The URL can be used to link to this page

7/17/06City of Yelm Planning Commission 2. 3. 4. 5. AGENDA Yelm Planning Commission Monday, July 17, 2006 4:00 P.M. Yelm City Hall 105 Yelm Avenue West Call to Order and Roll Call Approval of Minutes: June 12, 2006 Public Communications not associated with agenda items Public Hearings: None Scheduled Other a. Comprehensive Plan Update -Kathy McCormick b. Six Year Transportation Improvement Program -Grant Beck 6. Adjourn Next regular meeting Monday, August 21, 2006 - 4:00 P.M. Yelm City Hall Council Chambers Enclosures are available to non-Commission members upon request. It is the City of Yelm's policy to provide reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities. If you are a person with a disability in need of accommodations to conduct business, or to participate in government processes or activities, please contact Agnes Bennick, at 360-458-8404 at least four (4) working days prior to the scheduled event. All Planning Commission meetings are audio taped. For information on obtaining a copy, please call the Community Development Department at (360) 458-3835. City of Yelm Review Draft June 28, 2006 Comprehensive Plan Update 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... ........ 1 A. Intent ........................................................................................................................... ........ 1 B. Content ....................................................................................................................... ........ 1 C. Applicability ................................................................................................................. ........2 D. Consistency ................................................................................................................ ........ 5 II. Growth Management Act Planning Parameters .................................................................. ........6 A. Policies ........................................................................................................................ ........6 B. Population and Demographics .................................................................................... ........ 9 C. Urban Growth Area Boundaries .................................................................................. ...... 11 D The Planning Sub-Areas ............................................................................................. ...... 12 E. Public Participation ..................................................................................................... ...... 15 III . Land Use ............................................................................................................................ ...... 16 A. Policy Guide ................................................................................................................ ...... 16 B. Land Use Patterns ...................................................................................................... ...... 16 C. Changing the Land Use Map ...................................................................................... ...... 18 D. Intergovernmental Coordination ................................................................................. ...... 19 E. Transfer of Development Rights Program .................................................................. ...... 19 F. The Planning Sub-Areas - UGA Land Needs Assessment ........................................ ...... 20 IV . Housing ............................................................................................................................. ...... 24 A. Introduction ................................................................................................................. ...... 24 B. Inventory and Analysis ................................................................................................ ...... 24 C. Goals and Policies ...................................................................................................... ...... 37 D. Future Needs and Alternatives ................................................................................... ...... 39 V. Public Facilities and Utilities .............................................................................................. ...... 41 A. Introduction ....,.,.. ......................................................................................................... ..... 41 B. County-Wide Planning Policies .................................................................................... .....41 C. Public Faralities ............................................................................................................ .....42 D. Private Utflities ............................................................................................................. .....46 E. Overall Goals and Policies ........................................................................................... ..... 49 VI. TrartspoRatton .................... ............................................................................................... ..... 52 A. Adoption°of Existing }ocuments .................................................................................. ..... 52 $. Objective of Tn,~sportation Plan ......... ..... .... ....... ........... ...... ... ..... 52 C. Levels of Service (LOS) ............... ........ ........ ... 53 D; Other Transportation Service ::.................................................................................... ..... 53 E. Implementation of Transportation Plans......... ...... ...... ..... 54 VII Parks/Qpen Space ..................... ......... ......... ....... ......... ......... .. 55 A. Growth Management Objectives ...... .......... .... ........ ......... ...... ..... 55 B. County-Wide P ~ . ......... ..... ....... .. ........ ........ ............. ..... 55 C. City of Yeim Policies and LOS ..................................................................................... ..... 55 VII I. Economic Devebpment ................................................................................................... ..... 58 IX. Siting Essential Public Facilities ......................................................................................... .....59 X. Captial Facilities Plan .......................................................................................................... .....61 XI. Visioning ............................................................................................................................. .....68 XII . Environment ...................................................................................................................... .....69 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... ..... 69 Growth Management Act and County-Wide Planning Policies ............................................ ..... 69 Natural Environment Goals and Policies .............................................................................. ..... 69 Water Resources ........................................................... Aquifer Recharge Areas (Groundwater) ........................ Wellhead Protection Areas ............................................ Wetlands and Streams .................................................. Shorelines ...................................................................... Frequently Flooded Areas ............................................. XIII. Historic Preservation ................................................. XIV Miscellaneous Provisions .......................................... A. Property Rights ..................................................... B. Permits .................................................................. C. Citizen Participation .............................................. D. Growth Management Act Planning ....................... E. Comprehensive Plan Amendment ........................ F. Growth Management Definitions and Concepts... ............. ............... 70 ... .............................. ............... 71 ............ .............................. ............... 72 ........................... ............... 72 ........................ ............... 74 ............... ............... 74 .................... ............... 78 80 ....... ................ 80 ...................... ................ 80 ............................. ................ 80 . ~,~ :..................... ................ 70 ........... ...:......................... ................ 70 .......... ............................. ................ 71 I. INTRODUCTION* A. Intent The Yelm Comprehensive Plan represents the vision of the City of Yelm for development of the community over the next 259 years. This Plan also serves as the Joint Plan between Yelm and Thurston County for Yelm's Urban Growth Area. Sections of the Plan adopted by Thurston County are noted in each chapter (see the sections of the plan marked with an "). The Plan is written in the context of the State Growth Man ' "ent Act, which mandates issues which must be dealt with in a comprehensive plan and County-Wide Planning Policies which identify how certain aspects of growth managerrrent planning are to be met in Thurston County. Relevant County-Wide Policies in place a# the adoption of this plan are included at Tab 1. The narrative portions of the Plan identify specific goals and objectives- ~ the City for the Urban Growth Area which shall be considered policies for purposes of consistency. The purpose of the Joint Comprehensive Plan (the "Plan") is to identify how development is to occur over the next 259 years forthe City area and for the County area within the Urban Growth Area which will eventuaNy be served by City of Yelm public facilities and utilities. The Plan is to 6e revisited not less than each f+ve-seven years to review population progress, the. effectiveness. of the existing plan, and the need for change. B. Content The Plan is designed to in .and coordinate many of the Yelm planning documents into a coordinated whole. For purposes of a complete picture, the "Yelm Comprehensive Plan" cons~ts of the following documents: VOLUME 1 Comprehensive Plan Text Applicable to Entire Ci and UGA? Chapter I Introduction yes Chapter II GMA Planning Parameters yes Chapter III land Use yes Chapter IV Housing yes Chapter V Public Facilities & Utilities yes Chapter VI Transportation yes Chapter Vll Parks/Open Space no Chapter Vlll Economic Development no Chapter IX Siting Essential Public Facilities yes Chapter X Capital Facilities Plan no Chapter XI Visioning no Chapter I Page 1 Chapter XII Environment no Chapter XIII Historic Preservation no Chapter XIV Miscellaneous Provisions no Exhibit A County-Wide Planning Policies (August 1993) yes Exhibit B Population Projections yes Exhibit C Yelm Open Space Ordinance, amended 8/94 no Exhibit D Interim Yelm Critical Areas Resources Land Ordinance, no 9/92 Exhibit E Regional Transportation Improvement Program, 1995-1997 (September 1994) no Exhibit F Essential Public Facilities Comprehensive-Plan Provisions (January 1994) yes Civ eifdated ~fSt Bf l~'elirn°cS, A....I~...,G.Ie 4i. 4L.e r~ $ ~ ~ p~ ~ ~ T°°°7 Map 1 Urban Growth Boundary yes Map 2 Existing City Limits and Zoning no Map 3 Future Land Use yes Map 4 Critical Area and Shoreline Designat~ans yes Map 5 Critical Aquifer Designation yes Map 6 The Subareas yes Map 7 East Planning Subarea yes Map 8 South Planning Subarea yes Map 9 Southwest Planning Subarea yes Map 10 Northwest Planning Subarea yes Map 11 Developed, Unbuildable, and Developable Lands yes Appendix A Yelm Comprehensive Transportation Plan, August 1992 yes Appendix B Yelm Comprehensive Water Plan, August 1994 no Appendix C Yelm Comprehensive Sewer`Plan, August 1994 no Appendix D Yelm Parks Plan, 1987 Appendix E Yetm Econtunic Development Summit, 1988 Appendix F Yelm Visioning Plan, [pending] Appendix G Private Utility Planning for the Yelm Area 1. Electric 2. Gas 3. Telephone 4. Cable ~ ne C. Applicability The Comprehensive Plan is intended to apply to the entire Urban Growth Area. Jurisdictionally, the Plan will be implemented in the City by the City of Yelm within the City limits and in the unincorporated Urban Growth Area by Thurston County. Chapter I Page 2 Thurston County will adopt the following sections or portions of sections of the Yelm Comprehensive Plan and Joint Plan as applicable to the unincorporated Urban Growth Area (also see these sections of the Plan marked with an *): Cha ter Section I. Introduction Whole Cha ter II. GMA Planning A.1. Growth Management Act Parameters A.2. Countywide Planning Polices 6.1. Basis for Land Use P~ttning C. Urban Growth Area Bo ies D. The Planning Sub-Areas E.2. Provide Public Notice E.3. Provide O unit for Public I ut III. Land Use A. Policy G~ie B.2. Proposed` ,and Use Designations (subsection a.(i) and e. only) C. Changing the land Use Map D. In vernmental Coordination E. Transfer of Development Rights Program F. Plannin Su -Potential Land Uses IV. Housing Whole Chapter; except Goal 2 and policies 1-2, 2-1, 5-2 acid 5-4 V. Public Facilities and F. Overa~,Goals and Policies, except Goal 1 and Utilities Polic 1T1 VI. Trans ortation Whale Ch ter IX. Siting ~ntial Public Whole Chapter Fac~ities XIV. Miscellaneous R. Property Rights Provisions B. Permits C. Citizen Participation E. Com rehensive Plan Amendment Exhibit A, County-wide Whole Exhibit Plannin Policies,. Exhibit B, Population Whole Exhibit Pro'ections Exhibit F, Essential Public Whole Exhibit Facilities, Comprehensive Plan Provisions G •l.ihi4 !'` !`nn~nliM.~4r.d I lc~i \A/L..orc Chapter I Page 3 Cha ter Section Maps 1. Urban Growth Area Boundary 3. Future Land Use 4. Critical Areas 5. Critical Areas 6. Sub-Area 7. East Sub-Area 8. South Sub-Area 9. Southwest Sub-Area 10. Northwest Sub-Area Volume 2, Yelm Whole Plan and FEIS, but not the Transportation Plan Comprehensive Assumptions, and the Y Comprehensive Transportation Plan and Transportation Plan Supplement Final Environmental Impact Statement Thurston County will also adopt the following portions of the Draft Thurston County Comprehensive Plan as applicable to the unincorporated Urban Growth Area for Yelm: Cha ter Sections 6, Ca ital Facilities Whole Gha ter 7, Private Utilities Whole Ch ter 8, Economic Develo meat Whole Ch 9, Natural Environment Whole Cha ter 10, Historic Resources Whole Cha ter 11, Plan Amendments I. General Pfovisions II.A. Joint Plan Amendments II.D. Legislative Amendments Proposed by the Public III. Site-Specific (Quasi-Judicial) Amendments IV. A eats 12, Gbssa VVttole Cha ter Appendix B General Whole Appendix Schedule for Annual Comprehensnre Plan Amendments Map 34, Intercity Transit Whole Map Routes The City and the County ser~teraplate-have an urban services agreement and cooperation through permit processing and development regulations to implement the intent of this Plan. Chapter I Page 4 D. Consistency The Joint Comprehensive Plan for the Urban Growth Area incorporates and consolidates much of the planning which has been going on in the UGA. Many plans, including transportation and water, were completed using assumptions or calculations somewhat different from the assumptions used in this Comprehensive Plan. Where a variation exists, the more recent shall control and nonconforming plans are to be modified accordingly. Chapter I Page 5 I I. GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT PLANNING PARAMETERS A. Policies Note: See Chapter 1 Paoe 1 Introduction B Content which identities portions of the plan applicable to the Citv and UGA areas and C. Applicability for a list of the goals and policies applicable to the unincorporated portion of the Yelm Urban Growth Areas In addition ("1 reiterates the portions of the plan adopted by Thurston County. 1.* Growth Management Act The City of Yelm is participating in comprehensive planning under the provisions of the Growth Management Act, Chapter 36.7QA RCW. The purpose of the Act is to promote responsive, responsible ktcal planning to accomplish thirteen identified statewide goals. The goals in effect at the time this Plan is being adopted provide: The following State Growth Manaoement Act goals are adopted to guide the development and adoption of cxxt'tprehensive plans and development regulations of those counties and cities that are required ~ choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040. The following goad, are not listed in tinier of priority and shall be used exclusively for the purpose of guiding the development of comprehensive plans and development regulations: (1) Urban growth. Entourage delopment in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. (2) Reduce spraaA. Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low-density development. {3) Transportation. Encourage efficient multimodal transportation systems that are based on regional priorities and coordinated with county and city comprehensive plans. (4) Housing. Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of this state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing housing stock. (5) Economic development. Encourage economic development throughout the state that is consistent with adopted comprehensive plans, promote economic opportunity for all citizens of this state, especially for unemployed and for disadvantaged persons, promote the retention and expansion of existino businesses and recruitment of new businesses recognize regional differences impacting economic development opportunities, and encourage growth in areas experiencing insufficient Chapter II Page 6 economic growth, all within the capacities of the state's natural resources, public services, and public facilities. (6) Property rights. Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation having been made. The property rights of landowners shall be protected from arbitrary and discriminatory actions. 2.* (7) Permits. Applications for both state and local government permits should be processed in a timely and fair manner to ensure predictability. ($) (9) conserve nsn ana wuaure naaitaz, increase access ro rra lands and water, and develop parks and recreation facilities. opportunities, ural resource (10) Environment. Protect the environment and enhance the state's high quality of life, including air and water qualfly, and the availability of water. (11) Citizen participation and coordination. Encourage the involvement of citizens in the planning process and ensure coordination between communities and jurisdictions to reconcile conflicts. (12) Public facilities and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. (13) Historic preservation. Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and structures, that have historical or archaeological significance. RCW 36.70A.02Q The purpose of this Comprehensive Plan is to identify how the statewide goals will be met in the City of Yelm and the UGA. Procedural guidelines for the adoption of this plan were provided by the Washington State ['}apartment of Community, Trade and Economic Development under WAC 365-195-300 which were followed in the preparation of this document. County-Wide Planning Policies (CWPP) Thurston County, with the advice of the Cities and Towns in Thurston County, adopted County-Wide Planning Policies (CWPP) to aid and focus the Growth Management planning activities in Thurston County. These County-Wide Planning Policies were specifically approved by the City of Yelm. The CWPP in effect at the time the City of Yelm adopted its Comprehensive Plan are as set forth at Exhibit A. The purpose of this Comprehensive Plan is to identify how the Chapter II Page 7 Natural resource industries. Maintain and enhance natural resource- based industries, including productive timber,,?agricultural, and fisheries industries. Encourage the conservation of .productive forest lands and productive agricultural lands, and discourage incompatible uses. CWPP, as applicable, will be implemented in the City of Yelm and the UGA. The County-Wide Planning Policies are specifically adopted as the policy base for the Joint Plan in both the incorporated and unincorporated areas of the Yelm Urban Growth Area. 3. City of Yelm's Objectives a. Background The City of Yelm is a small town located in Northeastern Thurston County at the junction of two state highways. Growth in ate vicinity is determined by the community's proximity to Fort Lewis artd the rapidly growing Pierce County area, from Puyallup and Fredrickson toward the north, to Spanaway and Roy toward the south. The City of Yelm is also subject to growth pressures spilling over from the Thurston County metropolitan area and particularly the Lacey/East Lacey suburbs of the Lacey Urban Growth Management Area. It is expected that the growth itxtuced by the development of the major planned communities at DuPont, Meridian Campus, and Hawks Prairie will also spur growth in the Yelm area, as wr~tthe Thurston Highlands Planned Community, which is being designed to reach the recreational/golf/retirement market which does not now exist in the area as a focus development. In addition, Yelm is the urban center providing many of the urban services for a large suburban/rural cartmunity located in the Northeast Thurston County area. b. Comprehensive Plan Purpose The purpose of Yelm's Corttprehensive Plan is to identify how the City will ;prepare for and deal with growth which it is legally required to accommodate under the State Growth Management Act, as well as the other forces which will shape and guide the community in the future. Yelm's Comprehensive Plan is a continuation of the Joint Planning process between the City of Yelm and Thurston County prior to 1990. (chat Draft Plan is included as Volume 5/Appendix H for reference purposes, but is superseded by this Comprehensive Plan for all policy purposes} `The stated purpose of that Joint Plan was "to promote consistency of local plans and certainty about future development," which continues to be the focus of City planning under this Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the policy base for implementing the County-Wide Planning Policies (copy attached at Exhibit A) within the Yelm Urban Growth Area, including both incorporated and unincorporated Urban Growth Areas. Chapter II Page 8 B. Population and Demographics 1.'` Basis for Land Use Planning a. Forecasted Population: (see Exhibit B for details) a-9a2 I h~dtum-~t'evv~ I ~ ..e.~~ ~ n_._..i_c__ r..u r~___:a., T~~ Cnll flenci4v (icr'r Total Estimated Popwlation Between 2000 and 2030 Yelm andYel~ `Growth Area from TRPC Exhibit B Po ulation tedium Growth2 Po ulation Growth 4:385 2025 10,330 2005-2025 4,840 2{!30 11 480 2005-2030 5 890 populations forecasts in 2007. Chapter II Page 9 ' source ~ ' Aston coumy rrome zuua i rcr~ aman rvea roouiauon sun mans ? TRPC traditionally updates population and emolovment forecasts every 3-5 years and Cities and counties are obliged to conduct their planning using population forecasts that are consistent with those developed for their county by the Office of Financial Management (OFM) This means that the forecasts used by each county must fall within the range of the Hiah Intermediate and Low OFM series. Each county then determines the growth allocations for each city and its UGA in consultation with the cities In its County-Wide Planning Policies, Thurston 2. 3. 4. County relies on TRPC to determine realistic allocations of population, in Basis for Public Facility and Utility Planning The City of Yelm utilities and public facilities within the c~}r limits an of the~Medium Growth assumptio with the regional model adopted as part of the City may also use a 50-year planning horiz facilities as detailed in public facility plans. Range of Accuracy on Projections and 'rends Yelm School District Growth Planning l~for planning .Area. The use n Gs consistent The Yelm School District enrollment increased by an average annual rate of 2 4% between the 1990/1991 school year and the 2000/2001 school year. Between the 2003/2004 and 2004/2005 school nears the rate of change was 4 2% The school district will track student growth for planning purposes by Chapter II Page 10 n for such planni g regional allocation process. The on for certain portions of public o Student Enrollment. 1990-2005 Yelm Public School District So ce W h- et Stat Off fS cer ntendem of Publ clnstruction www kl2.wa.us. C.* Urban Growth Area Boundaries 1. Goals and Objectives of the Yelm Urban Growth Area Boundary The Urban Growth Area is a product of joint planning with the Board of Thurston County Commissioners after review and recxmtmendation by the Urban Growth Management Committee. The Urban Growth Area is designed to permit growth to occur, at urban densities, during the next 20 years, while assuring adequate facilities and the preservation of sufficient land to assure adequate open space and preservation of critical areas. The area must also contain sufficient land area to assure reasonable choice and variety in meeting residential, commercial, and industrial reeds and a reasonable allowance of reserve areas to provide a competitive and affordable land on which new development should occur. 9a 2. The Planning Subarea Characterization of the Yelm Growth Area The key elements ud to identify the property in and around the City of Yelm are as follows:" a. Characterized by urban growth or adjacent to territory already characterized by urban growth. b. Served or planned to be served by municipal utilities. c. Near urban areas and characterized by the ability to support urban growth. d. Follows logical boundaries. e. Provides adequate room for growth. f. Reflects citizen preference. Chapter II Page 11 Yelm 3 301 a '172 a t ~ 4.525 4.671 4.737 4.936 2.4La a.z°io 3. Urban Growth Area Boundaries Th 1 I L. /'` i+L. A L. .J IL. '4 .+ 'I fi ^a '^ iL.^ !`.. .^4.. \A/'.do ~ ~ The Plan identifies sher~terrr~{7rowth boundaries which are designed to encourage development at urban levels of density on urban services. The City of Yelm will not annex beyond the et3e'*.~~Urban Growth f~Boundary and will extend utilities beyond the City limits only when a public health emergency requiring such action ~ approved by the County, and will not impose a financial burden on the City. T~`^T~' ~.,~*ti FAT D.* The Planning Sub-Areas 1. "East" Planning Area (see Map 10) The East Planning Area is bounded by the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks on the west, the Centralia Power Canal on the north and east, and State Route 510 on the south. a. Urban Growth The East Plannit~, Area is characterized by significant commercial development within the City. The Urban Growth Area is presently characterized by swell-established road network and areas of urban and suburban den "' as well as some property at lower densities, and a potential for future growth. The land is relatively free of environmentally sensitive lands, other than the aquifer which is shallow and uncapped, and is generally suitable for more intensive development provided groundwater controls are,,established. ^^~+ ^^ ,....1~ ^^ ^Qhased utility planning will be used to facilitate development at urban levels of density. b. Municipal U~iGtes The East Planning Area is within the water service area of the City and development at any higher-level density requires sewers, since most of the area is underlain by an uncapped drinking water aquifer. Lower density areas are presently served by water, but not sewer services. Areas using on-site septic systems would be regulated through a sewer/septic utility, until sewers and higher density development is available. c. Logical Boundaries Chapter II Page 12 The railroad, the state highway, and the canal make logical physical boundaries for the East Planning Area, which is one of the two planning areas within the City which are closest to Pierce County and the growth occurring in the Roy-McKenna area. 2. "South" Planning Area (see Map 11) The South Planning area is bounded by State Highway 510 on its north and west boundaries. The east boundary is the Centralia Power Canal and the south boundary is the base of a ridge which reflects a logical pant of division between the urban and rural areas. a. Urban Growth The core of the South Planning Area is part of urban center of the community. Anew school site is located on the western boundary of the site and the northern boundary is the commercial development prevalent along State Highway 510. The area close to the existing. city limits is substantially developed in suburban lots, which is the anticipated development pattern. The area near the City contains few limitations for development and is considered appropriate for urban levels of development. b. Municipal Utilities The South Planning Area is served or planned to be served by City sewer and water. Ciiy Sewer is expected to be provided in the area. Due to the substantial recenf development on septic tanks, the City anticipates using a septic maintenance program to monitor and assure adequate sewer service in this planing area until sewer lines are extended to facilitate urban growth. c. Logical Boundaries The state:highways and the canal provide logical physical features for the urban boundary. The southern boundary is a physical feature and potential state highway corridor, which provides a logical area within which the City will provide urban services. The,. Ieag-turban Growth Boundary area includes an existing Agriculture/Environmentally-Sensitive Area which is included because IenQ-terms-development is expected over time and the area makes a logical service boundary. 3. "Southwest" Planning Area (see Map 12) The Southwest Planning Area is bounded by Fort Lewis on the west, 93 Ave SW and Highway 507 on the north, Highway 510 on the east, and the City Limits on the south. a. Urban Growth Chapter II Page 13 More than 90% of the Southwest Planning Area is included within the City of Yelm as part of the Southwest Yelm Annexation Area. The area is being planned as the Thurston Highlands Community. The area will have a mix of single family and multifamily residential uses as well as open space, parks, school sites, and commercial spaces. The overall average density of the Planned Community is 3:5 4 units per acre (gross densitv). b. Municipal Utilities All of the growth in the Southwest Planning Area is planned to be served by sewer and water from the City of Yelm. Any on-site systems approved in advance of sewer approval will be required to participate in and hook up to the extended sewers and would be subject to the City septic maintenance utility. The area is pro~;ded to Contain a main water reservoir for the City, as well as a storage facility integrated into the golf course ponds, for irrigation water storage. The irrigattn water may be recycled from the City's water treatment facility. c. Logical Boundaries The Southwest Planning Area is marked by a single large property ownership, Thurston Highlands, which is completely within the present City limits. Fort Lewis, 93rd, and the .state highways are all used for planning purposes to define limits of sewer and water service areas and provide a logical boundary. The leng-tea~Urban Growd~ Bouruarv area includes an Environmentally- SensitivelAgricutture area. The area is surrounded by roads, utilities, and other urban development, and is included to ensure a logical and cost- effective service area boundary, 4. "Northwest" Planning Area (see Map 13) The Northwest Planning Area is bounded on the north by the Centralia Power Canal, on the east by"the Burlington-Northern Railroad, on the south by 93rd Avenue and SR 510, and on the west by the north-south centerline of Section 14, Township 17N, Range 1 E and the south line of the north half of Sections 13 and 14, Township 17N, Range 1 E. a. Urban Growth The easterty portion of the Northwest Planning Area is comprised of one of the most rapidly growing areas in Yelm. The westerly portion, although of a lower residential density, is characterized by the Knight complex, which is used for education, publication, and other business uses, and often hosts programs which result in a periodic influx of visitors for public gatherings. b. Municipal Utilities Chapter II Page 14 The easterly portion of the Northwest Planning Area is to be accommodated by sewer and water service. The westerly portion is outside the °~~:.. urban growth boundary and will continue to be served by on-site systems ~ until road and sewer improvements are available for extension of urban services. c. Logical Boundaries Major roads such as 93rd and SR 510, and defining features such as the Canal and Fort Lewis provide logical boundaries for the Northwest Planning Area. E. Public Participation 1. Build on Existing Work Done It is the policy of Yelm to build on work previous done, to include and incorporate prior public programs, such as joint planning, the Economic Summit, parks planning and visioning processes. 2.* Provide Public Notice It is the policy of Yelm to provide public notice and opportunities for public participation throughout the Comprehensive Planning process. 3.* Provide Opportunity for Public Input It is the policy of Yelm to provide opportunity for public input at all phases of Plan development Chapter II Page 15 III. LAND USE A." Policy Guide Note: See Chapter 1, Page 1 Introduction B. Content which identifies portions of the plan applicable to the Ciy and UGA areas and C Applicability for a list of the goals and policies applicable to the unincorporated portion of the Yelm Urban Growth Area. is li.n~4e~.1 .n C..L.'L.'{ /~ The purpose of this Land Use Section of the Comprehensive Plan is to identify a pattern of development which will: 1. Promote infill at urban densities; 2. Permit cost effective phasing of urban utilities to enable the community to sustain project growth patterns; 3. Identify policies to guide development regulations which will allow implementation of the Yelm Comprehensive Plan and Joint'Plan; arrd 4. Provide a plan in which the required population is accommodated consistent with the State GMA and goals antl- policies of this Comprehensive Plan and consistent with the community resources. B. Land Use Patterns Within the city limits, the City of Yelm's current land use patterns are shown on Volume I, Map 2, which shows the existing (a-g94~ zoning of the Yelm area. Development regulations will modify density, use, and other standards to be consistent with the criteria below. 2.'~ Proposed Land Use Designations. The future land use plan is to be adopted as the land use and pre-annexation zoning for the City of Yelm. Properties which annex to the City will annex at the identified land use subject to the utility availability overlay. Residential The residential areas provide for the bulk of the housing development in the planning areas. Minimum densities Chapter III Page 16 1. 1=xisting Land`t.1se Designations. grew-beufldafies-will help achieve overall density goals. Development standards will be established to permit integration of duplexes, townhouses, and accessory units within the City's residential areas, using appropriate controls to protect the safety and quiet enjoyment of the area. Such housing is intended to broaden and increase the variety of housing available in the community and aid in achieving the overall urban density. (i) Urban Growth Area, unincorporated (County jurisdiction) - 1 unit per 5 acres (cross density) / Yelm will propose development. regulations to assure coordination and steps to aid in accomplishing the goals of this plan within the unincorporated urban area. Pursuant to County- Wide Planning Policies, the County will adopt coordinated regulations. (ii) City of Yelm , / 4 units per acre - no minimum density (3 units/acre is the expected rg oss density, (net density of 5.8 units/acre is / 6 units per acre (including mobile home parks and subdivisions) - 3 units per acre is minimum density (5 units/acre is the expected rg oss density) / Non-Severed Overlay (all City lands where sewer is not yet available) - 1 unit-per 5 acres until sewer service is approved through an approved sewer facilities plan designating the long- term disposal site, then underlying zone. Any development within the Nora-Severed Overlay shall be consistent with CWPP 2.1(e) as further defined through development regulations. (iii) Apartment / Medium Density Apartment - 10 units per 1 acre ross densi / High Density Apartment - 20 units per 1 acre (cross density), 15 acre minimum lot size (iv) Mixed Use (Planned Developments) in Residential Areas Mixed use developments are used for larger parcels to provide a variety of uses, more efficient use of open space, and public facilities. Mixed use proposals must accomplish not less than 75% of the underlying density for a property and not more than 125% of the planned maximum density for the property. Mixed use developments must be able to screen or buffer impacts of non- residential uses from existing or potential residential developments, Chapter III Page 17 and contain all open space and recreation areas within the site. The minimum acreage for a mixed use development shall be 40 acres. Mixed use developments may have 5% of the gross area in neighborhood commercial - no use is to be larger than 5,000 square feet, 25% of the net land area in medium density or high density apartments, and 25% of the gross land area in open space, with not less than 5 acres of improved park space dedicated to the City. Development standards should be created to encourage mixed-use subdivisions. The "mixed use" alternative must be processed as a project and applies only ta'~igible properties. b. The ESA category are properties in the letrr~ rg owth urban area but presently in agricultural use and affected 6y critical lands with environmental limitations. o '~^^' ,,,. c!c;; ~^~' a ~ c. Commercial Yelm has identified three levels of commercial categories to meet community needs: Neighborhood. ServelProfessional Office, General Retail/Commercial Core, and a Cor-unercial Service district (larger and more intensive commercial uses, including auto and machine oriented, modular housing, and recreational sales, service, and repair. d. Industrial/Warehouse Yelm has identfied two 'industrial categories which are on major transportation routes, near existing utilities, and capable of being buffered for other needed developmer~ o avoid undue impact on the community. The two categories are to servecommunity needs: warehouse, assembly, and distribution; and manufacturing/industrial, focusing on the production of goods, utilities, or services. The former are more appropriate on the perimeter of the industrial area, the latter designed to be included in the industrial core. The County will consider rezoning the industrial- designated area fo a light industrial zone, Chapter 20.28 Thurston County Code, prior to annexation. e. Public Institutional/Open Space Yelm has ....identified two land use designations or categories which reflect public ownership of the land or land permanently set aside as dedicated open space or critical areas. Public purpose lands which are presently identified are shown on the Future Land Use Map, Map #3. C.* Changing the Land Use Map 1. The purpose of the Joint Plan is to identify land uses within the Urban Growth Area. The land use designations shown on the Future Land Use Map (Map #3) in the unincorporated area will not take effect until annexation and inclusion within a sewer discharge permit area. Those land uses within the City shall take effect upon approval for inclusion within a sewer discharge area. If the land use Chapter Ill Page 18 designations are to be changed from the map, such changes should take place in the context of the Comprehensive Plan review. 2. To promote coordinated development, any land use approved in this Joint Plan will not be unilaterally changed by either the City or the County for three years from the date of this plan without written approval from the other jurisdiction. r....,.,.etie..~, a oi..,,. „ t6HndaFy- D.* Intergovernmental Coordination The City of Yelm supports the Transfer of Development Rights program to support certain rural programs. Proper regulations need to ~develeped~assure that such a program is not counterproductive to urban goals and objectives of this plan. The City and County wilt-sensideFhave established acounty-wide Transfer of Development Rights program, in which some portion of the density range within the low-density residential designation is achievable through the purchase of transferred development rights rather than allowed outright. The objective of a county-wide Transfer of Chapter III Page 19 E.* Transfer of Development Rights Program Development Rights program is to support conservation of important natural and/or cultural resources (e.g. long-term agricultural lands, historic properties, or significant wildlife habitat). F.* The Planning Sub-Areas =City of Yelm and UGA Land Needs Assessment The community is divided into four sub-areas to permit the identification of logical service areas and the development and monitoring of the goals and policies of this Comprehensive Plan. The subareas also provide a reasonable basis for the urban growth area lands needs assessment which is set forth in the tables below. ~~ - a ~'T1. 4 4. L. I.! n Ve.l.r. 'r 7 ~ .+ nln nn. 4.n nhnlA h~cer{ n ~n07 r ti ti la ~ ~ I ti ..I,n la ti..~na nn .tin ~ o nn I I c rnn~, ~ ve ln, ~...'~ nn.n~ .tin Chapter III Page 20 Table 1 -Estimated Population and the Housing Needed to Accommodate Growth Projected population at vear 2025 10,330 Master Planned Dwelling Units1 Projected o ulation at ear 2030' 11.480 2005-2030+ Amount of population growth expected between 2005 and 2025 4,840 Vested or recently approved 1,200 Amount of population growth ex ected between 2005 and 2030 5.890 dwelling units Approximate number of housing units needed to accommodate the projected growth between 2005 and 2,589 units 2025. Approximate number of housing units needed to accommodate the projected growth between 2005 and 2.775 units 2030. Approximate number of acres needed 925 acres Presubmission Review for housing, based on average target 5,000 to 6,000 density of 4 dwelling units per net dwelling units develo ed acre 3 units/ a ross Table 2 AnaWsis of Land Suooly vs. Demand. 2000-2025 Yelm and Yelm Urban Growth Area IUGAI Chapter III Page 21 Source: Thurston Regional Planning CouncO -Population and Employment Forecast - 2006; Regional Benchmarks for Thurston County. July 2003. coerce' Bu Itlable Lands Report /or ihursfon County. TRPC. 2002 ~a-~° (-0-~3 ~ ~ 0 0 _ ~d,...r.. ..ate ,.; ~~,~.. tie r'... b 0 0 Chapter III Page 22 Chapter III Page 23 IV. HOUSING A.* Introduction This housing element addresses the housing needs of the City of Yelm and its UGA. The goal of the City of Yelm is to establish a baseline for evaluating the growth of the community and to assure that adequate facilities are available'fp>serve the needs of the y.- - communit $' The housing element considers population and in~me r~aracteristics; housing characteristics, including the condition of the existing housing stock; housing problems; and strategies. It then sets forth the goals and policies that will be used to encourage the provision of affordable housing in the City of Yelm. The capacity utilities and planned densities within the UGA provide ample opportunity to meet housing needs above the median incomes levels. 1. Growth Management Act Requirements The Growth Management Act requires Yelm to meet the relevant planning goals in the Act. The relevant goal for housing elements is Goal 4: "Housing. Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of `this State; promote a variety of residential densities and housing types; and encourage preservation of existing housit~ stock." This housing element contains a number of goals and policies designed to encou-age the availability of affordable housing, promote variety in housing, and encourage the preservation of existing housing. ai Population estimates for the Yelm Urban Growth Area (UGA) were obtained from the TRPC and ~8g0 2000 In many of the tables, data is shown for both Yelm and either Thurston County overall or unincorporated Thurston County. This information is provided only for purposes of comparing the Yelm data with other local data. Chapter IV Page 24 2. County-Wide Planning Policies The City and County will institute measures to encourage the availability of affordable housing for all incomes and needs and ensure that each community includes a fair share of housing for all economic segments of the population by: 7.1 Establishing a process to accomplish a fair share distribution of affordable housing among the jurisdictions. 7.2 Working with the private sector, Housing Authority, neighborhood groups, and other affected citizens to facilitate the :development of attractive, quality low and moderate income housing... t##at is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and located wr~h :easy access to public transportation, commercial areas and empbymentCanters. 7.3 Accommodating low and moderate income housing throughout each jurisdiction rather than isolated in Certain areas. 7.4 Exploring ways to reduce the costs of housing. 7.5 Examining and modifying current policies that provide barriers to affordable housing. 7.6 Encouraging a range of housing types af~i costs commensurate with the employment base and income:~vels of there populations, particularly for low. moderate and fixed income families. 7.7 When possible, provide assistance in obtaining funding and/or technical assistance for the expansion or establishment of low cost affordable housing for low, moderate and fixed income individuals and families. This housing .element was. written to be consistent with the County-Wide Planning Policies. B.* Inventory and Analysis 1. :Population and Demographics a. Population The population of Yelm has grown irregularly over the last 60+ 75 years. As shown ih Pigt~re-Table 1 below, the largest increases occurred during the~$~8s 1990's, wit#~a-more than doubling e~-the population. The 1970's increase is attributed to a program of the federal Farmers Home Administration (FmHA) to provide low-cost loans for low-income families relocating to rural communities. ~~er-sro •*~. u^••~°•~°~, °Growth since the 1980's'~°' °°•~°•°' ••°^~° has been high, in part due to people searching Chapter IV Page 25 for more affordable housing and the general pattern of population increase for Thurston County. Southern Pierce County, directly across the Nisqually River, is also growing rapidly and Yelm is seeing spillover growth from Pierce County. deaf ~9pHiatlAR De...e.~~ WA $ 4930 ~~ ~ -pF~ - 4940 378 -~-~ 48x9 470 24,3 4960 47-9 4-8 4979 623 34-4 4$69 494 496-4 4990 437 3~ Table 1 Historic Population Change for City of Yelm Year Potulation Average Annual 1930 3~4 --- 1940 378 -0.2% 1950 470 2.2% 1960 479 0.2% 1970 628 2.7% 1980`" 1,294 7.5% 1990 1,337 0.3% 2000 3.289 9.4% Chapter IV Page 26 Table 2 Population Estimates. Yelm and Yelm UGA 1995.2000-2005 Preliminary Jurisdiction Estimate Estimate Total 1995 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Yelm C~ 2,295 3.289 3,420 3,485 3 8 4,150 4,455 UGA 1,085 1.095 1.110 1,105 y105 1,115 1,135 Total 3,380 4,384 4,530 4,590 4.935 5,265 5,590 Source: 1930 to 2000 - U.S. Bureau of the Census. 2005 Washington State Office of F aancial Management; UGAs - TRPC Small Area Population Estimates Population Estimate (20051 Population Proiection (2025) Population Proiection (2030) Population Growth (2005 to 2025) Population Growth (2005 to 20301 Proiected Dwelling Units Needed to Accommodate Growth'(2005 to 2025) (2005 to 2030) 5.590 Master Planned 10.330 Dwelli 11.480 2005-2030+ :4 840 Vested or recently „ 5:890 approved 1,200 dwelling units 2.589 2,775 Presubmission Review 5.000 to 6,000 dwelling The decade of the 1980s showed slower growth. However, growth has picked up during the last several years, in part due to people searching for more affordable housing and the general pattern of population increase for Thurston County. Southern Pierce County, directly across the Nisqually River, is also growing rapidly and Yelm is seeing spillover growth from Pierce County. Chapter IV Page 27 b. Household Characteristics The table below shows the types and sizes of households within the City. It is anticipated that the average household size will continue to drop due to lower birth rates, increased longevity of elderly persons, and a trend toward later marriage. It should eventually drop close to the rates for the larger metropolitan area (Olympia, Lacey, and Tumwater). Since more housing is needed in general to support anticipated growth, the amount of actual housing will be even greater, since fewer people will live in each dwelling unit. c. Special Needs Population The goal of the community is to provide an opportunity to meet special needs population requirements within the incorporated growth area. Yelm's principal special needs population is the Iowstcome elderly. As the City grows the variety of special needs will increase:.It is the policy of the City and Thurston County to provide, in all housing, designations, provisions for housing for special populations, including group homes. The City will adopt standards and criteria which assure within the community, facilities which provide access, affordability, and choice, and which promote and .protect residential neighborhood needs for quiet enjoyment and safety. Table 4 Households Served and on Waiting List for the Thurston County Housing Authority %Coun Households Served and on Wait List in Coun Ci of Yelm Yelm Total 2006 Households Currently Served 69 3.4% 2.003 2006 Households on aitin List 194 5% 3.820 source i nurs[on coun[v nousma .vumon[v Chapter IV Page 28 provide services or assistance. a= 467 elr~ Ge~,....~ 'rtr~a*H ~0 Cinnln Dnrnnn un~~nehnlan ~F~ ~,2--4% 44_ggg ~o C1.1nr1.. un~~nehnlrln /L:Fi\ ~' ~ ~,°.~ ~~ Cem..ln uen,J nF un~ innhnl.d ~ ~0~ 4~8 7 Cmnll CnmB.. /7 A nn nln\~~ ~O ~~ ~° I n o Cnmil.i /fi nennlc\ ~ ° ~1- ~°/O Avernn.. un~~~.nhnl.l Caen ,~ Alnin~ Dnrnnninnen Mb.l m .. 4hnn annoi h nr ens no cnm n h..~~nnhnWn Fi4 in rfo Table 5 Household CharacteristicsforYelm (2000) Yelm Countv (Overall) Total Households 1,216 81,625 Family Household 807 66.4% 54.981 67.3% Family Household with 505 41.5% 26.896 33.0% Children Under 18 Female Head of Household 175 14.4% 8.429 10.3% Female Household with 130 10.7% 5,712 7.0% Children Under 18 Single Person Households 330 27.1% 20.473 25.1% Elderly Households (65+) 363 29.8% 16,546 20.3% Average Household Size 2.67 2.50 Source: Census 2000. 2. Income and Affordability a. Introduction A seueraf-step process was used to determine the availability of affordable housing in this section. First, the household income for Yelm was determined and divided into federally-defined poverty categories. Second, information on households spending more than 30% of their income for housing, using standard census bureau income ranges, was determined for both renters and owners. Finally, the resulting information was converted into the federally-defined poverty categories. This resulted in information on Yelm households that spend more than 30% of their income on housing, in each of the federal poverty categories. Chapter IV Page 29 b. Household Income The household income ranges in dollars for Yelm and unincorporated Thurston County {999) 1( 999) and the number of households within each range are shown in €igufe-3-Table 6 below. For purposes of this housing element, the federal poverty categories for income are used. These categories vary by community, depending on the median income within the particular community. This often requires converting census data into data that can be used within the federal poverty categories, and may mean the numbel's are estimated. For Thurston County, the median income in 1999 was $3A~r} 46 975 The federal poverty categories and income for Thurston County, in a-990-1999 dollars, are: Extremely low income households -making less than 30% of county median income ($0 - $9;239 14 093 Very low income households -making between 30% and 50% of county median income ( 14 094- 23 488) Low income households -making between 51 % and 80% of county median income { , 23 489- 37 580 Moderate income households -making between 81% and 95% of county median inot~ne (~'",74' Q'°,""$24,782-$44,626) Yelse R ~PN~P1G du ~ -6eunty R t PJarebeF ~afl-S~ses a4 ersent aa er ~.4 2;4~ ersea a-s $5;199-59899 ~9 ~2 4x78 7:7 ~a~;ee9--~,$9e ~ aa-~ ~a,~8 ~a ~a,~eea--~2a;a99 ~ aa-~ a-a~ ~e 4;3-3 ~e~ a~-9 $~a898-$4;998 89 a-7.4 4z?906 29-8 ever$59:999 28 r} 3 4~-a-2 22~ Table 6 Household Income for Citv of Yelm and Thurston Countv (total), 2000 Income in 1999 Yelm Thurston Countv Number Percent Number Percent Households 1.206 100.0 81.666 100.0 Less than $10.000 122 10.1 5,422 6_6 $10.000 - $14,999 100 8_3 4,251 5_2 Chapter IV Page 30 $15.000 - $24.999 147 12.2 9,099 11.1 $25,000 - $34,999 150 12.4 10.417 12.8 $35,000 - $49,999 253 21.0 14,501 17.8 $50.000 - $74.999 300 24.9 19,489 23.9 $75.000 - $99.999 82 6_8 9.655 11.8 $100.000 - $149,999 40 3_3 6,430 7_9 $150.000 - $199.999 9 0_7 1,160 1_4 $200.000 or more 3 0_2 1,242 1_5 Median Household Income (Dollars) 39,453 ~ `46.975 Source: Census 2000. c. Housing Affordability Housing is generally considered to be affordable if the cost does not exceed 30% of family irxome. €igafesTables 4-7a~-a below shows that for owner-occupied housing in Yelm,-2x34.0% (64196 out of X574 s# households pair-paid 30% or more of their ~ y income for housing. For owner-occupied housing in Thurston County (overall), ~°k (49.801 out of X5441.441) of households aid 30% or more. Table 8 shows U~at fl=or renter-occupied housing, X38% in Yelm pay 30% or more offheir family income for housing, and 3~-940% in Thurston County (overall) pay 30% or more. ~Fekx~ Seaa>:y /'!1'/C~AI lI * ALJ LJ III fIC Tl1TAI ~/FLJ LJ III f1C T!'1TA1 Y~ , - ~°/O a-~-1~8 - ~~pp0~ ~/7~(~1~ l~l ~/vor~z ~orpv V.V 2YdFOCGaY - ~°~ - ~Q~~ ~° - tlYYO - ~ Chapter IV Page 31 Table 7 Households Spending as a Percent of Income on Housing (Owner-Occupied) Selected Monthly Owner Costs Ye lm Thurston County as a Percentage of Household P N b t P Income in 1999 Number ercent um er ercen Less than 15.0 percent 103 17.9 12,218 29.3 15.0 to 19.9 percent 89 15.5 7.424 17.8 20.0 to 24.9 percent 82 14.3 6.873 16.5 25.0 to 29.9 percent 104 18.1 5,125 12.3 30.0 to 34.9 percent 63 11.0 "'"386 7_7 35.0 percent or more 133 23.2 6,615- 15.9 Not computed _ - 190 .5 Source: Census 2000. Table 8 Households Spending as a Percent of Income on Housing (Renter-Occupied) Gross Rent as a Percentage of Ye lm Thurston County Household Income in 1999 Number Percent Number Percent Less than 15.0 percent 105 21.9 4,009 14.8 15.0 to 19.9 percent 62 12.9 4.074 15.1 20.0 to 24.9 percent 71 14.8 3,999 14.8 25.0 to 29:9 percent 45 9_4 2,941 10.9 30.Ota 34.9 percent 24 5_0 2,504 9_3 35.0 percent or more 159 33.2 8,385 31.0 Not computed. 13 2_7 1,108 4_1 Source: Census 2000. XelFii ~~}* ~€ *uuni nerrnrei <2&% 482 = 2z?4°h x$37 = 33-~°Ic 29-~4~6 2 = 9:4°!a ~0341~~ = a ~$°!e 2~z'-°o~ 2-bE1-92 = ~3:$°!e 2069/~83~ = a-~°!s x-34-% ~F~92 = ~% ~3~ = 8-4% Chapter IV Page 32 i* 8~,. ,~ ~e~~~ yew-t~ ~ ~~~ ed ~~ „~ ~ page 33 C P r IV Yelm 0-30% of Median 102 40 142 204 >30 to 50% of Median 130 20 150 145 >50 to 80% of Median 220 196 416 217 >80 to 95% of Median 37 146 183 112 Remainder 14 374 388 528 ~ t. Thurston Countv Total 0-30% of Median 1 777 3 004 4 781 8 901 >30 to 50% of Median 8 685 1 735 10 420 8 334 >50 to 80% of Median 13 659 6 761 20 420 14 408 >80 to 95% of Median 2 049 6 847 8 896 6 898 3. F~ggF~Table 107 below shows the total authorized housing units as of 2000. and estimated for 2005~aae~-498. T"~^ f~~"•° ~^^'••~'°° ° ~°'~^^ ^^+ •^^' ••~The data show ° °°+°• ^° °^*°^° ^' that single-family homes in Yelm and in the county make up 75% of the housing stock (78% if manufactured homes are includedl.~haa-seuaty- Note: This tabs. jg not intended g. ow a one-tonne relationship between the number of households within an inc tanee and the nut~ler of units av ' le within that same income ranee. In reali a laree number of " }g the mid-io-bwer..~~es are rented or owned ~ those who are spending less than 30% of their income ~.. ht ese units. olds "buv-down" and effectively lower their housine Rentals: Gross $gtt -SF3 H62 Universe: Specified renter-occupied housine unfits' Rent caner: Value for all Owner-Occupied Housine Units SF3 H84 Universe: Owner-Occupied Housine Units: Prce Asked - SF Universe: Specified vacant-for-sale-only housin unts. Households: Household Income in 1999-SF3 P52 Universe' Households Source: 2f100 Census, TRPC Data on Housing a. Authorized Housing Units Chapter IV Page 34 TABLE 9 CITY OF YELM AND THURSTON COUNTY ESTIMATE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING STOCKS AND HOUSEHOLDS BY INCOME CATEGORY. 2000 id d~ ~ ; li# ~ ~ Th,~ ..,,n sia ~arlEet .. .,,ae~ ere - , sees f hn' e d e-a ea y- a hn~~ a~S1 ~ ~ sia - g . A rain Inuinr 4h 9 ~S ~n 4n~ ~n egree~r~r~ rH....Mn tin hi i „~ g a .,rL..i~ rain h , . 'nhnr 4hnn cnvcn nn r......i 'nrl'n.+4n~. ' ' V ' ' ' rem-nvn~ver ..ih~ h la K .. li nS n rl In~TVn~,thG tCn't ~ef ~~,,,...,W.,.~~.G^^. ~g t~Itl177tl~ v~crvrr7 AAalti~aaa+ly 93 ~ .~ ~4 cc '' ~c^ v:V n ~9 ~~ ~9 ~a ~ r ~/~~.„ IIt TRVtFttlGT 1`C FbCtIt Y~ftYFttdCF 1~'CVChK ~pied ~9 €beRte r ~ ss 4 3~ .3 ~1 - r 9~ 33 -9 ' - -_ ~a ~dbW'1t ~ ~ A p ~ ` ~ ' ~f `!':~ G C V ~ V ~~°~ ~It eF{~9F6eH1:-6~ ref P-eF6eRt-9~ ~Fa6aF1! tBtaE ~aEaFlt t9ta1 Siagle-#a~ 38~~ p°k~3;375~3~~p%~ Chapter IV Page 35 Table 10 Total Small Area Dwelline Unit Estimates by Tyae Yelm and Yelm UGAs. Thurston County Tota12000 and 2005 UGA 270 15 1~ 295 ~ 150 Total 1.740 340 270 150 So rces• Th rston Regio al Plan ~ € C P B coda Lacey OI - R -d r Tenino T mwate Yel d Th ton Co my b ilding~ak t ~ U S B rea of [he Ce ~ W h-Heron State Office of F~ a c' I M e, ent TABLE 11 CITY OF YELM AND THURSTON COUNTY TRENDS IN HOUSING COSTS, INCOME AND HOUSING TENURE. 1990 TO 2000 Thurston Countv Yelm Selected Owner Occupied Home Valuesand Renter Occupied Gross Rent 1990 Median Value 79.700 56.400 2000 Median Value 145 200 117.400 Percent Increase $~Js 108°k 1990 Median Gross Rent 2000 Median Gross Rent 655 625 Percent Increase 4~ 65°h Income Median Household Income in 1989 30 976 19 053 Median Household Income in 1999 4~C 975 Percent Increase 52% 107°k Tenure 19900wner Occupied 40.226 277 1990 Renter Occupied 21 ~ 19Q 1990 Percent Owner Occupied Ei`3[3 59% 1990 Percent Renter Occupied 35°k 4~ 2000 Owner Occupied 54.364 7~,¢ 2000 Renter Occupied 27.261 47~ 2000 Percent Owner Occupied ¢1s 61 2000 Percent Renter Occupied ale Sources 1990 Census and 2000 Census SFi and SF3 files Note Housing costs have increased since 1999. Averace sales price between March and Mav 2006 was approximately $232 000' rents ranged from $495 to $1475. Source: Multiple Listing Service. Chapter IV Page 36 4. Analysis Yelm's Urban Growth Area is expected to grow substantially during the next 2825 years, and household size to continue to decrease. ~ F ^°•~ °~ "^~ ~°°"^'~'. These two factors point to a continuing demand for affordable housing. Although housing costs are less expensive than in many other Thurston County jurisdictions, average income is also lower. As €igafe Table 76 and 8 illustrates, there is an existing need for affordable housing that is expected to increase proportionate to the population. Based on a review of X9982000 data, adequate single-family housing is IikeW to be available. While multi-family units are being constructed, there is likely a need for more multi- family housing for an aging population, and a shift to more single person households and later marriage. The adopted Land Use Plan provides for a variety of additional housing types and ir~sreases~multt-family zoned property income is also lower. Y v°... e;~ NHrRbef 13allt elr» 6et~at~~ qt"` N~eF NING I?eF6eRt'" ~9~9--a-999 2 8-37 4,~ ~4 ~5 ~, -79 ~c~-~d~ a-8~0---954 ~'+ 28:7 3;595 4-~4 X978---878 283 333 284 333 ''~~8-x-9&9 33 5:86 ~4,~8 X49 X850--x-958 3=f 5<77 ~2 9:94 X948-f848 45 6-.~ 5~ r~ pre-938 88 46-78 ~&,-044 a-a-~ * o TABLE 12 YELM AND COUNTY HOUSING STOCK AGE Built Before 1980 (1980 and older) 565 45 393 1980 to 2000 (598 of these built since 19901 752 41 259 Yelm Housing Stock Aae by Decade Built Before 1939 120 6 138 1940 - 1959 82 8 530 1960 - 1969 54 9 356 1970 - 1979 309 21 369 1980 - 1989 172 17 247 1990 -March 2000 580 24 012 Total 1~ 8152 Source: Census 2000 Chapter IV Page 37 C. Goals and Policies Housing Goals and Policies within the Urban Growth Area GOAL 1:* Encourage a variety of housing types and densities and a range of affordable housing. Policy 1-1:* Monitor the need for special needs housing and work toward increasing opportunities for such housing. Policy 1-2: Review the zoning ordinance to ensure that a range of housing is available throughout the City. Policy 1-3:* Encourage opportunities for a range of housing costs to enable housing for all segments of the population. Policy 1-4:* Encourage the provision of adequate affordable building sites through appropriate zoning, infrastructure, and the overall regulatory climate. Policy 1-5:* Permit a variety of housing types within the residential and mixed use designations to promote the range of alternatives within the community, including but not I'rmited to government assisted housing, housing for low-income families, manufactured housing, multi-family housing, group and foster homes. GOAL 2: Encourage housing with a pedestrian orientation in order to promote a sense of community and safety. :Policy 2-1: Review the zoning ordinance and development standards to ensure residents can safely walk to points throughout the City. GOA1.3_ Meet County-wide planning policy requirements to ensure a fair share of affordable housing. E'olicy 3-1:_ 'Yelm and Thurston County shall encourage a variety of housing types in the residential designations to assure choice, opportunity, and ava~ability of a fair share of affordable housing throughout the community. Policy 3-2:* Yelm and Thurston County should participate with other jurisdictions within the County in a regional process to monitor achieving the Fair Share Affordable Housing targets throughout the County. GOAL 4:* Encourage housing that meets adequate safety standards. Chapter IV Page 38 Policy 4-1:* Continue to adopt the most up-to-date and safest building, housing, mechanical and other codes. Policy 4-2: Require owners of unsafe dwelling units to correct significant problems. GOAL 5:* Promote energy efficient housing to reduce the overall costs of home ownership. Policy 5-1:* Support programs that improve existing structures to make them more energy efficient. Policy 5-2: Periodically review energy efficiency requirements adopted by the City to ensure that they are up-to-date. Policy 5-3:* Promote residential subdivision designs that maximize solar heating opportunities. Policy 5-4: Accessory dwelling units. should be permitted in all residential zones, within the City, provided that development standards and design criteria are satisfied. GOAL 6:* Conserve and improve the existing housing stot~c and neighborhoods. Policy 6-1:` Support rehabilitation efforts for substandard housing. Policy,f-2:* Encourage and facilitate economic development as an important element of improving housing conditions by providing economic opportunRy. D.* Future Needs and Aftematives 1. Introduction This section discusses the number of affordable housing units within each income category that will be needed from one forecast period to the next. These figures are based-upon the population forecast approved by the Urban Growth Management Committee of Thurston Regional Planning Council (TRPC) in 1993. Since Yelm is required to plan for the growth anticipated within the UGA, the estimates are for the entire Yelm Urban Growth Area (UGA) rather than for the current City limits. The estimates are shown in €ig~+re-~-'Table 14 below: Chapter IV Page 39 Table 13 Estimated Housing Need for Low and Moderate Income Housing by Income Categ ory and Forecast Period for Yelm and Yelm Urban Growth Area (UGA) fAll figures Subject to Roundingl Year Need ex low Need very low Need low Need moderate TOTAL 91-92 22 17 18 6 63 93-95 18 14 15 5 52 96-2000 24 16 17 ~ 62 2001-05 16 12 13 4° 45 2006-10 19 15 16 5 55 2011-15 22 17 17 6 62 TOTAL: 339 2. 3. Population Estimates for Yelm and Yelm UGA These figures are ~~ - Maaaseraent °,-la;,:,;r,~~the target population is~or the "Medium Growth--Full 13ensity" scenario as agreed to by all jurisdictions within Thurston County in 2006. i~~ Initial population (49822000}: 3;43~~ 4,385 Targetpopulation (203045): 11,480888 The estimated reed projected in 1.993 is approximately 4&°612% of the total new housing stock anticipated in the Yeas growth area over the next 25 years. Table Strategies for Housing to Meet Year 20'l5- 2030 Need Provide Infrastructure to Suoaort Housing Needs The land use plan accommodates a variety of housing types to promote choice and opportunity in housing. In neighborhoods a variety of housing types and densities are encouraged to enable adequate sewer and water facilities at Chapter IV Page 40 this further reduces the quality of their lives. reasonable prices. This is key to accommodating a variety of densities at affordable prices. The City focus under this plan is to assure that such facilities are planned for and available to meet growth demands which reflect the changing population needs. Housing patterns will be monitored to assure that the City is continuing to meet its required housing needs. Adjustments will be made throughout Yelm and the Yelm Urban Growth Area during periodic revisions to the Plan where monitoring shows aSub-Area need for change to assure that required housing needs continue to be met. Provide Housing Choice In Transportatia~},EfficientAreas Chapter IV Page 41 Encourage Diversity of Housing Tyaes to Offer Choice and`Affordability Meeting housing needs especially for low income and elderly means expanding Maintain Existir-g Older Housing Stock XII. ENVIRONMENT Introduction The Environmental Chapter focuses on the City of Yelm's commitment to protect and enhance the quality of the natural and built environments. As increased residential and commercial development intensifies in Yelm, the protection of the natural environment becomes more of a challenge. The intent of this chapter, and the goals and policies it contains, is to guide the formation of regulations and future actions that will protect and enhance the natural environment. Growth Management Act and County-Wide Planning Policies The Environmental Chapter is intended to meet the objectives of the State Growth Management Act (GMA), Endangered Species Act (ESA), State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), County-Wide Planning Policies and other federal and state policies and regulations. The GMA contains specific requirements for the designation and protection of "critical areas," defined by the GMA as wetlands, areas with recharging effect on aquifers used for potable water, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, frequently flooded areas, and geologically hazardous areas. In addition, the G/k1A requires the adoption of development regulations that protect ex'itical areas (RCW 36.70A.060) and the inclusion of the best available science in dev ing paw and development regulations to protect the functions and values of critical areas (RCW 36.70A.172). Development of this chapter is based on same premise adopted in the Thurston County County-V1Pide,t'lanning Policies, Chapter IX, Environmental Quality. A list of the goals and policies app~able to the unincorporated portion of the Yelm Urban Growth Area is located in Exhibit G. Natural Environment Goals and Policies The City of Yelm recognizes that the natural environment is important for the following reasons: / It provides habitat for wildlife and plant life; / It creates a positive visual image and open space; / It provides opportunities for recreation; / It is part of the City's surface water management system and water supply; and / It is cost effective public policy. Chapter XII Page 42 The merits and costs of environmental actions must be weighed and balanced against other important demands, such as public safety and recreation, housing, public infrastructure, and economic development. Land use and development practices need to be compatible with the variety of environmental conditions. As a general rule, the City should protect the natural environment rather than try to overcome its limitations for development. Goal EG 1 Protect the natural environment and preserve environmentally sensitive areas. EG 2 Promote quality building and development that is compatible with the surrounding environment. Policies EP 1 The City should work with adjacent jurisdictions, state, federal, and regional agencies to protect sensitive areas and the City's natural environment. EP 2 Protect and restore environmental quality through land use plans, surface water management plans and programs, comprehensive park plans, and development review. EP 3 Develop regulations and programs that encourage well-designed land use pattems such as clustering, kwu impact development, and planned unit development. Use these. types of land use patterns to concentrate higher urban land use dens`'`' and intensity of uses in areas with environmentally sensitive features. Water Resources Yelm has several shorelines and abutting floodplains in or adjacent to the urban area, including Yelm Creek, Thompson Creek, the Centralia Power Canal, and the Nisqually River. The Nisqually River is host to a number of fish species and runs, which are dependent upon the watei'quality of the River and its tributary and riparian (stream side) areas. Yelm also has several wetland areas (shown on the critical areas maps), which form the headwaters of the two Creeks, and are indicative of the groundwater levels and proximity to the surface. Additionally, Yelm has an unprotected aquifer which underlies most of the urban area. The City's wells, and many private wells, use the aquifer for water supply. The water quality in the urban area is important for both public and environmental health reasons, and it is the policy of the City to provide methods and incentives for ongoing protection and enhancement within the urban area. Chapter XII Page 43 Specific policies or programs shall be used to accomplish the necessary protection. Aquifer Recharge Areas (Groundwater) The aquifer recharge area in Yelm covers the entire City. These areas are characterized by highly pervious glacial soils which drain rapidly into the underlying water table. These areas are classified primarily as Category 1, extremely sensitive with small pockets of Category 2, highly sensitive in the southwestern portion of the city. Typical activities associated with land development, such as daring and grading and stormwater management, affect the natural hydrologic cycle. All of these activities decrease the land's ability to absorb and retain water and increases the possibility of contamination. Goals EG 3 Protect the quality, and manage the quantity of groundwater for all uses in the present and the future. EG 4 Encourage measures that improve surface water management. Policies EP 4 Where feasible, development within the urban area should be on sewers with areuse/recycling discharge to reduce the potential for contamination of the aquifer". and ~e abutting surface streams. EP 5 stormwater policies hould require treatment of stormwater on site using swales, ;ponds, and other detention and conveyance facilities, together with, or in cornbirtat~n with, biofiltration prior to discharge to either gr~gdwafer t~' surface water to minimize or eliminate contaminants from the stormwater. EP 6 Implemerttatr4n of policies and programs of the sewer and water comprehensive plans: EP 7 The City of Yslm shall seek to prevent groundwater contamination by protecting "entire resource as effectively as possible, but within the limits of what is acceptable and affordable to the community. EP 8 The City of Yelm shall strive to assure that preventive actions are taken to protect water quality from further degradation and that the City, in cooperation with the Department of Ecology, will promote corrective actions in areas where degradation has occurred so that the net effect is a gradual improvement of the ground and surface water quality. Chapter XI I Page 44 Wellhead Protection Areas Because the City relies on groundwater for its drinking water, it must take preventative measures to avoid contamination in areas surrounding well sites. The City of Yelm Wellhead Protection Plan, developed by Robinson & Noble, Inc, 2001, focuses on three primary areas: A hydrologic evaluation of the aquifers used by the City, and the delineation of wellhead protection areas (WHPAs) for each of the City's production wells, An inventory of potentially hazardous materials inside the det' ated WHPAs, and The development of management, spill response, and contingency plans. Goals EG 5 Implement a wellhead protection program to ensure a safe source of drinking water and to avoid the large financial impact of contaminated wells. Policies EP 9 The City shall utilize a wellhead protection program based upon best available science. EP 10 Legislation. shall tae maintained, and updated as necessary, regulating land uses within wellhead protection zones 1 - 3. EP 11 The City of Yelm shall strive to prevent contamination of drinking water supplies and to devebp contingency plans to provide additional sources, should an existing source becomes unusable. Wetlands and Streams Wetlands are a valuable natural resource. They receive surface water from surrounding areas and fQter pollutants entering the system. By storing floodwaters, wetlands reduce flooding and downstream_fosion; trap and absorb sediments; and help protect water quality. Wetlands discharge water to aquifers and streams and help replenish groundwater. The City of Yelm is located within the Nisqually drainage basin. There are two streams that run through the city, Yelm Creek and Thompson Creek. Over the years, both Yelm Creek and Thompson Creek have experienced ecological degradation from the loss of shade trees, invasion of plant species like reed canary grass and nightshade, and repetitive dredging. Chapter XII Page 45 Goals EG 6 Achieve no net loss of wetlands and increase the quality of Yelm's wetland resources through the application of best available science. EG 7 Protect, restore, and enhance the City's streams. Policies EP 12 Construction sites shall be required to demonstrate construction period stormwater protection to prevent turbidity and s~#ation for affecting surface waters in the area. EP 13 Wetlands, streams, and their associated buffers shall not be used for construction purposes, except where necessary for stormwater control and utility and transportation connections. Where such control or connections are permitted, regulations must identify steps to assure no degradation to ground or surface water. EP 14 Update and utilize Yelm's wetland protection '°°'' °',~~reaulations to ensure protection of Yelm's wetland resources through use of techniques considered to be best available science in accordance with adopted laws. CD 1L: 1IFiG-.° FL... I I C C:..L. °.~I 1AC.LdIiFe. C.... d..° rd°FiniF.. °F ' ...11.....d ' F .~~.. ...... .>..w. ... ... ..nvn~.. ..... ..vv vv~~~nuvn vr~.cz.ur.a.a--rvr , , EP 15~ Wetlands, rivers, streams, ponds, and lakes should be viewed as systems and not as isolated units. EP 16~ Theekaluable natural functions of wetlands and stream corridors, such as habitat and water quality, should be protected by maintaining an undisturbed ar restored native vegetated buffer and by prohibiting filling, draining, and clearing within wetlands and adjacent fish bearing streams and their buffers. Physical alterations should be minimized except where restaribg;the natural functions. EP 178 The City may regulate private development and public actions to protect water quality and to ensure adequate in-stream flow to protect fisheries, wildlife habitat, and recreation resources. EP 1828 Retain existing open surface water systems in a natural state and rehabilitate degraded conditions. Chapter XII Page 46 EP 192 Restrict the runoff rate and quality to predevelopment levels for all new development and redevelopment. Shorelines The City of Yelm adopted the Thurston County Shoreline Master Program to implement the state's Shoreline Management Act. While Yelm Creek is designated as a shoreline of the state, it is questionable if the creek sustains the minimum flow requirements of more than twenty cubic feet per second, RCW 90.58. Also, the Centralia Power Canal was not identified in the Shoreline Master Program as a shoreNne of the state, but flows clearly exceed the minimum flow requirements and it should be designated as a shoreline of the state with the appropriate land use desi~ation in the urban area consistent with urban densities. Policies EP 202 The Conservancy shoreline designation, as identified in the Shoreline Master Program for the Thurston Region, should be retained along the Nisqually River and its jurisdictional wetlands. EP 212 Yelm Creek should be monitored to determine minimum flow. If supported by the flow data, the Shorel'me Master Program should be amended to delete Yelm Creek's mapped designation as it is not a regulated shoreline under State guidelines. EP 224 The Centraba Power Canal should be added as an urban shoreline on the south side and a rural shoreline on the north side. EP 23S The Nisqually River Management Plan identifies policies and programs for the protectionof the Nisqually Basin. The Management Plan policies are to be considered in adopting development regulations for the community. Frequently Flooded Areas Development in flood plains reduces the storage capacity and increases the amount of runoff. Increased runoff overtaxes both natural and man-made conveyance systems and leads to damage of public and private property. Over the last five years, the City of Yelm has collected substantial information on Yelm Creek and it's floodplain. The Federal Emergency Management Agency conducted a Yelm Creek Study and issued a new Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) in June of 1999. A Yelm Creek Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan was adopted in July of 2001. Both products incorporated the use of best available science. Goals EG 8 Prevent the loss of life and property in frequently flooded areas Chapter XII Page 47 Policies EP 246 The City adopts the FEMA flood hazard maps for reference purposes and any development in a flood plain must be consistent with FEMA guidelines, and such additional regulations as adopted by the City. Filling floodplains is discouraged unless necessary to meet a public purpose. No development should be allowed in any floodway. EP 2~5 Regulations of these lands should promote efficient use of the land and water resources by allocating frequently flooded areas to the uses for which they are best suited, and to discourage,t~structions to flood-flows or uses which pollute or deteriorate natural Wdtets and water courses. EP 268 Life and property should be protected from flood hazards, and the flood storage and transmission capacity of rivers and streams should be retained. EP 278 Protect natural flood storage and conveyance through the development and implementation of plans and regulations that reduce flood impacts. Geologic and Volcanic Hazard Zones Yelm has a few areas identified as steep slopes and voh~nic hazards, which occur along portions of the Cen#ralia Power Canal;and Yetm-Gigek (see Critical Areas Map #6). The City will need to develop guidelineSfor specific geologic issues. Goal EG 9 To designate and regulate development on lands having identified geologic hazards to protect the health and safety of persons and property, and to avoid other adverse impacts of erosion, landslide, and other geologic hazards. Policies EP 2838 Develop implementing legislation, based upon best available science, with specific requirements for analysis of geologically sensitive areas. and application of specific development standards to prevent erosion and landslide hazard. EP 293 The City will continue to gather and review seismic hazard data for the area to better assess specific seismic hazard areas (those areas more sensitive than others because of geological parameters). The City will consider development of additional requirements associated with Uniform Building Code review for buildings in Yelm's most sensitive earthquake hazard areas. Chapter XI I Page 48 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas Yelm does not have identified priority habitats and species within the Urban Growth Area, but is on land near the Nisqually River which provides important habitat and wildlife areas, in addition to the scattered locations of oak habitat (see Critical Areas Map #5). Shoreline and development regulations, and project-level SEPA reviews shall be used to assure that development within the Urban Growth Area does not adversely affect abutting wildlife and fish habitat outside the urban area. .aside the urban area, development regulations should provide incentives far `wetland and habitat enhancement. Yelm Creek and Thompson Creek provide opportunities for such enhancement within the Urban Growth Area. Wetland and wildlife enhancement should-not extend beyond the specified wetland buffer, however, if to do so would reduce densities below those specified in the development regulations. It iss important that Yelm obtain and promote urban densities in the urban areas to reduce development pressure outside the urban areas. Any development directly affecting ttte Nisqually River shall be reviewed for consistency with applicable State, County, and other habitat management programs. Urban landscapes are valuable supplements to natural areas in providing habitat for a wide variety of wildlife. The loss of natural wildlife habitat to urban development can be partially offset by landsgping that includes: a variety of native plants that provide food and shelter for wildlife. Native plants are generally well adapted to the soils and climate of the area and many species can #lourish without much watering or fertilization. Goals EG 10 Preserve, protect, and enhance fish and wildlife habitat. EG 11 Provide fish.-and wildlife habitat of sufficient diversity and abundance to sustain existing indigenous wildlife populations. Policies EP 303 The city should preserve and enhance native vegetation in riparian habitat, and wherever possible. EP 313 The City should manage aquatic and riparian (stream side) habitat in a way that minimizes its alteration in order to preserve and enhance its ability to sustain fish and wildlife. EP 324 The City should encourage residents and businesses to use native plants in residential and commercial landscaping. Chapter XII Page 49 Air Quality Air quality is an increasing problem in the Pacific Northwest. Numerous federal, state, and regional agencies enact and enforce legislation to protect air quality. Locally air pollution sources are from: motor vehicles, indoor and outdoor burning, industrial operations, and land clearing and grading. Goal EG 12 Protect air quality. Policies EP 336 Support state and federal air qualify standards and the regulation of activities that emit air pollutants. EP 346 Encourage transportation demand management and ,commute trip reduction in order to reduce energy consumption and air pollution. Noise Noise pollution can be harmful to the. general public's health and welfare. Noise is primarily generated by: industrial uses, vehicle traffic, and-construction activities. Goal EG 13 Control the level of noise pollution in a manner that promotes the use, value, and enjoyment of property in an urban environment. Policy EP 35~ Use state standards to ensure that excessive noise does not impair the perrr~ttked I .use activities in residential, commercial, and industrial land use d~tricts. Chapter XII Page 50 XIV. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS Note: A list of the goals and policies applicable to the unincorporated portion of the Yelm Urban Growth Area is located in Exhibit G. A.* Property Rights The right of citizens of the Urban Growth Area to be secure in their property is a fundamental policy of this Comprehensive Plan. The need of the community to provide adequate public service and to protect the peace and quiff enjoyment of private property is a fundamental policy of this Comprehensive Plan. Private property shall not be taken for public purpose without due process and just compensation where required. B.'` Permits The policy of the City of Yelm and Thurston County is to process permits in a timely and efficient manner in order to foster the goals of this Comprehensive Plan and Joint Plan. Development regulations will be integrated and coordinated to achieve this purpose. C.* Citizen Participation The City of Yelm and Thurston County support the Growth Management Act policies to encourage and promote atizen participation within the Urban Growth Area. Development regulations should provide for ample notice and opportunity to participate in key stages of the planning and development process. D. Growth Management Act Planning Yelm is a small community and without resources to fully articulate all GMA goals and objectives'nto this Plan. Small cities and towns are authorized to use an abbreviated process, which Yelm has elected to do. Yelm is committed to continued review and improvement of its Comprehensive Plan and development regulations, as resources are available. E.* Comprehensive Plan Amendment The Comprehensive Pian is to be amended no more than once any calendar year, except in emergencies. Development regulations will identify an annual calendar to facilitate the review and amendment process. The City plans for annual review will be consistent with the policies of Thurston County for amendment of the County's Comprehensive Plan. Tears. T~,;. urban growth boundaries shall be reviewed not less than every Chapter XIV Page 70 ten years. Any change to the long-term boundary must be consistent with the County- Wide Planning Policies. F. Growth Management Definitions and Concepts 1. Conformance -The degree to which all plans within the Urban Growth Area, including plans of other municipal corporations or state agencies comply with and/or promote the goals and policies of this Comprehensive Plan. Where inconsistent goals cannot be met by a single plan, consistency shall be measured by the degree to which the overall goals and objectives are met by the proposed action. 2. Consistency -The degree to which a project or deveto~nent accomplishes the goals and objectives of this Comprehensive Ptan. Some goals are mutually exclusive or incompatible as applied to a spec"rfic project. In the event of conflict, consistency is measured by the degree to which the overall goats and objectives of the Plan are met by the project. 3. Concurrency -The availability of adequate facilities to meet the public needs imposed on the Urban Growth Area by any proposal requiring a permit or approval by the City or County. All projects shall be reviewed to determine that parks, schools, fire, sewer, water, and transportation will be available or are to be planned and funded within six years of the date of the project approval. Development regulations shall identify ~ve1s of service and the plans of implementing the c:ata~rrency requirement. Chapter XIV Page 71 EXHIBIT B* Population Projections 5_years. Exhibit B Page B-1 MEMORANDUM TO: Thurston Regional Planning Council FROM: Veena Tabbutt, Senior Planner DATE: June 30, 2005 SUBJECT: Population Forecast Small Area Allocations PURPOSE Approve Population Forecast Small Area Allocations. Summary: Staff has prepared new Population Forecast Small Area Allocations These allocations are based on the Regional Population and Employment Forecast approved by the Council in November 2004. The allocations have been reviewed by the Forecast Advisory Committee, which consists of staff members for all jurisdictions in Thurston County, members from various planning commissions, representatives from the Transportation Advisory Board and Technical Advisory Committee, and representatives from local organizations including the commercial and residential building community, and the environmental community. These allocations will be used for transportation, sewer, water, land use, school, and other local government planning purposes. The final phase in the Forecast Allocations will be the Employment Forecast Small Area Allocations Exhibit B Page B-2 BACKGROUND TRPC develops updated population and employment forecasts every three to five years. These forecasts are used for transportation, sewer, water, land use, school, and other local governmental planning purposes. They are also used by the private sector for business planning. TRPC has been preparing these forecasts periodically since the late 1960s. We are in the midst of another update. On November 5~h the Thurston Regional Planning Council adopted the County-Wide Population and Employment Forecast. Given the forecast of future population county-wide, it nut be decided where the growth will go based on the adopted plans and policies of the local cities, towns, and the county. County-wide figures are allocated to the planning area evel using a large database of developable lands, development trends, and zoning densities. Only then can planning for streets, utilities, school sites, park sites, and other public services and facilities take place. ISSUES A key assumption in the Population Forecast Small Area Allocations is that there will be no mayor change in land use policy for th~a Thurston County or the cities and towns within Thurston County, the Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation or the Nisqually Indian Tribe over the period of the forecast. Policies that are assumed to remain constant are found in the compreherte plans atui related documents from the fall of 2004, and include (but are not limited to): • Zoning districts and zoning density calculations (deductions and density ranges) • Critir~l Areas tdirtances .. Size and locatwn of urban growth boundaries (annexations are an assumption of he model) Adopted sewer-and water plans In 2005 the population forecast small azea allocations could be considered BASELINE allocations if these aze major changes in any of the policies outlined above. The BASELINE allocations can then be used to evaluate the effects of any major changes in policy that have occurred in 2005, or may occur in the future. REQUESTED ACTION: After reviewing the attachments, approve Population Forecast Small Area Allocations as BASELINE allocations. 70:Ib Attachments Exhibit B Page B-3 Table 1: Comparison of new TRPC Population Forecast Small Area Allocations with the previous allocation'. Lacey &UGA New 64,600 73,900 82,900 92,200 99,900 106,700 Old 67, 900 75, 500 83, 000 89, 800 94, 600 N/A Olympia 8 UGA Nee 54,500 60,9Q0 87,000 x,4100 87,204 O#! 56,000 69,400 67,5f10 X644 "" 79,900 ! Tumwater &UGA New 21,600 24,400 27,100 32,200 37,100 41,600 Old 23, 000 24,500 28, 500 32, 800 38,100 N/A Bucoda&,t~A Nerar 620 65t1 880 79#i' T64 800 CNd 670 CiQ 81 640 64Y1 NfA Rainier &UGA New 1,530 1,760 1,990 2,260 2,510 2,740 Old 1,785 1,970 2,095 2,205 2,315 N/A Tertuw &UGA Mew 1,940 2030 2,470 r 3,71' 3.580. Old" 1,830 9,&50 '9,8'74 l,T~" 9;944 At7A Yelm &UGA New 5,490 6,590 7,690 9,100 10,330 11,480 Old 5, 625 6, 825 8, 325 9, 875 11, 375 N/A Grand Mound UGH Mew 834 850 870 974 1~£Ktt'! tad; 1,325 9,425' 9,740 f,8T5 2075 ' ' At/A Chehalis Reservation New 30 60 80 110 140 170 Old N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NisquaNy R 5 630 710 790 870- 9411 Ottl N/A iWA N!A # NlA !rflA Rural New 72,400 83,300 93,500 104,900 114,300 121,800 'Note.- added for the Yelm 2006 Comprehensive Plan amendment process. TRPC traditionally updates population and employment forecasts every 3-5 years, and released the most recent small area (city and rur.~) populations forecasts in July of 2005. The latest release was prior to the proposal of the Thurston "Highlands master planned community in Yelm, which may include 5,000 to 6,000 new dwelling units. The buildout of this development may exceed the time range of the 2030 forecast. TRPC will continue to monitor residential and commercial development activity and any proposed changes in Thurston County's rural zoning or the size of the Urban Growth Areas, and anticipates updating the small area (car and rural) populations forecasts in 2007. Exhibit B Page B-4 SUMMARY OF THE NEW ALLOCATIONS Lacey &UGA 2030 Rate of Trends: Po ulation.• Growth: 106,700 2.0% Within Lacey, initially some growth is likely to shift to what are now the unincorporated urban growth areas (UGAs) as the city becomes developed. Then, as available land supply decreases, Lacey will continue to grow, but it will likely see a decline in share of county-wide growth. Using the buildout" factor, the shift in owth is likely to occur by 2015. Toward the end of the forecast period the growth share in all urban areas, including Lacey, is likely !o crease as the demand for multifamily homes increases. This may result in redevelopment in the older nei hborhoods and mixed-use districts. Olympia &UGA 2030 Rate of Trends: Po ulation: Growth: 82,200 1.7% Trends in Olympia are very similar to Lacey. Within O~Itnpia, initially some growth is likely to shift to the urcorporated UGAs as the city becomes developed. Then, as avadabte land supply decreases, Olympia will also see a decline in share of conty-wide growth. Using the buildout factor, the shift in growth is likely°to occur by 2015. Toward the end of the forecast period the growth share in all urban areas is likely to increase as the demand fcrc multifamily homes increases. This may cause redevelopment in the older nei~borhoods and mixed-use districts. Tumwater &UGA 2030 Rate of Trends: Po ulation: Growth: 41,600 2.7% Tumwater i likely to tie the recipient of increased growth shares as the supply of avat7aWe land is reduced in Lacey and Olympia. This shift in growth will likely begin to occur around 2015, and continue to the end of the forecast period. Most of the increased growth share will be located in what are now the uninc~orated urban growth areas. " A buildout factor of 25°percent is applied as an indicator of when to shift growth shares. This factor is calculated by dividing demand by supply. It makes the assumption that in any given forecast interval (5 years) only 25 percent of the total capacity will be available for sale and development. As the total inventory of land or capacity decreases and prices rise, harder to develop lots, partially developed lots, and redevelopment opportunities will be available. The buildout factor will be calibrated for housing type (by zoning district) at the beginning of each forecast period so as to not artificially create a scarcity of capacity in one type of dwelling unit and a surplus in another. Exhibit B Page B-5 Bucoda &UGA 2030 Rate of Trends: Po ulation: Growth: 800 1.0% Bucoda is likely to see only a modest amount of growth. Growth shares may begin to increase in the latter years of the forecast if sewer service becomes available. Rainier &UGA 2030 Rate of Trends: Po ulation: Growth: 2,740 2.4% Historically, Rainier has experienced moderate growth, more than Bucoda and Tenino. It is likely that the growth share in Rainier will remain relatively constant until sewer servkx3 becomes available to the cit and UGA Tenino 8 UGA 2030 Rate of Trends: Po ulation: Growth: 3,580 2.6% Historically, Tenino has experienced very little growth. tt is likely that the growth share in Tenino will increase when sewer service becomes available to the cit and UGA. Yelm &UGA 2030 Rate of Trends: Po ulation: Growth: 11,480 3.0% Historically, Yelm has been one of the fastest growing communities in Thurston County. k is likely that ttus trend will continue with growth in commuting, increased accessibility to Yelm, and a large supply of land for residential rowth. Grand Mound UGA 2030 Rate of Trends:. Po ulation: Growth: 1,000 0:7% Grand: Mound is not likely to see much residential growth. The area ' ism "" desi Hated for commercial and industrial uses. Contletierated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation (Thurston County portion only) 2030 Rate of Trends: Po ulation: Growth: 170 7.2% The' reservation bisects two counties with most of the population residing in the Gray's Harbor County portion. The Tribe expects to see+9residential growth in the Thurston County portion. This will likely occur as utilities are available. Exhibit B Page B-6 Nis uall Reservation Thurston Counf onion onl 2030 Rate of Trends: Po ulation: Growth: 940 2.0% The Tribe anticipates a need for 100 homes. The forecast assumes this need will be met by around 2015, after which the rate of growth will continue to the end of the forecast eriod. Rural count 2030 Rate of Trends: Po ulation.• Growth: 122,000 2.1% Overall it is likely that there will be a shifter growth shares from the rural county to the urban areas, so that tfie split between urban and rural will be around 70 percent urban growth and 30 percent rural growth by the end of the forecast period. This is mainly due to an increasing demand for multi€amily housing;'' which predominately locates in urban areas. Using the buildout fates', the north county rural arm have less available land than those to the south, so it is anticipatetl that there will be a steady shift of rural growth to the south county until the available land supply is fairly even between the two areas. Rural areas will begin to feel full (the buildout factor will be approached) by 2015, with the ex of the s~ttth-central regions of the county where some land Will remain available. Overall, the buildout factors in the rural county do not indicate a shift in growth shares of single- family homes to the urt~ areas. The rural county will continue to receive the ma~orit ~ raw manufactured homes. How does the New Forecast 12004-20051 tbmoare to the Previous Forecast (1998- 1999)? Lacey &. UGA Old New Notes Forecast Forecast 2025 2025 94,600 9,9,900 With the growth in commuters to Pierce County, Lacey is expected to experience rapid growth. In addition, residential densities in Lacey tend to be higher than comparable zoning districts in Tumwater and Olympia, therefore the capacities are slightly higher than modeled in the revious forecast. Olympia & UGA Old New Notes Forecast Forecast 2025 2025 79,100 77,900 The forecasts are uite similar. Exhibit B Page B-7 Tumwater &UGA Old New Notes Forecast Forecast 2025 2025 38,100 37,100 The forecasts are quite similar. Bucoda &UGA Old New Notes Forecast Forecast 2025 2025 640 760 Bucoda now has an UGA so the new f includes a larger physical area. Rainier &UGA Old New Notes Forecast Forecast 2025 2025 2,315 2,510 Rainier may see slightly higher growth with the addition of a sewer s stem. Tenino &UGA Old New Notes Forecast Forecast 2025 2025 1,945 3,280 Tenino will likely experience.. higher growth with the addition of a sewer s steerr~ The new forecast is more cxmsistent with the 1996 forecast. Yeim &UGA Old New Notes Forecast Forecast 2025 2025 11,375 10,330 Yehn wilt likely still experience rapid growth, at a slightly lower rate than was :Frecast previously. The growth rate in Yelm has abated somewhat after the initial pent up demand for growth was met after the sewer was t into lace. Grand Mound UGA Old New Notes. Forecast Forecast 2025 2025 2,075 970 20,1 population estimates for the Grand Mound UGA were revised, leading to a lower forecast. There does not appear to be much capacity for residential growth in the UGA, but there is quite a lot of rowth oin into the Rochester rural sub-area. Exhibit B Page B-8 Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation Old New Notes Forecast Forecast 2025 2025 NA NA TRPC did not rovide a forecast for the Tribes in 1998199. Nis uall Reservation Old New Notes Forecast Forecast 2025 2025 NA NA TRPC did not rovide a forecast for the Tribes in 1998/99. Rural Cou n Old New Notes Forecast Forecast 2025 2025 104,000 114,300 Capacity in the rural county may have been understated in the 1998/99 forecast as the undersized but legal lots were not included in the invento Exhibit B Page B-9 EXHIBIT G Consolidated List of Policies Applicable to the Unincorporated Yelm Urban Growth Area Note: Exhibit G is not required and is no longer deerri~d necessary as part of the plan. It is recommended that it be deleted in full. Romer to Chapter I, Page 1. A. Intent -which notes that "The Yelm Comprehensives Flan rep ts.... this plan also serves as the Joint Plan between Yelm and Thurston County for Yin's Urban Growth Area." B. Content -clarify which sections are applicable to the UGA area as well as the City of Yelm. Yelm/Analysis/Yelm Comp Ptertand TC Joint Plan Application 6-28.doc Exhibit G Page G-1 City of Yelm STAFF REPORT To: Mayor Ron Harding Yelm City Council From: Grant Beck, Community Development Director Date: June 26, 2006 (for July 12, 2006 City Council Meeting) Subj: 2007 to 2012 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Recommendation Adopt Resolution Number 467 adopting the 2007 to 2012 Yelm Six Year Transportation Improvement Program. Background The six year transportation improvement program (STIP) is the capital facilities document that guides transportation funding for a six year cycle. The STIP is based on the Yelm Comprehensive Transportation Plan and is the `implementation' document for the overall plan. Projects that are not on the STIP are not eligible for State or Federal funding, or the use of local Traffic Facilities Charges (TFC's). Although it is a six year plan, it is required to be updated annually as projects are completed and new priorities arise. In 2004, the City created a Yelm Transportation Committee to review the STIP, transportation funding applications, and other transportation related issues. The Committee in 2004 adopted criteria for the establishment of priorities for transportation projects, updated construction estimates, and prioritized transportation projects against that criteria. This year, the Committee reviewed the priorities against changing conditions and recommend updates to the STIP accordingly. The draft STIP as recommended by the YTC is attached to this staff report, and is similar to the previous version, with the changes noted in this report. June 26, 2006 Page 1 of 3 Project 2006-2011 Priorit 2007-2012 Priorit SR 510 Yelm Loo 1 1 Stevens Street Connection 3 2 Coates Avenue Connector Y4 n/a 3 Road Resurfacin 4 4 West Road Im rovements 11 5 Mosman SE Street Connection 14 6 2" Street Im rovements 15 7 Yelm Avenue CBD n/a 8 NP Road Im rovements 13 9 Rhoton Road Im rovements 12 10 Mosman Street/SR 507 Reali nment 5 11 Solber /Mosman Im rovements 8 12 Yelm Avenue West/Killion Road Intersection 7 13 Mill Road Vertical Reali nment 10 14 Mill Road/SR 507 Intersection 9 15 View Drive n/a 16 Bald Hills Road n/a 17 SR 507 Yelm Loo Y-2 6 18 103` Avenue 2 n/a Killion Road Extension 16 n/a PROJECTS ADDED TO THE STIP Coates Road Connector (Y4) -Coates Road and West Road are the last two pieces to completing the 'mini-loop' that are not going to be developer-driven. View Drive -Added as this street will be a primary connector between Rhoton and Crystal Springs upon completion of the SR 510 Yelm Loop. This project is not specifically identified in the Yelm Comprehensive Transportation Plan except through the connected streets policies PROJECTS REMOVED FROM STIP 103`d Avenue SE -Project Complete! CHANGED PROJECTS Yelm Avenue CBD -This project is that portion of the Yelm Avenue Widening project that is not within the proposed Killion Road LID, from Cullens Road to 15f Street. It also includes the `under-improved' section of Yelm Avenue East from 15` Street to 4m Street, which would complete improvements to Yelm Avenue from 93`d to 106~n Killion Road Extension -This project is proposed to be completed through a Local Improvement District, along with the two projects below. June 26, 2006 Page 2 of 3 Yelm Avenue West/Killion Road Extension -This project is within the proposed LID, as noted above. Yelm Avenue (SR 507) Widening -This project is partially within the proposed LID boundaries, as noted above. Applications for funding from Transportation Improvement Board will be submitted for the top new construction priority, the Stevens Avenue connection from 151 to Edwards. This project would provide connectivity between the northwest and southwest areas of the City without having to travel through the light at 15t Street and Yelm Avenue and is the completion of the Y-4 transportation improvement. Current Situation The Yelm Transportation Committee has prepared an updated six year transportation improvement program for the Council's consideration and adoption. June 26, 2006 Page 3 of 3 CITY OF YELM RESOLUTION NUMBER 467 SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Whereas, Section RCW 35.77.010 RCW requires the adoption of a six year transportation improvement program; and Whereas, the adopted six year transportation improvement program has been updated annually by the City Council; and Whereas, the City Council has determined that recommendations of the Yelm Transportation Committee to update and amend the adopted six year transportation improvement program are consistent with the Comprehensive Transportation Plan, which is part of the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Yelm; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Yelm that the 2007-2012 six year transportation improvement program attached to this resolution as Exhibit A is hereby adopted and that a copy of this resolution be filed with the Director of the Washington State Department of Transportation. APPROVED this 12'h day July, 2006. Ron Harding, Mayor ATTEST: Agnes P. Bennick, City Clerk i ~j~,~ t~srN _,~ N W Q yin .- -- ~ ..~ as as anoa~ ~ / / 1 as as .~ _-.-. ~' m ,_ U w 3 0 a. ~v .. c d U W I N W aa"~s M3M 1 J 1 `~ M l W W / a N I K Q ~ ~ .r'" N +./" m ~~ `l ,~ ,® 1 ~~ 1 ~° / ~~ j e~ ~~ >I ~ d 0 W N ~i W h Q j = J ~fY 7 ~ Y C a W m na i as as aarno 3S 1S ~N'~ _ N L1- O -~y ~ 7 O 1~yn xaaae L as oa "3 ThomP„~ Gcee~ µ D Q. .:~ ..r....,-~ Sa 'r ,~ p ~ N ~ 0 ~ T Oy Ci = ~.- a~ ' a~ O U ~ C O O U U O N c C O U a m E ~ N N ~ ~ ~ N C "6 N l0 Y 3 ~ a w .a o c d ~ .. m ~~ m ;° r N pp O O M M M O M M P r r O O O M M O O O ~ ~ O O S O N 10 i~ M OI nl N (00 N r fA fA M ~ V3 fA fA fA fA W ~ y ~~ L U d 0 d N N 7 c ~ 'cm~ •Al y o,EE i m~i ~ ~ dF~>Y K ~ ~ LL O ~p 0~ O O w W O p'70 p M OMOOM O M O O t+7 O O O ~ U ~~~ O O O M ~ O O O O O O O O N 11 O V O~~ O 4 1 O~ N Q O O O O U O I~ (V (V N 000 O O 00~ r Off V N ~ O O N N `/ M M O n W fH fA fA /A ~ EA M lfl !A IA ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ N U ~ V j ~~ C ~ N O a OD • c ~ ~ o Op d ~d' o m ~ Q O Ol ~ ~ C ~ W U c j ` C O ~ N i4 G O 9~ O c G N c0 y > ~ Q O U D C l0 ~ O N V O> Q. L .'^- O N A ~ O N V ~ E L ~ ~ O N~ C r r N~~ E N C . .. O~'= 0 T/~ N N J '... O N O~ OCw~r G~ 2W7F - W ~1 UU~ O wU UU~ U AI o O ~ O d ~ 3 d ~ ti > m o v ~ S ~ o. p U ~ o ~ ~ x c °~ c aci d ~ o m y }_ N Y E 7 f6 J 3 O N V O N "O y _~ (6 C H ~ "O ~ C !A ~ N 'O ~ ~ f0 C c y a c W m N O O O ._ N N ~ O N ~ ~ W = O ~. v U m Q ~ ~ O ~ N E U y L O ~ } ~ ~ c c ~ f6 ~ N ~ m N O y ~ ~ N O O O (n c Z ~~ N v °o °o °o °o o °o ooo0 00 M O ~ N N O ~O O N P N N N O S M N N ''ww fA fA fA fA f9 fA fA v, 'N ~. U ~ U 7 C ~ ~ 7 C ~ N rn ~ ~ ~ m m ~ a ~F~>} ~ ~H~>Y 0 ~ U 0 0 O 0 0 0 ~ M U 0 0 O 0 0 0 01 O~ 0 0 0 Q N O' 0 0 0 N~ O O N N b ~ O O r~ 1 q A U N ~ Opf ~ U ~ P')MN '~J `. C~ 'mil ^~ ~/~ Vi fA V/ fA M W V~ fA fA ffl N ~l C rW~ C ~ ~€ ~ ~ ~~ U U O O D C N ~ O D U G d `o ~°-'-° m v o m m~ ~ o E o ~~ V o m m 0 at~E~ s~oa°'iU C~ •°'Lw°'d m2oa~iU N d~ O N N O~ C- O NN y~ O N tll O T C '.-. O r_ OJUU~ W U~ W ~F- ~ OJUUK WUO.' W 7F V m m a m .a ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ C ~ ~ L ~ N N ~ N ~ d O N c d 0 N 'p c E Y ~ m m m d d 3 O O N N ~ ~ - ~ C N C N ~ m a m rvi ~~ Um ~ ~ c o .~ O LL O C ~ ~ ~ C m = rn O m y 3 ~ ~ m ~~o m o~ m~, ~~ o~c o~ Lo J m Z U ~ U ~ ~ O O O O O O N 1~ O O O O O G a0 ~ N 0 0 ~ M 1A aND (O l"1 OONOfN0 A O M 7 ~ C h M ~ r N `> l~ b9 fA f9 ffl EA fA fA IA V `i U U ~ C ~ 7 C C 'p~ ~ ~ Oi 1~~ O N 0O O 000 ~ O 000 O 000 ^W ~ O O O O ww`` ~ U O O O O 1 V M~ O~~ l0 O W M N O~ 0 0 0 O Q O N N 10 ~ O O ~ r N N O O N 'L cNO °v °v `" Q~ U n rnrnm O N N~ ~ ~ M M N 0 Hf fA fA to iA `~, EA fA fA fA fA ^~ C 1`~ C W ~ ~~ v ~ ~~ T T O~ OQ O ~ 0 `O O D d N ~" E~~~ ~ O j c of ~ o E 0~~ ~ c0 j O m ^l ~' O w N C R` >>O O U ^ O' O~ m C 1a.0 ` 7„ N C_~ UmH~Y Ey Sa- N ~~NEa Eu,L~Tm d d~ O N N O~ C '~. O m N~ O m N O~ C = p GJUUK WU~ W ~F- ~ GJUU~ W U2' W ~F ~' ~ U ~ ~ B ~ O m ~ c N ~ ~ y ~ C ~ X N lb d 3 L O N Ol C ~ ~ d ~ -p O 01 (0 C C Q' '~O m N N ~ ~ a N a d ~ N ~ 3 ~ Q ~ U U ~ N N N iio o$ U ~ a~i ~ o ,2' 4~O o~ o U ~ r, O ~ O O ~ N ~ ~fJ ~ N .-:. ~ O Q' '~ O ° ~K fn C Z~ 0 0 0 0 0 °o °o °0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O t 7 0 ' O O O~ M N ~ O ~ O O O N O~ ~ ~ N O N N ~O~NOOf ~ MOB R M M di fA fH tl9 /A ~ ffl f9 fA fA IA 'w v.! L ~~ t U ICJ U 7 C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 C ~ aCi ~E E d m rn~ ~ a °o o~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o° o°° 0 0 0 0 0 v o d o d o O '0A 0 _d o 0 O O O O N N N ~ O O ~ l°O O (V M ~/1 'F\~S EA to KY to IA ~ fA fA fA fA /A £ ~C rl ~ ~C N ~" N N ~ ~j O 0~ N ~ ~ O` U~ N N O. C~~ O T m 6 C~~ O T Ol ~ C E O N V Cp N Qi := C E O f0 U O l0 m :. O ,~ .` N 'O . C C ~ O 'p c6 'O ~ ~ .S C N d~ O N 71 O T C- O N d W 0 41 y O~ C p CJUU~ W U2 W 7F OJUU~ W U~' W 7F- ~ ~ C O N ~ ~. "O O_ O O J N ~ ~ ~ -J } T C C O 3 ~ ~ N y y ~ C O ~ p B U - Val m V O O N N -p ~'-_ O M c N j L of O C a~i~° oY > r c y a ~, a~ ~° o m~ Y C ~ ~ ~ c _O l~0 O Q N iA •IV C N N ~ N ~ V C d fn ~ p '~w ~ ate. N O O O O p Oppp v. a O O 0 0 ~ a~0 ppO ~ O O p m N ^V N ~ O O t0 ~ f~ M ~ W OD ~ ~ ~ ~ y En»earnw ~ E» w ~ ~ ~ o 7 C ~ !J 7 a >m~~~ o >o ~~~ N N O~ 0 0 0 ~ m ~ O O O O O O O O U ~ N N M (^n` U a00_ ~ W O O f9 EA fA !A iA ~ fA !A fA di 1A ~~ ^W ~ ~~ `O O y ~ ~ O O y y 0> o E o m m ~o ° f0 c~ o E o ~~ U o m m _ ~ ~p L ~ C ~ y ~ ~ ` f0 ~O ~ ~ C d U O U O O c6 ~+ O U r ~i .?r°' o~i R~odU /N~~ .?L-"'a~i CmC 2`aa°'iU_ o y~ y E N ~ C L ~~ r /~ y C N~ 'n y C L~~ A N d~ O N y O~ C ~ O ~ 4i N E O N y O~ c ... Q ^' OJUUR' W U2 W ~F OJUU~ W U~ W ~F v V U N C O U d Y~ Oi {{5~~~ ~~ vJ~l, ~l •N 'W ~- ~~ V 0 H N d d O r V C l0 t ~_ C N N CI O 0 O O V N O U ~ ~ C o O ~ O E CO ~ ~' y W ~ ` . Q' ~ w ~ ~ u rn w ~ ~o d C ~ O d G~UUK 9 C c6 N ~ yj a~ ~~ L ~ C N O O ~ y `~ U ~~ f0 l0 d O ~ ~ O O O O O O O 00 O OOI~ 10 00 O 00 ~- r O O O O O N N o rn n ° °' ~ m f» f» . » r U 7 C N p> ~ ~ m d d N ~ f-Q'} } O O O S O ~ O O O O ~ O In O r O r O (V O N O~ O O ~ t9 f9 fA fR tR U 0 C O N m Dom m C O C~2 oa~iU G !A C t~ W U ~ W ~ ~ r~ .N ^~^` ^V (W 1^~` W ~FJ 0 rr/~ 1\ V 0 ~J O ~ O O U N O U E ~~ 0 03 a~R~ c ~ O ~ m d a ~ ~ c .~ ~'m E a d C ~ O d G~UU~ f» f» f» w U ~ C d 0] N N N ~ H ~ ~ ~ O O O O O O O O O ~ 010 O r O ~- O N O N O O O ~ EAM E9 fH fA U N C O N OI U o m m c C C d U O m ~ O N U C E m t . Z. ~ H O ~ C O WU2'W~F 1 0 U N O U 'O N O E 0 m 0 3 ro U ~ N V1 ~ c ro o v ~ c ~ y ° ° ° ° $ ° ° °o ° o o o o o oo o ~ 0 0~ O ~ 0 0 O O ~ N O O N f~ O O O N V' 10 ~~ 0 0' i ~ 0 1 l) V O r 1 01 0 r r fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA M L L U U 7 C ~ 7 C m mEE m mEE ~ U 0 0 O O O O ~~~ O O O O O O ~ N O~ O O Q ~~ O O O O O V O O O OO ¢ O O n f~+ 1 D N OOD W O ~ ON N N f0D ~ Ir~~ a-- ` fA fA EA EA IA '~w En ER M to W W C vJ C .N N C~ ti N !``~ N 3 1Tj ~ N > 3 U q oo H ~ ,'~+ a O~ E o~~ o '` m ac~~ o ~ rn ~ m~ Dorom~-, ~ pEOm Uorom«-. c ~ 'o S c 0> °'tw~d A2oa~~iv ti aL.U~N 1~~o2oa°'iV ;w~ omy ~ EmL.E~,~ ~ umuNiEO EinL~~'~ N~ ?~ O N Vi O~ c'f. p W y m O N w o .m C= O C~ DJUU2 W U~ W ~F ~ ~JUU~ W UR' W ~F V 3 t ~, ~, >~~ ~ LL m°c°o oooo°o, o `' ~Q °o°oooo 0 0 0 0 0 00000 ° oooo o _ ov~oo~ f» ut ~t+ ea w 0 ~ m c~ a ~ ~~ ~ a c~~ N Q1 U c~ rn~ © t o o ~q N O ~ .O O C C ~ ` ~ U a'SU~c ' O d U m~oa~iU V 07 N ~ N ~ C ~ O1 ~ sd O N~ R p m U~ f/! O G .. WU~2W ~1- pJV ,.y ~~