20050067 Tahoma Terra - Environmental T A M E M O R A N D UM
_ - City of Yelm
6
YELM Community Development Department
WYSHINCTON
To: Washington Department of Ecology
Nisqually Tribal Council
Agencies with Jurisdiction
Affected Agencies
From: Grant Beck, Director of Community Developmen
Date: May 24, 2005
Subj: SEPA Threshold determination —Tahoma Terra
Attached please find a mitigated determination of non-significance regarding Tahoma
Terra, a proposed 220 acre Master Planned Community located in Yelm. The proposal
includes between 880 and 1,200 dwelling units, a neighborhood commercial area, and
parks and open space.
In addition to the environmental checklist, the following environmental information was
included in the threshold determination:
✓ Expanded Environmental Checklist, March 2005, SCA Consulting Group
✓ Updated Wetlands Analysis, March 2005, The Coot Company
✓ Preliminary Drainage and Erosion Control Report, March 2005, SCA
Consulting Group
✓ Transportation Impact Analysis, February 2005, Transportation Engineering
NW
The City has adopted the following environmental documents as part of the threshold
determination:
✓ Final Environmental Impact Statement, January 1995, City of Yelm
Comprehensive Plan and Joint Plan with Thurston County.
✓ Final Environmental Impact Statement, March 1993, Southwest Yelm
Annexation.
✓ Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Southwest
Yelm Annexation, July 1994, Thurston Highlands Master Plan Application.
✓ Environmental Checklist and Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance,
September 1999, Prairie View Master Plan.
✓ Critical Areas Study, December 1997, IES Associates
The referenced and adopted environmental documents may be viewed on the City of
Yelm web site at www.ci velm.wa us. From the home page, go to the Community
Development Department home and choose Tahoma Terra from the Agendas/Permits
menu.
i
Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance
File Number MPD-05-0067-YL
Proponent: Tahoma Terra, LLC
Description of Proposal: The development of a Master Planned Community on 220
acres located in southwest Yelm The application includes:
• Conceptual Master Site Plan approval for the 220 acre parcel to include a range of
housing types of between 880 and 1,200 residential units, a neighborhood
commercial center, and a network of open space/recreation improvements.
• Final Master Site Plan approval for the portion of the site east of Thompson Creek.
The Final Master Site Plan includes approximately 216 residential lots, 18
townhouse units, a neighborhood commercial center with approximately 100,000
square feet of gross floor area, and a portion of the community park.
• Preliminary subdivision of 89 residential lots within the Final Master Site Plan area
Location of the Proposal: I he 'I ahoma -1 erra Master Plan is located in the western
portion of the City of Yelm, near the Nisqually Valley Golf Course and in an area known
as the Southwest Yelm Annexation area.
Section/Township/Range: The Southwest '/4 of Section 24, and the East '/2 of the
Southeast '/4 of Section 23, Township 17 North, Range 2 East, W.M.
Threshold Determination: The City of Yelm as lead agency for this action has
determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on
the environment. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will not be
required under Section 43.21 C.030 (2)(c) RCW. This decision was made after review of
a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
This information is available to the public on request.
Conditions/Mitigating Measures: See Attachment A
Lead agency: City of Yelm
Responsible Official. Grant Beck, Community Development Director
Date of Issue- May 24, 2005
Co t Deadline: June 10, 2005
�Ap ea De line; ne 17, 2005
IX
Grant P ck, Community Development Director
i
4
Attachment A
Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance
MPD-05-0067-YL
Findings of Fact
1. This Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance is based on the project as
proposed and the impacts and potential mitigation measures reflected in the
applicant's environmental documents. In addition, per WAC 197-11-754, the
following documents are directly applicable to the subject proposal and are
hereby adopted by reference:
✓ Final Environmental Impact Statement, January 1995, City of Yelm
Comprehensive Plan and Joint Plan with Thurston County.
✓ Final Environmental Impact Statement, March 1993, Southwest Yelm
Annexation.
✓ Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Southwest
Yelm Annexation, July 1994, Thurston Highlands Master Plan Application.
✓ Environmental Checklist and Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance,
September 1999, Prairie View Master Plan.
✓ Critical Areas Study, December 1997, IES Associates
Environmental documents submitted as part of the application include:
✓ Expanded Environmental Checklist, March 2005, SCA Consulting Group
✓ Updated Wetlands Analysis, March 2005, The Coot Company
✓ Preliminary Drainage and Erosion Control Report, March 2005, SCA
Consulting Group
✓ Transportation Impact Analysis, February 2005, Transportation Engineering
NW
2. The environmental documents indicate that the property is composed of soils and
substrates that are suitable for building and for stormwater infiltration These
soils will be managed on-site to provide a source of base material needed for
roadway and building construction. Approximately 250,000 cubic yards of
material has been identified that will be screened and processed to balance the
earthwork needs on the site. Potential geologic hazard areas located on the site
will be protected through the requirement of a geotechnical report prior to final
Master Site Plan approval which only allows activities which: will not increase the
threat of the geological hazard to adjacent properties beyond pre-development
conditions; will not adversely impact other critical areas; and are designed so that
the hazard to the project is eliminated or mitigated to a level equal to or less than
pre-development conditions; and are certified as safe as designed by a qualified
engineer or geologist.
3. There is no indication in any of the environmental documents that there will be
`t
9. The environmental checklist indicates that roadways and pedestrian paths will be
lit to provide safe driving and walking conditions. The expected light is not
anticipated to exceed typical urban standards and therefore, is not expected to
have a significant impact on surrounding areas.
10. The addition of up to 1,200 new residential units will create additional demand on
the City's parks and recreational amenities. The proposed master plan will be
required to provide recreational opportunities for the residents of the City of
Yelm. Improvements generally include but are not limited to soccer fields, play
structures, seating areas, picnic tables, restroom facilities, rock wall, bike paths,
foot paths and an open water boardwalk.
11. The environmental documents have not identified any areas of historical or
cultural significance. Research of the City's historic resources (1935 aerial
photograph, 1918 map of the Yelm Irrigation District and Thurston County's map
of Historic places, and the database of historic properties maintained by the
Thurston Regional Planning Council) did not reveal any structures or locations on
the subject site that have any historic or cultural significance.
12. The traffic impact analysis (TIA) submitted as part of the application indicates
that upon full build out, the project could potentially generate between 13,300 —
15,300 vehicle trips per day, with a minimum PM peak of 1,400 vehicles per
hour. The TIA indicates that, with average growth:
The proposal will have a significant adverse impact on specific road corridors and
traffic movements at various intersections in the City, including Longmire Street
and Berry Valley Road.
The proposal will lower the level of service and increase wait times at the
intersection of 1st Avenue (SR-507) and Mosman Avenue, 1st Avenue (SR-507)
and Yelm Avenue (SR-510) and other intersections along Yelm Avenue.
The TIA proposed specific mitigation measures for many of the identified impacts
and has outlined the necessary improvements tied to specific development
phases of the project.
13. The environmental checklist indicates that the proposal will require police and fire
protection. The Yelm Police Department provides police services to all City
residents and businesses. The construction of Tahoma Terra will create
additional demand on the Yelm Police Department. The Yelm Police Department
is currently located in a facility that is substandard and beyond its useful life The
Yelm Capital Facilities Plan identifies a need to replace this facility.
SE Thurston Fire/EMS provides Fire and Basic Life Support services to City of
Yelm residents and businesses. The Tahoma Terra project will create additional
demand on the Yelm Fire District.
14. Impacts to fire protection services will be mitigated through the provision of fire
Attachment A MDNS (MPD-05-0067-YL) Page 3 of 6
6 �
Mitigation Measures
1. The developer shall mitigate transportation impacts through the payment of a
transportation facility charge (TFC) pursuant to Chapter 15 40 YMC. The fee
shall be paid at the time of building permit issuance.
2. The applicant shall be responsible for the following transportation improvements:
✓ Prior to the final subdivision approval of any lots the applicant shall
reconstruct Longmire Street to a modified collector standard from the project
entry to Yelm Avenue West (SR 510).
✓ Prior to the approval of any development permit (including a final subdivision)
which includes the 90th peak P.M. trip generated from the project, the
applicant shall construct a center left-turn lane on Yelm Avenue West (SR-
510) at the Longmire Street intersection with sufficient storage to serve the
anticipated traffic volumes generated by the project.
✓ Prior to the approval of_anv development permit (includina a final subdivision)
which includes the 513th peak P.M. trip generated from the project,
construction of the Killion Road Boulevard extension from the property to
Yelm Avenue West (SR-510) along with the realignment of Killion Road, a
traffic signal, and left turn lanes on all four legs of the intersection with
sufficient storage to serve the anticipated traffic volumes generated by the
project.
✓ Prior to the approval of any development permit (including a final subdivision)
which includes the 1,100th peak P.M. trip generated from the project,
reconstruct Mosman Avenue to modified collector standards from Longmire
Street to 1st Avenue (SR-507) and the Mosman Avenue/1st Avenue
intersection to include realignment and a center left-turn lane on 1st Avenue
(SR-507) with sufficient storage to serve the anticipated traffic volumes
generated by the project.
✓ Prior to the approval of any development permit (including a final subdivision)
which includes the 1,301st peak P.M. trip generated from the project, define
and construct the Mosman Avenue connector between Longmire Street and
Solberg Street OR; continue the Boulevard to SR 507 through the Thurston
Highlands property.
Plans for approval of all transportation improvements associated with Yelm
Avenue (SR 510) and 1 st Avenue (SR 507) shall be submitted to the Washington
Department of Transportation and the City of Yelm for review and approval and
all required improvements shall be constructed by the applicant pursuant to
approved plans, and inspected and approved by the City of Yelm and
Washington Department of Transportation.
3. To mitigate previous impacts from agricultural activities to surface waters, plant
Attachment A MDNS (MPD-05-0067-YL) Page 5 of 6
IFee
of THE p� City of Ye l m BDa
y e Received
M
File No
asI TL ..4 Community Development
Department
Y E LMOMI
M ENVIRONMENTAL
WASHINGTON CHECKLIST
Instructions
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires all governmental agencies to
consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. The
purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help identify impacts from your
proposal, to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal if it can be done, and to help the
City decide whether an EIS is required. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must
be prepared for any proposal with probable significant adverse impacts on
environmental quality.
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your
proposal. The City will use this checklist to determine whether the environmental
impacts of your proposal are significant and require preparation of an EIS. You must
answer each question accurately, carefully and to the best of your knowledge. Answer
the questions briefly, but give the best description you can. In most cases, you should
Gbe able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the
need for experts. If you do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your
proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions
now may avoid delays later. If the space provided is too small, feel free to attach
additional sheets.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and
landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the
city staff can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal even if you plan to do them
over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information
that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. You may be asked to
explain your answers or provide additional information for determining if there may be
significant adverse impacts.
Nonproject Proposals Only:
Complete both the checklist (even though many questions may be answered "does not
apply") and the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions (part D). For nonproject
actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property
or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area,"
respectively.
C
105 Yelm Avenue West (360)458-3835
PO Box 479 (360)458-3144 FAX
Yelm, WA 98597 www.ci.yelm.wa.us
CITY USE ONLY
CFEE: $150.00
DATE REC'D
BY:
FILE NO.
CITY OF YELM
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
A BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if any-
Tahoma Terra
2. Name of applicant
Tahoma Terra, LLC
3 Address, phone number and email address of applicant and of any other contact person
Steven L. Chamberlain slc@slcemail.com
Doug Bloom
Tahoma Terra LLC
C 4200 6`h Ave SE Suite 301
Lacey, WA 98503
360.493.6002
4 Date checklist prepared.
December, 2004
5 Agency requesting checklist
City of Yelm
6 Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable)
Construction to begin immediately after plat and engineering approval is issued.
7 Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal? If yes, explain
Yes, future phases and surrounding property.
G
Page 3
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, directly related to this proposal
March 1993 Southwest Yelm Annexation Final Environmental Impact Statement
June 1992 Southwest Yelm Annexation Draft Environmental Impact Statement
9/16/1999 MDNS issued for Prairie View Conceptual Master Plan
9 Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal'? If yes, explain
No
10 List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known
Design review approval, environmental assessment, grading plan approval,
engineering plan approval and building plan approval.
11 Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the
size of the project and site There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you
to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers
on this page
Master Plan Approval to Construct of approximately 1000 residential units on a
220-acres. Preliminary Plat Approval for 88 single-family lots.
12. Location of the proposal Give sufficient information for a person to understand the
C precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section,
township, and range, if known If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide
the range or boundaries of the site(s) Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map,
and topographic map, if reasonably available You need not duplicate maps or detail
plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist
The project is located south of 9P and north of Highway 507, in sections 23 & 24,
Township 17, Range 1 East W.M.
Thurston County Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 21724310100, 21724320000,
21724330000, 21724340100, 21723410000, 21723440000
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1 EARTH
a General description of the site (circle one) Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes,
mountainous, other
The property is vegetated with pasture grasses, trees and understory
plants. A residence and farmstead is located on the property. The former
Dragt dairy includes a house, dairy barns and associated outbuildings.
However, a major portion of the property is pasture.
Thompson Creek bisects the proposed development and is generally
surrounded with stream bank vegetation. The immediately surrounding
area is seasonally flooded pasture that meets the classification requirements for
wetlands.
Page 4
The portion of the property laying east of the creek is relatively flat. That
located to the west is rolling and hilly with broad valley areas.
b What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate slope)?
Approximately 30%
C What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand,
gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland
There are six different soil types listed for the site in the Soils Survey
of Thurston County, Washington, Sheet 24. Nisqually loamy fine sand
dominates the meadow area and along the creek bank; Spanaway
sandy gravelly loam 0-3%, and Spanaway sandy loam 3- 15%
encompasses the eastern portion of the property. The slope area in
the western portion of the property is a mix of Everett gravelly sandy
loam 0-3%and 3-1 S%slopes with the crown of the western edge
dominated by Yelm fine sandy loam. A small pocket of Mukilteo muck
is located in the southern end in the vicinity of the pond and the
Oregon ash forested wetland. Mukilteo muck is the only soil classified
as a hydric soil by the U.S. Department of Agriculture(Hvdric Soils of
the United States, 1991) (Figure 5- Soils Map, Appendix A). Soils
cores taken on the site were basically consistent with the Department
of Agricultural Soils Classifications. The majority of the soils east of
the creek are dark 10 YR 2/1 to 3/2, typical of Spanaway and Yelm
series. Soils on the west slope were more reddish and yellow-brown
C varying from 10 YR 3/3 to 10 YR 4/3 with some marginal 5 YR 4/3 soils.
Pockets throughout the area had 10 YR 3/2 particularly in the sloped
areas where the Everett soils are predominant(Figure 6- Soil Core
Location Map, Appendix A).
The northern end of the low meadow area adjacent to the east side of
the creek varied from the Nisqually being a mix of 10 YR 2/1 to a 10
YR 3/2 with extensive mottling, oxidized root zones and concretions.
Areas of hydric soils extended from off-site of the property to the
north along the east side of the creek, south through the ponded area,
Oregon ash forested wetland stand, and extending southwesterly to
end in a blind drainage at the south edge of the property.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? If so, describe
There are no indications of unstable soils in the area.
e Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or
grading proposed Indicate source of fill
Grading will be necessary on this site for purposes of building roads,
building pads and stormwater facilities.
In general, we expect there will be approximately 250,000 cubic yards
of material that will be cut, moved,processed and used as fill to
balance the sites earthwork needs. There are no significant physical
Page 5
features, i.e., hills, rock outcroppings, etc., that will require significant
changes in the overall landscape of the area. Please refer to the
Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan for details.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so,
generally describe
There is always the potential of erosion especially during excavation
work. However, due to the topography of the site, all erosion will be
contained on site.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after
project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
Approximately 10%-15%.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the
earth, if any
The installations of erosion control measures, i.e., silt fences, catch
basin filters, etc., will be installed for purposes of controlling erosion
potential during the excavation phase of construction. Long-term
erosion control measures will involve significant landscaping of all
disturbed areas.
2 AIR
a What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i e , dust,
automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the
project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate
quantities if known
During the project there will be emissions from construction
equipment and construction personnel vehicles. Occasional dust
may be generated by the construction activities as well. Following
construction, there will be emissions from automobiles driven by staff
and visitors of the facility.
b Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your
proposal'? If so, generally describe
No there are not.
c Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if
any
All equipment used on site during construction will be equipped with
standard emission control devices. If dust is a problem, water trucks
will be used to keep the soil damp.
3 WATER
a Surface
1) Is there any surface waterbody on or in the immediate vicinity of the
site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
Page 6
ponds, wetland)? If yes, describe type and provide names If
appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into
Yes.A detailed wetland analysis was performed on this site in
1992 by Rex Van Wormer, Senior Biologist IES Associates, IES
staff biologists and sub-consultants with expertise in soils and
threatened and endangered species.A second survey was
completed in November of 1997 to re-evaluate the site and
reflag the stream and wetland boundaries. The following
paragraphs summarize the wetland conditions on the subject
site. Please refer to the full Wetlands Report for the scientific
analysis, conclusions and recommendations.
Based on the combination of wetland vegetation, hydric soils
and positive hydrology, both in the form of subsurface
saturation within 12 inches of the soil and surface water, it
was determined that there is a single linear wetland on the site
that starts in the south end of the property and extends along
both sides of the creek to the main entry road that connects
the east pasture to the west pasture and via a bridge across
Thompson Creek.
Wetlands were classified using two systems, (1) the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service System Wetlands and Deep Water
Habitats of the United States, Cowardin, 1979, and the(2)
Department of Ecology(DOE) Washinqton State Wetlands
Ratinq Svstem. Under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the
wetland would be classified as a Palustrine Persistent
Emergent Marsh Seasonally Flooded wetland(PEMIJ). There is
a forested component in the south end of the site that would
be classified as a Palustrine Deciduous Leafed Forested
Seasonally Flooded wetland(PFO I J) except for the fact that
the forested component does not occupy more than 30 of the
overall wetland.
Under the City of Yelm wetland rating system, the wetland
would be classified as a Class II wetland because of its
functional values for wildlife, connection to a salmon bearing
stream, diversity of wetland types, and a significant habitat
value greater than 22 points from the rating system. However,
these wetlands have been analyzed by previous studies and
are being updated utilizing "Best Available Science"
techniques.
A single stream, Thompson Creek, runs through the
property. Within the Thurston County Shoreline Stream Type
map (May 8"', 1998), Thompson Creek would be a Type 4
stream.
Page 7
In addition, this property and the surrounding parcels are
located within an aquifer recharge area according to County
Comp. Plan Map M-8.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200
feet) the described water? If yes, please describe and attach
available plans
Yes, the project will be creating a Boulevard road that will bisect
the wetland and its associated buffers. In addition, there will be
a bridge that will be created which will travel over Thompson
creek. There will also bee wetland, stream and buffer
enhancement work together with recreational amenities.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed
in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area
of the site that would be affected Indicate the source of fill material.
None
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions?
Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if
known
No it will not
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note
locations on the site plan
Referring to the December 1, 1982 Thurston County Flood
Insurance Rate Map(Community-Panel Number 530188 0335 C),
within this proposal there is approximately a fifty foot wide
corridor running along Thompson Creek that does lie within a
100-year flood plain.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to
surface water? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated
volume of discharge
There is no waste materials proposed to be discharged to the
surface waters.
b Ground-
1 Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to
ground water? Give general description, purpose and approximate
quantities, if known
Domestic and agricultural water supply to the property is
currently served by three wells. The perfected water rights are being
transferred to the City in exchange for ERU's
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from
septic tanks or other sources, if any(for example- Domestic sewage,
industrial, containing the following chemicals , agricultural, etc).
Describe the general size of the system, the number of such
Page 8
systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the
number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve
No waste materials will be discharged to ground water.
c Water Runoff(including stormwater).
1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of
collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known) Where
will this water flow? Will this water flow into other water? If so,
describe
Urban Development runoff will be collected and infiltrated into
the grounds. See Drainage Report
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,
generally describe
Not likely with an appropriately designed, approved and
installed stormwater system.
d Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground and runoff water
impacts, if any
See detailed storm drainage report and drainage plan.
4 PLANTS
�j a Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site
_x_ deciduous tree alder, maple, aspen, other
_x_ evergreen tree fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
_x_ grass
_x_ pasture
crop or grain
_x_ wet soil plants cattail, buttercup, bullbrush, skunk cabbage, other
water plants water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation See Wetlands and Tree Reports.
b What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
All of the property has been logged with different sections of the
property logged at different times(refer to page 8 within the Technical
Appendices of the June 22, 1992 Draft EIS).
Currently, there are four major vegetative communities on the site.
The largest is the managed open pasture, the second largest is the
Douglas Fir/Deciduous mixed forest, the third largest is the emergent
marsh wetland community, with the smallest community being the
mixed deciduous/coniferous forested community. The open grass
community and emergent marsh wetland communities encompass
90% of the non-developed site located east of Thompson Creek and a
majority of the southern half of the area located west of Thompson
Creek.
Page 9
CC. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site
During the overall site investigation, it was discovered that there is no
old growth/mature forests on the site. There is one small oak
woodland,however, it is less than five acres in size, therefore, it is
not defined as a critical area.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or
enhance vegetation on the site, if any
All disturbed areas will be re-landscaped with landscaping suitable to
the area.
5. ANIMALS
a Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or
are known to be on or near the site(See Appendix D of Final EIS)
Birds hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
Woodpecker
Mammals deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Squirrel and Wood
Duck
Fish bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other
Pacific Tree Frog &two species of salamanders
Cb List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site
Referring to page 8 of the Dec 23, 1997 Critical Areas Study(Prairie
View Meadows), the site was evaluated for priority species as
identified in the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Priorit
Habitats and Species List(1996). There are four birds listed which
use the site. These include great blue heron (Ardea herodias),pileated
woodpecker(DryocopllS pileatus), wood duck(Aix sponsa), and
bufflehead(Bucephala albeola). Great blue heron use the area as a
hunting area only. Wood duck and Bufflehead use the area as a winter
feeding and loafing area. Pileated woodpecker feed on the area but
there was no evidence of a major snag which has the 'capability of
supporting a nesting site.
C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
Not to our knowledge
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any
Retaining native vegetation within the tree tract areas and new
landscaping will provide some habitat opportunities for urban wildlife
species. In addition, approximately 60 acres of wetlands and open
space will be retained to help preserve wildlife.
C
Page 10
6 ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)will be used
to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be
used for heating, manufacturing, etc
Electricity and natural gas will provide the energy needs of the facility.
b Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe
This project will not affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties. No structures will be exceeding 35 feet in height.
c What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any
The buildings will be designed in compliance with all current energy
efficiency codes. All appliances will be selected with energy
conservation in mind.
7 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
a Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe
CNo. But, there is always a small potential that fire or a fuel spill could
occur on site during construction.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required
No special emergency services other than standard medical
emergency response is expected for this project.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health
hazards, if any
None proposed.
b Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project
(for example traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
There are no noises in the area that will affect this project.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with
the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example traffic,
construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come
from the site
Short-term noise will be generated during construction of the
Cproject. This will primarily be composed of equipment noise
Page 11
during clearing and grading, and other construction noise while
C homes are being built.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any
Construction will take place during daylight hours only and will
comply with Yelm requirements pertaining to noise.
8 LAND AND SHORELINE USE
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Currently, a residence and farmstead is located on the property.
Adjacent properties consist of additional farms and rural residences.
b Has the site been used for agriculture If so, describe
Yes. Originally the site was used as a commercial dairy farm but
currently it is functioning as a cattle farm and will remain so for several
years.
C. Describe any structures on the site
There is an existing residence that includes a house, a series of barns,
out buildings and corrals.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what
Yes. The existing residence that includes a house, a series of barns,
out buildings and corrals will all be removed.
e What is the current zoning classification on the site
The site and nearby properties associated with the southwest
annexation are zoned Master Planned Community.
f What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site'?
The City Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and its
associated environmental impact statement, classified the land as
Master Planned Community.
g. If applicable, what is the current Shoreline Master Program designation of the
site
Within the Thurston County Shoreline Stream Type map (May 8'h,
1998), Thompson Creek would be a Type 4 stream.
h Has any part of the site been classified an "environmentally sensitive" area?
If so, specify
Yes. A detailed wetland analysis was performed on this site in 1992 by
Rex Van Wormer, Senior Biologist/ES Associates, lES staff biologists
C and sub-consultants with expertise in soils and threatened and
endangered species. A second survey was completed in November of
1997 to re-evaluate the site and reflag the stream and wetland
Page 12
C boundaries. Please refer to the full Wetlands Report for the scientific
analysis, conclusions and recommendations. However, These wetlands
have been analyzed by previous studies and are being updated
utilizing "Best Available Science"techniques.
A single stream, Thompson Creek, runs through the
propert�r. Within the Thurston County Shoreline Stream Type map
(May 8` , 1998), Thompson Creek would be a Type 4 stream.
In addition, this property and the surrounding parcels are located
within an aquifer recharge area.
1. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed
project?
Based on 1000 units and 2.3 persons per household, 2300 people would
be expected to reside in the completed project.
Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
Approximately four people will be displaced who currently work on the
cattle farm.
k Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any
None proposed.
I Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any
This project is subject to the land use and environmental approval
process as set forth in state and local codes. Considerable effort has
been taken to ensure the project is compatible with Yelm's
Comprehensive Plan and associated EIS, the City Development
Standards and Critical Areas Ordinance. Reviewing agencies will
ensure that the project is meeting all requirements.
9. HOUSING
a Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether
high, middle, or low-income housing
1000 middle-income units will be provided.
b Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether
high, middle, or low-income housing
One middle-income residential unit will be eliminated.
c Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any
As required by City Code, a variety of housing types are being
proposed including, single family attached homes, townhomes,
apartments and a section designated for neighborhood commercial.
Page 13
10 AESTHETICS
a What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including
antennas, what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed
Over all height will not exceed 42 feet above the average grade on the
building pad.
b What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed
No views(including that of Mount Rainier)from adjacent properties will
be altered or obstructed by this development.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any,
Proper alteration to design, use of materials and nicely landscaped
areas.
11 LIGHT AND GLARE
a What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would
it mainly occur?
Security lighting and street lighting should not increase the amount of
glare beyond the amount that is normally induced by street lighting
alone.
b Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere
with view?
No, it should not.
C What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal'?
None.
d Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any
Ensure that all on-site lighting is directed in toward the site and away
from adjacent properties.
12 RECREATION
a What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate
vicinity'?
Currently, there are no formal recreational facilities onsite. Within the
vicinity, a number of city parks and school sites exist that provide
recreation opportunities.
b Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses'? If so,
describe
No it would not.
Page 14
c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including
recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any
Provide approximately 60 acres of active and passive open space,golf
cart amenities, trials,pathways,pocket parks,playground, etc. Areas
will be designated for passive or active recreational opportunities.
13 HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
a Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or
local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site'? If so,
generally describe
There are no sites of historical significance on or near this site
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site
None known.
c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any
None proposed.
14 TRANSPORTATION
a Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system Show on site plan, if any
See site plan and updated transportation study.
b Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate
distance to the nearest transit stop?
None, however provisions are being made for future school bus and
public transit.
c How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many
would the project eliminate
Each residential unit will have required onsite parking, some offsite or
street parking. Commercial parking will be also provided.
d Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to
existing road or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicated whether public or private)
Yes both public and private—Please refer to Master Plan.
e Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rad, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe
^ No
Page 15
f How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
protect? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur
The project is broken down into many phases, for purposes of this
review, the application focuses on phases 1 & 2 and then full build out
of the project. Phase 1 & 2 will generate approximately 5,100 average
daily trips and 512 PM peak hour trips. Full build out of the project
anticipates a range of average daily traffic between 13,300— 15,300 trips
with PM peak hour volumes ranging between 1,400— 1,600 trips. Please
see Transportation Study by TENW dated February 25, 2005 for more
details.
g Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any
The Transportation Study by TENW outlines the detailed mitigation
requirements for the project. Please see page 27 for details.
15 PUBLIC SERVICES
a Would the protect result in an increased need for public services (for
example fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so,
generally describe
The addition of 1000 new residential units will add some increased need
for public services such as standard police and fire protection.
b Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if
any
Contribution to the City's mitigation fee program which will provide
funding for schools and roads.
16 UTILITIES
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site electricity, natural gas, water,
refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other
b Describe the utilities that are proposed for the protect, the utility providing the
service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate
vicinity which might be needed
Existing water, sewer,power,phone, cable and other utilities currently
serve the site and will be utilized for this plat. Service providers are:
Water— City of Yelm to include on-site groundwater supply
Sewer—City of Yelm municipal sewer system. Including waste water
reuse.
Storm— On-site
Refuse—Pacific Disposal
Power—Puget Sound Energy
Phone— YCOM
SIGNATURE
CThe above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge I understand
that the lead agency is relying on them to make it's decision
Page 16
C
Signature
Date Submitted
f\text\++pf++\04\041041repo rts\ecl.frm
C
C
Fee
14 TyE A� City of Ye l m Date Received
C ;meq,� By
I .A File No
aZ !�
Community Development
Department
Y E LM ENVIRONMENTAL
WASHINGTON CHECKLIST
Instructions
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires all governmental agencies to
consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. The
purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help identify impacts from your
proposal, to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal if it can be done, and to help the
City decide whether an EIS is required. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must
be prepared for any proposal with probable significant adverse impacts on
environmental quality.
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your
proposal. The City will use this checklist to determine whether the environmental
impacts of your proposal are significant and require preparation of an EIS. You must
answer each question accurately, carefully and to the best of your knowledge. Answer
the questions briefly, but give the best description you can. In most cases, you should
Cbe able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the
need for experts. If you do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your
proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions
now may avoid delays later. If the space provided is too small, feel free to attach
additional sheets.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and
landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the
city staff can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal even if you plan to do them
over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information
that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. You may be asked to
explain your answers or provide additional information for determining if there may be
significant adverse impacts.
Nonproject Proposals Only:
Complete both the checklist (even though many questions may be answered "does not
apply") and the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions (part D). For nonproject
actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property
or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area,"
respectively.
C
105 Yelm Avenue West (360)458-3835
PO Box 479 (360)458-3144 FAX
Yelm, WA 98597 www.ci.yelm.wa.us
CITY USE ONLY
CFEE: $150.00
DATE REC'D
BY:
FILE NO.
CITY OF YELM
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
A BACKGROUND
1 Name of proposed project, if any
Tahoma Terra
2 Name of applicant
Tahoma Terra, LLC
3 Address, phone number and email address of applicant and of any other contact person
Steven L. Chamberlain slc@slcemaii.com
Doug Bloom
Tahoma Terra LLC
C 4200 6`n Ave SE Suite 301
Lacey, WA 98503
360.493.6002
4 Date checklist prepared,
December, 2004
5 Agency requesting checklist
City of Yelm
6 Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable)
Construction to begin immediately after plat and engineering approval is issued.
7 Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal'? If yes, explain
Yes, future phases and surrounding property.
Page 3
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, directly related to this proposal
March 1993 Southwest Yelm Annexation Final Environmental Impact Statement
June 1992 Southwest Yelm Annexation Draft Environmental Impact Statement
9/16/1999 MDNS issued for Prairie View Conceptual Master Plan
9 Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain
No
10 List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known
Design review approval, environmental assessment, grading plan approval,
engineering plan approval and building plan approval.
11 Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the
size of the project and site There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you
to describe certain aspects of your proposal You do not need to repeat those answers
on this page
Master Plan Approval to Construct of approximately 1000 residential units on a
220-acres. Preliminary Plat Approval for 88 single-family lots.
12 Location of the proposal Give sufficient information for a person to understand the
precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section,
township, and range, if known If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide
the range or boundaries of the site(s) Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map,
and topographic map, if reasonably available You need not duplicate maps or detail
plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.
The project is located south of 93rd and north of Highway 507, in sections 23 &24,
Township 17, Range 1 East W.M.
Thurston County Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 21724310100, 21724320000,
21724330000, 21724340100, 21723410000, 21723440000
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1 EARTH
a General description of the site (circle one) Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes,
mountainous, other
The property is vegetated with pasture grasses, trees and understory
plants. A residence and farmstead is located on the property. The former
Dragt dairy includes a house, dairy barns and associated outbuildings.
However, a major portion of the property is pasture.
Thompson Creek bisects the proposed development and is generally
surrounded with stream bank vegetation. The immediately surrounding
area is seasonally flooded pasture that meets the classification requirements for
(�/` wetlands.
Page 4
The portion of the property laying east of the creek is relatively flat. That
Clocated to the west is rolling and hilly with broad valley areas.
b What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate slope)
Approximately 30%
C What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand,
gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland
There are six different soil types listed for the site in the Soils Survey
of Thurston County, Washington, Sheet 24. Nisqually loamy fine sand
dominates the meadow area and along the creek bank; Spanaway
sandy gravelly loam 0-3%, and Spanaway sandy loam 3- 15%
encompasses the eastern portion of the property. The slope area in
the western portion of the property is a mix of Everett gravelly sandy
loam 0-3%and 3-1 S%slopes with the crown of the western edge
dominated by Yelm fine sandy loam. A small pocket of Mukilteo muck
is located in the southern end in the vicinity of the pond and the
Oregon ash forested wetland. Mukilteo muck is the only soil classified
as a hydric soil by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (Hydric Soils of
the United States. 1991) (Figure 5- Soils Map, Appendix A). Soils
cores taken on the site were basically consistent with the Department
of Agricultural Soils Classifications. The majority of the soils east of
the creek are dark 10 YR 2/1 to 3/2, typical of Spanaway and Yelm
series. Soils on the west slope were more reddish and yellow-brown
C varying from 10 YR 3/3 to 10 YR 4/3 with some marginal 5 YR 4/3 soils.
Pockets throughout the area had 10 YR 3/2 particularly in the sloped
areas where the Everett soils are predominant(Figure 6-Soil Core
Location Map, Appendix A).
The northern end of the low meadow area adjacent to the east side of
the creek varied from the Nisqually being a mix of 10 YR 2/1 to a 10
YR 3/2 with extensive mottling, oxidized root zones and concretions.
Areas of hydric soils extended from off-site of the property to the
north along the east side of the creek, south through the ponded area,
Oregon ash forested wetland stand, and extending southwesterly to
end in a blind drainage at the south edge of the property.
d Are there surface indications or history of unstable sods in the immediate
vicinity If so, describe
There are no indications of unstable soils in the area.
e Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or
grading proposed Indicate source of fill
Grading will be necessary on this site for purposes of building roads,
building pads and stormwater facilities.
In general, we expect there will be approximately 250,000 cubic yards
of material that will be cut, moved,processed and used as fill to
balance the sites earthwork needs. There are no significant physical
Page 5
features, i.e., hills, rock outcroppings, etc., that will require significant
changes in the overall landscape of the area. Please refer to the
Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan for details.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or uses If so,
generally describe
There is always the potential of erosion especially during excavation
work. However, due to the topography of the site, all erosion will be
contained on site.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after
project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)'?
Approximately 10%-15%.
h Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the
earth, if any
The installations of erosion control measures, i.e., silt fences, catch
basin filters, etc., will be installed for purposes of controlling erosion
potential during the excavation phase of construction. Long-term
erosion control measures will involve significant landscaping of all
disturbed areas.
2 AIR
C a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i e , dust,
automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the
project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate
quantities if known
During the project there will be emissions from construction
equipment and construction personnel vehicles. Occasional dust
may be generated by the construction activities as well. Following
construction, there will be emissions from automobiles driven by staff
and visitors of the facility.
b Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your
proposal'? If so, generally describe
No there are not.
c Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if
any
All equipment used on site during construction will be equipped with
standard emission control devices. If dust is a problem, water trucks
will be used to keep the soil damp.
3 WATER
a Surface
1) Is there any surface waterbody on or in the immediate vicinity of the
site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
Page 6
ponds, wetland)? If yes, describe type and provide names If
appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into
Yes.A detailed wetland analysis was performed on this site in
1992 by Rex Van Wormer, Senior Biologist IES Associates, IES
staff biologists and sub-consultants with expertise in soils and
threatened and endangered species.A second survey was
completed in November of 1997 to re-evaluate the site and
reflag the stream and wetland boundaries. The following
paragraphs summarize the wetland conditions on the subject
site. Please refer to the full Wetlands Report for the scientific
analysis, conclusions and recommendations.
Based on the combination of wetland vegetation, hydric soils
and positive hydrology, both in the form of subsurface
saturation within 12 inches of the soil and surface water, it
was determined that there is a single linear wetland on the site
that starts in the south end of the property and extends along
both sides of the creek to the main entry road that connects
the east pasture to the west pasture and via a bridge across
Thompson Creek.
Wetlands were classified using two systems, (1) the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service System Wetlands and Deep Water
Habitats of the United States. Cowardin, 1979, and the(2)
Department of Ecology(DOE) Washington State Wetlands
Ratinq Svstem. Under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the
wetland would be classified as a Palustrine Persistent
Emergent Marsh Seasonally Flooded wetland(PEM1J). There is
a forested component in the south end of the site that would
be classified as a Palustrine Deciduous Leafed Forested
Seasonally Flooded wetland(PFO I J) except for the fact that
the forested component does not occupy more than 30 of the
overall wetland.
Under the City of Yelm wetland rating system, the wetland
would be classified as a Class Il wetland because of its
functional values for wildlife, connection to a salmon bearing
stream, diversity of wetland types, and a significant habitat
value greater than 22 points from the rating system. However,
these wetlands have been analyzed by previous studies and
are being updated utilizing "Best Available Science"
techniques.
A single stream, Thompson Creek, runs through the
property. Within the Thurston County Shoreline Stream Type
map(May 8'h, 1998), Thompson Creek would be a Type 4
stream.
Page 7
In addition, this property and the surrounding parcels are
located within an aquifer recharge area according to County
Comp. Plan Map M-8.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200
feet) the described water? If yes, please describe and attach
available plans
Yes, the project will be creating a Boulevard road that will bisect
the wetland and its associated buffers. In addition, there will be
a bridge that will be created which will travel over Thompson
creek. There will also bee wetland, stream and buffer
enhancement work together with recreational amenities.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed
in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area
of the site that would be affected Indicate the source of fill material
None
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions?
Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if
known
No it will not
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note
locations on the site plan
Referring to the December 1, 1982 Thurston County Flood
Insurance Rate Map(Community-Panel Number 530188 0335 C),
within this proposal there is approximately a fifty foot wide
corridor running along Thompson Creek that does lie within a
100-year flood plain.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to
surface water? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated
volume of discharge
There is no waste materials proposed to be discharged to the
surface waters.
b Ground.
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to
ground water? Give general description, purpose and approximate
quantities, if known
Domestic and agricultural water supply to the property is
currently served by three wells. The perfected water rights are being
transferred to the City in exchange for ERU's
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from
septic tanks or other sources, if any(for example Domestic sewage,
industrial, containing the following chemicals , agricultural, etc)
Describe the general size of the system, the number of such
Page 8
systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the
number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve
No waste materials will be discharged to ground water.
C. Water Runoff(including stormwater)
1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of
collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where
will this water flow? Will this water flow into other water? If so,
describe
Urban Development runoff will be collected and infiltrated into
the grounds. See Drainage Report
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,
generally describe
Not likely with an appropriately designed, approved and
installed stormwater system.
d Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground and runoff water
impacts, if any
See detailed storm drainage report and drainage plan.
4 PLANTS
Ca Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site
_x_ deciduous tree alder, maple, aspen, other
_x_ evergreen tree fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
_x_ grass
_x_ pasture
crop or grain
_x_ wet soil plants cattail, buttercup, bullbrush, skunk cabbage, other
water plants water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation See Wetlands and Tree Reports.
b What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
All of the property has been logged with different sections of the
property logged at different times(refer to page 8 within the Technical
Appendices of the June 22, 1992 Draft OS).
Currently, there are four major vegetative communities on the site.
The largest is the managed open pasture, the second largest is the
Douglas Fir/Deciduous mixed forest, the third largest is the emergent
marsh wetland community, with the smallest community being the
mixed deciduous/coniferous forested community. The open grass
community and emergent marsh wetland communities encompass
90% of the non-developed site located east of Thompson Creek and a
majority of the southern half of the area located west of Thompson
Creek.
Page 9
c List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site
CDuring the overall site investigation, it was discovered that there is no
old growth/mature forests on the site. There is one small oak
woodland;however, it is less than five acres in size, therefore, it is
not defined as a critical area.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or
enhance vegetation on the site, if any
All disturbed areas will be re-landscaped with landscaping suitable to
the area.
5 ANIMALS
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or
are known to be on or near the site(See Appendix D of Final EIS)
Birds hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
Woodpecker
Mammals deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Squirrel and Wood
Duck
Fish bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other
Pacific Tree Frog &two species of salamanders
b List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site
Referring to page 8 of the Dec 23, 1997 Critical Areas Study(Prairie
View Meadows), the site was evaluated for priority species as
identified in the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Priorit
Habitats and Species List(1996). There are fourbirds listed which
use the site. These include great blue heron (Ardea herodias),pileated
woodpecker(DryocopllS pileatus), wood duck(Aix sponsa), and
bufflehead(Bucephala aibeo/a). Great blue heron use the area as a
hunting area only. Wood duck and Bufflehead use the area as a winter
feeding and loafing.area. Pileated woodpecker feed on the area but
there was no evidence of a major snag which has the 'capability of
supporting a nesting site.
c Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain
Not to our knowledge
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any
Retaining native vegetation within the tree tract areas and new
landscaping will provide some habitat opportunities for urban wildlife
species. In addition, approximately 60 acres of wetlands and open
space will be retained to help preserve wildlife.
C
Page 10
6 ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)will be used
to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be
used for heating, manufacturing, etc
Electricity and natural gas will provide the energy needs of the facility.
b Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe
This project will not affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties. No structures will be exceeding 35 feet in height.
c What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any
The buildings will be designed in compliance with all current energy
efficiency codes. All appliances will be selected with energy
conservation in mind.
7 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
a Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe
Cj No. But, there is always a small potential that fire or a fuel spill could
occur on site during construction.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required
No special emergency services other than standard medical
emergency response is expected for this project.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health
hazards, if any
None proposed.
b Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project
(for example traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
There are no noises in the area that will affect this project.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with
the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example traffic,
construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come
from the site
Short-term noise will be generated during construction of the
Cproject. This will primarily be composed of equipment noise
Page 11
during clearing and grading, and other construction noise while
(� homes are being built.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any-
Construction will take place during daylight hours only and will
comply with Yelm requirements pertaining to noise.
8 LAND AND SHORELINE USE
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Currently, a residence and farmstead is located on the property.
Adjacent properties consist of additional farms and rural residences.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe
Yes. Originally the site was used as a commercial dairy farm but
currently it is functioning as a cattle farm and will remain so for several
years.
c Describe any structures on the site.
There is an existing residence that includes a house, a series of barns,
out buildings and corrals.
d Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
Yes. The existing residence that includes a house, a series of barns,
out buildings and corrals will all be removed.
e. What is the current zoning classification on the site?
The site and nearby properties associated with the southwest
annexation are zoned Master Planned Community.
f What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
The City Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and its
associated environmental impact statement, classified the land as
Master Planned Community.
g If applicable, what is the current Shoreline Master Program designation of the
site?
Within the Thurston County Shoreline Stream Type map (May 8'h,
1998), Thompson Creek would be a Type 4 stream.
h. Has any part of the site been classified an "environmentally sensitive" area?
If so, specify
Yes. A detailed wetland analysis was performed on this site in 1992 by
Rex Van Wormer, Senior Biologist IES Associates, IES staff biologists
i and sub-consultants with expertise in soils and threatened and
endangered species.A second survey was completed in November of
1997 to re-evaluate the site and reflag the stream and wetland
Page 12
boundaries. Please refer to the full Wetlands Report for the scientific
analysis, conclusions and recommendations. However, These wetlands
have been analyzed by previous studies and are being updated
utilizing "Best Available Science"techniques.
A single stream, Thompson Creek, runs through the
propel. Within the Thurston County Shoreline Stream Type map
(May 8r , 1998), Thompson Creek would be a Type 4 stream.
In addition, this property and the surrounding parcels are located
within an aquifer recharge area.
1. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed
project?
Based on 1000 units and 2.3 persons per household, 2300 people would
be expected to reside in the completed project.
Approximately how many people would the completed project displace
Approximately four people will be displaced who currently work on the
cattle farm.
k Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any
None proposed.
I Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any
This project is subject to the land use and environmental approval
process as set forth in state and local codes. Considerable effort has
been taken to ensure the project is compatible with Yelm's
Comprehensive Plan and associated EIS, the City Development
Standards and Critical Areas Ordinance. Reviewing agencies will
ensure that the project is meeting all requirements.
9 HOUSING
a Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether
high, middle, or low-income housing
1000 middle-income units will be provided.
b Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether
high, middle, or low-income housing
One middle-income residential unit will be eliminated.
c Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any
As required by City Code, a variety of housing types are being
proposed including, single family attached homes, townhomes,
apartments and a section designated for neighborhood commercial.
Page 13
10 AESTHETICS
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including
antennas, what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed
Over all height will not exceed 42 feet above the average grade on the
building pad.
b What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed'?
No views(including that of Mount Rainier)from adjacent properties will
be altered or obstructed by this development.
C Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any
Proper alteration to design, use of materials and nicely landscaped
areas.
11 LIGHT AND GLARE
a What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would
it mainly occur'
Security lighting and street lighting should not increase the amount of
glare beyond the amount that is normally induced by street lighting
alone.
b Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere
with view?
No, it should not.
C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
None.
d Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any
Ensure that all on-site lighting is directed in toward the site and away
from adjacent properties.
12 RECREATION
a What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate
vicinity?
Currently, there are no formal recreational facilities onsite. Within the
vicinity, a number of city parks and school sites exist that provide
recreation opportunities.
b Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe
No it would not.
Page 14
Cc Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including
recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any
Provide approximately 60 acres of active and passive open space, golf
cart amenities, trials,pathways,pocket parks,playground, etc. Areas
will be designated for passive or active recreational opportunities.
13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or
local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,
generally describe.
There are no sites of historical significance on or near this site
b Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site
None known.
c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any-
None proposed.
14 TRANSPORTATION
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system Show on site plan, if any
See site plan and updated transportation study.
b Is the site currently served by public transit'? If not, what is the approximate
distance to the nearest transit stop?
None, however provisions are being made for future school bus and
public transit.
C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many
would the project eliminate
Each residential unit will have required onsite parking, some offsite or
street parking. Commercial parking will be also provided.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to
existing road or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicated whether public or private)
Yes both public and private—Please refer to Master Plan.
e Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe
No
Page 15
f How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur
The project is broken down into many phases, for purposes of this
review, the application focuses on phases I & 2 and then full build out
of the project. Phase 1 & 2 will generate approximately 5,100 average
daily trips and 512 PM peak hour trips. Full build out of the project
anticipates a range of average daily traffic between 13,300- 15,300 trips
with PM peak hour volumes ranging between 1,400- 1,600 trips. Please
see Transportation Study by TENW dated February 25, 2005 for more
details.
9 Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any
The Transportation Study by TENW outlines the detailed mitigation
requirements for the project Please see page 27 for details.
15. PUBLIC SERVICES
a Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for
example fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so,
generally describe
The addition of 1000 new residential units will add some increased need
for public services such as standard police and fire protection.
b Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if
any
Contribution to the City's mitigation fee program which will provide
funding for schools and roads.
16 UTILITIES
a Circle utilities currently available at the site electricity, natural gas, water,
refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other
b Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the
service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate
vicinity which might be needed
Existing water,sewer,power,phone, cable and other utilities currently
serve the site and will be utilized for this plat Service providers are:
Water-City of Yelm to include on-site groundwater supply
Sewer-City of Yelm municipal sewer system. Including waste water
reuse.
Storm-On-site
Refuse-Pacific Disposal
Power-Puget Sound Energy
Phone- YCOM
SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge I understand
that the lead agency is relying on them to make it's decision
Page 16
Signature*
Date Submitted-
f\text\++pf++\04\04104Veports\ecI frm
Cl/