The URL can be used to link to this page

Hard File Scanned March 27, 1997 Mr Randy PaIgen POBox 625 Yelm, W A 98597 Re SEP A MitIgatIOn for 5-Comers Dear Mr PaIgen In March 1994, the CIty of Yelm approved a development project for your sIte located on Hwy 507 south of Mossman Road. As a condItIOn of approval the City reqUIred you to mItIgate the Impact of new automobIle tnps whIch would travel through the 5-Comers IntersectIon dunng the pm. peak hour As IdentIfied m the Project Traffic AnalysIs your project created 10 new tnps through the 5-Comers IntersectIOn dunng the p m. peak resultmg m a total mItIgatIon fee of $3,00000 A sIgnalIzatIOn and road alIgnment project for the 5-Comers IntersectIOn IS scheduled to begm m April, 1997 wIth an estImated completIon date of late June As a result, all 5-Comer mItIgatIOn fees for projects that have been approved and constructed are due m full by July 1997 The mItIgatIOn fee of$3,000 00 for your project IS due and payable to the City ofYelm no later than July 1, 997 I have attached a copy of your projects SEPA DetermmatIOn and Page 9 of the TransportatIon AnalYSIS conducted by Heath and ASSocIates If! can be of further assIstance or you have any questIOns please contact me at 458-8408 Smcerely, Cathenne Carlson CIty Planner cc Kathy Wolf, Mayor Shelly Badger, CIty Adrrumstrator Ken Garmann, PublIc Works Director c'\office\cathle\8107mlt.wpd '\ Ciirl:Jl ({j)fJ!eEm 105 Yelm Avenue West PO Box 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 (206) 458-3244 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TIME SQUARE OFFICE BUILQING SITE..,.PLAN ANO VARIANCE REQUE.ST The City Yelm Planning Commi~sion will hold a public hearing bo receive comment oh a proposed site-plan fo~ a 8,000 square ft office buildin~ and regue~t for variance from the rear yard setback r'equirements. for a bui ld.il)gin a Commercial Zone The propo~ed 16cation is along the northwest side of SR507, just south of Mosman Ave The two story building is proposed for offiQe ~pace, will provide parking for 40 vehic1es ~nd wili access SR507 The P 1 ann i ng Comm i ss i on. wi 11 a 1 sc rece.; ve comment on a variance request fro~ Zoning Setback Requiremen~~ of 30 fe~t to 5 feet Jor the rear yard , The Public he<,?ring fo.r the site-p,lan and va-tance request, f or the P lanni ng Comm i ss i on, wi 11 take place Mcn:cay, March 7, 1994 at Yelm City Hall Council Chambers, 105 Yelm Avenue Yelm Wa, at 4:00 p m Written Comments can be addressed to City Planning Commission, POBox 479, Yelm, WA 98597, or dellver,ed to Cjty Hall ' Com~ehts must be received prior to the public hearing A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, March 9, t993, by the Ci ty Cbulici 1 to receive' comment on the val" iance request, Written comments can add~essed to City Council, POBox 479' . Ye]m, WA 98597, and must be recieved prior tp the meeting If there are questions or more information is requested, please contact Ty P~terson, Ci~Y ~lanner, at (206)458-8408 or at City Ha 1 i NOTICE OF MITIGAT~O DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE The City Yelm issued a mitigated determin~t;on of nonsignificance (MONS) under the State Environmental Policy Rules (Chapter 197-11 WAC) for a 8,000 +/- square ft. oftice buildfng, proposed by RandyPaigen After review of a completed Er:\v i,r,6nmenta 1 Checklist and other information on file with the City, the City has determlned that after mltigation, this proposal ~ill not have a significant adverse impact on~the environment Copies of the NDNS are available at .no charge frqm City Hall, 105 Yelm Avenue W, Yslm WA, The public ta invited to comment on thts MONS by submitti~ written comlT\ent :no later t.han 3,-14-:~4 to Ty Peterson, at the a.:we address or mai led, to P 0 Box ~~9, Yelm, WA 9S597 Recycled paper ' -------~-~----------,---------~~-~~-~~~----------~~- YELM, WASHINGTON 98597 AFFJDA VJT OF PUBLICA TJON STATE OF WASHINGTON County of Thurston Fiona Reeves , being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that she/he is the general manager of the Nisqually Valley News, a weekly newspaper That said newspa- per is a legal newspaper and has been approved as a legal newspaper ?~ order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and It IS now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the publ!Cations hereinafter referred to, published in the English language ~<:ntmually as a weekly newspaper in Thurston County, Washington, and It IS now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper That the annexed is a true copy of Notice of Public Hearing Time Square Office Building... as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form) of said 1 newspaper once a week for a period of consecutive weeks, commencing on the 3 day of March 19 94 d d , ,an en ing on the 3 day of March , 19 94 bo~h dates inclusive and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to Its subscribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ which amount has been paid in full. ~ . ---. O(~;7 ~ J~ 31.50 c.:...---- Subscribed and sworn to before me this (/7/l } . l j/ ( ,i /l./J, 1 day of ,1/ 19 ~, /" ~ /)? / //' // \.., ,. 1 /, /; ~.. ! ~ 11/1 <-CVlklC ill7/1---r/!L~~__ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Yelm, Washington. This form officially sanctioned by the WaShington Newspaper Publishers' Association N .nlCE OF PUBLIC HEARING TIME <;QUARE OFFICE BUILDING SITE-P:":~,lIli' \'- VARIANCE REQUEST The City velm ~Ianning Commission will hold a public hearing to receive comment on a proposed site'plan for a 8,000 sq. ft. office building and request for variance from the rear yard setback requirements \ for a building in a Commerical Zone The . proposed location is along the northwest side of SR 507, just south of Mosman Ave. The two story building is proposed for of, fice space, will provide parking for 40 vehicles and will access SR 507 The Plan. I ning Commission will also receive comment , on a variance request from Zoning Setback Requirements of 30 feet to 5 feet for the rear yard. The public hearing for the site-plan and variance request, for the Planning Com mis, sion, will take place Monday March 7, 1994 at Yelm City Hall Council Chambers, 105 Yelm Avenue, Yelm, WA at 4 '00 p.m. Written comments can be addressed to Ci, ty Planning Commission, PO. Box 479 Yelm, WA 98597, or delivered to city hall. Comments must be received prior to the public hearing. A public hearing will be held on Wednes, day, March 9, 1994 by the City Council to receive comment on the variance re' quest. Written comments can be address- ed to City Council, POBox 479, Yelm, WA 98597, and must be received prior to the meeting. if there are questions or more information is requested, please contact Ty Peterson, City Planner, at (206) 458,8408 or at City Hall. Published in the Nisqually Valley News Thursday, March 3 1994 ~ ,ltf$ & ~yal!~t~!!~~Ntw~ YELM, WASHINGTON 98597 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON County of Thurston Fiona Reeves , being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that she/he is the general manager of the Nisqually Valley News, a weekly newspaper That said newspa- per is a legal newspaper and has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the publications hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Thurston County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper Notice of That the annexed is a true copy of Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form) of said newspaper once a week for a period of 1 consecutive weeks, commencing on the 3 day of March 19 94 and ending on the 3 March 94 day of , 19 both dates inclusive and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the 18 00 fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ which amount has been paid in full. ~ ~{l('C'~/ --- .c.. 1/1//1 WI Subscribed ancYtworn to before me this day of / // d ./ fYt?1.YL--( ~ //1~ il / / ",,/ ,/ I , I I<<&(~~ residing at Yelm, Washington. \' ' This form officially sanctioned by the Washington Newspaper Publishers' Association NOTICE OF MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF ...." NON SIGNIFICANCE The City Yelm issued a mitigated deter mination of non significance (MONS) under the State Environmental Policy Rules (Chapter 197,11 WAC) for a 8,000 mil square ft. office building, proposed by Ran- dy Paigen. After review of a completed En, vironmentaJ Checklist and other information on file with the City, the City has determin, ed that after mitigation. this proposal will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. Copiys of the MONS are available at no charge from City Hall, 105 Yelm Avenue W , Yelm, WA. The public is invited to com- ment on this MONS by submitting written comment no later than 3-14-94 to Ty Peterson, at the above address or mailed to POBox 479, Yelm, WA 98597,,; Published in the Nisqually Valley News Thursday March 3, 1994 City of Yelm 105 Yelm Avenue West POBox 479 Yelin, Washington 98597 , (206) 458-3244 MITIGATION FOR 'TIME SQUARE' OFFICE BUILDING SITE-PLAN ENVIRONMEN~AL CHECKLIST: The City of Yelm acting as lead_agency, has ~etermined that the following mitigation will be set forth is a condition of the dete~mination on nonsignificance CONS) The applicant shall contribute financially to the fi.v.e-corners interse~tion improvement and/or Y~2 Alternate as specified in the 1992 Y~lm Comprehensive ~ransportation Plan Contribution ~s based upon the number _of au~omobile trips generated at 't/iis ~it~, i n- the P M' peak hour ContI" i but ion fo'r the proposed use at th i s site shall not exceed t-hree hundred dollars ($300 00) p~r trip The applicant shall agree to submit an agreement waiving any right the applicant might have to protest the formation of a Loc9-1 Improvement District (LIO) or Latecomer's Agreement Appllcants Signature: Date: @' Recycled paper DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal To build a 8,000 square foot commercial building with parking for 40 vehicles. Proponent Randy Paigen Location of proposal) including' street address, if any Frontinq NW side of SR 507 just west of Mosman Avenue. SEC 19 T 17N R2E WM Lead agency City of Yelm The lead agency for thIS proposal has determined t~at it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the envi~onment An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW -1-3 21C 030(2)(c) This decIsIon was made after re'leVv' of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency This information is available to the public on request o There is no comment period for this DNS ~ This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(3), the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date beloh' Comments must be submitted by 1/1~/q4 Responsible official Kathryn M. Wolf Position/title Mayor. City of Yelm Phone 4~g-1?44 Address PO BOX 479 YELM WA 98597 Date 3/1/q4 c:S:bgnature ~c.dI~) .hJ, Pf4 (Optional) o You may appeal this determination to (name) at (location) no later than by (method) You should be prepared to make specific factual objections Contact to read or ash about the procedures for SEPA appeals o There is no agency appeal T\SEPADNS FRM DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal To build a 8,000 square foot commercial building with parking for 40 vehicles. Proponent Randy Paigp.n Location of proposal, including" street address, if any Frontinq NW side of SR 507 just west of Mosman Avenue. SEC 19 T 17N R2E WM Lead agency City of Yelm The lead agency for this proposal has determined t~at it does not have a probable significant adverse Impact on the envi~onment An environmental impact statement (ErS) is not required under RCW 43 21C 030(2) (c) This decision was made after re'levv' of a completed environmental checklist and other information on flIe with the lead agency This information is available to the public on request o There is no comment period for this DNS ~ This DNS IS issued under 197-11-340(3) I the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below Comments must be submitted by 1/1~/q4 Responsible official Kathrvn M. Wolf Position/title Mayor, City of Yelm Phone 4~R-l)44 Address. PO BOX 479 Date 1/1 194 YELM WA 98597 Signature \~~rJ Ji; )f~1 (Optional) o You may appeal this determination to (name) at (location) no later than. by (method) You should be prepared to make specific factual objections Contact to read or ash about the procedures for SEPA appeals o There is no agency appeal. T\SEPADNS.FRM . . ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST CITY USE ONLY FEE' $50 00 OA TE FS-EC/O J 8 Y. /-/;it:. 12.:'1). 0 . FILE NO SPR / ;' 1 //1.( CITY OF YELM ~ 8,ll,CKGROUNC Name of proposed proJect, i i an)' JAM 5 ,Ht, Times Square Building .'~. "t, ~~~ "~'J :\ i= ~ ~ . ,~~'; 2 Name c f app 1 i can t. Randy Paigen 3 Address and phone nt..moer c f aDp i i can t and 0 T any c t her con t =..c t person. P.O. Box 625, Yelm, WA 98597 Phone 458-2751 John Erickson, 120 South 131st pt, Tacoma, WA 98444 531-0206 ~ Date c~eckiist prep=..rec 12/27/93 - Agency reque5ting c~ec~1ist 6 Proposec timing cr sC:1ecLle (i"!ciudir.g pras~ng :\ apo 1 i C2.0 1 e): Start construction as soon as building pennit received. 7 Do you further h a v e a l: 'I 2.ct i'v" ty _..-r"':~ ~ c:..l_ - -- I v! T\.1t-,rs additions to or connected wich e,<oans 10n:i: this proposa1'": . . . .,.. e &.. ~ ec I f yes, ex D 1 a i n No . 8 List any en\/ircnmen:a ii1for"7la:icn been orsoared, or wi:: be pre~ared fOU k'"',cw about tnat ,....=..5 directly related to thiS proposal Previous conditional use permit was granted for similar type building building not constructed. 9 Do you kno~ whetre~ ec=1icaticns are cen~i~g fer Gover~mer:aJ aDprcv:ls of ether p~cacsa1s directly af~ecti~g ~he pr==e:t/ covered by your prc~csa!? If jes explain NO. 10 List any government approvalS or permits that for your proposa 1 if known Condi tional Use Permit (Site plan review) and variance normal building, electrical and plumbing permits. CIT'r' OF YELM E:W-~ONY.ENTAL C:"':EO<LIST forms\sepa 'Niil be neeced P.Ar.:E . I .--'..-~."_h... .___. -4" .. . (.j " ,.~ 11 Give brief. complete cescr ption of your proposal includi~g the proposed uses and the s ze of the prcject and si~e There are several questions later in this checkl ist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal Ycu do net need to repeat those answers on this page Summary of request 12 Locatlon of the proposal Give sufficient information for a persen to understand the precise location or your prcposec project including a street acdres~, if 2.ny and section township and range if known :f 2. prcposai ~cu:d occur over e. range of area pro'l~de the ra'ige or bo,-,nde.ries of the site(s) Provide a lege.! cesor'ption site ;:::lan vicin1t~' mao and topographic mao if reascnab:! avaiiaa"e Yeu need not duplicate naps c,.. deta~lec p'ans suam~:te,j '..n:h any ::erm,: app. icat'ons relatec to this chec~ ii2t Fronting north side of SR 507 just to west of Mosman Avenue. See attached Legal description. ENVI~ON~ENTAL ELEME~TS Earth a General desc~i=ticn 0; tie fiat roiling hili; other generally flat ;:11:e ( r-..;......,.-... Q. - ; ~ - - c-e) =::eep slopes ;ncun~a1nous b What is the steepest sloes on the site percent slope)? 0-2% ( ... ,apprOXlmal..e c What general types of so1:':5 are found cn t.he Sl:e (fe" examp1e clay sand, grave~ peat muck)!:f ycu know t~e classification or agricuit:..:ra1 so;1s scecir), them anc note an~ prime rarmiand See attached Soil Log d Are there surface indicaticns or his~cry of unstable soiis in the immediate vicinity~ If so, describe No :ITi OF YaM ENVIRCNfvENT AL Ch'EO<LIST forms\sepa PAGE. 2 - . _.-. - -~=-' _.~.- -~-,.~- e 'J Descr ibe the purpose type and approximate quanc i ties of any f i i 1 ing or grading proposed Indicate source of f i 1 i It is intended to be a balanced cut and fill--which will be very minimal. f Coulc erosion occur as a result of c1eari0g construction or use? If so, generally describe Nature of soil and slope of site is minimal. Very little, if any, erosion should occur. A.bout what percent of the site will be covered wi:.h impervious surfaces after project construction such as asphalt or buildings? Approximately 55% is covered with asphalt sidewalk and approximately 18% is covered by building. 9 h Proposed measures to reauce or control eraSlon, cr ot~er imoacts to the earth if anv Rough and final grading is done during seasons when heavy rainfall may occur--silt fences will be utilized. Air a What types cf emlssicns ~o t~e 3~i wcuic resul: from :~e prcpasa 1 (i e dust autcmcb~ le exhaust, cdors incustrial wocd s0cke) during construct'cn and when :~e project is ccmpiete.::i? .!.i ani generally cescr-ibe and give apprcxima:e cuantities if known During rough and final grading, dust may occur. This would be minimal. The finished project would have only normal automobile exhaust. b ~re the:e ani cf~-stte 5cu~ces of emissicns cr odor tnc~ may affect veur ~rCDcsa'? _I sc genera-l~ Gescr1=~ NO c Proposed measures to reduce or centrol emissions er other imoacts to air li any. If there is a possibility of dust, the ground will be watered. 3 Water a Surface Water 1) Is there any s~rface water .~OdY .or.w~~~and or or in :~e immedia~e vlc"~it/ or the s1:e (l~ciWCjn; Year-~cunc ana seascnal streams saltwater lakes pends)? If le5 describ~ type a~d previde names State what stream or rlver- it flc\v's inter NO PAC:: 3 CITY' OF YELr-.t E:'NIRCN~"EfiAL a-EG<.LIST ". . 2) Will the project require any work over in or to (within 300 feet) the described waters? please describe and attach avai1able plans adjacent I f yes, No. 3 ) Estimate the amount of fiii and drsage material that placed In or remcved from surface wate, cr and indicate the area of the site that would be Indicate the source cf fill materlai wou 1 d be '...e t i anes affected N/A 4) Will the proposal require surface '.-later diversions? Give generai descr1otion aGproximate quantr~ies if knc'.-ln '",i tharawa 1 s or our pose and No 5 ) Does :he prcposa , i 1 e w i - - n a .CO-year '- ! , 5C r~i-Q. e ~ .0\;- 1:. Ian or the 'S i te an t _ .. c. ';;0ccp;ain~ .iT No 6) Does the procosa; involve any disc~arges of waste materials to surface waters^ ~T sa describe the type of waste and anticipated voiume of discharce No. Storm water from paved parking areas will be routed through bio swales before being discharged into the storm water dispersement system. c ;rO!...:ndwate" i) W ill G r c u n d w ate r t e w 1 t r. era '.-i nor w 1 ~ i "ya t e r b e discharged to grcundwate"-;: Give genera 1 cese:- ipt ~on purpose, and aporoximate quantities if known No 2) Describe the underlying aOUITer with rega~d tc cuali:y and Quantity sensitivity, Drotect~on rec;isrse areas etc The aquifer is designated as a sensitive aquifer. 3) Describe waste material that ~iii be dischargec i~t8 or onto the ground from seotic tanks or ether sources if any (such as c:cmestic se.....aGe: industrial b~proct.:c:s: agricuitural chemicalS) None IT( OF YEU-1 8'lVIRGMENT AL a-iEO<LIST orms\sepa PAGE 4 c ~ ) d ~ Plants a .i .--- ~-_...........~...-..........~...,.. r,. J"' ;.~r ~ .. .t. ... . :l., .-f j -, ';;-j .J": t-.;,::;" ~~' t, Water'Runoff (including storm water)' Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and me t hod 0 f co 11 ec t i on and d i sposa 1 if any ( i ne I ude qua,""tities if knm,m) Where will this '..Jater fio...,? it/iii this water fiow into other wa~ars~ If sc. cescribe Storm water from paved areas will flow through bio filtration swales and then be collected into dispersement trenches. See Civil plans 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface '..Jaters? ~i so generallY cescribe No ProDcsed ~easures tc reduce or contrcl SLrrace and runoff water impacts if any' groc:nc See Civil Storm Plans - , \-[iec:", ar circle types o~ veget.ation ~n ::re s1te r .:: L.. cee i dUQt.j5 t;- ee =sp=n C..:..,,,,,... w, _ , . a'::::::: t tap e r":!..c e'lergree:i tree p~ne .~t-er -Q.....:~"'" __ ,_ _ _ t shr~t5 X .]r:?.s==e~ pa~'C...lre C"O~5 or gr~lns wet soil plants, skunk cabbage, other wa~er plants water liiv other types cf vegetaticn c\::-;e.... " ... cati:ali, but:erc~p bulri..sh eeigra.ss . .. ... .. milial!. b 'tIhat. :"i:lc 2.nc amount cf 'Iegetat:cn wi:: be removed or c d alterec? Native grasses where parking and building will be placed. List neai threatened or the site endangerec species kncwn to be on or None known. P r aposed I andscap i ng me=.sures to pr:ser\'e or ennar:ce vegeta: i ~r en if any A 3-foot landscape border will surround parking area. U-::::> -- c,; nat.ive ., - ~..... p ~cnt..:: or ci::-e!" the sit: oJ Animals a Circle any birds and animals which have been observed en or near tne sit~ or are k~cw~ to be on or ne:= the site birds: hawk. heron duc~s eagle, songbirds other. mamma 1 s: deer bear e i k beaver other: fish: bass salmon, trout, shellfish, other: ':ITY OF YELM EN'r.J.RCt'lvENT.A.L a-tEa<.LIST L"lr::ms~sena PKE.. 5 L i b List any priority, threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site NO'ne mown. c Is the site part of a migratiO'n raute~ ~r so ex~~ain NO' d PrO'pO'sed measures to' preserve or- enhance ',"lid! ire any Not needed. 5 Energy and Natural Resources What kinds of energy (e1ect:ic rs:urai gas G~soiine, heating oil waed solar etc) will be used to meet tne ccmp1etec project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating manufacturing trarscartatlon etc u Wouie energy .y 0 \-:i-' bv or~cje'::t ac~acent a':~ec: . " DC:e-:ir.-:e, 1_:5e c.p: so~e~r :"""I.....,.....~O...-~.-~? ~t_~_ ~ c_. .!..T" so cenera'f'/ describe NO' c IHnat Kl~ds cf energy ccnserva:icn features are inclucec in the plans of tho'':: procesa!? '-1st O:iier prooosed measures to' reduce or ccnt~c energy 1mpacts if any. Building will meet O'r exceed WashingtO'n State Energy CO'nservatiO'n CO'des and requirements. Environmental Health a Are there any environmen:a ,ea 1 th ha:::s"'Gs, i IC i ud - rg e,posur~ t~ tc~ic cremic~!s risk cr f~re end expics1cn splll.:: of ha=ardcus ~aste :nat cau'd occ~r as a resu-t of this proposal? If so describe NO' 1 ) Describe sceclal reculred Standard Fire and Police protection of building. emergenc~ serVlces ~na: miGht te 2) Proposed meas,"" es health hazards if to ""~r' '-"Q. ; -_:-~- cr- c=rtroi en~/ ~ I" onrr:er t 2. any. None needed. b Noise 1) What types of noise eX1S~ in the area which may affect your project (for examole' :raffic, equipment operation, other-)? Traffic nO'ise from SR 507 will exist, but not be detrimental to' this prO'ject. :ITY CF YELM ENVIRONl-AENT Al crEG<L!S7 orms \sepa, PAGE 6 " ''; ~...... 2) What types and levels of noise would be created b~ cr associated with the project on a short-term or a lcng- term basis (fer e~ample traffic corst~~ct-c- eoeratien other)~ Indicate what heurs noise wo~ld cc~e from the site Grading equipment--fork lifts during construction occurring at normal daylight working hours. 3) Proposed ~easures to ~educe er centrol noise i~pacts any Restrict construction work hours to normal daytime hours. 2 Land and Shoreline Use a What is t'le c....rrent use of ene site and e.r:::jacent properties"" Vacant -- S.R. 507 to east and old Burlington right of way to west. b Has '.... ~:Ie 5,o:e been used - ~- ! .~ I . - m"r~era: ex c a '/ a tic ;"1 2.;:--1c-.:1:.,-,:e cr No ~crestry? sc. descP""~be c Descrlbe sn'l ~:~~c:~~es en t~e S1~e None d Ni11 any 5:r~C:~-=5 be demol;shec~ r.: sc '..Jn2. ':. ~ No e ..1'- _ '- rtl : C. ..... s,te? 1 5 ...:,e C!-il-ent ccmcrehens;ve clan de:- .; '~:"'ia: .; .~n cf ::~e I What 15 t-e c_rren~ zcnl~S C~~5S1f1cat~cn of :~e ~,:~ g .1.. i app 1 i cab ~ e ,..;ha t prcgram designation of is l....i:e cL.irrer:t the site? 5ho;eline mas:er N/A h :-l-- , . c:.;: any Dait the site been classified as c. natur=.l resource c-iticai area? !f so specify or en'/~ ronment2.1"1 I SeriSi:~ Acproximately how man" ccmoleted project~ PQ,",~1Q __U!_ i.VC:....: ; C res~de cr \ycrl< , ~ . I ;- ,-"" 20 to 30 .J Aporo~imately hew many pecple wculd the como'eted <Jrcject c~splace? None k Proposed impacts measures if any: to avoid er reduce displacer:ient N/A ...:lTY' OF YEU1 5WIROI'I'€'ITAL C-:Ea<lIST PAGE 7 ... . i Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any' B2 office use is compatible with commercial zoning. 9 Housing a Aooroximately how many units would be provided if any? Indicate whether high mid~-e or lew-income housing N/A b Approximately hCw many ~n-:s. el iminated? :ndicate whether high i f any middle or \-.'ould ce low-income housing N/A c Proposed meaSLres if any to reduce 1"'- ~, cenerOI housing imoacts N/A .,..., ! \...) Aesthetics a What is the taliest he~Ght c- nc~ including antennas wn~: bUi1dirg material!s) prc~cse~ Approximately 35 feet. a~Y propcsed s~ructure's) 1= the principal exterict' b Wha: \I~e\"':: in the immed~5te -:,CiiiiCV wc\..:'d De altered cr costructed? Any b~ld~g will alter what can be seen from adjacent properties, but no major vlstas come across the property. c Proposed me~SL.res to r-eCLce c contr.'J aest~.et~c 1mpac:.s if any' Building was designed with stepping sloped roofs to provide more human scale. 1 1 Light and Glare a What type o~ What t~ii1e of lign: or Glare ~ill the orc;:csal cat would it ma~iily occ~r? ;"Jtcc'-ce-: Normal building and parking lot lighting. b Could light or glare from t;"',e finishec project te a safety hazard or interfere with views~ No :ITY OF YEL.M ~AL C.!..iEO<LIST forms\sepa P.~GE 8 .', ... :. :::~ r~ ".. c What existir.g orf-site sources or light or glare may affect your proposal? None d Proposed measures to reduce or cantrol !i~nt anc g:are impacts, if any Arrange lighting to avoid hot spots and direct light inward. ;2 Recreation a What designated and infe~mal recreat~c-al c=oort~n;t;s~ are in the 'mmeciate vicln~ty? Thurston County Parks & Recreation b use of old railroad right of way. Wculd the prcqosed ~roject u;~~ recreational uses? ~- so describe 3.~: .'2 an'l exi-::-:'""';; No. c Prooosed mee.sures tc reduce er ccn:ro1 ""Dacts or prc"l::e r~c"'ea:ion oocortunit;e~ Potential off hours use of parking for access to future bike and jogging trails. Historic and Cultural Preservation a ~re there any place~ cr c=jects 1 i~:.e~ ~.., .~, propcsea T.::: r:aticna1 st:.te or 1cc:=.1 p==sE;\;::tion reglsters known tc be en cr nex~ tc the site? _i so GenerallY describe No b Ge:,e"'ally cesc-ibe ar:y landmar~s cr eV'1ce'ice or historic archec:ogical scie~tific or c~ltur=l ~mDc;tance hnown to be en cr next tc tre si:e None known. c ..... ' rrcao~ec me=sures t~ re..::""!ce ~'" ..... c:::r;ti~ "1 "~~a.cts i f ar- / N/A :4 Transportation a Identify sidewalks trails pubiic streets and high\.,ays ser'v~"":!;; the site ana des~ribe proposec ac::ess to the evisting street sys~em Shew en site ="ans if any Hwy 507 to the east b 1- :~te cLlirerlt..> mea;s~ If rot wnat served ~y public :rs.ns;t" 8~.1 '"ha~ Dians exist for tr:ns~t service? No. However, transit service is wi thin 1 mile of the site. c :-:Q'... mar:y par!-<1ng spaces wou:c the completed project have? Hcw many would the project eliminate? NThe completed pr9j~ct would have 43 parking spaces one woUld be eliiilinated. . :::ITY OF YaM 8.'VIRCN'v.ENT AL a-EXLIST PAGE 9 . - , ~ 16 c d Will the proposal require any new sidewalks trails roads or streets, or inprovements to existing sidewalks. trails, roads or streets not including dr'~eways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether pUblic or private) Those as required by City of Yelm. e Will the project of) 'N ate r .. Go i ~ describe use (or ccc~r in the lmmea,ate or air transportat.ion'" If so vici<1ity genera 11 y No .: I How many veh~c~lar trios per the completed project" If volumes would occ~r cay wcuid be generatec by vnown indlcate wh~n peal< See attached traffic study. 9 Prccosed impacts ~e.a.5ur8S tc red~ce cr c1Jntrol tr.ansocrtat ~Cti i- any Utilize standard City of Yelm Access Point to SR 507. Public Services _ Would the projec: ~esult ir ~~ ,icreased neec for services (Fe.... e,(amo:e '"'ire protection, protection ~ea!th care scneols ether)? gener a 11 y dese ~ ~ be Yes. Any building requires fire protection. 'This building's construction and use will be pub 1 i e pc I i ee ~l so and police low hazard demand. b Proocsed measures to reduce or centrol direct imoac:s en pub i i e se:\! ices if any Adhere to fire, building, electrical and mechanical codes, adequate security lighting and fire protection. Utilities a Circle utilities electricit elephone currently available at the site rai gas @-ceC) @ruse serv:~ sanitary sewe~ septic system ether Oeser ~be th.e us" 1 it ies th=.t are prooosed ror the project the utility O"O\flClng the servcce anc ...;-,~ General construct"on activities on the site or in t~e immec'ate vicinity whlcn mlght be neeced Water - City of Yelm Telephone - Yelm Telephone S:GNATURE l- '..J Electricity - Puget Power The above answers !<-noW' 1 edge them to make and complete to the best cf my t the City of Yelm is relying on ~,..Q C::. _ Signature: Date Submitte P-~ . ~, ~1 I PAGE 10 CTIY OF YaM ENVIRCrM:NTAL C-EO<LIST forms\sepa ~?~;.;i/~~)'~:i:( i1' ~ 3:" '~""',~~ ",":",,? .'--'-.....--_.._,.,.~~,_.....-.." ~....:.'.., ~~._'..' ".., "..~ '~';'~"......~~,- .--.....--.--.-...-.-..-.- .._..~ .....:...- ----...~. ;""", ,i", ,.! SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Do not use this sheet for project act;ons ) '.",hen answering these Questions. be 2'..Jare cf tr,e extent of tre proposal. or ene types of activities lii<ely to result frcm the proposal, \Houl.oj affect tne item a.t a greater ;ntensl~Y or C.I~ a faster rate cnan if the prcoosal were not imple::Jented Respond oriefly and in general terms "\ How would the proposal be likel;! to increase discharge water. emissions tc air. production. storage or release toxic or hazardous substances. or production of nOlse? to -~ 'oJ , Proposed measures :0 avoid or reduce such increases are .:.. Hc~ would the proposal be likely to affece p ant= fish. or marIne l;fe? animals Proposed fish or measures tc protect marine life are: cr conser've ::iants anirr.a"s ~ How would the proposal be likely to de~lete e~e-gy cr na:~ra res::::urces? Proposed measures to protect or conserve ene-gy and natural resources are. ~ How would the propcsal be likely to use or affect crit1ca cr env~ronmentallv sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under studY) for governmentai prctecticn suc~ as parks. wilderness I,vild and sce'lic river: t"ireatened or endangered soecies nabitat historic or cu'twral sites wetlands. floodplains or natural resource areas? Y OF YE.M ENVIR~Al a-Ea<LIST ~~~ ~CU:"t~ P.A.GE 11 ~'f ~,__~~~~<,-,-.~",,,,,,.,_,,,,""~.~"-:~""6 __.. _. .. ~ , ......t. ., ...... Proposed measures to protect such resources or reduce impacts are' to avo i.,<t. or 'J". ,;,"-._ : ~.: ~ ... '-' Ho~ ~ould the proposal ae likely to affect use including whether it would allo~ or shoreline uses incompatibie with existinG land and shoreline encourage 1 and or plans? ProDosed measures to avoid or reduce sho~eline and land use impacts are 6 How would the prooesai ~.o c.._ 11keiy ..,., 'J ..., ~ -c:--ea5e demands en transoortat1cn or pub1ic 5er\/ ices 2.nd :/1..';j~;"~~~""" _l... I ' ,... __ Proposed meas~res to ~ecwce cr resocnd to 5UC~ cemanc(s) a~e - i Identify i~ possible ~hether ~ne prcccsal may conflict W1~i local state or J:=-rQ.i'~'" 1.___ _ jaws cr reau"~ements for :. "ie protection of the enJ1rOnme~t CJ..lY OF YaM ENVIRONvENT Al crEC-<LIST farms\sepa p AG.: 12 .f .R!1-l-e4-1 Sg3 (J9. 34 FRCM ~-R'~ I CA T I TLS __'"1.. Y 1..J i I I. ~Hl'aI'! ';.. :3 CHWJU C o:<..en Ho : ~54:'7 ?.A.C:! l:O.. FO'tJ~ r:1~~ 'L.\}n~ ?.Z7~Z!j 1"0 a~~~!:t :~ ~=~";>.:r:;:D :::1 ':X:2 S7A'!'::: 07 "'ri;\~jH:~'lG:'C:-:, COu~rr:: 07 T:{"J::tZ1'O~ ..\..~D 15 O~:;C~!22!) ..~ :'e~:'=:rtZ; ~i3 :JC:07H :'00 .F~~ c:; "::-!A':' p~ 07 ~EZ TI:'::'::&~ 1~ ?L~;-'!:a OO:ii\T!C::r c~'\:x NO. ;s." TaWH~Hr1 ~:: iOX'"!:!, !{......\l'1GZ 2 Hr;.:rr I ~1 t l! t Ll'~~lC 50t,..j"':':ni'3ST~~L'1 (;7 ,.:::.t;;r::"~ ReAD :~CW~! ri3 ~--:'!..::J<. c'Ov-:: ~01\.D T'\H'O NCRT1~ C~ 1fC!"{':'{ :.:~{Z OF O;\Clt>Ji.n ?;\..;.'"t1{, A.CC~~:;::;~C 70 ~~~ :::~,,"= -:1!::n.sOJ" 1 U::~:1!~Z:: !ii '.,"Ow-=iZ i OF ?!..;::-~, ~.H.C= ; 7 :./= :::{ ~ru~S't=M ~:;~f:'''1, w~sa::~G~o:-{. 1(I...t ~ :. ~~5 ?~vai :5:73 ':ill1 1:C .?~:?7eS~'04~ AJI'III.d':I ... --~:::...~..:.:._--~~-' T:::W'1 ..- "-" :....:.....;:...... ....., ..".~, .,-,,,,-'. I 1:)':: \ !: I' TCTRL P e2 .' I) -;'o;>""i (,. 'R~ \.1 ',:,.-l.-I- 'I "t..0 ~~ '7 Sl-( ~~-r~'1 M. ice ~ w N'\. . L o';'\?e..~-r "3) S co-r . . 6 ~ '-i,€\-l- "-f M ~ I. 0...1 N\. 'S -e C>~ ~ c::; , l...1 ~ -r- 0 - Sel L. L.O~~ - i ~ ~ . ~~ . '_,,"'~U"~""<"_ .~:~.,:~r,.>>~,~",';.. c) -r-:>> 'Z-.C,., 2~ ~.. ~2." IO'"""!:"'" ~. I~D ""t:'~ Si - o -r'o z.so. :z.~ ,.. 4-:". L"3.'. -r~ S~ s~ . .c.....21..~ , J ~_~\! ~ . "^~\U~ , , .:...~~~ ../0 ~~ \ ~ ,,1\. t~. . ~i .'" rJ, Jf~.~ rl' . 'I:' ~, .;.~: ~}McGOVERN\ S 'J.~~ii ~\~,'~,Dr 131 STREET'.'!}:. 98444'~'r. 06' February 11, 1994 City of Yelm P.o. Box 479 Yelm, WA 98597 Re: Time Square Environmental Checklist Attn: Ty Peterson, City Planner Dear Mr. Peterson: Please include this with our Environmental Checklist as an attachment for the additional information you have requested. PAGE 1: PAGE 2: PAGE 3: PAGE 5: PAGE 6: PAGE 7: PAGE 8: ITEM 5: The agency requesting checklist is the City of Yelm. ITEM 8: We are unaware of any environmental information to be prepared for this proposal. ITEM 11: The description of proposal is: Construct a 2-story office complex approximately 8,000 square feet on a 24,393 square foot lot. ITEM 12: Measures to reduce erosion: will comply with Drainage & Erosion Control Manual for the City of Yelm. ITEM 3d: Proposed measures to reduce water impacts: will comply with the Drainage & Ero?ion Control Manual for the C1ty of Yelm. ITEM 6a: Energy and resources to be used are electricity and natural gas for lighting and heating. ITEM 8e & f: Current comprehensive plan is commercial for the site and zoning is C-1 Commercial. ITEM 8h: The site has a designated underlying critical aquifer. ITEM lOa: The building material will be wood siding. .J.\" 1. r" ''t-.~' ':~,:. "';; city of Yelm February 11, 1994 Page 2 PAGE 9: iTEM lId: If exterior building security lighting is used, it will be directed toward the sidewalk with an asymmetrical light pattern. If parking lot lighting is used, it will be an average of one (1) footcandle with a cutoff luminare with asymmetrical light pattern to reduce light impact off the property. PAGE 10: ITEM 14f: Vehicular trips as reported in traffic study is 208 TPD. If this does not clarify your questions, please feel free to call me at 531-0206. Sincerely, < (!fJtll~ ~ Cynthia Black CBjms ] ERICKSON. McGOVERN ARCHITECTS 120 SOUTH 131 STREET TACOMA, WA 98444 (206) 531. 0206 .. " --~.~-.-.~ -r.-.....-.,."-""7;----;-.,~:-----,-:-~~;_..:_.~........__;::.:o.=.;;c;:__...:o..._....- i: ....'. i- _ \...._..i.'-..~~ V" ~ :, :'~::. ... ciry'of' Yelm " 105 Yelm A venue West POBox 479 Yelm, Washington 98597 (206) 458-3244 MITIGATION FOR 'TIME SQUARE' OFFICE BUILDING SITE-PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: The City of Yelm, acting as lead agency, has determined that the following mitigation will be set forth as a condition of the determination on nonsignificance CONS) The applicant shall contribute financially to the five-corners intersection improvement and/or Y-2 Alternate as specified in the 1992 Yelm Comprehensive Transportation Plan. Contribution is based upon the number of automobile trips generated at this site in the P M peak hour Contribution for the proposed use at this site shall not exceed three hundred dollars ($300 00) per trip The applicant shall agree to submit an agreement waiving any right the applicant might have to protest the formation of a local Improvement District (LID) or Latecomer's Agreement Appl icants Si9nat1reG G ":::J Da te: '2 - I ( - or @ Recycled paper ~ I I I I:' ~\ I, I'.' , 1 " I I', ~." .. I,:. ~, .> I I I I I I I I I I I / /' /' /' /' /' /' /' /-1/ /!/ / /' /' /' /' /' ~ \ ~/ \~ / ~ ~ Site Plan Figure 3 ~0~...~.~.'t>:::::'!:'.c.t:"'.:'::it~~"""""~"""~1;l~~'~\:.."'! ."..~'t1'l"":"~~~"""r~~--:-"""'I"""'.:"",,..~..~...-;;~-:::;:o;.,,<='~-,",,,--:~-';"~';::':'..0-:' ._;..~ -.~'.. ,~..:...-=...,..._........... ..........~~~..~.. .~. ""M"'...._:..........-. I"~"~ . \f~~~t~~::i ~,i\ :if;~~i;~;~ ;/;:~;;~,:;&;;f::i:::i.!;;S, '::~ii;t~~:::;i';t;~;i i;;:~,L. .. .j'" ~l~~: ;~:';:;~r.::ijl~tT~~ ~~IY::;;c~' , r .ty~; ~'-;::'fr,~:2if''''''-'::)\''t:,:~"t:'';:'-'::.\:~Z'' :';'~:?,::: __ ~~~*_;~~~), ,'.-'\'f';':/;~;[. ,;;.~:~;\: "".'." f~~;, ' ,,~-1XI '-: - 'l 0' .:. e' m' ,I' ',.,. :.,<' <',-."':; :) J. - .~.:.' ~~. ~ ~,~.e f,,", ", \' .:: l,'~" J".:"k~~~'''''~'!.-;i:,.~:'~:::Jo.<-:;!.~ ~~j" : Q, rrt ,- , YELM WASHINGTON 105Yelm Avenue West PO Box479 Yelm, Washington 98597 - (206) 458-3244 February 14~ 1994 Johan Oye, P.E. 12202 Pacific Avenue South Tacoma, WA 98444 RE: TIMES SQUARE OFFICE BUILDING Dear Johan: The City of Yelm's Engineering Department has reviewed the preliminary drainage report and plans for the above referenced project and has the following comments: DRAINAGE REPORT 1. It appears that the storage facilities for this project have been sized utilizing 3,000 cubic feet of storage provided per acre. Please understand that the minimum requirements (which are in place at this time) are: 6,000 cubic feet per acre bf impervious area and 3,000 cubic feet per acre of disturbed area. The drainage manual is currently under revision at the county level and once the revised manual has been adopted for use (county wide), the City of Yelm will review the revised manual and determine what, if any changes are required prior to adoption by the city council. The latest revision does allow for a "lessening" of the storage requirements based on infiltration rate; for example: at 20 inches per hour - the storage minimums will be 3,000 cubic feet per acre of impervious and 1,000 cubic feet per acre of disturbed area. 2. Several variance requests have been granted recently to allow for the use of the proposed "reduced" storage minimums. The variance process is administrative in nature and is described in the drainage manual. In all of the requests thus far~ the proponent has. been required to provide the city engineer (drainage administrator) with the results of infiltration tests as described in Appendix L of the drainage manual.' This has been required to substantiate the use' of higher infiltration rates (greater than 6 inches per hour). It is likely that, as a condition of variance approval, a similar requirement will be made of you - should you decide to pursue utilizing the "reduced" storage requirements as cited above. Engineering Department Page 1 * : 'i,~'" ~;\t:, .,.; ':.:.'. ~c>,cledpaper _ J' ;:_.:; '- '~r . ~ l!<: ~', .~ ~r 3. ..,. ;~:~,:.,;J~~.":~".i, !t!it't.i)\:: ,\, '\ ',~'!i'~~l~~tl~;!(;;'!5i'~i~j", <' ";' 'c, , "'" .... vari;ancetLteques~ is: .not, made arid approval of,- the, 'request is .not granted prior to the public hearing for ~this-'" project, this department shall 'make a recommendation to the, planning department for CONDITIONAL approval only. Should a variance not be grant~d ~or this project, then the 6,000/3,~00 minimum requirements shall apply. \',i. If you have any questions, -please contact the' City of Yelm; s Engineering Department at (206) 458-8816. ~. Mark R. Cook Assistant City Engineer cc: Shelly Badger, Ty Peterson Dennis Cochran, P.E. 2626 12th Court SW Olympia, WA 98502 Randy paigen POB 625 Yelm" WA 98597 Erickson McGovern Architects 120 South l~lst Str~et Tacoma, WA 98444 Engineering Department Page 2 , ,- ~c~i~ \. .- .'f,.Y: .~ .' , .. McGOVERN S 131 STREET 98444 06 February 11, 1994 City of Yelm P.O. Box 479 Yelm, WA 98597 Re: Time Square Environmental Checklist Attn: Ty Peterson, City Planner Dear Mr. Peterson: Please include this with our Environmental Checklist as an attachment for the additional information you have requested. PAGE 1: PAGE 2: PAGE 3: PAGE 5: PAGE 6: PAGE 7: PAGE 8: ITEM 5: The agency requesting checklist is the City of Yelm. ITEM 8: We are unaware of any environmental information to be prepared for this proposal. ITEM 11: The description of proposal is: Construct a 2-story office complex approximately 8,000 square feet on a 24,393 square foot lot. ITEM 12: Measures to reduce erosion: Will comply with Drainage & Erosion Control Manual for the City of Yelm. ITEM 3d: Proposed measures to reduce water impacts: will comply with the Drainage & Erosion Control Manual for the Clty of Yelm. ITEM 6a: Energy and resources to be used are electricity and natural gas for lighting and heating. ITEM 8e & f: Current comprehensive plan is commercial for the site and zoning is C-1 Commercial. ITEM 8h: The site has a designated underlying critical aquifer. ITEM lOa: The building material will be wood siding. City of Yelm February 11, 1994 Page 2 PAGE 9: iTEM 11d: If exterior building security lighting is used, it will be directed toward the sidewalk with an asymmetrical light pattern. If parking lot lighting is used, it will be an average of one (1) footcandle with a cutoff luminare with asymmetrical light pattern to reduce light impact off the property. PAGE 10: ITEM 14f: Vehicular trips as reported in traffic study is 208 TPD. If this does not clarify your questions, please feel free to call me at 531-0206. St;~: & Cynthia Black CB/ms ERICKSON. McGOVERN ARCHITECTS 120 SOUTH 131 STREET TACOMA, WA98444 (206) 531.0206 ,..~; '; ~.' ."'-, Ii' A BACKGROUND CITY USE ONLY FEE' $50 00 DA TE R~)1/ D /J ' BY //~ <<Cf ~/1/f; FILE NO .s?~ /{J. . Wi! fjtJ 7 Il.:J;j) Ji f'J ,....~,' I.'? tt\\ d t!:J} CITY OF YELM ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Times Square Building JAM 5 i~94 rf">.'~ 'VA '1:;: \I.t'~'t ru" {0 ,\ ~ :J ",,;, V ~'__,\\V/U Name of proposed oroJect, if any 2 Name of applicant Randy Paigen 3 Address and phone n~mber of applicant and or any other con:ac: person P.O. Box 625, Yelm, WA 98597 Phone 458-2751 John Erickson, 120 South 131st pt, Tacoma, WA 98444 4 Date checklist prepared 12/27/93 531-0206 5 Agency ~eque5t'ng checklist 6 Proposed Liming cr sCiecule (i,cludlng phasing 'f apa 1 i C3.0 1 e). Start construction as soon as building permit received. 7 Do you further If yes, have anv activit! exolain s"ans r" ~ ~ V! fut~re additlons to or connected with expans, on Oi- this proposal"" ''''e~2~ted No. 8 Llst any environmen:a1 lnforma:ion (OU kr'1oW about tnat ""'as been preoared or wlll be prepared directly related tc th,s proposal Previous conditional use permit was granted for similar type building -- building not constructed. 9 Do you know whet~er aoplicaticns are cendlng for covernmer:al approv~ls of other proposa13 dlrect~y affectlng the proaerty covered by your proeosal? If jes exolaln NO. 10 L,st any government approvals or permits that wlll be neeced for your proposal if known Conditional Use Permit (Site plan review) and variance normal building, electrical and plumbing permits. CITY OF YELM ENVIRONVENTAL C~ECKLIST P~GE forms\sepa 'Q 11 Give brier complete descriptlon of your proposal lncluding the proposed uses and :he s1=e of the project and site There are several questions later in this checkl 1st that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal You do not need to repeat those answers on this page Sunnnary: of"tequest 12 Locatlon of the proposal Give sufficient ,nrormation for a person to understand the precise location of your prcposed project includlng a street address if any' and section townsh1p and range 1f known =f a proposal Nould occur over c. range of area provide the range or boundar1es of the slte(s) Provide a legal descr'ption site plan vicinit" map and topographic ~ap if reasonably avai:ab-e You need not duplicate maps or detailed plans suomi~ted Wl:n any permit appllcat'ons related to thiS chec~llst Fronting north side of SR 507 just to west of Mosman Avenue. See attached Legal description. o ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Earth a General descri=tlon or t~e s~te (circ e c~e) flat rolling hili; s:eep slopes mountainous other generally flat b Wha tis percent the steepest s lop e ) ? 0- 2% slope on the site (approXlmate c What general types of so115 are found cn the Sl:e example clay sand, grave peat muck)?:f you know classification of agt-icultural SO'iS soecif', them rote any prlme farmland See attached Soil Log ( f o~.. the anc d Are there surface indlcations or soiis In the immediate Vlclnity~ history of unstable If so, describe No CITY OF YELM ENVIRONMENTAL CHEO<LIST forms\sepa PAGE 2 e Describe the purpose type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed Indicate source of f ill It is intended to be a balanced cut and fill--which will be very minimal. f as a result of clear10g If so, generally describe si te is minimal. Very little, if any, erosion g Could erosion occur construct10n or use? Nature of soil and slope of should occur. About what percent of the site will be covered with 1mpervious surfaces after project construction such as asphalt or buildings? Approximately 55% is covered with asphalt sidewalk and approximately 18% is covered by building. h reouce or control erosion, or ot~er if any done during seasons when heavy rainfall may utilized. Proposed measures to imoacts to the earth Rough and final grading is occur--silt fences will be 2 Air a What types of em1ssions to the air wculd resul~ from :~e proposa 1 (, e dust automoo 11 e exhaust, odors industrlal wood snoke) durlng construct'on and when :he project 15 completed? If any, G.;enerally describe and give approximate quantities lf known During rough and final grading, dust may occur. This would be minimal. The finished project would have only normal automobile exhaust. b Are there an; off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your cr~Dosal? :f so genera-Iy descrice NO c Prooosed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to alr 1f any If there is a possibility of dust, the ground will be watered. 3 Water a Surface Water 1) Is there any sur~ace water body or wet!and on or in ~ne lmmedla~e VIC"01tj of the site (including year-'ounc and seasonal stree.ms saltwater lakes ponds)? If les descrloe type a~d prOvide names State what stream or rlver it flows ,nto? NO CITY OF YELM ErNIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST forms\sepa PAGE 3 -..- - ---_._~._---..__._"""=.,...._.:-_-==-~- _.__..._--._...,-~-....- . ->...--.. -....- --,-,._,~...._-._- 2) Will the p~oject requlre any work over in or to (within 300 feet) the described waters? please describe and attach a';ailable plans adjacent If V<=>c:: .I '-"-, No. 3 ) Estimate would be wetlands affected the amount or fili e.nd drecge material that placed In or removed from surface water or and indicate the area oT the site that would be Indicate the source cf fill material N/A 4 ) Will the proposal require surface ".Jater diversions? G,ve general descriotlon aoproxlmate quantities IT known I,.nthdra'.-Jals or purpose and No 5 ) Does the proposal lie Within a "OO-year floodplaln~ so note elevation on the site p an If No 6) Does the prooosal Involve any discnarges of waste materials to surface waters~ If so describe the type of waste and anticiDated volume of d'scharge No. Storm water from paved parking areas will be routed through bio swales before being discharged into the storm water dispersement system. b 3roundwater' 1) Will groundwater be wltndrawn or WIll water be disCharged to groundwate,? ;:lve general description purpose, and aporoximate quantities if known No 2) Describe the underlying aquifer with regard to quality and quantity sensitivity, Drotection recnarge areas etc The aquifer is designated as a sensitive aquifer. 3) Describe waste materlal that Will be discharged irtc cr onto the ground from septiC tan~s or other sources if any (such as domestic sewage. industrlal Qvproducts. agricultural chemicals) None CITY OF YEu'v1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHEO<LIST forms\sepa PAGe. 4 c Water Runoff (including storm water) Descrlbe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal if any (include quantities lf ~nO\Nn) Where will this water fio",'; ltiill this water flow into other waters~ If so cescrlbe Storm water from paved areas will flow through bio filtration swales and then be collected into dispersement trenches. See Civil plans 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? ~f so generally oeseribe No ...J U ProDosed ~eSSLlres to reduce or contrel sLlrface ground and runoff water impacts if any See Civil Storm Plans 4. Plants a '-I.....,o,rl.. ~li__i"\ or circle types o~ \egetaticn fCL~C on the site d~ciduous tree e\/ergreen tree shrubs X Jrasses a'der lao e o~~ =~soen ethe.... f ;".. cedar pine Gt-er pasture crops or gralns wet soil plants cattail, butr.ercup bulrush skunk cabbage, other water plants water lily eelgrass mllfoll other other types of vegetatlon b What "ind altered? and 2. m 0 u n t c f '! e get at' 0 n w ill be rem 0 v e d 0 r Native grasses where parking and building will be placed. c Llst threatened or near the site endanger eo species known to be on or None known. d Proposed messures landscaping use 0" native plants to preserve or ennance veget2:i~r en or the j-' o ,..ner site if any A 3-foot landscape border will surround parking area. 5 Animals a Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are ~ncwn to be on or nes: the site birds other mammals fish bass hawk. heron ducks eagle, songbirds deer. bear elk salmon, trout beaver other shellfish other' CITY OF YELM ENVIRa~NTAL CHECK.LIST rorms\sepa PAGE 5 b List any priority, threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site None known. c Is the sIte pari:, of a mig("atlon rOLlte.'" ":"1 so pv,", I~-;l'''' No d s Proposed measures to oreserve er enhance '.v'lldlife any ~ T Not needed. Energy and Natural Resources What kinds of energy (electric natural gas gasoline, heating ei 1 wood, solar etc ) wlll be used to meet the comp lei:ec project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heatlng manufacturing transcertat10n etc o Would yO\.H pro.Ject a~fect :ne oetent~a" use Of sOlar energy by adjacent descrlbe prcpe"":";es? Tf so cenera l ~ 'I No c wnat Klnds of energy conservaticn features are incluced in the plans of th's prooosa!? ,-ist other proposed measures to reduce or contrel energy impacts if any Building will meet or exceed Washington State Energy Conservation Codes and requirements. 7 Environmental Health a Are there any enVlronmen:a nealth hazards, i:lclud~ng e-posure to tO~lC chemicals risk of Tire and explOSion spill~ of hazardous waste that could occur as a resu"t of this proposal? If so describe b 1) No 1 '\ , " " '- r..nat. might Describe special required Standard Fire and Police protection of building. t:';e emergenc~ serVlces 2) control Proposed meas'-.:res health hazards if None needed. en'l ~ ronrr:en ta to ~pr! 1-;:::' . ..... ....;-"-'- cr any Noise What types of nOise exist your project (for examole other)? Traffic noise from detrimental to this project. in the area which may affect traffic, equipment operation. SR 507 will exist, but not be CITY OF YELM ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLISi forms\sepa P AC-E 6 2) What types and levels of nOlse would be created by or assoc:ated w~t~ the project on a short-term or a long- term basis (fer example trafflC cors~rLct"~- oaeratlon other)~ Indicate what hours nClse wOL.ld co~e from the site Grading equipment--fork lifts during construction occurring at normal daylight working hours. 3) Proposed ~easures to ~educe or centrol nOise i~pacts any Restrict construction work hours to normal daytime hours. a Land and Shoreline Use a What lS r.ne properties" to west. c~rrent use or the sIte and . . (3(J J seen T.. Vacant -- S.R. 507 to east and old Burlington right of way b Has the site been used --=_10""0 ! '-t I miner3.1 exca'/& t 1 C,'1 agriculture or No forestry? ..1..' so desc;~be c Descrlbe sn'/ s:r~ttLres en t~e Site None d Wl11 an~ 5truct~:re3 be demol-shed~ If so \,.;hat...., No e What is the cL.r:-ent comcrehens1v'e clan deslgna;:.":m of :r,e Site? i What IS t~e c~rren~ zanlng c;~~s:ficat~cn of the 31:e 9 1.. ;- app 1 ~ cab 1 e wha t program designation 15 the current of the sire" shoreline mas:er N/A h He.s any oar t of the site c r i t i ca l' or specify been classified as a natural en/lronmentall, sensit~ e resource area? If so Aoproximately ho~ many peoo1e wow Ie res~de or wcrk " rrp ce~oleted proJect~ 20 to 30 .J Aporoximately how many people wcuid the como'eted oroject d~splace? None k Proposed impacts measures if any: to avoid or reduce displacerr.ent N/A CITY OF YEL/v1 ENVIRONMENTAL C;...,ECKLIST forms\sepa PAGE 7 Proposed measures to ensure the proposal 1S compatible with eX1sting and projected land uses and plans if any B2 office use is compatible with commercial zoning. 9 Housing a Aporox1mately how many Ind1cate whether hlgh un1ts would be provlded lf any? mlCC e or low-income hous1ng N/A b Approximately how many un1~s eliminated? =ndicate whether nigh housing i f any middle or \..,' 0 u "1 d be lOw-income N/A c Proposed measures to reduce cr control housing lmoacts if any N/A 10 Aesthetics a What is the taiiest he'ght cr- not inclL,d~ng antennas, \--;ne-.: bUlldirg mater1a:(s) propesea Approximately 35 feet. ani proposed structure's) ~~ the pr~nc,pal exterior b Wha~ Vlews ln the immediate lCln,tj wou'd be altered or obstructed? Any building will alter what can be seen from adjacent properties, but no major vistas come across the property. o Proposed meaSLores i:O ,eaLoce c con;:r-o aestretio lmpac':.s 1 f any Building was designed with stepping sloped roofs to provide more human scale. 1 1 Light and Glare a What type of What tlme of tlgn~ or glare ~ll' the proposal dal would it ma'n"1y occur? ;')('odL...ce'i Normal building and parking lot lighting. b Could light or glare from ene finished project be a safety hazard or interfere wlth views~ No CITY OF YELM ENVIRONMENTAL CYECKLIST forms\sepa P.A.GE 8 . _._" ____" .;....:..-" ..:';~~""';'.ol.:""~",- c What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d Proposed measures to recuce or cont,ol ! iqnt and g iare imcacts, 1 f any Arrange lighting to avoid hot spots and direct light inward. 12 Recreation a What designated and informal rec,eat,c~a' CCDort~n,t'e~ are in the 'mmedlate vicinity? b use of old railroad right of way. Would the proQosed pr'oJect Thurston County Parks & Recreation :J 1 3D ! 2.c,e an'l eXl'3..~~,;: res rea t ion a IUS e s ? 1.:- so oj e s c r,b e No . c Proposed measures to reduce or ccntrol i'r10.3.Cts or provi::e recreation ooportunities Pot~ntial off hours use of parking for access to future bike and jogging tralls. 13 Historic and Cultural Preservation a Are there any places or c=jects li~tec ~n cr fc): national state or 1ccal presE:\'=.tion kno'...;n 1:0 be on or ne <t to the site? ..i.. I so propcsed registers generally describe No b Gene"ally cescribe any landmar\<s or' eVlce'!ce of historiC archeological sCientif,c or cultural imoortance known to be on 0, next to the Site None known. c PrOQosec me3sures to reduce or contrel :~pac~s ~ f an / N/A 14 Transportation a Identify Sidewalks trails public streets and highways serv i '"1g the site and deser i be proposed access to the e~isting street sys~em Show on Site c"ans if any Hwy 507 to the east b Is s~te current."\>, mea:s~ If rot wnat served by publ-:c :re.nsit" 8'1 ',Ih=.t clans exist for t,~ns~t service? No. However, transit service is within 1 mile of the site. C ~O\'" ma,-.y pad ing soaces It/Quld the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project wQuld have 43 parking spaces. None woUld be eliminated. CITY' OF YELM E!\NIRCi\MENT AL CHEO<LIST forms\sepa PAGE 9 .1..._. d Will the proposal reauire any new sidewalks trails roads or streets, or inprove~ents to existing sidewalks. trails, roads or streets not includi"'g dr'l'/eW'ays"" =r so, generally describe (1ndicate whether pub: 1C cr private) Those as required by City of Yelm. e Will the project of) water rai 1 describe use (or cccur In the immediate or air transP-:lrtatlon" If so vlcinity generally No f How many vehicular trlos per the completed project" If volumes would occur day would be generated by ~ nown i nd i ca t e when peah See attached traffic study. g Procosed impacts :-neasures to reduce or c~Jntrol transoortat ion l' any Utilize standard City of Yelm Access Point to SR 507. i5 Public Services a Would the projec: ~esult ir ~~ ncreased need for public s e r v 1 c e s ( for e ., a i'1 0 ! e " ire pro t e c ': "] 0 n . pol ice protection heaith care schools. other)? -'-, so gener all y desc r ' be Yes. Any building requires fire and police protection. This building's construction and use will be low hazard demand. b Proposed measures to reduce or control direct lmpac:s on pub I i c serv ices if any Adhere to fire, building, electrical and mechanical codes, adequate security lighting and fire protection. 16 Utilities a Clrcle utllit1es currently available at the site electricit ral gas @te'Q ~efuse serv~ elephone sanitary sewe septic system other b Oescr ibs ths ut - 11 t 1es that3.re proposed for the proJect the util ity orovlclng the serVlce ana :he ~enera! construction activities on :ne Site or in tne lmmeo'ate vicinity whicn ffilcht be neeced Water - City of Yelm ~ Electricity - Puget Power Telephone - Yelm Telephone C SIGNATURE The above answers knowledge them to make and complete tc the best of my t the City of Yelm is relying on Signature. Date Submitte V--~ . ~. ~1 , - CITY OF YELM ENVIRONMENTAL C.-1EO<LIST forms\sepa PAGE 10 SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (00 not use this sheet Tor project act'ons When answering these questions be a'...,iare of the extent of t i~e proposal , or the types of activities likely to result from r:ne proposal , would affect 1:ne i tern at a greater intensity or at a faster rate tnan if the proposal were not implemented Respond briefly and in general terms How would the proposal be I ikel/ to ,ncrease discharge water. emissions to air. production, storage or release toxic or hazardous substances. or production of nOlse? to .......~ '.J , Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are 2 Ho~ would the proposal be likely to affect D'ants fish, or marine iife? an,mals Proposed measures to protect or conser've :J lants rlsh or marine lire are 3.nima.3 3 How would the prooosal be likel! to deplete ene~gy or natura resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are d How would the proposal be likely to use or affect Crit'Ca or environmentally SenSl1:iVe areas or areas designated (or eligible or under studY) for governmental protection suc, as parks, wilderness \.-111d and sceniC rivers threatened or endangered soecies nabitat historic or cultural S,tes wetlands, floodplains or natural resource areas? CITY OF YELM ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST forms\sepa P .A.c--E 11 . ./.), ~\ . Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avotd or reduce lmo2ets are 5 How would the proposal De I ikely to affect land and shorel~ne use lneluding v/hether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses lneomoatibie with existinG plans? Prooosed measures impacts are to avoid or reduce Sn07"eiine and land , :~Q '-"-- 6 How would the transportation proposal or publiC be llkely to ircrease serVlees 2.nd utilit'es"'" demands en Proposed measures to ~eduee or respond to suen demand(s) are 7 Identify if possible whether the proposal may conflict WIth local state or federal laws or reqUirements for :he oroteetion of the enjlrOnment CITY OF YELM ENVIRONMENTAL CHEO<.LIST forms\sepa P.A.GE 12 JU\,H34-19g3 09 3c.l FROM "ffiHN3Ht1ER I CA TITLE -QL Y 1-..1 'l?' ;~ ~ ;1 ~ i } ~ ~ ~ ~ " \1 1 :/i .; \ 'j a " , " EXHIBIT · A' $CHEOULE ~ OROKR Mo.: J54~7 PAGlI NO. 1 FOtrn '1'Hlt UN!:') IU::nmRED '1'0 H~Jl.UN !S S:tT1JAT1!:D :nl THE S'rA'I'~ 01" WMltING'l'ON, COUNT. or TIiTJRSTON ANO IS o&a;CR! ~l.} As FOLLOW$; 'l'IiE SOUTH 100 PI>ET OF TW\'t PAAT 01" Tal!: w:n..:r..li'\M \~. PLtlM~ DONATION CI.JI;l:11 NO. 57, 'rOWNSIIIl? U NOR';rn, RJ\NGE 2 WEST I W . K I Lon NC SO'J'TIiWBSTERVt OT COI.1N"I"i ROJooO KNOWN l\S -etrrUi:R COVE ~O1l.0 AND /lO~TlI OF NO:lt':l:'lt LI.Nlt OF ORCHAAD l"AIt.K, Jl.CC01l0ING TO TH~ ~~'T ~!&RiOf, REconOEO IN VOLm1i 7 OF l"LATS. ~ACi J7 J./2 !~ THURSTON eoU~v, WASHINGTON. V,;.l: 1 Sl';:~ P~\I'ol 873 FUi tlQ: 92~7e:?004~ I \ o.....-.,~-"-~.~ ~ ....--.---,..------- I I I \ T!::W'1 , , . < \ I' 1 r I .Ill.. -;~ r \;J":; " TOTR\.. P 02 TOTHL P 00': -=~."'..",'",,",""'3~.C,'k"'L""_,b"""_'.-_.e'_e"""::r!'@~,,$'''">t~'~_;'''""'fo?""'''",~'it,};!:,,,..,,~~~1'\'!iJ'1':,~~-ffi,5'''31:,,,~~!!'''il>''~t1,H''''''WWlrl1<J;>i'",'1&:l;O';-"~;!,~'~'~":lJ'i!:"""~~'!il>~J~~~""-'!i1Il-,~=&&"I~ \~ ,?O!}~ (....\Z.~ \J '..:.-~'1 _ sel \...- L- C> l>~ - tA\~;t".:\ v tJ'...- S~ . ~)r~~ · · , ...,; .. .. " ,..., ~ ~ I "" ~ " . ~l.-l ,,>\ -r"':'1 'c.. 0 ,,-,I"" c.- -r V"'- ~ - --" t ^ ~ \ V >J\ ~) S~-r .. " (.,>~"6'-'-~ "N\.~..l\.v N'\. ~~'"i:;).. ~-e 0"-' o-l c::: I >.l "'- --r: <> .'" >:::<0. \ .J .1'-, t ..:...s:, · · ; . 6 -"C'~ ~ -z.,W;' -Co fo~ . . ,o''''''!.'''- ~. ~_ \..... ~~. --D -C S- _,......-- I I ... 0 I D -Co ~.. .., ~ ~ 4......' t .1"..... till ..... 4-;':' ""l:"" s~ \------' u -, J u ,-., u 1'""' , LJ ,-., i u " LJ YELM OFFICE BUILDING TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ------. LJ YELM, WA :------' u --, LJ -"0 LJ -, LJ -, -, PROJECT PROPONENT: Erickson - McGovern Architects 120 South 131st Street Tacoma, WA 98444 LJ LJ "0 LJ ------. JANUARY 1994 ..... LJ ...... LJ "0 LJ LJ r'l LJ 3302 Narrows Drive. Tacoma, Washington 98407 n u 'l LJ n YELM OFFICE BUILDING TRAFFIC ANALYSIS u n u TABLE OF CONTENTS n u I. II. III. IV. V. Introduction project Description Existing Conditions Forecasted Traffic Demand and Analysis Conclusions and Mitigating Measures 2. 2. 2. 8. 9. u 'l n Appendix u n List of Tables u n 1. Existing 1993 Level of service without project 2. Trip Generation 3. Future 1995 LOS with and without project 6. 8. 9. u n List of Figures LJ u 1. vicinity Map 2. Roadway system 3. site plan 4. 1993 Existing Street Volumes 5. Trip Distribution for project Traffic 6. 1995 Future street Volumes without project 7. 1995 Future street Volumes with project 3. 4. 5. 7. 8. II. 12. n n LJ n LJ n u n u n LJ n u n LJ r\ LJ " LJ 'I ~ " LJ " u 'I u " u II. " LJ 'I u " u " III. LJ 'I LJ " LJ 'I u " LJ " LJ 'I LJ " LJ 'I u 'I u PAGE 2 YELM OFFICE BUILDING TRAFFIC ANALYSIS I. Introduction The purpose of this traffic study is to gather and develop a data base of current traffic operations on the street system serving the proposed office building. Based on these findings, assessments of likely future traffic conditions on the surrounding street system as well as the key intersections were made. Appropriate mitigating measures, if required, are then defined in order to counteract any impacts associated with this development to insure safe and efficient operation of traffic in the area. proiect Description The project is defined from a traffic planning standpoint as a 8,000 square feet of general office with a mix of tenants. The total site area is approximately 3/4 of an acre. For traffic purposes the project is expected to be built and occupied by 1995. The project is located adjacent to SR-507 and southerly of the SR-510 and SR-507 intersection within the town of Yelm. Figure 1 shows the project location and an overview of the surrounding street network. Figure 2 illustrates the local roadway system and Figure 3 shows the proposed site plan. Existinq Conditions A. Existing street system 1. SR-510 is approximately 24 foot wide state route in good condition with two lanes provided along its length and enhanced improvements at its intersection with SR-507. 2. SR-507 is also a 24 foot wide state route in good condition with two lanes provided along its length except within the city of Yelm where increased improvements occur at major intersections. n LJ n LJ " '\ ;H.;' " u rl LJ " LJ n LJ w en o a: z ::> al :z: .... < a: n L.J " ~ L.J n ~~ 1 0000 <v~ t ~ o L.J " ~ LJ n L.J rl L.J 123RD AVE SE " L.J 128TH AVE SE " o ffi -' -' W N 133RD AVE SE IVESE LJ GEHRKE c::::::J LA K E w en RD -' ;c: > 138TH AVE SE LJ 'l LJ n Vicinity Map LJ " LJ Figure 1 " LJ I j -, ~ -, ....J 11 LJ Il LJ ,--, LJ Il L.J ,--, L.J Il LJ 1<;:)1\ $ ~ 11 LJ Il LJ Il LJ 11 L.J 11 L.J 11 L.J Il L.J 11 LJ --- SITE tsl BAKER Ul RD S E o GRIND P::: RD SE .J .J H ~ o p::: ~1 <:0 +,f << ~O <S'~ ~ Roadway System Figure 2 --- / I / I / I / I / I / I / I / I J ,!I -, ;/ u I I n / I 0 / I / n I / u I / " u , n \ u 0 \ .~ n / u A n u " ~ U n 0 n LJ Site plan n FigUre 3 U CfVil and ifranSPOrtauon Engineering n u n I U PAGE 6 n J B. Existing street Volumes and Patterns n All field data for this study was collected during December of 1993. Included in this field data are manual and mechanical counts as provided by WSDOT plus a review of the city of Yelm comprehensive Transportation plan and accompanying environmental impact statement. The AWDT for the roads serving the project are shown in Figure 3. Also included in this figure is the PM peak hour count taken at the intersection of sR-507 and SR-510. The estimated truck percentage used in the analysis is 2 percent. n LJ u n u The PM peak hour information was then used to perform capacity computations in accordance with Transportation Research Board special Report 209, commonly known as the 1985 Highway capacity Manual. capacity analysis is used to determine level of service (LOS). The methodology for determining the LOS at unsignalized intersections strives to determine the delay for vehicles desiring to move across conflicting traffic streams which have the right-of-way. The range for unsignalized intersection level of services is LOS 'A', indicating little or no delay, to LOS 'E', indicating capacity. The range for LOS at signalized intersections is the same but indicates the overall delay in terms of time delay for the motorists using the intersection. The program used to study this intersection is SIGNAL85 by strong concepts which seeks to optimize the intersections capabilities. u n n LJ n LJ n LJ n LJ The following table shows the LOS presently existing at the SR-507 and SR-510 intersection adjacent to the projects. (\ TABLE 1 Existing 1993 LOS without project u n Intersection SR-507/SR-510 control signal Geometrv All 1993 A LJ n c. planned Improvements LJ n A review of the Yelm comprehensive Transportation plan identifies a number of projects which are planned for the city of Yelm's transportation system. The overall projects and their location is identified on Figure I-I of the EIS and is included in the appendix to this document. I U n LJ n LJ n u n LJ n u 'I u PAGE 9 'I c. Future Traffic volumes with and without the project , u 'I The applicable growth rate for background traffic in this area was assumed to be five percent per year. Higher growth rates might be expected but for a short term time frame, 5 percent per year should be adequate. This growth rate was then applied to the 1995 counts shown in Figure 6 to determine the traffic expected in 1995 with the project built and occupied. These traffic counts are compiled in Figure 7. I U 'I LJ D. Future 1995 LOS with and without the project 'I U Table 4 analyzes the LOS expected at the buildout year both with and without the project. 'I LJ TABLE 4 Future 1995 LOS with and without project 'I LJ Intersection SR-507/SR-510 control signal Geometry All 1993 A 1995 A 1995 w/proi A 11 LJ SR-507/proj. Entr. stop southbound B 11 L.J As the above analysis shows, traffic planning standpoint. the LOS onto the state route operation. the LOS is excellent in the area from a The entrance to the project also shows is acceptable once the project is in full 11 LJ E. Left Turn Pocket Warrants for the project Entrances 'I LJ A review was made of the project entrances for the need for left turn pockets for project traffic. Figure 910-6 from the WSDOT Design Manual was used as the basis for determining the need. As the analysis found in the appendix shows, a positive left turn pocket is not required at the entrance onto SR-507. 11 LJ " v. conclusions and Mitiqatinq Measures LJ 'I The construction of this project is expected to add or redirect approximately 208 vehicle trips to the roads in this area. Of this expected daily volume, 29 vehicle trips are expected to occur during the PM peak hour and 27 trips are expected to occur during the AM peak hour. The LOS with project traffic at the intersection of SR-510 and SR-507 is not expected to reduce in LOS with the addition of project traffic during the PM peak hour. Approximately 10 ~M peak hour trips is expected to be added to the five corner intersection at Morris Road and SR-507. LJ " L.J 'I LJ 'I The new entrance associated with the project is anticipated to operate at LOS B at the entrance with SR-507. An analysis of left turn pocket warrants on SR-507 in front of the project shows that a positive left turn pocket is not warranted at the entrance. u 'I LJ 'I LJ 'I L.J PAGE 8 '1 I ~ IV. Forecasted Traffic Demand and Analvsis A. Trip Generation '1 J u The trip generation data is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineer's publication, Trip Generation, Fifth Edition. The land use codes (LUC) most applicable to this development is LUC 710, General office. The PM data is used as the design hour and applied to the street system in order to be used for future capacity analysis. Generally the street traffic during the AM peak hour is 75 percent of the PM peak hour. ,...-, '1 u L.J TABLE 3 Trip Generation 'I " Time Period AWDT PM peak Inbound PM Peak outbound AM Peak Inbound AM Peak outbound LUC 710 Gen. office 208 vpd 5 vph 24 vph 24 vph 3 vph " LJ LJ " LJ B. Trip Assignment and Distribution " " The destination and origination of this traffic influences the turning movements into and out of the project which in turn influences the LOS analysis. Once the trip allocation has been determined, trip assignment and distribution of the future project traffic is applied to the road system. c.J LJ 'I The trip generation for the project is oriented generally in all four directions as the traffic is primarily work based home, work based shopping trips and work based other trips. As Figure 5 shows a slight emphasis to the north has been assumed and reflects the trips presently passing the site as found in the PM peak hour. LJ 'I LJ 'l LJ Based on the above analysis the trips generated by the projects are expected to follow the general trip patterns as shown in Figure 5. Figure 5 also shows the intersection volumes for the project's driveway access to SR-507. ,...-, LJ 'I LJ 'I u ,...-, LJ 'I u r\ SITE , .J r\ o r\ --J " o --1 r\ \ o ~ ~ ~ 0:: ~ ~ ~. o o (j o o 1993 Existing Street Volumes Figure 4 n (j u a:vu and ~(ir\aUon Eng1neerlnl LJ r\ r\ , J "1 J "I u rJ LJ rJ LJ rJ u rJ u rJ LJ rJ LJ " LJ ~ u n u " u II u rJ LJ rJ u 30% 20 15% SITE 2::: t:> 35 ~ a ~ Trip Distribution For Project Traffic Figure 5 o -~,~---------- ~ .. .J --, L.J " SITE o " o " L.J " ~ (f ~ LJ " " " LJ " o " " 1995 FutUre Street . Volumes Without ProJect FigUre 6 o n u n o \J L.J SITE J -"1 .J .., u " L.J " LJ " L.J " LJ II L.J 'I L.J " L.J II L.J ~ n n L.J 'I J 1995 Future Stre~t Volumes with Project Figure 7 'i u avu and TraDSPOrtatloD EnglDeerin8 n LJ rr LJ PAGE 13 rr L.J rr L.J rr u rr L.J rr u YELM OFFICE BUILDING TRAFFIC ANALYSIS rr u APPENDIX rr LJ rr LJ rr LJ rr LJ rr LJ rr LJ "1 u rr LJ rr LJ rr u rr L.J rr LJ ,----, u 'I YELM OFFICE BUILDING u SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION CALCULATION r--o FOR 8 TH.GR.SQ.FT. OF GENERAL OFFICE L.J 12/93 ,----, u " DRIVE AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT WAY RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 25.99 0.00 1.00 208 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 2.99 0.00 1.00 24 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 0.37 0.00 1.00 3 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 3.35 0.00 1.00 27 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 0.61 0.00 1.00 5 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 3.00 0.00 1.00 24 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 3.61 0.00 1.00 29 AM GEN PK HR ENTER 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 AM GEN PK HR EXIT 0.00 0.00 1. 00 0 AM GEN PK HR TOTAL 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 PM GEN PK HR ENTER 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 PM GEN PK HR EXIT 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 PM GEN PK HR TOTAL 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 2.37 0.00 1.00 19 PK HR ENTER 0.22 0.00 1.00 2 PK HR EXIT 0.19 0.00 1.00 2 PK HR TOTAL 0.41 0.00 1.00 3 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 0.98 0.00 1.00 8 PK HR ENTER 0.08 0.00 1.00 1 PK HR EXIT 0.06 0.00 1.00 0 PK HR TOTAL 0.14 0.00 1.00 1 L.J r--o L.J r--o LJ r--o LJ " LJ 'I LJ " LJ " L.J r--o Note: A zero rate indicates no rate data available The above rates were calculated from the following equations: LJ 'I ~ AWD 2-Way Vol. (=<800 TGSF): Ln(T) = 0.756Ln(A) AWD 2-Way Vol. (>800 TGSF): 7-9 AM Pk Hr Total (=<800 TGSF): ,----, 4-6 Sat. Sat. Sun. Sun. PM Pk Hr Total 2-Way Vol.: Pk Hr Total: 2-Way Vol.: Pk Hr Total: + 3.765, R^2 = 0.82 T = 8.46 * A Ln(T) = 0.777Ln(A) + 1.674 R^2 = 0.81, 89% Enter, 11% Exit T = 1.2 * A, 89% Enter, 11% Exit Ln(T) = 0.737Ln(A) + 1.831 R^2 = 0.78, 17% Enter, 83% Exit (>800 TGSF): T = 1.08 * A, 17% Enter, 83% Exit T = 2.37 * A, S.D. = 2.08 T = 0.41 * A, S.D. = 0.68, 54% Enter, 46% Exit T = 0.98 * A, S.D. = 1.29 T = 0.14 * A, S.D. = 0.38, 58% Enter, 42% Exit ,----, 7-9 AM Pk Hr Total (>800 TGSF): 4-6 PM Pk Hk Total (=<800 TGSF): L.J L.J 'I LJ 'I Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 5th Edition, 1991. L.J TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS 'I LJ J LJ L) L) L) L) l] l.J l j L J L j L ~ f\GURt:. \-, --",.------ ,-- RECON\MENOEO "f1\A.tlSP01\"f A. "flOtl p1\OG1\A.NI .,lit. ~.~~) .- ,,".- ~ ~. 94!h. ,.,.... s.~ ..-------...-..-..'... RECO\A\AENO~'t\0t4S 1-1 ~10 1-1 ~~ 1-3 ~ llC)IoD tl(J\1t' IJ:J:' 1..4 r::~ ,CJ3r'L 1-6 'tElJl"~ ~ ,,-6 ~~ '1-1 S'II ~ ,,-6 art ~ ~ "A ~ 'I-10"~ ~ ~ '1_11 ~ ~ '1_'1 ::;:-':J# City of '(elm. washington . COtt\pr ehenSI'l e 1'ransporta\\On p\an \ !I.'T,S. J CJ CJ CJ CJ LJ CJ CJ L } l ) L} l. -' f'\GURE. \-2 RECOtAtAalOEO fUtlC,.\Otl~\. C\.~SS\f\C~ ,.\Otl S'Is"fEJA ,0' .,~"~-..,-"'--""- m~-'" -""", ~_~~~""_r---' . \ p..rter\a\ pr\ncW)o . \ __ ,,,,,rtena __ · -- · M\nor __ __ -- -- Co\\ector ..- d .. · · · . · · des\gnate ~ not fO\ ~\\ roadvJ?~~d res\den \ . , ~ : h.o it1~;";7 Y\ are c\ass\fi \ ~._~ ~ Lea end \ C\W 01 '(elm. ~Qtln\\'\9to\'\ cornprehenS\Ve ,.ranspor\a\\On p\an \ 1l.1.S. t' l '\ ,_..- -~ .~-_. 'I t.J 'I YEIM OFFICE BUILDING SR 507 & SR 510 1993 IDS u 'I 01/11/94 14:07:10 u SIGNAL85/TEAPAC[V2 L6.0] - Sunmary of Pararreter Values Intersection Pararreters MJVI.ABEI.S RI' TH LT RI' TH LT RI' TH LT RI' TH LT VOLUMES 96 475 134 82 57 57 32 364 157 140 81 125 WIUI'HS .0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 .0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 LANES 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 Ul'ILIZATIONS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 TRlXXPERCENI'S 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 PEAKHOURFACroRS .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACl'UATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES RECCLEARANCES 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 IDEALSA'l'F'IrnS 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 FACroRS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DEIAYFACroRS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NS'IDPFAC'IDRS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 GROUPl'YPES OORM OORM OORM OORM NORM OORM OORM NORM OORM OORM OORM NORM SATURATICJNF'I.OOS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Phasing Pararreters SEQUEOCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES 00 00 00 00 LEADIAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 30 120 20 PEOrIME .0 0 GREENl'IMES .00 .00 YEI.I:a'II'IMES .00 .00 CRITICAI.S 0 0 EXCESS 0 'I LJ METROAREA I.OSTl'IME LEVEIDFSERVICE OODEUX::ATION 'I LJ n Approach Pararreters LJ APPIABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTl'URNONREDS " LJ " LJ M:JverrEnt Pararreters " LJ 'I LJ " LJ 'I LJ ,., ~ 'I t.J 'I LJ '1 LJ 'I LJ 'I L.J 'I L.J OONCBD 3.0 C S o 0 N .0 IDil NONE 20 o o S .0 IDil NONE 20 o o w .0 IDil NONE 20 o o E .0 IDil NONE 20 o o " LJ {J LJ YEIM OFFICE BUILDING SR 507 & SR 510 1993 LOS {J LJ 4 S5~M6S ~ (J (Ms?:. 01/11/94 14:08:14 SIGNAL85/TEAPAC[V2 L6.0] - Evaluation of Intersection Perfo:rmance Sq 11 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I **/** ------------------------- * * + ^ . * * + ++++ / \ <* * +> <**** v ^ ++++ ^ ++++ v <+ + +> ++++> +++ ++++ +++ v {J u {J u {J LJ North I {J LJ {J G/C= .554 G= 16.6" Y+R= 3.0" OFF= .0% G/C= .246 G= 7.4" Y+R= 3.0" OFF=65.4% u 'I C= 30 see G= 24.0 see = 80.0% Y= 6.0 see = 20.0% Ped= .0 see = .0% u 'I MVMl' 'lUrALS Param:Units u Voll.lIIE: vph wid/Ln:ft/# g/C Rqd@C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph {J u 'I u Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:V/C Avg Del: see Tot Del:min # Stop: vph {J L.J N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int ~ m m ~ m m ~ m m ~ m mTo~ - - 107 528 149 91 63 63 0/0 12/1 12/1 12/1 12/1 12/1 o 38 10 8 5 5 o 55 55 25 25 25 o 959 627 363 439 383 A A B+ B+ B+ .00 .66 .24 .25 .14 .17 .0 7.5 4.3 10.5 9.5 9.7 o 79 11 16 10 10 o 448 77 73 49 50 36 404 174 156 90 139 2000 0/0 12/1 12/1 12/1 12/1 12/1 o 26 11 13 6 9 o 55 55 25 25 25 o 974 473 363 439 439 5459 A A B+ B+ B+ .00 .45 .37 .43 .20 .32 .0 5.3 5.8 12.2 9.9 10.7 o 39 17 32 15 25 o 262 97 132 71 114 A .45 7.6 254 1373 {J ----------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- ----- Max Que:veh Max Que: ft LJ ,., APPR 'lUrALS Param:Units u {J Voll.lIIE: vph LJ Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:V/C Avg Del: see Tot Del:min # Stop: vph ,., LJ {J LJ Max Que:veh Max Que: ft ,., u o 5 1 1 1 1 o 119 28 29 25 25 o 3 1 2 1 2 18 o 83 33 50 29 44 119 - - N Approach E Approach S Approach Int W Approach To~ 784 217 614 385 2000 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --C{i A B+ A B+ A .58 .19 .43 .34 . 5 6.9 10.0 5.4 11.1 7.6 90 36 56 72 254 525 172 359 317 1373 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- ----- 6 119 3 29 4 83 5 50 18 119 - - 11 L.J Il u YEI.M OFFICE BUILDING SR 507 & SR 510 1993 LOS 01/11/94 14:08:29 11 L.J SIGNAL85/TEAPAC[V2 L6.0] - Diagram of Signal Phasing 11 LJ North I Sq 11 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I **1** ------------------------- * * + ^ . * * + ++++ 1 \ <* * +> <**** v ^ ++++ ^ ++++ v <+ + +> ++++> +++ ++++ +++ v LJ n LJ Il Il u Il 'I YEIM OFFICE BUIIDING SR 507 & SR 510 1993 LOS 01/11/94 14:08:32 LJ LJ 11 SIGNAL85/TEAPAC[V2 L6.0] - Display of Intersection Paraneters Key: VOLUMES -- > I WIIJI'HS v IANES 96 475 134 .0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 ------------- 1 \ 125 12.0 1 1 + ------------------- 81 12.0 1 -- ------------------- \ 140 12.0 1 \ -------------------- 157 364 12.0 12.0 LOS'ITIME = 3.0 sec. 1 1 \ 82 12 .0 1 . 1 \ 'I LJ LJ 'I 57 12.0 1 LJ 1 57 12.0 1 North I 'I L.J 1 ------------- 'I LJ 32 .0 o Phasing: SEQUENCE 11 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Il LJ 'I LJ 'l L.i 'I LJ 'l LJ 'l LJ 'l u YEI:.M OFFICE BUIlDING SR 507 & SR 510 1995 IDS WITHOur n LJ 01/11/94 14:11:49 n SIGNAL85/TEAPAC[V2 L6.0] - Sl.lIIIta.l:Y of Pararreter Values Intersection Pararreters MJVLABEIS Rl' TH LT Rl' TH LT Rl' TH LT Rl' TH LT VOLUMES 106 524 148 90 63 63 35 401 173 154 89 138 WIUI'HS .0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 .0 12.0 12.0 12 . 0 12.0 12.0 LANES 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 urILlZATIONS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 TRlO<PERCEm'S 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 PEAKHOURFAC'IORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACl'UATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REg:LEARANCES 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 IDEALS.A'I'.FUMS 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 FACIORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DEIAYFAC'IDRS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSIDPFACIORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 GROUPI'YPES ooRM ooRM IDRM OORM ooRM ooRM ooRM ooRM IDRM ooRM IDRM IDRM SATURATION:Fl:.OOS o 1730 1693 1472 1782 1693 o 1757 1693 1472 1782 1693 Phasing Pararreters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES 00 00 00 00 LEADIAGS :ooNE :ooNE OVERlAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 30 120 20 PEIJl.'IME .0 0 GREENI'IMES 16.62 7.38 YE:Ll.(MI'IMES 3.00 3.00 CRITICALS 2 5 EXCESS 0 u n ME"I'.ROAREA IDS'ITIME LEVEIDFSERVICE ooDEI..O::ATION u n u Approach Pararreters n APPIABEI.S GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKnK;SIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTlURNONREDS LJ n LJ n M:Jverrent Pararreters u n u n u n u n u n u n u n u n u n u YEI.M OFFICE BUILDING SR 507 & SR 510 1995 IDS WI'l'HOUl' n u OONCBD 3.0 C S o 0 N .0 IJ:JiI :ooNE 20 o o E .0 IJ:JiI :ooNE 20 o o S .0 IJ:JiI :ooNE 20 o o w .0 IJ:JiI :ooNE 20 o o 01/11/94 14:12:49 LJ '1 SIGNAL85/TEAPAC[V2 L6.0] - Evaluation of Intersection Perfo:rnance Sq 11 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I **/** ------------------------- * * + ^ . **+ ++++ / \ <* * +> <**** v ^ ++++ ^ ++++ v <+ + +> ++++> +++ ++++ +++ v '1 LJ ,----, L.J ,----, North I Ll u G/C= .569 G= 17.1" Y+R= 3.0" OFF= .0% G/C= .231 G= 6.9" Y+R= 3.0" 0FF=66.9% ,----, ,----, 4-S:S~FS "2-- (Jr~ 6- C= 30 see G= 24.0 see = 80.0% Y= 6.0 see = 20.0% Ped= .0 see = .0% u ,----, MVMI' 'IDI'ALS Param: Units u ,----, Volurre: vph Wid/Ln:ft/# g/C Rqd@C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph u ,----, u Svc LvI: LOS Deg Sat:V/C Avg Del: see Tot Del:min # Stop: vph ,----, u N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int ~ ~ ill ~ ~ ill ~ ~ ill ~ ~ illTo~ 2204 5300 A .49 8.1 298 1543 ,----, ----------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- ----- u Max Que:veh Max Que: ft ,----, LJ APPR 'IDI'ALS Param:Units ,----, u Volurre: vph ,----, Svc LvI: LOS Deg Sat:V/C Avg Del: see Tot Del:min # Stop: vph u ,----, u Max Que:veh Max Que: ft ,----, u ,----, u ,----, LJ ,----, u 118 582 164 100 70 70 0/0 12/1 12/1 12/1 12/1 12/1 o 41 11 9 5 5 o 57 57 23 23 23 o 985 610 341 412 345 A .00 .71 .0 8.0 o 94 o 507 A B+ B+ B+ .27 .29 .17 .20 4.4 11.3 10.0 10.5 12 19 12 12 83 83 56 56 39 446 192 171 99 153 0/0 12/1 12/1 12/1 12/1 12/1 o 29 12 14 7 10 o 57 57 23 23 23 o 1000 442 341 412 412 .00 .0 o o A .49 5.3 43 289 A B+ B+ B+ .44 .50 .24 .37 6.6 13.6 10.5 11.6 21 39 17 29 110 149 81 129 o 3 1 2 1 2 18 o 88 35 55 32 50 127 S Approach Int W Approach To~ - - 864 240 677 423 2204 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --~- A B+ A B+ A .63 .23 .47 .39 . 9 7.3 10.7 5.7 12.2 8.1 106 43 64 85 298 590 195 399 359 1543 o 5 1 1 1 1 o 127 30 32 25 25 ----------~--- -------------- -------------- -------------- ----- 4 88 5 55 N Approach E Approach 18 127 - - 6 127 3 32 '1 u f1 YEIM OFFICE BUILDI:N3 SR 507 & SR 510 1995 IDS WITHour 01/11/94 14:13:23 LJ f1 u SIGNAL85/TEAPAC[V2 L6.0] - Diagram of Signal Phasing f1 u North I Sq 11 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I **/** ------------------------- * * + ^ . * * + ++++ / \ <* * +> <**** v ^ ++++ ^ ++++ v <+ + +> ++++> +++ ++++ +++ v u f1 u f1 'I u 'I 'I YEIM OFFICE BUILDI:N3 SR 507 & SR 510 1995 IDS WITHOlJI' 01/11/94 14:13:25 LJ LJ 'I SIGNAL85/TEAPAC[V2 L6.0] - Display of Intersection Paramaters Key: VOLUMES -- > I WIIJI'HS v IANES u 'I 106 524 148 .0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 ------------- / \ 138 12.0 1 / + ------------------- 89 12.0 1 -- ------------------- \ 154 12.0 1 \ -------------------- 173 401 12.0 12.0 IDSTl'IME = 3.0 sec. 1 1 \ 90 12.0 1 . / \ 'I u 'I 63 12.0 1 u / 63 12.0 1 North I 'I u / ------------- LJ 35 Phasing: SEQUENCE 11 .0 PERMSV N N N N o ~ YYYY LEADLAG LD LD 'I u f1 YEIM OFFICE BUILDI:N3 SR 507 & SR 510 1995 IDS WITHour 01/11/94 14:13:42 u '1 u SIGNAL85/TEAPAC[V2 L6.0] - Data and File Managerrent 'I LJ 3 lines SAVEd fran Line 57 to 59 in File #1: 507SR510 "1 LJ 'l L.J 'l LJ YEI.M OFFICE BUIIDING SR 507 & SR 510 1995 IDS WITH PROJECI' r-J L.J 01/11/94 14:15:19 SIGNAL85/TEAPAC[V2 L6.0] - Surrrnary of Paraneter Values 'l LJ Intersection Paraneters 'l METROAREA LOS'ITIME LEVEIDFSERVICE ooDELOCATION L.J 'I OONCBD 3.0 C S o 0 Approach Paraneters LJ r-J APPIl\BELS GRADES PEDLEVEIS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOWMES RIGHTl'URNONREDS L.J 'I LJ N .0 IJ:Ji/ NONE 20 o o 'I M:Jvement Paraneters L.J MJVIABEIS VOLUMES WIDI'HS LANES UI'ILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACIORS ARRIVAL'l'YPES ACl'UATIONS ~ MINIMUMS IDEALS.ATF:raVS FACIDRS DEIAYFAC'IDRS NSroPFACroRS GROUPI'YPES SATURATIONFI.CMS 'l LJ 'l LJ 'l LJ 'I u 'l u Rl' 'I'H LT 108 524 148 .0 12.0 12.0 011 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 .90 .90 .90 333 YES YES YES 3.0 3.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1800 1800 1800 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM o 1730 1693 Phasing Paraneters SEQUFXES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES 00 00 00 00 LEADLA.GS NONE NONE OVERIAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSEl' .00 1 CYCLES 30 120 20 PEUl'IME .0 0 GREENl'IMES 17.07 6.93 YEI..Ilm'IMES 3.00 3.00 CRITICAtS 2 5 EXCESS 0 'I u 'I LJ 'l LJ 'l L.J 'l L.J E .0 IJ:Ji/ NONE 20 o o S .0 IJ:Ji/ NONE 20 o o w .0 IJ:Ji/ NONE 20 o o Rl' 'I'H LT Rl' 'I'H LT Rl' 'I'H LT 90 63 63 35 401 175 162 93 145 12.0 12.0 12.0 .0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM 1472 1782 1693 o 1757 1693 1472 1782 1693 " LJ Ii LJ YEIM OFFICE BUIlDING SR 507 & SR 510 1995 LOS WITH PROJECl' " L.J 45 S vtA',...H75 '2--. r(~6 01/11/94 14:16:18 SIGNAL85/TEAPAC[V2 L6.0] - Evaluation of Intersection Perfo:rrnance Sq 11 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I **/** ------------------------- * * + ^ . **+ ++++ / \ <* * +> <**** v ^ ++++ ^ ++++ v North <+ + +> ++++> I +++ ++++ +++ v Ii LJ " LJ 'I LJ 'I L.J 'I G/C= .570 G= 17.1" Y+R= 3.0" OFF= .0% G/C= .230 G= 6.9" Y+R= 3.0" OFF=67.0% LJ LJ C= 30 see G= 24.0 see = 80.0% Y= 6.0 see = 20.0% Ped= .0 see = .0% Ii 'I MVMr 'IDI'AIS Param:Units L.J Vol\.1lre: vph wid/Ln:ft/# g/C Rqd@C:% g/C Used: % $V @E: vph " LJ " L.J Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:V/C Avg Del: see Tot Del:min # Stop: vph 'I LJ " Max Que:veh Max Que: ft LJ " APPR 'lUrALS Param:Units LJ " Vol\.1lre: vph LJ Svc Lvl:IDS Deg Sat:V/C Avg Del: see Tot Del:min # Stop: vph " LJ 'l Max Que:veh Max Que: ft LJ 'I L.J N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int ~ TH ill ~ TH ill ~ TH ill ~ TH illTo~ 120 582 164 100 70 70 0/0 12/1 12/1 12/1 12/1 12/1 o 41 11 9 5 5 o 57 57 23 23 23 o 985 610 340 411 334 A A B+ B+ B+ .00 .71 .27 .29 .17 .21 .0 8.1 4.3 11.3 10.0 10.6 o 94 12 19 12 12 o 509 83 83 56 57 39 446 194 180 103 161 0/0 12/1 12/1 12/1 12/1 12/1 o 29 13 14 7 11 o 57 57 23 23 23 o 1001 441 340 411 411 2229 5284 A A B+ B+ B+ A .00 .49 .44 .53 .25 .39 .50 .0 5.3 6.7 14.1 10.6 11.8 8.3 o 43 22 42 18 32 306 o 288 111 158 84 136 1565 0 5 1 1 1 1 0 3 1 2 1 2 18 0 127 30 32 25 25 0 88 35 58 33 52 127 - - Int N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total - 866 240 679 444 2229 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- ----- A B+ A B+ ~ .63 .23 .47 .41 7.4 10.7 5.7 12.5 8.3 106 43 65 92 306 592 196 399 378 1565 4 88 5 58 18 127 6 127 3 32 - - n u n ~ LJ YEIM OFFICE BUIlDING SR 507 & SR 510 1995 IDS WITH PROJECl' 01/11/94 14:16:52 n I LJ SIGNAL85/TEAPAC[V2 L6.0] - Diagram of Signal Phasing n LJ North I Sq 11 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I **/** ------------------------- * * + ^ . * * + ++++ / \ <* * +> <**** v ^ ++++ ^ ++++ v <+ + +> ++++> +++ ++++ +++ v LJ n u n n LJ n , LJ YEIM OFFICE BUILDING SR 507 & SR 510 1995 IDS WITH PROJECl' 01/11/94 14:16:55 n LJ n SIGNAL85/TEAPAC[V2 L6.0] - Display of Intersection Paramaters Key: VOLUMES -- > I WIDI'HS v IANES LJ n 108 524 148 .0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 ------------- / \ 145 12.0 1 / + ------------------- 93 12.0 1 -- ------------------- \ 162 12.0 1 \ -------------------- 175 401 12.0 12.0 IDS'ITIME = 3.0 sec. 1 1 \ 90 12.0 1 . / \ n LJ n 63 12.0 1 u / 63 12.0 1 North I n I L-i / ------------- n 35 Phasing: SEQUENCE 11 .0 PERMSV N N N N o ~ YYYY LEADIAG LD LD LJ LJ n YEI.M OFFICE BUILIJIN3 SR 507 & SR 510 1995 IDS WITH PROJECT 01/11/94 14:17:10 LJ n I ~ SIGNAL85/TEAPAC[V2 L6.0] - Data and File Managerrent n ! 3 lines SAVEd fran Line 60 to 62 in File #1: 507SR510 LJ n LJ f1 LJ LJ YEI.M OFFICE BUIlDING SR 507 & SR 510 1995 IDS WITH PROJECT '1 f1 01/11/94 14:24:04 SIGNAL85/TEAPAC[V2 L6.0] - SUIIIl1r3IY of Paraneter Values LJ '1 Intersection Paraneters LJ METROAREA lOOPI'IME LEVEIDFSERVICE ooDEUX'ATION f1 LJ mNCBD 3.0 C S o 0 Approach Paraneters '1 LJ l\PPIABELS GRADES PEDLEVEIS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGH'ITURNONREDS "1 LJ "1 LJ N .0 I.JJN NONE 20 o o M:werrent Paraneters "1 LJ MJVIABELS VOLUMES WIorns I.J.\NES urILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENI'S PEAKHOURFAC'IDRS ARRIVALTYPES ACI'UATIONS ~ MINIMUMS ID~ FACIDRS DEIAYFACIDRS NSroPFAC'IDRS GROUPl'YPES SATURATIONF'I.OVS "1 LJ 'I LJ 'I LJ "1 L.J "1 RI' TH LT 108 524 148 .0 12.0 12.0 011 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 .90 .90 .90 333 YES YES YES 3.0 3.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1800 1800 1800 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ooRM ooRM ooRM o 1729 1693 Phasing Paraneters SEQUENCES 44 PERMISSIVES 00 00 00 00 LEADIAGS NONE NONE OVERIJ\PS YES YES YES YES OFFSEr .00 1 CYClES 30 120 20 PElJI'IME .0 0 GREENrIMES 11.01 31. 04 9.52 6.44 YELI.CMl'IMES 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 CRITICAI.S 9 2 12 11 EXCESS 0 LJ "1 LJ "1 u "1 L.J "1 LJ "1 I L.J E .0 I.JJN NONE 20 o o S .0 I.JJN NONE 20 o o w .0 I.JJN NONE 20 o o RI' TH LT RI' TH LT RI' TH LT 90 63 63 35 401 175 162 93 145 12.0 12.0 12.0 .0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ooRM ooRM ooRM ooRM ooRM NORM ooRM NORM NORM 1472 1782 1693 o 1757 1693 1472 1782 1693 II LJ rJ LJ YEIM OFFICE BUILDING SR 507 & SR 510 1995 LOS WITH PRQJECl' II , LJ 4 S541-1PS Fu.Lu-( A~~ 01/11/94 14:24:31 SIGNAL85/TEAPAC[V2 L6.0] - Evaluation of Intersection Perfo:rrnance Sq 44 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I **/** ------------------------------------------------- +^ ** ^ + ++++ * * ++++ +> <* * <++++ v ^ ++++ **** v II LJ II u . / \ II LJ North <* I ++++ * v* rJ LJ ^ + +> ++ ++ G/C= .443 G= 31.0" Y+R= 3.0" OFF=20.0% G/C= .136 G= 9.5" Y+R= 3.0" OFF=68.6% n G/C= .157 G= 11.0" Y+R= 3.0" OFF= .0% LJ ****> ++++ v G/C= .092 G= 6.4" Y+R= 3.0" OFF=86.5% C= 70 see G= 58.0 see = 82.9% Y=12.0 see = 17.1% Ped= .0 see = .0% n LJ MVMr 'lUI'AI.S Pararn:Units n LJ Vollll'lE: vph wid/Ln:ft/# g/C Rqd@C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph rJ LJ n Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:V/C Avg Del: see Tot Del:min # Stop: vph u n LJ " Max Que:veh Max Que: ft u n APPR 'lUI'AI.S Pararn:Units LJ " Vollll'lE: vph LJ Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:V/C Avg Del: see Tot Del:min # Stop: vph n LJ rJ Max Que:veh Max Que: ft u rJ LJ N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int ~ lli ill ~ lli ill ~ lli ill ~ lli illTo~ 120 582 164 100 70 70 0/0 12/1 12/1 12/1 12/1 12/1 o 43 13 10 7 7 o 44 16 29 9 14 o 767 267 431 160 231 C C B C c+ .00 .92 .62 .23 .43 .30 .0 38.2 32.9 19.9 33.7 29.2 o 447 90 33 39 34 o 658 153 76 66 63 39 446 194 180 103 161 0/0 12/1 12/1 12/1 12/1 12/1 o 31 15 16 9 13 o 44 16 29 9 14 o 780 267 431 160 231 2229 3725 B C Bee C+ .00 .62 .73 .42 .63 .70 .68 .0 17.4 38.5 22.0 40.1 38.9 30.9 o 141 124 66 69 104 1147 o 373 185 145 99 154 1972 0 15 5 3 2 2 0 10 6 5 4 5 57 0 384 136 70 63 60 0 266 161 125 92 137 384 - - Int N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach To~ - 866 240 679 444 2229 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- ----- C c+ B c+ @ .86 .31 .65 .57 .68 37.2 26.6 23.4 32.3 30.9 537 106 265 239 1147 811 205 558 398 1972 16 266 14 137 57 384 20 384 7 70 - - ,.., LJ ,., LJ YEIM OFFICE BUILDING SR 507 & SR 510 1995 IDS WITH PROJECT 01/11/94 14:26:04 ,.., LJ SIGNAL85/TEAPAC[V2L6.0] - Diagram of Signal Phasing ,., ------------------------------------------------- LJ Sq 44 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I **/** ------------------------------------------------- +^ ** ^ + ++++ * * ++++ +> <* * <++++ v ^ ++++ **** v . / \ ,.., LJ ,.., I LJ ^ 'I North <* I ++++ * v* + +> ++ ++ ****> ++++ v c.-J 'I c.-J YEIM OFFICE BUILDING SR 507 & SR 510 1995 IDS WITH PROJECT 01/11/94 14:26:07 'I LJ 'I SIGNAL85/TEAPAC[V2 L6.0] - Display of Intersection Pararreters Key: VOLUMES -- > I WIDI'HS v IANES 'I LJ 'I 108 524 148 .0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 ------------- / \ 145 12.0 1 / + ------------------- 93 12.0 1 -- ------------------- \ 162 12.0 1 \ -------------------- 175 401 12.0 12.0 IDS'ITIME = 3.0 sec. 1 1 \ 90 12 . 0 1 . / \ c.-J 'I 63 12.0 1 c.J / 63 12.0 1 North I 'I c.J / ------------- LJ 35 .0 o Phasing: SEQUEOCE 44 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADIAG LD LD 'I LJ ,., LJ ,.., LJ 'I LJ ,.., o " u LOCATION SR-507/PROJ ENTR I NAME: HEATH " HOURLY VOLUMES VOLUMES IN PCPH ~ N Major street SR-507 =================================cc==== ccc=c================================ If J N= 1 Grade 0\ 342---V2---> 4---V3---v ================= <I <---V5--- 381 v---V4--- 1 N= 1 ---V2---> ---V3---v <---V5--- v---V4--- 1 If I LJ Date of Counts: 1995 WITH Time Period PM PK Approach Speed 35 PHF: 0 9 population: 5000 V7 I 19 Minor I> V9 I X STOP YIELD <I I> V7 V9 I I 19 5 5 Street: Grade 0\ If ENTR N= 1 LJ ===============:========:=:=:===:=========:===========c=c=c==================== 'l VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS i L.J Movement no. 2 3 4 5 7 I 9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume (vph) 342 4 1 381 19 I 5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vol(pcph),see Table 10 1 Ixxxxxxxxl xxxxxxxxl 1 Ixxxxxxxxl 19 I 5 " L.J ===================================_D=====~===========cac=ce_cccccee=========== STEP 1 RT From Minor Street /-> V9 ======================================================c==ccc==cc======:c======= If Conflicting Flows, Vc Critical Gap, Tc Potential Capacity, Cp Actual Capacity, Cm 1/2 V3+V2= 2 + 342 = 344 vph(Vc9) Tc= 5.5 secs (Tab 10 2) Cp9= 748 pcph (Fig 10 3) Cm9=Cp9= 748 pcph I L.J 'I =============================================================================== LJ STEP 2 : LT From Major Street v-- V4 ======================================================c====e=================== 'i conflicting Flows, Vc Critical Gap, Tc Potential Capacity, Cp \ of Cp utilized and Impedance Factor Actual Capacity, Cm (Fig.l0 5) V3+V2= 4 + 342 = 346 vph(Vc4) Tc= 5 secs (Tab.l0 2) Cp4= 846 pcph (Fig.l0 3) (V4/Cp4)xlOO= 1\ P4= 1 Cm4-Cp4m 846 pcph L.J =======================================================c======================= 'I STEP 3 : LT From Minor Street <-\ V7 ~ Conflicting Flows, Vc 1/2 V3+V2+V5+V4- 2 + 342 + 381 + 1 = 726 vph(Vc7) Tc= 6.5 secs (Tab.l0 2) Cp7= 351 pcph (Fig 10 3) Cm7=Cp7xP4= 351 x 1 = 351 pcph 'I Critical Gap, Tc Potential Capacity, cp Actual Capacity, Cm u SHARED LANE CAPACITY SH = (V7+V9)/((V7/Cm7)+(V9/Cm9)) if lane is shared If L.J MOVEMENT V(PCPH) CM(PCPH) CSH(PCPH) CR (CM-V) CR (CSH-V) LOS CM LOS CSH " 7 19 351 395 332 371 B B 9 5 748 395 743 371 A B L.J 4 1 846 845 A " U If LJ " U 'I ~ \1 W CJ ClCJ CJ CJ cj CJ J ~i "tSUI G;a 'a::J tr'C. ~lI) ::J ....CO COli) CO - ~ \; .... "t' ~ ~ :n(/) ~O . "'" CO.! 0<0 I!nQ S- o. <0 :::= :) ~ "'Q Q) IQ lD 110 .... o , .... W 2S t ~ Q) '> o e 20 01 C 'c. \... :l ~ ~ \5 01 c .- m ..., ~ ~ Q) .J \0 01 C 'c. \... :l I- 5.5"10 .O\1\] is ..speeds l J l j l J L ~ ~"' b~"" ~ -;:..11---? ~]l!YI n '" '2-~ c..\:+ , 1'/ \..\- ~'-\ L--T: '> ~ Y; '1- 1~ =- ~ 5 8~fo 'I- ! ~~. ~~ <;, '-I.- <, --"' :. J-/ ~ ~ 1t^!/ L~f1 1UR~ 510R~G~ GUIO~Ll~~5 uns,gnol'Zed ,ntersect,on iwO - \one nignwOj \<. t. '{ : ee\OW cur....e. storoge not needed for copoc i t'j - [>> <S f>,.bO....e cur....e. storoge recommended- '::>' 5 ::x:- c \200 s- O; ... '& a '0 ::J . ~ 0 '300 400 500 &00 100 800 900 \000 \ \00 +- o I- 10tol OR" 3-R pro;ects. vo\Ume moj be used on total volume from path d,rect\ons. current ~eor ore posted speed \imitS. if '/11 PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT for TIME SQUARE OFFICE BUILDING The City of Yelm Thurston County, Washington Parcel No Section 19, Township 17N, Range 2E, W M Johan aye, P E 12202 Pacific Avenue South Tacoma, W A 98444 (206) 537 8128 PREPARED FOR EMA Architects DATE Dec 27,1993 JOB NO 504 . " ~/~r TIME SQUARE OFFICE BUILDING PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE DRAINAGE ELEMENTS 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 Project Description 3 Existing Conditions Summary 3 Infiltration/soils report 3 Wells 4 Fuel Tanks 4 Sub Basin Description 4 100 Year Flood Plain 4 Aesthetic Considerations 5 Downstream Analysis 5 10 Covenants, Dedications and Easements 5 1 1 Articles of Incorporation 1 1 EROSION CONTROL ELEMENTS 1 Sequence 2 Trapping Sediment 3 Permanent Erosion Control 4 Geotechnical Report 5 Inspection 12 12 12 12 12 5/; TIME SQUARE OFFICE BUILDING PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Construct a new office building and associated parking areas The project includes a new driveway access onto SR 507 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is currently undeveloped Site Data Location Fronting north side of SR 507, west of Moseman Avenue, within the City Limits of Yelm Section 19, Township 17N, Range 2E, WM Zone C1 Rainfall 2 year 5 Year 10 Year 25 year 50 year 100 year 2 80"/24 hrs 3 75"/24 hrs 4 35"/24 hrs 5 10"/24 hrs 5 65"/24 hrs 6 15"/24 hrs Soil Spanaway Gravelly Sandy Loam Deep, excessively drained soil with very rapid permeability 3 INFilTRATION/SOilS REPORT Upstream Tributary Areas There is no offsite tributary flow onto the site due to the generally permeable nature of the soils in the area 1!v TIME SQUARE OFFICE BUILDING PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT 4 WELLS A site visit was performed, and no wells were found 5 FUEL TANKS No fuel tanks were found on the site 6 SUBBASIN DESCRIPTION This site is located In the Nisqually Drainage Basin and is located in a sensitive aquifer The site lies near the crest of a hill, with the terrain sloping gently to the south west From the SW property corner the terrain slopes at 4-5 % until the ground elevation drops below the two adjacent embankments for the BN railroad and SR 507 Any potential surface drainage from the site would be confined to the stnp of land between the embankments There are no structures along this flow path and due to the pervIous nature of the soils, little if any surface flows are in evidence Approximately 800 feet southwest of the site and at the south side of SR 507 IS found a large pothole With wetlands and an open pond The subject site is in the watershed of this pothole I estimated the flood elevation of this pond to be in more than 30 feet below the average site elevation 7 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN The 100 year floodplain for this water shed is associated with the pothole described above The estimated 100 year flood elevation does no abut the subject property Additionally there are no structures located near the pothole flood zone On site elevations are designed such that the 100 year storm will drain away from the structures I 5/rs TIME SQUARE OFFICE BUILDING PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT 8 AESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS Not required for the preliminary report 9 DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS Downstream Analysis Runoff generated from development on the site shall be infiltrated Into the ground by way of a retention/detention facility The design will be based on 3000 cubic feet per acre of impervious surface, accompanied by a request for variance from the current drainage ordinance requirement of 6000 cubic feet per acre The lower retention requirement is consistent with proposed revisions to the Thurston Co Drainage Design Manual A small area along the south west boundary line sheet flows to the south and west onto the State Route 507 Right of Way likeWise, a small area along the North East property line sheetflow to the BN Right of Way The downstream condition is described under item 6 above Any surface flows from the site will drain along ditches in the SR 507 ROW or along the toe of the BN embankment until the two ditches join The flow will eventually infiltrate and flow in a southerly direction towards the pothole described 10 COVENANTS, DEDICATIONS, AND EASEMENTS Attached to this section of the report are excerpts from the Thurston County Drainage Manual These show proposed maintenance covenants The responsibility for maintaining on site drainage systems shall remain with the property owner APPENDIX E COVENANTS E.1 Maintenance Covenants Whenever storm drainage facilities are to be maintained by a property owners' aSSOCIatIOn within a subdivision, a covenant stating the property owners' specific mamtenance responsibilities must be recorded on the plat and recorded against each lot in the subdiVISIOn. The covenant shall include the following or substantially smrilar language: "MAINTENANCE COVENANT Easements are hereby granted for the installation, inspection, and mamtenance of utilities and drainage facilIties as delmeated on the plat for subdivision No encroachment will be placed WIthin the easements shown on the plat whIch may damage or interfere with the installation, inspection, and mamtenance of utilitIes. Maintenance and expense thereof of the utilIties and dramage facilItIes shall be the responsibility of the property owners association as establIshed by covenant recorded under Auditor's file number " Page E . I .. ~)y (- ( "- 7Jy E..2 S~Ullcthlns foil" Failure to Maintili.m If a property owners' association is to mamtain dramage facilities then the following or substantially similar words shall appear in the document creatlng the property owners' association: "In the event Project Proponent (or successors or the Property Owners Association), in the judgment of the Jurisdictio~ fails to maintain drainage facilities within the plat or if the Proponent or successors willfully or accidentally reduces the capacity of the drainage system or renders any part of the dramage system unusable, the F roponent or successors agree to the following remedy: After 30 days notice by registered mail to the Proponent or successors, Jurisdiction may correct the problem or maintain facilities as necessary to restore the full design capacity of the drainage system. Jurisdiction will bill the Proponent or successors for all costs associated WIth the engineenng and construction of the remedial work. Junsdiction may charge interest as allowed by law from the date of completion of construction. Jurisdiction will place a lien on the property and/ or on lots in the Property Owners Associanon for payments in arrears. Costs or fees incurred by the junsdictiOD, should legal actJon be required to collect such payments, shall be borne by the Proponent or successors" ( \ l Page E . 2 '" Page 1 of 3 ~ APPROXIMATE MAINTENANCE SCHEDUI~ FOR DRAINAGE SYSTEM COMPONENTS / .~._._...._.__......n...._.q_o ..........__....__......_.u... .............................. -..---.---- FACILI1Y TYP\: w..l~ PllCil.B4 CHTBlIA Fm ATmlTlrn ESTI~TB') H"I~ FlmBICi' (ya'!M3 ) .... ....... ............_.... ................ ...... __.... ....... "'.0_- ...... _.......a__..........._........... ....___ ........... _........ ________ -..___ ... _-0-- ......-- fH ur W1A tz Pll.{!glre ~ In ~ systlVIil .S Opim ~. ~s Troail IJ, c.sbri a 1 a.tri c foot p21' 1000 eq ~, pl~ trm'ih rodt. PoISG"lllW ~Q'\ If IWi rlplCli \om fe:i lfty IlJ"d 1 prurm at tmUV, ~, p:lltan oak, stinsirG nml!lS, dM Is cllb, ett:. Pollutlcn Prnsen:e at oil, !JilS, or other CCI"ltIil'ainl1l'1tl> \lhi dt cculd ClLI!l! plant ~, CtlUld CO"IStitute II fire h!l.mrd, or ~ WlIteI' q.ml i ty. Lh-Iiltten:lod ~ CXMn" Site dcfIG not fit IntO '2 miltlbat.ood. Rodttnt holaa in b:lrm Evi d3ncllI of I'Cda1ts or pi pi f\'l 5 ~ dmn. T~ Sl'~ Trees interfere wi th 5 ll1llintEi'"lliT'Ce. (00 rot ~ if mt III prtblem> Eroalcn at slcpi faas SIl7'fS of eros I cn or r;ounti 9l 10 for CI"OI i a'I. SIrtt 1 II"l3 at bm'lll3. S4tt I ins of 4" or 1IDl"e. 15 Sed1l11B1t ~ ttuln 10% of des 1!11 Z 'w'OlUl2 is last. Fil tet' QJl:let lCJai 15% at apl!CI ty. Spill way or rcdt. 1"e'v,~tlrentS Soil Is U"p'VCer::ted en::! 12 clim!se- abject to eraslcn. "-. P6:all Ii( - 2 '" PagEl 2 of 3 ~~ APPROXlMA1'E MAINn:NANCE SCHD,)'Cl.E FOR DRAINAGE SYSTEM COMPONENTS ~-' FAtIUTY Tm1! MAl~ ~ ClUTElUA FGl ATTa4TI04 ESTm\lm MAlllTtHMlCE f'I!8J..fJa (~) ctClSlid deUntim ~ ~/}ir~ Itm! f of W3"i1: &I"Ir.l ill biC!dlad ~ mfll:l:fU't\1Oi' trof1C!dClblritml pip;;a ~ ~ ,~ of dmp1:l\ fe!'i' 112 tho t~ r;f ~ ~t: QlJ" W'lf paiNt ~ ~mot~ ~ inffltratim 1 I:l6!:rlfl 8 ~ ~ ~ tafWra. Tn, pipll 01" w:u(t ill bmt or CQ( l~ so ttult ,ax or I'/lOI'\! of wlum is lost. 2J.) Fl Cllll 1Wtric:tm' (aM fiol:) Tnm.n t;ui l~ I.sl ttvn 105 f~ frr;m aMfiClll dcon tXl cStri13 t:ui lcklp 01" l:llCldr:.l:ld aMfiCl!l. (- ~~ Fafla:i ...... _tcl iiI. CI.It of pl.Ultl. l~~, CQl'RI3i on, (?tC.. 2J) In1i l traticn ~ CIl;Ei ty t Cl'!3 (bt frdlns> ~ fmlln bclOli ro% of dmil1l hydrmul ie: ~ty. :2 Catdl bi!ll i na ~ bJi[~ ~ tNn 113 at dliipth tXl oS W, la>1iliGt i MV<Il"t is s il ud. StN:l:unll ~ Frnm cut at tll.Ell by 3/4", ;a) c:rmclI:s in Iallls I So2tt l 0Im'lt, rotBti~ etc. Pol.luti en Iti~ lewls of oil. ~, oS n;;tim, etr: ~ Pips ~SJlI1!% .zm: of dq:lth 2 Stn.dl.lrnl Dana! ~i"9 em.') tv 2l1'i:, 10 Cl'l.!!C:lQl sltCll1ire ~ intNSic:n, c:ln"a3icn ~ ~ 1(-3 Q pags 3 of 3 )O~y APPROXIMATE MAINTEN~~CE SCHEDULE FOR DRAINAGE SYSTEM COMPONENTS f AC1 LIlY TYPE I%\nrrewa PIlOli.6I OlITEJUA RR ATTBiTICN "" /' I EST1MAT8) fltt.I~ FIlfCl..IEla (~) _______0_______.__....________ .____.______~_._____.___._u___ ______________________0.______ ---------.- Cipm'l ~tl Sedifl'S'lt, W9'l!tlltfcn Sedimmt ctepUI ~ 2DX of clmf9" c!::lpl:tI or ~iM ~ c1uisn hlril11t. Pi!lSllII:-4 .. 2 ~ \~~1 TIME SQUARE OFFICE BUILDING PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT 11 ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION Not applicable \~\ ! TIME SQUARE OFFICE BUILDING PRELIMINARY EROSION CONTROL REPORT 1 SEQUENCE Not required for the preliminary report 2 TRAPPING SEDIMENT Temporary erosion control measures for the construction period will consist of the following A) Installation of Erosion Control Fencing in order to trap sediment before it reaches adjoining properties B) Installation of a Stabilized Construction Entrance Pad consisting of 4 to 8 Inch quarry spalls in order to clean wheels of mud before the vehicles leave the site The contractor shall have adequate rock stockpiled so rock can be added as necessary to maintain proper function of the pad If the pad does not adequately remove mud from the wheels, the wheels shall be hosed off before the vehicle enters the street Washing shall be done on a rock pad, and wash water shall be directed to an on site sediment trap 3 PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL Not required for the preliminary report 4 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT No steep slopes, so a Geotechnical report is not required for this project 5 INSPECTION Not required for the preliminary report \3k~ STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL FIG 82 T 'rl$' '.0. t "- flLTtR fABRIC hlATtRlI\1. 6(f WIlli: ROu..s USE STAPlES Olil WIRE RINGS TO ATTACM FABRIC TO WIRE , ;t' B r B 14 C<i wIRt I"Allmc OR !:QUIVllEliT 2'ft' I BURY BOTTOM OF FlUER MATtRIAL IN e: x 1r TRENCH L 5' !.lAX L -r B ~ WOOD POSTS, ST AHOMO OR ernER OR EQUAL ALTrRNAm STEEl. n:Ni:E POSTS r J( :t x 14 Gll WIllE FABRIC OR EOUIV. \ nI.T~ ,ABRIC MATERIAl. ~ PROVIDE 3/4" TO 1-1 It' WASHED ROCK Oft NATIVE !MCKFIll. ON 90TH SIDES or F'lLTtR FABRIC FENCE r x 4" \!IOOD POST / ALT. STILl. FENCE POSTS \ REFERE.t..lCE. KING COUNTY, W1>.SHINGTON. SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL OATE. FEB. 1991 \... FILTER FABRIC FENCE DETAIL ... /fll fry I ( ~~~ STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL IG 81 ~\) ~\) G '\~~ -\- \.S ~ "<7.p 1>~ ~</ ~ ~ I/. q,~ 1;>~ ~ V'b ( ,,' TO S' QUARRY SPALLS PROVtD!: f1.ll..L 'JtDTH Of" rNGRESS/E~ESS AREA REFERENCE. KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON, SURfACE WATER DESIGN MANUAl DATE: JULY 1988 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE "--- .... " '\~, " " \~ &~~~'. "'" l s i~ ~"'" " ~ 1\~ '\, .... / ~ <~ " .... 0.' \ ~y :i\\~", ''', "" " ,I. , , ", . ~' " , ~ "'~~~~ ~L' "'"" , ,....:-.... ~<~ ",\. ".... "~,,, ~ '\, ~.... ,","" 'f, "" FIll''' "~~,, '~, "" / A:J Ie'!:!" ';,.,' ,,' '", , , '" 'I /!;Jt!jl7ilj:r~':< '" "~~ '" ", " '" A.~/.It"i ::t:S(fJi 1" , "::>:..' '\:, "'" []''I; iFl!:t-i:fR/:, 'L" " ~'~"" \ ' ........, "-If!Pl//tffr.;1:;! S1 "" ~::i:~, -.;:.~ '~cJ1'~j:lli2" 'WA)'~~ f' '\'::'~ ;"~<~ ~ "'" J.-Iy..!..:" '/- 'fA~' 'f '1Cr'/b t ", "", .'" '." ,,'h ... ' 'i.c I I,,:;" ," "'~\," \ , " ' :; I:Nzi,'il!,:")!",, ','0'I~,,, '; ''>'''SI:;!/'Qt''t/: CH'.lz ',,' '~., I , "-;-lfl:i/!!!dil; If/jj;:;:. \5~/!j; ;~~" I w '" ~ "" " 1I4"f.fU ~I Jf/.;,., 1::0 q;,- ),,, , ~ ,",,,'-0 fI'lr ! '("'. / I, V ry , / ''<!.t.7}~''..,. ~.l:: .. , I /\; //' " . 'O~ "~-0:Ili ... .. I ~</ / ' "'J~ ~ ','<.J, " / ", , '" /.. / L, ~'-' , " --'--I ~ -, ''', I , I ,,_ '''' , ~~\,\./. / ..; / '" "/ ~ ' " ' '~ '".. ' / I ' , /, / / ">",,, ~",..... "" '\/.. / ./, \. '" " ~'/I" XI" ", " ~"",,,' //' / ~ "" \ / Y -::.'0.,,\,, ~,\ ~~~: " "'-~ ~'~ """< .,' I ' j / ',\,,; i;, , ,/ , / / \ / /""" ;,' '<' / , /, /, ,; , '\ / ~~" ~/ /;/ .. ' ~,,~ J\~ "'- '<<: / X / I ~~~~~ , \,~ ".... "'/// ~\">:, " , /v,' , ~\~'~ ~\" \\ ,', ..',/ I '~~'}., ~ '\ \ ' .. f' '" "~'S '-" ' // /'" " ",\-..,\~ ',. / I' I \ '\" \ '" / , I .) '"~ / /'-/ / \" ~ I :,tf ~.'<'" / / '" / l/"f' fd"':;ti,,'I '" ~ y' I v) '" '" . / /r L,~' + ,,} '< ' /1 / ',JV \"_ ": ' , ~'.l\ 'V~\, t/ ~/ -~-- .... " '" , " " " " .... " "- "'~ "-,,- '~ "-, '...... /\ ..\ ~\\\ \1- tU\ ,,\) \ -<C ~\ ::( \ Ii \") )- \( -<\ 7 ') '.... " "- ',,- \ \'ll\")' d.,~\~. \1-. '- r~. ~ .W. \'--)' 'i ~V,/ ~, "'" " "'-", '" , , , \. ),.'"'" ...---\ '" I..-~" "- f..:::, " :0, " '\ \ ""', "'(~J. " -" -- --'\ ---- \ ,-- \ ------ I --- I ------.-.. I \\ --~- / \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 /', , I I / y~{./I 6\/ "'?'j Q;;l /[;1 (,), -2/ ! ,'" 1 , c!,:, -:;.:/ I .;:-.;'/ / ,~ / , ~ i' i \ " "- "'-, '" ,< '" "-., '~ '" ,,~\ F " " , )c~ <,;0.... "~<,, ...~...';" / "~<0' ", / ~ '<~';.... :?, , 'y "- lrj ~...... . 1 ",! If 1 '" , " ! 1 "" ' / \"~~~:;, I '~~::::.c':" " ~~~~~~ ~'<:~"-., / ''?i<~~ ", /f~" 'Zq, \ I "~~'~, ~~r \ (.~v~ '\....... \ \;'2~'...0. ~ \ '/'/2"- \ (I;:?2:~ _i 5''\~_~_..__ ----- " " i /~"", en \ r'- \ -Z\ '.-../\ ) I / S":/ 't' : ~ \ ri " ";:: \ ~\ -C:::\ ,/- \ \ ......-- \ ( " \:=-\ -;r\ /.- \ .---- \ l,) \ -::::: \ // \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ --- L---- ,. xi:. ) ;:// ~/ ~I ~.J\ \~\ ',-"\ (J\ I I , ;If) '1:~;:~\_,,,-",,~..~ft~I-- r~_,,~''''':;i f;;,,:c" -'N'~;~~"":~:..II:""'\.7' -~--......-- .~----~---- ~ . "~ \Er) ~ ----- "~ " I / Gi " '~ ~~ '" ~, "~ ~, " , "", ...., '''..., ", "" " "'\,,,- ~, ~ " ...., "~, ~ ~ ~ ~~ , " , " ", , 01>c ;;;:...." Q'.>-, " /~"~ Y~'. ':::(:\. , '<'01. "" -10 ..(.Q "- '1;/'.- ~ '~ ~ " ""~ ~ ..... ~~ ..... '...... , , ~ \ \ ~\\ ~ j ~. \)- o \.\)\ l\J It- ~ /I 1/ \)c ~\. .1-- -\1\ .1\ \ .. ii~\~ uL\~ \1- " "" ""', '~~~ ""'\ " ~, JUH-04-i993 09 34 FROM TK'AN3At 'ER i CA T 1 TLE -(..lL Y IJ H~\....r'1 r l::J~ I ~ I 1 I .~ I q ! i ,. I ., i ~ i '1 i " '; I " ~~ I :~ " I I I 1 I I I ,I . I I I i I I I i ! 3XHl13IT "Aft $CtU:OOLR C ORDEn NO.: ~5417 l'.AGZ NO.: FOUR TX~ ~NC RE~~EO TO H~~2IN !S sIr~AT~D IN THE $TATE 07 WMltINGT01i, COUNT'! OF TirJRSTOM ANO IS O&/GCRI BED As FOLLOWS; 'mE SOOTH 100 FEET Ol" TAAt l'AAT OF THE ;r.ru"IAA W PLtl'Ml!l DONATION C~~M MO. 57, ToWNSHIP 18 NO~. RANGE 2 WEST, W.M , LY:XNC; SOIJ'I'HWSSTil\LY or COt,lll1"Y RO.l\D KNOWN I\S lWT!.Ji':R CO\1l': ROAD AND NO~Tll or }lOIt'rH L!N~ OF ORCJ\J\:RO l".I\It!{, .i\CCOTiDING TO THE :?t..\'I' TlIE~Q'. i\EconOEO IN 'lOLIDl;e 7 OF 'l"LAT3. PAGE ~ 7 112 IN THURSTON COUNTY, WASHINGTON. \ I' 1,',)1 t 1 Sl.;.~ P.,\Jli :5573 File ~J..;.: 92P.i7e$l~04~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I . " '-i- ~-,;-:-.:.;:;.:..-;:....--=--='_._, I i ! I !t "I~""""'" , . "6-""_~_ TOTRL P 02 TOTAL P 00': -=~Z\'I~~~;U&-e.,*u:.~",,-"<M:~~~~~tJ>~'M~~"'W~~~~~~~~&ifIi.~~~~'m EVERGREEN PACIFIC PROP. INC rHARLES J BROWN PO BOX 513 PO BOX Q YELM WA 98597 YELM WA 98597 CORP CATHOLIC BISHOP SEA 910 MARION ST SEATTLE WA 98104 MARK E MILES PO BOX 973 YELM WA 98597 ANDY A HAAPALA 820 BERG CT NW GIG HARBOR WA 98335 TRANSAMERICA TITLE TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE Page 1 01/05/94 Prepared for: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parcel Number 217-24-440500 Q-S-T-R SW-24-17-1E Owner/Taxpayer : EVERGREEN PACIFIC PROP INC Mailing Address: PO BOX 513 YELM, WA 98597 site Address 15424 SE HWY 507 RD TENINO WA 98589 CHARACTERISTIC DATA Use Code-Desc Zoning Land Size units Year Built 52100-RETAIL LUMBER/MTRLS Square Feet 2.05 Total Rooms Bedrooms 1971 Bathrooms 1804 F T H ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA Assessed Total Land Value Imp Value %Improvement , $45,000 $22,500 $22,500 50.0% 1993 Tax : Tax Exemption: Tax Area Code: City $722.12 TAXABLE 182 COUNTY SALE DATA Last Sale Date Sale Price Type Deed Multi Parcel Excise Tax # Recording # Type Loan Lender Lender Name Loan Amount 1: Loan Amount 2: LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plat Name: Vol/Page: Legal 24-17-1E 3.28A SE SE S & E OF W Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1994 TRW-REDI Property Data TRANSAMERICA TITLE TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE Page 1 01/05/94 Prepared for: Parcel Number : 227-19-330200 Owner/Taxpayer : BROWN CHARLES J Mailing Address: POBOX Q site Address Q-S-T-R SE-19-17-2E YELM, WA 98597 YELM WAWA 98597 CHARACTERISTIC DATA Use Code-Desc Zoning Land Size units Year Built 96350-COML NO FRNTG RURAL Square Feet 1.10 Total Rooms Bedrooms Bathrooms F T H ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA Assessed Total Land Value Imp Value % Improvement $4,400 $4,400 1993 Tax : Tax Exemption: Tax Area Code: City $77.60 TAXABLE 182 COUNTY SALE DATA Last Sale Date Sale Price Type Deed Multi Parcel Excise Tax # Recording # Type Loan Lender Lender Name Loan Amount 1: Loan Amount 2: LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plat Name: Legal Vol/Page: 19-17-2E PTN SW SW BEG AT INTER OF SWLY BDY OF MOSMAN ST W I Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1994 TRW-REDI Property Data Prepared for: TRANSAMERICA TITLE TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE Page 1 01/05/94 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parcel Number : 227-19-330801 Q-S-T-R: SE-19-17-2E Owner/Taxpayer : CORP CATHOLIC BISHOP SEA Mailing Address: 910 MARION ST SEATTLE, WA site Address Use Code-Desc Zoning Land Size Units Year Built Assessed Total Land Value Imp Value % Improvement Last Sale Date Sale Price Type Deed Multi Parcel Excise Tax # Recording # 98104 504 SE FIRST ST YELM WAWA 98597 CHARACTERISTIC DATA 69700-RELIGIOUS 4.04 1 1950 ACTIVITIES Square Feet Total Rooms Bedrooms Bathrooms T H 24460 F ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA $1,208,500 $166,400 $1,042,100 86.2% $5.30 HOLY EXEMPT 170 YELM 1993 Tax : Tax Exemption: Tax Area Code: City SALE DATA Type Loan Lender Lender Name Loan Amount 1: Loan Amount 2: LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plat Name: Vol/Page: Legal 19-17-2E SW-SW COM EXT NW LN 2ND AVE IN MC KENZIE 2ND S 37 Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1994 TRW-REDI Property Data TRANSAMERICA TITLE TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE Page 1 01/05/94 Prepared for: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parcel Number : 227-19-330900 Owner/Taxpayer : MILES MARK E Mailing Address: PO BOX 973 site Address Q-S-T-R SE-19-17-2E YELM, WA 98597 YELM WAWA 98597 CHARACTERISTIC DATA Use Code-Desc Zoning Land Size units Year Built 11110-SFR-UP TO 1 ACRE Square Feet 3,920 Total Rooms 1 Bedrooms Bathrooms F T H ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA Assessed Total Land Value Imp Value % Improvement $300 $300 1993 Tax : Tax Exemption: Tax Area Code: City $12.16 TAXABLE 182 COUNTY SALE DATA Last Sale Date Sale Price Type Deed Multi Parcel Excise Tax # Recording # 91/10/08 $1,200 WARRANTY 0197618 Type Loan Lender Lender Name Loan Amount 1: Loan Amount 2: LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plat Name: Legal Vol/Page: 19-17-2E .09A SW-SW COM X N LN THOMAS ST WITH CEN LN 1ST S T I I Informat~on provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1994 TRW-REDI Property Data TRANSAMERICA TITLE TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE Page 1 01/05/94 Prepared for: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parcel Number : 227-19-331200 Q-S-T-R: SE-19-17-2E Owner/Taxpayer : CORP. CATHOLIC ARCH. BISHOP Mailing Address: 910 MARION ST SEATTLE, WA 98104 site Address YELM WAWA 98597 CHARACTERISTIC DATA Use Code-Desc Zoning Land Size units Year Built 69700-RELIGIOUS ACTIVITIES Square Feet 27,007 Total Rooms Bedrooms 1940 Bathrooms 2798 F T H ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA Assessed Total Land Value Imp Value % Improvement $53,300 $29,600 $23,700 44.5% 1993 Tax : Tax Exemption: Tax Area Code: city $5.00 HOLY EXEMPT 170 YELM SALE DATA Last Sale Date Sale Price Type Deed Multi Parcel Excise Tax # Recording # Type Loan Lender Lender Name Loan Amount 1: Loan Amount 2: LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plat Name: Legal Vol/Page: 19-17-2E .62A SW-SW COM X CEN LN 1ST ST & CEN LN YELM AVE S Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed copyright 1994 TRW-REDI Property Data Prepared for: TRANSAMERICA TITLE TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE Page 1 01/05/94 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parcel Number : 227-19-332300 Owner/Taxpayer : HAAPALA ANDY A Mailing Address: 820 BERG COURT NW Q-S-T-R GIG HARBOR, WA : SE-19-17-2E site Address Use Code-Desc Zoning Land Size units Year Built Assessed Total Land Value Imp Value % Improvement Last Sale Date Sale Price Type Deed Multi Parcel Excise Tax # Recording # 101 SE MOSSMAN ST YELM WAWA CHARACTERISTIC DATA 53130-SHPNG CTR COMMUNITY Square Feet 29,620 Total Rooms Bedrooms 1982 Bathrooms ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA $353,400 $46,900 $306,500 86.7% 1993 Tax : Tax Exemption: Tax Area Code: city 12320 F T H $5,694.48 TAXABLE 170 YELM Plat Name: Vol/Page: Legal 19-17-2E SW SW COM SELY COR BLK 3 MC KENZIES 2ND S37-34- SALE DATA 84/09/01 $385,000 WARRANTY Type Loan Lender Lender Name Loan Amount 1: Loan Amount 2: Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed copyright 1994 TRW-REDI Property Data 0138507 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 98335 98597 Prepared for: TRANSAMERICA TITLE TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE Page 1 01/05/94 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Q-S-T-R Parcel Number 227-19-332400 Owner/Taxpayer : PAIGEN RANDY E Mailing Address: PO BOX 625 site Address Use Code-Desc Zoning Land Size units Year Built Assessed Total Land Value Imp Value %Improvement Last Sale Date Sale Price Type Deed Multi Parcel Excise Tax # Recording # YELM, WA SE-19-17-2E YELM WA CHARACTERISTIC DATA 11110-SFR-UP TO 1 ACRE Square Feet 24,393 Total Rooms 1 Bedrooms Bathrooms ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA $32,000 $32,000 1993 Tax : Tax Exemption: Tax Area Code: city F T H $522.72 TAXABLE 170 YELM Plat Name: Vol/Page: Legal 19-17-2E SW SW BOUNDED ON W BY WLN OF SEC ON SE BY NW LN SALE DATA 93/09/13 $110,000 WARRANTY Type Loan Lender Lender Name Loan Amount 1: Loan Amount 2: Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1994 TRW-REDI Property Data 0216516 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 98597 98597 CITY OF YELMI I - ..! '":po.. "?' ). i '1 ~r" i:~ IV...., ; -:.- P.O. Box 479 Yelm, WA 98597 458-3244 lAM 5 ~;llt OFFICIAL USE ONLY Fee Y( ~ c1.Q Date Re.ceived ,/1" " . ;~ f: \"~1 o~\ By ijf.1~ .A::r{l.h.51f!!... File No.<:.?e(.,P !.Q.6.. ......,. . , \ 'joJ1.l 1" ) [Ii' / D 61 ,j'l YELM Conditional Use Fee. $500 00'( ~ (0 C~ r,le WASHINGTON L 1(;0 L, ) D/"v Site Plan Fee. $250 00 plus $25.00 per mobile home space "'P J()G ~ ' ) I P / Multi-Family Building/Condominium: $100.00 plus $10.00 per unit ~oD' u~~ (tlJ )i~Y .. ~ .J /Commercial Site Plan: $100.00 plus $50.00 per 1,000 sq ft. of gross floor area j> S~D /" ,~/ )0t ~ Industrial Site Plan. $100 00 plus $10000 per acre . ., ,v _v \.~ ) \J ~'\ .~ APPLICATION FOF{" CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT OR SITE PLAN REVIEW 1i" ~ if A conditional use permit is an approval of a land use having slightly greater or unique impacts compared to those of the uses permitted as a matter of right by city zoning Site plan review is a process for reviewing the design of certain types of development. Site plan approval is required for mobile home parks, duplexes, multi-family dwellings, commercial and industrial uses, planned development districts and for all land uses within the central business district. Each requires a hearing before either the Yelm Planning Commission or City Council NAME OF PROJECT Tbne Square Building APPLICANT Randy Paigen Mailing Address P.O. Box 625 City, State and Zip Yelm WA 98597 Telephone 458-2751 OWNER Randy Paigen Mailing Address P.O. Box 625 City, State and Zip Yelm WA 98597 Telephone 458-2751 ENGINEER/ARCHITECT/OTHER Erickson McGovern Architects Mailing Address 120 South 131st Street City, State and Zip Tacoma, WA 98444 Telephone 531-0206 (John Erickson) SUMMARY OF REQUEST To build a two-story commercial building 5,000 +/- square toot first floor, 3,000 +/- square foot 2nd floor, with parking for 40 or more vehicles. Setback from SR 507 will be 25 feet, 10 feet from northeast property line and requesting 5 feet from north property line (all measured to foundation) PROPERTY DESCRIPTION General Location Fronting north side of SR 507 iust to west of MosmAn AvpnllP Site Address Land Area (acres) 24,393 Section SE 19 Township 17 Range ?F. Assessor's Tax Parcel Number 227-19-332400 Full legal description of subject property (attach separate sheet if necessary) See AttArnpn .. PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS ATTACH EXTRA PAGES IF NECESSARY Does the design minimize conflicts with neighboring land uses? Explain. Yes. The ad jacent land uses are commercial in nature and the use is therefore compatible. Landscape screen' g and potential sharing of amenltles Wl!!.I1 create IIUltual benefits with the adjacent Thuroton County P5rk3 lfffid to the north. 2. Is the site within 300 feet of any "critical areas" such as wetlands or streams? No 3. What provisions will be made for stormwater and/or flood control? Yes 4 What provisions will be made for water supply and sewage disposal? ConTIf~ction to City of Yelm System. 5. What provisions will be made for electrical power, natural gas, telephone and other utilities? Intend to be served by Puget Power, Washington Natural Gas, if needed, and Yelm Telephone. 6 What provisions will be made for streets, access, and/or buses? An access approved by the Town of Yelm and DOT will be constructed off SR 507. 7 What provisions, if any, will be made for open space and/or recreation? None. Other than to work with Thurston County Parks to create no adverse conditions for their land use. 8. What provisions will be made for schools and school children? N/ A ATTApHMENTS: d Environmental Checklist (including $50 fee) DUst of Owners of Property within 300 feet (include Assessor's Tax Parcel Numbers) - t..:tit.; i~ do o Vicinity map showing nearby property, streets, land uses, streams and other features. o Copy of any covenants or restrictions that will apply o Grading plan for cuts and fills over 100 cubic yards. o Ten copies of Site Plan showing 1 Datum, north arrow, date and scale. 2. Boundaries of all lots and streets in relation to city limits, section lines or corners, plus existing and proposed survey and elevation monuments. 3. Lakes, streams, wetlands, trees and other natural features. 4 Proposed zoning, use of each lot and any public or common areas. 5. Existing and proposed buildings and other structures. 6. Existing and proposed parking, streets, alleys, sidewalks, railroads and any associated rights-of-way 7 Wells and underground storage tanks. 8. On-site waste disposal systems and proposed sewer lines and tanks. 9 Location, size and any easements of existing and proposed street lighting, power, natural gas, television and telephone lines, water mains, sewer, stormwater facilities and points of connection to existing systems. 10 Grade and curvature of streets to 300 feet from the plat. 11 Existing and proposed contours at two-foot intervals (or 5-foot if >5%) o A reduced size copy of the site plan not larger than 11"x17" I affirm that all answers, statements and information above and submitted with this application are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also affirm that I am the owner of the subject site or am duly authorized by the owner to act with respect to this application. Further, I grant permission from the owner to any and all employees and representatives of the City of Yelm and other governmental agencies to enter upon and inspect said property as reasonably necessary to proce s this application I agree to pay all fees of the city which apply to this application Date V-c:. \ ~! q.3 d " e /: ~ ;; t t...,. JAfi 5 '144 CITY OF YELM POBox 479 Yelm, WA 98597 458-3244 ~ ... ~ r /;-lA~"" ;~-~ "'t f: OFFICIAL USE~ ONL y ~.~ Fee ~( (I(l~ fd Date Received. BY~{/ ~~.A C;/ VI File No))!? t ti t! 7 APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE PERMIT YELM WASHINGTON Fee, $10000 (Plus any professional service charges - J(,D / per Resolution No 252) ~ ~ . It\ . Jfi 9;\ " 0::> , , Variances are for the modification of size, dimension or design requirements in situations where unusual physical conditions of the property, such as shape or topography, make it impossible or unduly difficult to meet require- ments of the zoning district or other City standards The power to vary is limited to the minimum change nec- essary to overcome the inequality inherent in the property Variances are granted only when the following specific circumstances exist. 1 The change must not constitute a rezone It must not be for a use not permitted in the district 2 Special physical conditions must exist on the property which makes ordinary standards or requir,ements im- possible to meet, or which would cause undue hardship 3 The special conditions peculiar to the property must not result from actions of the applicant. 4 The variance must not confer a special privilege that is denied to other properties in the same district. NAME OF PROJECT Tbne Square Building - APPLICANT Randy Paigen Mailing Address P.O. Box 625 City, State and Zip Yelm, WA 98597 Telephone 458-2751 OWNER Randy Paigen Mailing Address P.O. Box 625 City, State and Zip Yelm WA 98597 Telephone 458-2751 ENGINEER/ARCHITECT/OTHER Erickson McGovern, Architects Mailing Address 120 South 131st Street City, State and Zip Tacoma WA 98444 Telephone 531-0206 (John Erickson) SUMMARY OF REQUEST To build a two-story commercial building 5,000 +/- square feet first floor, 3,000 +/- square feet second floor. with parking for 40 or more vehicles. Setback from SR 507 will be 25', 10" from northeast property line and requesting 5' from north property line (all measured to foundation). PROPERTY LOCATION General Location Fronting north side of SR 507 just to west of Mosman Avenue. , Site Address Section SE 19 Township 17 Range 2E Assessor's Tax Parcel Number 227-19-332400 Full legal description of subject property (attach separate sheet if necessary) See attached. " ,c. \ <7' ... "'\ List the provision(s) of zoning or other standards from which you are seeking a variance Reduce'the north (rear) setback to 5 feet from building fonndation to property line. 2. Floor space and use of buildings on site Existing N/ A Proposed 5,000 sq.ft. first floor,; 3,000 sq.ft. second floor = 8,000 sq.ft.total 3 What are the exceptions or extraordinary circumstances which lead you to believe you are entitled to a variance? Please describe the special conditions of this site The property is a narrow piece of land restricted by Hwy 507 and the Burlington Northern Railroad that is now pwned by, Thurston Connty Parks. Since no additional land can therefore be purchased to increase the total width, the building setback$ make the property a non-viable piece to build on and provide adequate parking nnless the rear setback is reduced. PLEASE ANSWER THE FOllOWING QUESTIONS ATTACH EXTRA PAGES IF NECESSARY 4 Please explain why the hardship should not be regarded as self-imposed - self-imposed hardships are not entitled to a variance, The width of the property was determined by Hwy 507 and the Burlington Northern Railroad--not by a piece of land broken off a larger development to specifically create a piece that is hard to develop. 5 If your variance rE)quest is granted, would it grant you a special privilege that is denied to others? Explain No. -':, Side" yard setbacks are maintained and the granting of this variance wlll be conslstent wlth what others have been granted and are not lnconslstent wlth whaL o Lheu; have beeu gLauLec.l. 6 How will granting the variance not be detrimental to the public welfare or to properties in the vicinity? The granting of the Variance will allow a plannpo opvplopmpnt with aOPTlatp parking and landscape buffers. 7 Is this the minimum variance that will make possible the proposed use of the land? XX Yes 0 No Explain To make the building any narrower than allowed by the 5' setback would restrict the ability to give a good aesthetic feeling or make the project feasible. 8 How will the granting of the variance be consistent with the purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance? This project is in harmony and consistent with the type of development that is happening and intended as a business community. ATTACHMENTS Adjacent Property Owners List including Assessors Tax Parcel Numbers A site plan of the property not larger than 11"x17", showing 1 The location of all existing and proposed structures, including buildings, fences, roads and streets 2 Setbacks from property lines 3 The boundaries of the property proposed to be developed 4 All means of access to and from the site, and size and location of driveways 5 The location and design of off-street parking areas showing their size and location 6 The specific dimensions and location of the variance requested NOTE: The site plan must be at a scale of not less than 20 feet to an Inch and not more than 1 00 feet to an Inch. ..c:,. I affirm that all answers, statements and information above and submitted with this application are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge I also affirm that I am the owner of the subject site or am duly authorized by the owner to act with respect to this application Further, I grant permission from the owner to any and all em- ployees and representatives of the ity of Yelm and other governmental agencies to enter upon and inspect said property as reasonably necess r to process this application I agree to pay all fees of the city which apply to thiS~ II ( Slgn~ Date :1).,., ~I 13 \, \ I j JUI'H}4-1993 09 34 FROM TRAl'r':*lt'1ER I CA T I Tl..E -Oi.. y lW T t:W'1 rt'J.:: ,,) ~ I ~~ ffl ~ '~ ~1 \. J\ !,~ ~~ :,~ ~ '~ ~ 'J ,~ ,~ :i , 'j ~ ~1 ,~ ~ ~ 1 ~.\ I~ :~ g k\ ~ " t ~~i l; " ~ " EXH121T "Aft 1ICHE1')U~ c: ORDEn NO.: 354~7 l'AClt NO. I FOVR THE LAND RE~tRREO TO HRft!IK !S S~~ATED 1~ THE ST^T~ OF WA,llINGTON, COUNTY or THtlRSTON ANO IS O&SCRIUD As FOLLOwS; "J:1ili: SOUTH 100 Pl:;BT Of THAT PAAT OF TItE w.ru..IAM W. PLUMS DOlihTIOI1 CLl'III1 NO. 57, 'rOWNS11IP ),8 NO~, RANGE 2 WltST, w. M , LYINC SOU'l'IDlBSTElilL'i or COl)NT'i RO.\D KNOWN l\S 8UTLEP. co...!: l\O1l0 AND NO~Tll OF Non'l'H LINlt OF O'RClIAAO PARK, ~CCORDINC TO '1'HR l'L.l\T 'l'llERiOlt, RECOROED IN 'l'ournz 7 OF t'U'1'S. li'J\C~ ;p :l./a IN 't1tORS'l'ON COUNTr. WASHINGTOtf. , , " . ( Vol t 15105i.=> Pl,," $73 FilII No: St21217~S1004~ ; t ;~ ~ !: I . t. > ~; 'j. t ~ ., ~ ; -~ . -I"-'<~"-~~._- I . , -.. " 1a':llSl-~ TOTR\... P 02 TOTAL P 1211215 JI"'"-1j4-JJ Ul~ ..;.:.....h1 Fjl:: - " , ~~-~ ~~"'-""'&"i""'>"..'T'-"'''~",:::'.i'!IT.''''''itM'~~li.!li:>'L'''''''~W,,;r~,iIl)i!l'$?'''''''''t''''"''''''~''''~'''''''''':~'''''''~''''~j':lliJVj;;i!''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''",J:''_~~'<.!''''W''''''%'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''"""""',' .