Environmental Review
12/22(99 16 37 FAX
12122/99 04'05 FAX 2539526717
ORION SERVICBS
I4l 003
IilI 0 2
'OESi
~ .',~11~~.. ~
lj ~ ~ mJlll1U!~ LJU.l~ ~f
Industrial Hygiene Services
Hazardous Materials Investigation
Executive Summary
AsbestDs Survey
ORION Ptoject Nunber991512
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Residential Address
307 E. Yelm
Yelm, Washington
Prepared For
Clem Heath
PO Bo:!: 970
EatonviDe. Wultingtoll
~~~'f~~~l::i ;?:!!\!?~~~r.;I~~~t~~:~~7fl'1fott1i;c:~~i':'t>'"'~ ""J~~~b[4~l : ~: "HI'~ ,.~... V 1>>~1l,i~~ .~ f ~.'" ~,;! ..' . *1' <; . l.- l< ' .; ~ ""~ ~ "'; ~ ~~ "I'~:"';."'". " ~~", '
~{:'i~~f~ ,-.~" ,\?*:,,~l\ ,i;~l ~e':1t~'i~~;'~~~!.t'~iC'::J~~'!~':t~~!;{~. ;~,," ~ <.1 ~~~Q~4-.. ~_J'F~it~~<p~itji",~vt,~ ~~ :'~ -;- t~J,' ,,~~),;~<~t~"~.I~~"~{3~.1~1~.t~,R;t i'~r-~~'t'.",'>! ~~(/ r'" . '1.;'.~" 1 ~~~, ,..;
lr,~(~;:!~~~I.~( "~SL;'."):,:7^,~ ;J:~{j~4:~~:~'~~"~~J~l!'f.~ ! ,(~:,~t.: ~.<lv">'.v:~ "~ o~"" '~""4"{.~1~i! '"i.~;.,>;...ft; :,~h~ 4;;:~~.~::;g~ </' J~IJ:.~;iiq ~ t:~~.v~,~~tZ;~:c~r~~ ,,~t,,:~~ ',: :>,~<f. ~ n...':~',' " "
12/22/99 16.04
TX/RX NO 4284
P 002
.
12/22/99 16 37 FAX
12/22/99 03:50 FAX 2539528717
ORION SBRVICBS
I4l 004
~03
.
.
.
.
-. - {JES ~
.
$-Po- 1. (J
lmrodIu:IiDn
1.1 GeIIenIl
OnDeoember 9. 1999 ORION Environmemal Services. as an asbestos consultant to Mr.
Clem Heath, per funned an Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA)
building survey. The J)urposeof this suney was to ascertain if asbesros-contJlining
materials existed within and around the Iesidential structure located 307 E. Yebn Yelm.
Washin{!ton. This survey was perfunned by an accredited AHERA Building lnspector
Kenda Roberts ( ARGUS 992004: Expiration Date May 04~ 2000).
This asbestos inspection report renresents data that describes the type, and locations of
asbestos-cont"inina materials (ACMl associated with building comoonents at the subject
location. Thi.s report may be used. as a program..plannin,g tool for all construction..
maintenance. abatement. renovation and dmnolition activities scheduled in this area.. All
ACM identified in this r~rt mu9t be hAnillPJt in auordanee WIth aU applicable federal
state and local regulatory requirements.
This inspection report may aJM be used in conjunction wiI:b. any existing ~s m1l!
Maintenance Policv Manual for As'bestoS::Q)1Jtainine: Materials to insure mir'llmsll
exposure. All affected individuals should be trained to use this inspection report in
conjunction with ~1anned Operations and Mainte~ (O&M) activities or renovations
so that these activities are carried out awper)y. This will prevent potential exposure to
airborne asbestos fibers or the creation of an emergency abatement or clean-up
operation.
The combined goals of sampling and visualasscssments were as fOllows:
1. Identify ACM associated with each structure and document the condition.
friability, location. and quantity of each identified material; and
2. Coordinate sample data information arJd observations obt~ from the site visit
mto a report furm, parts that will he incorpotated into demolition plans or project
specification., where appJjeabJe.
l.2InspediDn IIIId~PMcetJwes
An initial site walk-through was conducted to mmiliar1ze the in$pector with the
residential mocture. Coordination was made with Mr. Clem Heath. building owner., fur
authorization to proceed on the structures to be impacted. Suspect homogeneous
materials were selected for bulk sampling. The Inspector would try to find damasl!d
areas Or materials for collection., while the selection of area(s) remained UD.b~ for
sampling. Depending upon the location of the suspect material, specific samples were
,
12/22/99 15'49
TX/RX NO.4283
P,003
.
12/22/99 16 37 FAX
12/22/99 03 S~ FAX 2539526717
\ .
ORION SERVICES
I4l 005
@04
SecIioIIl. (I
lItIrotbu:IioIl
collected in a non-abrasive manner. with emphasis placed on m;n;mi~ng the potenti8.1
fiber release during collection procedures.
S8IIIfIles were collected a.ttd :placed into geparate. sealed. unadulterated plastic bags.
Each samnle was individually IDlmbered and samnle infOrmation was entered onto a
neld data sheet. When pOSSIble. samo1es were collected tTom areas Qr materials
previously dama~ed. Sample tools were decont.aminated with amended water after each
sample collection. The samples were delivered to a laboratory fur analysis; each
accompanied by a completed chain-of~ustody fonn and field data sheets. Sample
100000ns were recorded on plan drawings prepared for this purpose.
Suspect Materials were divided into three categories=
1 SlIl'facing Materials - ACM sprayed or troweled on surfiwes (willIs. ceilings, and
structural members) mr acoustica~ decorative, thermal io$ulation or fireproofing
purposes. Examples include plaster, popcorn-textured ceilings, skim coat
text\lre.9~ and structwaJ fireproofing.
2. T.h.enDa.I System InsuJation - Insulation used to inhibit heat transfer or prevent
condensation on pipeg. boilers, tanks. duct~ and various other components of hot
and cold water systems. and heating. ventilation. and air conditioning (IN AC)
systems. Examples include pipe laggmg. pipe wrap; block batt. and blanket
insulation; OI!:ment and "muds". and a variety of other products such as gaskets
and ropes.
3- Miscellaneous Materials - Mu.terials not classified under Surfi:lcing Materials or
Thennal System Insulation. Examples include &or tile, ceiling tile. roofing felt.
concrete pipe C'tnmsite''), outdoor siding and &brics.. gl~ putty. wallboard
and associated assembly components,. various mamic~ etc. such as floor tile.
waHboard. ceiling tiles. and mastics.
AsbestO$-(:()ntaining materials were classified accordingly:
Friability
). Friable
>> NOD Friable
Potential for
DisturbsDee
Disturbance So.ree
>> High
). Moderate
> Low
>>Air
}I. Contact
). Vibration
)- Wmer
> Friable aud non-fHable ItIaterKtl in good condition
);>- Friable and non-friable mater.ial showing signs of
isolated areas of damage (less than 10%)
Condition .AAlessmellt
2
12/22/99 15'19
TXjRX NO.4283
P.004
.
12122/99 03 50 FAX 2539528717
ORION SERVICES
I4l 006
IilI 05
12/22/99 16 37 FAX
SedioIt 1. (J
I~
> Friable and non-fnable materials with signs of
isolated areas of damage (10 - 25%)
~ Friable and non-friable materials with areas of
moderate to significant damage and loss of integrity
)i>- Highly friable and severely damaged
Friable materials are materials which can be crushed, pulverized, or reduced to powder
by band pressure. These materials were wetted wrth amended water prior tn sampling to
protect the inspector from potential exposure or accidental fiber release. At the
inspector's discretion, personal protective equipment (pPE) was used as an added
preeautioll.
Samples were collected using EP A guidelines for type of suspect material.. Where
pracbcal, sample locations were selected using random sampling methods. Withm each
area, samples were located where minimal damage would occur to the fucility structure
or fini!lJ,es. Emphasis was placed on obtaining samples of each type while minimi~ng
damage and disturbance of these materials. Each sample was collected by carefully
removing small portions in a non-abrasive manner. If possible., samples were collected
from areas already damaged. A particular suspect material may be loc:.atcd in various
separate places throughout tbe struc;tuI'e- TIle EP A does not require that these materials
be sampled in each location. Suspect materia.ls of the same type,. age, appearance, have
the same date of Ul5tallation. and are &uIlpled in accordance with AHERA requirements
must provide st.ati.stU::a11y reliable data which can be extrapolated on all remaining non-
sampled atl!aS.
AHERA protocol determines the number of samples of each material to be collected,
depending on it category and amoW"it. of material present. The goal of AHERA is to
ensure statistically reliable data and it accomplishes this by requiring or suggesting a
minimum number of samples to be collected, and in some cases, by using random
sampling techniques to determine sampling locations. However, in every rase, AHERA
relies on the judgment of the inspectors who are experienced in AHERA methodology
and the type of facibti.es being inspected_ For this fDcility. the following protocol was
used in determining the nun:IDer of suspect samples to collect:
'''~:''I ~"I~"':~i'. '~'IJ':'i'to."\"" I..t~'~..... _,' ~' . iii .il~'1(~ ~.V"I'.',.J';.-~.."
~ ~~.!'I t~, a '~~~i::\). ~'L> ~~~~';';~ ~~-rt '~'1r. .t:r~,f, ~ .~ "I' \ . .. ! ~~:!'\*f: ''''k1!-1~: ;l~"~~~r rl t ~ ~~.
b. Homogeneous ~ gtel\h;:r than 1000 SF but equal to less than 5000 SF
. '
~
.' '=;:., , ~;.
Table 1.1 EPA Reeommeaded Samp1iae SeheuIe
3
12/22/99 15:49
TX/RX NO.42B3
P 005
.
12/22/99 03 50 FAX 2539526717
ORION SERVICBS
I4l 007
~06
12/22/99 16 37 FAX
Section. 1. (J
l~
Non-Friable Suspect Materials - in a. manner sufficient to determme ACM
Table J.l EPA ReeoIIImeaded S8l1lpling Scheme (COIItiIlUed)
1.3 MeJhod C!f Ana(vs;&
All samples were delivered to ORION Environmental Services. ~.~ analytical
laboratory m Fedenu Way, W~D, to be analyzed for the type and the content of
asbestos. These sa.mples were analy7.ed using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) Stain
Dispersion Technique in accordance with EPA Method 6OO/R-931l16. Additional
treatment and tests may have been. used as required to define composition (e.g.. ashing.
extractions, chemical, etc.).
1.4 Im;peaimI limits
The renierrtial structure at the subject location, in addition to accessible materials, was
inspected for ubestos containing materials. Areas or materials that were inaccessible
were noted accordingly
..
12/22/99 15.49
TX/RX NO 4283
P 006
.
12/22/99 16 37 FAX
12122/99 03 50 FAX 2539528717
ORION SBRVICBS
I4l 008
IilI 07
S<<tion .2. II
GeItmII K&IoI'y of Asbatos
GenenlII&tory of Asbestos
2.1 GMenJI
Asbestos is a genenc name given to a number of naturally occWTing hydrated mineral
silicates that possess a unique crystaJ.line structure, are separable in fibers, and are noD.-
combustIble. The different types of asbestos are separated into two ~gical
categories termed Serpent1nes aud Amphiboles. The fibrous asbestos mincrtds in the
amphibole group are Actinolite, Amosite. Anthophyllite. Crocroolite and Tremolite.
Amosite and Crocidolite arc sometimes refeual to as brown and blue asbestos. The
only fibrous asbestos in the ~ ~ group is Chrysotile. sometimes lefi::nal to as
wh1te asbestos. It coroprises more than 90 percent of aU the asbestos that bas been Uged
in commercial products in the United States.
The variDus types of asbestos have been :incorporated into an. estimated 3.000
CO.Illlllm'Cial products. The inherent physical characteristics such as resist:anc:e to heat
and chemicals. abrasion resistance. insulating capabilitJes and high tensile strength along
with low cost and availability. resulted in the widespread use of asbestos--containing
materials.. Asbestos was commonly used on steam pipes and boilers of ships during the
early 19005. It was used widely in American ships and shipyards in the 19409 and was
expanded to inc.lude sprayed-<'tn insulation materials in the 1950-1970s.. Use of asbestos
in the United States did not begin to decline until the 1973-1978 bans by the
Environmental Protection Agency (EP A) on spray-applied and pre-molded friable
building materials.
Any materials or products that coDtain one percent or more of the mineral by weight are
regulated as containing asbestos.
22~~wcb
To obtain asbestos mr commercial use. asbestos ore is extracted 'from open pit or
underground mines. The ore is crushed and the asbestos fibers are separated from the
ro~k layers by vibrating sc.rccm; and airlifting process. The fibers are bagged in bulk for
incorporation into variow products . manuf~g &cilmes or throu.gh on-site mixing.
Asbestos-conmini"S materials that are batch-nnxed on the const:ru.ction site, such as
structural fireproofing. umally have a wider variation in percemage of asbestos content
than those that are incorporated into mamd~dured products,. such as flOOT tile. The type
oflIUltc:rial and method of production have a hearing on the nu.mber of samples that must
be colleeted fur a given suspect material in a building survey.
The follOwing is a represcntati:ve list ofmateria1s likely to oontain asbestos
Asbestos Cement Imulating Panels
Asbestos Wallboard
AsbestoslnsuJatiDg Panels
Asbestos Chalkboi\rds
Insulation
Thermal. Sprayed-on
Fireproofing
s
12/22/99 15'49
TX/RX NO 4283
P 007
.
12/22/99 16 37 FAX
12/22/99 03 SO FAX 2S39528717
ORION SERVICES
I4l 009
Jal 08
SediotJ 2-D
GtIMrIIllTl.1fImy of .A.abaIiJs
Roofing
Asphalt Saturaled Al5bcstos Felt
Reinforced. Asbestos Flasbi:ng Sheet
Asbestog Base Felt
Asbestos Finishing Felt
Flashing
Paint
Sheet M.etaI Work
P1astic Cement
Membrane Waterproofing and Damproofing
Putty
Fire ])Qof insulatIon
Fire Dampers
Insulation.. !IV AC
Piping Insulation
Boiler Block
BreachiDg Insulation
Boiler Wearing SwfBce
Gaskets
Duct-work Taping
Flexible Fabrics Joints (vihr'ation dampening)
Flue, Seam. Taping
Plaster
Paints
Textured Coatings
Taping Compounds
Elevatm' Brake Shoes
Insulation. PlumbiDg
Piping Insulation
Pipe Gaskets
Equipment Insulation
Laboratories
Hoods
Oven Gaskets
Gloves
Bench Tops
Cooling Tower, Baffles and. Fill
Valve Packing and Rope
Flooring
Asphalt Tile
Vinyl Asbestos Tile
Vinyl Sheet Flooring
Backing
Mastic
Ceiling Tile
2J HeaItIt l!Jfeas
The detri:lnental effect on the health. of people e:xpo5ed to asbestos fibers has been well
documented. Studies have been conducted on laboratoxy animals and cell cultures to
investigate the ~ific meehanism by which asbestos .initiates OT promotes disease.
Similarly, studies of former asbestos-mill workers and insulators have provided a wealth
of lmowledge concerning the risk of disease among populations exposed to various
concentm1ions of airborne asbestos:fibers. Most C(lntroversy surrounding the health
effects of asbenos is fuoused on low-level exposure to general building occupants.
There is little d~ about the detrimental effects of occupational or high-level
exposures to asbe!lt.os fibers.
Like any hazardous material, asbestos must first travel to the site where it can cause
disease. The primary route of expoSUl.'e fur asbestos is through the air. There have been
reports of asbestos warts due to asbestos :fibers becoming imbedded ill the skin;
8
12/22/99 15:49
TX/RX NO.4283
P 008
.
12/22/99 16 37 FAX
12122199 03 50 FAX 2539826717
ORION SBRVICBS
141010
@09
.~2.0
Gau!nIl H"1Jdory oj A8bestos
however, this appears to be a rare occurrence. There is also some concern that excessive
exposure to asbestos through. ingestion, such as ashestos fibers in drinking water. may
lead to an increased. rate of disease. Aaain. however. this has not been proven a
SIgnificant route of entry btdil1g to diseate. T.he greatest concem is exposure through
inha.latlOn. Diseases in direct correllltion :&om exposure to asbestos include LungCancer, Asbestosis, and Mesothelioma..
7
12/22/99 15:49
TX/RX NO 4283
P 009
.
12/22/99 16 37 FAX
12/22/99 03.50 FAX 2539528717
ORION SERVICES
141011
Ial10
SecIioII J. ()
Geftertll HutoI;f ~ .Asbestos
r:"'1I ~.
All inaccessible or concealed materials (materials with the poteutial of being discovered
durmg demolitwn) that were not identified at the time the survey was J)erfonned ate to
be presumed asbestos contAining and treated accordingly, unless proven non-asbestos
containing hy an accredited AHERA Building Inspector.
All suspect materials were believed to have been accessed.. noted. homoge~ and
tested.. at the time of this survey.
Site Information
This residential structure is wood ftamed on a cement slab foundation. Area size of this
structure was estimated at Bl)'PWxlrnately 1250 SQuare teet of flOOT space. The mtenoT
fini.she~ consisted of vinyl sheeting. vinyl tile. wallboard. and nailed ceiling tiles. The
exterior had wood siding with rolled roofing. Piping for this unit WM IlDt msulated and.appeared to be original Date of construction fur this structure was the 1930s. No repairs
or renovations wete known 01' identified. at the time the SUlVey was perfurmed. 1he
beating system 13 forced air. The liahtina IS i:ncandescentand fluorescent.
B
12/22/99 15 49
TX/RX NO 4283.
P.OIO
.
12/22/99 16 37 FAX
12122/99 03'50 FAX 25j9526717
ORION SERVICES
141012
~11
SectioIt .t 0
Inspet:lion SIuIuHsry if SIIsped Mflleri4ls
Inspection Summary of
Susped Materials
This section discusses inspection findings fur homogeneous suspect asbestos-comA1n;ng
materials sampled. In accordance with EP A guidelines for samphng. thirteen (13) non.
homogeneous suspect asbestos-eontainmg materials were identified and collected for
analyses. Material identification and descriptions of these materials are as fullows:
tt~~":~'~~:_7:'.'i,.\.~. ~ ':. ,-~, __._'_ _ ..'--______ __._~~..-_.:,.~:,;_-~... _ .:-~ ~--.: .:~=. ',' :' .;:..... ~ .:~ ____
Vinyl Tile (VTl)
Brown S-pecked; 9"x9"Cut with Black Felt Backing and
Associated Dark Mastic; FourW. on Wood in the Living
Room.
Vinyl Tile (VTI)
Tan; 9"x9"Cut with Black Felt Backing; Found on Wood
UDder VS I in. the Kitchen and Mud Room..
Vinyl Tile (VT3)
Mocha Specked~ 9"x9"ClJt with Black Felt Backing; Found
u:ndet VS 1 and on VT 4 in the Bathroom..
Vinyl Tile (VT4)
Tan; 9"x9"Cut with Black Felt Backing; Found under
VS 1 and VT3 and on Ply- Wood in. the Bathroom.
Dark; 9"x9"Cut: with Black Felt Backing; Found on
Plywood in the Main Bedroom..
White and Rose with Gray Felt Backing; FoWJd as the Top
Layer Over Various Othet- Vinyl Floorings in the Kitchen..
Bathroom" Utility, and Mnd Room..
Vmyl Tile (VTS)
Vinyl Sheeting (VSI)
Mise. 1
White Leveling Compound; Found in the Kitchen.
Paper Moisture Barrier; Found in Upstairs Closets.
Wallboard with As!lOciated. Joint Compound; Found
Throughout.
Misc. 2
Wallboard (WB 1)
Ceiling Tile (CTI)
Ceiling Tile (CI'2)
Ceiling Tile; 2 'xl ~ Nail-up; Found in Living Room.
Ceiling Tile; l.xl' Tongue and Groove; Found .in Main
Bedroom.
8
12/22/99 15 49
TX/RX NO.4283
POll
.
12/22/99 16 37 FAX
12/22199 03'50 FAX 2539526717
ORION SBRVICES
I4l 013
lilI12
SecIioII .1 (J
lIupet:tioft SuIIurury of Srupecl MtllerWs
'-.:' , ; ::~ -, ."i~t ,l;,\
Roofing Material (RM1)
Black Rnlled Roofing with Associated Roofing Felt
SUBped M8teriR1 Table
From the thirteen (13) types of non-homogeneous suspect materials. fourteen (14) bulk
samples: (inel~ing layered samples) were eolleeted and analyzed for asbestos.
During the survey. the inspector detem1ined that no other suspect materials existed with
or were associated with this structure.
10
12/22/99 15'49
TX/RX NO 4283
P.012
.
12/22/99 16 37 FAX
12122/9~ 03:5~ PAX 2539528717
ORION SBRVICBS
I4l 014
1il/13
SeaioII 4. (J
Cmu:/llsiim
~~of
M8teriak Found PoSitive
Upon c.ompletioll of the field investigation. review 01 field notes, and review of
laboratory daba, no materials we~ found positive for eontailling asbestos.
Condusion
4.1 .LiIniItIIiDI6
This survey report was intended to describe the locations and condjtions of ACM
identified at 307 E. Yelm. in Yelm, Washington. ORION Environmental represents that
our services are performed within the limits prescribed by applicable regulations and in a
mAftnP.t' consistent with the level of CJre and skill ordinarily exercised by other
proressw.nal consultants under similar circumstances.. No other representat)on IS made to
the client, expressed Or implied and no 'WBlTanty or guarantee is included or intended.
4.2 AppIiaMe ReguItItions
These asbestos surveys comply with applicable federal. state and local regulations.
These regulations inch1de:
>> Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency (PSAPCA) ~golation IIL Article 4;
~ 40 CFR 763 - Toxic and .Ha7mdous Subs1:ances Control: Asbestos;
). Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296.62.07721
This survey also satisfies regulatory criteria established by Wasbington's Department of
Labor and Industries (lAO fur identffYing asbestos-containing materials associated with.
the unit's windows for future l'eI1Ovation or demolitio.n. A copy of this report nmy be
submitted to the appropriate regulatory agencies as proof that surveys were performed
prior to demolition. The remainder of these reports consists of and contains exhtbits
referencing the following infurmation:
Exhibit One - Laboratory Hard Copy
Exhibit Two - J.nspector's Acc.redita:tion
~~~
ends Robe
RA B.ildiD~ Inspector
ORION Envimnments.
II
12/22/99 15'49
TX/RX NO.4283
P.Q13
.
12/22/99 16 37 FAX
12/22/99 03 50 FAX 2539526717
~~
~ '-...J
ORION SERVICBS
141015
1a114
Orion Environmental Services, Inc.
Clem Heath
PO Box 970
Eatonville. W A 98328
Orlo..
N'Juabcl"
91209.-41 (a)
91209-41(b)
9120942(&)
91209-42{b)
9120943(a)
91209-43(b)
9120944(a)
91209-44(b)
91209-45(a)
Project Nulllher 991572
Project Name 307 E. Yew
Stereo ScoDe Eu..
9'"x9'" Vinyl Tile
wi Felt aacking
Non-Separable
Mastic
Assoc. w/307.oo1(a)
Vinyl Sheeting
wi Felt Badtjng
NOD-Separable
Mastic
T6Q
Assoc. wI 307-602(a)
9"x9" Vinyl Tile
Tan
Homogeneous
Fait Backing
Black
As$oc. w/307-OO3(a)
Vinyl Til~
Specbd MoGha
Homogeneous
Felt BadUn,g
Black
Assoc. w/307..oo4(a)
Vinyl Tile
Tan
80U10gene0us
I"~ 3401),11- Awa.. __ . "1ldIq A. 58iie 5 . F..-er.t W1l7t W_........ 98IIl.J.6'740
WBE W2FS912535 T........ Seatde(2SJ)S7...111.T..... c;I53)9S!..4i71'7 . 1".....(253) 91'4'714 .--.OJU0N6"717@l*
Polarized Light Microscopy Test Report
+ EP A Method 6001R-98/116
Date
Pap
Date Receh'ed
Decemher 21, 1999
Page 10f3
DeceDlber 9" 1999
Clieat
Clieat
N..beJ'
307-001(4)
VCl
307-00 1 (b)
vn
301..oo2(a)
VSl
307-OO2(b)
VSl
301..oo3(a)
VT2
3Q7-OO3(b)
Vf2
307..()()4(a)
vn
307-OO4(b)
VT3
307-OO5(a)
VT4
Sample
Treatment
Mbeltos
Pen:ent !D!!
Other
Fiben
Ash
ND
Cellulose
Chloroform
ND
Celmlose
Ash
NO
Cellulose
Cbloroform
ND
Cellulose
Ash
NO
Cellulose
NO
Cellulose
Asb
NO
Cellulose
NO
Ce1llll05~
Ash
ND
Cellulose
12/22/99 15 49
TX/RX NO.4283
.
P.014
. 12/22/99 16 37 FAX
12/22/99 03 SO FAX 2539528717
ORION SERVICES
I4l 016
@15
\" "X>"~J
C2~.X=:> 0
{>/~ rion Environmental Services, Inc.
34004'" "....... s-tIa . Bddiq As-.. 5 . Fcdenl W.y. W......... !11003-6741
WBE W1F.S912535 Telepltaae SeaUle (1S3) 1'14-8111 . T_ (25.1) 9S2-6'717 . I'aeslmue (2M) 'lJ11-4714 .1IbIiI ORION6'1l7@J1el
Polarized Light Microscopy Test Report
EP A Method 600/R-98/116
Clielllt Clem lIe2tth Date December 21, 1999
PO Box 970 P-aEl Page2of3
Eatonville, W A 98328 Date Received Decen1ber 9~ 1999
Projeet Number 991572
Pmjeet Name 307 E. Yelm
cUent Orin Sample Asbestos Other
Number Number Stereo Scooe ED. TnatJneot Pen:ent 1m! Fibers
3Q7-QOS{b) 9I209--4S(b) Felt B...king ND Cellulose
VT4 alack
Assoc. w/307..ooS(a)
301..()06 91209-46 Leveling Compound NO Cellulose
Miscl Hof'MBel'Ous
307-OO7(q) 9""x9" Vinyl Tile Ash NO Cellulose
vrs 91209-47(a) Dark
Homogeneous
.307-OO7(h) 9I.209-47(b) Felt BackiDg NO Cellulose
vrs :Black
Assoc. wI 307~07(a)
307-008(8) 9120948(a) Joint Compound ND Cellulose
WBl Homogeneous
307.008(b) 91209-48(b) Wallboard ND Cellulose
WEn Homogeneous
307~09(a) 91209-49(a) 10int Compound NO Cellulose
WBl Homogeneous
307~09(b) 91209-49(b) Wallboard NO Cellulose
WBl Homogenous
307~10 9J209..s0 Paper Moisture Barriei' ND Cellulose
Misc2 Homogeneous
307-011 91209-51 2'xl' Ceiling Tile NO Cellulose
CTl Homogeneous
307-012 91209-52 l'xl' Ceiling Tile NO Cellulose
en liomopeous
307-013 91209-53 W:t.ndow Glazing ND Cellulose
WG1 Homogeneous
12/22/99 15 49
TX/RX NO.4283
P.015
.
. 12/22/99 16 37 FAX
12122/99 03.50 FAX 2539528711
ORION SERVICE'S
141017
1ilI16
''''vI
C~X=>
{~~
Orion Environmental Services, Inc.
348IW ". A_ ~ . ....... '" "*-~ . ,......WIIT. w~!ltII8IU'1a
WBE W~l1S35 T-...-. Seattle (253) 1'74-11111 . T..... (253) tSJ-6117 . F...... (2$3) 92'-4-'14 .....n ORl0N61l7@)ac11
Polarized Light Microscopy Test Report
EPA Method 6OOJR-98/116
Client Clem Heath
PO Box 970
Ea1oIIVille~ W A 98128
:r'l"Ojeet N81l11ber 991572
Project Name 307 E. Yehn
Client Orion
N...hel' N.mber Stereo &oDe E..-
307..o14(a) 91209.'4(8) Roofing Material
R.MI 3- Tab
Homogmeous
307-<J14(h) 91109-.S4(b) Roofing Ma'b:rial
RMl Roll Down
Homopcou
307-o14(e) 91209-S4(c) Roofiag Feh
RMl HomogeneoUlll
Da.
Pap
Date Received
December 21. 1999
Pase 3 of]
December 9~ 1999
Sa.ph: Asbestos
Treatme.t pemat ID!I
Otller
FiIlel'll
Ash
ND
Fiberglas:
Ash
ND
Cellulose
Ash
ND
CeUulosc
Dup: Laboratory QAlQC Duplicate;: M; Mastic ((a). (b). (el. etc.]: Sample layers numbered ti'om 6-ont to bIu:k..
CnmmfWfOI: For layered SilDlples, esd! 'component has been anaIyI.ed separately.
Disc~ers: PLM bas been Imown to miss ube9tos 111 a!ItDaU ~ ofslm:ples 1&at emdIlin asbe!ltoll. Thus
~ PLM n:suID cmmot hi! guaranteed.
'lhis report may OIDly be reproducal in Ml 'With wriu.. AAWcwal of ORION En\liro1maJbll Smvices. mc.
-ByQ~~~
DBa M ea.
LahoraMI')' Dlrecto,.
Member AOAC, ACS, AIIIA
.LIAl&wJS:.w~ .....,,-?rC-.,Jitnuz ~ /imJ a, 2.1- CI1IIIIry
12/22/99 15:49
TX/RX NO.4283
P 016
.
\"" ,...
NI ~
"- '-
NI ~
~ ~
'- '-
o <0
C <0
C!ttttititatt at Qttlm~\tt\Ol\ Q
c.- I-"
~ a>
Q (.I>
-1
"l1
t. ~
tlt\),j tj to ttttitl't\)at r,) '?'\
CA
c.o
0
CA
Renda Roberts ~
l$t
""
.,...
""
\}aj jattj\adot,ll' tOuw\tW3
21\ \)OUtSS ot ttah\\Ui aSS aU
,......
~ (. ~
- AsbestoS 13u.ilding 1nspector
~ ....
t-' ~
-
r.t:>
r.t:> ~
l-' to tOUW{P \Uit\) t\)t ttaitt\ttU ttl\u\ttmems ot ~
U1 ....
po 1Ii~ ~
r.t:> ~jl(.~ t:\dt 13\ I <\0 €.;'f. 1(;3 (~~~) rn
. ~
...; ceX\iUcate NU1l\bet ')91004
~
- 1\
~
'2!. ~t
0 ~
.
po uatet.s) of ltaitdng
t-:l
CD
c..J sAfi.T'f' .1\\AIN\l'lG' \NO~~ 'r\'(G\iNE 0 l!1<t>itallon Date'. MaY 4, "l.llllO
rtl . .~ _ /'M\h\ 285.33'7:\ · fait ,'lOO) ~;)7...,
0 ~M\
l-'
-3 ei
I-'
,
City ofYelm
105 Yelm Avenue West
PO Box 479
Yelm, Washington 98597
(360) 458-3244
SEPA NO 8241
MITIGATED
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Proponent:
Clem Heath
Description of Proposal
Demolition of older residential building and the construction of a 1960 sq ft
restaurant with associated parking
Location of the Proposal.
307 Yelm Ave East
SectionlT ownsh ip/Range
SW 1/4 Section 19, Township 17N Range 2E, Tax Parcel 22719341000
Threshold Determination
The City of Yelm as lead agency for this action has determined that this
proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the
environment. Therefore, an environmental impact statement (EIS) will not be
required under RCW 43.21C 030(2)(c) This decision was made after review
of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the
lead agency This information is available to the public on request.
Conditions/Mitigating Measures
SEE ATTACHED
Lead agency'
Responsible Official
City of Yelm
Shelly Badger, City Administrator
Date of Issue
Comment Deadline
October 14, 1999
500 pm, October 28, 1999
(l
Shelly Badgi ' City Adminijst
This Determination of NonSignificance is issued pursuant to Washington Administrative Code 197-11-340(2) The City
of Yelm will not act on this proposal prior to 5 00 pm, November 4, 1999 Comments must be submitted to Catherine
Carlson, City Planner, at City of Yelm, 105 Yelm Ave W, POBox 479, Yelm, WA 98597, by 5 00 pm, October 28,
1999
You may appeal this determination to the Yelm City Council, at above address, by submitting a written appeal no later
than 5 00 pm, November 4, 1999 You should be prepared to make specific factual objections Contact Agnes Bennick,
City Clerk, to learn more about the procedures for SEPA appeals. This MONS is not a permit and does not by itself
constitute project approval The applicant must comply with all applicable requirements of the City of Yelm prior to
receiving construction permits which may include but are not limited to the City of Yelm Comprehensive Plan, Zoning
Title (17), Critical Areas Ordinance (1408), Storm water Drainage Design and Erosion Control Manual (DOE), Uniform
Building Code, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Title (14), Road Design Standards, Platting and Subdivision Title
(16), and the Shoreline Master Program
DO NOT PUBLISH BELOW THIS LINE
Published Nisqually Valley News, Friday October 22,1999
Posted in public areas Thursday October 14, 1999
Copies to Thursday October 14, 1999 - Dept. of Ecology w/checklist
All agencies/citizens on SEPA mailing list and adjacent property owners
ATTACHMENT
SEPA CASE # 8241
ThIS Mitigated Determination of NonSignificance is based on the project as proposed and impacts and
mitigation reflected in the following
EnVIronmental Checklist, prepared by KSi ArchItecture & Planning, dated September 3, 1999
And the following conditIon
1 The applicant shall submit a demolition plan for all structures on the project site The demolition
plans shall address the presence of asbestos and lead paint Any bUIldings containing asbestos
andior lead paint shall be demolished in accordance with all applicable state and federal laws and
regulations
Kallsen Strouse Ishihara
" , I ARC HIT E C T U R E & P LAN N I N G' . . . .
~.
CitYOf~
lliMonmentaiCh~
for
Mallla Dot's Pizza
3 September 1999
Agency:
City ofYelm
POBox 479
105 Yelm Avenue W
Yelm W A 98597
Tel 360-458-3244
Fax 360-458-4348
Owner / Applicant:
Mr. Clem Heath
1605 Boylston Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98122
tel 323-6299 fax 323-6584
Architect / Agent:
KaIlsen Strouse Ishihara
310 First South - Room 332
Seattle WA 98104
tel 624-5454 fax 343-5023
Contact. philip Kallsen A.LA.
KSI Architecture & Planning A Professional Service Corporation
" <. I 310 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH ROOM 332 SEATTLE WASHINGTON 98104 (206) 624.5454 FAX 343.5023 ' ..'
ft. 1/e~'M
1Jt1
Kallsen Strouse Ishihara
: ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING
A. BACKGROUND
1 Name of proposed project, if applicable:
MAMA DOT'S PIZZA
307 YELM AVENUE EAST
YELM W A 98597
2 Name of applicant:
MR CLEM HEATH
1605 BOYLSTON AVENUE
SEATTLE WA 98122
206-323-6299
3 Address and phone number of applicant and contact person.
MR CLEM HEATH
1605 BOYLSTON AVENUE
SEATTLE WA 98122
206-323-6299
4. Date checklist prepared.
3 September 1999
5 Agency requesting checklist:
City ofYelm
6 Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable)
Construction to begin immediately upon issuance of a buildin,g permit.
7 Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further
activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
There are no future plans for further activity related to this pJ:oposal.
8 List any environmental information you know about that has been
prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposaL
City ofYelm building permit application.
9 Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental
approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain.
No. To our knowledge, there are no pending governmental approvals associated
with this proposal.
10 List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for
your proposal, if known.
City of Yelm Site Plan Review.
City of Yelm Building Permit.
KSI Architecture & Planning A Professional Service Corporation
. . . 310 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH ROOM 332 SEATTLE WASHINGTON 98104 (206) 624.5454 FAX 3
3.5023 . . , .
Kallsen Strouse Ishihara
" ARC HIT E C T U R E & P LAN N I N G . . ~
11 Give brief. complete description of your proposal, including the
proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several
questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain
aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on
this page (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional
specific information on project description.)
1960 SF restaurant and related site improvements.
12 Location of the proposaL Give sufficient information for a person
to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a
street address, if any, and section. township, and range, if known. If
a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or
boundaries of the site(s) Provide a legal description, site plan.
vicinity map. and topographic map. if reasonably available. While you
should submit any plans required by the agency. you are not required to
duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications
related to this checklist.
The project site is located at 307 Ye1m Avenue East, in Ye1m WA.
~a1 Description
PARCEL "B" OF BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT iJlAP NO BLA-8021
RECORDED MAY 26, 1989 UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO 8905260034
IN THURSTON COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION PER FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE
COMPANY'S REPORT NO 70514-1 DATED DEC 22,1998 AT 8'00 A.M
1D BE COMPLETED BY APPUCANf
EVALUATION FOR
AGENCY USE ONLY
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one) Flat. rolling,
hilly, steep slopes. mountainous. other
The site is generally flat.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent
slope)?
The site is generally flat. It exhibits an approximate 1.5 percent grade
fluctuation overall.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example,
clay, sand. gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of
agricultural soils. specify them and note any prime farmland.
Soils are gravel.
KSI Architecture & Planning A Professional Service Corporation
310 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH ROOM 332 SEATTLE WASHINGTON 98104 (206) 624.5454 FAX 343.5023 .
Kallsen Strouse Ishihara
, ,_ ' ARC HIT E C T U R E & P LAN N I N G
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the
immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
To our knowledge, there is no history of unstable soils on the site or in the area.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any
filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
No import of flll material would be required, other than foundation drainage
materials.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use?
If so, generally describe.
The potential for erosion is negligible.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious
surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
84.3% of the site, or less, will be covered by impervious surfaces when
construction of the buildings and associated parking is complete.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts
to the earth, if any'
A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, designed and
administered by a licensed Civil Engineer, is part of this submittal package.
Erosion control measures will be installed prior to c~onstruction and
maintained until the potential for erosion has ceased to exist,
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal
(Le., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during
construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally
describe and give approximate quantities if known.
During the construction phase, exhaust emissions from construction equipment
may be noticeable at times; however, the emissions would be of short duration
and not anticipated to have long-term impacts. Mtc~r completion of
construction, emissions would result from nonnal vehicular traffic.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may
affect your proposal? If so, generally describe.
There are no known sources of off-site emissions or odors that would result in
an adverse impact upon the proposed project.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts
to air, if any'
Unwanted dust particulates can be controlled to a certain extent by the
application of water before and during clearing and grading activities. It is
expected that construction vehicles would be equipped with factory-installed
mufflers and spark arresters that would control excessive emissions. Debris
would be hauled to a landIill or other appropriate disposal site. No special
measures are proposed for controlling emissions from normal post-
construction vehicular traffic.
KSI Architecture & Planning A Professional Service Corporation
310 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH ROOM 332 SEATTLE WASHINGTON 98104 (206) 624.5454 FAX
43 - 5023 ~ ~ v
,
ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING .
Kallsen Strguse Ishihara
3. Water
a. Swface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity
of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater,
lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If
appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into
No water bodies exist on or near the site.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to
(within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and
attach available plans.
The proposed construction will require no work over, in, or adjacent to water
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be
placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the
area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill
material
No fill or dredge material would not be placed in, or removed from any water or
wetlands.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or
diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate
quantities if known.
The proposal will require no surface water withdrawels or diversions.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so,
note location on the site plan.
No. The project site lies outside of the lOO-year floodplain.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to
surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated
volume of discharge.
No. The proposal does not involve any discharge of waste materials to any
surface water body. All drainage will be routed to existing stormwater
infrastructure .
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to
ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate
quantities if known.
There will be no groundwater withdrawels, or discharges to groundwater as a
result of this proposal.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground
from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic
sewage; industrial. containing the following chemicals. ,
agricultural, etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the
number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if
KSI Architecture & Planning A Professional Service Corporation
310 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH ROOM 332 SEATTLE WASHINGTON 98104 (206) 624 - 5454 FAX 343 - 5023
Kallsen Strouse Ishihara
ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING
lt~
~;y
~
applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are
expected to serve.
1
Waste materials will not be discharged into the ground as a result of this
proposal. The site is currently served by sanitary sewerslge infrastructure
adequate to accommodate the proposal.
c. Water runoff (including stonnwater)
1) Describe the source of runoff (including stonn water) and
"\ J ' 1-.. method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if
IvD .fLXt~/lf/1 known) Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other
writ f).e.e.d- waters? If so, describe.
P M:JrJ-:::; Stormwater run(9)Off Q ewly created impervious surfaces w:ill be collected and
-tfte.JJ./.A disposed via theexisting tormwater system.
O1-jlle- 4ft" ?
. . (f.,. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,
pc.. fYJtu1i{Vli generally describe.
It is poosible that small quantities of pollutants from paved areas may be
conveyed to the stormwater outfall system.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff
water impacts, if any'
Because of the small scope of this proposal, no special measurles are proposed.
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
!!im.b;
~
p:tSture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk
cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
All existing vegetation within the areas of proposed buildings or parking lots
will be removed. and replaced by a new landscape design.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the
site.
No threatened or endangered species are known to exist on or :near the site.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to
preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any'
As a part of this proposal, all unpaved areas of the site will be improved per a
landscape plan that will be submitted to the City for review Wild approval.
310 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH ROOM 33~ SEATTLE WASHINGTON 98104 (206) 624.5454 FAX 3
KSI Architecture & Planning A Professional Service Corporation
43.5023
I i.
Kallsen Strouse Ishihara
ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING .
3. Water
a. Surlace:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity
of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater,
lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If
appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into
No water bodies exist on or near the site.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to
(within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and
attach available plans
The proposed construction will require no work over, in, or adjacent to water
3) Estimate the amount of fIll and dredge material that would be
placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the
area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill
material
No fill or dredge material would not be placed in, or removed from any water or
wetlands.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or
diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate
quantities if known.
The proposal will require no surface water withdrawels or diversions.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so,
note location on the site plan.
No. The project site lies outside of the lOO-year floodplain.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to
surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated
volume of discharge.
No. The proposal does not involve any discharge of waste materials to any
surface water body. All drainage will be routed to existing stormwater
infrastructure .
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to
ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate
quantities if known.
There will be no groundwater withdrawels, or discharges to groundwater as a
result of this proposal.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground
from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic
sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. ,
agricultural, etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the
number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if
KSI Architecture & Planning A Professional Service Corporation
310 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH ROOM 332 SEATTLE WASHINGTON 98104 (206) 624 - 5454 FAX 343 - 5023
Kallsen Strouse Ishihara
ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING
applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are
expected to serve.
/;1l!S -j'1ff' l
J.a- V!' /Waste materials will not be discharged into the ground as a result of this
"outCl ~~Ij S "proposal. The site is currently served by sanitary sewerage infrastructure
~Jvl~v.f /' adequate to accommodate the proposal.
tyfP)/Yif t C~ c. Water runoff (including stonnwater)
1) Describe the source of runoff (including stonn water) and
method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if
known) Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other
waters? If so, describe.
. I\J i;.rJ Stonnwater runoff from newly created impervious surfaces will be collected and
fY' "" 1\.;fJv & dis~sed via the existing stonnwater system.
~ (Y \ t{l )~Yde(,0
.3 \olv\ 2) Could waste materials enter ground or sunace waters? If so,
\) generally describe.
It is poosible that small quantities of pollutants from paved areas may be
conveyed to the stonnwater outfall system.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control sunace, ground, and runoff
water impacts, if any'
Because of the small scope of this proposal, no special measur.es are proposed.
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
9mb;
~
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk
cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
All existing vegetation within the areas of proposed buildings or parking lots
will be removed. and replaced by a new landscape design.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the
site.
No threatened or endangered species are known to exist on or :near the site.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to
preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any'
As a part of this proposal, all unpaved areas of the site will be improved per a
landscape plan that will be submitted to the City for review and approval.
310 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH ROOM 332 SEATTLE WASHINGTON 98104 (206) 624.5454 FAX 3
KSI Architecture & Planning A Professional Service Corporation
3.5023 .
Kallsen Strouse Ishihara
" ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING "
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near
the site or are known to be on or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, son&birds. other
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other
fish. bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other
b List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near
the site.
No threatened or endangered species are known to exist on or near the site.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
The site lies within the Western Flyway.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any'
Landscaping of the unpaved areas of the site will add some cover and forage for
birds. The site is not considered priority habitat, and therefore, is unlikely to
attract wildlife.
6. Energy and natuml resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil. wood stove,
solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs?
Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
The proposeal will be designed to use electricity for lighting, and natural gas for
space heating.
b Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by
adjacent properties? If so, generally describe.
No additional off-site shading is anticipated within this proposal, and so it is
unlikely that the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties will be
affected.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the
plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or
control energy impacts, if any'
The design of the new structures will conform to current energy conservation
guidelines and building codes.
7. Environmental health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to
toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste,
that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
No environmental health hazards are expected to result from this proposal.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
310 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH ROOM 332 SEATTLE WASHINGTON 98104 (206) 624.5454 FAX 343-5023' .
KSI Architecture & Planning A Professional Service Corporation
Kallsen Strouse Ishihara
ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING
It is not anticipated that special emergency services will be I'equired as a result
of the proposal.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health
hazards, if any'
No special measures to reduce or control environmental health
hazards are proposed.
b Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your
project (for example. traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
The main source of noise is related to traffic on Yelm Avenue East. This
proposal is not considered to be noise-sensitive.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or
associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for
example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours
noise would come from the site.
Noise generated by construction activity would vary considerable from day ro
day as construction progress. Construction noise levels can bc~ expected to range
from 57 to 89 DBA with an average value of approximately 78 - 85 DBA. (from
Noise From Construction Equipment and Operations. BuildiJ:l2 Equipment. and
Home Appliances). Noise associated with construction opelrations on the site
will occur roughly between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
On a long-term basis, noise from facilities operations w01l1ld fall within the
range that is normal for the commercial functions for which the site is zoned.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any'
Noise impacts associated with the construction phases of the proposal will be
limited in duration. Construction hours will generally be limited to the normal
workday, from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Efficient
mumers and quieting devices will be emplyed on equipment.
8. land and shoreline use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Current use of the site is for single family residence (non-comfonning uses).
Current uses of adjacent properties include:
North: commercial
East: commercial.
South: commercial.
VVest:vcommercial
b Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
No agricultural use has been made of the site in at least twenty years.
KSI Architecture & Planning A Professional Service Corporation
. ; 310 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH ROOM 332 SEATTLE WASHINGTON 98104 (206) 624 - 5454 FAX
43.5023 '. .
USed- ~
a j " c.
(!tJM /ne/f) ~
U6(/ II)
r~
f)t!A(A(f~(
5H15rnU~
J)A~
fJQ[ifr0t
ft,bt~S ~
Kallsen Strouse Ishihara
, ,.', ARC HIT E C T U R E & P LAN N I N G '
Describe any structures on the site.
Single Family Residence
1,000 SF approx:
d.
Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
The existing single family structure will be demolished
e.
What is the current zoning classification of the site?
The site is zoned "CBD".
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
The site is planned for commercial uses.
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program
designation of the site?
Not applicable.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally
sensitive" area? If so, specify
To our knowledge, the City of Yelm has not designated the site as
environmentally sensitive.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the
completed project?
The total number of employees would be approximately four.
j Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None. The existing single family residence is vacant.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any'
No measures are proposed to avoid or reduce displacement impacts.
L Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with
existing and projected land uses and plans, if any'
The proposal is a use that is permitted under applicable zoning designation.
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
None
b Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated?
Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
One single family residences (middle income housing) would rbe eliminated.
KSI Architecture & Planning A Professional Service Corporation
. 310 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH ROOM 332 SEATTLE WASHINGTON 98104 (206) 624.5454 FAX 343.5023 '
Co':'f{,tin~ ~ c.
LU/ 0BD
j)J00'~.
hC0/ flJ (/6
Kallsen Strouse Ishihara
\. ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts. if any'
No special measures to reduce or control housing impacts are lProposed.
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not
including antennas, what is the principal exterior building material(s)
proposed?
The proposed structure will be less than 25 feet high. The exterior will
incorporate painted cedar walls, and painted metal roofing.
b What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or
obstructed?
No views within the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed.
Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any'
The proposed buildings are be architect-designed to hannonize with the existing
character of the neighborhood.
11.
Light and glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time
of day would it mainly occur?
Outdoor lighting will be used on the buildings and within the parking lots for
safety and security purposes. The lighting will be used primarily from dusk to
dawn.
b Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard
or interfere with views?
It is not anticipated that the proposed lighting will impact safety, views, or
wildlife.
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your
proposal?
No potentially impactive off-site light sources are known to exist.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if
any'
The proposed lighting will be shielded to minimize potentiail off-site light and
glare impacts.
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the
immediate vicinity?
No designated or informal recreational opportunities exist in the immediate
area.
KSI Architecture & Planning A Professional Service Corporation
,< 310 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH ROOM 332 SEATTLE WASHINGTON 98104 (206) 624.5454 FAX 3
3.5023 .-.
~-----~- -~
l>'.' ' .
Kallsen Strouse Ishihara
.' '.. ~" ARC HIT E C T U R E & P LAN N I N G .' .
b Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational
uses? If so. describe.
No designated or informal recreational opportunities would be displaced by the
proposal.
Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation.
including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or
applicant, if any'
None are proposed.
13. Historic and cultural preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on. or proposed for.
national. state. or local preservation registers known to be on or next
to the site? If so. generally describe.
No places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local
preservation registers are known to exist on or next to the site:
b Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic.
archaeological. scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or
next to the site.
No landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance are known to exist on or next to the site.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any'
No measures are proposed to reduce or control impacts. However, if any
culturally significant objects are found during site preparation work, the
Washington State Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation would be
notified.
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site. and
describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site
plans, if any
Tbe site is directly accessed by Yehn Avenue East.
11-[7 f5\ Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the
V\ 'b~p Wproximate distance to the nearest transit stop?
Y7t J~~ The site is not served by poblic transit.
0; y~ c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have?
:;j\ many would the project eliminate?
How
The completed project would provide approximately 10 parking stalls. These
would fulfill the parking requirements per the Yehn Municipal Code, and would
suffice for the facility operations. There would be no net reduction in parking
stalls.
KSI Architecture & Planning A Professional Service Corporation
310 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH ROOM 332 SEATTLE WASHINGTON 98104 (206) 624.5454 FAX 343. S023" . .
Kallsen Strouse Ishihara
ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING
~~~
IJ.O(\ ~Q;\(lV'~
\tt?~
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or
improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If
so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private)
No, the proposal requires no off-site street improvem.ents, other than
driveways.
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity 00
water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe.
The proposal does not make use of air, rail, or water transportation. None exists
in the immediate area.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the
completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur
Approximately 80 vehicle trips per day would be generated by the proposed
project.
1:Vl'1lwr-
or {~
Peak volwnes would occur during the 5 - 9 p.m. peak hours.
-yg~ Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if
~y'
Employees will be offered incentives to car-pool
15. Public seJ.Vices
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services
(for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools,
other)? If so, generally describe.
The completed project will increase the need for some public services. However,
these increases will be very minor and will not warrant an in<:rease in the City's
need for new public services.
b Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public
services, if any
Payments for building permit activities, and the additional tax revenue
generated by the proposal, will offset direct impacts upon public services.
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity.
natural gas. water. refuse service. telephone. sanitary sewer, septic
system, other
b Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the
utility providing the service, and the general construction activities
on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
Water, sewer, gas, electrical, and telephone service will be served by way ofYelm
Avenue East
310 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH ROOM 332 ~EATTLE WASHINGTON V8104 (206) 624 - 5454 FAX 3
KSI Architecture & Planning A Professional Service Corporation
3.5023 ". .
Kallsen Strouse Ishihara
, ',,", , , ARC HIT E C T U R E & P LAN N I N G . '.'. ,
b Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational
uses? If so, describe.
No designated or infonnal recreational opportunities would be displaced by the
proposal.
Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,
including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or
applicant, if any'
None are proposed.
13. Historic and cultural preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for,
national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next
to the site? If so, generally describe.
No places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local
preservation registers are known to exist on or next to the site~
b Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,
archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or-
next to the site.
No landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance are known to exist on or next to the site.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any'
No measures are proposed to reduce or control impacts However, if any
culturally significant objects are found during site preparation work, the
Washington State Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation would be
notified.
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and
describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site
plans, if any
The site is directly accessed by Yelm Avenue East.
b Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the
approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?
~l;;/ r1~ The site is not served by public transit.
fI C ~\Vv\ frwJ 0'l11 V} PA11 PI rL
c. H,ow many parking spaces would the completed project have? How
many would the project eliminate?
The completed project would provide approXimately 10 parking stalls. These
\J //would fulillI the parking requirements per the Yelm Municipal Code, and would
( .rt()YV~ ~ suffice for the facility operations. There would be no net reduction in parking
~oML~1 stalls.
. . 310 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH ROOM 332 SEATTLE WASHINGTON 98104 (206) 624. 5~54 FAX 343.5023' .
KSI Architecture & Planning A Professional Service Corporation
Kallsen Strouse Ishihara
, ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or
improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If
so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private)
No, the proposal requires no off-site street improvem1ents, other than
driveways.
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)
water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe.
The proposal does not make use of air, rail, or water transportation. None exists
in the immediate area.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the
completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur
Approximately 80 vehicle trips per day would be generateld by the proposed
project.
Peak volmnes would occur during the 5 - 9 p.m. peak hours.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if
any'
1^YV
15.
Employees will be offered incentives to car-pool.
Public services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services
(for example. fire protection, police protection, health care, schools,
other)? If so, generally describe.
The completed project will increase the need for some public services. However,
these increases will be very minor and will not warrant an in(:rease in the City's
need for new public services.
b Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public
services, if any
Payments for building permit activities, and the additional tax revenue
generated by the proposal, will offset direct impacts upon publlic services.
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity.
natural gas. water. refuse service. telephone. sanitaIy sewer, septic
system, other
b Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the
utility providing the service, and the general construction activities
on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
Water, sewer, gas, electrical, and telephone service will be served by way ofYelm
Avenue East
KSI Architecture & Planning A Professional Service Corporation
310 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH ROOM 332 SEATTLE WASHINGTON V8104 (206) 624 - 545~ FAX 3
43-5023 , ..... .
Kallsen Strouse Ishihara
, .' .,;,'> , '\:" , ", ' . ,"; . ' , ' A R' CHI TEe T .U, R E & P LAN N I N' G " ,:' ,. '/, :', ~ '-
c. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I
understand that the lead agency is relying on them to ake its decision.
Signature:
Philip Kallsen .l.A.
allsen Strouse Ishihara
Date Submitted:
3
SE?T q ~
KSI Architecture & Planning A Professional Service Corporation
',' " " . 310.:FIRST AVENUE SOUTH'ROOM 332 SEATTLE WASHINGTON 98104 (206) 624-5454 FAX 343-5,023 "~. ,:,.', :.'^:,