Environmental Review
.---------.
l~ ""/ .,. ...-""
\i ...,--'
~._'_."
STATE OF WASHINGTON
PO. Box 47775 CIl Olympia, Washington 98504-7775 0
August 11, 1997
Ms. Shelly Badger, CIty AdmIlllstrator
CIty ofYelm
PO Box 479
Yelm, W A 98597
Dear Ms. Badger'
Thank you for the OppOrtUlllty to comment on the mItigated determInatIOn of nonslglllficance for the
dIvIsIOn on 01 acres mto twelve resIdential lots (SEP A No 8196), located on the east sIde of Mill Road
Just south of 104th Avenue East as proposed by John Hudd1eston/Nelghborhood Development Group We
revIewed the envIronmental checklist and have the followmg comments
ErosIOn control measures must be 10 place pnor to any cleanng, gradIng, or constructIOn. These control
measures must be effective to prevent soil from bemg carned into surface water by stormwater runoff.
Sand, SIlt, and sOIl wIll damage aquatic habItat and are conSIdered pollutants.
Any dIscharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state IS 10 vIOlatIOn of Chapter
9048, Water PollutIOn Control, and WAC 173-201A, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the
State ofWashmgton, and IS subject to enforcement actIOn.
Proper dIsposal of constructIOn debns must be on land 10 such a manner that debns cannot enter the natural
stormwater dram age system or cause 'Wat~r qualIty degradatIOn of state waters.
Proper eroSIOn and sedIment control practIces must be used on the constructIOn SIte and adjacent areas to
prevent upland sedIments from entering the natural stormwater dramage system. All areas dIsturbed or
newly created by constructIOn activIties must be revegetated, use bIOengineering techlllques, use clean
durable nprap, or some other eqUIvalent type of protectIOn agaInst erosion when other measures are not
practical
After completIOn of thIs proJect, there IS a likelihood that stormwater runoff wIll contam mcreased levels of
grease, OIls, sedIment, and other debns It IS recommended that stormwater treatment deVIces be Installed so
that any discharge will be appropnately treated to remove these substances
RoutIne mspectIOn and mamtenance of all sedIment and eroSIOn control deVIces IS recommended both
durmg and after development of the SIte
A sedImentatIon and erOSIOn control plan for the project SIte may be reqUIred and must be developed by a
licensed engmeer The plan must be implemented before and dunng constructIon The SIte must be
carefully mOllltored to determIne effectIveness of the plan The plan must be upgraded as necessary dunng
the constructIOn penod.
Dunng constructIOn, all releases of oils, hydraulic flUIds, fuels, other petroleum products, paints, solvents,
and other deletenous matenals must be contamed and removed In a manner that WIll prevent theIr dIscharge
to waters and SOlIs of the state The cleanup of spIlls should take precedence over other work on the SIte
For All Proposed Sewered Developments.
Engmeering reports, plans and specificatIOns must be submItted to the Department of Ecology for approval.
Reports must meet the reqUIrements of Chapter 173-240 Washmgton AdmmlstratIve Code (WAC) Wntten
approval from Ecology IS reqUIred before begmnIng constructIOn
...,...
@
Ms. Shelly Badger
August 11, 1997
Page 2
Plans and specIfications for sewer lIne extensIon shall mclude, as a separate report, an analysIs of the
eXlstmg collectIOn and treatment system's ability to transport and treat addItional flow and loading.
If all of the followmg condItions are met, engmeenng reports, plans and specIficatIOns for sewer l1ne
extenSIOns, mcludmg pump statIOns, need not be submItted to Ecology for approval.
* The local government entity provldmg sewer service has already receIved Ecology
approval of a general sewer plan.
* The local government entity provldmg sewer servIce has already receIved Ecology
approval of standard design cntena.
* The local government entity has submItted to Ecology a wntten descriptIon of the project
and a wntten statement that It conforms WIth the approved general sewer plan.
* The proposed sewers and pump statIOns do not mvolve the mstallation of overflows or
bypasses
* The proposed sewers, pump or lift statIons do not dIscharge to an overloaded treatment,
collection or dIsposal facIl1ty
For All Developments Proposed in the Puyallup RIver Basm.
There is a total maXImum daIly load (TMDL) established for biochemIcal oxygen demand (BOD) and
ammoma in the Puyallup RIver Basm. All dischargers to the nver have established waste load allocatIOns
for BOD and Ammollla. Any addltIOnalloadmg to the nver IS subJect to avaIlable capaCIty The TMDL
prohibIts any additIOnalloadmg from this development to the nver unless speCIfically allocated.
If you have any questions, please call Mr Bob Duffy WIth Ecology's Water Quality Program at (360)
407-0239
Sincer.ely,
(--L~, ~P>
Charles Gale
ASSIstant to the Regional Director
(360) 407-6309
CG.alw (97-5158)
cc Abbe WhIte, SWRO
Bob Duffy, SWRO
~.
YELM
WASHINGTON
City oif Ye llrm. f'--. t~-r7;-n \\-~~..~ ~::::,
'I 1'\ LS': \..] l.:.. ,J L. '.11 , \ I
11r---------- - 'I,!; 1.1
105 Yelm Avenue West lI~V~~G -. 5, 1,99~\'WI "II
POBox 479 d \ U
Yelm, Washington 98597 I =C"'7""-"'=~X'T~
(360) 458-3244, SEPA NO 8196
I..----..-...~,~,...-
MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Proponent:
Johh Huddleston/Neighborhood Development Group
Description of Proposal
Planned Residential Development/Preliminary Plat to develop 3 01 acres. The
proposal is for twelve (12) residential lots with ten (10) of the lots having zero (0)
lot line setbacks.
Location of the Proposal
East side of Mill Road just south of 104th Ave SE., Tax Parcel 22730220700
Section/T ownship/Range
Section 30, Township 17N, Range 2E, W.M.
Threshold Determination
The City ofYelm as lead agency for this action has determined that this proposal
does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment.
Therefore, an environmental impact statement (EIS) will not be required under
RCW 43.21 C 030(2)(c) This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency This
information is available to the public on request.
ConditionslMitigating Measures
The applicant shall negotiate and enter into a Mitigation Agreement with the Yelm
School District prior to final plat. School mitigation fees are payable at time of
building per issuance
Lead agency'
Responsible Official
City ofYelm
Shelly Badger, City Administrator
Date of Issue
Comment Deadline
July 31, 1997
5'00 pm, August 15, 1997
L->
inistrator
This Determination ,qfJ;~!2JJ~,QPlfi!?gg2~;.j~j~"~;IJ,~g,,{?J;!~:>JH~P~[t.9"~gp,,"QjQ9l9,n.,6.gmin.i~tr~~Y~ Code 197-11-340(2) The City of
Yelm wil.1 not acton\t.his proposal prior to 5'00 p.m ,August 18,1997 Comments must b$ submitted to Catherine Carlson,
City Planner, City dfYelm, POBox 479, Yelm, WA 9859?by 5:00 p..m 6\Jgu~t,~~i~,1997
~ "'"','%".'"''''''';''' G'!)i~,r" r"'~'l~~o " c" C;r,{:,::, )
You may appeal th~determination to theYelhiCity CoLincil, at above address, by submitting a written appeal no later than
5 00 pm, August ~1, 1997 ;1'J~9U should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Agnes Bennick, City
Clerk, to learn morJ1about thi:;"p'rocedures for SEPA appeals. This MDNS is not a permit and does not by itself constitute
project approval lThe applical1t must comply with all applicable requirements of t~"e City of Yelm prior to receiving
construction permi~, : "
~ ~...'" ~ f
~ t
~J --------
I ~~~.~~~~~~~,~.~~:,:~:~:,~~:.,~:~~(:"...,"".,,",.,.".{~~ ~
Published Nisqual)y Valley News, August 7, 1997
Posted in public a~~as. July 31, 1997 ,.~ .'Jo' f\
Copiesto July31,~1997, Dept"a.~.~lew&WLeli1e~lis~~~...;;."fi~Jjl f)
All age1F!.:~t~~~:'~'::.;~~~~$:~~~~~r~~~;~~;;~~~::~;::;., );
RECEIVED
AUG 1 1997
OLYIVWllJ tit\1IUN
R<cyckd pap"
Citiy ({j)f YcellJ1}1J
":
105 Yelm Avenue .West
POBox 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
(360) 458-3244'
'MITIGATED DE:rERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
SEPA NO 8196
Proponent
Description of Propos~1
Location of the Proposal
, .
\
Section/Township/Ra nge
Threshold Determination
" ,Conditions/Mitigating Measures.
Lead agency:
Responsible Official
Dat~ of Issue
Comment Deadline
Johh Huddleston/Neighborhood, Development Group
Planned Residential. DevelopmenUPreliniinary Plat to develop 3 01 acres. ThE?
proposal is for twelve (1,2) residential lots ~ith. ten (10) of the lots having zero (0)'
lot line .setbacks "
East side of Mill.Road just south of 194th Ave SE, Tax Parcel 22730220700
Section ~O, Township 17N, Range2E,.,W,M
, .
The City ofYelm as I~ad agency for this action has deternlin.ed, that this proposal
does not have a probable significant adverse, impact on the environment.
Therefore, an,environmental impact statem~nt (EIS) will no't be required under
RCW 43.21C 030(2)(c) This decision was ma<;le aftenevieyv of a completed.
environmental checklist and. other information on file with the lead ag~ncy This
informatioriis available to. the publjc on request. .
The applicant snali negoti~te and enter into a Mitigation Agreement with..the Yelm
School. District prior to finall?lat. School mitigation fees are payable attime of
bui,ldinQ per issuanqe
City qf Yehn
Shelly Badger, 'CityAdministrator
..'
This Determination of NonSignificance is issued pursuant to Washington A,dministrative Code 197-11-340(2) 'The'City of,'
Yelrilwil.1 not aCt on this proposal prior to 5'00 p m ; August 18, 1997 '(:;omments must be submitted to Catherine Carlson"
City Planner, City of Yelm, POBox 479, Yelm, WA.98597 by 5'00 p.rn AUQust 15, '1997
Yol,l ni~y appeaLthis determination 'to the Yelm City Council, .~t 9bove, address, by submittihg a written appeal no later than
5 00 P ni , August 21., 1997 You should I;>e prepared to r:nake specific factual objectiqns. Contact Agnes,Bennick, City
Clerk;,to learn more about thepro.cedures for SEPA appeals This MDNS is not a permit 9nd does .not by itself constitute
, proj~~t approval The applicant must comply with aiL applicaple req!Jirements of the City of Yelm prior to receiving
con?tructiori permits .
. . . .. .. , ' , "
-----------------------------------------
, ..
DO NOT PUBLI.SH BELOW THIS LINE'
Puqlished' Nisqually Valley'News, August 7 ,1'~97
Posted in public aIei'ls July 31, 1997
,Copies'lo July 31., 1~97, Dept. of Ecology Wlchecklist
All agencies/cjti:ens on SEPA mailing liS~ adjage~f property owners
Recycled ,paper
t;;::,
A BACKGROUND
Name of proposed proJect, If any'
MILL PARK PLACE, A P.R.D
2 Name of applIcant:
NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT GROUP
3 Address and phone number of applIcant and of any other contact person.
JOHN HUDDLESTON - POBOX 1206 YELM, WA 98597 (360) 458-9106
4 Date checklIst prepared.
JULY 3 1, 1997
5 Agency requestmg checklIst.
CITY OF YELM PLANNING
6 Proposed tImmg or schedule (includmg phasmg, If applIcable)
ASAP
7 Do you have any plans for future addItiOnS, expansIOn, or further activIty related to or
connected wIth thIS proposal? If yes, explam.
NO
8 LISt any envIronmental mformatIOn you know about that has been prepared, or wIll be
prepared, dIrectly related to thIS proposal.
NONE
9 Do you know whether applIcatIOns are pendmg for governmental approvals of other
proposals dIrectly affectmg the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explam.
NONE KNOWN
10 LISt any government approvals or permIts that wIll be needed for your proposal, If
known.
CITY OF YELM PLANNING AND PUBLIC WORKS PERMITS & APPROVALS
11 GIve bnef, complete descnptIOn of your proposal, mcludmg the proposed uses and the SIze
of the project and SIte There are several questIOns later m thIS checklIst that ask you to
descrIbe certam aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on thIS
page
DEVELOP EXISTING 301 ACRE PARCEL INTO 12 LOTS WITH 10 LOTS
HAVING ZERO LOT LINE SETBACK. PARCEL HAS BEEN PREDEVELOPED
AS A 7 LOT SHORTPLAT WITH ALL CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED
....It ,
12 LocatIOn of the proposal GIve sufficIent mformatIOn for a person to understand the
preCIse locatIOn of your proposed proJect, mcludmg a street address, If any, and sectIOn,
townshIp, and range, If known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provIde the
range or boundanes of the sIte(s) ProvIde a legal descnptIOn, SIte plan, vlclmty map, and
topographIc map, If reasonably aVaIlable You need not duplIcate maps or detaIled plans
submItted wIth any permIt applIcatIOns related to thIS checklIst.
PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MILL ROAD
APPROXIMATEL Y 1300 FEET SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF MILL
ROAD AND SR 507 THE SITE ADDRESS IS 10440 MILL ROAD SE AND IS
LOCATED IN SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 2 EAST, W.M.
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
Earth
a. General descnptIOn of the SIte (cIrcle one) Cfl~J rollmg, hIlly, steep slopes,
mountamous, other
b What IS the steepest slope on the SIte (approXImate percent slope)?
1%
c What general types of soIls are found on the SIte (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? If you know the classIficatIOn of agncultural soIls, specIfy them and note any
pnme farmland.
GRA VELL Y LOAM
d. Are there surface mdlcatIOns or hIstory of unstable soIls m the ImmedIate vlcmlty? If so,
descn be
NO
e Descnbe the purpose, type, and approxImate quantities of any fillmg or gradmg proposed.
IndIcate source of fill.
NO PHYSICAL CHANGES WILL OCCUR ON SITE WITH THIS PROPOSAL
f Could eroSIOn occur as a result of cleanng, constructIOn, or use? If so, generally describe
NO
g About what percent of the SIte WIll be covered WIth ImpervIOus surfaces after project
constructIOn such as asphalt or bUIldmgs?
30%
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control eroSIon, or other Impacts to the earth, If any
NONE
, .
2 Air
a. What types of emISSIOns to the aIr would result from the proposal (i.e , dust, automobIle
exhaust, odors, mdustrIal wood smoke) dUrIng constructIOn and when the proJect IS
completed? If any, generally describe and gIve approXImate quantitIes Ifknown.
NO CHANGE FROM PRESENT SITUATION
b Are there any off-sIte sources of emISSIOns or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe
NO
c Proposed measures to reduce or control emISSIOns or other Impacts to air, If any
NONE
3 Water
a. Surface Water
1) Is there any surface water body or wetland on or m the ImmedIate vlcmlty of the SIte
(includmg year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds)? If yes, descrIbe type
and provIde names. State what stream or nver It flows mto?
NO
2) Will the proJect reqUIre any work over, m, or adJacent to (wlthm 300 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach aVailable plans
NO
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge materIal that would be placed m or removed from
surface water or wetlands and mdlcate the area of the SIte that would be affected. IndIcate
the source of fill materIal
N/A
4) Will the proposal reqUIre surface water wIthdrawals or dIversIOns? GIve general
deSCrIptIOn, purpose, and approXImate quantItIes Ifknown.
NO
5) Does the proposal he wlthm a 100-year floodplam? If so, note elevatIOn on the SIte plan.
NO
6) Does the proposalmvolve any dIscharges of waste matenals to surface waters? If so,
descrIbe the type of waste and anticIpated volume of dIscharge
NO
b Groundwater
1) Will groundwater be wIthdrawn, or wIll water be dIscharged to groundwater? GIve
general deSCrIptIOn, purpose, and approxImate quantities Ifknown.
NO
2) Descnbe the underlymg aqUIfer wIth regard to quahty and quantIty, sensItivIty,
protectIOn, recharge areas, etc
UNKNOWN
3) Descnbe waste matenal that wIll be discharged mto or onto the ground from septic tanks
or other sources, If any (such as domestIc sewage, mdustnal byproducts, agncultural
chemIcals)
NONE, ALL LOTS WILL BE CONNECTED TO CITY OF YELM SEWER
c Water Runoff (includmg storm water)
I) Descnbe the source of runoff (includmg storm water) and method of collectIOn and
dIsposal, If any (include quantItIes, Ifknown) Where will thIS water flow? Will thIS
water flow mto other waters? If so, describe
NATURAL STORM WATER WILL BE COLLECTED IN STORM DRAINAGE
TRACT "B" AND CONTAINED ON SITE
2) Could waste matenals enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe
NO
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water Impacts, If any'
NONE
4 Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetatIOn found on the sIte
deciduous tree alder, maple, oak, aspen, other
= evergreen tree @cedar, pme, other
shrubs
-~
_ pasture
_ crops or grams
_ wet SOIl plants cattaIl, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other
_ water plants water lIly, eelgrass, milfOII, other
_ other types of vegetatIOn
b What kmd and amount of vegetatIOn wIll be removed or altered?
AS REQUIRED FOR RESIDENCE AND ACCESS
c List threatened or endangered speCIes known to be on or near the site
NOT KNOWN
d Proposed landscapmg, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetatIOn on the Site, if any
NORMAL RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPING AND NATIVE TREES
W/SPRINKLERS AND GRASS PLANTED IN BUFFER AREAS
5 Animals
a. CIrcle any bIrds and annuals whIch have been observed on or near the sIte or are known to
be on or near the sIte
buds hawk, heron, ducks, eagle,~gblf(ib
other
mammals deer, bear, elk, beaver, other
fish. bass, salmon, trout, shellfish, other
b LISt any pnonty, threatened or endangered speCIes known to be on or near the sIte
NOT KNOWN
c Is the sIte part of a mIgratIOn route? If so, explam.
NOT KNOWN
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wIldlIfe, If any
NONE
6 Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kmds of energy (electnc, natural gas, gasolme, heatmg oIl, wood, solar etc ) wIll be
used to meet the completed proJect's energy needs? Describe whether It WIll be used for
heatmg, manufactunng, transportatIOn, etc
ELECTRIC, NATURAL GAS, WOOD
b Would your proJect affect the potentIal use of solar energy by adjacent propertIes? If so,
generally describe
NO
c What kmds of energy conservatIOn features are mcluded m the plans of thIS proposal?
LISt other proposed measures to reduce or control energy Impacts, If any
STRUCTURES WILL BE BUILT TO MEET LATEST ENERGY CODE
7 Environmental Health
a. Are there any envIronmental health hazards, mcludmg exposure to tOXIC chemIcals, nsk of
fire and explosIOn, spIlls, of hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of thIS proposal?
If so, descnbe
NO
1) Describe specIal emergency serVIces that mIght be reqmred.
NO CHANGE
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control envIronmental health hazards, If any
NONE
b NOIse
1) What types of nOIse eXIst In the area WhICh may affect your proJect (for example traffic,
eqUIpment operatIOn, other)?
NORMAL RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC
2) What types and levels of nOIse would be created by or assocIated wIth the proJect on a
short-term or a long-term basIs (for example traffic, constructIOn, operatIOn, other)?
IndIcate what hours nOIse would come from the sIte
SHORT TERM CONSTRUCTION NOISE NORMAL TO DEVELOPMENT OF
HOUSES AND ACCESS ROAD DURING REGULAR WORK HOURS
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control nOIse Impacts, If any
NONE
8 Land and Shoreline Use
a. What IS the current use of the sIte and adJacent propertIes?
SITE IS VACANT EXCEPT FOR EXISTING HOUSE ON LOT 1 ADJOINING
PARCELS ARE SINGLE F AMIL Y RESIDENCES
b Has the sIte been used for mIneral excavatIOn, agnculture or forestry? If so, describe
NOT KNOWN
c Descnbe any structures on the sIte
HOUSE WITH DETACHED GARAGE AND WELL HOUSE ON LOT 1
d Will any structures be demolIshed? If so, what?
NO
e What IS the current comprehensIve plan deSIgnatIOn of the sIte?
R-4
f What IS the current zomng classIficatIOn of the sIte?
R-4
g If applIcable, what IS the current shorelIne master program deSIgnatIOn of the sIte?
N/A
h. Has any part ofthe sIte been classIfied as a "natural resource", "cntIcal" or
envIronmentally sensItIve" area? If so, speCIfy
NOT KNOWN
1. ApproxImately how many people would resIde or work In the completed proJect?
12 LOTS, EACH WITH A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
J Approxllnately how many people would the completed project dIsplace?
NONE
k. Proposed measures to aVOId or reduce dIsplacement Impacts, If any
NONE
Proposed measures to ensure the proposal IS compatible wIth eXlstmg and projected land
uses and plans, If any
NONE
9 Housing
a. ApproxImately how many umts would be provIded, If any? IndIcate whether hIgh,
mIddle, or low-mcome housmg
ELEVEN ADDITIONAL SINGLE F AMIL Y DWELLINGS, MIDDLE-INCOME
HOUSING
b ApproXImately how many umts, If any, would be elImmated? IndIcate whether hIgh,
Imddle, or low-mcome housmg
NONE
c Proposed measures to reduce or control housmg Impacts, If any'
NONE
10 Aesthetics
a. What IS the tallest heIght of any proposed structure(s), not mcludmg antennas, what IS the
pnnclpal extenor bUIldmg matenal(s) proposed?
TWO STORY DWELLING, MAX. 30', WITH WOOD, VINYL OR MASONRY
EXTERIOR
b What VIews m the ImmedIate vlclmty would be altered or obstructed?
NO CHANGE
c Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetIC Impacts, If any
STRUCTURES WILL BE OF TRADITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL STYLING
11 Light and Glare
a. What type of hght or glare wIll the proposal produce? What tIme of day would It mamly
occur?
NORMAL RESIDENTIAL PARKING AND SECURITY LIGHTING
b Could lIght or glare from the fimshed proJect be a safety hazard or mterfere WIth VIews?
NO
c What eXIstmg off-SIte sources of lIght or glare may affect your proposal?
NONE
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control lIght and glare Impacts, If any
NONE
12 Recreation
a. What desIgnated and mformal recreatIOnal opportumtIes are m the ImmedIate VICInIty?
COCHRAN PARK APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET TO THE NORTH
b Would the proposed project dIsplace any eXlstmg recreatIOnal uses? If so, describe
NO
c Proposed measures to reduce or control Impacts or provIde recreatIOn opportUnItIes
NONE
13 Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or obJects lIsted on, or proposed for, natIOnal, state, or local
preservatIOn regIsters known to be on or next to the SIte? If so, generally descnbe
NONE KNOWN
b Generally describe any landmarks or eVIdence ofhlstonc, archeologIcal, sCIentIfic, or
cultural Importance known to be on or next to the SIte
NONE KNOWN
c Proposed measures to reduce or control Impacts, If any
NONE
14 Transportation
a. IdentIfy sIdewalks, trails, publIc streets and hIghways servmg the SIte, and descnbe
proposed access to the eXIstmg street system. Show on SIte plans, If any
MILL ROAD SE SERVES THE SITE
b Is SIte currently served by publIc tranSIt? By what means? If not, what plans eXIst for
tranSIt servIce?
YES, INTERCITY TRANSIT SERVICE ON SR 507
c How many parkmg spaces would the completed proJect have? How many would the
project elImmate?
N/A
d. Will the proposal reqUIre any new SIdewalks, traIls, roads or streets, or Improvements to
eXIstmg SIdewalks, trails, roads or streets, not mc1udmg dnveways? If so, generally
describe (mdIcate whether publIc or pnvate)
APPROXIMA TEL Y 600' OF PUBLIC ROADS
e Will the project use (or occur m the ImmedIate VIClllIty of) water, raIl, or air
transportatIOn? If so, generally describe
NO
f. How many vehIcular tnps per day would be generated by the completed project? If
known, mdlcate when peak volumes would occur
12 x 4 = 48 T.P.D (APPROX.)
NORMAL RESIDENTIAL
g Proposed measures to reduce or control transportatIOn Impacts, If any
NONE
15 Public Services
a. Would the project result m an mcreased need for publIc serVIces (for example fire
protectIOn, polIce protectIOn, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe
AS REQUIRED FOR 12 ADDITIONAL FAMILIES
b Proposed measures to reduce or control dIrect Impacts on pubhc serVIces, If any
WILL WORK WITH PUBLIC AGENCIES TO REDUCE IMPACTS AS MUCH AS
POSSIBLE
16 Utilities
a. CIrcle utIlItIes currently aVailable at the sIte electnclty
@epho~nitary seweg septIC system, other
b Descnbe the utilItIes that are proposed for the project, the utIlIty provldmg the serVIce,
and the general constructIOn actIvItIes on the sIte or m the ImmedIate vIcmlty whIch mIght
be needed.
ELEC & GAS PUGET SOUND ENERGY
TELE YELM TELEPHONE
SEWER. CITY OF YELM SANITARY SEWER
WATER. CITY OF YELM
C SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge I understand that the
CIty of Yelm IS relymg on them to make ItS deCISIOn.
SIgnature 2~~ A. ~
Date SubmItted. ;:;Ti,.,.1y 1/ J I ~97