Checklist & MDNS
"
DEVELOPMENT
July 15, 1998
Cathie Carlson
City ofYelm
POBox 479
Yelm, W A 98597
RE: Nisqually Plaza
Safeway Determination of Significance - Land Use Case SPR-978220- YL
Dear Cathie
The letter is m response to the DeterminatIOn ofNonsIgmficance Issued for the Land Use Case
SPR-978220- YL
As you know, the Nisqually Plaza funded the largest percentage of the traffic signal at the Vancil
RoadlY elm Avenue mtersection. The City mdicate It would reqUIre that proponents of future
projects benefiting from the traffic sIgnal, as a condItion of permIt approval, enter mto an
agreement wIth Gramor to contribute towards the cost of the traffic signal installatIOn. Enclosed
herewith IS a copy of a May 11, 1993 letter from Shelly Badger acknowledgmg and confirm the
agreement.
Therefore, Gramor requests the City, as noted in the aforementioned letter, condition the
Safeway project accordingly. I envisIOn the condItion and process could be sImilar, but
hopefully much less rancorous, to the condItion the CIty imposed upon the NIsqually Plaza
buildmg permIt of satIsfymg Mrs. McAlexander concemmg her parkmg area and the common
drIveway between the propertIes.
As always, feel free to contact me If you have any questIOns or comments
c
cc. Mitch Johnson, Safeway
Enclosure
rde
1133 164TH ST S W I SUITE 107 I LYNNWOOD WA 98037-8121 1(425) 742-0520 FAX (425) 742-5553
SEATTLE I PORTLAND I SAN DIEGO
d< ",mo.,,,
International Counctl
~ ot$lloppongCcnters
.";,.
105 Yelm Avenue West
POBox 479
Yelm. Washington 98597
(206) 458-3244
d.
City ofYelm
,...__._.~~~~~~;~~;;;;~~~~~
May 11, 1993
Richard Embry, Project Manager
Gramor Development N W., Inc
1133 164th St. SW, Suite 107
Lynnwood, WA 98037
RE: Nisqually Plaza, Yelm Avenue Traffic Signal
Construction and Participation.
Dear Richard:
To confirm our previous conversation, ~e will require Gramor
Development to construct the traffic signal at the Nisqually
Plaza main access driveway/Vancil Rd intersection with Yelm
Ave We will, as a condition of future project approvals,
require that those developments and projects that will
directly impact the service of the traffic signal enter an
agreement with Gramor Deveiopment concerning its prorata
share of the traffic signal construction and design costs.
Said agreement wiTl be required prior to issuance of any
construction permits respective to said developments and
projects. Typically, the agreement will involve a prorata
share that will b~ ~etermined by a calculation on the
estimated v~hicle trips that the development or project wi~l
contribute to the intersection.
I trust this brief acknowledgment formalizes and satisfies
your lenders concern regarding the issue surrounding future
,prorata share of the costs for the traffic light
Sincerely,
~1~~ve
Officer
*
Recyc~.d paper
"
SEPA NO 8220
MITIGATED
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Proponent:
Safeway, I nc
Description of Proposal
Construction of a 56,232 Safeway Super Store with future retail space of
approximately 18,735 sq ft.
Location of the Proposal
SE corner or Yelm Avenue E and Vancil Road
Section/T ownship/Range
NE 1/4 Section 30, Township 17N Range 2E, Tax Parcel 22730110300
and 22730110400
Threshold Determination.
The City of Yelm as lead agency for this action has determined that this
proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the
environment. Therefore, an environmental impact statement (EIS) will
not be required under RCW 43.21C 030(2)(c) This decision was made
after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information
on file with the lead agency This information is available to the public on
request.
Conditions/Mitigating Measures
SEE ATTACHED
Lead agency'
Responsible Official
City of Yelm
Shelly Badger, City Administrator
Date of Issue.
Comment Deadline
July 2, 1998
5'00 pm, July 17,1998
.fudi
elly Badg,/ r, City Admin6trator
This Mitigated Determination of NonSignificance is issued pursuant to Washington Administrative Code 197-11-
340(2) The City of Yelm will not act on this proposal prior to 5'00 pm, July 24, 1998 Comments must be
submitted to Catherine Carlson, City Planner, at the address below by 5'00 pm, July 17, 1998
You may appeal this determination to the Yelm City Council, at above address, by submitting a written appeal no
later than 5'00 pm, July 24, 1998 You should be prepared to make specific factual objections Contact Agnes
Bennick, City Clerk, to learn more about the procedures for SEPA appeals. This MDNS is not a permit and does
not by itself constitute project approval The applicant must comply with all applicable requirements of the City of
Yelm prior to receiving construction permits which may include but are not limited to the City of Yelm
Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Title (17), Critical Areas Ordinance (14 08), Storm water Drainage Design and Erosion
Control Manual (DOE), Uniform Building Code, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Title (14), Road Design
Standards, Platting and Subdivision Title (16), and the Shoreline Master Program
DO NOT PUBLISH BELOW-THIS LINE
Published Nisqually Valley News, Thursday, July 9,1998
Posted in public areas. Tuesday, July 2, 1998
Copies to Dept. of Ecology w/checklist
All agencies/citizens on SEPA mailing list and adjacent property owners
ATTACHMENT
SEPA CASE NO 8220
This Mitigated Determination of NOl Significance is based on the project as proposed and impacts and
mitigation reflected in the following
. Environmental Checklist (dated May 5, 1998, prepared by Tiland/Schmidt Architects, PC)
. Traffic Impact Analysis (dated May 6, 1998, prepared by Heffron Transportation)
. Drainage and Erosion Control Report (dated May 8, 1998, prepared by AHR Engineers, Inc.)
. Geotechnical Engineering Study (dated March 2, 1998, prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc.)
. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (dated October 16, 1998, prepared by Hahn and
Associates, Inc.)
. Traffic Impact Analysis Review LettS" (dated June 23, 1998, prepared by SCA Engineering, Inc
for the City of Yelm)
And the following conditions
1 The applicant shall mitigate transportation impacts as detailed in the Traffic Impact Analysis
Review Letter, dated June 23, 1998, and the Traffic Impact Analysis, dated May 6, 1998
2. The applicant shall contribute $750 per new PM peak hour trip generated by the project. The
Transportation Facility Charge (TFC) shall be based on 450 new trips, the proponent will be
responsible for a TFC of $337,50000 The applicant is eligible for an econOllic benefit credit as
provided by Ordinance 580
"'r f.:O
J'
'11-}
/
/
/!
./
\~:
'\~
!~
\,
\"
:!
...
"
~
'11'1 'Illll'l
!II ill I
I II
'\ Hill II ,
I ~ !l "!Ill ~
m~
l0J~
..
\JO
\ll
. - II Iii f'9~
'11111
~ b. Ii III
II 11~3
111 IP,!
I'!
..
~
i
l
,
.,...,.
q
~
'\
l!i ft
"lIB ~Il
III .
i-
~ ~
r,
lJ
I
."
)-
z
F'l'!op~ED &AI'EUlAY &TORE No, Ib~
Yl!V1 .AY&Ue Ie"AOf
Te:LM. ~NGT(lN
........,.~,.. ......-~.~---
~TII.^ND/SCHMIPT
t-. ..fItC:"'~T.G.T.. ~.c::.
t J" ~."l"" ...".... ..". ....
I .....,....... ... "1..
....It...", ,.... .....,.......
I
....J
I
c.J
'I
e-J
'I
~
'I
Lj
"
t-J
"
LJ
~
u
"
L1
'I
u
r'-1
LJ
'1
I
LJI
II
LJ
'1
~
r-,
LJ
n
u
n
L1
1'\
U
II
u
CITY OF YELM
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
A
BACKGROUND
1.
Name of proposed project, if any:
Yelm Market Center
2.
Name of applicant:
Frank SchmIdt for Safeway Inc
3.
Address and phone number of applicant and of any other contact person:
Frank SchmIdt: Tiland/SchmIdt ArchItects, P C
333 S W 5lh Ave, SUIte 406 Portland, OR 97204
Mitch Johnson Safeway Inc
1121 NE l24lh Street Bellevue, W A 98005
4.
Date checklist prepared:
May 5, 1998
5.
Agency requesting checklist:
Plannmg department
6.
Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
SItework and Safeway bUIldmg completed and open prIor to the end of ] 998 The
pad bUIldmgs antICIpated to follow wIthm the next few years.
7.
Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
Yes. The land behmd the proposed Safeway bUIldmg at the south. wIll be bUIlt-
out at a later date The use IS unknown at thIS time
8.
List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared,
or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
1 Traffic Impact AnalYSIS
2 Level of ServIce Impact
3 Dramage and EroSIOn Control Report
4 Geotechmcal Engmeenng Study' Earth Consultants, Inc
5 Dramage CalculatIOns
6 InformatIOn ProVided by Washmgton Department of Ecology
7 Phase One EnVIronmental SIte Assessment
8 Good Faith Asbestos and Lead Survey
9.
Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals
of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal?
If yes, explain
No
PAGE I
I
--J
I
cJ
'I
~
'I
~
!
o
'1
u
'I
12.
LJ
r1,
u
r---,
u
r----,
LJ
~
B
u
1.
11
u
r--,
u
'1
LJ
'!
U
'1
LJ
11
U
r-'\
u
11
,
I
U
10.
List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for our
proposal, if known.
SIte desIgn reVIew approval.
11.
Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed
uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in
this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You
do not need to repeat those answers on this page.
Proposmg bUIldmg A Safeway grocery store of 56,232 S.F And one future m-
Ime retaIl bUIldmg of approxImately 18,735 S.F On an overall sIte of 11.3 acres.
Surface parkmg, landscapmg, SIte IIghtmg WIth subsurface stonn dramage wIll
encompass the SIte between the proposed bUIldmgs
Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to
understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street
address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal
would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site
(s). Provide a leeal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topoeraphic map,
if reasonably available. You need not duplicate maps or detailed plans
submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.
Property located at the south east comer of VancIl Road and Y elm Avenue East.
Refer to the attached survey developed by Bush, Roed & HItchmgs, Inc for The
Legal DescnptIon.
ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one):
C@ rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous,
other
b.
What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
3-4 percent at south.
c.
What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay,
sand sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of
agriculture soils, specify them and note any prime farmland.
Fonnally a fann and orchard, soIl generally fine to medIUm sand WIth sIlt
and gravel Refer to soIls mvestIgatIOn.
d.
Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the
immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
No
PAGE 2
'I
I
c..-J
'I
u
11
o
~
LJ
11
w
r;
u
11
u
i)
L1
'1
J
n
2
u
!7
u
n
LJ
'I
U
n
LJi
~f
U
3 Water
'1
U
n
!
U
M
L1
11
u
e.
Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling
or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
GradIng and fillIng to prOVIde bUIldIng sIte and parkIng lot for store,
shallow cuts and fills over the entire sIte WIll total about 20,000 c y
f.
Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use? If so,
generally describe.
Yes, mass excavatIOn wIll dISrupt the overall sIte However through
erOSIOn control measures wIll contaIn runoff.
g.
About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious
surfaces after project construction such as asphalt or buildings?
ApproXImately 75%
h.
Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to
the earth, if any:
The proJect contractor WIll Implement a temporary eroSIon and
sedImentatIOn control plan that wIll lImIt, contaIn, trap and control erOSIon
from the sIte
Air
a.
What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.,
dust, automobile exhaust, odors, industrial wood smoke) during
construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally
describe and give approximate quantities if known.
Dust from excavation, and automobIle exhaust after proJect IS complete
b.
Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect
your proposal? If so, generally describe.
No
c.
Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to
air, if any:
A water truck WIll be used In the sIte actiVIties to control the dust from sIte
vehIcles and constructIOn eqUIpment.
a. Surface Water
1 Is there any surface water body or wetland on or in the immediate
vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams,
saltwater, lakes, ponds)? If yes, describe type and provide names.
State what stream or river it flows into?
No
PAGE 3
!
~
'l
L.l
'1
2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 300
feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available
plans.
No
L.J
'\
LJ
3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed
in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of
the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
None.
LJ
'1
LJ
4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions?
Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if
known.
None
Cj
n
L.J
r1
5. Does the proposal lie within a tOO-year floodplain? If so, note
elevation on the site plan.
No
L.J
u
6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface
waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of
discharge.
No
n
11
,
LJ
b. Groundwater:
r'J
n
1. Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to
groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate
quantities if known.
No
u
LJ
III
J
'I
LJI
2. Describe the underlying aquifier with regard to quality and quantity,
sensitivity, protection, recharge areas, etc.
The area IS generally tributary to Yelm Creek. whIch eventually flows mto
the msqually rIver No speCial sensItive areas known.
II
I
3. Describe waste material that will be discharged into or onto the
ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (such as domestic
sewage; industrial byproducts; agricultural chemicals).
None Only treated storm water from the sIte WIll be retamed on-sIte
u
11
LJ
11
\
U
c.
Water runoff (including storm water):
'1
u
PAGE 4
n
J
'I
~
'I
I
~
'1
LJ
rJ
,
LJ
n
u
!)
u
1\
u
rl
L..1
4 Plants
r-J
u
"
LJ
r/
L1
n
,
u
n
,
w
n
\
u'
"
I
U
Ii
L1
n
I
U
'1
U
'i'
I
LJ
1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of
collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where
will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,
describe.
Surface water runoff from ImpervIOUS areas WIll be collected, treated m
wet tanks and percolated m retention areas onsIte Roof drams wIll be
percolated dIrectly mto the retentIOn systems.
2. Could wasted materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,
generally describe.
Not likely
d.
Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runofff
water impacts, if any:
As stated the surface water wIll be treated (6 month storm per WDOE
gUIdelInes) pnor to percolatmg mto retention areas onsIte
a.
Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
x
alder, maple, oak, aspen, other
fir, cedar, pine, other
deciduous tree:
evergreen tree:
shrubs
grasses
pasture
crops or grains
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk
cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, mifoil, other
other types of vegetation
x
X
b.
What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
MaJonty of the eXIstmg vegetatIOn wIll be removed and new vanetIes
planted.
c.
List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
N one present.
d.
Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to
preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
Enhanced vegetatIOn IS noted wIthm the landscape plan.
PAGE 5
'\
,--1
~
"
LJ
5
'\
,
L.J
-)
u
'I
LJ
'I
I
U
i\
'0
C\
LJ
Animals
a.
Circle any birds and animal which have been observed on or near the
site or are known to be on or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, ducks, eagle, songbirds, other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, shellfish, other:
b.
List any priority, threatened or endangered species known to be on or
near the site.
None
Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
No
c.
d.
Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
None
'J
6 Energy and natural resources
u
11
'LJ
r"i
LJ
II
LJ
r
u
'I
\
U
'1
I
U
7
'l
LJ
11
\
U
'1
LJ
n
LJ
a.
What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, gasoline, heating oil,
wood, solar etc.) will be used to meet the completed project's energy
needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,
transportation, etc.
ElectncIty and gas for heatmg and electncIty for IIghtmg.
b.
Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by
adjacent properties? If so, generally describe.
No
c.
What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans
of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control
energy impacts, if any:
HV AC umts eqUIpped WIth economIzers and IIghtmg eqUIpped with
electromc ballasts.
Environmental Health
a.
Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to
toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spills, of hazardous waste,
that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
No
1. Describe special emergency services that might be required.
None reqUIred.
PAGE 6
.,
~
'\
L-.l
'\
--l
"I
c.J
'I
--J
"I
~
'l
o
"\
L.J
I
w
1\
L.J
8
J)
u
'l
LJ
,.,
LJ
iT
u
n
LJ
1"1
U
rr
\
LJ
n
,
u
\T
LJ
2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health
hazards, if any:
None reqUIred.
b.
Noise
1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project
(for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)?
Traffic at pen meter of sIte, nothIng substantial on sIte
2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with
the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic,
construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would
come from the site.
Vanes nOise levels for the short term dunng constructIOn.
3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
General sIte nOises common to constructIOn WIll be short term wIth
common efforts to mInImIZe nOIse The bUIlt proJect WIll provIde nOIses
common to a development of thIS type
Land and shoreline use
a.
What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
SIte IS currently open grassland and partIal orchards SurroundIng
property IS a mIX of resIdential and commercIal
b.
Has the site been used for mineral excavation, agriculture or forestry?
If so, describe.
Agnculture farm and orchard.
c.
Describe any structures on the site.
Old houses and bam.
d.
Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
Yes all structures WIll be removed.
e. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
f.
What is the current zoning classification of the site?
C -1 CommercIal DIstnct 1
g.
If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program
designation of the site?
Not applIcable
PAGE 7
'I
I
U
'i
L-l
"
l-J
!
LJ
'I
LJ
"1
U
\l
u
'1
U
n
LJ
h.
Has any part of the site been classified as a "natural resource",
"critical" or "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
No
I.
Approximately how many people would reside or work in the
completed project?
ApproxImately 60 would work wIth In the completed proJect.
J.
Approximately how many people would the completed project
displace?
None
k.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
Not Applicable
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing
and projected land uses and plans, if any:
Proposed development confonmng to the current zomng and plannIng
codes.
9 Housing
11
LJ
\l
LJ
r\
u
"
u
II
u
10
'1
L.J
'I
U
n
!
U
~
I
LJ
\l
LJ
a.
Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
Not applIcable
b.
Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated?
Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
One mIddle Income home
c.
Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
Not applicable
Asethetics
a.
What is the tallest height of any proposed structure (s), not including
antennas; what is the principal exterior building material (s)
proposed?
40 Feet.
b.
What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
None
c.
Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
None
PAGE 8
'I
I
.....J
'"I
LJ
"
u
'I
LJ
'I
LJ
if
o
r"\
LJ
'\
u
n,
u
n
u
n
u
r\
u
"
LJ
n
u
Ii
J
'1
LJ
n
)
LJ
'1
I
U
'I
,
LJ
11
12
13
Light and glare
a.
'''hat type of light or glare will the proposal produce?
What time of day would it mainly occur?
Mostly parkIng lot lIghtIng after dark. UntIl clOSIng at approxImately
mIdmght.
b.
Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or
interfere with views?
No antIcIpated lIght or glare that would be consIdered a safety hazard or an
Interference wIth VIews.
What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your
proposal?
None
c.
d.
Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if
any:
ParkIng lot lIghtIng shIeldIng at penmeter lIghtIng
Recreation
a.
What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the
immediate vicinity?
None
b.
Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses?
If so, describe.
No
c.
Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts or provide recreation
opportunities:
Not applIcable
Historic and cultural preservation
a.
Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national,
state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the
site? If so, generally describe.
No
b.
Generally describe any landmarks 01' evidence of historic,
archeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or
next to the site
None
PAGE 9
'I
~
'I
e-J
fl
u
I
LJ
'I
LJ
'1
LJ
n
u
'I
L.J
fI
u
11
LJ
fl
u
11
u
11
u
<I
LJ
'I
u
'l
u
14
c.
Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
Not applIcable
Transportation
a.
Identify sidewalks, trails, public streets and highways serving the site,
and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on
site plans, if any.
SIdewalks and pedestnan walkways are mdIcated on the sIteplan
cIrculatIOn around the SIte IS well orgamzed.
b.
Is site currently served by public transit? By what means? If not,
what plans exist for transit service?
PublIc transportatIOn IS aVaIlable across Y elm Avenue East (s.r 507)
There does not eXIst any OpposItIOn to reroutmg the buses to the other SIde
of the street for dIrect access to the center
c.
How many parking spaces would the completed project have?
How many would the project eliminate?
461 new parkmg spaces and not parkmg WIll be dIsplaced.
d.
Will the proposal require any new sidewalks, trails, roads or streets,
or improvements to existing sidewalks, trails, roads ore streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether
public or private).
New sIdewalk.s wIll be reqUIred on Yelm Avenue East and East VancIl
Road, these WIll be publIc and are noted on the SIte plan.
e.
Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail,
or air transportation? If so, generally describe.
No
f.
How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the
completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would
occur.
Refer to the transportatIOn report by Heffron TransportatIOn.
g.
Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if
any:
Refer to the transportatIOn report.
15 Public Services
n
I
U
":
LI
n
LJ
a.
Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for
example. fire protection, police protection, health care, schools,
other)? If so, generally describe:
An mcrease of serVIces for the fire protection and polIce serVIces WIll be
reqUIred. PAGE 10
'I
c-l
,---,
L.J
rI
I
LJ
'I
U
'l
L.J
')
t-l
n
o
rI
u
r-"l
u
r\
u
rI
u
r1
u
(I
LJ
n
I~
'1
u
fl
o
r"l
LJ
'l
tJ
'l
I
LJ
b.
Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public
services, if any.
Measures m the stnct complIance wIth the fire codes wIll be met to
facIlItate a hIgh level of control for fire and publIc safety
16
Utilities
a.
Circle utilities currently available at the site:
electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary
sewer, septic system, other.
b.
Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility
providing the service, and the general construction activities on the
site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
Step samtary sewer connectIOn water mam loop around bUIldmg from E
Yelm to VancIl Road, gas to buIldmg new power servIce and pnmary
power relocatIOn on E. Yelm hIghway
C
SIGNA TURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I
understand that the City of Yelm is relying on them to make its decision.
Signature:
Date Submitted:
PAGE 11
"I
,~
'<\
L.J
SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
-)
(Do not use this sheet for project actions.)
--.J
,
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent of the
proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the
proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a
faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond
briefly and in general terms.
u
\
U
1.
How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to
water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of
toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
,.....,
t-J
r\
u
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
'I
~
2.
How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals,
fish, or marine life?
~
u
'1
U
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals,
fish, or marine life are:
r-,
LJ
3.
How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural
resources?
r\
u
n
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural
resources are:
LJ
,.,
LJ
4.
How would the proposal be likely to use or affect critical or
environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or
eligible or under study) for governmental protection, such as
parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or
endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites,
wetlands, floodplains, or natural resource areas?
1\
U
'I
o
f\
)
LJ
1\
I
L1
CITY OF YELM ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
forms\sepa
PAGE 1'C-
<\
Ll
/
J.
'1
~
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or
reduce impacts are:
~
~
'I
5.
How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline
use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or
shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
u
~
Li
"]
tJ
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use
impacts are:
r'1
L.J
'1
LJ
6.
How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on
transportation or public services and utilities?
'1
u
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
n
u
7.
Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with
local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the
protection of the environment.
n
u
r\
LJ
n
u
r<
L1
'I
LJ
n
u
rr
u
n
u
n
J
CITY OF YELH ENVIRONHENTAL CHECKLIST
forms\sepa
PAGE ':!>