~1 t .1 , ,I' 7. ' '~I s4 )~ t fj ! .A!: 1/.1, ~\ ) ,- / / -j l' /:./'< /..~ --=- -- -+ ,1 .; /",,~ -/I Y (j t~l'" 1'1 ( p. I: I'l'l l }rJqj '.a ' ;, ; 8 (lffi -:./t .5~ / <i;*_,...(1f......~ -' '" ~./:.. .,..tl- Ll~R1 ,/lh' \:;;..~',l !JLffl r -" I, fP .P J.f "-. . '- "-'.~-~ .-,. - - ~_. - '~t ~..", d "I 1)_) , ";/ - /' 1'1 -1 ~ . l I \, I', ~;;; ",' . ,>l\''!.j"',.I' )1.../t r \. . ~ if: . ( t1j{ 't ,_._~. I ~ " k/' L.~nj rl t L/n<1 .-- ~ ---- -- - -* - ----~- ----- III IVY HI-LIFT Scaffolding, Forklifts, Aerial Work Platforms, and Contractor & Industrial Equipment II Z0/uDJ P!~ plM ;11Lf-/I/U-G dfP(~ J3Vo ~tLt f~ - \ f-7 ~ /~- ~i/cdj (JUII?J t3 d::b~ / , q:- l!a~ dO Belmont, CA (415) 593-'1100 La Mirada, CA (714) 994-6360 Portland, OR (503) 256-9800 BOlse, ID (208) 884-1234 Las Vegas, NV (702) 399-3850 Sacramento, CA (916) 372~2555 Eugene, OR (541) 484-2511 Longview, WA (360) 57-8-0300 Salem, OR (503) 399-9568 Everett, WA (425) 513-9578 Martinez, CA (510) 228-0332 Salt LakeCity, UT (801) 974-5858 Glendale, CA (800) 540-6360. Pasco, WA (509) 547-8565 Tacoma, WA (253) 589-9500 Kent, WA (253) 872-4175 Phoenix, AZ (602) 968-'5591 Tucson, AZ (520) 790-8891 , ~& Of THE p~~'ft ,~ /~ '\ ~ ~ FAX TRANSMISSION CITY OF YELM PO BOX 479 - 105 YELM AVE W YELM WA 98597 360-458-3244 FAX 360-458-4348 To: rYlt<< U ~ Fax#: {113 :;-r 54 From: C{0H~ Cu( (<r~ Date: l- 9 r- C; 0 Pages: L lId h , nc u mg t IS cover sheet. Subject: COMMENTS If J 1~f( uJd-<< Mflpfd ~ {50 c)~ ~r(Jv~/tL fnJ-urs, ?f/;a)!(l- ~sJ!1JPrrf6- tor ~ ci)sf dtuc)Lkr fJr (jlJ;Li 6lJ-t( fi~ 1"1l r t j .1] /J A 11 / /1 -l_ YI ) /1/--\ () 0 UfO 11'Vvv,,--, fr: (fIe/vr (IJ 1.;:yuu - ** If you do not receIve all copIes or an Co . soon as possible Y PY IS not legIble, please call (360) 458-3244 as ds/c- \office\forms\fax 3 .. City of Yelm , ! j05 YelmAvenue .West PO Box 419 Yelm, Washington 98597 (360) 458-3244 Date January 8, 1998 To > Mike, D~lry' Queen From. CathIe Carls~ 'l Re' PM Peak Hour Tnp DIstributIon ',. The formula to determme the number of new tnps generated by tpe Dairy Queen, dunng the pm peak-hour, IS taker) froIl). the CIty Concurrency Managel11ent'Ordmange (TFC) Once the pm peak hour number IS ~eterm~ned It must be establIshed how many of those tnps will traveL through the _ 5-CotQers IntersectIOn. The prevIous traffic study for this sIte mdIcates' approxImately SQ% of traffic gerierilted by, your sIte' WIll travel through the'5-Corners IntersectIon. TFC table shows that a fast food restauran~ generates, 1827 new tnps,dui.ing the pm peak hour for every 1, OOQ sqft of gr6s~ fl09f area. The 18 2 Tfigure recogmzes many vehicles usmg the site will have,already been Qn the transportatIon ~ystem for) other uses ,Therefore t,he 18 27 new trips reflect a '50% disqount' for "pass-by" traffic ' , 1827 x 23 (2)OO sq ft of floor area) = 42 new pm peak tnps .' ' 42 tnps x 50%., will travel tlirbu~h, 5-Corners = 21 tnps through 5'-Con1e~s , . 21 tnps x. $300'00 $6,3 00 00 - SEP A. MitIgatl('m for 5-Corners' I;' r '@ Recyc1d~ ) ~ ~'. 'II .. " UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY HEAD OFFICE, PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA SURETY BOND BOND # U2788395 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That KOP CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Contractor, as PnncIpal, and UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, a CorporatiOn organIzed under the laws of the State of Pennsylvama and authonzed to transact busmess m the State ofWashmgton, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the CITY OF YELM, WASHINGTON, as Obhgee, m the penal sum of *FIFTY-SEVENTHOUSANDANDNO/100* ($57,00000) dollars lawful money of the Umted States of Amenca, for the payment of whIch the PnncIpal and Surety bmd themselves, then heIrs, executors, admImstrators, successors and assIgns, Jomtly and severlly, firmly these presents WHEREAS, smd PnncIpalls the Contractor of a project known as YELM POST OFFICE, located m YELM, WASHINGTON and smd CIty has reqmred a bond to be furnIshed m one and one half times the amount suffiCIent to pay the constructiOn costs of LANDSCAPE, such Improvements to be completed m SIX months. NOW, THEREFORE, If the smd PrmcIpal shall complete the smd LANDSCAPE m accordance to the reqmrements of the CITY OF YELM, WASHINGTON then thIS obhgatiOn shall be null and VOid. PROVIDED FURTHER, HOWEVER, that the obhgatiOn of thIS bond shall be kept m force and effect untll.MAY 31, 1998 SIgned and Sealed this 20th day of NOVEMBER, 1997 ~Z7~L Richard 1. Cronk, Project Manager UNITED P AI\CIFOC INSURANCE COMPANY ~~ Lois Stewart, Attorney-in-Fact '. Cif1~\ ~ Sedgwick Sedgwick of Washington, Inc. 601 West Main Suite 1400 PO Box 2151 Spokane Washington 99210-2151 Telephone 509 358-3900 Facsimile 509 358-3937 November 20, 1997 Tim Peterson City of Yelm P. O. Box 479 Yelm, WA 98597 RE: KOP CONSTRUCTION COMPANY YELM POST OFFICE PROJECT Dear Mr. Peterson: Enclosed are the original bonds to be filed with your office on behalf of KOP Construction Company Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter, Mr. Peterson Please give me a call if you have any questions Sincerely, ~~ Jody Hatton Bond Department Enclosures Insurance Braking Risk Services Employee Benefits (~~it~J O/~ Yelm r,,' ~ June 30, 1997 /(5 l'e/f/I Ave/lite West POBox 479 Yt, m 1~('].I'hinglon 9.s597 (3M)) 4)8-3244 Mr Cary Kopczynski, Pacific First Plaza 155 108th Ave. N E., Bellevue, WA. 98004 P.E. #220 Re Yelm Post Office Dear Mr Kopczynski, We have begun the civil plan review for the proposed post office site to be located on Creek Street in Yelm In order to continue progress toward permitting, we need the following information . Public Works Department 1. Drainage Report 2. Algiers Street Drainage Plan 3 Horizontal Control Plan . Planning Department 1. Landscape/Irrigation Plan . Building Department 1. Structural Calculations 2 Window Schedule Will you please submit these above referenced items at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions feel free to contact my office at (360) 458-8499 Sincerely, City of Yelm tL0lt.-- Ken Garmlnn Public Works Director cc Cathie Carlson, Planner Jerry Prock, Building Department * &C\'ckd paper City ofYelm YELM WAS....NCTaN 105 Yelm Avenue West P 0 Bor 479 Yelm, Washingron 98597 (360) 458-3244 FACSL~I~E ~~~~SMITTAL FORM TO. COM? JUl-y IlID rvIilIT1! T (! a,( (~ -K 0 D GL i (J 6 L/ J I I 15C;; - 2-D 1 / NUMBER _ FROM: COMP _~-y (!Jirrr , CU(1?O~" ::!:-tu IV::JUl> 7. FAX ~u~E~ r360\ 458-4348 NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW {o DA~~ -111/q1 I ~::!1::: SENT qc5~ SDE-2CT ~~DITIONF~ COMMENTS ********IF YOO DO NOT RECEIv~ 1>7.7, COPIES OR l>_~ COPY IS NOT PT,~~SE C~7,:, (360) 458-3244 AS SOON AS ?OSSI3LE. - -"...--- ~ ~\.:'-'=~r * ~ papo- City ofYelm 105 Yelm Avenue West POBox 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 (360) 458-3244 FACSL~=LE T~~SMIT~~ FORM 'l:'0: COM? jtij"""y , /pl [/ I I INDIVIDu.F GM a /) IJ () (! j J!7 :?--W . f I NUMBER 105- - 2-D 1/ FROM: C Ol:1P _S,b"""y (~J1;(f.~ " , (Ya{ fs!P( '--' /' :l'-Il) IV::JU;'-=. FAX ~u~ER {3601 453-4348 Dlt:::~ ND'MBER OF :?AGES :J/;?! /77 I TO FOLLOW 2-- ~IM::: S3:NT ;'~DITIONF-=- COMMENTS ********I~ ?OO DO NOT RECElv~ ~7.T, COPIES OR ~~ COpy IS NOT PT,~~SE C~i,T, (360) 458-3244 AS SOON AS ?OSSI3LE. - -..--......- ~ ~\.:_.:~ r @ ~ papt:r City of Yelm YELM WASHINGTON 105 Yelm Avenue West POBox 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 (360) 458-3244 August 22, 1996 Nlr Larry Schorno Rocky Prame Development Company POBox 480 Yelm, WA 98597 Re Approval of Amendment to SPR-8095 Dear Mr Schomo The Yelm Planrung CormmssIon has approved the amendment to the sIte plan for Prame Plaza ShoppIng Center located on the north sIde ofYelm Avenue between Plaza Dnve and Creek Street. The amended sIte plan IS approved wIth the folloWIng condItIons 1 W{) ~~ I~ ~l ~~ " ~~1, --7 J 5 tvl el;Y1V~ t~ 5 Corners/Y-2 MitIgatIOn 0 ~ , The proposed land use (lube and tire store) IS a much less mtense use Ihan the approved t!.." 1& pJJY Co)U)JA5:dl'~ I U.vId /J ~A1 +~ r,J I U0 1/2--4'18 < n D c? - ~'f--1;0 f)/'I- ~ Phase I, Tire and Lube Store: All stormwater facilItIes shalLQe deSIgned per the Thurston County Stormwater Manual. The apphcant shall submIt a Stormwater FacilItIes MaIntenance Agreement to the Clty for approval. The agreement, at a rmrumum, shall contaIn prOVISIons for JOInt ownerslup of the stormwater faCIlItIes and authonzatIOn for the assessment and collectIon of fees for maIntenance 2 Street Improvements shall Include Plaza Dnve - Full frontage Improvements to mclude two - 12' outbound dnvIng lanes, one - 16' Inbound lane, two 5' SIdewalks, two 6' planter stnps, street hghtmg and landscapIng. AddItIonal nght-of-way shall be dedicatIOn as reqUIred to meet the above standards Plaza Dnve shall remaIn pnvate untIl full build-out of the project. " .J @ Ru....cI_d P<'pu .1S a fast food. The revIsed traffic study IdentIfied a sIgrnficant reductIOn m the number J! tnps generated dunng the pm peak hour F ollowmg the same analysIs process as the ongmal study the pm peak hour traffic Impact to the 5-Corners mtersectIOn from Phase I (lube and tIre shop) wIll be four tnps SEP A mltlgatIon for thIs projects reqUIres the applIcant contribute $300 00 per pm peak tnp through the 5-Corners mtersectIOn resultmg m a contributIOn of $1 ,200 00 The traffic nutIgatIOn fee IS payable pnor to Issuance of a buildmg permIt. 4 Landscapmg Landscapmg and 1mgatIon plans shall be subnutted for approval All parlang Islands, above ground stormwater facIlItIeS, penmeter of the SIte, and the penmeter ofbuildmgs shall be landscaped. 5 Water Phase I shall connect to the eXIstmg water lme on Plaza Dnve On s1te mfrastructure for water shall be desIgned and constructed per the Yelm Development GUIdelmes. 6 Sewer Phase I shall extend the eXIstmg STEP sewer lIne located at Yelm Avenue along the Plaza Dnve frontage of Phase 1. On SIte mfrastructure for sewer shall be des1gned and constructed per the Yelm Development GUIdelmes 7 Future Amendments Any future nunor amendments to the approved SIte plan shall be processed m accordance wIth Title 17 Chapter 17 84, SIte Plan ReVIew Phase II. US Post Office 1 All stormwater facilItIes shall be deSIgned per the Thurston County Stormwater Manual. The applIcant shall subnut a Stormwater FacilItIes Mamtenance Agreement to the Crt l' for approval. The agreement, at a nurnmum, shall contam proVISIOns for Jomt ownershIp of the stormwater faCIlItIes and authonzatIOn for the assessment and collectIon of fees for mamtenance 2 Street Improvements shall mclude AlgIers Dnve - half street 1mprovements along property frontage of Phase II shall mclude one - 12' dnvmg lane, 5' SIde walk, 6' planter stnp street IIghtmg and landscapmg Upon fu1l1mprovement of Alg1ers Dnve, 1t shall be ded1cated to the C1ty as a publIc nght-of-way 2 Creek St. - half street Improvements are reqUired per final desIgn of the Creek Street Improvement ProJect. The SIte IS reqUired to dedIcate an addItlOnal 15' to accommodate half street Improvements The property owner shall partIcIpate m the Creek Street Improvement ProJect. 3 5 Comers/Y-2 MitIgatlOn The proposed land use as a Post Office IS a more mtense use than the 12,000 sf retail buildmg that was approved for tms area. Total pm peak hour traffic generated by the Post Office WIll be 81 tnps DIstributIon of the pm peak hour traffic through the 5-Corners mtersectIOn WIll be 49 tnps SEP A mltlgatIon for Phase II (Post Office) will be $14, 700~ 00 :tvlitlgatlOn fees are payable pnor to Issuance of a buildmg permIt. 4 Landscapmg Landscapmg and ImgatlOn plans shall be subIll1tted for approva1. All parkmg Islands, above ground stormwater facilItIes, penmeter of the sIte, and the penmeter ofbuildmgs shall be landscaped. 5 Water Phase II shaH be reqUired to upgrade the eXIstmg 6' water lme to a 10' water lme The upgrade shaH be from the mtersectlOn of AlgIers Dnve and Creek Street to the SW comer of Phase III. On sIte mfrastructure for water shall be deSIgned and constructed per the Yelm Development GUIdehnes. 6 Sewer Phase II shall extend the eXIstmg 4' STEP sewer lme from AlgIers/Creek St. to the SW comer of Phase III. On SIte mfrastructure for sewer shall be deSIgned and constructed per the Yelm Development GUIdelmes. 7 Future Amendments Any future mmor amendments to the approved SIte plan shall be processed m accordance WIth Title 17, Chapter 17 84, SIte Plan ReVIew Phase III. 60.000 sf of Retail Building All stormwater faCIlItIes shall be deSIgned per the Thurston County Stormwater Manual. The applIcant shall submIt a Stormwater FacilItIes Mamtenance Agreement to the CIty for approval The agreement, at a nurumum, shall contam proVISIons for JOInt ownershIp of the stormwater facllltIes and authonzatlOn for the assessment and collectlon of fees for mamtenance J 2 Street Improvements AlgIers Dnve - half street Improvements along property frontage of Phase III that IS adjacent to propertIes owned by other mdlVlduals shall mclude one - 12' dnvmg lane, 5' sIde walk, 6' planter stnp, street lIghtmg and landscapmg. Full street Improvements shall be reqUIred for Phase ill where the appbcant owns both SIdes of the road. Upon full unprovement to AlgIers Dnve, It shall be dedIcated to the City as a publIc nght-of-way AlgIers Court - shall be desIgned and constructed per the Yelm Development GUIdelmes AlgIers Court shall be dedIcated to the CIty as a publIc nght-of-way Plaza Dnve - Full frontage unprovements to mcIude two - 12' outbound dnvmg lanes, one - 16' Inbound lane, two 5' SIdewalks, two 6' planter StripS, street lIghtIng and landscapIng. AddItional nght-of-way shall be dedIcatlOn as requITed to meet the above standards. Plaza Dnve shall be dedIcated to the City of Yelm as a publIc nght-of-way upon full build-out of the proJect. .., :> 5 Comers/Y -2 Mitigation The proposed land use, 60,000 sf of retail buildmg, IS a slIghtly less Intense use than the prevIously approved 71,000 sf. The reVIsed traffic study IdentIfied a reductIon In the number of tnps generated dunng the pm peak hour 4 Followmg the same analySiS process as the anginal study, new pm peak hour traffic Impact to the 5-Comers mtersectlon from Phase III will be 63 tnps SEP A rmtIgatIOn for tills projects reqUITes the applicant contribute $300 00 per pm peak tnp through the 5 Comers mtersectIon resultmg In a contributIOn of $18,900 00 Traffic mmgatIon fees~are payable pnor to Issuance of; buildIng perrrut. , 32. p..e f ~ B ,51 pi, (, //&) ..::#-- I:: / l) Oc)(} ::::: it.3 7 Bo ~L) Landscapmg I . LandscapIng and rrngatlon plans shall be subnutted for approval. All parkmg Islands, above ground stormwater facilities, penmeter of the SIte, and the. penmeter ofbuildmgs 1l1/!..l- JoA -; ,"' Z /"""J I shall be landscaped. l_ll~PI\!'(.. ! I rJ(J - ~(/{f1..cl l~-c.k.AL=-" f.. . . I - /1/. "I ----- /j If.,. LJI < !";,:'t L Y CC:-{__ L_tf4'/..( SC~pA I (r ...-J-..( ;?- C'--l ,SiI"- ,- a/YI -'/L ~ , Water TV fJ /c<-f? ,) ?"1 <1 (/:'plc{J T7l1'-(~/}'-r. Buildmg E shall connect to the City water system on Creek S1. and be deSIgned and constructed per the Yelm Development GUidelines. All other buildIngs shall connect to the CIty water system on Plaza Dnve The water lIne connectmg to Plaza Dnve shall be looped on Site and desl!med and constructed per the Yelm Development GUldelmes. , .... '"""7\.J (I ',f ! . lYe c'_tL.... IltL f!.-<'7 tUt.t..Tr:'.{_(J;/f jU/J'f7J /)''- :t:F. -=:) .- Sewer STEP sewer collectors for Phase ill shall be detenruned at tIme of ClYl] draWIng subrmsslOn. 5 6 4 7 Future Amendments Any future mmor amendments to the approved sIte plan shall be processed m accordance WIth tItle 17, Chapter 17 84, Site Plan ReVIew If you need addItlOnal mfonnatlOn or aSSistance, please call me at 458-8408 ~U-J C~~ Cathenne Carlson CIty Planner cc Cr3.1g Steepy Shelly Badger Ken Gannann Jerry Prock 5 D /0 /)0 :Sec::L I-I /- /1m e () d et'L :JdG Pla1] PRAIRIE PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER SEe .30. T 1 7N. R 2E. W M r-- ~i' ot~'~ ./ $fA. ~8lJ.AL..lJERS IRK cr. ....--- -------------------- P3. ..,.,--~. . . .' - . : 'I>IR ': .....',:.-.. . . - [..~:~~,...,J ________--"/W "'"" - f/;~1 ---~~ SCAlL: ,...."'. .....----...;......; o 25.50 100 ~~~ BENCHMARK: ~_.: ,==:..cr=-~-=:'=-";-. _~~__.-J. ...._~ 18M: I'.A:;-..~...-._--.._---" ,,--,"~CIIIR -----.-.-~..~ /91 Cp \ II I' :\ ~ I LEGEJlD STE: DATA - I'RCPf15ED -'1> .."."."" v . -- =>lINOl<H -- "" ow .,,,'" ..",. 1DT 2-f. OF S!J-G7 '11 '1/ IMmt VALK' -- #fIIJOI(Y I'IMIK ~ OD. f'(U _ 1'.0. I1IOJl CD -op POIIDt f'(U ~~ IllI POIIDt -"""" "'" .... .="" ~ .... ...'" -....cNJ' NID. e1,.2lSS !iF. 1WWIIQ SWL$ SID STAUS 0 ",.",.,... lINHU - .......... T ..mr arr CF "'" DT ",.",.,...Pf1IfSIAL .... arr CF \WI -or ",.",.,...PC/.E c.- _BOX .......- . _1'<ISr .. ClM'Dt .... W lI<a>ooUS .... fUIC< f ......... 8 $.TLP. TN<< (QlAWTY,) ...... QUNWT --".- WA1'Df UHC 1I1D'H<lH< /Hi 0\VlIEAD POIIDt ___ -STLP. Sl'SlDf L#E '" Q.CNtWr p 3~ o.l m~ ~i ~ t SHT...!...t b YELM PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 19,1996 YELM CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS "_ "..' t 1 IL-- b~"" ~: ~j -- . " Vii ~ Agenda Item! Motion No 1 The meeting was called to order at 400 P m by Chair Tom Gorman Members present: Glenn Blando, E J Curry, Tom Gorman, Joe Huddleston, Bob Isom, Ray Kent and Roberta Longmire Members absent: Ed Pitts, Lyle Sundsmo Staff. Shelly Badger, Cathie Carlson, Ken Garmann and Dana Spivey Guests Amos Lawton, City Council liaison, Craig Steepy, S Chamberlain & Associates, Marilyn Marshall Approval of Minutes 96-21 MOTION BY ROBERTA LONGMIRE, SECONDED BY E.J CURRY TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JULY 15, 1996 AS PRINTED. CARRIED. 2. Continuation of Public Hearinq - Development Fees. Tom Gorman opened the hearing at 402 pm, and asked Cathie Carlson to give the staff report. Cathie Carlson started by saYing that the Planning Commission held a special work session to discuss the proposed changes to the Development Fee Schedule Numerous Issues were brought up, including the difference between simple and complex annexations Staff recommended on the actual application table, that "Boundary Review Board Approval" in parenthesIs be added under the Complex Annexation section Another change to the proposed table was the Appeal Fee - Staff decision, the current fee IS $25, the proposed was $150, at the work session the commiSSion members agreed on $50 for this fee On the Commission decision - Appeal Fee, the current fee IS $50, the proposed was $350, at the work session the commission decided on a fee of $100 Tom Gorman asked If there were any questions from the public? There were none Tom asked the Commission members if they had any further questions or discussion to add? There was none Tom closed the public heanng at 4 05 P m 1 ellll Planning CUlllIlli.3..Jioo August 1'1, 199E 14""""1 rD" Q_:r. A'<<" I \ / ~ ~I "~--':... Page 1 rDAA-r7 ~ 96-22 AFTER REVIEW OF EXISTING DEVELOPMENT FEES, AND COMPARISON TO FEES OF COMPARABLE COMMUNITIES, THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS DEVELOPED A REVISED DEVELOPMENT FEE SCHEDULE IF THE CITY COUNCIL DESIRES THAT FEE REVENUES COVER 30% OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUDGET, THE PLANNING COMMISSION MOVES THAT THE ATTACHED SCHEDULE BE CONSIDERED BY THE COUNCIL. MOTION SO MOVED BY ROBERTA LONGMIRE, SECONDED BY GLENN BLANDO. MOTION CARRIED. 3 Public HearinQ - SPR-8095 Amendment. Tom Gorman opened the public heanng at 407 pm, then asked the audience if there were any objections to any of the Planning Commission members present? There were none Cathie Carlson gave the staff report. The Prairie Plaza Shopping Center received binding site plan approval in May of 1994 The approval is for 71 ,000sf of retail space and a 4,OOOsf fast food pad As approved, the project IS required to construct all Infrastructure improvements (streets, utility lines, storm water) pnor to the issuance of any bUilding permits SEPA mitigation includes 5 CornerslY -2 contributions not to exceed $41,100 00, the applicant shall sign an agreement waiving any nght to protest the formation of a LID or Latecomer's Agreement and the completion of all mitigation as described In the Traffic Impact Analysis Prairie Plaza Site Plan Amendment includes constructing the project in three phases, replacing the fast food pad (4,000sf) with a lube and tire shop (6,300sf) and replacing a 12,000sf retail bUilding with a 6,800sf Post Office The Impacts identified In the onglnal analysIs for the project change slightly by the proposed amendment. Storm water and traffic impacts have been re-accessed based on the new proposal Cathie stated that staff recommends the Site Plan Amendment for Prairie Plaza be approved with attached conditions T om Gorman asked if there were any questions from the Commission members Roberta Lonqmlre stated that she does not feel that the P M peak hours are the busiest time at the Post Office, she feels that the time period between 10'00 a.m. - 1 00 P m. IS a classic example of a busy time at the current Post Office felm Plalllling Commission August 1'1, 1996 Page 2 rDRA1-'7 Cathie Carlson agreed that from 1000-1 00 P m is very busy at the Post Office, and If they were gOing to be site specific then they would use those hours in the traffic study The P M peak hours (4 30-6 00 pm) are used In this study because that is the city's most congested time In the whole city The traffic IS bUSiest on most of the main streets, side streets, as well as at the Post Office, grocery store etc at this time In the day Craiq Steepy, from S Chamberlain & Assoc , affirmed Cathie's statement, and added that different land uses have different "peak hours" - but the overall bUSiest and congested time in the whole city IS during the P M peak hours The Post Office parking lot may be very full and congested during the 10'00 - 1 00 P m. time frame, but the rest of the street system IS working 0 K. Shelly Badqer added that the congested parking lot problem at the current Post Office site was factored Into this study, so this won't be a problem at the new site Ray Kent stated that he IS concerned about the flow of traffic and the ingress and egress at the proposed site of the new Post Office E.J. Curry stated that It seems there will be many cars coming down side streets to get to the new Post Office site rather than uSing Yelm Avenue and the new Five Corners Intersection Shelly Badqer stated that there will be road Improvements on Creek Street, Plaza Drive and Algiers Drive which will better accommodate for added vehicles traveling to the Post Office Tom Gorman asked if there were any further questions? Roberta Lonqmire inqUired about the street Improvements on Algiers Drive and Algiers Court. There was much discussion regarding Algiers Dr & Algiers Ct. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission members that Algiers Drive should have half street Improvements along property frontage of Phase III that is adjacent to properties owned by other individuals, and shall include one - 12' driving lane, 5' sidewalk, 6' planter strip, street lighting and landscaping Full street improvements should be required for Phase III where the applicant owns both Sides of the road Upon full improvement to Algiers Drive, it should be dedicated to the City as a public right of way rellfl flann.ing _ 'll1mission August l~, 19% Page 3 rD. 0 .t\ .CT tlillRr:I.~ The Planning Commission members also concurred that Algiers Court should be designed ad constructed per the Yelm Development GUidelines Algiers Court should be dedicated to the City as a public right-of-way Tom Gorman asked If there were any comments or questions from the public? Craiq Steepy. representinq Rocky Prairie Development - asked about when Algiers IS dedicated will It change their frontage improvement requirements for Algiers? Cathie Carlson - No, It would not. E.J. Curry made the comment that she is warned about traffic being very congested in these areas Cathie Carlson stated that part of the transportation and traffic plan is to have the traffic light at Five Corners and at Nisqually Plaza be coordinated for less congestion Tom Gorman asked If there were any further questions or comments? There were none, Tom closed the public heanng at 450 P m 96-23 MOTION BY E.J. CURRY, SECONDED BY ROBERTA LONGMIRE TO APPROVE THE SITE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR PRAIRIE PLAZA, AS PER THE APPROVAL LETTER WITH AMENDED PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS ATTACHED MOTION CARRIED. Cathie Carlson made announcements before the next agenda Item because E J Curry had to leave meeting Cathie stated that Perry Shea will be at the next meeting, September 16th, to give a presentation on the Transportation Impact Analysis Studies 4 Public Hearinq - Comprehensive Plan Amendment: Tom Gorman opened the public heanng at 5 05 P m Tom asked If there was any conflict of interest from the public or the Planning Commission members? There were none Cathie Carlson gave the staff report and pointed out the four proposed revisions to the Land Use Map, that make up the proposed Camp Plan amendment. The first site, has been annexed into the City, Ordinance No 577 \elm P13nning Commission August 19, 1 'JC)f Page 4 .. ... rDAA~7. The second site has been rezoned from Industnal to Moderate Density Residential The third and fourth sItes are corrections to the City Zoning Map in the comprehensive plan No text or policy changes are proposed to the comprehensive plan Tom Gorman asked If there were any questions from the Planning Commission members or from the public? There were none Tom closed the public hearing at 5 11 pm 96-24 MOTION BY JOE HUDDLESTON, SECONDED BY GLENN BLANDO TO APPROVE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS, AS DESCRIBED IN THE STAFF REPORT ATTACHED. MOTION CARRIED Meeting adjourned at 5 15 P m Respectfully submitted, Tom Gorman, Chairperson Date Yellll Planning Cuwmission August 1Q, 1996 Page 5 "'- / /i> . . p\(J. .> ~~k City of Yelm ~ ,........,~-- YELM WASHINGTON 105 Yelm Avenue West POBox 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 (360) 458-3244 August 22, 1996 Mr Larry Schorno Rocky Prame Development Company POBox 480 Yelm, WA 98597 Re Approval of Amendment to SPR-8095 Dear NIl' Schorno \. The Yelm Planrung CorrumssIon has approved the amendment to the sIte plan for Prame Plaza Shoppmg Center located on the north sIde ofYelm Avenue between Plaza Dnve and Creek Street. The amended sIte plan IS approved WIth the followmg condItIOns Phase I, Tire and Lube Store: 1 All stormwater facilIties shall be designed per the Thurston County Stormwater Manual. The apphcant shall submit a Stormwater FacilIties Mamtenance Agreement to the CIty for approval. The agreement, at a rmrumum, shall contam proVISIons for Jomt ownerslnp of the stormwater facihtles and authonzatIOn for the assessment and collectIOn of fees for mamtenance 2 5/ rl~ s-rt 0'11 ~;J 5 C orners/Y - 2 MitIgatIOn 0 ~ , The proposed land use (lube and tire store) IS a much less mtense use than the approved / ,\ ~ ~JJ ~f,0.,r- / l2,ki (JrJA'J~ IIJ '-1UU / f"J..).f'18 Street Improvements shall mclude Plaza Dnve - Full frontage Improvements to mclude two - 12' outbound drIvmg lanes, one - 16' mbound lane, two 5' Sidewalks, two 6' planter StrIpS, street lIghtmg and landscapmg. AdditIOnal nght-of-way shall be dedicatIOn as reqUIred to meet the above standards Plaza Dnve shall remam prIvate untIl full build-out of the project .., -' * R~c...ckd JXlP~r / I / -, / v. use as a fast food. The revIsed traffic study IdentIfied a sIgmficant reductIon m the number oftnps generated dunng the pm peak hour F ollowmg the same analysIs process as the ongmal study the pm peak hour traffic Impact to the 5-Corners mtersectIOn from Phase I (lube and tIre shop) wIll be four tnps SEP A mItIgatIOn for thIS projects reqUIres the applIcant contribute $300 00 per pm peak tnp through the 5-Corners mtersectlon resultmg m a contributIOn of $1,200 00 The traffic lllitlgatIOn fee IS payable pnor to Issuance of a buildmg permIt. 4 Landscapmg Landscapmg and IrrIgatIOn plans shall be submItted for approval All parkmg Islands, above ground stormwater facilItIes, penmeter of the SIte, and the penmeter ofbuildmgs shall be landscaped. 5 Water Phase I shall connect to the eXIstmg water lme on Plaza Dnve On SIte mfrastructure for water shall be deSIgned and constructed per the Yelm Development GUIdelInes 6 Sewer Phase I shall extend the eXIstmg STEP sewer lme located at Yelm Avenue along the Plaza Dnve frontage of Phase 1. On SIte Infrastructure for sewer shall be desIgned and constructed per the Yelm Development GUIdelmes 7 Future Amendments Any future lllinor amendments to the approved SIte plan shall be processed m accordance WIth Title 17, Chapter 17 84, SIte Plan ReVIew Phase II. US Post Office All stormwater facilItIes shall be deSIgned per the Thurston County Stormwater Manual. The applIcant shall submIt a Stormwater FaCIlItIes Mamtenance Agreement to the CIty for approval. The agreement, at a lllimmum, shall contam proVISIons for Jomt ownershIp of the stormwater facilItIes and authonzatIOn for the assessment and collectIOn of fees for mamtenance. 2 Street Improvements shall mclude AlgIers Dnve - half street Improvements along property frontage of Phase II shall mclude one - 12' dnvmg lane, 5' SIde walk, 6' planter stnp, street IIghtmg and landscapmg. Upon full Improvement of AlgIers Dnve, It shall be dedIcated to the CIty as a publIc nght-of-way 2 , -0 ....0. Co Creek St. - half street Improvements are reqUIred per final desIgn of the Creek Street Improvement Project. The sIte IS reqUIred to dedIcate an addItIOnal IS' to accommodate half street Improvements The property owner shall partICIpate m the Creek Street Improvement Project. 3 5 Corners/Y-2 MitIgatIOn The proposed land use as a Post Office IS a more mtense use than the 12,000 sf retail buIldmg that was approved for thIS area. Total pm peak hour traffic generated by the Post Office WIll be 81 trIpS DIstributIOn of the pm peak hour traffic through the 5-Corners mtersectIOn will be 49 trIpS SEP A mItIgatIOn for Phase II (Post Office) will be $14,700100 J'vlitigation fees are payable pnor to Issuance of a buildmg permIt 4 Landscapmg Landscapmg and ImgatIOn plans shall be submItted for approval. All parkIng Islands, above ground stormwater facilItIes, penmeter of the site, and the perImeter of buildmgs shall be landscaped. 5 Water Phase II shall be reqUIred to upgrade the eXIstmg 6' water lme to a 10' water lme The upgrade shall be from the mtersectIon of AlgIers Dnve and Creek Street to the SW corner of Phase III. On sIte Infrastructure for water shall be deSIgned and constructed per the Yelm Development GUIdelInes 6 Sewer Phase II shall extend the eXIstmg 4' STEP sewer lme from AlgIers/Creek S1. to the SW corner of Phase III. On sIte mfrastructure for sewer shall be deSIgned and constructed per the Yelm Development GUIdelInes. 7 Future Amendments Any future mInor amendments to the approved sIte plan shall be processed m accordance WIth Title 17, Chapter 17 84, Site Plan ReVIew Phase m. 60,000 sf of Retail Buildin2 1 All stormwater facilItIes shall be deSIgned per the Thurston County Stormwater Manual. The applIcant shall submIt a Stormwater FaCIlItIes Mamtenance Agreement to the CIty for approval. The agreement, at a mInimum, shall contam proVISIons for Jomt ownershIp of the stormwater facilItIes and authonzatIOn for the assessment and collectIon of fees for mamtenance 3 -.. ll',~ 2 Street Improvements AlgIers Dnve - half street Improvements along property frontage of Phase ill that IS adjacent to propertIes owned by other mdlVlduals shall mclude one - 12' dnvmg lane, 5' sIde walk, 6' planter stnp, street lIghtmg and landscapmg. Full street Improvements shall be reqUIred for Phase III where the applIcant owns both SIdes of the road. Upon fullllTIprovement to AlgIers Dnve, It shall be dedIcated to the CIty as a publIc nght-of-way Alglers Court - shall be deSIgned and constructed per the Yelm Development GUidelInes Alglers Court shall be dedIcated to the City as a publIc nght-of-way Plaza Dnve - Full frontage Improvements to mclude two - 12' outbound dnvmg lanes, one - 16' mbound lane, two 5' SIdewalks, two 6' planter StrIpS, street lIghtmg and landscapmg. AddItIOnal nght-of-way shall be dedIcatiOn as reqUIred to meet the above standards. Plaza Dnve shall be dedicated to the City of Yelm as a publIc nght-of-way upon full build-out of the proJect. ..., .) 5 Corners/Y -2 MitIgatIon The proposed land use, 60,000 sf of retail buildmg, is a slIghtly less mtense use than the prevIously approved 71,000 sf The reVIsed traffic study IdentIfied a reductIOn m the number of tnps generated dunng the pm peak hour 4 Followmg the same analYSIS process as the ongtnal study, new pm peak hour traffic impact to the 5-Corners mtersectIOn from Phase ill will be 63 tnps SEP A rmtIgatIOn for tlus projects reqUIres the applIcant contribute $300 00 per pm peak tnp through the 5 Corners mtersectIOn resultmg m a contributIOn of $18,900 00 Traffic ITlmgatIon fees are payable pnor to Issuance of a building perrmt. , 32. pd .j ~ 0 61ff. 3/4 :If- (:= /2..1000 ~ 11 3790 rdJ Landscapmg J Landscapmg and rrngatIon plans shall be subrrutted for approval. All parkmg Islands, above ground stormwater facilItIes, penmeter of the SIte, and the.penmeter ofbuildmgs shall be landscaped. eh. ~+<< J'1 B 0 - b tt"OJ, Cod L., StJ:Jt11. t-qj rvZ. LIMe( sCPp lilt c{- :J-/ I J&ec:t> ov- jJllVVI j/ Water -tv P/dAlrJt"lc; U.trJeU'~q-. Buildmg E shall connect to the City water system on Creek S1. and be deSigned and constructed per the Yelm Development GUidelInes. All other buildmgs shall connect to the City water system on Plaza Dnve The water lme connectmg to Plaza Dnve shall be looped on SIte and deSIgned and constructed per the Yelm Developme.nt GUIdelines. N e ut.- ']) tLt ~ /).J iL-T q C!-onStb!/i\tiJ rJP.- -:IF 1:5 - Sewer STEP sewer collectors for Phase ill shall be deterrmned at tIme of clVll drawmg subrrussIOn. 5 6 4 . - . q ". "'A.4t; OJ J-,J' ' 7 Future Amendments Any future mmor amendments to the approved sIte plan shall be processed m accordance WIth tItle 17, Chapter 17 84, Site Plan ReVIew If you need addItIOnal mformation or assIstance; please call me at 458-8408 ~UJ C~~ Cathenne Carlson City Planner cc CraIg Steepy Shelly Badger Ken Garmann Jerry Prock 5 H/A-j /I tf7 f.-fl d ec:L :5 d G Plan PfO po 5&L /91&.~ PRAIRIE PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER SEC. .30 T 17N. R 2E.. W M III I- -I -, ~.... Q+2Cl.8 PLt7A. CRnIE- 5TA- Hi:lUIIII A[Qms MM' 3J -:.:- SCALE: ,....50' ~~~~oo ~ i ~ D1JeALDAltlW BENCHMARK. "_4...-n~....... -.n___z &I:l:_~___~~~. _MIlIIW.......__~ -- IBM M._.-'~_"'--"r.__cr _~"'~1IIllIn: ___'--(XIII. _".-.. ~ . LEGEJlD ! DIS7INC ,.,.",.,.. ~~ v v -- "" .., .."" ..,.. p " W ., _0 VALM: -" ~~='~-=~~-f P<U_ -<>p _P<U i 18I -- "f GAS ...... I OT mD'HONE __ OT mD'HONE ....",..... , ..., mD'HONE P<U , c. -""" I ~ WR_ i ....""'" *' -- 1l<CIllOOUS_ i l... FDIC< , f .....- \ : 8 ~T.E.P. TNII( (QMwn? \ "'-~ ... ......~ --- -.- _mtLME TE1DIlOMi: .- ~1'CfIER ____ -ST.E.P Sl'SlDf UHC "'~ ~ 1\Ula" __ ..".,..... -- U1T ~ ", ....", - ...,........ CG. ~.o. .. .8) !ILII,...- C>OII__ -- -- _ SfNJS - ."" -- D ~~ 3~ g"t. ~~ ~~ g,,~ t fUf"" ......". -...... allDCIAL arr " "'" arr " ..... CT. .....---- ---- --- ------- ---- I"'~-----~ p-~~~ '''-'''1 ~ " j.,' " '''""'' - ~,,~. -.l ,- .t -~ - - - - ---,------,.-~-,--...--------- City of Yelm 105 Ye!m Avenue West PO Box 479 , , Yelm, Washington 98597 (360). 458-3244 Date August 14, 1996 To Planmng CommIsSIOn From CathIe carlso~y Plan~er Re SIte Plan Amendment for Prame Plaza, SPR~8095. Background Prame PlazaShoppmg Center recelVedhndmg SIte plan approval m May of 1994 The approval IS for 71,000 sf ofretal1 space and a 4,000 sffast food pad. As approved, the project IS reqUlred to construct all mfrastructure Improvements (streets, utihty hnes, stormwater) .pnot to the Issuance of any buildmg penmts. SEP A mItIgatlOn mcludes 5 Corners/Y -2 coptributions not to exceed $41,100 00, the apphcant shall SIgn an agreement walvmg any,nght to protest the formation of a LID or Latecomer's Agreement and tne completIOn of al,l mItlgatlOn as described m the Traffic Impact AnalYSIS Ongmal SIte plan attached ~roposal Frame Plaza SIte Plan Amendment nicludes constructmg the project m three phases, repl~cmg the fast food pad (4,000 sf) WIth a lube and tIre shop (6,3 00 sf), and replacmg a 12,000 sf retail bUlldmg~lth a 6,800 ~fPostOffic~ Amended site plan attached. Analvsis The Impacts IdentIfied m the ongmal analYSIS for the project change shghtly by the propose~ amendment. 'Stormwater and traffi<';lmpacts have been re-accessedcbased on the new proposal. "Stormwater f The ongmalprehmmary stormwater report, calculatIOns and conceptual layout were based on the assumptIOn that the entire SIte would bedevelopeo at one tIme The p~ehmmary plans were to prOVIde stormwater facilltle~ throughout the SIte servmg more th<;tn one arealbuildmg. , With the proposed phasmg of the project It IS necessary to ensure eac;:h phase fully cont~llhs all stbrmwatergenerated by the SIte development of each phase- The apphcant has submItted a * Recycled paper ~ -~---- ------------- -~- -- revised stormwater plan and report as an element of the amendment. Stormwater for each phase will be designed and constructed to accommodate stormwater generated by that phase No shared stormwater facilities are proposed with the phasmg plan. Traffic The ongmal traffic analysis, prepared by S Chamberlam and ASSOCIates, identIfied the number of tnps generated by the proposed uses, the distributIOn of those tnps, and the rmtigatIOn necessary to reduce the impacts of the additIOnal traffic on the road system. Based on the proposed new uses, S Chamberlam and ASSOCiates, reevaluated the traffic impacts and the appropnate mitigatIon. Because of a sigmficant reductIOn m pm peak hour tnps generated by the proposed amendment and the planned constructIOn of the 5-Corners Signal the reVised traffic report finds that momtonng and future SignalizatIon at the mtersectIOn of Plaza Dnve and Yelm Avenue is not longer warranted. The remammg rmtigatIOn measures remam m place, with mmor modIficatIOns, and are identIfied below under each Phase of the project Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the SIte Plan Amendment for Prame Plaza be approved WIth the followmg conditIOns Phase I, Tire and Lube Store: All stormwater facilitieS shall be deSigned per the Thurston County Stormwater Manual. The stormwater facilities shall be deSigned and constructed for Phase I stormwater only 2 Street Improvements shall mclude Plaza Dnve - Full frontage improvements to mclude two - 12' outbound dnvmg lanes, one - 16' mbound lane, two 5' sIdewalks, two 6' planter stnps, street hghtmg and landscapmg. AddItIOnal nght-of-way shall be dedIcatIOn as reqUIred to meet the above standards Plaza Dnve shall remam pnvate until full build-out of the project 3 5 Corners/Y-2 MitigatIOn The proposed land use (lube and tire store) is a much less mtense use than the approved use as a fast food. The reVIsed traffic study identified a sigmficant reductIOn m the number of tnps generated dunng the pm peak hour Followmg the same analYSIS process as the ongmal study the pm peak hour traffic impact to the 5 -Corners mtersectIOn from Phase I (lube and tire shop) will be four tnps SEP A mitigatIOn for thIS projects reqUIres the applicant contribute $300 00 per pm peak tnp through the 5 Corners mtersectIOn resultmg m a contributIOn of $1 ,200 00 The traffic mitigatIOn fee IS payable pnor to Issuance of a buildmg permIt. 4 Landscapmg Landscapmg and IrngatIon plans shall be submItted for approval. All parkmg Islands, above ground stormwater facilItIes, penmeter of the sIte, and the penmeter of buildmgs shall be landscaped. 5 Water Phase I shall connect to the eXIstmg water lme on Plaza Dnve On sIte mfrastructure for water shall be desIgned and constructed per the Yelm Development GUIdelInes 6 Sewer Phase I shall extend the eXIstmg STEP sewer lIne located at Yelm Avenue along the Plaza Dnve frontage of Phase I. On sIte mfrastructure for sewer shall be desIgned and constructed per the Yelm Development GUIdelmes. Phase II. US Post Office I All stormwater facIlItIes shall be desIgned per the Thurston County Stormwater Manual. The stormwater facilItIes shall be desIgned and constructed for Phase II stormwater only 2 Street Improvements, slIghtly modIfied from ongmal approval, shall mclude AlgIers Dnve - half street Improvements along property frontage of Phase II shall mclude one - 12' dnvmg lane, 5' sIde walk, 6' planter stnp, street lIghtmg and landscapmg. The sIte IS reqUIred to dedIcate addItIonal nght-of-way necessary to accommodate half street Improvements AlgIers Dnve shall remam a pnvate road. Creek S1. - half street Improvements are reqUIred per final desIgn of the Creek Street Improvement Project The sIte IS reqUIred to dedIcate an addItIOnal 15' to accommodate half street Improvements The property owner shall partICIpate m the Creek Street Improvement Project 3 5 Corners/Y -2 MitIgatIon The proposed land use, Post Office IS a more mtense use than the 12,000 sfretail buildmg that was approved for thIS area. Because the operatIon of the Yelm Post Office IS predommately mail boxes rather than route servIce, the InstItute of TransportatIOn Engmeers, Tnp GeneratIOn Manual. 5th EdItIon, does not prOVIde accurate mformatIon on tnp generatIon. To establIsh an accurate tnp generatIOn number a pm peak count at the eXIstmg post office was done The pm peak tnps were compared to the eXIstmg number of mail boxes m the post office to establIsh a ratIO of tnps to mail boxes Total pm peak hour traffic generated by the Post Office will be 81 tnps DIstributIon of the pm peak hour traffic has not be establIshed at the tIme of staff report Final dIstributIon and Impact to the 5-Corners intersectIOn from Phase II (Post Office) will be completed by the Plannmg CommIssIOn PublIc Heanng on August 19, 1996 Staffwill make a final recommendatIOn on SEP A mItIgatIOn for 5-Corners at the PublIc Heanng. 4 Landscapmg Landscapmg and IrrIgatIOn plans shall be submItted for approval. All parlang Islands, above ground stormwater facilItIes, penmeter of the SIte, and the penmeter ofbuildmgs shall be landscaped. 5 Water Phase II shall be reqUIred to upgrade the eXIstmg 6' water lme to a 10' water lme The upgrade shall be from the mtersectIOn of AlgIers Dnve and Creek Street to the SW corner of Phase III. On SIte Infrastructure for water shall be deSIgned and constructed per the Yelm Development GUIdelInes. 6 Sewer Phase II shall extend the eXIstmg 4' STEP sewer lme from AlgIers/Creek St. to the SW corner of Phase III. On SIte mfrastructure for sewer shall be deSIgned and constructed per the Yelm Development GUIdelmes. Phase ill. 60.000 sf of Retail BuildiDl! All stormwater facilItIes shall be deSIgned per the Thurston County Stormwater Manual. The stormwater facilItIes shall be deSIgned and constructed for Phase III stormwater only 2 Street Improvements AlgIers Dnve - half street Improvements along property frontage of Phase II shall mclude one - 12' dnvmg lane, 5' sIde walk, 6' planter stnp, street IIghtmg and landscapmg. The SIte IS reqUIred to dedIcate addItIOnal nght-of-way necessary to accommodate half street Improvements AlgIers Dnve shall remam a pnvate road AlgIers Court - shall be deSIgned and constructed per the Yelm Development GUIdelInes AlgIers Court shall remam a pnvate road. Plaza Dnve - Full frontage Improvements to mclude two - 12' outbound dnvmg lanes, one - 16' mbound lane, two 5' sIdewalks, two 6' planter stnps, street IIghtmg and landscapmg. AddItIOnal nght-of-way shall be dedIcatIOn as reqUIred to meet the above standards Plaza Dnve shall remam pnvate until full build-out of the project 3 5 Corners/Y-2 MitIgatIOn The proposed land use, 60,000 sf of retaIl buildmg, IS a slIghtly less mtense use than the prevIOusly approved 71,000 sf The revIsed traffic study IdentIfied a reductIOn m the number of tnps generated dunng the pm peak hour Followmg the same analysIs process as the ongmal study, new pm peak hour traffic Impact to the 5-Corners mtersectIOn from Phase III will be 63 tnps. SEP A mItIgatIOn for thIS projects reqUIres the applIcant contribute $300 00 per pm peak tnp through the 5 Corners mtersectIOn resultmg m a contributIon of$18,900 00 Traffic mItIgatIOn fees are payable pnor to Issuance of a buildmg permIt 4 Landscapmg Landscapmg and IrngatIOn plans shall be submItted for approval. All parkmg Islands, above ground stormwater facilItIes, penmeter of the sIte, and the penmeter ofbuildmgs shall be landscaped. 5 Water BUIldmg E shall connect to the water system on Creek St. and be desIgned and constructed per the Yelm Development GUIdelInes All other buildmgs shall connect to the water system on Plaza Dnve The water lme connectmg to Plaza Dnve shall be looped on sIte and desIgned and constructed per the Yelm Development GUIdelmes. 6 Sewer STEP sewer collectors for Phase III shall be determmed at tIme of cIvil drawmg submIssIon. ...... -'. ~ \<O'neAl. DAft/i/ A1NT~OF'DK.7HlEJIS 5/fe-- P; tLf) If1+ /J1~ BENCHMARK. 0IrS0.lD Y' II HOIIH..lST coP;tiOff TOP Of' SQlJ1HE.AS7tRll' ur;HT STNI>AII/) aEVAncw .. J$O.1O /" --.. ......."'-;:-.7~~___...-....--~--- lEGEND =-- + smxw C>>lle 0 rDIRBE rDIRBE m;lmlftN/T .",,,""'" ~ It "'~VAL\of' 1 "" NOQf <\; Pr1fERFaE " ..-..-.-. t' GU'VAL'If OT ~""'""" m """"'" FfI6TAI. ""; """"'" "" ::I.; """"",sax ..-- -""" "" """"'TREE 0 """""""- """ -- 8 SUP. S1SmI ... ..- =-n- '"'- -IMPUr<<" ~UH< - ..... _~ snlEW tK ~ ","". . - . - ,------_. ~'~T:' "" . ,"!TAL .~ '#' f~~f'~~~.:~~::@ ~ I III I III ~BY ....'" BY oe:om BY ...'" SCAlE ~ -[I] JOB TI TLE. PRAIRIE PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER YELM WASHINGTON S. CHAMBERLAIN ~._ ;'..", & ASSOCIATES, INC ~::~.;;.,.____ _.._./.~._ "- II'fGIJaDZNCo ~.lHJ) sc:rvrroo; samt:EI ~...:. ~_n_ n_'.- ~~~~ =:-:. (2Oe) ~ (toe) 4.8S-I47e ,n ~ ,.-.,. '..."!.' N ~'OJ' ~ ~4.J~ SITE DATA SECTION 30, T17N, R2E W.M. PARCEl. ,. 2273Ol101W 22730II01CU 2273<UOl01 LOTS 2-4 Of 55-8017 OllNER: ROCKY PRAIRIE ~ co. P.o. BOX 480 mAl. WA 98597 (206) 458-2201 SITE AREA BUILDING AREA PARKING STALLS ZONING WA1ER SEIIfR 12.32 AC 75,000 SF 375 ST ALL.S COMMERCIAL CITY OF YF:J.M CITY OF YF:J.M IIICINITY UAP DRAWING TITLE. SITE/UTILITY PLAN N'PRO'rKD n:.w CXWS1RfJC1IC)I B~ DATE: orr PUflJC *'RKS DCPT. 11\ ~ . I L I~ I:. I~ I I I ~l ffi Ii -~ " "'" Nt.UlER """'" lIRA__ ~ l>ET ..La'..L p(O po:suL I~ iY1 fJ 1 cl tfL :Sd0 (./It( n I I [^-'i _ ~ '7.).. S fi 0 f' f' rNG c ];:N'l'];:F p:RAlF.fe:: P~o I nN R zE:.. 'IV M sE:e J ~ Si~ ........ ftJPS jiii>< ., >"." \ i \ ~ ~ ~ IOJ --- . \ \ . \ \ ~--~\ \ ) \ 0~ .:/ -~,\ ~~::.:,J..-~~~i.\ I . \ \ \ ' \ I '\ . \ . \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ . \ \ . \ \ \ \ \ \ / \ \ ------// \ . ------- --.----" \ r--.....-- . -el, " - ..-----J- \:-c,-,",~~~~vJ; - !' ~~,~ :-:; -<yq; ~ rJJ 'V . ""~cr. ..,~ <1' 6ENCti~.-,~"~"...r:" . ::r.J ~J'r? ~~-- 113M' ~.--"..--, ~rJ'''''''- t..E;GfN..JL.---- ~ -----=-- f'IIdi'-" ~ l>'5""'''''''''''' r:u-- . .....~ ""...~""""" "" ... .."" ...... ...-- 'I ., .."" v"'''' if:(',::tflt< <t> ",r."'-' ~~ ",."..",r. ~,r. ",."..~ ~~ ~". .....v"'... ~.......~ """""" ..........."" ':l:< ~ ~ """""" Pfll'S'''' ..... """"""",r. .....,....""" ..P"'" "",""" """","'" ~"'" ""'" ..,...", B ~,JJ'. ",t< (.....r<) ",' ~~ .~ ..""..... ---~. """"""..... _ ~ "...,.00 ,.,." _---- ___ .-sld srs'fOl~ .... IV oP""" .or IS ~. 0, 0' -<<; c. '" ~""--"<"\ ~..,..- - ,..,' ~... " .... - ~ ;;i\< ..... ~ \ i ~\ P<,\ ~ ( P<~ t '~y?\ f- P.O 86x3485, Lacey, Wash i ngtoh 98509c3485 677 Woodland SquareLp SI: Lacey, Washingtol1.98503 Lacey (360) 493c6002 Fax (360) 493c2476 Yelm (360) 458c2487 '" ... ........ A ~._""'"==----. --,~---_.~.,=,_.,_.~""~ '---' S.Chamberlain & Associat~s, Inc. August 13, 1996 F.!E'==-=> If?"<.. F"'E"' ~ - , ' . D"~ 1 ~{ f' CM R C n f7 r-:.' 1'"\\ '., 'i',iI,-", ' "'1' ';.:' " ' \. " I ' ifJ ~' 1//' ","_;~' '';j ~,J _ .:J I, I' -, .--... - '"HI ((\1lm~", :',MIm III Iii \., ~' lt~~~v~.~,......~........: '. .~<I"'l.."i.t",,,,,,,,,;,,,^,, ," , . ~ i ,"' '/,t>..~ ...,.tr~!-!:J.l "~'~$:":i-~"'l '?'l..... 'if' ~ 1~~~~~~~~~~.A&~ , CathIe Carlson, CIty Planner CIty ofYelm PO Box 479 Yelm, W A 98597 Re. Prairie Plaza Center.., Addendum to Traffic Impact Analysis SeA Project #93028.1 Dear CathIe ThIs 'letter IS to provIde updated traffic mformatlOn regardmg the proposed amendments to the Pralne Plaza CommercIal Center On behalf of Rocky Pralne Development Company, a complete transportatlOn Impact analYSIS (TIA) was prepared by S Chamberlam & AssocIates, Inc. (SCA) and approved by the CIty of Yelm m June 1993 The Qngmal TIA provIded estlmates of sIte traffic volumes, IdentIfied potentlallmpacts and proposed mltlgatlOn measures for an 80',0'0'0' square foot faclllty; (the actual SIze of the approved faclhty was 75,0'0'0' sqliare feet) Table 1 shows the tnp generatlOn from the ongmal approved land uses and SIte plan. TABLE 1 Estimated Traffic Generation Ongmal Pralne 'Plaza Shoppmg Center Yelm, Washmgton i Evemng Peak Hour Dally Land-Use Traffic Enter EXlt Total Fast- Food Rest. (Land Use Code 834) 90' 85 175 3,035 DIscounted for MIxed-Use (20'%) 70 70' 140 2,425 SUBTOTAL 70' 70' 140' 2,425 Shoppmg Center 210' 210' 420' 4,67() (Land Use Code 820') Total Dnveway Volumes 280' 280' 560' 7,10'0' Total New SIte-Generated Traffic' 19'5 195 390' 4,970' (With 30'% Pass-by DlflCount) \ Based upon the expected traffic created,by the proposed development, the followmg mltlgatlOn measures were recommended for the orlgmai SIte plan. ENGINEERING PLANNING . SURVEYING . ----,(-:==.- ....."........-"_.'""" ~~~ CathIe Carlson , August 13, 1996 Page 2 , Previous Off~Site Mitigation Per Site Plan ApPioval (-!une 1993) , 1 Momtor the traffic operatIOns of the YelJ Avenue/3rd Street IntersectIOn. 2 ProvIde preparatIOns to share contnbutIOns t the "FIve Corners'" mtersectIon Improvements. 3 Implement frontage Improvements that contribute to a three-lane cross-sectIOn along Yelm Avenue (These Imp~ovements have been completed, June 1994 ) 1 4. Momtor the traffic operatIOns for future sIgn hzatIon of the Plaza DrlvelYelm Avenue mtersectIOn. l 5 Momtor the traffic operatIOns. of the Vanc' RoadlYelm Avenue IntersectIOn. } Previous On-Site Mitigation Per Site Plan Approval (June 1993) 6 Widen eXlstmg Plaza Dnve to 40 foot wIdth. 7 ProvIde sIdewalks amd hghtmg along Plaza DrIve and AlgIers Dnve Proposed Site Plan Amendments I. The proposed amend~ents to the sIte plan mcludl breakmg the proJect I mto three separate phases and modlfymg some of the land uses. Phase 1, locateq m the southern most pad and adJacent tal Yelm Avenue, wIll be modIfied to accommodate a bUIldmg speclahzm~ m automotIve care mcludmg such potentIal activItIes as an 011 chaJge facihty" tire store, muffler shop, etc. ThIS use wIll be III heu of the Imml-mart or fast food restaurant mltIally proposed for thIS pad. l Phase 2 of the' proJect, located m the easter~ port' on of the SIte between' I ' Yelm West Court and Creek Street, .IS. bemg proppsed to accommodate a new 6,000 square foot US Post Office m place o~ an 11,000 square foot retaIl bUIldIng The proposal for the other 12,eOO square foot retaIl bUIldmg IS unchanged,. however, It will be bUIlt m phase 3 \ Phase 3 wIll mclude the remamder o;th~ SIte an~ no SIte plan -elements or lflnd uses are bemg changed at thIS tIme I TrIp generatIOn was recalculated based upon the Jew land use condItIOns" I , ' ENGINEERING , SURVEYING PLANNING . . ~QtZ\ , Cathie Carlson August 13,1996 Page 3 Tnp gener~tlOn was recalculated based upon the new land use condltlOns hsted above AutomobIle Care Center = 2 87 pea~ hour tnps per 1,000 sf (2.87)(6 36) = 18 U S Po~t Office = 43 peak hour tnps per 1,000 Post Office Boxes (43)(269) = 115 peak hour tnps SpecIalty Retail = 5 24 peak hour tnps per 1,000 sf \ (5 24)(60) = 314 peak hour tnps' Table 2 shows the new tnp generatlOn for the SIze and land uses bt;mg proposed m thIS amendment. TABLE 2 Estimated Traffic Generation Amended PraIne Plaza ShoppIng Center Yelm, WashIngton Evemng Peak Hour Land Use , Enter EXIt Total Auto Care Center (840) '8 10 18 MIxed Use DIscount (20%) /' -2 ! , -2 -4 Pass- By DIscount -2 -3 -5 U S Post Office(732) 57 58 115 MIxed Use DIscount (0%) 0 0 0 Pass-By DIscount (30%)- -17 -17 -34 ShoPPIng Center (840) 157 157 314 MIxed Use DIscount (20%) -31 -31 -62 Pass-by DIscount (30%) -47 -47 ! -94 \ Total New to Network Tnps 123 125 , 248 VehIcle tnp dIstnbutlOn was apphed to the street network USIng the assumptlOns made In the ongInal report whlCh Included the use of Yelm's transportatlOn plannIng model, FIgures 1-3 show the tnp rn.strIbutlOn for each IndIVIdual' phase to assIst In the appropnate mItIgatIOn' fees estabhshed for FlVe Corners FIgure 4 shows the combIned traffic upon proJect bUlldout. Based upon the changes to the, sIte plan, proposed land uses and other condltlOns whIch have been modIfied, the folloWIng reVISIOns _ are__ ENGINEERING PLANNING . I SURVEYING . 'SG~?\ CathIe Carlson August 13, 1996 Page 4 " recommended to the seven mltIgatlOn measures descrIbed prevlOusly m thIS letter Revised Off-Site Mitigation 1 Momtor the Yelm Avenue/3rd Street IntersectlOn. ThIs mltIgatlOn measure does not change and the prevlOUS comments are still recommended. - 2 MItigate the mtersectlOn at "FIve Corners". The CIty of Yelm has provIded funds for the desIgn and reconstructlOn of the FIve Corners mtersectlOn. ThIS Improvement IS occurrmg much faster than the proposed scl],edule outhned m the ongmal TIA. In the CIty'S MDNS for theongmal approval of the PraIne Plaza proJect, mltIgatlOn was ,\ ' determmed to be $300 per peak hour trIp passmg through thIS mtersectlOn. ThIS same reqUlrement will apply to the amended SIte plan. FIgures 1-3 show the expected traffic passmg through the FlVe Corners mtersectlOn and It) IS propo.sed that mltIgatlOn be paId as each phase of the proJect obtams ItS bUlldmg permIts. Phase 1 mltIgatlOn will equal four peak hour tnps or $1,200 Phase II mltIgatlOn WIll equal 32 peak hour tnps or $9;600 Phase III mltIgatlOn wIll equal 63 peak hour tnps or $18,90,0 Total mltIgatlOn fee, to be paId equals $29,700 3 Implement frontage Improvements that contribute to a three-lane cross-sectlOn along Yelm Avenue. The Improvements descnbed m the ongmal mltIgatlOn recommendatlOn have been completed. The developer of thIS property should have no further responsIbIlIty for thIS Item. 4 Momtor the Plaza Dnve/Yelm Avenue mtersectlOn. At the tune thIS mltIgatlOn recommendatlOn was wntten, the FlVe Corners mtersectlOn Improvements were consIdered long range Impro~~ments and the traffic study Identified a need for future slgnahzatlOn at thIS locatlOn. Due to thee'xpedlted schedule of the FIve Corners Improvements, , whIch mcludes sIgnalIzatIon, and the current sIgnal at Nisqually Plaza, both the CIty and WSDOT feel that another sIgnal at Plaza Dnve will only degrade traffic flow along Yelm Avenue rathe:t; than Improve It. It IS theIr recommendatlOn tnat no future sIgnal be constructed at thIS locatlOn. - ENGINEERING PLANNING SURVEYING . . sc/\ CathIe Carlson August 13, 1996 Page 5 5 M<?mtor the Access "B"Nelm Avenue mtersectIOn. The orIgmal recomm1endatIOn for thIS Item IS still vahd and no changes to the developers responsIbilIty IS reqUIred. Revised Ort-Site Mitigation \ 6 Widen eXIstmg Plaza Dnve to 40 foot wIdth. ThIs Item does not change The recommendatIOns hsted m the ongmal TIA should stIll be Implemented. However, because the proJect IS now a phased proposal, these Improvements should be constructed along those portIOns of the toad where' a current phase IS bemg constructed or where needed to, accommodate safe t;raffic flow 7 ProvIde sIdewalks and hghtmg along Plaza DrIve and AlgIers DrIve. ThIs Item does not change' The recommendatIOns hsted m the orIgmal TIA should stIll be Implemented and only along phased proJect frontages, except where they are also necessary to provIde safe pedestnan access. In conclusIOn, the proposed amendment to the PraIne Plaza shoppmg center will generate less peak hour traffic than the ongInal proposal and therefore wIll have less Impact, on the surroundmg transportatIOn network. However, the developer IS stIll responsible for certam mItIgatIOn measures The only sIgmficant change to the recommended mItIgatIOn measures was the deletIOn of Item 4? sIgnahzatIOn at Plaza DrIve, due to the Improvements bemg made at FIVe Corners No other sIgmficant changes to the mItIg,atIOn measures were added except where partIcular Improvements have already been completed by the developer ,/ We hope thIS mformatIOn will aSSIst you"m your reVIew Of'thIS proposed amendment.. If you have any questIOns, please call me at 493-6002. Thank you. Smcerely, S. CHAMBERLAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. ..-, 2::7 ,,/' (~ craI~Steepy . Semor Planner CRS/sw .. (c: \corres \3028725.ltr) ENGINEERING PLANNING SURVEYING . . TRlP GENERA TlON * LAND USE PHASE I - AU10 CARE CEN1ER . = ,RIP GENERA1ION ,OOALS REfLEC1 "NEW- ,O_NEW/ORK' ,RIPS AS DESCRIBED IN OABLE 2 EN1ER D<H 101AL - -- 4- 5 9 103RO A \IE ....0 FO -- o .....\ ~ , O....ocoo e <( ....0 FO --- o .....\~ , o ~ 00 10% PROJECT SlTE \- Vl ~ W Q:: <..) fIVE CORNERS SR 507 SIlE GENERA lED lRAFFIC VOLUMES - PHASE I PRAIRIE PLAZA SHOPPING CEN1ER (AMENDED) ~ 'TRlP GENERA'T\ON '" HilER EXIT 101 AL --- 41 41 82 LANO USE PHASE \I - U S. POSI OFFICE . ~ mlP GHIERAUON IOTALS REfLECT .NEW- TO_NET'NORK" mlPS AS OESCRIBED IN TABLE 2. 4-0 1"4 ~ o .....\~ , O~ o-<t 10% 103RO A\lE I- ({l ~ w W IX. _0 -<t ALGIERS SI 4- -:J \~ 16"\<;: fWE CORNERS PROJEC'T S\lE <;:\\ \ SR 507 0000 \~\,"8 ~ 4-0 0' ""lW SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PHASE II PRAIRI( PLAZA S\-IOPPING C(N1(R (AM(NO(O) ~ ,.R\P GENERA. 'T\ON * EN1ER EXI1 101 AL ----- 79 79 158 LAND USE PHASE III _ SHOPPING CEN1ER . " 1RIP GENERA 1\01'1 101 ",-S REfLEC1 'NEW_10-NEIWORK' mlPS 1.5 OEScRIBEO IN 1 ABLE 2. ....4- ./"4- ~ 4- .....\~ i' O~ o..r 10% 103RO AVE 'in )(.. ~ 0: _0 ..r ALGIERS S1 4.J'~ 12 ~~~ fiVE CORNERS PROJEC" $''TE ~\t \ ~ SR 507 ~ snE GENERA lED lRAff\C "OLUMES - PHASE \\\ PRAIRIE PLAZA SHOPPING CEN1f.R (AMENDED) srtE GENERA-1EO lRA-FF\C \/O\.UMES - PROJECl 5U\\,0 OUl PRNRIE p\J>..lA SHOPPING CEN1t.R (AMENDED) 1R\P GENeRI\ 1\ON ----- LA"D ~ ~ p,,,SE I _ AUTO C,RE CE"TEl' ' 5 pHASE \I - \J S pOsT OffICE ,," PHASE \II _ SHOPPI"G CE"TER 19 19 lOT J\L "NEW- 10_NE1WOR\<''' lRIPS \03RO AVE ALGIERS SI PROJEC1 S\lE -.;t<t .-'- \ ~\" ,6 7'i'--- .-9 77 ..... ""'llf ~ tOtAL 101AL -- 9 82 '58 -- 249 .-4- ",8 .......-::' 4 ....\~ , O~ 00') '0% r- \fI 6 w 0:: _0 0') 8;~ 28 ~ ~ ~ fIVE CORNEF.5 ~\\ ~ SR 'S07 ... f\GURE 4 9~028 CITY OF YELM PLANNING DEPARTMENT ROUTING FORM PROJECT/PROPOSAL: 17 I . ~ 1_ /1/nef} tClnerrl '-1[) 4fJ(;~ PLy- ROUTING DATE: 8 Jtp / 1 (p / I TO: TIM, OTHER: PLAN REVIEW AND COMMENTS RE: "ihls cL (K~41 -:::::::-- COMMENTS RECIEVED: IP 1\ ' ..k ( Gu in l}1t!/l1 J /17 /176 D1 fltc ())L 5 It Z/"J !p 11 /J /! /rr~ 'fIL0 /711rct U~1 {[HUlk.~ P I rt'),_/I^--l/Ij C6YIi'-.(/1( Yore!"---- r ,j)S jllsa/ld /{JrY7I1~f/lr ,'~ {t./r.p((cl</ /11 yifl-tA t!ut-- blrf ;/ /;J1JYvlcl fJVcd a I1t-cl~{ ucf tJ(!J)g In &f-~ JY/~j/la! vfl/J/~eL- CJrIU(;,~[I {ltJrry~(~1FA /U1j?~~f'S,~ f(:e(~r; lR ""!J /,2,7 l' jf1nJ {j tJ j"O 'he :Inn J:e / {}a III a I Hu l! 0. uJ J2k - rJ J (? /- (()" 7 (Jy r lJ tJ/'h blf) 2- or f)I/ Lr It' P (j, 1rV ch ? ? ~ fJiisr-- IJiVJ I~ /Il.ud fa ef7~W ----/1Jzt 1:-1 {u /(120 or WCL rfT ()((Orha{Ci f-U ph n;J cI C1iynci/ef/lA.Vl0', (/.gn) :x 1f}fa( tJjhL \Sfrvf6 /luflf1~dcdifAJZJJ. -fk l1tt-t!rc IiR (0l0 be !j)/-/Zi to ti!fft!Oj;U/{ vat tl S'/-..Cvu at ~/l~ {0b1I11ct-()/ ~ -7 1/ q f;,t'/IJJbe r ~ 0 I ~ -1110 flu / ui -!fz,,} f;,VJ ........-' 16r/;€ u...J , ~ I }0VL Ci/^-j ; / J I tLJ ~i1 0 clctutz; e.ll,;{ 01 H1G d'^-J (j\ ~ "Ii' ;1')1'(--- <)t-- y L.te. [,L..-- ,'-" - I 1a 'Z~ (JiAfh{/JS '7 ~ (tVn -(!Uk J;;1/tf7 /;r-lim (M If~ /h r- 7/;'1/Jtt6 jl;x~~/t ) ){t17 ~ 'tIli., / PO Box3485 Lacey,Wasnington 98509"3485 677 Woodland Square Lp SE ~acey, Washington 9850} Lacey (360) 493~600:2 Fax (360)493"2476 Yelm (360)4'5872487 s. Chamberlain & Associates, Inc. August 5, 1996 CathIe Carlson, CIty Planner CIty of Yelm PO Box 479 Yelm, W A 98597 Re: Prairie Plaza Center - Addendum to Traffic Impact Analysis SeA Project #93028.1 , " Dear CathIe ThIS lett~r IS to provIde updated traffic mformatIOn regardmg the \ proposed amendments to the Pralne Plaza CommercIal Center On behalf . I of Rocky Pralne Development Company, a complete transportatIOn Impact, analysls~ (TIA) was prepared by S Chamberlam & AssocIates" Inc. (SCA) and approved by the CIty of Yelm m June 1~93 The ongmal TIA provIded estimates of stte traffic volumes, Identified potentIalnp.pacts. a~d proposed mItigatIOn measures for an 80,000 square foot faculty; (the actual SIze of the approved facilIty was 75,00'0 square feet) Table 1 shows the tnp, generatIOn from the ongmal approved land uses and sIte plan. ., TABLE 1 Estimated Traffi~ Generation - Ongmal Pralne Plaza Shoppmg Center , Yelm, Washmgton - - - Evemng Peak Hour Dauy Land-Use Traffic Enter EXIt Total Fast- Food Rest. (Land Use Code 834) 90 85_ 175 3,035 DIscounted for MIxed-Use (20%) 70 70 140 2,425 SUBTOTAL 70 70 140 2,425 Shoppmg Center 210 210 420 4,676 . (Land Use Code 820) , 'Total Dnveway Volumes 280 280 560 7,100 Total New SIte-Generated Traffic 195 195 390 4,970 (With 30% Pass-by DIscount) Based upon the exp~cted traffic created by the proposed development, the followmg mItigatIOn measures were recommended for the ongmal sIte plan. ENGINEERING PLANNING . . Sl)RVEYING ~5'<\ CathIe Carlson August 5, 1996 Page 2 Previous Off-Site Mitigation Per Site Plan Approval (June 1993) 1 Momtor the traffic operatIOns of the Yelm Avenue/3rd Street In tetsectIOn. 2. ProvIde preparatIOns to share cont:t;'ibutIOns to the "FIve Corners" IntersectIOn Improvements 3 Implement frontage Improvements that contrIbute to a three-lane cross-sectIOn along Yelm Avenue (These Improvements have been completed, June 19~)4.) \ 4' MonItor the traffic operatIOns for future sIgnalIzatIOn of the Plaza DrIveN elm Avenue mtersectIOn. 5 Momtor the traffic operatIOns of the Vancil RoadlYelm Avenue IntersectIOn. Previous On-Site Mitigation Per Site Plan Approval (June 1993) , , 6 Widen eXlstmg Plaza D~IVe to 40 fQ(')t wIdth. 7 ProvIde sIdewalks amd lIghtmg along Plaza Drive and AlgIers DrIVe Proposed Site Plan Amendments The proposed amendments to the sIte plan mclude breakmg the proJect mto three separate phases and modIfyIng some of the land uses. Phase 1, located m the southern most pad and adJacent to Yelm Avenue, will be mollified to accommodate a bl,uldmg specIalIzmg 1P- automotIVe care mcludmg such potential actIVIties as an 011 change facilIty, tire store, muffler shop, etc. ThIS use will be m lIeu of the mlm-mart or fast food restaurant ImtIally proposed for thIS pad. " Phase 2 of the proJect, located ,m the eastern portIOn of the SIte between \ Yelm West Court and Creek Street, IS bemg proposed to accommodate a new 6,000 square foot lJ S Post Office m place of an 11,000 square foot retaIl bUIldmg The proposal for the other 12,000 squa;e foot retail bUIldmg IS unchanged, however, ItwilLbe bUIlt m phase 3 - Phase 3 WIll mclude'the remamder of the SIte and no SIte plan elements or land uses are bemg changed at thIS time ~ ENGINEERING PLANNING SURVEYING . . ~/?\ $1 CathIe Carlson August 5, 1996 Page 3 TrIp gEmeratlOn was recalculated based upon the new land use condItions lIsted above Automobile Care Center = 2.87 peak hour tripS per 1,000 sf (2.87)(6 36) = 18 US Post Office = 6 11 peak hour'trIps per 1,000 sf (6 11)(6) = 37 peak hour tripS Specialty RetaIl = 5 24 peak hour tnps per 1,000 sf (524)(60) = 314 peak hour tripS Table 2 shows the new tnp generation for the SIze and land uses bemg proposed m thIs amendment. ' TABLE 2 Estimated Traffic -Generation Amended PraIrie Pl'aza S40ppmg Center Yelm, Washmgton Evenmg Peak Hour Land Use Enter Exit Total Auto Care Center (840) / 8 lO \ 18 ( j Shoppmg Center (820) 157 157 314, US Post Office(732) 18 19 37 MIxed Use DIscount (20%) -36 -37 I -73 Pass-by DIscount (30%) -55 , -56 ' -111 Total New to Network TrIOS 92 93 185, VehIcle tnp dIstrIbutlOn was applIed to the street network usmg the, assumptlOns made m the ongmal report whIch mcluded the use ofYel~'s transportatlOn plannmg model. FIgures 1-3 show the trip dIstnbutlOn for each mdIvIdual phase to aSSIst m the appropriate mItIgatlOn fees establIshed for FIve Corners. FIgure 4 shows the combmed traffic upon proJect bUlldout. Based upon the changes to the SIte plan, proposed land uses and other condItions whIch have been modIfied, the followmg reV;I.SlOnS arp recommended to the seven mItigation measures described prevlOusly m thIS letter ENGINEERING PLANNING SURVEYING . . ~?\ CathIe Carlson August 5, 1996 Page 4 Revised Off-Site Mitigation 1 MOnItor the Yelm Avenue/3rd Street IntersectIOn. ThIs mItIgatIOn measure does not change and the preVIous. comments are stIll recommended. I 2. MItIgate the mtersectIOn at "FIve Corners". The CIty of Yelm has proVIded funds for the desIgn and reconstructIOn of the FIve Corners mtersectIOIi. ThIS Improvement IS occurrmg much faster than the proposed schedule outlmed m the ongmal TIA. In the CIty'S MDNS for the ongmal approval of the Pralne Plaza proJect, mItIgatIOn was determmed to be $300 per peak hour tnp passmg through thIS mtersectIOn. ThIS same reqUIrement wIll apply to -the amended SIte plan. FIgures 1-3 show the expected traffic passlllg through the FIve Corners mtersectIOn ap.d It IS proposed that mItIgatIOn be paId as each phase of the project obtams ItS bUIldmg permIts ' Phase 1 mItIgatIOn WIll equal four peak hour tnps or $1,200 Phase II mItIgatIOn WIll equal SIX peak hour tnps or $1,800 Phase III mItIgatIOn WIll equal 63 peak hour trIps or $18,900 Total mltIgatIOI). fee to be paId equal!3 $21,900 3 Implement frontage Improvements that contnbute to a three-lane cross-sectIOn along Yelm Avenue. The Improvements descnbed m the ongmal mItIgatIOn recommendatIOn have been completed. The developer of, thIS property should have no further responsIbIlIty for thIS Item. 4. MOnItor the Plaza Dnve/Yelm Avenue mtersectIOn. At the tIme thIS mItIgatIOn recommendatIOn was wntten, the FIVe CQrners mtersectIOn Improvements were consIdered long range Improvements and the traffic study IdentIfied a need for future sIgnalIzatIOn at thIS locatIOn. Due to the expedIted schedule of the FIve Corners Improvements, whIch mcludes sIgnalIzatIOn, and the current SIgnal at Nisqually Plaza, both the CIty and WSDOT feel that another SIgnal at Plaza Dnve wIll only degrade traffic flow along Yelm Avenue rather than . I Improve It. It IS theIr recommendatIOn that no future SIgnal be constructed at thIS locatIOn. 5 MOnItor the' Access "B"/Yelm Avenue mtersectIOn. The ongllial recommendatIOn for thIS Item IS stIll valId and no changes to the developers responsIbilIty IS reqUIred. " ENGINEERING PLANNING . . SURVEYING ~3^' CathIe Carlson , August 5, 1996 Page 5, I Revised On-Site Mitigation 6 Widen eXIstmg Plaza DrIve to 40 foot wIdth. ThIs Item does not change The recommendatIOns hsted m the orIgmal TIA should stIll be Implemented. However, because the project IS l)OW a phased proposal, these Improvements should be constructed along those portIOns of the road where a current phase Is'bemg constructed or where needed to accommodate safe traffic flow 7 ProvIde sIdewalks and hghtmg along Plaza DrIve and AlgIerS DrIve. ThIs Item does not change The recommendatIOns hsted m the orIgmal TIA should stIll be Implemented and only along phased project frontages, except where they are also necessary to provIde, safe pedestrIan access I In conclusIOn, the proposed amendment to the PraIrIe Plaza shoppmg center wIll generate less peak hour traffic than the orIgmal proposal and therefore wIll haye less Impact on the surroundmg transportatIOn network. However, the developer IS still responsIble for certam mItIgatIOn measures _ The only sIgmficant change to the recommended mItIgatIOn measures was the deletIOn of Item 4, sIgnahzatIOn at Plaza 'DrIve, due to the Improvements bemg made at FIve Corners. No other sIgmficant changes to the mItIgatIOn measures were added except where partIcular , ) Improvements have already been completed by the developer , We hope thIs mformatIOn will aSSIst you m your reVIew of thIS prbposed amendment. If you have any questIOns, please call me at 493-6002. Thank you. Smcerely, '\ S. CHAMBERLAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. ~ craI;,Z'eepy Semor Planner CRS/sw (c: \corres \3028725.ltr) / ENGINEE~ING PLANNING . SURVEYING . TR\P GENER~ T\ON '" LAND USE EN1ER EXI1 101AL ---- PHASE I _ AU10 CARE CEN1ER · 5 9 . ~ "\RIP GENERA110N 101ALS REfLEC1 "NEW_l0-NEW/ORK" 1RIPS AS DEScRIBED IN 1ABLE 2 ....0 -/,0 -...--:'" o ....\~ i' 0,", 00 10% 103RD ",VE ....0 -/,0 --- o ...., ~ i' 0,",0::00 PROJECT S\TE l- V) Q 'ii <.) f\\lE CORNERS ~ S\"fE GENER~ "fED "fR~FF\C VOLUMES - PH~SE \ PRAIRIE PLAZ.A SHOPPING CENiER (AMENDED) SR 507 \ f\GURE 1 93028 . ~ 1RIP GE~ERA1\O\'I 101ALS REfLECl .~EVI_l0-~E1'IIOR". 1RIPS AS DESCRIBED I~ lABLE 2. >I' 'TR\P GENERA'T\ON LAND USE p\-\ASE II - U S. POS1 OfFICE EN1ER E~\1 101AL ---- 9 9 18 103RD A\lE ....0 ..r1 ~ o ....\~ , O~ 0..... ALGIERS S1 II - 1~~ 3 ~ t'l PROJEC'T S\'TE 10'10 fIVE CORNERS t'l\\ SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES ~ PHASE \I PRAIRIE PLAZA SHOPPING CENiER (M.\ENDED) ~ SR 507 'TR'P GENER~ 'T,ON * -------- O-lIE.R E.~11 101 f>..L :.--- -- -- '" 79 158 ...-4- ",4- ........-::' .<\ .-.. \~ I' O""lw o...r 1Q3RD f>.. \If.. f>..LGlf..RS SI .<\'J'~ 12 ""lw~~ PROJEC'T S''Te '0% I- (j) ~ \.'J 0:: _0 ...r fI\I( CORNERS ~H C'l ..- S\,.E GENEill>. ,.ED ,.ill>.ff\C "OLUMES - pHi' SE \\\ PRA\R\E. pU>..1.f>.. S\,\OPPI!-lG CEN1t~!-lDE.D) ~~=----- ~ SR 507 ~ f\GURE 3 93028 ,.R\P aENERt-. ,.,ON GENEfl~iED ifl~fflC "OLUMES - PflOJECi aUILD OUi nO ~\R\t PL~Z~ S\-IOPP\\'lG C(\'lit:R (M,,\(\'lO(O) EN1ER (')(.11 :---- -- 4- 5 9 9 79 79 ---- L~NO llSE Ptl~St. I _ I\ll10 C~Rt. CEN1ER Ptll\SE II _ II S. pOSl OffICE p\-lI\St. \II _ S\-IOPPING CEN1ER 1011\L "NEW_l0-NE1'NOR\<." lRIPS \03RO ~\ft. ~LGIERS SI PROJEC" srfE ~ .,..01" AL srt'E 1011\L -- 9 18 158 -- 185 .....4 ",5 4 ...~ -, o "" 0 <t G Q ~ _0 Ul 5 J' :4\ '5""~~ 10% VI\JE CORNERS ~\\ \ ~ SR 507 \' f\GURE 4 93028 4" ~. s. Chamberlain & Associates,. Inc. ~~?\ August 2, 1996 CathIe Carlson CIty ofYelm PO Box 479 Yelm, W A 98597 (360) 458-4348 FAX .: ~" RE: Prairie Plaza Site Plan Revisions SCA #93028 Dear CathIe The PraIrie Plaza Shoppmg Center SIte plan IS bemg reVIsed to accommodate a'tIre and lube shop m the southwest corner of the project SIte and a post office located at the nortIteast corner of the SIte . These ') changes wIll affect the approved dramage plan (August' 1995) The followmg dIscussIOn 'and enclosed details are mtended to clarify the proposed changes and provIde techmcal support for the dramage plan modIficatIOns. The proposed tire and lube shop wIll be m heu of the orIgmally proposed 4,000 s.f. fast food or mmI-mart pad. The approved dramage plan and report depIcted thIS area as sub-basm #A5 ThIS sub-basm has now been subdIVIded further mto 3 sub-basms Sub-basm area Cl now encompasses the west parkmg area, Cz now encompasses the east parkmg area, and the 6,500 s.f. shop WIll now dIspose of ItS roof runoff mto retentIOn/infiltratIOn basm #4. Basm #4 was orIgmally deSIgned wIth extra capacIty and wIll eaSIly accommodate the addItional runoff created by the shop (see calculatIOns for basm area #A4) , Runoff from sub-basms Cl and Cz wIll be 'treated by bIOfiltratIOn swales and be dIsposed of m underground retentIOn/infiltratIOn rock galleries For sIzmg calculatIOns, please refer to sub-basm mformatIOn Cl and Cz. - PO Box 3485 . Lacey, Washington 98509-3485 . The proposed post office bUIldmg WIll affect several prevIOusly deSIgnated sub-basm areas. In preVIOusly deSIgnated sub-basm A9, buildmg "D" and the adjacent covered courtyard to the south have been ehmmated. Buildmg E has mcreased m SIze to 12,00b s.f. These changes m the approved SIte plan reqUIre the followmg changes m dramage layout. New sub-basm Bs now encompasses buildmg E, and dIsposes of the assocIated roof run-off mto an open retentIOn/infiltratIOn basm to the Im~edlate west. Newsub-basm Bl encompasses the ImmedIate parkmg area to the north and access drive to the east. Stormwater runoff in thissub-basm 677 Woodland Squar~ Lp SE Lacey, Washington 9~503 Lacey (360) 493-'6002 Fax (360) 493-2476 Yelm (360) 458-2487 ENGINEERING . PLANNING . SURVEYING ~3C\ CathIe Carlson August 5, 1996 Page 2 travels northward by sheetflow across a 10 foot wIde bIlfiltratIOn stnp fpr treatment1 and then by collector swale to a Type 1 catch basm and thence travels west to retentIOn/infiltratIpn basm #5 for dIsposal. The new post office bu~ldmg WIll affect prevIOusly desIgnated sub-basm areas 1'\.1, A2 and An Wet pond and retentIOn/infiltratIOn basm #1 has been ehmmated and replaced by grass bIOfiltratIOn swales, a retentIOn/infiltratIOn swale and retentIOn/infiltratIOn basm#5 New sub- basIns B2, B3, B4, B5, B6 and B7 will replace prevIOusly desIgnated sub- basms Al and An Sub-basm A2 will be mcreased m SIze to take advantage of prevIOUS desIgned excess capacIty m wet pond #2 and 'retentIOIl/infiltratIOll basm #2 Sub=basms B2, B3, B5, and B6 all ,have sheetflow runoff treated by bIOfiltratIOn swales, and dIspose of the treated storm runoff m retentIOn/infiltratIOn. basm #5 Sub-basm B7 (post office roof runoff) IS routed dIrectly to basm #5 wIthout pretreatment. Storm runoff created wIthm 'sub-basm B4 travels by sheetflow to a bIOfiltratIOn swale for treatment, and then IS dIsposed of m a retentIOn/infiltratIOn swale I The enclosed calculatIOns, dramage sub-basm map and reduced SIte plan drawmgs should proVIde you wIth a general concept of the proposed changes to the ongmal dramage plan. We will provIde addItIOnal detaIl for final approval at a later date when all cIvil drawmgs are revIsed to reflect these proposed SIte plan changes. Should you have any questIOns regardmg thIS mformatIOn, please contact us at (360) 493-6002. Smcerely, s. CHAM;BERLAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. W~~ Wilham Parnell, P.E WP/jmm (c: \corres \3628802.mmo) ENGINEERING PLANNING . SURVEYING . Prairie Plaza Shopping Center Sub-basIn InformatIOn Basin Area #Bl ImpervIOus Area. BIO-filtratIon stnp Asphalt pavIng/sIdewalk Swale area DIsturbed PerVlous Area. LandscapIng = 3,100 sf = o 07 ac = 18,160 sf = o 42 ac = 1,600 sf = o 04 ac Total = 22,860 sf = o 53 ac = 1,300 sf = o 03 ac Bio-filtration Requirements: Use 10 ft wIde x 310 ft long bIO-filtratIOn strIp = 3,100sf Minimum Storage Volume: Use InfiltratIOn rate = 20"lhr TotallmperVlous area = 22,860 sf = 0 53 ac Total msturbed peI'VlOUS area = 1,300 sf = 003 ac MInImum volume per Table 4.1 = 3,000 cf/ac x 0 53 ac + 1,000 cf/ac x 003 ac MInImum storage volume = 1,620 cf See RetentIOn InfiltratIOn BasIn #5 for storage volume proVlded and mImmum volume to be Infiltrated. Storage volume proVlded. See RetentIOn InfiltratIOn BasIn #5 for storage volume proVlded and mInImUm volume to be Infiltrated. S. Chamberlain & Associates, Inc. August 1996 Page 1 Prairie Plaza Shopping Center Sub-basm InformatIOn Basin Area #B2 ImpervIOus Area. Asphalt pavmg/sIdewalk BIO-filtratIOn swale DIsturbed PervIOus Area. Landscapmg = 9,385 sf = o 22 ac = 480 sf = o 01 ac Total = 9,865 sf = o 23 ac = 1,055 sf = o 02 ac Bio-filtration Requirements: Asphalt pavmg = 9,385 sf = 0 22 Mimmum bIO-filtratIon area. 2,000 sflac ImpervIOus = 2,000 (0 22) = 440 sf Use 8 ft wIde x 60 ft long swale 8 x 60 = 480 sf= 480 sf; OK Minimum Storage Volume: Use mfiltratIOn rate = 20"lhr Total ImpervIOUS area = 9,865 sf = 0 23 ac Total dIsturbed perVIOUS area = 1,055 sf = 002 ac MImmum volume per Table 4 1 = 3,000 cflac x 0 23 ac + 1,000 cflac x 0 02 ac MImmum storage volume = 710 cf See RetentIOn InfiltratIOn Basm #5 for storage volume proVIded and mmImum volume to be mfiltrated. S Chamberlain & Associates, Inc. August 1996 Page 2 Prairie Plaza Shopping Center Sub-basm InformatIOn Basin Area #B3 ImpervIOUS Area. Asphalt pavmg/sIdewalk BIO-filtratIOn swale = 7,775 sf = = 400 sf o 18 ac o 01 ac Total = 8,175 sf = 019 ac DIsturbed PerVIous Area. Landscapmg = 500 sf = 0 01 ac Bio-filtration Requirements: Asphalt paVIng = 7,775 sf = 0 18 ac MmImum bIO-filtratIOn area. 2,000 sflac ImperVIous = 2,000 (0 18) = 360 sf Use 8 ft wIde x 50 ft long swale 8 x 50 = 400 sf= 400 sf; OK Minimum Storage Volume: Use mfiltratIOn rate = 20"lhr Total ImperVIOUS area = 8,175 sf = 0 19 ac Total dIsturbed perVIOUS area = 500 sf = 0 01 ac Mimmum volume per Table 4.1 = 3,000 cflac x 0 19 ac + 1,000 cflac x 0 01 ac MmImum storage volume = 580 cf See RetentIOn InfiltratIOn Basm #5 for storage volume proVIded and mmImum volume to be mfiltrated. S Chamberlain & Associates, Inc. August 1996 Page 3 Prairie Plaza Shopping Center Sub-basm InformatIOn Basin Area #Bs ImpervIOus Area. Asphalt pavmg/sIdewalk BIO-filtratIOn swale = 11,200 sf = 0 26 ac = 530 sf = 001 ac Total = 11,730 sf = 027 ac DIsturbed PerVIous Area. Landscapmg = 1,220 sf = 003 ac Bio-filtration Requirements: Asphalt paVIng = 11,200 sf = 0 26 ac MmImum bIo-filtratIon area. 2,000 sf/ac ImperVIous = 2,000 (0 26) = 520 sf Use varYIng wIdth (max 8 ft wIde) swale Total sJ. = 530 s.f. > 520; OK Minimum Storage Volume: Use mfiltratIon rate = 20"lhr Total ImpervlOUS area = 11,730 sf = 0 27 ac Total chsturbed perVIOUS area = 1,120 sf = 0 03 ac MInImUm volume per Table 4.1 = 3,000 cf/ac x 0 27 ac + 1,000 cf/ac x 0 03 ac MmImum storage volume = 640 cf See RetentIon InfiltratIon BasIn #5 for storage volume proVIded and mmImum volume to be Infiltrated. S. Chamberlain & Associates, Inc. August 1996 Page 4 Prairie Plaza Shopping Center Sub-basm InformatIOn Basin Area #B6 ImpervIOus Area. Asphalt paVIng/sIdewalk BIO-filtratIOn swale RetentIOn/InfiltratIOn Basm DIsturbed PerVIous Area. Landscapmg = 9,625 sf = o 22 ac = 480 sf = o 01 ac = 3,712 sf = o 08 ac Total = 13,817 sf = o 31 ac = 7,050 sf = o 16 ac Bio-filtration Requirements: Asphalt paVIng = 9,625 sf = 022 ac Mimmum bIO-filtratIOn area. 2,000 sflac ImperVIous = 2,000 (0 22) = 440 sf Use 8 ft wIde x 60 ft long swale 8 x 60 = 480 sf< 440 sf; OK Minimum Storage Volume: Use mfiltratIOn rate = 20"lhr Total ImperVIOUS area = 13,817 sf = 0 31 ac Total dIsturbed perVIOUS area = 7,050 sf = 0 16 ac MmImum volume per Table 4.1 = 3,000 cflac x 031 ac + 1,000 cflac x 0 16 ac MmImum storage volume = 1,090 cf See RetentIOn InfiltratIOn Basm #5 for storage volume prOVIded and mmImum volume to be mfiltrated. s. Chamberlain & Associates, Inc. August 1996 Page 5 Prairie Plaza Shopping Center Sub-basm Information Basin Area #B7 ImpervIOus Area. BUIldmg roof area 6,765 sf o 16 ac Total = 6,765 sf o 16 ac DIsturbed Pemous Area. None Bio-filtration Requirements: None Minimum Storage Volume: Use mfiltratIOn rate = 20"/hr Total Impemous area = 6,765 sf 0 16 ac MmImum volume per Table 4.1 = 3,000 cflac x 0 16 ac MmImum storage volume = 480 cf See RetentIOn InfiltratIOn Basm #5 for storage volume proVIded and mIrnmum volume to be mfiltrated. S. Chamberlain & Associates, Inc. Page 6 August 1996 Prairie Plaza Shopping Center Sub-basm InformatIOn Retentionllnfiltration Basin #5 For Sub-basms #Bl, B2, Ba, B5, B6, B7 Mlmmum storage volume = 1,620 + 710 + 580 + 640 + 1,090 + 480 = 5,120 cf Storage volume proVIded. Assume water 1% ft deep Storage = 5,568 + cf > 5,120 cf Minimum Volume to be Infiltrated: From Appencb.x D, Soil HydrolOgIC Group B Pre-development Post-development/d.1sturbed perVIOUS Post-development/im perVIOUS 2.37/12 x 1 86 x 43560 = 16,002 cf 3 92/12 x 0.25 x 43560 = 3,557 cf 5 91/12 x 1 69 x 43560 = 36,256 cf Mimmum volume to be mfiltrated = (3,557 + 36,256) - 16,002 = 23,811 cf/48 hrs InfiltratIOn volume proVIded. For 48 hrs, mfiltratIOn rate = 20"lhr InfiltratIOn surface area = 3,712 sf 20" Ihr x 1'/12" x 3,712 sf x 48 hrs Total mfiltratIOn volume = 296,960 cf/48 hrs > 23,811 cf/48 hrs, CN = 64 CN = 80 CN = 98 Runoff = 2.37 Runoff = 3 92 Runoff = 5 91 OK S Chamberlain & Associates, Inc. August 1996 Page 7 Prairie Plaza Shopping Center Sub-basm InformatIOn Basin Area #B4 ImpervIOUS Area. Asphalt paVIng BIO-filtratIOn swale = 10,075 sf = 0.23 ac = 480 sf = 0 01 ac Total = 10,555 sf = 024 ac DIsturbed PervIOUS Area. Grass swale, Landscapmg = 1,900 sf = 0 04 ac Bio-filtration Requirements: Asphalt paVIng = 10,075 sf = 023 ac MImmum bIO-filtratIOn area. 2,000 sf'lac ImperVIOus = 2,000 (0 23) = 460 sf Use 8 ft wIde x 60 ft long swale 8 x 60 = 480 sf> 240 sf; OK Minimum Storage Volume: Use mfiltratIOn rate = 20"!hr Total ImpervIOUS area = 10,555 sf = 0 24 ac Total chsturbed perVIOUS area = 1,900 sf = 0 04 ac Mimmum volume per Table 4.1 = 3,000 cf'lac x 0 24 ac + 1,000 cf'lac x 0 04 ac MImmum storage volume = 760 cf Storage in a trapeZOIdal swale Bottom wIdth = 2 ft Bottom length = 55 ft Water Depth = 2 ft 31 SS Storage = 770 cf> 760 cf; OK Minimum Volume to be Infiltrated: From Appenchx D, Soil HydrolOgIC Group B Pre-development Post-development/chsturbed perVIOUS Post-developmen t/im perVIOUS 2.37/12 x 0 28 x 43560 = 2,409 cf 3 92/12 x 0 04 x 43560 = 569 cf 5 91/12 x 0 24 x 43560 = 5,149 cf MmImum volume to be mfiltrated = (569 + 5,149) - 2,409 = 3,309 cf'l48 hrs InfiltratIOn volume prOVIded. For 48 hrs, mfiltratIOn rate = 20"!hr InfiltratIOn surface area = 55 ft x 2 ft = 110 sf 20"!hr x 1 ft/12 m x 110 sf x 48 hrs Total mfiltratIOn volume = 8,800 cf'l48 hrs > 3,309 cf'l48 hrs, CN = 64 CN = 80 CN = 98 Runoff = 2.37 Runoff = 3 92 Runoff = 5 91 OK S Chamberlain & Associates, Inc. August 1996 Page 8 Prairie Plaza Shopping Center Sub-basm InformatIOn Basin Area #Bs ImperVlous Area. Buildmg roof area Retention/InfiltratIOn basm = 12,250 sf = 0 28 ac = 1,100sf = 002ac Total = 13,350 sf = 030 ac DIsturbed PerVlous Area. Landscapmg = 1,800 sf = 004 ac Bio-filtration Requirements: None Minimum Storage Volume: Use mfiltratIOn rate = 20"lhr Total Impemous area = 13,350 sf = 030 ac Total dIsturbed perVlOUS area = 1,800 sf = 0 04 ac MImmum volume per Table 4.1 = 3,000 cf/ac x 0 3 ac + 1,000 cf/ac x 0 04 ac Mlmmum storage volume = 940 cf Storage volume proVlded. Assume water 1 ft deep Storage = 1,100 cf> 940 cf; OK Minimum Volume to be Infiltrated: From Appenchx D, Soil HydrologIc Group B Pre-development Post-development/dIsturbed perVlOUS Post-development/im perVlous 2.37/12 x 034 x 43560 = 2,925 cf 3 92/12 x 0 04 x 43560 = 569 cf 5 91/12 x 0 30 x 43560 = 6,436 cf Mimmum volume to be mfiltrated = (569 + 6,436) - 2,925 = 4,080 cf/48 hrs InfiltratIOn volume proVlded. For 48 hrs, mfiltratIOn rate = 20"lhr InfiltratIOn surface area = 1,100 sf 20"lhr x 1'/12" x 1,100 sfx 48 hrs Total mfiltratIOn volume = 88,000 cf/48 hrs > 4,080 cf/48 hrs, CN = 64 CN = 80 CN = 98 Runoff = 2.37 Runoff = 3 92 Runoff = 591 OK s. Chamberlain & Associates, Inc. August 1996 Page 9 Prairie Plaza Shopping Center Sub-basm InformatIOn Basin Area #A2 ImpervIOus Area. Asphalt pavmg/sIdewalk (add 17,938) Wetpond area InfiltratIOn basm area DIsturbed PervIOus Area. Landscapmg (add 5,566) = 45,376 sf = 1 04 ac = 2,614 sf = o 06 ac = 1,675 sf = o 04 ac Total = 49,664 sf = 1 14 ac = 7,269 sf = o 17 ac Wetpond Requirements (wetpond #2, sheet 5 of 11) Asphalt paVlng, sIdewalk area = 45,376 sf = 1 04 ac Surface area reqUlred. 0025 x (45,376 sf) = 1,134 sf Surface area proVlded. 1,439 4 sf> 1,134 sf; OK Minimum Storage Volume: Use mfiltratIOn rate = 20"lhr TotallmperVlous area = 49,664 sf = 114 ac Total d.1sturbed perVlOUS area = 7,269 sf = 0 17 ac MmImum volume per Table 4.1 = 3,000 cf/ac x 114 ac + 1,000 cf/ac x 0 17 ac Mimmum storage volume = 3,437 cf Storage volume proVlded. 1 ft m wetpond = 1,719 4 cf 3 ft m retentIOn/infiltratIOn basm 2,280 4 cf Total storage volume - 3,9998 cf> 3,437 cf; OK Minimum Volume to be Infiltrated (infiltratIOn pond #2, sheet 5 of 11): From Appenchx D, Soil Hydrologlc Group B Pre-development Post-development/chsturbed pervIOUS Post-develop men t/im perVlOUS Post-development/dramage facilitIes 2 37/12 x 1 31 x 43560 = 11,270 cf 3 92/12 x 0 04 x 43560 = 569 cf 5 91/12 x 1 04 x 43560 = 22,311 cf 6 15/12 x 0 10 x 43560 = 2,232 cf MmImum volume to be mfiltrated = (569 + 22,311 + 2,232) - 11,270 = 13,842 cf/48 hrs InfiltratIOn volume proVlded. For 48 hrs, mfiltratIOn rate = 20"lhr InfiltratIOn surface area = 263 5 sf 20"lhr xl ft/12 m x 2635 sfx 48 hrs Total mfiltratIOn volume = 21,080 cf/48 hrs > 13,842 cf/48 hrs, OK CN = 64 CN = 80 CN = 98 CN = 100 Runoff = 2.37 Runoff = 3 92 Runoff = 591 Runoff = 6 15 S. Chamberlain & Associates, Inc. August 1996 Page 10 Prairie Plaza Shopping Center Sub-basIn InformatIOn Basin Area #Cl ImperVIous Area. Asphalt paVIng/sIdewalk BIO-filtratIOn swale DIsturbed PerVIous Area. LandscapIng = 12,570 sf = o 29 ac = 600 sf = o 01 ac Total = 13,170 sf = o 30 ac = 3,425 sf = o 08 ac Bio-filtration Requirements: Asphalt paVIng/sIdewalk = 12,570 sf = 0 29 ac Mimmum bIO-filtratIOn area. 2,000 sf/ac ImperVIous = 2,000 (0 29) = 580 sf Use 6 ft x 100 ft long $wale 6 x 100 = 600 sf> 580 sf; OK Minimum Storage Volume: Use InfiltratIOn rate = 20"lhr Total ImperVIOUS area = 13,170 sf = 0 30. ac Total dIsturbed perVIOUS area = 3,425 sf = 008 ac Mimmum volume per Table 4 1 = 3,000 cf/ac x 0 30 ac + 1,000 cf/ac x 008 ac MImmum storage volume = 980 cf Storage volume proVIded. Storage In 100 ft x 5 ft x 2 ft rock gallery = 1,000 cf> 980 cf; OK Minimum Volume to be Infiltrated: From Appenchx D, Soil HydrologIc Group B Pre-development Post-development/dIsturbed perVIOUS Post-develop men t/im perVIOUS 2.37/12 x 0 38 x 43560 = 3,269 cf 3 92/12 x 0 08 x 43560 = 1,138 cf 591/12 x 030 x 43560 = 6,436 cf MInImUm volume to be Infiltrated = (1,138 + 6,436) - 3,269 = 4,305 cf/48 hrs InfiltratIOn volume proVIded. For 48 hrs, InfiltratIOn rate = 20" Ihr InfiltratIOn surface area = 100 x 5 = 500 sf 20" Ihr x 1 ft/12 In x 500 sf x 48 hrs Total InfiltratIOn volume = 40,000 cf/48 hrs > 4,305 cf/48 hrs, CN = 64 CN = 80 CN = 98 Runoff = 2.37 Runoff = 392 Runoff = 5 91 OK S Chamberlain & Associates, Inc. August 1996 Page 11 Prairie Plaza Shopping Center Sub-basm InformatIOn Basin Area #C2 ImperVIous Area. Asphalt pavmg/sIdewalk BIO-filtratIOn strIp DIsturbed PerVIous Area. Landscapmg ::: 10,800 sf ::: o 25 ac ::: 510 sf ::: o 01 ac Total::: 11,310 sf ::: o 26 ac ::: 4,690 sf ::: o 11 ac Bio-filtration Requirements: Asphalt paVIng/sIdewalk ::: 10,800 sf ::: 0 25 ac Use 6 ft x 85 ft long bIO-filtratIOn strIP::: 510 sf Filter area reqUlred::: (0 25)(2,000) = 500 < 510 sf; OK Minimum Storage Volume: Use mfiltratIOn rate::: 20" Ihr Total ImperVIOUS area = 11,310 sf ::: 026 ac Total dIsturbed perVIOUS area = 4,690 sf ::: 0 11 ac Mirnmum volume per Table 4.1 ::: 3,000 cf/ac x 0 26 ac + 1,000 cf/ac x 0 11 ac MmImum storage volume = 890 cf Storage volume proVIded. Storage m 60 ft x 5 ft x 3 ft rock gallery = 900 cf> 890 cf; OK Minimum Volume to be Infiltrated. From AppendIx D, Soil HydrologIc Group B Pre-development Post-development/dIsturbed perVIOUS Post-development/imperVIous Post-development/dramage facilitIes 2 37/12 x 0 37 x 43560::: 3,183 cf 3 92/12 x 0 11 x 43560::: 1,565 cf 5 91/12 x 0 25 x 43560::: 5,363 cf 6 15/12 x 0 04 x 43560 ::: 893 cf Mirnmum volume to be mfiltrated::: (1,565 + 5,363 + 893) - 3,183 = 4,638 cf/48'hrs InfiltratIOn volume proVIded. For 48 hrs, mfiltration rate = 20"lhr InfiltratIOn surface area 5 ft WIde x 60 ft long = 300 sf 20"lhr xl ft/12 m x 300 sfx 48 hrs Total mfiltratIOn volume = 24,000 cf/48 hrs > 4,638 cf/48 hrs, OK CN ::: 64 CN = 80 CN = 98 CN = 100 Runoff = 2.37 Runoff = 3 92 Runoff = 591 Runoff = 6.15 S Chamberlain & Associates, Inc. August 1996 Page 12 Prairie Plaza Shopping Center Sub-basm InformatIOn Basin Area #A4 ImpervIOus Area. Asphalt paVIng/sIdewalk Wetpond area InfiltratIOn basm area Roof area = 40,840 0 sf = 0 93 ac = 3,374.5 sf = 008 ac = 3,367 1 sf = 0 08 ac = 6,500 0 sf = 0 15 ac Total = 54,081 6 sf = 124 ac DIsturbed PerVIous Area. Landscapmg = 4,6497 sf = 0 11 ac Wetpond Requirements (wetpond #4, sheet 4 of 11) Asphalt paVIng, sIdewalk area = 40,840 0 sf = 0 93 ac Surface area reqUIred. 0025 x (40,840 sf) = 1,021 sf Surface area proVIded at: 2,452 sf> 1,021 sf; OK Minimum Storage Volume: Use mfiltratIOn rate = 20"lhr Total ImperVIOUS area = 54,081.6 sf = 1.24 ac Total dIsturbed pervIOUS area = 4,6497 sf = 0 11 ac MmImum volume per Table 4.1 = 3,000 cf/ac x 1.24 ac + 1,000 cf/ac x 011 ac MmImum storage volume = 3,830 cf Storage volume proVIded. 1 ft m wetpond = 2,9275 SF 3 ft m retentIOn/infiltratIOn basm = 3,661 cf Total storage volume = 6,588 5 cf> 3,830 cf; OK Minimum Volume to be Infiltrated (infiltratIOn pond #4, sheet 4 of 11): From AppendIx D, Soli HydrologIc Group B Pre-development Post-development/dIsturbed perVIOUS Post-development/imperVIous Post-development/dramage facilitIes 237/12 x 1.35 x 43560 = 11,614 cf 3 92/12 x 0 11 x 43560 = 1,565 cf 591/12 x 2.17 x 43560 = 46,554 cf 6.15/12 x 0 16 x 43560 = 3,572 cf MmImum volume to be mfiltrated = (1,565 + 46,554 + 3,572) - 11,614 = 40,077 cf/48 hrs InfiltratIOn volume prOVIded. For 48 hrs, mfiltratIOn rate = 20"lhr InfiltratIOn surface area = 1,500 sf 20"lhr xl ft/12 m x 1,500 sfx 48 hrs Total mfiltratIOn volume = 120,000 cf/48 hrs > 40,077 cf/48 hrs, OK CN = 64 CN = 80 CN = 98 CN = 100 Runoff = 2.37 Runoff = 3 92 Runoff = 5 91 Runoff = 6 15 S Chamberlain & Associates, Inc. August 1996 Page 13 (J . 0 () o \ , ~~ , \ ::r . ~ 552.00 ~ ~------T--~------:'-::-:'-:::~----- --:-- .- L_- ~ . ~- N 00'54'0'- E 568 J5 --r---~--r -------~-~----~~-- ------ ,. r D' 1-,p ~~- A(;;;:;J)id , ---..........~ I I t\ \ ~~ ,:;;; .c;""" ;.J lii'!'_~ j' : \ . ~ I - . \ ,.,' "- \ .. \ '.. I . rr-.... . \ \ ~. =;' , 1 t ;:; 1; ~'''-t r ., I ~ ~ @ '0 ~ BB .'" I ~ ,,~.; POST r 'c" _____________~I _:' V!.:!J I -- ~~ " 24' II :'- ~ il II il I I I 1- / _._______:tJ --' .....------- nn_ '__n M ~.l' I;;~' /y ~ \ } \ ; \ '. ~;::~~...-~<:~~.::: -'\;"-~.- .~~<.::-~-~:.--~~~-::".<(. ~;::. ... .C1I61: ... .... E,' t' ....... ",.,. " ,.". ........ ....... ...........~ "'" , S'~~:.'-':':~'~ ~.:'":.:~~.:~._~-~~~ L ."c-:f.----- ..~ .____:_~ .+;<._ __.____________~ 'S1iliir \ ..... ----.-.-- I ...' ......"..;.. .c.. C- ," 1\ "'---_.....~'--.--I'<---." ,-- --- "1)' \ ,\ ~ \ \\ ,\ I , I \ \ SUB-BASIN SUMMARY (s.r.) MI;f.A NO. ~S DiS'fiJRSED PERVIOUS A2 4Q.6M 7289 1\3 61.09:5.5 10.578.5 M ~.~ ~6ro /IS 42.890.3 9.933.7 1.7 28,600 729 AB 12.000 2&67 Al0 '8.7Y17 2.178.3 A12 4,200 1,650 A13 5,272 2.2&6 1.14 5,272 2.268 A15 5,272 2.2&8 1.16 4,340 1.670 1.17 ~050 - 1.18 5,490 - 1.19 8.700 - A20 3,900 - A21 2.5!lO - ~ 7.t!15 1,515 B1 22,8&0 1.300 82 9.885 1.055 B3 8.175 SOD B4 10.555 1.900 B5 11.730 1,220 86 13,817 7.050 87 6.~ - 88 13,350 1.600 C1 13,170 3.425 C2 11.310 4,690 REVISED AUG. , 1996 TOT ~ /i..Rf.A ~,933 - 71,672 - 58.732 - 52.624 29.329 1~&87 - ~ 5,8!lO - 7,540 7.540 - 7,540 6.010 - ~050 5.490 8.700 - 3,900 - 2.5l5O - 9,4eO - 24,160 - 10.920 - 8.675 - 12.455 - 12.950 - 20.867 - 6.765 - 15,150 I 1 \ I 1 I 1 1 I I :. \\1 .-u I 1 "' ~ ~\I\ I. ~\I ~:!\'" I' I II, :::__...J ! \ --, \ I I I I .. I , II I Ii ll: I I I I t 1 I i I t I . . I t I I I \ I , \ I I I I I i I t I I I t I I I I I I I I I \ I t \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I , I I I I ! , I I , I 18.595 - 1&.000 en Wz ~- <CJ) z< -m <, a: en Q~ l-- < N -< ..J 0- W - a: - < a: 0. . , at .- ~ :;. 1\i ~=!s I la 'III .0 i , i5 ,,,, .. &:51 . I , City of Yelm 105 Yelm Avenue West PO Box 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 (360) 458-3244 PLANNING DEPARTMENT I DATE July 15, 1996 CASE NUMBER.SPR-8095 APPLICANT Rocky Prairie Development Co PROJECT LOCATION North side of Yelm Ave Between Plaza Dr and Creek St. PROJECT SUMMARY Requestforminor amendment to approved Binding Site Plan Amendment includes dividing the prbject jnto three phases, reducing th4a building area from 78,500 sq ft. to 61,265 sq ft. and changing the land uses to less intense uses The enclosed project Information is for your review Please proVide written comments or recommendations to Cathie Carl?on IJY AUQust 19, 1996 Your comments will become part of the record and utilized in the decision-making process by staff, Planning Commission or City'Council TYPE OF APPLlCA nON ~PRQPOSEb FINAL' _ADMINISTRATIVE LPLANNING COMMISSION _CITY COUNCIL --.2LSitePlan Review ~Prelimii1gry Plat _Final PLat _Short ~ubdivision ~Conditional Use _Variance ----...:Planned Residential Development ..,.....,..-Mixed Use Planned Development _Master Planned Development ~Hom~ Occupatioris _Mobile Home Park TO ~ City Administrator ~Oirettor of Public Works ~Building Department ~ City Planner 1- City Clerk ~Police Department ~ Yelm. Municipal Court _Puget Power Viacom _Washington Natural, Gas ~AdJacent Property Owners L-US Post Office (Yelm) -,-,--,Dept. of Ecology _Thurston County Assessor ~WSDOT ~Intercity Transit _School District --'- Yelm Telephone _LeM~y GarlJage Servi~e ~Fire Department ~ Thurston County Capcom _ Adjacent JUrisdiction - --,-Thurston County Environmental Health -'-- Olym.pic Air Pollution Control Authority Parks and Recreation Committee l Yelm Chamber of Commerce c, \wpwin \forms \distrib * RifC)'ckdpaper I ------'--'-- ~~- City of Yelm 105 Yelm Avenue West POBox 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 (360) 458-3244 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING YELM PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: Monday, August 19, 1996, at 4:00 p.m. PLACE: Council Chambers, City Hall, 105 Yelm Ave. West, Yelm, WA PURPOSE. Public Hearing on Proposed Site Plan Amendment to1?rairie Plaza The Yelm Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on a proposed site plan amendment to Prairie Plaza commencal development proJect. The amendment Includes project phaSing and changes In Identified land uses on the site Testimony may be given at the hearing or through any written comments on the proposals received by the close of the public hearing on August 19,1996. Such written comments may be submitted to the City of Yelm at the address shown above. Copies of the proposed amendment to the site plan are available at Yelm City Hall For more Information, contact Cathie Carlson with the City of Yelm at 458-8408 The City of Yelm provides reasonable accommodations to person with dlsabrlltles If you need speCial accommodations to attend or partIcipate, call the City Clerk, Agnes Bennick, at (360) 458-8404 at least 72 hours before the meetIng ATTEST City of Yelm Agnes Bennick, City Clerk DO NQT PUBLISH BELOW THIS LINE Published In the Nlsqually Valley News August 8,1996 Posted In Pub/lc Areas August 6, 1996 * Recyckd paper APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Rle No. OR SITE PLAN REVIEW /l /J!t Conditional Use Fee. $500 00 e!?% ) rJJ Site Plan Fee. $250 00 plus $25.00 per mobile home space e/ /f Multi-Family Building/Condominium: $100.00 plus $10.00 per unit Commercial Site Plan: $100.00 plus S50.00 per ',000 sq ft. of gross floor area Industrial Site Plan: $100 00 plus $100 00 per acre YELlVI: WASHINCTON ',CITY OF YELM P.O. Box.479 Yelm, WA98597 458-3244 #93028 OFFICIAL USE ONL'r Fee Date Received By A conditional use permit is an approval of a land use having slightly greater or unique impacts compared to those of the uses permitted as a matter of right by city zoning Site plan review IS a process for reviewing the design of certaIn types of development. Site plan approval is required for mobile home parks, duplexes. multi-family dwellings, commercial and industrial uses, planned development districts and for all land uses within the central business district. Each requires a hearing before eIther the Yelm Planning Commission or City Council NAME OF PROJECT Prairie Plaza Shopping Center APPLiCANT \Rocky-pra-i.Jr-ie-DevelGpment....Co--!_~ .... Mailing Addres; P.o. Box 480------) City, State and Zip Yelrn, WA 98597 Telephone (360) 458-2201 OWNER Salle as above. Mailing Address City, State and Zip Telephone ENGJNEER/ARCHITECT/OTH ER Maiiing Address City, State and Zip Telephone (S-;-eharr1J::ie:tlairr~&--Assoc:-'~, P.o. Box 3485 Lace WA 98509-3485 (360)493-6002 SUMMARY OF REQUEST Amend existing site plan review approval for Prairie Plaza. Eliminate fast-food pad and 12,000 sf retail bldg. Replace with 6,800 sf u.S. Post Office and 6,300 sf automobile care center. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION General Location North side of Yelrn Ave. (SR 507) between Plaza Dr. and Creek st. Site Address None Land Area (acres) Section 30 Township 17N Range 2E Assessor's Tax Parcel Number 22730110103, 22730110104, 22730140101 Full legal description of subject property (attach separate sheet if necessary) Lots 2 4 of SS~8017 ....;,~,..q""""."."~~;;L....,,.'""".O, ,-......;... Z;\ I PO Box 3485 Lacey, Washington 98509-3485 67,7 Woodland Square LJ? SE Lacey, WashingtQn 9850;3 (360) 493-6002 (360) 493-2476 Facsimile (360)458-2487 Yelm .\j So - Chamberlain & Associates, Inca MEMORANDUM DATE September 21, 1995 TO Ken Garmann FROM. John :KJ{owles r/&L- SUBJECT' PraIne Plaza SeA #93028 DISCUSSION Ken, I have enclosed two bluehne copIes of the plans per your request. I r81terat~d to Larry Schorno that the plan. approval lasts for one year, and that a 6i1e-year--.extenslOn may be requested, If needed.- JEKIl] enclosure (2 bluelme sets of plans) (C' \corres \3028920.mmo) '1~ ENGINEERING PLANNING o SURVEYING o STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY p.o. Box 47600 <I> Olympia, Washington 98504-7600 0 (206) 407-6000 0 TDD Only (Hearing Impaired) (206) 407-6006 May 18, 1994 Ms. Kathryn Wolf City of Yelm PO Box 479 Yelm, WA 98697 Dear Ms. Wolf: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for the construction of the Prairie Plaza Commer- cial Center on 12.32 acres located between Yelm Avenue and Plaza Drive proposed by Rocky prairie Development Company. We reviewed the environmental checklist and have the following comments. 1. Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent soil from being carried into surface water by stormwater runoff. Sand, silt, and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered pollutants. Causing or allowing pollutants to enter state waters carries a maximum penalty of $10,000 per day. 2. The applicant should check with solid waste officials, garbage haulers, and recyclers to locate recycling services that are available locally. Recycling programs and requirements outlined in ,the local comprehensive solid waste management plan may affect the project. The applicant should also refer to the local comprehensive solid waste management plan for recycling programs and requirements in the community. 3. The facility should be designed to accommodate recycling. Opportunities for recycling aluminum, other metals, glass, newspaper, corrugated containers, plastics, office paper and other materials should be as convenient as throwing them out. Space should be provided to accommodate the storage of these materials both inside the building and at a centralized location outside the building. 4. The applicant, when considering space in the design of the building(s), may also want to consider processing equipment, such as a baler, to compact recyclables. ~. @ '"" Ms. Kathryn Wolf Page 2 May 18, 1994 5. During the construction phase of the project, we encourage the applicant to use products made from recycled materials wherever possible. Products containing recycled materials include parking lot bumper stops, park and picnic benches, landscape timbers and sign posts made from recycled plastic, rubberized asphalt made with recycled tires, glassphalt made with ground glass, insulation and other building materials. An inquiry to a building material supplier will provide information on what products are available and at what percentage the prod- ucts contain recyclable materials (the higher the better). 6. During the landscaping phase of the project, we recommend using recycled materials. Compost from recovered organic waste can be used as a soil amendment in landscaping. Chipped woody debris can be used to mulch ornamental beds, to control erosion on slopes, and as a base for pathways and jogging trails. We also recommend that organic landscaping debris generated on-site be used on-site. 7. During the construction phase of the project, we encourage the applicant to recycle construction debris and to reduce construction waste whenever possible. 8. During daily operations of the facility, we recommend using products and supplies that are recyclable and/or made from recycled materials. The local office supply company may have products and supplies made with recycled materials. Also, non- toxic chemicals for cleaning and maintenance should be consid- ered. If you have any questions on comment 1, please call Mr. Bill Young with the Water Quality Program at (206) 407-6399. Ques- tions on comments 2 through 8, should be directed to Mr. Arthur Hugo with the Solid Waste Services Program at (206) 407-6351. Sincerely, ~!t~~ Barbara J. Ritchie Environmental Review section BR:tm 94-3453 cc: Carey Grunenfelder, SWRO Bill Young, SWRO Arthur Hugo, SWRO ~ Ryal~!~~tA .... , / . YELM, WASHINGTON 98597 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON County of Thurston Fiona Reeves , being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that she/he is the general manager of the Nisqually Valley News, a weekly newspaper That said newspa- per is a legal newspaper and has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the publications hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Thurston County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper Th h d . Notice of Mitigated at t e annexe IS a true copy of Determination of Nonsignificance as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form) of said 1 newspaper once a week for a period of consecutive weeks, commencing on the 5 day of May 94 . and ending on the 19 5 day of May ,19 94 both dates inclusive and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ 25 . 50 which amount has been paid in full. ~---- Subscribed and sworn to before me this 13 day of 1994 residing at Yelm, Washington. This form officially sanctioned by the Washington Newspaper Publishers' Association NOTICE OF MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCe: The City of Yelm issued ~ mitigated determination of nonsignificance (MONS) under the State Environmental Policy Act Rules (Chapter 1 97 11 WAC) for the following project: Prairie Plaza Shopping Center, 75 000 square feet of proposed commercial buildings, intemaltraffic and pedestrian cir- culation, par1<ing and Iand~ping:d}1is pJ;9- ject Is located to t~eJcj,rth_,ot,(;~f9! ftcve. ~ ~~!{ot)~between Plaza' Dr .8[I~.~rlilek~q~, proposed by the .Rocky pralrie.'Devel~p. ment Co., ""ir"! After review of a completed environmen- tal checklist, a traffic mitigatior plan and other information on file with the City ,. the City has determined this proposal will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. ,~, . 'Copies of the DNS are available at no ~harge from the City of Yelm P~anning Dept.,. loCated at1 05 Yelm Averue:w. ,. Yelm' WA or call 458'8408. The pubhcls invited to comment on this DNS by submit~ ting written comments'no later than May 18, 1994, to Yelm Planning Dept. PO Box 479,. Yelm, WA 98597 Published in the Nisqually Valley News Thursday, May 5, 1994 1;\"1 .,.~ ", '. ) J , I~f. ? .( , , '. - q .. , / .J. l'~ ~ " _"I .'t/:'.'......l;. ;,. Carly (fJ)f Jfelm 105 Yelm Avenue West POBox 479 Yelm, Was/;ington 98597 (206) 458-3244 NOTICE OF MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONS;IGNIFICANCE T~e City of Yelm issued a mitigated determination of nonsignificance (MDNS) under the State Environmental Policy Act Rules (Chapt~r 197-11 WAC). for the following project: P~air1e Plaza Shopping Center, 75,000 squ~re ft of proposed commercial buildings, internal traffic and pedestrian circul~tion, parki~g and landscaping This project is located to the nor~h of YeTm Ave (SR501) between Plaza Dr and Creek Rd , proposed by,the RoCky Prairie Development Co Afier review of a com~leted ~nvironmental checklist, ~ traffic mitigation plan and oiher information on file with the City, the City has determined this proposal will no~ have a probable significant adverse impact. on the environment Copi'es of .the DNS are avai lable at no charge from the City of Yelm Planhihg Dept, located at 105 Yelm Avenue W Yelm, WA or ~all 458~8408 The pUblic 1S invited to comment oh this DNS bY submittim;J written comments no l~t'er than May 18, 1994, to Yelm Planning Dept P Q Box 479, Yelm, WA 98597 @ Recycled paper . . DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal Proposed 75.000 square feet of commercial buildinqs on 12.32 acres. Proponent Rocky Prairie Development Company Location of proposal, including' street address, if any Sec. 30, TI7N, R2E Lot Numbers 2-4 of SS 9017. Located North of Yelm Avenue between Plaza Drive and Creek Road. Lead agency City of Yelm The lead agency for thlS proposal has determined t~at it does not have a probable significant adverse lmpact on the environment An environmental impact statement (ElS) is no: reauired unc.er R(l;[ 43 21C 030(2)(c) This decision '..!as made after re'iew of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file ""itn the lead agency This information is available to the public on request i i There is no comment period for this DNS 00 This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(3) the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below Comments must be submitted by Responsible official Kathryn M. Wolf Position/title Mayor Phone 458-8401 Address 105 Yelm Ave W / PO Box 479 YELM WA 98597 Date 1/)Yf'l Signature f-~/ hX'"...tJ (Optional) o You may appeal this determination to (name) at (location) no later than by (method) You should be prepared to make specIfic factual objections Contact to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. o There is no agency appeal. -- T\SEPADNS.FRM \ PraLT1~ Plaza Commercwl Center A. BACKGROUND 1 Name of proposed proJect, If applIcable 2 Name of applIcant YELM WASHINGTON Rochy Prmne Developrnent Compa.ny 3 Address and phone number of applIcant and of any other contact person. Frank W~tt POBox 480 Yelm, IVA 98597 458-2201 4 Date checklIst prepared. 051271.)3 f2ev'~c1 /2;{1r 3 5 Agency requestmg checklIst Cay of Yelm. G Proposed tImmg or schedule (includmg phasmg, If applIcable) Begm constructwn rnLd-summer 1993 Budd out wdl occur m 3 to 4 phases over the next three years 7 Do you have any plans for future adchtIOns; eXpanSIOn, or further actlvIty related to or connected wIth thIS proposal? If yes, explam. No, not at thLS t~me 8 LISt any envIronmental mformatlOn you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, chrectly related to thIs proposal. None to our knowledge 9 Do you know whether applIcatIOns are penchng for governmental approvals of other proposals drrectly affectmg the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explam No, we do not 10 LIst any government approvals or permIts that wIll be needed for your proposal, If known. 5Lte Plan Ret'z.ew PublLc Worhs approval Buddmg Pe rrrLLts 11 GIve brIef, complete deSCrIptIOn of your proposal, mcluchng the proposed uses and the SIze of the project and SIte There are several questIOns later m thIS checklIst that ask you to descrIbe certam aspects of your proposal You do not need to repeat those answers on tlllS page Pram}! Plaza Cornrnercwl Center LS proposed on three eXLStmg IJJts wahm short plat #8017 17ze tot.al sLte area LS 12,32 AC wLth up to 75,000 square feet. of bwldmg area proposed. 12 LocatIOn of the proposal. GIve sufficIent mformatIOn for a person to understand the preCIse locatIOn of your proposed proJect, mcluchng a street address, If any, and sectIOn, townshIp, and range, If known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provIde the range or boundarIes of the sIte(s) ProvIde a legal deSCrIptIOn, SIte plan, vlclmty map, and topographIc map, If reasonably avmlable You need not duplIcate maps or detmled plans submItted wIth any permIt applIcatIOns related to thIS checklIst. The Project LS located m 5ect.wn 30, T17N, R2E Lot #52-4 of 55-8017 Located at the Northeast corner of Yelrn Ave and Plaza Drwe m Yelrn, Washmgton. B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1 EARTH a. ~al deSCrIptIOn of the SIte (CIrcle one) ~ rollIng, hIlly, steep slopes, mountamous, other) b What IS the steepest slope on the SIte (apprOXImate percent slope)? The steepest slope does not exceed 5%. c. What general types of sOlIs are found on the SIte (for example, clay, sand, gravel, / so, generally descrIbe No, there are not c Proposed measures to reduce or control emISSIons or other Impacts, If any None proposed. 3 WATER a. Surface Water 1) Is there any surface water body or wetland on or m the Immechate VICInIty of the sIte (incluchng year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds)? If yes, descrIbe type and provIde names State what stream or rIver It flows mto No, there lS not 2) WIll the project reqUIre any work over, Ill, or adjacent to (wIthm 300 feet) the deSCrIbed waters? If yes, please descnbe and attach aVaIlable plans No, Lt wLll not 3) Estlmate the amount of fill and dredge materIal that would be placed III or removed from surface water or wetlands and mchcate the area of the sIte that would be affected. Inchcate the source of fill materIal. None 4) WIll the proposal reqUIre surface water WIthdrawals or chversIOns? GIVe general deSCrIptIOn, purpose, and approXImate quantltles If known No, Lt wLll not 5) Does the proposal he wItlun a lOa-year foodplam? If so, note elevatlOn on the SIte plan. No, Lt does not 6) Does the proposal Illvolve any chscharge of waste matenals to surface ..~ 4 PLANTS a. Check or cIrcle types of vegetatIOn found on the sIte decIduous tree alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree fir, cedar, pme, other X shrubs X grass pasture crop or gram wet sOlI plants cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants water lIly, eelgrass, mIlfoII, other other types of vegetatIOn b What kmd and amount of vegetatIOn WIll be removed or altered? The enstmg shrubs and grass WLll be removed from the sLte c. LIst threatened or endangered speCIes known to be on or near the sIte None lmown. d. Proposed landscapmg, use of natIve plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetatIOn on the sIte, If any New landscapmg wLll be placed m all areas not consumed wLth bwldmgs and parlang 5 ANIMALS a. ClYcle any bIrds and ammals wmch have been observed on or near the sIte or are known to be on or near the sIte bIrds hawk heron, eagle,~~~ other mammals-~: bear, elk, beaver, other fish. bass,~on, trout, herrmg, shellfish, other b LIst any pnonty, threatened or endangered speCIes known to be on or near the sIte None lmown. c. Is the sIte part of a mIgratIOn route? If so, explam. Not to our Imowl.edge I I I / / 2) What types and levels of nOIse would be created by or assocIated wIth the project on a short-term or a long-term basIs (for example traffic, constructlOn, operatlOn, other)? IndIcate what hours nOIse would come from the sIte Short term nOLSe WLll be assocwted wLth constructwn actwLty whLle l.ong term nOLSe wLll be assocwted wLth heavy automobLle traffic. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control nOIse Impacts, If any LLmLt constructwn actwLty to daylIght hours only 8 LAND AND SHORELINE USE a What IS the current use of the sIte and adjacent propertIes? Current use of the property LS vacant Adjacent propertLes are el,ther vacant or commercwl type uses b Has the sIte been used for mmeral excavatIOn, agnculture or forestry? If so, descnbe No, Lt has not c. Descnbe any structures on the sIte No structures eXLSt on sLte d. Will any structures be demolIshed? If so, what? No e What IS the current comprehensIVe plan desIgnatIOn of the sIte? Commercwl. f. What IS the current zonmg classIficatIOn of the sIte? Commercwl. 10 AESTHETI CS a. What IS the tallest heIght of any proposed structure(s), not mcludmg antennas, what IS the pnnclpal extenor bUlldmg matenal(s) proposed. The tallest hezght of any structure WLll not exceed 50 feet b What VIews ill the immemate vlclmty would be altered or obstructed? Potentwl VLeWS of lvlount RamLer would be partwlly obstructed from some propertws c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetlc Impacts If any. New landscapmg wLll take place throughout the sLte 11 LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of lIght or glare wIll the proposal produce? What tIme of day would It mamly occur? Parkmg lot lzghtmg for safety and secunty purposes b Could lIght or glare from the fimshed project be a safety hazard or mterfere wIth VIew? No, Lt would not. c What eXlstmg off-SIte sources of lIght or glare may affect your proposal? None should affect thzs proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control lIght and glare Impacts, If any None proposed. 12 RECREATION a. What desIgnated and mformal recreatlOnal opportumtles are m the Immemate vlclmty? Varwus CLty parks throughout the area. b Would the proposed proJect dIsplace any eXIstmg recreatIOnal uses? If so descrIbe No, Lt would not c Proposed measures to reduce or control Impacts or provIde rec:r:eatIOn opportumtIes None proposed. 13 HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or obJects lIsted on, or proposed for, natIOnal, state, or local preservatIOn regIsters known to be on or next to the sIte? If so, generally descrIbe Not to our lmowledge b Generally descrIbe any landmarks or eVIdence of hIStOrIC, archaeologIcal, sCIentlfic, or cultural Importance known to be on or next to the sIte None on tlns sLte c. Proposed measures to reduce or control Impacts, If any" None proposed. 14 TRANSPORTATION a. Identlfy SIdewalks, traIls, publIc streets and hIghways servmg the sIte, and descrIbe proposed access to the eXIstmg street system Show on sIte plans, If any SR.507, Plaza Drwe, and Creek Road wLll serve thLS sLte b Is sIte currently served by publIc transIt? By what means? If not, what plans eXIst for tranSIt serVIce? No, Lt LS not. c. How many parkmg spaces would the completed proJect have? How many would the proJect elImmate? Approxunately 375parkmg stalls Mnll be provu1ed. ./" ) Water - CLty of Yelm, Sewer - CLty of Yelm, Phone - Yelm Telephone, Powe r - Puge t Powe r C SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge I understand ::;:::~T~'tY ~~m to;ake its deCiSlOn. Date submitted._ < !?eU!6ed 12/:;,,/5C3 -r City of YelDl 105 Yelm Avenue West POBox 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 206-458-3244 MITIGATION FOR 'PRAIRIE PLAZA' OFFICE BUILDING SITE-PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: The City of Yelm, acting as lead agency. has determined that the following mitigation will be set forth as a condition of the determination on nonsignif1cance (DNS) 1) The applicant shall contribute financially to the five- corners intersection improvement and/or Y-2 Alternate as specified in the 1992 Yelm Comprehensive Transportation Plan Contribution is based upon the number of automobile trips generated at this site in the P M peak hour Contribution for the proposed use at this site shall not exceed three hundred do 11 ar s ($300 00) per t rip) not to exceed 137 trips or a maximum of $41,100.00. 2) The applicant shall agree to submit an agreement waiving any right the applicant might have to protest the formation of a Local Improvement District (LID) or Latecomer's Agreement 3) In addition, all mitigation as contained in the June 1993 Traffic Impact Ananlysis, far this project, as described and included as part of the mitigation required for project approval /~ / /~ Applicants Signatu~~~ Da te: LI-J;)~qi ~ \/ . . '" MEMORANDUM 4/14/94 TO: City of Y elm Planning Dept. A TTN: Ty Peterson FROM: Robert Connolly, PE for the City ofYelm RE: Prairie Plaza Shopping Center Preliminary Approval Comments Upon review of the proposed project referenced above it is recommended that conditional approval be granted to include the following conditions: A. That a final drainage report be prepared WIth the followmg corrections and/or reVISions. . The drywell storage volumes shall be based on 125cf/l000sf of roof per stormwater manual. . Provisions for frontage road drainage on Creek Road and Yelm Ave. (1/2 ROW after dedication to meet required ROW widths) to be mcluded m the report. If the improvements are to be constructed at a later date, adequate area onsite should be reserved for the reqUired storm water treatment, storage and mfiltratIon. Design to be proVIded pnor to construction plans approval for the site. The treatment swales and retention basin as shown on the drainage plan located WIthm the ROW will not be acceptable. . Pnor to final acceptance of construction a storm water maintenance agreement will be required by the City . Being that no percolation tests have been proVIded, the City will reqUire certificatiOn from the engmeer at the time of construction that the percolatiOn rate of the soils at each basin exceeds 20 inches/hour If the soils percolate at a slower rate the dramage facilities will be reqUired to be modified to provide adequate storage. No vanances to drainage manual requirements will be considered. . All biOfiltration swales are to have a nurumum 1% slope and a maxt.mum 4% The flat area of the swales shall be considered for the reqUired treatment area only Mirumum lengths per the manual shall be stnctly adhered to Due to the permeability of the soils onslte, all swales and wetponds shall be constructed with impermeable liners. . For wetpond calculations only that area of the pond greater than or equal to 3 ft. m depth shall be considered as credit for the minimum surface area for treatment. . The report calculates the nunimum acceptable storage volumes but does not mclude any calculations of a drainage model as reqUired m the drainage manual. Calculations are to be provided m the final report. . The report does not mclude any calculatiOns as to the adequacy of the areas set aSide for grass biOfiltratiOn, wetponds or percolatiOn! retentiOn facihties. Without tlus informatiOn it IS Impossible to determme If the present layout of the SIte can accommodate the reqUired dramage features. . If addItional areas are found to be necessary dunng final deSign, absolutely rio vanances will be granted to alter storm water manual or city requirements. The City will not be held responsible for reqUired reduction of parkmg or building areas due to the reslZlng of dramage facihtIes. Provide calculations in final report. SKILLINGS-CONNOLL Y, INe q;\I994\94007\ltr418kh.doc PRAIRIE PLAZA Page 1 . . '- . If a gas station! minimart is proposed in the future adequate, oiV water separation deVIces designed per state guides will be reqUired. . The final drwnage report shall be subrmtted to the city for review and approval at the time of final construction plan subrmttal. B. A mutual access and utilities easement agreement with adjacent property owners on Algiers Drive and Plaza Drive IS required. C. An agreement enforcmg adjacent property owners to maintam Algters Drive and Plaza Drive to mimmum City roadway maintenance standards. D. The developer shall design the frontage improvements for Creek Road to current City standards. The developer shall bond to complete the roadway work within one year WIth a one year extension possible. Additional nght-of-way to be proVIded as a conditIOn of approval. Right -of-way to be 35 feet from eXlstmg roadway center line. The applicant shall be required to complete the deSign of the frontage improvements prior to final engineenng approval of the Civil drawings for this proJect. E. Improve Algiers Dnve and Plaza Dnve to meet rmmmum pnvate roadway standards WIth a 6 foot sidewalk on one Side from Creek Road to the second parking lot entrance on the south side of Algiers. The pavement IS m poor condition and therefore should be repaired or reconstructed to present standards. F. All mitigation as contained m the June 1993 Traffic Impact Analysis are accepted as described and mcluded as part of the rmtlgatlon required for project approval. Included m this IS that the applicant contribute his fair share of the costs towards the "5 corners intersectIOn" mitigation. cc. Shelly Badger PRAIRIE PLAZA SKILLINGS-CONNOLL Y, INC. q;\I994\94007\ltr418kh.doc Page 2 ;SCA (;77 Woodland Square Lp SE P.o Box 3485 Lacey, Washington 98503-0485 (206) 493-6002 (206) 493-2476 Facsimile (907) 279-5929 Anchorage s. Chamberlain & Associates, Inc. April 14, 1994 Ty Peterson, City Planner City of Yelm P 0. Box 479 Yelm, W A 98597 Re: Prairie Plaza Conceptual Drainage Report SCA Project No. 93028 Dear Ty. In response to Mark Cooks letter dated November 10, 1993, we offer the following' The original 90,000 SF of roof area referenced to in the environmental checklist was a conservative estimate made from a rough site plan proposal. Further refinement in the proposed project site has established a more accurat~ figure of 75,000 SF The site. plan originally submitted-with the Conceptual Drainage Report has changed and 90,000 SF of roof area does not reflect the most recent project proposal. Total landscaped area (stormwater basins and bio.filtration swales) now equals 2.6 +/- acres. Total asphalt area was slightly reduced to 8.0 acres. We request approval of the Conceptual Drainage Plan as submitted (i.e., based on the expected revised drainage manual requirement) with the approval conditioned on granting of a variance from the requirements now in effect. The use of 100 CF/lOOO SF for roof drywell sizing was ba~ed on cnteria proposed in the Drainage Manual Draft Revision available at the time of this Conceptual Drainage Plan submittal. The currently proposed revision to 125 _ CF/lOOO SF can be utilized without adverse effects to the original proposal for drywell use. Based on 75,000 SF of roof area, the minimum drywell storage volume would now be 9,375 CF The project site has ample capacity to provide this increase in storage requi'rements. Again, we request conditional approval based on the ultimate granting of variance from existing policy to that of the current TCDM Draft. Treatment provided will consist ofbiofilters with the possible use of wet ponds for pre. treatment. The attached scaled SIte plan drawing proposes 18,000 :!: SF ofbiofiltration swales. The final design will satisfy all requirements of the TCDM final draft. The project site does fall within the Yelm Creek Drainage Basin. The flat terrain and permeable soils present on-site will prevent any off. site runoff. All drainage facilities will conform to the TCDM. The proposed construction site erosion control measures will further ensure no adverse impacts to Yelm Creek. ENGINEERING PLANNING . SURVEYING . 'seA The on-site soil conditions encountered during our initial soils logging on 4/13/93 indicated the soil permeability rate of 20 inches per hour used in the conceptual report is probably conservative. Soil conditions throughout the site were very consistent, with soils below 24" more permeable than those logged immediately west at the Nisqually Plaza project site Falling head percolation tests taken on the Nisqually Plaza site revealed a percolation rate of 40 inches/hour We, therefore, feel it is reasonable to assume a 20 inches/hour percolation rate for this conceptual report. Percolation test results for the final report will be completed as per Appen.dix L of the manual. We request that all the percolation tests may be completed as part of the final report, and that conditional approval of this conceptual report be based on a percolation rate of 20 inches/hour The required minimum volume ofthe retention facility assuming a total impervious area of9 72 acres is 26,600 CF The minimum volume to be infiltrated per Appendix D would be 5~,325 CF The overall capacity of the proposed stormwater retention/infiltration basins to infiltrate runoff over a 48 hour time frame is 556,416 CF (assuming a percolation rate of20 inches/hour) The proposed retention/infiltration basins will satisfy the storage volume and infiltration capacity requirements set forth in the-proposed drainage manual revisions. A scaled drawing showing the size and location of the required treatment and storage facilities is attached for your review Also, inCluded are revised drainage calculations for the most recent site plan. We hope this will satisfy your concerns regardmg the subject conceptual drainage plan approval. If you have any additional questions or comments, please contact us at 493-6002. Sincerely, S. CHAMBERLAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. U/~~ William Parnell, P.E. WP/jl Enclosures (c: \corres \93028414.1tr) ENGINEERING PLANNING SURVEYI.NG . . RETENTION FACILITIES DESIGN CALCULATIONS Minimum Volume of Retention Facility Total Impervious Area Lots 2,3 and 4 Proposed Asphalt Paving/Concrete Area = Proposed Buildmg Area = Total Area = 8 00 Ac 1 72 Ac 9 72 Ac Total DIsturbed PervIous Area. = 26Ac Assume 20"1hr or 3 minlinch Volume Required For paving area & pervious area from latest version of Drainage Manual. = 3,000 CF x 8.00 Ac + 1,000 CF x 260 Ac Ac Ac = 26,600 CF Roof Drain Drywell Volumes Required Total dramrock drywell trench volumes includmg rock, per 1,000 SF of roof, accordmg to table 8 2 of latest version of Drainage Manual. 125 CFIl,OOO SF of Roof Total Roof Area of All Buildings = 75,000 SF Total Minimum Drywell Volume: 125 CF Storage = 1000 SF Roof Area (x) CF Storage 75,000 SF Roof Area x = 9,375 CF of Total Storage RETENTION DESIGN EVENTIMINIMUM VOLUME TO BE INFILTRATED 100% of 100 Year Storm Volume Estimate SCS Curve Number for Group B Appendix D - Table D 1 and D 2 Land Use (pre-Development) MeadowlPasture = 78 Land Use (post-Development) Commercial (85% Impervious) = 94 From Table D 1 Pre- Development for SCS #78, Inches of Runoff = 0 99 Runoff = 0.99 x 12 32 Ac x 43,560 SF = 12 Ac 44,274 CF Post-Development for SCS #94, Inches of Runoff = 2 16 Runoff = 2.16 x 12 32 Ac x 43,560 SF = 12 Ac 96,599 CF Volume to be infiltrated on the project site in open basins. 96,599 - 44,274 = 52,325 CF Volume infiltrated by open basins: Assume percolation rate = 20"/hr = 0 33"/min Percolation Rate (for a I' x I' surface area) = 000046 CFS SF Volume Infiltrated m 48 hours = 000046 CFS x 7,000 SF infiltratIOn SF basm surface area x 60 S x 60 Min x 48 Hour = Min Hr 556,416 CF > 52,325 CF BID-FILTER REQUIREMENTS (7.4) Bio-filter area prlOr to retentIon/infiltration facility' Minimum Total Surface Area = 2,000 SF/Impervious Ac Bio-filter area after detention (wet well) facility. MImmum Total Surface Area = 500 SF/Impervious Ac MImmum Surface Area of Bio-filter Assummg Bio-filter Area PrIor to RetentIon: Mimmum Surface Area = 2,000 SF x 8.00 Ac Ac = 16,000 SF APP-14-94 THU 16:25 ~KILLINGS-CONNOLLY :r P_01 "' 5 8KlI~DING'S.CONN01.Lj~ 1^'C Consu.}(jOC El.'t!lllCCfS FACSlMU...E Tl1ANSMrT'I'AL To Company' --W71j.,. ~ILL-..W~?". , ,. ~ ._. _._ "'._.'J . Illdividu>ll _7j- ,~,"'.er;$6h.,. ; Sully.. B'Owci, e c l?nx #..._~._,._.~f Q f~:' 'i.31 fJ From Individ"al ". R@,but:"._ COl'.y.gJl~ _ _ _ , OUf F1Ix II LU>.QL42.l.::?BSl I I j Number of pages (including this page) _.;J.." l'fojrtt Number _.2.'fP9.7 Date: .,.it. -Ii.:.! l:l& Time sent. _~Q_Q Project Name _....... __. _~ . SlIbj<<1 _ 1>.r::4iYlt;!..1~: ~~~~'-T:__ -.__ _ _ . .- Additiona' Comments .g~fO)1" JOfl. ~ fl.1?T.~/T-'t.P-id.. . .c.1M:!"(4-_:s~ .Q.rcI. ..' .GQY.:rt~'N~CA.it15.l YF~~ NoD Hard Copy to follow by m~il: ... IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL corIes OR ANY PAGE IS NOT LEG.on,E PI~I;;AS)i: CAU.. (206) 491-3399, AS SOON AS POSSIBl.E". I I 'Ibis facsImile uansmissiofl (and or dOc.uUlf-nts accompanYlng it) may contain confidential information belongmg to a sender which is protected by the consultant-clie.nt privilege The infonnatlon is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above If you are not the IOtended recipitnt. you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copymg, diStribution, or the taking of any action in rcHance on the cQments of this information lS strictly prohibited If you received this transmiSsIOn in error. ple;)se notify 1I5 by telephone lJJUnedialely to arrange for rel\n n or destruction of the documents 5016 La(~y Boulevard 5.1-:., 1'. 0 Box 5080 Lace}', Wll...tun~ton 98S03.S080 (206) 491-3399 FAX (I06) 491.38.57 ... M~~M()RAN'DUM 4/14/94 TO: TyPeterson and Shelly Badger FROM: Robert Connolly, Pl: R}~: Prairie Plaza Shopping Center Afler reviewing the drainage report as submitted for this projc.ct It 15 recommended that the following items be addressed · Recalculate the drywell storage volume.s using 12Scf/ 1 OOOsf of roof per storlllwater manual . ProviSIons for frontage road drainage on Creek Road and Yelm Ave (112 ROW aile!" dedicatIOn to meet requITed ROW widths) to be included in the report. If the Improvements are to be constructed at a latcr date, ade.quate are.a onSlte should be rc.sclvcd for the reqUired stormwater treatment, storage and mfiltratlon. Design to be provided prior to construction plans approval for the site. . Pnor to final ac-ceptance of construction a stormwater mamtenance agreement will bl' reqUIred by the City . "". Bemg that no percolatton tests have been provided, the city will require certification from the englncer at the lime of conslnlctlon that the percolation rate of the soils at eaeh basm exce,eds 20incheslhour lfthe soils percolate at a slower rate the drainage facilities will be reqUired to be modified to prOVide adequate storage No variances to dcamage manual reqUirements wlll be considered. . All blOfillralion swales arc to have a ml1llrnUm 1% slope. The flat area ofthc swales shall be conSidered for the reqUired treatment area only Minimum lengths per the manual shall be strIctly adhered to Due to the permeability of the soils onsite, all swale-s. and wet ponds shall be constructed Wlth impermeable liners. Please provide dChuls for approval . For wetpond calculatIOns only that area of the pond greater than or equal to 3 ft. in depth shall be conSidered as credit for the nurumurn surface area for treatment . The re.port calculates the nunimlltn acceptable storage volumes but does not include any calculations of a dramage model as reqUired In the dramage manual. Calculations arc to be proVided .. The report does not tnclude any calculations as to the adequacy of the areas set aSIde fOf g.-ass biofiltratton, wet ponds or percolatIOn! retention facilities Without this IJ1fonnatlon It IS impossible to determine If the present layout of the site can acc.ollllHodate the reqUired dramage features. If additional areas are found to be necessaJY dUring final deSign, absolutely no vanances will be granted to alter stormwatcr manual or city reqUirements The city will not be held responsible for reqUired reduchon of parkll1g or building areas due to the reslzing of drainage facilities. . If a gas station! minuTIart IS proposed in the future adequate, oiV water separatIOn devices designed per state guides will be reqUired . A final drain<lgc report shall be provided for city a\X;Cptancc at the tune oCfinal plAn sllbnulti~1 o 4_=J_4-=-9_4___D_L1._ -..J LI. ~~,I_P_il 'L _ ~ I' SKI Dl1N(,'..9.CONNOL1~.Y, lIVe Conc;u1tiJ'K r..ngmcr.cs FACSlM" LE THANSMl'rrAL To Company' ( ~ .1- ~ ~. .fl., <.. ji! Jl\di\lidu~1 I _ _ .'-:: l!..r-:I- L/ ~ .f' r.~ Q .. i...,. . .1 (' I L:-:11 i ~_...~ ..lIII pi ( Vi\ x # ~ './ ,..)l.....( r 'Frol1l Indi,,'idual ,. __j<'r:; t... I , Olle }'ax 1/ {~.QQ L491-) &~1 NUlllh{'f oC pagt'S (including this page) .. rrojea NumQcr: _ '--:/~~~.q.~... () ,70 I' -) . :0!~ Lc: I f.~ D~Ht' _ Ii d._:./'].I./_-__ Time sent rfojtx( Name f ., /4. I t Sl.Ihjc(t . J' /') f::ri i /:...-....... .=. f_ (~ . , !....."...(- .~ t. tf""Lr ~ Addition!ll Comments Hard Copy to follow by mail: YES JZ1 NoD U IF YOU 1>0 NOT RECf<;lVE ALl, COI)JE$ OR ANY PAGE IS NOT Lft~Gl8n<: PLF:ASE CALL (206) 491-3399, AS SOON AS POSSml,R". ThIS fac.slImle tr;mSrnJS~IOn (and or doC\.unems accompanYIng it) may contain confidential informalion b\.'.loogmg to a sender which IS protecte.d hy tile consultant-dient privilege The information is mtendl.'d only for the use of the 1I1divldual or entity named above If you are not the mte.nded wcipienr, yotl are hereby DOldit:.d that any disclosure, copymg, distribution, or tile taking of any action in reliance 011 the contt'nts of this mformatlon 1$ srdctly prohibited If you re.celVed thiS transmission in enor, please notif" us by t('lcphone Immediately to arrange for re.turn or destruction of the documents 50161Atcey Boulcvllrd S.lo:., P O. Box 5080 I.ac~y, Wastullglon 98503-5080 (206) 49J-3399 J.'AX (206) 491-3857 .---'--''-----l~_~_~ ---=-"-.,.L...!.. ~1l.~,-'--'-1-- PRAIRIE PLAZA RESPONSE TO TRAFFIC ISSUES 1 he following is a summary of the status of each cIty comment relayed to the project consultant in Mark Cook's letter of November 9, 1993 PAGE 1 This question was not addressed We need to know what tl1e square footage of the proposed shopping canter really is The drawings and reports use different figures 2 The sIte was correctly analyzed as a shopping centor Ignore this comment. 3 Tho City made a valid comment. The consultant memo stressed again the tvvo shopping iXlntors will act as one The fact that the two shopping centers are not physically connected for automobile access was not addressed The latest copy of the site plan shows tl10 two shopping centor driveways offset approximately 150 feet. This clearly 1/1dlcates tl1at the two centers are separate The report should be modified to show P(alne PI::U8 as a separate shopping center as suggested earlier 4 Tho cnteria used was sited Incorrectly This question is not important. 5 1 ho consultant's response to the cIty's comments suggest permission was given to use 35% for a trip reduction discount. The study states on pages 8 and 13 that a 30% pass by discount was used According to Yolrn's Comprehensive Transportation Plan, Appendix 0 SectIon D, Part 3a, MA 'passer-by' traffic volume discount for commercial conters shall not exceed 25% unloss approved by the ERO (environmental review officer). lhe total sqW3H; footage for the two centers combined equals 186,000 square feet. From figure VII.1A page 1-30, ITE Trap Generation, 1991 Edition, the pass-by trip reduction disCOllnt for 186,000 square feel is approximately 36% For 90,000 square feet the pass-by trMfic reduction discount is approximately 48% The 30% pass.by trip reduction discount Llsed In tile study is acceptable 6 This question was nol addressed Correction of this problem will result in a different number of trips generated by the site. The consultant should make the necessary changes PAG~: 2 ? This quostlon was not addressed AssumIng tho latest site plan is used, the report should rafloet the changes of the site plan. 8 This QlJOstion was not addrossed Not important at this time PAGE 3 9 The weekday evening peak-hour turning movement volumes are shown in FIgure 3 of the study Disregard this question. SKICCiNGS-CON-N"OLLY,-INC-'-'--- q;\ 1 ~1l4001\ltc412lch.doo -."-'PRNRIE PLAZA' --, Page 1 10 Tho decision to usa a growth (actor of 4% or 5% is not available for our review at this time However, it is a minor issue with little significance when applied to the existing traffic volumes for a one year period 11 This question was not addressed Not important at this time PAGE 5 12 This question was not addressed Not important at this time PAGE 6 13 Ignoro this comment. 14 Tho driveways from the two shopping centers are offsot approximately 150 feet on PI8Z8 Dnvo This type of alignment does not promote a smooth traffic flow betvveen the two shopping ,.enters and can possibly cause congestion on Plaza Drive It is recommended that the driveway be moved approximately 150 feet west to match the opposite driveway IntI) the Nisqually Plaza Shopping Center If the City decides not to require this, the dovelopcr sl10uld be inforll1ed that the City will not be held responsible for any future problems. 15 Goth Mark Cook and tho consultant interpreted the land use differently ITE descnbes "A shopping center is an integrated group of commercial establishments which is planned, doveloped, owned and managed as a unit. Its composition is related to Its market area in terms of size, locaUon and type of store Shopping centers provide on-site parking facilities" S-C agrees the site should be evaluated as a shopping center based upon the 11E desalption When applying the calculations to detennine the number of trips generated by the sito the consultant should follow the directions suggested in the ITE Trip Generation Report, page 1230, paragraph 4 which states "Many shopping centers, in addition to the Integrated unit ot shops in one building or enclosed around a mall, include out-parcels (peripheral buildings or pads located on tho perimutor ot the center adjacent to the streets and major access points) These buildings are generally drive-in banks, restaurants, or small offices The data herein do not indicate which cenlers included peripheral buildings In general, it can be assumed that tho data do reflect the effect of the peripheral buildings However, it is suggested when estimating driveway volumes for a shopping center for the purpose of designing the access that a conservative approach be taken. First, calculate the trips generated by the peripheral buildings as part of the shopping center (using the chopping center trip generation statistics) and as a mu/tinuse davelopment (using the peripheral land uses trip generatior statistics) Then usa the higher of the two estimates" liOW mucll of the total square footago is intended for use as a fast food rastaurant and gas/mini,mart? The report should be changed to reflect any changes SKlllINGS..CONNOlLY, jNc q;\ 1~94'.94007\ll1417'h.doo ......... -"'-.-"- PRAIRIE PLAZ.A Page 2 1- L--_I_ '__.-L --L-.......-- --.:........:.. ___t-.J;.,l_---L..!....::- PAGE 7 16 Ignore this comment. PAGE 8 1l Tho estimated traffic goneration should be reevaluated based upon the latest sQuare footage of U1e proposed site There is a discrepancy between ~od on page 1 and the square footage shown in figure 1 );; otJiJ 18 1his question was not addressed Not Important at this time PAGE 9 19 "' hIs question was not addressed Where is the figure depicting trip distribution which is called for in Appendix 0 of Yelm's Comprehensive Transportation Plan? Consultant to provide thIs figure. This also applies to note no 18 PAGE 11 20 Refer to note no 3 PAGE 12 21 DIsregard this Question :/2 ThIS question was not addressed Not important at this time PAGE 13 23 Disregard this comment. PAGF 14 24 1 his quostion was not addrossed Were the calculations done tor 1993 or 1994? All the calGulations will have to be redone to rofloct the change in trip generation. PAGF15 25 Ignoro this comment. PAGE 17 26 Disregard this comment. PAG~: 18 'Xl , his que5tion was not addressed Not important at this time - to ~......... ~--..^". -...... -,.....-".-.-..... PRAIRIE. PLAZA skiu.IN(3'$OONNOLLY~ INC~ .~.- q:\ 1994\9400'Nlf .c12ktl.docl Page 3 PAGE 21 28 .his question was not addressed. How will the pedestrians crossing Plaza Drive be accommodat$d? Consultant to provide text. PAGE 22 29 This questlon was not addressed Not important at this time PAGE 24 30 Mixed.use discounts don't apply to this proJect. Disregard this comment. PAGE 25 31 Disregard this comment. ADDITIONAL 32 Please review and re-work as necessary (based on above) all tables and figures Impacted basod on the discussion above 33 Hevlew and approval of the TIA shalf be required prior to the pUblic hearing for this proposal. MITIGATION The following is a list of suggested mitigation's A mutual access and utilities easement agreement with adjacent property owners on Algiers Drive and Plaza Drive . An agreement enforcing adjacent proporty owners to maintain Algiers Drive and Plal{l Dnve to minImum City roadway maintenance standards . ^ waiver of LID protest on Creek Road frontage improvements Additional right-of-way to bo proYidod as a condition of approval Right -of.way to be ajfeet from existing roadway center IIno. 3.5 . Improve Algiers Drive and Plaza Drive to meet minimum private roadway standards with a 6 fool sldowalk on one side The pavemont is in poor condition and therefore should bo repaired to present standards. 0.,-__ Bus.. plltkouts shall be COm>tI ucted on t>o{n SIdes of PI3-'C:I O. ive A summary of tile Items the developer's consultant needs to address at this time are Nos 1,3.6, ", 14, 15. 17, 19,24,28,32 and 33 SKTC~(NG~CONNOlLY.I'NC."'~~" q;\ 19~-4\94Q07\I(14 , 2t..h.dOc '-".,. ....................' -.-. -"'. PRAIRIE PlAl.A Page 4 Sev()ral docisions concerning mitigation fees depends heavily upon the number of trips gonerated and how the trips are distributed The items in quastion need to be adprf}ssed in order to get a best information possible so mitigation decisions can be made .....s /l. o~ Wo recommend that the consultant respond to the items addressed above The City will have to decide whether or not to accept the traffic impact conditionally or require an updated report SKll.l'NG~fCONNOlLY.I~"C- q;\ 19!1.c\94OQ7IItr4 mll.doc _. _... __..._ ...-.. YO' _. .....~ PRAIRIE PlAZA Page 5 -'T~'" .,;., - , \ ... !' .......~ ..,......._~.. "<<'.1......-..;_ "I'" ._..._. .,' ..L.,....,O:... ~....:...~......'4 ..;~:....,.I":\4'j_-"'",,,,'_""""'" "I......,. ". t. ',I ",.. .w '~YELM. WAe:".UNOfO,." ]05 relm Avenue West POBox 479 Yelm. n'tulliilglOll 98597 (206) 458-3244 November 9, 1993 S. Chamberlain and Associates, Inc. Robe:rt Hazlett, Jr. 719 Slcater-Kinney Road, Suite 120 POB 3485 La.cey, WA 98503 FilE COpy RF.;: PRAIRIE PLAZA 'l'IA Deal. Robel t.. The Cl':.V of Ye)m's englnem::-lng department has rev~ewect ::.~C- Tran5pOI~at~on Impact Analysis for the above referenced projcc~ ana has the following comments: PAG,,: 1. The Envlronmental Checklist provided to the Clty states tha~ 90,000 square feet of bUlldlng area is proposed. The 51te plan provided to the city lndlcates that 78,500 square feet cf ::etcul -- genera':" merchandlse l.S pro9osed leavJ.ng 11,500 SqUiE ~ feeL for fast food. The TIA shall reflect the proposal set forLh in the checkl~st. ,.., ~his proposal fails to meet the definitlon/descript~on of a .. s hOPP1.ng center" (ITF. T;rl.p- G~r.lera tj,,911 , 5th Ed i tion) a.nd sha ~.l. be evaluated as reta~l - general merchandise: land use code 810. " .) It is the understanding of the engineering department that thlS proposal shall NOT be physically connected to Nisqually Plaza (automobile access) and therefore the analys~6 shall be fCl- (t separate stand alone proposal, utilizing the NistlUally 21a2a traffic as background/existing traffic in the analysts and the requJ.red lmprovements (Nisqually plaza) bei.ng in place. 4 The Yclm Comprehensive Transportation plan Supplement on page ~8 states: "The Clty will adopt guidelines similar to thosp cstabllshed by the neighbOl-J.ng cities of Olymp~a and Lacey to dctcnnine when a TIA is required of a development and :.hE' scope of work needed to effectively analyze the impacts of SJ.te generated traffic." Appendix D of the Yelm ComprehensivE: Transportation Plan provides the guidel~ncs that shall be followed for review of this project. * Rtcyc:('J JK'Pfr i -'~.!-,,::":'l -~~~ f-~-'--~- c....~- {.---.-~.~ .....-::-~~ -. - \.. '-- J :" ~ ,;., -;::' r(~- <: .~ ~ " ; ( . T I , ~ ''1.. ~... M --- j -l'. " . "~"'~-";':'~"~"~'~~' -; '~.',:~,. . 1'\' - . ~:~ ;':. '.:~.~,;.:.~.,~ ,~.;, ". we .;~ ~ ~ PAGe '1 .,,', -"[". " ':,;;.~~~;.>:, 1,.~.~~.~.;.~.t:;,fL'" ", ,,;-'..: i' ,,', I -.; ;~}/~~.;l'''~: ~_..~ " ': '~ \ .._ ,~.~ ,;, ,_ '.~. ' :./: _ 16 .Z\s stated in ~tem #:5" above, ~.the maximum discount 'tnatshall be allowed lS 25%.- :rl).'r~ use" code \ 845. lndicates that only 8 statJ.ons J.n three cities were observed and that ,a maxilnum of 58% of the P.M. peak hour const~tuted npassLng byn. If this J.3 d. proposed land use for thl.s pro j ect. f please use it as the land use and not 1.ISe code 834 :01.- the ap~roximate 11,500 square area d~scussed ~n item #1 above ~AGr; 8 1 P It;dse re"-es timate r:hc "Es-c.lmated '.!:'l:~..ff l.C GeneratJ.on" based on the d~scussion above. 18 What J.S the "Yellll model" aU.uded to? What software 1.s u~~1~2ed for develop~ng directlonal distr~but~ons? PAGE 9 ') :5 the access locacea at Creek and Alg~ers ~mpl~cit in the ct~str.lbut~on to Prair.le Plaza from ~he: "East on l03rd"? PAGE ...1 ~o Please see ~tem #3 above. PAGl": 1.2 Ac~ess shall be by Plaza Dr~ve and by Alg~ers Dr.lve. 22 Is the I.pipeline'& project that 15 referenced Nisqually Pl.aza? Please see item i3 above. ?AGr~ l3 :3 Please see iteIn #10 above. Please re-work Figure 6 and alJ. othere that are effected by the clscussion above. PAGg 14 24 The proJccL'S horlzon year shall be 1994. PAGE 15 25 Please see item ill above. PAGr~ 1. 7 ,: 5 P lease ~.:eview warrants :In f *2 and :j1:11 (Plaza Drive/Yclm Avenue) basod on the discussion above. Addl.tionally, please cons.1.der the effect: of signalizatlon of "Five Corners" whnn analyz ',ng Plaza Dr.1.ve/Yelm Avenue for s.1.gnal. ....,ar:r:ants. "l " {. ..- ..~ .. .-i ;, t "1. '{ ... ~ .... ...:" l- . 5. 6 PAGE ~-~,; ,- ---;;-:--.---;~!--.-.- ~-~~--------- , - .,. 'f - ., , J _ ..:~ L . 'f~~~:~:;;:? ~:~~,~.~~/ ~~-<.'. "~. :~:. i:~~:\ :;:~~~.} ;i:.~:~ ,,;~: ,.~~ ~::i-<:\~ .:. ,~~ :.~.~~~~;~i:4~; ~~-~~i : .t,~'. f >.e~'J~:"t:"...~ !'f..~l~-:-;i}u;' ;.. ~:""1l' ,...J......, :.....:h~.~..l: ~:..~\f,~' oJ ~~JI ...~ ,:.";. r --.~ ":J.~~/1:;f:J:1.~~ i:'!.'. '\~.i?~ ~.':;~/.~,.....:~'~.:."\o ~ \#.~...: ',~~.;. ~t '.1t--~f' "~"_~'!':~;~;.. . '.J~'~'~" .:~ 'r:\ ~ 4 :;~~i..':~~~:;'~.~~'~.~"'~ t. P lease understand that .a "passer.'by" ,.t~affJ.c v:.o-l;lime 5Iisco\.1nt fOl" co~nmerc~al centers shall' not exceed 25% t1nless~:"approvcd by the ERO (Environmental Review Officer). \ SJ..nce this project would seem to faJ.l to satisf'y the crite:d.a of Categol'y II - Mixed Use Developments I no mixed use d.lscoun" shall be allowed. ') -" '( I' to f'~\ 1'\ ~. I i ~ T'hJ td:~~p1Lari .ih,fdent.ed 1;.0 the cJ.ty does not match li'ignre :: of tne TJA. Which is the appropriate slte plan? 8. No access to Yelm Avenue other than Plaza Drive is indicated lr1 F.lgllre 2. The site plan presented to the city shows an ent:::ance only located on Yelm Avenue. The access configurat.J.on presented in }'.lgure 2 IS acceptable to :..ne ~.lty's engineering department. The access conf.J.guratton ~nd~cated on the s~te plan LS NOT acceptable to the engineering department. WhJ.ch of the two proposals lS be ::".19 r:n:esented for 1. eV.lew by the plannl.ng com.HUSS.lOn? PAGE 3 'J ~;). .... - PAGE 5 ? iaza Dr:.ve/Ye.l.Jn Avenue appears to nave Deen omitt.ed from ~he weeKday even~ng peak-nour turnIng ~ovements counts - was tn~5 because none ex~sted? Why was a projected growth factor of 4% ut~lized as oppose~ ~o a growth rate of 5%? ACCldcnt data for the "Flve Corne:!" intersection states that ~1 acc~dents were recorded w~thln ~he last three years. Wete t.here 5 accidents or more loll anyone year? Spec::lficaJly, please address parts 2 and 3 of Warrant 6, M.lJ'I'C.Q, ::.. 9 88 editi.on. 12 Please note and add "ITU bus serVlce to Plaza Drive~ PAGE 6 13. Please see note *2 above. ~4 Please note that the c~ty's engineering department does NOT expect the retall and commercial community in this ar.-CE; r.O funct~on as a single shopping center. 15. What is the "progr:anuned increase" alluded to in parag aph fom:-? '. . , -----'------.:...- . :: '?: ?~' ~". ." ::,,:, ~ r. :; ,- ,::, .:- ,:"'<,';;,":;~::'- ,. "" .' , .. " ".. . .'~ ;( Jot I. 'f ~ ~ :-':y. \ <( 'l..;.~ -:. _;. ';'.;0.>....:. ",." ... ... _ .,... '" ~ .r.\ j; .4"" ~. ... ) ~~ ( ,J... r "" (., )' , '''(1i'';'~{ '; .,.,.,. .,~. ,;o:.'\!!,fYMt""',i~' " ,'.- i;;".' i~"i'~ ,,, ;', . ;,,,: :~~.~{~}'.&~,~~.;:;,.'~:.{.~oi_'~o:;~. o' 1 ~ , .~ (;:~~)i~~~~f~:' ~.."::~~~;~~~~~~:~:~t:~:l~ii2}:'\o':).~~\7\~~'i;'~:~'K}~;~i'~o'/ , ;,';,. t~..\:l~:;~"" .:;.~;o :. ,': 0 .1 -?' :." - - '127. The: c.~ty ~/s,!:aff' _ :ls" very., c.lo~e- to' proposing a 'fngnal~zatxon scheme..;- to. ',!'the -; city' coun.cil--'ior' "P,i vC,' Corners":: It l8 ancic~pated' 'that this' sil:dnali.zation :yill proceed in the nor;.zon year ~o:c t.his praject. (19911) &nd will effect -.:~.~ pcssj,ble signa.liza~icn 9f Plaza Drive/161m Avenue. PAGE ? ~ ~... :2 W 11 a sidewa~k pedest~ian clen be subm~tted to eadres5 the L~ot tr5ff~c ba~;ee~ ~~squaily Plaza a~d Prai~ie ?la~a? ?ACr; 2:-: 29 ~~ease ~av~ew the conclus~Qns based on the disCllssion above =' hl;~~ ~ 4 JO ?lease see ~tems 4. 2, 3, 5, 6 and :6 - abovB. T~ ,$.,F; ~ 5 3 Pl~~~e see item t30 abcve. Arm r~::: GNAT. P~ease review an~ re-wcrk as necessary (based on aoove) all 71blCS and f~gures lmpacted based on the discuss~on above , . _ ..J ~<:VI.~W and approval 0= t~e TIA shell publlc hearing for th~s prcposal , ne required prior to ~hp stncerely, U.[I24~ Hark R. Cock As~d.gtant C.).ty Engineer cc: Shelly Badger Dennis Cochran, P.E. 2626 12th Court SW olympi.a, WA 98502 Rocky Prairie Development Company POB 480 Yelm, WA 98597 .,.. J. ,'" ~ 1 - :.~ ~ . ., , - ". J . ". _ --'-- ~T_ ~ _.::-::':"":-...J. <l II ~'i ; PRAIRIE PLAZA :":.:;r;t!T ~~~ RESPONSE TO TRAI'FIC ISSUES1l~~'$~),.~ PAGE 1 1 This question was not addressed We need to know what the square footage of the proposed shopping center really is Tho drawings and reports use different figures. 2 The silo was correctly analyzed as a shopping center Ignore this comment. 3 The City made a valid comment. The consultant memo stressed again the two shopping centors will act as one The two shopping centers are not physically connected (automobile access) was not addressed The latest copy of the sita plan shows the two shoppIng center driveways offset approxImately 150 feet. -4 1 he criteria used was sited incorrectly ThiS question is no important. 5 The consultant's response to the city's comments suggest permission was givon to usa 35% for a trip reduction discount. The study states on pages 8 and 13that a 30% pass by discolmt was used According to Yelrn's Comprehensive Transportation Plan, Appendix D, Soction D, Part 3a, "A "passer-by" traffic volume discount for commercial centers shall not exceed 25% unless approved by the FRO (environmental review officer) If The total squaro footage for the two centers combined equals 186,000 square feet. From figure VII.1A, page 1.30, ITE Trip Generation, 1991 Edition, the pass-by trip reduction discount for 186,000 square feet is approximately 36% For 90,000 square feet the pass-by traffic reduction discount is approximately 48% lhe 30% pass-by trip reduction discount ll~od in the study Is acceptable 6 'This question was not addressed Correction of thiS problem will result in a different nlJmber of trips generated by the site PAGE 2 7 1 his questIon was not addressed We need the correct sito plan. 8 This questIon was not addressed Not Important at thIS time PAGE 3 9 The weokday ovening peak-hour turning movemont volumes are shown in Figure 3 or the sttldy Disregard this question 10 lhe decision to use a groWth factor of 4% or 5% is not available for our review at this tm1c ~ iowever, It is a minor issub with little Significance when applied to tho existing traffic volumes for a one year pe~iod 11 This question was not addressed Not important at this time ..., ..... '0' ._ SKllUNGS-CONNOll Y, INC. Q;\199t190400tIl1J412lih.doo PRAIRIE PLAIA Page 1 04-12-94 12 46PM PO: PAGE 5 12 This question was not addressed Not important at this time, PAGE: 6 13 Please see nota No 2 above 14 The driveways from the mo shoppIng centers are offset approximately 150 feat on Plaza Drive This type of alignment does not promote a smooth traffic flow between the two shopping conters and can possibly cause congestion on Plaza Drive The driveway should be movod approximately 150 feet:wesl to} match the opposite driveway Into the Nisqually PI.n~a Shopping Center ~ 15 Both the reviewer and the consultant Interpreted the land usa differently ITE describes "/I shopping center is an integrated group of commercial establishments which is planned, dovefoped, owned and managed as a unit. Its composItion is related to its market area In torlllS of SIze, location and type of store Shopping centers provide on~site parking facilities" S-C agrees site should be evaluated as a shopping center based llpon the IlE description When applying the calculations to determine the number of trips generated by tho $Ite, H"IO consultant should follow the directIons sLlggosted in the ITE Trip Generation Report, pagQ 1230. paragraph 4 which states' Many Shopping center, in addition to the Integrated unit of shops in one building or enclosod around a mall, include out-parcE:?ls (peripheral buildings or pads located on ttw porimeter of the center adjacent to the streets and major access points) Thase buildings aro generally dnve-in banks, restaurants, or small offices The data herein do not indicate which centers included peripheral buildings In general, it can be assumed that the data do reflect the effect of the peripheral buildings However. it is suggested when estimatIng driveway volumes for a shopping center for Ule purpose of designing the access that a conservative approach be taken, First, calculate the trips generated by the peripheral buildings as part of the shopping cenler (Llslng the chopping center trip generation statistics) and as a lTlulti. use development (using the peripheral land uses trip generation statistics) Then use the higher of the two estimates IlOW much of the total square footAgO is intended for use as a fast food restaurant and gas/mini-mart? PAGE 7 16 ihis quostion was not addfessed Note no 5 addresses this question. PAGE 8 1;' 1 he estimated traffic gener;)tion should be reevaluated based upon the latest squarl:1 I foot8go of the proposed si,te There is a discrepancy between 80,000 S F sited on page 1 and the square footage sHown in figure 1 SKIllINO$..CONNOLt.Y-INC: C\,\ t 994\\1 <lOO7\llf -412kh.doc PRAIRIE PlAZA Page 2 " 18 This quostion was not addressed. Not important at this time PAGE 9 19 This question was not addressed Where is the figure depicting trip distribution which is c.alled for In Appendix 0 of Yelm's Comprehensive Transportation Plan? We noed to see this This also applies to note no 18 PAGE 11 20 Refor to nota no 3 PAGE 12 21 Disregard this question 22 This question was not addressed Not important at this tima PAGE: 13 23 DIsregard this comment. PAGE 14 24 This quostion was not addressed Where the calculations dona for 1993 or 1994? All thl:? c.alculatlons will have to be redone to reflect the change In trip generation. PAGE 15 25 Refor to note no 11 PAGE 17 20 Disregard this comment. PAGE 18 27 This Quostion was not addressed Not Important at this time PAGE 21 28 -r his question was not addressed How will the pedestrians crossing Plaza Dnve be accommodated? PAGE 22 29 This question was not addressed Not important at this time -, ..-. . .. '--'--..'-'.. SKILUNGS-CONNOLlY.INC q:\ 1994\9400Nlr-412l..h.doc PRAIRIE. PlA7A Page 3 1,,,-1::-'"4 l: 46FM FII4 ~ PAGE 24 30 Mixed, use discounts don't apply to this project. Disregard this comment. PAGE 25 31 Disregard this comment. AOOHIONAL 32 Statement to redo the work. 33 StatElment of review and approval MITIGATION An agreement enforcing adjacent property owners to maintain Algiers Drive and Plaz:} Drive to minimum City roadway maintenance standards A mutual easement agreement with adjacent property owners on Algiers Drive and Pla73 Drive A waiver of LID protost on Creek Road frontage improvements Additional right-of-way to be provided as a condition of approval Improvo Algiers Drive and Plaza Drive to m~et minimum private roadway standards with a e foot sidewalk on one side Upgrade Creak Road to commercial collector standards with 86 feet of right-of-way and 6 foot sidewalks SKilliNGS-CONNOlLY. INC" q;\1li~\94001\Il1.4 t 2kh.doo ---- PRAIRIE PLAZA Page .. l~-I:-?4 I: 46FM F05 ~ · ~~aI~!~~l" -. ! YELM, WASHINGTON 98597 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON County of Thurston Fiona Reeves , being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that she/he is the general manager of the Nisqually Valley News, a weekly newspaper That said newspa- per is a legal newspaper and has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the publications hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Thurston County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper That the annexed is a true copy of Public Hearing Notice Prairie Plaza Shopping Center Site Plan as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form) of said 1 newspaper once a week for a period of consecutive weeks, commencing on the 7 day 94 19 , and ending on the 7 day of April , 19 94 both dates inclusive and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the of April fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ 24.00 which amount has been paid in full. ~ Subscribed and sworn to before me this 14 day of ApMl / / , / i / i I f2L ;' ;; I / '" c! w ry Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Yelm, Washington. This form officially sanctioned by the Washington Newspaper Publishers' Association PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PRAIRIE PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER SITE PLAN The City of Yelm Planning commission will hold a Public Hearing to receive com- ment on a proposed commercial shOPPing center site plan for approxlmat.elY 75,000 square feet of buildings including a 4,000 square foot commerical pad The 12 32-acre site is located at the northeast co;ner of Yelm Ave. East (SA .5~7) ~d Plaza Drive, just east of the eXisting Nls- qually Plaza Shopping Center Th Hearing is scheduled for Monday, A 'le18 1994 at 4'00 p.m. in the Yelm ci; Hall'COuncii Chambers, located at 105 Yelm Ave. W , Yelm. WA. All interested parties are invited to atte~d. Written comments must be received pnor to the date of the Hearing and.~ be se~t ,; to"the Yelm Planning CommiSSIon: P Box 479. Yelm. WA 98597 or de.IIVered to City Hall. If there are any questions or additional information is requested, pleas~ contact Ty Peterson at 458-8408 or at CI- ty Hall. C.ty CI rI< ATIEST Agnes P Colombo. I e Published in the Nisqually Valley News Thursday. April 7, 1994 , - , J ;J City of Yelm 105- YelmAvenue West PO Box 479 I Yelm, Washington 98J97 (206) 458-3244 f)1u 1.rd f?J OJ) aflae1td ~ '-1-/644. S6 , " PUBLIC HEARll<<; rVrICE PRAIRIE PLAZA SHOPP]JII; CENlER SiTE PLAN The City of Yelm Planning Commission will hold a Public Hearing ~o receive cOmment on a pr9pos~d comm~rcial shopping center site plan for approximately 75; 000 square feet of bllildings including a 4,000 square foot commercial pad. The 12,.32 acre site is located at the northeast comer of Yelm Ave. East (SR 507) and Plaza Drive, just east of the existing Nisqually Plaza Shopping Center. The Hearing is scheduled for Monday, April 18, 1994 at 4:00 PM, in the Yelm City Hall Council Chambers, located at 105 Yelm Ave. W., Yelm, W~. All intel:"ested parties -are invited to attend. Written cornrents must be received prior to the date of the Hearing and can be sent to the Yelm Planning- Corrmission, P.O. Box 479, Yelm; WA 98597 or delivered to City Hall. If there are any ques,tions or additional information is requested, please contact Ty Peterson at 458~8408 or at City Hall. ATI'EST: q: yJC~)' ~ . ..- . '//lV- -. .FfnU Agnes P. Colombo Yelm City C).erk ~ Published in the Nisqually Valley News: Thursday, April 7, ,1994 * Rec"cled [XIper . . ~ -------"- ~ - -- ---- - - MARIL~yN "CD.FFELT PO Bnf~ 1201 YELM WA 98597 BONNIE LITTLEJOHN TASCHE PO BOX 318 YELM WA 98597 MELANIE SNAPP PO BOX 1256 YELM WA 98597 U.C.O. OIL CO. PO BOX 4218 WHITTIER CA 90607 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PO BOX J YELM WA 98597 ROBERT CHRISTENSEN 10520 CREEK ST SE YELM WA 98597 MARGUERITE PICKLE 404 123rd ST E TACOMA WA 98445 PUGET SOUND-KEY BANK PO BOX 11500 TACOMA WA 98411 LEO LEFEBVRE PO BOX 1056 YELM WA 98597 KEY BANK ATTN: LYLE BURSTAD P.O. BOX 574 YELM, WA 98597-0574 GRAMOR DEVELOPMENT N.W. RICHARD EMBRY 1133-164th ST. S.W., SUITE 107 LYNNWOOD, WA 98037-8121 HOWARD NETTLETON PO BOX 217 MCKENNA WA 98558 KEITH MCMASTER 2516 BROOKDALE RD E TACOMA WA 98445 JACK PEUGH 10704 VANCIL RD SE YELM WA 98597 EDWARD HULBERT 522 FRANKLIN SE OLYMPIA WA 98501 S. CHAMBERLAIN & ASSOCIATES ATTN: Craig Steepy P.O. BOX 3485 LACEY, WA 98503-0485 ROCKY PRAIRIE DEVELOPMENT CO. P.O. BOX 480 YEIM, WA 98597 Larry Schorno 17835 Hwy. 507 SE Yelm, WA 98597 SCA 677 Woodland Square Lp SE POBox 3485 Lacey, Washington 98503-0485 (206) 493-6002 (206) 493-2476 Facsimile (907) 279-5929 Anchorage "s. Chamberlain & Associates, Inc. March 29, 1994 Ty Peterson, City Planner City of Yelm PO Box 479 Yelm, W A 98597 He: Prajrie Plaza SeA #93028 Dear Ty. Enclosed for your reVIew are the revIsed SIte plans, envIronmental checklists, and applications. All three documents show consIstent numbers for building square footage and parking stalls. In additIOn, we .have enclosed Bob Hazlett's memo response to Mark Cook's letter regardmg the traffic study . Please reView tills informatIOn. Weare lookmg forward to the Planmng Commission meeting commg up in April. If you need more copIes of anytillng or have questIons, please call me at 493-6002 Smcerely, CRS/jl Enclosure. Bob Hazlett's Memo (c: \corres\93028329.1tr) ENGINEERING PLANNING . . SURVEYING APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT File No. OR SITE PLAN REVIEW 11 /Jh Conditional Use Fee $500 00 C'I?~ l~ Site Plan Fee. $250 00 plus $25.00 per mobile home space e/7r Multi-Family Building/Condominium: $100.00 plus $10.00 per unit Commercial Site Plan: $10000 plus $50 00 per 1,000 sq ft. of gross floor area Industrial Site Plan. $100 00 plus $100 00 per acre '" 6 YELM WASHINGTON iCITY OF YELM #93028 PO. Box 479 Yelm, WA 98597 458-3244 OFFICIAL USE ONL'r Fee Date Received By A conditional use permit is an approval of a land use having slightly greater or unique impacts compared to those of the uses permitted as a matter of right by city zoning Site plan review is a process for reviewing the design of certain types of development. Site plan approval is required for mobile home parks, duplexes. multi-family dwellings, commercial and industrial uses, planned development districts and for all land uses within the central bUSiness district. Each requires a hearing before either the Yelm Planning Commission or City Council NAME OF PROJECT Prairie Plaza Shopping Center APPLICANT Rocky Prairie Development Co. Mailing Address P.O. Box 480 City, State and Zip Yelm, WA 98597 Telephone (360)458-2201 OWNER ScuLle as above. Mailing Address City, State and Zip Telephone ENGINEER/ARCHITECT/OTH ER S. Chamberlain & Assoc. Mailing Address P.O. Box 3485 City, State and Zip Lacey WA 98509-3485 ! Telephone (360)493-6002 I SUMMARY OF REQUEST Amend existing site plan review approval for prairie Plaza. I Eliminate fast-food pad and 12,000 sf retail bldg. Replace with 6,800 sf I U.S. Post Office and 6,300 sf automobile care center. I I I I I PROPERTY DESCRIPTION I General Location North side of Yelm Ave. (SR 507) between Plaza Dr. and Creek st. Site Address None Land Area (acres) Section 30 Township 17N Range 2E Assessors Tax Parcel Number 22730110103, 22730110104, 22730140101 Full legal description of subject property (attach separate sheet if necessary) Lots 2-4 of 88-8017 '" ... n PLEASE ANSWER THE FOllOWING QUESTIONS ATTACH EXTRA PAGES IF NECESSARY Does the design minimize conflicts with neighboring land uses? Explain Yes, the site is cOImnercial1 y zoned and surrounded by other corrmerclal uses. 2. Is the site within 300 feet of any "critical areas" such as wetlands or streams? No it is not. 3 What provisions will be made for stormwater and/or flood control? All stonnwater will be treated and infiltrated on-site with storage to accomodate a 100 yr. stonn. 4 What provisions will be made for water supply and sewage disposal? City water and sewer will serve this site. 5 What provisions will be made for electrical power, natural gas, telephone and oth!3r utilities? The corresponding utility purveyors will be contacted regardlng provislons tor utilities into this site. 6 What provisions will be made for streets, access, and/or buses? ThQ QXistin'} ipterrv'll ~t-rppt system will be utilized and expanded upon for maximum circulation and accessibility. .....i~.. 7 What provisions, if any, will be made for open space and/or recreation? Landscape areas will be provided within parking areas and adjacent to buildings. 8 What provisions will be made for schools and school children? None profX)sed. ATTACHMENTS. o Environmental Checklist (including $50 fee) OUst of Owners of Property within 300 feet (include Assessor's Tax Parcel Numbers) o Vicinity map showing nearby property, streets, land uses, streams and other features o Copy of any covenants or restrictions that will apply o Grading plan for cuts and fills over 100 cubic yards. o Ten copies of Site Plan showing 1 Datum, north arrow, date and scale 2. Boundaries of all lots and streets in relation to city limits, section lines or corners, plus existing and proposed survey and elevation monuments. 3. Lakes, streams, wetlands, trees and other natural features. 4 Proposed zoning, use ot each lot and any public or common areas. 5. Existing and proposed buildings and other structures. 6 Existing and proposed parking, streets. alleys, sidewalks. railroads and any associated rights-at-way 7 Wells and underground storage tanks. 8. On-site waste disposal systems and proposed sewer lines and tanks. 9 Location, size and any easements of existing and proposed street lighting, power, natural gas, television and telephone lines, water mains, sewer, stormwater facilities and points of connection to existing systems. 10 Grade and curvature of streets to 300 feet from the plat. 11 Existing and proposed contours at two-foot intervals (or 5-foot if >5%) o A reduced size copy of the site plan not larger than 11"x17" I affirm that all answers, statements and Information above and submitted with this application are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also affirm that I am the owner of the subject site or am duly authorized by the owner to act with respect to this application. Further, I grant permission from the owner to any and all employees and representatives of the City of Yelm and other governmental agencies to enter upon and inspect said property as reasonably necessary to process this application I agree to pay all fees of the city which apply to this application Signed Date ." .. \ PLEASE NOTE. CASE NO . TYPE OR PRINT LEGIBLY IN BLACK INK . MUST HAVE CORRECT ZIP CODES . DO NOT WRITE PARCEL NUMBERS ON THIS FORM . THURSTON COUNTY PROPERTIES ONLY OBTAIN ADDRESSES FROM COUNTY ASSESSORS, BUILDING #1, FIRST FLOOR . INCLUDE ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET OF EXTERIOR BOUND~RY OF THE PROPERTY INVOLVED EXAMPLE Jack Smith 4921 Olympia Street Olympia, W A 98502 #93028 Manlyn Coffelt Bonme LIttlejohn Melame Snapp POBox 1201 POBox 318 POBox 1266 Yelm, WA 98597 Yelm, WA 98597 Yelm, W A 98597 KeIth McMaster FIrst BaptIst Church Evelyn Chnstensen 2516 Brookdale Rd. E POBox J 10520 Creek St. SE Tacoma, W A 98445 Yelm, W A 98597 Yelm, WA 98597 Jack Peugh Puget Sound NatIOnal Bank Edward Hulbert 10704 VancIl Rd. SE POBox 11500 711 CapItol Way #201 Yelm, WA 98597 Tacoma, WA 98411 OlympIa, WA 98501 Leo Lefebvre Donald Detlefson Nisqually Plaza Ltd. POBox 1056 7901 Brown Rd. SW 1133 164th St SW, #107 Yelm, W A 98597 OlympIa, WA 98512 Lynwood, WA 98037 Desmond Iverson Yelm PraIne ChnstIan Center 407 103rd Ave SE POBox 578 Yelm, W A 98597 Yelm, WA 98597 MARILYN COFFELT 502 103rd AVE NE YEIM WA 98597 BONNIE TASGIE PO BOX 318 YEIM WA 98597 KEITH MCMASTER 2516 BROOKDAI.E RD E TACCMA WA 98445 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PO BOX 5090 YEIM WA 98597 JACK PEUGH 10704 VANCIL RD SE YEIM WA 98597 KEY BANK OF WASHING'IDN YEIM BRANCH PO BOX 574 YEIM WA 98597 LEO LEFEBVRE PO BOX 1056 YEIM WA 98597 DONALD DETLEFSON 7901 BRCWN RD SW OLYMPIA WA 98512 DESMOND IVERSON 407 103rd AVE SE YEIM WA 98597 YEIM PRAIRIE CHRISTIAN CENTER PO BOX 578 YEIM WA 98597 MELANIE SNAPP PO BOX 609 PROSSER WA 99350 JUDY BUTLER 15511 109th AVE SE YEIM WA 98597 EDWARD HULBERT 711 CAPI'IDL WAY #201 OLYMPIA WA 98501 NISQUALLY PLAZA LTD. 1133 164th ST SW #107 LYNWOOD WA 98037 .r PLEASE NOTE. CASE NO . TYPE OR PRINT LEGIBLY IN BLACK INK . MUST HAVE CORRECT ZIP CODES . DO NOT WRITE PARCEL NUMBERS ON THIS FORM . THURSTON COUNTY PROPERTIES ONLY OBTAIN ADDRESSES FROM COUNTY ASSESSORS, BUILDING #1, FIRST FLOOR . INCLUDE ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET OF EXTERIOR BOUNDARY OF THE PROPERTY INVOLVED EXAMPLE JackSmith /" 4921 Olympla Street OlymPJa(W A 98502 / #93028 Marilyn Coffelt ~ ~ Bonme I:.ittleJohrr 1'Ct7e.l/? Melame Snapp PO Dox 1201:- 50:? 103 .-tUJ~ PO Box 318 P 0 Bux 12GG (0 (WK. u-o q Yelm, W A 98597 Yelm, W A 98597 Yelm, W~^.. 98597 p(IJ$5eV' {;1JJt Cfi ~50 KeIth McMaster FIrst Baptlst Church E ~lYll CIHisteu::it:n J~ J ~ / 2516 Brookdale Rd. E Pty!Pex gOq 0 'iBfj20 Creek St.-sE e le.r Tacoma, W A 98445 Yelm78597 Yelm, W A 98597 I 'ilj {{ I {)q f!,.. awe- Se- Jack Peugh ~t.~OlU:ld Watl8Rm: BanK Edward Hulbert 10704 VancIl Rd. SE Ip-e-~ I(W GMVt 711 CapItol Way #201 Yelm, W A 98597 // - ~ '.N~ OlympIa, WA 98501 V ~Af(l 1/1. /' V '~tJP Leo Lefebvre // Dol aId Detlefson Nisqually Plaza Ltd. / POBox 1056 / 7901 Brown Rd. SW 1133 164th St SW, #107 / OlympIa, WA 98512 Lynwood, WA 98037 Yelm, W A 98597 ,/ / / / Desmond I veF~on Yelm PraIne Chnstlan Center / POBox 578 407 103rd Ave SE Yelm, W k98597 Yelm, W A 98597 / / / / / //. III \ II " '" ~- SCAlE. ,"-SO' '..r- ::::J o 2~ 50 tOO 22.00 '-~'" ~ '<OIT1CAI. VA 71111 ~y cOflPS. Of DlctHEfRS N .2!J'54'OJ" E ~6a3~ 00 SITE DA TA BENCHMARK. 0/1SfiCl) "X. IN HCR1IiEAST c~ TOP Of SOUlHE.ASTERI. y UQlT STAJlDAAD EUVAT10N _ -"".70 . ./' -., K 't~ I SECTION JO, T17N, R2E W.M. '\\ ~ 0( 00 PARCEL's 2273011 01 OJ 22730110104 227J04(J101 LOTS 2-4 OF SS-8017 I L I~ I:. \ri In ['1 I I \ 20' .; O'IrNfR: ROCKY PRAIRIE Df1/. co. P.O. BOX 480 YEUI, WA 98597 (206) 458-2201 ~ '- ..... 12..32 AC 75,000 SF .375 STALLS COMMERCIAL CI TY OF '/ELM CITY OF '/ELM SITE AREA BUILDING AREA PARKING STALLS ZONING WATER SEWER LEGEND -- r- E>>STH9 PROPOSED ~~ + sroKM CX1I1ER ()ESCRI11E flESQlIfJE fII!E H'If)IWIT !fA 1lR ICIER !fA 1lR VALlE" 1'QE AHOlCfl PO'IER FaE PO'IER TfW(SEQf1JIER ~ VALlE" fl1E1'HC'IIC /IANHOtE roE1'HCfIE P(])€S1'AL fl1E1'HC'IIC pq.E UlCTIOH BOX LARGE SIGN SIGH PCST IXHFER 1IlfE tJWWf)IJS 1IlfE FENCE W4B0x B s. TO. S'1SlElI CO . snE7r C!..UI/CUT - - 11141lR LK fl1E1'HC'IIC LK ()Vf1IHUJJ POllel - -SDER S'1SlElI LK o . 1J . OW _ "I " 1 -OJ; lil 'G' Or Dr t~:l:i~~~~:~;~~t~!~r~1mB F;~s~;'~'~:::\ " ! -or ,:\1 ~ ---- ~ , * ,~-\ \_/ ~j: En I' -~ q 1;\ III '.1 I III I III 1tfCIlf1Y wg r-- JC8 NI.IIBER"""" lIJ028 ORA IlfNQ NNtIE ~ SHfET i (N" ..L DRA ~NG 11TLE: SITE/UTILITY PLAN JOB 11 TLE: PRAIRIE PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER '/ELM WASHINGTON 0) -- DDiIGNED BY cs.Js.c. ORA"'" BY k'AJUc.AlL.I ot!Cl<ED BY ~ DA TC tJ/'Z1 /'IS SCALE ,- - l1Q' S. CHAMBERLAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. N'PROI,fi) FOR CONSTRUCTION B~ OA~ CJTY PVBUC llORKS DfPT. IMGDlDKING, PLUQ(DIG, AND 8l1RVn1NG SBRVICIIS rrn If'OOllU!f SQUAIlB UlOP a J.lCllY. W.lSIIINGTON eeeos-3486 2Oe) 493-8002 '206} .t3-24~ PAX f SCA s. Chamberlain & Associates, Inc. MEMORANDUM DATE. February 11, 1994 TO. Ty Peterson, CIty Planner CIty of Yelm FROM. Bob Hazlett SUBJECT. PrairIe Plaza Commercaal Center SCA No 93028 Pursuant to Mark Cook's letter, dated November 9, 1993, regardmg review of our traffic study, I have prepared the following comments for your consIderatIOn. Many of your comments were related to Impact on traffic wIthout a connectIOn between the PraIrie Plaza and Nisqually Plaza Centers. As of the date of this memorandum, I beheve that Issue has been resolved m a way that will be consIstent WIth the assumptIOns of our traffic Impact analysIs Therefore, I will address only those Issues not related to the crpss- easement between the two centers. ' Study Context SCA developed the Prairie Plaza traffic impact analysis prImarily as an adJunct to our study for the Nisqually Plaza center As you are aware, the sIte development plans are for a second center that takes advantage of the commercial precedent set by Nisqually Plaza. Likewis~, the access system proposed for PraIrie Plaza took full advantage of the access planned for Nisqually Plaza, mcludmg the planned sIgnals it the center's primary dnve. .-' ,'" Therefore, in effect, we developed a study that assumed one smgle shopping center operatmg in the sIte vIcImty We beheve tills approach to be the most logIcal for developing the PrairIe Plaza study, and antiCIpate the center patrons will see little dIfference between the two centers. By takmg this approach, we generated a document that assumes there will be pass-by and mlXed-use dIscounts for joint tnp purpOfles to both centers Tills .approach also assumes traffic generatIOns lower than what could be generated If both centers operated independently - WIth no cross-easements, access system, or like land uses. at separate locations in the CIty As noted above, we believe both centers will operate a single unit and provIde a central retail destmation ..for Yelm reSIdents. 677 Woodland Square Lp SE POBox 3485 Lacey, Washington 98503-0485 (206) 493-6002 (206) 493-2476 Facsimile (907) 279-5929 Anchorage ENGINEERING . PLANNING . SURVEYING SCA .., Memorandum Mr Mark Cook, Assistant City Engmeer City of Yelm - February 11, 1994 Page 2 " Trip Generation Rat~s It has always been our practice to use the trip generation rates that closely match the proposed mtended uses of the planned development. LikewIse, we also use rates where sufficIent study has been conducted by the InstItute of Transportation Engmeers (ITE) m development of trIp generatIon factors. Related to tlus proJect, we used the Shoppmg Center Rate (ITE Land Use Code N9 820) for development of our study We belIeve the greater the survey, the better the statistical accuracy in the trIp generation rates. Although one could interpret the planned land use as "specialty retail," we belIeve there IS lIttle statistIcal background to support use of these.rates for the PraIrIe Plaza study It has been our experIence that "specIalty retail" can Imply many uses. from commercIal tourIst type shops up to establishments specialIzmg m specialIze servIces (e.g., Karaoke Enterprises, etc.) We do not belIeve Prairie Plaza will fall into tlus category As mentIOned above, we belIeve the center will act as a continuatIOn of the planned retail opportumtIes planned at Nisqually Plaza. We also do not advocate use of the "several merchandIse" rate As noted m the current edItIOn of ITE's Trip Generatwn Report, the statistIcal sample IS small and suggests lIttle background for use. Pass-By Factors The final issue to your responses relates to the 35% pass-by factor we used for the study As noted, the pass-by factor is less than stated 25% standard noted m the TIA guidelInes adopted .by Yelm. During our scopmg of the study, we relIed upon the mformatIOn provided in the ITE Tnp Generatwn, Report for IdentIfymg pass-by dIscounts. We ha,d passed tlus InformatIOn on to the CIty durmg the scopmg process and reCeIved no ObjectIOns to its use. If you have any questIOns or comments about these responses, please call me at (206) 493-6002 P AS\jl (c:\memos'\93028328.mmo) ENGINEERING PLANNING . SURVEYING . b City of Yelm 105 Yelm Avenue West POBox 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 (206) 458-3244 TO. Rocky Prairie Development Company FROM: City of Yelm Planning Department DATE: November 30, 1993 SUBJECT. General comments on the site plan appllcation for Pralrie Plaza Dear Mr Witt. Before the City of Yelm Plann1ng Department cont1nues the reV1ew of the Prairie Plaza Shopping Center, several issues need to be cleared up and information provided 1) There 1S some inconsistency in the size of the project and the square footage calculations. for instance -The full size slte plan 1ndicates 78,500sf of building area -The reduced sized site plan indicates 89,250sf of building area -The site plan application and environmental checklist both mention 90,OOOsf of building area -My calculations indicate 90,450sf of buildings *Please clarify what calculations are being used and be uniform in all of the appl1cation materials 2) The number of parking spaces appears to be insuffic1ent, again these numbers are inconsistent on the application materials -The full sized site plan shows 269 stalls -The reduced sized site plan shows 358 stalls -The site plan application and environmental checklist both 1ndicate 360 stalls *The minimum parking required for this project is one space per 200 square feet of building floor area Based on 90,OOOsf, the total number of parking stalls required would be 450 @ Recycled paper -4 0. .."Q. 3) The current landscape standards for the City require a three foot wide landscaped area along any front, rear, or side boundary property line abutting a public or private road The landscaped area shall consist a variety of plants (shrubs, bushes, trees, etc ) with suitable ground cover (grass, bark, rock, etc ) *The proposed landscape plan for Prairie Plaza appears to exceed the City's minimum requirements for the amount of trees While the Planning Department encourages plenty of tasteful landscaping, please understand that the proposed landscape plan would become binding with site plan approval, and would be required to be 1mplemented 4) Provide a vicinity map on the site plan 5) Please provide the locations of proposed outdoor lighting, contact Mark Cook, Assistant City Engineer 6) provide a site plan indicating existing and proposed contours at two-foot intervals (or 5-foot if >5%) 7) Please include a full legal description and general location on the site plan application form 8) Please submit a signed and dated application form 9) Please provide a grading plan if cuts and fills exceed 100 CUb1C yards of material Review of the Environmental checklist is still underway You should receive a comment letter regarding the Threshold Determination by December 10, 1993, or sooner The Engineering Department will review the Traffic Impact and preliminary Drainage Plans Please contact Mark Cook, Assistant City Engineer, at 458-8816, if there are any questions with regard to those reviews Please contact me if there are any questions at 458-8408, or at Yelm City Hall ResP/tfully, ;:7~~ Ty ~son City Planner cc: S Chamberlain & Associates, Inc ,..;.. ;7" '1:' :-.:;....;, '~(.~ :l~..::.;~ '.;j'r<-'_' ...... 't...",';';. " .. -.'~- . ~. .~.. t,. 1... .. ~ ..':.:.., .,"" ~. . -, , ,-'''';>St'~f :1 ::. ....", ..1:-:.7 \''\, !.> "'..,;.~, .. .J, :,... ;'" {,: ~ V;' ,," ~:..-,...:,.. ~ -/ <'- ./. .r i':;~:"~;'::'; . >:,1,,.. _ ~.~.~ .- ... ::'..\, '..: .~ '1 10~ Yelm Avenue West > POBox 479 Yelni, Washington 98597 (206) 458-3244 November 10,. 1993 S. Chamberlain and Steve Chamberlain, 719 Sleater-Kinney Suite 120 POB 3485 Lacey, WA 98503 Associates, Inc. P.E. Road RE: PRAIRIE PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER Dear Steve: The City of Yelm's Engineering Department conceptual drainage plan submitted, for the project, and has the following comments: has reviewed the above referenced 1. The storage volumes used for this report will require a variance from the city engineer. Although the "revisions" are anticipated to be accepted by all of the jurisdictions by the end of the year, a variance shall be required at this time, or as a minimum, conditional approval 'based on obtaining a variance for this project. 2. The minimum storage volume that shall be acceptable for roof runoff shall be 125 cubic feet/l,OOO square feet NOT 100 cub~c/l,OOO square feet as proposed. This too shall require a variance as this standard is not formally in place at th~s time. Utilizing the figure of 125, it appears that this proposal fails to meet the minimum storage requirement by 2,9~0 cubic feet. 3. The minimum amount of treatment provided shall be 16,080 square feet of biofilters or 8,756 square feet of wet pond with a design minimum depth of three feet. 4. A physical infiltration test shall be required for the final report. 5. Is this project within the Yelm Creek drainage basin? If so, will there be any adverse impacts from this proposal to the creek. 6. A maintenance and operation agreement between the city and Rocky prairie Development Company shall be required for the final report. (A blank agreement shall pe provided for your use by. ~he city). \ '( ,t _ 11>l-: r- \Vr Recycled. p/zper ", ~- 't_ ,~' ..~: '\. ,.;.:,' :.- .1.".:~ ;~' ~'~:::',:~ '~:~:~:: ':.. . :,~.' " .r, {:f;~r;::~~.:~~~: ~':';c~~J/;:"/.~_",n"',:':'i-ktiI c;~r-:;:~,::(," . ; ~';J , ;:J;\,,::,~<>- ~ -i - \ -:.', ,- ~ .. --.. .~ .1_.. 'j ',. 7. .. ~ I I "'..' .."\; .... ......- .... _I' ;~! ~1~ -~ :" j" l :-"1. ..' 'J, .. ...'5- "". '" ._';'. L"('~.~. .t ,;:i", ,,~, ,,>, ,(:'"~,,, _ ;< :", 'F} :,~t~~,,,,, tt~"";: ,~"i;;:~;-i. The total"ofal'l-~ioof-areas-c:is'" stated ~to': be 90,.000 'square- feet. in..:the" environmental "checklis.t while a figure 'pf ;83,500 was used to calculate roof storage reqUirements. The city is utilizing the 90,000 square foot figure (please see item #2 above) .: ;. -..... - :'" :'lr ... - 8. Please review the methodology used calculating runoff based on Appendix D of the drainage manual. No provision is made in this technique to allow for the removal of roof areas from the postdeveloped runoff condition. Therefore; the runoff and minimum storage calculated for this proposal is in excess of the minimum storage requirements, ancj would then be used instead of the minimum requirements. It is unlikely howeve~, that storage requirements would exceed the minimums if some form of hydrologic modeling was utilized. The phenomenon of Appendix D exceeding the minimums is partly based on a reduction of the minimum storage requirements for this project via the variance referenced in items #1 and #2 above. Based on the minimums present today, 52,960 cubic feet of storage would be required for the paved and landscaped areas. This volume is less than that predicted by the Appendix D methodology. 9. It seems reasonable to condition the approval of the conceptual stormwater design on the results of a falling head percolation test as per Appendix L of the manual. Since this design is based on an estimated infiltration rate of 2D inches per hour _( 3 minutes per inch), the minimum storage volumes should control. It. seems reasonable that given a confirmed percolation rate of 20 inches per hour, the variances referenced above would have the support of the engineering department. 10. Please provide a scaled drawing showing the size and location of the required treatment and storage facilities prior to the public hearing for this proposal. Sincerely, ~~ Mark R. Cook Assistant City Engineer cc: Shelly Badger Ty Peterson Dennis Cochran, P.E.. 2626 12th Court SW Olympia, WA 98502 Rocky prairie Development Company POB 480 Yelm, WA 98597 .r"' ... j. Conditional Use Fee: $500 00 '\ ) WASHINGTON . .' JUL , 9 1993 Site Plan Fee: $250 00 plus $25.00 per mobile home spac Multi-Family Building/Condominium: $100.00 plus $1 0.00 P~fl~ it Commercial Site Plan: $100.00 plus $50.00 per 1,000 sq ft. of grossu ~ area Industrial Site Plan: $100 00 plus $100 00 per acre _ A conditional use permit is an approval of a land use having slightly greater or unique impacts compared to those of the uses permitted as a matter of right by city zoning Site plan review is a process 'for reviewing the design of certain types of development. Site plan approval is required for mobile home parks, duplexes, multi-family dwellings, commercial and industrial uses, planned development districts and for all land uses within the central business district. Each requires a hearing before either the Yelm Planning Commission or City Council NAME OF PROJECT Prairie Plaza Shopping Center APPLICANT Rocky Prairie Development Company Mailing Address P o Box 480 City, State and Zip Yelm, WA 98597 Telephone (206) 458-2201 OWNER Same as above Mailing Address City, State and Zip Telephone ENGINEER/ARCHffECT/OTHER S. Chamberlain & Associates, Inc. Mailing Address P o Box 3485 City, State and Zip Lacey, WA 98503 Telephone (206) , 493-6002 . SUMMARY OF REQUEST Build a new shoppinq center with nearly 90.000 square feet of buildings, 360 parking stalls, with associated utility and . . roadway improvements. . '1-2) Sp~ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Northeast corner of Yelm Ave. (SR 507) and Plaza Dr. General Location Site Address Land Area (acres) 17 l? "A." Section 30 Township 17N Range 2 E W.M. Assessor's Tax Parcel Number 22730110103. 22730110104. 22730 140101 Full legal description of subject property (attach separate sheet if necessary) Lots ? 4 of ~~ R01? .- <' '., CITY OF YELl\I!lf po. Box 479 :\ Yelm, WA 98597 IJ . 458-3244 ~ APPLICATION FOR ~. 'if! CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ~__ OR SITE PLAN REVIEW '\D. sp,e ~6q'5 OFFICIAL USE ONLY Fee t..~.29.:;~~i.;l"''' Dale Received ~........ ..'?... By .. ~;-.~.:.:~-;::... ~ ~~I '" . .,. PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS ATTACH EXTRA PAGES IF NECESSARY 1 Does the design minimize conflicts with neighboring land uses? Explain The design of this facility takes into account current and future improvement plans to the Nisqually Plaza Shoppinq Center and Highway 507. 2. Is the site within 300 feet of any "critical areas" such as wetlands or streams? No, i t. .i-.s~".'not. , " . ; . "", '~ ., 3. What provisions'wiJl:.be i:n~p~ for stormwater and/or flood control? The drainage system for this ,site will follow all requirements of the Drainage & Erosion Control t 1 I ~ :~ ~~.p;'~, fj.et ~I> N ~ '\" c 4 ~~~It p(oVisidnslwj.!IL,t~~ made for water supply and sewage disposal? Manual for Thurston Reqion. \,.'iJ Yelm City,' waiti~r will serve this site as well as future Yelm City j ";~"Sewe.:rr...."'...___Jl#: ; >,''\:.1,} .l~. 5. What provisions'will be"mad~ for electrical power, natural gas, telephone and other utilities? Revi sions ar being made to adequatley provide the necessary easements for these services. 6. What provisions will be made for streets, access, and/or buses? Street improvements are propos d in coordination with other larqer proiects in the immediate vicinity 7 What provisions, if any, will be made for open space and/or recreation? No provisions are proposed for open space or r~~re~tion 8. What provisions will be made for schools and school children? No provisions are proposed for school facilities. ATTACHMENTS: o Environmental Checklist (including $50 fee) DUst of Owners of Property within 300 feet (include Assessor's Tax Parcel Numbers) o Vicinity map showing nearby property, streets, land uses, streams and other features. o Copy of any covenants or restrictions that will apply o Grading plan for cuts and fills over 100 cubic yards. o Ten copies of Site Plan showing 1 Datum, north arrow, date and scale. 2. Boundaries of all lots and streets in relation to city limits, section lines or comers, plus existing and proposed survey and elevation monuments. 3. Lakes, streams, wetlands, trees and other natural features. 4 Proposed zoning, use ot each lot and any public or common areas. 5. Existing and proposed buildings and other structures. 6. Existing and proposed parking, streets, alleys, sidewalks, railroads and any associated rights-ot-way 7 Wells and underground storage tanks. 8. On-site waste disposal systems and proposed sewer lines and tanks. 9. Location, size and any easements ot existing and proposed street lighting, power, natural gas, television and telephone lines, water mains, sewer, stormwater facilities and points ot connection to existing systems. 10 Grade and curvature of streets to 300 feet from the plat. 11 Existing and proposed contours at two-foot intervals (or 5-foot if >5%). o A reduced size copy of the site plan not larger than 11"x17". I affirm that all answers, statements and information above and submitted with this application are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also affirm that I am the owner of the subject site or am duly authorized by the owner to act with respect to this application. Further, I grant permission from the owner to any and all employees and representatives of the City of Yelm and other governmental agencies to enter upon and inspect said property as reasonably necessary to process this application I agree to pay all fees of the city which apply to this application Signed Date ----~_.~--.- ~ ~ -- ~ ..~ ':ITY OF YEL~__ POBox 479 Yelm, WA 98597 458-3244 OFFICIAL USE ONLY APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT OR SITE PLAN REVIEW Fee Dale Received By File No. YELM WASHINGTON Conditional Use Fee. $500 00 Site Plan Fee: $250 00 plus $25.00 per mobile home space Multi-Family Building/Condominium: $100.00 plus $10.00 per unit Commercial Site Plan: $100.00 plus $50.00 per 1,000 sq ft. of gross floor area Industrial Site Plan. $100 00 plus $100 00 per acre A conditional use permit is an approval of a land use having slightly greater or unique impacts compared to those of the uses permitted as a matter of right by city zoning Site plan review is a process for reviewing the design of certain types of development. Site plan approval is required for mobile home parks, duplexes, multi-family dwellings, commercial and industrial uses, planned development districts and for all land uses within the central business district. Each requires a hearing before either the Yelm Planning Commission or City Council NAME OF PROJECT Prairie Plaza Shopping Center APPLICANT Rocky prairie Development Company Mailing Address P 0 Box 480 City, State and Zip Yelm, WA 98597 Telephone (206) 458-2201 OWNER Same as above Mailing Address City, State and Zip Telephone ENGINEER/ARCHITECT/OTHER S. Chamberlain & Associates, Inc. Mailing Address P 0 Box 3485 City, State and Zip Lacey, WA 98503 Telephone (206) 493-6002 SUMMARY OF REQUEST Build a new shoppinq center with nearly 7~,000 square feet of building-s. 375 parking stalls. with associated utility and roadway improvements. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Northeast corner of Yelm Ave. (SR 507) and Plaza Dr. General Location Site Address Land Area (acres) 1 ? 1? "Al'. Section 30 Township 17N Range 2 E W.M. Assessor's Tax Parcel Number 22730110103, 22730110104, 22730 140101 Full legal description of subject property (attach separate sheet if necessary) Lots 2 L1 of SS 8017 <) ~ '"' PLEASE;. ..4SWER THE FOllOWING Ql..iSTIONS . ATTACH EXTRA PAGES IF NECESSARY 1 Does the design minimize conflicts with neighboring land uses? Explain. The design of this facility takes into account current and future improvement plans to the Nisquallv Plaza Shoppinq Center and Hiqhway 507. 2. Is the site within 300 feet of any "critical areas" such as wetlands or streams? No, it is not. 3. What provisions will be made for stormwater and/or flood control? The drainage system for this site will follow all requirements of the Drainage & Erosion Control 4 What provisions will be made for water supply and sewage disposal? Manual for Thurston Reqion. Yelm City, water will serve this site as well as future Yelm City Sewer. 5. What provisions will be made for electrical power, natural gas, telephone and other utilities? Revisions ar being made to adequatley provide the necessary easements for these services. 6. What provisions will be made for streets, access, and/or buses? Street improvements are propos in coordination with other larqer proiects in the immediate vicinity 7 What provisions, if any, will be made for open space and/or recreation? No provisions are proposed for open space or n~~reQtion 8. What provisions will be made for schools and school children? No provisions are proposed for school facilities. I ATTACHMENTS. 0 Environmental Checklist (including $50 fee) 0 Ust of Owners of Property within 300 feet (include Assessor's Tax Parcel Numbers) 0 Vicinity map showing nearby property, streets, land uses, streams and other features. 0 Copy of any covenants or restrictions that will apply 0 Grading plan for cuts and fills over 100 cubic yards. 0 Ten copies of Site Plan showing 1 Datum, north arrow, date and scale 2. Boundaries of all lots and streets in relation to city limits, section lines or corners, plus existing and proposed survey and elevation monuments. 3 Lakes, streams, wetlands, trees and other natural features. 4 Proposed zoning, use of each lot and any public or common areas. 5. Existing and proposed buildings and other structures. 6. Existing and proposed parking, streets, alleys, sidewalks, railroads and any associated rights-of-way 7 Wells and underground storage tanks. 8. On-site waste disposal systems and proposed sewer lines and tanks. 9 Location, size and any easements of existing and proposed street lighting, power, natural gas, television and telephone lines, water mains, sewer, stormwater facilities and points of connection to existing systems. 10 Grade and curvature of streets to 300 feet from the plat. 11 Existing and proposed contours at two-foot intervals (or 5-foot if >5%) 0 A reduced size copy of the site plan not larger than 11"x17" I affirm that all answers, statements and information above and submitted with this application are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also affirm that I am the owner of the subject site or am duly authorized by the owner to act with respect to this application Further, I grant permission from the owner to any and all employees and representatives of the City of Yelm and other governmental agencies to enter upon and inspect said property as reasonably necessary to process this application I agree to pay all fees of the city which apply to this application /1 '_ /2- to- 93 Signed i _---7~ Date '--. / . d ", I.'''...,..,.......-a '-"J.. V. . ft "",- &.", , "... "&;"..J . ~ OIlI'8NT LEGlII. Y IN IlACK INK . MUST #fA VfCOllllECT Z1P CODES DO NOT wmr PARCS. NlJAfiEIlS ON THIS FORM THUIlSTON COUNTY PIlOPEIlTIES ONt Y.. OBTAIN ADDRESSES FJlOAf COUNTY ASSES.iOft, IUILDING ", FIRST FLOOR CITY OF Ot YMPtA PflOPfIl77ES ONt Y.. ADJACENT PIlOPEIl1Y OWNEIlS LIST SHAU BE mPAIlED BY A Tm.E COMPANY FOR THOSE PARCELS WITHIN THE CITY OF OL YMPfA.. INCLUDE ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN JOO FEET OF ExTERIOR BOUNDARY OF THE PIlOPEIl1Y IN VOL VED PLEASE NOTE: If J- I CASE NO. Jack Sml~ ~ 4921 (:bIitlti Street Ol~)&: WA 98503 USE BLACK INK ONLY BO(}() / r! L/ tl/eJoh /1 PO /:3cJx 3/15 Ye/m) w/4 9?;S97 (1'/ <l(' I )yO () UJ ~~'e I f- ro BoX /2CJ/ /e/ml wA C(?)5?7 lioWClrd fJe-fl-I~+{)n PO 80;( Z/ 7 (fle li'e!l()a/ LUll 9<:655-<6 meJanle 3()QP)~ Po l3o~ /Z~4:> Ye/m u)/4 065(77 / f(e/fn /f)c;1)ci6Ief 26/ b B/(/okcJo)e. RJ k: "lac:o/1/'a/ U)!4 9~445 ~Roberf C)lnsfen~en 10520 Ue::e/A- s!- sE ye/ jtfl, L1/ Ii 9:65G! 7 I -:Sc<<_k ;::etL~h . mar1ue!,~+;;; ?L;f</f! 10704 Vancil l?c) SE 404 /?~J ~+ E~ Ye/~ LvA 9SSY7 ICic-c/YJJc:t1 vJII- 9<0445 , F1gef~:::::::o(jn) /UQ ~/onCiJ E cJL~){Lrcl J/-Cb/ bel'"f 8qf} k /--22 -c-- I.." I. Y) ~- t~ '-~/J UL.::-/lO ~ r- rc;~v", j'l ..:::::::.,E-- f- L./ BoX 'H~J Q../ ,J III -TQco,rnq/ L<..1,4 C??;4/) rC0;,'/J!ZlJ/ai [/)11 C}f)5C";J/ Leo LePebvre po E?:o)< 1056 Ye//12 w!4 7<6597 U,CiO. t11 (!o, Po 80x 42-/~ wh ,.ff iC~r( eft 900tJ? Flrsf Baptlsf du(ct^l PO E?tJx r Ye/(Y)/ WA 915097 CITY OF QlYJiFlA PROPERTES ONY Prep..-.c:t by TItle ~8ny Date PRAIRIE PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER SEe .30 T 1 7N. R 2E. W M ,--- :D , i I, -,. I. _ __ _ I - ,...;" ~c:..__>:.:..;_ _-=:::. PLAZA DRIVE '~_.=__~.._ .'__._._~,. ------~~-:.:~~~~~~~~:;---i:~:--,,-~-~~:f~::7 -----:-". _ ~--I ~ r:, ~:-:";"""""'-'"-C"'~1' r;'" , l - _, -~r .;; STA 1+01. srA l..F:GEND SIT<: DATA DlSIlNll """"'"" .--.,.. - . . "'" IOOfIAKf ..,.,..,. -- ow ow ..... ...... U1r2-f,~~ 31 7 ., II\lIJER'VAl:K' - IfI1O(Y ,..... ~ ca. POlE .-.... ".ca..... """..- -<>p flM/( POlE oml ....1:ll1I III flM/( """"""'" .... ... ,......... 114t) ~ ....""... --.. ...- " ~~ IW/II1IIfI SJ*&,J JID S'tlI.U O. """'- - - -.... ..... art " "'" OT """'- "",..,.... ..... art " lIUI 8: ~ """'- POlE E. -- l14i -- """"''''''' """ POST t1) . C<NFDl """ -.os """ F<HCC ltAIUIOK !."__~'m_~ ..._____-:-_-:__-. \ i B s'TLP. TAM( (QltAWl"I? ",. ,""",=-n" ..-,....-. _7OI'UIE IElmO<< _ 0>0lH<AD ~ ___ -s'r.!:p. SYS7Df I.I€ - "'=-n" STA. H-Oll. AiiitERS ~ cr. - :.:- ,.., SCALE: ,a_50' ~-5~OO ~ U ~1JCAI.OA11JW BeNCHMARK: ~~~~4J'~~::'-:-2 :::':'~DI1IbSI'_.-:I ~ iSM: M-..-.z~~__r(JI___" :=.n:.,~*'r..:r:__ 0-'4 ojl' 1;j;III~~ ~ rg~II!IIL "~IJlI =11111 ~J-l '.., III II ~ I ~ <.: '" ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~IILI .QI- ~ __ HAlO ~T.DllC SIfT. ..LfI..!..... ~ Sa Chamberlain & Associates7 Inca June 18, 1993 Shelly Badg~r CIty ofYelm AdmmIstrator 105 Yelm Avenue W Yelm, W A 98597 RE PraIne Plaza CommercIal Development SCA #93028 Dear Shelly; Enclosed for your reVIeW are SIX copIes of the Conceptual-Dramage, Erosion Contrul, and Mamtenance Plan Report for the Prall'le Plaza Shoppll1g Center ThIS report was prepared accordmg to tll(~ Dramage DesIgn and ErosIOn Control Manual for Thurston County and the CIty of Yelm lnducleclm the n~port are a prehmlllary dramage report, an erOSIOn control report, and a maIntenance plan. A final dramage desIgn has not been completed at thIS tIme but WIll be forthcommg The final desIgn WIll conform wIth all reqmrements for blO-fIltratlUll al1dll1fdtratHJn as determmed m the dramage calculatIOn portIOn of tins report The exact configuratIOn ofbIO-filtratIOn swales, wet well baSlllS and lIlflltratLun basins h,lS not yet been completed. However, adequate space has l}een provlCled ill the overall sil:p plan to accommodate the reqmred surface areas. and volumes as de term med 1lY the draInage calculatIolls Generally, the stormwater runoff from all paved surface areas WIll be dJl'('~cU~d by sheet {low to grasslmed swales placed throughout the, Sltt~ Once t1'e<l tr-~d hv blU- filtratIOn m these swales, the runoff WIll enter omnte mtiltratlOll sw;:dps or hRSlns Runoff whIch WIll not slieet flow to these areas WIll be cullected by LRtch basms and ruuted to eIther wet wells and/or grasslmed swales for llre-treatinent Once twatecl, tillS runoff WIll then also enter onSlte mfiltratIOll swales or basms All huddmg roo!: runoff WIll be Isolated and dIrected to mchvHlual undergrouml rock. mftltra tl<Jl1 gallenes 719 Sleater-Kinney Rd SE Suite 120 PO Box 3485 Lacey, Washington 98503-0485 (206) 493-6002 (206) 493-2476 Facsimile (907) 279-5929 Anchorage ENGINEERING o PLANNING o SURVEYING ~ "-.. Ms Shelly Badger June 18, 1993 Page Two Should you have any questIOns or comments regardmg tlllS report, pJeaS(l contact liS at (206) 493-6002 Smcerely, S. CHAMBERLAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. {J~.~ WIlham Parnell, P E WP/gJd enclosures cc: Frank WItt (93028618.ltr) ENGINEERING PLANNING SURVEYING . . I ~ 00 L__~J ~ TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS PrairIe Plaza Shopp lllg Center Yelm, Washmgton June 1993 s. Chamberlain & Associates, Inc. Engineering, Planning & Surveying Lacey, Washington 1-1 U II LJ [I U II LJ Transportation Impact Analysis n LJ n Prairie Plaza Shopping Center LJ n Yelm, Washmgton u n I .June 1993 LJ for II LJ n Rocky PraIrIe Development Company POBox 480 Yelm, Washmgton 98597 (206) 458-2201 LJ fI I LJ prepared by II ~ S Chamberlam & Associates, Inc. 719 Sleater-Kmney Road SE, SUlte 120 Lacey, Waslungton 98503 (206) 493-6002 (206) 493-24 76 FAX n I II LJ contacts Robert E Jewell AsSOCiate LJ n LJ LJ Robert C Hazlett, Jr , P E Semor ASSOCIate (I~~fI~ESj~i~25-b!~ f' Il f' U ";, LJ S Chamberlam & ASSOCiates, Inc. SeA Project No 93028 June 9, 1993 193028TIA.RPTI Prame Plaza Shoppmg Center Transportat.lon Impact: AnalysIs Page 11 II -, / r' l.J fI U r' ~ TABLE OF CONTENTS fI I INTRODUCTION LJ PROJECT DESCRl PTION r' ~ BACKGROUNDINPORMATION Area Land Uses Roadway Inventory EXIstmg Traffic OperatIOns Traffic Volume Data AccId()nt Data Pubhl TransportatIOn n u fI LJ n PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS Traffic GeneratIOn TrIp DIstrIbHtlOn L.J fI LJ FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS PIpelme Prolects Future Traffic Growth 1994 Traffic AsSIgnments r' l.J [l I l.J TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS CapacIty DefiCIencIes 1st S1 reet / Yelm Avenue 3rd Street / Yelm Avenue FIve Corners (at Yelm Avenue/Bald HIlls Road) FIve Corners (at Bald I-hlls Road/Morns Road) 103rcl Avenue / Yelm Avenue Driveway "A / Yelm Avenue DrIveway "B" / Yelm Avenue DrIveway "C" / Yelm Avenue Plaza DrIve / 103rd Avenue AlgIers DrIve/ Plaza DrIve Plaza DrIve / Yelm Avenue Other mtersectIOns Safety DeficJencIes n u n L.J n LJ n l.J fI L.J MITIGATION CONCLUSIONS fI l.J "', S Chamberlam & As..;ocIates, Inc. SCA Project No 93028 June 9, 1993 193028TIA.RPTI rr U fI LJ 1 2 3 3 3 4 5 5 5 6 G 8 10 10 13 13 14 14 14 15 15 16 16 16 16 16 16 17 17 17 17 19 22 PraIrIe Plaza Shoppmg Center TransportatIOn Impact AnalysIs Page III I' I U fI U I' u /l ! LJ I' ~ n u fI I Table 1 LJ Table 2 n LJ Table 3 /l LJ FIgure 1 /l u FIgure 2 fI ~ FIgure 3 /l FIgure 4 LJ I' LJ FIgure 5 I' LJ FIgure 6 r' LJ I' U /l LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Level of ServIce (LOS) AnalysIs Results SIgnal Warrant AnalysIs Results (Five Corners) SIgnal Warrant AnalysIs Results (Plaza DrIve) VicmJ ty Map SIte Plan EXIstmg 1993 PM Peak Hour Volumes and .Average Dmly Traffic Volumes SIte-generated PM Peak I-lour and Average DaIly Traffic Volumes Projected 1994 PM Peak I-lour and Aver3ge Dmly Traffic Volumes WIthout Project Projected 1994 PM Peak Hour and Aver,lge DaIly Traffic Volumes WIth Project u fI LJ S Chamberlam & As-;oclates, Inc. SCA Project No. 930~8 June 9, 1993 (93028TIA.RPTI Prmne Plaza Shoppmg Center TransportatIOn Impact AnalvsIs Page IV 11 LJ I' U n U Jl , LJ INTRODUCTION (I u Rock Prairie Development Company proposes an 80,000 square foot (sf) commerCIal center wIth future plans for a fast food restaurant or gasolme statlOn/mmI-mart m Yelm, Washmgton. The shoppmg center wIll be sItuated m an area bounded by Yelm Avenue along the south, lO.3rd Avenue to the north, Plaza DrIve on the west, Creek Street to the west. AlgIers DrIVe bIsects the SIte and connects Plaza DrIVe wIth Creek Street. FIgure 1 Illustrates the SIte locatlOn. I' ~ n LJ ThIS report by S Chamberlam & ASSOCIates, Inc. (SCA) documents the results of a traffic Impact analysIs of QXlstmg and future traffic conditions m the proJect; V1CII11ty The study was prepared accordmg to Thurston County gUldehnes for new developments whICh are conSIstent WIth CIt) of Yelm traffic analysis procedures Included are analyses of ten prImary mtersectIons m the project area. il U il LJ u ThiS report also represents a techmcal addendum to the December 19!)2 SCA traffic report study for the Nlsqually Plaza Shoppmg Center PraIrIe Plaza will be constructed WIth a parkmg and cIrculatlOn system tymg It to the eXlstmg lot at Nlsqually Plaza Followmg construct LOn, SCA expects traffic to flow freely between both centers ancllocal traffic generatlOn t(1 functIOn as a smgle retaIl complex. II II LJ il ~ 11 LJ n u il , u 11 U jl LJ n LJ II S Chamberlam & AsSOCIates, Inc. SCA Project No. 93028 June 9, 1993 (93028TIA.RPT) Pramo Plaza Shopping Conter TransportatIOn Impact AnalYSIS Page 1 u n I LJ f' LJ n u il , LJ PROJECT DESCRIPTION n I Presently, the proJect sIte IS undeveloped wIth onslte meandermg pnvate roadways The sIte is VIrtually level, treeless, and exhIbIts scattered vegetatlOn. Figure 2 shows the prehmmary sIte plan. l.J fI ~ ThIs proJect proposes several access pomts along prIvate roadways. These roadways are Plaza DrIve, AlglOrs DrIve, AlglOrs Court, and View Court. These paved roadways presently eXIst on-s te FIgure 2 also depIcts the drIveway locatIOns for access to the sIte's parkmg faclhbes. f' u n n ThIS development vehIcle mteractlOn wIth Nlsqually Plaza. ThIs center's dnve "D" IR located OpposIte the central parkmg alsle m front of the two bmldmgs facmg Yelm Avenue L.J LJ Development WIll occur over the next year After the development IS constructed, full occupancy IS antlclI ated m 1994 Therefore, thIS study analyzes trafIic Impacts expected durmg the 1994 honzon year n U n u f' 1.J fI lJ n 1.J n i 1.J n u f' I l.J f' l.J n U S. Chamberlam & AssocIates, Inc. SCA Project No. 93028 June 9, 1993 (9302BTIA.RPTI PraIrIe Plaza Shoppmg Center TransportatIOn Impact AnalysIs Page 2 r' ~ c 11 LJ r u BACKGROUND INFORMATION n u Area Land Uses The SIte eXIsts m a commercIal/industrIal zonmg chstrIct and IS presently undeveloped. The SIte IS wIthm the existmg southwest commercial dIStriCt ofYelm. West of the site IS the NIsqually Plaza Shoppmg Center East of the SIte are smaller commercial establIshments along SR 507 Witllln the ImmedIate SIte VICInIty are small mdustrIal and warehousmg developments along Creek Street. Surroundmg the site are smgle family dwellmgs and large vacant parcels m southeast Yelm [' G ,11 u fl I U Roadway Inventory Yelm Avenue (Washmgton State Routes 510 and 507) IS a prmcIpal arterial m the Yelm DGA. Generally, tlv~ roadway has a two-lane 22-foot cross-sectIOn wIthm the Yelm DCA. lt has a posted 25 rnph speed lImIt m the CIty Center that mcreases to 35 mph m front of NIsqually Plaza. OutSIde the DGA, SR 510 and SR 507 has posted speed lImits of 50 mph. All minor roadways approaclllng Yelm Avenue are under STOP control. In front of NIsqually Plaza, the roadway Widens to prOVide separate left and right turn lanes for traffic entermg the shoppmg center If LJ n u If Third Street IS des]~nated as a local street With a two-lane cross sectIOn. The posted ~peed lImit IS 25-mph. ThIS street IS under STOP control at Yelm Avenue u 11 Bald HIlls Road IS a two-lane collector roadway, connectmg the City and SR 507 With the rural reSidentIal arr;as south of the Yelm DGA. The road has a 50-mph posted speed lImit. ThiS roadway IS under STOP control at its mtersectIOn With SR 507 Bald l-hlls Road IS a major leg to the mtersectIOn configuratIOn known as "Five Corners" LJ [' U LJ Morns Road IS a 22-foot Wide collector road WIth no shoulders. The posted speed lImIt IS 50-mph. ThIS road ]s an mtegral part of the "FIVe Corners" mtersectIOn alIgnment. The road IS under STOP control on Bald I-lills Road. 11 11 u Creek Street IS a 2:~-foot Wide collector road WIth no shoulders, and a 35-mph posted speed limIt. ThIS roadway serves mmImal peak-hour traffic as part of the "FIVe Corners" mtersectIOn alIgnm:mt. The road IS under STOP control on SR 507 n I l.J 11 U 103rd Avenue IS a ;~2-foot WIde two-lane collector WIth a 25-mph posted speed lImit near the shoppmg center No SIdewalks or shoulders presently eXISt. n u 11 S Chamberlam & AsSOCIates, Inc. SCA Project No. 93028 June 9, 1993 19302BTIA.RPTI Prame Plaza Shoppmg Center TransportatIOn Impact AnalvsIs Page 3 LJ r LJ c /l U 11 LJ r< u Plaza Drlve and AlS"lers Dnve are pnvate 26-foot wlde roadways without shoulders Both roadways are under STOP control at local materlals and collectors. Speed hmlts are not posted on these roadways. Existing Traffic Operations [ Traffic Volume Data Weekday evenmg peak-hour turmng movement counts were conducted by SCA between 4'00 and 6 00 p.m., at the followmg locatlOns m September, 1992 11 l.J /l Dnveway "A"/SR 507 Drlveway "B"/SR 507 Dnveway "D"/Plaza Dnve Plaza Dnvell03rd Avenue SR 507/Plaza Dnve 3rd Street Nelm Avenue 9/24/92 9/24/92 9/24/92 9/24/92 9/24/92 9/29/92 /l u LJ /l U Adcl1tional evemng peak-hour traffic counts were obtamed from the Yelms ComprehensIVe TransportatlOn Plan for the followmg mtersectlOns. n l.J Five CornerslBaldI-hlls Road FIVe Corners/ Morns Road I l.J The traffic counts v'ere summanzed, and the predommant peak-hour traffic hour was between 4 30 and 5 30 p.m The eXlstmg peak hour through traffic volumes for the study mtersections were then adjusted, usmg a 4% growth factor, to reflect 1993 eXlstmg traffic concl1tlOns. Flgure 3 shows the 1993 eXlstmg P.M. peak- hour traffic condltIons c [I I l.J /l I LJ AccLdent data Area-wlde accldent records for the past three calendar years (1989-91) were revlCwed to ldentIfy hazardous 'lccldent locatlOns on the roadway network. The cntena used to ldentIfy "hazardous locatlOns" was more than 10 and 5 aCCIdents at sIgnalIzed and unslgnahzed mterSI\ctlOns, respecbvely n I L.J I' L.J Accldent data at th,~ unslgnahzed mtersectlOns at Yelm AvenueIBald I-hlls Road and Bald Hllls Road/ Morns i~oad, the "Flve Corners" mterscctlOn, mdlcated that there were 11 accldents recorded \vlthm the last three years. No other mtersectIons met the hazardous locations crlterla. n U n U S. Chamberlam & AssocIates, Inc. SCA Project No. 93028 June 9, 1993 t93028TIA.RPTl Pratne Plaza Shoppmg Center TransportatIOn Impact AnalysIs Page 4 r' lJ ! LJ i1 u r U n LJ I' ~ n l.J n u n l.J n u n u [1 LJ n u [I l.J n u n LJ i1 lJ n u n U f1 LJ Pubhc Transportation Yelm IS not served by eIther daIly commuter pubhc transIt. ThIS sItuatIOn IS scheduled to change m the fall of 1993 InterCIty TransIt (IT), the desIgnated transIt provlder for Thurston County, recently received approval from voters to extend ItS serVIce dlstrIct and mclude the south county commumties, mcludmg Yelm. At the wrIting of tlus report, the exact serVIce routes had not been determmed. S Chamberlam & AS'Joclates, Inc. SCA Project No. 93028 June 9, 1993 193028TIA.RPTJ Praine Plaza Shopping Center TransportatIOn Impact AnalYSIS Page 5 rl LJ n I l.J ! LJ PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS !l I LJ The two proJect-related charactenstIcs havmg the most affect on area traffic conditions are 1) peak-hour traffic generation, and 2) dlrectlOnal dIstribution of these SIte volumes on the area roadways. r< ~ Traffic Generation n u BasLS VehIcle traffic estImates are determmed through a process known as tnp generatlOn. Rates are applIed to the proposed land use to estimate traffic generated by development durmg a speCIfic time mterval. The acknowledged source for tnp generatlOn rates IS the current edItIon of the Tnp Generatwn Report by the Institute of TransportatlOn EngIneers (ITE) ITE establIshed tnp rates m natlOnwlde stuches of shoppIng centers (land use code 820) and fast food restaurants (land use code 834) 11 u !' l.J LJ As prevlOusly noted, Prame Plaza and Nlsqually Plaza WIll have a parkmg and clrculatlOn system that tIes both centers together Thus, SCA expects the retml and commercIal commumty m thIS area to functlOn as a smgle shoppmg center Based upon thIS conclusion, the pnmary purpose for tIllS SCA study of PraIne Plaza IS to assess the abIlIty of the adjacent roadway system to accommodate the addItIonal traffic created by the planned develo} Iment. The concluslOns and recommendatlOns of SCA's December 1993 study were used as the study foundatlOn for tlllS report. !' n LJ !' LJ n u Process Traffic generatlOn i;)r thIS study was computed by forecastmg the traffic growth based on the programmed m(:rease m retaIl actiVIty from Prmne Plaza. The total retaIl square footage IS 186,000 ::of, 80,000 sf from PrmrIe Plaza, and 106,000 sf for Nlsqually Plaza. The followmg tnp generation factors were then applIed to the total retml actIVIty n LJ n LJ DaIly trIps = 58 45 trIpS per 1,000 sf Evemng peak-hour trIps = 5.24 trIpS per 1,000 sf !' ~ It should be noted 1 hat the above-tnp generatlOn rates are lower than those used m the SCA study for Nlsqually Plaza. StudIeS by IrrE have concluded as the retaIl actiVIty mcreases, tnp generatIOn rates - the number of trips per 1,000 sf - go down. As noted, SCA expects PraIrw Plaza to functIOn as a member of the eXIstIng and planned retml system m southeast Yelm. !l u !l U n L.J S Chamberlam & AsSOCIates, Inc. SCA Project No. 93028 June 9, 1993 193028TIA.RPTI PrairIe Plaza Shoppmg Center TransportatIOn Impact AnalYSIS Page 6 n u r-o i l.J n LJ r' ~ As noted m thIS report's mtroductIOn, a portIon of sIte IS desIgnated for future development as eItLer a fast-food restaurant or gasoline statIOn/mmI market trIp generatIon for these types of developments are n LJ r' I U Fast Food Restaurants (Drwe-In) Dally trIps = 632 12 trIps per 1,000 sf Evemng peak hour trIpS = 36 53 trips per 1,000 sf n l.J n Gasolme Statwn/lvfim-Market Dally tripS = 820.2 trIps per 1,000 sfk Evenmg peak hour trIps = 82 02 trips per 1,000 sf u n *Estlmated - based on Yelm peak hour to dally traffic percentage L.J n , ~ SCA assumed the hIghest traffic potentIal for the development as the densIty for thIS report. Based on tLe relatIVe trIp generatIon rates, a fast-food restaurant WIll generate greater new traffic ,olumes than a gasolme statIOn/mmI-market. Land uses, such as fast- food restaurants and gasolme statIOns, attract traffic from the eXIstmg vehIcular stream (e g Yelm Avenue), commonly referred to as "pass-by" trIps. Stumes by ITE have concluded as much 1S 30% of the traffic generated by a fast-food restaurant WIll come from eXIstmg traffic and as much as 80% for gasolme statIOns. Therefore, SCA's analYSIS used traffic generaV:~d by a fast-food restaurant m tlns study to demonstrate the hIghest traffic generatIon potentIal for the Prame Plaza development. n u n u n The followmg sumntunzes the hIghest traf(ic generation potentIal for the PraIrIe Plaza development. u n u [' u n u r' ~ n LJ n I S Chamberlam & As.';ocIates, Inc. SCA Project No. 93023 June 9, 1993 19302BTIA.RPTI Prame Plaza Shoppmg Center Transportation Impact AnalYSIS Page 7 LJ n , U ,.--. I LJ n l.J n LJ I' LJ Estimated Traffic Generation Prmne Plaza Shoppmg Centers Yelm, Washmgton Evemng Peak Hour Dmly Land-Use Enter EXIt Total Traffic Fast-Food Rest. (Land Use Code 834) ~~ 90 85 175 3,035 MIxed-use DIscount (20%) 70 70 140 2,425 SUBTOTAL 70 70 140 2,425 Shoppmg Center (Land Use Code 820) IlK 210 210 420 4,676 Total Dnveway Volumes 280 280 560 7,100 Total New SIte-Generated Traffic 195 195 390 4,970 y (WIth 30% Pass-by DIscount) I~\g \ ,1 II LJ n I l.J n U n U n n ')11- L\ 'oq - 3,0 y; 0'^-S'.> ~ ~ ~ l.J I' LJ ~?cc-rrer15>:-- i37 n Trip Distribution The vehIcle dIrectIOllal trip dIstnbutIOn to and from the SIte WIll be based pnmarIly on. LJ n the area street system characterIstics, current travel patterns on the area roadways the proposed access system for the proJect and, locatIons of employment and recreatIOnal opportumtIes. i LJ [1 I U 11 lJ EIther field studIes or results from transportatIon plannmg models prOVide data for developmg lhrectIOnal dIstnbutIOns. The City of Yelm has adopted a Comprehensive TransportatlOn Plan that mcluded developmg a cahbrated transportatIOn plannmg model of the area. The m'Jdel's dIstrIbution element has been calibrated to the aforementIOned elements. Usmg tb:; Yelm model (zone 30) as a baSIS, trip dIstributIOn factors listed on the next page were developed for the NIsqually Plaza Shoppmg Center J ' n I LJ n LJ Prame Plaza Shoppmg Center TransportatiOn Impact AnalySiS Page 8 n U S Chamberlam & As'50Clates, Inc. SCA Project No. 93028 June 9, 1993 19302BTIA.RPTI n I LJ n u n l.J I l.J Site traffic was asslgned to the local street network based on the mrectlOnal mstrlbutlOn estimates and current travel patterns. The sIte mstribution IS provIded In Figure 4 n LJ Trip Distribution Table Prmrze Plaza Shoppmg Center Yolm , WashlOgton To/From the Project TrIp DIstrIbutIOn South on SH. 507 10% West on Yelm Avenue 35% East on SR 507 20% North on Ist Street 5% East on 10:~rd Avenue 10% South on Bald HIlls Road 5% South on MorrIs Road 15% Total. 100% n I lJ II , l.J II l.J n LJ n , u 11 LJ c Ii LJ n u \l u n LJ n u II LJ S. Chamberlam & AssocIates, Inc. SeA Project No. 93028 June 9, 1993 193028TIA.RPTI PraIrie Plaza Shoppmg Center TransportatIOn Impact AnalySiS Page 9 n l.J \l l.J n LJ n I LJ Il L FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS [ Pipeline Projects The ComprehenslV(: TransportatIOn Plan for the CIty of Yelm has recommended future street and mtersectLon improvement projects in the study area that wIll eventually benefit the proposed Prmn; Plaza Shoppmg Centers. n LJ !' U Y-I (SR 507/SR-51O Connector) ThIS project wIll consIst of contmumg an eXistIng southeast projectIOn of SR 510 to SR 507 It could be mItIally constructed as a three-lane facIlity that could be wIdened for a fourth and fifth] ane as traffic volumes warrant. AnticIpated completIOn date IS by 2002 Il LJ c Y-2 (SR 507/FlVe-Corners Connector) The recommended locatIOn for tIus road", ay IS a westward extensIOn of SR 507 from "FIve-Corners" along the apprOxImate locatIOn of 105th Avenue SE to an mtersectIon wIth eXIstmg SR 507 and Y-I south of the CIty Center The recommendatIOn mcludes recoTIc;tructmg "FlVe-Corners" for a four-way mtersectIOn wIth Morns Road and") elm Avenue Creek Street would be closed, and the Bald I-hIls Road approach would be relocated to the east as part of the Y-3 and Y-9 recommendatIOns. East ofYelm Avenue / MorrIS Road, the Y-2 recoffimendatIOn mcludes wIdemng eXlstmg SR 507 for a five-lane faCIlity to the .t\lsqually RIVer bl'ldge 'fhe antIcipated completIon date for the InItIal three lane cross section IS by 2002 n U n ~ n 1..J c Y-3 (Canal Road North Loop) Much of the alignment for thIS recorrmendatIOn follows eXIstmg roadways. Start1ng at ItS west term mus, the f( adway mtersects proposed Y-I near 88th Avenue SW, and IS a pro)e( lIOn of Canal Road west of Crystal Sprmgs Road. It then follows Cana: Road to Grove Road and mtersects SR 507 OpposIte a realigned Bald HIlls Road. A three-lane cross-section is, accordmg to mterIm-year traffic mode: projectIOns, the need for the roadway is wltlun six to ten years. Howe vel', thIS need may change as development plans for the mdustrlal area '1.re better defined. n LJ n L.J n U r' LJ Il LJ " n S. Chamberlam & AS;ocIates, Inc. SCA Project No. 93028 June 9, 1993 193028TIA.RPTI Prame Plaza Shoppmg Center TransportatIOn Impact AnalvsIs Page 10 LJ ! L.J n U I' LJ 11 I LJ n LJ I' ~ n , LJ n u ,n L.J I' U n LJ I' ~ 11 ~ n u (l U I' LJ c 11 LJ n i u II , LJ Y-4 (Stevens-103rd Connector) ThIs Improvement consIsts of usmg the eXlstmg Stevens Street ahgnment between 4th Street and Edwards Street. A connector road would then be constructed to 103rd Avenue The estimated completIOn date IS by 1998. Y-5 (Yelm Avenue Improvements) RebUIldmg Yelm Avenue IS dependent upon ;onstructIOn of recommendatIOns Y-l,Y-2, and Y-3 The prImary recom mendatlOn (and immedIate need) IS to construct a bi-du.ectionalle[t- turn lane from 93rd Avenue to "FIve-Corners." IfY-1,Y-2, and Y-3 are constructed, thIS three-lane faCIlIty WIll accommodate volumes for a 20-year perIOd. Accordmg to mterIm-year traffic model prOJectIOns, the need for a three lane faCIlIty IS Immediate The city has acted on the ImmedIate need and has begun deSIgn of the three lane constructIOn ofYelm Avenue between 103rd Avenue and the eastern property lIne of thIS SIte Included m tlllS proJect wIll be frontage Improvements as part of mItigatIOn for new development m southeast Yelm Rock) PraIne Development IS partIcIpatmg m these Improvements on behalf of Pr<:une Plaza. AddItional mformatIOn on thIS subject IS contamed m the followmg paragraphs. Y-9 (Bald I-lIlls Road Reahgnment) Presently, "Five Corners" IS the most dangerous mtersection in the Yelm area. Because of the eXIstl1lg intersection geometries, the best possible improvement would be to realIgn or close off one of the approaches. The plan recommends Bald l-hlls Road reahgned as a two-lane roadway between the Western Chehahs Rmlroad. rrlllS recommendatIOn calls for movmg the roadway east and mtersectmg SR 507 at Grove Road. GroVE- Road IS part of the Y-3 Improvement as the Canal Road North Loop The mtersectIOn WIth Grove Road / SR 507 would be sIgnaJIZed. SCA estimates that tlllS proJect WIll be completed by 1998 In adilltlOn to the R::ltIclpated roadway Improvements, a planned expanSIOn of the eXIstmg Nlsqually Plaza Sh\ lppmg Center ]S expected to contribute a sIgmficant mcrease m vehicular traffic onio the adjacent roadwaYB wlthm the study area The eXIsting NIsqually Plaza Shllppmg Center presently conSIsts of 57,061 sf of mIxed-retaIl use It mcIudes Jayhawks drugstore, Thnftway food market, and other retml outlets A detached bankmg faCIlIty, Puget Sound, also eXIsts on the southeastern portIOn of the SIte S. Chamberlam & As:-;ocmtes, Inc. SCA Project No. 93023 June 9, 1993 19302BTIA.RPTI Prame Plaza Shoppmg Center TransportatIOn Impact AnalYSIS Page 11 n U n U n I I LJ As part of the shoPllmg center expanSlOn, the eXlstmg Jayhawks drugstore and health food store WIll be removed and replaced WIth a new ThrIftway food market. The expanslOn wIll also mclude attached mIxed-retml outlets located to the east of the proposed drugstore The new SIze of the attached shopping center will encompass approxImately 106,000 sf. When added to proposed fast food restaurant pads and the eXIstmg bankmg faLllIty, the total area of the shoppmg center complex east of Plaza DrIve wIll be approxImate ly 124,000 square feet. n J c n LJ Access WIll be provded by three drIveways along SR 507, whIch two presently eXIst (DrIveways "A" and "B") DrIveway "B", along SR 507, WIll provIde prImary SIte access and WIll be slgnal1z:;d. DrIveway "C" WIll allow limIted access, prolubItmg left-turns eXIting from the SItl ~ A raIsed traffic Island WIll be mstalled at access "C" to prohibIt left turn maneuvers oni 0 SR 507 EXIstmg drIVeways along 103rd Avenue (DrIVeway "E") and Plaza DrIve (Drivev ay "D") WIll provIde mmor SIte access. n LJ 'l LJ c ThIS pIpelme proJec, provides developer mItIgatiOn for expected mtersectlOn capacIty constramts along sn 507 The developer mItIgatIon m whIch the applIcant IS currently partIcIpatmg m, mcludes the afore mentlOned half-street Improvements on the north SIde of SR 507, and mcludes the followmg. a) left-turn storage bays and acceleratlOn lanes at Access "A" and Plm'a DrIve, b) a rIght-turn deceleratIOn lane at Access "B" and Plaza Drive, c) a trafTic s gnal mstalled at Access "B", and, d) curb, gutter, SIdewalk, and a bIcycle lane Also mcluded IS the 900 realIgnment of 103rd Avenue WIth SR 507 Project development is plm-;ned over thIS year Therefore, this study assumes these Improvements will 1 Je m place prlOr to the PrmrIe Plaza development. n I U r LJ n LJ n LJ [I , u 11 G 11 i l.J r' l.J [I 1 LJ S Chamberlam & As:;ocIates, Inc. SCA Project No, 93023 June 9, 1993 193028TIA.RPT) Prame Plaza Shoppmg Center TransportatIOn Impact AnalYSIS Page 12 n u fI u !l u !l G The trIp generatIOn for thIS development IS summarIzed m the followmg table 'l LJ fI ~ EstImated Traffic GeneratIOn Nisqually Plaza Shoppmg Center Yelm, Washmgton Evemng Peak Hour DaIly Land-Use Enter EXIt Total Traffic Fast-Food Rest. (Land Use Code 834) 260 240 500 8,675 MIxed-use DIscount (20%) 210 190 400 6,940 SUBTOTAL 210 190 400 6,940 Shoppmg Centel' (Land Use Code 820) 155 155 310 3,335 Total Driveway Volumes 365 345 710 10,275 Total New SIte-Generated Traffic 255 245 500 7,195 (WIth 30% Pass-by Discount) !l G n I LJ n LJ r' LJ n , I U n LJ n Future Traffic Grew ih Growth factors are used to account for unspecIfied growth, m addItIOn to any pipelme proJects, occurrmg wIthm the study area by the hOrIzon year Existing peak-hour traffic volumes were factored by four percent per year, uncompounded, to reflect background traffic growth. FIgure 5 Illustrates 1994 traffic condItIOns WIth background and pIpelme traffic added. , LJ n LJ n LJ 1994 Traffic Assignments CIty of Yelm gmdelmes speCIfy one analysIs scenarIO of SIte traffic WIth projected background horizon year traffic. Site traffic was combmed with these volumes accordIng to the traffic generatIOn and dIrectIOnal dIstrIbutIOn estImates FIgure 6 depIcts the 1994 traffic volumes mcb tdmg SIte traffic. n LJ n LJ n u S Chamberlam & As;;ocwtes, Inc. SCA Project No 93028 June 9, 1993 (93028TIA.RPTI Prame Plaza Shoppmg Center TransportatIOn Impact Analysls Page 13 n LJ n U n u (l l.J I' I LJ TRAFFIC OPEHATIONS ANALYSIS n U Analyses were conducted to determme potentIal defiCIencIes m the present (1992) and horIzon (1993) year DefiCIenCIeS fall mto two categorIes. capacIty and safety [I I LJ Capacity Deficiencies CapacIty defiCIenCIeS are most notable at nearby mtersectIons that WIll carry sIgmficant site traffic volumes The acknowledged source for determinmg overall capacity IS the current emtIOn of the Highway Capac~ty Manual, which IS used m operatIOns analyses. CapaCIty analyses were completed for eXIstmg counts and future traffic aSSIgnment scenarIOS. Complete lIstmgs of the capaCIty analyses are lIsted m the appendIX. II I . U n LJ n CapaCIty analYSIS rl~sults are lIsted m terms of Level of SerVIce (LOS) LOS IS a qualItatIve term de:;crIbmg operatmg condItIons a drIver WIll experIence whIle travelmg on a partIcular strC':lt or hIghway durmg a speCIfic tIme mterval. It ranges from A (very lIttle delay) to FOong delays and congestIon) LOS D along Yelm Avenue and LOS C elsewhere are the r\lcommended mmImum deSIgn standards for the purposes of tIus study by the CIty of Yelm The capaCIty analYSIS results are lIsted in Table 1 for. n U , U n LJ 1993 EXIstmg Traffic CondItIons, 1994 Background Traffic WIthout project SIte traffic 1994 Total Traffic WIth project SIte traffic n u n ~ Table 1 shows the LOS results for the study mtersectlOns. For unsIgnalIzed mtersectIOns, the LOS IS determmed by the operatIOn of mmor street left turns. SIgnalIzed mtersectIOn LOS IS determmed by the average velucular delay m seconds motOrists experlCnce at the mtersectIOn. The followmg dIscusses the analYSIS results by the eleven primary mtersectIOlls m the study area. n LJ n I LJ Signalized IntersecLlons c First StreetlYelm Avenue ThIS IS presently tb8 only SIgnalIzed mtersectIOn m the CIty It IS a fully actuated eIght- phase traffic SIgnal system. Protected left-turn phasmg IS prOVIded on all legs at the mtersectIOn. CapaClty results mdicate the mtersectIOn presently operates at LOS C durmg the evemng peak hour IntersectIOn operatIOns will degrade to LOS D WIth construction of the proJect. ThIS serVICe level IS stIll wIthm acceptable standards n l.J II , U n I U S Chamberlam & AsSOCIates, Inc. SCA Project No. 93028 June 9, 1993 193028TIA.RPTI PraIrie Plaza Shoppmg Center TransportatIOn Impact AnalYSIS Page 14 n LJ n i I LJ n U c Unsignalized Intersections c Tlurd Street/Yelrn Llvenue This four-leg mtersectIOn IS currently under STOP control on 3rd Avenue Presently, the intersectIOn operates at LOS D durmg the evemng peak perIOd. It WIll deteriorate to LOS E for future condItwns wIth and wIthout project development. Although tIllS does not meet current servlCl~ level concurrency standards, background traffic growth on SR 507 IS contrIbuted to thIS }lOOr serVIce level. PotentIal roadway Improvements Y-l and Y-2, per the comprehenSIve transportatIOn plan, WIll Improve traffic operations at thIS locatIon n , I U 11 U n L Five Corners/Yelrn Avenue & Bald Hills Road ThIS mtersectIOn waS analyzed as a four-approach mtersectIOn wIth STOP control on Bald HIlls Road and Creek Road. TIllS mtersectIOn currently operates at LOS E durmg the evenmg peak hour The serVIce level wIll detenorate to LOS F when the project IS completed. TIns unacceptable servIce level could be Improved WIth InstallatIOn of a traffic SIgnal. A capacIty analYSIS was performed to determme what LOS could be acllleved under sIgnalIzed condItIOns Results mdIcated that LOS B could be realIzed, subsequent to sIgnalIzatIon. n ~ n i U f' l.J Traffic sIgnal warrD nts were revlOwed to determme If sIgnalIzatIOn Improvements WIll be reqmred to accomm odate eXIstmg and projected traffic condItions. If Thurston County Traffic Impact AnalysIs (rIA) gmdelmes are followed, three sIgnal warrants must be met before sIgnalIzatIOn IS reqmred for an mtersectIOn. There are eleven traffic sIgnal warrants WIth speClfic cntena outlmed m the Manual on Umforrn Traffic Control Demces, (MUTCD) Handbook., 1988 EdItIOn. Each warrant was revlOwed and analyzed to determme If proJectJd traffic volume concU.tIOns wIll reqmre mstallIng a sIgnal system. n U II LJ II LJ The eIghth hIghest hour traffic volumes of an average day is a measurement cnterIa for five sIgnal warrant~: TYPIcally, the eIghth hIghest hour traffic volume IS 60% of the peak hour volume Tabl( 2 provIdes the results of the sIgnal warrant analYSIS for eXlstmg and projected traffic volume condItIOns The table shows the cntena for the "volume" warrants (#1, #2, and #11) that are typIcally used to evaluate the need for sIgnalIzatIOn. Based on thIS traffil volume data, only Warrant 11, based on peak hour volumes, IS met m the 1994 honzon year II ~ Ii u Another warrant W IS also checked. Warrant 6, based on accIdents, was not met WIth eXIstmg data. II I U rr ~ f' LJ S Chamberlam & As;;ocIates, Inc. SCA Project No. 93028 June 9, 1993 193026TIA.RPTI Prame Plaza Shoppmg Center TransportatIOn Impact AnalYSIS Page 15 II I l.J n LJ n u c n LJ Five Corners/Bald Hills Road & Morns Road ThIS nearby mtersection operated at LOS A for eXlstmg traffic condItIOns. WIth project development, the serVIce level WIll degrade to LOS B This IS stIll well wlthm acceptable standards. Although thIS mtersectIOn shows acceptable serVICe levels, these results are misleadmg due to tne close proXImIty of the Yelm Avenue/Bald HIlls Road/Creek Street legs of the mtersecllon. Heavy eastbound rIght-turn traffic volumes often conflIct wIth vehIcles entermg and eXIting Morns Road. Improvements Y-2 and Y-9 WIll mItIgate the safety problems of thIS mtersectIOn. n U n U n I U l03rd Avenue/Yelm Avenue TIns unslgnahzed mtersectIon currently has STOP control on 103rd Avenue The mtersection currently operates at LOS B durmg the steady peak perIOd. It WIll degrade to LOS C wIth proJnct development. ThIS serVIce level IS stIll well wlthm concurrency standards. n lJ [I U Nisqually Plaza Dnveway ''A''/ Yelm Avenue The mtersectIOn cUlTently operates at LOS D The mtersectIOn WIll degrade to an unacceptable LOS n for future conchbons durmg the evenmg peak hour, wIth and wIthout project developmenl However, thiS uetonoratIOn is unlIkely as the planned tra11ic sIgnal at Access "B" IS expected to dIvert left-turn vehIcles from tIus mtersectIOn. AB a result, SCA antIcIpates traffic operatIOns at tlus mtersectIOn to Improve to acceptable LOS n U n N~squally Plaza Dnveway "B"/Yelm Avenue As the pnmary drI\ away to the Nisqually Plaza Shoppmg Center, tIns mtersectIOn currently operates ,It LOS E durmg the evenmg peak hour The mtersectIOn WIll Improve to LOS B for future condItIOns wIth and wIthout SIte traffic. ThIS Improved level of serVIce WIll be attnbutable to the mstallatIOn of a fully actuated traffic sIgnal system by 1994 [I LJ u f1 I ~ Nzsqually Plaza Dr"veway "C"/Yelm Avenue Left turns WIll be p wlubIted from the SIte at thIS drIVe All other turmng movements WIll be allowed. Based llpon these planned operatIOns, SCA beheves tIns drIVeway WIll operate wIthm acceptable LOS n LJ fl l.J Plaza Drwel103rd Llvenue ThIS mtersectIOn presently operates at LOS A durmg the evemng peak hour The mtersectIOn WIll contmue to operate at LOS A under future traffic condItIons n I LJ n LJ S. Chamberlam & A<;.,oclates, Inc. SCA Project No. 93028 June 9, 1993 19302BTIA.RPTI Prame Plaza Shoppmg Center TransportatIOn Impact AnalysIs Page 16 n u n u /" II LJ II LJ c Alglers DrwelPlazCJ, Drwe ThIs intersection WJll experIence Increased vehIcle actIvIty drIveway In the horIzon year I t WIll serve as a ve lucle InteractIOn node between the two shopping centers. It presently operates at LOS A durmg the evenmg peak hour, and the serVIce level at the IntersectIOn will contInue at LOS A under future condItIOns. II LJ I' ~ Plaza Drwel Yelm Avenue Presently, smgle-lane approaches are provIded on all legs at tlns mtersection. This analysis assumes roadway Improvements WIll be m place prior to project completIon. The analYSIS also assum es Plaza DrIve WIll provIde separate left and nght-turn channelIzatIon In the 1994 horIzon year ThIs IntersectIOn, under STOP control on Plaza DrIve, presently operates at LOS E durIng the evemng peak hour The IntersectIon capaCIty WIll detenorate to LOS G' after project completIOn. The pnmary cause for tlns poor serVIce level IS the heavy through-traffic along Yelm Avenue Tlus projected LOS does not meet concurrency standai'ds, and further analYSIS was performed to determIne If traffic SIgnal warrants were met for the 1994 honzon year n u II I U II u II II Table 3 prOVIdes thu results of the SIgnal warrant analYSIS for eXIstmg and projected traffic volume condJ tIOns. The table shows the cnterIa for the "volume" warrants (#1, #2, and #11) that are typIcally used to evaluate the need for signalIzatIOn. Based on this traffic volume data, no traffic SIgnal warrants WIll not be met under 1993 eXlstmg traffic condItIOns. However, m the 1994 hOrIzon year, Warrants #2 and #11 WIll be met. In- stallmg a traffic sIgaal at the intersectIOn will improve mtersection operations to LOS B, m the 1994 reVIew u n LJ I LJ II LJ Based on the need for SIgnalIzatIOn m the 1994 hOrIzon year, other scenarIOS were exammed to determme the maXImum development threshold allowed at PrmrlO Plaza before traffic SIgnal warrants are met. Based upon SCA's analysis, approxImately 70,000 sf commercIal or 40 000 sf commercIal WIth the planned fast food restaurants are pOSSIble before traffic SIgna); are warranted at Plaza DrIVe I Yelm Avenue ThIS estImate IS based upon the most consl;rvatIve of the three examIned SIgnal warrants- #2 n U I' I LJ Other Intersectwns Other mternal mtersectIOns are planned onsIte SCA expects traffic operatIOns onsIte WIll be acceptable at thE' project horIzon. J fl LJ n LJ I' LJ S. Chamberlam & AsSOCIates, Inc. SCA Project No. 93028 June 9, 1993 19302BTIA.RPTI PraIrIe Plaza Shoppmg Center Transportation Impact AnalYSIS Page 17 I' I LJ n LJ n LJ c Safety Deficiencies The roadway netwc rk m the SIte vIcimty was surveyed for potential sight dIstance deficIencIes. Study results showed sIght dIstance IS adequate at all present and future locatIOns except for two mtersectlOns. n U c The exceptIOn IS at the 103rd AvenueNelm Avenue mtersectlOn. 103rd Avenue presently mtersects Yelm Avtnue at an 1300 obtuse angle ThIS poor angle causes motOrIsts to turn theIr head sharply ,0 get a good VIeW of conflIctmg vehIcles. The angle of mtersectlOn should ideally be 9C 0 to achIeve a proper line of SIght. The proposed roadway Improvement proJec t mentIOned earlIer WIll correct thIS defiCIency n u n n The "FIve Corners" mtersectlOn has been IdentIfied as a hazardous locatIon. The large volume of aCCIdents were attrIbuted to the hIgh rIght-turn traffic volume onto Bald HIlls Road conflIctmg WIi h traffic turning from MorrIS Road The aCCIdents WIll be elImmated WIth the construcbcn ofY-2 and Y-9 comprehenSIVe transportatIOn plan Improvements. u , LJ n u n u n LJ i LJ n u n L.J n u c i U '!I' I' U S Chamberlam & Ac;,-;ocwtes, Inc. SCA Project No. 93028 June 9, 1993 193028TIA.RPTI PraIrIe Plaza Shoppmg Center TransportatIOn Impact AnalYSIS Page 18 n lJ n l.J n LJ c MITIGATION n c Traffic generated by the proposed PraIrIe Plaza Shoppmg Center WIll Impact on the local roadway system. Eased upon the analYSIS completed m the preVIOUS sectIon, mItIgatIOn measures are need(~d. These mItIgatIve measures are based on partIal and full bmld-out scenarIOS, as IdentIfied in our analyses , U n Off-Site Mitigation u n Momtor the Yelm Avenue/3rd Street mtersectIOn. Although thIS mtersectIOn presently ov~rates wIthm Yelm Level of SerVIce (LOS) standards, it wIll deterIO- rate to unac(~eptable levels durmg the horIzon year After the shoppmg center IS constructed, It IS recommended that Yelm Avenue/3rd Street be momtored by the CIty to determme If other developments m the SIte VIcImty warrant SIgnalIzatIOn. At that tIme, SCA recommends developer partICIpatIOn. n u L.J n u However, tr lffic SIgnals at tlllS mtersectIOn may offset eventual constructIOn of Y-I and Y-2 Tllils, SCA recommends momtormg as part ofYelm's concurrency managemenJ system to assess the ultImate needs at tIllS mtersectIon. n [' l.J MItIgate the mtersectIOn at "Five Corners" 'rIllS mtersection currently operates at a poor level )f service The mtersectIOn has also been lClentIfied as a hazardous locatIon as 0 result of numerous aCCIdents. The CIty has plans for Improvements at thIS mtersectIOn (improvements Y-2 and Y-9 m the CIty'S ComprehenSIve Transportatwn plan) However, these planned Improvements are long range, and WIll not be m-place by the hOrIzon year of tIllS development. The CIty, Thurston County, and WSDOT WIll need to determme how the proposed Improvements WIll be construct~d and when. u n u n U Traffic generated by the shoppmg center WIll Impact the mtersectIOn. Current CIty polIcy IS to r3qmre local developer partICIpatIOn (faIr-share contrIbutIOns) towards mItIgatIOn ot defiCIenCIes at the "FIVe-Corners" mtersectIOn. n L.J n Implement frontage Improvements that contrIbute to a three-lane cross-sectIOn along Yelm \venue The developer IS currently partIcIpatmg m the costs for the Yelm Avenu,3 Roadway Improvement Project deSCrIbed earlIer m tlllS report. The applIcant Will prOVIde "half-street" frontage Improvements along Yelm Avenue m front of the ,Ite to accommodate an ultImate three-lane cross sectIOn, as specIfied n U u n ~ n S. Chamberlam & As:-50CIates, Inc. SCA Project No. 930~~8 June 9, 1993 19302BTIA.RPTI Prame Plaza Shoppmg Center TransportatIOn Impact AnalYSIS Page 19 l.J n l.J n l.J n LJ c m the CIty'S ComprehenSIve TransportatIOn Plan. These Improvements mclude curb and guiter, sidewalks, and a bicycle lane These Improvements WIll extend approxImate ly 200' west of the Plaza DrIVe mtersectIOn, and WIll also provIde left- turn storage at the Plaza Drive mtersectIOn. Accordmg to WSDOT gUIdelmes, the exclusIve left-turn lane wIll reqmre 200-feet of storage space, excluding taper lengths, for hOrizon year traffic conmtIOns. Also, accormng to WSDOT gUIdelmes, an exclusIve right-turn lane wIll be reqUIred, based upon future traffic estimates. These roadway geometric features are currently m the desIgn stage, and will be desIgned to accommodate projected traffic volumes shown m tlus study n u c fl , LJ n Momtor the Plaza DrIVelYelm Avenue mtersectIon. Subsequent to the development of 40,000 sf shoppmg space, the developer IS recommended to have thIS mtersecGlon momtored, and submIt to the CIty eVIdence that traffic sIgnal warrants (#J, #2, #6, or #11) are not met. If none of these sIgnal warrants are met, the developer may proceed to develop the remammg 30,000 sf shoppmg center space or the fast food restaurant, wIthout mcurrmg any adchtIOnal off-sIte mItigative responslblhtws n LJ LJ n l.J n LJ At completlOG of the partIal bUlld-out scenarIO, traffic sIgnal warrants wIll be met. Then, SIgna] IzatIOn of the mtersection is needed. In additIOn, proportionate share costs for a traffic sIgnal mterconnect system (to the Yelm Avenue/Access "B" traffic sIgnal) will also be necessary n ~ Momtor the Access "B"lYelm Avenue mtersectlOn. In additlOn, the traffic signal at Yelm Avenw; and Access "B" should be momtored. A larger percentage of SIte traffic may be attracted to thIS mtersectIOn than thIS study assumes. A study would assurn that the new traffic sIgnal at thIS mtersectIOn wIll not attract exceSSIve tre:ffic from the new development, to the extent that It causes capacity restramts at the mtersectlOn or congestIOn problems to the mternal clrculatlOn of the Nlsqually Plaza Shoppmg Center fl G n LJ n u On-Site Mitigation ~rJ~'"'\~ ~o-h- WIden eXlstJn.g Plaza DrIve The eXlstmg pavement wIdth IS currently 2G-feet. It IS recommended that the drIve be wIdened to 40 feet to accommodate two 12-foot outboundlaJles, striped for separate left and right turns, and a smgle 16-foot mboundlann ThIS wldenmg should be Implemented, regardless to the extent of development The addItIonal wIdth wIll accommodate the expected mcrease m traffic due t(l SIte expanslOn and eventual sIgnahzatlOn of the mtersectlOn wIth n LJ fl l.J n LJ fl l.J S. Chamberlain & Associates, Inc. SCA Project No 93028 June 9, 1993 193028TIA.RPTI Praine Plaza Shoppmg Center TransportatiOn Impact AnalysIs Page 20 [l ~ n u n U ! LJ Yelm Avenu1} ThIs Improvement should mclude a 150-foot left-turn storage area to accommodate the projected left-turn volume '1 I U c ProvIde sIdewalks The expected mteraction between the two shoppmg center areas WIll result In mcreased pedestnan actIvIty Therefore, a SIdewalk/pedestrIan plan should be submItted to address thIS concern. Street lIghting on Plaza DrIve and AlgIers DrIve IS also recommended for pedestrIan and motOrIst safety n LJ n l.J fI LJ r' L.J f1 l.J r ~ r L.J n LJ n I l.J n u n l.J n U n S Chamberlam & As.-;ocIates, Inc. SCA Project No. 93028 June 9, 1993 193029TIA.RPTI Prame Plaza Shoppmg Center TransportatIOn Impact AnalYSIS Page 21 l.J n u n U n LJ c CONCLUSIONS n U The PrairIe Plaza Shoppmg Center development will impact the transportation system. ThIs study has exammed the hIghest traffic potentIal generated by the sIte followmg constructIOn. Results of the capaCIty analyses mdIcate many mtersectIOns presently operate well wIthm CIty serVIce level concurrency standards. The only mtersectIOns that do not meet serVIce level concurrency standards are the Yelm Avenue/Access "B", "FIve Corners" (at Yelm Avenue), and Plaza DrlveNelm Avenue mtersectIOns. Other than these mtersectIons (excludmg Access "B"), only one wIll not meet servICe level concurrency standards at Yelm .\.venue and 3rd Avenue for the 1994 hOrIzon year n U n LJ Il U n U Analyses from the traffic study shows the need for mItIgatIOn of safety and capaCIty deficIencIes created by sIte traffic Impacts at partial development. These developments levels are either 70000 sf commercIal or 40,000 sf commercIal wIth the planned fast food restaurant. RecommendatIOns mclude contributIOn to Yelm Avenue and "Five Corners" Improvements, as speCified m the City'S Comprehensive TransportatIOn Plan, momtormg the crltlcal Third SireetNelm Avenue mtersectIOn near the Yelm City Center; and, wIdemng Plaza DrI Ie to CIty standards. n u f' ~ The traffic analysis also Identlfies the need for "checkpomt" momtormg at the Plaza DrIveNelm Avenue mtersectIOn. Subsequent to development of a 40,000 sf shoppmg center, the mtersectIOn should be analyzed agam to assure SIgnal warrants are not met. Followmg the constructIOn of the adchtIOnal 30,000 sf shoppmg center space, or a fast food restaurant, SIgnal v'arrants should be checked agam. Before full development, sIgnahzatIOn of the mtersectIOn Will be warranted. n u !' l.J These recommendai:lOns, coupled with programmed Improvements for Nlsqually Plaza, Will accommodate planned traffic volumes at partIal development levels. n LJ I' I U n u 11 i l.J 11 ~ n I S Chamberlam & AssocIates, Inc. SCA Project No. 93028 June 9, 1993 (93028TIA.RPTI Prame Plaza Shoppmg Center TransportatIOn Impact AnalYSIS Page 22 u r' I l.J n LJ n LJ Jl I LJ n LJ n I l.J n I U n LJ n U [' u Appendix n , LJ n U r' , LJ Jl LJ 11 I U Jl u Jl I U Jl , LJ 11 LJ S. Chamberlam & AsSOCIates, Inc. SCA Project No. 930~.8 June 9, 1993 193028TIA.RPT) Prmne Plaza Shoppmg Center TransportatIon Impact AnalysIs Page 23 11 LJ n U n LJ !l LJ Trip Generation Comparison n U PM trIp generatIOn traffic volumes for eXIsting busmesses that presently attract velllcle trIps to the site drIveways were calculated as follows: 11 U Restaurant (High Turnover Sa Down Restaurants) Evenmg Peak Hour TrIps = 16.26 trips per 1,000 sf n u Retml Shops Evenmg Peak Hour TrIps = 4 80 trIpS per 1,000 sf n Shoppmg Center (Thnftway, Jayhawlls, Health Store, Attached Retml) Evenmg Peak Hour TrIps = 8 07 trIps per 1,000 sf LJ l' LJ I' L These trIp rates do not take mto consIderatIon the fact that some of the trIpS generated by these mdIVldual sItes are made wlthm the multI-use development by walkmg or drIvmg from one busmess to another There tYPIcally IS a factor applIed to the actual trIps generated by the complex to account for such use ITE recommends that the mIxed-use dIScount not exceed 28% for shoppmg centers of thIS SIze Th(~refore a 20% mIxed-use chscount was used for tlllS study TIllS ruscount wa~ not applIed to generated shoppmg center trIpS smce the mIxed-use ruscount IS already factored mto the trIp rate The final eXlstmg traffic generated trIp volumes were then complIed as follows: n LJ n LJ I' l.J n u n u n u n I U [I ! u n S Chamberlam & A'3.-;oclates, Inc. SCA Project No. 930~~8 June 9, 1993 193026TIA.RPTI PraIrIe Plaza Shoppmg Center 'rransportatlOn Impact AnalYSIS Page 24 u n u n LJ n LJ n U n L.J Estimated Traffic Generation EXIstmg Nisqually Plaza Shopping Center Yelm, Washmgton Evemng Peak Hour Restaurant (Land Use Code 832) 50 40 90 RetaIl Shops (Land Use Code 810) 25 30 55 Bank (Land Use Code 912) 85 90 175 SUBTOTAL 160 160 320 MIxed-use DIscount (20%) 130 125 255 Shoppmg Center (Land Use Code 820) 230 230 460 TOTAL 360 355 715 n U n U n J n L.J n I L.J n l.J These calcullted volumes compare closely to actual existing drIveway traffic volumes counted by SCA (385 entermg and 335 eXIting,720 total) Smce these results are sJmIlar, this same methodology was used to calculate trIps generated by the proposed proJect. I' ~ r' 1..J n l..J n u f' lJ I' lJ n l.J n S. Chamberlam & As'iocmtes, Inc. SCA Project No. 93028 June 9, 1993 19302BTIA.RPTI Prame Plaza Shoppmg Center TransportatIOn Impact AnalYSIS Page 25 u n L.J 11 u n LJ TABLE 1 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) SUMMARY PRAIRIE PLAZA TIA PM PEAK HOUR Il u II u EXISTING 1993 PROJECTED 1994 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFIC VOLUMES W/OSITE W /0 SITE \V /SITE INTERSECTIONS TRAFFIC TRAFFIC TRAFFIC LOS(DELAY)* LOS(DELA Y)* LOS(DELAY)* YELM A VENUE/ 1 ST STREET C(17) D(27) D(34) YELM A VENUE (SR 507)/ 3RD STREET D E E YELM AVENUE (SR 507)/ 103RD STREET B C C YELM A VENUE (SR 507)/ NlSQ PLAZA ACCESS "A" D E E YELM AVENUE (SR 507)/ NlSQ PLAZA ACCESS "B" E B(lO) B(ll) YELM A VENUE (SR 507)1 PLAZA DRIVE E E FIE (8) YELM A VENUE (SR 507)1 BALD HILLS RD E FIB (6) F/B(6) BALD HILLS ROAD/ MORRIS ROAD A B B PLAZA DRIVE/ ALGIERS DR.lVE A A A PLAZA DRIVEl 103RD STREET A A A * LOS REFLECTS MINOR STREET LEFT TURN MOVEMENT -UNSIGNALlZED INTERSECTIONS INTERSECTION AVERAGE DELAY IN SECONDS -SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS II LJ II u II u II LJ Il LJ 11 u Il u Il u Il u Il l.J Il u Il u 11 u S. CHAMBERLAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Il u 11 LJ J C J CO C] cJ CJ [J CJ [J [J c-J [J l' A.\lLE 2. SSOClATES. INC. J'{ELM j\\TENUE - '"'5.CHAMBERlJI1N A~~~j\L'iS1S FOlt FIVE COlt'::;ltJ\FF\C 1M1'j\CT j\NJ\L'iS1S r<T \lOLUME Clt1TElt1j\ SlGNJ\L Wj\lt11J\N , .IT' S1101'1'lNG CEN 1994 18tJl.1t1\ - . 1'ItJ\llt1E 1'~ 1'ltOJECTED NT 1'ltOJ~C~~OZ2 f,l' W,,t5PL'Z.)(LS rouST1NG 19~ES Tltj\FF1 C \lOLUME~lt '" tJl.1t1\NT '" j\lt1t1\NT W j\lt~~ ~i'" 0 Tltj\FF1C \101- l>Tl1110Ult 1'Ej\R 110 #1 #2 _ \ l>Tl1110Ult 1'EAR l1~\llt (\'1'11) (\'1'11) \ ",,!,,';-- _ ___________ (\'1'11) (\'1' \ ~I)'1"Cll \ _ " p,.,4C.9 _, _..~<> 4-5 ~ 3Go '285 LJ:iO '2'20 WESTBOU1W pJ>1'ROj\Cll gJJl ~ 1All 900 EASTBOUND pJ>PROJ\Cll ~ 730 1215 600 TOTJ\L BOTl1 j\1'1'ROj\Cl1ES 585 975 ~ '2'10 200 100 100 1'10 160 NORTllBOUND pJ>PROJ\Cll hCCID"ENrrS rrl\lN LhSrr ~hR 3 ALL p.pl'ROl\.CllES * WJ\ltRANT Sj\T1SF\ED NO NO #1 NO NO #'2 NIl\. NO #6 NO YES #11 , "",a,u"" int",,,tion ."'hk~ ,oold he ,o"""d with ".noli,"t>on('N,,,.nt #6) c ] L ..J . C' J C 1 , C--J C J CJ [J CJ ] [J C J - ~MA~ ~ES'tBO\l}lD )\J'PRO,\CfI Ei\S'tBO \l}lD )\J'pRO ,\CfI 'to'fAL BO'ffl APPROACflES ~ SO \l'fflBO \l}lD )\J' PRO'\ CfI ACClDE}l'tS ;<j\'ffll}l Li\S'f 11>,,;1\ ALL APPRO~C1:lES W ARM}l't SA 'flSF1ED #\ #2 #6 #\\ . ",,,iden'S" in,e"""ons ;,"i,h ,ould be ,o"eo,ed ",ith si.o"\>".,,on\'" ,,,'0' #6) 'fABLE 3 '050 4illl '150 585 ~ 1250 480 Q1Q. 990 '200 100 \'05 225 '2,0 '00 \ 1 NO NO YES NO NO NO YES ~O ,,~ ." , '~'~>""H \~'" I I HIll ,.1;',{ t:.t..,,~ I _____ _______~~~ _ __ r - - - - - - - - - -- ;- - - - - - - - - ~ / /-,\,_ '6 I Will I T-N T17N I I a: a: I I I - -~ , SE J , I , T.;'t . !I I ------------ ,,'"" ... '" 4 , ;< ,), \ '\ !FIGURE VICINITY MAP II 1 PRAIRIE PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT AI\JAL YSIS L 1 [ J LJ [ J c ] L 1 [ ~ ] [ l ['l LJ C:-l [ ] C J [ ] LJ L~.J I , I ., I I , , I '.,.., I ..~'[. y. I, I \.~C ( I ,'I I I I , I I , I I I <0.. I ~-', I"~ ,I I I ' I. ~;j-l-_-------------~-----J-- - -, - .' R.;:7 I t I ) : : t~ I I' I I I ~ I I --l------Nf---------~-~~~---- I I ..:. I I:'S !. J I ./" I I / I I I I / I I I . ....r-.- I ~ , (' I I I J --i-------;~-~-----~------ !f. I I - - --J ~ 1 ~ , I I ~ I I I , I I I ~ I I I c ] L._J [ J ~ ~lriirriiI '11'1 e~ I'.J<:::)F=OtTt---t NOT TO SCALE J ...."'/1 [J L J L] [J [J [J [J C J L J [J [J CJ C ~ [J CJ [J [J [] [ ] ...~oo " ClO"5of.'of E ~J5 SITE DA TA SECTION 30, T17N, R2E W.M. ~ .... - r&.aD u. PAACEl. ,. 22730110103 227JOflO1CU 227J04Of01 LOTS 2-4 OF' 5S-8Of7 ~ OIlflfR: ROaCY PRAIRIE O€Y. CO- P.a. BOX 480 'rElJI, WA. 98S7 (206) 468-2201 :.:- S/CILE: f"-~' ~ --........I c 25 30 roo ---r ~ ~ ......1 SITE: AREA BUILDING AREA PARKING STALLS ZONING WA TER SE~ 12.32 AC 89.250 SF 358 STALLS COMERCIAL CITY OF YEl..M CITY OF YELM ~ W1fJJCAL OAlUII IIRJIY CCJllI'S. rx LNCJHt[RS .... ,. ...... Sf: BENCHMARK. CH'$IIJE.O y " NQlItJ)j[A$T CC1lHDt JtlP f7 $Clt1HAS1IRL Y UQfT ST..vcwtD aEVAJKW - J5c11O ~'~7"'""1" :"'0."" \ ;:-.:::~~ ;.....m....: _~,.._..~ - ~"'''''''''' ~1~~lr' .... ........ ..........,"""'...nr ...-... "K" - SITE PLAN PRAIRIE PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS \ I, I , L "' Ii I~ ~ I I I FIGURE 2 C-l [ J C J CJ CJ CJ C J C J C J C J C J C J "- 40 ~..( 5 '\ 03rd 518.'\:1.1 6J~O";' ...... '\ ...... 620 5 ;...... /:j ~ &) f !vj LEGEND '1'1'1 l yyyyl p "^ pEAK \--lOUR VOLUME AV[RAGt. DAILY ,RAffle LESS ,HAN 5 p[AK HOUR ,RIPS '" 1'e lI'vt (Sf? -4 veNUe 50?) L.- 3;!, O:io Cr '0'0 co;:: ~\ '\9 ...... 5 720...;14 475 540...... 0 et. .-I o Z 4:. ~ ~ @ r-J ~o SC~I..E NO~ .-35 1"'\5 .- 45 ..( '\0 l~,3001 ----- ~I' o " ...... 55 ..... ~ 0 """ ~I' 00 ......t'l cO..... "'""" o ~i< ('.!Ul" .-.5 J\LGI'C.R.5 UlUl, DRWt: J \ '> .( , DRIVt: J \ "0" 35f'" \ i' ~f'" \ '\ 0..... If) Ul " ::>"",," Ul 25""" ...- 4.w N"/ 4.- .-let. 0-0 PROJEC\ S\\E "~. J~..'\ 5 . ....!..5 660..;.570 ...... r- ~w Ww wet. ct.r- 00 ------ ---- ----- ------- F\GURE 1993 EXIS11NG I' .~. PEAl<. HOUR ANt) A'lERl\..GE t)AI\.'llR~ PRAIRIC PLAZA S\-\OPPING CCN1CR 1RAfflC IMPAC1 3 AN Al '{51 S C J C J C J \ ~. i-... Ir) "'" i.J..J 0> .!? ~ ~% t; :2 't.. 70 f .......68 .. -r.20 ~ ,. o '0' / 0v o ~ ?f", o r- "'Ii) o t.'/.'/. (t.t.t.! It.t.t.1 t.t.% C 1 ell ~ C J C J [ J C J cJ c-1 i-... /:j f!: C/) b rJs ;a-- ..... / .......93 LEGEND ~ snE~ pM PEAKHOUR VOLUME oRIVE'" A' PM pEA" HOUR voUJME A "'-RAGE OAlL' ,RAffle VOLUMES p(RC(NI Of SITE. IR~ff\C cYflA- \R\P~ ~BOUND OU1BOUND ~ S\-\OPPING CEN1ER f ~S1 fOOD RES1 ~ i45 50 - i95 S rtE. GEtlER />.1 EO l' .tA. l' E />.K \\0 U R />.tlO />. 'IE.R/>.GE OM\. 'l "fR/>.ffIC 'IO\.UtAES PR"IR\E \,l"l" S\-\O\,PING CENIER IR"fflC INI\' "CI '\ 031'0 SIR((\ YfL./vt (Sn A'VfNUf " 50?) i45 50 - i95 !i! -::-'\. -:-- ~ RJ/7;' ~-QJ '-.:.. 0v '--J- ~~ 9ri 8...... o ex:. ..J G -z ~ ~ ~ ~ r-1 ~o sCJ-.\....E. ",0' ....-iO C--:::- \" 5001 f i 07. l ()) .(' iO aw~~f N-' . 4:.::::'" \.0 0 ~~ ~""5 klG$RS ()) \ " .t 20(24) DR\$( J .. . 9; ~ \ f 30~ 0 o I"'J 00 ~.... }\\.0 ~5. . , ~ ....- '\O(i 5) \:0 Df:\~,( ~ \0 pR,OJ(CI ~ I) r,:;~. S\lt. ~ Or- ... ~ ()) 2' t' ;f.. t0~ NO \...J \"- I"'J 'i{}.... ~ \..lJ "f\V( J ~ ~ .. \'S CORN(RS" 9<=> 27 u ..J#. . \ --- ------ 507 ~ &-1( ;y,() 0-1() !Y1.<S ----- - MORR\S ROkO ~ ANAL '{S\S f\GUf\E 4 C J C J cJ C J [J [J [J [J C J C J C J [ J -\.. 55 ~~ 5 ,\03rd SIREE.I 45 //0 J. ....... \ ....... /JS 5 PROJEC1EO 1994 p.M. PEt$ \\OUR jl.NO jI. VERjl.GE 01\.11. 't lRjl.FFIC VOI.UMES V111\\OUl PROJECl PRAIRIE PLAZA ShOPPING CEN,(R ,RAFflC IMP AC' ANAl'lSIS 8; J-.. /:j ~ &) !? ^j \5 ....... /. lE.G[NO xxx LXXXX} P M pE.A\<. \-lOUR VOLUME. p.,VERP--GE Op.,\L'I' iRP--FFIC LESS i\-lp.,N :) PEW \-lOUR iRIPS " YfL../vt (Sf? ~6~JlJf .-40 ~3:) ~~....~~ I' . ~. 1f)0 4w ..,... <S) N? If) o. 4- .q-...~" ,.\lGI[RS<"'"'" 0'\5 \ '+ ~ ,0 DRIVE.! \ i. 5 1'. \ I' . DRIVE. \ \f').* '\.0 ~ "ot) 0 r--- If)Ul Is! g~Co o '0!!J -ry +',- \ (f() . S~OoJo. .....PS :q' 70 .?~"'. ' 5....... 45 45~.Ul\f') o +' '\ .,r) 0:: <5 ....... /5 Ul\f') -1 /60 .J. 655 . J .q- <3........ ~ '+.\ ~ ..40 <::( ....... ~ >SSJo. >oS 0....... ---- --- ------ ~ ~ ~ "",-r"""< N ~o SC....\..E. ,.,01 .-75 ~ '\0 p.iOO} '*0 .,... "" UlUl ,r) PROJ[C1 S\1[ \- W w 0:: \- \.f) ':L "d " fIVE. D CORNERS" ----- R 507 ~ &-1( 1;() . 0-1() ~(S MORRIS ROp.,O f\GURE 5 c.] C 1 C j cJ C J C 1 [1 C1 C] 1 C] C ~J J..... I:J fr &) "2 ^j 8f 45J. 860....... ""- 6 0 + 5 \03ro SiR.tJ:.i ----- ........ 8:?0't.. 5 PROJEC":O"~:f~~~;C:~:~\~:~~OJEC1 ~ '1ER~GE O~\\..l f''' 11\ SuO"'''\ N G C(N ,(R ,R A,n C \ \,^" A C' AN Al 'is\ S PRA\R\( ?lA t'\ ,I" \...t.Gt.ND "i"i'! \. "i"i"i"i1 P \JI pO,\<' \-lOUR \JOlU\JI( p,:v(RAG( O"'\l'< 1RAffle CESS ",," 5 PE" >louR 1RIPS " uJ "2:~uJ 0::- 'ytLM o. (SR 1b~)Ut !J~ +'c. 770 J. 855....... ~ ! F"<.........-< r-l ~o seA\-'" NOT ....-40 +4S --- I' 00 0l!- ....- 8 S + ,0 \.2,001 '\35~81' " .,., ,,0 01 ~~\ U')U1 r0 !!:! g~~ go -::J +'c.j't.. 20;;-::- ......135 675 J. ~ ~tJ uJW wo: 0:1- o<Jl " flVt. COR.N[RS" --- --- 507 ~ &-1/ ~,() 0-1o'Y1.<5' ----- MORRIS ROAD ------ ~ f\GURE 6 M' "'-'~-''''''U'.--''''''>'''''''''',A."''~'.'~~',''''_ ...,.....", '''''~'''''''''''''-'",.,"'''~''J,... ~."<-"'_""",,",""""_."' ",,,,"'.A""',,,,,, ,,.. ~~ ....,. . .. .,.'" ." ..n..... ., ........ -> ... '... ~, . """......'" CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE, EROSION CONTROL, AND MAINTENANCE PLAN REPORT PR.J\IRIE PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER Yelm, Washmgton June 1993 prepared for- Rocky PraIne Development Company POBox 480 Yelm, Waslungton 985~7 (206) 458-2201 prepared by S Chamberlam & ASSocIates, Inc Engmeermg, Plannmg, and Surveymg ServIces 719 Sleater-Kmney Rd. SE, Smte 120 POBox 3485 Lacey, Waslungton 98503-0485 (206) 493-6002 (206) 493-24 76 FAX contact Steven L Chamberlam, P E ",~ """",.. ~,,~ .w'" ,"-" "". . ..r;;-....,.i::;., '\..~~". ,..,,,.,,~.,, "......... ' ,""" ,).. ..."'"..~,~ ..~ '".~ ... n.. . '.. "."">......~ .~'"' , ........ "" ~ '''''''"'''"_<.,_... --' ~.2 "" _ ~,.. S Chamberlam & ASSOC13 ,Ct;, Inc. SCA Project No 93028 June 1993 (93028H20.RPT) Prame Plaza Shoppmg Center Conceptual Dramagc Report Page 1 . . ""'''''.~ ~ ~ ......n ~ - PROJECT ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION I hereby certIfy that tillS Conceptual Dramage, ErosIOn Control, and Mamtenance Plan Report for PraIne Plaza ShOpplllg Center has been prepared by me or under my superVISIOn and meets mlllImum standarcls of the CIty of Yelm and normal standards of engmeermg practIce I understand that the JunsdIctIon docs not and wlll not assume lIabIllty [or the sufIicwncy, sllltalJlhty, or perfurmance of drdIn.1.ge facdIt,le.s desIgned by S Chamberlam & A",socIates, Inc. . ~ _a - ~ - .. '" .. ,~'" N" S Chamberlam & AssocIates, Inc. SCA Project No 93028 June 1993 (93028H20.RPT) Prmne Plaza Shoppmg Center Conceptual Dramage Report. Page II " . ~. "'" ...." ,. w -,,,.,. . ,,~.. DRAINAGE, EROSION CONTROL, AND MAINTENANCE PLAN REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I - DRAINAGE REPORT 1 Proposed Project DescnptLOn EXlstmg ConchtIOns InfiltratIOn Rates/SolIs Report Wells Fuel Tanks Sub-Basm DescnptIOn AnalysIs of the 100 Year Flood AesthetIc ConsIderatIOns for Stormwater FaCIlItIeS Downstream AnalySiS (not applIcable) Covenants, DedIcatIons, Easements Property Owners ASSOCiatIOn Art1cles of IncorporatIOn 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 PART II - EROSION CONTROL REPORT G ConstructIOn Sequence and Proeedure Trapp1l1g Sechment Permanent ErOSIOn Con trol and SIte RestoratIOn Geotechmcal AnalysIs and Report (not applIcable) InspectIOn Sequence 7 7 8 8 8 PART III - MAINTENANCE PLAN 10 ReqUIred MaIntenanc(~ ResponsIble OrgamzatIon VegetatIOn Management Plan Source Control 11 13 13 13 APPENDIX I APPENDIX II APPENDIX III Dramage CaleulatIons SOlIs Report Vleil1lty Map " S Chamberlam & ASSOCIates, Inc. SCA Project No 9:3028 June 1993 (93028H20.RPT) pr;:une Plaza Shoppmg Center Conceptual Dramage Report Page ill ~!;:,'7::'"..J.''''~~ . ~. '" '" "., ...""","" ~i'y",'i~V"""'" u_ .'''''~''''~ .-" "."" ~ -, S Chamberlam & Assocwtes, Inc. SCA PrG.lcct No 93028 June IJ93 (9J0281120.Er'T) .. PART I CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE REPORT "'""".....- ..'" ""~... ..... , ,,,...,, '" ., ,......, .. "~ - ...--......;:;,,1,,,-, ~ ~.~ Prame Plaza Shoppmg Ccnter Conceptual Dramage lleport Page 1 . ~ ' '~"'~""'"'-~~ ., .~~. ~ ....""<'" .~ "'v... "" """~ .,..u ,.,~,."... -.l','. ........, "'" .. "'"' , ,." , .,. . ~,., ''', ,,~ ~."'.."__. r.~""' ....",".>"~,......,.,,,. ~ "" ,.,....,.... The format of tIllS report follows the outlme provIded m the Dramage DesIgn and EroslOn Control Manual for Thurston County and the CIties ofYelm SECTI IN 1 - PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project sIte IS located on lots 2, 3, and 4 of SS-8017 m the CIty ofYelm, Washmgton. EXlstmg mternal roads and utlht18s now serVIce these lots Total on-sIte tnbutary area for tlllS project IS 12 32 acres The sIte IS bordered by Yelm Avenue along the south, 103rd Avenue to the north, Plaza Dnve on the west, Creek Street to the west Alg18rs Dnve bIsects the sIte and connects Plaza Dnve WIth Creek Street. The legal descnpbon for tIllS property IS Lots 2, 3 and 4 of SS #8017 The tax parcel numbers arc 22730110103, 22730110109, 2273040101, respectfully The pI u.lcct IS bemg submItted for sIte plan approval, and WIll eventually reqUlre a cleanng and gradmg permIt, utlhty/roadway constructlOn permIts, bmldmg permIts, plumbIng permIts, mechamcal permIts, and electncal permIts The pl"GposalIs to construct approxImately 78,500 square feet (sf) of office/storage/retall space ;md 5,000 sf fast food restaurant. BUlldmgs WIll be served by CIty of Yelm utlht18S and bUilt to CIty o[Yelm standards The property IS zoned commercIal/mdustnal Re-devdopment of tIllS project will be completed m phases The utlhtlCs and roadway network to serVIce each lot WIll be done first The mdIvldual bUlldmg pads WIll be graded m preparatlOn of startmg constructlOn for each mdlvldual bUlldmg It IS anticIpated that the bmldmg constructlOn, mcludmg the necessary parkmg areas, WIll be done m phases as bmldmg pads are sold or mdlvldual tenants found. Bluldmg pads A and Bare antlcIpated to be bmlt on tlllS summer The others WIll be phased m over the next two to three years as demand cl1ctates Development WIll mclude cleamng the brush and orgamc tOP8011 away from all bmldmg areas Gradmg WIll be done pnmdnly to prOVIde for adequate dramage away from the bUlldmgs, across the paved parkll1g arC,IS dnd Into ::;url'aee and below grouncbtorm clramage facIlItws The mstal1atwn oC addIt;lOnallll1derground utlht18S WIll also reqUlre some gradmg An estllna(;(: oC the amount of earthwork has not been determmed yet, however clue to the eXlstmg ground elevatIuns and the proposed SIte layout, gradmg should be mmu11al - - ,-~"'.'" .- ~'''--'" ,.< .N.>-, """",,,,,r-o. . Prame Plaza Shoppmg Center Conceptual Dramage Rcport Page 2 S Chamberlmn & ASSOCIatcs, Inc. SCA ProJcct No 93028 June 1993 (93028H20.RPT) ~ . '''--'' _....~~" ~"'. -< p .. . -~ . "....."'"."..".".. ...""'- The completed overall developed SIte wIll create approxlilldtely' * 83,500 sf of new roof area (1 92 acres) 350,042 sf of new asphalt (804 acres) 102,801 sf of landscaped <l.reas (2 36 acres (incluclmg open stormwater basms) * * Currently, the three lots have approxImately 78,400 sf (1 8 ac) of asphalt roads whIch wIll be mcorporated mto the completed development. Stormwater runoff generated by t1us proJeet wIll be treated and dIsposed of uSing a mIxture of best management practices ::;uch as blO-fiItratlOn swales, wet ponds/artlficwl wetland, retentlOnlinfiltratlOn basms, underground dramfield gallenes and routme parkmg lot mamtenance See tYPIcal debuls figures 3, 4, 5 and Al through A14 All facIlItIes will be deSIgned to conform to the Dramage DeSIgn and EroslOn Control Manual for Thurston County and all CIty of Ye1m sLlI1dards Based on the area SOlI condItlOns and usmg an mfiltratlOn rate of 20 mches/hr or 3 mm./inch, the estImated reqmred mfiltratlOn/retentlOn storage volume for the entIre SIte (lots 2, 3 and 4) IS * 37,270 cf for all perVlOU;-i dnd ImpervIOUS parklOg areas 8,350 cf for all roof arca<..; * The estImated blO-filtratlOn area reqUIrements for treatment pnor to mfiltratlOn/retentlOn IS 16,080 sf. If wet pond type treatment IS used an area of approxImately 4,020 sf would be reqmred. The attached SIte plan proposes over IG,550 sf of grasslmed swale stormwater treatment area and 40,500 cf of retentlOn/infiltratlOn areas, whIch are greater than the above stated mml111Um reqUirements Exact details of the final configuratIons WIll be done at final deSIgn (See SectlOn 3 - InfiltratlOn Rates/SOlIs Report, Apl)endlx I - Dramage CalculatlOns, and Appencl1x II - SOlIs Report) To prOVIde the necessary control, surface water runoff wI]1 be dIrected m(;o roadSIde and area dI'amage blO-filtratlOn, retentlOn/infiltratlOn swales and open basms by sheet flow and underground stormdI'ams from roof drams located throughout the proJect SIte The ponds and swales are shown as lrregubrly shaped to conform to the proposed proJect SIte charactenstJcs SIde slopes WIll be 3 1 on all open dramage retentlOn/infiltratlOn faclhtIes ~ ~. ~ . '''' "'. ,.. .~,.- ......" ",,,,,, ." -.. .JiIlI;kh'~ ". .",,,,",,,,",,,,, S Chamberlam & ASSOCIates, Inc. SCA Project No 93028 June 1993 (93028H20.RPT) "'_ w .,..."" ...._.'" . _"" ~. _"..-, ~, ,.u~' ,.~. ^' '~'"" ~ n..", G ~ , ._n."".'............ ""'''''''''''''''''''" ~_ ~ ",.,." - Prame Plaza Shoppmg Center Conceptual Dramage lleport Page 3 ,,~-,... "," ~ ""'." ..,,,,.- .. ,~. ~.~ ..' .. "'~ ._~"_::~: .e...,...,. ." .......~."'.,.u....."'c "-"~._ ""...'-"..~ ~ ~, ~. These faclht18s are desIgned to control runoff for a 100 year storm event. To satlsfy the reqUlrements of the Dralllage Manual, the retentlOn/infiltratlOn facll1t18S wIll utlhze grasslmed swales desIgned to restnct lllflltratlOn allowlllg pre-treatment pnor to percolatlllg llltO the natlve sOlIs AddltlOnal u~e of lmpec lOUS Imed wet ponds for asphalt dramage may be used pnor to cl1scharge llltO the lllfiltrahon galleys as necessary All roof runoff wIll be dIrected to llldIVldllal underground dralllrock dry well gallenes Drywell SlZlllg IS estlmated at 100 cf of volume per 1,000 sf of roof area per the clralllage manual. There IS ample area around each bUlldlllg to provIde necessary control. A Conceptual EroslOn Control Plan has been prepared aE part of the SIte plans (see Part II of thIS report) The draInage facllIt18s wIll be desIgned to blendlllto and act as an amemty to thIS proJect. All chsturbed areas wluch arc not developed wIll be landscaped wIth trees, shrubs, and smtable ground cover as outlllled m SectlOn 8 - Aesthetlc ConslderatlOns for Stormwater Faclht18s below A landscapIng plan for the proJect wIll be completed by a Llccmsed Landscape ArchItect and submItted for final approval. SECTION 2 - EXISTING CONDITIONS Currently, the project SIte (indIVIdual lots) are undeveloped except for some on-SIte paved roadways andllnderground UtJht18~ The SIte IS vIrtually a level grass prmne WIth scattered bushes There IS no off-stl;e dramag(: onto the: operty, and all eXIstIng on-sl1;e dramage appears to percolate away on-sI.t;e SECTION 3 - INFILTRATION RATES/SOILS REPORTS The SOlI ConservatlOn SerVIce (SCS) SOlI Survey of Thurston County lllcl1cates that SOlIs on the SIte are a mIxture of Spanaway gravelly sandy loams and Spanaway stony sand, loam. Both are conSIdered a HydraulIc Croup B On-SIte SOlIs tests completed by thIS office confirm the SCS SOlIs classlficatlOn and the permeablhty charactenstlcs conSIstent WIth tIns SOlI type Ten test pItS were excavated to seven feet throughout the proJect SIte The locatlOn of the~e test pItS, as well as the SOlIs log, aru found 111 the SOlIs Report locatedlll Append})., II NeIther a fallmg head percolatIon test or a double rIng mfiltrometer test was completed nor deemed neces~ary to determme an appropnate lllfiltratlOn rate The SOlIs log llldlcates that the top 24 to 30 Inches of natJve sOlI IS generally less permeable than the ullderlymg sod ThIS matcmal WIll be used to restnct flow through the blO-filtratlOn swales The underlYlllg SOlIs are a hIghly permeable gravelly sand very condUCIVe to stormwater lllfiltratlOn. Based on thIS m[ormatlOn and our personal expenence WIth SOlIs In tlus general area, an InfiltratIon L".lte of three mmutes per ll1ch '..'~;~;:;:,-,.,., S Chambcrlam & ASSOCIatc::;, Inc. SCA ProJcct No 93028 June 1993 (9J028H20.RPT) Prame Plaza Shoppmg Centcr Conccptual Dramage Rcport Page 4 ~ ~ .,... ,~"...... ..,....~ ~. A. "", 'p. ". ,,' c''-'''''''''''''~ '''","""",,, -, ~.. was used for conceptual desIgn purposes It IS expected that the actual mfiltratlOn rate may be faster than the desIgn rate SECTION 4 - WELLS AND SEPTIC SYSTEMS There are no wells or septic systems on-sIte or adJacent to thIs proJect sIte wIthm mmlmum setback reqmrements for proposed stormwater retentlOn/detentlOn faclhties, however, there are wells wlthm tlllS area of the CIty SECTION 5 - FUEL TANI{S No m-use or abandoned fuel tanks are known to be located on the sIte No fuel tanks were located on the sIte durmg the topography surveymg and sIte reconnaissance SECTION 6 - SUB-BASIN DESCRIPTION There IS no apparent off-Site draInage trIbutary to thIS proJect sIte The sIte and adJacent propert18s are essentially kvel TIns, m adchtlOn to the IJermeable sods present m thIS general area, greatly reduces surface water ImgratlOl1 or erosIOn problems SECTION 7 - ANALYSIS OF 100-\'EAR FLOOD Because the proJect does not he adjacent to or contam a maJor stream on-SIte, It IS not Identified wlthm a 100-year flood hazard area. AnalYSIS of the 100-year flood hazard zone was therefore not deemed to be apphcable SECTION 8 - AESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR STORMVVATER FACILITIES The storm water mfiltratlOn facIht18s and blO-filteratlOn swales Will be deSIgned to conform to the proposed SIte layout as much as possIble Many of the drall1age swales are placed adJacent to the peflmeter roads to enhance the external features of the proJect Irregular shapes of the stormwater retentIOn areas were used to gIve the basms a more natural and aesthetIc appearance All stormwater Improvements and any ilisturbed areas wlthm thc proJect SIte Will be landscaped and lrngated when needed. The completed basms WIll be landscaped WIth mdIgenous plantmgs and/or hned WIth mrugenous plantmgs and all dramage swales WIll be Imed WIth sod. The landscapmg plan Will detml the number, types, and placement of all vegetatlVc Improvements and lrngatlOn. . .,'" =, ," ,-~. ,-" -~. "" .'....~ ,.....,. " ~" S Chamberlalll & ASSOCIates, Inc. SCA Project No 93028 June 1993 (93028H20.RPT) PraIne Plaza Shoppmg Center Conceptual Dramage Report Page 5 ...~ - ....... -~" """'.........,~ , ~ ""'..... 7"'........., ''''"..<'OO...,.~-'-.''' '... ~...,.... ~. ._...~,..... "''''' "".,.C . ~-'" ~., ...",...",,,,, .... n...... ...~,~ - SECTION 9 - DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS All clramage IS retamed on-sIte, therefore a downstream analysIs of the proJect was not appropnate nor provIded. SECTION 10 - COVENANTS, DEDICATIONS, EASEMENTS These clramage faclht18s wIll reqmre routme mamtenance These reqUIred activIties are outlmed m the followmg mamtenance recommendatlOn sectlOn and WIll be addressed m the Developments CondltlOns, Covenants and RestnctlOns and be aclmmlstered by the Rocky Prmne Developmcnt Company ASSoclatlOn. A copy of the CC&R WIll be provIded to the CIty of Yelm pnor to final approval. The deSIgn conccpt provIdes the cIty access to all stormwater faclht18s for purposes of mspecbon, water quahty momtormg, and other actlvlt18S as reqmred by crdmance SECTION 11 - PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION In order to msure proper responSIbIlIty and authonty to carry out necessary mamtenance actIvlt18S, the Rocky Prmne Development Company AssoclatlOn shall, at a mmlmum, mclude the followmg proVlslOn m theIr by-laws 1 The responslblhty for mamtenance of all common clramage areas as specIfically detailed shall fall upon the AssoClatIon. """"'......". - -~ ~" -.- .. ~..._ v~,,~..., . .~ ,,,., ."'~""".,,, .........."", ,,', ...,...... . ",."~.._,~.,, .". '''''h '''' yO"_".,,,,,. .,. ""''''m''''''~ "... '" ""_" ".,,,", n '..,,'...~, n.""""',.."'''.... "'"'"" S Chambcrlam & ASSOCIates, Inc. SCA Project No 93028 June 1993 (93028H20.RPT) Prame Plaza Shoppmg Center Conceptual Dramage Report Page 6 ~ ~ ,"""'".." -, .. - , - S Chamberlam & AssocIates, Inc. SCA ProJcct No 93028 June 1993 (9J028H20.RPT) '''~,=~.-'-'''~ ,.- , ~".....~ ......""~ _ "'n..~..'.,~.,",,=-> , ,.. ,'""" ~ - ...'''.'''''.."...._ ., ,,,.. "''''''". ...., ""'...,~.'" . _ K ~ m Pramc Plaza Shoppmg Centcr Conceptual Dramage Report Page 7 PART II EROSION CONTROL PLAN -, "" >" ~". .,....."" ",,,,,,.,,,, ~"''''' .. SECTION 1 - CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE AND PROCEDURE The proposed development Wlllllldude an EroslOn Control Plan deSIgned to contam on- sIte, SlIt and SOlI wlthm the proJect boundanes durmg constructlOn and to prOVIde permanent erOSIon control afterwards EroslOn/seilimentatlOn control wIll be aclueved by a combmatlOn of structural measures, vegetatlOn cover measures, and constructlOn practIces tmlored to fit the speCIfic SIte Best constructlOn management practices are to be employed to properly clear and grade the SIte and to schedule constructlOn actIVIties m proper sequence Before any constructlOn begms on SIte, erOSlOn control faclht18s shall first be mstalled. The planned constructlOn sequence IS as follows 1 Install rock constructIOn entrances to IJrovlde access to each lot Use 4" to 8" dIameter spalls WIth 12" mllumum depth. 2 Install filter fabrIC fence around all active constructlOn areas 3 Clear SIte (grllbbmg and rough gradIng) 4 DUrIng the tune penod of November 1 through March 31, all ilisturbed areas greater than 5,000 square feet, that are to be left unworked for more than twelve (12) hours shall be stabIlIzed by one of the followmg' mulch, soddmg, or plastic covermg 5 Install utIhtlCs (storm, samtary sewer, power, etc) G DUring the gradmg and P,lVIng proeess prOVide catch baSIn protectIOn by InstallIng Glter fabnc and hay bales around all Inlets to the dramage system and particularly to underground storm unprovemenLs. 7 The on-SIte permeabIlIty of the natIVe SOlIs should prevent an abundance of stormwater runoff from accumulatIng on-sll;e or mlgratmg off-sIt;e Temporary basms may be reqUired on a case by case condIt;lOn Where temporary baSInS are constructed, the dramage facillt;y area WIll be excavated to 24 ll1ches below natlve ground (pre-constructlOn) When constructlOn of Improvements is completed, the temporary baSInS WIll be eXLilvaLed to clean native matenal and replaced WIth more permeable gravel back-fill as necessary 8 Landscape, sod, and/or seed and mulch all dIsturbed areas conSIstent With the landscapmg plan 9 Flush storm drmnage system 10 MaIntaIn all erOSIOn control facdll;ws untJl the entire SIte IS stabilIzed and sdt runoff ceases SECTION 2 - TRAPPING SEDIMENT "'.. ~~ ... ,.......'" >=."""" ~ ~.~. '''' ~.. - . "'.~ , - <,.... ..." ~.~.'...... ~ .,~~..... "... ... S Chambcrlmn & Assocmtcs, Inc. SCA Project No 93028 June 1993 (93028H20.RPT) Prmne Plai~a Shoppmg Center Conceptual Dramage Report Page 8 "...........,--"...,......,,"'.~ .,.. ,,,,-,, ."'~...""....""" ~ . "''''".... '" .. "'''~. .~ , ~". > ' .'~M"~.. ,.....~. .~ __.n. ,. ""'~~ ~, ,"~ " ~, The sOlIs on-sIte belong to the Spanaway group and have a low to moderate erOSlOn potential accordmg to the S C.S SOlI Survey for Thurston County Smce the sIte IS generally flat, erOS.LOn mlgratlOn should be relatlvely mSlgmficant. FIlter fabnc fencmg wIll be Illstallec1 ,U'ound the penmeter of" all actIve constructIOn sItes to control erOSIon nllgratIOll on-SIte A stablhzed constructIOn entrance Will be ll1stalled to prevent velucles from trackmg SOlI away from the sIte FIlter fabnc and hay bales mstalled around all catch basm mlets to prevent entry of SIlt mto the dramage system. The contractor WIll not be allowed to leave illsturbed areas greater than 5,000 square feet that are left unworked for more than twelve (12) hours, uncovered durmg the ramy season from November 1 through March 31 Mulch, soddmg, or plastic covermg WIll be used to prevent erOSlOn m these areas SECTION 3 - PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL AND SITE RESTORATION All illsturbec1 areas WIll be landscaped with grass, natural vegetatlOn, or trees per the Landscapmg Plan pnor to final project approval SECTION 4 - GECTECHNICAL ANALYSIS AND REPORT Proposed retentlOr faclhtIes are not located wlthm 100 feet of the top of any slope steeper than 25 percent r herefore, a geotechmcal report addressmg seepage and the potential for slope fallure was not deemed necessary SECTION 5 - INSPECTION SEQUENCE In adilltIOn to the CIty mspectlOns, the ProJect Engmeer shall be retamed to mspect the faclht18s related to stormwater treatment, erOSlOn control, retentlOn and conveyance durmg constructwll At a mUllmum, the followmg Items shall be mspected at the time speclfie d. 1 The EroslOn Control Faclhtles shall be mspected pnor to the start of cleanng and gradmg to l1sure the followmg structures are In place o ConstructlOll Entrances o FIlter Fabnc Fences 2 The Infiltr ion Basms and blO-filteratIon swale areas shall be mspected before, durmg, and after constrllctlOn to ensure that the faclhty IS constructed to deSIgn speclficatwns, that protectIon from sechmentatlOn IS m place, and that the , """"""-'="" "'. , ....f:.i{,;... . ""'..... . - <, ""'''''' ... ~ .~. ~....... "'. ~,,'" ''"'" , w '" ,,_ ",..... ""'-"'.r.xl......"__~,,.......,"'~'''' "'.... '" .<>....- ,," "" ~ ..,."" Pramc Plaza Shoppmg Center Conceptual Dramage Report Page 9 S Chamberlam & ASSoCIatcs, Inc. SCA Project No 93028 June 1993 (93028H20.RPT) ~~;:~,:.~';,:.::;..~~...' N,H" .^"",~ "'""" -. ~"" ..,'~ ' .,..,,, "~ ,~ mfiltratlOn surface 1"', not compacted nor sIlted up 3 The Conveyance Systems ~hall be mspected after constructlOn of the facIhty, but before the project IS completed to ensure the followmg are m workmg order- o Road D ralDage o Storm Sewer Plpmg o Catch Basms 4 The Permanent SIte R'~storatlOn Measures shall be mspected after landscapmg IS completed. A final mspectlOn should be l)('(formed to determme final grades, settmgs of control structures, and all neces~aJ'Y nformatIOn to complete as-bmlt drawmgs and tu fulfill the CIty of Yelm's reqmrements f.Jr mspectlOn and rcportmg pnor to final approval of the proJect. ._,'""'" ,;~~},;:,.,._..,;,,_.--" Prame Plaza Shoppmg Center Conceptual Dramage Report Page 10 S Chamberlam & ASSOCIates, 111v. SCA Project No 93028 June 1993 (93028H20.RPT) '_~".R. ""'"' ...""...,',...._.......-~'Z;~..,."'..."" - ~ - or.. S Chl1l11berlalll & Assocwtes, Inc. SCA ProJcct No 93028 June 1993 (93028H20.RPT) ,...~" .'.'" ~ ~ .... ok""'" PART III MAINTENANCE PLAN M~~.""""'r"... . . ~. ." -'" ,,~, .. "'. .,..... . ~ ,,,,. ,~. , ~ ~ ,~. "'. ",. "" .~ . ~ ~'-""-'" "" - Prmnc Plaza Shoppmg Center Conceptual Dramage Report Page 11 _ """n.....~ ."', ., ,~<""" ...,"~"'''''' .,.".........."""'. . """ .... """~.~ "..,'"" ....' ... SECTION 1 - REQUIRED MAINTENANCE .. .",~ ~ ,~<",,-....",.;-:.~ ". - ......., ,.... ~ ~..~. ..,-", These clramage faclhtIes will reqmre occaslOnal mamtenance The followmg IS based on nllmmum reqmrements as set forth m the DraInage DesIgn and EroslOn Control Manual of Thurston RegIOn, Waslnngton. The reqmred mmntenance and frequency of mamtenance IS as follows Faclhty Type Mamtenancc Problem InfiltratlOn basm Trash and debns POlsonous VegetatIOn Pollution Un-attended ground cover Rodent holes m berm Tree growth . ~ ~ ." S Chamberlam & AssocIates, Inc. SCA Project No 93028 June 1993 (93028H20.RPT) Cntcna Fo, AttentlOn 1 cubIc foot per 1000 square feet. If multiple u.-ie faclhty and presence of tansy, ragwort, pOlson oak, strmgmg nettles, dcvds club, de. Presence of 011, gas, or other contamInant" w Inch could cause plant damag-e, could constItute a fire hazard or threatens water quahty Site does not fit mto neIghborhood. EVIdence of rodents or IHpmg through dam Trees mterfcre wIth mmntenanC2 (clon't remo\c; If not a problem) Estlm ate cl Mamtenance Frequency (once every # of veal's) 1 1 2 5 5 "".... ... c, ,...,,,, .',~"'~ "< ,,' . ~~, .. -'" , .,..... ~ PrmHe Plaza Shoppmg Center Conceptual Dramage Report Page 12 ..... "I'.~~. ~ ~ . Estimated Mamtenance Cntena For Mamtenance Faclhty Type Problem AttentlOn Frequency (once every # of years) InfiltratlOn basm EroslOn of slope SIgns of erOSlOn 10 faces or potentIal for eroSlOn. Settlmg of berm Settlmg of 4" or 15 more SedIment More than 10% 2 of desIgn volume IS lost. Rock revetments SOlI IS 12 damage unprotected and subJect to erOSlOn Catch b asms Se dlmen t More than 113 of o 5 to 1 bmldup depth to lowest Invert ]S sIlted. Structural Frame out of 20 damage Hush by 3/4 ", cracks In walls, settlement, rotation, etc. PollutIon Illgh levels of OIl, 05 grease, toxms, cLc. present PIpes SedIment 20% of depth. 2 Structural Dents decrcasmg 10 arcas by 20%, cracks allowmg groundwater IntruslOn, corroSlOn ".,,<< .. .,....""- . "',',"'-, "'.,.,.,..,.,.......- ~ .~, .'.. ~ '.~ ~ '., ,..... ~ S Chamberla1l1 & AsSOCIates, Inc. SCA ProJcct No 93028 June 1993 (9J028H20.RPT) Prame Plaza ShoPP1l1g Centcr Conceptual Dramagc llcport Page 13 ~......" . ...__~~ '" """,... M" ^ "'~._. ~.. ,"M .. ,. "",'"" .~""'-.,....~".., u ~ "" ~ '" ~,~~ -~,'"" ,~ SECTION 2 - RESPONSIBLE ORGANIZATION The Rocky Pralne Development Company AssocIatlOn (R.P D C.A.)shall be responsIble for the operatlOn and mamtenance of the clramage facIhtIes and the mamtenance schedule outlmed m the prevIOUS sectIOn shall be mcluded m the ArtIcles of the AssocIatlOn. SECTION 3 - VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN The stormwater facIhtIes and all dIsturbed areas wIthm the proJect sIte WIll be landscaped and Irngated. A landscapmg plan for the proJect wIll be completed by a LIcensed Landscape Arcllltecl; and subnlltted to the ClI;y of Yelm Plannmg and PublIc Works Department for review and approval The landscapmg plan WIll detaIl the number, types, and placement of all vegetatIve Improvements and IrngatlOn, as well as any speCific mamtenance reqmrements that are necessary for these vegetatlve Improvements A statement shall be placed on the landscapmg plans statmg that the landscaplllg shall be mamtamed for the hfe of the project The maJonty of the landscapmg IS mtended to be mdlgenous vegetatlOn and therefore reqmre httle or no mamtenanC8 The mtenor SIde slopes of the mfiltratIOn basms WIll be hydroseeded or sodded wIth a drought tolerant turf grass such as red fescue or annual rye The grass should reqUlre only occasional maIntenance m the form of mowmg ThIs can be done on an as necessary baSIS wlth access to the bas1l1s bemg the pnmary reqmrement for mowlllg SECTION 4 - SOURCE CONTROL Warmng SIgns (e g "Dump No Waste - Drams to Ground Water") WIll be pamted or embossed on, or adJacent to all storm dram mlets and WIll be repamtcd as necessary Any surface actIVIty that have a lllgh potentIal for surface or groundwater contamlllatlOn should be restncted and momtorcd closely by the City and R P D C.A. S Chamberlam & ASSOCIates, Inc. SCA Project No 93028 June 1993 (D3028H20.RPT) Prame Plaza Shoppmg Center Conceptual Dramage Rcport Page 14 ..,.'" ~.~ ~ .. '.."'~ , -- ,", - , "'. ~ , ~ - APPENDIX I DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS S Chamberlam & Associates, Inc. SCA ProJect No 93028 June 1993 (93028H20,RPT) Prame Plaza Shoppmg Center Conceptual Dramage Report =, . ,~, v ,,_, M'''' ,_,~ . ".~,... ..~'" ., "' ,- ... ,., . ,."" '. ,." ~. ,,"'. " .~ ., ... ,.. ~""'" ~..~ ... "" RETENTION FACILITIES DESIGN CALCULATIONS Minll11UlTI V olrune of Retention Facility Total ImpervlOus Area Lots 2, 3 and 4 Proposed Asphalt Pavmg/Concrete Area = Proposed Bmldmg Area = Total Area = 8 04 Ac 1 92 Ac 9 96 Ac Total Disturbed PervlOus Area. = 2 36 Ac Assume 20"/hr or 3 nun/inch Volume Reqmred For Pavmg Area & PervlOus Area From latest verSlOn of Dramage Manual = 3,000 cf X 804 Ac + 1,000 cf X 2 36 Ac = Ac Ac = 26,180 C F Roof Drains Drywell Volrunes ReqUIred Total drall1rock drywell trench volumes mduchng rocK, per 1,000 sf of root: accordll1g to table 8 2 of latest versIOn of Dramage Manual 100 CF'./l,OOO sf of Roof Total Roof Area of All Bmldmgs = 8:3,500 sf Total Mmlluum Drywell Volume 100 C.l". Storage = 1000 sf Roof Area (X) C.l". Storage 83,500 sf Roof Area X = 8,350 C F of Storage Total .'" ~ ~,. . . , . ~ ." .,. ''''''~' "'... ~. ."'~......."r . . ... "'W~,,^. ~.~".. ,~ ..'.. ,... ., ....R , ~ "" ..""~ S Chamberlam & ASSOCIates, Tnc SCA ProJect No 93028 June 1993 (93028H20.RPT) Prame Plaza Shoppll1g Center Conceptual Dralllage Report ...,"., "or,,", I""~;': - RETENTION DESIGN EVENT/MINIMUM VOLUME TO BE INFILTRATED 100% of 100-Year Stonn Volume Estlmate SCS Curve Numbcr for Group B Appcnmx D - Table D 1 and D 2 Land Use (Pre-Development) Meadow/Pasture = 78 Land Use (Post-Development) Commercial (85% ImpervlOus = 94 From Table D 1 Pre-Development> for SCS #78, Inches of Runoff = 0 99 Runoff = 0.99 x 12 32 Ac x 43,5GOsf = 41,274 cf 12 Ac Post-Development [or SCS #94, Inches of Runoff = 2 16 lhmo ff = 2.1G x 104* At: x 43,GGO sf = 81,511 cf 12 Ac = Total Area - BUIlmng Roof Area 12 32 Ac - 1 92 Ac 10 4 Ac *Area = = Volume to be lllfiltrated on the proJect SIte III open basllls 81,544 - 44,274 = 37,270 cf Check volume agalllst mmlmum reqUIrements 37,270 cf> 26,480 cf Use volume reqmrcd = 37,270 cf r. _ ,.~, ....... ~~ - _.,.. ~ T ",""...... S Chamberlalll & ASSOCiates, Inc. SCA ProJect No 93028 June 1993 (93028H20.RPT) PrmrIe Plaza Shoppmg Center Conceptual Dramage Report l ' .., . .,~-~,. ".. ~.~ ." ~ <'< " .~ . '1~";;"~'Z:;;';;" - BIO-FILTER REQUIREMENTS (74) BlO-filter area pnor to retentlOn/infiltratlOn faclhty Tvllmmum Total Surface Area = 2,000sflImpervlOus Ac BlO-filter area after detentIOn (wet well) facIhty' Mllllmum Total Surface Area = 500 sf/ImpervlOus Ac Mlmmum Surface Area of BlO-filter Assummg BlO-filter Area Pnor to RetentlOn. MmImum Surface Area = 2,000 sf X 8 04 Ac Ac 16,080 sf = Mllllmum Surface Area of BlO-filter Assumlllg BlO-filter Area Mter DetentlOn (Wet Well) M1l11mUm Surface Area = 500 sf X 8 04 Ac Ae 4,020 sf" = ............ ~,~.~~..""~, ....-..... . ~ .""" .., ..., T ,. ..." "'.'"""~~ .. ..... ~. '" """ ..- ." ~.. "" S Chamberlalll & AssocIates, Inc. SCA ProJect No 93028 June 1993 (9302SH20.HPT) PraIne Plaza ShOPPlllg Center Conceptual Dralllage Report APPENDIX II SOILS REPORT S Chamberlam & Assocwtes, 1ne SCA ProJect No 93028 June 1993 (93028H20.RPT) Prmne Plaza Shoppmg Center Conceptual Dramage Report ...."-,. - ,:-.z'"- Twelve sOlI test pItS were dug and logged on Apn113, 1993 (see FIgure 2) Landforms consIst of broad glacIal outwash WIth vIrtually no slope Top SOlIs were generally a brown to dark brown gravelly to very gravelly sIlty sandy loam and averaged 24 lllches III depth. The substratum to a depth of 84" or more was a brown, gravelly s<md. SCS SOlI Survey of Thurston County mapped thIS proJect sIte as a comblllatlOn of Spanaway gravelly sandy loam and Spanaway stony sandy loam On-sll,e SOlIs mvestIgatlOn confirmed these SOlI deslgnatlOns PermeabIlIty of the sub sOlI IS moderately rapId and very rapId III tbe substratum Runoff can be expected to be slow, WIth a low hazard of water erOSlOn No mcl1catlOn of seasonal water table was present III the test pItS All test pItS revealed substratum SOlIs WIth hIgh potentIallllfiltratlun rates Generally from 24" to over 84" below eXlstmg preconstructlOn grade, the permeabIlIty rate can be expected to be over 20 lllches per hour It IS suggested that all dralllage ll1filtratlOn basms be located m thIs lower honzon to utIlIze the lllgh mfiJtratlOn rates descrIbed above .....-...~~........., S Chamberlam & AssocIates, Inc. SCA ProJect No 93028 June 1993 (9302SH20.RPT) Pralne Plaza Shoppmg Center Conceptual Dralllage Report SOILS LOG Prairie Plaza Shopping Center 4/13/93 by WIlham W Parnell, P E #1 0" - 30" Brown gravelly SIlty loam - Class 5 30" - 84" Brown gravelly sand Class 1/2 #2 0" - 24" Brown gravelly SIlty loam - Class 5 24" - 84" Brown gravelly sand Class 1/2 #3 0" - 24" Brown gravelly sIlty loam - Class 5 24" - 84" Brown gravelly sand Class 1/2 #4 0" - 24" Brown gravelly sIlty loam - Class 5 24" - 84" Brown gravelly sand Class 1/2 #5 0" - 12" Brown gravelly SIlty loam - Class 5 12" - 84" Brown gravelIy sand Class 1/2 #6 0" - 18" Brown gravelly sIlty loam - Class 5 18" - 84" Brown gravelly sand Class 1/2 #7 0" - 24" Drown gravelly sIlty hIm - Class 5 24" - 84" Brown gravelly sand Cl ass 1/2 #8 0" - 24" Brown gravelly sIlty loam - Class 5 24" - 84" Brown gravelly sand Class 1/2 #9 0" - 30" Brown gravelly sIlty loam - Class 5 30" - 84" Brown gravelly sand Class 1/2 #10 0" - 24" Brown gravelly sIlty loam - Class 5 24" - 84" Brown gravelly sand Class 1/2 #11 0" - 24" Brown gravelly SIlty loam - Class 5 24" - 84" Brown gravelly sand Class 2 #12 0" - 24" Brown gravelly sIlty loam - Class 5 24" - 84" Brown gravelly sand Class 2 ""' , S Chamberlall1 & ASSOCIates, Inc. SCA ProJect No 93028 June 1993 (93028H20.RPT) Prame Plaza Shoppll1g Center Conceptual Drall1age Report "''''-'"."'' "'" "~n""<..~.".:.-.,~,. ~ ..........""".,..""'"'.r<. ~ . ~ (""'.....:1 'io.'...;:.,':~':."".':~ .', . -"."-,,, ,~ u ~ S ChamberlalD ~'~ AssocIates, Inc. SCA ProJect No D3028 June 1993 (93028H20.RPT) i' . , .......,"', ""...~--"" "'"'U .'..,..... ... """ ...,,,...., " """,,,,,. ."'........~."-"'",.. .......~".".~ ~ APPENDIX III VI CINITY MAP , -"""'~.~"' ...." "d Pralne Plaza ShoPPll1g Center Conceptual Dramage Report \ \ --., I \ \ \ --T \ \ , }j,~\ \ \ ---I \ , \ \ 0>- \ \ , _z ~ \ I I , I \ \ \ _ - t~ I ,n ':;. \J ?J 1> ?s f'l \J r )? N )? IJl :L- a \J v \ " :;. , \ \ , \ \ \ I \ ;' ~ /J '. / Q, _.-' r--- 'I ~~:i:~ \~'" ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ -"" ..,.. - ~ . , ,,... w ~"'~"" " . MISCELLANEOUS FIGURES ~;~ ;~'.:}';,':~" ~ ~ ,,,..... - .~ S Chamberlalll ~ Associates, Inc. SCA Project No D3028 June 1993 (93028H20.RPT) Pralne Plaza Shoppmg Center Conceptual Dralllage Report S Chamberlam & Assoczates, Inc 719 Sleater Kinney Road SE . Suite 120 . Lacey Washington 98503 (20(j) 493-6002 . (907) 279-5929 . (206) 4932476 F^X .......\....":. 0"\ c/?-r::<" i:', c::.\~ II Cb-r...~)lel? '" ~ ;;:p.L.....No fJ ,,~~ , .~;'-r,{ri~'~R~,~!k-"~~~-7~ 1 C~,AP · ' 'EEi, ~~~/#'k)0'h'iJ' -: l'iPr'- :!!I;- -~n fT T~ -i. ... . ....' HP,AFfE;O"iJrfD~J2"""'"~''' . ..C6~)" ~~FP"DP;P;IF~~"7I~T""~ . .t)W'uy:> .., . '. . .............-- . rl.bF-'fH'*I\::;7ffi:;~~I;;~1 '~~~i? PrOject Name Ft2AIP.I~ f1-A:2A 5HC'FFING c~Nn=F2 Project Number ~'3o<::z g Date OG - I -4 - ~"3- DeSCription FI~FE: ~~:3 .i ... , .'. . ' . . ....................................,;....................................................................... , . ' ........h..=...~.........=.l. ...... . I " ..................01;.....1"....... ................t.I.....' v-tP! Fc::::1 ['lP ~"'LJFJv~rl" __!FF"t!;mhfJ.qe.._. GAL-l-pfl ~s;-' ..........'1'... I . ... .t.,....,:..................1 I ", I .....L...~..~~..J. . !~: , .... . '. , '. . . ................-.......... .......:......................'................................................ . , . ',' ......................................................................................... . . , . ...................~.............. ....................,................,....... ........................... .....~.............. I ~r4eer...~~... .............,......................................... . . . . Page of By p, ~ FAY"Al3.A~ . . . . .................... ...................................................................................... . ..GHF~T.f9....~H.. -- -<I . : , . , .......................................................................................... .' , -<l ' .--.................................................. . . , . AvPr2~rto ~\ : ,A>rRAL --("f'.A~Ir---6i- '-;. "'!-' ' ~L-r Tr--7"'r y:::~. . . , ' . . . . m, ,?1~ME~~~1t~""6'rl;.:F~k (8BiF.;tli?;jiiE~iJti~tJiFrFIL-'h?f;o;nbt1;~L:JUii~i~) S. ChamberlaIn & AssocIates, Inc 7] 9 Skater Kinney Road SE . Suite 120 . Lacey Washington 98503 (206) 493-6002 . (907) 279-5929 . (206) 493 2476 FAX PrOject Name f'l2~If2IE= A-A-:2A .sHCJF'firl6 ~r-J-rFrz PrOject Number '2)"3~'2<& Description pI6UPf;::." rJc:l 4 Date 0((;, -14- ~3 Page of By j2 5" PAYAf3ArJ ~ ~ddddd W I :,12(1~~m . . . . . . -ldEI~W~TldJ.. CT'~~' . . D!- . . . . . . . . . . . '. . ......:...........d................................................).....:.............................:..............:................~................................ ::;;lm::':';I;mm!;~~i~I~;;~; . . . . . . . . ....^......:...,...~......:-......~................ ... i jJ-Tm:,......._,,~t>.mm.l"-'-~-'~~~6" 'mil, . ~-+, ,~~ ' 1m: . :~ ~JI-! .. : i t7 . : , . ~","'~ FI=f- If<1''' Gf' of I0''''F rp<,""A ~ ~~::: ~t0~ S:L~F7~~~~~;r~~ ~:~~di' . , .. -..L - I -"';<~~.... o . (\ ~<I ,. <:) ~O()':a' .6' . g. a....~~"" '. . '.' . . , ~..; ..88'0 . ..0..0:. . ( QQi .. . ."""':' , H ,'T' ctP~-,~.Gf ~. &fD P8.: 'r !' ..............)11'................. . - ~At.l.P6PP ~~JY.~ --1f:..~rf'"~~Ce;pF7AreP fT'lF'f= . . :.. ......~N~~I.~~~~ IY~P~fTI:p ......................__.................:..................._................._I__.._.._:......._...~q.A.ii1......;.:?f~..l.~i~~.~g._......r..~~l~~~~...._.......:.........:............................................ :: : D~AIJ--5 .: : .. ( i~~F........!BrJ.kTf?A~fl~.Nt.............GA.~~lp=.;>..)... ................................... 5 Chamberlam & AssocIates, Inc 719 Skater Kinney Road SE . Suite 120 . Lacey Washington 98503 (206) 493-6002 . (907) 279-5929 . (206) 493 2476 FAX Project Name fi2-AI~:::: 'A-A-;2A ~Hc>PFIN6 ~~p Project Number i1)~:;2.!& Dat~ 06 -\4- Os Description Fl~tJrzp ~6', C;; Page ot By P <;; PA---(~r4 :......;.......... (;>- ~AH ....:. f.... .:.......:..............:...............:..............:...................... ~................ . . . . ,,- . ' ................................... ...J........:.......; '1" ............;.~~...... -fvtJ : . . . . : ... ...........................~...................................."....... .'J~<ifii"m6n~tfi,,;~~ II:. --4 'f 'HHH iHH : :: : ::!: ...r2.~w~fr";;r:J....>...i..~.tti.0rf2AT1t;:1rJ ~s:I~...\.... t=1-A ~\ vlF="H " . ' \\\ : , I I 1:1..... /. I I I III '-1 I ,- !: II//} I y.., I }I : .,.' ill { : \ i ,,'-;,f/ ~ .~~. HHH?7'~" ~'\'>f7kh HH' .: H ~r~. IHHt lH\ iH m!m...'i;=~'1'~~Jf .., .............................................................. .'.......... .... .:.....'..:........................:.................... -....,................;........... .;.........;.......................................~............;.................................. ................................ ................... ......................... .; _...............:...................;.......... ..mmm....mm ..~cFj~AI~~~~ .~~u ~ I . ~. .pvt.,..,......., ..~ ~ ,'. N.. F1 A . (f3Td'ff,~~~6ird?P?'~~r=t~t..ltk;.1dI8'F'I~~,;gtll~rr4? ...-.>-~~ L-IHE= ~v'PF~ i-'2.b-i:L.:L. ) ~. ~"-"'I!'"f'1 ~ .'l~ oi . !, . '. _. , ., ' , " ' .' ' ..............:.......,......................................:.......................................:................................. STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL FIG A 1 GRASS L!i"[D SWALE -R":~~~ - \"~: I. 10' INTERVALS LEVEL BOTTn/vi ::=..-J 1 :3 REFERENCE. ;'-- DATE JULY 1935 BIOFILTRATION SWALE STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL FI G A2 m-m REFERENCE. DATE: JAN 1991 r------ L__ ~\ II II 1\\ I 1\ ! \ I I II I 1\ ! ) \ I I I I I I ) I I I I / -...L. / / ->1 A -cQ - ---=::,.. ~ A PLAN 6 MIN / / / / / / / / L- ARMORING AS NECESSARY AND VEGETATION I WHEEL STOPS == SECTION A - A PARKING LOT CONVEYANCE SYSTEM STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL FIG AS NOTE. SHEET FLOW OVER WEIR FOR DESIGN EVENT < 1" DEEP ESTABLISHED NATIVE VEGETATION AND MAT ARMOR (MAX SLOPE SEE TEXD~ 25 YR FLOOD ~2 YR STORM ELEV I~I t :J 2 ong'ro:;,,, 1 ~'l'lO()OOl )OOOOL(, 2 I _....~O?oOoDo( )00000000 - .}oJ~~gogogogo~ )gogogogog~ 1 ....)...0""0....0"'0""0...0. )...o....o""o...o....<>~o...._1 .Ii / ~ FILTER FABRIC 4' MIN CRUSHED ROCK S+ SECTION AA ~ SOITeH ..::; ROADWAY ~7\ STREAM STORM SEWER PEFERENCE. DATE. JULY 1988 STANDARD OUTFALL ( , STJRM DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL FIG AS o p o-t 00 ~~ 1-' ~n: CL l'l I- ~ z :::> o lLl 0:: ,,, ~:S r"' -,,, :;! .~ 0... :> Vl<T '" >- ~ ~- n:: .- <('-" ::> C1 .---- ! z ~O G- o:: 4: w GW zn: ::>:J '-' /G: \/~. ~~I lLl I C1 f <:( " z :E oc w wW ':::;Vl G: 3: Dl,J ~~ PlT-:!"Et'-ICE Di\TE JAI'i 1991 DETENTION/WET POND SCHEMATIC - PLAN VIEW STORlvf DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL FIG A 1 0 CRUSHED ROCK ~+ \JOOOOO 0 0 oOooooooooooooo~~ REfAOVABLE REDUCER OR __. JoOoOoOooooooooooo' _____ )000000000000000 ORIFICE PLATE AS NECESSARY ~g~ci~g 0 0 0 ~ooooooo 0goo l' tv11N OUTLET PIPE TRASH RACK DETAIL -- DEAD STORAGE - FILTER FABRIC PERFORATED PIPE MAX DIA. = TRENCH WIDTH - 4 UNDERDRAIN FILTER OUTLET DETAIL REFERENCE. DATE. JULY 1988 DETENTION/WET POND DETAIL I I I MITIGATION I Traffic generated by the proposed Prairie Plaza Shopping Center will impact on the local roadway system. Based upon the analysis completed in the previous section, mitigation measures are needed. These mitigative measures are based on partial and full build-out scenarios, as identIfied in our analyses: I I Off-Site Mitigation I Momtor the Yelm Avenue/3rd Street mtersection. Although thIs mtersectIon presently op3rates wIthin Yelm Level of Service (LOS) standards, it will deterio- rate to unacceptable levels durmg the horIzon year. Mter the shopping center IS constructed, It is recommended that Yelm Avenue/3rd Street be monitored by the City to determine If other developments in the site vIcmity warrant signahzation. At that time, SCA recommends developer particIpation. I I However, traffic signals at this mtersection may offset eventual construction ofY-l and Y-2 Thus, SCA recommends monitormg as part ofYelm's concurrency management system to assess the ultimate needs at this intersection. I Mitigate the intersection at "Five Corners" This intersection currently operates at a poor level Jf service The intersectlOn has also been Identified as a hazardous locatlOn as a result of numerous accIdents. The City has plans for improvements at this intersection (improvements Y-2 and Y-9 m the City's ComprehensIve Transportatwn plan) However, these planned Improvements are long range, and wIll not be m-place by the horIzon year of this development. The CIty, Thurston County, and WSDOT will need to determme how the proposed improvements will be construct;,:~d and when. I I I I Traffic generated by the shoppmg center wIll impact the mtersectIon. Current CIty policy is to require local developer participation (fair-share contributions) towards mitigation of deficiencies at the "Five-Corners" intersection. , I Implement frontage improvements that contribute to a three-lane cross-section along Yelm Avenue The developer is currently particIpating m the costs for the Yelm Avenu<3 Roadway Improvement Project described earlier m tlllS report. The applIcant WIll provIde "half-street" frontage Improvements along Yelm Avenue m front of the ,lte to accommodate an ultimate three-lane cross section, as specIfied I I I S. Chamberlain & As'3ociates, Inc. SCA Project No. 93028 June 9, 1993 193028TIA.RPTI Prairie Plaza Shopping Center TransportatIOn Impact Analysis Page 19 I ~ in the City's Comprehensive Transportation Plan. These improvements include curb and gutter, sidewalks, and a bicycle lane. These improvements will extend approximately 200' west of the Plaza DrIve mtersectIon, and will also provIde left- turn storage at the Plaza DrIve mtersection. According to WSDOT guidelines, the exclusive left-turn lane wIll require 200-feet of storage space, excluding taper lengths, for horIzoFl. year traffic conditIons. Also, accordmg to WSDOT guidelines, an exclusive rIght-turn lane will be required, based upon future traffic estimates. These roadway geometric features are currently in the design stage, and will be designed to accommodate projected traffic volumes shown in this study Monitor the Plaza DrIvelYelm Avenue mtersectlOn. Subsequent to the development of 40,000 sf shoppmg space, the developer is recommended to have this intersection monitored, and submit to the CIty eVIdence that traffic sIgnal warrants (#1, #2, #6, or #11) are not met. If none of these signal warrants are met, the developer may proceed to develop the remaimng 30,000 sf shopping center space or the fast food restaurant, without mcurrmg any addItional off-SIte mitigative rE:sponsibilities. At completIon of the partial build-out scenano, traffic SIgnal warrants will be met. Then, signallzation of the intersection is needed. In addition, proportion,ate share costs for a traffic signal mterconnect system (to the Yelm Avenue/Access "B" traffic signal) will hlso be necessary ~ I I I I I I I Monitor the Access "B"lYelm Avenue mtersectlOn. In addItion, the traffic SIgnal at Yelm AvenUi3 and Access "B" should be monitored. A larger percentage of SIte traffic may be attracted to thIS mtersecbon than this study assumes. A study would assurll that the new traffic signal at this intersection will not attract excessive traffic from the new development, to the extent that It causes capaCIty restraints at the mtersectIOn or congestIon problems to the internal circulatIon of the Nisqually Plaza Shopping Center. On-Site Mitigation ?rV~-,,\b- ~oh- Widen eXIstJ ng Plaza Dnve The eXlstmg pavement WIdth IS currently 26-feet. It IS recommended that the drIve be widened to 40 feet to accommodate two 12-foot outbound lanes, strIped for separate left and rIght turns, and a smgle 16-foot inbound lan(~ This widening should be Implemented, regardless to the extent of development The addItIonal WIdth WIll accommodate the expected mcrease m traffic due tCl site expanSIOn and eventual SIgnalization of the intersectIOn WIth S. Chamberlain & As3oclates, Inc. SCA Project No. 93028 June 9, 1993 19302BTIA.RPT} Prairie Plaza Shopping Center Transportation Impact AnalYSIS Page 20 ~ Yelm Avenw3 This improvement should include a 150-foot left-turn storage area to accommodate the projected left-turn volume. Provide SIdewalks. The expected interaction between the two shopping center areas will result in increased pedestrian activIty Therefore, a sidewalk/pedestrian plan should be submitted to address this concern. Street lighting on Plaza Drive and Algiers DrIve IS also recommended for pedestrIan and motorIst safety j I J I I J t I. I I S. Chamberlam & As,>oclates, Inc. SCA Project No. 93028 June 9, 1993 19302BTIA.RPT) Praine Plaza Shoppmg Center TransportatIOn Impact AnalysIs Page 21 ~ I,i 1)? P40;&~ \ \ ~Ni/JIV ~d ~ /' \ \ (j) ~uf 1J~~- \. cY' IYO ~ ~ d((ll/r'bdt~_ "; r$) (VIik _ ~ ~ l1i-- rtt/UvUJ Yo ;2 0 /-1 ;) l-fl~ ( 400 c\ 1J5pL-J [ft'. . /" . _ /)1 _ ofhif l fN1)~/U ) \. / I f [, \'1 // Y { (L II :S 1, -.{- :J Ur Ii' \ ~ ____6 / ',' I r0((/~ IS 1D /7-- I \; J) ~ /O!., (l)-U~ y. -ji ;;;- ! 50 Ii) /+u i ' p/~ J)AIiJ-ZJ -fO t alff i I i\ (~~'\~ () 'l) \ wr ,f'l ~~ ~ \ ~S~~ · \ Jl1 ( 1 z 40 stfD 5D'1 ILftr)~ 1.;l.., ~ \f)VJ f -:- 1 ~(),l/ &&00 ~ (&~OD \v~ \O~ ?J z~ 'f '7fP . rJ ,'0- fl-;r .!)rIVe...- ~~-~-----------~. ~ ~~ ---- ---. - ~ .j) o RCW 197-11-960 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST' The State EnvIronmental Pohcy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW reqmres all governmental agenC18S to consIder the envIronmental Impacts of a proposal before makmg decIslOns. An EnvIronmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals wIth probable slgmficant adverse Impacts on the quahty of the enVIronment. The purpose of thIS checkhst IS to provIde mformatlOn to help you and the agency Identify Impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or aVOld Impacts from the proposal, If It can be done) and to help the agency deCIde whether an EIS IS reqmred. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS ThIS EnvIronmental Checkhst asks you to descnbe some basIc mformatlOn about your proposal. Governmental agencIes use thIS checkhst to determme whether the envIronmental Impacts of your proposal are slgmficant, reqmrmg preparatlOn of an EIS Answer the questlOns bnefly, wIth the most preCIse mformatlOn known, or glVe the best descnptlOn you can. You must answer each questlOn accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge In most cases, you should be able to answer the questlOns from your own observatlOns or proJect plans wIthout the need to hIre experts If you really do not know the answer, or If a questlOn does not apply to your proposal, wnte "do not know" or "does not apply" Complete answers to the questlOns now may aVOld unnecessary delays later Some questlOns ask about governmental regulations, such as zonmg, shorelme, and landmark deslgnatlOns Answer these questlOns If you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencIes can aSSIst you. The checkhst questlOns apply to all parts of your proposal, even If you plan to do them over a penod of time or on illfferent parcels of land. Attach any adilltIonal mformatlOn that WIll help descnbe your proposal or ItS envIronmental effects The agency to whIch you submIt thIS checkhst may ask you to explam your answers or provIde adilltlOnal mformatlOn reasonably related to determmmg If there may be slgmficant adverse Impacts USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS Complete thIS checkhst for nonproJect proposals, even though questlOns may be answered "does not apply" IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D) For nonproJect actlOns, the references m the checkhst to the words "proJect", "apphcant", and "property or SIte", should be read as "proposal", "proposer", and "affected geographIc area", respectively q A. BACKGROUND /;} 1 Name of proposed proJect, If apphcable Prmrze Plaza Commercwl Center 2 Name of applIcant. Rocky Pram,e Development Company 3 Address and phone number of apphcant and of any other contact person. Frank WLtt POBox 480 Yelm, WA 98597 458-2201 4 Date checkhst prepared. 05127193 5 Agency requestmg checklIst: CLty of Yelm. 6 Proposed tlmmg or schedule (includmg phasmg, If apphcable) Begm constructwn mLd-summer 1993 Bwld out wLll occur m 3 to 4 phases over the next three years 7 Do you have any plans for future adilltIOns, expanSIOn, or further activIty related to or connected wIth thIS proposal? If yes, explaln. No, not at thLS tLme 8 LISt any envIronmental mformatIOn you know about that has been prepared, or WIll be prepared, illrectly related to thIS proposal. None to our knowledge o 9 Do you know whether apphcatlOns are pendmg for governmental approvals of other proposals <hrectly affectmg the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explam. No, we do not 10 LIst any government approvals or permIts that wIll be needed for your proposal, If known. SLte Plan Revzew Pubhc Works approval Buildmg PermLts 11 GlVe brIef, complete descnptlOn of your proposal, mclu<hng the proposed uses and the SIze of the project and sIte There are several questlOns later m thIs checkhst that ask you to descnbe certam aspects of your proposal You do not need to repeat those answers on thIs page Prmrze Plaza Commercwl Center /,S proposed on three ex/,Stmg lots wLthm short plat #8017 The total sLte area /,S 12,32 AC wLth up to 90,000 square feet of bwldmg area proposed. 12 LocatlOn of the proposal. GlVe sufficIent mformatlOn for a person to understand the preCIse locatlOn of your proposed proJect, mclu<hng a street address, If any, and sectlOn, townshIp, and range, If known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, prOVIde the range or boundanes of the slte(s) PrOVIde a legal descnptlOn, sIte plan, vlclmty map, and topographIC map, If reasonably aVailable You need not duphcate maps or detalled plans submItted wIth any permIt apphcatlOns related to thIS checkhst. The Project /,S located m Sectwn 30, T17N, R2E Lot #'s 2-4 of SS-8017 Located at the Northeast corner of Yelm Ave and Plaza Drwe m Yelm, Washmgton. B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1 EARTH a. General descnptlOn of the sIte (CIrcle one) (Flat, rollmg, hIlly, steep slopes, mountamous, other) b What IS the steepest slope on the sIte (apprOXImate percent slope)? The steepest slope does not exceed 5%. c. What general types of soIls are found on the SIte (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classlficatlOn of agrIcultural sOlIs, specIfy them and note any prIme farmland. The Thurston County Soil Survey mdlcates predommate ly Spanaway Sandy Loam. See sOlllogs for more detail. d. Are there surface mdIcatlOns or hIstory of unstable sOlIs m the ImmedIate VIclmty? If so, describe No, there are not. e DescrIbe the purpose, type, and apprOXImate quantltles of any fillmg or gradmg proposed. IndIcate source of fill. Minor gradmg for roadway and buildmg pad constructwn. f. Could erOSlOn occur as a result of clearmg, constructlOn, or use? If so, generally descrIbe Yes, but the potentlallS mmor due to the flatness of the slte g About what percent of the SIte WIll be covered wIth ImpervlOus surfaces after proJect constructlOn, such as asphalt or bUlldIngs? Appronmately 70% of the slte will be covered wlth lmpervwus surface h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erOSlOn, or other Impacts to the earth, If any' Submlt an eroswn control plan to Yelm Pubhc Works for review and approval. 2 AIR a. What types of emISSlOns to the aIr would result from the proposal (i e, dust, automobIle, odors, mdustrIaI wood smoke) durmg constructlOn and when the project IS completed? If any, generally descrIbe and gIVe apprOXImate quantltles If known. Short term emlSswns wlll result from dust and constructwn eqUlpment exhaust Long term emlSswns wlll result from automoblle exhaust b Are there any off-sIte sources of emlSSlOns or odor that may affect your proposal? If p so, generally describe No, there are not c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emISSIOns or other Impacts, If any' None proposed. 3 WATER a. Surface Water 1) Is there any surface water body or wetland on or III the Immeruate vlclmty of the sIte (inclurung year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds)? If yes, descrIbe type and provIde names. State what stream or river It flows llltO No, there l,S not 2) W1l1 the proJect reqmre any work over, m, or adJacent to (wlthm 300 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach aVailable plans No, It wlll not 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed III or removed from surface water or wetlands and lllrucate the area of the sIte that would be affected. IndIcate the source of fill material. None 4) WIll the proposal reqmre surface water WIthdrawals or ruverslOns? GlVe general deSCriptIOn, purpose, and approXImate quantities If known No, a will not 5) Does the proposal he wlthlll a 100-year foodplalll? If so, note elevatlOn on the sIte plan. No, It does not 6) Does the proposal lllvolve any ruscharge of waste materials to surface waters? If so, descnbe the type of waste and anticIpated volume of dIscharge No, zt does not. b Groundwater 1) WIll ground water be wIthdrawn, or wIll water be illscharged to ground water? GlVe general descnptIOn, purpose and apprOXImate quantities, Ifknown. No, zt will not. 2) DescrIbe the underlymg aqUlfer wIth regard to quahty and quantity, sensItivIty, protectlOn, recharge areas, etc. Accordmg to the Thurston County Comprehenswe Plan, the entzre czty of Yelm hes over an aqwfer sensztwe area. 3) Descnbe waste matenal that WIll be illscharged mto or onto the ground from septic tanks or other sources, If any (such as domestic sewage, mdustnal byproducts, agncultural chemIcals) No waste matenal wlll be du;charged to groundwater c. Water Runoff (incluillng storm water) 1) Descnbe the source of runoff (incluillng storm water) and method of collectIOn and illsposal, If any (include quantities, If known) Where WIll thIS water flow? WIll thIS water flow mto other water? If so, descnbe Storm water will be collected from buildmgs, and parkmg lots wlth treatment and retentwn deszgn m accordance wah the drmnage and eroswn control manual for the Thurston Regwn. 2) Could waste matenals enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally descrIbe Storm water will be pretreated through the use of grass lmed swales prwr to release mto the ground. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water Impacts, If any' Prepare and submlt a storm water drmnage plan to Yelm Pubhc works for revww and approval. f 4 PLANTS a. Check or cIrcle types of vegetatIOn found on the SIte decIduous tree alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree fir, cedar, pme, other -----X- shrub s -----X- grass pasture crop or grain wet sOlI plants. cattaIl, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants. water hly, eelgrass, mllfOlI, other other types of vegetatIOn b What kllld and amount of vegetatIOn WIll be removed or altered? The enstmg shrubs and grass wdl be removed from the s~te c. LISt threatened or endangered speCIes known to be on or near the SIte None known. d. Proposed landscaplllg, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetatlOn on the SIte, If any' New landscapmg will be placed ~n all areas not consumed w~th buildmgs and parkmg 5 ANIMALS a. CIrcle any bIrds and ammals whIch have been observed on or near the SIte or are known to be on or near the SIte bIrds. hawk, heron, eagle, songbIrds, other mammals deer, bear, elk, beaver, other fish. bass, salmon, trout, herrlllg, shellfish, other b List any pnorlty, threatened or endangered speCIeS known to be on or near the SIte None known. c. Is the SIte part of a mIgratIOn route? If so, explalll. Not to our knowledge , .. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlIfe, If any' New landscaped areas will prouule some habltat for wildhfe 6 ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kmds of energy (electnc, natural gas, gasolIne, heatmg OIl, wood, solar, etc.) WIll be used to meet the completed proJect's energy needs? Descnbe whether It WIll be used for heatmg, manufacturmg, transportatlOn, etc. Electnclty will be the pnmary energy source for thLS slte b Would your proJect affect the potential use of solar energy by adJacent properties? If so, generally descnbe No, It will not c. What kmds of energy conservatlOn features are mcluded m the plans of thIS proposal? LIst other proposed measures to reduce or control energy Impacts, If any Buzldmgs will meet all Tmmmum U.B C energy efficumt standards 7 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any envIronmental health hazards, mcluchng exposure to tOXIC chemIcals, rIsk of fire and exploslOn, spIll, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of tIllS proposal? If so, deSCrIbe No, there LS not 1) DeSCrIbe specIal emergency serVIces that mIght be reqmred. None should be requzred. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control envIronmental health hazards, If any' None proposed. b Noise 1) What types of nOIse eXIst m the area whIch may affect your project (for example traffic, eqmpment operatlOn, other?) The Clty of Yelm falls wlthm the NOLSe Impact Zone of Fort LewLS ? o 2) What types and levels of nOIse would be created by or assocIated wIth the project on a short-term or a long-term basIs (for example traffic, constructlOn, operatlOn, other)? Inmcate what hours nOIse would come from the SIte Short term nOl,se will be assocwted wLth constructwn actwLty while long term nOLSe will be assocLated wLth heavy automobLle traffic 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control nOIse Impacts, If any' LLmLt constructwn actwLty to dayl1ght hours only 8 LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What IS the current use of the SIte and adJacent properties? Current use of the property 1$ vacant. Adjacent propertws are eLther vacant or commercwl type uses b Has the SIte been used for mmeral excavatIOn, agrIculture or forestry? If so, descnbe No, Lt has not. c. Descnbe any structures on the SIte No structures eXLSt on sLte d. WIll any structures be demohshed? If SO, what? No e What IS the current comprehensIve plan deslgnatlOn of the SIte? Commercwl. f. What IS the current zonmg classIficatIOn of the SIte? Commercwl. l) g If apphcable, what IS the current shorelme master program deSignatIOn of the Site? N/A h. Has any part of the SIte been classIfied as a "natural resource", "crItical" or "envIronmentally senSItive" area? If so, specIfy The s~te LS w~thm an aqwfer sens~twe zone 1. Approximately how many people would reSide or work m the completed proJect? Approx~mately 100+ people would work m the completed project ApproxImately how many people would the completed proJect chsplace? None k. Proposed measures to aVOId or reduce chsplacement Impacts, If any' None proposed. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal IS compatible With eXlstmg and proJected land uses and plans, If any' The ent~re project LS bemg subm~tted to the c~ty of Yelm for reVleW and approval. 9 HOUSING a ApprOXimately how many umts would be prOVIded, If any? Inchcate whether hIgh, mIddle, or low-mcome housmg None b ApprOXimately how many umts, If any, would be ehmmated? Indicate whether hIgh, middle, or low mclude housmg None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housmg Impacts, If any None proposed. o 10 AESTHETICS a. What IS the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not mcludmg antennas, what IS the prmclpal extenor bmldmg matenal(s) proposed. The tallest heIght of any structure will not exceed 50 feet b What VIews m the Immemate vlclmty would be altered or obstructed? Potentwl Ulews of Mount Razmer would be partwlly obstructed from some propertlRs c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic Impacts If any' New landscapmg will take place throughout the sLte 11 LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of lIght or glare wIll the proposal produce? What time of day would It mamly occur? Parkmg lot l,ghtmg for safety and secunty purposes b Could hght or glare from the fimshed proJect be a safety hazard or mterfere WIth V18w? No, Lt would not. c. What eXlstmg off-sIte sources of lIght or glare may affect your proposal? None should affect thLS proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control lIght and glare Impacts, If any' None proposed. 12 RECREATION a. What deSIgnated and mformal recreatIOnal opportumtIes are m the Immemate Vlclmty? Varwus CLty parks throughout the area. Q b Would the proposed proJect msplace any eXIstmg recreational uses? If so descnbe No, It would not c. Proposed measures to reduce or control Impacts or provIde recreatIOn opportumtIes None proposed. 13 HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or obJects hsted on, or proposed for, natIOnal, state, or local preservatIOn regIsters known to be on or next to the SIte? If so, generally descnbe Not to our knowledge b Generally describe any landmarks or eVIdence of hlstonc, archaeologIcal, sCientific, or cultural Importance known to be on or next to the SIte None on thLS slte c. Proposed measures to reduce or control Impacts, If any' None proposed. 14 TRANSPORTATION a. IdentIfy sIdewalks, trails, pubhc streets and hIghways servmg the SIte, and descnbe proposed access to the eXlstmg street system. Show on SIte plans, If any SR.507, Plaza Drwe, and Creek Road wlll serve thLS slte b Is SIte currently served by pubhc transIt? By what means? If not, what plans eXIst for transIt serVIce? No, It LS not. c. How many parkmg spaces would the completed proJect have? How many would the proJect elImInate? Approxlmately 360 parkmg stalls will be provu1ed. ;, ~ (See traffic study for more detaIl.) d. WIll the proposal reqmre any new roads or streets, or improvements to eXlstmg road or streets, not includmg drIveways? If so, generally descrIbe (inmcate whether pubhc or prIvate) Yes, major frontage ~mprovements for SR.507, Plaza Drwe and Creek Road are planned as part of thu; prOject e WIll the project use (or occur m the Immemate vlcmlty of) water, rail, or all' transportatIOn? If so, generally descrIbe No, ~t will not. f. How many vehIcular trIpS per day would be generated by the completed proJect? If known, mmcate when peak volumes would occur Appronmately 4,970 tnps per day are ant~c~pated w~th the peak hour bemg between 4.00 p m. - 6.00 p m. weekdays g Proposed measures to reduce or control transportatIOn Impacts, If any See traffic study for fulllu;t of Tmtlgatwn measures 15 PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the proJect result m an mcreased need for pubhc serVIces (for example fire protecbon, pohce protectIOn, health care, school, other)? If so, generally deSCrIbe Yes, new facil~tu!s will generate an mcreased potentwl need for fire and polLce protectwn. b Proposed measures to reduce or control mrect Impacts on pubhc serVIces, If any New property and sales tax revenue willprovu1e add~twnalfundmg for publ~c servwes 16 UTILITIES a. CIrcle ubhbes currently aVaIlable at the SIte electrICIty, natural gas, water, refuse serVIce, telephone, samtary sewer, septic system, other b DeSCrIbe the ubhbes that are proposed for the proJect, the ubhty provImng the servIce, and the general construction actiVIties on the SIte or m the Immemate vIcImty whIch mIght be needed. ,4 Water - C~ty of Yelm, Sewer - C~ty of Yelm, Phone - Yelm Telephone, Powe r - Puge t Power q C SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge I understand ::;:~::r~ItY :2~m to ;ake Its deCISIon. Date submItted. - - ,(' CITY OF YELM POBox 479 Yelm, WA 98597 458-3244 OFFICIAL USE ONLY Date Received G.ti-q) . M . \.mlt q;~ ~~8 J eetmg a 13:...; ,; ~..; '.'.'... .' ~ltft1\=-7 PRESUBMISSION MEETING REQUEST FORM YELM WASHINGTON Foe None A presubmission conference is an opportunity for a developer and/or consultants to meet with city staff and ser- vice providers to discuss preliminary studies or sketches gf a proposed project. At the conference the staff will make available information relating to the proposed development. The intent is to identify and eliminate as many potential problems as possible in order for the project to be processed without delay The conference should take place prior to detailed work by an engineer or surveyor, however a site drawing must be submitted that has suf- ficient information to allow for evaluation Discussion topics will include such things as Yelm's Comprehensive Plan, street design, storm runoff and retention, Shoreline Master Program, zoning, availability of sewer and water, development concepts, other requirements and permits, and the environmental impact. Staff notes are prepared and available for review There is no charge for this meeting Meetings are held each Wednesday morning This request form should be submitted at least one week before the preferred meeting date Meeting Date Requested ff~!jrj--3i~ ifm (A Wednesel@ \" (Alternative date) Applicant Ra:::k\/ Pra./ rle.. Address FO Bt:?/<~ Y-c:/m Telephone 4 ~R- zzo I D fA) 11 9<3597 Owner Address Telephone I Representative Uf any) 5. ~ (lC?yY)b~q./n s;A~ Occupation Address 7/'7 '6:;tar /<1'IlV)~'i l2c ;5/:3 #/20 Telephone 493 - Wc?..2. p/?tlll&r//lt{ L4:~e-y W A- I 9"8SQ3' Yelm #v'e &12 5D7) arrd Section 30 TownShip I 7 1\) Range Z!3 w.m. Assessor's Tax Parcel Number 227.3011003, 22'7.?OljOJD1-,Z273014o!o! Type of Project (Subdivision, Annexation, Zone Ch~nge, etc.) L.ornrtJerc...;q/ Slfe. p!ql/ ReI/leu..; Total acreage 12. ' 32 Proposed Density LS< Proposed land Use Single-family Duplex Multi~family Mobile Home Park ~rc0lndustrial Generf' location of project tJor+heQ::/ UrlJlf ~-r P/&i. :z..c... br J ve- Please attach six copies of a site plan drawing not larger than 11 "x17" and forward to Yelm City Hall \ / d STOR11 DHAINAGE DESIGN IvIANUAL FIG A 1 4 AS NECESSARY )A ~ ~ ~ROOF DRAIN 64' A~ 62' 60' 10' MIN ;> <,---ROOF DRAIN DESIGt..J STOP~J ELEV -< 3/4" + ',',rASH ED ROCK FILTER FABRIC B SOILS SECTION AA [ REFERENC[ DATE. JULY 19B8 ROOF DRAIN DRYWELL EXAMPLE ---.---.--.--... -- _.... --- LO :v ~~ r'l ZfTi 'T) fT1 :OJ ~ fT1 <D Z to 0 -' rr: o : .-,0 0 OZ 0-1 <;:0 nO ;Or zC s;:Z ,.,0 Z -IC tfJ;:o - CD ~ :::;}> Z ~z tfJ >-:::j -;:0 =c >--I Zz r ~o -3 ~~I\ ;:r:l ~ . 0 l-3 03: ~ - ~ 0 ~7J1 ~ z coO -..)0 (.J) 0 ~ c z (.J) Q l-3 r t=j ~ po..., GPASS SViALE t t ~ n FLOOR ELEY 8 A A~ SITE PL4.N ~ ,~ /~ ~ J 3 SECTION BB BIOFILTER tf\A ') *--- Ul r-3 o ?j ~ u ;::d ~ l-i Z ~ o t?j o R Ul )--i ~FILTER FABRIC I 0 TO PREVENT SOIL Z CONTAMINATION ~L \ SECTION AA INFILTRATION TRENCH ') " ~ ;:t> Z C ~ r 'l C) )> .....-':>. (pj