The URL can be used to link to this page

East Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis (2)Traffic Impact Analysis +� SCSI ALLIANCE �► CONSULTING SERVICES Traffic Impact Analysis Project Information Project: Yelm East Gateway Prepared for: Evergreen Pacific Fund, LLC Steve Guidinger 2724 Alki Avenue SW, #302 Seattle, WA 98116 -4704 Phone: 206.579.6222 stevenguidinger @msn.com Reviewing Agency Jurisdiction: City of Yelm 105 Yelm Avenue West Yelm, WA 98597 Proiect Representative Prepared by: SCJ Alliance 2102 Carriage St SW, Suite H Olympia, WA 98502 360.352.1465 scjalliance.com Contact: George Smith, Senior Transportation Planner Project Reference: SCJ #1470.01 Path: N: \Projects \1470 Evergreen Pacific Fund, LLC \1470.01 Yelm Commercial EIS \Phase 01- Preliminary EIS \Traffic \Report \2014 -1117 Yelm East Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis.docx SCJ Alliance November 2014 yelm East Gateway CERTIFICATION Traffic Impact Analysis The technical material and data contained in this document were prepared under the supervision and direction of the undersigned, whose seal, as a professional engineer licensed to practice as such, is affixed below. red by George Smith Transportation Planner Approv9XPerry A. Shea, PE Principal A. WA Ike E« 0 a a.�� IST L SO Alliance November 2014 Yelm East Gateway TABLE OF CONTENTS Traffic Impact Analysis Page 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... ..............................3 1.1 Project Overview ......................................................................................... ..............................3 1.2 Study Context .............................................................................................. ..............................4 1.3 Long Range Planning Context ...................................................................... ..............................5 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................... ..............................7 2.1 Maximum Build -out as a Coordinated Development (Alternative 1) ......... ..............................7 2.2 Moderate Intensity Build -out as a Coordinated Development (Alternative 2) .........................7 2.3 No- Action Alternative (Alternative 3) ......................................................... ..............................7 2.4 Site Access System ....................................................................................... ..............................9 3. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ........................................................ .............................12 3.1 Area Land Uses ........................................................................................... .............................12 3.2 Roadway Inventory ..................................................................................... .............................12 3.3 Public Transportation ................................................................................. .............................13 4. PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS ............................................. ............................... 15 4.1 Site - Generated Traffic Volumes ................................................................. .............................15 4.2 Site Traffic Distribution ............................................................................... .............................16 4.3 Traffic Assignment Scenarios ..................................................................... .............................17 5. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ...................................................... ............................... 21 5.1 Roadway Improvements ............................................................................ .............................21 5.2 Future Traffic Volumes ............................................................................... .............................21 6. TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS ................................................... ............................... 26 6.1 Intersection Level of Service ...................................................................... .............................26 6.2 Volume to Capacity Ratio ........................................................................... .............................27 6.3 Intersection Operations .............................................................................. .............................27 6.4 Stop Sign - Controlled Intersections ............................................................. .............................28 6.5 Signalized Intersections .............................................................................. .............................32 6.6 Site Driveways ............................................................................................ .............................33 7. LONG -RANGE TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ............................................. ............................... 38 8. MITIGATION ................................................................................... .............................41 8.1 Developer Funded Off -site Infrastructure Improvements ......................... .............................42 8.2 Site Access and Circulation Improvements ................................................ .............................43 8.3 City of Yelm Traffic Facility Charge ( TFC) .................................................... .............................43 8.4 Phasing of On -Site and Off -Site Traffic Mitigation Improvements ............. .............................44 9. CONCLUSION .................................................................................. .............................46 SO Alliance Page i November 2014 Yelm East Gateway LIST OF TABLES Traffic Impact Analysis Page Table 1. Trip Generation Characteristics — PM Peak Hour .......................................... ............................... 15 Table 2. Project PM Trip Generation Summary .......................................................... ............................... 16 Table 3. Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections .................................... ............................... 27 Table 4. Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections ................................ ............................... 27 Table 5. Unsignalized Intersections — LOS Summary PM Peak Hour .......................... ............................... 31 Table 6. Signalized Intersections— LOS Summary PM Peak Hour ................................. .............................33 Table 7. Site Driveways — LOS Summary PM Peak Hour ............................................. ............................... 37 Table 8. LOS Summary 2035 PM Peak Hour with Alternative 1 .................................... .............................38 LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure1. Site Vicinity Map ............................................................................................ ............................... 6 Figure 2. Parcels and Boundary Area ............................................................................. ..............................8 Figure 3. Uncoordinated Conceptual Access Plan ....................................................... ............................... 10 Figure 4. Coordinated Conceptual Access Plan ............................................................ ............................... 11 Figure 5. Existing PM Peak Hour Volumes ................................................................... ............................... 14 Figure 6. Site - Generated PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes — Alternative 1 ................... ............................... 18 Figure 7. Site - Generated PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes — Alternative 1 (Site Driveways) ....................... 19 Figure 8. 2035 Site - Generated PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes — Alternative 1 .......... ............................... 20 Figure 9. Projected 2020 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes — Alternative 1 ................... ............................... 23 Figure 10. Projected 2020 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes — Alternative 1 (Site Driveways) ..................... 24 Figure 11. Projected 2035 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes — Alternative 1 ................. ............................... 25 Figure 12. Proposed 2020 Alternative 1 Channelization Plan ........................................ .............................34 Figure 13. Proposed 2035 Alternative 1 Channelization Plan ........................................ .............................39 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Turning Movement Counts Appendix B Alternative 2 and 3 Volume Figures Appendix C Traffic Volume Calculations Appendix D Capacity Analysis Worksheets SO Alliance November 2014 Page ii Yelm East Gateway 1. INTRODUCTION Traffic Impact Analysis 1.1 Project Overview The East Gateway commercial area is comprised of approximately 46 acres of undeveloped property located in the eastern portion of the City of Yelm's commercially -zoned district. The project area includes seven distinct parcels of land owned by several independent property and business owners. The potential build -out of the properties will be dependent upon market and economic factors, but it is likely that these properties could realize their full development potential within the next 10 -15 years. This report analyzes three build -out alternatives for potential impacts for a near -term (2020) and long - range (2035) planning horizon. This analysis is reviewing three potential development scenarios as described below: 1.1.1 Maximum Build -out as a Coordinated Development (Alternative 1) This alternative is for development of the commercial area as a coordinated development and assumes a 40% build -out on the site and up to approximately 800,000 square feet of shopping center uses. This development scenario exceeds the coverage of the neighboring Walmart by approximately 10 %. This scenario has a PM peak hour traffic volume potential of up to 2,000 new -to- network trip ends. 1.1.2 Moderate Intensity Build -out as a Coordinated Development (Alternative 2) The moderate intensity alternative assumes a coordinated build -out of the site with approximately 25% build out on the site and up to approximately 500,000 square feet of shopping center uses. This development scenario reflects the upper range of development coverage typically seen in the City and provides a moderate build -out of the properties. This scenario has a PM peak hour traffic volume potential of up to 1,450 new -to- network trip ends. 1.1.3 No Action Alternative (Alternative 3) The no- action alternative assumes that development would occur consistent with existing zoning and would undergo environmental review on a project -by- project basis. Such projects would be subject to site - specific mitigation and potential SEPA -based appeals, without coverage under the non - project, Planned Action EIS process. Commercial properties would develop as single parcel sites. The ultimate build out of the parcels is less predictable. The building area used for the no- action alternative is based on the non - specific growth forecast used by TRPC and the City of Yelm in preparing the 2035 Regional Transportation Plan. The employment growth projected for the project site in the current regional forecast equates to approximately 229,000 -sf of retail building area. This scenario has a PM peak hour traffic volume potential of up to 850 new -to- network trip ends. 1.1.4 Types of Uses The project analysis of the alternatives was based on uses typically found in shopping centers and commercial districts. This includes uses such as: • Offices • Banks (including drive through) SO Alliance November 2014 Page 3 Yelm East Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis • Grocery • Retail Shops • Health /Fitness • Auto Services • Fast Food Restaurants (including drive through) • Sit Down Restaurants Although the land -use "shopping center" category was used to estimate site - generated traffic levels, other mixes of specific land -uses could potentially yield higher trip generation. Since there is the potential for both the maximum build -out and the moderate build -out to generate higher trips, in the context of the traffic operational analysis, the highest vehicle trip threshold will be used to assess the traffic characteristics and potential impacts to the adjacent and surrounding transportation system. Using the highest vehicle trip threshold provides flexibility for the mix of uses within the moderate density scenario without the risk of exceeding the "approved" trip generation potential. Figure 1 illustrates the site vicinity and the transportation network serving the project area. 1.2 Study Context This report evaluates the specific transportation impacts of the East Gateway area development alternatives. This analysis determines the impacts of new development traffic on the existing and future street network, determines and assesses the appropriate layout and design of the proposed public street system, determines if the new development can meet acceptable traffic performance measures and the City's regulatory standards for concurrency under the Growth Management Act, and identifies appropriate traffic solutions and mitigation measures to accommodate the planned traffic growth and development impacts. The study was prepared according to City of Yelm Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) guidelines as part of the required environmental review submittal for the proposed project. The following intersections in the study area were analyzed: • Creek Street -Bald Hills Road /Yelm Avenue (SR 507) • Bald Hills Road /Morris Road • Grove Road/ Yelm Avenue (SR 507) • Walmart Boulevard/ Yelm Avenue (SR 507) • Walmart Driveway Access /Yelm Avenue (SR 507) • Creek Street /103rd Avenue • Grove Road /103rd Avenue • Walmart Boulevard /103rd Avenue • Burnett Road /SR 510 • Killion Road /SR 510 • Cullens Road /SR 510 • Longmire Street /SR 510 • Mosman Street /SR 507 • First Street /SR 510 • Clark Road /SR 507 • 103rd Avenue /SR 507 • First Street /Rhoton Road /Railway Road SO Alliance November 2014 Page 4 Yelm East Gateway • 103rd Street /West Road • First Street /Stevens Street Traffic Impact Analysis 1.3 Long Range Planning Context This analysis evaluates traffic conditions for two distinct planning horizons; 2020 and 2035. The 2020 analysis provides an evaluation of all of the study intersections to determine if the study intersections will maintain acceptable operation per the City of Yelm's mobility standards. The 2035 horizon has also been included to evaluate the ultimate needs of the site frontage and driveway accesses in the context of the City of Yelm's general long -term vision for the corridor. An important consideration is the planned completion of the SR 510 Alternate (Yelm Loop). While the final Stage 2 completion horizon for the SR 510 Alternate (Yelm Loop) is uncertain, regional and local planning anticipates its completion well before the 2035 horizon. The initial Stage 1 of the SR 510 Alternate (Yelm Loop) was competed several years ago (SR 510 to Cullens Road) and is already providing an important link in the City's long -range transportation system. The final Stage 2 will finish the loop highway by extending the facility from Cullens Road to the SR 507 (Walmart Blvd) intersection. Upon final completion, SR 510 Alternate (Yelm Loop) will serve as an important part of the arterial system in and around Yelm and will reduce congestion on Yelm Avenue through the City. Additionally, the City's vision for Yelm Avenue (SR 507) is that it will remain a two -lane corridor (a single through capacity lane in each direction —this does not preclude turn lanes as appropriate at intersections). The 2035 analysis in this report provides a framework for the required lane configurations on Yelm Avenue (SR 507), Grove Road and Walmart Boulevard to serve local access and regional travel with the SR 510 Alternate (Yelm Loop) completed. Per direction from the City of Yelm, the roadway frontage and access requirements for the Yelm Gateway East properties were determined by the 2035 analysis. The "ultimate" lane configurations and recommended access plan for the 2035 horizon were then used as the basis of analysis for the 2020 scenario. SO Alliance November 2014 Page 5 Ulu FW- -0 sw e' 2 Mullen Rd Sf YeOm Hwy 5E T O N i Nisqually Indian Reservation~ Fort Lewis Military Reservation s0 Roy Mock City I Tod Leuris Mliitary Reservation North Yelm k C SW v+ Yelm +Py1P Project Area - m v Rainier S� Q16 -v t 3`07 #'po,�' 148th Ave SF + ±r SCJ ALLIANCE CONSULTMC, SERVICES Figure 1 Site Vicinity Map . I Yelm East Gateway Yelm, WA Traffic Impact Analysis Yelm East Gateway 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Traffic Impact Analysis The East Gateway commercial area consists of approximately 46 acres of undeveloped property in the eastern portion of the City of Yelm's commercial district. The project area includes seven parcels of land owned by several independent owners. The properties are situated mostly along the Yelm Avenue (SR 507) corridor, east of Yelm Creek and include areas just east of the Walmart Boulevard intersection. Figure 2 shows the subject properties, boundary area and surrounding development and parcels. The properties are located within a commercially- designated land -use area and could develop with a variety of uses, such as general retail, restaurants, professional office, big -box facilities, and others that are allowed by the City of Yelm code. The potential build -out of the properties will be dependent upon market and economic factors but it is likely that these properties could realize their full development potential within the next 10 -15 years. 2.1 Maximum Build -out as a Coordinated Development (Alternative 1) This alternative is for development of the commercial area as a coordinated development and assumes a 40% build -out on the site and up to approximately 800,000 square feet of shopping center uses. This development scenario exceeds the coverage of the neighboring Walmart by approximately 10 %. While this option may not be economically feasible, it demonstrates a future trend to provide high density urban centers. 2.2 Moderate Intensity Build -out as a Coordinated Development (Alternative 2) The moderate intensity alternative assumes a coordinated build -out of the site with approximately 25% build out on the site and up to approximately 500,000 square feet of shopping center uses. This development scenario reflects the upper range of development coverage typically seen in the City and provides a moderate build -out of the properties. 2.3 No- Action Alternative (Alternative 3) The no- action alternative assumes that development would occur consistent with existing zoning and would undergo environmental review on a project -by- project basis. Such projects would be subject to site - specific mitigation and potential SEPA -based appeals, without coverage under the non - project, Planned Action EIS process. Commercial properties would develop as single parcel sites. This option would achieve the lowest potential of build -out and would be restricted by a non - coordinated design of the commercial properties. This would be considered a "strip" retail type scenario with parcel -by- parcel development 2.3.1 Types of Uses The project analysis of the alternatives was based on uses typically found in shopping centers and commercial districts. This includes uses such as: • Offices • Banks (including drive through) • Grocery SO Alliance November 2014 Page 7 N Y 07 7] V + ±1► SCJ ALLIANCE CONSULTING SERVICES Yelm Ave (SR 507) 5.74 ■ Acres 933 9.21 3'9 Acres Acres pcC�$ Ra'd gills Rd Figure 2 Project Boundary and Parcels Yelm East Gateway Yelm, WA Traffic Impact Analysis Yelm East Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis • Retail Shops • Health /Fitness • Auto Services • Fast Food Restaurants (including drive through) • Sit Down Restaurants 2.4 Site Access System 2.4.1 Uncoordinated Access Plan The Yelm East Gateway project area is composed of multiple parcels with many different owners. If the properties were to develop independently with no coordination (as described in the No- Action alternative) each parcel would require access to the public road system. "Piecemeal" development under the No- Action scenario would require more individual driveways onto Yelm Avenue (SR 507). Denser driveway spacing could require variance from City of Yelm and WSDOT intersection spacing criteria. Providing adequate circulation to the parcels would require left -turn access onto and off of Yelm Avenue (SR 507) at each driveway however, many driveways may only be allowed right -turn movements. Additionally customer interaction between parcels would require drivers to use the public street to drive between separate businesses. Specifically under the No- Action scenario it is anticipated that five full- access driveways onto Yelm Avenue (SR 507) (in addition to Grove Road and Walmart Boulevard) would be required to serve the subject properties. The Uncoordinated Conceptual Access Plan is shown on Figure 3. 2.4.2 Coordinated Access Plan The Maximum Build -Out and Medium Build -Out scenarios each include coordination between parcels. This will allow a comprehensive access plan to be designed and constructed with internal connections between adjacent parcels. This will reduce the number of access points onto Yelm Avenue (SR 507) and will allow for limited access (right- turn -only) at some driveways where internal connections would provide drivers access to a controlled intersection with left -turn movements. Under the coordinated development scenarios there are no full- access driveways proposed on Yelm Avenue (SR 507) except via the northbound approach of the Grove Road intersection. The Coordinated Conceptual Access Plan that applies to both the Maximum Build -out and Moderate Intensity Build -out alternatives is shown on Figure 4. 2.4.3 Consistency with WSDOT and Yelm Policy The WSDOT Olympic region access control manual designates Yelm Avenue (SR 507) to be under access control Class 4 up to the eastern limits of the City. The project study limits fall within these limits. This allows for driveway spacing of 250 feet. However, based on City and WSDOT input the driveways would most likely not be allowed to provide left -turn movements into and out of the properties at this close spacing. SO Alliance November 2014 Page 9 IE� NO —,MW ivo internai Roadway Connections v ■ Right -out only t ■ ■ ■ µ Yelm East Gateway �� Figure 3 Yelm, WA Uncoordinated Conceptual Access Plan Traffic Impact Analysis SCJ ALLIANCE CONSULTMC, SERVICES \I,�/ 0 Internal Roadway Connections r,r■ ■n■■■ ■n■■■ % * *on?o ■ ■ ■■ 4 1 ■m■■ ■m■■■ ■1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ LEGEND REM Conceptual Access Network ■ Full Access Right -Turn Only Access l = Right -out L only i � ■ •� +' ■■■ ■■■mono■■ A. • �.Ml� Internal Roadway = Connections IN ■ ■ IS 04019■■■■■ ■r ■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ IN IN i ■ ;m■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ IN ■ ■ 4 1 ■m■■ ■m■■■ ■1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ LEGEND REM Conceptual Access Network ■ Full Access Right -Turn Only Access l = Right -out L only i � ■ ■■■ ■■■mono■■ ■■■ml�■■■■■■1 Internal Roadway = Connections ■ ■ IN ■■■■■ MMMOMM ■ IS 04019■■■■■ ■r IN IN IN IN Abi ■ ■o■■■■■■■ t Yelm East Gateway �� Figure 4 Yelm, WA Coordinated Conceptual Access Plan Traffic Impact Analysis SCJ ALLIANCE CONSULTMC, SERVICES Yelm East Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis 3. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 3.1 Area Land Uses The project site has two family homes and outbuildings. Most of the property immediately surrounding the site is undeveloped, with a few single family homes. A Walmart has been constructed adjacent to the northeast portion of the site and Country Storage is located immediately to the west of Walmart. 3.2 Roadway Inventory A comprehensive roadway survey was conducted to identify pre- existing conditions of the primary traffic facilities serving the subject properties. 3.2.1 Yelm Avenue (SR 507) The City of Yelm classifies Yelm Avenue (SR 507) as an Urban Arterial. SR 507 is a Highway of Regional Significance (Non -HSS) and its state functional classification is R2, Rural -Minor Arterial. Mile Post (MP) 27.32 through MP 29.90 of SR 507 is located within the incorporated limits of the City. Yelm Avenue (SR 507) consists of a single lane in each direction, with a two -way left -turn lane between Third Street and Creek Street /SR 507 /Bald Hills Road. Curb, gutter, sidewalks and bike lanes are provided along portions of the road. The road has a posted speed limit of 35 mph west of Bald Hills Road and 45 mph east of Bald Hills Road. 3.2.2 Yelm Avenue (SR 510) SR 510 has a state functional classification of R2, Rural -Minor Arterial. It is a Highway of Regional Significance (Non Highway of State Significance). The City classifies the roadway as an Urban Arterial. The road runs from the east City limits to First Street. One lane in each direction is provided, with a two - way left turn lane west of Longmire Street and between Edwards Street and First Street. 3.2.3 Grove Road SE Grove Road is classified as an Urban Arterial. In the project vicinity, the roadway has a single lane in each direction and narrow shoulders. Neither sidewalks nor bike lanes are provided. 3.2.4 Walmart Boulevard Walmart Boulevard runs in a north -south direction between 103rd Avenue SE and SR 507. A single travel lane in each direction is provided, with sidewalks and planter strips along the Walmart frontage. This roadway alignment is part of the partially constructed SR 510 Alternate (Yelm Loop) roadway that will provide a direct arterial connection from SR 510 (Yelm Highway) at Mud Run Road SE to Yelm Avenue (SR 507) at the current Walmart Boulevard intersection. 3.2.5 Bald Hills Road SE Bald Hills Road is a two -lane Urban Arterial with paved shoulders. Sidewalks and bike lanes are not provided. In the study area the roadway has a posted speed limit of 40 mph. SO Alliance November 2014 Page 12 Yelm East Gateway 3.2.6 103rd Avenue NE Traffic Impact Analysis In the project vicinity, 103rd Avenue provides a single lane in each direction with narrow paved shoulders and a posted speed limit of 25 mph. 103rd Avenue NE is classified as a Commercial Collector from Yelm Avenue (SR 507) to NE Creek Street and as a Local Access Residential Street from NE Creek Street to Canal Road SE. 3.2.7 Traffic Volume Data The City of Yelm and Traffic Count Consultants provided evening peak period turning movement counts. The counts were conducted on January 9, 2014 between 3:00 PM and 6:00 PM for the following locations: • Creek Street -Bald Hills Road /Yelm Avenue (SR 507) • Bald Hills Road /Morris Road • Grove Road/ Yelm Avenue (SR 507) • Walmart Boulevard/ Yelm Avenue (SR 507) • Walmart Driveway Access /Yelm Avenue (SR 507) • Creek Street /103rd Avenue • Grove Road /103rd Avenue • Walmart Boulevard /103rd Avenue Additionally, counts for the following locations were conducted between 2:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. on April 16, 2014: • Burnett Road /SR 510 • Killion Road /SR 510 • Cullens Road /SR 510 • Longmire Street /SR 510 • Mosman Street /SR 507 • First Street /SR 510 • First Street /Stevens Street • First Street /Rhoton Road /Railway Street • Clark Road /SR 507 • 103rd Avenue /SR 507 • 103rd Avenue /West Road These traffic volumes were used for the base year operations analysis and as the basis for future year traffic volume projections. Figure 5 shows the existing 2014 traffic volumes for the study intersections. The turning movement count diagrams are provided in Appendix A. 3.3 Public Transportation Intercity Transit (IT) Route 94 travels between downtown Olympia and the Yelm Walmart. Buses run east on SR 507 through the site to the Yelm Walmart, north on Walmart Boulevard, west on 103rd Avenue, south on Creek Street and west on SR 507. Hourly service is provided on weekdays between 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. On weekends, hourly service is between 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. SO Alliance November 2014 Page 13 o N I L-35 -) L+ —395 21 615— 1) Burnett Rd at Yelm Ave Ln L 45 r, Ln -1 —480 .j 1 L. r 20 51 1 r 670— Ln o Ln 40-1 N -i Ln 2) Killion Rd at Yelm Ave L 15 o o X535 l ti r 2 201 740 L o r 5-1 3) Cullens St at Yelm Ave L-25 Ln rn —475 �) 1 r 200 501 r 500 L o 60–� mrn� ci N 6) 1st St at Yelm Ave L-20 N Ln oN —755 ff 1 L. r-70 251 'I1r 805 o Ln o 10-1 9) Clark Rd at Yelm Ave a" c 3 m 0 4) Longmire St at Yelm Ave ,n t_ 60 Ln o o —125 -i rn J 1 L. r25 951 'I 1 r 265— o o o 45-1 mNm ci 7) 1st St at Stevens Hwy L- 10 o in — 830 JIL. r2 601 'I 1 r 870 -i o Ln 0-1 10) 103rd Ave at Yelm Ave 5) 1st St at Mosman Ave --y. • .... ERs ry i O r N Y Sj7$ O - , ® •% & / o L 50 —15 L-85 r10 —140 Ln ° —100 205-1 o^ - 370 o Ln o o °° "' r' 280-1 14) Walmart Blvd at 200— '1 r Yelm Ave 1051 `1 1 r 145-1 ° Ln 180— o o Ln 10-1 N Qo 12) Creek St at 13) Grove Rd at 103rd Ave 103rd Ave Ln Ln Ln o) -i m Ln in-i L-70 .j 1 .� �► —670 1101 `� 1 51 15-1 Ln o 520 - N / o L 50 —15 v`^i 61 rn X520 r10 ff 1 L. r75 10— '1 r 201 `1 1 r 205-1 o^ - 370 o Ln o o °° "' r' 280-1 14) Walmart Blvd at 15) Bald Hills Rd /Creek St at 103rd Ave Yelm Ave Ln L 100 .� �► 1-685 1051 455— 1140 8 16) Bald Hills Rd at 17) Grove Rd at 18) Walmart Blvd at 19) Yelm Ave at Morris Rd Yelm Ave Yelm Ave Walmart Driveway Access 7 d, ,, AI ,y► 2— -1 o o L-5 1� r, o ,n ;35 160 I �► 85 i � 5 551 `� - If -�i�■ .� , Of- 11) West Rd at 01 . 410 2— -1 o o L-5 1� r, o ,n ;35 160 I �► 85 i � 5 551 `� - If -�i�■ .� , 10- 11) West Rd at 01 u 2— -1 o o 1� r, o ,n ;35 160 m ° N om i � 5 551 `� - If -�i�■ 85 � Ln o Ln , 10- 11) West Rd at 8) 1st St /Rhoton Rd at u Railway Rd ,n ;35 160 ° N om i � 5 551 `� - If -�i�■ 85 � Ln o Ln , 10- 11) West Rd at R 103rd Ave 15 16 0 13 103rd Ave 14 - xx--*. PM F G� 4 O �� f6 Yom. � r. -'�vs •ii� ?j yr- r,_ 17 r. Project ,y Area 190/of "'ills Ra r a Figure 5 Yelm East Gateway Existing 2014 PM Peak Hour Yelm, WA SC.J ALLIANCE Traffic Volumes Traffic Impact Analysis CONSULTING SERVICES Yelm East Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis 4. PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS The two project - related characteristics having the most effect on area traffic conditions are peak hour trip generation and the directional distribution of traffic volumes on the surrounding roadway network. 4.1 Site - Generated Traffic Volumes Project trip generation for each of the three alternatives was calculated using the trip generation rates contained in the current edition of the Trip Generation report by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The Shopping Center land use (land use code 820) was determined to be applicable. The trip generation rates used for this analysis are shown in Table 1. A project such as a commercial center tends to attract a large amount of traffic from people already driving on the area roadways. These trips are not new trips added to the local roadways (primary trips) but represent "pass -by" trips according to the following definition: Pass -by Trips are trips made as an intermediate stop from an origin to a primary destination (i.e., stopping to shop on the way home from work) by vehicles passing directly by the project driveway. The new -to- network trip rate reflects an estimated 34% occurrence of "pass -by" vehicles for the shopping center. Table 1. Trip Generation Characteristics — PM Peak Hour Fitted Curve PM Peak Hour Trip Rates Land Use (LU) Unit Rate Pass -By % Enter % Exit Shopping Center (LU 820) 1,000 sf Varies 34% 48% 52% The total trip generation expected from the development is calculated by applying the square footage of the shopping center uses in each of the alternatives to the appropriate trip generation rate. The total project trip generation and new -to- network trip generation for each scenario are shown in Table 2. The fitted curve equation for a shopping center (ITE land use code 820) was used to calculate the trip generation of each alternative. Trip generation was reviewed and approved by the City of Yelm during the traffic scoping process. SO Alliance November 2014 Page 15 Yelm East Gateway Table 2. Project PM Trip Generation Summary Traffic Impact Analysis 4.2 Site Traffic Distribution The vehicle directional trip distribution to and from the site will be based primarily on: • The area street system characteristics; • Current travel patterns on the area roadways; • The proposed access system for the project; and • Locations of residential areas and shopping /commercial centers. The Thurston Regional Planning Council (TRPC) model currently maintains a travel demand model that incorporates all of Thurston County. TRPC created the area -wide transportation model with cooperation from the local jurisdictions within the County. The model, developed using the Emme /3 software package, has been calibrated to accurately represent the existing vehicle travel patterns throughout the entire county. The model provides significant detail in the City of Yelm area and has been used extensively as a traffic forecasting tool for transportation studies in the City of Yelm. In the transportation model, the county -wide transportation network is divided into "Traffic Analysis Zones" (TAZ's). A Select Zone Analysis (SZA) was conducted for TAZ 534 to estimate the directional distribution characteristics of project traffic. This feature of the Emme /3 software package allows all of SO Alliance November 2014 Page 16 Fitted New -To- Network Site Plan Units Curve Total Trips Pass- Trips Description Land Use (sf) Rate In Out Total By In Out Total No Action Alternative Shopping North Side Center 105,333 5.89 298 322 620 211 196 213 409 Shopping South Side Center 123,667 5.59 332 359 691 235 219 237 456 Total 630 681 1311 446 415 450 865 Moderate Intensity Alternative Shopping North Side Center 190,337 4.84 442 479 921 313 292 316 608 Shopping South Side Center 307,860 4.13 610 661 1271 432 403 436 839 Total 1052 1140 2192 745 695 752 1447 Highest Intensity Alternative Shopping North Side Center 304,572 4.15 607 657 1264 430 400 434 834 Shopping South Side Center 492,576 3.54 837 907 1744 593 552 599 1151 Total 1444 1564 3008 1023 952 1033 1985 4.2 Site Traffic Distribution The vehicle directional trip distribution to and from the site will be based primarily on: • The area street system characteristics; • Current travel patterns on the area roadways; • The proposed access system for the project; and • Locations of residential areas and shopping /commercial centers. The Thurston Regional Planning Council (TRPC) model currently maintains a travel demand model that incorporates all of Thurston County. TRPC created the area -wide transportation model with cooperation from the local jurisdictions within the County. The model, developed using the Emme /3 software package, has been calibrated to accurately represent the existing vehicle travel patterns throughout the entire county. The model provides significant detail in the City of Yelm area and has been used extensively as a traffic forecasting tool for transportation studies in the City of Yelm. In the transportation model, the county -wide transportation network is divided into "Traffic Analysis Zones" (TAZ's). A Select Zone Analysis (SZA) was conducted for TAZ 534 to estimate the directional distribution characteristics of project traffic. This feature of the Emme /3 software package allows all of SO Alliance November 2014 Page 16 Yelm East Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis the traffic into and out of a particular zone to be isolated and shown separately from the rest of the traffic on the network. This graphically shows the percentage of vehicles currently using each of the available routes into and out of the area (Yelm Avenue (SR 507), Bald Hills Road, Grove Road, Walmart Boulevard, etc.). From this information, regional distribution percentages were calculated for future traffic from the proposed East Gateway project. Previous review and analysis of the regional traffic distribution in the vicinity has shown that the model underestimates the commercial traffic draw to /from the northeast (into Pierce County). Accordingly, the regional distribution was adjusted for this study to be consistent with previous analysis for the area. Specifically, the draw to /from west of Yelm (on SR 510, from the Lacey area) was reduced and the draw to /from northeast of Yelm (via SR 507). The distribution was also "ground - truthed" by comparing to the existing traffic volumes generated by the Walmart based on recent counts at the Walmart driveways. 4.3 Traffic Assignment Scenarios The site - generated traffic was assigned to the area roadway network differently for the two analysis horizon years (2020 and 2035). The differences are described below. 4.3.1 2020 horizon The development traffic was assigned based on existing travel trends and includes only existing roadway connections in the area. Specifically SR 510 Alternate (Yelm Loop) and the Bald Hills Road Connector (Y- 2c) are not yet in place for this scenario. The site traffic distribution and assignment for the highest traffic potential for the 2020 network is shown on Figures 6 and 7. 4.3.2 2035 horizon Development traffic was assigned to the network assuming SR 510 Alternate (Yelm Loop) and Y -2c (from Yelm Avenue (SR 507) to Bald Hills Road) to be completed. These improvements are described in section 5.1. These connections result in more site - generated traffic arriving from the loop roads and not using Yelm Avenue (SR 507) directly to access the site. The site traffic distribution and assignment of the highest traffic potential for the 2035 network is shown on Figure 8. The site traffic distribution and assignment figures for the other two development scenarios are provided in Appendix B. The traffic distribution and assignments were reviewed and approved by City of Yelm staff. SO Alliance November 2014 Page 17 1) Burnett Rd at Yelm Ave 60 r 21 58— r 0, 2) Killion Rd at Yelm Ave 3) Cullens St at Yelm Ave —91 r 103 87— r Ln 0, 6) 1st St at Yelm Ave —238 r7 222— r 9) Clark Rd at Yelm Ave Z c 3 m _y O .� y L- 10 �► —81 77— 4) Longmire St at Yelm Ave r � 5) 1st St at Mosman Ave 7) 1st St at Stevens Hwy 8) 1st St /Rhoton Rd at Railway Rd 10) 103rd Ave at Yelm Ave 11) West Rd at 103rd Ave Project Trips � o Pass -By Trips X31 o m r 21 ! I. L35 —23 X287 r 134 Inbound Outbound Total 511 512 1023 28— r 21— `� 1 53- 267— r rn 26-1 rn rn 00 �' N New -to- Network Trips N ° �' Inbound Outbound Total 953 1033 1986 _ e ,••tits °� SAP 4 sst OvOC� f' ?�0s 6 C O J AV 12) Creek St at 13) Grove Rd at 14) Walmart Blvd at 15) Bald Hills Rd /Creek St at 103rd Ave 103rd Ave 103rd Ave Yelm Ave N N L-52 (48) L-53 Ln W DI o`I�o m L. —160( -167 X176( -95) .) 1 «� ! 1, r89 (83) ,J ! r 104 (9 5) . 333 481 (44) 1001 ') 1 ' (42) 651 361 ( -73) 173 o ( -93) 172— - oo (29) 70-1 (39) 60-1 r 16) Bald Hills Rd at 17) Grove Rd at 18) Walmart Blvd at 19) Yelm Ave at Morris Rd Yelm Ave Yelm Ave Walmart Driveway Access •'�.r�,. ' � ` - .. : +- � • fir► •'� W E Legend @Apw Y GJ i' GJ 15 16 O a 13 103rd Ave 14 XXX Site - Generated Project Trips m (XXX) Site - Generated Pass -By Trips °�° +u�, XX Distribution Percentage O Ewa�q• f0 Yom. - vs •iii ..s •� 190/of "'ills Ra T , __ •y. %11 Figure 6 Yelm East Gateway W 2020 PM Peak Hour Site - Generated Yelm, WA SC.J ALLIANCE Traffic Volumes - Alt 1 Traffic Impact Analysis CONSULTING SERVICES Note 5% of the distribution was applied internally between the north and south side of the site. An additional 5% was assigned as internal capture. Legend XXX Site - Generated Project Trips (XXX) Site - Generated Pass -By Trips XX Distribution Percentage � + SCJ ALLIANCE CONSULTMC, SERVICES Figure 7 PM Peak Hour Site - Generated Project Trips - Alt 1 (Site Driveways) ;_ m -- m L18 (27) (28) 86-1-t t 0 O M l �n 00 -z:r �m �I 18 (27) 20—' t . ro�ect (21) 59-1 ZL N Area M k i t t 00 00 _ N In 00 c-I ...- _ - .�... L53 Oo v L52 (48) °—° •" o vi _ X176 ( -95) M m r, r 160 ( -167) r, 00 L35 (81) j r 104 (95) X421 1 r89 (83) 223(-81) 321--o. r (44) 100-J I r ( r (42) 65-J ~I t r 325 li y 3 74 N ( -73) 173 (12) 23 Oo o v ( -93) 172 Ln � (29) 70-1 N V (39) 60� � J - Figure 7 PM Peak Hour Site - Generated Project Trips - Alt 1 (Site Driveways) ;_ m -- m L18 (27) (28) 86-1-t t 0 cn v �n 00 -z:r �m �I 18 (27) 128► 85-J 35 -0/ e Project Trips Pass -By Trips Inbound Outbound Total 511 512 1023 New -to- Network Trips Inbound Outbound Total 953 1033 1986 Yelm East Gateway Ye I m, WA Traffic Impact Analysis N f " 1 #� T__ . W E �" � 7• a f . - rz1 29� r .F y �a �&di s a •�Ir L� r� f a * .103, AVe.. 14 ` { Y 12) 103rd Ave at - -_ - ` , `•� Creek St I � 25% ,. O OL` '� E . + i- 14) 103rd Ave at Walmart Blvd i:iiiiiiiii Yelm Ave , Legend XXX —0- Site - Generated Project Trips (XXX) --1P- Site - Generated Pass -By Trips XX Distribution Percentage + ±r �� SCJ ALLIANCE CONSULTMC, SERVICES n Project Area 18% I - 16) Bald Hills Rd at 9 25 Morris Rd L 37 O n r 115 j x71 68� I t Ailh r ( -12) 125 0. c (12) 78-1 N J Project Trips Pass -By Trips Inbound Outbound Total 511 512 1023 New -to- Network Trips Inbound Outbound Total 953 1033 1986 Figure 8 2035 PM Peak Hour Site - Generated Traffic Volumes - Alt 1 18) Yelm Ave at Walmart Blvd L 12 �o (► —11 10 —I`1 t 38-1 o a� 13) 103rd Ave at Grove Rd —227 ;-52 209— r a 15) Yelm Ave at Bald Hills Rd /Creek St rN 6a(za) d14) x87(60) (22) 59- t r 30) 125— ,� c (8) 43� 17) Yelm Ave at Grove Rd 19) Yelm Ave at I Walmart Driveway Access Yelm East Gateway Yelm, WA Traffic Impact Analysis Yelm East Gateway 5. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Traffic Impact Analysis 5.1 Roadway Improvements The City of Yelm's Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) 2013 -2019 includes a number of projects in the study area: Y -2c — Bald Hills to SR 507 —This project constructs a new collector street between Bald Hills Road and the traffic signal at the SR 507 /SR 510 Alternate (Yelm Loop) intersection. SR 510 Alternate (Yelm Loop) — Construction of this north loop provides a primary alternative for traffic traveling through and around the City Center. Bald Hills Road from City limits to 5 Corners —This project reconstructs Bald Hills Road to a three -lane facility between the Western Chehalis Railroad and its intersection with Yelm Avenue (SR 507). 5.2 Future Traffic Volumes The traffic volume forecasts for the study intersections were prepared using the TRPC travel demand model. The TRPC model reflects the planned household and employment growth predicted by the City for over the long -term planning horizon. 5.2.1 2020 Horizon For the 2020 horizon, the "background" area -wide traffic growth rate was determined by the growth trends calculated from model output. Specifically, for the 2020 horizon a 2.5% annual growth rate was used for SR 507 and SR 510, and 1% annual growth rate for all other roadways in the study area. The growth rates were applied to the existing traffic counts collected for the area. The site - generated traffic volumes for the three development alternatives were added to the background traffic volumes to calculate the three total traffic assignments for the study. 5.2.2 2035 Horizon By the 2035 horizon additional roadway connections planned within the City are anticipated to be completed. These new connections will have a notable effect on traffic flows within the localized study area. The current TRPC 2035 model scenario was used as the baseline for calculating the traffic shifts in the area. The 2035 model includes all of the planned improvements in the current Regional Transportation Plan. Specific improvements within the study area that will affect 2035 travel patterns are listed below: • Completion of the entire SR 510 Alternate (Yelm Loop) from Mud Run Road at Yelm Avenue (SR 507) to the Walmart Boulevard intersection at Yelm Avenue (SR 507). • Y -1 Loop (Thurston Highlands area) from Killion Street at Yelm Avenue to SR 507 south of Yelm. • Y -2c from Yelm Avenue (SR 507) at Walmart Boulevard to Bald Hills Road. The spacing between the Grove Road and WalMart Boulevard intersection is approximately 700 -feet and it is doubtful the Washington State Department of Transportation will allow traffic signal control at this intersection due to insufficient spacing for vehicle queuing between intersections. Therefore, it is anticipated intersection control will include a roundabout. Construction of a modern roundabout will improve the intersection operations by decreasing speeds and reducing collisions and traffic delays. SO Alliance November 2014 Page 21 Yelm East Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis To estimate background traffic volume conditions, the TRPC model was used to predict changes in the traffic patterns associated with the new connections. Specifically the 2035 volume scenarios were calculated by growing the study intersections by the global growth trends used for the 2020 horizon and adjusting the traffic flows to account for the localized traffic re- assignment caused by the Y -2c and SR 510 Alternate (Yelm Loop) connections. The 2020 total traffic assignment for the highest traffic scenario is provided on Figures 9 and 10. The total traffic assignment for the 2035 horizon is shown on Figure 11. The total traffic assignment for the other scenarios is provided in Appendix B. Traffic volume calculations for the study intersections are shown in Appendix C. SO Alliance November 2014 Page 22 o m I L45 -) L+ —505 51 755— 1) Burnett Rd at Yelm Ave Ln L 45 ,n Ln 1 —610 .j 1 L. r 45 5-J 1I- 825— Ln o Ln 45-1 `4 -i ^ 2) Killion Rd at Yelm Ave L 15 o Ln o X 700 «) 1 L. r 5 201 930 L o r 5-1 3) Cullens St at Yelm Ave 0 L25 0 ° ° 640 �) 1 L. r 335 501 `I1r 665 o Ln Ln 65 - rnm � m 6) 1st St at Yelm Ave L-20 N Ln 0° —1105 ff 1 L. r 80 251 'I I r 1150— o Ln Ln 10-1 00 9) Clark Rd at Yelm Ave ai c 3 m O *1 `.F Y 4) Longmire St at Yelm Ave 0 t-85 0 -i ° X135 J 1 L. 125 1001 I -1 t r 280 Ln o o 50--, mmm 7) 1st St at Stevens Hwy L 10 � o Ln — 1195 JIL. r5 651 1230— o 0-1 10) 103rd Ave at Yelm Ave 5) 1st St at Mosman Ave --y. • .... ERs O r N Y Ac 1117$: ® 1140 0 16) Bald Hills Rd at 17) Grove Rd at 18) Walmart Blvd at 19) Yelm Ave at `i4} `04s� .. _ Morris Rd Yelm Ave Yelm Ave Walmart Driveway Access s off` . , ;:.� `• � - _ - • . ; , �" :p � .�; ► X180 185 ,n o 000 -1 -1 fj ! L-125 X130 r5 '� r 10— —15 110 `� r 0 0 ° °�' ° �) 1 201 L-55 X885 1215 '� r 240— `� (' 1101 155 0 210 o o �n 270 -• -a R � `• 695 Ln o Ln Of 40- Ln F, N 295 N O1 12) Creek St at 13) Grove Rd at 14) Walmart Blvd at 15) Bald Hills Rd /Creek St at 103rd Ave 103rd Ave 103rd Ave Yelm Ave 175 41f L 160 �n o N ° rLno ;-760 rjS X870 L140 `J + 1501 170 `� 1 �' 2151 1200 `� 1 �' J L. 451 —1155 1651 in o ooQ0 inino � Om 100 0 010 100-1 r-i Q0 rn 1140 0 16) Bald Hills Rd at 17) Grove Rd at 18) Walmart Blvd at 19) Yelm Ave at `i4} `04s� .. _ Morris Rd Yelm Ave Yelm Ave Walmart Driveway Access s off` . , ;:.� `• � - _ - • . ; , �" :p � .�; ► 12 ! 190 :<i.• i ... Y .� -• -a R � `• GJ 01 Of - 0Z h• y F 41f r =+ 12 5 in in o i 5 0 m 8) 1st St /Rhoton Rd at u Railway Rd 0 L190, o N m n —45 .1 j L. r 5 601 '1 t r 100 Ln o Ln 10- 11) West Rd at 103rd Ave 15 16 •.: s oC In O _ • -Y r ., 1� 11� 13 103rd Ave 14 C m � i � y 190/of "'ills Ra Project Area 19 • J`! r • 4? a Figure 9 Yelm East Gateway Projected 2020 PM Peak Hour Yelm, WA SC.J ALLIANCE Traffic Volumes - Alt 1 Traffic Impact Analysis CONSULTING SERVICES ! 190 :<i.• i ... Y .� -• -a R � `• GJ 01 5 in in o i 5 0 m 8) 1st St /Rhoton Rd at u Railway Rd 0 L190, o N m n —45 .1 j L. r 5 601 '1 t r 100 Ln o Ln 10- 11) West Rd at 103rd Ave 15 16 •.: s oC In O _ • -Y r ., 1� 11� 13 103rd Ave 14 C m � i � y 190/of "'ills Ra Project Area 19 • J`! r • 4? a Figure 9 Yelm East Gateway Projected 2020 PM Peak Hour Yelm, WA SC.J ALLIANCE Traffic Volumes - Alt 1 Traffic Impact Analysis CONSULTING SERVICES R :k -- SCJ ALLIANCE CONSULTENC, SERVICES G Parcel A Parcel C North Driveway North Driveway 3 _ Parcel C Pa South Driveway = South Driveway Figure 10 Projected 2020 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Alt 1 (Site Driveways) N n .I.. 1 �► 1-45 T M - r3 .n i .4 Yelm East Gateway Ye I m, WA Traffic Impact Analysis . or 1-115 x925 M m N N r r 215 j 1-175 _ - ,n o N m N x760 -- X1205 - ;-170 r '1tf o O Ln mN Figure 10 Projected 2020 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Alt 1 (Site Driveways) N n .I.. 1 �► 1-45 T M - r3 .n i .4 Yelm East Gateway Ye I m, WA Traffic Impact Analysis 0 1-115 x925 r r 215 j Im _ :.605 is 100 N W L-n O �� Figure 10 Projected 2020 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Alt 1 (Site Driveways) N n .I.. 1 �► 1-45 T M - r3 .n i .4 Yelm East Gateway Ye I m, WA Traffic Impact Analysis W WJ s , k 4f - r "rr Figure 11 1.8 Projected 2035 PM Peak Hour SCJ ALLIANCE Traffic Volumes - Alt 1 CONSULTMC, SERVICES � t_ 40 x200 (00 ib 0`"0 X130 r90 1 L. r5 245 r 1251 } 175 o N 200 1 f 55-� ° N 12) 103rd Ave at 13) 103rd Ave at Creek St Grove Rd L5 L60 �n 00 ui r15 ° n�i X695 ,J1� r10 ,J1� r70 51 t r 20-J -1 4t)r 10� � o� 400 �320 �m 310 ° 14) 103rd Ave at 15) Yelm Ave at Walmart Blvd Bald Hills Rd /Creek St 'J 1 ti 1 �► r 1145 2301 851 r 15-1 465— ^ o o m 50� 16) Bald Hills Rd at 17) Yelm Ave at Morris Rd Grove Rd n o o L635 X660 rVL. L160 r80 ~1290 951 'I t r 501 485 � � 0 1130 — 90� oo N .-I 18) Yelm Ave at 19) Yelm Ave at ° Walmart Blvd Walmart Driveway Access LEGEND XX— PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES Yelm East Gateway Yelm, WA Traffic Impact Analysis Yelm East Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis 6. TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS 6.1 Intersection Level of Service The acknowledged source for determining overall capacity for arterial segments and independent intersections is the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). For signalized and stop sign - controlled intersections, the HCM 2010 methodology was used. For analysis of "modern roundabout" intersections, the Sidra analysis methodology was used. Capacity analyses were completed for the base year and projected 2020 PM peak hour traffic volume scenarios for all intersections. Capacity analyses were completed for 2035 horizon for the project frontage area intersections only. Capacity analysis results are described in terms of Level of Service (LOS). LOS is a qualitative term describing operating conditions a driver will experience while traveling on a particular street or highway during a specific time interval. It ranges from A (very little delay) to F (long delays and congestion). The intersections in this study are held to the following LOS standards adopted by the City: In all residential zones, LOS C In all commercial and light industrial zones, LOS D In the urban core, generally between Edwards Street and 4t" Street and Mosman Avenue and West Road, LOS F is recognized as an acceptable level of service where mitigation to create traffic diversions, alternate routes and modes of transportation are being planned, funded and implemented. The LOS standard for the urban core area shall not preclude the City's ability to require necessary safety improvements of intersections impacted by new development. 6.1.1 Intersection Operations Level of Service calculations for intersections determine the amount of "control delay" (in seconds) that drivers will experience while proceeding through an intersection. Control delay includes all deceleration delay, stopped delay and acceleration delay caused by the traffic control device. The Level of Service is directly related to the amount of delay experienced. For Concurrency Review, the City uses the total average delay of the intersection and not individual movements. For intersections under minor street stop -sign control, the LOS of the most difficult movement (typically the minor street left -turn) represents the intersection level of service for purposes of assessing potential impacts. However, the Concurrency Review threshold is applied to the intersection average LOS. The following tables show the Level of Service criteria for signalized and unsignalized intersections. SO Alliance November 2014 Page 26 Yelm East Gateway Table 3. Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Traffic Impact Analysis Level of Service Average Control Delay (seconds /vehicle) A <_ 10 B > 10 -20 C > 20 -35 D > 35 -55 E > 55 -80 F > 80 Table 4. Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Control Delay (seconds /vehicle) A <_ 10 B > 10 -15 C > 15 -25 D > 25 -35 E > 35 -50 F > 50 6.2 Volume to Capacity Ratio Another measure of the function of a signalized intersection is the "degree of saturation" which is typically presented as the "volume to capacity" (v /c) ratio. Many factors affect the volume of traffic an intersection can accommodate during a specific time interval. These factors include the number of lanes, lane widths, the type of signal phasing, the number of parking maneuvers on the adjacent street, etc. Based on these factors, the intersection (or individual lane group) is determined to have a total vehicle carrying capacity "c" for the analysis period. The analysis period volume "v" is compared to the calculated carrying capacity and presented as a ratio. If the v/c ratio is below 1.0, the demand volume is less than the maximum capacity. If the v/c ratio is over 1.0, the demand volume is exceeding the available capacity. 6.3 Intersection Operations The analysis was conducted for the following three traffic volume scenarios: • Existing 2014 traffic volumes • Projected 2020 traffic volumes with the Yelm East Gateway project (three development alternatives) • Projected 2035 traffic volumes (using highest traffic development scenario only) The capacity analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix D. Following is a description of the level of service analysis of the study intersections for the scenarios listed above. SO Alliance November 2014 Page 27 Yelm East Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis 6.4 Stop Sign - Controlled Intersections Intersection analysis for stop controlled intersections was performed using the Highway Capacity Manual output for the Synchro software. Synchro incorporates the methodology of the current Highway Capacity Manual and is used by the City of Yelm to review operating conditions for unsignalized intersections. The results identified below represent the average LOS condition for the intersection as a whole and not by specific traffic movement. 6.4.1 Burnett Road /SR 510 This is a tee intersection with stop sign control for Burnett Road. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS D. This intersection currently operates at an LOS A and is projected to remain an LOS A in all of the 2020 build alternatives. No mitigation is required. 6.4.2 Cullens Road /Yelm Avenue (SR 510) This intersection has stop sign control for the north and south approaches on Cullens Road. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS D. This intersection currently operates at an LOS A and is projected to remain an LOS A in all of the 2020 build alternatives. No mitigation is required. 6.4.3 Longmire Street /Yelm Avenue (SR 510) This intersection has stop sign control for the north and south approaches on Longmire Street. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS D. This intersection currently operates at an LOS A and is projected to remain an LOS A in all of the 2020 build alternatives. No mitigation is required. 6.4.4 1st Street / Mosman Avenue This intersection is made up of two slightly offset tee intersections, with stop control on the east and west approaches of Mosman Avenue. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS F. This intersection currently operates at an LOS A and is projected to remain an LOS A in all of the 2020 build alternatives. No mitigation is required. 6.4.5 First Street /Stevens Street This intersection has stop control for the east and west approaches on Stevens Street. Both roads provide a single lane in each direction. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS F. This intersection currently operates at an LOS D and is projected to operate at an LOS E in the 2020 scenario for the highest traffic threshold. This intersection has experienced a change in volume patterns now that it provides an alternative route across 1St Street. The change in volume can be accommodated by converting this intersection to all -way stop - control. Under all -way stop - control, this intersection is projected to operate at an LOS C for all of the build alternatives. 6.4.6 1st Street /Rhoton Road /Railway Road This intersection has stop control for the east and west approaches on Railway Road. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS D. This intersection currently operates at an LOS A and is projected to remain an LOS A in all of the 2020 build alternatives. No mitigation is required. SO Alliance November 2014 Page 28 Yelm East Gateway 6.4.7 103rd Avenue /Yelm Avenue (SR 507) Traffic Impact Analysis This intersection has stop control on the north and south approaches of 103rd Avenue. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS D. This intersection currently operates at an LOS A and is projected to remain an LOS A in all of the 2020 build alternatives. No mitigation is required. 6.4.8 West Road /103rd Avenue This intersection has stop control on the north and south approaches of West Road. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS D. This intersection currently operates at an LOS B. It is projected to operate at an LOS C in all of the 2020 build alternatives. No mitigation is required. 6.4.9 Creek Street /103rd Avenue This is a tee intersection with stop control for Creek Street. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS D. This intersection currently operates at an LOS A and is projected to remain an LOS A in all of the 2020 build alternatives. No mitigation is required. 6.4.10 Grove Road /103rd Avenue This is a four -way intersection under all -way stop - control. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS C. This intersection currently operates at an LOS B and is projected to remain an LOS B for the 2020 Alt 2 and Alt 3 build alternatives. The intersection is projected to operate at an LOS C in the 2020 Alt 1 build alternative. No mitigation is required. 6.4.11 Walmart Boulevard /103rd Avenue This tee intersection has stop sign control on the south approach of Walmart Boulevard. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS C. This intersection currently operates at an LOS A and is projected to remain an LOS A in all of the 2020 build alternatives. No mitigation is required. 6.4.12 Bald Hills Road /Morris Road This is a tee intersection with stop control on the south approach of Morris Road. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS D. This intersection currently operates at an LOS A and is projected to remain an LOS A in all of the 2020 build alternatives. No mitigation is required. 6.4.13 Grove Road /Yelm Avenue (SR 507) This is a tee intersection with stop control on the north approach of Grove Road. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS D. This intersection currently operates at an LOS A. For the 2020 build alternatives, a fourth leg (south approach) of the intersection will be constructed to provide access into the project area south of Yelm Avenue (SR 507). Leaving the north and south approaches as stop controlled for the 2020 build alternatives, the intersection is projected to operate at an LOS F condition during the PM peak traffic period. This location will serve as one of the primary access points for the proposed development and stop control will not accommodate the projected traffic volumes for any of the development scenarios. Construction of a modern roundabout will improve the operations for conditions with the highest traffic potential to an LOS D. The Alt 2 build alternative is projected to operate at an LOS B, while the Alt 3 SO Alliance November 2014 Page 29 Yelm East Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis build alternative is projected to operate at an LOS A. The other type of intersection control to consider is the installation of a traffic signal control system. This is a traditional method to provide controlled access while mitigating significant delay impacts to the cross street traffic. However, given the close proximity of this location to the downstream signal system at the Walmart intersection, this type of traffic control will not be permitted by WSDOT. A description of the merits and impacts associated with a modern roundabout versus a signalized system is provided below. Both a modern roundabout and a traffic signal system could be designed at this location to meet acceptable level of service standards. However, a traffic signal would require widening Yelm Avenue (SR 507) further west of the intersection to accommodate vehicle storage. At roundabouts vehicles only turn right to enter the intersection and left -turn lanes are not required. Also vehicles are generally continuously moving which reduces the need for widening to accommodate queued vehicles. A modern roundabout would also provide an opportunity for vehicles to enter or exit right- turn -only (RTO) driveways on Yelm Avenue (SR 507) by performing a U -turn at the roundabout. For example a vehicle headed westbound on Yelm Avenue (SR 507) wishing to enter a RTO driveway on the south side of Yelm Avenue (SR 507) could U -turn at Grove Road and enter the driveway. Modern roundabouts have been shown to experience much lower crash rates than comparable traffic signals. Data provided by FHWA indicate that an intersection converting from traffic signal to roundabout experiences, on average, a 48% reduction in total vehicle crashes and a 78% reduction in injury crashes. For the reasons described above a modern roundabout is proposed as the preferred intersection control alternative at this location. 6.4.14 Walmart Driveway Access /Yelm Avenue (SR 507) This is a tee intersection with stop control on the north approach, which is the Walmart Driveway Access. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS D. This intersection currently operates at an LOS A and is projected to remain an LOS A in all of the 2020 build alternatives. No mitigation is required. Table 5 summarizes the operational results for the stop sign - controlled intersections. SO Alliance November 2014 Page 30 Yelm East Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis Table S. Unsignalized Intersections — LOS Summary PM Peak Hour SO Alliance November 2014 Page 31 Projected Projected Projected Concurrency Projected 2020 Alt 1 2020 Alt 2 2020 Alt 3 Standard Existing 2014 2020 Alt 1 with Imp with Imp With Imp Worst Worst Worst Worst Worst Movement Movement Movement Movement Movement Intersection Intersection Intersection Intersection Intersection Intersection Average Average Average Average Average Burnett Rd at D C(22) D (33) D (33) D (30) D (29) Yelm Ave A (1) A (1) A (1) A (1) A (1) Cullens St at (E 39) F(76) F(76) F(70) F(64) Yelm Ave D A (1) A (1) A (1) A (1) A (1) Longmire St at D D (35) F(108) F(108) F(77) F(53) Yelm Ave A (2) A (3) A (3) A (3) A (2) 1St St at C(24) E(43) E(43) E(37) D (33) Mosman Ave F A (5) A (5) A (5) A (5) A (5) 1St St at F(50) F(108) C (24)1 C (23)1 C (22)1 Stevens Hwy F D (25) E(49) C (18)1 C (17)1 C (17)1 1St St /Rhoton Rd B (12) B (14) B (14) B (14) B (13) at Railway Rd D A (2) A (3) A (3) A (3) A (3) 103rd Ave at F(93) F(300+) F(300+) F(300+) F(253) Yelm Ave D A (1) A (4) A (4) A (4) A (3) West Rd at D C(24) D (32) D (32) D (30) D (28) 103rd Ave B (13) C (17) C (17) C (16) B (15) Creek St at D B (12) B (14) B (14) B (14) B (13) 103rd Ave A (3) A (4) A (4) A (4) A (3) Grove Rd at B (12) C (21) C (21) C (17) B (15) 103rd Ave C B (11) C (18) C(18) B (15) B (13) Walmart Blvd at C B (11) B (12) B (12) B (11) B (11) 103rd Ave A (5) A (6) A (6) A (5) A (5) Bald Hills Rd at C (17) D (30) D (30) D (25) C(22) Morris Rd D A (3) A (5) A (5) A (4) A (3) Grove Rd at C(24) F(300+) F (101)3 C(25 )3 C (17)3 Yelm Ave D A (1) F (Error)' D (32)3 B (14)3 A (7)3 Walmart Driveway C(23) F(60) F(60) E(48) E(38) Access at D A (2) A (3) A (3) A (3) A (2) Yelm Ave 1) Convert intersection to all -way stop control 2) Error given in software as a result of excessive delay 3) Includes implementation of a Modern Roundabout SO Alliance November 2014 Page 31 Yelm East Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis 6.5 Signalized Intersections 6.5.1 Killion Road /Tahoma Boulevard SE /SR 510 This is a four approach intersection under traffic signal control. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS D. This intersection currently operates at an LOS A. It is projected to operate at an LOS B in all of the 2020 build alternatives. No mitigation is required. 6.5.2 First Street /SR 507 /SR 510 This is a four approach intersection under traffic signal control. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS F. This intersection currently operates at an LOS C. It is projected to operate at an LOS E in the 2020 Alt 1 and Alt 2 build alternatives. For the 2020 Alt 3 build alternative, this intersection is projected to operate at an LOS D. No mitigation is required. 6.5.3 Clark Road /Yelm Avenue (SR 507) This is a four approach intersection under traffic signal control. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS D. This intersection currently operates at an LOS A. It is projected to operate at an LOS B in all of the 2020 build alternatives. No mitigation is required. 6.5.4 Bald Hills Road /Creek Street /Yelm Avenue (SR 507) This is a four -leg intersection under signal control. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS D. This intersection currently operates at an LOS C. It is projected to operate at an LOS D in the 2020 Alt 1 and Alt 2 build alternatives. For the 2020 Alt 3 build alternative, this intersection is projected to remain at an LOS C. No mitigation is required. 6.5.5 Walmart Boulevard /Yelm Avenue (SR 507) This is currently a three -leg intersection under signal control. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS D. This intersection currently operates at an LOS B. For the 2020 build alternatives, a fourth leg (south approach) will be constructed. Without further improvements, the 2020 highest traffic potential scenario is projected to operate at an LOS F condition. Construction of additional eastbound and westbound through lanes through the project area and a southbound through lane is projected to improve the level of service of the 2020 highest traffic build alternative to an LOS C. The 2020 Alt 2 build alternative is also projected to operate at an LOS C with these improvements, while the 2020 Alt 3 build alternative is projected to operate at an LOS B. Table 6 summarizes the operational results for the signal - controlled intersections. SO Alliance November 2014 Page 32 Yelm East Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis Table 6. Signalized Intersections — LOS Summary PM Peak Hour Projected Projected Projected Concurrency Projected 2020 Alt 1 2020 Alt 2 2020 Alt 3 Standard Existing 2014 2020 Alt 1 with Imp with Imp With Imp LOS (Delay) LOS (Delay) LOS (Delay) LOS (Delay) LOS (Delay) Intersection Intersection Intersection Intersection Intersection Intersection Average Average Average Average Average Killion Rd at D A (9) B (12) B (12) B (11) B (10) Yelm Ave 1St St at F C(28) E(75) E(75) E(63) D (51) Yelm Ave Clark Rd at D A (9) B (15) B (15) B (13) B (11) Yelm Ave Bald Hills Rd at D C(25) D (54) D (54)4 D (40 )4 C(35 )4 Yelm Ave4 Walmart Blvd at D B (10) F(100) D (41) C(27) B (17) Yelm Ave 4) HCM 2000 methodology used to accommodate Non -NEMA phasing 6.6 Site Driveways Analysis for the site driveways was prepared based on a conceptual development plan for the overall project. The driveway volumes represent equal distribution of site development traffic based on the proposed access system. Individual developments that locate within the site may have actual trip generation characteristics higher or lower than the averages represented in this analysis. Turn lane locations were identified based on these assumptions to provide optimum accessibility to and within the site while creating the least friction on the public street system (Yelm Avenue (SR 507), Walmart Boulevard, Grove Road and the future Y -2c connection). The proposed roadway and intersection geometrics for the site driveways and public intersections adjacent to the site that were assumed for this analysis are shown on Figure 12. As individual developments are advanced within the context of the overall plan, the driveway turn lanes and storage lengths will be defined to the satisfaction of the City of Yelm and WSDOT. The following is a description of the operating conditions expected with the proposed driveway access locations and configurations. SO Alliance November 2014 Page 33 FIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Existing mmm$l- Existing Propose Propose Figure 12 Yelm Gateway EIS Proposed 2020 Alt 1 Yelm, WA 5CJ ALLIANCE Channelization Plan Traffic Impact Analysis t- ONSULTING SERVICES Yelm East Gateway 6.6.1 Grove Road /North Parcel A Driveway Traffic Impact Analysis This will be a tee intersection with stop control on the east approach. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS D. This intersection is projected to operate at an LOS A in all of the 2020 build alternatives. 6.6.2 Grove Road /South Parcel A Driveway This will be a four approach intersection with stop control on the east and west approaches. The west approach serves an existing mini storage facility. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS D. This intersection is projected to operate at an LOS A in all of the 2020 build alternatives. 6.6.3 Parcel D Driveway /Yelm Avenue (SR 507) This will be a tee intersection with stop control on the south approach. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS D. In Alternatives 1 and 2, this intersection is projected to be a "right -in, right -out (RIRO) driveway. For Alternative 3 this intersection is projected to be full access since there would be no planned connectivity within the adjacent parcels. This intersection is projected to operate at an LOS A in 2020 for Alternatives 1 and 2. For Alternative 3 it is projected to operate at an LOS B. 6.6.4 Parcel B Driveway /Yelm Avenue (SR 507) This will be a tee intersection with stop control on the north approach. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS D. For Alternative 3 this intersection is projected to be full access since there would be no planned connectivity within the adjacent parcels. In Alternatives 1 and 2, this intersection would not be constructed, as access is provided along Yelm Avenue (SR 507) in other locations and there is connectivity through the parcels. This intersection is projected to operate at an LOS A in 2020 Alternative 3. 6.6.5 Parcel C Driveway /Parcel F Driveway /Yelm Avenue (SR 507) This will be a four approach intersection with stop control on the north and south approaches. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS D. In Alternatives 1 and 2, this intersection is projected to be a RIRO for the north and south approaches. For Alternative 3 this intersection is projected to be full access since there would be no planned connectivity within the adjacent parcels. This intersection is projected to operate at an LOS A in 2020 for Alternatives 1 and 2. For Alternative 3 it is projected to operate at an LOS B. 6.6.6 Parcel F North Driveway /Walmart Boulevard This will be a four approach intersection with stop control on the east and west approaches. The west approach serves the existing Walmart. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS D. This intersection is projected to operate at an LOS A in all of the 2020 build alternatives. 6.6.7 Parcel F South Driveway /Walmart Boulevard This will be a four approach intersection with stop control on the east and west approaches. The west approach serves the existing Walmart. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS D. This intersection is projected to operate at an LOS A in all of the 2020 build alternatives. SO Alliance November 2014 Page 35 Yelm East Gateway 6.6.8 Parcel G North Driveway /Y -2c Extension Traffic Impact Analysis This will be a four approach intersection with stop control on the east and west approaches. This intersection will initially be an internal intersection serving the development. It will be constructed to fit within the planned Y -2c improvement. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS D. This intersection is projected to operate at an LOS A in all of the 2020 build alternatives. 6.6.9 Parcel G South Driveway /Y -2c Extension This will be a four approach intersection with stop control on the east and west approaches. This intersection will initially be an internal intersection serving the development. It will be constructed to fit within the planned Y -2c improvement. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS D. This intersection is projected to operate at an LOS A in all of the 2020 build alternatives. 6.6.10 Parcel G Driveway /Yelm Avenue (SR 507) This will be a tee intersection with stop control on the south approach. The concurrency standard for this location is LOS D. This intersection is planned as a right -out only in all three alternatives. This intersection is projected to operate at an LOS A in all of the 2020 build alternatives. Table 7 summarizes the operational results for the site driveway intersections. SO Alliance November 2014 Page 36 Yelm East Gateway Table 7. Site Driveways — LOS Summary PM Peak Hour Traffic Impact Analysis Intersection Concurrency Standard Projected 2020 Alt 1 with Imp LOS (Delay) Worst Movement Intersection Average Projected 2020 Alt 2 with Imp LOS (Delay) Worst Movement Intersection Average Projected 2020 Alt 3 With Imp LOS (Delay) Worst Movement Intersection Average Grove Rd at B (14) B (12) B (10) North Parcel A Driveway D A (4) A (3) A (2) Grove Rd at C(23) C(15) B (11) South Parcel A Driveway D A (5) A (3) A (2) Parcel D Driveway at C(20) C (16) F(189) Yelm Ave D A (1) A (1) B (13) Parcel B Driveway at D N/A N/A D (30) Yelm Ave A (1) Parcel C/F Driveways at C (17) B (14) F(143) Yelm Ave D A (2) A (1) B (12) Walmart Blvd at D (28) C(22) B (15) North Parcel C Driveway D A (5) A (4) A (2) Walmart Blvd at C (21) C (18) B (13) South Parcel C Driveway D A (3) A (3) A (3) Y -2c Extension at C (19) B (14) B (10) North Parcel G Driveway D A (5) A (4) A (3) Y -2c Extension at D B (12) B (10) A (9) South Parcel G Driveway A (7) A (6) A (6) Parcel G Driveway at B (13) B (12) B (11) Yelm Ave D A (1) A (1) A (1) SO Alliance November 2014 Page 37 Yelm East Gateway 7. LONG -RANGE TRAFFIC OPERATIONS Traffic Impact Analysis Although not required for concurrency testing as part of the environmental review for this project, this study has analyzed the intersections and roadways near the project site for conditions expected by the City's long term 2035 planning horizon. The analysis is based on the 2035 traffic flows predicted for the area with SR 510 Alternate (Yelm Loop) and Y -2c completed. The analysis also assumes the highest traffic potential will be realized even though the moderate land -use build -out is the preferred alternative for the future development scenario. The analysis provides a framework for the street and highway frontage and access requirements of the Yelm East Gateway development within the context of the City of Yelm's general overall vision for the area. The intersection and lane configurations anticipated for this scenario are shown on Figure 13. The roadway and intersection configurations are the same in 2035 as for 2020 with the exception of roadway widening on Walmart Boulevard and Yelm Avenue (SR 507) east of Walmart Boulevard associated with the completion of the SR 510 Alternate (Yelm Loop) and Y -2c connections. The following is a summary of the predicted operation of the study intersections for the 2035 horizon. Table 8. LOS Summary 2035 PM Peak Hour with Alternative 1 SCJ Alliance November 2014 Page 38 Projected 2035 Alternative 1 Intersection LOS (Delay) Geometric and Intersection Control Intersection Average Intersection Control Description Creek Street at Stop 103rd Avenue Control A (4) Same as 2020 Grove Road at Stop 103rd Avenue Control B (14) Same as 2020 Install traffic signal and widen Walmart Blvd at Traffic Walmart Boulevard to five lanes 103rd Avenue Signal B (20) south of 103rd Ave as part of Yelm Lop completion Bald Hills Rd at Traffic Yelm Ave Signal D (42) Same as 2020 Morris Rd at Stop A (7) Same as 2020 Bald Hills Rd Control Grove Road at Yelm Ave RAB B (11) Same as 2020 2nd SB to EB left -turn lane and Walmart Blvd at Traffic conversion of WB through -right lane D (46) Yelm Ave Signal to right -only as part of SR 510 Alternate (Yelm Loop) completion Widening of Yelm Avenue (SR 507) Walmart Driveway Stop A (3) to accommodate completion of SR Access at SR 507 Control 510 Alternate (Yelm Loop) SCJ Alliance November 2014 Page 38 001 SCSI ALLIANCE t.ONSULTING SERVICES r� Figure 13 Proposed 2035 Alt 1 Channelization Plan I t. t t-11. �Itk.. 41 LOO. LOO. 0 f-;�- A MH;Mr—T-* d i�I�A y� x 9)k 7p . . . . . . . . . . llnmL LM 41 di . Yelm Gateway EIS Yelm, WA Traffic Impact Analysis Yelm East Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis As shown on the 2035 total traffic volume figures in Section 5 of this study, the intersections on Yelm Avenue (SR 507) west of SR 510 Alternate (Yelm Loop) will experience less traffic in the 2035 horizon compared to 2020, and currently Walmart Boulevard and Yelm Avenue (SR 507) east of Walmart Boulevard will experience much higher traffic volumes than in 2035 than in 2020. The overall future traffic shift and reductions of through traffic in the core commercial area of the City is consistent with the future vision and plans identified in the City's Comprehensive Planning documents. SO Alliance November 2014 Page 40 Yelm East Gateway 8. MITIGATION Traffic Impact Analysis Development of the proposed Yelm East Gateway project area has been anticipated and in the planning process for some time. The City of Yelm has prepared comprehensive and project- specific documents over the past 15 years that address the traffic potential of this and other large -scale developments within the area. While it is expected that the Yelm East Gateway project would have a measurable impact on the City's transportation system, local and regional transportation corridors have been identified to accommodate this significant development as well as other anticipated growth in the area not associated with Yelm East Gateway. Even with these planned corridors and transportation improvements in place, project- specific impacts would be realized and mitigation measures will be necessary to accommodate the new traffic from the Yelm East Gateway development. The overall development is proposed to be constructed over a 10 to 15 -year period and this study has analyzed the traffic potential for three specific build -out scenarios to occur by 2020 and conditions predicted by 2035. Given the complexity of predicting the type and size of potential commercial users and economic trends that will impact the development build -out, this study used the highest traffic scenario as a benchmark in assessing probable impacts to the City's transportation system. This scenario, if realized, will attract up to approximately 2,000 evening peak hour trips on the local and regional transportation system. The mitigation strategies listed below are categorized into three types of potential developer contributions and responsibilities. Each of these types is described briefly below, and the mitigation that follows for the project is organized according to these types: Developer Funded Off -site Infrastructure Improvements — Improvements that are required to meet current Level of Service and concurrency standards if the proposed development creates impacts that affect service levels, safety and /or operational constraints. Site Access and Circulation Improvements — Street and intersection improvements to accommodate internal site access and circulation. These requirements often include provisions for future street connections and corridors linking to adjacent developable properties and identified transportation routes listed in the City's comprehensive planning documents. Traffic Mitigation Fees — Traffic mitigation fees paid in accordance with applicable City and County policies as outlined in the Yelm Municipal Code, Section 15.40 Concurrency Management. The following mitigation measures have been identified as necessary to accommodate traffic resulting from the proposed Yelm East Gateway project. Mitigation is organized according to the types described above. SO Alliance November 2014 Page 41 Yelm East Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis 8.1 Developer Funded Off -site Infrastructure Improvements 8.1.1 Grove Road /Yelm Avenue (SR 507) Intersection This intersection will serve as a major access point into the proposed Yelm East Gateway development. It will be one of only two locations that will provide left -turn access to /from the subject property via Yelm Avenue (SR 507). Accommodating the volume of traffic predicted at this intersection will require installation of a high volume intersection control. As described in section 6 of this report, the optimum intersection control was determined to be a modern roundabout. The project developers will construct a two -lane modern roundabout concurrent with development of properties that will access Grove Road within the westerly portion of the development. The proposed intersection geometry is shown on Figure 12 in section 6. Roundabouts can be an efficient form of intersection control. They have fewer conflict points, lower speeds, reduce injury collisions and traffic delays and vehicle stacking (i.e. queuing), and also permit U- turns. Per Chapter 1300 of the WSDOT Design Manual, an intersection control analysis (ICA) will be performed to evaluate and determine the appropriate type of intersection control for the Grove Road /Yelm Avenue (SR 507) intersection. The spacing between the Grove Road and Wal -Mart Boulevard intersection is approximately 700 -feet and it is doubtful the Washington State Department of Transportation will allow traffic signal control at this intersection due to insufficient spacing for vehicle queuing between intersections. Design and construction of the roundabout will be paid for by the developers and will require approval by the City of Yelm and WSDOT prior to construction. 8.1.2 Walmart Boulevard [SR 510 Alternate (Yelm Loop), Y- 2c] /Yelm Avenue (SR 507) Intersection The project developers will construct improvements to this intersection to accommodate the new northbound approach at the intersection, and to accommodate the predicted traffic flows at the intersection with completion of the Yelm East Gateway development. The proposed roadway and intersection improvements to be constructed by the project developers are shown on Figure 12 in section 6 of this report. In addition to the improvements that will be constructed by the developers concurrently with construction of the Yelm East Gateway development, the project will grant public right -of -way setbacks for future completion by the City of additional improvements associated with completion of SR 510 Alternate (Yelm Loop) and Y -2c. 8.1.3 SR 510 Alternate (Yelm Loop) and Y -2c Corridors The City of Yelm plans to construct the Y -2c corridor through the subject property between Yelm Avenue (SR 507) and Bald Hills Road and the SR 510 Alternate (Yelm Loop) corridor that will extend from Yelm Avenue (SR 507) to the north along the east edge of the subject property. These projects have long been identified in the City of Yelm Transportation Plan as part of a system of improvements to provide alternate routes to reduce congestion on Yelm Avenue (SR 507). The Yelm East Gateway development will accommodate these improvements in two ways: SO Alliance November 2014 Page 42 Yelm East Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis • Constructing frontage improvements on both sides of the proposed Y -2c alignment and the west side of the SR 510 Alternate (Yelm Loop) alignment that will accommodate the ultimate cross - section of the SR 510 Alternate (Yelm Loop) and Y -2c projects. • Constructing portions of the Y -2c roadway within the development area that will initially serve just as access to the southern portion of the development, but will also be the future alignment of the completed Y -2c connection to Bald Hills Road. The Yelm East Gateway development will pay for the design and construction of the roadway and intersection configurations shown on Figure 12 in section 6. 8.1.4 Yelm Avenue (SR 507) The project will design and construct improvements to Yelm Avenue (SR 507) along the project frontage to accommodate projected traffic flows on Yelm Avenue (SR 507) and the construction of site accesses. The developers will construct frontage improvements as well as the ultimate lane configurations on Yelm Avenue (SR 507) along the project frontage concurrently with development of the Yelm East Gateway project. The project developers may be due a credit against the overall Traffic Facility Charge (TFC - described in section 8.3) if portions of the public roadway system that they construct is also part of City improvements being collected for as part of the TFC. 8.2 Site Access and Circulation Improvements The development of the Yelm East Gateway will require construction of a series of internal private roadway connections. The conceptual site layout has identified a series of internal drive aisles that will provide the major access points within the area. This coordinated design effort will allow the most efficient access to /from the site and will minimize impacts to the public street system by not overloading individual driveways. As each individual development project within the Yelm East Gateway is designed and constructed it will adhere to the access and circulation system developed for the overall project. While all individual access points have been identified in this study, the exact locations will be determined and approved by the City of Yelm and WSDOT later for each development. Each property within the development will also be required to allow for future connection to adjacent properties as identified in this study. Each individual development will be required to prepare a "Site Circulation Analysis" to identify the trip generation potential of the development and specific site driveway configuration. The analysis will be used to compare cumulative traffic generation within the Yelm East Gateway area to the threshold established in this EIS (2,000 new PM peak hour trips). The analysis will also determine the final driveway location, driveway intersection configurations and turn lane storage lengths (as needed). 8.3 City of Yelm Traffic Facility Charge (TFC) Each property owner /applicant within the proposed development will pay the City of Yelm Traffic Facility Charge. The fees will be based on the net new PM peak hour traffic flows on the area roadways caused by the construction of Yelm East Gateway as shown on Figure 12. The fees will be calculated by the City of Yelm for each individual project as it moves through design and approval stage. SO Alliance November 2014 Page 43 Yelm East Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis 8.4 Phasing of On -Site and Off -Site Traffic Mitigation Improvements The Yelm East Gateway project is expected to be designed and constructed incrementally over the next 10 —15 years. The proposed on -site and off -site improvements will also be constructed incrementally to serve the traffic demands of the public street system and the site access and circulation needs of the development. The following is a description of the construction phasing of these improvements. 8.4.1 Site Driveways Each individual development that advances will be required to construct all driveways that will serve the subject property. Each driveway will be designed to accommodate the ultimate configuration, but based on the Site Circulation Study may be constructed to a lesser configuration with property and frontage improvement setbacks to accommodate the ultimate configuration. 8.4.2 Internal Access and Circulation Each individual development will be required to design the internal site circulation system to accommodate connections to adjacent properties as shown on the conceptual site layout (Figure 4). Internal connections will be designed and constructed as major circulation aisles to accommodate through- traffic within the development between individual parcels. These internal connections will allow traffic from any property within the southern portion of the development to access the public street system via Yelm Avenue (SR 507), or Y -2c. Similarly, all properties North of Yelm Avenue (SR 507) will be able to access the public street system via Yelm Avenue (SR 507), Grove Road or Walmart Boulevard. 8.4.3 Frontage Improvements Each property that fronts a public roadway will be required to construct public street frontage improvements along the entire frontage concurrently with development of property. This will include all curb, gutter, sidewalk and landscaping improvements and public roadway improvements including turn lanes. Where appropriate it may also require additional ROW dedication to accommodate future roadway widening not included as part of the project mitigation. All frontage improvements will be constructed with appropriate setbacks to accommodate future widening. 8.4.4 Yelm Avenue (SR 507) /Grove Road Any project constructed in the southwest quadrant of the subject property (south of Yelm Avenue (SR 507) and west of Y -2c) that will have its primary public access via the Grove Road /Yelm Avenue (SR 507) intersection will be required to construct improvements to the Grove Road /Yelm Avenue (SR 507) intersection. This will include constructing the new fourth (south) leg of the intersection and necessary intersection improvements to accommodate the new approach leg and development traffic. In addition to the construction of the new south leg, development of the East Yelm Gateway project will trigger the need for a modern roundabout at this intersection. The timing of the construction of the roundabout will be contingent on the background traffic growth in the area that has occurred and the amount of other development traffic within the Yelm East Gateway project that impacts the intersection. A limit of 25 PM peak hour trips of development traffic (new -to- network and pass -by) using the new south leg of the intersection has been established as the threshold to require construction of a roundabout. Development in the northwest quadrant of the subject property (north of SO Alliance November 2014 Page 44 Yelm East Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis Yelm Avenue (SR 507) will also require construction of the modern roundabout if it has not yet been constructed by others. The same threshold of 25 PM peak hour trips of development traffic using the existing north leg of Grove Road has been established to require construction of a modern roundabout. Prior to either volume threshold being met, the intersection may operate adequately under northbound and southbound stop sign - control until development traffic increases. The roundabout will be designed to accommodate the ultimate two circulating -lane design, but may be initially constructed without all of the auxiliary lanes. This will be determined on a case -by -case basis as each development prepares an individual Site Circulation Analysis. The Site Circulation Analysis would also provide an updated review of the operation of the Yelm Avenue (SR 507) /Grove Road intersection to determine if a modern roundabout is required at that time. The City will consider level of service, delay, queuing, safety and area traffic circulation efficiency in determining when the modern roundabout is required, and what auxiliary lanes are needed. 8.4.5 Yelm Avenue (SR 507) /Walmart Boulevard The first development in the southeast quadrant of the subject property [south of Yelm Avenue (SR 507) and either side of Y2 -c] that will use the new Y2 -c connection as the primary access will be required to construct all of the improvements necessary to convert this into a four -way intersection. This will include the northbound approach lanes (on Y -2c), a southbound through lane (on Walmart Boulevard) and a westbound to southbound left -turn lane on Yelm Avenue (SR 507). Improvements will also include all traffic signal system improvements required to accommodate the fourth (south) leg of the intersection. SO Alliance November 2014 Page 45 Yelm East Gateway 9. CONCLUSION Traffic Impact Analysis The East Gateway commercial area is comprised of approximately 46 acres of undeveloped property located in the eastern portion of the City of Yelm's commercially -zoned district. The project area includes seven distinct parcels of land owned by several independent property and business owners. The potential build -out of the properties will be dependent upon market and economic factors, but it is likely that these properties could realize their full development potential within the next 10 -15 years. This report analyzes three build -out alternatives for potential impacts for a near -term (2020) and long - range (2035) planning horizon. The following three potential development scenarios were analyzed: • Maximum Build -out as a Coordinated Development (Alternative 1) • Moderate Intensity Build -out as a Coordinated Development (Alternative 2) • No Action Alternative (Alternative 3) The traffic analysis considered the highest traffic potential of the build -out scenarios and assessed the traffic characteristics and potential impacts for a development activity that could generate up to a maximum of 2,000 PM peak hour trips. The ability to achieve this level of traffic activity will be predicated on the development type and mix of retail uses that will generally develop in a moderate density. The analysis was prepared for 2020 conditions to identify potential off -site traffic impacts that could require mitigation. A review of 2035 traffic conditions was also prepared to ensure that this development and proposed access system was consistent with the general long -term vision and needs of the area transportation system. A mitigation plan showing off -site improvements, and a conceptual access and internal circulation plan was provided in Section 8 of this report. The mitigation plan also provides a discussion of recommended phasing of the improvements. SO Alliance November 2014 Page 46 Yelm East Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis APPENDIX A TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS SO Alliance November 2014 Page 47 LlkPrepared for: SCJ Alliance/Shea, Carr, Jewell Traffic Count Cbn- gdtaat4 Ina Phone (253) 926 -6009 FAX: (253) 922 -7211 E -Mail: Tearr1@TC2inc.com WBEMBE Intersection: Burnett Rd SE & W Yehn Ave (SR 510) Date of Count: Wed 4/16/2014 Location: Yehr, Washington Checked By: Jess Time From North on (SB) From South on (NB) From East on (WB) From West on (EB) Interval Interval Burnett Rd SE 0 W Yehn Ave (SR 510) W Yehn Ave (SR 510) Total Ending at T L S R T L S R T L S R T L S R 4:15 P 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 93 3 1 0 149 0 250 4:30 P 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 97 3 3 0 128 0 230 4:45 P 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 101 8 2 0 135 0 248 5:00 P 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 98 5 2 0 146 0 1 252 5:15 P 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 106 8 1 0 161 0 285 5:30 P 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 10 0 1 153 0 264 5:45 P 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 88 1 6 2 1 147 0 246 6:00 P 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 101 10 0 0 152 0 270 6:15P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:00P 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Total 1 Survey 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 782 53 11 1171 0 2045 Peak Hour: 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM Total 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 393 34 3 2 613 0 1065 Approach 23 0 427 615 1065 %HV n/a n/a 0.7% 0.5% 006% MIT 0.93 Burnett Rd SE z z 59 23 36 L__Q___IBike W Yelm Ave SR 510 o 23 0 Wed R" Yelm Ave SR 510 34 O 393 I Ped; 0 393 427 Bike- 0 1063 1008 2 0 Bike 615 I 613 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM .0 ;Ped 636 PEDs Amass: N S E W 1140 1.0 PHF Peak Hour Volume INT 01 0 PHF %HV INT 02 0 EB 0.5% INT 03 0 Check WB 0.7% INT 04 0 In: 1065 NB n/a INT 05 0 Out: 1065 SB n/a INT 06 NO PEDS 0 T Int. 0.93 0.6% INT 07 0 Bicycles From: N S E W Conditions: INT 08 0 INT 01 1 1 INT 09 0 INT 02 0 INT 10 0 INT 03 0 INT 11 0 INT 04 0 INT 12 0 INT 05 0 0 INT 06 0 Special Notes INT 07 0 INT 08 0 NT 09 0 NT 10 0 NT 11 0 INT 12 0 0 0 1 0 1 SCJ 14032M_01 p3 for: SCJ Alliance/Shea, Carr, Jewell 1Prepared 2 Traffic Cant Consultants Ina Phone (253) 926-6009 FAX: (253) 922 -7211 E -Mal: Tmn @TCtinc.com WBE/DBE Intersection: Killion Rd SF/Tahoma Blvd SE & W Yelm Ave (SR 510) Date of Count: Wed 4/16/2014 Location: Yelm, Washington Chocked By: Jess Time From North on (SB) From South on (NB) From East on (WB) From West on (EB) Interval Interval Killion Rd SE Tahoma Blvd SE W Yelm Ave (SR 510) W Yelm Ave (SR 510) Total Ending at T L S R T L S R T L S R T L S R 4:15 P 0 6 1 1 0 6 1 15 1 15 100 7 1 1 163 15 331 4:30 P 0 0 1 1 0 7 3 16 2 10 103 8 2 0 142 6 297 4:45 P 0 8 0 0 0 4 0 13 3 8 131 4 3 0 165 12 345 5:00 P 0 4 2 0 0 7 3 15 0 17 123 4 1 2 183 11 371 5:15 P 0 2 4 0 0 7 3 11 2 9 121 6 2 1 179 13 1 356 5:30 P 0 2 2 0 0 8 1 7 0 9 110 4 0 1 123 17 284 545P 0 3 0 1 0 4 2 12 0 6 96 0 2 0 153 11 288 600P 0 4 3 1 0 7 1 5 1 4 124 2 0 0 151 12 314 6:15P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 630P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 645P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 700P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Survey 0 29 13 4 0 50 14 94 9 78 908 35 11 5 1259 97 2586 Peak Hour: 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM Total 0 14 7 1 0 1 25 9 1 55 7 44 478 22 8 3 669 42 1369 Approach 22 89 544 714 1369 %HV n/a n/a 1.3% 1.1% 1.1% PHF 0.92 Killion Rd SE 56 22 34 0 Bike VV Yelm Ave (SR 510) 1 7 14 4 :Ped W Yelm Ave SR 510 503 I Ped;.... 1..... .........; zz 478 544 Bike' 1 44 1282 1218 3 0 :Bike El. 669 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM I 0 ................ Wed 738 PEM A—. N S E W 42 Pedi 12 3 25 9 55 1484 1.0 PHF Peak Hour Volume INT01 1 5 1 7 Bikes 0 PHF %HV INT 02 2 8 1 11 EB 1.1% INT03 1 1 2 93 89 Cheek WB 1.3% INT 04 1 1 In: 1369 NB n/a INT05 1 2 3 182 Out: 1369 SB n/a INT 06 2 2 Tahoma Blvd SE T Int. 0.92 1.1% INT07 1 1 Bicycles From: N S E W Conditions: INT 08 4 4 INT01 1 1 INT 09 0 INT 02 0 INT 10 0 INT 03 0 INT 11 it 0 INT 04 1 1 INT 12 0 INT 05 0 5 24 1 31 INT 06 0 Special Notes INT 07 0 INT 08 1 10 INT 09 0 INT 10 0 INT 11 0 INT 12 0 0 0 1 12 SCJ 14032M_02p3 for: SCJ Alliance/Shea, Carr, Jewell LPrepared Z Traffic Cant Consultants Ina Phone (253) 926-6009 FAX: (253) 922 -7211 E -Mal: Tmn @TCtinc.cam WBE/DBE Intersection: Cullen St NW/Berry V alley Rd SE & W Yelm Ave (SR 510) Date of Count: Wed 4/16/2014 Location: Yelm, Washington Checked By: Jess Time From North on (SB) From South on (NB) From East on (WB) From West on (EB) Interval Interval Cullen St NW Berry Valley Rd SE W Yelm Ave (SR 510) W Yelm Ave (SR 510) Total Ending at T L S R T L S R T L S R T L S R 4:15 P 0 3 1 6 0 1 1 2 1 1 106 3 1 5 175 1 305 4:30 P 0 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 0 120 3 2 1 159 1 292 4:45 P 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 148 4 3 8 186 1 353 5:00 P 0 3 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 132 2 1 3 208 0 356 5:15 P 0 2 0 6 0 1 0 1 1 2 124 4 2 6 206 0 1 352 5:30 P 0 1 1 6 0 1 0 1 0 0 133 5 0 2 141 2 293 545P 0 7 0 6 0 0 0 1 1 0 108 3 2 1 186 2 314 600P 0 3 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 149 3 0 1 163 1 331 6:15P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 630P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 645P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 700P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Survey 0 26 2 48 0 5 1 5 9 3 1020 27 11 27 1424 8 2596 Peak Hour: 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM Total 0 11 1 20 0 1 3 0 2 5 2 537 15 6 19 741 3 1354 Approach 32 5 554 763 1354 %HV n/a n/a 0.9% 0.8% 0.8% PHF 0.95 Cullens St NW 66 32 34 0_ _ _!Bike VV Yelm Ave SR 510 zo 1 11 6 Wed ...................... . W Yelun Ave SR 510 560 I Pedl .0.: 15 537 554 Bike' �..........; 1 2 1308 1323 19 0 :Bike 763 I 741 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM j 7 Wed 754 PEM across N S E W ....................... . Pedi 7 3 3 0 2 1424 j 1.0 PHF Peak Hour Volume INT01 5 5 Bike! 0 PHF %HV INT 02 2 9 11 EB 0.8% INT03 1 1 2 4 Check WB 0.9% INT 04 4 3 2 9 In: 1354 NB n/a INT05 3 2 5 11 Out: 1354 SB n/a INT 06 1 1 2 Berry Valley Rd SE T Iot. 0.95 0.8% INT07 0 Bicycles From: N S E W Condition: INT 08 1 2 1 2 6 INT01 1 1 INT 09 0 INT 02 0 INT 10 0 INT 03 0 INT 11 0 INT 04 1 1 INT 12 0 INT 05 0 9 23 8 2 42 INT 06 0 Special Notes INT 07 0 INT 0' 1 1 10 NT09 1 10 NT 10 1 10 NT 11 0 INT 12 toE 0 0 12 SCJ 14032M_03p3 Prepared for: SCJ Alliance/Shea, Carr, Jewell Traffic Cant Consultants Ina Phone (253) 926-6009 FAX: (253) 922 -7211 E -Mal: Team @TCtinc.co n WBE/DBE Intersection: Longmire St NW /SE & W Yelm Ave (SR 510) Date of Count: Wed 4/16/2014 Location: Yelm, W.bi gton Checked By: Jess Time From North on (SB) From South on (NB) From East on (WB) From West on (EB) Interval Interval Longmire St NW Longmire St SE W Yelm Ave (SR 510) W Yelm Ave (SR 510) Total Ending at T L S R T L S R T L S R T L S R 4:15 P 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 12 120 4 1 0 172 2 313 4:30 P 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 7 2 14 126 0 2 0 146 5 302 4:45 P 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 12 1 10 145 1 2 1 178 2 353 5:00 P 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 13 0 18 133 5 1 2 200 4 380 5:15 P 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 1 14 135 1 2 2 179 5 1 346 5:30 P 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 12 135 1 0 0 139 3 294 545P 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 8 1 16 108 0 2 1 166 2 304 600P 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 7 0 18 146 0 0 0 154 3 332 6:15P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 630P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 645P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:OOP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total S—ey 0 9 1 5 2 12 1 56 6 114 1048 12 10 6 1334 26 2624 Peak Hour: 4:15 PM to 515 PM Total 0 3 1 3 1 1 11 1 36 4 56 539 5 1 703 16 1381 Approach 7 48 602 724 1381 %HV n/a 2.1% 0.7% 1.0% 0.9% PHF 0.91 Longmire St NW 20 7 13 �_ 0_ _ _!Bike \V Yelm Ave SR 510 3 1 3 7 Wed ...................... . W Yelm Ave SR 510 553 I Pedl .2.: ...........; 7 539 602 Bike 0 S6 1344 1277 5 0 Bike 724 I 703 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM I 0 ................ Wed 742 PEDs Across N S E w 16 Pedi 15 i 11 1 36 1520 LO PHFPeakHaur Volume _j INT01 1 1 Bikes 0 PHF %HV INT 02 2 9 11 EB 1.0% INT03 2 2 73 48 Check WB 0.7% INT 04 4 2 6 In: 1381 NB 2.1% INT05 1 2 2 5 121 Out: 1381 SB n/a INT O6 2 1 3 Longmire St SE TIot. 0.91 0.9% INT07 0 Bicycles From: N S E W Conditions: INT O8 2 2 INT01 0 INT 09 0 INT 02 0 INT 10 0 INT 03 0 INT 11 0 INT 04 0 INT 12 0 INT 05 0 9 19 0 2 all INT O6 0 Special Notes INT 07 1 1 2 O ' 0 !NT NT 09 0 NT 10 0 NT 11 Lo 0 NT 12 0 0 1 12 SCJ 14032M_04p3 Prepared for: SCJ Alliance/Shea, Carr, Jewell Traffic Count Consv/tants Ina Rime (253) 926-6009 FAX: (253) 922 -7211 E -Mal: Tmn @TCtinccom WBE/DBE Intersection: SE Mosman Ave/Mosman Ave SE & 1st St S (SR 507) Date of Count: Wed 4/16/2014 Location: Yelm, Washington Chocked By: Jess Time From North on (SB) From South on (NB) From East on (WB) From Weston( B) Interval Interval SE Mosman Ave Mosman Ave SE 1st St S (SR 507) 1st St S (SR 507) Total Ending at T L S R T L S R T L S R T L S R 4:15 P 0 2 3 35 2 9 4 3 2 6 75 3 6 9 108 7 264 4:30 P 0 4 3 34 0 9 0 1 1 2 76 3 2 6 68 1 213 4:45 P 0 7 2 20 0 10 2 9 7 3 84 4 1 7 84 1 233 5:00 P 1 1 2 45 0 7 1 10 1 6 60 1 2 11 99 9 252 5:15 P 0 3 4 48 0 7 0 2 2 4 63 8 5 1 7 95 4 245 5:30 P 0 2 3 25 0 6 2 3 2 4 61 5 1 6 75 7 199 5:45 P 0 2 4 20 0 7 0 4 2 5 75 4 0 7 88 4 220 6:00 P 0 3 1 18 0 10 2 7 1 10 67 2 0 8 75 - 208 6:15P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:00 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ps— 1 24 22 245 2 65 11 39 18 40 561 30 17 61 692 44 1834 Peak Hour: 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM Total 1 14 10 134 2 1 35 1 7 1 23 11 1 17 1 295 11 11 33 359 24 962 Approach 158 65 323 416 962 %HV 0.6% 3.1% 3.4% 2.6% 2.6% 0.91 1PHF LSE Mosman Ave 209 158 51 r__1 __!Bike 1st St S SR 507 134 10 14 1 SPed 1st St S SR 507 464 I Pedl 0.: u 295 323 Bike r...........; 0 17 1 719 SSO 33 0 Bike 416 I 359 4:001'M to 5:00 PM 1 Wed 396 ................ PED Across: N S E W 24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pedj 0 35 7 23 1056 LO PHFPeakHaur Volume INT 01 0 Bike: I PHF %HV INT 02 0 EB 2.6% INT 03 1 1 2 51 65 Check WB 3.4% INT 04 0 In: 962 NB 3.1% INT 05 0 116 Out: 962 SB 0.6% INT 06 0 Mosman Ave SE T Int. 0.91 2.6% INT 07 0 Bicycles From: N S E W Conditions: INT 01 0 INT 01 1 1 INT 09 0 INT 02 I 1 INT 10 0 INT 03 0 INT 11 0 INT 04 0 INT 12 0 INT 05 0 1 0 1 0 2 INT 06 0 Special Notes INT 07 0 INT 08 0 INT 09 0 INT 10 0 NT 11 0 INT 12 0 1 1 0 02 SCJ 14032 M_05p Prepared for: SCJ Alliance/Shea, Carr, Jewell Traffic Count Consv/tants Ina Phone (253) 926-6009 FAX: (253) 922 -7211 E -Mal: Tmn @TCtinccom WBE/DBE Intersection: N 1st St Ist St S (SR 507) & E/W Yelm Ave (SR 507 & 510) Date of Count: Wed 4/16/2014 Location: Yelm, Washington Checked By: Jess Time From North on (SB) From South on (NB) From East on (WB) From Weston( B) Interval Interval N 1st St 1st St S (SR 507) E Yehn Ave (SR 507) W Yelm Ave (SR 510) Total Ending at T L S R T L S R T L S R T L S R 4:15 P 0 9 28 14 4 31 30 64 5 52 114 5 1 12 122 17 498 4:30 P 1 10 25 12 3 26 14 43 3 47 113 4 1 13 131 14 452 4:45 P 3 15 27 18 2 40 17 39 5 53 132 5 3 15 120 22 503 5:00 P 1 12 16 13 2 36 28 62 4 50 117 11 0 8 128 7 488 5:15 P 1 14 17 15 5 32 19 51 3 39 121 4 2 1 20 150 14 496 5:30 P 0 8 16 12 1 32 21 43 2 41 104 2 1 14 106 15 414 5:45 P 1 5 23 17 0 18 25 51 1 51 114 8 2 14 125 17 468 6:00 P 0 4 25 9 0 31 29 42 2 53 120 4 0 11 128 13 469 6:15P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6:30P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:00P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 ps— 7 77 177 110 17 246 183 395 25 386 935 43 10 107 1010 119 3788 Peak Hour: 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM Total 5 46 96 57 11 1 133 89 1 208 17 202 476 25 5 48 501 60 1941 Approach 199 430 703 609 1941 %HV 2.5% 2.6% 2.4% 0.8% 2.0% 0.96 !PHF LN 1st St 361 199 162 r__Z !Bike W Yelm Ave SR 510 57 96 46 3 SPed E Yelal Ave SR 50 666 I Pedl 0.: 25 476 703 Bike r...........; 1 202 1458 1275 48 0 Bike 609 I 501 4:001'M to 5:00 P3I j 2 jPed 755 ................ PED Across: N S E W 60 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pedj 5 133 89 208 2012 LO PHFPeakHaur Volume INT 01 3 3 Bike: 0 PHF %HV INT 02 1 1 EB 0.8% INT 03 2 1 2 5 3 58 430 Cheek WB 2.4% INT 04 1 1 In: 1941 NB 2.6% INT 05 5 5 788 Out: 1941 SB 2.5% INT 06 2 1 3 1st St S (SR 507) T Int. 0.96 2.0% INT 07 1 1 1 2 Bicycles Fr m: N S E W Conditions: INT 01 0 INT 01 0 INT 09 0 INT 02 1 1 INT 10 0 INT 03 0 INT 11 0 INT 04 2 2 INT 12 0 INT 05 0 11 7 2 0 20 INT 06 1 1 Special Notes INT 07 0 INT 08 1 1 INT 09 0 INT 10 0 INT 11 0 NT 12 0 2 0 0 35 SCJ 14032M_06p3 Prepared for: SCJ Alliance/Shea, Carr, Jewell Traffic Cant Consultants Ina Phone (253) 926-6009 FAX: (253) 922 -7211 E -Mal: Tmn @TCtinc.cam WBE/DBE Intersection: 1st St NE & Stevens St NE/NW Date of Count: Wed 4/16/2014 Location: Yelm, W.bi gton Checked By: Jess Time From North on (SB) From South on (NB) From East on (WB) From West on (EB) Interval Interval 1st St NE 1st St NE Stevens St NE Stevens St NW Total Ending at T I L I S R T L S R T L S R T L S R 4:15 P 1 9 30 14 1 12 32 10 6 5 39 11 1 19 57 13 251 4:30 P 3 7 27 16 2 6 28 3 0 4 35 15 0 25 69 9 244 4:45 P 4 4 27 14 2 8 29 3 0 11 23 18 0 24 76 13 250 5:00 P 2 9 22 13 2 5 32 12 0 4 30 16 0 27 63 10 243 5:15 P 0 15 27 12 0 7 29 10 0 4 34 14 0 16 73 7 1 248 5:30 P 0 3 21 9 0 4 25 7 0 3 39 7 0 14 60 8 200 545P 1 4 27 19 0 4 30 3 0 1 34 9 0 24 52 11 218 600P 0 9 29 5 0 4 38 6 0 4 31 13 0 24 51 2 216 6:15P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 630P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 645P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 700P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 1 Survey 11 60 210 102 7 50 243 54 6 36 265 103 1 173 501 73 1870 Peak Hour: 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM Total 10 29 106 57 7 1 31 121 1 28 6 24 127 60 1 95 265 45 988 Approach 192 180 211 405 988 %HV 5.2% 3.9% 2.8% 0.2% 2.4% PHF 0.98 1st St NE 468 112 276 _ 1_ _ _Bike Stevens St NW s 106 29 2 Ped ........................ Stevens St NE 60 215 I Pedj .0. ...........; 127 211 Bike 2 24 533 620 95 2 Bike 405 I 265 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM I 0 Wed 322 45 PEM across N S E W Pedi 7 3 31 121 28 j 1.0 PHF Peak 1004 Hour Volume INT01 1 1 2 Bikes 0 PHF %HV INT 02 4 4 EB 0.2% INT03 1 1 2 175 180 Check WB 2.8% INT 04 1 1 In: 988 NB 3.9% INT05 2 1 3 355 Out: 988 SB 5.2% INT 06 3 3 1st St NE T Iot. 0.98 2.4% INT07 0 Bicycles From: N S E W Conditions: INT 08 0 INT 01 1 1 INT 09 0 INT 02 10 INT 10 0 INT 03 1 1 INT 11 0 INT 04 1 2 3 INT 12 0 INT 05 0 2 12 1 0 15 INT 06 1 1 2 Special Notes INT 07 1 1 INT 0' 1 1 2 NT09 0 NT 10 0 NT 11 0 INT 12 0 1 1 4 4 10 SCJ 14032M_07p3 Prepared for: SCJ Alliance/Shea, Carr, Jewell Traffic Cbunt CoP aillants Ina Phone: (253) 926 -6009 FAX: (253) 922 -7211 E -Mail: Team @TC2inc.com WBE/DBE Intersection: NW Rhoton Rd/lst St NE & Railway Rd SE Date of Count: Wed 4/16/2014 Location: Yelm, Washington Checked By: Jess Time From North on (SB) From South on (NB) From East on (WB) From West on (EB) Interval Interval NW Rhoton Rd 1st St NE Railway Rd SE Park Davy Total Ending at T L S R T L S R T L S R T L S R 4:15 P 1 0 32 0 2 0 34 28 1 25 0 2 0 0 0 0 121 4:30 P 4 1 27 1 1 0 46 21 1 27 0 0 0 0 0 1 124 445 P 1 0 24 0 1 1 47 20 1 18 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 112 5:00 P 1 0 30 0 0 0 45 33 1 13 0 2 0 0 1 0 124 5:15 P 0 2 36 0 0 0 37 21 0 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 111 5:30 P 0 2 21 0 0 0 29 16 0 14 0 0 0 1 0 0 83 5:45 P 1 1 32 0 0 0 36 31 0 20 0 1 0 0 0 0 121 6:00 P 0 1 29 0 0 0 34 36 0 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 112 6:15P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:00P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Survey 8 7 231 1 4 1 308 206 4 140 2 8 0 1 2 1 908 Peak Hour: 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM Total 7 1 113 1 4 1 1 1 172 1 102 4 83 1 4 0 0 2 1 481 Approach 115 275 88 3 481 %HV 6.1% 1.5% 4.5% n/a 3.1% PUT 0.97 NW Rhoton Rd 291 115 176 !Bike Park Drwy r 1T 113 1 0 Ped . ........................ Railway Rd SE 4 3 I Ped 1 i 1 88 Bike ..............I 1 83 193 6 0 2 Bike 3 ? 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM 0 ;Ped ................. 105 1 PEDs A«.oss_ N S E W Ped: 3 1 ..........' 172 102 496 LO PHF Peak Hour Volume INT 01 0 Bikel..........1 J PHF %HV INT 02 1 1 EB n/a INT 03 2 1 3 197 275 Check WB 4.5% INT 04 0 In: 481 NB 1.5% INT 05 4 4 472 Out: 481 SB 6.1% INT 06 0 1St St NE T Int. 0.97 3.1% INT 07 0 Bicycles From: N S E W Conditions: INT 08 0 INT 01 0 INT 09 0 INT 02 0 INT 10 0 INT 03 1 1 2 INT 11 0 INT 04 2 2 INT 12 0 INT 05 0 $ INT 06 1 1 Special Notes INT 07 0 INT 08 0 NT 09 0 NT 10 0 NT 11 0 INT 12 E 0 z z 1s SCJ 14032M_10p Prepared for: SCJ Alliance/Shea, Carr, Jewell Traffic Cant Consultants Ina Phone (253) 926-6009 FAX: (253) 922 -7211 E -Mal: Team @TCtinc.com WBE/DBE Intersection: Clark Rd SE & E Yelm Ave (SR 507) Date of Count: Wed 4/16/2014 Location: Yelm, W.bi gton Chocked By: Jess Time From North on (SB) From South on (NB) From East on (WB) From West on (EB) Interval Interval Clark Rd SE Clark Rd SE E Yelm Ave (SR 507) E Yelm Ave (SR 507) Total Ending at T L S R T L S R T L S R T L S R 4:15 P 0 5 2 7 2 4 - 18 18 183 4 1 3 203 2 454 4:30 P 0 6 1 0 1 1 0 18 2 14 181 3 1 4 194 0 422 4:45 P 0 5 2 9 0 4 2 14 3 25 196 0 2 5 177 4 443 5:00 P 0 5 3 10 0 3 2 20 2 18 197 10 1 9 208 3 488 5:15 P 0 2 0 6 0 0 1 20 2 13 182 7 6 6 228 1 1 466 5:30 P 0 2 0 6 0 1 0 12 2 16 171 3 2 9 187 0 407 545P 0 1 1 3 0 2 2 14 0 12 182 1 1 4 174 2 398 600P 0 3 0 3 0 3 1 9 2 21 174 7 0 6 172 2 401 6:15P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 630P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 645P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 700P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Survey 0 29 9 44 3 18 13 125 20 137 1466 35 14 46 1543 14 3479 Peak Hour: 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM Total 0 18 6 25 1 1 8 1 5 1 72 9 70 756 20 10 24 1 807 8 1819 Approach 49 85 846 839 1819 %HV n/a 1.2% 1.1% 1.2% 1.1% PHF 0.93 Clark Rd SE 98 49 49 _Bike E Yelm Ave SR 50 25 a 1 3 €Ped ....................... E Yelm Ave SR 50 zo F7.71 Ped....4 ...........; Bike 0 70 1743 1628 24 1 Bike 839 I 807 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM I 1 ................ Wed 897 8 ....................... . PEM A. N S E W Pedi 1 3 8 5 72 L1952J I.0PHFPeakHour Volume INT01 3 1 4 Bikes 0 PHF %HV INT 02 1 1 EB 1.2% INT03 2 2 4 85 Check WB 1.1% INT 04 1 1 In: 1819 NB 1.2% INT05 1 1 1 3 169 Out: 1819 SB n/a INT 06 2 3 5 Clark Rd SE T Iot. 0.93 1.1% INT07 1 3 1 4 Bicycles From: N S E W Conditions: INT 08 0 INT 01 0 INT 09 0 INT 02 0 INT 10 0 INT 03 1 1 INT 11 0 INT 04 0 INT 12 0 INT 05 0 7 3 2 10 22 INT 06 0 Special Notes INT 07 1 2 13 INT08 1 2 3 INT 09 0 NT 10 0 NT 11 0 NT 12 0 0 1 2 47 SCJ 14032M_08p Prepared for: SCJ Alliance/Shea, Carr, Jewell Traffic Count C®i1757! 11ant4 Ina Phorle: (253) 926 -6009 FAX: (253) 922 -7211 E -Mail: Team @TC2inc.com WBE/DBE Intersection: NE 103rd Ave& E Yehn Ave (SR 507) Date of Count: Thurs 4 /17/2014 Location: Yehn, Washington Checked By: Jess Time From North on (SB) From South on (NB) From East on (WB) From West on (EB) Interval Interval NE 103rd Ave Business Drury E Yehn Ave (SR 507) E Yehn Ave (SR 507) Total Ending at T L S R T L S R T L S R T L S R 4:15 P 0 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 5 2 186 3 3 11 234 0 445 4:30 P 2 0 0 14 0 0 0 1 1 1 189 2 5 17 212 0 436 4:45 P 0 2 0 14 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 236 4 8 16 207 0 481 5:00 P 0 2 0 18 0 0 0 2 1 0 189 2 4 18 241 0 472 5:15 P 0 0 0 13 0 1 0 0 4 0 214 1 2 10 209 0 448 5:30 P 0 1 0 1 14 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 203 5 0 9 188 1 423 5:45 P 0 2 0 15 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 197 1 3 1 16 204 0 437 6:00 P 0 3 0 15 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 191 1 1 2 14 1 199 0 423 6: 15P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45P 0 Eo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:00P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 1 1 1 1 Survey 2 11 0 111 0 2 0 5 21 4 1605 21 25 111 1694 1 3565 Peak Hour: 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM Total 2 1 4 1 0 �9 0 1 1 0 1 4 9 2 828 9 19 61 869 1 0 1 1837 Approach 6; 5 839 930 1 1837 "/oHV 3.2% n/a 1.1% 2.0% 1.6% PHF 0.95 NE 103rd Ave 133 70 Bike N: Yelm Ave SR 50 Fil o 1 a 0 !Ped ........................ E Yelm Ave SR 50 9 r—... —1 Ped.....1 ...., 828 839 Bike: 1 2 1716 1818 61 1 :Bike 930 I 869 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM 0 . ................ Ped 877 0 . ........................ PEDs Aoross: N S E W Pedj 0 ' 1 0 4 1924 LOPHF Peak Hour Volume i. . . . . . . . . . . ............ i INT01 0 Bikes _0 PHF %HV INT 02 1 1 EB 2.0% INT 03 0 Check WB 1.1% INT 04 0 In: 1837 NB n/a INT 05 0 7 Out: 1837 SB 3.2% INT 06 0 Business Drwy T Int. 0.95 1.6% INT 07 1 1 Bicycles From: N S E W Conditions: INT 08 0 INT 01 0 INT 09 0 INT 02 1 1 INT 10 0 INT 03 0 INT 11 0 INT04 1 1 INT 12 0 INT 05 0 01 01 7T= 2 INT 06 0 Special Notes INT07 0 INT08 1 1 INT 09 0 INT 10 0 INT 11 0 INT 12 10 0 0 11 23 SCJ 14032M_09p for: SCJ Alliance/Shea, Carr, Jewell LdiPrepared Traffic Count C®i1757! 1tant4 Ina a Phone (253) 926 -6009 FAX: (253) 922 -7211 E -Mail: Team @TC2inc.com WBE/DBE Intersection: West Rd SE/Northeast Algiers Rd SE & 103rd Ave SE Date of Count: Thurs 4/17/2014 Location: Yehn, Washington Checked By: Jess Time From North on (SB) From South on (NB) From East on (WB) From West on (EB) Interval Interval West Rd SE Northeast Algiers Rd SE 103rd Ave SE 103rd Ave SE Total Ending at T L S R T L S R T L S R T L S R 4:15 P 0 54 4 7 0 1 2 2 6 1 10 48 0 11 13 2 155 4:30 P 0 81 8 13 0 2 2 1 3 0 4 42 0 13 19 2 187 4:45 P 0 80 5 9 0 1 4 3 0 2 6 42 0 11 17 1 1 181 5:00 P 1 85 6 15 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 11 34 0 15 28 3 202 5:15 P 2 58 4 11 0 2 3 1 0 2 13 43 0 16 20 3 176 5:30 P 0 54 3 13 0 0 2 1 0 1 8 36 0 9 21 2 150 5:45 P 0 51 8 10 0 2 0 1 0 0 7 35 0 12 13 1 140 6:00 P 0 52 2 11 0 1 4 0 0 1 2 24 0 13 10 1 121 6: 15P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6:30P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45P 0 Eo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 7:00P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Total Survey 3 515 40 89 0 11 17 10 9 9 61 304 0 100 141 15 1312 Peak Hour: 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM Total 3 304 23 48 0 1 7 9 1 6 3 6 1 34 161 0 1 55 1 84 9 746 Approach 375 22 201 148 746 %HV 0.8% n/a 1.5% n/a 0.8% PHF 0.92 West Rd SE 600 375 225 Bike 103rd Ave SE 48 23 1 304 6 !Ped ........................ 103rd Ave SE 161 —.,—I Ped'; 5 34 201 Bike: �............� 1 6 595 237 55 2 :Bike 148 I 84 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM 5 1Ped 394 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PEDs Aoross: N S E W Pedj 1 ' 7 9 6 808 1.0 PHF Peak Hour Volume ........ i i . . . . . . . . . . . ............ INT01 0 Bikes Q--1' PHF %HV INT 02 4 1 3 1 9 EB n/a INT 03 2 1 4 7 38 22 Check WB 1.5% INT 04 0 In: 746 NB n/a INT 05 1 1 60 Out: 746 SB 0.8% INT 06 0 Northeast Algiers Rd SE T Iot. 0.92 0.8% INT 07 0 Bicycles From: N S E W Conditions: INT 08 0 INT 01 1 1 INT 09 0 INT 02 1 1 INT 10 0 INT 03 0 INT 11 0 INT04 1 1 2 INT 12 0 INT 05 1 1 2 17 NT06 0 Special Notes INT07 1 1 NT08 1 I I 1 NT09 0 NT 10 0 NT 11 0 INT 12 0 3 0 4 18 SCJ 14032M_11 p �! 1 Prepared for: SCJ Alliance /Shea Carr Jewell Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. P—.: (253) 926 6009 FAX: (253) 922 7211 EM.., T..- (Q)TC2... ..m WBF/DBE NE Creek St & 103rd Ave SE D.— ., C. Thurs 1/09/2014 Lo Yelm, Washington C—.... By Jess Time F— N.11n — (SB) F —. S —n (NB) F —. E..,.� (WB) F —. W..,.� (EB) Interval 0 NE Creek St 103rd Ave SE 103rd Ave SE T.— Ending at T L S R T L S R T L S R T L S R 3:15 P 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 18 1 14 27 0 0 0 35 22 138 3:30 P 0 0 0 0 1 23 0 20 0 16 30 0 1 0 37 25 151 3:45 P 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 19 1 19 27 0 0 0 44 37 164 4:00 P 0 0 0 0 2 12 0 24 2 25 46 0 0 0 40 34 181 4:15 P 0 0 0 0 5 11 0 15 3 17 37 0 1 0 38 33 151 430P 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 24 1 30 36 0 0 0 40 34 176 445P 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 21 1 14 32 0 0 0 43 46 166 5:00 P 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 14 0 13 41 0 0 0 48 48 175 5:15 P 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 29 0 16 25 0 0 0 50 1 39 171 5:30 P 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 23 1 16 36 0 0 0 46 1 36 168 545P 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 21 2 14 39 0 0 0 54 23 158 600P 0 0 0 0 0 9 �_o 25 0 16 45 0 0 0 54 37 186 Total Survey 0 0 0 0 8 158 0 253 12 210 421 0 2 0 529 414 1985 Peak Hour: 4:15 PM to 515 PM Total 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 88 2 73 134 0 0 0 181 167 688 Approach 0 133 207 348 688 %HV 1.0% 03v PHF 0.98 103rd Ave SE 103rd Ave SE 179 I Ped 0 134 207 �...........i Bikel 0 1 73 476 527 0 :Bike 348 I 181 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM ,1 ....... ;Ped 269 167 ........................ pmD A—: N S E W Ped: 1 45 88 L744J 1.0 PHFPeakHour Volume INT 01 0 Bike- 0 PHF ° /.HV INT 02 3 3 EB n/a INT 03 0 F 240 133 Cheek WB 1.0% INT 04 0 In: 688 NB n/a INT 05 0 373 Out: 688 SB n/a INT 06 0 NE Creek St T Int. 0.98 0.3% INT 07 1 1 1 1 3 B,.,.,.. Fro - N S E W Conditions: INT I 0 INT 01 0 INT09 3 3 INT 02 0 INT 10 1 1 INT 03 0 INT 11 0 INT 04 0 INT 12 0 INT 05 0 10 INT 06 NO BIKES 0 Special Notes INT 07 0 INT 08 0 INT 09 0 INT 10 0 INT 11 0 INT 12 0 0 0 0 00 SCJI4004M_08. Prepared for: SCJ Alliance /Shea Carr Jewell Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. Pn ... :(253)9266009 FAX: (253) 922 7211 EM., T.— CcOTC2.... m WBE/DBE Grove St SE & 103rd Ave SE D.— .. C... Thurs 1/09/2014 L... Yelm, Washington C...... By: Jess Time F,.m N.—.. (SB) F..m S. —.. (NB) F,.., E. —.. (WB) F— W..— (EB) 1-1-1 Interval Grove St SE Grove St SE 103rd Ave SE 103rd Ave SE T... Ending at T L S R T L S R T L S R T L S R 3:15 P 0 9 3 13 0 4 3 2 1 1 30 9 1 22 27 4 132 3:30 P 0 8 1 18 1 2 9 1 0 0 21 9 0 23 33 2 127 3:45 P 0 11 2 20 2 3 8 0 0 1 20 22 0 27 24 4 142 4:00 P 2 29 3 34 0 5 5 0 0 1 31 21 0 29 37 2 1 197 4:15 P 1 16 1 1 23 0 4 1 11 1 3 0 36 18 0 17 1 37 4 168 4:30 P 0 14 0 24 0 3 10 0 2 0 27 23 0 30 27 4 162 4:45 P 0 20 4 10 0 6 16 0 1 2 26 16 0 28 32 2 162 5:00 P 0 19 6 24 0 7 21 1 1 0 22 27 0 21 38 2 188 5:15 P 0 15 4 12 0 2 - 2 0 2 24 15 0 30 41 - 157 5:30 P 0 16 2 19 0 5 20 1 1 1 1 1 0 29 21 0 26 59 1 2 1 200 5:45 P 0 12 2 21 0 6 12 1 0 1 2 1 0 25 22 0 28 41 1 3 1 172 6:00 P 0 8 1 33 0 3 12 1 0 0 25 1 21 1 0 1 37 1 39 4 184 Total Survey 1=29 256 3 50 132 9 11 7 316 224 1 318 435 38 1991 Peak Hour: 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM , Total 0 62 14 76 0 1 20 58 4 4 2 100 85 0 105 179 12 717 Approach 152 82 187 296 717 PHF 0.90 Grove St SE 400 152 248 F O Bike 103rd Ave SE F76T 14 1 62 1 :Ped ................... 103rd Ave SE ss 196 I Ped 0 ............i € 100 187 Bikel 0 2 432 492 105 0 Bike 296 I 179 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM 0 .............. -. Wed 245 12 .......................... PEDs A.ross_ N S E W Ped: 0 20 ..............� 58 4 800 I.OPHFPeak Hour Volume INT 01 0 Bike! PHF %HV INT 02 INT 03 1 1 0 2 28 82 Check EB WB n/a 2.1% INT 04 0 In: 717 NB n/a INT 05 0 110 Out: 717 SB n/a INT 06 0 Grove St SE T Int. 0.90 0.6 INT 07 0 B,.y. —F,. m: N S E W Conditions: INT 08 0 INT 01 0 INT 09 0 INT 02 0 INT 10 0 INT 03 1 1 INT 11 1 1 INT 04 0 INT 12 0 INT 05 0 1 1 0 1 3 INT 06 0 Special Notes INT 07 0 INT 08 0 INT 09 0 INT 10 0 INT 11 0 INT 12 0 0 1 0 0 1 SCJ 14004M_03 p for: SCJ Alliance /Shea Carr Jewell LZPrepared Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. R,.... (253) 926 6009 FAX: (253) 922 7211 E M.., T..m (,?TC2... ..m WBF/DBE Wal -Mart Blvd &103rd Ave SE D.—.,C... Thursl /09/2014 Lo Yelm, Washington C,..,., By Jess Time From N.-. o„ (SB) Fro., S.._ .. (NB) Fro., E.. (WB) From W.— (EB) Interval 0 Wal -Mart Blvd 103rd Ave SE 103rd Ave SE T.— Ending at T L S R T L S R T L S R T L S R 3:15 P 0 0 0 0 1 46 0 2 0 1 5 0 0 0 6 35 95 3:30 P 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 4 0 3 1 0 0 0 5 36 90 3:45 P 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 2 0 1 4 0 0 0 1 41 90 4:00 P 0 0 0 0 1 44 0 3 0 1 3 0 0 0 6 60 117 4:15 P 0 0 0 0 2 52 0 5 1 2 4 0 1 0 2 39 1 104 430P 0 0 0 0 0 52 0 2 1 3 6 0 0 0 2 49 114 445P 0 0 0 0 2 43 0 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 51 103 5:00 P 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 6 0 4 5 0 0 0 1 54 109 5:15 P 0 0 0 0 0 46 0 3 0 3 2 0 0 0 3 55 112 5:30 P 0 0 0 0 0 42 0 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 49 98 545P 0 0 0 0 2 46 0 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 48 103 600P 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 41 94 Total Sm- V 0 0 0 0 8 536 0 40 2 23 38 0 1 0 34 558 1229 Peak Hour: 3:45 PM to 4:45 PM Total 0 0 0 0 5 191 0 16 2 6 15 0 1 0 11 199 438 Approach 0 207 21 210 438 %HV 2.1% 9.5% 0.5% l.8% PHF - O.00 0.94 1 103rd Ave SE 103rd Ave SE 206 I Ped 0 ...........5 15 21 Bike' 0 6 48 416 0 'Bike 210 I 11 3:45 PM to 4:45 PM 0 , ................ :Ped 27 199 ....................... PEDS A. N S E fib' Ped: 0 191 ...................... L 4 6 8j 1.0 PHF Peak Hour Volume INT01 0 l Bike' PHF %HV INT 02 0 EB 0.5% INT 03 0 205 207 Cheek WB 9.5% INT 04 #PEDS 0 In: 438 NB 2.4% INT 05 0 412 Out: 438 SB n/a INT 06 N0 W al -M art Blvd T Int. 0.94 1.8% INT 07 0 B,.,.,.. F,o..: N S E W Conditions: INT OS 0 INT 01 0 INT 09 0 INT 02 0 INT 10 0 INT 03 0 INT 11 0 INT 04 0 INT 12 0 INT 05 0 0 0 0 0 0 INT 06 NO BIKES 0 Special Notes INT 07 0 NT 08 1 10 INT 09 0 INT 10 0 INT 11 0 INT 12 0 0 0 0 00 SCJ14004M_07, Prepared for: SCJ Alliance /Shea Carr Jewell Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. Pn ... :(253)9266009 FAX: (253) 922 7211 EM., T.— CcOTC2.... m WBE/DBE L..�...��. NE Creek St/Bald Hill Rd SE & E Yelm Ave (SR 507) D.— .. C....: Thurs 1/09/2014 L... Yelm, Washington C...... By: Jess Time F,.m N.—.. (SB) F..m S. —.. (NB) F-- E. —.. (WB) F— W..— (EB) L�.�..., Interval NE Creek St Bald Hill Rd SE E Yelm Ave (SR 507) E Yelm Ave (SR 507) T.,. Ending at T r L S R T L S R T L S R T L S R 3:15 P 1 30 54 16 5 54 28 15 3 12 109 13 3 12 100 64 507 3:30 P 1 20 28 15 0 66 36 28 3 8 112 14 7 15 95 66 503 3:45 P 1 31 38 18 3 54 25 10 3 19 124 7 5 6 100 62 494 4:00 P 1 26 44 20 6 63 43 13 3 12 100 23 6 16 106 66 1 532 4:15 P 4 27 1 47 15 4 53 1 28 11 8 10 118 10 5 8 1 95 74 496 4:30 P 1 29 42 17 2 66 27 17 4 20 116 13 9 12 105 81 545 4:45 P 1 24 33 17 2 62 25 14 1 12 108 7 3 13 107 81 503 5:00 P 1 30 49 13 1 55 21 13 1 22 116 17 6 0 91 69 496 5:15 P 1 22 48 20 1 44 18 14 4 16 144 10 9 7 96 77 516 5:30 P 0 25 45 9 0 50 25 1 6 1 0 1 19 136 12 1 5 92 1 71 1 495 5:45 P 1 19 37 15 0 52 23 15 3 20 124 12 1 6 91 1 61 1 475 6:00 P 0 13 34 8 0 47 15 8 2 16 118 8 4 11 125 63 466 Total Survey 13 296 499 183 24 666 314 164 35 186 1425 146 59 111 1203 835 6028 Peak Hour: 3:45 PM to 4:45 PM Total 7 106 166 69 14 244 123 55 16 54 442 53 23 49 413 302 2076 Approach 341 422 549 764 2076 ° /.HV 2.1% 3.3% 2.9% 3.0% 29% PHF 0.95 NE Creek St 566 341 225 Bike E Yelm Ave SR 50 F69T 166 1 106 0 :Ped , ........................ E Yelm Ave (SR 507 53 755 Ped.....0€ ............i 442 549 Bikel 0 54 1123 1519 49 0 Bike 764 413 3:45 PM to 4:45 PM 0 .............. -. :Ped 574 302 .......................... PEDs a.rss_ N S E W Ped: 1 244 . .............. 123 55 2180 LOPHF Peak Hour Volume INT 01 0 Bike! PHF %HV INT 02 INT 03 0 0 522 422 Check EB WB 3.0% 2.9% INT 04 1 1 In: 2076 NB 3.3% INT 05 0 944 Out: 2076 SB 2.1% INT 06 0 Bald Hill Rd SE T Int. 0.95 2.9% INT 07 0 B,.y. —F,. m: N S E W Conditions: INT 08 0 INT 01 0 INT 09 0 INT 02 0 INT 10 2 2 IN T03 0 INT 11 0 INT 04 0 INT 12 0 INT 05 0 0 3 0 0 3 INT 06 NO BIKES 0 Special Notes INT 07 0 INT 08 0 INT 09 0 INT 10 0 INT 11 0 INT 12 0 0 0 0 00 SCJ14004M_01 p Prepared for: SCJ Alliance /Shea Carr Jewell Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. N.. =: (253) 926 6009 FAX: (253) 922 7211 E M.., T =.mC ,DTC2,„=.= =m WBE/DBE Bald Hill Rd SE &Morris Rd SE Low Yehn,Washington Time Interval Ending at Fp=m Noo=n o. (SB) Bald Hill Rd SE F.o., B T L7 S R T L 3:15 P 3:30 P 3:45 P 4:00 P 4:15P 4:30 P 4:45 P 5:00 P 5:15 P 5:30 P 5:45 P 6:00 P 0 0 79 40 1 6 0 0 70 28 1 4 0 0 79 33 2 3 1 0 87 31 5 3 0 0 91 43 3 4 0 0 85 56 0 7 0 0 1 106 39 1 6 0 0 101 46 1 8 0 0 103 37 0 2 0 0 102 35 0 1 0 0 88 37 FoT2 0 0 70 1 36 1 0 1 7 Total D.— o. Co„„=: Thurs 1 /09/2014 C—.,.a B,: Jess Sow=n o. (NB) F, =m E.,=o. (WB) F,om W =o„ (EB) ald Hill Rd S ,= E 0 Morris Rd SE 60 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 61 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 66 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 To�...� 245 224 207 54 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 25 1 0 1 1 235 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 1 5 223 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 4 233 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 4 206 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 2 190 Survey I 1 1 0 1 1061 1 4611 14 1 53 1 746 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 2750 Peak Hour: 3:45 PM to 4:45 PM Total 1 1 0 1 369 1 169 9 1 20 290 0 0 1 0 Approach 538 %HV 0.2% PHF Morris Rd SE ............. T. I Ped 0 i r............� Bike- 0 328 1 116 139 23 PED. N S E W a..... INT 01 0 INT 02 0 NT 03 0 NT 04 0 NT 05 0 INT 06 NO PEDS 0 INT 01 0 N 0 0 NT 09 0 NT 10 0 NT 11 0 INT 12 0 01 01 01 0 0 Special Notes 310 2.9 0 1 0 1 4 1 371 1 0 1 58 1 2750 1 0 1 0 1 1 116 1 0 1 23 987 0 139 987 0.95 Bald Hill Rd SE 944 538 406 369 1 ,0 :Pod 3:45 PM to 4:45 PM Pod €..........0 20 290 Bike� ....................... i t__0__� 392 310 702 Bald Hill Rd SE Ba= F,= m: N S E INT 01 NT 02 NT 03 NT 04 INT 05 INT 06 NO BIKES INT 07 NT 08 NT 09 NT 10 NT 11 NT 12 El 1.0 PHF Peak Hour Volume PHF %HV EB 0.7% Check W B n/a In: 987 NB 2.9% Out: 987 SB 0.2% T Int. 0.95 17 Conditions: SCJ 1 Prepared for: SCJ Alliance /Shea Carr Jewell Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. P—.: (253) 926 6009 FAX: (253) 922 7211 EM.., WBF/DBE Grove Rd SE &E Yelm A— (SR 507) D.—or C... Thurs 1/09/2014 Lo Yelm, Washington C,..,., By Jess Time From N.— o„ (SB) Fro., S..— o„ (NB) Fro., E.. (WB) Fro., W.— o. (EB) Interval Grove Rd SE 0 E Yelm Ave (SR 507) E Yelm Ave (SR 507) Ending at T L S R T L S R T L S R T L S R 3:15 P 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 138 8 3 2 152 0 306 3:30 P 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 138 6 3 134 0 286 3:45 P 0 6 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 162 9 3 1 143 0 324 4:00 P 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 149 8 6 1 143 0 302 4:15 P 1 4 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 6 0 155 12 3 2 130 0 305 4:30 P 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 150 19 11 1 144 0 317 4:45 P 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 151 19 0 1 135 0 309 5:00 P 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 148 25 4 0 135 0 316 5:15 P 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 189 5 9 1 136 0 338 5:30 P 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 164 22 1 2 121 0 311 5:45 P 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 168 18 11 1 129 0 321 600P 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 146 16 2 1 143 0 312 Total Survey 1 1 41 1 0 1 20 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 32 1 0 1 1858 1 167 1 47 1 16 1 1645 1 0 1 3747 Peak Hour: 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM Total 0 1 17 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 7 1 0 1 669 1 70 14 1 4 1 521 1 0 1286 Approach 22 0 739 525 1286 PHF LLZ E Yelm Ave SR 50 674 I Ped?......0.....€ 1 ..............5 B ke' 0 1199 FZI 525 I PEDs Across: N S E W INT INT INT INT INT INT INT INT INT INT INT INT 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grove Rd SE 96 22 74 i 0 iBike :Ped 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM 0 B,.,.,.. F,o.. 0 INT01 0 INT 0. 0 INT 0: 0 INT 01 0 INT 0'. 0 INT Of INT 0 i INT Of INT 0E INT 1( INT 11 INT 1' E Yelm Ave SR 50 70 669 739 1277 0 :Bike ........ 0.......Ped 538 1352 1.0 PHFPeakHour Volume PHF EB Cheek WB Iu: 1286 NB Out: 1286 SB T Iut. 0.95 Conditions: SCJ14004M_04p • C 1 E Yelm Ave SR 50 70 669 739 1277 0 :Bike ........ 0.......Ped 538 1352 1.0 PHFPeakHour Volume PHF EB Cheek WB Iu: 1286 NB Out: 1286 SB T Iut. 0.95 Conditions: SCJ14004M_04p ^� Prepared for: SCJ Alliance /Shea Carr Jewell Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. P —.: (253) 926 6009 FAX: (253) 922 7211 EM.., T..- (Q)TC2... ..m WBE/DBE Wal -Mart Blvd& EYelm Ave (SR 507) D.— .,C. Thursl /09/2014 Lo Yehn, Washington C.... By Jess Time F,.m N.z .� (SB) F� S. —.. (NB) F,.m E..,.� (WB) F,.., W..,.� (EB) Interval Wal -Mart Blvd Private Drmy E Yehn Ave (SR 507) E Yehn Ave (SR 507) T.:. o Ending at T L S R T L S R T L S R T L S R 3:15 P 0 22 0 15 0 0 0 1 2 0 134 17 4 25 118 0 332 3:30 P 0 36 0 14 0 0 0 0 4 0 139 13 6 36 115 0 353 3:45 P 0 32 0 19 0 0 0 0 6 0 163 22 3 30 119 0 385 4:00 P 0 37 0 23 0 0 0 0 4 0 121 22 5 39 110 0 352 4:15 P 1 43 0 22 0 0 0 0 9 0 154 20 4 23 121 0 383 4:30 P 0 48 1 15 0 0 0 1 1 0 175 20 9 28 129 0 417 4:45 P 0 35 0 18 0 0 0 0 3 0 162 22 2 17 124 0 378 5:00 P 0 46 0 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 166 29 4 27 106 0 385 5:15 P 0 51 0 26 0 0 0 0 2 0 165 27 7 30 121 0 420 5:30 P 0 39 0 17 0 0 0 0 1 0 169 26 2 22 111 0 384 5:45 P 0 40 0 16 0 0 0 0 4 0 185 18 0 25 119 0 403 6:00 P 1 34 0 21 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 157 19 4 28 118 0 377 Total 1 Survey 2 463 1 216 0 0 0 3 37 0 1890 255 50 330 1411 0 469 Peak Hour: 4:15 PM to 515 PM Total 0 180 1 69 0 0 0 2 6 0 668 98 22 102 480 0 1600 Approach 250 2 766 582 16(1(1 PHF 0.9� LWal -Mart Blvd 450 250 zoo F--- --!Bike E Yelm Ave SR 507 ev 1 ts0 0 ;Ped :......................: E Yelm Ave SR 507 737 I Ped; 0 98 668 766 Bike �...........5 0 0 1428 1319 102 0 Bike E 480 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM 0 ................. ;Ped 662 PEDs arrss: N S E W 0 ........................ Ped: .0 0 0 2 j LO PHFPeak Hour Volume 1680 INT 01 0 Bike- 0 PHF ° /.HV INT 02 0 EB 3.8% INT 03 0 �1 �'- Cheek WB 0.8% INT 04 0 In: 1600 NB n/a INT 05 2 2 3 Out: 1600 SB n/a INT 06 0 Private Drwy T Int. 0.95 1.8% INT 07 0 B,.,.,.. F,.- N S E W NU's SU's EU's WU's INT 01 0 INT 01 0 0 INT 09 0 INT 02 0 1 INT 10 0 INT 03 0 0 INT 11 0 INT 04 0 0 INT 12 0 INT 05 0 0 2 INT 06 NO BIKES 10 0 S ecial Notes INT 07 0 0 INT 08 0 0 INT 09 0 0 INT 10 0 0 INT 11 0 0 INT 12 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 1 SCJI4004M_05. �I Prepared for: SCJ Alliance /Shea Carr Jewell Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. P..: (253) 926 6009 FAX: (253) 922 7211 EM.., WBF/DBE Wal -Mart Access& E Yelm Ave (SR 507) D.—or C... Thurs 1/09/2014 Lo Yelm, Washington C,..,., By Jess Time From N._. o„ (SB) Fro., S.._ o„ (NB) Fro., E.. (WB) Fro., W. —o. (EB) Interval Wal -Mart Access 0 E Yelm Ave (SR 507) E Yelm Ave (SR 507) Ending at T L S R T L S R T L S R T L S R Ia: 3:15 P 0 22 0 21 0 0 0 0 3 0 131 24 3 6 135 0 339 3:30 P 0 27 0 14 0 0 0 0 4 0 138 22 5 8 142 0 351 3:45 P 0 20 0 14 0 0 0 0 3 0 171 20 3 7 144 0 376 4:00 P 0 22 0 6 0 0 0 0 4 0 137 27 9 138 0 339 4:15 P 0 10 0 11 0 0 0 0 8 0 163 1 33 3 6 158 0 381 4:30 P 0 16 0 9 0 0 0 0 1 0 186 41 7 9 169 0 430 4:45 P 0 16 0 16 0 0 0 0 3 0 169 38 2 7 151 0 397 5:00 P 0 15 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 180 32 1 8 145 0 395 5:15 P 1 18 0 19 0 0 0 0 2 0 173 38 3 15 157 0 420 5:30 P 0 22 0 22 0 0 0 0 1 0 173 36 0 5 145 0 403 5:45 P 0 14 0 14 0 0 0 0 3 0 189 25 0 14 145 0 401 6:00 P 0 21 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 168 32 1 1 150 0 381 Total Survey 1 1 223 1 0 1 170 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 32 1 0 1 1978 1 368 1 30 1 95 1 1779 1 0 1 4613 ' Peak Hour: 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM Total 1 1 65 1 0 1 59 0 0 1 0 L 0 6 1 0 1 708 149 13 39 622 0 1642 Approach 124 0 857 661 1642 %HV 0.13% 0.7% 2.0% 1.2% PHF 0.95 Wal-Mart Access z 312 124 I 188 O Bike E Yelm Ave SR 50 7 =61 o :Ped E Yelm Ave SR 50 767 I Ped......0...... 708 857 I..............5 Bike' 0 1544 1428 39 0 :Bike 661 622 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM .0 :Ped F 687 PEDs Across: N S E W 1720 1 LOPHFPeakHOur Volume INT INT INT INT INT INT INT INT INT INT INT INT 0 B,.,.,.. F,o- 0 INT01 0 INT 02 0 INT 03 0 INT 04 0 INT 05 0 INT 06 INT 07 INT 08 NT09 INT 10 INT 11 INT 12 ©aa© 0 PHF %HV 0 EB 2.0% 0 Check WB 0.7% 0 Ia: 1642 NB n/a 0 Out: 1642 SB 0.8% 0 T Iat. 0.95 1.2% 0 B,.,.,.. F,o- 0 INT01 0 INT 02 0 INT 03 0 INT 04 0 INT 05 0 INT 06 INT 07 INT 08 NT09 INT 10 INT 11 INT 12 ©aa© • C I Conditions: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O SCJ14004M_06p Yelm East Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis APPENDIX B ALTERNATIVE 2 AND 3 VOLUME FIGURES SO Alliance November 2014 Page 48 1) Burnett Rd at Yelm Ave F;- 7*4 6 15 42— r 2) Killion Rd at Yelm Ave 41 Z c 3 m_ _y O .� y 0 3) Cullens St at Yelm Ave —69 r 75 63— r CY, 6) 1st St at Yelm Ave —174 r7 160— r 9) Clark Rd at Yelm Ave 4) Longmire St at Yelm Ave 5) 1st St at Mosman Ave 7) 1st St at Stevens Hwy 8) 1st St /Rhoton Rd at Railway Rd 10) 103rd Ave at Yelm Ave 11) West Rd at 103rd Ave oh O ' 4. rf • •, • ` 4S Aw Project Trips Pass -By Trips —23 r, N ;t- 25 r 15 L► 17 Inbound Outbound Total 373 374 747 21~ r 19~ `� t 39- New-to- Network Trips N 0 Inbound Outbound Total 696 754 1450 C O s•. n J —211 r 98 195— r 0 0, 12) Creek St at 13) Grove Rd at 14) Walmart Blvd at 15) Bald Hills Rd /Creek St at 103rd Ave 103rd Ave 103rd Ave Yelm Ave • 0 m m L38 (35) `"'. L38 m I� INI 119 ( -122 a N 129 ( -69) •) i «� ! L. x65(61) ! x77(69) X244 } (31) 691 (31) 501 265- 35 ( -52) 130 N 1 r (69) 127 r Ln (21) 51-1 N (2 9) 44� m 16) Bald Hills Rd at 17) Grove Rd at 18) Walmart Blvd at 19) Yelm Ave at Morris Rd Yelm Ave Yelm Ave Walmart Driveway Access • ' r W (P` E kk FS Legend @Apw Y GJ i' GJ 15 16 O a 13 103rd Ave 14 XXX Site - Generated Project Trips m (XXX) Site - Generated Pass -By Trips °�° +u�, XX Distribution Percentage O Ewa�q• f0 Yom. - vs •iii ..s '� 190/of "'ills Ra m %11 Figure B -1 Yelm East Gateway W 2020 PM Peak Hour Site - Generated Yelm, WA SC.J ALLIANCE Traffic Volumes - Alt 2 Traffic Impact Analysis CONSULTING SERVICES Nu Oa I- s r 5 N ti L23 i4 r67 (34) _ tr � M Project ti i22 Area ,. l x66(34 • (15) 42-1 v tr 00 N a-I t0 V .-. M M M 38 a +-38(35) = m m v X129 ( -69) 00 Ch ,^n X119 ( -122) � L26 (59) j j j 77 (69) Ln X309 1 x65 (61) x163 ( -59) r+ i �► 41% ` T 28 231 ( (28) 54� r (31) 69� ~I I r (99zo6� (' (31) 50� 'j I 238 li 14 ( -52) 130 m n m () -1 N Ln ( -69) 127— v v N N (21) 51� V (29) 44� V 00 - Note 5% of the distribution was applied internally between the north and south side of the site. An additional 5% was assigned as internal capture. Legend XXX —Do- Site - Generated Project Trips (XXX)—N� Site - Generated Pass -By Trips XX Distribution Percentage +' +�.r �� SCJ ALLIANCE CONSULTMC, SERVICES Ln ONO N 1 L► +-13(20) VY 20) 62m } F N N V rLn Parcel G r4 J L. I L 14 (20) Figure B -2 2020 PM Peak Hour Site - Generated Traffic Volumes - Alt 2 (Site Driveways) 35% Project Trips Pass -By Trips Inbound Outbound Total 373 374 747 New -to- Network Trips Inbound Outbound Total 696 754 1450 Yelm East Gateway Yelm, WA Traffic Impact Analysis 1) Burnett Rd at Yelm Ave 2) Killion Rd at Yelm Ave 41 Z c m_ _y O .� y 0 3) Cullens St at Yelm Ave X41 r-45 38-1 r N zT 6) 1st St at Yelm Ave —104 r4 96— r 9) Clark Rd at Yelm Ave 4) Longmire St at Yelm Ave 5) 1st St at Mosman Ave 7) 1st St at Stevens Hwy 8) 1st St /Rhoton Rd at Railway Rd 10) 103rd Ave at Yelm Ave 11) West Rd at 103rd Ave oh O ' 4, .00 d7 rf • •, • ` 4S Aw Project Trips —14 m N L25 Pass -By Trips 1. r9 ! X10 Inbound Outbound Total 223 223 446 12~ r 00 9~ 11 `1 j 32-1 Ln New -to- Network Trips m ^ i m m Inbound Outbound Total Al C; asn 865 C O s•. n J —127 r 58 117— r Ln 12) Creek St at 13) Grove Rd at 14) Walmart Blvd at 15) Bald Hills Rd /Creek St at 103rd Ave 103rd Ave 103rd Ave Yelm Ave • N Z t_44 (23) t_ 11 N m D a s X136( -33) �° N- 110( -23) 13 (10) � 25 (23) 146 21� (16) 47-J -� t r ( -16) 106— «) I r 158 - ( -22) 129— a a (16) 35-1 � 1- (6) 13-1 16) Bald Hills Rd at 17) Grove Rd at 18) Walmart Blvd at 19) Yelm Ave at Morris Rd Yelm Ave Yelm Ave Walmart Driveway Access • ' r W (P` E Legend @Apw Y GJ i' GJ 15 16 O a 13 103rd Ave 14 XXX Site - Generated Project Trips m (XXX) Site - Generated Pass -By Trips °�° +u�, XX Distribution Percentage O �q• f0 Yom. - %�vs •ii, � �i ..s •� 190/of "'ills Ra m %11 VIM Figure B -3 Yelm East Gateway W 2020 PM Peak Hour Site - Generated Yelm, WA SC.J ALLIANCE Traffic Volumes - Alt 3 Traffic Impact Analysis CONSULTING SERVICES L8 1 r34 (20) A V M O N Note 5% of the distribution was applied internally between the north and south side of the site. An additional 5% was assigned as internal capture. Legend XXX —Do- Site - Generated Project Trips (XXX)—N� Site - Generated Pass -By Trips XX Distribution Percentage SCJ ALLIANCE CONSULTMIG, SERVICES O 11 L7 O ^ r33 (19 t t0 M O Ol N a-I L 00 Ch t-14(.10) (10 21-1 } v m m N L- 14 (9) (10) 20-J Figure B -4 2020 PM Peak Hour Site - Generated Traffic Volumes - Alt 3 (Site Driveways) 35 Project Trips Pass -By Trips Inbound Outbound Total 223 223 446 New -to- Network Trips — f N a L( 44 23 ) 14 L25 (31) 4 N —110(-23) —153(-23) N v n v —136 ( -33) —107 (-45) o L11 (8) r16 ( 14 ) I 4 + r25 (23) r45 (23) r13 (30) —170(-8) '1 r * 00 (16) 471 (6) 181 6 175 (21) 431 `� t r 01 ) t r n v 145- M v M N (- 22) 129 (6) 13- t r N ( -31) 111 ti N n (-16)106— M (30) 29-1 (16) 35-1 oo N ALFN L 00 Ch t-14(.10) (10 21-1 } v m m N L- 14 (9) (10) 20-J Figure B -4 2020 PM Peak Hour Site - Generated Traffic Volumes - Alt 3 (Site Driveways) 35 Project Trips Pass -By Trips Inbound Outbound Total 223 223 446 New -to- Network Trips Inbound Outbound Total 415 450 865 Yelm East Gateway Yelm, WA Traffic Impact Analysis 1) Burnett Rd at Yelm Ave Ln L 45 ,n Ln - X595 .j 1 L. r 40 51 1 r 810— Ln o o 45-1 `4 -i ^ 2) Killion Rd at Yelm Ave L 15 o Ln o X 680 «) 1 L. r 5 201 910 L 0 Ln 5-1 3) Cullens St at Yelm Ave 0 L-25 0 ° ° X615 �) 1 L. r 305 501 `I1r 640 o Ln o 65 -� � rn � m 6) 1st St at Yelm Ave L-20 N Ln 0° —1045 1 L. r 80 251 `I 1 r 1090— o Ln Ln 10-1 00 9) Clark Rd at Yelm Ave ai c 3 m 0 46.4 qt 4) Longmire St at 5) 1st St at Yelm Ave Mosman Ave ' 0 0 -i � 'J 1 L. t 80 rn —135 v� -1 Ln r25 �) 1 1. t_ 5 —5 r90 230— `� r 1 f o 1 1 r 200 n in o 50-1 mrn m 5� 103rd Ave 7) 1st St at 8) 1st St /Rhoton Rd at Stevens Hwy Railway Rd Ln o o O1 L10 ,n L185 � o Ln —1135 0° N m X45 15) Bald Hills Rd /Creek St at 5 ,11�,r5 Yelm Ave 651 `I 1 r 601 1 r 1165— Ln o 95— 0-1 10- 10) 103rd Ave at 11) West Rd at Yelm Ave 103rd Ave --y. • .... ERs ry i O r N Y Sj7$ L-115' — 170 r- 80 000 0) 0) J ! L. 125 r- 5 230— `� r 1101 -1 1 r 155 0 .zT 205 o o Ln 30-1 12) Creek St at 13) Grove Rd at 103rd Ave 103rd Ave 00 0 0 L145 o o o - X765 ") + ..I ! L. x125 1501 `� 1 1051 -1 1 r 15-1 �0 675 o ^o O- nl 70-1 nl Ln ® "% & / o o L 55 —15 ° °�' ° —810 r10 x180 10D 201 `� 1 r 255 . 410 620 Ln o o O1 F 295-11 N 14) Walmart Blvd at 15) Bald Hills Rd /Creek St at 103rd Ave Yelm Ave 0 L-145' 0`00 � N X850 .f 1 L. x145 1901 I I 1 r 585 o Ln Ln 75-1 0' 0' L 140 .� �► —1065 451 945— 1140 8 16) Bald Hills Rd at 17) Grove Rd at 18) Walmart Blvd at 19) Yelm Ave at �`i� 4ss� . ' T _ ••• _ � Morris Rd Yelm Ave Yelm Ave Walmart Driveway Access 4 `- 10 Y i c� 11 12 of - _ Y V Of- �� . 410 h• y F ALP r. !� �� t rnN �Rf: A•.: ti. `- 10 Y i c� 11 12 15 16 13 103rd Ave 14 - xx--*. PM F G� 04 1 r• M:. r.� ?� ?j yr- 17 18 Project ,y Area ea /ayills Ra t I- A ,. y1 ti a� r, a Figure B -5 Yelm East Gateway Projected 2020 PM Peak Hour Yelm, WA SC.J ALLIANCE Traffic Volumes - Alt 2 Traffic Impact Analysis CONSULTING SERVICES of - _ Y V 15 16 13 103rd Ave 14 - xx--*. PM F G� 04 1 r• M:. r.� ?� ?j yr- 17 18 Project ,y Area ea /ayills Ra t I- A ,. y1 ti a� r, a Figure B -5 Yelm East Gateway Projected 2020 PM Peak Hour Yelm, WA SC.J ALLIANCE Traffic Volumes - Alt 2 Traffic Impact Analysis CONSULTING SERVICES + T �� SCJ ALLIANCE CONSULTMG, SERVICES roject Area o Ln M 01 N L 145 0 x765 L85 1 � x125 1x885 105-J — -1 t �► 765— I 675 N n Ln 25-1 N 70-1 ' OR Figure B -6 Projected 2020 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Alt 2 (Site Driveways) 85~ 0 V Ln Ln 01 M-o 1 l► i35 o—f t 14 L-35 r Ln e it 4 i Yelm East Gateway Yelm, W Traffic ImpactAnalysi! J� 1 b 5� t - a- 85~ 0 V Ln Ln 01 M-o 1 l► i35 o—f t 14 L-35 r Ln e it 4 i Yelm East Gateway Yelm, W Traffic ImpactAnalysi! 1) Burnett Rd at Yelm Ave Ln L 45 ,n Ln - X575 .j 1 L. r 30 51 1 r 795— Ln o Ln 45-1 `4 -i `0 2) Killion Rd at Yelm Ave L 15 o Ln o X655 «) 1 L. r 5 201 -1 1r 885 Ln o Ln 5-1 3) Cullens St at Yelm Ave 0 L-25 0 ° ° X 590 �) 1 L. r 275 501 `1 1 r 615 o Ln o 65 -� N 4 ci 6) 1st St at Yelm Ave L-20 N Ln ON —975 1 L. r 80 251 `I 1 r 1025— o Ln o 10-1 00 9) Clark Rd at Yelm Ave a" c 3 m 0 4) Longmire St at Yelm Ave 0 t_75 0 X135 25 1001 1 f- 280 Ln o o 50-1 mmm ci 7) 1st St at Stevens Hwy t_ 10 � o Ln -1060 J1L. r5 651 1100— o 0-1 10) 103rd Ave at Yelm Ave -_-I: ZI.{p =L�` 5) 1st St at Mosman Ave o L5 \ _) ! L. r 90 5� oo 0' 5 ci ci 8) 1st St /Rhoton Rd at Railway Rd r t_ 180 X40 r 5 601 95— 10- 11) West Rd at 103rd Ave --y. • .... ERs O r N Y Ac 1117$: L-115' — 165 r- 70 000 0° 6) J ! L. 115 r- 5 220— '1 r 1101 '1 1 r 155-1 Ln 0 200 Ln o Ln 201 `1 1 r 25- m o 12) Creek St at 13) Grove Rd at 103rd Ave 103rd Ave 00 �n t_ 140 -i � Ln 0 ,870 .f 1 .I ! L. r25 1351 `� 1 651 15-1 Lno 705 Nino N 20-1 ® �a / o o L-55 °�' —15 ° ° —725 r10 �) 1 x140 10— `� r 201 `1 1 r 250 545 Ln o o N D 295- N 14) Walmart Blvd at 15) Bald Hills Rd /Creek St at 103rd Ave Yelm Ave 0 L-115 F, -i N —875 .) 1 L. r50 1101 I -I 1 r 615 o Ln o 50-1 10 -i m Y i c� 11 12 of - 1140 8 16) Bald Hills Rd at 17) Grove Rd at 18) Walmart Blvd at Morris Rd Yelm Ave Yelm Ave AS o L C� Y P 11 F� I • O /'9l, 0 � � ' �{ Y i c� 11 12 15 16 13 103rd Ave 14 - xx--*. PM F CD G 04 1 r• M:. r.� ?� ?j yr- 17 18 19 Project ,y Area ea /ayills Ra t I- A ,. y1 ti a� r, L 140 .� �► —970 451 840— 19) Walmart Access at Yelm Ave a Figure B -7 Yelm East Gateway Projected 2020 PM Peak Hour Yelm, WA SC.J ALLIANCE Traffic Volumes - Alt 3 Traffic Impact Analysis CONSULTING SERVICES of - _ Y V 15 16 13 103rd Ave 14 - xx--*. PM F CD G 04 1 r• M:. r.� ?� ?j yr- 17 18 19 Project ,y Area ea /ayills Ra t I- A ,. y1 ti a� r, L 140 .� �► —970 451 840— 19) Walmart Access at Yelm Ave a Figure B -7 Yelm East Gateway Projected 2020 PM Peak Hour Yelm, WA SC.J ALLIANCE Traffic Volumes - Alt 3 Traffic Impact Analysis CONSULTING SERVICES 1 70 m .1 l► x910 n N N • 25 ► — 30 1010 r rl 1 �► 25-1 790— t f► 110, t r 700 In In In 615— N Ln Ln N 40-1 - v 507 r8/5 T — : -t_ - --. _ r50 x980 Yelm East Gateway + Figure B -8 Yelm, WA Projected 2020 PM Peak Hour Traffic Impact Analysis 1-18 Traffic Volumes - Alt 3 (Site Driveways) SCJ ALLIANCE CONSULTING SERVICES Yelm East Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis APPENDIX C TRAFFIC VOLUME CALCULATION WORKSHEETS SO Alliance November 2014 Page 49 East Yelm Gateway EIS ml 5C7 ALLM!'Wr= PM Peak Hour Volumes SR 507/SR 510 Growth Rate: 2.5% 41•`x'^" ��-"" Global Growth Rate: 1.0% Fie 5 Fie B -3, B4 Fie B -), B -8 Fie B -1, B -2 Fie B -5, B -6 Fie 6, ) Fie 9,10 Fie 8 Fie 11 InterseRipnM=014 9ING W1, -LUMES Volume 2020 Growth Baseline 2020 Volumes Ns Action Project Trips No Action Pass -BY Trips No Action 2020 Volumes Projected — Build Project Trips Low Build Pass -BY Trips Low Build 2020 Volumes High Build Prolect Trips High Build Pass -BY Trips High Build 2020 Volumes Volume 2035 Grow._ Y3 and Y2c 2035 ,High Build Prolect gyps ,High Build Pass -BY Trips High Build 2035 Volumes �a000000000000�� a000000000000�� a ®o ®oo0oom0om�� a000000000000�� ma000000000000�� a000000000000�� a ®v ®oo0o0 ®000�� maooaaaoaaoaao�� a000000000000�� a ©moomoomoom�� yam ©moomoomoom�� ma ®oomoomoom�� a ®v ®oomoomoom�� maooaaaaaaaaaa�� a0o0oo0000000�� am0 ®oomoomoom�� a ®v ®oo0oo0oom�� ma000000000000�� 4 30 5 30 ma0oaaaaaaaaaa�� a ®v ®oomoomoom�� a ® ©moomoomoom�� a000 ©v ®oommom�� a ®o ®oo0000000�� a ©v ©00000mmo ®�� ma0oaaaaaaaaaa�� a ®v ®oomoomoom�� ma ®v ®oomoomoom�� maooaaaaaaaaaa�� a ®v ®oo0o00000�� East Yel m Gateway E IS ml !F5CJ AL-3-I&I'Wr= PM Peak HourVolumes SIR 507/SR 510 Growth Rate 2.5% Global Growth Rate 1.0% Fie � Fie B-3, B4 Fie B-7, B-8 Fie B-1, B-2 Fie B-5, B-6 Fie 6, 7 Fie 9, A Fie 8 Fie �1 Projected 2020 SbRl,.t.. Rd R,il.,y Rd TMC D,t,: 04/16/2014 4 00 5 00 East Yelm Gateway EIS ml 5C7 ALLM!'Wr= PM Peak Hour Volumes SR 507/SR 510 Growth Rate: 2.5% 41•`x'^" ��-"" Global Growth Rate: 1.0% Fie 5 Fie B -3, B4 Fie B -), B -8 Fie B -1, B -2 Fie B -5, B -6 Fie 6, ) Fie 9,10 Fie 8 Fie 11 InterseRion �� W1, 9ING =014 -LUMES Volume 2020 Growth Baseline 2020 Volumes No Action Project Trips No Action Pass -BY Trips No Action 2020 Volumes Projected — Build Project Trips Low Build Pass -BY Trips Low Build 2020 Volumes High Build Prolect Trips High Build Pass -BY Trips High Build 2020 Volumes Volume 2035 Growth Y3 and Y2c 2035 Ash-- ,High Build Prolect Trips ,High Build Pass -BY Trips High Build 2035 Volumes �ao0 ®oo0000000�� a0o0oo0000000�� ma000000000000�� a000000000000�� a000000000000�� maooaaaoaaoaao�� a0o ®oo0000000�� a ®o ®oo0oo0oom�� ma ® ©moomoomoom�� ao0 ®oo0000000�� aaoa000000000�� ma ®o ®aamaammam�� a000000000000�� mao0 ®oomoomoom�� aaoa000000000�� ma ®v ®aamaamaam�� a00000000000000000 �a ®v ®vv ®vv ®vv® ®000® �a0o ®vv ®moo ®o0 ®v ®o0 Creek St ma ® ©�ma� ®a® ®ate ®v ®ate �a00000000000000000 �a ®o ®oomoomoom0000m ma00000000000000000 �a ® ©moo�mo�mo ® ®omo� 4 15 5 15 �a00000000000000000 maooaaaoaaoaaoaoaao �a00000000000000000 �a ®a ®vv ®vv ®vv® ®000® �a ®v ®momma ®mom ©v ®v® �a ©v ©vv ©vv ©vv ©0000© Gr— Rd ma ®a ®mama® ®ate ®v ®a® �a ®v ® ®om ®ommomoo ®om TMC D-: 01/09/2014 ma ®o ® ®o0 ®0��0� ®000 �a0000000000000000© 4 15 5 15 �a ®v ® ®o0 ®00 ®o0 ®v ®o0 ma ®v ® ®a ®mam ®a ®aomam �a ®o ®oo0000000 ®0000 �a00000000000000000 ma ©v ©000000000 ©000m �ao0 ®oomoomoom ©000m ma ®v ®aamaamaamaoaam �a00000000000000000 ma0000000000000 ® ®0� �a ®v ®oomoomoom ©0000 �a00000000000000000 maooaaaaaaaaaaa® ®ate �a00000000000000000 East Yelm Gateway EIS ml 5C7 #LLiANr= PM Peak Hour Volumes SR 507 /SR 510 Growth Rate: 2.5% 41•`x'^" ��-"" Global Growth Rate: 1.0% Fie 5 Fie B -3, B4 Fie B -), B -8 Fie B -1, B -2 Fie B -5, B -6 Fie 6, ) Fie 9,10 Fie 8 Fie 11 E %I STIN6 Volume Baseline No Action NO Action NO Action InterseRion nt �a 2014 VOLUMES ®0moo0oo0oom0000® 2020 Growth 2020 Volumes Project Trips Pass -BY Trips 2020 Volumes Projected BUiId, Project Trips Low BUild Pass -BY Trips Low BUild 2020 Volumes High BUild Prolect Trips High BUild Pass -BY Trips High BUild 2020 Volumes Volume 2035 Growth Y3 and Y2c 2035 Aslustmeet ,High BUild Prolect Trips Pas_ Tr_- - Bed Elill, Rd/Cr..k St �a ® ©moomoomoom ®000m ma ® ©moomoomoom ®000� 415 515 �a�a ®oo�oo�oo� ®000� maw ®�aa�aa�aa� ®oaa® �a ®o ®oomoomoom ®000m ma00000000000000000 �a ®v ®oomoomoom ©000m �a00000000000000000 maooaaaaaaaaaaaoaaa �a00000000000000000 �a ®v ®oomoomoom ©0000 �a00000000000000000 �a00000000000000000 maw ® ®ma�ma�ma� ® ®aa® �a000m ®mom ®� ®m�0om ®m �a000 ®am ® ® ®mmmoo ® ©® ma000aoo ®v ® ®o�o0 ®00 �a000 ®v ® ® ®mm ®moo ® ©® maooaaaa�ammamao ®am �a000 ® ® ®m0® ®0000 ® ®0 �a000 ® ®mm�� ®moo ® ®om �a000 ® ®0m ®0 ®moo ®o0 ma000 ®om ®om ®omo ® ®o� maooa ®am ®am ®ama ® ® ®� �a�o ®vv ® ®om ®om ®m ®o �a ® ©moomoomoom0000® �a00000000000000000 �a00000000000000000 ma ® ®® ®ate ®ate ®a ® ®® ®ate �a ® ©�oo�oo�oo� ®000� �a00000000000000000 East Yelm Gateway EIS ml 5C7 #LLiANr= PM Peak Hour Volumes SR 507 /SR 510 Growth Rate: 2.5% 41•`x'^" ��-"" Global Growth Rate: 1.0% Fie 5 Fie B -3, B4 Fie B -), B -8 Fie B -1, B -2 Fie B -5, B -6 Fie 6, ) Fie 9,10 Fie 8 Fie 11 Projected 2020 InterseRion ma E %1 STING 2014 VOLUMES Volume 2020 Growth Baseline 2020 Volumes No Action Project Trips NO Action--------- Pass_BY Trips ------ ------ v00000000000 - - - - - - - - -- -- -- �a �a�o ®vv J�00000000000 ®vv ®vv ® ®000m maooaaaaaaaaaaaoaaa �amomoomoomoom ®000m �a �000000000000 ma �a �000000000000 �000000000000 maooaaaoaaoaaoaoaao �a000 ©oo ®v ® ®v ®vv ®o0 �a �000000000000 �a000000 ®v® ®0000 ®v® ma ®v ® ®am ®ammo ®ao ®am �a00000000000000000 �a00000000000000000 ma00000000000000000 �a00000000000000000 maooaaaoaaoaaoaoaao �a000000 ®v ® ®v ®vv ®o0 �a00000000000000000 �a000 ®mm ® ®m® ®room ®m �a000000 ®v® ®0000 ®v® �a00000000000000000 �a00000000000000000 �a000m ®000000000000 �a00000000000000000 �a voo ® ® ®00000000000 ma v0000000000000000 �a voo ® ®m00000000000 �a00000000000000000 maooaaaoaaoaaoaoaao �a00000000000000000 �a000 ®a000000000000 �a00000000000000000 �a00000000000000000 �a000 ® ©m00000000000 �a00000000000000000 ma00000000000000000 �a00000000000000000 �a000 ®am00000000000 maooaaaaaaaaaaaoaaa �a000mom00000000000 �a000 ® ®m00000000000 East Yelm Gateway EIS ml 5C7 ALLM!'Wr= PM Peak Hour Volumes SR 507/SR 510 Growth Rate: 2.5% 41•`x'^" ��-"" Global Growth Rate: 1.0% Fie 5 Fie B -3, B4 Fie B -), B -8 Fie B -1, B -2 Fie B -5, B -6 Fie 6, ) Fie 9,10 Fie 8 Fie 11 InterseRion ��IIIIIIII1LUME5 �a000m W19ING =014 Volume 2020 Growth Baseline 2020 Volumes No Action Project Trips No Action Pass -By Trips ®m00000000000 No Action 2020 Volumes Projected , — Project Trips Low Build Pass -By Trips Low Build 2020 Volumes High Build Prolect Trips High Build Pass -By Trips High Build 2020 Volumes Volume 2035 Growth Y3 and Y2c 2035 Ash-- ,High Build Prolect Trips ,High�- Pas_ T�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII, - �a000® ®000000000000 �a000® ®000000000000 �a000 ® ®m00000000000 ma000 ©v ©00000000000 �a000 ® ® ®00000000000 �a000® ®000000000000 maooaaaaaaoaaoaoaao ��a �a000m ®000000000000 o 00 ®o0 ®om ®o0 00 ®0® ma00000000000000000 �a000 ®om ® ®00 ®000 ® ®0 �a00000000000000000 maooaaaaaaaaaaaoaaa �a00000000000000000 �a00000000000000000 �a00000000000000000 �a000000000 ®omoo ® ®m �a00000000000000 ®00 ma00000000000000000 �a000 ®v ® ® ® ®0 ®000 ® ®0 �a00000000000000000 maooaaaaaaaaaaaoaaa �a00000000000000000 �a00000000000000000 �a00000000000000000 415 515 �a00000000000000000 �a00000000000000 ® ®m ma00000000000000000 �a00000000000000 ® ®m �a000000000000000 ®m maooaaaaaaaaaaaoaaa �a000 ® ®m ® ® ® ® ®moom ®m �a00000000000000� ®® TMC D-: 01/09/2014 ma000 ®m® ®mom® ®moo ®� ®� �a000000000000000am 415 515 �a000m ®m ® ®m ® ®moom ®® �a000m ®m ® ®m ® ® ®oomm� ma — �000000000000000 �a �a000000000000000 s�000000000000 ® ®® ®m maooaaaaaaaaaaaoaaa �a000 ®v ® ® ®m ® ®moom ®m �a v0000000000000 ® ®m TMC D-: 01/09/2014 ma s000000000000 ® ® ®� �a v0000000000000 ©ao 415 515 �a000mom ® ®m ® ®moom ®® East Yelm Gateway EIS ml 5C7 #LLiAfW = PM Peak Hour Volumes SR 507/SR 510 Growth Rate: 2.5% 41•`x'^" ��-"" Global Growth Rate: 1.0% Yelm East Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis APPENDIX D CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS SO Alliance November 2014 Page 50 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2035 - AM 12: NE Creek St & 103rd Ave SE PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh 3.8 Moveme EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh /h 245 175 90 200 50 125 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized 2.6 None HCM LOS None - None Storage Length Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 1123 0 0 0.341 Grade, % 0 - HCM Control Delay (s) 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 1 1 0 0 Mvmt Flow 258 184 95 211 53 132 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 + Min Conflicting Flow All 0 0 442 0 750 350 Stage 1 - - - - 350 - Stage 2 - 400 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.4 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.209 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1123 382 698 Stage 1 - 718 - Stage 2 681 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1123 345 698 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 345 - Stage 1 718 Stage 2 616 Approach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.6 15.1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh /h) 540 1123 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.341 0.084 - HCM Control Delay (s) 15.1 8.5 0 HCM Lane LOS C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.5 0.3 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/3/2014 HCM 2010 AWSC Projected 2035 - AM 13: Grove Rd SE & 103rd Ave SE PM Peak Hour �tersectioi I Intersection Delay, s /veh 14.2 Intersection LOS B Movement EBL E� EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR 0 Vol, veh /h 0 125 200 55 0 5 130 40 0 65 120 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 132 211 58 0 5 137 42 0 68 126 5 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB Opposing Approach WB EB SB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 17.3 11.5 12.3 HCM LOS C B B ��BLr EBL,&WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 34% 33% 3% 35% Vol Thru, % 63% 53% 74% 27% Vol Right, % 3% 14% 23% 38% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 190 380 175 240 LT Vol 120 200 130 65 Through Vol 5 55 40 90 RT Vol 65 125 5 85 Lane Flow Rate 200 400 184 253 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.339 0.618 0.3 0.407 Departure Headway (Hd) 6.105 5.558 5.87 5.803 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 584 644 606 614 Service Time 4.199 3.633 3.965 3.892 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.342 0.621 0.304 0.412 HCM Control Delay 12.3 17.3 11.5 12.9 HCM Lane LOS B C B B HCM 95th -tile Q 1.5 4.3 1.3 2 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/3/2014 HCM 2010 AWSC Projected 2035 - AM 13: Grove Rd SE & 103rd Ave SE PM Peak Hour kjtersectioi� Intersection Delay, s /veh Intersection LOS Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 0 85 65 90 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 89 68 95 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 Approach SB Opposing Approach NB Opposing Lanes 1 Conflicting Approach Left WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 Conflicting Approach Right EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 HCM Control Delay 12.9 HCM LOS B Lane Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/3/2014 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Projected 2035 - AM 14: Walmart Blvd & 103rd Ave SE PM Peak Hour --1. 4--- t i Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T r + Volume (veh /h) 5 10 320 10 15 5 155 920 15 5 985 5 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1900 1875 1881 1900 1747 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 5 11 337 11 16 5 163 968 16 5 1037 5 Adj No. of Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 10 10 10 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh /h 160 315 374 152 197 52 419 1217 20 319 1371 7 Arrive On Green 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.47 1.00 1.00 0.38 0.38 0.38 Sat Flow, veh /h 393 1347 1599 356 842 222 1774 1827 30 570 3612 17 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 16 0 337 32 0 0 163 0 984 5 508 534 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /h /In 1740 0 1599 1420 0 0 1774 0 1857 570 1770 1860 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 14.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 17.4 17.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 0.0 14.3 1.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 17.4 17.4 Prop In Lane 0.31 1.00 0.34 0.16 1.00 0.02 1.00 0.01 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 474 0 374 401 0 0 419 0 1237 319 672 706 V/C Ratio(X) 0.03 0.00 0.90 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.80 0.02 0.76 0.76 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 479 0 378 405 0 0 419 0 1237 319 672 706 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.45 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 20.7 0.0 26.0 20.9 0.0 0.0 15.1 0.0 0.0 13.6 18.8 18.8 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 0.0 0.0 23.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 2.5 0.1 7.8 7.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 1/o),veh /In 0.2 0.0 8.8 0.5 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.9 0.1 9.9 10.4 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 20.7 0.0 49.8 21.0 0.0 0.0 16.4 0.0 2.5 13.6 26.6 26.3 LnGrp LOS C D C B A B C C Approach Vol, veh /h 353 32 1147 1047 Approach Delay, s /veh 48.5 21.0 4.5 26.4 Approach LOS D C A C 5 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 50.2 19.8 20.2 30.0 19.8 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 46.5 16.5 16.5 26.5 16.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +ll), s 2.0 16.3 6.1 19.4 3.0 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 12.4 0.0 6.0 3.4 1.2 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 19.6 HCM 2010 LOS B Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/3/2014 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Projected 2035 - AM 15: Bald Hills Rd /NE Creek St & E Yelm Ave (SR 507) PM Peak Hour � � i Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Sl- SBT SBR Lane Configurations + r + r + r Volume (veh /h) 20 400 310 70 695 60 395 105 105 115 215 70 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1845 1845 1845 1845 1845 1918 1918 1918 1976 1863 1937 1937 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 21 421 326 74 732 63 416 111 111 121 226 74 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 Cap, veh /h 56 493 564 308 760 672 452 263 263 163 284 233 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.27 0.27 0.18 0.41 0.41 0.25 0.30 0.29 0.09 0.15 0.14 Sat Flow, veh /h 1757 1845 1568 1757 1845 1631 1827 881 881 1774 1937 1647 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 21 421 326 74 732 63 416 0 222 121 226 74 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /h /In 1757 1845 1568 1757 1845 1631 1827 0 1763 1774 1937 1647 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.2 21.4 8.6 3.6 38.1 2.3 21.9 0.0 10.0 6.6 11.1 2.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.2 21.4 8.6 3.6 38.1 2.3 21.9 0.0 10.0 6.6 11.1 2.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 56 493 564 308 760 672 452 0 526 163 284 233 V/C Ratio(X) 0.38 0.85 0.58 0.24 0.96 0.09 0.92 0.00 0.42 0.74 0.80 0.32 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 116 625 677 308 760 672 452 0 526 405 442 368 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 46.8 34.3 9.7 35.0 28.3 17.7 36.1 0.0 27.9 43.6 40.6 18.1 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 4.2 9.2 0.9 0.4 23.9 0.1 24.0 0.0 0.5 6.6 5.5 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 1/o),veh /In 0.6 12.1 3.9 1.8 24.4 1.1 14.0 0.0 5.0 3.5 6.4 1.8 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 50.9 43.4 10.6 35.4 52.2 17.8 60.1 0.0 28.5 50.2 46.1 18.9 LnGrp LOS D D B D D B E C D D B Approach Vol, veh /h 768 869 638 421 Approach Delay, s /veh 29.7 48.3 49.1 42.5 Approach LOS C D D D 4 q 6 i Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 7.1 44.6 28.0 18.8 21.4 30.3 13.4 33.4 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.9 4.6 ' 4.6 4.9 ' 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 40.0 23.5 22.0 13.1 * 33 22.0 * 23 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +ll), s 3.2 40.1 23.9 13.1 5.6 23.4 8.6 12.0 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.6 Intersection Summary - HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 42.3 HCM 2010 LOS D Notes HCM 2010 computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/3/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2035 - Alt1 16: Morris Rd SE & Bald Hills Rd PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 7.2 Moveme SET SER ! NWLI NW N E L NER Vol, veh /h 350 340 15 355 230 15 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized 37.4 None None - None Storage Length NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER - 0 357 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 9.2 0.1 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 3 3 1 1 Mvmt Flow 368 358 16 374 242 16 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 726 0 765 547 Stage 1 - - - - 547 - Stage 2 - 218 - Critical Hdwy 4.13 6.615 6.215 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.415 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.815 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.227 3.5095 3.3095 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 872 357 538 Stage 1 - 581 - Stage 2 801 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 872 349 538 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 349 - Stage 1 581 Stage 2 783 Approach NW NE HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 37.4 HCM LOS E Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER i Capacity (veh /h) 357 872 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.722 0.018 - HCM Control Delay (s) 37.4 9.2 0.1 HCM Lane LOS E A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 5.4 0.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/3/2014 1" t SB Grove Rd NB GroV(� Rd a �r MOVEMENT SUMMARY 17) Yelm Ave at Grove Rd Roundabout Site: Projected 2035 -Alt 1 South: NB Grove Rd 3 L 184 2.0 0.476 17.1 LOS C 2.7 67.5 0.71 8 T 74 2.0 0.476 10.3 LOS B 2.7 67.5 0.71 18 R 53 2.0 0.476 11.5 LOS B 2.7 67.5 0.71 Approach 311 2.0 0.476 14.5 LOS B 2.7 67.5 0.71 East: WB Yelm Ave 1 L 153 2.0 0.602 15.2 LOS C 5.7 145.0 0.75 6 T 684 2.0 0.602 8.3 LOS A 5.7 145.0 0.72 16 R 184 2.0 0.379 9.3 LOS A 2.5 63.1 0.64 Approach 1021 2.0 0.602 9.5 LOS A 5.7 145.0 0.71 North: SB Grove Rd 7 L 147 2.0 0.353 17.4 LOS C 2.0 51.9 0.80 4 T 68 2.0 0.353 10.6 LOS B 2.0 51.9 0.80 14 R 84 2.0 0.199 13.4 LOS B 0.9 23.7 0.75 Approach 300 2.0 0.353 14.7 LOS B 2.0 51.9 0.79 West: EB Yelm Ave 5 L 89 2.0 0.303 14.5 LOS B 1.9 48.5 0.60 2 T 489 2.0 0.303 7.5 LOS A 2.0 50.3 0.59 12 R 53 2.0 0.303 8.6 LOS A 2.0 50.3 0.59 Approach 632 2.0 0.303 8.6 LOS A 2.0 50.3 0.60 All Vehicles 2263 2.0 0.602 10.6 LOS B 5.7 145.0 0.69 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v /c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. SIDRA Standard Delay Model used. Processed: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 9:42:36 AM Copyright © 2000 -2011 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA INTERSECTION 5.1.13.2093 www.sidrasoIutions.com Project: N: \Projects \1470 Evergreen Pacific Fund, LLC \1470.01 Yelm Commercial EIS \Phase 01- Preliminary EIS \Traffic\Ope ration s\S id ra\Ye I m - Grove current rev 1.sip 8001450, SHEACARR JEWELL, SINGLE 0.99 27.5 0.87 30.0 0.90 29.7 0.94 28.4 0.85 29.0 0.71 30.7 0.72 31.0 0.73 30.5 0.97 27.4 0.89 29.7 0.89 28.7 0.93 28.2 0.83 29.2 0.62 31.4 0.68 31.4 0.66 31.0 0.77 30.0 SIDRA - -%. INTERSECTION HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Projected 2035 - AM 18: Y- 2c /Walmart Blvd & E Yelm Ave (SR 507) /SR -507 PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations --1. 0 .4--- t r t i t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 t r t r Volume (veh /h) 95 485 90 80 660 635 85 295 110 530 530 185 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1827 1832 1900 1863 1881 1881 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 100 511 95 84 695 668 89 311 116 558 558 195 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 4 4 2 1 1 2 2 2 0 2 0 Cap, veh /h 107 641 119 383 702 887 109 296 110 638 649 563 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.37 0.37 0.06 0.23 0.23 0.18 0.35 0.35 Sat Flow, veh /h 1740 2934 543 1774 1881 1599 1774 1295 483 3510 1863 1615 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 100 302 304 84 695 668 89 0 427 558 558 195 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /h /In 1740 1741 1737 1774 1881 1599 1774 0 1778 1755 1863 1615 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.1 14.7 14.9 3.5 33.0 7.4 4.5 0.0 20.5 13.9 25.0 8.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.1 14.7 14.9 3.5 33.0 7.4 4.5 0.0 20.5 13.9 25.0 8.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.31 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.27 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 107 380 379 383 702 887 109 0 406 638 649 563 V/C Ratio(X) 0.94 0.80 0.80 0.22 0.99 0.75 0.82 0.00 1.05 0.88 0.86 0.35 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 107 572 570 383 702 887 109 0 406 645 653 566 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 42.0 33.2 33.3 29.0 28.0 6.5 41.7 0.0 34.7 35.8 27.2 21.7 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 67.6 4.6 4.8 0.3 31.5 3.7 37.0 0.0 59.1 12.7 11.1 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 1/o),veh /In 4.4 7.5 7.6 1.7 23.1 11.1 3.3 0.0 16.6 7.9 14.9 3.6 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 109.6 37.8 38.1 29.3 59.5 10.2 78.7 0.0 93.8 48.5 38.3 22.0 LnGrp LOS F D D C E B E F D D C Approach Vol, veh /h 706 1447 516 1311 Approach Delay, s /veh 48.1 35.0 91.2 40.2 Approach LOS D C F D 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 19.8 24.0 22.9 23.1 9.0 34.8 9.0 37.0 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.5 20.5 9.5 29.5 5.5 31.5 5.5 33.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +ll), s 15.9 22.5 5.5 16.9 6.5 27.0 7.1 35.0 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.4 0.0 2.6 2.7 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary - HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 46.3 HCM 2010 LOS D Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/9/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2035 - AM 19: SR -507 & Walmart Access PM Peak Hour LtersectioM IL Int Delay, s /veh 2.8 Moveme EBL EBT WBT WB�ftllllll SBL SBR Vol, veh /h 50 1130 1290 160 85 85 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 150 - 350 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 53 1189 1358 168 89 89 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1358 0 0 2058 679 Stage 1 - - - 1358 - Stage 2 - 700 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 6.82 6.92 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.82 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.82 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.22 3.51 3.31 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 502 -48 396 Stage 1 - 206 - Stage 2 456 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 502 -43 396 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 142 - Stage 1 206 Stage 2 - 408 Approach WB HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 0 41.3 HCM LOS E Minor Lane /Major Mvmt j EBL EBT WBT WBR &BLn1 dh Capacity (veh /h) 502 142 396 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.105 0.63 0.226 HCM Control Delay (s) 13 65.9 16.7 HCM Lane LOS B F C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 3.4 0.9 Notes 0 -: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/3/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 1: E Yelm Ave (SR 510) & Burnett Rd PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 0.8 Moveme SBL SBR 1032 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver NWT NWR Vol, veh /h 30 1 5 725 475 40 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None SET SBLn1 None None Storage Length 0 0.005 - HCM Control Delay (s) Veh in Median Storage, # 0 HCM Lane LOS 0 0 HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) Grade, % 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 32 1 5 763 500 42 Major /Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1295 521 542 0 0 Stage 1 521 - - - - Stage 2 774 - - Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.11 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.209 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 181 559 1032 Stage 1 600 - - Stage 2 458 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 180 559 1032 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 180 - - Stage 1 600 Stage 2 454 Approach SB SE NW HCM Control Delay, s 28.7 0.1 0 HCM LOS D Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NWT NWR SEL SET SBLn1 Capacity (veh /h) 1032 184 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 0.177 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.5 0 28.7 HCM Lane LOS A A D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.6 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Projected 2020 - Alt 3 2: Tahoma Blvd /Killion Rd & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations + r + r Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations + r + r Volume (veh /h) 5 795 45 30 575 45 25 10 65 15 5 5 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1881 1881 1881 1881 1881 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 5 837 47 32 605 47 26 11 68 16 5 5 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh /h 10 1073 912 52 1024 80 45 140 119 29 57 57 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.57 0.57 0.03 0.59 0.59 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.02 0.06 0.06 Sat Flow, veh /h 1792 1881 1599 1792 1724 134 1810 1900 1615 1810 873 873 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 5 837 47 32 0 652 26 11 68 16 0 10 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /h /In 1792 1881 1599 1792 0 1858 1810 1900 1615 1810 0 1746 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 15.5 0.6 0.8 0.0 9.9 0.6 0.2 1.8 0.4 0.0 0.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 15.5 0.6 0.8 0.0 9.9 0.6 0.2 1.8 0.4 0.0 0.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 10 1073 912 52 0 1104 45 140 119 29 0 113 V/C Ratio(X) 0.52 0.78 0.05 0.61 0.00 0.59 0.58 0.08 0.57 0.55 0.00 0.09 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 179 1274 1083 179 0 1258 181 696 592 181 0 640 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 22.3 7.5 4.3 21.6 0.0 5.7 21.7 19.4 20.2 22.0 0.0 19.8 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 37.0 2.7 0.0 10.9 0.0 0.6 11.5 0.2 4.3 15.1 0.0 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 1/o),veh /In 0.2 8.7 0.3 0.5 0.0 5.1 0.5 0.1 0.9 0.3 0.0 0.1 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 59.4 10.2 4.3 32.5 0.0 6.3 33.2 19.7 24.5 37.1 0.0 20.1 LnGrp LOS E B A C A C B C D C Approach Vol, veh /h 889 684 105 26 Approach Delay, s /veh 10.1 7.5 26.1 30.6 Approach LOS B A C C 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 3.7 30.2 4.2 6.8 4.8 29.2 4.6 6.4 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.5 30.5 4.5 16.5 4.5 30.5 4.5 16.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +ll), s 2.1 11.9 2.4 3.8 2.8 17.5 2.6 2.2 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 10.4 0.0 0.2 0.0 8.2 0.0 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 10.4 HCM 2010 LOS B Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 I Berry Valley Rd /Cullens St & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 1.2 Moveme SEL SET SER I NWLI NWT NWR NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 20 885 5 5 655 15 5 1 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - HCM LOS None - None E None Storage Length 150 NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 150 Capacity (veh /h) 108 735 898 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0 0.023 0.148 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 21 932 5 5 689 16 5 1 5 Major /Minor Major1 Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 705 0 0 937 0 0 1697 1692 934 Stage 1 - - - - - - 976 976 - Stage 2 - - 721 716 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 4.11 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.209 2.209 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 898 735 74 94 325 Stage 1 - - 305 332 - Stage 2 422 437 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 898 735 66 91 325 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 66 91 - Stage 1 298 324 Stage 2 394 434 Approach SE NW HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0.1 42.3 HCM LOS E Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 SWL0 Capacity (veh /h) 108 735 898 71 252 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.107 0.007 0.023 0.148 0.104 HCM Control Delay (s) 42.3 9.9 9.1 64.3 20.9 HCM Lane LOS E A A F C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 0.1 0.5 0.3 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 I Berry Valley Rd /Cullens St & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SWL SWT SWR Vol, veh /h 10 5 20 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None Storage Length 100 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 11 5 21 Major /Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1687 1687 697 Stage 1 708 708 - Stage 2 979 979 - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 75 95 444 Stage 1 429 441 - Stage 2 304 331 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 71 92 444 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 71 92 - Stage 1 419 438 Stage 2 291 323 Approach SW HCM Control Delay, s 33.3 HCM LOS D Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 4: Longmire St & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour rsectio Int Delay, s /veh 2.2 Moveme SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 5 840 15 60 655 10 10 5 40 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - 40.1 None - None None Storage Length 150 NEW NWL 200 SER SWLn1 Capacity (veh /h) 159 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - 0 0.364 0.083 0 0.175 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 884 16 63 689 11 11 5 42 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 = Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 700 0 0 900 0 0 1729 1729 892 Stage 1 - - - - - - 903 903 - Stage 2 - - 826 826 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 4.11 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.209 2.209 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 902 759 69 88 341 Stage 1 - - 332 356 - Stage 2 366 387 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 902 759 60 80 341 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 60 80 - Stage 1 330 354 Stage 2 327 355 Approach SE NW HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.8 40.1 HCM LOS E Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NEW NWL NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 Capacity (veh /h) 159 759 902 90 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.364 0.083 0.006 0.175 HCM Control Delay (s) 40.1 10.2 9 53.3 HCM Lane LOS E B A F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.5 0.3 0 0.6 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 4: Longmire St & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour rsectio Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SWL SWT SWR Vol, veh /h 5 5 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 5 5 5 Major /Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1747 1732 695 Stage 1 821 821 - Stage 2 926 911 - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 68 89 446 Stage 1 371 391 - Stage 2 325 356 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 53 81 446 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 53 81 - Stage 1 369 359 Stage 2 279 354 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 53.3 HCM LOS F Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 5: 1st St & Mosman Ave PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh 4.6 Moveme SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 15 10 140 35 5 25 35 455 25 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized 32.7 None 0.6 HCM LOS None None Storage Length Minor Lane /Major Mvmt + NEL NET NER NWLn1 JFELn1 SWL SWT SWR Capacity (veh /h) Veh in Median Storage, # 0 476 1065 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.032 0 0.347 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Mvmt Flow 16 11 147 37 5 26 37 479 26 Major /Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Conflicting Flow All 1035 1032 411 1098 1024 492 416 0 0 Stage 453 453 - 566 566 - - - - Stage 2 582 579 - 532 458 - - Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 209 232 639 189 234 575 1138 Stage 584 568 - 507 506 - - Stage 2 497 499 529 565 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 185 216 639 133 218 575 1138 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 185 216 - 133 218 - - Stage 1 558 553 484 483 Stage 2 448 477 389 550 - Approach SE HCM Control Delay, s 16.8 32.7 0.6 HCM LOS C D Minor Lane /Major Mvmt + NEL NET NER NWLn1 JFELn1 SWL SWT SWR Capacity (veh /h) 1138 197 476 1065 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.032 - 0.347 0.365 0.02 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.3 0 32.7 16.8 8.4 0 HCM Lane LOS A A D C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 1.5 1.7 0.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 5: 1st St & Mosman Ave PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SWL SWT SWR Vol, veh /h 20 385 10 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 21 405 11 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 505 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.209 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1065 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1065 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SW HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Projected 2020 - Alt 3 6: 1st St & E Yelm Ave (SR 507)/E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations + r Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations + r Volume (veh /h) 50 615 65 275 590 25 140 95 280 50 100 60 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1881 1881 1881 1863 1863 1900 1845 1845 1900 1845 1845 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 53 647 68 289 621 26 147 100 295 53 105 63 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 Cap, veh /h 69 732 622 322 945 40 287 98 288 68 125 75 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.39 0.39 0.18 0.53 0.53 0.16 0.24 0.24 0.04 0.12 0.12 Sat Flow, veh /h 1792 1881 1599 1774 1775 74 1757 413 1217 1757 1081 649 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 53 647 68 289 0 647 147 0 395 53 0 168 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /h /In 1792 1881 1599 1774 0 1850 1757 0 1630 1757 0 1730 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.4 37.3 1.9 18.5 0.0 29.3 8.9 0.0 27.5 3.5 0.0 11.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.4 37.3 1.9 18.5 0.0 29.3 8.9 0.0 27.5 3.5 0.0 11.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.38 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 69 732 622 322 0 984 287 0 385 68 0 200 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.88 0.11 0.90 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 1.03 0.78 0.00 0.84 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 145 800 680 450 0 1106 287 0 385 83 0 282 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 55.5 33.1 8.3 46.6 0.0 19.6 44.5 0.0 44.4 55.5 0.0 50.4 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 16.6 10.9 0.1 16.0 0.0 1.2 1.5 0.0 52.5 31.2 0.0 14.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 1/o),veh /In 2.0 21.6 1.3 10.5 0.0 15.2 4.5 0.0 17.9 2.3 0.0 6.1 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 72.0 44.0 8.4 62.6 0.0 20.8 46.0 0.0 97.0 86.6 0.0 64.5 LnGrp LOS E D A E C D F F E Approach Vol, veh /h 768 936 542 221 Approach Delay, s /veh 42.8 33.7 83.2 69.8 Approach LOS D C F E 6 7 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 9.0 66.4 9.0 32.0 25.6 49.8 23.5 17.5 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.4 69.6 5.5 27.5 29.5 49.5 14.5 19.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +ll), s 5.4 31.3 5.5 29.5 20.5 39.3 10.9 13.1 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 11.7 0.0 0.0 0.6 6.0 1.1 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 50.6 HCM 2010 LOS D Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 AWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 7: 1 st St & West Rd /Stevens St PM Peak Hour �tersectioi I Intersection Delay, s /veh 16.8 Intersection LOS C Movement SEU SEL SET SER NWU NWL NWT NWR NEU NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 0 100 280 50 0 25 135 75 0 35 130 30 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 0 2 3 3 3 2 4 4 4 Mvmt Flow 0 105 295 53 0 26 142 79 0 37 137 32 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 Approach Cc NW Opposing Approach NW SE SW Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 1 Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 1 HCM Control Delay 22.4 13.6 12.8 HCM LOS C B B NELn2 NWLn1 SEW SWLn1 SWLn Vol Left, % 100% 0% 11% 23% 100% 0% Vol Thru, % 0% 81% 57% 65% 0% 65% Vol Right, % 0% 19% 32% 12% 0% 35% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 35 160 235 430 40 170 LT Vol 0 130 135 280 0 110 Through Vol 0 30 75 50 0 60 RT Vol 35 0 25 100 40 0 Lane Flow Rate 37 168 247 453 42 179 Geometry Grp 7 7 2 2 7 7 Degree of Util (X) 0.079 0.33 0.421 0.719 0.09 0.344 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.698 7.049 6.123 5.85 7.686 6.918 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 467 512 589 620 467 521 Service Time 5.423 4.774 4.152 3.85 5.41 4.642 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.079 0.328 0.419 0.731 0.09 0.344 HCM Control Delay 11.1 13.2 13.6 22.4 11.2 13.2 HCM Lane LOS B B B C B B HCM 95th -tile Q 0.3 1.4 2.1 6 0.3 1.5 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 AWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 7: 1 st St & West Rd /Stevens St PM Peak Hour kjtersectioi� Intersection Delay, s /veh Intersection LOS Movement WU SWL SWT SWR Vol, veh /h 0 40 110 60 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 5 5 5 Mvmt Flow 0 42 116 63 Number of Lanes 0 1 1 0 Approach SW Opposing Approach NE Opposing Lanes 2 Conflicting Approach Left NW Conflicting Lanes Left 1 Conflicting Approach Right SE Conflicting Lanes Right 1 HCM Control Delay 12.8 HCM LOS B Lane Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 8: 1st St & Railway Rd PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 2.8 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 1 5 5 90 5 5 5 190 110 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized 0.1 HCM LOS None None None Storage Length NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) 1441 625 Veh in Median Storage, # 1222 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 0 0.019 0.197 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 5 5 5 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 5 5 95 5 5 5 200 116 Major /Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Conflicting Flow All 424 476 139 423 421 258 142 0 0 Stage 1 150 150 - 268 268 - - - - Stage 2 274 326 - 155 153 - - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.15 6.55 6.25 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.15 5.55 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.15 5.55 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.545 4.045 3.345 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 544 491 915 536 519 773 1441 Stage 857 777 - 731 682 - - Stage 2 736 652 840 765 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 533 487 915 525 515 773 1441 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 533 487 - 525 515 - - Stage 1 854 774 728 679 Stage 2 722 649 826 762 Approach EB NB HCM Control Delay, s 10.9 13.4 0.1 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) 1441 625 533 1222 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - 0.019 0.197 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 10.9 13.4 8 0 HCM Lane LOS A A B B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.1 0.7 0 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 8: 1st St & Railway Rd PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 5 130 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 6 6 Mvmt Flow 5 137 5 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 316 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.16 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.254 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1222 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1222 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Projected 2020 - Alt 3 9: Clark Rd & E Yelm Ave (SR 507) PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations Volume (veh /h) 25 1025 10 80 975 20 10 5 80 20 5 25 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1881 1881 1900 1881 1881 1900 1881 1881 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 26 1079 11 84 1026 21 11 5 84 21 5 26 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 Cap, veh /h 354 1372 14 339 1386 28 180 8 141 129 25 129 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.74 0.74 0.04 0.75 0.75 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 Sat Flow, veh /h 1792 1859 19 1792 1837 38 1386 91 1522 1329 267 1388 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 26 0 1090 84 0 1047 11 0 89 21 0 31 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /h /In 1792 0 1878 1792 0 1875 1386 0 1613 1329 0 1655 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.3 0.0 34.5 1.0 0.0 29.5 0.7 0.0 5.0 1.5 0.0 1.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.3 0.0 34.5 1.0 0.0 29.5 2.3 0.0 5.0 6.5 0.0 1.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.02 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.84 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 354 0 1386 339 0 1415 180 0 150 129 0 154 V/C Ratio(X) 0.07 0.00 0.79 0.25 0.00 0.74 0.06 0.00 0.59 0.16 0.00 0.20 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 401 0 1826 356 0 1823 278 0 263 222 0 270 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 7.1 0.0 7.8 10.0 0.0 6.5 41.0 0.0 41.4 44.5 0.0 39.9 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 0.1 0.0 1.7 0.4 0.0 1.2 0.1 0.0 3.7 0.6 0.0 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 1/o),veh /In 0.2 0.0 18.2 1.0 0.0 15.3 0.3 0.0 2.4 0.6 0.0 0.8 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 7.2 0.0 9.5 10.3 0.0 7.7 41.1 0.0 45.1 45.1 0.0 40.5 LnGrp LOS A A B A D D D D Approach Vol, veh /h 1116 1131 100 52 Approach Delay, s /veh 9.4 7.9 44.7 42.4 Approach LOS A A D D ILJ 2 Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 13.3 7.1 74.7 13.3 5.5 76.3 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 4.5 3.5 4.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.5 4.5 92.5 15.5 4.5 92.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +ll), s 7.0 3.0 36.5 8.5 2.3 31.5 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.4 0.0 33.8 0.3 0.0 35.4 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 10.9 HCM 2010 LOS B Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 10: E Yelm Ave (SR 507) & 103rd Ave PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 2.7 Moveme SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 65 1100 1 5 1060 10 5 1 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - 215.4 None - None None Storage Length 100 NELn1 NWL NWT NWR 50 SER SWLn1 SWLn2 Capacity (veh /h) 27 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 250 - 0 0.429 0.009 0 0.316 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 68 1158 1 5 1116 11 5 1 5 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 w Min Conflicting Flow All 1126 0 0 1159 0 0 2427 2432 1158 Stage - - - - - - 1295 1295 - Stage 2 - - 1132 1137 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.11 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 2.209 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 620 606 22 32 241 Stage 1 - - 202 235 - Stage 2 249 279 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 620 606 14 28 241 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 14 28 - Stage 1 180 209 Stage 2 179 277 Approach SE NW HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 0.1 215.4 HCM LOS F Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 SWLn2 Capacity (veh /h) 27 606 620 20 250 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.429 0.009 0.11 0.316 0.274 HCM Control Delay (s) 215.4 11 11.5 253 24.7 HCM Lane LOS F B B F C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.3 0 0.4 0.9 1.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 10: E Yelm Ave (SR 507) & 103rd Ave PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SWL SWT SWR Vol, veh /h 5 1 65 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None Storage Length 75 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 Mvmt Flow 5 1 68 Major /Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 2430 2428 1121 Stage 1132 1132 - Stage 2 1298 1296 - Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 22 32 250 Stage 1 246 277 - Stage 2 198 231 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 19 28 250 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 19 28 - Stage 1 219 275 Stage 2 172 206 Approach SW HCM Control Delay, s 44 HCM LOS E Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 11: 103rd Ave SE & West Rd PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh 14.9 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 60 95 10 5 40 180 5 10 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized 12 None None B None Storage Length NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBI Capacity (veh /h) 538 1348 Veh in Median Storage, # 566 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 0.047 - 0.004 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 63 100 11 5 42 189 5 11 5 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Min Conflicting Flow All 232 0 0 111 0 0 419 474 105 Stage 1 - - - - - 232 232 - Stage 2 - - 187 242 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.12 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.2 2.218 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1348 1479 548 492 955 Stage 1 - - 775 716 - Stage 2 819 709 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1348 1479 476 466 955 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 476 466 - Stage 1 736 680 Stage 2 743 706 Approach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 2.8 0.2 12 HCM LOS B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBI Capacity (veh /h) 538 1348 1479 566 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.039 0.047 - 0.004 - 0.753 HCM Control Delay (s) 12 7.8 0 7.4 0 28.2 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 0 6.6 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 11: 103rd Ave SE & West Rd PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 330 25 50 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 347 26 53 Major /Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 386 384 137 Stage 1 147 147 - Stage 2 239 237 - Critical Hdwy 7.11 6.51 6.21 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.11 5.51 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.11 5.51 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.509 4.009 3.309 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 574 551 914 Stage 1 858 777 - Stage 2 767 711 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 538 521 914 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 538 521 - Stage 1 815 774 Stage 2 713 675 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 28.2 HCM LOS D Minor Lane /Major Mvmt - Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 12: NE Creek St & 103rd Ave SE PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh 3.3 Moveme EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh /h 220 155 70 165 45 100 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized 13.2 None None - None Storage Length j NBLn1 =EBR jWBL i WBT - 0 592 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - 8.3 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 1 1 0 0 Mvmt Flow 232 163 74 174 47 105 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Min Conflicting Flow All 0 0 395 0 634 313 Stage 1 - - - - 313 - Stage 2 - 321 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.4 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.209 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1169 446 732 Stage 1 - 746 - Stage 2 740 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1169 415 732 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 415 - Stage 1 746 Stage 2 - 688 Approach WB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.5 13.2 HCM LOS B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt j NBLn1 =EBR jWBL i WBT Capacity (veh /h) 592 1169 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.258 0.063 - HCM Control Delay (s) 13.2 8.3 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 0.2 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 AWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 13: Grove Rd SE & 103rd Ave SE PM Peak Hour �tersectioi I Intersection Delay, s /veh 12.7 Intersection LOS B Movement EBL � EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NB U NBL ` NBT+ NBR 0 Vol, veh /h 0 110 200 25 0 5 115 115 0 35 100 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 116 211 26 0 5 121 121 0 37 105 5 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB Opposing Approach WB EB SB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 14.6 11.5 11 HCM LOS B B B IF NBLr&EBL WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 25% 33% 2% 41% Vol Thru, % 71% 60% 49% 23% Vol Right, % 4% 7% 49% 36% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 140 335 235 220 LT Vol 100 200 115 50 Through Vol 5 25 115 80 RT Vol 35 110 5 90 Lane Flow Rate 147 353 247 232 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.245 0.532 0.367 0.365 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.997 5.432 5.341 5.669 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 595 659 670 632 Service Time 4.072 3.49 3.404 3.734 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.247 0.536 0.369 0.367 HCM Control Delay 11 14.6 11.5 12 HCM Lane LOS B B B B HCM 95th -tile Q 1 3.2 1.7 1.7 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 AWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 13: Grove Rd SE & 103rd Ave SE PM Peak Hour kjtersectioi� Intersection Delay, s /veh Intersection LOS Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 0 90 50 80 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 95 53 84 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 Approach SB Opposing Approach NB Opposing Lanes 1 Conflicting Approach Left WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 Conflicting Approach Right EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 HCM Control Delay 12 HCM LOS B Lane Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 14: Walmart Blvd & 103rd Ave SE PM Peak Hour kitersectiom - Int Delay, s /veh 5.2 Moveme EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh /h 10 250 10 15 215 15 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None HCM Control Delay, s None - None Storage Length HCM LOS - 0 B Veh in Median Storage, # 0 EBT EBR WBL 0 0 Capacity (veh /h) Grade, % 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 10 10 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 263 11 16 226 16 Major /Minor MajorL= Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 274 0 179 142 Stage 1 - - - - 142 - Stage 2 - 37 - Critical Hdwy 4.2 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.29 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1244 811 906 Stage 1 - 885 - Stage 2 985 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1244 804 906 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 804 - Stage 1 885 Stage 2 976 Approach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0 3.2 11.3 HCM LOS B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh /h) 810 1244 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.299 0.008 - HCM Control Delay (s) 11.3 7.9 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.3 0 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Projected 2020 - Alt 3 15: Bald Hills Rd /NE Creek St & E Yelm Ave (SR 507) PM Peak Hour � � i Movement EB BR WBL WBT WBRl NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + r + r Vii + r Volume (vph) 20 545 295 140 725 55 215 90 105 100 190 60 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 11 12 16 16 14 14 10 13 13 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 3.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.6 3.6 4.4 4.4 4.9 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1845 1568 1694 1845 1777 1986 1809 1652 1925 1636 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 1845 1568 1694 1845 1777 1986 1809 1652 1925 1636 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 21 574 311 147 763 58 226 95 111 105 200 63 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 46 0 0 28 0 37 0 0 0 54 Lane Group Flow (vph) 21 574 265 147 763 30 226 169 0 105 200 9 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Prot NA pm +ov Prot NA Perm Split NA Split NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 3 5 2 3 3 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 2.4 47.1 63.0 12.4 57.1 57.1 15.9 15.9 16.1 16.1 16.1 Effective Green, g (s) 2.9 47.7 64.2 12.9 57.7 57.7 16.8 16.8 16.6 16.6 16.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.43 0.58 0.12 0.52 0.52 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.9 4.9 4.9 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 46 800 915 198 967 932 303 276 249 290 239 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.31 0.04 0.09 c0.41 c0.11 0.09 0.06 c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 0.02 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.46 0.72 0.29 0.74 0.79 0.03 0.75 0.61 0.42 0.69 0.04 Uniform Delay, d1 52.8 25.6 11.5 46.9 21.2 12.6 44.6 43.5 42.3 44.3 40.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5.2 5.5 0.1 13.3 6.5 0.1 9.1 3.4 0.8 6.1 0.0 Delay (s) 57.9 31.1 11.6 60.2 27.7 12.7 53.7 46.9 43.2 50.4 40.4 Level of Service E C B E C B D D D D D Approach Delay (s) 25.0 31.8 50.5 46.6 Approach LOS C C D D Phtersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 34.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 16: Morris Rd SE & Bald Hills Rd PM Peak Hour LtersectioM - Int Delay, s /veh 3.2 Moveme SET SER F NWLI NWT NEL NER Vol, veh /h 455 185 15 260 135 15 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized 21.7 None None - None Storage Length NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER - 0 371 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 9 0.1 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 3 3 1 1 Mvmt Flow 479 195 16 274 142 16 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 674 0 744 576 Stage 1 - - - - 576 - Stage 2 - 168 - Critical Hdwy 4.13 6.615 6.215 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.415 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.815 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.227 3.5095 3.3095 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 912 368 518 Stage 1 - 564 - Stage 2 848 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 912 360 518 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 360 - Stage 1 564 Stage 2 830 Approach SE NW HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.6 21.7 HCM LOS C Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER Capacity (veh /h) 371 912 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.426 0.017 - HCM Control Delay (s) 21.7 9 0.1 HCM Lane LOS C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.1 0.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 1" t SB Grove Rd NB GroV(� Rd a �r MOVEMENT SUMMARY 17) Yelm Ave at Grove Rd Roundabout Site: Projected 2020 -Alt 3 South: NB Grove Rd 3 L 26 2.0 0.100 16.6 LOS C 0.4 9.6 0.61 8 T 5 2.0 0.100 9.7 LOS A 0.4 9.6 0.61 18 R 21 2.0 0.100 10.9 LOS B 0.4 9.6 0.61 Approach 53 2.0 0.100 13.6 LOS B 0.4 9.6 0.61 East: WB Yelm Ave 1 L 26 2.0 0.525 13.0 LOS B 4.4 111.2 0.40 6 T 916 2.0 0.525 6.1 LOS A 4.4 111.2 0.38 16 R 147 2.0 0.331 7.4 LOS A 2.1 53.5 0.35 Approach 1089 2.0 0.525 6.5 LOS A 4.4 111.2 0.38 North: SB Grove Rd 7 L 84 2.0 0.144 16.4 LOS C 0.6 16.3 0.66 4 T 5 2.0 0.144 9.6 LOS A 0.6 16.3 0.66 14 R 79 2.0 0.134 11.3 LOS B 0.6 14.8 0.66 Approach 168 2.0 0.144 13.8 LOS B 0.6 16.3 0.66 West: EB Yelm Ave 5 L 68 2.0 0.341 12.9 LOS B 2.4 59.9 0.37 2 T 742 2.0 0.341 6.1 LOS A 2.4 59.9 0.37 12 R 21 2.0 0.341 7.4 LOS A 2.1 54.0 0.37 Approach 832 2.0 0.341 6.7 LOS A 2.4 59.9 0.37 All Vehicles 2142 2.0 0.525 7.3 LOS A 4.4 111.2 0.40 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v /c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. SIDRA Standard Delay Model used. Processed: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 9:39:23 AM Copyright © 2000 -2011 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA INTERSECTION 5.1.13.2093 www.sidrasoIutions.com Project: N: \Projects \1470 Evergreen Pacific Fund, LLC \1470.01 Yelm Commercial EIS \Phase 01- Preliminary EIS \Traffic\Ope ration s\S id ra\Ye I m - Grove current rev 1.sip 8001450, SHEACARR JEWELL, SINGLE 0.92 27.8 0.76 30.5 0.80 30.1 0.86 28.9 0.80 30.0 0.48 32.5 0.56 32.2 0.49 32.4 0.89 27.7 0.77 30.3 0.83 30.1 0.86 28.8 0.80 29.9 0.48 32.6 0.57 32.2 0.51 32.3 0.54 32.0 SIDRA - -%. INTERSECTION HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Projected 2020 - Alt 3 18: Y- 2c /Walmart Blvd & SR -507 PM Peak Hour --I. -4- t i Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 t t r Volume (veh /h) 110 615 50 50 875 115 60 15 30 210 15 75 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1827 1827 1900 1881 1881 1900 1881 1881 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 116 647 53 53 921 121 63 16 32 221 16 79 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 Cap, veh /h 148 1492 122 73 1319 173 81 42 84 291 360 306 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.46 0.46 0.04 0.42 0.42 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.16 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh /h 1740 3250 266 1792 3177 417 1792 561 1122 1774 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 116 345 355 53 518 524 63 0 48 221 16 79 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /h /In 1740 1736 1780 1792 1787 1808 1792 0 1683 1774 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.5 7.2 7.2 1.6 12.8 12.8 1.9 0.0 1.5 6.4 0.4 2.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.5 7.2 7.2 1.6 12.8 12.8 1.9 0.0 1.5 6.4 0.4 2.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.23 1.00 0.67 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 148 797 817 73 742 750 81 0 126 291 360 306 V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.43 0.43 0.73 0.70 0.70 0.77 0.00 0.38 0.76 0.04 0.26 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 211 859 881 218 885 895 218 0 519 547 922 784 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 24.0 9.8 9.8 25.4 12.9 12.9 25.3 0.0 23.6 21.4 17.6 18.3 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 11.7 0.4 0.4 12.8 1.9 1.9 14.3 0.0 1.9 4.1 0.1 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 1/o),veh /In 2.2 3.4 3.5 1.0 6.6 6.7 1.2 0.0 0.7 3.5 0.2 1.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 35.7 10.1 10.1 38.2 14.8 14.8 39.6 0.0 25.5 25.5 17.6 18.8 LnGrp LOS D B B D B B D C C B B Approach Vol, veh /h 816 1095 111 316 Approach Delay, s /veh 13.8 15.9 33.5 23.4 Approach LOS B B C C 4 5 6 7 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 12.3 7.5 5.7 28.1 5.9 13.8 8.0 25.7 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.5 16.5 6.5 26.5 6.5 26.5 6.5 26.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +ll), s 8.4 3.5 3.6 9.2 3.9 4.3 5.5 14.8 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.4 0.4 0.0 9.7 0.0 0.5 0.0 7.4 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 17.0 HCM 2010 LOS B Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 19: SR -507 & Walmart Driveway Access PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 2.3 Moveme EBL EBT ! WBT WB� SBL SBR Vol, veh /h 45 840 970 140 75 75 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 150 - SBLn 350 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 47 884 1021 147 79 79 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1021 0 0 2000 1021 Stage 1 - - - 1021 - Stage 2 - 979 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.41 6.21 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.41 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.41 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 3.509 3.309 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 680 -66 288 Stage 1 - 349 - Stage 2 366 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 680 -61 288 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 185 - Stage 1 349 Stage 2 341 Approach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0.5 0 30.2 HCM LOS D Minor Lane /Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn Capacity (veh /h) 680 185 288 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.07 0.427 0.274 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.7 38.2 22.2 HCM Lane LOS B E C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 1.9 1.1 Notes -: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 20: Grove Rd SE & Parcel A North Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM - Int Delay, s /veh 2.3 Moveme WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Vol, veh /h 55 10 120 50 5 65 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None SBL SBT None None Storage Length 0 0.089 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 HCM Lane LOS 0 B A A 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 58 11 126 53 5 68 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 232 153 0 0 179 0 Stage 1 153 - - - - - Stage 2 79 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 756 893 1397 Stage 1 875 - - Stage 2 944 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 753 893 1397 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 753 - - Stage 1 875 Stage 2 940 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.1 0 0.5 HCM LOS B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBT NBR WBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh /h) 772 1397 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.089 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.1 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 21: Grove Rd SE & Parcel A South Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 1.8 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 1 1 1 50 1 5 1 165 50 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized 0 HCM LOS None - None None Storage Length NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 0 SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) 1471 673 Veh in Median Storage, # 1342 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0 0.005 0.091 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 1 1 53 1 5 1 174 53 Major /Minor Minorl Ma� Conflicting Flow All 332 355 116 330 329 200 117 0 0 Stage 127 127 - 202 202 - - - - Stage 2 205 228 - 128 127 - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 621 571 936 623 590 841 1471 Stage 1 877 791 - 800 734 - - Stage 2 797 715 876 791 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 614 568 936 619 587 841 1471 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 614 568 - 619 587 - - Stage 1 876 788 799 733 Stage 2 790 714 870 788 Approach "m NB HCM Control Delay, s 10.4 11.2 0 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) 1471 673 634 1342 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - 0.005 0.091 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 10.4 11.2 7.7 0 HCM Lane LOS A A B B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 0.3 0 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 21: Grove Rd SE & Parcel A South Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 5 110 1 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 116 1 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 226 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1342 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1342 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 22: Parcel D Driveway & E Yelm Ave (SR 507) PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 12.5 Moveme EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh /h 730 45 70 905 55 65 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized 188.7 None None - None Storage Length NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT - 0 114 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - 9.9 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 768 47 74 953 58 68 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 816 0 1892 792 Stage 1 - - - - 792 - Stage 2 - 1100 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 812 77 389 Stage 1 - 446 - Stage 2 319 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 812 62 389 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 62 - Stage 1 446 Stage 2 257 Approach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.7 188.7 HCM LOS F Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh /h) 114 812 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.108 0.091 - HCM Control Delay (s) 188.7 9.9 0 HCM Lane LOS F A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 7.7 0.3 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 23: E Yelm Ave (SR 507) & Parcel B Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 0.9 Moveme EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh /h 25 790 1010 20 20 30 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 50 - 0.271 0 10.9 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 D 0 HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 26 832 1063 21 21 32 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1084 0 0 1542 542 Stage 1 - - - 1074 - Stage 2 - 468 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.84 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.22 3.52 3.32 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 639 106 485 Stage 1 - 289 - Stage 2 597 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 639 102 485 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 102 - Stage 1 289 Stage 2 - 573 Approach WB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 0 30.3 HCM LOS D Minor Lane /Major Mvmt EBL EBT wBT wBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh /h) 639 194 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.041 0.271 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.9 30.3 HCM Lane LOS B D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 1.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 24: Parcel F Driveway /Parcel C Driveway & E Yelm Ave (SR 507) PM Peak Hour rsectio Int Delay, s /veh 12.2 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 65 700 40 30 910 55 45 5 25 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - HCM LOS None None Storage Length 50 Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 50 EBT EBR WBL Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 91 - 0 144 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 68 737 42 32 958 58 47 5 26 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 1016 0 0 779 0 0 1440 1974 389 Stage 1 - - - - - - 895 895 - Stage 2 - - 545 1079 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 4.14 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.54 5.54 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.22 2.22 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 678 834 93 61 610 Stage 1 - - 302 357 - Stage 2 490 293 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 678 834 65 53 610 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 65 53 - Stage 1 272 321 Stage 2 386 282 Approach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0.9 0.3 142.6 HCM LOS F Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL Capacity (veh /h) 91 678 834 144 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.868 0.101 0.038 0.877 HCM Control Delay (s) 142.6 10.9 9.5 105.5 HCM Lane LOS F B A F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 4.7 0.3 0.1 5.9 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 24: Parcel F Driveway /Parcel C Driveway & E Yelm Ave (SR 507) PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s /veh Movement Vol, veh /h Conflicting Peds, # /hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow SBL SBT SBR 35 5 80 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop 0 Major /Minor 0 0 95 95 95 2 2 2 37 5 84 Major /Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1558 1966 508 Stage 1 1050 1050 - Stage 2 508 916 - Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 76 62 510 Stage 243 302 - Stage 2 516 349 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 60 54 510 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 60 54 - Stage 1 219 290 Stage 2 437 314 Approach SIB HCM Control Delay, s 105.5 HCM LOS F Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 25: Walmart Blvd & Parcel C Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 2.1 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 20 5 15 10 5 25 15 210 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - HCM Control Delay, s None - None Storage Length 100 0.5 50 B 50 B Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Minor Lane /Major Mvmt - 0 NBR EBLn1 - 0 WBLn2 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 21 5 16 11 5 26 16 221 5 Major /Minor Minor2 0.1 0.1 Minorl 0 Majorl Conflicting Flow All 587 574 274 581 576 224 279 0 0 Stage 316 316 - 255 255 - - - - Stage 2 271 258 - 326 321 - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 421 429 765 425 428 815 1284 Stage 1 695 655 - 749 696 - - Stage 2 735 694 687 652 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 395 417 765 403 416 815 1284 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 395 417 - 403 416 - - Stage 1 686 645 740 687 Stage 2 697 685 657 642 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 12.8 11.4 0.5 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLnl WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) 1284 395 633 403 703 1342 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 0.053 0.033 0.026 0.045 0.016 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 14.6 10.9 14.2 10.4 7.7 HCM Lane LOS A B B B B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 25: Walmart Blvd & Parcel C Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 20 255 10 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized - None Storage Length 100 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 21 268 11 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 226 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1342 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1342 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.5 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 26: Walmart Blvd & Parcel C South Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 2.5 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 0 0 15 50 0 50 0 220 50 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized Minor Lane /Major Mvmt None NBT NBR EBLn1 None SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) None Storage Length 765 536 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.021 0.196 0.021 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 - 13.4 0 HCM Lane LOS A 0 A Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 16 53 0 53 0 232 53 Major /Minor Minor2 Minorl Maj - Conflicting Flow All 610 610 274 584 590 258 279 0 0 Stage 326 326 - 258 258 - - - - Stage 2 284 284 - 326 332 - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 407 409 765 423 420 781 1284 Stage 1 687 648 - 747 694 - - Stage 2 723 676 687 644 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 374 401 765 408 411 781 1284 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 374 401 - 408 411 - - Stage 1 687 635 747 694 Stage 2 674 676 659 631 Approach EB -W NB HCM Control Delay, s 9.8 13.4 0 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLnl SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) 1284 765 536 1278 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.021 0.196 0.021 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 9.8 13.4 7.9 HCM Lane LOS A A B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.1 0.7 0.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 26: Walmart Blvd & Parcel C South Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme BT SBR Vol, veh /h 25 255 10 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized - None Storage Length 50 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 26 268 11 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 284 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1278 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1278 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 27: Y -2c & Parcel G North Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 3.4 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 30 1 1 1 1 25 1 55 1 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized Minor Lane /Major Mvmt None NBT NBR EBLn1 None - Capacity (veh /h) None Storage Length 719 977 1545 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 50 0.029 0.02 Veh in Median Storage, # 7.4 0 10.3 8.8 0 HCM Lane LOS - 0 B Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 32 1 1 1 1 26 1 58 1 Major /Minor Minor2 Minor1 Majorl Conflicting Flow All 211 198 74 199 214 58 89 0 0 Stage 137 137 - 61 61 - - - - Stage 2 74 61 - 138 153 - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 746 698 988 760 684 1008 1506 Stage 1 866 783 - 950 844 - - Stage 2 935 844 865 771 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 714 683 988 746 669 1008 1506 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 714 683 - 746 669 - - Stage 1 865 767 949 843 Stage 2 909 843 845 755 - Approach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 10.3 8.8 0.1 HCM LOS B A Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) 1506 719 977 1545 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 0.047 0.029 0.02 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 10.3 8.8 7.4 HCM Lane LOS A B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 27: Y -2c & Parcel G North Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 30 55 30 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized - None Storage Length 50 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 32 58 32 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 59 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1545 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1545 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.9 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 28: Y -2c & Parcel G South Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 6.2 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 30 1 1 1 1 25 1 1 1 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized Minor Lane /Major Mvmt None NBT NBR EBLn1 None - Capacity (veh /h) None Storage Length 852 1058 1620 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 50 0.027 0.019 Veh in Median Storage, # 7.3 0 9.4 8.5 0 HCM Lane LOS - 0 A Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 32 1 1 1 1 26 1 1 1 Major /Minor Minor2 Minor Major1 Conflicting Flow All 97 84 17 85 100 2 33 0 0 Stage 1 80 80 - 4 4 - - - - Stage 2 17 4 - 81 96 - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 885 806 1062 901 790 1082 1579 Stage 929 828 - 1018 892 - - Stage 2 1002 892 927 815 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 849 790 1062 885 774 1082 1579 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 849 790 - 885 774 - - Stage 1 928 812 1017 891 Stage 2 976 891 907 799 Approach EB —I NB HCM Control Delay, s 9.4 8.5 2.4 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 BR' Capacity (veh /h) 1579 852 1058 1620 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 0.04 0.027 0.019 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 9.4 8.5 7.3 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 28: Y -2c & Parcel G South Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 30 1 30 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized - None Storage Length 50 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 32 1 32 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 2 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1620 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1620 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 3.6 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 3 32: Parcel G Right -Out & SR -507 PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 0.1 Moveme EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh /h 815 0 0 980 0 15 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized 0 None HCM LOS None None Storage Length Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - 11.4 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 858 0 0 1032 0 16 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minor1 - Conflicting Flow All 0 0 858 0 1890 429 Stage 1 - - - - 858 - Stage 2 - 1032 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 6.63 6.93 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.83 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.43 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.22 3.519 3.319 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 779 69 575 Stage 1 - 377 - Stage 2 342 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 779 69 575 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 195 - Stage 1 377 Stage 2 342 Approach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 11.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh /h) 575 779 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.027 - HCM Control Delay (s) 11.4 0 HCM Lane LOS B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 1: E Yelm Ave (SR 510) & Burnett Rd PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 0.8 Moveme SBL SBR SEL SET NWT NWR Vol, veh /h 30 1 5 740 490 45 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None SBLn1 None None Storage Length 0 0.005 - HCM Control Delay (s) Veh in Median Storage, # 0 HCM Lane LOS 0 0 HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) Grade, % 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 32 1 5 779 516 47 Major /Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1328 539 563 0 0 Stage 1 539 - - - - Stage 2 789 - - Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.11 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.209 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 173 546 1013 Stage 1 589 - - Stage 2 451 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 171 546 1013 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 171 - - Stage 1 589 Stage 2 447 - Approach SB NW HCM Control Delay, s 30.2 0.1 0 HCM LOS D Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NWT NWR S�T SBLn1 Capacity (veh /h) 1013 - 175 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - 0.186 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.6 0 30.2 HCM Lane LOS A A D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.7 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Projected 2020 - Alt 2 2: Tahoma Blvd /Killion Rd & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations + r + r Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations + r + r Volume (veh /h) 5 810 45 40 595 45 25 10 70 15 5 5 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1881 1881 1881 1881 1881 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 5 853 47 42 626 47 26 11 74 16 5 5 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh /h 10 1073 912 65 1039 78 44 141 120 29 57 57 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.57 0.57 0.04 0.60 0.60 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.02 0.07 0.07 Sat Flow, veh /h 1792 1881 1599 1792 1729 130 1810 1900 1615 1810 873 873 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 5 853 47 42 0 673 26 11 74 16 0 10 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /h /In 1792 1881 1599 1792 0 1858 1810 1900 1615 1810 0 1746 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 16.5 0.6 1.1 0.0 10.5 0.7 0.2 2.1 0.4 0.0 0.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 16.5 0.6 1.1 0.0 10.5 0.7 0.2 2.1 0.4 0.0 0.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 10 1073 912 65 0 1117 44 141 120 29 0 115 V/C Ratio(X) 0.52 0.79 0.05 0.65 0.00 0.60 0.58 0.08 0.62 0.55 0.00 0.09 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 175 1242 1056 175 0 1227 176 679 577 176 0 624 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 22.9 7.8 4.4 22.0 0.0 5.8 22.3 19.9 20.7 22.6 0.0 20.3 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 37.1 3.2 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.7 11.6 0.2 5.1 15.2 0.0 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 1/o),veh /In 0.2 9.2 0.3 0.7 0.0 5.5 0.5 0.1 1.1 0.3 0.0 0.1 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 60.0 11.0 4.4 32.4 0.0 6.5 33.9 20.1 25.8 37.8 0.0 20.6 LnGrp LOS E B A C A C C C D C Approach Vol, veh /h 905 715 111 26 Approach Delay, s /veh 10.9 8.0 27.2 31.2 Approach LOS B A C C 6 IIIIIIIIIIIIIEW7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 3.7 31.3 4.2 6.9 5.2 29.9 4.6 6.5 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.5 30.5 4.5 16.5 4.5 30.5 4.5 16.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +ll), s 2.1 12.5 2.4 4.1 3.1 18.5 2.7 2.2 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 7.9 0.0 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 11.1 HCM 2010 LOS B Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 I Berry Valley Rd /Cullens St & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 1.2 Moveme SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 20 910 5 5 680 15 5 1 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - HCM LOS None - None E None Storage Length 150 NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 150 Capacity (veh /h) 99 719 877 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0 0.024 0.159 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 21 958 5 5 716 16 5 1 5 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 732 0 0 963 0 0 1750 1745 961 Stage - - - - - - 1003 1003 - Stage 2 - - 747 742 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 4.11 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.209 2.209 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 877 719 68 87 314 Stage 1 - - 294 322 - Stage 2 408 425 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 877 719 60 84 314 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 60 84 - Stage 1 287 314 Stage 2 381 422 Approach SE NW HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0.1 46.1 HCM LOS E Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 SWL0 Capacity (veh /h) 99 719 877 66 237 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.117 0.007 0.024 0.159 0.111 HCM Control Delay (s) 46.1 10 9.2 69.6 22.1 HCM Lane LOS E B A F C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 0.1 0.5 0.4 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 I Berry Valley Rd /Cullens St & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SWL SWT SWR Vol, veh /h 10 5 20 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None Storage Length 100 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 11 5 21 Major /Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1740 1739 724 Stage 1 734 734 - Stage 2 1006 1005 - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 69 88 429 Stage 1 415 429 - Stage 2 293 322 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 66 85 429 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 66 85 - Stage 1 405 426 Stage 2 280 314 Approach SW HCM Control Delay, s 35.7 HCM LOS E Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 4: Longmire St & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour rsectio Int Delay, s /veh 2.7 Moveme SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 5 865 15 60 680 15 10 5 40 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - HCM LOS None - None E None Storage Length 150 NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 200 Capacity (veh /h) 148 742 877 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0 0.006 0.301 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 911 16 63 716 16 11 5 42 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 inor Conflicting Flow All 732 0 0 926 0 0 1784 1787 918 Stage 1 - - - - - - 929 929 - Stage 2 - - 855 858 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 4.11 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.209 2.209 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 877 742 63 81 329 Stage 1 - - 321 346 - Stage 2 353 374 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 877 742 55 74 329 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 55 74 - Stage 1 319 344 Stage 2 314 342 Approach SE NW NE HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.8 44.2 HCM LOS E Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 Capacity (veh /h) 148 742 877 70 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.391 0.085 0.006 0.301 HCM Control Delay (s) 44.2 10.3 9.1 77.2 HCM Lane LOS E B A F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.7 0.3 0 1.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 4: Longmire St & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour rsectio Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SWL SWT SWR Vol, veh /h 10 5 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 11 5 5 Major /Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1803 1787 724 Stage 1 850 850 - Stage 2 953 937 - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 62 82 429 Stage 1 358 380 - Stage 2 314 346 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 48 75 429 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 48 75 - Stage 1 356 348 Stage 2 268 344 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 77.2 HCM LOS F Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 5: 1st St & Mosman Ave PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh 4.8 Moveme SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 15 10 140 35 5 25 35 480 25 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized 37 None 0.5 HCM LOS None None Storage Length Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NEL NET NER NWLn1 SELn1 SWL SWT SWR Capacity (veh /h) Veh in Median Storage, # 0 448 1041 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.033 0 0.382 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Mvmt Flow 16 11 147 37 5 26 37 505 26 Major /Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl i R Conflicting Flow All 1092 1089 442 1155 1081 518 447 0 0 Stage 484 484 - 592 592 - - - - Stage 2 608 605 - 563 489 - - Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 191 215 613 173 217 556 1108 Stage 562 550 - 491 492 - - Stage 2 481 486 509 548 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 168 199 613 119 201 556 1108 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 168 199 - 119 201 - - Stage 1 535 535 467 468 Stage 2 431 463 369 533 - Approach NW HCM Control Delay, s 18 37 0.5 HCM LOS C E Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NEL NET NER NWLn1 SELn1 SWL SWT SWR Capacity (veh /h) 1108 179 448 1041 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.033 - 0.382 0.388 0.02 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.4 0 37 18 8.5 0 HCM Lane LOS A A E C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 1.7 1.8 0.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 5: 1st St & Mosman Ave PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SWL SWT SWR Vol, veh /h 20 415 10 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 21 437 11 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 532 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.209 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1041 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1041 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SW HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Projected 2020 - Alt 2 6: 1st St & E Yelm Ave (SR 507)/E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations + r Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations + r Volume (veh /h) 50 640 65 305 615 25 140 95 310 50 100 60 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1881 1881 1881 1863 1863 1900 1845 1845 1900 1845 1845 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 53 674 68 321 647 26 147 100 326 53 105 63 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 Cap, veh /h 69 734 624 351 978 39 270 86 281 68 124 74 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.39 0.39 0.20 0.55 0.55 0.15 0.23 0.23 0.04 0.11 0.11 Sat Flow, veh /h 1792 1881 1599 1774 1779 71 1757 381 1244 1757 1081 649 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 53 674 68 321 0 673 147 0 426 53 0 168 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /h /In 1792 1881 1599 1774 0 1850 1757 0 1625 1757 0 1730 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.6 41.5 2.1 21.6 0.0 31.4 9.4 0.0 27.5 3.6 0.0 11.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.6 41.5 2.1 21.6 0.0 31.4 9.4 0.0 27.5 3.6 0.0 11.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.77 1.00 0.38 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 69 734 624 351 0 1017 270 0 367 68 0 199 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.92 0.11 0.91 0.00 0.66 0.55 0.00 1.16 0.78 0.00 0.85 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 138 764 649 429 0 1056 270 0 367 79 0 270 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 58.1 35.3 9.3 47.9 0.0 19.4 47.7 0.0 47.2 58.1 0.0 52.9 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 16.6 15.7 0.1 21.4 0.0 1.5 2.3 0.0 98.8 33.9 0.0 16.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 1/o),veh /In 2.1 24.7 1.4 12.7 0.0 16.3 4.7 0.0 22.3 2.4 0.0 6.5 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 74.7 51.0 9.4 69.3 0.0 20.9 49.9 0.0 146.0 92.0 0.0 69.3 LnGrp LOS E D A E C D F F E Approach Vol, veh /h 795 994 573 221 Approach Delay, s /veh 49.0 36.5 121.4 74.8 Approach LOS D D F E 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 9.2 71.5 9.2 32.0 28.6 52.1 23.2 18.0 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.4 69.6 5.5 27.5 29.5 49.5 14.5 19.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +ll), s 5.6 33.4 5.6 29.5 23.6 43.5 11.4 13.6 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 12.3 0.0 0.0 0.5 4.1 1.0 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 62.5 HCM 2010 LOS E Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 AWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 7: 1 st St & West Rd /Stevens St PM Peak Hour �tersectioi I Intersection Delay, s /veh 17 Intersection LOS C Movement SEU SEL SET SER NWU NWL NWT NWR NEU NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 0 100 280 50 0 25 135 80 0 35 130 30 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 0 2 3 3 3 2 4 4 4 Mvmt Flow 0 105 295 53 0 26 142 84 0 37 137 32 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 Approach Cc N W Opposing Approach NW SE SW Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 1 Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 1 HCM Control Delay 22.7 13.8 12.9 HCM LOS C B B NELn2 NWLn1 SEW SWLn1 SWLn Vol Left, % 100% 0% 10% 23% 100% 0% Vol Thru, % 0% 81% 56% 65% 0% 65% Vol Right, % 0% 19% 33% 12% 0% 35% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 35 160 240 430 45 170 LT Vol 0 130 135 280 0 110 Through Vol 0 30 80 50 0 60 RT Vol 35 0 25 100 45 0 Lane Flow Rate 37 168 253 453 47 179 Geometry Grp 7 7 2 2 7 7 Degree of Util (X) 0.079 0.332 0.431 0.723 0.101 0.345 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.736 7.087 6.143 5.883 7.713 6.945 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 464 509 586 620 466 519 Service Time 5.462 4.813 4.171 3.883 5.438 4.67 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.08 0.33 0.432 0.731 0.101 0.345 HCM Control Delay 11.1 13.3 13.8 22.7 11.3 13.3 HCM Lane LOS B B B C B B HCM 95th -tile Q 0.3 1.4 2.2 6.1 0.3 1.5 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 AWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 7: 1 st St & West Rd /Stevens St PM Peak Hour kjtersectioi� Intersection Delay, s /veh Intersection LOS Movement WU SWL SWT SWR Vol, veh /h 0 45 110 60 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 5 5 5 Mvmt Flow 0 47 116 63 Number of Lanes 0 1 1 0 Approach SW Opposing Approach NE Opposing Lanes 2 Conflicting Approach Left NW Conflicting Lanes Left 1 Conflicting Approach Right SE Conflicting Lanes Right 1 HCM Control Delay 12.9 HCM LOS B Lane Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 8: 1st St & Railway Rd PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 2.7 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 1 5 5 90 5 5 5 195 110 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized 13.6 None 0.1 HCM LOS None None Storage Length Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) Veh in Median Storage, # 0 523 1217 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 0 0.019 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 5 5 5 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 5 5 95 5 5 5 205 116 Major /Minor Minor2 Majorl Conflicting Flow All 434 487 145 435 432 263 147 0 0 Stage 155 155 - 274 274 - - - - Stage 2 279 332 - 161 158 - - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.15 6.55 6.25 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.15 5.55 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.15 5.55 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.545 4.045 3.345 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 536 484 908 526 512 768 1435 Stage 1 852 773 - 726 678 - - Stage 2 732 648 834 761 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 525 480 908 515 508 768 1435 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 525 480 - 515 508 - - Stage 1 849 770 723 675 Stage 2 718 645 820 758 - Approach EB HCM Control Delay, s 10.9 13.6 0.1 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) 1435 617 523 1217 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - 0.019 0.201 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 10.9 13.6 8 0 HCM Lane LOS A A B B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.1 0.7 0 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 8: 1st St & Railway Rd PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 5 135 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 6 6 Mvmt Flow 5 142 5 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 321 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.16 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.254 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1217 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1217 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Projected 2020 - Alt 2 9: Clark Rd & E Yelm Ave (SR 507) PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations Volume (veh /h) 25 1090 10 80 1045 20 10 5 85 20 5 25 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1881 1881 1900 1881 1881 1900 1881 1881 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 26 1147 11 84 1100 21 11 5 89 21 5 26 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 Cap, veh /h 314 1392 13 301 1404 27 178 8 145 121 25 132 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.75 0.75 0.04 0.76 0.76 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 Sat Flow, veh /h 1792 1860 18 1792 1840 35 1386 86 1526 1323 267 1388 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 26 0 1158 84 0 1121 11 0 94 21 0 31 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /h /In 1792 0 1878 1792 0 1875 1386 0 1612 1323 0 1655 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 0.0 41.6 1.1 0.0 36.2 0.8 0.0 5.8 1.6 0.0 1.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 0.0 41.6 1.1 0.0 36.2 2.5 0.0 5.8 7.3 0.0 1.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.02 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.84 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 314 0 1405 301 0 1431 178 0 153 121 0 157 V/C Ratio(X) 0.08 0.00 0.82 0.28 0.00 0.78 0.06 0.00 0.62 0.17 0.00 0.20 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 356 0 1637 333 0 1653 282 0 275 221 0 282 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 9.0 0.0 8.5 12.7 0.0 7.2 44.0 0.0 44.7 48.2 0.0 42.9 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 0.1 0.0 3.1 0.5 0.0 2.2 0.1 0.0 4.0 0.7 0.0 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 1/o),veh /In 0.3 0.0 22.1 1.2 0.0 19.2 0.3 0.0 2.7 0.6 0.0 0.8 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 9.1 0.0 11.6 13.2 0.0 9.4 44.2 0.0 48.6 48.9 0.0 43.5 LnGrp LOS A B B A D D D D Approach Vol, veh /h 1184 1205 105 52 Approach Delay, s /veh 11.6 9.6 48.2 45.7 Approach LOS B A D D 1 2 7 Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 14.2 7.1 81.3 14.2 5.6 82.9 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 4.5 3.5 4.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.5 5.5 89.5 17.5 4.5 90.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +ll), s 7.8 3.1 43.6 9.3 2.4 38.2 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.4 0.0 33.2 0.4 0.0 36.4 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 12.9 HCM 2010 LOS B Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 10: E Yelm Ave (SR 507) & 103rd Ave PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 3.5 Moveme SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 65 1165 1 5 1135 10 5 1 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - HCM LOS None - None F None Storage Length 100 NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 50 - Capacity (veh /h) 19 572 579 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0 0.118 0.421 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 68 1226 1 5 1195 11 5 1 5 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 1205 0 0 1227 0 0 2575 2580 1227 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1364 1364 - Stage 2 - - 1211 1216 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.11 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 2.209 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 579 572 17 26 220 Stage 1 - - 184 218 - Stage 2 225 256 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 579 572 10 23 220 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 10 23 - Stage 1 162 192 Stage 2 154 254 Approach SE NW - HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 0 $ 350.9 HCM LOS F Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NEW NWL NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 SWLn2 - Capacity (veh /h) 19 572 579 15 224 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.609 0.009 0.118 0.421 0.305 HCM Control Delay (s) $ 350.9 11.4 12 $ 364.6 28 HCM Lane LOS F B B F D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.7 0 0.4 1.1 1.2 Notes -: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 10: E Yelm Ave (SR 507) & 103rd Ave PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SWL SWT SWR Vol, veh /h 5 1 65 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized 1364 - None Storage Length 6.53 6.23 75 Veh in Median Storage, # 5.53 0 - Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 Mvmt Flow 5 1 68 Major /Minor Conflicting Flow All 2578 2575 1200 Stage 1211 1211 - Stage 2 1367 1364 - Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 17 26 224 Stage 1 222 254 - Stage 2 181 214 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 14 23 224 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 14 23 - Stage 1 196 252 Stage 2 155 189 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 56.4 HCM LOS F Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 11: 103rd Ave SE & West Rd PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh 15.8 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 60 95 10 5 45 185 5 10 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized 12.1 None HCM LOS None None Storage Length Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh /h) 531 Veh in Median Storage, # 1479 0 0 0.04 0.047 0 - 0.773 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 63 100 11 5 47 195 5 11 5 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Min Conflicting Flow All 242 0 0 111 0 0 427 485 105 Stage 1 - - - - - 232 232 - Stage 2 - - 195 253 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.12 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.2 2.218 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1336 1479 541 485 955 Stage 1 - - 775 716 - Stage 2 811 701 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1336 1479 470 459 955 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 470 459 - Stage 1 736 680 Stage 2 735 698 Approach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 2.8 0.2 12.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh /h) 531 1336 1479 558 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.04 0.047 - 0.004 - 0.773 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.1 7.8 0 7.4 0 30.1 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 0 7.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 11: 103rd Ave SE & West Rd PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 335 25 50 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.11 None Storage Length 6.11 5.51 - Follow -up Hdwy Veh in Median Storage, # 4.009 3.309 0 567 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 353 26 53 Major /Minor Conflicting Flow All 394 392 145 Stage 1 155 155 - Stage 2 239 237 - Critical Hdwy 7.11 6.51 6.21 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.11 5.51 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.11 5.51 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.509 4.009 3.309 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 567 545 905 Stage 1 850 771 - Stage 2 767 711 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 531 516 905 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 531 516 - Stage 1 808 768 Stage 2 713 675 Approach —1 SB HCM Control Delay, s 30.1 HCM LOS D Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 12: NE Creek St & 103rd Ave SE PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh 3.5 Moveme EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh /h 230 155 80 170 45 105 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized 13.6 None None - None Storage Length NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT - 0 576 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - 8.3 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 1 1 0 0 Mvmt Flow 242 163 84 179 47 111 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Er Min Conflicting Flow All 0 0 405 0 671 324 Stage 1 - - - - 324 - Stage 2 - 347 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.4 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.209 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1159 425 722 Stage 1 - 738 - Stage 2 720 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1159 391 722 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 391 - Stage 1 738 Stage 2 662 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.7 13.6 HCM LOS B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh /h) 576 1159 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.274 0.073 - HCM Control Delay (s) 13.6 8.3 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.1 0.2 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 AWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 13: Grove Rd SE & 103rd Ave SE PM Peak Hour �tersectioi I Intersection Delay, s /veh 14.8 Intersection LOS B Movement 22% EBL � EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR 0 Vol, veh /h 0 110 205 30 0 5 125 115 0 40 140 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 116 216 32 0 5 132 121 0 42 147 5 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Approach HCM Control Delay EB 17.3 13.2 14.3 WB B 1 B NB HCM 95th -tile Q 1.5 Opposing Approach 2.1 WB EB SB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 17.3 13.2 12.8 HCM LOS C B B BLr&EBLnl WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 22% 32% 2% 35% Vol Thru, % 76% 59% 51% 35% Vol Right, % 3% 9% 47% 31% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 185 345 245 260 LT Vol 140 205 125 90 Through Vol 5 30 115 80 RT Vol 40 110 5 90 Lane Flow Rate 195 363 258 274 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.346 0.596 0.421 0.462 Departure Headway (Hd) 6.4 5.91 5.879 6.083 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 561 610 611 591 Service Time 4.449 3.949 3.922 4.127 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.348 0.595 0.422 0.464 HCM Control Delay 12.8 17.3 13.2 14.3 HCM Lane LOS B C B B HCM 95th -tile Q 1.5 3.9 2.1 2.4 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 AWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 13: Grove Rd SE & 103rd Ave SE PM Peak Hour kjtersectioi� Intersection Delay, s /veh Intersection LOS Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 0 90 90 80 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 95 95 84 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 Approach SB Opposing Approach NB Opposing Lanes 1 Conflicting Approach Left WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 Conflicting Approach Right EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 HCM Control Delay 14.3 HCM LOS B Lane Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 14: Walmart Blvd & 103rd Ave SE PM Peak Hour �itersectio� Int Delay, s /veh 5.3 Moveme EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh /h 10 255 10 15 220 15 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized 3.2 None HCM LOS None - None Storage Length Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL - 0 Capacity (veh /h) Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0.008 Grade, % 0 - 11.4 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 10 10 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 268 11 16 232 16 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 279 0 182 145 Stage 1 - - - - 145 - Stage 2 - 37 - Critical Hdwy 4.2 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.29 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1239 807 902 Stage 1 - 882 - Stage 2 985 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1239 800 902 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 800 - Stage 1 882 Stage 2 976 Approach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0 3.2 11.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh /h) 806 1239 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.307 0.008 - HCM Control Delay (s) 11.4 7.9 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.3 0 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Projected 2020 - Alt 2 15: Bald Hills Rd /NE Creek St & E Yelm Ave (SR 507) PM Peak Hour � � i Movement EBL EBT MEBR WBL WBT WBRl NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + r + r Vii + r Volume (vph) 20 620 295 180 810 55 215 90 140 100 190 60 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 11 12 16 16 14 14 10 13 13 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 3.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.6 3.6 4.4 4.4 4.9 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1845 1568 1694 1845 1777 1986 1788 1652 1925 1636 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 1845 1568 1694 1845 1777 1986 1788 1652 1925 1636 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 21 653 311 189 853 58 226 95 147 105 200 63 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 105 0 0 28 0 48 0 0 0 54 Lane Group Flow (vph) 21 653 206 189 853 30 226 194 0 105 200 9 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Prot NA pm +ov Prot NA Perm Split NA Split NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 3 5 2 3 3 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 2.4 45.6 61.5 13.9 57.1 57.1 15.9 15.9 16.1 16.1 16.1 Effective Green, g (s) 2.9 46.2 62.7 14.4 57.7 57.7 16.8 16.8 16.6 16.6 16.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.42 0.57 0.13 0.52 0.52 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.9 4.9 4.9 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 46 774 893 221 967 932 303 273 249 290 239 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.35 0.03 0.11 c0.46 c0.11 0.11 0.06 c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.02 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.46 0.84 0.23 0.86 0.88 0.03 0.75 0.71 0.42 0.69 0.04 Uniform Delay, dl 52.8 28.7 11.7 46.8 23.1 12.6 44.6 44.3 42.3 44.3 40.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5.2 10.9 0.1 25.8 11.5 0.1 9.1 7.6 0.8 6.1 0.0 Delay (s) 57.9 39.5 11.8 72.6 34.6 12.7 53.7 51.9 43.2 50.4 40.4 Level of Service E D B E C B D D D D D Approach Delay (s) 31.2 40.0 52.7 46.6 Approach LOS C D D D Phtersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 39.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.85 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 16: Morris Rd SE & Bald Hills Rd PM Peak Hour LtersectioM - Int Delay, s /veh 3.8 Moveme SET SER ! NWLi NWT NEL NER Vol, veh /h 480 200 15 280 150 15 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized 25.4 None None - None Storage Length NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER - 0 346 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 9.2 0.1 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 3 3 1 1 Mvmt Flow 505 211 16 295 158 16 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minor1 ' Conflicting Flow All 0 0 716 0 790 611 Stage - - - - 611 - Stage 2 - 179 - Critical Hdwy 4.13 6.615 6.215 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.415 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.815 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.227 3.5095 3.3095 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 880 344 495 Stage 1 - 543 - Stage 2 837 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 880 336 495 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 336 - Stage 1 543 Stage 2 819 Approach SE NW NE HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.6 25.4 HCM LOS D Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER Capacity (veh /h) 346 880 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.502 0.018 - HCM Control Delay (s) 25.4 9.2 0.1 HCM Lane LOS D A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.7 0.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 1" t SB Grove Rd NB GroV(� Rd a �r MOVEMENT SUMMARY 17) Yelm Ave at Grove Rd Roundabout Site: Projected 2020 -Alt 2 South: NB Grove Rd 3 L 232 2.0 0.755 24.7 LOS C 5.7 144.2 0.87 8 T 79 2.0 0.755 17.8 LOS C 5.7 144.2 0.87 18 R 53 2.0 0.755 19.0 LOS C 5.7 144.2 0.87 Approach 363 2.0 0.755 22.4 LOS C 5.7 144.2 0.87 East: WB Yelm Ave 1 L 132 2.0 0.779 20.7 LOS C 11.4 289.4 0.96 6 T 805 2.0 0.779 13.0 LOS B 11.4 289.4 0.91 16 R 153 2.0 0.490 11.4 LOS B 3.7 93.3 0.76 Approach 1089 2.0 0.779 13.7 LOS B 11.4 289.4 0.90 North: SB Grove Rd 7 L 116 2.0 0.433 20.8 LOS C 2.7 67.5 0.87 4 T 74 2.0 0.433 13.9 LOS B 2.7 67.5 0.87 14 R 105 2.0 0.302 15.1 LOS C 1.5 38.6 0.82 Approach 295 2.0 0.433 17.0 LOS C 2.7 67.5 0.85 West: EB Yelm Ave 5 L 111 2.0 0.446 14.7 LOS B 3.2 80.3 0.65 2 T 711 2.0 0.446 7.7 LOS A 3.2 81.8 0.64 12 R 74 2.0 0.446 8.9 LOS A 3.2 81.8 0.64 Approach 895 2.0 0.446 8.7 LOS A 3.2 81.8 0.64 All Vehicles 2642 2.0 0.779 13.6 LOS B 11.4 289.4 0.80 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v /c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. SIDRA Standard Delay Model used. Processed: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 9:41:33 AM Copyright © 2000 -2011 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA INTERSECTION 5.1.13.2093 www.sidrasoIutions.com Project: N: \Projects \1470 Evergreen Pacific Fund, LLC \1470.01 Yelm Commercial EIS \Phase 01- Preliminary EIS \Traffic\Ope ration s\S id ra\Ye I m - Grove current rev 1.sip 8001450, SHEACARR JEWELL, SINGLE 1.14 24.1 1.08 25.6 1.10 25.5 1.12 24.6 1.04 26.4 0.97 28.8 0.85 30.3 0.96 28.6 1.02 25.9 0.97 27.8 0.93 27.7 0.97 26.9 0.84 29.2 0.65 31.1 0.71 31.2 0.68 30.9 0.89 28.5 SIDRA - -%. INTERSECTION HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Projected 2020 - Alt 2 18: Y- 2c /Walmart Blvd & SR -507 PM Peak Hour --I. -4- t i Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 t t r Volume (veh /h) 190 585 75 145 850 145 90 45 95 270 45 85 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1827 1831 1900 1863 1881 1900 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 200 616 79 153 895 153 95 47 100 284 47 89 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 4 4 2 1 1 2 2 2 0 2 0 Cap, veh /h 241 1631 209 358 1021 174 222 67 142 345 355 308 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.53 0.53 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh /h 1740 3103 397 747 3054 522 1774 532 1131 1810 1863 1615 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 200 345 350 153 524 524 95 0 147 284 47 89 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /h /In 1740 1739 1761 747 1787 1789 1774 0 1663 1810 1863 1615 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.4 7.8 7.8 11.4 18.3 18.3 3.3 0.0 5.6 10.0 1.4 3.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.4 7.8 7.8 11.4 18.3 18.3 3.3 0.0 5.6 10.0 1.4 3.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.23 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.68 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 241 914 925 358 597 598 222 0 208 345 355 308 V/C Ratio(X) 0.83 0.38 0.38 0.43 0.88 0.88 0.43 0.00 0.71 0.82 0.13 0.29 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 249 932 943 362 607 607 468 0 439 450 464 402 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 27.8 9.3 9.3 18.5 20.8 20.8 26.8 0.0 27.8 25.7 22.3 23.0 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 19.9 0.3 0.3 0.8 13.5 13.6 1.3 0.0 4.3 9.1 0.2 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 1/o),veh /In 4.9 3.8 3.9 2.4 11.3 11.3 1.7 0.0 2.8 5.8 0.7 1.4 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 47.7 9.6 9.6 19.3 34.3 34.3 28.1 0.0 32.1 34.9 22.4 23.5 LnGrp LOS D A A B C C C C C C C Approach Vol, veh /h 895 1201 242 420 Approach Delay, s /veh 18.1 32.4 30.5 31.1 Approach LOS B C C C 1 2 Assigned Phs 2 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 11.8 38.3 16.1 12.7 25.6 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.5 35.5 16.5 9.5 22.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +ll), s 7.6 9.8 12.0 9.4 20.3 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.7 13.5 0.7 0.0 1.8 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 27.4 HCM 2010 LOS C Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 19: SR -507 & Walmart Driveway Access PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 2.6 Moveme EBL EBT WBT Wl SBL SBR Vol, veh /h 45 945 1065 140 75 75 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 150 - SBLn 350 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 47 995 1121 147 79 79 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1121 0 0 2210 1121 Stage 1 - - - 1121 - Stage 2 - 1089 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.41 6.21 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.41 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.41 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 3.509 3.309 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 623 -49 252 Stage 1 - 313 - Stage 2 324 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 623 -45 252 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 160 - Stage 1 313 Stage 2 - 300 Approach WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.5 0 36.7 HCM LOS E Minor Lane /Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn Capacity (veh /h) 623 160 252 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.076 0.493 0.313 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.3 47.6 25.7 HCM Lane LOS B E D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 2.4 1.3 Notes -: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 20: Grove Rd SE & Parcel A North Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 3.3 Moveme WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Vol, veh /h 100 25 155 95 20 95 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None SBL SBT None None Storage Length 0 0.198 0.016 - HCM Control Delay (s) - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 HCM Lane LOS 0 B A A 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 105 26 163 100 21 100 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 355 213 0 0 263 0 Stage 1 213 - - - - - Stage 2 142 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 643 827 1301 Stage 1 823 - - Stage 2 885 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 632 827 1301 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 632 - - Stage 1 823 Stage 2 870 Approach 'NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 11.8 0 1.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt ' NBT NBR WBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh /h) 663 1301 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.198 0.016 - HCM Control Delay (s) 11.8 7.8 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 21: Grove Rd SE & Parcel A South Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 3.1 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 1 1 1 100 1 20 1 230 95 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized 15 None 0 HCM LOS None None Storage Length Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Ipm Capacity (veh /h) Veh in Median Storage, # 0 487 1217 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 0 0.006 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 1 1 105 1 21 1 242 100 Major /Minor Minor2 Minorl Maj Conflicting Flow All 532 571 185 522 521 292 185 0 0 Stage 227 227 - 294 294 - - - - Stage 2 305 344 - 228 227 - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 458 431 857 465 460 747 1390 Stage 1 776 716 - 714 670 - - Stage 2 705 637 775 716 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 438 422 857 456 451 747 1390 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 438 422 - 456 451 - - Stage 1 775 702 713 669 Stage 2 683 636 758 702 - Approach WB HCM Control Delay, s 12 15 0 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Ipm Capacity (veh /h) 1390 515 487 1217 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - 0.006 0.262 0.017 - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 0 12 15 8 0 HCM Lane LOS A A B C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 1 0.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 21: Grove Rd SE & Parcel A South Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 20 175 1 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 21 184 1 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 342 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1217 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1217 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.8 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 22: Parcel D RIRO & E Yelm Ave (SR 507) PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s /veh 0.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh /h 775 80 0 1090 0 45 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized Free Free None Storage Length - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 816 84 0 1147 0 47 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 - 816 0 1963 816 Stage 1 - - - 816 - Stage 2 - 1147 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow -up Hdwy - 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 812 69 377 Stage 1 0 - 435 - Stage 2 0 - 303 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 812 69 377 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 69 - Stage 1 435 Stage 2 303 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 15.9 HCM LOS C Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBL WBT Capacity (veh /h) 377 812 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.126 - HCM Control Delay (s) 15.9 0 HCM Lane LOS C A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 24: Parcel F RIRO /Parcel B/C RIRO PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s /veh 1.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR - WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 0 765 25 0 885 85 0 0 25 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 805 26 0 932 89 0 0 26 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 1021 0 0 832 0 0 1284 1839 416 Stage 1 - - - - - - 818 818 - Stage 2 - - 466 1021 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 4.14 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.54 5.54 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.22 2.22 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 675 796 122 75 585 Stage 1 - - 336 388 - Stage 2 - - 546 312 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 675 796 92 75 585 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 92 75 - Stage 1 336 388 Stage 2 410 312 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 11.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh /h) 585 675 796 508 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.045 - - 0.249 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.4 0 0 14.4 HCM Lane LOS B A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 0 1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 24: Parcel F RIRO /Parcel B/C RIRO PM Peak Hour �itersectio� Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 0 0 120 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 126 Major /Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1379 1808 511 Stage 1 976 976 - Stage 2 403 832 - Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 104 78 508 Stage 1 270 327 - Stage 2 595 382 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 99 78 508 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 99 78 - Stage 1 270 327 Stage 2 568 382 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 14.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 25: Walmart Blvd & Parcel C North Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 3.7 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 15 5 60 10 5 25 140 220 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - HCM Control Delay, s None - None Storage Length 100 3.1 50 B 50 B Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Minor Lane /Major Mvmt - 0 NBR EBLn1 - 0 WBLn2 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 16 5 63 11 5 26 147 232 5 Major /Minor Minor2 0.3 0.2 Minorl 0 Maj Conflicting Flow All 863 850 276 882 850 234 279 0 0 Stage 318 318 - 529 529 - - - - Stage 2 545 532 - 353 321 - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 275 298 763 267 298 805 1284 Stage 1 693 654 - 533 527 - - Stage 2 523 526 664 652 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 236 260 763 217 260 805 1284 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 236 260 - 217 260 - - Stage 1 614 644 472 467 Stage 2 443 466 595 642 Approach NB _ HCM Control Delay, s 12.9 14.2 3.1 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBL SBT Capacity (veh /h) 1284 236 664 217 597 1330 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.115 0.067 0.103 0.049 0.053 0.016 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.2 21.3 11 22.4 11.4 7.8 HCM Lane LOS A C B C B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 25: Walmart Blvd & Parcel C North Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 20 260 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized - None Storage Length 100 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 21 274 5 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 237 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1330 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1330 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.5 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 26: Walmart Blvd & Parcel C South Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 2.8 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 0 0 55 50 0 50 0 360 50 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized C None Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBL None NBR EBLn1 WBLnl None Storage Length Capacity (veh /h) 1227 0 712 390 1128 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - Veh in Median Storage, # 0.27 0 - 0 0 10.5 17.6 0 HCM Lane LOS Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 58 53 0 53 0 379 53 Major /Minor Minor2 = Minorl Majorl , Conflicting Flow All 814 814 329 787 789 405 332 0 0 Stage 382 382 - 405 405 - - - - Stage 2 432 432 - 382 384 - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 297 312 712 309 323 646 1227 Stage 1 640 613 - 622 598 - - Stage 2 602 582 640 611 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 268 305 712 279 316 646 1227 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 268 305 - 279 316 - - Stage 1 640 599 622 598 Stage 2 553 582 574 597 - Approach EB HCM Control Delay, s 10.5 17.6 0 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLnl Capacity (veh /h) 1227 712 390 1128 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.081 0.27 0.023 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 10.5 17.6 8.3 HCM Lane LOS A B C A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.3 1.1 0.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 26: Walmart Blvd & Parcel C South Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 25 310 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized - None Storage Length 50 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 26 326 5 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 432 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1128 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1128 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 27: Y -2c & Parcel G North Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 3.7 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 80 1 1 1 1 35 1 115 1 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized A None NBL NBT None - SBL SBT SBR None Storage Length 504 889 1465 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 50 0.171 0.044 Veh in Median Storage, # HCM Control Delay (s) 0 13.6 0 7.5 - 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 84 1 1 1 1 37 1 121 1 Major /Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Conflicting Flow All 427 408 179 409 450 122 221 0 0 Stage 284 284 - 124 124 - - - - Stage 2 143 124 - 285 326 - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 538 533 864 553 504 929 1348 Stage 1 723 676 - 880 793 - - Stage 2 860 793 722 648 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 501 513 864 536 485 929 1348 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 501 513 - 536 485 - - Stage 1 722 652 879 792 Stage 2 824 792 694 625 Approach NB _W HCM Control Delay, s 13.6 9.2 0.1 HCM LOS B A Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) 1348 504 889 1465 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 0.171 0.044 0.036 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 13.6 9.2 7.5 HCM Lane LOS A B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.6 0.1 0.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 27: Y -2c & Parcel G North Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 50 130 80 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized - None Storage Length 50 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 53 137 84 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 122 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1465 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1465 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.5 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 28: Y -2c & Parcel G South Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 6.1 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 80 1 1 1 1 35 1 1 1 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized A None NBL NBT None - PFWBR None Storage Length 747 1055 1620 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 50 0.116 0.037 Veh in Median Storage, # HCM Control Delay (s) 0 10.4 0 7.3 - 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 84 1 1 1 1 37 1 1 1 Major /Minor Minor2 Minor1 Majorl Conflicting Flow All 171 152 43 153 195 2 85 0 0 Stage 148 148 - 4 4 - - - - Stage 2 23 4 - 149 191 - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 792 740 1027 814 700 1082 1512 Stage 855 775 - 1018 892 - - Stage 2 995 892 854 742 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 745 715 1027 792 677 1082 1512 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 745 715 - 792 677 - - Stage 1 854 750 1017 891 Stage 2 959 891 824 718 - Approach EB HCM Control Delay, s 10.4 8.5 2.5 HCM LOS B A Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 PFWBR Capacity (veh /h) 1512 747 1055 1620 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 0.116 0.037 0.032 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 10.4 8.5 7.3 HCM Lane LOS A B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.4 0.1 0.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 28: Y -2c & Parcel G South Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 50 1 80 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized - None Storage Length 50 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 53 1 84 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 2 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1620 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1620 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.8 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 2 32: Parcel G Right -Out & SR -507 PM Peak Hour LtersectioM - Int Delay, s /veh 0.2 Moveme EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh /h 910 0 0 1075 0 25 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized 12.1 None None None Storage Length NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 958 0 0 1132 0 26 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minor1 - Conflicting Flow All 0 0 958 0 2090 479 Stage 1 - - - - 958 - Stage 2 - 1132 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 6.63 6.93 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.83 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.43 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.22 3.519 3.319 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 714 51 534 Stage 1 - 334 - Stage 2 307 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 714 51 534 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 169 - Stage 1 334 Stage 2 307 Approach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 12.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh /h) 534 714 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.049 - HCM Control Delay (s) 12.1 0 HCM Lane LOS B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 -Alt 1 no Improvements 1: E Yelm Ave (SR 510) & Burnett Rd PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 0.9 Moveme SBL SBR ] SEL SET NWT NWR Vol, veh /h 35 1 5 755 500 45 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None SET SBLn1 None None Storage Length 0 0.005 - HCM Control Delay (s) Veh in Median Storage, # 0 HCM Lane LOS 0 0 HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) Grade, % 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 37 1 5 795 526 47 Major /Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1355 550 574 0 0 Stage 1 550 - - - - Stage 2 805 - - Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.11 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.209 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 166 539 1004 Stage 1 582 - - Stage 2 443 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 165 539 1004 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 165 - - Stage 1 582 Stage 2 439 Approach SB SE NW HCM Control Delay, s 32.6 0.1 0 HCM LOS D Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NWT NWR SEL SET SBLn1 Capacity (veh /h) 1004 168 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 0.226 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.6 0 32.6 HCM Lane LOS A A D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.8 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Projected 2020 - Alt 1 no Improvements 2: Tahoma Blvd /Killion Rd & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations + r + r Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations + r + r Volume (veh /h) 5 825 45 45 610 45 25 10 75 15 5 5 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1881 1881 1881 1881 1881 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 5 868 47 47 642 47 26 11 79 16 5 5 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh /h 10 1075 914 70 1048 77 44 145 123 29 59 59 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.57 0.57 0.04 0.61 0.61 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.07 0.07 Sat Flow, veh /h 1792 1881 1599 1792 1732 127 1810 1900 1615 1810 873 873 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 5 868 47 47 0 689 26 11 79 16 0 10 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /h /In 1792 1881 1599 1792 0 1859 1810 1900 1615 1810 0 1746 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 17.3 0.6 1.2 0.0 10.9 0.7 0.3 2.2 0.4 0.0 0.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 17.3 0.6 1.2 0.0 10.9 0.7 0.3 2.2 0.4 0.0 0.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 10 1075 914 70 0 1125 44 145 123 29 0 118 V/C Ratio(X) 0.52 0.81 0.05 0.67 0.00 0.61 0.59 0.08 0.64 0.55 0.00 0.08 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 171 1219 1036 171 0 1204 173 666 566 173 0 612 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 23.4 8.0 4.5 22.3 0.0 5.8 22.7 20.2 21.1 23.0 0.0 20.6 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 37.2 3.7 0.0 10.7 0.0 0.8 11.7 0.2 5.5 15.3 0.0 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 1/o),veh /In 0.2 9.8 0.3 0.8 0.0 5.6 0.5 0.1 1.2 0.3 0.0 0.1 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 60.5 11.7 4.5 33.0 0.0 6.7 34.5 20.4 26.6 38.3 0.0 20.9 LnGrp LOS E B A C A C C C D C Approach Vol, veh /h 920 736 116 26 Approach Delay, s /veh 11.6 8.3 27.8 31.6 Approach LOS B A C C Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 3.8 32.0 4.3 7.1 5.3 30.4 4.7 6.7 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.5 30.5 4.5 16.5 4.5 30.5 4.5 16.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +ll), s 2.1 12.9 2.4 4.2 3.2 19.3 2.7 2.3 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 11.6 HCM 2010 LOS B Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 -Alt 1 no Improvements 3: Berry Valley Rd /Cullens St & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 1.2 Moveme SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 20 930 5 5 700 15 5 1 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - HCM LOS None - None E None Storage Length 150 NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 150 - Capacity (veh /h) 92 706 861 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0 0.024 0.173 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 21 979 5 5 737 16 5 1 5 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 753 0 0 984 0 0 1792 1787 982 Stage - - - - - - 1024 1024 - Stage 2 - - 768 763 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 4.11 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.209 2.209 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 861 706 63 82 305 Stage 1 - - 286 315 - Stage 2 397 416 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 861 706 55 79 305 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 55 79 - Stage 1 279 307 Stage 2 370 413 Approach SE NW HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0.1 49.7 HCM LOS E Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 SWLn2 - Capacity (veh /h) 92 706 861 61 226 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.126 0.007 0.024 0.173 0.116 HCM Control Delay (s) 49.7 10.1 9.3 75.9 23 HCM Lane LOS E B A F C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 0.1 0.6 0.4 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 no Improvements 3: Berry Valley Rd /Cullens St & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s /veh Movement SWL SWT SWR Vol, veh /h 10 5 20 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None Storage Length 100 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 11 5 21 Major /Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1782 1781 745 Stage 1 755 755 - Stage 2 1027 1026 - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 64 83 417 Stage 1 404 420 - Stage 2 285 315 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 61 80 417 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 61 80 - Stage 1 394 417 Stage 2 272 307 Approach SW HCM Control Delay, s 38.1 HCM LOS E Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 -Alt 1 no Improvements 4: Longmire St & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour rsectio Int Delay, s /veh 3.4 Moveme SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 5 885 15 60 700 15 10 5 40 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - HCM LOS None - None E None Storage Length 150 NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 200 Capacity (veh /h) 140 729 861 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0 0.006 0.446 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 932 16 63 737 16 11 5 42 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 J Minor1 - Conflicting Flow All 753 0 0 947 0 0 1826 1829 939 Stage 1 - - - - - - 950 950 - Stage 2 - - 876 879 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 4.11 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.209 2.209 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 861 729 59 77 320 Stage 1 - - 312 339 - Stage 2 344 365 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 861 729 51 70 320 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 51 70 - Stage 1 310 337 Stage 2 305 333 Approach SE NW NE - HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.8 47.7 HCM LOS E Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 Capacity (veh /h) 140 729 861 59 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.414 0.087 0.006 0.446 HCM Control Delay (s) 47.7 10.4 9.2 108.1 HCM Lane LOS E B A F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.8 0.3 0 1.7 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 -Alt 1 no Improvements 4: Longmire St & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour rsectio Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SWL SWT SWR Vol, veh /h 15 5 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 16 5 5 Major /Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1845 1829 745 Stage 1 871 871 - Stage 2 974 958 - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 58 77 417 Stage 1 349 371 - Stage 2 305 338 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 44 70 417 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 44 70 - Stage 1 347 339 Stage 2 259 336 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 108.1 HCM LOS F Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 -Alt 1 no Improvements 5: 1st St & Mosman Ave PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh 5.1 Moveme SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 15 10 140 35 5 25 35 510 25 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized 0.5 HCM LOS None None None Storage Length NER NWLn1 SELn1 SWL SWT SWR Capacity (veh /h) 1083 162 Veh in Median Storage, # 1013 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.034 0 0.422 0.41 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Mvmt Flow 16 11 147 37 5 26 37 537 26 Major /Minor Minor2 Minorl Mainrl Conflicting Flow All 1150 1148 468 1213 1140 550 474 0 0 Stage 511 511 - 624 624 - - - - Stage 2 639 637 - 589 516 - - Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 174 198 593 158 200 533 1083 Stage 543 535 - 471 476 - - Stage 2 463 470 493 533 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 152 183 593 107 185 533 1083 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 152 183 - 107 185 - - Stage 1 516 520 447 452 Stage 2 413 447 353 518 Approach SE NW NE HCM Control Delay, s 19.3 42.6 0.5 HCM LOS C E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NE� NER NWLn1 SELn1 SWL SWT SWR Capacity (veh /h) 1083 162 424 1013 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.034 - 0.422 0.41 0.021 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.4 0 42.6 19.3 8.6 0 HCM Lane LOS A A E C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 1.9 2 0.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 -Alt 1 no Improvements 5: 1st St & Mosman Ave PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SWL SWT SWR Vol, veh /h 20 440 10 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 21 463 11 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 563 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.209 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1013 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1013 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Projected 2020 - Alt 1 no Improvements 6: 1st St & E Yelm Ave (SR 507)/E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations + r Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations + r Volume (veh /h) 50 665 65 335 640 25 140 95 335 50 100 60 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1881 1881 1881 1863 1863 1900 1845 1845 1900 1845 1845 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 53 700 68 353 674 26 147 100 353 53 105 63 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 Cap, veh /h 69 740 629 379 1014 39 245 78 276 56 124 74 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.39 0.39 0.21 0.57 0.57 0.14 0.22 0.22 0.03 0.11 0.11 Sat Flow, veh /h 1792 1881 1599 1774 1782 69 1757 358 1264 1757 1081 649 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 53 700 68 353 0 700 147 0 453 53 0 168 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /h /In 1792 1881 1599 1774 0 1851 1757 0 1622 1757 0 1730 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.7 45.3 2.2 24.6 0.0 33.0 9.9 0.0 27.5 3.8 0.0 12.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.7 45.3 2.2 24.6 0.0 33.0 9.9 0.0 27.5 3.8 0.0 12.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.78 1.00 0.38 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 69 740 629 379 0 1053 245 0 354 56 0 198 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.95 0.11 0.93 0.00 0.67 0.60 0.00 1.28 0.95 0.00 0.85 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 134 762 647 415 0 1053 245 0 354 56 0 282 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 60.0 36.9 10.3 48.6 0.0 18.8 50.9 0.0 49.2 60.9 0.0 54.7 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 16.6 20.3 0.1 26.4 0.0 1.6 4.0 0.0 145.9 102.1 0.0 15.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 1/o),veh /In 2.1 27.7 1.4 14.8 0.0 17.2 5.1 0.0 26.6 3.4 0.0 6.6 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 76.6 57.3 10.4 75.0 0.0 20.4 55.0 0.0 195.2 163.0 0.0 69.8 LnGrp LOS E E B E C D F F E Approach Vol, veh /h 821 1053 600 221 Approach Delay, s /veh 54.6 38.7 160.8 92.1 Approach LOS D D F F 7 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 9.3 76.2 8.5 32.0 31.4 54.0 22.1 18.4 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.4 71.1 4.0 27.5 29.5 51.0 11.5 20.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +ll), s 5.7 35.0 5.8 29.5 26.6 47.3 11.9 14.0 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 13.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 2.2 0.0 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 75.1 HCM 2010 LOS E Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 -Alt 1 no Improvements 7: 1 st St & West Rd /Stevens St PM Peak Hour �itersectio� Int Delay, s /veh 48.8 Moveme SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 100 280 50 25 135 85 35 130 30 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length 150 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 - 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 3 3 3 4 4 4 Mvmt Flow 105 295 53 26 142 89 37 137 32 Major /Minor Minor2 A Minorl Maw i Conflicting Flow All 595 495 147 652 510 153 179 0 0 Stage 253 253 - 226 226 - - - - Stage 2 342 242 - 426 284 - - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.13 5.53 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.13 5.53 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.236 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 419 479 905 380 465 890 1385 Stage 756 701 - 774 715 - - Stage 2 677 709 604 675 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 269 448 905 162 435 890 1385 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 269 448 - 162 435 - - Stage 1 736 674 753 696 Stage 2 472 690 308 649 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 108.2 24.4 1.4 HCM LOS F C Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NEL i NER NWLn1 JSELn1 SWL SWT SWR Capacity (veh /h) 1385 437 409 1392 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.027 0.59 1.107 0.038 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 24.4 108.2 7.7 HCM Lane LOS A C F A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 3.7 16 0.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 no Improvements 7: 1 st St & West Rd /Stevens St PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s /veh Movement Vol, veh /h Conflicting Peds, # /hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow SWL SWT SWR 50 110 60 0 0 0 Free Free Free - - None 150 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1392 Stage 1 0 Stage 2 - 0 95 95 95 5 5 5 53 116 63 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 168 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.15 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.245 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1392 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1392 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SW HCM Control Delay, s 1.7 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 -Alt 1 no Improvements 8: 1st St & Railway Rd PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 2.7 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 1 5 5 90 5 5 5 205 110 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized 0.1 HCM LOS None None None Storage Length NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) 1428 607 Veh in Median Storage, # 1205 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 0 0.019 0.206 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 5 5 5 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 5 5 95 5 5 5 216 116 Major /Minor Minorl Majorl Conflicting Flow All 450 503 150 450 447 274 153 0 0 Stage 161 161 - 284 284 - - - - Stage 2 289 342 - 166 163 - - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.15 6.55 6.25 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.15 5.55 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 61 5.5 - 6.15 5.55 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.545 4.045 3.345 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 523 474 902 514 502 758 1428 Stage 846 769 - 717 671 - - Stage 2 723 642 829 758 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 512 470 902 503 497 758 1428 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 512 470 - 503 497 - - Stage 1 843 765 714 668 Stage 2 709 639 814 754 Approach WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 11 13.9 0.1 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NB NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) 1428 607 511 1205 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 0.019 0.206 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 11 13.9 8 0 HCM Lane LOS A A B B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.1 0.8 0 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 -Alt 1 no Improvements 8: 1st St & Railway Rd PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 5 140 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 6 6 Mvmt Flow 5 147 5 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 332 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.16 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.254 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1205 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1205 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Projected 2020 - Alt 1 no Improvements 9: Clark Rd & E Yelm Ave (SR 507) PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations Volume (veh /h) 25 1150 10 80 1105 20 10 5 85 20 5 25 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1881 1881 1900 1881 1881 1900 1881 1881 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 26 1211 11 84 1163 21 11 5 89 21 5 26 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 Cap, veh /h 284 1412 13 269 1423 26 171 8 142 115 25 129 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.76 0.76 0.03 0.77 0.77 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 Sat Flow, veh /h 1792 1861 17 1792 1842 33 1386 86 1526 1323 267 1388 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 26 0 1222 84 0 1184 11 0 94 21 0 31 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /h /In 1792 0 1878 1792 0 1875 1386 0 1612 1323 0 1655 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 0.0 49.1 1.1 0.0 42.6 0.8 0.0 6.1 1.7 0.0 1.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 0.0 49.1 1.1 0.0 42.6 2.7 0.0 6.1 7.8 0.0 1.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.02 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.84 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 284 0 1425 269 0 1449 171 0 150 115 0 154 V/C Ratio(X) 0.09 0.00 0.86 0.31 0.00 0.82 0.06 0.00 0.63 0.18 0.00 0.20 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 322 0 1555 298 0 1570 251 0 243 191 0 250 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 10.9 0.0 9.1 16.0 0.0 7.7 47.0 0.0 47.7 51.5 0.0 45.8 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 0.1 0.0 4.7 0.7 0.0 3.3 0.2 0.0 4.2 0.8 0.0 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 1/o),veh /In 0.3 0.0 26.6 1.4 0.0 22.7 0.3 0.0 2.9 0.6 0.0 0.9 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 11.0 0.0 13.8 16.6 0.0 10.9 47.2 0.0 52.0 52.3 0.0 46.4 LnGrp LOS B B B B D D D D Approach Vol, veh /h 1248 1268 105 52 Approach Delay, s /veh 13.7 11.3 51.5 48.8 Approach LOS B B D D 1 2-1 3 4 8 Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 14.7 7.2 87.4 14.7 5.7 88.9 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 4.5 3.5 4.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.5 5.5 90.5 16.5 4.5 91.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +ll), s 8.1 3.1 51.1 9.8 2.4 44.6 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.4 0.0 31.8 0.3 0.0 36.6 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 14.8 HCM 2010 LOS B Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 -Alt 1 no Improvements 10: E Yelm Ave (SR 507) & 103rd Ave PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 4 Moveme 548 SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 65 1230 0 5 1195 10 5 1 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - HCM LOS None - None F None Storage Length 100 NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 50 Capacity (veh /h) 16 539 548 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0 0.125 0.486 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 68 1295 0 5 1258 11 5 1 5 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl - Conflicting Flow All 1268 0 0 1295 0 0 2706 2711 1295 Stage - - - - - - 1432 1432 - Stage 2 - - 1274 1279 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.11 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 2.209 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 548 539 14 21 200 Stage 1 - - 168 202 - Stage 2 207 239 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 548 539 8 18 200 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 8 18 - Stage 1 147 177 Stage 2 136 237 Approach SE NW HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 0 $ 445.6 HCM LOS F Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 SWLn2 Capacity (veh /h) 16 539 548 13 206 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.724 0.01 0.125 0.486 0.332 HCM Control Delay (s) $ 445.6 11.7 12.5 $ 438.1 30.9 HCM Lane LOS F B B F D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.8 0 0.4 1.2 1.4 Notes -: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 -Alt 1 no Improvements 10: E Yelm Ave (SR 507) & 103rd Ave PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SWL SWT SWR Vol, veh /h 5 1 65 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None Storage Length 75 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 Mvmt Flow 5 1 68 Major /Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 2709 2706 1263 Stage 1274 1274 - Stage 2 1435 1432 - Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 14 21 206 Stage 1 204 237 - Stage 2 165 199 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 12 18 206 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 12 18 - Stage 1 179 235 Stage 2 140 174 Approach SW HCM Control Delay, s 65.3 HCM LOS F Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 -Alt 1 no Improvements 11: 103rd Ave SE & West Rd PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh 16.6 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 60 100 10 5 45 190 5 10 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized 12.1 None HCM LOS None None Storage Length Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBL Capacity (veh /h) 525 Veh in Median Storage, # 1473 0 0 0.04 0.047 0 - 0.793 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 63 105 11 5 47 200 5 11 5 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Min Conflicting Flow All 247 0 0 116 0 0 434 495 111 Stage 1 - - - - - - 237 237 Stage 2 - - 197 258 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.12 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.2 2.218 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1331 1473 536 479 948 Stage 1 - - 771 713 - Stage 2 809 698 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1331 1473 465 453 948 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 465 453 - Stage 1 732 677 Stage 2 733 695 Approach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 2.8 0.2 12.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBL Capacity (veh /h) 525 1331 1473 551 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.04 0.047 - 0.004 - 0.793 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.1 7.8 0 7.5 0 32 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 0 7.5 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 -Alt 1 no Improvements 11: 103rd Ave SE & West Rd PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 340 25 50 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 358 26 53 Major /Minor �Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 403 400 147 Stage 1 158 158 - Stage 2 245 242 - Critical Hdwy 7.11 6.51 6.21 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.11 5.51 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.11 5.51 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.509 4.009 3.309 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 560 540 903 Stage 1 847 769 - Stage 2 761 707 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 524 510 903 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 524 510 - Stage 1 804 766 Stage 2 707 671 Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 32 HCM LOS D Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 -Alt 1 no Improvements 12: NE Creek St & 103rd Ave SE PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh 3.5 Moveme EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh /h 240 155 85 180 45 110 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized 14 None None - None Storage Length NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT - 0 563 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - 8.4 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 1 1 0 0 Mvmt Flow 253 163 89 189 47 116 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minor1 - Conflicting Flow All 0 0 416 0 702 334 Stage 1 - - - - 334 - Stage 2 - 368 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.4 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.209 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1148 407 712 Stage 1 - 730 - Stage 2 704 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1148 372 712 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 372 - Stage 1 730 Stage 2 643 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.7 14 HCM LOS B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh /h) 563 1148 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.29 0.078 - HCM Control Delay (s) 14 8.4 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.2 0.3 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 AWSC Projected 2020 -Alt 1 no Improvements 13: Grove Rd SE & 103rd Ave SE PM Peak Hour �tersectioi I Intersection Delay, s /veh 17.8 Intersection LOS C Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL 1 NBT s NBR Vol, veh /h 0 110 210 40 0 5 130 125 0 50 170 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 116 221 42 0 5 137 132 0 53 179 5 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB Opposing Approach WB EB SB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 21.4 15.4 15.3 HCM LOS C C C ��BLr EBL WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 22% 31% 2% 34% Vol Thru, % 76% 58% 50% 39% Vol Right, % 2% 11% 48% 27% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 225 360 260 295 LT Vol 170 210 130 115 Through Vol 5 40 125 80 RT Vol 50 110 5 100 Lane Flow Rate 237 379 274 311 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.447 0.669 0.484 0.56 Departure Headway (Hd) 6.798 6.351 6.369 6.491 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 526 565 561 553 Service Time 4.89 4.427 4.455 4.575 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.451 0.671 0.488 0.562 HCM Control Delay 15.3 21.4 15.4 17.6 HCM Lane LOS C C C C HCM 95th -tile Q 2.3 5 2.6 3.4 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 AWSC Projected 2020 -Alt 1 no Improvements 13: Grove Rd SE & 103rd Ave SE PM Peak Hour kjtersectioi� - Intersection Delay, s /veh Intersection LOS Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 0 100 115 80 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 105 121 84 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 Approach SB Opposing Approach NB Opposing Lanes 1 Conflicting Approach Left WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 Conflicting Approach Right EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 HCM Control Delay 17.6 HCM LOS C Lane Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 -Alt 1 no Improvements 14: Walmart Blvd & 103rd Ave SE PM Peak Hour �itersectio� Int Delay, s /veh 5.5 Moveme EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh /h 10 270 10 15 240 15 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized 3.2 None HCM LOS None - None Storage Length Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLnl EBT EBR WBL - 0 Capacity (veh /h) Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0.009 Grade, % 0 - 11.8 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 10 10 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 284 11 16 253 16 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 295 0 190 153 Stage 1 - - - - 153 - Stage 2 - 37 - Critical Hdwy 4.2 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.29 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1222 799 893 Stage 1 - 875 - Stage 2 985 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1222 792 893 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 792 - Stage 1 875 Stage 2 976 Approach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0 3.2 11.8 HCM LOS B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLnl EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh /h) 797 1222 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.337 0.009 - HCM Control Delay (s) 11.8 8 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.5 0 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Projected 2020 - Alt 1 no Improvements 15: Bald Hills Rd /NE Creek St & E Yelm Ave (SR 507) PM Peak Hour � � i Movement BR WBL WBT WBRl NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations r + r Vii + r Volume (vph) 20 695 295 215 885 55 215 90 175 100 190 60 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 11 12 16 16 14 14 10 13 13 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 3.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.6 3.6 4.4 4.4 4.9 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1845 1568 1694 1845 1777 1986 1773 1652 1925 1636 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 1845 1568 1694 1845 1777 1986 1773 1652 1925 1636 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 21 732 311 226 932 58 226 95 184 105 200 63 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 37 0 0 28 0 60 0 0 0 53 Lane Group Flow (vph) 21 732 274 226 932 30 226 219 0 105 200 10 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Prot NA pm +ov Prot NA Perm Split NA Split NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 3 5 2 3 3 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 2.4 43.1 60.1 14.8 55.5 55.5 17.0 17.0 16.6 16.6 16.6 Effective Green, g (s) 2.9 43.7 61.3 15.3 56.1 56.1 17.9 17.9 17.1 17.1 16.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.40 0.56 0.14 0.51 0.51 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.9 4.9 4.9 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 46 732 873 235 940 906 323 288 256 299 246 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.40 0.05 0.13 c0.51 0.11 c0.12 0.06 c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.02 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.46 1.00 0.31 0.96 0.99 0.03 0.70 0.76 0.41 0.67 0.04 Uniform Delay, dl 52.8 33.1 13.1 47.1 26.7 13.4 43.5 44.0 41.9 43.8 39.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 7.0 33.3 0.2 47.7 27.4 0.1 6.5 10.9 1.1 5.6 0.1 Delay (s) 59.8 66.4 13.3 94.8 54.1 13.5 50.0 54.9 43.0 49.4 39.9 Level of Service E E B F D B D D D D D Approach Delay (s) 50.8 59.7 52.7 45.9 Approach LOS D E D D Phtersection Summary I _ HCM 2000 Control Delay 54.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 no Improvements 16: Morris Rd SE & Bald Hills Rd PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s /veh 4.6 Movement SET SER NWL NW NEL NER Vol, veh /h 500 215 15 300 165 15 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized 30 None None - None Storage Length NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER - 0 328 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 9.3 0.1 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 3 3 1 1 Mvmt Flow 526 226 16 316 174 16 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Min Conflicting Flow All 0 0 753 0 828 639 Stage 1 - - - - 639 - Stage 2 - 189 - Critical Hdwy 4.13 6.615 6.215 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.415 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.815 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.227 3.5095 3.3095 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 852 326 477 Stage 1 - 527 - Stage 2 828 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 852 319 477 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 319 - Stage 1 527 Stage 2 809 Approach SE NW HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 30 HCM LOS D Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER Capacity (veh /h) 328 852 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.578 0.019 - HCM Control Delay (s) 30 9.3 0.1 HCM Lane LOS D A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3.4 0.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 -Alt 1 no Improvements 17: E Yelm Ave (SR 507) & Grove Rd SE PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 1.2 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 150 700 100 170 760 175 300 100 65 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 150 150 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 158 737 105 179 800 184 316 105 68 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 984 0 0 737 0 0 2424 2395 737 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1053 1053 - Stage 2 - - 1371 1342 - Critical Hdwy 4.13 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.227 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 698 869 -22 -34 418 Stage 1 - - -274 303 - Stage 2 - - -181 221 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 698 869 - - 15 418 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 15 - Stage 1 -155 171 Stage 2 - -41 175 Approach WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 1.8 1.6 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLi�EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh /h) 24 698 869 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 7.237 0.226 - 0.206 HCM Control Delay (s) $ 3126 11.7 0 10.2 HCM Lane LOS F B A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 21.7 0.9 0.8 Notes -: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 -Alt 1 no Improvements 17: E Yelm Ave (SR 507) & Grove Rd SE PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 140 95 135 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 Mvmt Flow 147 100 142 Major /Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 2389 2303 892 Stage 1250 1250 - Stage 2 1139 1053 - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.52 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.52 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.5 4.018 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver -24 -38 344 Stage 1 214 244 - Stage 2 247 303 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 17 344 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 17 - Stage 1 - 121 194 Stage 2 -45 171 Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 18: Y- 2c /Walmart Blvd & SR -507 Projected 2020 - Alt 1 no Improvements PM Peak Hour --I. Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL -4- t WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR i SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh /h) 215 605 100 200 870 160 125 65 130 305 60 90 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1827 1832 1900 1863 1881 1900 1863 1863 1900 1900 1885 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 226 637 105 211 916 168 132 68 137 321 63 95 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 4 4 2 1 1 2 2 2 0 2 2 Cap, veh /h 203 780 129 233 810 149 155 61 122 283 122 184 Arrive On Green 0.12 0.51 0.51 0.13 0.52 0.52 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.16 0.18 0.18 Sat Flow, veh /h 1740 1534 253 1774 1547 284 1774 553 1114 1810 680 1025 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 226 0 742 211 0 1084 132 0 205 321 0 158 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /h /In 1740 0 1787 1774 0 1831 1774 0 1666 1810 0 1704 Q Serve(g_s), s 17.5 0.0 52.3 17.6 0.0 78.5 11.0 0.0 16.5 23.5 0.0 12.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 17.5 0.0 52.3 17.6 0.0 78.5 11.0 0.0 16.5 23.5 0.0 12.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.14 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.67 1.00 0.60 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 203 0 909 233 0 958 155 0 183 283 0 306 V/C Ratio(X) 1.11 0.00 0.82 0.90 0.00 1.13 0.85 0.00 1.12 1.13 0.00 0.52 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 203 0 909 266 0 958 207 0 183 283 0 306 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 66.3 0.0 31.0 64.2 0.0 35.8 67.5 0.0 66.8 63.3 0.0 55.7 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 96.9 0.0 5.9 29.2 0.0 72.3 22.0 0.0 101.8 94.0 0.0 1.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 1/o),veh /In 13.9 0.0 27.2 10.5 0.0 58.6 6.3 0.0 12.8 19.1 0.0 6.1 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 163.1 0.0 36.9 93.4 0.0 108.0 89.5 0.0 168.6 157.2 0.0 57.2 LnGrp LOS F D F F F F F E Approach Vol, veh /h 968 1295 337 479 Approach Delay, s /veh 66.3 105.6 137.6 124.2 Approach LOS E F F F Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 27.0 20.0 23.2 79.8 16.6 30.4 21.0 82.0 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 23.5 16.5 22.5 73.5 17.5 22.5 17.5 78.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +ll), s 25.5 18.5 19.6 54.3 13.0 14.6 19.5 80.5 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 0.0 0.2 12.9 0.1 1.4 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 99.7 HCM 2010 LOS F Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 -Alt 1 no Improvements 19: SR -507 & Walmart Access PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh 2.9 Moveme EBL EBT WBT WB�&IIIIIIII SBL SBR Vol, veh /h 45 1040 1155 140 75 75 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 150 - SBLn 350 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 47 1095 1216 147 79 79 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1216 0 0 2405 1216 Stage 1 - - - 1216 - Stage 2 - 1189 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.41 6.21 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.41 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.41 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 3.509 3.309 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 573 -37 222 Stage 1 - 282 - Stage 2 290 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 573 -34 222 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 140 - Stage 1 282 Stage 2 266 Approach —IW E W HCM Control Delay, s 0.5 0 44.8 HCM LOS E Minor Lane /Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn = Capacity (veh /h) 573 140 222 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.083 0.564 0.356 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.8 59.7 29.9 HCM Lane LOS B F D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 2.8 1.5 Notes -: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 1: E Yelm Ave (SR 510) & Burnett Rd PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 0.9 Moveme SBL SBR ] SEL SET NWT NWR Vol, veh /h 35 1 5 755 500 45 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None SET SBLn1 None None Storage Length 0 0.005 - HCM Control Delay (s) Veh in Median Storage, # 0 HCM Lane LOS 0 0 HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) Grade, % 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 37 1 5 795 526 47 Major /Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1355 550 574 0 0 Stage 1 550 - - - - Stage 2 805 - - Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.11 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.209 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 166 539 1004 Stage 1 582 - - Stage 2 443 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 165 539 1004 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 165 - - Stage 1 582 Stage 2 439 Approach SB SE NW HCM Control Delay, s 32.6 0.1 0 HCM LOS D Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NWT NWR SEL SET SBLn1 Capacity (veh /h) 1004 168 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 0.226 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.6 0 32.6 HCM Lane LOS A A D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.8 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Projected 2020 - Alt 1 2: Tahoma Blvd /Killion Rd & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations + r + r Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations + r + r Volume (veh /h) 5 825 45 45 610 45 25 10 75 15 5 5 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1881 1881 1881 1881 1881 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 5 868 47 47 642 47 26 11 79 16 5 5 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh /h 10 1075 914 70 1048 77 44 145 123 29 59 59 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.57 0.57 0.04 0.61 0.61 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.07 0.07 Sat Flow, veh /h 1792 1881 1599 1792 1732 127 1810 1900 1615 1810 873 873 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 5 868 47 47 0 689 26 11 79 16 0 10 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /h /In 1792 1881 1599 1792 0 1859 1810 1900 1615 1810 0 1746 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 17.3 0.6 1.2 0.0 10.9 0.7 0.3 2.2 0.4 0.0 0.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 17.3 0.6 1.2 0.0 10.9 0.7 0.3 2.2 0.4 0.0 0.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 10 1075 914 70 0 1125 44 145 123 29 0 118 V/C Ratio(X) 0.52 0.81 0.05 0.67 0.00 0.61 0.59 0.08 0.64 0.55 0.00 0.08 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 171 1219 1036 171 0 1204 173 666 566 173 0 612 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 23.4 8.0 4.5 22.3 0.0 5.8 22.7 20.2 21.1 23.0 0.0 20.6 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 37.2 3.7 0.0 10.7 0.0 0.8 11.7 0.2 5.5 15.3 0.0 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 1/o),veh /In 0.2 9.8 0.3 0.8 0.0 5.6 0.5 0.1 1.2 0.3 0.0 0.1 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 60.5 11.7 4.5 33.0 0.0 6.7 34.5 20.4 26.6 38.3 0.0 20.9 LnGrp LOS E B A C A C C C D C Approach Vol, veh /h 920 736 116 26 Approach Delay, s /veh 11.6 8.3 27.8 31.6 Approach LOS B A C C Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 3.8 32.0 4.3 7.1 5.3 30.4 4.7 6.7 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.5 30.5 4.5 16.5 4.5 30.5 4.5 16.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +ll), s 2.1 12.9 2.4 4.2 3.2 19.3 2.7 2.3 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 11.6 HCM 2010 LOS B Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 I Berry Valley Rd /Cullens St & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 1.2 Moveme SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 20 930 5 5 700 15 5 1 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - HCM LOS None - None E None Storage Length 150 NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 150 - Capacity (veh /h) 92 706 861 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0 0.024 0.173 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 21 979 5 5 737 16 5 1 5 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 753 0 0 984 0 0 1792 1787 982 Stage - - - - - - 1024 1024 - Stage 2 - - 768 763 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 4.11 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.209 2.209 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 861 706 63 82 305 Stage 1 - - 286 315 - Stage 2 397 416 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 861 706 55 79 305 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 55 79 - Stage 1 279 307 Stage 2 370 413 Approach SE NW HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0.1 49.7 HCM LOS E Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 SWLn2 - Capacity (veh /h) 92 706 861 61 226 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.126 0.007 0.024 0.173 0.116 HCM Control Delay (s) 49.7 10.1 9.3 75.9 23 HCM Lane LOS E B A F C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 0.1 0.6 0.4 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 I Berry Valley Rd /Cullens St & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SWL SWT SWR - Vol, veh /h 10 5 20 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None Storage Length 100 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 11 5 21 Major /Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1782 1781 745 Stage 1 755 755 - Stage 2 1027 1026 - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 64 83 417 Stage 1 404 420 - Stage 2 285 315 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 61 80 417 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 61 80 - Stage 1 394 417 Stage 2 272 307 Approach SW HCM Control Delay, s 38.1 HCM LOS E Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 4: Longmire St & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour rsectio Int Delay, s /veh 3.4 Moveme SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 5 885 15 60 700 15 10 5 40 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - HCM LOS None - None E None Storage Length 150 NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 200 Capacity (veh /h) 140 729 861 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0 0.006 0.446 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 932 16 63 737 16 11 5 42 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 J Minor1 - Conflicting Flow All 753 0 0 947 0 0 1826 1829 939 Stage 1 - - - - - - 950 950 - Stage 2 - - 876 879 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 4.11 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.209 2.209 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 861 729 59 77 320 Stage 1 - - 312 339 - Stage 2 344 365 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 861 729 51 70 320 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 51 70 - Stage 1 310 337 Stage 2 305 333 Approach SE NW NE - HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.8 47.7 HCM LOS E Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 Capacity (veh /h) 140 729 861 59 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.414 0.087 0.006 0.446 HCM Control Delay (s) 47.7 10.4 9.2 108.1 HCM Lane LOS E B A F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.8 0.3 0 1.7 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 4: Longmire St & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour rsectio Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SWL SWT SWR Vol, veh /h 15 5 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 16 5 5 Major /Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1845 1829 745 Stage 1 871 871 - Stage 2 974 958 - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 58 77 417 Stage 1 349 371 - Stage 2 305 338 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 44 70 417 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 44 70 - Stage 1 347 339 Stage 2 259 336 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 108.1 HCM LOS F Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 5: 1st St & Mosman Ave PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh 5.1 Moveme SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 15 10 140 35 5 25 35 510 25 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized 0.5 HCM LOS None None None Storage Length NER NWLn1 SELn1 SWL SWT SWR Capacity (veh /h) 1083 162 Veh in Median Storage, # 1013 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.034 0 0.422 0.41 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Mvmt Flow 16 11 147 37 5 26 37 537 26 Major /Minor Minor2 Minorl Mainrl Conflicting Flow All 1150 1148 468 1213 1140 550 474 0 0 Stage 511 511 - 624 624 - - - - Stage 2 639 637 - 589 516 - - Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 174 198 593 158 200 533 1083 Stage 543 535 - 471 476 - - Stage 2 463 470 493 533 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 152 183 593 107 185 533 1083 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 152 183 - 107 185 - - Stage 1 516 520 447 452 Stage 2 413 447 353 518 Approach SE NW NE HCM Control Delay, s 19.3 42.6 0.5 HCM LOS C E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NE� NER NWLn1 SELn1 SWL SWT SWR Capacity (veh /h) 1083 162 424 1013 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.034 - 0.422 0.41 0.021 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.4 0 42.6 19.3 8.6 0 HCM Lane LOS A A E C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 1.9 2 0.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 5: 1st St & Mosman Ave PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SWL SWT SWR Vol, veh /h 20 440 10 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 21 463 11 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 563 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.209 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1013 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1013 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Projected 2020 - Alt 1 6: 1st St & E Yelm Ave (SR 507)/E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations + r Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations + r Volume (veh /h) 50 665 65 335 640 25 140 95 335 50 100 60 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1881 1881 1881 1863 1863 1900 1845 1845 1900 1845 1845 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 53 700 68 353 674 26 147 100 353 53 105 63 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 Cap, veh /h 69 740 629 379 1014 39 245 78 276 56 124 74 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.39 0.39 0.21 0.57 0.57 0.14 0.22 0.22 0.03 0.11 0.11 Sat Flow, veh /h 1792 1881 1599 1774 1782 69 1757 358 1264 1757 1081 649 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 53 700 68 353 0 700 147 0 453 53 0 168 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /h /In 1792 1881 1599 1774 0 1851 1757 0 1622 1757 0 1730 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.7 45.3 2.2 24.6 0.0 33.0 9.9 0.0 27.5 3.8 0.0 12.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.7 45.3 2.2 24.6 0.0 33.0 9.9 0.0 27.5 3.8 0.0 12.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.78 1.00 0.38 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 69 740 629 379 0 1053 245 0 354 56 0 198 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.95 0.11 0.93 0.00 0.67 0.60 0.00 1.28 0.95 0.00 0.85 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 134 762 647 415 0 1053 245 0 354 56 0 282 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 60.0 36.9 10.3 48.6 0.0 18.8 50.9 0.0 49.2 60.9 0.0 54.7 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 16.6 20.3 0.1 26.4 0.0 1.6 4.0 0.0 145.9 102.1 0.0 15.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 1/o),veh /In 2.1 27.7 1.4 14.8 0.0 17.2 5.1 0.0 26.6 3.4 0.0 6.6 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 76.6 57.3 10.4 75.0 0.0 20.4 55.0 0.0 195.2 163.0 0.0 69.8 LnGrp LOS E E B E C D F F E Approach Vol, veh /h 821 1053 600 221 Approach Delay, s /veh 54.6 38.7 160.8 92.1 Approach LOS D D F F 7 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 9.3 76.2 8.5 32.0 31.4 54.0 22.1 18.4 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.4 71.1 4.0 27.5 29.5 51.0 11.5 20.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +ll), s 5.7 35.0 5.8 29.5 26.6 47.3 11.9 14.0 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 13.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 2.2 0.0 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 75.1 HCM 2010 LOS E Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 AWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 7: 1 st St & West Rd /Stevens St PM Peak Hour �tersectioi I Intersection Delay, s /veh 17.5 Intersection LOS C Movement SEU SEL SET SER NWU NWL NWT NWR NEU NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 0 100 280 50 0 25 135 85 0 35 130 30 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 0 2 3 3 3 2 4 4 4 Mvmt Flow 0 105 295 53 0 26 142 89 0 37 137 32 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 Approach Cc NW Opposing Approach NW SE SW Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 1 Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 1 HCM Control Delay 23.8 14 13 HCM LOS C B B NELn2 NWLn1 SEW SWLn1 SWLn Vol Left, % 100% 0% 10% 23% 100% 0% Vol Thru, % 0% 81% 55% 65% 0% 65% Vol Right, % 0% 19% 35% 12% 0% 35% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 35 160 245 430 50 170 LT Vol 0 130 135 280 0 110 Through Vol 0 30 85 50 0 60 RT Vol 35 0 25 100 50 0 Lane Flow Rate 37 168 258 453 53 179 Geometry Grp 7 7 2 2 7 7 Degree of Util (X) 0.08 0.333 0.441 0.739 0.113 0.347 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.778 7.128 6.16 5.88 7.742 6.974 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 461 504 583 616 463 515 Service Time 5.528 4.878 4.21 3.92 5.491 4.722 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.08 0.333 0.443 0.735 0.114 0.348 HCM Control Delay 11.2 13.4 14 23.8 11.5 13.4 HCM Lane LOS B B B C B B HCM 95th -tile Q 0.3 1.4 2.2 6.4 0.4 1.5 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 AWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 7: 1 st St & West Rd /Stevens St PM Peak Hour kjtersectioi� Intersection Delay, s /veh Intersection LOS Movement WU SWL SWT SWR Vol, veh /h 0 50 110 60 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 5 5 5 Mvmt Flow 0 53 116 63 Number of Lanes 0 1 1 0 Approach SW Opposing Approach NE Opposing Lanes 2 Conflicting Approach Left NW Conflicting Lanes Left 1 Conflicting Approach Right SE Conflicting Lanes Right 1 HCM Control Delay 13 HCM LOS B Lane Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 8: 1st St & Railway Rd PM Peak Hour Intersection Minor2 Minorl Majorl Conflicting Flow All Int Delay, s /veh 2.7 150 450 447 274 153 0 0 Stage 1 161 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 1 5 5 90 5 5 5 205 110 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None 3.5 4 None 3.545 None Storage Length 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 523 474 902 514 502 758 Veh in Median Storage, # Stage 0 769 - 0 717 671 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 5 5 5 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 5 5 95 5 5 5 216 116 Major /Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Conflicting Flow All 450 503 150 450 447 274 153 0 0 Stage 1 161 161 - 284 284 - - - - Stage 2 289 342 - 166 163 - - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.15 6.55 6.25 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.15 5.55 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.15 5.55 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.545 4.045 3.345 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 523 474 902 514 502 758 1428 Stage 846 769 - 717 671 - - Stage 2 723 642 - 829 758 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 512 470 902 503 497 758 1428 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 512 470 - 503 497 - - Stage 1 843 765 714 668 Stage 2 709 639 814 754 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 11 13.9 0.1 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) 1428 607 511 1205 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - 0.019 0.206 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 11 13.9 8 0 HCM Lane LOS A A B B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.1 0.8 0 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 8: 1st St & Railway Rd PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 5 140 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 6 6 Mvmt Flow 5 147 5 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 332 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.16 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.254 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1205 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1205 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Projected 2020 - Alt 1 9: Clark Rd & E Yelm Ave (SR 507) PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations Volume (veh /h) 25 1150 10 80 1105 20 10 5 85 20 5 25 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1881 1881 1900 1881 1881 1900 1881 1881 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 26 1211 11 84 1163 21 11 5 89 21 5 26 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 Cap, veh /h 284 1412 13 269 1423 26 171 8 142 115 25 129 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.76 0.76 0.03 0.77 0.77 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 Sat Flow, veh /h 1792 1861 17 1792 1842 33 1386 86 1526 1323 267 1388 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 26 0 1222 84 0 1184 11 0 94 21 0 31 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /h /In 1792 0 1878 1792 0 1875 1386 0 1612 1323 0 1655 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 0.0 49.1 1.1 0.0 42.6 0.8 0.0 6.1 1.7 0.0 1.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 0.0 49.1 1.1 0.0 42.6 2.7 0.0 6.1 7.8 0.0 1.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.02 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.84 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 284 0 1425 269 0 1449 171 0 150 115 0 154 V/C Ratio(X) 0.09 0.00 0.86 0.31 0.00 0.82 0.06 0.00 0.63 0.18 0.00 0.20 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 322 0 1555 298 0 1570 251 0 243 191 0 250 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 10.9 0.0 9.1 16.0 0.0 7.7 47.0 0.0 47.7 51.5 0.0 45.8 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 0.1 0.0 4.7 0.7 0.0 3.3 0.2 0.0 4.2 0.8 0.0 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 1/o),veh /In 0.3 0.0 26.6 1.4 0.0 22.7 0.3 0.0 2.9 0.6 0.0 0.9 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 11.0 0.0 13.8 16.6 0.0 10.9 47.2 0.0 52.0 52.3 0.0 46.4 LnGrp LOS B B B B D D D D Approach Vol, veh /h 1248 1268 105 52 Approach Delay, s /veh 13.7 11.3 51.5 48.8 Approach LOS B B D D 1 2-1 3 4 8 Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 14.7 7.2 87.4 14.7 5.7 88.9 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 4.5 3.5 4.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.5 5.5 90.5 16.5 4.5 91.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +ll), s 8.1 3.1 51.1 9.8 2.4 44.6 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.4 0.0 31.8 0.3 0.0 36.6 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 14.8 HCM 2010 LOS B Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 10: E Yelm Ave (SR 507) & 103rd Ave PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 4 Moveme 548 SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 65 1230 1 5 1195 10 5 1 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - HCM LOS None - None F None Storage Length 100 NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 50 Capacity (veh /h) 16 538 548 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0 0.125 0.486 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 68 1295 1 5 1258 11 5 1 5 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl - Conflicting Flow All 1268 0 0 1296 0 0 2706 2711 1295 Stage - - - - - - 1432 1432 - Stage 2 - - 1274 1279 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.11 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 2.209 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 548 538 14 21 200 Stage 1 - - 168 202 - Stage 2 207 239 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 548 538 8 18 200 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 8 18 - Stage 1 147 177 Stage 2 136 237 Approach SE NW HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 0 $ 445.6 HCM LOS F Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 SWLn2 Capacity (veh /h) 16 538 548 13 206 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.724 0.01 0.125 0.486 0.332 HCM Control Delay (s) $ 445.6 11.8 12.5 $ 438.1 30.9 HCM Lane LOS F B B F D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.8 0 0.4 1.2 1.4 Notes -: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 10: E Yelm Ave (SR 507) & 103rd Ave PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SWL SWT SWR Vol, veh /h 5 1 65 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None Storage Length 75 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 Mvmt Flow 5 1 68 Major /Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 2709 2707 1263 Stage 1274 1274 - Stage 2 1435 1433 - Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 14 21 206 Stage 1 204 237 - Stage 2 165 199 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 12 18 206 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 12 18 - Stage 1 179 235 Stage 2 140 174 Approach SW HCM Control Delay, s 65.3 HCM LOS F Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 11: 103rd Ave SE & West Rd PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh 16.6 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 60 100 10 5 45 190 5 10 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized 12.1 None HCM LOS None None Storage Length Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBL Capacity (veh /h) 525 Veh in Median Storage, # 1473 0 0 0.04 0.047 0 - 0.793 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 63 105 11 5 47 200 5 11 5 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Min Conflicting Flow All 247 0 0 116 0 0 434 495 111 Stage 1 - - - - - - 237 237 Stage 2 - - 197 258 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.12 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.2 2.218 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1331 1473 536 479 948 Stage 1 - - 771 713 - Stage 2 809 698 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1331 1473 465 453 948 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 465 453 - Stage 1 732 677 Stage 2 733 695 Approach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 2.8 0.2 12.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBL Capacity (veh /h) 525 1331 1473 551 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.04 0.047 - 0.004 - 0.793 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.1 7.8 0 7.5 0 32 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 0 7.5 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 11: 103rd Ave SE & West Rd PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 340 25 50 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 358 26 53 Major /Minor �Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 403 400 147 Stage 1 158 158 - Stage 2 245 242 - Critical Hdwy 7.11 6.51 6.21 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.11 5.51 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.11 5.51 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.509 4.009 3.309 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 560 540 903 Stage 1 847 769 - Stage 2 761 707 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 524 510 903 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 524 510 - Stage 1 804 766 Stage 2 707 671 Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 32 HCM LOS D Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 12: NE Creek St & 103rd Ave SE PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh 3.5 Moveme EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh /h 240 155 85 180 45 110 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized 14 None None - None Storage Length NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT - 0 563 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - 8.4 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 1 1 0 0 Mvmt Flow 253 163 89 189 47 116 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minor1 - Conflicting Flow All 0 0 416 0 702 334 Stage 1 - - - - 334 - Stage 2 - 368 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.4 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.209 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1148 407 712 Stage 1 - 730 - Stage 2 704 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1148 372 712 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 372 - Stage 1 730 Stage 2 643 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.7 14 HCM LOS B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh /h) 563 1148 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.29 0.078 - HCM Control Delay (s) 14 8.4 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.2 0.3 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 AWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 13: Grove Rd SE & 103rd Ave SE PM Peak Hour �tersectioi I Intersection Delay, s /veh 17.8 Intersection LOS C Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU � WBT WBR NBU NBL NBTm NBR Vol, veh /h 0 110 210 40 0 5 130 125 0 50 170 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 116 221 42 0 5 137 132 0 53 179 5 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB Opposing Approach WB EB SB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 21.4 15.4 15.3 HCM LOS C C C ��BLr EBL WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 22% 31% 2% 34% Vol Thru, % 76% 58% 50% 39% Vol Right, % 2% 11% 48% 27% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 225 360 260 295 LT Vol 170 210 130 115 Through Vol 5 40 125 80 RT Vol 50 110 5 100 Lane Flow Rate 237 379 274 311 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.447 0.669 0.484 0.56 Departure Headway (Hd) 6.798 6.351 6.369 6.491 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 526 565 561 553 Service Time 4.89 4.427 4.455 4.575 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.451 0.671 0.488 0.562 HCM Control Delay 15.3 21.4 15.4 17.6 HCM Lane LOS C C C C HCM 95th -tile Q 2.3 5 2.6 3.4 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 AWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 13: Grove Rd SE & 103rd Ave SE PM Peak Hour kjtersectioi� Intersection Delay, s /veh Intersection LOS Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 0 100 115 80 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 105 121 84 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 Approach SB Opposing Approach NB Opposing Lanes 1 Conflicting Approach Left WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 Conflicting Approach Right EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 HCM Control Delay 17.6 HCM LOS C Lane Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 14: Walmart Blvd & 103rd Ave SE PM Peak Hour �itersectio� Int Delay, s /veh 5.5 Moveme EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh /h 10 270 10 15 240 15 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized 3.2 None HCM LOS None - None Storage Length Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL - 0 Capacity (veh /h) Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0.009 Grade, % 0 - 11.8 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 10 10 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 284 11 16 253 16 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 295 0 190 153 Stage 1 - - - - 153 - Stage 2 - 37 - Critical Hdwy 4.2 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.29 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1222 799 893 Stage 1 - 875 - Stage 2 985 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1222 792 893 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 792 - Stage 1 875 Stage 2 976 Approach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0 3.2 11.8 HCM LOS B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh /h) 797 1222 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.337 0.009 - HCM Control Delay (s) 11.8 8 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.5 0 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Projected 2020 - Alt 1 15: Bald Hills Rd /NE Creek St & E Yelm Ave (SR 507) PM Peak Hour � � i Movement BR WBL WBT WBRl NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations r + r Vii + r Volume (vph) 20 695 295 215 885 55 215 90 175 100 190 60 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 11 12 16 16 14 14 10 13 13 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 3.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.6 3.6 4.4 4.4 4.9 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1845 1568 1694 1845 1777 1986 1773 1652 1925 1636 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 1845 1568 1694 1845 1777 1986 1773 1652 1925 1636 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 21 732 311 226 932 58 226 95 184 105 200 63 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 37 0 0 28 0 60 0 0 0 53 Lane Group Flow (vph) 21 732 274 226 932 30 226 219 0 105 200 10 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Prot NA pm +ov Prot NA Perm Split NA Split NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 3 5 2 3 3 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 2.4 43.1 60.1 14.8 55.5 55.5 17.0 17.0 16.6 16.6 16.6 Effective Green, g (s) 2.9 43.7 61.3 15.3 56.1 56.1 17.9 17.9 17.1 17.1 16.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.40 0.56 0.14 0.51 0.51 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.9 4.9 4.9 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 46 732 873 235 940 906 323 288 256 299 246 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.40 0.05 0.13 c0.51 0.11 c0.12 0.06 c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.02 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.46 1.00 0.31 0.96 0.99 0.03 0.70 0.76 0.41 0.67 0.04 Uniform Delay, dl 52.8 33.1 13.1 47.1 26.7 13.4 43.5 44.0 41.9 43.8 39.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 7.0 33.3 0.2 47.7 27.4 0.1 6.5 10.9 1.1 5.6 0.1 Delay (s) 59.8 66.4 13.3 94.8 54.1 13.5 50.0 54.9 43.0 49.4 39.9 Level of Service E E B F D B D D D D D Approach Delay (s) 50.8 59.7 52.7 45.9 Approach LOS D E D D Phtersection Summary I _ HCM 2000 Control Delay 54.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 16: Morris Rd SE & Bald Hills Rd PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 4.6 Moveme SET SER NWL NW N E L NER Vol, veh /h 500 215 15 300 165 15 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized 30 None None - None Storage Length NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER - 0 328 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 9.3 0.1 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 3 3 1 1 Mvmt Flow 526 226 16 316 174 16 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Ir Min Conflicting Flow All 0 0 753 0 828 639 Stage 1 - - - - 639 - Stage 2 - 189 - Critical Hdwy 4.13 6.615 6.215 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.415 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.815 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.227 3.5095 3.3095 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 852 326 477 Stage 1 - 527 - Stage 2 828 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 852 319 477 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 319 - Stage 1 527 Stage 2 809 Approach SE NW HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 30 HCM LOS D Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER Capacity (veh /h) 328 852 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.578 0.019 - HCM Control Delay (s) 30 9.3 0.1 HCM Lane LOS D A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3.4 0.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 1" t SB Grove Rd NB GroV(� Rd a �r MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Projected 2020 -Alt 1 17) Yelm Ave at Grove Rd Roundabout South: NB Grove Rd 3 L 316 2.0 1.147 101.1 LOS F 30.8 782.4 1.00 8 T 105 2.0 1.147 94.2 LOS F 30.8 782.4 1.00 18 R 68 2.0 1.147 95.4 LOS F 30.8 782.4 1.00 Approach 489 2.0 1.147 98.8 LOS F 30.8 782.4 1.00 East: WB Yelm Ave 1 L 179 2.0 0.937 35.5 LOS E 22.7 577.7 1.00 6 T 800 2.0 0.937 24.9 LOS C 22.7 577.7 0.97 16 R 184 2.0 0.590 14.6 LOS B 5.3 134.0 0.87 Approach 1163 2.0 0.937 24.9 LOS C 22.7 577.7 0.96 North: SB Grove Rd 7 L 147 2.0 0.637 27.5 LOS D 4.8 122.7 0.95 4 T 100 2.0 0.637 20.7 LOS C 4.8 122.7 0.95 14 R 142 2.0 0.456 19.6 LOS C 2.7 67.4 0.88 Approach 389 2.0 0.637 22.9 LOS C 4.8 122.7 0.92 West: EB Yelm Ave 5 L 158 2.0 0.556 16.8 LOS C 4.8 122.1 0.79 2 T 737 2.0 0.556 9.7 LOS A 4.9 123.6 0.78 12 R 105 2.0 0.556 10.8 LOS B 4.9 123.6 0.78 Approach 1000 2.0 0.556 11.0 LOS B 4.9 123.6 0.78 All Vehicles 3042 2.0 1.147 32.0 LOS D 30.8 782.4 0.90 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v /c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. SIDRA Standard Delay Model used. Processed: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 9:33:36 AM Copyright © 2000 -2011 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA INTERSECTION 5.1.13.2093 www.sidrasoIutions.com Project: N: \Projects \1470 Evergreen Pacific Fund, LLC \1470.01 Yelm Commercial EIS \Phase 01- Preliminary EIS \Traffic\Ope ration s\S id ra\Ye I m - Grove current.sip 8001450, SHEACARR JEWELL, SINGLE 2.28 10.7 2.28 10.5 2.28 10.5 2.28 10.6 1.44 20.8 1.33 23.0 1.00 28.3 1.30 23.3 1.12 23.1 1.10 24.4 1.01 25.4 1.07 24.2 0.92 28.0 0.81 30.4 0.83 30.7 0.83 30.0 1.27 20.8 SIDRA _-%. INTERSECTION HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Projected 2020 - Alt 1 18: Y- 2c /Walmart Blvd & SR -507 PM Peak Hour --I. -4- t i Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 t t r Volume (veh /h) 215 605 100 200 870 160 125 65 130 305 60 90 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1827 1832 1900 1863 1881 1900 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 226 637 105 211 916 168 132 68 137 321 63 95 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 4 4 2 1 1 2 2 2 0 2 0 Cap, veh /h 262 1041 171 249 1019 187 166 82 166 355 468 406 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.35 0.35 0.14 0.34 0.34 0.09 0.15 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.25 Sat Flow, veh /h 1740 2993 493 1774 3017 553 1774 553 1114 1810 1863 1615 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 226 370 372 211 542 542 132 0 205 321 63 95 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /h /In 1740 1740 1745 1774 1787 1784 1774 0 1666 1810 1863 1615 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.7 14.8 14.8 9.7 24.2 24.3 6.1 0.0 10.0 14.6 2.2 3.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.7 14.8 14.8 9.7 24.2 24.3 6.1 0.0 10.0 14.6 2.2 3.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.28 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.67 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 262 605 607 249 604 603 166 0 248 355 468 406 V/C Ratio(X) 0.86 0.61 0.61 0.85 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.00 0.83 0.90 0.13 0.23 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 280 605 607 306 627 626 264 0 327 355 468 406 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 34.8 22.7 22.7 35.2 26.4 26.5 37.3 0.0 34.7 33.0 24.4 25.0 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 22.3 1.8 1.8 16.4 15.5 15.6 8.3 0.0 12.4 25.4 0.1 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 1/o),veh /In 6.7 7.4 7.4 5.9 14.5 14.5 3.4 0.0 5.5 9.7 1.2 1.8 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 57.1 24.5 24.5 51.7 41.9 42.1 45.6 0.0 47.2 58.4 24.5 25.3 LnGrp LOS E C C D D D D D E C C Approach Vol, veh /h 968 1295 337 479 Approach Delay, s /veh 32.1 43.6 46.6 47.4 Approach LOS C D D D 1 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 20.0 16.0 15.3 32.7 11.4 24.6 16.1 31.9 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.5 16.5 14.5 28.5 12.5 20.5 13.5 29.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +ll), s 16.6 12.0 11.7 16.8 8.1 5.9 12.7 26.3 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 0.5 0.1 7.7 0.1 1.7 0.1 2.1 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 40.9 HCM 2010 LOS D Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 19: SR -507 & Walmart Driveway Access PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 2.9 Moveme EBL EBT WBT Wl SBL SBR Vol, veh /h 45 1040 1155 140 75 75 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 150 - SBLn 350 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 47 1095 1216 147 79 79 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1216 0 0 2405 1216 Stage 1 - - - 1216 - Stage 2 - 1189 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.41 6.21 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.41 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.41 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 3.509 3.309 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 573 -37 222 Stage 1 - 282 - Stage 2 290 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 573 -34 222 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 140 - Stage 1 282 Stage 2 266 Approach —IW E W HCM Control Delay, s 0.5 0 44.8 HCM LOS E Minor Lane /Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn = Capacity (veh /h) 573 140 222 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.083 0.564 0.356 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.8 59.7 29.9 HCM Lane LOS B F D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 2.8 1.5 Notes -: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 20: Grove Rd SE & Parcel A North Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 3.9 Moveme WBL WBR NBT NBR - SBL SBT Vol, veh /h 140 30 185 135 30 120 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None 13.3 None None Storage Length 0 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 SBL SBT 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 147 32 195 142 32 126 Major /Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 455 266 0 0 337 0 Stage 1 266 - - - - - Stage 2 189 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 563 773 1222 Stage 1 779 - - Stage 2 843 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 547 773 1222 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 547 - - Stage 1 779 Stage 2 819 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 13.3 0 1.6 HCM LOS B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBT NBR WBLn1 WBLn2 SBL SBT Capacity (veh /h) 547 773 1222 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.269 0.041 0.026 - HCM Control Delay (s) 14 9.9 8 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.1 0.1 0.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 21: Grove Rd SE & Parcel A South Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 4.8 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 1 1 1 140 1 30 1 290 135 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized 6.12 5.52 None 6.12 5.52 None - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 None Storage Length - 6.12 5.52 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 Veh in Median Storage, # 4.018 0 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 338 796 0 371 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 1 1 147 1 32 1 305 142 Major /Minor in 327 796 351 358 670 1323 i aj Conflicting Flow All 701 755 243 685 684 376 243 0 0 Stage 306 306 - 378 378 - - - - Stage 2 395 449 - 307 306 - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 353 338 796 362 371 670 1323 Stage 1 704 662 - 644 615 - - Stage 2 630 572 A 703 662 0 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 327 327 796 351 358 670 1323 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 327 327 - 351 358 - - Stage 1 703 640 643 614 Stage 2 599 571 678 640 Approach F -W NB HCM Control Delay, s 13.9 22.5 0 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) 1323 407 383 1113 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - 0.008 0.47 0.028 - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 13.9 22.5 8.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A A B C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 2.4 0.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 21: Grove Rd SE & Parcel A South Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 30 230 1 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 32 242 1 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 447 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1113 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1113 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 1 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 22: Parcel D RIRO & E Yelm Ave (SR 507) PM Peak Hour LtersectioM - Int Delay, s /veh 0.6 Moveme EBT EBR WBL WB N B L NBR Vol, veh /h 855 110 0 1205 0 65 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized 19.8 None None None Storage Length NBLn1 -EBR WBL WBT - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 900 116 0 1268 0 68 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1016 0 2226 958 Stage 1 - - - - 958 - Stage 2 - 1268 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 683 47 312 Stage 1 - 373 - Stage 2 265 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 683 47 312 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 47 - Stage 1 373 Stage 2 - 265 Approach WB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 19.8 HCM LOS C Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 -EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh /h) 312 683 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.219 - HCM Control Delay (s) 19.8 0 HCM Lane LOS C A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 0 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 24: Parcel F RIRO /Parcel B/C RIRO PM Peak Hour Lersectiom Int Delay, s /veh 1.5 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 0 835 35 0 925 115 0 0 35 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized 0 None HCM LOS None None Storage Length Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBTm 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 550 633 0 481 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 879 37 0 974 121 0 0 37 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 mmmminor Conflicting Flow All 1095 0 0 916 0 0 1384 1992 458 Stage 1 - - - - - - 897 897 - Stage 2 - - 487 1095 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 4.14 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.54 5.54 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.22 2.22 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 633 740 103 60 550 Stage 1 - - 301 357 - Stage 2 531 288 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 633 740 67 60 550 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 67 60 - Stage 1 301 357 Stage 2 345 288 Approach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 12 HCM LOS B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBTm Capacity (veh /h) 550 633 740 481 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.067 - - 0.35 HCM Control Delay (s) 12 0 0 16.5 HCM Lane LOS B A A C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 0 1.6 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 24: Parcel F RIRO /Parcel B/C RIRO PM Peak Hour �itersectio� Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 0 0 160 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 168 Major /Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1473 1950 547 Stage 1034 1034 - Stage 2 439 916 - Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 88 64 481 Stage 1 248 308 - Stage 2 567 349 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 82 64 481 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 82 64 Stage 1 248 308 Stage 2 529 349 Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 16.5 HCM LOS C Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 25: Walmart Blvd & Parcel C North Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 4.5 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 20 5 80 10 5 25 185 230 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - 5.52 None - 5.52 None - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 None Storage Length 100 6.12 5.52 50 - Follow -up Hdwy 50 4.018 3.318 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 2.218 - 0 254 - 0 253 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 21 5 84 11 5 26 195 242 5 Major /Minor 189 211 750 166 211 794 Majorl Conflicting Flow All 982 969 289 1010 971 245 295 0 0 Stage 332 332 - 634 634 - - - - Stage 2 650 637 - 376 337 - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 228 254 750 218 253 794 1266 Stage 681 644 - 467 473 - - Stage 2 458 471 645 641 0.063 0.058 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 189 211 750 166 211 794 1266 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 189 211 - 166 211 - - Stage 1 576 634 395 400 Stage 2 370 398 559 631 Approach EB NB HCM Control Delay, s 14.3 16.1 3.7 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLnl WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) 1266 189 652 166 544 1319 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.154 0.111 0.137 0.063 0.058 0.016 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.4 26.4 11.4 28.2 12 7.8 HCM Lane LOS A D B D B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.2 0 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 25: Walmart Blvd & Parcel C North Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 20 270 10 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized - None Storage Length 100 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 21 284 11 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 247 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1319 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1319 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.5 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 26: Walmart Blvd & Parcel C South Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 3.1 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 0 0 80 50 0 50 0 420 50 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized Minor Lane /Major Mvmt None NBT NBR EBLn1 None SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) None Storage Length 682 331 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.123 0.318 0.025 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 - 20.9 0 HCM Lane LOS A 0 B Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 84 53 0 53 0 442 53 Major /Minor Minor2 Minorl Mai Conflicting Flow All 911 911 363 884 889 468 368 0 0 Stage 416 416 - 468 468 - - - - Stage 2 495 495 - 416 421 - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 255 274 682 266 282 595 1191 Stage 1 614 592 - 575 561 - - Stage 2 556 546 614 589 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 228 267 682 229 275 595 1191 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 228 267 - 229 275 - - Stage 1 614 578 575 561 Stage 2 507 546 525 575 Approach WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 11 20.9 0 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLnl SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) 1191 682 331 1069 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.123 0.318 0.025 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 11 20.9 8.5 HCM Lane LOS A B C A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.4 1.3 0.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 26: Walmart Blvd & Parcel C South Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 25 340 10 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized - None Storage Length 50 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 26 358 11 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 495 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1069 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1069 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 27: Y -2c & Parcel G North Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 4.7 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 115 1 1 1 1 45 1 160 1 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized A None i NBT None - SBL SBT SBR None Storage Length 381 832 1409 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 50 0.323 0.059 Veh in Median Storage, # HCM Control Delay (s) 0 18.9 0 7.7 - 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 121 1 1 1 1 47 1 168 1 Major /Minor Minor2 Minorl Major1 , Conflicting Flow All 590 567 247 567 624 169 305 0 0 Stage 395 395 - 171 171 - - - - Stage 2 195 172 - 396 453 - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 419 433 792 434 402 875 1256 Stage 630 605 - 831 757 - - Stage 2 807 756 629 570 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 379 410 792 415 381 875 1256 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 379 410 - 415 381 - - Stage 1 629 573 830 756 Stage 2 762 755 594 540 - Approach HCM Control Delay, s 18.9 9.6 0 HCM LOS C A Minor Lane /Major Mvmt i NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) 1256 381 832 1409 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 0.323 0.059 0.052 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 18.9 9.6 7.7 HCM Lane LOS A C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 1.4 0.2 0.2 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 27: Y -2c & Parcel G North Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 70 180 110 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized - None Storage Length 50 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 74 189 116 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 169 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1409 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1409 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.5 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 28: Y2- c /Y -2c & Parcel G South Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 6.5 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 115 1 1 1 1 45 1 1 1 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized Minor Lane /Major Mvmt None NBT NBR EBLn1 None - None Storage Length 666 1053 1620 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 50 0.185 0.047 Veh in Median Storage, # HCM Control Delay (s) 0 11.6 0 7.3 - 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 121 1 1 1 1 47 1 1 1 Major /Minor Minorl m Conflicting Flow All 234 210 59 211 268 2 117 0 0 Stage 206 206 - 4 4 - - - - Stage 2 28 4 - 207 264 - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 721 687 1007 746 638 1082 1471 Stage 796 731 - 1018 892 - - Stage 2 989 892 795 690 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 664 655 1007 718 608 1082 1471 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 664 655 - 718 608 - - Stage 1 795 698 1017 891 Stage 2 944 891 757 658 Approach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 11.6 8.6 2.5 HCM LOS B A Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 Capacity (veh /h) 1471 666 1053 1620 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 0.185 0.047 0.045 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 11.6 8.6 7.3 HCM Lane LOS A B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.7 0.1 0.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 28: Y2- c /Y -2c & Parcel G South Driveway PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 70 1 110 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized - None Storage Length 50 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 74 1 116 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 2 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1620 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1620 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.8 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Projected 2020 - Alt 1 32: Parcel G Right -Out & SR -507 PM Peak Hour LtersectioM - Int Delay, s /veh 0.2 Moveme EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh /h 995 0 0 1165 0 35 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized 12.8 None None None Storage Length NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1047 0 0 1226 0 37 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Min Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1047 0 2273 524 Stage 1 - - - - 1047 - Stage 2 - 1226 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 6.63 6.93 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.83 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.43 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.22 3.519 3.319 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 660 39 499 Stage 1 - 300 - Stage 2 276 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 660 39 499 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 149 - Stage 1 300 Stage 2 276 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 12.8 HCM LOS B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh /h) 499 660 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.074 - HCM Control Delay (s) 12.8 0 HCM Lane LOS B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing 2014 1: E Yelm Ave (SR 510) & Burnett Rd PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 0.5 Moveme SBL SBR SEL Mov Cap -2 Maneuver NWT NWR Vol, veh /h 25 1 2 615 395 35 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None SET SBLn1 None None Storage Length 0 0.002 - HCM Control Delay (s) Veh in Median Storage, # 0 HCM Lane LOS 0 0 HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) Grade, % 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 27 1 2 661 425 38 Major /Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1110 444 462 0 0 Stage 1 444 - - - - Stage 2 666 - - Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.11 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.209 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 234 618 1104 Stage 1 651 - - Stage 2 515 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 233 618 1104 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 233 - - Stage 1 651 Stage 2 513 Approach SE NW HCM Control Delay, s 22 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWR SEL SET SBLn1 Capacity (veh /h) 1104 239 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.117 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.3 0 22 HCM Lane LOS A A C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.4 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Existing 2014 2: Tahoma Blvd /Killion Rd & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations + r + r Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations + r + r Volume (veh /h) 5 670 40 20 480 45 25 10 55 15 5 1 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1881 1881 1881 1881 1881 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 5 728 43 22 522 49 27 11 60 16 5 1 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh /h 10 1021 868 39 947 89 47 140 119 29 99 20 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.54 0.54 0.02 0.56 0.56 0.03 0.07 0.07 0.02 0.06 0.06 Sat Flow, veh /h 1792 1881 1599 1792 1694 159 1810 1900 1615 1810 1538 308 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 5 728 43 22 0 571 27 11 60 16 0 6 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /h /In 1792 1881 1599 1792 0 1853 1810 1900 1615 1810 0 1846 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 11.7 0.5 0.5 0.0 8.0 0.6 0.2 1.4 0.4 0.0 0.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 11.7 0.5 0.5 0.0 8.0 0.6 0.2 1.4 0.4 0.0 0.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.17 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 10 1021 868 39 0 1036 47 140 119 29 0 118 V/C Ratio(X) 0.52 0.71 0.05 0.57 0.00 0.55 0.58 0.08 0.50 0.54 0.00 0.05 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 199 1416 1204 199 0 1395 201 774 658 201 0 752 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 20.1 6.9 4.4 19.6 0.0 5.7 19.5 17.5 18.1 19.8 0.0 17.8 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 36.7 1.0 0.0 12.3 0.0 0.5 10.7 0.2 3.3 14.7 0.0 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 1/o),veh /In 0.2 6.2 0.2 0.4 0.0 4.1 0.4 0.1 0.8 0.3 0.0 0.1 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 56.8 7.9 4.4 32.0 0.0 6.2 30.2 17.7 21.3 34.5 0.0 18.0 LnGrp LOS E A A C A C B C C B Approach Vol, veh /h 776 593 98 22 Approach Delay, s /veh 8.1 7.1 23.4 30.0 Approach LOS A A C C 2 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 3.7 26.1 4.2 6.5 4.4 25.5 4.5 6.1 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.5 30.5 4.5 16.5 4.5 30.5 4.5 16.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +ll), s 2.1 10.0 2.4 3.4 2.5 13.7 2.6 2.1 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 9.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 9.0 HCM 2010 LOS A Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing 2014 I Berry Valley Rd /Cullens St & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 0.8 Moveme SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 20 740 5 2 535 15 5 1 2 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - HCM LOS None - None D None Storage Length 150 NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 150 Capacity (veh /h) 138 839 1000 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0 0.021 0.091 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 21 779 5 2 563 16 5 1 2 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 inor Conflicting Flow All 579 0 0 784 0 0 1410 1407 782 Stage 1 - - - - - - 824 824 - Stage 2 - - 586 583 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 4.11 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.209 2.209 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1000 839 117 140 397 Stage 1 - - 370 390 - Stage 2 500 502 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1000 839 110 137 397 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 110 137 - Stage 1 362 382 Stage 2 478 501 Approach SE NW NE HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 32.8 HCM LOS D Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 SWLn2 Capacity (veh /h) 138 839 1000 116 462 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.061 0.003 0.021 0.091 0.048 HCM Control Delay (s) 32.8 9.3 8.7 39.1 13.2 HCM Lane LOS D A A E B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 0.1 0.3 0.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing 2014 I Berry Valley Rd /Cullens St & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SWL SWT SWR Vol, veh /h 10 1 20 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None Storage Length 100 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 11 1 21 Major /Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1400 1401 571 Stage 1 575 575 - Stage 2 825 826 - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 119 141 524 Stage 1 507 506 - Stage 2 370 389 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 116 138 524 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 116 138 - Stage 1 496 505 Stage 2 359 381 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 21.6 HCM LOS C Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing 2014 4: Longmire St & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour rsectio Int Delay, s /veh 1.8 Moveme SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 5 705 15 55 540 5 10 5 35 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - Minor Lane /Major Mvmt None - NWT NWR SEL SET None Capacity (veh /h) None Storage Length 150 134 200 0.268 0.072 0.006 0.09 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 8.7 - 0 HCM Lane LOS D 0 A Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 775 16 60 593 5 11 5 38 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Min Conflicting Flow All 599 0 0 791 0 0 1514 1514 783 Stage 1 - - - - - - 794 794 - Stage 2 - - 720 720 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 4.11 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.209 2.209 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 983 834 98 120 394 Stage 1 - - 381 400 - Stage 2 419 432 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 983 834 91 111 394 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 91 111 - Stage 1 379 398 Stage 2 - 384 401 Approach NW - HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.9 28.9 HCM LOS D Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 Capacity (veh /h) 205 834 983 134 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.268 0.072 0.006 0.09 HCM Control Delay (s) 28.9 9.7 8.7 34.5 HCM Lane LOS D A A D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 0.2 0 0.3 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing 2014 4: Longmire St & E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour rsectio Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SWL SWT SWR Vol, veh /h 5 1 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 None Storage Length 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy Veh in Median Storage, # 4 3.3 0 96 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 5 1 5 Major /Minor Conflicting Flow All 1533 1519 596 Stage 1 717 717 - Stage 2 816 802 - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 96 120 507 Stage 1 424 437 - Stage 2 374 399 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 79 111 507 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 79 111 - Stage 1 422 406 Stage 2 331 397 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 34.5 HCM LOS D Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing 2014 5: 1st St & Mosman Ave PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh 4.5 Moveme SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 15 10 135 35 5 25 35 360 25 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Mvmt Flow 16 11 148 38 5 27 38 396 27 Major /Minor Minorl Majorl Conflicting Flow All 866 863 330 928 854 409 335 0 0 Stage 363 363 - 486 486 - - - - Stage 2 503 500 - 442 368 - - Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 272 291 709 247 295 640 1219 Stage 654 623 - 561 549 - - Stage 2 549 541 592 620 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 245 274 709 181 278 640 1219 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 245 274 - 181 278 - - Stage 1 627 612 538 526 Stage 2 499 519 452 609 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 14.5 24 0.7 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane /Major Mvmt I SWL SWT SWR PW Capacity (veh /h) 1219 260 555 1142 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.032 - 0.275 0.317 0.014 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8 0 24 14.5 8.2 0 HCM Lane LOS A A C B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 1.1 1.4 0 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing 2014 5: 1st St & Mosman Ave PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SWL SWT SWR Vol, veh /h 15 295 10 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 16 324 11 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 423 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.209 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1142 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1142 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SW HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Existing 2014 6: 1st St & E Yelm Ave (SR 507)/E Yelm Ave (SR 510) PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations + r Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations + r Volume (veh /h) 50 500 60 200 475 25 135 90 210 45 95 55 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1881 1881 1881 1863 1863 1900 1845 1845 1900 1845 1845 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 53 526 63 211 500 26 142 95 221 47 100 58 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 Cap, veh /h 68 684 581 258 827 43 269 116 269 59 132 77 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.36 0.36 0.15 0.47 0.47 0.15 0.23 0.23 0.03 0.12 0.12 Sat Flow, veh /h 1792 1881 1599 1774 1755 91 1757 494 1148 1757 1096 636 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 53 526 63 211 0 526 142 0 316 47 0 158 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /h /In 1792 1881 1599 1774 0 1847 1757 0 1642 1757 0 1732 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.4 19.9 1.2 9.3 0.0 17.0 6.0 0.0 14.7 2.1 0.0 7.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.4 19.9 1.2 9.3 0.0 17.0 6.0 0.0 14.7 2.1 0.0 7.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.70 1.00 0.37 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 68 684 581 258 0 870 269 0 385 59 0 209 V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.77 0.11 0.82 0.00 0.60 0.53 0.00 0.82 0.80 0.00 0.76 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 211 1038 882 649 0 1477 394 0 621 163 0 438 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 38.5 22.7 5.8 33.4 0.0 15.8 31.4 0.0 29.3 38.7 0.0 34.3 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 17.4 2.0 0.1 6.3 0.0 0.7 1.6 0.0 4.7 21.0 0.0 5.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 1/o),veh /In 1.5 10.6 0.9 5.0 0.0 8.8 3.0 0.0 7.2 1.4 0.0 3.7 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 55.8 24.6 5.9 39.7 0.0 16.5 33.0 0.0 34.0 59.7 0.0 39.8 LnGrp LOS E C A D B C C E D Approach Vol, veh /h 642 737 458 205 Approach Delay, s /veh 25.4 23.1 33.7 44.3 Approach LOS C C C D 7 IF Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 7.6 42.5 7.2 23.4 16.2 33.8 16.9 13.7 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.5 64.5 7.5 30.5 29.5 44.5 18.1 20.4 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +ll), s 4.4 19.0 4.1 16.7 11.3 21.9 8.0 9.1 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 8.7 0.0 2.2 0.5 7.4 1.9 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 28.3 HCM 2010 LOS C Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing 2014 7: 1 st St & West Rd /Stevens St PM Peak Hour �itersectio� Int Delay, s /veh 25.1 Moveme SEL SET SER NWL NWT NW- NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 95 265 45 25 125 60 30 120 30 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized C None None - SWL SWT SWR None Storage Length 483 473 1403 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.023 150 0.458 0.901 Veh in Median Storage, # HCM Control Delay (s) 0 18.6 0 7.6 - 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 3 3 3 4 4 4 Mvmt Flow 100 279 47 26 132 63 32 126 32 Major /Minor T Minor1 Majorl Conflicting Flow All 506 424 139 571 437 142 168 0 0 Stage 203 203 - 205 205 - - - - Stage 2 303 221 - 366 232 - - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.13 5.53 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.13 5.53 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.236 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 480 525 915 430 512 903 1398 Stage 804 737 - 795 730 - - Stage 2 711 724 651 711 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 342 501 915 221 489 903 1398 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 342 501 - 221 489 - - Stage 1 786 720 777 713 Stage 2 527 707 370 695 - Approach SE NW HCM Control Delay, s 50.2 18.6 1.3 HCM LOS F C Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NER NWLn1 SELn1 SWL SWT SWR Capacity (veh /h) 1398 483 473 1403 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.023 0.458 0.901 0.023 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 18.6 50.2 7.6 HCM Lane LOS A C F A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 2.4 10.1 0.1 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing 2014 7: 1 st St & West Rd /Stevens St PM Peak Hour �itersectio� Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SWL SWT SWR Vol, veh /h 30 105 55 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized - None Storage Length 150 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 Mvmt Flow 32 111 58 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 158 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.15 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.245 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1403 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1403 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SW HCM Control Delay, s 1.2 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing 2014 8: 1st St & Railway Rd PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 2.4 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 1 2 1 85 1 5 1 170 100 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized 0 HCM LOS None None None Storage Length NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) 1465 614 Veh in Median Storage, # 1256 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 0 0.007 0.161 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 5 5 5 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 2 1 89 1 5 1 179 105 Major /Minor Minor2 Major1 Conflicting Flow All 361 410 122 359 358 232 122 0 0 Stage 124 124 - 234 234 - - - - Stage 2 237 286 - 125 124 - - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.15 6.55 6.25 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.15 5.55 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.15 5.55 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.545 4.045 3.345 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 598 534 935 591 564 800 1465 Stage 1 885 797 - 762 706 - - Stage 2 771 679 872 788 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 592 533 935 588 563 800 1465 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 592 533 - 588 563 - - Stage 1 884 796 761 705 Stage 2 764 678 868 787 Approach WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 10.9 12.2 0 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) 1465 614 596 1256 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - 0.007 0.161 0.001 - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 10.9 12.2 7.9 0 HCM Lane LOS A A B B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 0.6 0 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing 2014 8: 1st St & Railway Rd PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 1 115 1 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 6 6 Mvmt Flow 1 121 1 Major /Minor Major2 Conflicting Flow All 284 0 0 Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.16 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.254 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1256 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1256 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 HCM LOS Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Existing 2014 9: Clark Rd & E Yelm Ave (SR 507) PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations Volume (veh /h) 25 805 10 70 755 20 10 5 70 20 5 25 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1881 1881 1900 1881 1881 1900 1881 1881 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 27 866 11 75 812 22 11 5 75 22 5 27 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 Cap, veh /h 439 1230 16 425 1249 34 224 10 152 182 26 140 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.66 0.66 0.05 0.69 0.69 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 Sat Flow, veh /h 1792 1853 24 1792 1823 49 1385 101 1513 1339 258 1395 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 27 0 877 75 0 834 11 0 80 22 0 32 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /h /In 1792 0 1877 1792 0 1872 1385 0 1614 1339 0 1654 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.3 0.0 19.4 0.8 0.0 16.6 0.5 0.0 3.1 1.0 0.0 1.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.3 0.0 19.4 0.8 0.0 16.6 1.6 0.0 3.1 4.1 0.0 1.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.84 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 439 0 1245 425 0 1283 224 0 162 182 0 166 V/C Ratio(X) 0.06 0.00 0.70 0.18 0.00 0.65 0.05 0.00 0.49 0.12 0.00 0.19 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 519 0 2534 467 0 2528 497 0 480 445 0 492 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 5.1 0.0 7.0 6.1 0.0 5.9 27.8 0.0 27.9 29.9 0.0 27.0 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.0 2.3 0.3 0.0 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 1/o),veh /In 0.2 0.0 10.0 0.5 0.0 8.5 0.2 0.0 1.5 0.4 0.0 0.6 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 5.1 0.0 7.7 6.3 0.0 6.4 27.9 0.0 30.2 30.1 0.0 27.6 LnGrp LOS A A A A C C C C Approach Vol, veh /h 904 909 91 54 Approach Delay, s /veh 7.6 6.4 29.9 28.6 Approach LOS A A C C 1 2 ! 5 7 8 - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 11.1 6.5 48.0 11.1 5.1 49.4 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 4.5 3.5 4.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 4.5 88.5 19.5 4.5 88.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +ll), s 5.1 2.8 21.4 6.1 2.3 18.6 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.5 0.0 22.1 0.5 0.0 22.3 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 8.7 HCM 2010 LOS A Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing 2014 10: E Yelm Ave (SR 507) & 103rd Ave PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh 1.4 Moveme SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER Vol, veh /h 60 870 1 2 830 10 1 1 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - HCM LOS None - None E None Storage Length 100 NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 50 - Capacity (veh /h) 121 748 765 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0 0.083 0.134 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 63 916 1 2 874 11 1 1 5 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 884 0 0 917 0 0 1927 1931 916 Stage - - - - - - 1043 1043 - Stage 2 - - 884 888 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.11 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 2.209 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 765 748 51 67 333 Stage 1 - - 280 309 - Stage 2 343 365 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 765 748 38 61 333 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 38 61 - Stage 1 257 284 Stage 2 279 364 Approach SE NW HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0 36.7 HCM LOS E Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT NWR SEL SET SER SWLn1 SWLn2 - Capacity (veh /h) 121 748 765 47 345 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.061 0.003 0.083 0.134 0.183 HCM Control Delay (s) 36.7 9.8 10.1 93.1 17.8 HCM Lane LOS E A B F C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 0.3 0.4 0.7 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing 2014 10: E Yelm Ave (SR 507) & 103rd Ave PM Peak Hour LtersectioM Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SWL SWT SWR Vol, veh /h 5 1 60 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None Storage Length 75 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 Mvmt Flow 5 1 63 Major /Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1929 1926 879 Stage 1 883 883 - Stage 2 1046 1043 - Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 50 66 345 Stage 1 339 362 - Stage 2 275 305 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 45 60 345 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 45 60 - Stage 1 311 361 Stage 2 247 280 Approach SW HCM Control Delay, s 24.6 HCM LOS C Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing 2014 11: 103rd Ave SE & West Rd PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh 13.2 Moveme EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 55 85 10 5 35 160 5 10 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized HCM LOS None None B None Storage Length EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh /h) 559 1370 Veh in Median Storage, # 589 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 0.044 - 0.004 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 60 92 11 5 38 174 5 11 5 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 212 0 0 103 0 0 394 440 98 Stage 1 - - - - - - 217 217 - Stage 2 - - 177 223 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.12 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.2 2.218 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1370 1489 569 514 963 Stage 1 - - 790 727 - Stage 2 829 723 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1370 1489 495 488 963 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 495 488 - Stage 1 753 693 Stage 2 750 720 Approach EB WB i - HCM Control Delay, s 2.8 0.2 11.7 HCM LOS B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh /h) 559 1370 1489 589 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.039 0.044 - 0.004 - 0.701 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.7 7.7 0 7.4 0 24.2 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 0 5.6 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing 2014 11: 103rd Ave SE & West Rd PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh Moveme SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 305 25 50 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 332 27 54 Major /Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 362 359 125 Stage 1 136 136 - Stage 2 226 223 - Critical Hdwy 7.11 6.51 6.21 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.11 5.51 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.11 5.51 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.509 4.009 3.309 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 596 569 928 Stage 1 870 786 - Stage 2 779 721 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 560 540 928 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 560 540 - Stage 1 829 783 Stage 2 727 687 Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 24.2 HCM LOS C Minor Lane /Major Mvmt Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing 2014 12: NE Creek St & 103rd Ave SE PM Peak Hour Ltersectio Int Delay, s /veh 3 Moveme EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh /h 200 145 60 140 40 85 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized 12.1 None None - None Storage Length NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT - 0 634 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - 8.2 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 1 1 0 0 Mvmt Flow 208 151 62 146 42 89 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 359 0 555 284 Stage 1 - - - - 284 - Stage 2 - 271 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.4 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.209 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1205 496 760 Stage 1 - 769 - Stage 2 779 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1205 468 760 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 468 - Stage 1 769 Stage 2 - 735 Approach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.4 12.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh /h) 634 1205 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.205 0.052 - HCM Control Delay (s) 12.1 8.2 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 0.2 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 AWSC Existing 2014 13: Grove Rd SE & 103rd Ave SE PM Peak Hour �tersectioi� � Intersection Delay, s /veh 10.6 Intersection LOS B Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh /h 0 105 180 10 0 2 100 85 0 20 60 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 117 200 11 0 2 111 94 0 22 67 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Approach 0.24 EB 9.5 11.9 9.7 WB HCM Lane LOS A B NB A HCM 95th -tile Q Opposing Approach 2.3 WB 0.9 EB SB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 11.9 9.7 9.5 HCM LOS B A A NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 24% 36% 1% 40% Vol Thru, % 71% 61% 53% 10% Vol Right, % 6% 3% 45% 50% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 85 295 187 150 LT Vol 60 180 100 15 Through Vol 5 10 85 75 RT Vol 20 105 2 60 Lane Flow Rate 94 328 208 167 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.145 0.443 0.274 0.24 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.53 4.866 4.849 5.178 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 652 731 746 697 Service Time 3.536 2.965 2.849 3.181 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.144 0.449 0.279 0.24 HCM Control Delay 9.5 11.9 9.7 9.8 HCM Lane LOS A B A A HCM 95th -tile Q 0.5 2.3 1.1 0.9 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 AWSC Existing 2014 13: Grove Rd SE & 103rd Ave SE PM Peak Hour kjtersectioi� Intersection Delay, s /veh Intersection LOS Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh /h 0 60 15 75 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 67 17 83 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 Approach SB Opposing Approach NB Opposing Lanes 1 Conflicting Approach Left WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 Conflicting Approach Right EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 HCM Control Delay 9.8 HCM LOS A Lane Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing 2014 14: Walmart Blvd & 103rd Ave SE PM Peak Hour kitersectiom - Int Delay, s /veh 4.8 Moveme EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh /h 10 205 10 15 170 15 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None HCM Control Delay, s None - None Storage Length HCM LOS - 0 B Veh in Median Storage, # 0 EBT EBR WBL 0 0 Capacity (veh /h) Grade, % 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 10 10 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 218 11 16 181 16 Major /Minor MajorL= Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 229 0 157 120 Stage 1 - - - - 120 - Stage 2 - 37 - Critical Hdwy 4.2 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.29 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1293 834 931 Stage 1 - 905 - Stage 2 985 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1293 826 931 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 826 - Stage 1 905 Stage 2 976 Approach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0 3.1 10.6 HCM LOS B Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBLnl EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh /h) 834 1293 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.236 0.008 - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.6 7.8 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 0 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing 2014 15: Bald Hills Rd /NE Creek St & E Yelm Ave (SR 507) PM Peak Hour � � i Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + r + r Vii + r Volume (vph) 20 370 280 75 520 50 200 85 50 95 180 55 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 11 12 16 16 14 14 10 13 13 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 3.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.6 3.6 4.4 4.4 4.9 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1845 1568 1694 1845 1777 1986 1859 1652 1925 1636 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 1845 1568 1694 1845 1777 1986 1859 1652 1925 1636 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 21 385 292 78 542 52 208 89 52 99 188 57 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 76 0 0 31 0 16 0 0 0 47 Lane Group Flow (vph) 21 385 216 78 542 21 208 125 0 99 188 10 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Prot NA pm +ov Prot NA Perm Split NA Split NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 3 5 2 3 3 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 1.9 28.3 43.2 7.3 33.7 33.7 14.9 14.9 14.1 14.1 14.1 Effective Green, g (s) 2.4 28.9 44.4 7.8 34.3 34.3 15.8 15.8 14.6 14.6 14.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.35 0.53 0.09 0.41 0.41 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.17 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.9 4.9 4.9 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 50 641 837 159 761 733 377 353 290 338 277 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.21 0.05 c0.05 c0.29 c0.10 0.07 0.06 c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 0.01 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.42 0.60 0.26 0.49 0.71 0.03 0.55 0.35 0.34 0.56 0.03 Uniform Delay, dl 39.7 22.3 10.5 35.8 20.3 14.5 30.4 29.2 30.0 31.3 28.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.1 1.3 0.1 1.7 3.0 0.0 1.4 0.4 0.5 1.6 0.0 Delay (s) 43.8 23.7 10.6 37.5 23.2 14.5 31.8 29.7 30.5 32.9 28.9 Level of Service D C B D C B C C C C C Approach Delay (s) 18.8 24.2 31.0 31.5 Approach LOS B C C C Phtersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 24.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 83.1 Sum of lost time (s) 16.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing 2014 16: Morris Rd SE & Bald Hills Rd PM Peak Hour LtersectioM - Int Delay, s /veh 2.5 Moveme SET SER F NWLi NWT NEL NER Vol, veh /h 395 155 15 210 110 15 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized 16.9 None None - None Storage Length NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER - 0 432 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 8.7 0.1 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 3 3 1 1 Mvmt Flow 416 163 16 221 116 16 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Mincy� Conflicting Flow All 0 0 579 0 639 497 Stage 1 - - - - 497 - Stage 2 - 142 - Critical Hdwy 4.13 6.615 6.215 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.415 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.815 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.227 3.5095 3.3095 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 990 426 575 Stage 1 - 613 - Stage 2 873 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 990 418 575 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 418 - Stage 1 613 Stage 2 857 Approach NW HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.7 16.9 HCM LOS C Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER Capacity (veh /h) 432 990 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.305 0.016 - HCM Control Delay (s) 16.9 8.7 0.1 HCM Lane LOS C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.3 0 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing 2014 17: E Yelm Ave (SR 507) & Grove Rd SE PM Peak Hour LtersectioM _ Int Delay, s /veh 0.4 Moveme EBL EBT ! WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh /h 5 520 670 70 15 5 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized EBL None None - None Storage Length HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.101 0 9.3 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 A C 0 HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) Grade, % 0.3 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 1 1 0 0 Mvmt Flow 5 547 705 74 16 5 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 779 0 0 1300 742 Stage 1 - - - 742 - Stage 2 - 558 - Critical Hdwy 4.13 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.4 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.227 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 834 180 419 Stage 1 - 474 - Stage 2 577 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 834 178 419 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 178 - Stage 1 474 Stage 2 572 Approach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 24.2 HCM LOS C Minor Lane /Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh /h) 834 208 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - 0.101 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.3 0 24.2 HCM Lane LOS A A C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.3 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Existing 2014 18: E Yelm Ave (SR 507) /SR -507 & Walmart Blvd PM Peak Hour Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations + + r r Volume (veh /h) 105 455 685 100 175 70 Number 7 4 8 18 1 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1827 1827 1881 1881 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 111 479 721 105 184 74 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 4 1 1 0 0 Cap, veh /h 142 1264 1002 851 277 247 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.69 0.53 0.53 0.15 0.15 Sat Flow, veh /h 1740 1827 1881 1599 1810 1615 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 111 479 721 105 184 74 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /h /In 1740 1827 1881 1599 1810 1615 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.8 4.9 13.1 1.5 4.3 1.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.8 4.9 13.1 1.5 4.3 1.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 142 1264 1002 851 277 247 V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.38 0.72 0.12 0.66 0.30 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 366 2245 1771 1505 701 626 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 20.3 2.9 8.0 5.3 18.0 17.0 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 8.9 0.2 1.0 0.1 2.7 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 1/o),veh /In 1.7 2.5 6.9 0.7 2.4 1.8 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 29.2 3.1 9.0 5.3 20.7 17.6 LnGrp LOS C A A A C B Approach Vol, veh /h 590 826 258 Approach Delay, s /veh 8.0 8.5 19.9 Approach LOS A A B ILJ 2 3 Assigned Phs 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 34.7 10.4 7.2 27.5 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 55.5 17.5 9.5 42.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +ll), s 6.9 6.3 4.8 15.1 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 10.1 0.6 0.1 8.9 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 10.1 HCM 2010 LOS B Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing 2014 19: SR -507 & Walmart Driveway Access PM Peak Hour LtersectioM - Int Delay, s /veh 1.9 Moveme EBL EBT WBT WB� SBL SBR Vol, veh /h 40 590 715 130 70 70 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 150 - SBLn2 350 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 42 615 745 135 73 73 Major /Minor Majorl Major2 J Minor - Conflicting Flow All 745 0 0 1443 745 Stage 1 - - - 745 - Stage 2 - 698 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.41 6.21 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.41 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.41 - Follow -up Hdwy 2.218 3.509 3.309 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 863 146 416 Stage 1 - 471 - Stage 2 495 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 863 139 416 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 278 - Stage 1 471 Stage 2 - 471 Approach WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 0 19 HCM LOS C Minor Lane /Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT jWBR &BLnl SBLn2 Capacity (veh /h) 863 278 416 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.048 0.262 0.175 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.4 22.5 15.5 HCM Lane LOS A C C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 1 0.6 Yelm East Gateway Synchro 7 - Report SCJ Alliance 9/5/2014