Ordinance 580 Concurrency~r
-~ ~~
City of Yelm
Ordinance 580
Concurrency Ordinance
" WHEREAS, the Washington State laws governing the division or development of
property require a specific written finding as to the adequacy of facilities necessary to
serve proposed development; and
WHEREAS, the City of Yelm has adopted a comprehensive plan and capital
facility plan identifying the levels of service necessary to accomplish concurrency; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to specify the standards and criteria for determining
concurrency within the City of Yelm or its associated urban boundary;
WHEREAS, the City desires to set rates which are below those of surrounding,
communities where possible;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY ADOPTED
Section 1. Definitions
a. .Concurrency-A determination that the facilities necessary to serve a
proposed land development are in place or planned for and properly funded with a
reasonable expectation that the facilities will be in place at the time needed to preserve
adopted levels of service.
b. Development activity-Any construction or expansion of a building,
structure, or use, any change in use of a building or structure, or any changes in the use,
of land, that creates additional demand and need for public facilities.
c. Development approval-Any written authorization from the City which
authorizes the commencement of development activity.
d. Land division-The action of dividing land for sale or lease, whether
through the subdivision process identified in Chapter 58.17 RCW, the City's binding site
plan review process, or any other process which results in the creation or modification
of the boundaries of a property for purposes of development.
e. Land development-Any action with respect to a parcel of real property
which requires plat approval pursuant to Chapter 58.17 RCW or site plan review
approval through Chapter 17.84 of the Yelm City Code, or master plan development
approval through Chapter 17.62 of the Yelm City Code.
f. Owner-The owner of record of real property, although when real property
is being purchased under a real estate contract, the purchaser shall be considered the
owner of the real property if the contract is recorded.
Ordinance 580
g. Project improvements-Site improvements and facilities that are planned
and designed to provide service for a particular development project and that are
necessary for the use and convenience of the occupants or users of the project, and are
not system improvements. No improvement or facility included in a capital facilities plan
approved by the governing body of the City shall be considered a project improvement.
h. Proportionate share-That portion of the cost of public facility improvements
that are reasonably related to the service demands and needs of new development.
i. Public facilities-Sewer service, water service, parks,. schools, and roads
are the public facilities for which the City will make specific findings of concurrency
based on the comprehensive plan.
j. Service area-A geographic area defined by the City in which a defined set
of public facilities provide service to development within the area. Service areas shall
be designated on the basis of sound planning or engineering principles.
k. System improvements-Public facilities that are included in the capital
facilities plan and are designed to provide service to service areas within the community
at large, in contrast to project improvements.
I. Transportation Facility Charge-payment of money imposed upon
development as a condition of development approval to pay for public facilities needed
to serve new growth and development, and that is reasonably related to the new
development that creates additional demand and need for public facilities, that is a
proportionate share of the cost of the public facilities, and that is used for facilities that
reasonably benefit the new development. "Transportation Facility Charge" does not
include a reasonable permit or application fee.
Section 2. Process
a. Whenever a reviewing authority is asked to consider the approval of a
division of land for sale or lease or the approval of a site plan, the reviewing official shall
make a written determination of concurrency in connection with facilities proposed or
available for the project.
b. With respect to each of the public facilities identified above, concurrency
shall be established and determined as follows:
i. Sewer:
(1) The project is within an area approved for sewer pursuant to
the adopted Sewer Comprehensive Plan for the City.
(2) Improvements necessary to provide City standard facilities
and services are present or are on an approved and funded plan to assure
availability in time to meet the needs of the proposed development.
Ordinance 580 2.
ii. Water:
(1) The project is within an area approved for municipal water
service pursuant to the adopted Water Comprehensive Plan for the City.
(2) Improvements necessary to provide City standard facilities
and services are present or are on an approved and funded plan to assure
availability in a time to meet the needs of the proposed development.
iii. Parks:
The project meets the requirements of the City fee-in-lieu requirements for
parks, Chapter 14.12 Yelm City Code.
iv. Schools:
The project sponsor provides a letter from the local school district that the
school facilities impacted by the proposed development are present, or are
on an approved and funded plan, to assure that facilities will be available
to meet the needs and impacts of the proposed development.
v. Transportation:
(1) The project makes on-site and frontage improvements,
consistent with City standards for utilities, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, bicycle
lanes where appropriate, and roads necessary to serve the proposed
project consistent with safety and public interest.
(2) The project makes such off-site ,facility improvements, not
listed on the capital facilities plan, as are necessary to meet City standards
for the safe movement of traffic and pedestrians attributable to the project.
Where a developer is required to oversize an off-site facility for a project
by more than 10% of the need generated by the proposed project, the City
may consider a developer reimbursement contract as authorized by state
law.
(3) The project makes a contribution to the facilities identified in
off-site comprehensive transportation plan, in the form of a Transportation
Facility Charge based on the list of projects specified to be constructed
within the next six years, or as partial credit against such charge,
constructs a portion of the six-year facility, in which case a credit shall be
given for the reasonable cost incurred therein, but not to exceed the extent
of potential savings to the City.
(4) Appendix A to this ordinance is the traffic report identifying
the Transportation Facility Charge for the six-year road program in place
at the date of the adoption of this ordinance. Such traffic report is to be
Ordinance 580 3
updated no less than annually, by July 1, of each year; provided, however,
the plan in effect shall remain in effect until a successor plan is fully
adopted.
Section 3. Determination and Payment of the Transportation Facility Charge
a. The Transportation Facility Charge shall be based on the per peak hour trip
rate identified in the report from transportation trip calculations based on a transportation
report consistent with City standards.
b. City Standards shall include:
Standard transportation assumptions as identified in Table 1.
ii. For facilities not on the standard transportation assumptions, the
Institute of Traffic Engineers trip generation manual for the most recent
year.
iii. For projects with nontraditional peal hour impacts or different from
standard projects modelled in Table 1, a special report, based on generally
accepted traffic engineering principles may be submitted and considered.
c. Credits shall be given to reflect the projected impact on the community
system such as, traffic decreases where an existing facility on site is removed or
replaced, and traffic reduction systems which are binding and likely to remain effective
for the life of the project.
d. Credits may also be given for projects which create a significant economic
benefit to the community, including industrial or manufacturing uses with an excess of
500 trips per day. The size of the credit shall be measured at an appropriate percentage
of the anticipated annual tax revenue increase to the community and available for capital
contribution to transportation facilities on the approved plan as a result of the project.
e. Payment of the Transportation Facility Charge shall be as follows:
i. For projects involving the division of land for sale of lease-upon the
issuance of a building permit for construction of each lot of record, for the
traffic attributable to that lot.
ii. For projects approved through site plan review-upon the issuance
of the building permit authorizing the construction of any phase, for the traffic
associated with that phase.
iii. For any project over 100 peak hour trips per day-the fee may be
paid in installments, at the municipal rate of interest in effect on the day of
building permit issuance, with 50% being paid at the issuance of the building
Ordinance 580
4
permit and the balance paid within 24 months, recognizing the lead time for the
City to bring major projects on line.
Section 4. Accounting and Appeals
a. All fees collected under this chapter shall be placed in separate accounts
for the dedicated purpose for which collected. Such funds may only be expended for
identified facilities on an approved plan, and must be spent within six years absent a
specific situation where the City can justify a longer period.
b. If an applicant desires to challenge the calculation or assessment of any
fee, such fee shall be paid under protest and the permit may be issued. Appeals shall
be heard by the City Council upon a de novo hearing.
c. Any such appeal shall consider the issues. raised, the proper fee to be
assessed, and the necessity to find concurrency as a precondition to any project
approval. The proper fee to be charged on appeal is determined (1) by compliance with
the terms of this ordinance, and (2) if for any reason the terms of this ordinance are
found inappropriate, such fee as necessary to assure concurrence for all facilities
identified herein, but not to exceed the fee collected pursuant to this ordinance.
Section 5. Effective Date
The ordinance shall be applicable to all land divisions and land developments and
master plan reviews for which applications are complete after the adoption date of this
ordinance.
Ka hryn Wolf, May r
ATTEST:
G1 ~ ~
L L/ ,~2Cf~
Agne P. Berin~i~ck, Cith Clerk
ADOPTED: June,"`26,1996
PUBLISHED: ~ NVN, ;7 ti-1y~4 , 1996
EFFECTIVE: Julyr 1'0, 1996
6~~~`~.'C~E~NN001~CURCY.ORD ~j
S. Chamberlain Associates, Inc.
TABLE 1
TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES CHARGE (TFC)
6-YEAR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
(Capacity Improvements Only)
Yelm Zoning
List of Improvements Sub-Area Cost*
1 .Stevens Avenue East $220,000
First Street to West Road
2 Edwards Street Northwest $210,000
Yelm Avenue to Coates Street
3 Yelm Avenue East East, South $120,000
4th Street to Clark Road
4 Ye/m Avenue East East, South $190,000
Plaza Drive to 5-Corners
5 Railroad Street Improvements (NP Road) Northwest $330,000
Rhoton Road to NE City Limits
6 Stevens Avenue Extension Northwest, East $210,000
Edwards Street to First Street
- 7 Mosman Street Realignment South, Southwest $190,000
SR 507 to Third Street
8 Y-3 Corridor Study & Design All $650,000
SR 510 to SR 507 (North Loop)
9 Ye/m Avenue West Northwest, Southwest $720,000
Yelm H.S. to First Street
10 West Road East $385,000
4th Street to 103rd Avenue
11 93rd Avenue Northwest $180,000
Realignment &Channelization
12 Killion Road Northwest $120,000
Realignment &Channelization
13 Traffic Signal System Improvements All $360,000
3-Locations
Total Improvement Cost: $3,885,000
" The estimated project cost includes the construction of the "core" roadway only. The cost for urban
amenities, such as concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lighting and landscaping is not included in the
TFC project cost estimate.
APPENDIX A
ORDINANCE 580
6/17/96
6054GRW.XLS
TABLE 1
TRIP GENERATION RATE DEFAULT VALUES
P.M. PEAK HOUR
and Uses Unit of
Measure
* Basic Rate
PM Peak
Trips/iJnit New
Trips % New
Trip Rate
Residential
Single Family (Detached) dwelling 1.01 100% 1.01
Multi Family (Town House, Duplex, &
Accessory Dwelling Units)
dwelling
0.60
100%
0.60
Retirement Community dwelling 0.28 100% 0.28
_
Mobile Home in MH Parks dwelling 0.56 100% 0.56
Commercial -Services
Drive-in Bank sq ft/GFA 43.63 75% 32.73
Walk-in Bank sq ft/GFA 17.35 80% 13.88
Day Care sq ft/GFA 15.56 75% 11.67
Library sq ft/GFA 4.74 75% 3.56
Post Office sq ft/GFA 6.11 75% 4.58
HoteUMotel room 0.69 100% 0.69
Service Station pump 15.18 50% 7.59
Service StationlMinimart pump 17.45 40% 6.98
Movie Theater screen 19.04 85% 16.18
Carwash site 81.00 65% 52.65
Health Club/Racquet Club sq ft/GFA 1.83 75% 1.37
Commercial - bzstitutioiaal
Elementary SchooUJr. High School student 0.02 80% 0.02
High School student 0.04 90% 0.04
Church sq ft/GFA 0.72 100% 0.72
Nursing Home bed 0.17 100% 0.17
Congregate Care/Asst. Living dwelling 0.17 100% 0.17
Commercial -Restaurant
Restaurant s ft/GFA 7.66 80% 6.13
'Fast Food Restaurant sq ft/GFA 36.53 50% 18.27
Commercial -
Retail Shopping Center
up to 9.999 sq ft sq ft/GLA 15.14 50% 7.57
*For uses with Unit of Measure in "sq ft/GFA" or "sq ft/GLA", trip rate is given as trips per 1000 sq ft of
gross floor area (GFA) or gross leasable area (GLA).
TABLE 1 (Cont.)
TRIP GENERATION RATE DEFAULT VALUES
P.M. PEAK HOUR
Unit of Basic Rate New New
Measure PM Peak Trips % Trip Rate
* Trips/Unit
Land Uses
10.000 - 49.999 sa ft sa ft/GLA 10.16 55% 5.59
50,000 - 99,999 sq ft sq ft/GLA 7.28 55% 4.00
100,000 - 199,999 sq ft sq ft/GLA 5.66 60% 3.40
200,000 - 299,999 sq ft sq ft/GLA 4.71 65% 3.06
300,000 - 399,999 sq ft sq ft/GLA 4.16 70% 2.91
over 400,000 sq ft sq ft/ GLA 3.66 75% 2.75
Supermarket sq ft/ GLA 10.34 75% 7.76
Convenience Market sq ft/GFA 53.73 45% 24.18
Discount/Department Store sq ft/GFA 7.79 50% 3.90
Miscellaneous Retail Sales sq ft/GFA 4.80 50% 2.40
Furniture Store sq ft/GFA 0.39 60% 0.23
Car Sales - New/LTsed sq ft/GFA 2.62 80% 2.10
Commercial -
Admi~tistrative Office
up to 9,999 sq ft sq ft/GFA 4.09 90% 3.68
10,000 - 49,999 sq ft sq ft/GFA 2.55 90% 2.30
50,000 - 99,999 sq ft sq ft/GFA 2.00 90% 1.80
100,000 - 199,999 sq ft sq ft/GFA 1.67 90% 1.50
200,000 - 299,999 sq ft sq ft/GFA 1.46 90% 1.31
over 300,000 sq ft sq ft/GFA 1.29 90% 1.16
Medical Office/Clinic sq ft/GFA 4.08 75% 3.06
btdustrial
Li ht Industr /Manufacturin s ft/GFA 0.98 100% 0.98
Industrial Park s ft/GFA 0.98 100% 0.98
Warehousin /St ra e s ft/GFA 0.74 100% 0.74
*For uses with Unit of Measure in "sq ft/GFA" or "sq ft/GLA", trip rate is given as trips per 1000 sq ft of
gross floor area (GFA) or gross leasable area (GLA).
(c:\data\6054702.tab)
S. Chamberlain Associates, Inc.
TABLE A-1
TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES CHARGE (TFC)
BASE-YEAR MODEL TRIPS
Total Base Year Census Data in Yelm TAZ's
SFDU 839 Units
Other 468 Units
Office 817 Emp.
Indust. 380 Emp.
Retail 497 Emp.
Average Weekday Evening Peak Hour Vehicle Trip Rates
SFDU 1.01 L.U. Code 210
Other 0.63 L.U. Code 220
Office 0.5 From Tumwater Kittelson Report
Industrial 0.46 L.U. Code 130
Retail 2.71 L.U. Code 814
Base Year 1995 Model Trips.
SFDU 847
Other 295
Office 409
Industrial 175
Retail 1347
Adjusted Base Year 1995 Model Trips
Pass-By Reduction
SFDU 847 1
Other 295 1
Office 409 1
Industrial 175 1
Retail 539 0.4
Total 2264
Adjusted Base Year Model Trips Including 25% Pass-Through Traffic
2830
Adjusted 6 year "No Growth" Model Trips
(Reflecting 3% annual pass-through increase)
2932
APPENDIX A
6~~~~~DINANCE 580
6054GRW.XLS
S. Chamberlain Associates, Inc.
TABLE A-2
TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES CHARGE (TFC)
FUTURE-YEAR TRAFFIC MODEL TRIPS
Total Expected 20 year Growth in Yelm UGA (With Thurston Highlands)
SFDU 1679 Units
Other 1381 Units
Office 333 Emp.
Indust. 241 Emp.
Retail 890 Emp.
Total Expected 6 year Growth in Yelm UGA (With Thurston Highlands)
SFDU 504 Units
Other 414 Units
Office 100 Emp.
Indust. 72 Emp.
Retail 267 Emp.
Average Weekday Evening Peak Hour Vehicle Trip Rates
SFDU 1.01 L.U. Code 210
Other 0.63 L.U. Code 220
Office 0.5 From Tumwater Kittelson Report
Industrial 0.46 L.U. Code 130
Retail 2.71 L.U. Code 814
Increase in Model Trips (6-Year Growth)
SFDU 509
Other 261
Office 50
Industrial 33
Retail 724
Adjusted Increase in Model Trips (6-Year Growth)
Pass-B v Reduction
SFDU 509 1
Other 261 1
Office 50 1
Industrial 33 1
Retail 362 0.5
Total 1215
APPENDIX A
6/17196 ORDINANCE 580
6054GRW.XLS
S. Chamberlain Associates, Inc.
TABLE A~
TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES CHARGE (TFC)
CONCURRENCY FEE CALCULATION
(P.M. PEAK HOUR TRIPS)
Six Year Growth -Percent Private Share
Adjusted New Model Trips 1215
Adjusted Total 6 year "No Growth" model trips 2932
Total 6 year trips
Percent Private Share
1215/4147= 29.30%
Total 6 Year TFC Eligible Improvement Costs (All Projects)
$ 3,109,660
Cost per New Trip End (All Projects)
Private Share Cost per New Vehicle Trip End
(29.3% of total cost divided by adjusted new model trips)
((29.3%)($3,109,660))/1215 $750
4147
7~8~96 6054GRW XLS
Ordinance 580 8
S. Chamberlain Associates, Inc.
TABLE 2
CITY OF YELM
TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES CHARGE (TFC)
FINANCIAL COST SUMMARY
Public Share Public Share Private Share
Maint/Re
List of Improvements Total Cost pair Cost Cost (Capacity) Capacity Cost Capacity Cost
1 Stevens Avenue $220,000 20% $44,000 $176,000 65%
$114,400 °
35/0
$61,600
First Street to West Road
2 Edwards Street $210,000 30% $63,000 $147,000 69%
$101,430 °
31 /o
$45,570
Yelm Avenue to Coates Street
3 Yelm Avenue East $120,000 10% $12,000 $108,000 63%
$68,040 °
37 /°
$39,960
4th Street to Clark Road
4 Ye/m Avenue East $190,000 10% $19,000 $171,000 80% $136,800 20% $34,200
Plaza Drive to 5-Corners
5 Railroad Street Improvements (NP Road) $330,000 20% $66,000 $264,000 65% $171,600 35% $92,400
Rhoton Road to NE City Limits
6 Stevens Avenue Extension $210,000 0% $0 $210,000 68% $142,800 32%
$67,200
Edwards Street to First Street
7 Mosman Street Realignment $190,000 20% $38,000 $152,000 67% $101,840 33% $50,160
SR 507 to Third Street
8 Y-3 Corridor Study & Design $650,000 0% $0 $650,000 85% $552,500 15% $97,500
SR 510 to SR 507 (North Loop)
9 Ye/m Avenue West $720,000 10% $72,000 $648,000 68% $440,640 32% $207,360
Yelm H.S. to First Street
10 West Road $385,000 20% $77,000 $308,000 65%
$200,200 °
35 /°
$107,800
4th Street to 103rd Avenue
11 93rd Avenue $180,000 0% $0 $180,000 58% $104,400 42%
$75,600
Realignment & Channelization
APPENDIX A
ORDINANCE 580
6/17/96 1
6054GRW.XLS
S. Chamberlain Associates, Inc.
TABLE 2
CITY OF YELM
TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES CHARGE (TFC)
FINANCIAL COST SUMMARY
List of Improvements
Total Cost Public Share
MainURe
pair Cost
Cost (Capacity) Public Share
Capacity Cost Private Share
Capacity Cost
12 Killion Road $120,000 0% $0 ~ $120,000 10%
$12,000 °
90% $108,000
Realignment & Channelization
13 Traffic Signal System Improvements $360,000 0% $0 $360,000 90%
$324,000 °
10 /° $36,000
3-Locations
SUBTOTALS: $3,885,000 $391,000 $3,494,000 71% $2,470,650 29% $1,023,350
Projected Revenues
(Gas Tax Allowance,
Grants-TIB, STP, etc.,
Assume 10% of cost)
($388,500) ($39,100) ($349,400) ($247,065) ($102,335)
'(Tax Increments, Assume
1 % of cost)
($38,850) ($3,910) ($34,940) ($24,707) ($10,234)
TOTALS: $3,457,650 $347,990 $3,109,660 $2,198,879 $910,782
*Tax Increments Allowance is based on the following figures:
1) Annual Tax Revenue increase of $100,000 per year.
2) Historic allocations of 9% per year of tax revenue increase, equating to an estimated $150,000 revenue over 6-year period allocated to the "road" fund.
3) Historically 10% of "road" fund is attributed to new growth, 25% of increased revenues in this model will be applied to new growth.
APPENDIX A
ORDINANCE 580
6/17/96 2
6054GRW.XLS
S. Chamberlain Associates, Inc.
TABLE 3
TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES CHARGE (TFC)
CONCURRENCY FEE CALCULATION
(P.M. PEAK HOUR TRIPS)
Six Year Growth -Percent Private Share
Adjusted New Model Trips 1215
Adjusted Total 6 year "No Growth" model trips 2932
Total 6 year trips 4147
Percent Private Share
1215/4147= 29.30%
Total 6 Year TFC Eligible Improvement Costs (All Projects)
$ 3,109,660 _
Cost per New Trip End (All Projects)
Private Share Cost per New Vehicle Trip End
(29.3% of total cost divided by adjusted new model trips)
((29.3%)($3,109,660))/1215 $750
APPENDIX A
ORDINANCE 580
6/17/96 6054GRW.XLS
S. Chamberlain Associates, Inc..
TABLE 4
CITY OF YELM
TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES CHARGE (TFC)
POTENTIAL CREDIT OPTIONS
List of Potential Credit Options
1 TFC reduction for businesses that generate significant tax revenues to the City.
2 TFC deferred payments for larger projects (i.e., 50% TFC payment with balance ~ interest over 5-years).
3 Transportation Demand Management (TDM) programs that reduce p.m. peak volumes.
Examples of TDM: flex-time work hours, tele-commuting, car & van pools, transit, etc.
APPENDIX A
ORDINANCE 580
6/17/96
Threshold
> 100 p.m. peak hour trips
> 100 p.m. peak hour trips
Any
6054GRW.XLS
~- S. Chamberlain Associates, Inc.
Sample TFC Calculations
SAMPLE NO. 1
20 Unif Single-Family Subdivision
P.M. Peak Hour Trip Rate - 1.01 trips/unit '
Total New Trips: (20 units) "` (1.01 trips/unit) = 20 trips (p.m. peak hour)
T1=C Calculation
(20 trips)*($750 per trip) _ $15,000
Cost Per Unit
($15,000)/(20 units) $750
SAMPLE NO. 2
90,000 sf OFFICE' COMPLIX
P.M. Peak Hour Trip Rate - 3.40 trips/1,000 sf
Total New Trips: (10,000 sf) '' (3.40 trips/1,000 sf) = 34 trips (p.m. peak hour)
Apply trip discount of 10%
Net New Trips: (34 trips) * (90%) = 31 trips (p.m. peak hour)
TFC Calculation
(31 trips)*($750 per trip) _ $23,250
Cost Per sf of Office Space
($23250)/10000sf) _ $2.33
APPENDIX A
ORDINANCE 580. ~ so54~RWXLS
sip sirs
S: .Chamberlain Associates, Inc.
Sample TFC Calculations
SAMPLE NO. 3
50,000 SF Commercial Retail
P.M. Peak Hour Trip Rate - 4.93 trips/1,000 sf
Total.Trips: (50,000 sf) " (4.93 trips/1,000) = 247 trips (p.m. peak hour)
Apply pass-by trip discount of 50%
Net New Trips: (247 trips) * (50%) = 124 trips (p.m. peak hour)
TFC Calculation
(124 trips)"($750 per trip) _ $93,000
Cost Per sf of Retail Space
{$93,000)/50,000 sf) $1.86
-------=-------------------------------------------------------
SAMPLE NO. 4
Fast-Food Restaurant (3,000 sf~
P.M. Peak Nour Trip Rate - 36.53 trips/1,000 sf
Total Trips: (2,500 sf) " (36.53 trips/1,000) = 110 trips (p.m. peak hour)
Apply pass-by trip discount of 50%
Net New Trips: (110 trips) * (50%) = 55 .trips (p.m. peak hour)
TFC Calculation
(55 trips)*($750 per trip) _ $41,250
Cost Per sf of Restaurant Space
($41,250)/3,000 sf) _ $13.75
APPENDIX A
ORDINANCE 580
6/19/96
6054GRW.XLS
', '~. Chamberlain Associates, Inc.
<'`
Sample.TFC Calculations
SAMPLE N0..5
100 Unit Apartment Complex .
P.M. Peak Hour Trip Rate - 0.63 trips/unit
Total New Trips: (100 units) * (0.63 trips/unit) = 63 trips (p.m. peak hour)
TFC Calculation
(63 trips)*($750 per trip) _ $47,250
Cost Per Unit
($47250)/(100 units) $473
APPENDIX A
ORDINANCE 580
6/19/96 ~ 6054GRW.XLS